SQU Med J, August 2011, Vol. 11, Iss. 3, pp. 399-402, Epub. Submitted 19th Jan 11 Revision ReQ. 11th Apr 11, Revision recd. 29th Apr & 24th May 11 Accepted 1st Jun 11 Cornual pregnancy accounts for 2–4% of ectopic pregnancies and can be associated with a mortality rate in the range of 2.0–2.5%.1 Cornual pregnancy constitutes a medical emergency and its diagnosis and management is challenging. We present a rare case of an ectopic pregnancy located just under a cornual fibroid, at the site of right fallopian tube insertion, which did not respond to intensive medical management thus necessitating surgical intervention. Case Report A 25 year-old primigravida presented with a history of mild vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain and 7 weeks of amenorrhoea. She gave history of bleeding per vagina at home during the last four days. There were no identifiable risk factors for an ectopic pregnancy. On physical assessment, the patient was haemodynamically stable and not in distress. Abdominal palpation revealed a 16-week size mobile non-tender mass in the midline. Bimanual examination confirmed an enlarged uterus corresponding to 16 weeks with a single closed cervix and minimal cervical motion tenderness. Abdominal ultrasound showed an 8 cm right cornual fibroid and transvaginal ultrasound (US) confirmed an empty endometrial cavity (endometrial thickness of 19 mm) despite high beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hcG) levels of 6,600 units, normal adnexa and no free fluid Departments of 1Obstetrics & Gynaecology and 3Radiology & Molecular Imaging, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman; 2Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat,Oman. *Corresponding Author email: gowrie61@hotmail.com Íõ^ß5000 mIU required two doses according to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, UK.4 Medical treatment is not free of complications; it can be associated with uterine rupture and catastrophic haemorrhage. A large ectopic pregnancy and the presence of a heartbeat are relative contraindications to medical treatment.1 Multiple dose methotrexate is recommended by many authors for interstitial/ cornual pregnancy despite the lack of strong evidence for or against a multidose methotrexate regimen.5 Figure 3: Intraoperative photograph of the uterus with the myoma (arrow) in the right cornual region. A US guided local injection of methotrexate/ potassium chloride is described by Monteagudo et al. with immediate cessation of fetal heart activity.6 There was no time difference in the resolution of the ectopic whether they used potassium chloride or methotrexate and they reported a 100% success rate. Many studies have reported the use of laparoscopy for local methotrexate injection into a cornual pregnancy.7 In this case, local injection of methotrexate was not feasible either by US or laparoscopy due to the position of the ectopic under the myoma. Cornual excision, salpingostomy and repair are other approaches reported by many authors for cornual gestation.8 Successful cornuostomy has been reported by some other authors;9,10 however, a laparoscopic cornual excision and salpingostomy was not possible as an 8 cm myoma was sitting on the ectopic pregnancy; even visualising the pregnancy completely was impossible in this case. Hence a laparotomy and myomectomy, followed by a cornuostomy, were performed. Conclusion This is a rare case of cornual pregnancy situated under a cornual subserous fibroid. It was successfully managed by myomectomy and cornuostomy thus preserving the future fertility of the patient. References 1. Faraj R, Steel M. Review Management of cornual (interstitial) pregnancy. Obstet & Gynecol 2007; 9:249–55. 2. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Matera C, Veit CR. Sonographic evolution of cornual pregnancies treated without surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79:1044–9. 3. Jermy K, Thomas J, Doo A, Bourne T. The conservative management of interstitial pregnancy. BJOG 2004; 111:1283–8. 4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Management of Tubal Pregnancy. Green Top Guideline No. 21. London: RCOG, May 2004. From: www.rcog.org.uk/index.asp?PageID=537. Accessed: Jan 2011. 5. Tulandi T, Al-Jaroudi D. Interstitial pregnancy: results generated from the Society of Reproductive Surgeons registry. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:47–50. 6. Monteagudo A, Minior VK, Stephenson C, Monda S, Timor-Tritsch IE. Nonsurgical management of Submyomatous Cornual Pregnancy Managed surgically after failed medical management 402 | SQU Medical Journal, August 2011, Volume 11, Issue 3 live ectopic pregnancy with ultrasound-guided local injection: a case series. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25:282–8. 7. Benifla JL, Fernandez H, Sebban E, Darai E, Frydman R, Madelenat P. Alternative to surgery of treatment of unruptured interstitial pregnancy: 15 cases of medical treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1996; 70:151–6. 8. Reich H, Johns DA, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F, Reich EL. Laparoscopic treatment of one hundred and nine consecutive ectopic pregnancies. J Reprod Med 1988; 33:885–90. 9. Chan LY, Yuen PM. Successful treatment of ruptured interstitial pregnancy with laparoscopic surgery. A report of 2 cases. J Reprod Med 2003; 48:569–71. 10. Matsuzaki S, Fukaya T, Murakami T, Yajima A. Laparoscopic cornuostomy for interstitial pregnancy. A case report. J Reprod Med 1999; 44:981–2.