1Faculty of Pharmacy, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon; 2INSPECT-LB Institut National de Santé Publique, Épidémiologie Clinique et Toxicologie- Liban, Beirut, Lebanon; 3School of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Beirut, Lebanon; 4Department of Pharmacy, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; 5Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik (USEK), Jounieh, Lebanon; 6Research Department,Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Jal Eddib, Lebanon *Corresponding Author’s e-mail: souheilhallit@hotmail.com Knowledge of Antibiotics Use among Lebanese Adults A study on the influence of sociodemographic characteristics Anna-Maria Henaine,1 Nathalie Lahoud,1,2 Rachel Abdo,1,2 Ruba Shdeed,3 Jihan Safwan,3 Marwan Akel,2.3 Iqbal Fahs,3 Rony Zeenny,2,4 Hala Sacre,2 *Souheil Hallit,2,5,6 Pascale Salameh1,2 Sultan Qaboos University Med J, August 2021, Vol. 20, Iss. 3, pp. 442–449, Epub. 29 Aug 21 Submitted 27 Apr 20 Revisions Req. 1 Jul & 5 Oct 20; Revisions Recd. 26 Aug & 21 Oct 20 Accepted 10 Nov 20 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.4.2021.006 CLINICAL & BASIC RESEARCH abstract: Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the association between sociodemographic characteristics and antibiotic knowledge in the Lebanese population. Methods: A questionnaire-based survey was conducted in community pharmacies across all Lebanese governorates. Data were collected by well-trained pharmacists through face-to-face interviews from January until March 2017. The survey tool was adapted from a questionnaire developed by the World Health Organization. A knowledge index was computed for comparative purposes and a linear regression model was performed to assess factors associated with knowledge. Results: A total of 623 participants were included in the analysis of this study (response rate: 90.6%). The mean antibiotic knowledge index was 12.5 ± 3.2 (minimum score: 3 and maximum score: 19). Higher knowledge score was inversely correlated with age (r = −0.118; P = 0.003), but no gender differences were reported (females: 12.6 versus males: 12.3; P = 0.191). However, statistically significant differences were found for residence type (P = 0.002), educational level (P <0.001) and total household income categories (P <0.001). The linear regression model showed a significant association between residence type and knowledge (urban versus rural: β = 0.793; P = 0.011). Furthermore, a higher knowledge index was significantly associated with a higher income combined with higher education (additive scale/β = 1.590; P = 0.025). Finally, interactions between income and age, gender and residence type were not significant. Conclusion: Individuals residing in urban areas, with combined high income and educational levels, are more knowledgeable about antibiotics use and resistance compared to other groups. More studies are needed to assess the interaction of sociodemographic interactions with health literacy. Keywords: Knowledge; Socioeconomic Factors; Attitude to Health; Educational Achievements; Lebanon. Advances in Knowledge - Despite several information campaigns in Lebanon targeting the appropriate use of antibiotics, knowledge about the correct use of antibiotics is still mediocre, resulting in reflected high levels of bacterial resistance and treatment failures. - Particularly vulnerable groups are mainly rural populations and those with low education and income levels. On its own, better education was not significantly associated with antibiotic awareness, but when coupled with a higher household income, there was a significant association. Application to Patient Care - Awareness campaigns on antibiotics misuse and the risk of bacterial resistance should target specific groups in the country, using appropriate tools. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a pressing public health problem that continues to spread globally at an alarming rate, resulting in antibiotic-resistant infections that cause high morbidity and mortality.1,2 It is associated with social and economic consequences and increased healthcare expenditure.1–5 Several factors are involved in the emergence of antibiotic resistance such as inadequate patients’ expectations, lack of education among patients and healthcare providers, pharmaceutical marketing, dispensing of antibiotics without prescription in pharmacies, improper dosage, overuse of broad- spectrum antibiotics, non-completion of the antibiotic course, prescribing antibiotics for viral infections and the high prevalence of self-medication.4–8 Although antibiotics are prescription-only medicines, it is essential to empower the general population with adequate knowledge regarding the antibiotics spectrum of action, indication, administration and malpractice that may induce resistance to these medications.9 Indeed, individuals tend to self-administer antibiotic ‘leftovers’, share antibiotics or even purchase them abroad or online.9 A systematic review found that the mean compliance to the antibiotic regimen was 62.2% and 28.6% reporting that they use leftover antibiotics.10 Moreover, a study revealed that whenever patients or their caregivers expected an antibiotic prescription, the likelihood that a physician will prescribe one was higher.11 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ Anna-Maria Henaine, Nathalie Lahoud, Rachel Abdo, Ruba Shdeed, Jihan Safwan, Marwan Akel, Iqbal Fahs, Rony Zeenny, Hala Sacre, Souheil Hallit and Pascale Salameh Clinical and Basic Research | 443 Reducing antibiotic misuse and overuse prevents further increases in antibiotic resistance.12,13 It is essential to have a solid understanding of knowledge, attitudes and practices towards antibiotics among populations by age, gender, education, economic status and type of residence, to improve the rational use of antibiotics and reduce the resistance to antibiotics. A large Swedish study on knowledge of and attitudes towards antibiotics showed that the male gender, a higher level of education and younger age were associated with more knowledge about antibiotics, with males exhibiting less restrictive behaviour towards antibiotic use and effects; respondents with high levels of knowledge were more likely to have appropriate restrictive attitudes.14 Moreover, several regional studies found high rates of antibiotic misuse, with a lack of knowledge related to sociodemographic factors in particular.15–17 In Syria, lack of knowledge was associated with socioeconomic disparities, with only 10% of participants knowing that antibiotic misuse leads to antibiotic resistance and 15% knowing that it is harmful.16 A Jordanian study reported that 39.5% of self-medication with antibiotics was significantly correlated with social and economic factors, i.e. age, income and education.4 Improved awareness of antibiotics among the general population can help individuals reach appropriate use, improved adherence to treatment and outcomes and consequently less resistance. People’s attitudes, beliefs and visions concerning antibiotics can affect their practices. Public knowledge is considered a requirement for adequate use of antibiotics.18 The over-prescription of antibiotics is associated with higher odds of side effects and higher medicalisation of self-limiting situations, leading to more frequent re-attendance to hospitals. A common problem in primary care resides in the fact that viruses are responsible for the majority of infections. General practitioners prescribe approximately 90% of all antibiotic prescriptions, with respiratory tract infections being the leading cause of those pres- criptions.19 Interventions should include several measures such as enforcing laws that forbid the sale of antibiotics without a valid prescription (over-the-counter), applying antimicrobial stewardship programmes, involving clinicians in audits, using valid rapid point-of-care tests, promoting policies that delay the prescription of antibiotics, improving the healthcare professional- patient communication through information brochures and performing more realistic studies in primary care that may be of importance to clinicians.3,13 In Lebanon, few studies have addressed the influence of sociodemographic factors on the knowl- edge and attitudes of the general population towards antibiotic use and resistance. A cross-sectional study on a random convenience sample of 500 participants in Lebanon showed that knowledge and attitudes of participants were significantly associated with income, educational level and place of residence.20 Another study conducted among the general population in community pharmacies revealed that women had better knowledge of antibiotic use and that a sufficient level of knowledge was higher among participants aged 25–50 years compared to older adults.21 Moreover, in a research conducted in two major cities of Lebanon (Beirut and Tripoli), education was the only factor to show a significant association with self-medication.22 As per the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the 2018 Guidelines of the Lebanese Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, improved knowledge and adequate antibiotic use among people would help decrease the emergence of antimicrobial resistance and curtail other adverse outcomes.23,24 Hence, the present study aimed to assess the influence of socioeconomic and demographic factors on public awareness of antibiotic use and resistance in Lebanon. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out via a face- to-face questionnaire distributed to participants in community pharmacies across all the Lebanese governorates over a period of three months from January to March 2017. Lebanese people aged 18 years and above, visiting community pharmacies and those who consented to participate in the study in the presence of the interviewer were included. The Lebanese Order of Pharmacists (OPL) provided the list of pharmacies from which a random sample of 500 pharmacies, out of a total of 3,500, was selected (using Microsoft Excel’s random function) to ensure geographic representativeness. The first two eligible people were then systematically recruited from each pharmacy. The G*Power software (Heinrich-Heine-Univer- sität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany) calculated a minimum sample of 351 participants for a 0.05 increase in R2, 80% study power, 95% confidence interval (CI) and 13 predictors. The sample size was doubled for possible stratified analysis (multivariable analysis on subgroups) and the number of 700 participants was set as a reasonable number to cover all studied sociodemographic factors and interactions between income and other variables (total of 13 predictors). Thus, 500 community pharmacies were selected and visited to recruit two participants from each and allow for potential refusal and missing values within the questionnaire. Knowledge of Antibiotics Use among Lebanese Adults A study on the influence of sociodemographic characteristics 444 | SQU Medical Journal, August 2021, Volume 21, Issue 3 Data were collected by five well-trained OPL registered pharmacists (one pharmacist for each Lebanese governorate) through face-to-face interviews. The survey tool was adapted from the ‘Antibiotic Resistance Multi-country Public Awareness Survey’ conducted by the WHO in 2015 and developed by a specialised research agency, Good Business, in collaboration with the WHO.25 It was then translated into Arabic and back-translated into English by two different native speakers. The questionnaire targeted public knowledge on antibiotic use and resistance with questions related to demographic and socioeconomic factors.25 Questions related to knowledge were used to compute a knowledge index as follows: correct answers were coded as 1 and incorrect and ‘don’t know’ answers were coded as 0. Overall, 20 knowledge questions/statements were selected for this purpose from a previous study.22 The Kuder Richardson 20 (KR20), a specific Cronbach’s alpha for dichotomous tools, was used to measure how closely related a set of items are as a group; the reliability of the index was considered acceptable (0.65). A bivariate analysis was first conducted between the knowledge index (dependent variable) and sociodemographic variables (age, gender, residence type, total household income and education level). Residence type was categorised into rural, suburban and urban areas, income into low (≤1.500.000 Lebanese pound [LBP]) and high (>1.500.000 LBP) and education into low (12th grade or less), medium (high school graduate/some college credit/technical/ vocational training or associate degree) and high levels (bachelor’s degree/master’s/professional degree/ doctorate). One-way analysis of variance with further Bonferroni post hoc analyses was used to test statistical differences between multiple groups and an independent t-test was used to compare two groups. Pearson correlation coefficients were reported for the relationship between age and knowledge index, after checking for statistical assumptions (level of measurement, outliers, normality, linearity and homoscedasticity).26 Means and 95% CI were reported. The same analysis was repeated after stratification over income categories to detect its modifying effects; it tested the effect of income combined with age, gender, residence type and education level on antibiotic knowledge, based on previous studies conducted in Lebanon, showing the independent effects of sociodemographic factors.22,27,28 Finally, for multivariable analysis, a multiple linear regression was performed to assess factors related to the knowledge index while testing for interactions between income and other socioeconomic factors. Unstandardised predicted values were plotted against significant interaction terms to further illustrate results. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests. All statistics were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), Version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). The ethics committee of the Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross approved the study protocol (approval code: HPC-007-2020). Participants gave their oral consent to take part in the study after the study’s objectives were explained. Results Out of 1,000 targeted participants, 906 agreed to participate (response rate: 90.6%); however, 623 were included in the analysis after excluding participants whose data were incomplete for the variables of the knowledge index. Thus, an antibiotic knowledge index Table 1: Characteristics of study participants compared to antibiotic knowledge index (N = 623) Characteristic N* Mean knowledge index (95% CI) P value Age 616 r = −0.118 0.003 Gender 0.191 Female 319 12.6 (12.2–13.0) Male 301 12.3 (11.9–12.7) Residence type 0.002 Urban 333 12.8 (12.5–13.1) Suburban 138 12.5 (11.9–13.1) Rural 148 11.7 (11.2–12.2) Education level <0.001 Low 154 11.2 (10.7–11.7) Medium 185 11.9 (11.5–12.3) High 280 13.5 (13.2–13.8) Total household income in LBP <0.001 ≤1.500.000 (Low) 252 11.8 (11.4–12.2) >1.500.000 (High) 339 13.0 (12.7–13.3) CI = confidence interval; LBP = Lebanese pound. *Total number without missing data. Anna-Maria Henaine, Nathalie Lahoud, Rachel Abdo, Ruba Shdeed, Jihan Safwan, Marwan Akel, Iqbal Fahs, Rony Zeenny, Hala Sacre, Souheil Hallit and Pascale Salameh Clinical and Basic Research | 445 was computed for 623 participants, with a minimum score of 3 and a maximum score of 19 (mean score: 12.5 ± 3.2). A negative correlation was found between the knowledge index and age (r = −0.118; P = 0.003), but no gender differences were reported (females: 12.6 versus males: 12.3; P = 0.191). However, differences were statistically significant for residence type (P = 0.002), education level (P <0.001) and total household income categories (P <0.001). Indeed, residents in urban areas had a higher mean score compared to those in rural areas (12.8 versus 11.7; P = 0.002 after Bonferroni adjustment) and higher education and income levels were significantly associated with a higher knowledge index (P <0.001 each after Bonferroni adjustment) [Table 1]. A stratification over the total household income categories (low and high) showed a statistically significant difference in knowledge in the low-income category between residence types (rural: 11.1 versus suburban: 12.4; P = 0.026). In the high-income category, significant knowledge difference existed for gender (males: 12.6 versus females: 13.4; P = 0.010), age (r = −0.198) and education levels (high: 13.8 versus medium: 11.8 or low: 11.2; P <0.001 after Bonferroni adjustment) [Table 2]. A linear regression model demonstrated a significant association between residence type and knowledge index (urban versus rural: β = 0.793; P = 0.011). Regarding the studied interactions, a significantly higher knowledge index was found among individuals with combined higher income and higher education versus other categories (additive scale/β = 1.590; P = 0.025). Finally, interactions between income and age, gender and residence type were not significant and thus removed from the model for better goodness of fit. In contrast, the interaction term between higher education and income had the highest standardised β, showing the highest effect on knowledge compared with other factors [Table 3]. Unstandardised predicted values of the knowledge index plotted against education levels for income categories illustrate the interaction between income and education [Figure 1]. Discussion To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first population-based survey conducted in Lebanon to evaluate the association between sociodemographic characteristics and antibiotic awareness with a particular focus on potential interactions between socioeconomic factors. This study carried out in community pharmacies distributed over rural, urban and suburban areas of Lebanon collected data on Table 2: Stratification by total household income categories and mean knowledge index (N = 623) Characteristic Low income High income N* Mean knowledge index (95% CI) P value N* Mean knowledge index (95% CI) P value Age 252 r = 0.003 0.959 339 r = −0.198 <0.001 Gender Female 142 11.9 (11.4–12.4) 0.651 160 13.4 (12.9–13.9) 0.010 Male 109 11.7 (11.1–12.3) 179 12.6 (12.1–13.1) Residence type Urban 109 12.1 (11.5–12.7) 0.026 199 13.2 (12.8–13.6) 0.371Suburban 50 12.4 (11.4–13.4) 85 12.7 (11.9–13.5) Rural 92 11.1 (10.4–11.8) 54 12.7 (11.9–13.5) Education level Low 100 11.3 (10.7–11.9) 0.110 42 11.2 (10.2–12.2) <0.001Medium 89 12.0 (11.4–12.6) 90 11.8 (11.2–12.4) High 63 12.3 (11.5–13.1) 206 13.8 (13.4–14.2) *Total number without missing data. Knowledge of Antibiotics Use among Lebanese Adults A study on the influence of sociodemographic characteristics 446 | SQU Medical Journal, August 2021, Volume 21, Issue 3 sociodemographic characteristics and antibiotic knowledge via interviews with eligible participants. Moreover, the use of a culturally adapted tool makes it more applicable in the Lebanese population and its results closer to reality.29 Additionally, the KR20 (a version of Cronbach alpha for dichotomous questions) of the knowledge index was 0.65, which can be considered acceptable and shows the internal consistency of the tool in the population.30 This study’s results showed statistically significant differences in the knowledge index for residence type, education level and total household income categories (low and high). Residents of urban areas had higher knowledge compared to those of rural areas and higher education and income levels were significantly associated with a higher knowledge index. These findings are in agreement with those found in the literature, showing that antibiotic use in human medicine does not only vary according to patient characteristics but also according to geographical location, reimbursement systems, medical education and cultural considerations.18,31 Overall, participants residing in urban areas had significantly better knowledge and awareness towards antibiotic resistance and antibiotic consumption, which supports this study’s hypothesis that socio-demographic factors can be related to antibiotic resistance knowledge and awareness.25 The results also revealed no gender difference in the level of antibiotic knowledge, probably because both males and females are affected by similar factors related to the environment, culture and economy, as studies from the United Arab Emirates and Egypt have shown.15,32 Findings from the UK, Kuwait and Lithuania revealed that females have a higher tendency to consume antibiotics than their male counterparts.17,33,34 Regarding the effect of the educational level on antibiotic utilisation, no such comparable data have been reported to date. A study has shown that people with low education may receive inadequate medical care compared to highly educated people who may be more informed about health care.35 Hence, educated people are more knowledgeable and careful about appropriate antibiotic use and the impact of antibiotic resistance and, consequently, may utilise antibiotics less.35 Differences related to the income were noted in the current study as well; participants with low incomes were more likely to have a lower knowledge index than those with higher incomes. The incidence of infectious diseases tends to be higher and their outcomes worse, in groups with a lower socioeconomic status, a finding similar to that of other studies.34,36 Table 3: Factors associated with the antibiotic knowledge index (N = 586)* Model† Unstandardised β (95% CI) Standardised β P value Intercept 11.464 (9.708 to 13.221) - 0.000 Age −0.005 (−0.023 to 0.013) −0.023 0.578 Male versus female −0.457 (−0.953 to 0.040) −0.072 0.071 Urban residence versus rural 0.793 (0.182 to 1.404) 0.125 0.011 Suburban residence versus rural 0.584 (−0.137 to 1.305) 0.077 0.112 Medium education versus low 0.545 (−1.537 to 2.627) 0.079 0.607 High education versus low −0.686 (−2.858 to 1.485) −0.107 0.535 High income versus low −0.174 (−1.278 to 0.929) −0.027 0.756 High income + medium education 0.015 (−1.400 to 1.430) 0.004 0.983 High income + high education 1.590 (0.202 to 2.978) 0.463 0.025 The following interactions were not significant and therefore excluded from the table: income*residence type, income*age, income*gender. *When performing a multiple regression participants with missing data were removed from the model. †Linear regression model: F (9.576) = 9.155; P <0.001 and R2 = 12.5%. Figure 1: Values of the antibiotic knowledge index predicted from the regression model according to educational level and income category. Anna-Maria Henaine, Nathalie Lahoud, Rachel Abdo, Ruba Shdeed, Jihan Safwan, Marwan Akel, Iqbal Fahs, Rony Zeenny, Hala Sacre, Souheil Hallit and Pascale Salameh Clinical and Basic Research | 447 Generally, respondents with lower levels of education and in lower-income countries are more likely to have misconceptions about antibiotic use and believe that there is little that they can do to stop antibiotic resistance. The WHO 2015 survey showed that 63% of respondents with no education agree with this statement compared to those with basic (58%), further (58%) and higher education (56%).25 In this study, those with a low-education level had a knowledge index lower than those of the medium and high education levels, respectively. Moreover, the impact of occupation, age groups and socioeconomic status (excluding gender) on behaviours of antibiotics use was in agreement with previous findings.37 The income level is of great importance as antimicrobials are common goods.38 Therefore, people residing in high-income countries have more access to medical care and thus purchase and utilise more outpatient antibiotics compared to those living in low-income countries.38 Recent data revealed an association between the income level and inequalities in the use of health-care services, which were less applicable and consistent with primary care.39 Surveyed individuals from varied economic statuses favoured methods other than asking for a physician’s advice since they believed that common diseases are not worth consulting a physician about and that pharmacists remained their first choice since they would save them the expenses of the physician’s consultation. Policymakers have to take into account all the factors described; fighting antimicrobial resistance should be part of a health-system strategy that considers patients’ education and economic aspects. Consequently, it is essential to initiate multiple plans to increase public knowledge of antibiotics while focusing on lower socioeconomic areas through public-awareness campaigns, continuing education for pharmacists and implementing restrictions on haphazard antibiotic use and distribution. The results of this study should be interpreted in light of certain limitations in the design and data collection methods. Participants were selected from community pharmacies, half of which were in urban areas, which may have resulted in selection bias by representing people of slightly higher socioeconomic levels and higher levels of education. Although the sample was random, the self-selection resulting from voluntary participation may lead to the risk of selection bias; however, since the objective was not to calculate a prevalence but to evaluate associations and interactions, the effect of this bias is cautiously expected to be lower and a possible effect could be an overestimation of associations.40,41 Furthermore, this study used a face-to-face questionnaire, which has its inherent limitations, despite the confidentiality and anonymity of the reporting (Hawthorne effect); participants may either over-report socially desirable behaviours or hide undesirable attitudes. Despite these limitations, the current study provides essential information for assessing the knowledge and attitude towards antibiotics use and resistance. It showed gaps in terms of the knowledge of antibiotics and identified specific groups to target to improve this knowledge. Further national studies with larger representative samples are necessary to confirm these findings. Conclusion This study revealed that individuals residing in urban areas, those with combined high income and high educational levels, are more knowledgeable about antibiotics use and resistance compared to other groups. More studies are needed to assess sociodemographic interactions on health literacy. a c k n o w l e d g e m e n t s The authors would like to thank the community pharmacists and all members of the Lebanese Order of Pharmacists scientific committee. c o n f l i c t o f i n t e r e s t The authors declare no conflicts of interest. f u n d i n g No funding was received for this study. a u t h o r s’ c o n t r i b u t i o n s PS and NL were involved in planning the design and supervising the work. A-MH drafted the manuscript. RA and NL performed the analysis and interpretation of the results. RS, JS, MA, IF, RZ and SH aided in interpreting the results and worked on writing the manuscript. HS reviewed the manuscript. All authors discussed the results, commented on the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript. References 1. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance: Global report on surveillance. From: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/1 0665/112642 Accessed: Oct 2020. 2. Butler CC, Hillier S, Roberts Z, Dunstan F, Howard A, Palmer S. Antibiotic-resistant infections in primary care are symptomatic for longer and increase workload: Outcomes for patients with E. coli UTIs. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56:686–92. 3. Thabit AK, Crandon JL, Nicolau DP. Antimicrobial resistance: Impact on clinical and economic outcomes and the need for new antimicrobials. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2015; 16:159–77. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2015.993381. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2015.993381 Knowledge of Antibiotics Use among Lebanese Adults A study on the influence of sociodemographic characteristics 448 | SQU Medical Journal, August 2021, Volume 21, Issue 3 4. Al-Azzam SI, Al-Husein BA, Alzoubi F, Masadeh MM, Al- Horani MA. Self-medication with antibiotics in Jordanian population. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2007; 20:373–80. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10001-007-0038-9. 5. Yagupsky P. Selection of antibiotic-resistant pathogens in the community. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006; 25:974–6. https://doi. org/10.1097/01.inf.0000239270.33190.71. 6. Panagakou SG, Theodoridou MN, Papaevangelou V, Papaster- giou P, Syrogiannopoulos GA, Goutziana GP, et al. Development and assessment of a questionnaire for a descriptive cross- sectional study concerning parents' knowledge, attitudes and practises in antibiotic use in Greece. BMC Infect Dis 2009; 9:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-52. 7. Parimi N, Pinto Pereira LM, Prabhakar P. Caregivers' practices, knowledge and beliefs of antibiotics in paediatric upper respiratory tract infections in Trinidad and Tobago: A cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract 2004; 5:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-5-28. 8. Vanden Eng J, Marcus R, Hadler JL, Imhoff B, Vugia DJ, Cieslak PR, et al. Consumer attitudes and use of antibiotics. Emerg Infect Dis 2003; 9:1128–35. https://doi.org/10.3201/ eid0909.020591. 9. André M, Vernby A, Berg J, Lundborg CS. A survey of public knowledge and awareness related to antibiotic use and resistance in Sweden. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65:1292–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkq104. 10. Kardas P, Devine S, Golembesky A, Roberts C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of misuse of antibiotic therapies in the community. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2005; 26:106–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.04.017. 11. Stivers T, Mangione-Smith R, Elliott MN, McDonald L, Heritage J. Why do physicians think parents expect antibiotics? What parents report vs what physicians believe. J Fam Pract 2003; 52:140–8. 12. Costelloe C, Metcalfe C, Lovering A, Mant D, Hay AD. Effect of antibiotic prescribing in primary care on antimicrobial resistance in individual patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010; 340:c2096. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2096. 13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. New guidance limits antibiotic for common infections in children. From: www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2013/p1118-get-smart.html Accessed: Oct 2020. 14. Vallin M, Polyzoi M, Marrone G, Rosales-Klintz S, Tegmark Wisell K, Stålsby Lundborg C. Knowledge and attitudes towards antibiotic use and resistance - A latent class analysis of a Swedish population-based sample. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0152160. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152160. 15. Abasaeed A, Vlcek J, Abuelkhair M, Kubena A. Self-medication with antibiotics by the community of Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates. J Infect Dev Ctries 2009; 3:491–7. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.466. 16. Barah F, Gonçalves V. Antibiotic use and knowledge in the community in Kalamoon, Syrian Arab Republic: A cross- sectional study. East Mediterr Health J 2010; 16:516–21. https://doi.org/10.26719/2010.16.5.516. 17. Berzanskyte A, Valinteliene R, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, Gurevicius R, Grigoryan L. Self-medication with antibiotics in Lithuania. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2006; 19:246–53. https://doi. org/10.2478/v10001-006-0030-9. 18. Waaseth M, Adan A, Røen IL, Eriksen K, Stanojevic T, Halvorsen KH, et al. Knowledge of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance among Norwegian pharmacy customers - A cross- sectional study. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:66. https://doi. org/10.1186/s12889-019-6409-x. 19. Little P, Gould C, Williamson I, Warner G, Gantley M, Kinmonth AL. Reattendance and complications in a randomised trial of pres- cribing strategies for sore throat: The medicalising effect of prescribing antibiotics. BMJ 1997; 315:350–2. https://doi.org/1 0.1136/bmj.315.7104.350. 20. Mouhieddine TH, Olleik Z, Itani MM, Kawtharani S, Nassar H, Hassoun R, et al. Assessing the Lebanese population for their knowledge, attitudes and practices of antibiotic usage. J Infect Public Health 2015; 8:20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.20 14.07.010. 21. Khalifeh MM, Moore ND, Salameh PR. Self-medication misuse in the Middle East: A systematic literature review. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2017; 5:e00323. https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.323. 22. Jamhour A, El-Kheir A, Salameh P, Hanna PA, Mansour H. Anti- biotic knowledge and self-medication practices in a developing country: A cross-sectional study. Am J Infect Control 2017; 45:384–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.11.026. 23. World Health Organization. WHO’s first global report on antibiotic resistance reveals serious, worldwide threat to public health. From: https://www.who.int/southeastasia/news/ detail/30-04-2014-who-s-first-global-report-on-antibiotic- resistance-reveals-serious-worldwide-threat-to-public-health Accessed: Oct 2020. 24. Haddad N, Kanj SS, Awad LS, Abdallah DI, Moghnieh RA. The 2018 Lebanese Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Guidelines for the use of antimicrobial therapy in complicated intra-abdominal infections in the era of anti- microbial resistance. BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19:293. https://doi. org/10.1186/s12879-019-3829-2. 25. World Health Organization. Antibiotic resistance: Multi- country public awareness survey. 2015. From: https://apps. who.int/iris/handle/10665/194460 Accessed: Oct 2020. 26. Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 2018; 126:1763–8. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864. 27. Farah R, Lahoud N, Salameh P, Saleh N. Antibiotic dispensation by Lebanese pharmacists: A comparison of higher and lower socio-economic levels. J Infect Public Health 2015; 8:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2014.07.003. 28. Cheaito L, Azizi S, Saleh N, Salameh P. Assessment of self- medication in population buying antibiotics in pharmacies: A pilot study from Beirut and its suburbs. Int J Public Health 2014; 59:319–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0493-y. 29. Gjersing L, Caplehorn JR, Clausen T. Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: Language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10:13. https:// doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-13. 30. Anselmi P, Colledani D, Robusto E. A comparison of classical and modern measures of internal consistency. Front Psychol 2019; 10:2714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02714. 31. Sanchez GV, Roberts RM, Albert AP, Johnson DD, Hicks LA. Effects of knowledge, attitudes, and practices of primary care providers on antibiotic selection, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2014; 20:2041–7. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2012.140331. 32. Elmasry AAG, Bakr ASM, Kolkailah DAAA, Khaskia MAI, Mohammed MEE, Riad OHMA, et al. Pattern of antibiotic abuse – A population based study in Cairo. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc 2013; 62:189–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcdt.2013.02.010. 33. Awad AI, Aboud EA. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards antibiotic use among the public in Kuwait. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0117910. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117910. 34. Mason T, Trochez C, Thomas R, Babar M, Hesso I, Kayyali R. Knowledge and awareness of the general public and perception of pharmacists about antibiotic resistance. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:711. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5614-3. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10001-007-0038-9 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000239270.33190.71 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000239270.33190.71 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-52 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-5-28 https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0909.02059 https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0909.02059 https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkq104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.04.017 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2096 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152160 https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.466 https://doi.org/10.26719/2010.16.5.516 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10001-006-0030-9 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10001-006-0030-9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6409-x https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6409-x https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7104.350 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7104.350 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2014.07.010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2014.07.010 https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.323 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.11.026 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3829-2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3829-2 https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2014.07.003 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0493-y https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-13 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-13 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02714 https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2012.140331 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcdt.2013.02.010 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117910 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5614-3 Anna-Maria Henaine, Nathalie Lahoud, Rachel Abdo, Ruba Shdeed, Jihan Safwan, Marwan Akel, Iqbal Fahs, Rony Zeenny, Hala Sacre, Souheil Hallit and Pascale Salameh Clinical and Basic Research | 449 35. Hunt-McCool J, Kiker BF, Ng YC. Estimates of the demand for medical care under different functional forms. J Appl Econ (Chichester Engl) 1994; 9:201–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ jae.3950090206. 36. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Antimicrobial stewardship: Changing risk-related behaviors in the general population. 2017. From: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng63/resour ce s / a n t i m i c r o b i a l - s t e w a r d s h i p - c h a n g i n g - r i s k r e l a t e d - behaviours-in-the-general-population-pdf-1837572082117 Accessed: Oct 2020. 37. Saleh N, Awada S, Awwad R, Jibai S, Arfoul C, Zaiter L, et al. Evaluation of antibiotic prescription in the Lebanese community: A pilot study. Infect Ecol Epidemiol 2015; 5:27094. https://doi.org/10.3402/iee.v5.27094. 38. Blommaert A, Marais C, Hens N, Coenen S, Muller A, Goossens H, et al. Determinants of between-country differences in ambulatory antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance in Europe: A longitudinal observational study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014; 69:535–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt377. 39. Habicht J, Kiivet RA, Habicht T, Kunst AE. Social inequalities in the use of health care services after 8 years of health care reforms - A comparative study of the Baltic countries. Int J Public Health 2009; 54:250–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038- 009-8012-x. 40. Nilsen RM, Vollset SE, Gjessing HK, Skjaerven R, Melve KK, Schreuder P, et al. Self-selection and bias in a large prospective pregnancy cohort in Norway. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2009; 23:597–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01062.x. 41. Søgaard AJ, Selmer R, Bjertness E, Thelle D. The Oslo Health Study: The impact of self-selection in a large, population-based survey. Int J Equity Health 2004; 3:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-3-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950090206 https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950090206 https://doi.org/10.3402/iee.v5.27094 https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt377 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-8012-x https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-8012-x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01062.x https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-3-3