1Department of Plastic Surgery, Khoula Hospital, Muscat, Oman; 2Oman Medical Specialty Board, Muscat, Oman; 3Internship Program, Sultan Qaboos 
University, Muscat, Oman
*Corresponding Author’s e-mail: sheikhan123@yahoo.com

Experience of Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair using the 
Anatomical Subunit Technique in an Omani 

Population over a Five-Year Period

*Sheikhan Al Hashmi,1 Malak Al Wahaibi,2 Sony P. Varghese,1 Maather Al Abri,3 Moath A. Shummo,1
Buthina Al Muqbali1

Sultan Qaboos University Med J, August 2022, Vol. 22, Iss. 3, pp. 387–392, Epub. 25 Aug 22
Submitted 23 Feb 21
Revisions Req. 26 Apr & 31 May 21; Revisions Recd. 9 May & 16 Jun 21
Accepted 7 Jul 21

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.8.2021.108

CLINICAL & BASIC RESEARCH

abstract: Objectives: This study aimed to report the authors’ experience with the anatomical subunit technique 
for unilateral cleft lip repair, which has gained popularity worldwide. Methods: From July 2015 to April 2020, 114 
consecutive cases of cleft lip underwent primary cleft lip repair with closed rhinoplasty by a single surgeon. The 
demographic data, severity and type of the cleft lip, surgical outcomes, including vermillion notching, were assessed 
by an independent senior surgeon. The rate of revision surgery was collected from the Al-Shifa® - 3Plus healthcare 
information system (Ministry of Health, Oman). Parents’ satisfaction regarding scar quality and lip and nose 
appearance was collected and all data were statistically analysed. Results: A total of 82 cases satisfied the inclusion 
criteria. The mean age at surgery for cleft lip was 32 weeks. Among these, 35 cases (43%) were complete cleft lips 
and 47 cases (57%) were incomplete. Additionally, 43 children (52%) were born of consanguineous marriage. Six 
patients (7%) needed revision surgery. The digital survey was completed by 40 subjects (response rate: 48.8%) which 
showed 85% satisfaction rate with the postoperative scar and 77.5% satisfaction with the aesthetic appearance of 
the nose. Conclusion: The anatomical subunit technique resulted in a predictable outcome indicating a high rate 
of patient satisfaction with scar quality and nasal and lip symmetry in children with varying severity of cleft lip. 
The high percentage of consanguinity (52%) in this study highlights the need for more targeted national campaigns 
involving premarital counselling in the Omani population.

Keywords: Cleft Lips; Congenital Abnormalities; Cleft lip/Surgery; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures; Treatment 
Outcome; Surgical Diagnostic Technique; Consanguinity; Oman.

Advances in Knowledge
- To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study in Oman to highlight the outcomes and direct experience of this particular 

technique for cleft lip repair in an Omani population. 
- This study revealed a high percentage of consanguinity (52%) in the study group.
- The most common complication associated with the anatomical subunit technique in the current study was vermilion excess, which was 

corrected with simple wedge excision.
- There was an 85% satisfaction rate with the postoperative scar and 77.5% satisfaction rate with the aesthetic appearance of the nose.

Application to Patient Care
- The anatomic subunit technique used here produced predictable and identical results related to scar quality and nasal and lip symmetry 

in children with varying severity of cleft lip.
- Due to the high consanguinity in this study group, the authors are calling for more targeted national campaigns involving premarital 

counselling in the Omani population.

Orofacial clefts remain the most common craniofacial congenital anomaly.1,2 A study published in 2001 by Rajab and 
Thomas concluded that the prevalence of cleft lip in 
Oman was 15 per 10,000 births.3 Out of those, 0.62 per 
1000 live births were combined cleft lip and palate and 
0.34 per 1000 live births were isolated cleft lip cases.3 
This result is striking as it suggests a higher prevalence 
of cleft lip in Oman in relation to worldwide numbers. 
The Data published from the International Perinatal 
Database of Typical Oral Clefts in 2011 stated that the 
worldwide prevalence of cleft lip was found to be 9.9 
per 10,000 births, compared to 15 per 10,000 births in 

Oman.4 The incidence of cleft lip has been found to be 
associated with consanguineous marriages, specifically 
in children born to parents who are first cousins which 
was found to be 61.1%; this incidence falls down to 
18.0% in parents who are second cousins.5 A meta-
analysis of orofacial clefts indicated a clear relationship 
between consanguinity and non-syndromic orofacial 
clefts (NSOFC), with the risk being twice in children 
born to consanguineous parents.5

Cleft lip anomalies are more commonly found 
in association with cleft palate deformities; however, 
in other less common instances, it can present as an 
isolated cleft lip anomaly.1,6 Cleft lip anomalies can be 

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/


Experience of Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair using the Anatomical Subunit Technique in an Omani Population over a Five-Year Period

388 | SQU Medical Journal, August 2022, Volume 22, Issue 3

unilateral or bilateral and can range in severity from 
a scale of a microform cleft lip which is considered 
the least disfiguring, to a complete cleft lip.1,7 Some of 
the well-known challenges of children born with cleft 
lip include feeding difficulties, trouble in articulation 
and speech development along with psychological and 
self-esteem concerns related to the condition.1 Studies 
related to the comprehensive statistics of this anomaly 
and its management outcomes in Oman remain 
significantly limited.

Different studies have reported their experience 
with the anatomical subunit technique in comparison 
to Millard and Modified Millard technique. Deshmukh 
et al. published a study favouring the aesthetic out-
comes of Fisher’s technique over Mohler’s technique.8 
In the study, 50 patients were selected and randomly 
assigned to undergo surgical cleft lip repair by either 
the Mohler or Fisher technique performed by a single 
surgeon. Outcomes were then assessed by laymen and 
demonstrated that a bigger proportion of evaluators 
have favoured the aesthetic outcomes of the Fisher 
repair.8

Kwang et al. also published a similar study, 
which enrolled candidates from different levels of 
training and requested them to evaluate the aesthetic 
outcomes of anatomical subunit repair in comparison 
to rotation advancement repair.9 In this study, 
candidates from different levels of training have found 
outcomes of the anatomical subunit techniques to be 
aesthetically superior to that of the latter technique.9 
The experience of the anatomic subunit technique has 
not been studied in the Omani population prior to this 
study.

Given that the anatomical subunit technique 
for unilateral cleft lip repair has gained popularity 
worldwide, this study aimed to report the present 
authors’ experience with the aforementioned 
technique. A related aim was to explore the opinion 
and experience of parents whose children had 
undergone cleft lip repair using the above technique 
and provide a clearer picture of the demographic data 
in a population of Omani patients with cleft lip. 

Methods

This is a retrospective study of the surgical correction 
of the cleft lip anomaly in an Omani population. The 
procedure was performed using the anatomic subunit 
technique of cleft lip repair by single surgeon over a 
period of 5 years—July 2015 to April 2020—for varying 
degrees of cleft lip ranging from unilateral incomplete 
cleft lip to complete cleft lip. The institute indicated in 
this study, Khoula hospital, is a level 1 trauma centre 
and is also the main plastic surgery centre in Oman. 

The standard technique used for the correction of cleft 
lip in this institute is the Millard or modified Millard 
Rotation Advancement Technique. The anatomic 
subunit technique was introduced to the department 
of plastic surgery by one of the authors in 2015.

All children who underwent cleft lip repair 
from July 2015 to April 2020 using the anatomic 
subunit technique of cleft lip repair at Khoula 
hospital, Muscat, Oman were included in this study. 
The records were collected using the Al-Shifa® 3Plus 
healthcare information system, (Ministry of Health, 
Oman). Children who did not follow up, parents who 
refused to be part of the study due to social or cultural 
reasons, children with a microform cleft lip, children 
with bilateral cleft lip, or patients with inadequate 
data entered into the above-mentioned e-healthcare 
system were all excluded.

All patients were evaluated preoperatively in 
the clinic and prioritised according to the age and 
anaesthetic clearance for surgery. Nasoalveolar 
moulding by an experienced orthodontist was 
requested for indicated cases. Most of the children 
were operated on by the fifth to seventh month of 
age after adequate weight gain and haemoglobin 
evaluation. Once the children were cleared by the 
pre-anaesthetic clinic for surgery, they were admitted 
and operated on the following day. All the children 
underwent cheiloplasty using the anatomic subunit 
technique with closed rhinoplasty by a single surgeon 
under general anaesthesia. 

The procedure started with markings as per the 
anatomical subunit technique following which the 
key landmarks were tattooed. Infiltration of xylocaine 
1% with 1:200,000 adrenaline in the alar base and 
inferior turbinate area on the cleft side was performed. 
Incisions were made on the medial lip along the 
markings including the opening triangle. A cuff of the 
orbicularis oris muscle was dissected after releasing its 
attachments to the columella base and alveolar cleft 
margin. Following this, lateral lip incisions were made 
along the markings and after discarding the tissue 
along the cleft margin, a cuff of the orbicularis oris 
muscle was dissected in the same manner. The alar 
base on the cleft side was then released off the pyriform 
and advanced anteromedially. The closure started with 
the nasal floor and, in some cases, a turbinate flap 
was used to cover any exposed periosteal surface of 
the pyriform margin. Primary closed rhinoplasty was 
done with repositioning of the cleft side dome using 
5–0 Monocryl (Ethicon Inc., Cornelia, Georgia, USA). 
The mucosa, the muscle and the lateral vermilion 
flap were each approximated with 5–0 Vicryl 
(Ethicon Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Somerville, New 
Jersey, USA) and the skin is closed with 7–0 Prolene 



Sheikhan Al Hashmi, Malak Al Wahaibi, Sony P. Varghese, Maather Al Abri, Moath A. Shummo and Buthina Al Muqbali

Clinical and Basic Research | 389

(Ethicon, Inc., Manlo Park, California, USA). An intra-
operative nostril retainer was applied in all cases and 
secured using a 4/0 nylon monofilament  suture to 
the membranous septum. Elbow splints were applied 
and maintained for 10–14 days. The children were 
allowed to be breast fed 3–4 hours post-operation 
and discharged on the first or second postoperative 
day. They were re-evaluated at three weeks, six weeks, 
three months, six months and then annually at the 
clinic. The average long-term follow-up for patients in 
this study was 2.3 years. The postoperative evaluation 
of all children who underwent cleft lip repair included 
evaluation and assessment of the quality of the scar on 
the lip and vermilion, symmetry of the nose, symmetry 
of the vermilion volume and white roll alignment by 
an independent senior surgeon.

Parents of all the children who had undergone 
cleft lip repair using the anatomic subunit technique 
of cleft lip repair at the hospital were sent a link to an 
electronic survey regarding the aesthetic appearance 
of the lip after surgery, ability to breast feed and their 
satisfaction with surgical scar and with the correction 
of the nasal deformity. All other data required for 
the study was collected from the Al-Shifa® 3Plus 
healthcare information system (Ministry of Health, 
Oman). This included personal data, date of surgery, 
severity and side of cleft lip, presence of a protruding 
premaxilla, pre-surgical orthodontics, grade of cleft 
palate, associated syndromes, the geographical area 
the child is from, associated anomalies, consanguinity, 
family history of cleft, last follow-up date, objective 
assessment and any revision surgery for the lip. The 
data were entered into excel sheets and analysed using 
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), 
Version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ministry 
of Health, Centre of Studies and Research at Oman and 
the Research Ethics Committee at Khoula Hospital 
(Unique Identification code: 24273) Verbal consent 
was obtained from the parents who were interested in 

filling out the electronic survey and for those willing to 
include their children’s photos in this article.

Results

A total of 114 cleft lip surgeries were performed by 
one of the authors during the study period. Out of 
114 patients, 82 satisfied the inclusion criteria and 
were included in the study. Out of the included cases, 
52 were males (63%) and 30 were females (37%). The 
mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 
32 weeks. Nine children (11%) underwent the surgery 
in following weeks due to late presentation and co-
morbid conditions. The eldest of the patients presented 
for the first time at 356 weeks due to personal and 
socioeconomic issues and was operated on at the age 
of presentation. A total of 43% of the cleft lip cases were 
from the Muscat and A’Dakhiliya governorates with 
18 (22%) and 17 (21%) cases, respectively. The other 
regions made up 57% of the cases with A’Sharqiah, Al 
Batinah, A’Dhahirah, Al Wusta, Musandam and Al 
Buraimi representing 20%, 19%, 11%, 4%, 2% and 1% 
of the cases, respectively. All cleft lip surgeries were 
conducted using the anatomical subunit technique.

It was found that 35 cases (43%) presented with 
complete cleft lip and 47 cases (57%) were found to 
be incomplete. Additionally, 53 cases (65%) were 
left-sided and 29 cases (35%) were right-sided. It was 
also noted that 36 patients (44%) had cleft of palate 
involving both hard and soft palate, out of which 28 
patients (34%) qualified for Veau’s criteria of class III 
cleft palate and eight patients (10%) qualified for class 
II. Additionally, 21 patients (26%) underwent pre-
surgical nasoalveolar moulding and three patients 
had protruding premaxilla; 12 patients had associated 
anomalies which were mainly cardiac anomalies. 
Two children were confirmed to be syndromic—one 
had Downs syndrome and the other, velocardiofacial 
syndrome. Additionally, 43 children (52%) were born of 

Figure 1: A pre-operative image of an infant (A) showing left-sided incomplete cleft lip and post-operative image (B) 
showing left-sided incomplete cleft lip following surgery using the anatomical subunit technique.



Experience of Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair using the Anatomical Subunit Technique in an Omani Population over a Five-Year Period

390 | SQU Medical Journal, August 2022, Volume 22, Issue 3

consanguineous marriages: 33 (77%) from a first cousin 
marriage, 7 (16%) from a second cousin marriage and 3 
(7%) from a third cousin marriage. It was found that 22 
patients (27%) had a positive family history of cleft lip. 
Out of the 82 who had undergone cleft lip repair using 
the anatomic subunit technique, six patients (7%) 
needed revision as judged by the senior independent 
surgeon at the time of the last follow-up during the 
study period, five of which were for vermilion excess, 
managed through simple wedge resection. Collectively, 
the repair was performed on both complete and 
incomplete cleft lips and both produced identical 
results [Figures 1 and 2].  A digital survey was sent to 
the parents of the 82 children who had undergone cleft 
lip repair using the anatomical subunit technique. Out 
of these, the parents of 40 children responded to the 
survey anonymously (response rate: 48.8%). Statistical 
analysis showed that 82.5% (33/40) were satisfied with 
the aesthetic appearance of lip following cleft lip repair 
by the anatomical subunit technique, 85% (34/40) 
were satisfied with the postoperative scar over the lip 
and 77.5% (31/40) were satisfied with the aesthetic 
appearance of nose following cleft lip surgery with 
closed rhinoplasty.

Discussion

Various techniques have been used by plastic surgeons 
to correct cleft lip anomalies, all of which have aimed 
to establish the best functional rehabilitation and 
aesthetical acceptance.10–13 Rose’s straight-line repair 
was one of the first cleft lip repair techniques to be 
described; this technique was published in 1891, 
followed by the rotation advancement technique for 
unilateral cleft lip repair introduced by Ralph Millard 
in 1957. This technique is initiated by forming an 
incision just below the nostril which continues to run 
vertically to the philtral ridge.12 Millard’s technique 
has undergone a number of refinements throughout 
the years but probably remains the most common 
technique used in unilateral cleft lip repair worldwide.13 

Mohler further modified the rotation-advancement 
repair technique in 1987, achieving a more symmetric 
positioning of the scar. The next big evolution in cleft 
lip repair came with the introduction of the extended 
Mohler cleft lip repair by Court Cutting in 2003.14 The 
major adjustment of this technique was to extend the 
incision to the noncleft philtral column.11 With this 
modification, two major shortcomings arose: first 
was the complex appearance of the scar under the 
nasal sill, which did not blend with the anatomical 
landmarks; the second was that in order to avoid the 
under rotation and elevation of the cupid’s bow peak, 
the lateral lip segment was shortened.11

To address the aforementioned shortcomings, 
David M. Fisher proposed the anatomic subunit 
technique first published in 2005.11 As the name 
suggests, this technique respects the anatomical 
subunits of the lip and is based on accurate pre-
operative measurements. This technique preserved 
the transverse length of the lateral lip by creating a 
cutaneous triangle flap above the white roll to correct 
the height of the medial lip.11 Ever since this technique 
had been introduced, the anatomical subunit technique 
gained notable popularity.7 A recent study conducted 
in 2020 aimed to explore the current practice patterns 
in unilateral cleft lip repair among surgeons within the 
American Cleft Palate Association. It concluded that 
up to 40% of surgeons had changed their previously 
implemented techniques of cleft lip repair to the 
anatomical subunit approximation technique.7 Fisher’s 
technique of cleft lip repair has also been found to 
have a lesser revision rate for lip shortening, scar 
hypertrophy and scar widening in comparison to the 
rotation advancement technique.15 However, Fisher’s 
technique was found to be associated with a higher 
number of vermilion revisions which can be managed 
easily by a simple wedge excision of the vermilion. 

As mentioned above, Millard’s technique for cleft 
lip repair remains one of the most implemented and 
taught methods for correcting the cleft lip anomaly 
worldwide.16 This has also been the case in the present 

Figure 2: A pre-operative image of a child (A) showing left-sided complete cleft lip and post-operative image (B) showing 
left-sided complete cleft lip following surgery using the anatomical subunit technique.



Sheikhan Al Hashmi, Malak Al Wahaibi, Sony P. Varghese, Maather Al Abri, Moath A. Shummo and Buthina Al Muqbali

Clinical and Basic Research | 391

institution. The anatomical subunit technique was 
introduced in the department by one of the authors 
in 2015, and since then, it has been gaining popularity. 
The experience of this technique has not been studied 
in the Omani population prior to this study. 

Oman is a country nestled in the tip of Arabian 
Peninsula with a population of 4.5 million and land area 
of 309,500 km2 encompassing 11 governorates.17 As per 
certain traditional values preserved within this rapidly 
modernising country, consanguineous marriages 
appear to be prevalent in the local population. Local 
research has indicated that more than half (52%) of 
marriages are consanguineous, with first cousin unions 
being the most common type of consanguineous 
marriages constituting of 39% of all marriages and 75% 
of consanguineous marriages.3 Owing to this cultural 
practice of consanguineous marriages in Oman, the 
incidence of clefts has been found to be almost 1.5 
times the worldwide prevalence.3

In the authors’ experience, the outcome of cleft 
lip repair using the anatomical subunit technique has 
been very satisfactory, a fact that can be corroborated 
by the small number of revision surgeries required 
by the patients involved in the current study. Excess 
vermillion is a recognised outcome of the anatomical 
subunit technique. For example, a study published by 
Mittermiller et al. revealed that 37% of patients in their 
study group who underwent unilateral cleft lip repair 
using the technique required debulking of excess 
vermillion.18 Furthermore, the parents’ satisfaction 
rate following the surgery in this study was 82.5%. 
Most of the parents were well-accepting of the surgical 
repair with anatomical subunit technique and willing 
to recommend the procedure to other children with 
similar anomalies. Similarly, a study by Deshmukh et 
al. has aimed to compare the post-operative aesthetic 
outcomes between Fisher’s and Mohler’s technique.8 
The comparison was done through a layman evaluation 
of the post-operative cases based on which the authors 
were able to confirm the superior aesthetic outcomes 
of Fisher’s technique.8

Another factor of comparison with the 
international literature was the implementation of 
Fisher’s technique on a different spectrum of cleft lip 
severity. Out of the 82 patients included in our study, 
36 had varying clefts of the soft and hard palate. No 
significant difference was found in the outcome of 
cleft lip repair done in children with isolated cleft lip 
in comparison to children with combined cleft lip and 
palate. This finding was also true with other published 
studies, indicating that with accurate application of the 
technique, the outcomes will less likely be affected by 
the severity of the cleft lip.15,16,19

The high percentage of consanguinity (52%) 
in the current study group highlights the need for 
targeted national campaigns involving premarital 
counselling regarding consanguinity, especially as 
this study revealed that consanguineous families are 
more likely to have a first degree relative with cleft 
lip. Out of the 82 children, two were confirmed to 
be syndromic, one was a case of trisomy 21 and the 
other was diagnosed with velocardiofacial syndrome. 
The current syndrome-related findings are also similar 
to the patterns found internationally, indicating 
velocardiofacial syndrome along with other previously 
mentioned syndromes to be commonly associated 
with this anomaly.20 The most common complication 
associated with anatomical subunit technique was 
vermilion excess which were corrected for six patients 
in this study using simple wedge excision done 18–24 
months after the initial lip surgery.

The limitation of the current study includes the 
absence of a comparison group. Comparison of the 
present cases with cases operated on using another 
technique would have provided better insight into the 
superiority of the anatomical subunit technique. In 
addition, a more accurate temporal relationship might 
have been established if the study was prospective in 
nature. Lastly, in order to obtain more transparent 
results, the participation of families in the electronic 
survey was voluntary and anonymous. However, 
voluntary participation commonly leads to lower 
response rates and some families have refused to 
participate in the survey for various socio-cultural 
reasons.

Conclusion

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first 
study in Oman to highlight the outcomes and patients’ 
experience of the anatomical subunit technique 
for cleft lip anomaly in an Omani population. 
Accordingly, it resulted in predictable and identical 
results related to scar quality and nasal and lip 
symmetry in children with varying severity of cleft 
lip. Revision for vermilion excess was needed in 7% of 
the cases. The high percentage of consanguinity in this 
study highlighted the need for more targeted national 
campaigns involving premarital counselling in the 
Omani population as consanguineal marriages have 
been commonly implicated in the development of the 
cleft lip anomaly.

a u t h o r s’ c o n t r i b u t i o n
SH conceptualised and designed the study as well 
as supervised the work. MW, SPV, MA and MAS 



Experience of Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair using the Anatomical Subunit Technique in an Omani Population over a Five-Year Period

392 | SQU Medical Journal, August 2022, Volume 22, Issue 3

collected the data. BM was responsible for patient 
coordination in this study. MA analysed the data. MW 
and SPV drafted the manuscript. All authors approved 
the final version of the manuscript.

c o n f l i c t o f i n t e r e s t
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

f u n d i n g

No funding was received for this study.

References
1. Trainor PA. Craniofacial birth defects: The role of neural crest 

cells in the etiology and pathogenesis of Treacher Collins 
syndrome and the potential for prevention. Am J Med Genet A 
2010; 152A:2984–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33454. 

2. Kantar RS, Cammarata MJ, Rifkin WJ, Plana NM, Diaz-Siso JR, 
Flores RL. Outpatient versus inpatient primary cleft lip and 
palate surgery: Analysis of early complications. Plast Reconstr 
Surg 2018; 141:697e–706e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.00000 
00000004293. 

3. Rajab A, Thomas C. Oral clefts in the Sultanate of Oman. 
Eur J Plast Surg 2001; 24:230–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s002380100253. 

4. IPDTOC Working Group. Prevalence at birth of cleft lip with 
or without cleft palate: data from the International Perinatal 
Database of Typical Oral Clefts (IPDTOC). Cleft Palate 
Craniofac J 2011; 48:66–81. https://doi.org/10.1597/09-217. 

5. Sabbagh HJ, Innes NP, Sallout BI, Alamoudi NM, Hamdan MA, 
Alhamlan N, et al. Birth prevalence of non-syndromic orofacial 
clefts in Saudi Arabia and the effects of parental consanguinity. 
Saudi Med J 2015; 36:1076–83. https://doi.org/10.15537/
smj.2015.9.11823. 

6. Sisti A, Nisi G. Principles of cleft lip repair: Conventions, 
commonalities, and controversies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 
140:833e–4e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003884.

7. Roberts JM, Jacobs A, Morrow B, Hauck R, Samson TD. 
Current trends in unilateral cleft lip care: A 10-year update on 
practice patterns. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 84:595–601. https://doi.
org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002017. 

8. Deshmukh M, Vaidya S, Deshpande G, Galinde J, Natarajan S. 
Comparative evaluation of esthetic outcomes in unilateral 
cleft lip repair between the Mohler and Fisher repair 
techniques: A prospective, randomized, observer-blind study. 
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 77:182.e1–182.e8. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.029. 

9. Kwong JW, Cai LZ, Azad AD, Lorenz HP, Khosla RK, Lee GK, 
et al. Assessing the Fisher, Mohler, and Millard techniques 
of cleft lip repair surgery with eye-tracking technology. 
Ann Plast Surg 2019; 82:S313–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/
sap.0000000000001911. 

10. Wehby GL, Cassell CH. The impact of orofacial clefts on quality 
of life and healthcare use and costs. Oral Dis 2010; 16:3–10. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01588.x. 

11. Kim HY, Park J, Chang MC, Song IS, Seo BM. Modified Fisher 
method for unilateral cleft lip-report of cases. Maxillofac Plast 
Reconstr Surg 2017; 39:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-
017-0109-1. 

12. Monson LA, Kirschner RE, Losee JE. Primary repair of cleft lip 
and nasal deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132:1040e–53e. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3182a808e6.

13. Knežević P, Vuletić M, Blivajs I, Dediol E, Macan D, Virag M. 
The modification of rotation – Advancement flap made in 1950. 
Acta Stomatol Croat 2017; 51:60–4. https://doi.org/10.15644/
asc51/1/8.

14. Mohler LR. Unilateral cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 
80:511–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198710000-00005.

15. Ajmal S, Khan MA, Khan AT, Yousaf K, Shadman M, Iqbal T. 
Evaluating anatomical subunit approximation technique for 
unilateral cleft repair. J of Postgrad Med Inst 2010; 24:68–72.

16. Tse R, Lien S. Unilateral cleft lip repair using the anatomical 
subunit approximation: Modifications and analysis of early 
results in 100 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 
136:119–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000001369.

17. Foreign Ministry of Oman. Geography. From: https://fm.gov.
om/about-oman/state/geography/  Accessed: Jun 21.

18. Mittermiller PA, Martin S, Johns DN, Perrault D, Jablonka EM, 
Khosla RK. Improvements in cleft lip aesthetics with the Fisher 
repair compared to the Mohler repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 
Glob Open 2020; 8:e2919. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.00000 
00000002919.

19. Fisher DM. Unilateral cleft lip repair: An anatomical subunit 
approximation technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116:61–71. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000169693.87591.9b.

20. Venkatesh R. Syndromes and anomalies associated with cleft. 
Indian J Plast Surg 2009; 42:S51–5. https://doi.org/10.41 
03/0970-0358.57187.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33454
https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004293
https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004293
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002380100253
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002380100253
https://doi.org/10.1597/09-217
https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.9.11823
https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.9.11823
https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003884
https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002017
https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002017
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.029
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.029
https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000001911
https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000001911
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01588.x
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-017-0109-1
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-017-0109-1
https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3182a808e6.
https://doi.org/10.15644/asc51/1/8.
https://doi.org/10.15644/asc51/1/8.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198710000-00005
https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000001369
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.00000 00000002919.
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.00000 00000002919.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000169693.87591.9b
https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.57187
https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.57187