Sultan Qaboos University Med J, February 2015, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, pp. e136–139, Epub. 21 Jan 15 Submitted 22 Mar 14 Revision Req. 11 Jun 14; Revision Recd. 25 Jul 14 Accepted 19 Oct 14 Wheezing is a common medicalproblem during early childhood.1,2 Most of the conditions that cause wheezing in children are benign and self-limiting. However, when wheezing presents itself before the age of one year, it requires careful evaluation. Similarly, as noted by Payne et al., a thorough reassessment of an asthmatic patient who is not responding to classic treatment is essential so as to establish the aetiology of the condition.3 Poorly controlled childhood asthma may be due to the improper use of inhalation devices, poor compliance to treatment or recurrent triggering factors.4 In a young child with a persistent wheeze who is not responding to treatment, other rare causes need to be identified. Aortic arch malformations occur in 3% of the general population.4 Usually, incomplete vascular anomalies of the aortic arch do not cause respiratory symptoms and, therefore, can remain undetected in childhood.5 However, significant respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms are common with complete vascular anomalies due to the resulting compression of the trachea and oesophagus.6 A chest X-ray may show unremarkable findings or a right-sided aortic arch, with the absence of a left-sided aortic knuckle. A high index of suspicion alongside investigations such as Departments of 1Child Health and 2Radiology & Molecular Imaging, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman *Corresponding Author e-mail: mnaggari@squ.edu.om and mnaggari@yahoo.com عيوب األوعية الدموية لدى األطفال ذوى التشخيص اخلطأ كحاالت الربو سلسلة من احلاالت ها�ضم جافاد، خلفان ال�ضنيدي، ان�س الوجود عبد املغيث، ديليب �ضانكل، حمود الذهلي، �ضنان عزاوي، حممد النجاري abstract: In most asthmatic children, inhaled steroids can relieve and control the symptoms of asthma. Persistent wheezing and respiratory symptoms in young children despite appropriate treatment may indicate other diagnostic considerations. Delays in this diagnosis can result in unnecessary investigations, inappropriate treatment and further complications. We report three patients who presented to Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman, in the period between September 2010 and May 2012 with persistent wheezing due to compression of the trachea caused by vascular anomalies. All patients had double aortic arches putting pressure on the trachea, leading to respiratory manifestations and feeding problems. Following surgery, all cases showed improvement and no longer required medication. Without clinical suspicion and appropriate imaging, congenital vascular anomalies may remain undetected for years. Infants and children with chronic wheezing should be evaluated for vascular anomalies as soon as possible. General practitioners should refer all such patients to a tertiary-level hospital for further investigations and management. Keywords: Vascular Malformations; Aortic Arch Syndromes; Asthma; X-Ray Computed Tomography; Wheezing; Stridor; Case Report; Oman. امللخ�ص: يف معظم االأطفال امل�ضابني بالربو ميكن لل�ضتريويدات امل�ضتن�ضقة اأن تخفف وتتحكم يف اأعرا�س الربو. قد ي�ضري ا�ضتمرار ال�ضفري و اأعرا�س اجلهاز التنف�ضي عند االأطفال ال�ضغار رغم العلج املنا�ضب اإىل اعتبارات ت�ضخي�ضية اأخرى. ميكن اأن يوؤدي التاأخري يف الت�ضخي�س اإىل قدموا مر�ضى ثلثة التقرير هذا يف هنا نعر�س التعقيدات. من مزيد و منا�ضب غري علج وتلقي لها، داعي ال فحو�ضات اإجراء اإىل م�ضت�ضفى جامعة ال�ضلطان قابو�س، م�ضقط، �ضلطنة عمان، يف الفرتة ما بني سبتمرب 2010 حتى مايو 2012 وهم يعانون من �ضفري م�ضتمر ب�ضبب الضغط عىلالق�ضبة الهوائية الناجم عن عيوب يف االأوعية الدموية. �ضكل ازدواج القو�س االأبهري �ضغطا على الق�ضبة الهوائية يف جميع املر�ضى ، مما اأدى اإىل ظهور اأعرا�س اجلهاز التنف�ضي و م�ضاكل يف التغذية. اأظهرت جميع احلاالت حت�ضنا بعد اإجراء اجلراحة، وعدم احلاجة اإىل االأدوية. بدون االشتباه ال�رضيري و الت�ضوير الطبي املنا�ضب قد يتاأخر اكت�ضاف عيوب االأوعية الدموية اإىل �ضنوات. ينبغي تقييم الر�ضع و االأطفال الذين يعانون من ال�ضفري املزمن ال�ضتبعاد عيوب االأوعية الدموية يف اأقرب وقت ممكن. يجب على االأطباء املمار�ضني حتويل جميع هوؤالء املر�ضى اإىل م�ضت�ضفى مركزي الإجراء مزيد من الفحو�ضات والعلج. مفتاح الكلمات: ت�ضوهات االأوعية الدموية؛ متلزمة القو�س االأبهري؛ الربو؛ الت�ضويراملقطعي الأ�ضعة اإك�س؛ ال�ضفري؛ �رضير؛ تقرير حالة؛ عمان. Vascular Anomalies in Children Misdiagnosed with Asthma Case series Hashim Javad,1 Khalfan Al-Sineidi,1 Anas A. Abdelmogheth,1 Dilip Sankhla,2 Humoud Al-Dhuhli,2 Sinan I. Azzawi,2 *Mohamed A. El-Naggari1 online case report Hashim Javad, Khalfan Al-Sineidi, Anas A. Abdelmogheth, Dilip Sankhla, Humoud Al-Dhuhli, Sinan I. Azzawi and Mohamed A. El-Naggari Case Report | e137 upper gastrointestinal contrast studies, echocardio- grams and computed tomography (CT) angiograms of the chest are critical in the diagnosis.7 The timely identification and treatment of a vascular anomaly is essential in order to prevent complications. Case One An eight-month-old male infant was referred to Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) in Muscat, Oman, in October 2011 with persistent wheezing that had continued since birth. He was born by emergency Caesarian section due to fetal bradycardia; however, after birth, he demonstrated an acceptable Apgar score. From two weeks of age the infant had attended various health facilities as he had noisy breathing and mild difficulty with feeding. He showed no response to treatment with bronchodilators and steroids. On examination, it was found that the infant’s growth parameters were below the third percentile. Biphasic wheezing was heard all over his chest by auscultation. Findings from other systemic examinations, as well as his vital signs and oxygen saturation levels, were normal. A flexible endoscopy of the upper airway and chest X-rays showed no abnormal signs. However, the infant’s symptoms worsened with time. An echocardiogram revealed a double aortic arch (DAA). A chest CT angiography confirmed this finding and showed that the DAA was pressing gently on the trachea and oesophagus [Figure 1]. The infant was operated on at 10 months of age. During surgery, pressure on the trachea and oesophagus from the DAA was observed and the posterior aortic arch was divided to release the obstruction. The infant’s symptoms and growth parameters improved after surgery and he was not on any medication at the time of follow-up. Case Two A three-year-old male child was referred to SQUH in September 2010 with a history of wheezing, dysphagia and cyanosis while feeding. From the age of six months, he had been undergoing regular follow-up with an ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgeon at SQUH for suspected laryngomalacia. His growth parameters were between the 25th and 50th percentile. His vital signs and oxygen saturation levels were normal. On auscultation, wheezing was heard bilaterally. A clinical examination of his cardiovascular system was unremarkable. Routine blood investigations and a chest X-ray showed no abnormal findings. A barium swallow test with fluoroscopy revealed an indentation of the oesophagus at the T4–T5 vertebral level. An echocardiogram revealed a left-sided hypoplastic aortic arch with two branches; the left carotid and left subclavian. The right aortic arch was dominant with both the right carotid and the subclavian arising from it. These findings were consistent with a diagnosis of DAA. A coronal CT angiogram showed both aortic arches compressing the distal trachea as well as the junction of both posterior arches [Figure 2]. At the age of three-and-a-half years, the patient underwent an operation whereby the posterior aortic arch was divided to release the obstruction. On follow-up, he was not taking any medication and was asymptomatic and thriving. Case Three A three-month-old female infant was referred to SQUH in May 2012 with noisy breathing, wheezing and difficulty with feeding since birth. She was born normally with a good Apgar score and a birth weight of 2.7 kg. Soon after the infant’s birth, her parents Figure 1: Axial computed tomography angiography image of the first case, demonstrating both aortic arches with a mildly compressed trachea and oesophagus. Figure 2: Coronal computed tomography angiography image of the second case, showing both aortic arches compressing the distal trachea. Vascular Anomalies in Children Misdiagnosed with Asthma Case series e138 | SQU Medical Journal, February 2015, Volume 15, Issue 1 noticed the aforementioned symptoms. It was also observed that she was not gaining any weight. She received nebulised bronchodilators and antibiotics which had no effect. Laryngomalacia was suspected by the SQUH ENT surgeon. The infant’s growth parameters were below the third percentile and she had biphasic wheezing. The findings of a chest X-ray were normal. A barium swallow test revealed a posterior indentation on the upper oesophagus which was suggestive of an extrinsic vascular compression. A CT chest angiogram was performed and showed a DAA compressing the trachea. A three-dimensional volume-rendered CT angiography of the chest also showed the DAA [Figure 3]. The infant was operated on at the age of 10 months. During the surgery, it was observed that the DAA was putting pressure on the trachea and oesophagus. The posterior aortic arch was therefore divided to release the obstruction. The infant’s symptoms persisted for some time after surgery due to the indentation caused by the DAA on the trachea and oesophagus. However, on follow-up, a gradual improvement in her symptoms and growth parameters was seen and she was not on any medication. A summary of the details and clinical findings for all three cases in this series is presented in Table 1. Discussion A DAA is a prevalent vascular ring malformation whereby the two arches surround the trachea and oesophagus.7 The paired aortic arch arteries fail to remodel properly, resulting in two aortic arches connecting both the ascending and descending aortas. The ascending aorta bifurcates anteriorly to the trachea and oesophagus, with one arch coursing to the left of the trachea and oesophagus and the other to the right.7 The arches rejoin into a single descending aorta behind the trachea and oesophagus, thereby completely encircling the two structures.7 In children with a DAA, stridor is considered a common clinical presentation, followed by recurrent respiratory infections, respiratory distress, wheezing and coughing.8 Gastrointestinal symptoms are usually elicited during the patient history and include dysphagia, feeding difficulty and vomiting.8 All three patients in this case series presented with breathing difficulties, wheezing and dysphagia. A dominant right-sided aortic arch raises clinical suspicion for a vascular ring. At present, CT and magnetic resonance imaging angiograms are used as an effective diagnostic and assessment tool for aortic arch anomalies, including DAA.9 A DAA compressing the trachea Table 1: Summary of the details and clinical findings for the three presented patients with vascular anomalies Detail/finding Case 1 2 3 Age at presentation Eight months Three years Three months Gender Male Male Female Age at onset of symptoms Since birth Six months Since birth Presenting features Persistent wheezing Wheezing and dysphagia Noisy breathing Growth FTT* Normal+ FTT* Development AFA AFA AFA Auscultation Biphasic wheezing Bilateral wheezing Bilateral wheezing CVS UR UR UR Chest X-ray UR UR UR Upper GI contrast study Not performed Indentation of upper oesophagus Indentation of upper oesophagus Echocardiogram DAA DAA DAA Chest CT angiogram DAA DAA DAA Diagnosis DAA DAA DAA Treatment received Surgical division of PAA Surgical division of PAA Surgical division of PAA Outcome Cured Cured Slowly improving FTT = failure to thrive; AFA = appropriate for age; CVS = chorionic villus sampling ; UR = unremarkable; GI = gastrointestinal; DAA = double aortic arch; CT = computed tomography; PAA = posterior aortic arch. *Below the third percentile. +Between the 25th and 50th percentile. Figure 3: Three-dimensional volume-rendered com- puted tomography chest angiography image of the third case, showing a double aortic arch (marked 1 and 2). Hashim Javad, Khalfan Al-Sineidi, Anas A. Abdelmogheth, Dilip Sankhla, Humoud Al-Dhuhli, Sinan I. Azzawi and Mohamed A. El-Naggari Case Report | e139 and oesophagus in the first two cases of this series were confirmed by a CT angiogram. In these patients, compression of the trachea and oesophagus from the DAA was observed during surgery and the posterior aortic arch was divided to release the obstruction. Following surgery, both of the patients became asymptomatic. A study by Stewart et al. revealed cleavage of the vascular ring in three out of 15 patients with a vascular ring.10 In the management of children with vascular rings, Phelan et al. indicated that a high index of clinical suspicion is required in order to ensure a rapid and timely diagnosis.11 Mild vascular rings can be missed in very young patients and manifest only at an older age. However, noisy breathing sounds are usually the classical presentation soon after delivery.11 These symptoms often worsen during a respiratory infection. Wheezing in a very young infant is another typical clinical presentation. Sometimes, the vascular ring can be misdiagnosed as cardiac disease, unless the history points to airway problems, as clinical examinations can appear normal.10 Multi-view chest imaging scans are very helpful in distinguishing many subtle pulmonary and cardiac abnormalities. Identification of the right- sided aortic arch on a chest radiograph is crucial as it may be associated with a ring anomaly. Missed or late identification of vascular anomalies can result in unnecessary investigations and treatment, while a prolonged and inappropriate use of inhaled corticosteroids may cause hazardous effects on growth, bones and adrenal glands.12 If the airway is compressed by a vascular ring for an extended period of time, it may cause a permanent indentation of the airway. Establishing the correct diagnosis and ensuring appropriate surgery will assist in the improvement of symptoms and the avoidance of unnecessary treatment. When treating a patient with poorly controlled persistent respiratory complaints, physicians should consider alternative diagnoses by carefully reviewing the patient history and chest images. Furthermore, all children with persistent wheezing should be referred to tertiary level hospitals for further investigations and management. Conclusion A diagnosis of bronchial asthma in young children should be made cautiously, after excluding other conditions that can cause persistent wheezing. Chronic or recurrent wheezing in young children who do not respond to classic treatment requires thorough reassessment to establish the aetiology and to avoid complications and unnecessary medication. In the absence of clinical suspicion and appropriate imaging, congenital vascular anomalies can remain undetected until adulthood. General practitioners should refer all children with persistent wheezing for further investigations at a tertiary level hospital. References 1. Taussig LM, Wright AL, Holberg CJ, Halonen M, Morgan WJ, Martinez FD. Tucson Children’s Respiratory Study: 1980 to present. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 111:661–75. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.162. 2. Bloomberg GR. Recurrent wheezing illness in preschool- aged children: Assessment and management in primary care practice. Postgrad Med 2009; 121:48–55. doi: 10.3810/ pgm.2009.09.2052. 3. Payne DN, Lincoln C, Bush A. Lesson of the week: Right sided aortic arch in children with persistent respiratory symptoms. BMJ 2000; 321:687–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.687. 4. Balfour-Lynn I. Difficult asthma: Beyond the guidelines. Arch Dis Child 1999; 80:201–6. doi: 10.1136/adc.80.2.201. 5. Humphrey C, Duncan K, Fletcher S. Decade of experience with vascular rings at a single institution. Pediatrics 2006; 117:e903– 8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1674. 6. Woods RK, Sharp RJ, Holcomb GW 3rd, Snyder CL, Lofland GK, Ashcraft KW, et al. Vascular anomalies and tracheoesophageal compression: A single institution’s 25-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72:434–8. doi: 10.1016/ S0003-4975(01)02806-5. 7. Juraszek AL, Fulton DR. Vascular Rings. From: www.uptodate. com/contents/vascular-rings Accessed: Jan 2014. 8. Backer CL, Mavroudis C, Rigsby CK, Holinger LD. Trends in vascular ring surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129:1339–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.10.044. 9. Felson B, Palayew MJ. The two types of right aortic arch. Radiology 1963; 81:745–59. doi: 10.1148/81.5.745. 10. Stewart JR, Kincaid OW, Titus JL. Right aortic arch: Plain film diagnosis and significance. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1966; 97:377–89. doi: 10.2214/ajr.97.2.377. 11. Phelan E, Ryan S, Rowley H. Vascular rings and slings: Interesting vascular anomalies. J Laryngol Otol 2011; 125:1158– 63. doi: 10.1017/S0022215111001605. 12. Pedersen S, O’Byrne P. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma. Allergy 1997; 52:1–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb05047.x.