1Department of Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar; 2Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan *Corresponding Author’s e-mail: alismc2051@gmail.com Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Workers A cross-sectional survey from Pakistan *Syed M. Ali1 and Sidrah Nausheen2 Sultan Qaboos University Med J, February 2022, Vol. 22, Iss. 1, pp. 82–90, Epub. 28 Feb 22 Submitted 10 Sep 20 Revision Req. 28 Oct 20; Revision Recd. 1 Dec 20 Accepted 30 Dec 20 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.4.2021.067 CLINICAL & BASIC RESEARCH abstract: Objectives: This study aimed to assess the anxiety and depression symptoms in healthcare professionals in Pakistan as a result of the coronavirus pandemic. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from May to June 2020 and included six different hospitals in Pakistan. An English-language demographics questionnaire, a validated COVID-19 fear scale, depression scale PHQ-9 and anxiety scale GAD-7 were sent to doctors, nurses and paramedical staff via WhatsApp. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square test and Student’s t-test. Results: A total of 400 participants were included in this study (response rate: 80.0%); 263 (65.8%) were doctors and 137 (34.3%) were nurses and paramedical staff. Of the participants, 57.0% were less than 40 years old and 18.3% were aged above 50. Most of the participants (n = 262; 65.5 %) experienced moderate levels of fear and 16.5% (n = 66) experienced a high level of fear. Moreover, 19.5% feared death and 56.5% reported social media to be responsible for increasing their fears. On the depression PHQ-9 and anxiety GAD-7 scales, 21.8% (n = 87) reported moderate to severe depression and anxiety symptoms. A significant relationship was demonstrated between the depression level and age, education and profession (P <0.001 each). Similarly, anxiety and depression scores were strongly related to the availability of personal protective equipment (P <0.001). Conclusion: It was found that 21.8% of healthcare professionals are suffering from moderate to severe depression symptoms, 15.5% had moderate to severe anxiety, whereas 65.5% had moderate symptoms of fear. The predictors are age, education level and co-morbidities. These moderate to high levels of fear and anxiety and depression raise concerns about the psychological well-being of healthcare staff and should be addressed through different programmes. Keywords: COVID-19; Healthcare workers; Fear; Anxiety; Depression; Patient Health Questionnaire; Pakistan. Advances in Knowledge - This cross-sectional study examined the harmful effects of COVID-19 on healthcare workers’ psychological well-being in a resourcelimited country (Pakistan). - This study’s results offer an insight into the gravity of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and recommend ways to deal with such problems by offering proper strategies. - The better understanding of the relationship between anxiety and depression and associated factors such as non-availability of personal protective equipment (PPE), age and co-morbidities will help in dealing with mental health issues. Application to Patient Care - There is a relationship between healthcare workers’ mental health and the possibility of an increased chance of medical errors. - A healthcare worker who suffers from anxiety and depression cannot give their full input, remains tired and exhibits an inefficient thought process. - This study highlights the importance of formulating strategies, such as decreasing working hours and provision of PPE among others, to minimise the occurrence of mental health issues among doctors, thereby improving the quality of patient care. The 2019 novel coronavirus (covid-19) resulted in the first pandemic in over a century, which has impacted the world.1,2 This contagious disease has led to concerns, distress and apprehension among individuals across the globe. Infections account for a significant proportion of the fear, as the transmission of this virus is rapid and invisible, and results in considerable health deterioration and even death. The appearance of new and resistant strains of the virus continues to put the media and society alike “in awe”.3 The current COVID-19 pandemic is occurring during a time in which social media has a rapid and wide reach, and has therefore led to stigmatisation in some cases.4 A global pandemic caused by an unknown agent, severe acute respiratory syndrome(SARS)- CoV-2, and relatively inefficient medical authorities, lacking in readiness, have led to the spread of misinformation and created confusion and anxiety among the public. However, the effect on medical professionals, both physically and psychologically, is much higher https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ Syed M. Ali and Sidrah Nausheen Clinical and Basic Research | 83 than the general public, as the former group is more exposed to the virus due to their involvement in the management and care of COVID-infected patients and lack of proper personal protective equipment (PPE). “Health workers have always been, unfortunately, the mine’s canary in epidemic response, particularly in areas that don’t have strong surveillance systems”.5 The increasing number of infected cases, overwhelming workload, inappropriate media coverage, non-avail- ability of particular drugs and inadequate support have contributed to their psychological burden. The situation is worse in low- and middle-income countries such as Pakistan compared to developed nations. Pakistan reported a COVID-19 outbreak in February 2020, with more than 255,769 cases and 5,386 deaths as of July 15, 2020.6 Healthcare systems were overburdened and collapsed due to violations of lockdown regulations and standard operating procedures. Similarly, weak infrastructure, poor governance, scarcity of basic health needs, increased turnover of positive cases and inconsistent behaviour of the public contributed to the worsening situation. Lockdowns, unemployment, financial instability, prohibition of religious and social gatherings, fear of getting the infection and family safety also affected the mental health of the general population.7 During an outbreak of SARS in 2003, healthcare workers (HCWs) had a fear of infections, which resulted in a lack of interest in work and some experienced anxiety, stress and depression, causing long-term psychological issues.8 Similarly, HCWs who react strongly to the current COVID-19 pandemic are likely to be older with a chronic disease and a pre-existing mental health disease. Others are affected by social distancing, isolation and, ultimately, depression. Common symptoms of anxiety and stress include numbness, disbelief, anxiety or fear, changes in appetite, lethargy, difficulty in concentrating, insomnia, headaches, fear about one’s health and the well-being of loved ones, worsening of chronic health problems, anger or being short-tempered, etc.9,10 Although worldwide focus regarding COVID-19 has been mainly on infection control, an appropriate vaccine and effective treatment, the psychological aspect has not received much attention and these implications can be devastating in the long term.11 This study aimed to assess the psychosocial impact of COVID-19 on HCWs by evaluating the signs and symptoms of fear, anxiety and depression among a group of individuals who are educated and dealing directly with COVID-19 patients. Few previous studies have also shown psychological implications of this viral pandemic on HCWs.9,10 Methods This cross-sectional study included HCWs (doctors, nurses and paramedical staff ) working in six different hospitals in Pakistan from May to June, 2020. A convenient sampling technique was used. An English-language questionnaire was created on Google Forms (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) and distributed among the sample via WhatsApp (Meta Platforms, Inc., Menlo Park, California, USA). The contact details of the respondents were acquired from the hospital directory and there were therefore no face-to-face interactions. Participants who were found to be depressed and anxious were sent to a psychiatrist for further management. The data collection form was divided into the following three sections: (a) demographics and validated scales evaluated the participants’ level of symptoms of fear, depression and anxiety; (b) a generalised anxiety disorder GAD-7 scale and depression PHQ-9 questionnaire;9 (c) the Fear of COVID-19 Scale.10 The depression scale PHQ-9 used a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). These scores were added together to obtain a total score ranging from 0 (minimal) to 27(maximal). Scores for minimal depression ranged from 1–4, mild depression from 5–9, moderate depression from 10–14, moderately severe depression from 15–19 and severe depression from 20–27. The generalised anxiety scale GAD-7 also used a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Scores for mild ranged from 5–9, moderate 10–14 and severe more than 15. We used a cut-off of 10 with a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 82% for GAD-7. For the Fear of COVID-19 Scale, a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) was used. These scores were added together to obtain a total fear score; total scores ranged from 7 (minimum) to 35 (maximum). The range of scores for low fear is 7–16, moderate fear is 17–26 and high fear is 27–35. The anxiety GAD-7 and depression PHQ-9 tools have been successfully used in a previous similar study conducted in China, where HCWs were assessed for symptoms of anxiety and depression.9 These tools can also be used to assess the symptoms of mental health disorders. The Fear of COVID-19 Scale was validated in an Irani population.10 All data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), Version 19 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Mean scores and standard deviation were attained for continuous variables such as total fear scores and depression Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Workers A cross-sectional survey from Pakistan 84 | SQU Medical Journal, February 2022, Volume 22, Issue 1 scores, while frequency and percentages were used for categorical variables such as characteristics of the participant. Associations between the variables such as fear level, depression level and characteristics of the participant were examined using the Chi-square test. The Student’s t-test evaluated continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at P <0.05. A short consent form, attached to the survey form, was sent to the participants, informing them that by completing the survey they are agreeing to participate in the study. Their names and personal details and the names of the employee’s hospital were not asked to keep their identities anonymous. Permission was obtained from each healthcare centre before proceeding with the study. This study’s proposal was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Aga Khan University (ERC #2020-4733-10959). The data will be kept safe and password-protected and will only be accessible to the investigators and the department head. The data will be disposed of seven years post-study completion as per the institutional policy. Results A total of 400 individuals were included in this study (response rate: 80.0%). Of these, 263 (65.8%) were doctors and 137 (34.3%) were nurses and paramedical staff. Moreover, 57.0% were less than 40 years old, whereas 18.3% were more than 50 years of age. The majority of the participants (59.3%) had attained a post-graduate education and 32.3% were graduates. In addition, it was found that 51.5% of the respondents reported fearing the disease and its consequences; only 19.5% feared death. In terms of co-morbidities, 10.0% of the participants were asthmatic and another 10.0% were hypertensive; 72.8% had no co-morbidities. Approximately 36.0% of participants were working in the COVID-19 area and 59.3% had always received proper PPE at the workplace [Table 1]. The majority of the participants (n = 262; 65.5%) experienced a moderate level of fear while 16.5% (n = 66) reported a high level of fear and 18.0% (n = 72) scored low on the fear scale. The majority (56.5%) reported that social media was responsible for increasing their fear; 17.0% reported not being able to sleep due to being worried about contracting COVID-19. The mean fear score was 20.8 ± 5.6 [Table 2]. Approximately 26.5 % of the participants (n = 106) experienced a mild level of depression and 47% (n = 188) had mild anxiety, whereas 21.8% (n = 87) showed moderate to severe symptoms of depression and 15.5% (n = 62) showed moderate to severe anxiety. The mean depression score was 10.4 ± 9.8 [Table 3]. While assessing factors that cause fear, results showed that comorbidities such as diabetes, hyper- tension, asthma and not getting proper PPE in the workplace were not significantly related to participants’ fear levels. However, a significant relationship was found between the fear level and age (P = 0.022), profession (P <0.001), education level (P = 0.004), type Table 1: Characteristics of participants from six different hospitals in Pakistan (N = 400) Characteristic n (%) Age group in years 20–30 88 (22.0) 30–40 140 (35.0) 40–50 99 (24.8) 50–60 73 (18.3) Profession Doctor 263 (65.8) Nurse 62 (15.5) Paramedical 41 (10.3) Technician 34 (8.5) Education level Middle 20 (5.0) Higher 14 (3.5) Graduate 129 (32.3) Postgraduate 237 (59.3) Type of fear Isolation 116 (29.0) Disease 206 (51.5) Death 78 (19.5) Co-morbidity Asthma 40 (10.0) Diabetes 29 (7.3) Hypertension 40 (10.0) None 291 (72.8) Are you provided proper PPE in your workplace? Yes 237 (59.3) No 83 (20.8) Sometimes 80 (20.0) Are you working in a COVID-19 isolation area? Yes 144 (36.0) No 256 (64.0) PPE = personal protective equipment. Syed M. Ali and Sidrah Nausheen Clinical and Basic Research | 85 of fear (P <0.001) and working in the COVID-19 area (P < 0.001) [Table 4]. A significant relationship was demonstrated between the depression level and all variables, most notably age, profession and education (P <0.001 each). Similarly, anxiety and depression scores were strongly related to the availability of PPE (P <0.001) [Table 5]. Discussion Low- and middle-income countries such as Pakistan can be characterised by large and highly populated urban regions, inadequate health systems and infra- structure, compromised resources such as HCWs and medicines, an unstable economy and scarce availability of COVID-19-testing kits. Consequently, there are high rates of COVID-19 infection, affecting millions, including HCWs and their families. This study demonstrated that 21.8% of HCWs suffered from moderate to severe depression and 15.5% anxiety symptoms and required treatment. A meta-analysis of 12 studies from China and another report from Singapore also showed that the prevalence of depression, insomnia and anxiety among HCWs during COVID-19 was 22.8%, 23.2% and 38.9%, respectively.12 These findings, along with those from the current study, confirm the massive impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HCWs’ mental and psychosocial health. A significantly high anxiety level has also been found, indicating a prevalent state of tension that could lead to psychological distress symptoms. The susceptibility of frontline HCWs to anxiety and stress during a pandemic has been attributed to an overburdened healthcare system and the risk of contracting the infection.13 Outbreaks of SARS- CoV-1, H1N1 influenza, Ebola and others, have had a significant psychosocial impact on HCWs.14 Similar results were found in the current study where 51.5% Table 2: Distribution of responses to The Fear of COVID-19 Scale (N = 400) Item n (%) I am most afraid of Coronavirus-19. Strongly disagree 21 (5.3) Disagree 33 (8.3) Neutral 116 (29.0) Agree 178 (44.5) Strongly agree 52 (13.0) It makes me uncomfortable to think about Coronavirus-19. Strongly disagree 22 (5.5) Disagree 36 (9.0) Neutral 77 (19.3) Agree 211 (52.8) Strongly agree 54 (13.5) My hands become clammy when I think about Coronavirus-19. Strongly disagree 87 (21.8) Disagree 146 (36.5) Neutral 79 (19.8) Agree 81 (20.3) Strongly agree 7 (1.8) I am afraid of losing my life because of Coronavirus-19. Strongly disagree 47 (11.8) Disagree 86 (21.5) Neutral 97 (24.3) Agree 123 (30.8) Strongly agree 47 (11.8) When watching news and stories about Coronavirus-19 on social media, I become nervous or scale. Strongly disagree 40 (10.0) Disagree 51 (12.8) Neutral 83 (20.8) Agree 147 (36.8) Strongly agree 79 (19.8) I cannot sleep because I'm worried about getting Coronavirus-19. Strongly disagree 101 (25.3) Disagree 153 (38.3) Neutral 78 (19.5) Agree 54 (13.5) Strongly agree 14 (3.5) My heart races or palpitates when I think about getting Coronavirus-19. Strongly disagree 98 (24.5) Disagree 142 (35.5) Neutral 82 (20.5) Agree 69 (17.3) Strongly agree 9 (2.3) Total score on fear scale Low 72 (18.0) Moderate 262 (65.5) High 66 (16.5) Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Workers A cross-sectional survey from Pakistan 86 | SQU Medical Journal, February 2022, Volume 22, Issue 1 Table 3: Distribution of anxiety GAD-7 and depression PHQ-9 scale responses among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 400) Anxiety and depression scales n (%) GAD-7 anxiety scale Feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge Not at all 181 (45.3) Several days 125 (31.3) More than half the days 34 (8.5) Nearly every day 60 (15.0) Not being able to stop or control worrying Not at all 221 (55.3) Several days 103 (25.8) More than half the days 41 (10.3) Nearly every day 35 (8.8) Worrying too much about different things Not at all 170 (42.5) Several days 150 (37.5) More than half the days 33 (8.3) Nearly every day 47 (11.8) Trouble relaxing Not at all 213 (53.3) Several days 109 (27.3) More than half the days 42 (10.5) Nearly every day 36 (9.0) Being so restless that it's hard to sit still. Not at all 297 (74.3) Several days 54 (13.5) More than half the days 23 (5.8) Nearly every day 26 (6.5) Becoming easily annoyed or irritable. Not at all 244 (61.0) Several days 74 (18.5) More than half the days 47 (11.8) Nearly every day 35 (8.8) Feeling afraid as if something awful might happen. Not at all 171 (42.8) Several days 116 (29.0) More than half the days 43 (10.8) Nearly every day 70 (17.5) Total anxiety score None <5 150 (37.5) Mild (5–9) 188 ( 47.0) Moderate (10–14) 52 ( 13 ) Severe (>15) 10 (2.5) PHQ-9 depression scale Little interest or pleasure in doing things. Not at all 198 (49.5) Several days 118 (29.5) More than half the days 33 (8.3) Nearly every day 51 (12.8) Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless. Not at all 248 (62.0) Several days 101 (25.3) More than half the days 26 (6.5) Nearly every day 25 (6.3) Trouble falling or staying asleep, or sleeping too much. Not at all 258 (64.5) Several days 77 (19.3) More than half the days 38 (9.5) Nearly every day 27 (6.8) Feeling tired or having little energy. Not at all 230 (57.5) Several days 105 (26.3) More than half the days 26 (6.5) Nearly every day 39 (9.8) Poor appetite or overeating. Not at all 286 (71.5) Several days 80 (20.0) More than half the days 16 (4.0) Nearly every day 18 (4.5) Feeling bad about yourself - or that you are a failure or have let yourself or your family down. Not at all 274 (68.5) Several days 67 (16.8) More than half the days 25 (6.3) Nearly every day 34 (8.5) Trouble concentrating on things, such as reading the newspaper or watching television. Not at all 252 (63.0) Several days 87 (21.8) More than half the days 22 (5.5) Nearly every day 39 (9.8) Moving or speaking so slowly that other people could have noticed. Or the opposite – being so fidgety or restless that you have been moving around a lot more than usual. Not at all 311 (77.8) Several days 55 (13.8) More than half the days 18 (4.5) Nearly every day 16 (4.0) Thoughts that you would be better off dead, or of hurting yourself. Not at all 325 (81.3) Several days 50 (12.5) More than half the days 12 (3.0) Nearly every day 13 (3.3) Total score on the depression PHQ-9 scale None 51(12.8) Minimal depression (1–4) 156 (39.0) Mild depression (5–9) 106 (26.5) Moderate depression (10–14) 60 (15.0) Moderately severe depression (15–19) 16 (4.0) Severe depression (20–27) 11 (2.8) Syed M. Ali and Sidrah Nausheen Clinical and Basic Research | 87 of the respondents were afraid of contracting the virus and suffering from its symptoms, whereas 19.5% feared death. These findings are similar to those of a study conducted in China where 53.8% rated the psychological impact of the outbreak as moderate or severe.15 Among those having past experiences of being infected, quarantined or even hospitalised, it was found that quarantined individuals feel more depressed, anxious, isolated, frustrated and helpless than the general population.16 The findings of the current study are also comparable to another study from Pakistan, where a significant number of Pakistanis experienced anxiety, stress and depression due to COVID-19; approximately 89% of HCWs were scared for their families and 80% were fearful that they might contract COVID-19.17 The media’s intense coverage of the current pandemic exacerbates the fear, anxiety, stress and panic of the public and HCWs. The majority of HCWs included in the current study (56.5%) reported social media and watching the news to be responsible for increasing their fear. In a recent study in Karachi, Pakistan, Balkhi et al. reported that a high proportion of participants ( 82.8%) found that fake news and un-authenticated information related to COVID-19, which was surfacing via social media, was a source of panic.18 According to the current study, 21.8% of the participants had moderate to severe depression and 15.5% had moderate to severe anxiety levels. In contrast, another study from Pakistan reported that 72.3% of the participants working in the COVID-19 Table 4: Comparison between fear of COVID-19 level and studied variables (N = 400) Characteristic Total Level of fear of COVID-19, n (%) P value Low Moderate High Age group in years 0.022 20–30 88 13 (14.8) 60 (68.2) 15 (17.0) 30–40 140 23 (16.4) 83 (59.3) 34 (24.3) 40–50 99 17 (17.2) 72 (72.7) 10 (10.1) 50–60 73 19 (26.0) 47 (64.4) 7 (9.6) Profession <0.001 Doctor 263 57 (21.7) 179 (68.1) 27 (10.3) Nurse 62 8 (12.9) 34 (54.8) 20 (32.3) Paramedical 41 3 (7.3) 28 (68.3) 10 (24.4) Technician 34 4 (11.8) 21 (61.8) 9 (26.5) Education 0.004 Middle 20 0 (0.0) 12 (60.0) 8 (40.0) Higher 14 2 (14.3) 10 (71.4) 2 (14.3) Graduate 129 17 (13.2) 85 (65.9) 27 (20.9) Postgraduate 237 53 (22.4) 155 (65.4) 29 (12.2) Type of fear <0.001 Isolation 116 33 (28.4) 62 (53.4) 21 (18.1) Disease 206 28 (13.6) 154 (74.8) 24 (11.7) Death 78 11 (14.1) 46 (59.0) 21 (26.9) Co-morbidity 0.560 Asthma 40 6 (15.0) 28 (70.0) 6 (15.0) Diabetes 29 3 (10.3) 21 (72.4) 5 (17.2) Hypertension 40 11 (27.5) 21 (52.5) 8 (20.0) None 291 52 (17.9) 192 (66.0) 47 (16.2) Are you getting proper PPE in your workplace? 0.970 Yes 237 44 (18.6) 154 (65.0) 39 (16.5) No 83 13 (15.7) 57 (68.7) 13 (15.7) Sometimes 80 15 (18.8) 51 (63.8) 14 (17.5) Are you working in the COVID-19 isolation area? <0.001 Yes 144 40 (27.8) 91 (63.2) 13 (9.0) No 256 32 (12.5) 171 (66.8) 53 (20.7) PPE = personal protective equipment. Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Workers A cross-sectional survey from Pakistan 88 | SQU Medical Journal, February 2022, Volume 22, Issue 1 isolation ward suffered from moderate to extremely severe depression and 85.7% suffered from moderate to extremely severe anxiety.17 This difference could be due to the inclusion of general HCWs in the current study versus those specifically working in COVID-19 isolation areas. Approximately 36.0% of the participants in the present study were working in COVID-19 areas. The findings of the current study were similar to an extensive Chinese study that reported psychological distress in almost 35% of the respondents.19 On the other hand, a recent survey from Malaysia reported 72.1% experienced moderate to severe anxiety levels, whereas in a study from Egypt, 18% reported minimal anxiety, 34% reported mild anxiety and 48% reported moderate anxiety symptoms.20,21 The difference in psychological well-being observed among different countries could be due to differences in healthcare infrastructures. The HCWs are at the frontline of dealing with unprecedented traumatic issues resulting from an overwhelming load of cases, exceptionally long work hours as a result of limited resources and an uncertain primary facility. All these factors most likely led to severe anxiety and depression among HCWs, affecting their decision-making abilities and causing long-term detrimental effects on their overall well-being. Furthermore, this study found that anxiety and depression scores are strongly related to the non-availability of PPE (P <0.001). Similarly, a strong association of depression and anxiety was found with Table 5: Correlation of depression of healthcare workers with the studied variable during the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 400) Characteristic Total Depression level, n (%) P value None Minimal Mild Moderate Moderately severe Severe Age group in years <0.001 20–30 88 11 (12.5) 32 (36.4) 23 (26.1) 16 (18.2) 0 (0.0) 6 (6.8) 30–40 140 6 (4.3) 56 (40.0) 36 (25.7) 27 (19.3) 10 (7.1) 5 (3.6) 40–50 99 13 (13.1) 36 (36.4) 34 (34.3) 14 (14.1) 2 (2.0) 0 (0.0) 50–60 73 21 (28.8) 32 (43.8) 13 (17.8) 3 (4.1) 4 (5.5) 0 (0.0) Profession <0.001 Doctor 263 41 (15.6) 112 (42.6) 81 (30.8) 23 (8.7) 6 (2.3) 0 (0.0) Nurse 62 4 (6.5) 21 (33.9) 10 (16.1) 20 (32.3) 3 (4.8) 4 (6.5) Paramedical 41 0 (0.0) 16 (39.0) 11 (26.8) 9 (22.0) 5 (12.2) 0 (0.0) Technician 34 6 (17.6) 7 (20.6) 4 (11.8) 8 (23.5) 2 (5.9) 7 (20.6) Education <0.001 Middle 20 0 (0.0) 6 (30.0) 3 (15.0) 11 (55.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) Higher 14 4 (28.6) 2 (14.3) 6 (42.9) 2 (14.3) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) Graduate 129 20 (15.5) 44 (34.1) 37 (28.7) 17 (13.2) 7 (5.4) 4 (3.1) Postgraduate 237 27 (11.4) 104 (43.9) 60 (25.3) 30 (12.7) 9 (3.8) 7 (3.0) Type of fear <0.001 Isolation 116 29 (25.0) 38 (32.8) 16 (13.8) 26 (22.4) 5 (4.3) 2 (1.7) Disease 206 14 (6.8) 94 (45.6) 69 (33.5) 19 (9.2) 5 (2.4) 5 (2.4) Death 78 8 (10.3) 24 (30.8) 21 (26.9) 15 (19.2) 6 (7.7) 4 (5.1) Co-morbidity <0.001 Asthma 40 3 (7.5) 21 (52.5) 12 (30.0) 3 (7.5) 1 (2.5) 0 (0.0) Diabetes 29 1 (3.4) 10 (34.5) 13 (44.8) 0 (0.0) 2 (6.9) 3 (10.3) Hypertension 40 13 (32.5) 10 (25.0) 10 (25.0) 7 (17.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) None 291 34 (11.7) 115 (39.5) 71 (24.4) 50 (17.2) 13 (4.5) 8 (2.7) Are you getting proper PPE in your workplace? <0.001 Yes 237 26 (11.0) 93 (39.2) 65 (27.4) 42 (17.7) 4 (1.7) 7 (3.0) No 83 22 (26.5) 35 (42.2) 17 (20.5) 4 (4.8) 5 (6.0) 0 (0.0) Sometimes 80 3 (3.8) 28 (35.0) 24 (30.0) 14 (17.5) 7 (8.8) 4 (5.0) Are you working in the COVID-19 isolation area? 0.002 Yes 144 21 (14.6) 69 (47.9) 36 (25.0) 17 (11.8) 1 (0.7) 0 (0.0) No 256 30 (11.7) 87 (34.0) 70 (27.3) 43 (16.8) 15 (5.9) 11 (4.3) PPE = personal protective equipment. Syed M. Ali and Sidrah Nausheen Clinical and Basic Research | 89 education, age, profession and co-morbidities (P <0.001), which have not been reported in any previous study from Pakistan. One of the limitations to this study is lack of generalisability, as only the urban population was included; the study sample size was small and, as such, might not have provided sufficient data to be representative of the country as a whole. However, the results can help policymakers monitor the mental health status of HCWs during this unusual crisis. Adequate planning such as work-hour regulations, programmes for provision of psychological support, training of individual and group skills as well as cognitive behaviour therapy can reduce the number of these mental health issues.22 While there may be some overlap between the concepts of anxiety and fear, the individual scales of anxiety and fear used were validated in previous studies. This minimises the probability of overlap. In addition, the anxiety scale is a general scale, whereas the fear scale is related particularly and specifically to the fear of coronavirus. One of the prime implications caused by prolonged stress and anxiety is burnout syndrome, or emotional fatigue, which leads to energy loss, fatigue, dissociation and depersonalisation. Clinical signs are social isolation, anxiety, fear, depression, anger, addictions, personality changes, guiltiness and self-immolation, changes in eating habits, substantial gain or weight loss, loss of memory disorganisation, problems with concentration and sleep disorders. Such healthcare worker is a risk for patients and needs immediate treatment. Burnout for HCPs working during the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with factors such as feeling pushed beyond training (high workload), making life-or-death prioritising decisions (high job stress), work impacting the ability to perform household activities (high time pressure) and lack of adequate PPE (limited organisational support).23 Finally, this study recommends that utmost protection of HCWs’ well-being be provided before the ongoing pandemic creates complete chaos in the healthcare system. A mental health assistance hotline can be set-up to provide psychosocial assistance to HCWs. Moreover, adequate provision of PPE to staff must be offered to HCWs to protect them from contracting the infection.7 Conclusion This study reports that 21.8% of the HCWs suffered from moderate to severe levels of depression, 15.5% had moderate to severe anxiety whereas 65.5% had a moderate level of fear. The predictors for anxiety and depression due to the effects of COVID-19 are age, education level and co-morbidities, all of which raises concerns for professionals’ psychological well- being. This should be addressed through different strategies and programmes to allow for better control of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online medical advice and strategies for risk reduction of viral transmission between patients and medical workers will help reduce the pressure on HCWs. c o n f l i c t o f i n t e r e s t The authors declare no conflicts of interest. f u n d i n g No funding was received for this study. a u t h o r s’ c o n t r i b u t i o n SMA conceived the study design and executed the study. Both authors drafted the manuscript. SN collected the data and edited the manuscript. Both authors approved the final version of the manuscript. References 1. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:1708–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/ NEJMoa2002032. 2. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020; 395:497–506. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. 3. Pappas G, Kiriaze IJ, Giannakis P, Falagas ME. Psychosocial consequences of infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Infect 2009; 15:743–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02947.x. 4. Lin CY. Social reaction towards the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Soc Health Behav 2020; 3:1–2. https://doi. org/10.4103/SHB.SHB_11_20. 5. World Economic Forum. What's needed now to protect health workers: WHO COVID-19 briefing. https://www.weforum. org/agenda/2020/04/10-april-who-briefing-health-workers- covid-19-ppe-training/ Accessed: Dec 2020. 6. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/ Accessed: Dec 2020. 7. Khalid A, Ali S. COVID-19 and its challenges for the healthcare system in Pakistan. Asian Bioeth Rev 2020; 12:551–64. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s41649-020-00139-x. 8. Bai Y, Lin CC, Lin CY, Chen JY, Chue CM, Chou P. Survey of stress reactions among health care workers involved with the SARS outbreak. Psychiatr Serv 2004; 55:1055–7. https://doi. org/10.1176/appi.ps.55.9.1055. 9. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, et al. Factors assoc- iated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e203976. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976. 10. Ahorsu DK, Lin CK, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The fear of COVID-19 scale: Development and initial validation. Int J Ment Health Addict 2020; 27:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11469-020-00270-8. 11. Dong L, Hu, S, Gao J. Discovering drugs to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Drug Discov Ther 2020; 14:58–60. https://doi.org/10.5582/ddt.2020.01012. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02947.x https://doi.org/10.4103/SHB.SHB_11_20 https://doi.org/10.4103/SHB.SHB_11_20 https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-020-00139-x https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-020-00139-x https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.55.9.1055 https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.55.9.1055 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8 https://doi.org/10.5582/ddt.2020.01012 Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Workers A cross-sectional survey from Pakistan 90 | SQU Medical Journal, February 2022, Volume 22, Issue 1 12. Pappa S, Ntella V, Giannakas T, Giannakoulis VG, Papoutsi E, Katsaounou P. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun 2020; 88:901–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.026. 13. Wilson N, Baker M, Crampton P, Mansoor O. The potential impact of the next influenza pandemic on a national primary care medical workforce. Hum Resour Health 2005; 3:7. https:// doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-3-7. 14. Wu P, Fang Y, Guan Z, Fan B, Kong J, Yao Z, et al. The psychological impact of the SARS epidemic on hospital employees in China: Exposure, risk perception, and altruistic acceptance of risk. Can J Psychiatry 2009; 54:302–11. https:// doi.org/10.1177/070674370905400504. 15. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 2020; 17:1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729. 16. Gómez-Durán EL, Martin-Fumadó C, Forero CG. The psychological impact of quarantine on healthcare workers. Occup Environ Med 2020; 77:666–74. https://doi.org/10.1136/ oemed-2020-106587. 17. Sandesh R, Shahid W, Dev K, Mandhan N, Shankar P, Shaikh A, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare professionals in Pakistan. Cureus 2020; 12:e8974. https://doi. org/10.7759/cureus.8974. 18. Balkhi F, Nasir A, Zehra A, Riaz R. Psychological and behavioral response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Cureus 2020; 12:e7923. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7923. 19. Qiu J, Shen B, Zhao M, Wang Z, Xie B, Xu Y. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: Implications and policy recommendations. Gen Psychiatry 2020; 33:e100213. https:// doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213. 20. Wong LP, Alias H. Temporal changes in psychobehavioural responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia. J Behav Med 2021; 44:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10865-020-00172-z. 21. Magdy DM, Metwally A, Magdy O. Assessment of community psycho-behavioral responses during the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV): A cross-sectional study. AIMS Public Health 2022; 9:26–40. https://doi.org/10.3934/public health.2022003. 22. Ho CS, Chee CY, Ho RC. Mental health strategies to combat the psychological impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) beyond paranoia and panic. Ann Acad Med Singap 2020; 49:155–60. https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202043. 23. Morgantini LA, Naha U, Wang H, Francavilla S, Acar Ö, Flores JM, et al. Factors contributing to healthcare professional burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid turnaround global survey. PLoS ONE 2020; 15:e0238217. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0238217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.026 https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-3-7 https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-3-7 https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370905400504 https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370905400504 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729 https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106587 https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106587 https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8974 https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8974 https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7923 https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213 https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-020-00172-z https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-020-00172-z https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2022003 https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2022003 https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202043 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238217 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238217