ISSN: 2469-6706 Vol. 5 2018 Management of Ureters Involved in Inguinal Hernias Sarah K Perz a , 1 Timothy Suttle b and Puneet Sindhwani a aDepartment of Urology, Health Science Campus, The University of Toledo, 3000 Arlington, Toledo OH 43614-2598, USA, and bProMedica Toledo Hospital, Department of Urology, 2120 W Central Ave, Toledo, OH 43606, USA Background: The presence of a ureter in a hernia sac presents a unique surgical challenge and can increase the likelihood of ureteral injury at the time of surgery as they are often not iden- tified pre-operatively. Here we present our institutional experi- ence and review of the literature in order to provide guidance on the urologist’s role in this situation. Materials and Methods: A PubMed and Medline search was conducted to identify relevant literature published in the year 2000 or later. Case reports and case series in the English language were included using terms "ureter and hernia", "herniated ureter", "ureteral hernia", "in- guinal hernia and ureter". Results: The presence of a ureter in an inguinal hernia sac is an uncommon finding. When present, many are not identified pre-operatively, which places the patient at risk for ureteral injury during herniorrhaphy. Patients with ureters contained in their inguinal hernias, that were identified pre-operatively or intra-operatively and not injured, recovered well. Post-operative imaging, when performed, showed stabi- lization or improvement of hydronephrosis and a more normal course of the ureter. One case reported the identification of ureteral involvement post-operatively after injury, which resulted in worsened renal function and required a re-operation. Conclu- sions: The presence of a ureter in an inguinal hernia can be differently managed. The primary goal should be avoidance of injury intra-operatively. ureteral hernia | inguinal hernia | hydronephrosis | renal ectopia The presence of a ureter in an inguinal hernia sac is uncommonand likely underreported event (1). The literature is scarce on this topic and discusses a variety of methods of management rang- ing from ligation of ureters in non-functioning kidneys to placement of ureteral stents or percutaneous nephrostomy tubes (PCNT) (1-4). Identification of the herniated ureter before or during the surgery can be a concerning finding for the operating general surgeon and usually prompts a urologic consult. The data on how to best manage these ureters and renal units - whether with or without hydronephro- sis - are sparse. Ideally, identifying this problem on pre-operative imaging can potentially reduce the likelihood of ureteral injury dur- ing hernia repair. Since obtaining cross-sectional imaging is not a routine for all patients undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphies, these ureters are often a surprising intraoperative finding. This paper will discuss our institutional experience with these patients and review the literature to date to provide guidance for other urologists and general surgeons facing this unusual clinical scenario. Methods We present two cases that had the rare finding of ureters en- trapped within the inguinal hernia sac. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was not required for this study. Case 1. A 71-year-old man was admitted for pre-operative medical op- timization prior to undergoing left inguinal hernia repair for a large symptomatic left inguinal hernia. Pre-operative computed tomogra- phy (CT) scan revealed an indirect incarcerated left inguinal hernia with the left ureter contained within the hernia sac (Figure 1). We elected to perform a retrograde pyelogram and stent place- ment prior to herniorraphy (Figure 2). This confirmed the course of the ureter through the hernia sac with significant redundancy of the ureter; notably, a 28 cm ureteral stent barely reached the renal pelvis. Case 2 A 65-year-old man was admitted with acute on chronic renal failure and significant right hydroureteronephrosis. The patient had a very large chronic right indirect inguinal hernia which was asymp- tomatic. CT scan revealed his right ureter contained within the her- nia. In this patient a ureteral stent was placed pre-operatively for optimization of renal function. We again experienced difficulty due to an elongated, tortuous ureter, however we were eventually able to place a 30 centimeter stent into the renal pelvis. The patient’s creatinine declined slightly after stent placement but did not return to baseline. A PubMed and Medline search was conducted to identify rel- evant literature published in the year 2000 or later. Case reports and case series in the English language were included using terms "ureter and hernia", "herniated ureter", "ureteral hernia", "inguinal hernia and ureter". Case reports or series with discussion of man- agement of the ureter were included. Case reports that involved transplanted kidneys or herniated bladders were excluded. Includ- ing our own series, 12 series with only 17 cases were identified and included in our analysis (Table 1). Results The most common presentation were patients with symptomatic hernias referred to a general surgeon for repair (1, 2, 5-7, 9), al- though rarely patients presented initially to a urologist with renal colic (8, 10). Of the 17 cases reviewed, 10 patients (58.8%) were being evaluated for symptomatic inguinal hernia (1, 2, 5-7, 9), four patients (23.5%) for renal insufficiency and hydronephrosis (1, 3, All authors contributed to this paper. 1To whom correspondence should be sent: sarah.perz@utoledo.edu or Skperz@gmail.com The authors declare no conflict of interest. Submitted: September/09/2018, published: Octo- ber/15//2018. Freely available online through the UTJMS open access option utdc.utoledo.edu/Translation UTJMS 2018 Vol. 5 21–25 Figure 1. A: Coronal CT showing left ureter entering hernia sac. Left kidney inferiorly displaced. B: Sagital CT showing left ureter entering and leaving the hernia sac. A B Figure 2. A: Retrograde pyelogram showing left ureter in the inguinal hernia sac. B: Postoperative abdominal X-ray showing redundancy of stented left ureter. 11), two patients (11.8%) had renal colic (8, 10) and one patient (5.9%) presented with incidental findings during workup for another ailment (4). In 15 (88.2%) of the cases, the ureter was identified in the hernia sac prior to operative intervention (1-6, 8-11). Three of these patients were primarily being worked up for uro- logic symptoms (4, 11), while 12 patients were being evaluated for large symptomatic inguinal hernias. In two patients (11.8%), ureteral involvement was not identified prior to surgical interven- tion for the hernia (1, 7). In one patient, the ureter was identified intra-operatively, reduced with the hernia contents and follow-up imaging revealed a normal upper urinary tract (7). In the second pa- tient, the ureter was presumed to have been located within the hernia sac after delayed identification of a ureteral injury, which resulted in hydronephrosis and drainage of urine from the surgical incision (1). In eight patients (53.3%), who were diagnosed pre-operatively, urologic intervention was attempted pre-operatively, such as retro- grade pyelogram and attempted placement of a ureteral stent (1-4). Ureteral stents were successfully placed in five patients (1, 2, 4), while the other three patients had percutaneous nephrostomy tubes placed. 22 utdc.utoledo.edu/Translation Perz et al. Table 1. Analysis of studies meeting criteria for inclusion (1-11). *IVU: intravenous urogram. Author Presentation Diagnosis Indication for intervention Pre-op GU intervention Intervention Outcome Ahmed et al. (2016) hernia IVU* symptomatic hernia none herniorraphy ureter in appropriate position on follow-up IVU Allam et al.(2015) hernia postop injury symptomatic hydrocele hernia none hydrocelectomy, herniorraphy hydronephrosis, renal atrophy from ureteral injury renal insufficiency CT hydronephrosis, renal insufficiency attempted retrograde stent, PCNT herniorraphy, ureteral resection and reimplant resolution of hydronephrosis hernia CT hydrocele, renal atrophy none herniorraphy, hydrocelectomy, scrotoplasty, ligation of ureter recovered well hernia CT not reported ureteral stent herniorraphy no ureteral injury hernia CT symptomatic hernia PCNT herniorraphy successful herniorraphy Eilber et al.(2001) hernia CT symptomatic hernias none none not reported Falidas et al. (2015) hernia intraoperative not reported none herniorrhaphy no ureteral injury Giglio et al. (2001) renal colic IVU non-reducible hernia none herniorraphy not reported Giuly et al. (2002) hernia IVU not reported none herniorraphy post-op IVU with ureter in normal position Latowsky et al. (2013) hernia CT inguinal pain ureteral stent herniorrhaphy no ureteral injury Massoud et al. (2010) renal colic CT hydronephrosis, flank pain none herniorraphy resolution of hydronephrosis McKay et al.(2014) renal insufficiency CT urethral obstruction, renal failure attempted ureteral stent, bilateral PCNT bilateral ureteral reimplants, bilateral inguinal hernia repairs recovered well Won et al.(2012) renal insufficiency CT ureteral obstruction, renal failure none none not reported Yahya et al. (2017) incidental CT ureteral calculus ureteral stent herniorraphy no ureteral injury Perz, et al. (2018) hernia CT ureteral stent herniorraphy ureteral calculus no ureteral injury renal insufficiency CT large hernia, renal failure ureteral stent herniorrhaphy no ureteral injury Perz et al. UTJMS 2018 Vol. 5 23 The degree of hydronephrosis and renal atrophy varied at the time of presentation, however the majority of patients displayed lit- tle or no evidence of upper urinary tract damage. In the patient with delayed post-operative identification of ureteral injury, the hy- dronephrosis worsened after surgical intervention (1). It was re- ported in 4 patients that post-operative urologic imaging confirmed stabilization or improvement of hydronephrosis and appropriate po- sition of the ureter (1, 5, 9). Discussion A ureter in a hernia sac is a rare condition but can have se- rious complications, including intra-operative injury to the ureter, hydronephrosis and renal failure. Ureters are more likely to be in- volved in large inguinal hernias containing other visceral structures and should be an indication to obtain imaging of the pelvic region prior to intervention. In patients with ipsilateral hydronephrosis or renal colic, a high index of suspicion should be maintained, thus representing another indication to obtain pelvic imaging prior to in- tervention. Identification Patients are not routinely imaged prior to in- guinal hernia repair. Involvement of the ureter should be suspected in patients with ipsilateral renal colic or previously detected hy- dronephrosis [12]. If there is suspicion of ureteral involvement, imaging of the ureter can be pursued in the form of CT Urogram, IV Urogram or retrograde pyelogram. The most commonly employed technique is CT Urogram, which can be helpful for the planning of the operation, as it will provide further information about the con- tents of the hernia sac. Pollock et. al discussed in depth findings associated with herniated ureters and speculated that the commonly identified inferior displacement of the kidney is due to loss of fat in the retroperitoneum leading to loss of support of the kidney rather than downward traction of the ureter itself (12). Previous reports have identified patients at increased risk of ureteral involvement as those with anterior displacement of the ureter at level of L4 on CT and obese males in their fifth and sixth decade of life (12). Ureteral involvement is more common in indirect rather than direct hernias (80% v. 20%) (4). Involvement of renal transplant ureters is a much more common finding and ipsilateral inguinal hernias should al- ways be carefully examined for ureteral involvement in the trans- plant population (12). Perioperative management For most patients, the treatment plan is not significantly altered due to the presence of a ureter within the hernia sac. In seven (41.2%) of the cases we reviewed, a urologic problem was listed as an indication for surgery (Table 1). In these cases, a urologic problem such as hydronephrosis or renal insuffi- ciency may have persuaded the patient to pursue surgical correction of the hernia sooner than if they had no urologic involvement. In the urologic literature there are no uniform recommendations for man- aging ureters located in hernia sacs. If the kidney is functional, avoidance of ureteral injury at the time of surgery should be of paramount importance. Whether to place a ureteral stent is a de- cision to be made by collaboration between the general surgeon and the urologist. Certainly, if there is evidence of significant obstruc- tion a stent can be placed to optimize renal function. Similar to use of ureteral stents preoperatively in complex gynecological or col- orectal resections, cannulation of ureters can potentially minimize the chance of injury in these patients. Stent placement in this sit- uation is particularly difficult due to long, tortuous ureters. In one series of five cases, only one patient had successful pre-operatively placement of a ureteral stent; failure in the other patients was due to a variety of obstacles, including technical difficulty due to re- dundancy of the ureter, and futility in non-functioning kidneys. In one patient, the ureter was not identified pre-operatively (1). Al- though there were no reported cases of ureteral injury during at- tempted stent placement, the benefit of stent placement should be carefully weighed against the possible risks of ureteral injury and prolonged anesthesia. In one study, a retrograde pyelogram was performed before and after reduction of a sliding inguinal hernia and a more normal course of the ureter was seen after the hernia was reduced (5). There was no further intervention required and the patient’s hydronephrosis resolved after the hernia repair. The ma- jority of patients had favorable outcomes. In nine (52.9%) of the cases, the authors reported that there was no ureteral injury and the patients recovered well (1-4, 7). In five (29.4%) of the cases, post- operative renal imaging was ordered in the form of ultrasound, CT scan or IVU; the patients who were imaged post-operatively were all found to have a more normal course of the ureter and stabiliza- tion and/or improvement of hydronephrosis. (5, 9, 10). However, in three (17.6%) of the cases, post-operative follow-up was not re- ported (6, 8, 11). In one of the patients imaged post-operatively the ureteral involvement was identified only after ureteral injury and the patient was found to have worsened hydronephrosis and renal atro- phy (1), supporting the importance pre-operative identification of the ureter within the hernia sac. While rare, it is important for surgeons to be aware of the possi- bility of ureteral involvement in inguinal hernias. Lack of awareness can lead to significant intra-operative and post-operative complica- tions. The general surgeon should be suspicious of large indirect inguinal hernias that could contain ureters and obtain pre-operative imaging. A patient with hydronephrosis and renal failure as their presenting symptom and a large hernia should also undergo ap- propriate imaging to rule out intra-hernia ureter as the cause of hydronephrosis and renal failure. Pre-operative identification of a ureter within a hernia sac can allow for early involvement of a urologist and pre-operative planning to protect the ureter and renal function. Failure to identify ureteral involvement can lead to com- plications such as intra-operative injury, the need for re-operation, and irreversible renal damage (1). The primary role of the urologist is to assist the general surgeon in identifying and avoiding injury to the ureter. Pre-operative ureteral stent placement or retrograde pyelogram can help reduce the likelihood of ureteral injury or help identify ureteral injury should it occur. In the unfortunate occurrence of an inadvertent ureteral injury, a urologist should be consulted and standard techniques for repair of the ureter should be implemented, such as uretero-ureterostomy or ureteral reimplantation, depending on the location of the injury. There should be an abundance of ureteral length available for repair as these ureters are often elongated. A stent should be placed at the time of repair if it was not placed previously. Rarely, nephrec- tomy can be performed in lieu of ureteral stenting or repair. This should be reserved for patients with limited or no renal function con- firmed on a functional study such as lasix renogram, and symptoms such as infections or stones. Although salvaging the kidney may not contribute to overall renal function, there is significant morbid- ity associated with a more extensive procedure involving nephrec- tomy compared to herniorrhaphy alone. It is reasonable to perform nephrectomy or ureteral ligation in situations where there is mini- mal renal function and significant ureteral reconstruction would be necessary to return the ureter to a normal position. Conclusion In this literature review, all patients who had post-operative imaging without an intra-operative ureteral injury had improvement or stabilization of their hydronephrosis and a more normal course of the ureter [1, 5, 9, 10]. 24 utdc.utoledo.edu/Translation Perz et al. We conclude that identification and avoidance of injury of a ureter contained within a hernia sac are paramount for preven- tion of ureteral injury during inguinal herniorrhaphies. This can be achieved by collaboration between the urologist and general surgeon and minimally invasive techniques such as pre-operative ureteral stent placement for identification and protection of the ureter. 1. Allam ES, Johnson DY, Grewal SG, Johnson FE. (2015) Inguinoscrotal herniation of the ureter: Description of five cases. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, 14:160-3. 2. Latowsky J, Shenoy S. (2013) Ureteral inguinoscrotal hernia: a hidden hazard, stents may prevent injury. Am Surg., 79(3):E133-4. 3. McKay JP, Organ M, Bagnell S, Gallant C, French C. (2014) Inguinoscrotal hernias involving urologic organs: A case series. Can Urol Assoc J., 8(5-6):E429-32. 4. Yahya Z, Al-Habbal Y, Hassen S. (2017) Ureteral inguinal hernia: an uncommon trap for general surgeons, BMJ Case Rep., 1, 1-5. 5. Ahmed S, Stanford R. (2016) Ureteric obstruction secondary to a paraperitoneal inguinal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl., 98(2):e16-8. 6. Eilber KS, Freedland SJ, Rajfer J. (2001) Obstructive uropathy secondary to ureteroinguinal herniation. Rev Urol., 3(4):207-8. 7. Falidas E, Gourgiotis S, Veloudis G,Exarchou E, Vlachos K, Villias C. (2015) Asymptomatic extraperitoneal inguinoscrotal hernia involving ureter: A case presentation and review of the literature. J Nat Sci Biol Med., 6(Suppl 1):S153-5. 8. Giglio M, Medica M, Germinale F, Raggio M, Campodonico F, Stubinski R, et al. (2001) Scrotal extraperitoneal hernia of the ureter: case report and literature review. Urol Int., 66(3):166-8. 9. Giuly J, Francois GF, Giuly D, Leroux C, Nguyen-Cat RR. (2003) Intrascrotal hernia of the ureter and fatty hernia. Hernia, 7(1):47-9. 10. Massoud W, Eschwege P, Hajj P, Awad A, Iaaza LA, Chabenne J, et al. (2011) Hydronephrosis secondary to sliding inguinal hernia containing the ureter. Urol J., 8(4):333-4. 11. Won AC, Testa G. (2012) Chronic obstructive uropathy due to uretero-inguinal hernia: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep., 3(8):379-81. 12. Pollack HM, Popky GL, Blumberg ML. (1975) Hernias of the ureter.–An anatomi- croentgenographic study. Radiology, 117(2):275-81. Perz et al. UTJMS 2018 Vol. 5 25 Cover Volume 5 1039 final