Association between Bioactive Molecules in Breast Milk and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus *Tajudeen Yahaya1 and Ufuoma Shemishere2 Sultan Qaboos University Med J, February 2020, Vol. 20, Iss. 1, pp. e5–12, Epub. 9 Mar 20 Submitted 28 May 19 Revisions Req. 1 Aug & 2 Oct 19; Revisions Recd. 23 Aug & 5 Oct 19 Accepted 3 Nov 19 Departments of 1Biology and 2Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Federal University Birnin Kebbi, Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria *Corresponding Author’s e-mail: yahayatajudeen@gmail.com Type 1 diabetes mellitus (t1dm) is a long-term degenerative disease that begins when the body’s defense mechanism starts to destroy its own pancreatic β-cells.1,2 While the exact aetiology of the disease is unknown, several triggers are thought to play a role in disease causation, including genetic, epi- genetic and environmental factors. Previously, T1DM was thought to affect only children and thus termed juvenile or childhood diabetes mellitus; however, as a result of technological advancements in diagnostic tools, it is now understood that it occurs at any age.1,2 While T1DM affects both genders equally, there are racial disparities in terms of prevalence, with the disease being more common among Caucasian Americans compared to African Americans.3,4 Generally, T1DM is considered the most taxing form of diabetes mellitus (DM) and is characterised by severe insulin deficiency and hyperglycaemia.5 Early symptoms include increased thirst, appetite and weakness, frequent urination and weight loss.6 Uncontrolled hyper- glycaemia may subsequently result in multiorgan damage involving the eyes, kidneys, nerves and heart, among other organs.7 Unfortunately, there is no cure for the disease yet; as such, affected patients need to self-medicate and take daily doses of insulin for survival.8 Although type 2 DM (T2DM) accounts for the majority of the overall economic burden of DM due to its higher prevalence, the economic burden is greater on individual patients with T1DM.9 Overall, the prevalence of T1DM is rising steadily, with an annual global increase of over 3%, which is projected to double in the next 20 years.10 For many European and North American countries, the rising incidence of T1DM began around the mid-20th century, coinciding with increased industrialisation.11,12 Among other lifestyle modifications, breastfeeding patterns review العالقة بني اجلزيئات النشطة بيولوجًيا يف حليب الثدي وداء السكري من النوع األول تاج الدين يحيا و يوفوما �صمي�صري abstract: The association between breastfeeding and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is controversial. However, several recent studies have established a link between these two factors, necessitating a need to review this subject to raise public awareness. Current research indicates that breast milk contains a variety of bioactive substances including immunoglobulins, oligosaccharides, insulin, lactoferrin, lysozyme, cytokines, epidermal growth factors, leukocytes, nucleotides, beneficial bacteria and vitamins. Such substances strengthen the breastfeeding infant’s immune system, both directly, by increasing gut microbiota diversity and attacking harmful bacteria and pro- inflammatory molecules, and indirectly, by increasing thymus performance. Accordingly, a lack of or inadequate breastfeeding may predispose infants to several autoimmune disorders, including T1DM. Nursing mothers and caregivers are therefore advised to follow optimal breastfeeding practices prior to introducing complementary foods. Keywords: Breastfeeding; Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus; Autoimmune Diseases; Immunoglobulins; Oligosaccharides; Review Literature. امللخ�ص: العالقة بني الر�صاعة الطبيعية وداء ال�صكري من النوع الأول مثرية للجدل. ومع ذلك فقد اأثبتت العديد من الدرا�صات احلديثة احلالية الأبحاث ت�صري العام. الوعي م�صتوى لرفع املو�صوع هذا مراجعة اإىل احلاجة ي�صتدعي مما العاملني هذين بني �صلة وجود قليلة ال�صكريات املناعية، الغلوبولينات ذلك يف مبا بيولوجًيا الن�صطة املواد من متنوعة جمموعة على يحتوي الثدي حليب اأن اإىل التعدد، الأن�صولني، الالكتوفريين، الليزوزمي، ال�صيتوكينات، عوامل منو الب�رشة، كريات الدم البي�صاء، النيوكليوتيدات، البكترييا النافعة والفيتامينات. مثل هذه املواد تقوي اجلهاز املناعي لدى الر�صع املعتمدين على الر�صاعة الطبيعية �صواء ب�صكل مبا�رش وذلك من خالل زيادة تنوع الأحياء املجهرية املعوية ومهاجمة البكترييا ال�صارة واجلزيئات امل�صببة لاللتهاب او ب�صكل غري مبا�رش عن طريق زيادة اأداء الغدة الزعرتية. وفًقا لذلك قد يوؤدي نق�س الر�صاعة الطبيعية اأوعدم كفايتها اإىل تعري�س الر�صع اإىل العديد من ا�صطرابات املناعة الذاتية، مبا يف ذلك داء ال�صكري من النوع الأول. لذلك ُتن�صح الأمهات املر�صعات ومقدمي الرعاية باتباع املمار�صات امُلثلى للر�صاعة الطبيعية قبل اإدخال الأطعمة التكميلية. الكلمات املفتاحية: ر�صاعة طبيعية؛ داء ال�صكري من النوع الأول؛ اأمرا�س املناعة الذاتية؛ غلوبولينات مناعية؛ �صكريات قليلة التعدد؛ مراجعة الأدبيات. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.2020.20.01.002 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ Association between Bioactive Molecules in Breast Milk and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus e6 | SQU Medical Journal, February 2020, Volume 20, Issue 1 changed due to the introduction of infant feeding alternatives such as formula. The loss of immunological function due to inadequate or inappropriate breast- feeding habits may contribute to the rising incidence of T1DM. This review therefore aimed to examine the association between T1DM and the immunological function of bioactive molecules in breast milk. Association of Bioactive Molecules with Breastfeeding The role of breast milk in the aetiology and prevention of T1DM is controversial, with certain studies showing a protective effect and others reporting predisposing or no effects at all.13–15 In a meta-analysis of 25 studies with 226,508 participants from 12 countries, Yan et al. found that breastfeeding resulted in a reduced risk of DM triggers.13 Importantly, 17 of these studies indicated a dose-response relationship between breastfeeding duration and a lowered risk of childhood obesity. In another meta-analysis involving 155,392 Norwegian and Danish children, Lund-Blix et al. reported that T1DM was related to the early introduction of infant formula, with non-breastfed children having a two-fold increased risk of disease compared to those who were breastfed.14 Nevertheless, in a meta-analysis involving 43 observational studies of 9,874 individuals with T1DM, Cardwell et al. observed a weak link between exclusive breastfeeding and T1DM.15 Many factors, particularly the experimental designs of these studies and variations in breastfeeding patterns in different countries, could be responsible for these inconsistent results. However, studies that report weak or negative effects usually monitor breastfeeding to an imprecise degree, without considering whether breastfeeding is exclusive or complementary. Exclusive breastfeeding without vitamin supple- mentation may cause vitamin D deficiency in infants, particularly if the mother herself is deficient.16 It may also result in vitamin E deficiency as vitamin E content in breast milk decreases as colostrum matures.17 Vitamin E scavenges free radicals, blocking infiltrating toxins and cytokines and protecting cells, including the pan- creatic islet cells. Deficiencies of both vitamins may play a role in the pathogenesis of T1DM.18,19 Giulietti et al. reported the overexpression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, reduced thymus performance and pancreatic islet dysfunction in non-obese diabetic mice kept away from ultraviolet light and fed with a vitamin D-depleted diet.20 In a Finnish birth cohort study, Hyppönen et al. found that daily supplementation of 200 IU of vitamin D was associated with a lower incidence of T1DM among children.21 In a prospective clinical study of both T1DM and T2DM patients, vitamin E supplementation decreased blood glucose levels and reduced the progression of the disease.22 According to Virtanen et al., complementary feeding may yield no effect if this feeding consists of dietary formulas containing certain complex proteins.23 Similarly, Chia et al. showed that dietary A1 β-casein may affect glucose homeostasis and induce progression to T1DM in non-obese diabetic mice.24 Gluten in cereals is also linked with increased T-cell reactivity, with diabetogenic effects in rodents.25 Additionally, breastfeeding from containers, which are often coated with preservatives and anti-rust agents such as bisphenol A (BPA), may affect breastfeeding outcomes.26 In a study of new and used baby bottles in Iran, BPA levels ranged from 0.49–8.58 μg/L and 0.63–2.47 μg/L, respectively.26 In pregnant rats, BPA doses as low as 0.5 μg/L were found to induce persistent islet insulin hypersecretion for up to one year.27 The duration of breastfeeding and the age at which complementary foods are administered may also deter- mine the protective role or otherwise of breast milk on TIDM pathogenesis. Short-term breastfeeding (<3 months) and the early or late introduction of complementary foods (<4 months and ≥6 months, respectively) are risk factors for T1DM.28 Additionally, the introduction of cereals before three months of age may be related to early β-cell autoimmunity.29 Furthermore, certain maternal factors and prenatal lifestyle choices such as tobacco smoking, age, mode of birth and psychological stress levels may predispose an infant to T1DM.30–32 These factors may also be linked to breastfeeding outcomes. Mechanistic Links Breast milk has been found to contain various anti- pathogenic and anti-inflammatory bioactive molecules, some of which can confer infants with lifelong immunity against many diseases, including T1DM.33 Thus, breast milk can be described as a medium through which the maternal defense mechanism trains the immune system of the infant.34 Established mechanisms through which breast milk prevents T1DM and other autoimmune diseases are outlined in Table 1.33,35–55 r e d u c e d g u t p e r m e a b i l i t y a n d p r i m i n g o f t h e i m m u n e s y s t e m The diversity of the gut microbiota—the composition of which is influenced by various environmental factors such as diet and lifestyle—is important in the aetiology and prevention of T1DM. Homeostatically imbalanced microbiota, as characterised by a high preponderance of certain bacteria, increases intestinal permeability, eliciting autoantibodies and causing β-cell auto- Tajudeen Yahaya and Ufuoma Shemishere Review | e7 immunity, the hallmark of T1DM.35 Individuals with T1DM have less stable and diverse microbiota comp- ared to non-diabetics.36,56 The most frequently reported microbiome imbalance in diabetic individuals is a decreased Firmicutes population with a corresponding increase in the Bacteroides genus, the opposite of which is usual in non-diabetics.36 In experimental mice, microbiota imbalance was found to decrease tolerance to food antigens and the proportions of regulatory T-cells (Tregs) in the intestinal lamina propria, causing intestinal inflammation.37 This results in high intestinal permeability, inducing insulitis or allowing more exogenous antigens into the mucosal immune system. Studies of obese and non-obese diabetic mice have observed that this leads to increased cytokine production that may attack and damage pancreatic β-cells.57–59 Bacterial metabolites may also attack the pancreatic islet directly. This was shown during a study of mice in which Streptomyces-derived toxins impaired glucose tolerance, reducing islet size and β-cell mass at low doses via adenosine triphosphatase inhibition.60 The innate immune system—the body’s first defence mechanism after birth—is weak and lacks important components. In healthy infants, a developing gut microbiome undergoes several stages of maturation in which the ingestion of breast milk is considered the most important factor.61 This is possible because breast milk contains many beneficial bacteria and bioactive molecules. Diverse groups of beneficial bacteria in breast milk reduce gut permeability, promote gut microbiota diversity and maturation as well as boost immunological and metabolic function.38 Breast milk contains high levels of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species, which promote the growth of Firmicutes bacteria.61,62 Firmicutes deficiency has been reported in individuals with T1DM.36,56 Bacteroides species are also present in breast milk and increase gut diversity and maturation.61 Gut bacteria achieve these functions in vitro by either naturally killing pathogenic bacteria during the competition for food and survival or by producing antimicrobial effects.63,64 Insulin is another bioactive molecule found in breast milk; this hormone enhances gut maturation and reduces gut permeability to macromolecules.39 In addition, insulin in breast milk may induce tolerance to blood insulin and prevent T1DM pathogenesis.39 Breast milk insulin enhances the diversity of the gut microbiota by boosting the growth of some members of the Gammaproteobacteria family and reducing the Streptococcaceae population.40 Gammaproteobacteria are involved in the maturation of infant gut microbiota, primarily in the first week after birth.41 Insulin and leptin, another hormone in breast milk, also influence gut microbiota diversity by suppressing certain microbial metabolic pathways associated with intestinal inflamm- ation while promoting beneficial ones.40 Oligosaccharides are non-digestible sugars in breast milk that promote the growth of protective bacteria in the colon.33 The non-digestible properties of oligosaccharides allow these molecules to escape the acidic medium of the small intestine into the colon Table 1: Bioactive molecules in breast milk and their role in type 1 diabetes mellitus risk reduction33,35–55 Category Molecule Potential roles Adipokines33,40,43 • Leptin • Adiponectin • Antimicrobial function • Immune modulation • Increased β-cell function Immunoglobulins33,43,45 • IgA • IgG • Antimicrobial function • Anti- inflammatory function • Immune modulation Hormones39–41,46,47 • Insulin • Lactoferrin • Lysozyme • Caseins • Corticosteroids • Anti- inflammatory function • Strengthened immune tolerance • Increased thymus performance Maternal immune cells51,53,55 • Leukocytes • Stem cells • CD4+ • miRNAs • Antimicrobial function • Strengthened immunity • Increased thymus performance Growth factors50–52 • EGFs • IGF • Immune modulation • Increased β-cell mass •Pancreatic morphogenesis Cytokines44,49 • IL-1 • IL-6 • IL-7 • Anti- inflammatory function • Immune modulation • Increased thymus size Beneficial bacteria35–38 • Lactobacillus sp. • Bifidobacterium spp. • Firmicutes spp. • Anti-infectious function • Increased gut diversity • Strengthened immunity Nutrients37,42,48,54 • Oligosaccharides • Triglycerides • Vitamins • Minerals • Increased gut diversity • Anti-microbial function • Immune modulation Ig = immunoglobulin; CD = cluster of differentiation; miRNAs = microri- bonucleic acids; EGFs = epidermal growth factors; IGF = insulin-like growth factor; IL = interleukin. Association between Bioactive Molecules in Breast Milk and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus e8 | SQU Medical Journal, February 2020, Volume 20, Issue 1 where they produce short-chain fatty acids.42 These fatty acids enhance the growth of probiotic species, including Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, resulting in a balanced microbiome.43 In an in vitro study, oligo- saccharides were found to inhibit and block harmful intestinal microorganisms from binding to their normal targets in the epithelial cells, thus reducing their population.44 Oligosaccharides were also reported to confer a protective effect in a murine model of T1DM.65 The administration of oligosaccharides was shown to influence microbiota diversity and produce short- chain fatty acids in non-obese diabetic mice, reversing DM progression.66,67 Breast milk also contains large quantities of secretory immunoglobulin (Ig) A, which accounts for the majority of the Igs in human breast milk.33,43 Besides IgA, there are four other types of Igs in breast milk: IgE, IgG, IgM and IgD.45 Breast milk secretory IgA helps train the immune system of newborns against enteric pathogens acquired through maternal exposure.33,43 Breast milk also contains certain bio- active substances capable of stimulating IgA secretion in infants.43 Secretory IgA can neutralise infectious agents and reduce the inflammatory effects of other antibodies.68 Some children with DM are both IgA- and IgG-deficient.69 Lactoferrin, an iron-binding glycoprotein, possesses several anti-infective properties that form part of the innate defense mechanism conferred by mature human breast milk.46 Lactoferrin has a high binding affinity for iron, thus limiting its availability to bacteria and other microorganisms.43 In the intestine, lactoferrin may bind to certain receptors, such as toll-like receptors (TLRs) and the cluster of differentiation (CD)14 gene, thereby blocking the attachment of pathogens to the intestinal epithelium.47 In the stomach, lactoferrin combines with pepsin to form lactoferrincin, an antimicrobial agent powerful enough to damage the cell membrane of Gram-negative bacteria.70,71 Lactoferrin also strengthens neonate immunity by inhibiting tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin (IL)-1β, as well as initiating the maturation of lymphocytes and assisting antioxidation processes.72 Adequate levels of lactoferrin have been reported to improve diabetic conditions, while their decline in obese individuals has been linked to insulin resistance.73,74 Other molecules present in breast milk include lysozyme, caseins, cytokines, epidermal growth factors (EGFs), leukocytes and nucleotides. Lysozyme is an antibacterial enzyme that works together with lacto- ferrin in the stomach to destroy Gram-negative bacteria.75 Lysozyme can also degrade bacteria independently by breaking β-glycoside chains in the bacterial cell wall.48 Caseins are a family of highly glycosylated proteins; they account for up to 40% of the proteins present in breast milk (mainly β-casein) and functionally boost newborn immunity.43 A minor subunit known as κ-casein mimics a receptor analogue, preventing the attachment of bacteria to the mucosal epithelium.76 Cytokines are signalling molecules that mediate, regulate and modulate immune responses, with one example being the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10.44,49 While many growth factors are present in breast milk, EGFs are of particular importance, as these factors aid in the healing and maturation of the intestinal mucosa, nervous system and endocrine system, among others.50 Breast milk, particularly colostrum, contains high concentrations of leukocytes, of which approximately 10% are lymphocytes, T-cells, macrophages, neutrophils and antibody-producing B-cells.51 These cells survive passage into the newborn intestines, where they phagocytise microbial pathogens and strengthen the infant’s immune response. Triglycerides are also an important component of breast milk. The newborn stomach digests triglycerides using lingual and gastric lipases, releasing free fatty acids and monoglycerides. These two products strengthen the immune system and—through their lytic activities—protect the newborn from various viruses, bacteria and some protozoa, specifically those of the Giardia family.52 Nucleotides are also present in human breast milk and enhance immune function in infants.53 Finally, apart from vitamin D, breast milk contains sufficient quantities of all vitamins essential for normal growth in children.54 enhanced thymus size and function During both the fetal and neonatal periods, the primary function of the thymus is to assist in the development and maturation of T-lymphocytes or T-cells.77 This specific type of white blood cell protects the body from microbial infections and other risks by either controlling immune reactions or directly attacking infected or cancerous cells.77,78 After puberty, the thymus reduces its function and slowly decreases in size until it is replaced by fat at about 75 years of age.77,79 Nevertheless, during its active phase, the thymus produces enough T-cells to protect the body from autoimmunity for life.77 Due to its role in maintaining a strong neonate defence mechanism, loss of thymus function may be implicated in the pathogenesis of several diseases. For instance, autoimmune-mediated DM begins with the failure of the thymus to develop a normal β-cell self-tolerance.80 Dysfunctional thymic activity along with expression of insulin-like growth factor 2 is also suspected in certain cases of insulin resistance.80 One animal study noted the development of autoimmune Tajudeen Yahaya and Ufuoma Shemishere Review | e9 diseases in mice whose thymuses were removed.81 While scientists are still skeptical about the role of thymus size in its performance, the fact that the organ is largest during childhood when an individual is most prone to immunological threats seems to indicate that increased thymus size is associated with better immunity.77 Several factors may influence thymus size and activity, potentially leading to the prevention of autoimmune diseases such as T1DM. Some studies show that breast milk may enlarge the thymus gland, either directly via certain components in breast milk or indirectly as a result of the effects of breast milk on infant gut microbiota.82,83 Breast milk contains CD4+ T-cells, which are passed into the thymus of the infant where they help train CD8+ T-cells to fight pathogens.55 Breast milk also contains maternal cytotoxic T-lymphocytes which pass into the thymus of infants, after which they find their way to the lymphatic tissues in the ileum where they prevent the growth of harmful bacteria.84 Microribonucleic acids (miRNAs) that regulate post-transcription immune cell activity are also present in breast milk.85 Notably, miRNA-155 plays a key role in regulating thymus Treg and T-helper-2 cell development in humans and animals.86,87 In mice, miRNA-449a regulates thymus medullary epithelial cell development.88 Certain hormones involved in thymus development are also present in breast milk. Among these are corticosteroids, which control thymus epithelial differentiation and the production of thymus corpuscles.89,90 In addition, IL-7 is also present in breast milk and regulates thymus size. Collinson et al. reported that the children of malnourished mothers have small thymuses, with small thymus size linked with low IL-7 levels in maternal breast milk.91 Conclusion Breast milk contains a wide variety of bioactive sub- stances which functionally protect the infant’s immune system from autoimmune disorders by increasing the population of beneficial bacteria in the gut, attacking pathogenic bacteria and pro-inflammatory molecules as well as increasing thymus size and performance. As such, inadequate breastfeeding may predispose an infant to autoimmune diseases, including T1DM. Nursing mothers and caregivers are therefore advised to follow optimal breastfeeding practices. For babies unable to be breastfed, perhaps due to maternal death or the risk of vertical disease transmission, the bioactive sub- stances mentioned in breast milk can be used to form- ulate infant feeding formula for such babies. References 1. Kalathi D, James S, Zaidi R. Diagnosis and management of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Clin Pharm 2018; 10:1. https://doi.org/10.1 211/CP.2018.20205044. 2. Thomas NJ, Jones SE, Weedon MN, Weedon MN, Shields BM, Oram RA, et al. Frequency and phenotype of type 1 diabetes in the first six decades of life: A cross-sectional, genetically stratified survival analysis from UK Biobank. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6:122–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587 (17)30362-5. 3. Soltesz G, Patterson CC, Dahlquist G; EURODIAB Study Group. Worldwide childhood type 1 diabetes incidence: What can we learn from epidemiology? Pediatr Diabetes 2007; 8:6–14. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00280.x. 4. Redondo MJ, Libman I, Cheng P, Kollman C, Tosur M, Gal RL, et al. Racial/ethnic minority youth with recent-onset type 1 diabetes have poor prognostic factors. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:1017–24. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2335. 5. Burrack AL, Martinov T, Fife BT. T cell-mediated beta cell destruction: Autoimmunity and alloimmunity in the context of type 1 diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2017; 8:343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00343. 6. Kahanovitz L, Sluss PM, Russell SJ. Type 1 diabetes: A clinical perspective. Point Care 2017; 16:37–40. https://doi.org/10.109 7/POC.0000000000000125. 7. Internation Diabetes Federation. About diabetes: Diabetes complications. From: www.idf.org/aboutdiabetes/complicatio ns.html Accessed: Oct 2019. 8. Grose DN, O’Brien CL, Bongetti EK, Corcoran HM, Loh MM, Ward GM, et al. Living with type 1 diabetes and an insulin pump: A qualitative insight. Pract Diabetes Int 2018; 35:2187. https://doi.org/10.1002/pdi.2187. 9. Tao B, Pietropaolo M, Atkinson M, Schatz D, Taylor D. Estim- ating the cost of type 1 diabetes in the U.S.: A propensity score matching method. PLoS One 2010; 5:e11501. https://doi.org/10.1 371/journal.pone.0011501. 10. Patterson CC, Harjutsalo V, Rosenbauer J, Nen A, Cinek O, Skrivarhaug T, et al. Trends and cyclical variation in the inc- idence of childhood type 1 diabetes in 26 European centres in the 25 year period 1989-2013: A multicentre prospective registration study. Diabetologia 2019; 62:408–17. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00125-018-4763-3. 11. Harjutsalo V, Sjöberg L, Tuomilehto J. Time trends in the incid- ence of type 1 diabetes in Finnish children: A cohort study. Lancet 2008; 371:1777–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736 (08)60765-5. 12. Gale EA. The rise of childhood type 1 diabetes in the 20th century. Diabetes 2002; 51:3353–61. https://doi.org/10.2337/ diabetes.51.12.3353. 13. Yan J, Liu L, Zhu Y, Huang G, Wang PP. The association between breastfeeding and childhood obesity: A meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2014; 14:1267. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-245 8-14-1267. 14. Lund-Blix NA, Dydensborg Sander S, Størdal K, Nybo Andersen AM, Rønningen KS, Joner G, et al. Infant feeding and risk of type 1 diabetes in two large Scandinavian birth cohorts. Diabetes Care 2017; 40:920–7. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0016. 15. Cardwell CR, Stene LC, Ludvigsson J, Rosenbauer J, Cinek O, Svensson J, et al. Breast-feeding and childhood-onset type 1 diab- etes: A pooled analysis of individual participant data from 43 observ- ational studies. Diabetes Care 2012; 35:2215–25. https://doi.org/ 10.2337/dc12-0438. 16. Dawodu A, Tsang RC. Maternal vitamin D status: Effect on milk vitamin D content and vitamin D status of breastfeeding infants. Adv Nutr 2012; 3:353–61. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.1 11.000950. https://doi.org/10.1211/CP.2018.20205044 https://doi.org/10.1211/CP.2018.20205044 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587%2817%2930362-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587%2817%2930362-5 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00280.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00280.x https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2335 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00343 https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000125 https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000125 https://doi.org/10.1002/pdi.2187 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011501 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011501 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4763-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4763-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2808%2960765-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2808%2960765-5 https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.51.12.3353 https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.51.12.3353 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1267 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1267 https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0016 https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0438 https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0438 https://doi.org/10.3945/an.111.000950 https://doi.org/10.3945/an.111.000950 Association between Bioactive Molecules in Breast Milk and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus e10 | SQU Medical Journal, February 2020, Volume 20, Issue 1 17. Silva AL, Ribeiro KD, Melo LR, Bezerra DF, de Queiroz JL, Lima MS, et al. Vitamin E in human milk and its relation to the nutritional requirement of the term newborn. Rev Paul Pediatr 2017; 35:158–64. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/;2 017;35;2;00015. 18. Al-Agha AE, Ahmad IA. Association among vitamin D deficiency, type 1 diabetes mellitus and glycemic control. J Diabetes Metab 2015; 6:1000594. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6156.1000594. 19. Komisarenko YI, Bobryk MI. Vitamin D deficiency and immune disorders in combined endocrine pathology. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2018; 9:600. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00600. 20. Giulietti A, Gysemans C, Stoffels K, van Etten E, Decallonne B, Overbergh L, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in early life accelerates type 1 diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice. Diabetologia 2004; 47:451–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-004-1329-3. 21. Hyppönen E, Läärä E, Reunanen A, Järvelin MR, Virtanen SM. Intake of vitamin D and risk of type 1 diabetes: A birth-cohort study. Lancet 2001; 358:1500–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S014 0-6736(01)06580-1. 22. Baburao Jain A, Anand Jain V. Vitamin E, its beneficial role in diabetes mellitus (DM) and its complications. J Clin Diagn Res 2012; 6:1624–8. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2012/4791.2625. 23. Virtanen SM, Läärä E, Hyppönen E, Reijonen H, Räsänen L, Aro A, et al. Cow’s milk consumption, HLA-DQB1 genotype, and type 1 diabetes: A nested case-control study of siblings of children with diabetes - Childhood diabetes in Finland study group. Diabetes 2000; 49:912–17. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabe tes.49.6.912. 24. Chia JS, McRae JL, Enjapoori AK, Lefèvre CM, Kukuljan S, Dwyer MK. Dietary cows’ milk protein A1 beta-casein incr- eases the incidence of T1D in NOD mice. Nutrients 2018; 10:1291. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10091291. 25. Scott FW, Rowsell P, Wang GS, Burghardt K, Kolb H, Flohé S. Oral exposure to diabetes-promoting food or immunomodul- ators in neonates alters gut cytokines and diabetes. Diabetes 2002; 51:73–8. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.51.1.73. 26. Moghadam ZA, Mirlohi M, Pourzamani H, Malekpour A, Amininoor Z, Merasi MR. Exposure assessment of bisphenol A intake from polymeric baby bottles in formula-fed infants aged less than one year. Toxicol Rep 2015; 2:1273–80. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.09.002. 27. Manukyana L, Dunder L, Lind PM, Bergsten P, Lejonklou MH. Developmental exposure to a very low dose of bisphenol A induces persistent islet insulin hypersecretion in Fischer 344 rat offspring. Environ Res 2019; 172:127–36. https://doi.org/10.1 016/j.envres.2019.02.009. 28. Frederiksen B, Kroehl M, Lamb MM, Seifert J, Barriga K, Elisenbarth GS, et al. Infant exposures and development of type 1 diabetes mellitus: The Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY). JAMA Pediatr 2013; 167:808–15. https://doi. org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.317. 29. Norris JM, Barriga K, Klingensmith G, Hoffman M, Eisenbarth GS, Erlich HA, et al. Timing of initial cereal exposure in infancy and risk of islet autoimmunity. JAMA 2003; 290:1713–20. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.13.1713. 30. Mattsson K, Jönsson I, Malmqvist E, Larsson HE, Rylander L. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and offspring type 1 diab- etes mellitus risk: Accounting for HLA haplotype. Eur J Epid- emiol 2015; 30:231–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9985-1. 31. Rewers M, Ludvigsson J. Environmental risk factors for type 1 diabetes. Lancet 2016; 387:2340–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(16)30507-4. 32. Chen H, Iglesias MA, Caruso V, Morris MJ. Maternal cigarette smoke exposure contributes to glucose intolerance and decr- eased brain insulin action in mice offspring independent of mat- ernal diet. PLoS One 2011; 6:e27260. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0027260. 33. Cacho NT, Lawrence RM. Innate immunity and breast milk. Front Immunol 2017; 8:584. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2 017.00584. 34. Field CJ. The immunological components of human milk and their effect on immune development in infants. J Nutr 2005; 135:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.1.1. 35. Gülden E, Wong FS, Wen L. The gut microbiota and type 1 diabetes. Clin Immunol 2015; 159:143–53. https://doi.org/10.1 016/j.clim.2015.05.013. 36. Fassatoui M, Lopez-Siles M, Díaz-Rizzolo DA, Jmel H, Naouali C, Abdessalem G, et al. Gut microbiota imbalances in Tunisian participants with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biosci Rep 2019; 39:BSR20182348. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20182348. 37. Candon S, Perez-Arroyo A, Marquet C, Valette F, Foray AP, Pelletier B, et al. Antibiotics in early life alter the gut microbiome and increase disease incidence in a spontaneous mouse model of autoimmune insulin-dependent diabetes. PLoS One 2015; 10:e125448. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125448. 38. Pannaraj PS, Li F, Cerini C, Bender JM, Yang S, Rollie A, et al. Association between breast milk bacterial communities and establishment and development of the infant gut microbiome. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171:647–54. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamape diatrics.2017.0378. 39. Shehadeh N, Shamir R, Berant M, Etzioni A. Insulin in human milk and the prevention of type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2002; 2:175–7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-5448.20 01.20406.x. 40. Lemas DJ, Young BE, Baker PR 2nd, Tomczik AC, Soderberg TK, Hernandez TL, et al. Alterations in human milk leptin and insulin are associated with early changes in the infant intestinal microbiome. Am J Clin Nutr 2016; 103:1291–300. https://doi. org/10.3945/ajcn.115.126375. 41. Eggesbø M, Moen B, Peddada S, Baird D, Rugtveit J, Midtvedt T, et al. Development of gut microbiota in infants not exposed to medical interventions. APMIS 2011; 119:17–35. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02688.x. 42. Triantis V, Bode L, van Neerven RJ. Immunological effects of human milk oligosaccharides. Front Pediatr 2018; 6:190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00190. 43. Mehta R, Petrova A. Biologically active breast milk proteins in association with very preterm delivery and stage of lactation. J Perinatol 2011; 31:58–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.68. 44. Laucirica DR, Triantis V, Schoemaker R, Estes MK, Ramani S. Milk oligosaccharides inhibit human rotavirus infectivity in MA104 cells. J Nutr 2017; 147:1709–14. https://doi.org/10.3 945/jn.116.246090. 45. Mix E, Goertsches R, Zett UK. Immunoglobulins: Basic consid- erations. J Neurol 2006; 253:V9–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00415-006-5002-2. 46. Adamkin DH. Mother’s milk, feeding strategies, and lactoferrin to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2012; 36:25S–9S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607111420158. 47. Sherman MP. Lactoferrin and necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin Perinatol 2013; 40:79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2012.12.006. 48. Lönnerdal B. Bioactive proteins in breast milk. J Paediatr Child Health 2013; 49:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12104. 49. Dawod B, Marshall SJ. Cytokines and soluble receptors in breast milk as enhancers of oral tolerance development. Front Immunol 2019; 10:16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00016. 50. Khailova L, Dvorak K, Arganbright KM, Williams CS, Halpern MD, Dvorak B. Changes in hepatic cell junctions structure during experimental necrotizing enterocolitis: Effect of EGF treatment. Pediatr Res 2009; 66:140–4. https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013 e3181aa3198. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/%3B2017%3B35%3B2%3B00015 https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/%3B2017%3B35%3B2%3B00015 https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6156.1000594 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00600 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-004-1329-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2801%2906580-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2801%2906580-1 https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2012/4791.2625 https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.49.6.912 https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.49.6.912 https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10091291 https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.51.1.73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.09.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.09.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.02.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.02.009 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.317 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.317 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.13.1713 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9985-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2816%2930507-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2816%2930507-4 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027260 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027260 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00584 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00584 https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.1.1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2015.05.013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2015.05.013 https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20182348 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125448 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0378 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0378 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-5448.2001.20406.x https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-5448.2001.20406.x https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.126375 https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.126375 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02688.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02688.x https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00190 https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.68 https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.246090 https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.246090 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-5002-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-5002-2 https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607111420158 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2012.12.006 https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12104 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00016 https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181aa3198 https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181aa3198 Tajudeen Yahaya and Ufuoma Shemishere Review | e11 51. Kimpimäki T, Erkkola M, Korhonen S, Kupila A, Virtanen SM, Ilonen J, et al. Short-term exclusive breastfeeding predisposes young children with increased genetic risk of type 1 diabetes to progressive beta-cell autoimmunity. Diabetologia 2001; 44:63–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001250051581. 52. Newburg DS, Walker WA. Protection of the neonate by the innate immune system of developing gut and of human milk. Pediatr Res 2007; 61:2–8. https://doi.org/10.1203/01.pdr.00002 50274.68571.18. 53. Pickering LK, Granoff DM, Erickson JR, Masor ML, Cordle CT, Schaller JP, et al. Modulation of the immune system by human milk and infant formula containing nucleotides. Pediatrics 1998; 101:242–9. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.101.2.242. 54. við Streym S, Højskov CS, Møller UK, Heickendorff L, Vestergaard P, Mosekilde L, Rejnmark L. Vitamin D content in human breast milk: A 9-mo follow-up study. Am J Clin Nutr 2016; 103:107–14. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.115105. 55. Ghosh MK, Nguyen V, Muller HK, Walker AM. Maternal milk T cells drive development of transgenerational Th1 immunity in offspring thymus. J Immunol 2016; 197:2290–6. https://doi. org/10.4049/jimmunol.1502483. 56. Giongo A, Gano KA, Crabb DB, Mukherjee N, Novelo LL, Casella G, et al. Toward defining the autoimmune microbiome for type 1 diabetes. ISME J 2011; 5:82–91. https://doi.org/10.1 038/ismej.2010.92. 57. Cani PD, Possemiers S, Van de Wiele T, Guiot Y, Everard A, Rottier O, et al. Changes in gut microbiota control inflammation in obese mice through a mechanism involving GLP-2-driven improvement of gut permeability. Gut 2009; 58:1091–103. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2008.165886. 58. Lee AS, Gibson DL, Zhang Y, Sham HP, Vallance BA, Dutz JP. Gut barrier disruption by an enteric bacterial pathogen accel- erates insulitis in NOD mice. Diabetologia 2010; 53:741–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1626-y. 59. Maffeis C, Martina A, Corradi M, Quarella S, Nori N, Torriani S, et al. Association between intestinal permeability and faecal microbiota composition in Italian children with beta cell auto- immunity at risk for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2016; 32:700–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2790. 60. Myers MA, Hettiarachchi KD, Ludeman JP, Wilson AJ, Wilson CR, Zimmet PZ. Dietary microbial toxins and type 1 diabetes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003; 1005:418–22. https://doi.org/10.1196/ann als.1288.071. 61. Soto A, Martín V, Jiménez E, Mader I, Rodríguez JM, Fernández L. Lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in human breast milk: Influence of antibiotherapy and other host and clinical factors. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014; 59:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/ MPG.0000000000000347. 62. Angelakis E, Raoult D. The increase of species in the gut flora of newborn broiler chicks and ducks is associated with weight gain. PLoS One 2010; 5:e10463. https://doi.org/10.1371/journ al.pone.0010463. 63. Jara S, Sánchez M, Vera R, Cofré J, Castro E. The inhibitory activity of Lactobacillus spp. isolated from breast milk on gastro- intestinal pathogenic bacteria of nosocomial origin. Anaerobe 2011; 17:474–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.07.008. 64. Lyons A, O’Mahony D, O’Brien F, MacSharry J, Sheil B, Ceddia M, et al. Bacterial strain-specific induction of Foxp3+ T regulatory cells is protective in murine allergy models. Clin Exp Allergy 2010; 40:811–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03437.x. 65. Xiao L, Van’t Land B, Engen PA, Naqib A, Green SJ, Nato A, et al. Human milk oligosaccharides protect against the devel- opment of autoimmune diabetes in NOD-mice. Sci Rep 2018; 8:3829. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22052-y. 66. Xiao L, Van’t LB, van de Worp WR, Stahl B, Folkerts G, Garssen J. Early-life nutritional factors and mucosal immunity in the devel- opment of autoimmune diabetes. Front Immunol 2017; 8:1219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01219. 67. Mariño E, Richards JL, McLeod KH, Stanley D, Yap YA, Knight J, et al. Gut microbial metabolites limit the frequency of autoimmune T cells and protect against type 1 diabetes. Nat Immunol 2017; 18:552–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3713. 68. Knip M, Veijola R, Virtanen S, Hyöty H, Vaarala O, Akerblom HK. Environmental triggers and determinants of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2005; 54:S125–36. https://doi.org/10.2337/ diabetes.54.suppl_2.s125. 69. Ali BA, Sayed MA, Moness HM, Mahmoud MM. Assessment of serum levels of immunoglobulin A and immunoglobulin G in children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). Curr Pediatr Res 2017; 21:627–31. 70. Yamauchi K, Tomita M, Giehl TJ, Ellison RT 3rd. Antibacterial activity of lactoferrin and a pepsin-derived lactoferrin peptide fragment. Infect Immun 1993; 61:719–28. 71. Gifford JL, Hunter HN, Vogel HJ. Lactoferricin: A lactoferrin- derived peptide with antimicrobial, antiviral, antitumor and immunological properties. Cell Mol Life Sci 2005; 62:2588–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-005-5373-z. 72. Legrand D. Overview of lactoferrin as a natural immune modulator. J Pediatr 2016; 173:S10–15. https://doi.org/10.10 16/j.jpeds.2016.02.071. 73. Mohamed WA, Schaalan MF. Antidiabetic efficacy of lacto- ferrin in type 2 diabetic pediatrics: Controlling impact on PPAR-γ, SIRT-1, and TLR4 downstream signaling pathway. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2018; 10:89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-018-0390-x. 74. Moreno-Navarrete JM, Ortega F, Moreno M, Serrano M, Ricart W, Fernández-Real JM. Lactoferrin gene knockdown leads to sim- ilar effects to iron chelation in human adipocytes. J Cell Mol Med 2014; 18:391–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12234. 75. Lu D, Liu S, Ding F, Wang H, Li J, Li L, et al. Large-scale prod- uction of functional human lysozyme from marker-free trans- genic cloned cows. Sci Rep 2016; 6:22947. https://doi.org/10.103 8/srep22947. 76. Lönnerdal B. Bioactive proteins in human milk: Mechanisms of action. J Pediatr 2010; 156:S26–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jpeds.2009.11.017. 77. Sargis RM. An overview of the thymus: The gland that protects you long after it’s gone. From: www.endocrineweb.com/endo- crinology/overview-thymus Accessed: Oct 2019. 78. World Health Organization. Training for the health sector: Immune diseases and children. From: www.who.int/ceh/capa city/immune_diseases.pdf?ua=1 Accessed: Oct 2019. 79. Dietert RR, Piepenbrink MS. Perinatal immunotoxicity: Why adult exposure assessment fails to predict risk. Environ Health Perspect 2006; 114:477–83. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8566. 80. Dardenne O, Geenen V. Thymus dysfunction in the development of type 1 diabetes and endocrine autoimmune diseases. Eur Endocrinol 2009; 5:24–6. https://doi.org/10.17925/EE.2009.05.00.24. 81. Sakaguchi S. Naturally arising CD4+ regulatory t cells for immun- ologic self-tolerance and negative control of immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol 2004; 22:531–62. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.immunol.21.120601.141122. 82. Ngom PT, Collinson AC, Pido-Lopez J, Henson SM, Prentice AM, Aspinall R. Improved thymic function in exclusively breastfed infants is associated with higher interleukin 7 concentrations in their mothers’ breast milk. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80:722–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/80.3.722. 83. Pannaraj PS, Li F, Cerini C, Bender JM, Yang S, Rollie A, et al. Association between breast milk bacterial communities and establishment and development of the infant gut microbiome. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171:647–54. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamape diatrics.2017.0378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001250051581 https://doi.org/10.1203/01.pdr.0000250274.68571.18 https://doi.org/10.1203/01.pdr.0000250274.68571.18 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.101.2.242 https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.115105 https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1502483 https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1502483 https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.92 https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.92 https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2008.165886 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1626-y https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2790 https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1288.071 https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1288.071 https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000347 https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000347 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010463 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010463 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.07.008 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03437.x https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22052-y https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01219 https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3713 https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.54.suppl_2.s125 https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.54.suppl_2.s125 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-005-5373-z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.071 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.071 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-018-0390-x https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12234 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22947 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22947 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.11.017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.11.017 https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8566 https://doi.org/10.17925/EE.2009.05.00.24 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141122 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141122 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/80.3.722 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0378 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0378 Association between Bioactive Molecules in Breast Milk and Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus e12 | SQU Medical Journal, February 2020, Volume 20, Issue 1 84. Cabinian A, Sinsimer D, Tang M, Zumba O, Mehta H, Toma A, et al. Transfer of maternal immune cells by breastfeeding: Maternal cytotoxic T lymphocytes present in breast milk localize in the Peyer’s patches of the nursed infant. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0156762. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156762. 85. Melnik BC, John SM, Schmitz G. Milk: An exosomal microRNA transmitter promoting thymic regulatory T cell maturation preventing the development of atopy? J Transl Med 2014; 12:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-12-43. 86. Kohlhaas S, Garden OA, Scudamore C, Turner M, Okkenhaug K, Vigorito E. Cutting edge: The Foxp3 target miR-155 contributes to the development of regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2009; 182:2578–82. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0803162. 87. Alsaweed M, Hartmann PE, Geddes DT, Kakulas F. MicroRNAs in breastmilk and the lactating breast: Potential immunoprotec- tors and developmental regulators for the infant and the mother. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015; 12:13981–4020. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121113981. 88. Chen P, Zhang H, Sun X, Hu Y, Jiang W, Liu Z, et al. MicroRNA- 449a modulates medullary thymic epithelial cell differentiation. Sci Rep 2017; 7:15915. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16162-2. 89. Hale LP, Markert ML. Corticosteroids regulate epithelial cell differentiation and Hassall body formation in the human thymus. J Immunol 2004; 172:617–24. https://doi.org/10.4049/ jimmunol.172.1.617. 90. Pundir S, Wall CR, Mitchell CJ, Thorstensen EB, Lai CT, et al. Variation of human milk glucocorticoids over 24 hour period. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2017; 22:85–92. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10911-017-9375-x. 91. Collinson AC, Moore SE, Cole TJ, Prentice AM. Birth season and environmental influences on patterns of thymic growth in rural Gambian infants. Acta Paediatr 2003; 92:1014–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb02568.x. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156762 https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-12-43 https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0803162 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121113981 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121113981 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16162-2 https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.172.1.617 https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.172.1.617 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-017-9375-x https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-017-9375-x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb02568.x