Sultan Qaboos University Med J, May 2013, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, pp. 202-217, Epub. 9th May 13 Submitted 19TH Jul 12 Revision Req. 10TH Sep 12, Revision Recd. 18TH Oct 12 Accepted 27TH Oct 12 According to the global cancer incidence report, lung cancer is the most common malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide.1 In the USA, non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 87% of all the cases of lung cancer with adenocarcinoma as the most prevalent subtype (40%).2 In Oman, NSCLC accounts for 88% of all lung cancers, with adenocarcinoma in 34% of cases, and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in 22%.3 Despite diagnostic advances, lung cancer continues to present in advanced stages and as many as 50% of the patients have unresectable disease (stages IIIb– IV), and perhaps an even higher percentage in the developing world [Table 1].2 Certain clinical parameters have an impact on the outcome of the disease. Gender affects outcomes as females generally are diagnosed at a younger age and earlier stage, and perhaps have an inherent greater longevity. Different races also have different 5-year relative survival rates. In a study done between 2001–07, the 5-year survival rates were as follows: white men 13.7%; white women 18.3%; black men 11.6%; black women 14.5%.2 Weight loss, 1Department of Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital; 2Department of Medicine, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman; 3Oncology Department, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan *Corresponding Author e-mail: furrukh_1@yahoo.com العالج الفردي و املخصص لسرطان الرئة املنتشر من اخلاليا غري الصغرية حممد فروخ، من�شور املنذري، فرحان خوجة زاهد، �شيام كومار، و اإكرام برين املتقدمة املراحل مر�شى اأن موؤخرا اأكدت واأوروبا اآ�شيا يف الع�شوائية الثالثة واملرحلة الثانية، املرحلة درا�شات من �شل�شلة امللخ�ص: من �رسطان الرئة من اخلاليا الغري �شغرية من النوع الفرعي الغدي الآوي لطفرات حمددة عندما تتعر�ض للعالج امل�شتهدف تظهر نتائج بقاء م�شاوية للذين عوجلوا بالعالج الكيميائي ومبناأى عن اإثارة الأعرا�ض اجلانبية. ان مفهوم العالج الكيميائي للجميع بداأ بالتال�شي، والو�شول للعالج الأمثل يربز كنقلة نوعية يف العالج. تو�شح هذه املقالة باإيجاز الآليات اخللوية امل�شاهمة يف �رسطنة الرئة و التي توفر اأ�شا�ض جزيئي للعالج امل�شتهدف. اإن التقدم يف علم الأحياء اجلزيئي ح�شنت فهمنا لالآليات التي ت�شارك يف مقاومة الأدوية البتدائية اأو الثانوية. يورد هذا املقال باإيجاز التطورات يف املوؤ�رسات احليوية ذات األأهمية التكهنية والتنبوؤية، واأثر البحوث املتعدية على نتائج العالج. اإن عالمة ما تعترب تكهنية اإذا توقعت النتائج، بغ�ض النظر عن العالج، وتنبوؤية اإذا توقعت نتائج عالج حمدد الأوعية بطانة منو عامل الب�رسة؛ منو عامل الرئة؛ يف اخلبيثة الأورام �شغرية؛ الغري اخلاليا من الرئة �رسطان �رسطان؛ الكلمات: مفتاح الدموية؛ عالمات بيولوجية؛ مثبطات الربوتني كينيز. abstract: A series of phase II and randomised phase III trials in Asia and Europe have confirmed recently that advanced stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients with adenocarcinoma subtypes harbouring specific mutations when subjected to targeted therapy experience equivalent survival outcomes as those treated with chemotherapy and are spared from its side effects. The concept of chemotherapy for all is fading, and therapy optimisation has emerged as a paradigm shift in treatment. This article briefly describes cellular mechanisms involved in lung carcinogenesis which provide a molecular basis for targeted therapy. Advances in molecular biology have improved our understanding of mechanisms involved in primary or secondary drug resistance. Evolving biomarkers of prognostic and predictive importance, and the impact of translational research on outcomes are also covered. A marker is considered prognostic if it predicts the outcome, regardless of the treatment, and predictive if it predicts the outcome of a specific therapy. Keywords: Carcinoma; Non-small-cell lung; Lung neoplasm; Receptor, Epidermal growth factor; Vascular endothelial growth factor; Biological markers; Protein kinase inhibitors, Bevacizumab, Erlotinib. review Customised, Individualised Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) *Muhammad Furrukh,1 Mansour Al-Moundhri,2 Khawaja F. Zahid,3 Shiyam Kumar,1 Ikram Burney1 Muhammad Furrukh, Mansour Al-Moundhri, Khawaja F. Zahid, Shiyam Kumar and Ikram Burney review | 203 poor performance status, advancing age, and the presence of concomitant illness may also adversely affect patient outcomes.4–7 Smoking has emerged as a prognostic and predictive marker. In addition, it also has certain significance, i.e. never smokers have epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations at a rate of 37% compared to 14% in current and former smokers; k-ras mutations in 4% of never smokers as compared to 43% in current and former smokers, and echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like4 anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4- ALK) in 12% of never smokers as compared to 2% of current and former smokers. The prevalence of p53 mutation was the same in never smokers and current and former smokers (26% each).8 Methods Data were identified from searches of PubMed, Medscape, Google, and key cancer groups (American Society for Clinical Oncology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Society for Medical Oncology) using search terms such as “chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC”, and various biomarkers of prognostic and predictive markers in lung cancer, EGFR, EGFR mutation (EGFRMUT), k-ras mutation, EML4-ALK mutation, MET, and T790M mutations. Reference was also made to key phase II and III trials and meta-analyses published in oncology journals including Chest, Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet Oncology, Oncologist, and Cancer. Information acquired from international scientific conferences was confirmed through computer searches. Evolution of Systemic Chemotherapy in Advanced/Metastatic NSCLC Patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC have traditionally been treated with systemic therapy if they carry a performance status of zero to two. Untreated, these patients have a median survival time of 3–4 months, and only one in 10 patients survives 12 months on best supportive care (BSC).9–10 Cisplatin or carboplatin is the cytotoxic backbone when considering palliative chemotherapy.11 In 1995, a large meta-analysis revealed a 27% risk reduction in death and one year survival enhancement of 10% when comparing chemotherapy to best supportive care (BSC).12 The Cochrane Collaboration Group upheld the advantage of platinum doublets which were associated with higher response rates (RR) and an absolute benefit of 5% improvement in one-year survival.13 The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) E1594 study is regarded as a reference trial of advanced NSCLC comparing four different chemotherapy regimens with each other (i.e. cisplatin combined in three arms with paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and docetaxel, respectively and the fourth arm comprising carboplatin and paclitaxel). The RR improved from 10 to 19%, and the median survival improved to 9.1 months for 431 females, and 7.4 months for 726 males. The survival increased to approximately 33% in the first year and 11% in the second year. Essentially, all arms revealed similar median survival, but the regimen comprising cisplatin and gemcitabine was associated with longer time to progression (TTP), whereas carboplatin and paclitaxel was the least toxic amongst the four arms, and regarded as their reference doublet combination for future studies.10 Other large phase III trials validated the results Table 1: Stage, distribution, and 5-year survival rate by stage at diagnosis: 2001–07 (Adapted from SEER2) Stage at Diagnosis Stage distribution (%) 5-year relative survival (%) localised 15 52 regional (lymph nodes) 22 24 Distant (metastases) 56 <4 Not staged 07 08 *Stage at Diagnosis Stage distribution (%) 5-year relative survival (%) **NSClC (82.7%) I 4.6 100 II 13 66.7 III 21.7 20 Iv 60.4 10 * = Stage, distribution, and survival rate by stage of 43/52 patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital: 2002–2011 (unpublished data); **NSCLC = non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Customised, Individualised Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) 204 | SQU Medical Journal, May 2013, Volume 13, Issue 2 By 2008, chemotherapy for NSCLC reached a plateau with median survival approaching 10–12 months, while scientific research drifted towards molecular profiling with the evolution of cancer genetics and translational work. Researchers started to study the cell signalling pathways and evaluate means to target cancer cells at the molecular level. Others started to use maintenance therapy in their effort to enhance the median survival time in this aggressive disease. Molecular Targets and Targeted Therapy in Metastatic NSCLC t u m o u r a n g i o g e n e s i s a n d va s c u l a r ta r g e t s: b e va c i z u m a b Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was discovered by Harold Dvorak and Donald Senger in 1983, and subsequently sequenced by Napoleone Ferrara's group in 1989.15,16 It was well-established that small tumours fail to thrive after attaining sizes as small as a few millimeters until they derive their independent vasculature. This in fact is carried out by the release of VEGF-A and other ligands that bind to the extracellular domain on the tumour cell VEGF receptors [Figure 1]. This initiates of the platinum doublets used in the E1594 trial and these doublets emerged as a standard of care for patients with well-preserved organ function in performance status (PS) 0–1, and with slightly higher toxicity in selected PS 2 cases. Towards the end of the last decade, histology emerged as a strong predictor for response and enhanced survival in non-squamous NSCLC. Data from phase II and randomised phase III trials of patients having the adenocarcinoma subtype, including large cell carcinoma and bronchioalveolar carcinoma (BAC), confirmed improvement in median survival beyond 10 months after the addition of pemetrexed. A phase III study revealed survival approaching a statistically significant 12.6 months in the pemetrexed cisplatin arm compared to 11 months in gemcitabine cisplatin arm in adenocarcinoma subtypes.14 The survival was 10.4 versus 6.7 months for the experimental arm in large cell carcinoma. SCC, however, did poorly with the addition of pemetrexed where median overall survival (OS) remained at <10 months. The combination therefore emerged as an option for non-squamous subtypes, reaching a median survival time in excess of 12 months, while cisplatin plus gemcitabine or docetaxel remained the standard treatment for SCC. Figure 1: The EGFR and VEGFR cell signal transduction pathways and site of blockade by targeted therapies 1–3. EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; TKI = tyrosine kinase inhibitor; VEGFR = vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor; mut = mutation. Muhammad Furrukh, Mansour Al-Moundhri, Khawaja F. Zahid, Shiyam Kumar and Ikram Burney review | 205 downstream cell signalling through activation of Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK or PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways leading to cell proliferation, endothelial migration, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastases. The VEGF-A and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) binding to platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) also complements the regulation of angiogenesis indirectly providing targets for dual- or multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Bevacizumab blocks the VEGF-A and prevents binding to the VEGF receptor while the complex is recognised and eliminated by the immune system. Bevacizumab exerts its action through the following proposed mechanisms. Antivascular effects lead to the regression of the tumour vasculature and reduce tumour size. Antiangiogenesis inhibits neo-angiogenesis and recurrent blood vessel growth in the tumour. Antipermeability decreases vascular permeability, and oedema in the tumour microenvironment, reducing pleural fluid volume. After promising results from a US phase II trial by Johnson et al. in 2004, a series of large randomised phase III trials of bevacizumab were initiated [Figure 2].17 A subset analysis of a phase III trial by Sandler et al. revealed interesting findings: patients with an adenocarcinoma subtype had a survival advantage of 3.9 months.18 Additionally, patients who developed hypertension on bevacizumab had a superior OS.19 Also, elderly patients (>70 years) showed a trend of higher RR and (progression-free survival) PFS but no gains in OS. They also experienced more toxicity. The outcome of patients on maintenance bevacizumab showed promise on retrospective review and, therefore, a series of successful phase III maintenance trials were initiated to test its relevance. The addition of bevacizumab to pemetrexed and platinum improved survival outcomes in adenocarcinoma histology in two phase II trials.20,21 A randomised phase III maintenance trial (AVAPERL 1) in PS 0–1 advanced adenocarcinoma patients was initiated using pemetrexed-cisplatin plus bevacizumab followed by continuation bevacizumab with or without pemetrexed.22 The interim results seem promising, as the addition of bevacizumab was well tolerated and associated with a superior PFS of 3.6 months. The median OS for the bevacizumab arm was 15.7 months, but for the pemetrexed bevacizumab arm; an OS level has not yet been reached. The Pointbreak study (900 patients) with advanced non-squamous NSCLC used pemetrexed + carboplatin + bevacizumab induction followed by pemetrexed + bevacizumab maintenance (arm A) and compared it with paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab induction followed by bevacizumab maintenance (arm B). Though it failed to reach the primary endpoint of enhancing OS, the maintenance arm A improved the survival outcomes (PFS and OS) compared to maintenance arm B.23 Whether the gain in survival is because of pemetrexed or bevacizumab remains to be defined. The ECOG E 5508 trial is underway to address this question.24 In a meta-analysis of 2,252 patients from 5 randomised trials with advanced NSCLC, Andre et al. reported that the addition of bevacizumab to platinum doublets increased RR, enhanced PFS by 1.4 months, extended OS by 1 month, and was associated with a significant 11% reduction in death. However, the combination was associated with slightly higher toxicity and mortality and therefore warrants careful patient selection.25 Based on promising survival gains from a colorectal study (BRITE),26 the ARIES trial27 in NSCLC, and another American retrospective analysis of non-squamous NSCLC,28 a large multi- institutional, randomised trial called Avastin in all Lung Lines (AVAll) was initiated and is currently recruiting patients to evaluate the role of post-progression bevacizumab.29 Nearly all key trials exploring the efficacy of the addition of bevacizumab to standard platinum doublets showed a consistent improvement in RR, PFS, and median survival rates in adenocarcinoma subtypes Figure 2: Continued survival benefit with bevacizumab: 2006 to 2011 showing the major trials undertaken. -The yellow bars show the subset analysis for ECOG4599 trial. -The red bar is the control (chemotherapy arm) of ECOG 4599 trial. Customised, Individualised Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) 206 | SQU Medical Journal, May 2013, Volume 13, Issue 2 e p i d e r m a l g r o w t h fa c t o r r e c e p t o r (e g f r) EGFR is a trans-membrane cellular protein receptor located on the cell surface. The gene that codes for EGFR protein is located in 7p11-13. It consists of 26 exons, of which the first 14 code for the extracellular ligand binding domain, exon 15 for the transmembrane domain, and the last 11 for the intracellular domain. The ATP-binding site and intrinsic TK activity is also coded by exons 16–26.43 It is generally expressed at low levels in a wide variety of normal tissues. Excessive expression or activation of EGFR is able to induce malignant transformation. Over-expression has been observed in 40–80% of NSCLC.44-46 A form of EGFRMUT (EGFRvIII) is implicated in carcinogenesis with TK activity.47 Receptor activation is generally initiated by the binding of EGF or related ligands, leading to receptor homodimerisation or heterodimerisation, which activates intrinsic TK activity of the receptors leading to autophosphorylation of tyrosine residues. Mutations or over-expression in the TK domain of the EGFR gene increase the activity of the intracellular signalling cascades through Ras/Raf/ MAPK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways [Figure 1], leading to events which result in over-proliferation, differentiation, enhanced survival, inhibition of apoptosis, neo-angiogenesis, and metastases, and is associated with a poorer prognosis.48,49 Determination of EGFR gene mutations has clinical relevance as it allows the optimisation of therapy and has emerged as one of the most important single predictive molecular markers in clinical oncology. Patients with certain EGFRMUT derive significant benefit after the addition of gefitinib or erlotinib.50–52 These agents inhibit the TK and adversely compete with ATP for the critical ATP-binding site located in the intracellular domain inhibiting the intrinsic tyrosine kinase enzyme activity. Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody that binds the extracellular domain of EGFR effectively and prevents the subsequent intracellular cascade of events and the inhibition of malignant transformation [Figure 1]. Certain clinical subgroups of patients derive a greater benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) therapy by virtue of the presence of an EGFRMUT. These include patients of East Asian origin, never smokers, females, and those having an adenocarcinoma.53–54 The EGFRMUT are found in exons 18–21 of the EGFR gene.43 with PS 0–1 [Figure 2]. However, the 4,000 patients (>65 years) from the SEER database were recently analysed and the addition of bevacizumab was not found to be advantageous in the elderly population.30 When a single cellular target is blocked, the cancer cell finds an alternative pathway to proliferate and hence provides a rationale for dual or multi- targeted therapy. Phase II and III trials, using dual TKI (vandetanib) after multi-line chemotherapy failure in advanced NSCLC, provided a hint of activity and efficacy in favour of the combination of chemotherapy with vandetanib.31–34 Multi-TKI (i.e. sorafenib, which inhibits TK, VEGFR, PDGFR, and the Raf signalling pathway when compared to a placebo) failed to enhance the efficacy of the treatment.35–36 In the MISSION trial, sorafenib failed to improve the OS, but the PFS, TTP, RR, and disease control rate (DCR) improved substantially.37 BATTLE, a phase II study, incorporated heavily pretreated NSCLC patients with PS 0–2 (2–5 lines failures, brain metastases allowed). The study compared the effects of erlotinib in the EGFR mutation-positive group, which validated results of earlier randomised trials, versus vandetanib and erlotinib, which showed enhanced activity in the VEGFR2-expressing subsets versus erlotinib and bexarotene showing activity in cyclin D1 expressing and EGFR amplified patients with improved outcomes versus. sorafenib which was associated with a dismal outcome in EGFR-mutation positive subsets.38,39 Multi-TKI roles in the metastatic setting remain under investigation. However, there is emerging data of multi-TKI use in RET translocations (1%) in adenocarcinoma subtype. BIBF 1120, a triple angio-kinase inhibitor (active against FGFR, PDGFR, and VEGFR) in the second- or third-line setting was found to be associated with tumour shrinkage in patients with adenocarcinoma.40 Its use is being explored in combination with docetaxel and pemetrexed.41,42 With advances in molecular biology and genetics, newer markers of significance are being explored to determine their prognostic or predictive value, and non-squamous NSCLC has emerged as a classical model of studying cancer genetics. Discovery of key cellular markers and their targeting has started to bring a paradigm shift in the management of advanced adenocarcinoma subtypes and will be the focus of the following discussion. Muhammad Furrukh, Mansour Al-Moundhri, Khawaja F. Zahid, Shiyam Kumar and Ikram Burney review | 207 Ta r ge T i n g T h e e pi d e r m a l gr ow T h fa c T o r r e c e p T o r ( e gfr) lu n g The different types of EGFR mutations provide information on whether patients with these mutations are likely to benefit from TKIs (erlotinib or gefitinib)50–52,56 [Table 2]. An individual matching the clinical criteria above carries a 50% chance of harbouring the mutation, but this is not the sole criteria used to commence TKI therapy. EGFRMUT are present in 30–50% of East Asians and approximately 10% of Caucasians having NSCLC. Its exact incidence in Arabian Gulf countries or Oman is not known. Well to moderately differentiated tumours have more frequent EGFRMUT than their poorly differentiated counterparts.57 Adenocarcinoma, which is thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF1) negative, will usually harbour a wild-type (normal) EGFR (EGFRWT). 58,59 Around 30% of SCCs overexpress the EGFR protein (not the gene) on immune-staining, and TKI provides a similar advantage to this subtype. The evidence of adding a TKI in SCC comes from the subset analysis of the SATURN study and the exploratory retrospective analyses from the NCIC BR.21 trial according to which these agents enhance PFS and OS irrespective of histology when used as maintenance and second-line salvage therapy, respectively.60,61 Similarly, data from the FLEX trial recommend use of cetuximab with induction chemotherapy in SCC expressing the EGFR protein. EGFR mutations rarely occur in never smoking SCC patients, and therefore are not routinely determined. Ta r ge T i n g T h e e gfr i n T r a c e l lu l a r d om a i n : T y r o si n e k i n a se i n h i b i T o r s (T k i s) After successful preclinical studies, evidence that the EGFRMUT correlated with response to TKI in clinical practice first emerged in 2004 from phase II trials in previously treated NSCLC patients. Trials of salvage TKIs have been undertaken. In the IDEAL 1 trial, gefitinib was used in patients pretreated with two or fewer previous chemotherapy regimens, while in IDEAL 2 the same agent was used in pretreated NSCLC patients who received more than two regimens.62,63 In 210 patients, the RR were 18–19% and there were median survival gains of 7.6–8 months in the IDEAL 1 trial. The RR was 11.8% and median OS was 6.5 months in the IDEAL 2 trial. The subset analyses revealed that Asian, never smoking females having adenocarcinoma (especially BAC) reacted with a predictable response to gefitinib. The ISEL, a phase III study, used gefitinib as first salvage in NSCLC after one or more prior chemotherapy failures. Survival was increased in patients who were Asians or never smokers.53 INTEREST, a phase III trial, utilised gefitinib versus docetaxel in a second-line salvage setting. The TKI was associated with a superior quality of life (QoL) and fewer side effects.64 Erlotinib was also used as a monotherapy in patients with NSCLC who progressed on 1–2 previous chemotherapies in the phase III BR.21 trial against BSC, and was associated with improvement in disease-related symptoms, superior TTP, and median OS enhancement by 2 months.61 Phase III trials of concurrent use of TKIs with chemotherapy have also been conducted. TALENT was a negative trial (>1,172 patients) with two arms that used carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without erlotinib.65 The RR, PFS, and OS remained unchanged when the TKI was used concurrent with chemotherapy as compared to chemotherapy alone. The TRIBUTE study utilised cisplatin and gemcitabine alone or concurrent with erlotinib and validated the results of the TALENT trial.66 However, subset analyses revealed increased survival in never smokers. INTACT 1 and INTACT 2 also used carboplatin and paclitaxel alone or concurrent Table 2: Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation types, incidence, and sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors Sr. No. EGFR mutation type Known mutations % Sensitivity to TKI 1 Exon 19 del(del 746-A750) Exon 21 point mutation(L858R) 45 45 + Yes 2 Dual mutationsT790M/exon19del T790M/L858R/others 5–7 ? No, data limited 3 Exon 20 insertion(T790M) Exon 18(G719S) 5 5 - No EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; TKI = tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Customised, Individualised Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) 208 | SQU Medical Journal, May 2013, Volume 13, Issue 2 The OPTIMAL trial was conducted by the Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group, and involved 23 centres using erlotinib.51,52 The trial also validated results from the IPASS study. In subgroup analyses, PFS was 15.3 months in exon 19 del and 12.5 months in L585R mutation. Table 3 shows the key phase III, prospective randomised clinical trials of upfront TKIs in non-squamous NSCLC with almost similar outcomes.50–52,55,72–74 At disease progression on TKIs, patients may still be treated with salvage platinum doublets. The TORCH trial revealed that in unselected advanced NSCLC patients, first-line erlotinib (followed by cisplatin gemcitabine at progression) was inferior in terms of OS compared with the standard sequence of first-line chemotherapy followed by erlotinib at progression.75 TAILOR is another phase III trial, where 218 evaluable patients (EGFRWT) were subjected to second-line docetaxel or erlotinib. The PFS was superior in the docetaxel arm with an absolute difference in 6 months PFS of 12% and remains a negative trial for TKI in wild type EGFR.76 Ta r ge T i n g T h e e gfr e xT r a c e l lu l a r d om a i n : c e T u x i m a b After encouraging results from phase II trials of the addition of cetuximab to induction chemotherapy in metastatic NSCLC, phase III trials were initiated. The monoclonal antibody binds to the extracellular ligand binding domain of the EGFR, blocking the intracellular cell signalling [Figure 1]. FLEX (First Line Erbitux in Lung Cancer trial) is a key phase III, randomised trial comparing the addition of cetuximab to cisplatin and vinorelbine, given for 6 cycles and cetuximab continued as maintenance therapy until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity versus chemotherapy alone. The median OS was superior.77 Moreover, a high EGFR expression was associated with a better survival with the addition of cetuximab. Survival figures were also superior for females, those of Asian ethnicity, in those who developed acne, and in those having adenocarcinoma. The addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy was found to be as effective in SCC with a prolongation of one year survival by 19%.78 Another USA-based trial looked at unselected NSCLC patients treated with taxane plus cetuximab, which enhanced median OS.79 The addition of cetuximab to platinum doublets remains a reasonable option in distinct PS 0–1 patients, as erlotinib without improvement in efficacy.67,68 CALGB 30406, presented in ASCO 2012, reveals erlotinib efficacy as singlet or concurrent with paclitaxel carboplatin in never or light smokers, harboring adenocarcinoma. Erlotinib was found to have similar efficacy in EGFRMUT in this phase II setting whether used as a singlet, and with higher toxicity or when used in combination with chemotherapy.69 There is a hint of TKI continuation concurrent with chemotherapy in some NSCLC cases associated with flare-up of the disease on discontinuation of the TKI. TKI use concurrent with chemotherapy remains investigational and necessitates further study in the context of a phase III trials. Trials comparing TKIs to chemotherapy as initial therapy have also been carried out. When TKI was used as frontline therapy in adenocarcinoma harbouring the EGFRMUT, the RR and PFS improved substantially but with similar OS gains to those seen with chemotherapy.50–52,56,70–74 Similar efficacy, superior tolerability, and less toxicity made TKI a new therapeutic option for adenocarcinoma subtypes, as well as its potential use in PS 3 and selected PS 4 cases. Certain clinical subgroups of patients with an EGFRMUT had a substantial enhancement in median survival, including those having an adenocarcinoma, never smokers, females, ethnic Asians, and those who developed a high-grade, acne-like rash with TKI.64–68,70–74 In the Iressa Pan-Asia Study (IPASS), a phase III, multicentre, randomised trial of advanced NSCLC, 1,217 patients from East Asia were randomly assigned to receive daily TKI orally versus a platinum doublet every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.50 Crossover was allowed. One-third of the patients had an EGFRMUT. The objective RR was statistically and numerically superior in the gefitinib arm in all clinical subgroups, with marked improvement of RR in the EGFRMUT-positive subgroup. However, the median OS remained similar, and mutation- negative patients benefited from chemotherapy but did extremely poorly with gefitinib (RR = 1%). The TKI are therefore not indicated in EGFRWT. The OS was similar in the EGFRMUT positive or negative groups and is possibly due to crossover in the two arms. The survival was also superior in patients with a high EGFR gene copy number, however, at the expense of mild toxicity. Muhammad Furrukh, Mansour Al-Moundhri, Khawaja F. Zahid, Shiyam Kumar and Ikram Burney review | 209 shown in the algorithm in Figure 3. It is reasonable to consider adding cetuximab to platinum doublets in patients with SCC (30% of these express the EGFR protein) and then use it as maintenance in those stablising after induction therapy, where it adds 1 month to OS. Molecular Markers of Significance in Targeted Therapy With advances in molecular biology and translational research, molecular targets are evolving which are potential targets of newer drugs [Tables 3 and 4]. Some key markers of prognostic and predictive value are described below. m e t a m p l i f i c at i o n MET is a cell surface receptor with TK activity expressed by normal cells as well as malignant cells.80 It is amplified in 10–20% of NSCLC. Ligand-like hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor binds to MET, activating downstream cell signalling and leading to cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion and metastases. High expression is defined on immunostaining, when >50% cells stain strongly (>3+) or, by an increased gene copy number (>5 copies/cell) as detected by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH). MET and EGFR coamplification occurs rarely—in only 1% of cases. The incidence of MET mutation was highest in Asians (13%), 0% in blacks, and N375S was the commonest mutation.81 MET amplification may lead to acquired resistance to TKI therapy through activation of alternate cell signalling pathways like PI3K in up to 20% of patients.82,83 It is also associated with reduced TTP. The PFS varies inversely with MET overexpression. Patients with high MET had superior survival with chemotherapy (P 0.25). Several MET inhibitors, with or without dual inhibition of EGFR and MET as a potential mechanism to overcome resistance, are currently undergoing trials. MET inhibitors like METMab plus erlotinib versus placebo plus erlotinib were compared in a phase II trial and showed 50% enhancement in PFS and OS in patients with high MET expression.84 Patients with low MET expression fared worse with the same combination. ARQ 197 is another MEK inhibitor that showed superior PFS when combined with erlotinib in a phase II trial with a trend towards increased OS.85 The MetLung trial is a global phase III randomised trial recruiting patients with metastatic or recurrent disease after one previous chemotherapy failure in MET-positive NSCLC. Patients are being randomised to erlotinib plus onartuzumab (MetMab) versus erlotinib plus placebo.86 k-r a s m u tat i o n Mutations in the Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene homologue gene (k-ras) occurs in approximately 20–30% of NSCLC cases. They are common in mucinous adenocarcinoma (but not in large-cell carcinoma or BAC), in the elderly, in heavy smokers, in stage I and tumour grade I but frequently fall with stage and grade progression, while the Table 3: Phase III, prospective, randomised clinical trials of upfront tyrosine kinase inhibitor- erlotinib (E), and gefitinib (G) Study No. of Patients ORR % DCR % Median PFS (months) Median OS (months) HR/P value for PFS tKI trials EGFrMUt P value NS IPASS50(G) China 261; 132 71.2 91.7 9.8 vs. 6.4 21.3 vs. 23.3 0.48 OPTIMAL51,52(E) Asia 154; 82 82.9 96.3 13.7 vs. 4.6 18.8 vs. 17.4 0.16 EURTAC56(E) Europe 1275; 174 54.5 10.5 10.4 vs. 5.1 22.9 vs. 18.8 0.34 First-SIGNAL70(G) Korea 42; 26 84.6 88.5 8.4 vs. 6.7 21.3 vs. 23.3 0.613 NEJSG 00271(G) Japan 228; 114 73.7 89.5 10.8 vs. 5.4 30.5 vs. 23.6 0.30 WJTOG 340572(G) Japan 172; 86 62.1 93.1 9.2 vs. 6.3 36.3 vs. 39 0.489 SLCG73(E) Spain 217; 217 70.6 89.8 14.0 27 -- CALGB 3040669(E) US 181; 164 71 NR 14.1 vs. 2.6 OS 31 vs.18 ORR = objective response rate; DCR = disease control rate; PFS = progression free survival; OS = overall survival; HR = hazard ratio; TKI = tyrosine kinase inhibitor; EGFRMUT = epidermal growth factor mutation; NS = not significant; NR = not reported. Customised, Individualised Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) 210 | SQU Medical Journal, May 2013, Volume 13, Issue 2 only rules out EGFR mutation, but is also a marker of TKI inactivity. To date, patients harbouring the k-ras mutation are best treated with chemotherapy. In a recent trial comparing docetaxel with or without selumetinib (MEK 1 and 2 inhibitor downstream of k-ras), the combination resulted in superior RR, PFS, and OS in patients with the k-ras mutation.87 e c h i n o d e r m m i c r o t u b u l e- a s s o c i at e d p r o t e i n-l i k e 4 a n a p l a s t i c ly m p h o m a k i n a s e (e m l 4-a l k) m u tat i o n EML4-ALK was isolated from a surgically resected lung adenocarcioma specimen, but originally identified in anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).88,89 It occurs in 4–11% of NSCLC. EML4- ALK exhibits activating mutations or translocations of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase aberrant fusion gene (result of a small inversion within short arm of chromosome 2p, in which the EML4 becomes fused to the intracellular kinase domain of ALK). It leads to the activation of downstream cell signalling through PI3K and STAT pathways. The gene encodes a cytoplasmic chimeric protein with kinase activity, and typically tested positive in younger subjects, having adenocarcinoma of a predominantly signet ring subtype, and in never or occurrence in non-smokers is low. The majority of mutations occur in codon 12 (>90%—guanine to thymine transversion) and 13, and the gene leads to impaired GTPase activity, located towards the inner surface of the cell membrane. This leads to subsequent constitutive activation of RAS signalling, which is downstream of the EGFR, leading to activation of proliferative and anti- apoptotic pathways such as ERK. In the early 1990s, it was considered a negative prognostic marker, and perhaps a negative predictive marker responsible for chemo-resistance. However, data from recent trials like TRIBUTE and FLEX negates it.66,77 Unlike colorectal cancers, where k-ras mutation is a strong predictor of response to cetuximab, its status in NSCLC could not confirm it to be so on retrospective analyses of FLEX and BMS 099 trials.77,79 In the NCIC BR.21 study, 28% of 731 patients had k-ras genotype.61 The majority was wild type that responded well to TKI, while 15% had a mutation that conferred primary resistance to TKI therapy. Data from TRIBUTE reveals that EGFR and k-ras mutations rarely occur together, and that survival was inferior in the group of patients with k-ras mutation who were treated with chemotherapy plus TKI.66 Hence, the presence of k-ras mutation not Figure 3: Evolving treatment algorithm of non-small-cell lung carcinoma in 2012. NSCLC = non-small-cell lung carcinoma; EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; CA = carcinoma; BAC = bronchioalveolar carcinoma; IHC = immunohistochemistry; VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor; EML4-ALK = echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like4 anaplastic lymphoma kinase; PS = performance status; *BSC = best supportive care. Muhammad Furrukh, Mansour Al-Moundhri, Khawaja F. Zahid, Shiyam Kumar and Ikram Burney review | 211 light smokers who did not harbour EGFR mutations. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) could detect the protein, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), gene sequencing, and FISH could detect the break-apart rearrangement.90 The break removes the inhibitory effect of EML4 and ALK initiates carcinogenesis due to its inherent oncogenic activity. EML4-ALK positivity mutually rules out EGFR and k-ras mutations. Currently, patients with this distinct expression have a similar RR and OS to platinum-based chemotherapy compared to the wild type patients. Crizotinib, an oral ALK inhibitor which produced a 90% clinical benefit (57% objective response rate [ORR]) when used as a second-line compared favourably to salvage second-line chemotherapy which produced a RR of 10% in a phase II trial.91 Another phase II trial (PROFILE 1005) is assessing salvage crizotinib in adenocarcinoma patients treated with one previous platinum, with the finding that the ORRs were 54% and the DCRs were 74%, which was considered safe and tolerable.92 Recently, PROFILE 1007 data were presented to the European Society for Medical Oncology. ALK- positive patients who failed one previous platinum doublet were treated with crizotinib compared with chemotherapy (docetaxel or pemetrexed). Crizotinib enhanced PFS (7.7 versus 3 months; P <0.0001), RR (60% versus 20%; P <0.001), and QoL.93 The exact sequencing of the drug still needs to be defined. Currently all patients harbouring wild type EGFR are treated with chemotherapy doublets and crizotinib is reserved as salvage in those who have the EML4-ALK mutation. The new agent is being tested in metastatic setting as frontline treatment. Crizotinib has also been found effective against ROS1 (~1%) mutation in NSCLC. r e s i s ta n c e t o e p i d e r m a l g r o w t h fa c t o r r e c e p t o r (e g f r) t y r o s i n e k i n a s e i n h i b i t o r s (t k i s) At some point during the course of disease, NSCLC progresses, despite therapy, because of the emergence of resistance due to underlying Table 4: Personalised therapy in 2012 for non-small cell lung carcinoma Factors Featurers/ Molecular Targets Targeted Therapy/Chemotherapy Options Clinical Female, Never smoker, Asian, Adenocarcinoma Treated CNS metastases, No hemoptysis, Controlled hypertension, No tumor near great vessels, No VTE, No therapeutic anticoagulant therapy TKI Bevacizumab Histologic Non mucinous Adenocarcinoma(EGFR Mutation+) Mucinous adenocarcinoma(k ras mutation/ EGFR wild) Mucinous adenocarcinoma(EML4 ALK+) Nonsquamous subtypes Squamous(30% EGFR protein expression) TKI Platinum doublets (pemetrexed) Crizotinib 1st line or after induc chemo Pemetrexed/ Cisplatin/ or both Bevacizumab, Pemetrexed + Platinum Gemcitabine or taxanes + Platinum + Cetuximab No pemetrexed/ No bevacizumab Molecular (markers in targeted therapy) EGFR Mutation + (FISH) k ras +ive , EGFR wild type EGFR overexpression on (for SCC) cMET mutation T790M mutation EML4 ALK mutation/ ROS 1 mutation RET translocation TKI Chemotherapy, suitable combination? Cetuximab Chemotherapy, (?ARQ 197, METMab) Afatinib, (?AEE788+Everolimus) Crizotinib Pemetrexed/ Cisplatin/ or both ?Multi-TKI (Sorafenib/ Sunitinib) Unanswered Triple negative lung cancer*(EGFR-, k ras -, EML4 ALK-) Primary vs Metastases Do poorly with standard chemotherapy, Best regimen? Do these harbour same mutations? Biomarkers in Chemotherapy** ERCC1 low ERCC1 high RRM1 high β Tubulin Platinum sensitive disease Gemcitabine Docetaxel (cisplatin resistance) Non-gemcitabine doublets (gemcitabine resist) Non taxane combination (taxane resistance) * = Retrospective subgroup analyse; ** = Markers undergoing research; CNS = central nervous system; VTE = venous thromboembolism; TKI = tyrosine-kinase; EGFR = epidermal growth factor reactor; FISH = fluorescence in situ hybridization; SCC = squamous cell carcinoma; EML4 ALK = echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like4 anaplastic lymphoma kinase; ERCC1 = excision repair cross-complementation group 1; RRM1 = ribonucleotide reductase M1 gene inhibitor. Customised, Individualised Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) 212 | SQU Medical Journal, May 2013, Volume 13, Issue 2 30% of acquired resistance.101 It has also been shown that patients who have developed resistance to TKI, when subjected to chemotherapy, may respond again to the re-introduction of TKI.102 Conclusion Bevacizumab and cetuximab have emerged as targeted agents to be used with cisplatin doublets in metastatic adenocarcinoma in patients with PS 0–1 and well preserved organ function. Those harbouring the EGFRMUT in PS 0–3 and highly selected PS 4 are now candidates for oral TKI therapy which offers equal efficacy, superior tolerability, and a lesser and different side effect profile, bringing a paradigm shift in the management of these cancers. There are compelling data for using more or prolonged therapy, and optimising therapy based on histology and genetic mutations, while resistance patterns continue to be recognised. The era of one chemotherapy that fits all is fading as patients’ median survival is improving gradually under customised individualised therapy. References 1. Union for International Cancer Control. Agency for Research on Cancer. GloboCan 2008 Fast Stats. From: http://globocan.iarc.fr/factsheet.asp. Accessed: May 2012. 2. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou Tatalovich Z, Cho H, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2008 NCI Bethesda. From: http : / / s e e r. c a n ce r. go v / c s r ? 1 9 7 5 - 2 0 0 8 / p o s te d . Accessed: May 2012. 3. Ministry of Health. Cancer Incidence in Oman. From: www.moh.gov.om. Accessed: May 2012. 4. Yang R, Cheung MC, Pedroso FE, Byrne MM, Koniaris LG, Zimmers TA. Obesity and weight loss at presentation of lung cancer are associated with opposite effects on survival. J Surg Res 2011; 170:e75–83. 5. Burdett S, Johnson DH, Stewart L, Tierney J, Le Pechoux C for the NSCLC collaborative group. Supportive care and chemotherapy vs supportive care alone in advanced NSCLC: A meta analysis using individual patient data (IPD) from randomized controlled trials. J Thorac Oncol 2007; 2:S337. 6. Luu DCN, Mamet R, Zornosa CC, Niland JC, D'Amico TA, Kalemkerian GP, et al. Retrospective analyses of the impact of age on overall survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012; e18018. genetic alterations. Primary resistance affects patients who are refractory to TKI therapy at the time of initiation. Molecular factors identified as predictive of an EGFR TKI response are often EGFR-related due to an increased EGFR gene copy number; activating mutations within the EGFR TKI domain; or resistant EGFR mutants. For example, the presence of insertions in EGFR’s exon 20 (5% of all known mutations) precludes the binding of gefitinib or erlotinib to the EGFR TKI domain, conferring resistance.94 Exon 18 (G719S) or exon 21 mutations (T854A), the presence of the k-ras mutation, and the loss of PTEN, B Raf mutations, or overexpression of MAPK and bcl2 also confer primary resistance. Secondary or acquired resistance generally affects patients who initially respond to TKI therapy but experience a loss of response after 6–12 months. Acquired resistance generally occurs with changes in MET over-expression, which accounts for 20% of resistance to the TKI.82,83 A T790M mutation (substitution of methionine for threonine at position 790) in progressing tumours accounts for 50% of resistance, and interferes with the binding of TKIs to the ATP-kinase binding pocket leading to continued activation of downstream signalling.95–97 This mutation is responsible for acquired drug resistance in patients receiving TKI therapy over a period of time. Patients harbouring this mutation have an indolent course as the disease is not rapidly fatal and metastasises late. The LUX1 trial used irreversible TKI (afatinib) that inhibits T790M after failure of first-line TKI with a DCR of 58% versus 19% and a 2.2 month improvement in PFS in favour of the agent.98 The agent was subsequently used in chemo-naive metastatic NSCLC patients in the LUX Lung 3 trial, revealing a superior RR and enhanced PFS of 11.1 months in patients with an exon 19 del and 13.6 months in the L585R mutation when the agent was compared to pemetrexed and cisplatin.99 The LUX Lung 7 and 8 trials compare afatinib versus TKIs (gefitinib and erlotinib) respectively. AEE788 is a multiple RTK inhibitor that blocks EGFR, VEGFR, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) pathways and, when combined with a mTOR inhibitor (everolimus), was found to be effective against the T790M mutation.100 Numerous unknown mechanisms (e.g. rare D761Y, L747S, T854A mutations, IGF-1R, etc.) account for Muhammad Furrukh, Mansour Al-Moundhri, Khawaja F. Zahid, Shiyam Kumar and Ikram Burney review | 213 7. Tammemagi CM, Neslund-Dudas C, Simoff M. Impact of co-morbidity on lung cancer survival. Int J Cancer 2003;103:792-802. 8. Paik PK, Johnson ML, D'Angelo SP, Sima CS, Ang D, Dogan S, et al. Driver mutations determine survival in smokers and never-smokers with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinomas. Cancer 2012; 118:5840–7. 9. Ganz PA, Figlin RA, Haskell CM, La Soto N, Siau J. Supportive care versus supportive care and combination chemotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer 1989; 63:1271–8. 10. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:92–8. 11. Ardizzoni M, Boni L, Tiseo M, Fossella FV, Schiller JH, Paesmans M. Cisplatin- versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99:847– 57. 12. NSCLC collaborative group. Chemotherapy in non- small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials. BMJ 1995; 311:899–909. 13. NSCLC Meta-Analyses Collaborative Group. Chemotherapy in addition to supportive care improved survival in advanced NSCLC: A systematic review and met analyses of individual patient data for 16 randomized controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:4617–25. 14. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, Von Pawel J, Biesma B, Vansteenkiste J, Manegold C, et al. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced stage NSCLC. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:3543–51. 15. Ferrara N, Gerber HP, LeCouter I. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med 2003; 9:669–76. 16. Leung DW, Cachianes G, Kuang WJ, Goeddel DV, Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science 1989; 246:1306–9. 17. Johnson DH, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny WF, Herbst RS, Nemunaitis JJ, Jablons DM, et al. Randomized phase II trial comparing bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with carboplatin and paclitaxel alone in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:2184–91. 18. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, Brahmer J, Schiller JH, Dowlati A, et al. Paclitaxel carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2542–50. 19. Dahlberg SE, Sandler AB, Brahmer JR, Schiller JH, Johnson DH. Clinical course of advanced non-small- cell lung cancer patients experiencing hypertension during treatment with bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin & paclitaxel on ECOG 4599. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:949–54. 20. Jyoti DP, Thomas AH, Alfred R, Eric MH, Mathew GB, Daniel TM, et al. Phase II study of pemetrexed and carboplatin plus bevacizumab with maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsqamous NSCLC. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:1–7. 21. Stevenson JP, Langer CJ, Somer RA, Evans TL, Rajagopalan K, Krieger K, et al. Phase 2 trial of maintenance bevacizumab alone after bevacizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin in advanced, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer 2012;118:5580–7. 22. Barlesi F, de Castro J, Dvornichenko V, Kim JH, Pazzola A, Rittmeyer A, et al. AVAPERL1 (MO22089): Final efficacy outcomes for patients with advanced non- squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC) randomised to continuation maintenance (mtc) with bevacizumab (bev) or bev+pemetrexed (pem) after first-line (1L) bev-cisplatin (cis)-pem treatment (Tx). European Multidisciplinary Cancer Congress. Euro J Cancer 2011; 47:S16. 23. Patel JD, Bonomi P, Socinski MA, Govindan R, Hong S, Obasaju C, et al. Treatment rationale and study design for the pointbreak study: a randomized,open- label phase III study of pemetrexed/carboplatin/ bevacizumab followed by maintenance peme- trexed/bevacizumab versus paclitaxel/carboplatin/ bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsquamous non- small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2009; 10:252–6. 24. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and National Cancer Institute. Bevacizumab or Pemetrexed Disodium Alone or In Combination After Induction Therapy In Treating Patients With Advanced Non- Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. From: http : / / cl i n i c a l t r i a l s . go v / s h o w / N C T 0 1 1 0 7 6 2 6 Accessed: Jun 2012. 25. Lima ABC, Macedo LT, Sasse AD. Addition of Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. From: http://www.plosone. org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal. pone.0022681. Accessed: May 2012. 26. Grothev A, Sugrue MM, Purdie DM, Dong W, Sargent D, Hedrick E, et al. Bevacizumab beyond first progression is associated with prolonged overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a large observational cohort study (BRiTE). J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:5326–34. 27. Lynch TJ, Brahmer J, Fischbach N, Garst J, Kumar P, Spigel DR, et al. Preliminary treatment patterns and safety outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from ARIES, a bevacizumab treatment observational cohort study (OCS). J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:8077. 28. Nadler EE, Yu EE, Ravelo AA, Sing AA, Forsythe Customised, Individualised Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) 214 | SQU Medical Journal, May 2013, Volume 13, Issue 2 therapy for lung cancer. Cancer Discov 2011; 1:44– 53. 39. Herbst RS, Blumenschein GR, Jr, Kim ES, Lee J, Tsao AS, Alden CM, et al. Sorafenib treatment efficacy and KRAS biomarker status in the Biomarker- Integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination (BATTLE) trial. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:7609. 40. Gori B, Ricciardi S, Fulvi A, Intagliata S, Del Signore E, de Filippo M, et al. New antiangiogenics in non- small cell lung cancer treatment: Vargatef (BIBF 1120) and beyond. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2011; 7:429–40. 41. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals. LUME- Lung 1. BIBF 1120 Plus Docetaxel as Compared to Placebo Plus Docetaxel in 2nd Line Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. From: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/ NCT00805194. Accessed: May 2012. 42. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals. LUME Lung 2. BIBF 1120 Plus Pemetrexed Compared to Placebo Plus Pemetrexed in 2nd Line Nonsquamous NSCLC. From: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00806819. Accessed: May 2012. 43. Haley J, Whittle N, Bennet P, Kinchington D, Ullrich A, Waterfield M, et al. The human EGF receptor gene: Structure of the 110 kb locus and identification of sequences regulating its transcription. Oncogene Res 1987; 1:375–96. 44. Salomon DS, Brandt R, Ciardiello F, Normanno N. Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their receptors in human malignancies. Crit Rev Onco Hematol 1995; 19:183–232. 45. Herbst RS, Shin DM. Monoclonal antibodies to target epidermal growth factor receptor-positive tumors: A new paradigm for cancer therapy. Cancer 2002; 94:1593–611. 46. Sridhar SS, Seymour L, Shepherd FA. Inhibitors of epidermal-growth factor receptors: A review of clinical research with a focus on non-small cell lung cancer. Lancet Oncol 2003; 4:397–406. 47. Pederson MW, Meltorn M, Damstrup L, Poulsen HS. The type III EGFR mutation. Biological significance and potential target for anticancer therapy. Ann Oncol 2001; 12:745–60. 48. Janmaat ML, Giaccone G. The epidermal growth factor receptor pathway and its inhibition as anticancer therapy. Drugs Today (Barc) 2003; 39:61– 80. 49. Ennis BW, Lippman ME, Dickson RB. The EGF receptor system as a target for antitumor therapy. Cancer Invest 1991; 9:553–62. 50. Fukuoka M, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Sunpaweravong P, Leong SS, Sriuranpong V, et al. Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in MM, Gruschkus SS. Bevacizumab treatment to progression after chemotherapy: Outcomes from a US community practice network. Oncologist 2011; 16:486–96. 29. F. Hoffmann La Roche Ltd. An open label, randomized, phase IIIb trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of standard of care + continuous bevacizumab treatment beyond progression of disease in patients with advanced NSCLC after first line treatment with bevacizumab plus a platinum doublets containing chemotherapy – AVAall (MO22097); From: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01351415 Accessed: May 2012. 30. Zhu J, Sharma DB, Gray SW, Chen AB, Weeks JC, Schrag D. Carboplatin and paclitaxel with vs without bevacizumab in older patients with advanced non- small cell lung cancer. JAMA 2012; 307:1593–601. 31. Herbst RS, Sun Y, Eberhardt WE, Germonpre P, Saijo N, Zhou C, et al. Vandetanib plus docetaxel versus docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ZODIAC): A double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11:619–26. 32. de Boer RH, Arrieta Ó, Yang CH, Gottfried M, Chan V, Raats J, et al. Vandetanib plus pemetrexed for the second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:1067–74. 33. Natale RB, Thongprasert S, Greco FA, Thomas M, Tsai CM, Sunpaweravong P, et al. Phase III trial of vandetanib compared with erlotinib in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:1059–66. 34. Lee J, Hirsh V, Park K, Qin S, Blajman CR, Perng R, et al. Vandetanib versus placebo in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after prior therapy with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI): A randomised, double-blind phase III trial (ZEPHYR). J Clin Oncol 2010; S28:7525. 35. Scagliotti G, Govindan R. Targeting angiogenesis with multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 2010; 15:436–46. 36. Gatzemeier U, Eisen T, Santoro A, Paz-Ares L, Bennouna J, Liao M, et al. Sorafenib (S) + gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) vs GC alone in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): phase III NSCLC research experience utilizing sorafenib (NEXUS) trial. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2012; 1:72–7. 37. Bayer Health Care Pharmaceuticals. A 3rd/4th Line Placebo-controlled Trial of Sorafenib in Patients With Predominantly Non Squamous Non- Small Cell Lung Cancer NSCLC. (MISSION). From: www.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00863746 Accessed: Jun 2012. 38. Kim ES, Herbst RS, Wistuba II, Lee JJ, Blumenschein GR, Jr, Tsao A, et al. The BATTLE trial: Personalizing Muhammad Furrukh, Mansour Al-Moundhri, Khawaja F. Zahid, Shiyam Kumar and Ikram Burney review | 215 Asia (IPASS). J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:2866. 51. Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Yang CH, Chu DT, Saijo N, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. OPTIMAL trial. N Eng J Med 2009; 361:947–57. 52. Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, Wang C, et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first- line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): A multicentre, open- label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12:735. 53. Thatcher N, Chang A, Parikh P, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, Von Pawel J, et al. Gefitinib plus best supportive care in previously treated patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer). Lancet 2005; 366:1527–37. 54. D'Angelo SP, Pietanza MC, Johnson ML, Riely GJ, Miller VA, Sima CS, et al. Incidence of EGFR exon 19 deletions and L858R in tumor specimens from men and cigarette smokers with lung adenocarcinomas. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:2066–70. 55. Shigematsu H, Gazdar AF. Somatic mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway in lung cancers. Int J Cancer 2006; 118:257–62. 56. Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, Vergnenegre A, Massuti B, Felip E, et al. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non- small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): A multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13:239. 57. Leary AF, Castro DG, Nicholson AG, Ashley S, Wotherspoon A, O'Brien ME, et al. Establishing an EGFR mutation screening service for non-small cell lung cancer – Sample quality criteria and candidate histological predictors. Eur J Can 2012; 48:61–7. 58. Somaiah N, Garrett-Mayer E, Huang X, Wahlquist AE, Danenberg K, Simon GR, et al. Use of negative thyroid transcription factor (TTF-1) status to predict for negative epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (Mts) status with a high negative predictive value (NPV) in patients (pts) with adenocarcinomas (AC) of the lung. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:7530. 59. Gazdar AF. Activating and resistance mutations of EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer: role in clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncogene 2009; S24–31. 60. Coudert B, Ciuleanu T, Park K, Wu YL, Giaccone G, Cappuzzo F. Survival benefit with erlotinib maintenance therapy relative to prior chemotherapeutic response: A subanalysis of the phase III SATURN study in NSCLC. From: https:// w w w.webges .com/cslide/e6388cc/public/play_ video/500. Accessed: May 2012. 61. Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, et al. NCIC BR.21 trial. Erlotinib in previously treated non–small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:123–32. 62. Fukuoka M, Yano S, Giaccone G, Tamura T, Nakagawa K, Douillard JY, et al. A multi-institutional randomised phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial). J Clin Oncol 2003; 21:2237–46. 63. Kris MG, Natale RB, Herbst RS, TJ Lynch Jr, D Prager, C P Belani, et al. A phase II trial of ZD1839 (Iressa) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients who had failed platinum- and docetaxel-based regimens (IDEAL-2). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002; 21:292a. 64. Douillard JY, Kim E, Hirsh V, Mok T, Socinski M, Gervais R, et al. Gefitinib (IRESSA) versus docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non- small-cell lung cancer pre-treated with platinum- based chemotherapy: A randomised, open-label phase III study (INTEREST): PRS-02. J Thorac Oncol 2007; 2:S305–6. 65. Gatzemeier U, Pluzanska A, Szczesna A, Kaukel E, Roubec J, De Rosa F, et al. Phase III study of erlotinib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: The Tarceva Lung Cancer Investigation Trial. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:1545–52. 66. Herbst RS, Prager D, Hermann R, Fehrenbaher L, Johnson BE, Sandler A, et al. TRIBUTE: A phase III trial of erlotinib HCl combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:5892–9. 67. Giaccone G, Herbst RS, Manegold C, Scagliotti G, Rosell R, Miller V, et al. Gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non- small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial-INTACT 1. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:777–84. 68. Herbst RS, Giaccone G, Schiller JH, Natale RB, Miller V, Manegold C, et al. Gefitinib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small- cell lung cancer: A phase III trial-INTACT 2. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:785–94. 69. Janne PA, Wang X, Socinski MA, Crawford J, Stinchcombe TE, Gu L, et al. Randomized phase II trial of erlotinib alone or with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients who were never or light former smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: CALGB 30406 trial. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30:2063–9. 70. Lee JS, Park K, Kim SW, Lee DH, Kim HT, Han JY, et al. A randomised phase III study of gefitinib (IRESSA) versus standard chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) as a first-line treatment for never-smokers with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Thor Oncol 2009; 4:AbstrPRS4. 71. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Sugawara S, Oizumi S, Isobe H, et al. Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. Customised, Individualised Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) 216 | SQU Medical Journal, May 2013, Volume 13, Issue 2 Oncol 2008; 19:1605–12. 83. Engelman JA, Zejnullahu K, Mitsudomi T, Song Y, Hyland C, Park JO, et al. MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating ERBB3 signaling. Science 2007; 316:1039–43. 84. Spigel DR, Ervin T, Ramlau R, Daniel DB, Goldschmidt JH, Blumenschein GR, et al. Final efficacy result from a randomized phase II study (OAM4558G) evaluating MetMab or placebo in combination with erlotinib in advanced NSCLC. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29:7505. 85. Schiller JH, Akerley WL, Brugger W, Ferrari D, Garmey EG, Gerber DE, et al. Results from ARQ 197-209: A global randomized placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial of erlotinib plus ARQ 197 versus erlotinib plus placebo in previously treated EGFR inhibitor-naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 2012; 28:7502. 86. Genentech with Hoffmann-La Roche. A Study of Onartuzumab (MetMAb) in Combination with Tarceva (Erlotinib) in Patients with Met Diagnostic- Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer who have Received Chemotherapy for Advanced or Metastatic Disease (MetLung) trial. From: http://clinicaltrials. gov/show/NCT01456325. Accessed: Sep 2012. 87. Jänne PA, Shaw AT, Pereira JR, Gaelle J, Johan V, et al. Phase II double-blind, randomized study of selumetinib (SEL) plus docetaxel (DOC) versus DOC plus placebo as second-line treatment for advanced KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 2012; 30:7503. 88. Mano H. Nonsolid oncogenes in solid tumors; EML4-ALK fusion genes in lung cancer. Cancer Sci 2008; 99:2349–55. 89. Manabu S, Shuji T, Kengo T, Young LC, Munehiro E, Toshihide U, et al. EML4 ALK mutations in lung cancer that confers resistance to ALK inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2010; 313:18:1734–9. 90. Shaw AT, Yeap BY, Mino-Kenudson M, Digumarthy SR, Costa DB, Heist RS, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of patients with NSCLC who harbor EML4 ALK. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:424. 91. Kwak EL, Bang YJ, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, Solomon B, Maki RG, et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:1693–703. 92. Riely G. Phase 2 data for crizotinib (PF-02341066) in ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): PROFILE 1005. International Association for the Study on Lung Cancer, 14th World Conference on Lung Cancer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3–7 Jul 2011. Abstr 031.05. 93. Pfizer Oncology. PROFILE 1007: A phase III trial of crizotinib (PF-02341066) versus standard of care in patients with NSCLC with a specific alterationof the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. NPU00315. From: http://www.pfizer.com/files/news/ N Engl J Med 2010; 362:2380–8. 72. Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Shunichi N, Isamu O, Takashi S, et al. Updated overall survival results of WJTOG 3405, a randomized phase III trial comparing gefitinib (G) with cisplatin plus docetaxel (CD) as the first-line treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). J Clin Oncol 2012; 30:7521. 73. Massuti B, Morán T, Porta R, Queralt C, Cardenal F, Mayo C, et al. Multicenter prospective trial of customized erlotinib for advanced NSCLC patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: Final results of Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) trial. J Clin Oncol 2009; 7;8023. 74. Jänne PA, Wang XF, Socinski MA, Crawford J, Capelletti M, Edelman MJ, et al. Randomized phase II trial of erlotinib (E) alone or in combination with carboplatin/ paclitaxel (CP) in never or light former smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: CALGB 30406. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:7503. 75. Gridelli C, Ciardiello F, Gallo C, Feld R, Butts C, Gebbia V, et al. First-line erlotinib followed by second-line cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the TORCH randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30:3002–11. 76. Garassino MC, Martelli O, Bettini A, Floriani A, Copreni E, Calogero L, et al. TAILOR: A phase III trial comparing erlotinib with docetaxel as the second-line treatment of NSCLC patients with wild- type (wt) EGFR. J Clin Oncol 2012: 30:7501. 77. Pirker R, Pereiera JR, Szezesna A, von Pawel J, Krzakowski M, Ramlau R, et al. Cetuximab plus chemo in patients with advanced NSCLC (FLEX): An open label phase III trial. Lancet 2009; 373:1525– 31. 78. Carillio GG, Montanino A, Costanzo R, Sandomenico C, Piccirillo MC, Di Maio M, et al. Cetuximab in non-small-cell lung cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Therapy 2012; 12:163–75. 79. Lynch TJ, Patel T, Dreisbach L, Heim WJ, Hermann RC, Paschold E, et al. Cetuximab and first-line taxane/carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced non- small-cell lung cancer: Results of the randomized multicenter phase III trial BMS099. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:911–7. 80. Christensen JG, Burrows J, Salgia R. cMET as a target for human cancer and characterization of inhibitors for therapeutic intervention. Cancer Lett 2005; 225:1–26. 81. Krishnaswamy S, Kanteti R, Duke-Cohan JS, Loganathan S, Liu W, Ma PC, et al. Ethnic differences and functional analysis of MET mutations in the lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15:5714–23. 82. Zucali PA, Ruiz MG, Giovannetti E, Destro A, Varella-Garcia M, Floor K, et al. Role of cMET expression in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Ann Muhammad Furrukh, Mansour Al-Moundhri, Khawaja F. Zahid, Shiyam Kumar and Ikram Burney review | 217 ash/crizotinib_study_1007_backgrounder_2010.pdf. Accessed: Jun 2012. 94. Greulich H, Chen TH, Feng W, Jänne PA, Alvarez JV, Zappaterra M, et al. Oncogenic transformation by inhibitor-sensitive and - resistant EGFR mutants. PLoS Med 2005; 2:e313. 95. Pao W, Miller V, Politi KA, Riely GJ, Samwar R, Zakowski MF, et al. Acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinoma to gefitinib or erlotinib is associated with a second mutation in the EGFR kinase domain. PLoS Med 2005; 2:e73. 96. Kobayashi S, Boggon TJ, Dayaram T, Jänne PA, Kocher O, Meyerson M, et al. EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:786–92. 97. Engelman JA, Mukohara T, Zejnullahu K, Lifshits E, Barras AM, Gale CM, et al. Allelic dilution obscures detection of a biologically significant resistance mutation in EGFR amplified lung cancer. J Clin Invest 2006; 116:2695–706. 98. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals. BIBW 2992 and BSC Versus Placebo and BSC in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Failing Erlotinib or Gefitinib (LUX-Lung 1) From: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/ NCT00656136. Accessed: Jun 2012. 99. Yang JC, Schuler MH, Yamamoto N, O'Byrne KJ, Hirsh V, Mok T, et al. A multicentre, randomised, open-label phase III trial of BIBW 2992 versus chemotherapy (cisplatin /pemetrexed) as firstline treatment for patients with advanced and metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an EGFR mutation. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30:7500. 100. Nakachi I, Naoki K, Soejima K, Kawada I, Watanabe H, Yasuda H, et al. The combination of multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor overcomes erlotinib resistance in lung cancer cell lines. Mol Cancer Res 2010; 8:1142–51. 101. Nguyen KS, Kobayashi S, Costa DB. Acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancers dependent on the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway. Clin Lung Cancer 2009; 10:281–9. 102. Gua RH, Chen XF, Wang TS, Zhang ZY, Sun J, Shu YQ, et al. Subsequent chemotherapy reveals acquired TKI resistance and restores response to TKI in advanced NSCLC. BMC Cancer 2011; 11:9.