THE IMPLICATIONS OF MISINFORMATION FOR PUBLIC ORDER 

POLICING 

Dr. Laura Huey, University of Western Ontario  

Canada  

Disclaimer: This briefing note contains the encapsulation of views presented by 

the speaker and does not exclusively represent the views of the Canadian 

Association for Security and Intelligence Studies.        

KEY EVENTS 

On September 8th, 2022, Dr. Laura Huey, a professor of Sociology at the 

University of Western Ontario, presented on The Implications of Misinformation 

for Public Order Policing. The presentation was followed by a question-and-

answer period with questions from the audience and CASIS-Vancouver 

executives. The key points discussed in Dr. Huey’s presentation highlighted the 

risks and effects of misinformation around policing and how they can quickly 

spiral globally and have harmful effects on the police force’s reputation and 

police officers.  

NATURE OF DISCUSSION 

Presentation 

The main theme of Dr. Huey’s presentation was about the spread of 

misinformation and how it can affect Canadian police forces and police officers 

at a personal level. Dr. Huey also discussed how both sides of the political 

spectrum seem to have come together to destabilize public policing.  

Question & Answer Period  

During the question-and-answer-period, Dr. Huey discussed the divide that social 

media has created between law enforcement and the public and some of the most 

common policing misperceptions. She also delved into what could be more 

effective in countering extremist narratives, as well as what has not or might not 

work and why.  

  



Laura Huey 

The Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare 

Volume 5, Issue 2  

 

205 

BACKGROUND 

Presentation 

Dr. Huey began her presentation by highlighting that national security is now 

endangered by the divisive political spectrums. According to Dr. Huey, extremist 

attacks on public policing seem to be receiving almost no attention. The irony of 

these attacks, she said, is that far-right and far-left extremists seem to be joining 

a common cause: the destabilization of public policing. As an example, Dr. Huey 

pointed to the manufactured story of the “RCMP’s killer horse”, which claimed 

that an RCMP horse had trampled and killed an old lady during the Freedom 

Convoy protest. This false story originated with the Convoy protest in downtown 

Toronto, where after several hours of police officers trying to push protesters out 

of the downtown core area, the Toronto Mounted Police was called in. In the 

process of pushing people out, a person was impacted by a horse; however, this 

person was not seriously hurt and was back to the protest the next day.  

Dr. Huey stated that his kind of misinformation is a classic example of how false 

information can spread rapidly and cause global outrage. The story of the 

“RCMP’s killer horse” resulted in the Ottawa police call center being subject to 

national and international harassment. 

After becoming aware of this false story and how it had spread, Dr. Huey decided 

to conduct some interviews with Canadian police officers, and she learned that 

police officers' involvement in these protests was blending in with their personal 

lives. They were being harassed online, they were losing friendships, and their 

family members were also being harassed. Dr. Huey also learned that police 

officers from Alberta have been dealing with that same situation for two years 

already.  

Some of the consequences of the spread of misinformation through social media 

included police officers being subject to fake arrests by sovereign citizens, 

doxxing, and threats. Although this has decreased, Dr. Huey predicts that these 

kinds of attacks will become a common occurrence. She also noted that this kind 

of behavior seems to have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. The worst 

example of police targeting happened in Alberta, where protesters began to 

stockpile weapons planning to kill police officers if they tried to shut down their 

border protest.   

Dr. Huey stated that it is particularly concerning that the acceptance of these 

kinds of tactics is growing not only in the far-right and far-left of the political 

spectrum but also creeping into the center. Unfortunately, very little information 



Laura Huey 

The Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare 

Volume 5, Issue 2  

 

206 

is being made public about such incidents, but we need to pay attention to these 

kinds of tactics as they also threaten democracy, Dr. Huey stated.     

Question & Answer Period 

When Dr. Huey was asked whether she believed social media had created a 

greater divide between law enforcement and the public, she agreed and noted that 

public policing seems to be behind on recognizing the severity of misinformation. 

She also added that there are some police officers who still seem surprised by 

anti-police sentiment posts in social media. Dr. Huey pointed out that due to the 

pandemic, people spent more time online, allowing them to entrench in their echo 

chambers.    

Dr. Huey also emphasized that there is a misperception that the police are 

paramilitary and follow an authoritarian system and, therefore, are more inclined 

to agree with views on the extreme right. However, she mentioned that this is not 

supported by evidence or reality. For example, even though the majority of police 

personnel got vaccinated and followed COVID mandates, a few groups which 

were in disagreement with public policy and claimed to be policing-centric were 

the ones that received more attention. The public did not hear about how the 

majority of police officers were endangered by the actions of those who took 

extreme views within their organizations.  

Dr. Huey pointed out that it is too late to regulate social media to an extent of 

eliminating ideas that have already spread widely. De-platforming people also 

does not seem to have any effect because these groups eventually find another 

way to continue spreading their narratives. Dr. Huey stated that this can 

sometimes be counterproductive as they might move to places where it is more 

difficult to counteract their narratives.  

In order to develop better measures to counter extreme narratives, there needs to 

be a better understanding on how extremists are able to manipulate people 

intellectually, emotionally, and financially so effectively. Dr. Huey also stated 

that the way we counter extreme narratives needs to change. Government 

involvement in countering this issue could have been effective thirty years ago, 

but with the current political environment, government involvement might incite 

more violence.       

To conclude, Dr. Huey reiterated that the police need to be more proactive in 

countering misinformation, which starts by recognizing that this issue exists. 

Messages to counter radicalization need to be put in places where people are more 



Laura Huey 

The Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare 

Volume 5, Issue 2  

 

207 

likely to congregate, while also considering demographics and the effect that 

having a certain person delivering that message will have.  

KEY POINTS OF DISCUSSION 

Presentation  

• The spread of misinformation about policing affects not only police forces’ 

reputation, but also police officers’ personal lives. 

• Some of the effects of the spread of misinformation in social media include 

police officers being subject to fake arrests by sovereign citizens, doxxing, 

and threats.  

• National security is now endangered by the divisive political spectrums.  

• Far-right and far-left extremists seem to be joining a common cause: the 

destabilization of public policing. 

• The acceptance of attacks on police is growing not only in the far-right and 

the far-left of the political spectrum, but it is also creeping into the center.  

Question & Answer Period 

• Social media has created a greater divide between law enforcement and the 

public, and the police seem to be behind on recognizing the severity of 

misinformation. 

• There is a misperception that the police are paramilitary and follow an 

authoritarian system and, therefore, are more inclined to agree with views on 

the extreme right.  

• It is too late to regulate social media to an extent of eliminating ideas that 

have already spread widely; therefore, how we counter extreme narratives 

needs to change.   

• In order to develop better measures to counter extreme narratives, there needs 

to be a better understanding on how extremists are able to manipulate people 

so effectively.  

  



Laura Huey 

The Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare 

Volume 5, Issue 2  

 

208 

 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-

Commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. 

© (LAURA HUEY, 2022) 

Published by the Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare and Simon Fraser 

University 

Available from: https://jicw.org/