ISSN: 2469-6706 Vol. 5 2018 Civilian Social Support and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms among National Guard Members Xin Wang 1 a Laura Prince a Juhi Rattan a Neal L. Swartz a Vipul Shukla a Tory A. Durham b Tracey L. Biehn b Jennifer L. Drue a Gowri Ramachandran a Christine Sutu a Amber J. Benton a John L. Luckoski a Andrew Ding a and Marijo B. Tamburrino a aThe University of Toledo Health Science Campus, Department of Psychiatry, 3000 Arlington Ave., Toledo Ohio 43560, and bThe University of Toledo, Department of Psychology, 2801 W. Bancroft St., Toledo Ohio 43606 Increasing evidence suggests that posttraumatic stress disor- der (PTSD) symptoms are highly prevalent and pervasive among National Guard members who served in recent wars. Previ- ous meta-analyses report a lack of social support as one of the strongest risk factors for the development of PTSD symptoms. Social support among military members is typically categorized into two types: assistance and support which is received from military leaders and fellow members of one’s unit and civilian social support which is obtained from civilian family and friends. Prior research has demonstrated that unit support is associated with less severe PTSD symptoms. In addition to unit support, the influence of civilian social support was also considered a potent buffer for PTSD symptoms. Civilian social support is important to National Guard members because their experiences integrate military and civilian life more than active duty soldiers. Unlike intensive studies in active duty military personnel, fewer studies have examined the role of social support in National Guard mem- bers, and civilian social support is rarely investigated in these limited studies. This review article examines the role of civilian social support in National Guard members as a potential protec- tive factor against the development of PTSD symptoms. posttraumatic stress symptoms | civilian social support | National Guard | military | Posttraumatic Stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms are a majormental health issue in military personnel who have been de- ployed to Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Endur- ing Freedom (OEF). A systematic review of the literature yielded a PTSD prevalence estimate of 4-17% among OEF/OIF veterans (1), while another group’s meta-analysis of 33 studies of OEF/OIF veterans estimated a PTSD prevalence as high as 23% (2). Factors that contribute to variability in PTSD prevalence numbers include differences in study methodology such as choice of PTSD measure- ment tools, timing of the assessments in relationship to timing of deployment, number of deployments, and combat intensity. More recently, PTSD research has begun to focus specifically on the Na- tional Guard population. The Guard and Reserves refer to the re- serve components of the United States military, who augment full- time or active duty troops as needed during war or national emer- gencies. The Guard and Reserve forces composed up to nearly 40% of the troops in OIF and OEF (3). Goldmann et al. conducted hour long structured interviews with 1668 Ohio Army National Guard soldiers, and reported a deployment-related PTSD rate of 9.6% (4). In another study of 522 Army National Guard soldiers who com- pleted the 17 item PTSD checklist 3 months following return from OIF deployment, 13.8% were found to have new-onset probable PTSD (5). Guard/Reserve troops could be especially at risk for PTSD (6). In Milliken et al. study of Active and Reserve/Guard soldiers (7), participants were surveyed with the Post-Deployment Health Assessment (PDHA) immediately upon return from OIF and 4 -10 months later were reassessed with the Post- Deployment Health Re-Assessment (PDHRA). Guard and reserve soldiers indi- cated more PTSD symptoms and interpersonal conflict over the two time periods. Active troops’ endorsements of 4 PTSD symptoms increased from 11.8 to 16.7%, while Reserve/Guard’s indications of PTSD symptoms grew from 12.7% to 24.5%. Social support is one factor that has been well documented to protect against PTSD risk and severity among populations exposed to various traumas world- wide. (6, 8). High levels of social support are associated with less severe PTSD symptoms (4, 9-17) and other mental health symp- toms (4, 9-19). The risk for PTSD in military veterans increases when posttraumatic social support is minimal (20). Of these re- ports on social support in the military, only two were exclusive to National Guard and Reserves, highlighting the need for more re- search on the Reserves. Two principal forms of social support are relevant for military personnel: unit support and civilian social sup- port. Prior research has demonstrated that unit support is associated with less severe PTSD symptoms (21, 22). Aside from unit sup- port, the influence of civilian social support was also considered a potent buffer for PTSD symptoms (23). Soldiers with greater per- ceived civilian social support had an overall lower severity of PTSD symptoms (24). Cross-sectional studies have reported negative cor- relations between civilian social support and PTSD severity (13, 24-27). A small handful of longitudinal studies confirm this corre- lation (10, 13, 27). In a study that included veterans of the Viet- nam war, Persian Gulf War, and WWII prisoners of war, Ozer, et al (9) reported that low civilian social support was a strong predictor of PTSD symptoms more than three years following the traumatic event [9]. There have been extensive studies of active duty military personnel, but fewer studies have examined the role of civilian so- cial support in National Guard members. This review article will ex- amine the literature documenting the role of civilian social support in National Guard members as a potential protective factor against the development of PTSD symptoms and the possible mechanisms All authors contributed to this paper. 1To whom correspondence should be sent: Xin.Wang2@utoledo.edu The authors declare no conflict of interest. Submitted: June/03/2018, published: Septem- ber/21//2018. Freely available online through the UTJMS open access option 14–16 UTJMS 2018 Vol. 5 utdc.utoledo.edu/Translation by which social support alleviates PTSD severity. Civilian social support and PTSD symptoms in National Guard members Civilian social support is particularly important for National Guard members because it involves increased social interaction and intimacy. Compared to full-time active duty personnel, National Guard soldiers may have more opportunities for civilian relation- ships because they generally spend more time engaged in civilian activities, are often older, and maintain more developed roles within occupational and familial relationships (28, 29). Decreased post- traumatic stress symptoms and enhanced quality of relationships have been reported in returning veterans who have disclosed their experiences of combat trauma to an intimate partner (30). In a CBT couples therapy for PTSD, being able to discuss feelings and mem- ories about trauma with an accepting and non-critical partner helped alleviate numbing and avoidance symptoms common in PTSD (31). However, an early study by Southwick, et al. (32), found that dis- cussing war experiences with family and friends had no effect on PTSD symptoms for National Guard Members two years after de- ployment, although their study did not directly examine the effects of civilian social support. Additional studies are needed to further examine the relationship between support from civilian social in- teractions and coping skills for PTSD symptoms in National Guard Members. Studies of OEF/OIF veterans have shown that civilian support is negatively associated with PTSD symptom severity, de- pression, suicidal tendencies, and psychosocial difficulties in both Active Duty and Reserve troops (12, 23). Martin, et al. (33) found that as time progressed following return from a final deployment for National Guard members, a lack of perceived civilian social sup- port contributed to continued risk of suicidal tendencies. Continued suicidal risk was not observed in veterans reporting high civilian social support. Griffith (34) drew similar conclusions regarding the benefit of post-deployment support in minimizing suicidal ideations amongst military personnel. These findings collectively illustrate more potential beneficial effects of civilian social support follow- ing traumatic events. Civilian social support may also be one of the key factors that leads to the utilization of mental health ser- vices by National Guard and Active Duty members suffering from PTSD symptoms. Individuals with high levels of social support and encouragement are more likely to seek out mental health treat- ment and remain retained in care (14, 16, 35, 36). For soldiers with PTSD, receiving acceptance and understanding of their mental condition from significant people in their lives increases their sense of safety and reduces their sense of stigma associated with having PTSD (16, 37). These factors help encourage soldiers to actively seek and maintain professional help to manage their PTSD. Spe- cific therapies, informed by such social support research findings, have been found effective in lessening PTSD symptoms after sev- eral kinds of trauma. Disorder-specific couples therapy has been shown to mitigate symptoms in relationships where one partner is diagnosed with PTSD (31). Similarly, structured approach ther- apy incorporates "trauma education, empathic communication and emotion-regulation skills training, and disclosure-based conjoint ex- posure sessions" (38, 39) and can also be used with couples who are affected by post-combat PTSD to yield greater reductions in symp- toms (39). Preserving bonds between family members and friends (40) and enhancing interpersonal skills of soldiers post-deployment may also prevent the loss of social support due to PTSD (41). Fur- ther research assessing availability, access to, and the effectiveness of these therapies in National Guard members is needed. Potential mechanisms mediating influences of civilian social support on PTSD symptoms in National Guard members The findings above suggest beneficial effects of civilian social support on PTSD symptoms of National Guard members. This is consistent with the findings in other active duty military personnel. Researchers have proposed several possible mechanisms by which social support may be beneficial for patients with PTSD follow- ing various kinds of trauma. Firstly, the stress-buffering model and main effect model have been proposed to explain the direct ben- efits of social support. According to the stress-buffering model, increased social support reduces adverse effects of stress expo- sure, while social isolation leads to increased susceptibility to the symptoms of stress (40, 42). On the other hand, the main effect model states that social interactions are beneficial with or without stress; studies on this model have shown inconclusive results. Some researchers consider the stress-buffering model may explain why PTSD symptoms decrease after years have passed in soldiers with high social support (9). Others suggest that the main effect of social support is only relevant if it occurs close to the time of the trauma (43). The stress-buffering model is relevant for stressors during and immediately after deployment, while the main effect model may be applicable to daily life events. However, there has been no study that has tested these theoretical models of civilian social support in National Guard members. Secondly, the social-cognitive process- ing model suggests that a person’s social environment can encour- age or inhibit the individual from discussing traumatic events that led to the onset of PTSD (44). Positive support encourages dis- cussion of the trauma, while negative support or lack of support encourages avoidance (37, 44). As avoidance and withdrawal are key diagnostic features of PTSD, discussing trauma and therefore preventing avoidance behaviors may be a beneficial coping mecha- nism for a person suffering from the disorder. For example, talking to others about problems has been found to reduce the intrusive thoughts that act to maintain chronic maladaptive responses to the stressful event (45). However, a previous cross-sectional study in a relatively small sample of National Guard members did not find a significant relationship between talking to family/friends and PTSD symptoms (32). Therefore, whether the social-cognitive processing model best accounts for the beneficial effects of civilian support in National Guard members is still inconclusive. Finally, Maercker and Horn (46) propose a socio-interpersonal model of social sup- port and PTSD that analyzes the impact of social relationships on PTSD symptoms. This model takes a broader approach to analyz- ing the factors associated with PTSD symptom development and alleviation. The socio-interpersonal model includes three layers: 1) social affective states including shame, guilt, or anger; 2) close re- lationships comprising family and friends; and 3) cultural/ societal influences, which include cultural values and the social recognition of survivors and victims. At the level of close relationships, empiri- cal evidence corroborating this model suggests that PTSD symptom severity is associated with disclosure approaches of both patient and significant others (47). For example, the patients with difficulty in disclosure may report more PTSD symptoms if their significant others also have dysfunctional disclosure. Therefore, the socio- interpersonal model suggests a crucial role of family and friends in fostering healing through verbal exchanges. In summary, the the- oretical models mentioned above suggest some possible explana- tions for the beneficial effects of social support on PTSD symptoms in PTSD patients after various trauma. Further studies examining these potential mechanisms in civilian support for National Guard members are clearly needed. Conclusion. Although the beneficial effects of social support on military per- sonnel suffering from PTSD symptoms are well documented, there Wang et al. UTJMS 2018 Vol. 5 15 is a limited understanding of civilian relationships and PTSD symp- toms in National Guard members who have been deployed in recent wars. Civilian social support could be particularly important for Na- tional Guard members, as they have to adjust to military and civilian experiences more frequently than other active duty soldiers. Studies that fill in these gaps in current knowledge may provide a basis for support efforts to enhance civilian relationships of National Guard members and improve soldiers’ mental health after deployment. 1. Richardson LK, Frueh BC, and Acierno R (2010) Prevalence estimates of combat- related post-traumatic stress disorder: critical review. The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry 44(1):4-19. 2. Fulton JJ, et al. (2015) The prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder in Oper- ation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans: a meta- analysis. Journal of anxiety disorders 31:98-107. 3. Litz BT and Schlenger WE (2009) Posttraumatic stress disorder in service mem- bers and new veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars: A bibliography and critique. PTSD Research Quarterly 20:1-2. 4. Goldmann E, et al. (2012) Potentially modifiable pre-, peri-, and postdeployment characteristics associated with deployment-related posttraumatic stress disor- der among ohio army national guard soldiers. Annals of epidemiology 22(2):71- 78. 5. Polusny MA, et al. (2011) Prospective risk factors for new-onset post-traumatic stress disorder in National Guard soldiers deployed to Iraq. Psychological medicine 41(4):687- 698. 6. Schell TL and Marshall GN (2008) Survey of Individuals Previously Deployed for OEF/OIF. Invisible Wounds of War: Psychological and Cognitive Injuries, Their Consequences, and Services to Assist Recovery, eds Tanielian T and Jaycox LH (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica), 87-115. 7. Milliken CS, Auchterlonie JL, and Hoge CW (2007) Longitudinal assessment of mental health problems among active and reserve component soldiers returning from the Iraq war. Jama 298(18):2141-2148. 8. Southwick SM, et al. (2016) Why are some individuals more resilient than oth- ers: the role of social support. World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association 15(1):77-79. 9. Ozer EJ, Best SR, Lipsey TL, and Weiss DS (2003) Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin 129(1):52-73. 10. Laffaye C, Cavella S, Drescher K, and Rosen C (2008) Relationships among PTSD symptoms, social support, and support source in veterans with chronic PTSD. J Trauma Stress 21(4):394-401. 11. Pruitt LD and Zoellner LA (2008) The impact of social support: an analogue investigation of the aftermath of trauma exposure. Journal of anxiety disorders 22(2):253-262. 12. Pietrzak RH, et al. (2010) Psychosocial buffers of traumatic stress, depressive symptoms, and psychosocial difficulties in veterans of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom: the role of resilience, unit support, and postde- ployment social support. Journal of affective disorders 120(1-3):188-192. 13. McAndrew LM, et al. (2013) What pre-deployment and early post-deployment factors predict health function after combat deployment?: a prospective lon- gitudinal study of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF)/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) soldiers. Health and quality of life outcomes 11:73. 14. Price M, Gros DF, Strachan M, Ruggiero KJ, and Acierno R (2013) The Role of Social Support in Exposure Therapy for Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation En- during Freedom Veterans: A Preliminary Investigation. Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy 5(1):93-100. 15. Fjeldheim CB, et al. (2014) Trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress disorder and the effect of explanatory variables in paramedic trainees. BMC emergency medicine 14:11. 16. Murphy D, Hunt E, Luzon O, and Greenberg N (2014) Exploring positive pathways to care for members of the UK Armed Forces receiving treatment for PTSD: a qualitative study. European journal of psychotraumatology 5. 17. Wu Z, Xu J, and He L (2014) Psychological consequences and associated risk factors among adult survivors of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. BMC psychia- try 14:126. 18. Dai W, et al. (2016) Association between social support and recovery from post- traumatic stress disorder after flood: a 13-14 year follow-up study in Hunan, China. BMC public health 16(1):194. 19. Sripada RK, et al. (2015) Social networks, mental health problems, and mental health service utilization in OEF/OIF National Guard veterans. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology 50(9):1367-1378. 20. Xue C, et al. (2015) A meta-analysis of risk factors for combat-related PTSD among military personnel and veterans. PloS one 10(3):e0120270. 21. Brailey K, Vasterling JJ, Proctor SP, Constans JI, and Friedman MJ (2007) PTSD symptoms, life events, and unit cohesion in US soldiers: Baseline findings from the neurocognition deployment health study. Journal of Trauma Stress 20(4):495- 503. 22. Dickstein BD, et al. (2010) Unit Cohesion and PTSD Symptom Severity in Air Force Medical Personnel. Military Medicine 175(7):482-486. 23. Han SC, et al. (2014) Military unit support, postdeployment social support, and PTSD symptoms among active duty and National Guard soldiers deployed to Iraq. Journal of anxiety disorders 28(5):446-453. 24. Smith BN, et al. (2013) Main and interactive effects of social support in pre- dicting mental health symptoms in men and women following military stressor exposure. Anxiety, stress, and coping 26(1):52-69. 25. Ramchand R, Rudavsky R, Grant S, Tanielian T, and Jaycox L (2015) Prevalence of, risk factors for, and consequences of posttraumatic stress disorder and other mental health problems in military populations deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. Current psychiatry reports 17(5):37. 26. Pietrzak RH, Johnson DC, Goldstein MB, Malley JC, and Southwick SM (2009) Psychological resilience and postdeployment social support protect against traumatic stress and depressive symptoms in soldiers returning from Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. Depression and anxiety 26(8):745-751. 27. Hourani L, et al. (2012) Longitudinal study of resilience and mental health in Marines leaving military service. Journal of affective disorders 139(2):154-165. 28. Kehle SM, et al. (2010) Early Mental Health Treatment-Seeking Among US Na- tional Guard Soldiers Deployed to Iraq. Journal of Trauma Stress 23(1):33-40. 29. Interian A, Kline A, Callahan L, and Losonczy M (2012) Readjustment stressors and early mental health treatment seeking by returning National Guard soldiers with PTSD. Psychiatric services 63(9):855-861. 30. Balderrama-Durbin C, et al. (2013) Combat disclosure in intimate relationships: mediating the impact of partner support on posttraumatic stress. Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) 27(4):560-568. 31. Monson, et al. (2012) Effect of cognitive-behavioral couple therapy for PTSD: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 308(7):700-709. 32. Southwick SM, Morgan CA, 3rd, and Rosenberg R (2000) Social sharing of Gulf War experiences: association with trauma-related psychological symptoms. The Journal of nervous and mental disease 188(10):695-700. 33. Martin RL, Houtsma C, Green BA, and Anestis MD (2016) Support Systems: How Post- Deployment support impacts suicide risk factors in the United States Army National Guard. Cognitive Therapy and Research 40(1):14-21. 34. Griffith J (2015) Cross (Unit)-level effects of cohesion on relationships of suicide thoughts to combat exposure, postdeployment stressors, and postdeployment social support. Behavioral medicine 41(3):98-106. 35. Blais RK, Renshaw KD, and Jakupcak M (2014) Posttraumatic Stress and Stigma in active-duty service members relate to lower likelihood of seeking support. Journal of Trauma Stress 27(1):116-119. 36. Ehlers A, et al. (2013) Implementation of cognitive therapy for PTSD in routine clinical care: effectiveness and moderators of outcome in a consecutive sample. Behaviour research and therapy 51(11):742-752. 37. Charuvastra A and Cloitre M (2008) Social bonds and posttraumatic stress dis- order. Annu Rev Psychol 59:301-328. 38. Meichenbaum D (1996) Stress inoculation training for coping with stressors. The Clinical Psychologist. 49:4-7. 39. Sautter FJ, Glynn SM, Cretu JB, Senturk D, and Vaught AS (2015) Efficacy of structured approach therapy in reducing PTSD in returning veterans: A random- ized clinical trial. Psychological services 12(3):199-212. 40. Cohen S (2004) Social relationships and health. American Psychologist 59(8):676-684. 41. Galovski TE, Blain LM, Mott JM, Elwood L, and Houle T (2012) Manualized ther- apy for PTSD: flexing the structure of cognitive processing therapy. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 80(6):968-981. 42. Coan JA, Schaefer HS, and Davidson RJ (2006) Lending a hand: Social regulation of the neural response to threat. American Psychologist 17(12):1032-1039. 43. Hussain A, Weisaeth L, and Heir T (2013) Posttraumatic stress and symptom improvement in Norwegian tourists exposed to the 2004 tsunami–a longitudinal study. BMC psychiatry 13:232. 44. Lepore SJ (2001) A social-cognitive processing model of emotional adjustment to cancer. Psychosocial interventions for cancer, (American Psychological As- sociation, Washington, D.C.), 99-116. 45. Cohen S, Underwood LG, and Gottlieb B (2000) Social Support Measurement and Intervention: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. eds Cohen S, Underwood LG, and Gottlieb B (Oxford University, New York). 46. Maercker A and Horn AB (2013) A socio-interpersonal perspective on PTSD: the case for environments and interpersonal processes. Clinical psychology and psychotherapy 20(6):465-481. 47. Maercker A and Hecker T (2016) Broadening perspectives on trauma and recov- ery: a socio-interpersonal view of PTSD. European journal of psychotraumatol- ogy 7:29303 16 utdc.utoledo.edu/Translation Wang et al. Cover Volume 5 1036 v5