The University of Toledo Translation Journal of Medical Sciences Internal Medicine Abstract, Department of Medicine Research Symposium UTJMS 2023 May 5; 11(1):e1-e2 Full Thickness Versus Circular Peroral Myotomy in the Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis Wasef Sayeh, MD1*, Sami Ghazaleh, MD2, Azizullah Beran, MD1, Mohammad Safi, MD1, Dipen Patel, MD, MBA1, Justin Chaung, MD1, Saif-Eddin Malhas, MD1, Amna Iqbal, MD1, Ziad Abuhelwa, MD1, Waleed Khokher, MD1, Omar Sajdeya, MD1, Anas Alsughayer, MD1, Anas Renno, MD2, Ajit Ramadugu, MD2, Ali Nawras; MD2 1Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43614 2Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43614 *Corresponding author: wasef.sayeh@utoledo.edu Published: 05 May 2023 Introduction: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective procedure that is used to treat esophageal achalasia. Early studies recommended a circular myotomy where the circular muscle layer is cut with preservation of the longitudinal layer. Recent studies have investigated full thickness myotomy as a possible alternative. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search in the databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception through April 20th, 2022. We considered only randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was clinical success. The secondary outcomes were the occurrence of subcutaneous emphysema and post-procedure reflux symptoms. The random-effects model was used to calculate the risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and confidence intervals (CI). A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Six randomized controlled trials involving 774 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The rate of clinical success was not statistically different between the two groups (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.98- 1.06, p = 0.45, I2 = 0%) (Figure 1a). The rate of subcutaneous emphysema was significantly lower in the full thickness group (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.89, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%) (Figure 1b). The rate of post- procedure reflux symptoms was not statistically different between the two groups (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.60-2.02, p = 0.75, I2 = 22%). https://dx.doi.org/10.46570/utjms.vol11-2023-722 https://dx.doi.org/10.46570/utjms.vol11-2023-722 mailto:wasef.sayeh@utoledo.edu https://dx.doi.org/10.46570/utjms.vol11-2023-722 UTJMS 11(1):e1-e2 https://dx.doi.org/10.46570/utjms.vol11-2023-722 2 ©2023 UTJMS Discussion: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that clinical success and the post-procedure reflux symptoms were both not statistically different between full thickness and circular PEOM. However, subcutaneous emphysema was significantly lower in the full thickness myotomy group. https://dx.doi.org/10.46570/utjms.vol11-2023-722 https://dx.doi.org/10.46570/utjms.vol11-2023-722