Running Head: MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  1 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Military Youth & Young Adult Resiliency 

Kaylee B. Grant, Kami N. Kramer, Amber L. Michael, Claire E. Palmatier, Leanne R. Pizzi, Molly C. 

Quinlan, Amber L. Reichardt, Julia L. Riopelle, and Maureen F. Rose 

University of Anchorage Alaska 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

2 

Abstract 

Nursing students formulated the Military Youth and Young Adult Resiliency program to promote 

resiliency in an emerging adult military associated population. This population exhibits high-risk 

behaviors leading to poor health outcomes. Assessment included a literature review, key informant 

presentations, and a questionnaire. Results documented need for resiliency training focused on coping 

skills. Training was given to 28 JROTC members using discussion, interactive activities, and distribution 

of community resource cards. Evaluation questionnaire showed improvement in identification of positive 

coping skills and community resources, as well as self-promotion of resiliency. Intervention had a 

positive impact on participants and improved self-perception of resiliency.    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

  



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

3 

Military Youth & Young Adult Resiliency 

During the spring of 2015, students of the University of Anchorage, Alaska (UAA) School of 

Nursing (SON) partnered with the Alaska Army National Guard (ANG) and Colony High School Junior 

Reserve Officers' Training Corps (JROTC) for their Community Health Promotion Project.  Both federal 

and state governments fund the ANG, while JROTC is funded by the Department of Defense and local 

school districts (State of Alaska, 2013; Establishing a JROTC program, n.d.). To help military service 

members and their families deal with the challenges of military life, the United States (US) Military 

developed numerous support trainings and resources focused on resilience, domestic violence, bystander 

awareness and much more (Ready and Resilient, n.d.).  As explained by Sergeant 1st Class Diane Singh 

of the ANG, what is missing from these offerings is a training focused on the normalization of adversity 

in daily life combined with identification of coping skills (personal communication, January 21, 2015). 

To meet this need, we developed the Military Youth & Young Adult Resiliency Program (MYYARP). 

The following paper will describe this project, beginning with the assessment of our target population, the 

analysis of the gathered data, and the planning of our intervention. The intervention will be detailed along 

with the evaluation of its effect, project impact and suggestions for future work.   

Assessment, Analysis, & Planning 

Our target population was emerging adults associated with the military, ages 16-24. According to 

the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Report (2014c), 70% of all 

deaths among youths and young adults aged 10–24 years resulted from motor vehicle crashes, 

unintentional injuries, homicide, and suicide. Other risk behaviors that contributed to death and disability 

were tobacco, alcohol, and drug use, as well as unsafe sexual practices. Coupled with the stresses of 

military life, the presence of these high-risk behaviors put this population at risk for negative health 

outcomes.       

  



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

4 

Assessment Process 

 Our assessment began with a briefing from a panel of key informants from the Alaskan ANG 

regarding the culture and recent challenges faced by this organization. The panel included the following 

active duty and civilian members: Chaplain Richard Koch, Chaplain Ted McGovern, Lyn Tashea, 

Director of Psychological Health; Octavia Thomson, Joint Forces Headquarters Sexual Assault Response 

Coordinator; Sergeant Monique Andrews, Victim Advocate Coordinator; and Captain Troy Townsend, 

Behavioral Health Officer.      

 On subsequent meetings, we received resiliency training from Sergeant 1st Class Diane Singh, 

Coordinator for the Comprehensive Family Fitness Program. Kim Conkling, Prevention Educator at 

Alaska National Guard, spoke to us regarding risk behavior reduction. Ruby Batchelor discussed suicide 

awareness and prevention in the military. Sergeant Andrews returned to provide bystander awareness 

training. Finally, we directly observed the JROTC program at Colony High School and discussed student 

challenges with teachers Lieutenant Colonel Butch Diotte and First Sergeant Derek Heavener.     

 Specific assessment of our target population was conducted with a structured written 

questionnaire, given to ANG soldiers during a drill weekend on January 24, 2015 and JROTC students 

during class on January 23, 2015. We received ninety completed questionnaires from our target 

population. The questionnaire asked the following closed-ended, multiple-choice questions: their age, 

stressful life events experienced, coping methods used during these times, likelihood to reach out to 

others, and how well they bounced back from stressful situations. In order to provide feedback for the 

ANG, we also asked if military trainings helped individuals deal with stressful life events and increased 

their awareness of community resources.    

Assessment Rationale 

We relied on Diem and Moyer’s (2005) Community Health Nursing Projects to guide our 

assessment process. Key informants from the ANG and JROTC were our first primary sources of 

information. Their input helped us identify the present health situation of our target population, strengths 



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

5 

and barriers to health, and available resources. We learned that a variety of trainings and community 

resources are available to military associated emerging youth. However, missing from these offerings are 

the normalization of adversity in daily life and an overarching training to tie these programs together (D. 

Singh, personal communication, January 21, 2015).    

Our specific assessment consisted of a questionnaire to collect data in our target population at 

different times and locations. Questionnaires were self-administered and anonymous, consisting of 

closed-ended questions that could be answered quickly to encourage the maximum return rate, with prizes 

of food to encourage participation. Several of the questions were formulated to provide our key 

informants with requested feedback on the perceived efficacy of their existing training programs and 

participant’s knowledge of community resources.    

Review of Literature 

The purpose of our literature review was to better understand our target population of military 

associated emerging adults, ages 16 to 24. We also sought to better understand resiliency and the best 

educational methods to convey this concept.     

We started our literature review by researching emerging adults. We determined that emerging 

adulthood is a developmental state from the late teens through the twenties, with a focus on ages 18 – 25 

(Arnett, 2000). Risk behaviors for emerging adults are sensation seeking and peer influences.   Both are 

correlated with drug use, promiscuous sexual behavior, reckless driving and theft (Bradly & Wildman, 

2001). Emerging adults in the military are at high risk for sexual misconduct, suicide and risky behaviors 

(Department of Defense, 2015; Department of Defense, 2014; National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2011).     

In order to better understand the relationship between adversity in our population and future health 

outcomes, we reviewed the Adverse Childhood Experiences study conducted by the Kaiser Permanente’s 

Health Appraisal Clinic in 1995. The study demonstrated a strong relationship between higher levels of 

traumatic stress encountered during childhood and poor physical, mental, and behavioral outcomes later 

in life (CDC, 2014a).   



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

6 

Resiliency can enable individuals to overcome adverse life experiences, as the American 

Psychological Association (2015) defines it as “the process of adapting well in the face of adversity, 

trauma, tragedy, threats or significant sources of stress.” We learned about the connection between 

resiliency and coping skills from the American Psychological Association (2015).    

We found Foundations of Nursing to be a good resource for educational theories to guide our 

intervention, such as learning domains (Berman & Snyder, 2012). Our intervention incorporated 

cognitive, affective and psychomotor learning domains. The teaching techniques of discovery, 

demonstration and group discussion were used. We also incorporated audiovisual materials.   

Development of Goals & Objectives 

From assessment data, we learned all participants had experienced stressful life events. The three 

most common were school (72%, n=56), loss (47%, n=37), and relationships (45%, n=35). Positive (51%, 

n=148) and negative (49%, n=140) coping skills were used almost equally to deal with these stressors. 

Participants were more likely to always (23%, n=18) or sometimes (46%, n=36) reach out to others 

during times of stress, compared to those who never did (31%, n=24). Most respondents rated themselves 

as always or nearly always bouncing back after adverse experiences (70%, n=53). Additionally, most 

respondents knew of community resources to use in times of stress or if they felt overwhelmed (79%, 

n=61) compared to those who did not (21%, n=16).   

 Based on the assessment, our target population exhibited numerous strengths. Most were likely to 

reach out to others during difficult times. The majority of the target population was aware of community 

resources they could turn to when feeling overwhelmed and perceived themselves as resilient. However, 

the assessment also identified potential weaknesses. In particular, all participants reported experiencing 

adversity in their lives. In dealing with adversity, they used both positive and negative coping skills 

equally and nearly a quarter were unaware of community resources.    

We developed the following action statements to address the issues found in our assessment: the 

military associated emerging adults (a) are at risk for ineffective coping based on their use of negative 



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

7 

coping skills, (b) are at risk for ineffective coping based on their lack of information regarding 

community resources, and (c) have readiness for improved health based on their self-perception of being 

resilient. Our goal in this project was to promote resiliency in the military associated emerging adult. In 

order to achieve this goal, we formulated the following objectives: (a) 95% of the military associated 

emerging adults will name one positive coping method, (b) 95% of the military associated emerging 

adults will identify one community resource, and (c) 75% of the military associated emerging adults will 

plan to apply one method to promote self-perception of resiliency at the end of the intervention on 

February 9, 2015.     

The social ecological model guided our intervention (CDC, 2014b). This model focuses on the 

complex relationship between individual, relationship, community, and societal factors. According to 

Stanhope and Lancaster (2008), resiliency is “a function of individual, interpersonal, organizational, 

community, and population factors” (p. 384). While our focus was on individual interventions, resilient 

behavior is a product of all four factors.   

Description of Intervention 

The MYYARP intervention took place on February 9, 2015 with the third period JROTC class at 

Colony High School in Palmer, Alaska. The training lasted 46 minutes and consisted of 28 students. We 

presented educational activities in a formal course that consisted of lectures, a group game, and group 

discussions that were delivered in person and included audiovisual materials.     

We used the learning theories of behaviorism, cognitivism, and humanism to develop different 

teaching techniques and address the three learning domains. The game that was created achieved 

cognitive learning, the class discussion achieved affective learning, and our activity with the tree helped 

with psychomotor learning, which will be described in more detail below.    

The presentation began with students describing resiliency, followed by a short introduction on its 

meaning and importance. We discussed the survey results, for the purpose of showing that all students 

experienced some sort of stressful event, thus normalizing adversity. Next, students participated in a 



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

8 

version of the Family Feud game show (Appendix B), taking turns guessing the top four positive and 

negative coping skills students identified in the questionnaire. Students actively participated in this game 

and received prizes.           

Next, participants received green and brown leaves, on which they wrote coping methods. A short 

explanation accompanied this activity, explaining how positive coping skills promote resilience. Most 

students taped multiple green, or positive, coping skills to the branches of the Tree of Resilience 

(Appendix C), while brown, or negative coping skills, were taped at the base of the tree to represent fallen 

leaves. A class discussion on coping methods followed the activity. The discussion provided an 

opportunity to discuss other ways to promote resiliency, including the importance of positive 

relationships.   

We then showed a short video that told the story of Bob Shumaker, a prisoner during the Vietnam 

War (Sweet, Streeter & Bloom, 2010). He explained how using a tap code to communicate with other 

prisoners helped him develop resilience during his time in prison. We used this video to illustrate the 

centrality of relationships in resiliency promotion. Following the video, we distributed cards with 

community resources that were specific to Colony High School JROTC. The cards included names and 

contact information for school counselors, the Military Family Life Counselor, and the Alaska Careline 

Crisis Intervention Line.     

Our presentation concluded with a summary focused on positive coping skills and how these 

important life skills can be used to promote healthy relationships, goal achievement and ultimately 

resiliency. We further discussed ways that negative coping skills can result in outcomes such as domestic 

violence, sexual assault, drug and alcohol abuse, and suicide. We stressed the importance of making good 

choices in life, and how individual choices can affect other individuals and the community. We 

incorporated the topic of bystander awareness into our conclusion by discussing the fact that individuals 

can set a positive example for others regarding their coping choices, and those who set a positive example 

are leaders among their peers.   



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

9 

Evaluation 

Following the intervention, we evaluated effectiveness by having students fill out a self- 

administered, structured, written, open-ended questionnaire. Our outcome evaluation focused on 

evaluating participant’s learning in the three areas identified as issues in our assessment: (a) naming 

positive coping skills, (b) identifying community resources to use when feeling overwhelmed, and (c) 

promoting resiliency in daily life.   

After analyzing the results of the twenty-four evaluations, we determined that we met two of our 

three objectives. Our first objective was achieved, as 96% (n=23) of the military associated emerging 

adults were able to name one positive coping method. We did not achieve our second objective, as at the 

end of our presentation, only 88% (n=21) of the respondents could name a community resource to turn to 

when they felt overwhelmed, rather than the 95% that was our goal. Our third objective was achieved, as 

88% (n=21) of the military associated emerging adults could describe at least one method to promote self-

perception of resiliency at the end of the intervention presentation on February 9, 2015. We received good 

feedback, with most participants writing on the questionnaire that they understood and enjoyed the 

presentation.   

Impact & Future Anticipated Impact 

The immediate impact of the MYYARP was to normalize adversity, by emphasizing that 

everyone experiences adversity and by communicating the survey results regarding the most common 

adverse experiences for this population. The presentation, the game, the Tree of Resiliency, and class 

discussion all served to increase understanding of positive versus negative coping skills. Focusing on 

positive coping skills provided participants with additional tools to promote resiliency.   The negative 

coping skills were associated with negative outcomes. Finally, participants have increased awareness of 

community resources to help deal with stressful events.   

 The future anticipated impact of the MYYARP is to promote resilient behavior in participants. By 

modeling resilient behavior, participants promote resiliency in their peers, leading to sustainable cultural 



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

10 

change. In the long term, greater reliance on positive coping skills can lead to decreased adverse 

outcomes, like substance abuse, interpersonal violence, and suicide. Additionally, Sergeant Andrews, who 

watched the training, said that she was very happy with the intervention and would incorporate elements 

into her trainings with similar populations, which could also be easily adapted for an older audience as 

well (personal communication, February 9, 2015).   

Recommendations for Future Work 

 Central to future work on this subject is continued discussions on the importance of resilience. 

We have specific recommendations for future work in this area. First, military associated emerging adults 

in JROTC would benefit from continued resiliency trainings, such as the Comprehensive Soldier Fitness 

Resiliency Training, with a focus on mental fitness promotion. Secondly, the training should be provided 

to additional JROTC populations in the Anchorage area. Third, as our intervention took place with the 

JROTC population only, it would be beneficial to conduct the MYYARP intervention with the ANG 

population as well. This program provides a different perspective than current military resiliency trainings 

as it focuses on the normalization of adversity and connects coping skills to both positive and negative 

outcomes. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, continued partnerships with the UAA SON, the Alaska 

ANG, and JROTC programs would bring the unique nursing perspective to help create interesting 

programs to meet the challenges faced by youths associated with the military, providing them with the 

tools necessary to succeed in life.          



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

11 

References 

American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American 

  Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. 

American Psychological Association. (2015). The road to resilience. Retrieved from:  

 http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/road-resilience.aspx 

Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through  

 the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469-480. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469 

Berman, A., & Snyder, S. (2012). Kozier & Erb’s Fundamentals of Nursing (9
th
 ed.). Upper Saddle River, 

New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.   

Bradley, G & Wildman, K. (2001). Psychosocial predictors of emerging adults’ risk and reckless  

 behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(4): 253-265. 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014a). Injury prevention & control: division of violence 

prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/acestudy/ 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014b). The socio-ecological model: A framework for 

prevention. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/overview/social-

ecologicalmodel.html 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014c). Youth risk behavior surveillance-United states 2013 

(Surveillance Summaries Vol. 63 No. 4). Retrieved from: 

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6304.pdf  

Diem, E., & Moyer, A. (2005) Community health nursing projects: Making a difference. Philadelphia, 

PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.   

Establishing a JROTC program. (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://www.usarmyjrotc.com 

/jrotc-program/establish-jrotc-program 

National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2011). Substance abuse among the military, veterans and their 

families. Retrieved from: http://www.drugabuse.gov/sites/default/files/veterans.pdf 

Ready and Resilient. (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://www.army.mil/readyandresilient 



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

12 

Stanhope, M., & Lancaster, J. (2008). Public health nursing: Population-centered health care in the 

community. Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier Mosby.   

State of Alaska FY2015 Governor’s Operating Budget. (2013). Retrieved from: 

https://www.omb.alaska.gov//ombfiles/15_budget/DMVA/Proposed/comp2135.pdf 

Sweet, J., Streeter, S., & Bloom, A. (Producers). (2010). This emotional life: The tap-code.    [Television 

series]. United States of America: Public Broadcasting Service.    

Retrieved from: http://www.pbs.org/thisemotionallife/video/tap-code 

United States Department of Defense. (2014). Department of defense quarterly suicide report calendar 

year 2014. Retrieved from: http://www.suicideoutreach.org 

/Docs/Reports/DoD%20Quarterly%20Suicide%20Report%20CY2014%20Q1.pdf 

United States Department of Defense. (2015). Report on sexual harassment and violence at military 

service academies. Retrieved from: http://sapr.mil/public/docs/reports/MSA 

/APY_1314_MSA_Report_Executive_Summary.pdf 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

13 

Appendix A 

Copy of questionnaire 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

14 

Appendix B 

Version of the Family Feud game show  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

15 

Appendix C 

Tree of Resiliency 

 

  



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

16 

Appendix D 

Evaluation Survey 

 

  



MILITARY YOUTH & YOUNG ADULT RESILIENCY  

    

17 

Appendix E 

Resource Card 

  

 

 

 

 



Undergraduate Journal of Service Learning and Community-Based Research, Volume 4, Fall 2015 

Military Youth and Young Adult Resiliency 
 

Amber L. Michael 

University of Alaska Anchorage 

 

 The UAA College of Nursing capstone project has become well known for the 

contributions that students make to the community.  It is a project that I had been looking 

forward to even before I began nursing school, and I couldn’t wait to be a part of it. What I 

didn’t expect was the intense coordination and strain that a project of this magnitude would have 

on my nine-person team. Grasping the concepts of resiliency and who our population was took 

time and effort, and a lot of communication.  

 We were handed a blank slate with a lot of information and were then asked to produce 

positive teaching tools to help young enlisted military members become more resilient in their 

everyday lives. The fundamental idea of resiliency was initially much larger in scope than we 

could grasp. It appeared as though each of us understand resiliency differently, and finding a 

common ground as to what and how we could employ teaching tools proved to be a complex 

challenge. I was grateful to have a talent for grasping and communicating concepts. As the leader 

of our group, I spent most of our meetings reflecting and rephrasing concepts between members 

of our group, the professor, and our key informants. I relied heavily on my teammates to make 

sure our ideas and information was organized, while they relied on me to keep everyone on 

point, making sure the work we were doing would lead us all in the right direction.  

 The key informants from the Alaska National Guard do exceptional work, and we were 

humbled by the time they took to teach us about the struggles they face with their young enlisted 

soldiers. We spoke with social workers, chaplains, educators, and members of the sexual assault 

response team. Lowering rates of sexual assault, domestic violence, and drug and alcohol abuse 

encompasses their jobs, and yet they were asking us for help, for a different perspective. The 

viewpoint of the public health nurse was missing from their approach, so they welcomed our 

input and were eager to learn.  

 After our literature review, meeting with key informants, and surveying soldiers, we 

began to form a picture that was more tangible. Due to scheduling conflicts, we knew we would 

be teaching these concepts to high school NJROTC students instead of soldiers, but these 

students still fell into the category of young adult. Knowing our audience gave us a sense of 

direction and an understanding of how to grab their attention and to teach concepts that they 

could use in their daily lives. We reached this understanding very late into our project, and were 

then able to quickly grasp the need to teach these students how to cope. 

 We were both equally frustrated and motivated by this realization – motivated by the 

epiphany and direction, but dismayed because teaching coping skills alone seemed to leave out 

so many concepts that resiliency comprises. We also realized that these young adults were more 

than likely overwhelmed with the amount of information and stress that they deal with on a daily 

basis.   

Nine people can make quite a large presentation, but nine overachievers who work well 

together can make a fantastic presentation. We expanded our teaching strategy to include coping 

skills, bystander awareness, and discussion about what stressors and coping strategies these 

young adults have on a daily basis. Our multimedia and interactive approaches were well 

received by the students and teachers. The interactions we had were incredibly positive and our 

challenges during the learning process helped us become more familiar with our own resiliency 



Michael 2 

Undergraduate Journal of Service Learning and Community-Based Research, Volume 4, Fall 2015 

as well as the resiliency of our own families. Most of us found ourselves teaching our children 

how to be more resilient, and altering some of our coping skills to be more positive and effective 

in our own lives. As a group, we founded new friendships that the previous year of study 

together had not forged.  

I am incredibly proud of my team and how well we supported each other. These women 

saw their strengths and acknowledged their weaknesses, and we stepped in to fill those gaps 

where we could, so that no one was overburdened. When I felt as though I was not handling the 

agendas and documentation well as leader, another teammate stepped in, because her talent was 

in the details. This relieved me of stressful work I am normally challenged by and allowed me to 

utilize my talent motivating and communicating. This project will always be a proud moment for 

me as a student, as a nurse, and as a friend and teammate.  

 

~ 

 

I would like to give my sincere thanks to Professor Angelia Trujillo, DNP of the University of 

Alaska Anchorage for sharing her love of community health and learning, and for her 

unwavering support for my professional future.  


	Amber L. Michael, University of Alaska Anchorage Research
	Amber L. Michael, University of Alaska Anchorage Reflection