alvina 96 ABSTRACT Arthritis is a disease of the joints that causes pain and musculoskeletal stiffness, and may cause limitation of joint movement. Age, obesity, smoking behavior, and occupation are risk factors for rheumatic diseases. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the role of body mass index (BMI), smoking behavior, and occupation on rheumatic disease among persons of productive age in Indonesia. A cross-sectional study was conducted using National Basic Health Research data. The inclusion criterion was age 15-64 years. Rheumatic disease diagnosis was based on interview results and was defined as the presence of a history of rheumatic disease diagnosed by health professionals and/or rheumatic symptoms in the past 12 months. The study sample consisted of 609.097 persons who fulfilled the inclusion criterion. Compared to persons with normal BMI, rheumatic disease was more prevalent in the overweight (OR 1.25; 95%CI 1.21—1.29) and the obese (OR 1.52; 95%CI 1.47—1.56), but less prevalent in the underweight (OR 0.91; 95%CI 0.88—0.93). Compared to non- smokers, rheumatic disease was more prevalent in every day smokers (OR 1.65; 95%CI 1.60—1.70), occasional smokers (OR 1.41; 95%CI 1.35—1.47), and ex-smokers (OR 1.85; 95%CI 1.76—1.95). Measures for prevention of rheumatic disease are needed, e.g. through education to increase knowledge about the impact of smoking and obesity on rheumatic disease. Keywords: Rheumatic disease, smoking, body mass index, productive age *Center of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research and Development National Institute of Health Research and Development, MOH RI Correspondence dr. Lusianawaty Tana, MS, SpOK Center of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research and Development National Institute of Health Research and Development, MOH RI Jl. Percetakan Negara No.23a Jakarta Phone: 021-6500266 Email: lusianawaty@litbang.depkes.go.id Univ Med 2010;29:96-103 Impact of smoking and obesity on rheumatic disease in persons of productive age Lusianawaty Tana* and Daroham Mutiatikum* May-August, 2010May-August, 2010May-August, 2010May-August, 2010May-August, 2010 Vol.29 - No.2 Vol.29 - No.2 Vol.29 - No.2 Vol.29 - No.2 Vol.29 - No.2 UNIVERSA MEDICINA INTRODUCTION Rheumatic disease comprises more than 100 disorders and conditions, constituting a health problem frequently experienced by the community. The most frequently encountered rheumatic diseases are osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).(1) In 2001 there was an estimated 43 million people in America who reportedly had rheumatic disease.(2) One study stated that rheumatic disease was the cause of impaired mobility and agility in more than 30% of the elderly population.(3) The reported prevalence of rheumatic diseases or disorders vary considerably in a number of countries, being 33% in Australia, 26.3% in Bangladesh, 18.2% in India, and 14.9% in Vietnam.(4-7) The varying prevalence between countries indicates differences in the definition of rheumatic disease. 97 Univ Med Vol.29 No.2 OA is the most frequently encountered t y p e o f a r t h r i t i s t h r o u g h o u t t h e w o r l d , p a r t i c u l a r l y a m o n g t h e e l d e r l y, a n d t h e principal cause of disability both in developed as well as in developing countries.(8) The symptoms of OA initially appear around the age of 40 years and by the age of 50 years female OA patients outnumber males.(9) The etiology of OA is still undetermined, but the risk factors of OA are: (i) ethnicity; (ii) overweight; iii) joint injury; (iv) overuse of joints; (v) infrequent excercise; (vi) nerve injury; and vii) advanced age. There is a dearth of data on OA prevalence, due to p r o b l e m s o f d e f i n i t i o n a n d m e t h o d s o f d e t e r m i n i n g t h e o n s e t o f t h e d i s e a s e . Worldwide, the proportions of male and female OA patients have been estimated at 9.6% and 18.0%, respectively.(10) In Australia, the incidence of OA in females is higher than in males of all age groups (2.95 per 1000 vs 1.71 per 1000 population). In females, the peak incidence is at age 65–74 years, while in males it is at age 75 years and over.(10) In Malaysia the prevalence of OA is around 10– 20%.(11) The incidence and prevalence of RA increase with age up to the age of 70 years and subsequently decrease. Females suffer from RA twice as frequent as males. The prevalence of RA in industrial countries is around 0.3-1%, while in developing countries it is estimated to be less than 0.3%.(10) Although rheumatic disease is rarely fatal, the resulting pain may be extremely uncomfortable/incapacitating and may lead to limitations in activity and thus affect quality of life. The course of the disease is chronic, and if not properly treated may result in mild disability (joint damage) to severe disability (paralysis). The data collected by the National Basic H e a l t h R e s e a r c h 2 0 0 7 ( R i s k e s d a s 2 0 0 7 ) include data on rheumatic disease and various variables such as individual characteristics, B M I , a n d s m o k i n g b e h a v i o r. ( 1 2 ) I n t h i s connection it was desired to analyze the Riskesdas 2007 data to determine the role of obesity and smoking on rheumatic disease in persons of productive age in Indonesia. This s t u d y i s p a r t o f t h e r e s e a r c h p r o j e c t o n “ F a c t o r s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h r h e u m a t i c a n d inherited diseases in Indonesia according to Riskesdas data”.(13) METHODS Design of the study The study was of cross-sectional design, and attempted to attain the research objectives using the Riskesdas 2007 data. Subjects of the study The inclusion criterion of the study was age 15-64 years, resulting in a sample size of 609.097. Data collection The variables came from 3 types of questionnaire, i.e. the RKD07.RT (Riskesdas 2 0 0 7 H o u s e h o l d q u e s t i o n n a i r e ) , t h e RKD07.IND (Riskesdas 2007 Individual q u e s t i o n n a i r e ) , a n d t h e S u s e n a s 2 0 0 7 VSEN2007.K questionnaire (National Socio- economic Survey of the 2007 Census). Data on individual characteristics were obtained from the RKD07.RT questionnaire and data on rheumatic disease, smoking and BMI from the RKD07.IND questionnaire. Data on per capita household expenditure were from the Susenas 2007 VSEN2007.K questionnaire.(17) The diagnosis of rheumatic fever was based on two questions, viz. (i) had respondent in the past 12 months been diagnosed as having rheumatic joint disease/rheumatism by health personnel and (ii) did respondent in the past 1 2 m o n t h s e v e r s u ff e r f r o m a c h e s / p a i n / stiffness/swelling around the joints and/or joint stiffness on waking up or after a long rest, that did not result from accidents.(14) 98 Data analysis Data analysis was by means of the SPSS program version 15.0. Univariate, bivariate and m u l t i v a r i a t e a n a l y s i s w a s p e r f o r m e d o n variables with p<0.25 or on variables with p>0.25 that were theoretically influential. The level of significance was set at < 0.05 and the confidence interval at 95%. RESULTS A total of 609.097 respondents aged 15- 64 years were recruited in this study. Only the data on the variables age, gender and type of residence were collected for an identical total of 609.097 (100%). Data on education, per capita expenditure, occupation, smoking, and BMI were obtained in differing percentages, i.e. respectively 99.63%, 99.61%, 99.59%, 99.54% and 97.04%. The proportion of respondents aged 15-44 years was 71.9% while those between 45-64 years of age accounted for 28.1 %. The sample comprised 52% females and 48% males, among whom 55% were rural residents and 45% were urban residents. A total of 71.8% respondents had an educational level of junior high school (SMP) a n d l o w e r, w h i l e 2 8 . 2 % h a d a n educational level of senior high school (SMA) and above. Among the respondents, 56.8% had a monthly per capita household expenditure in the 1-3 quintile range and 43.2% in the 4-5 quintile range. On the aspect of occupation, 32.6% of the respondents were farmers/ fishermen/laborers, 21.4% housewives, 15.4% entrepreneurs, 11% employees, 17.2% without occupation and without education, and 2.4% “other”. T h e p r o p o r t i o n o f r e s p o n d e n t s w i t h normal BMI was 67.5%, overweight 9.2%, Characteristics N Rheumatic disease (%) OR* 95% CI** p Yes No Age ( year s) 45-64 164.607 50.7 49.3 3.88 3.80 —3.95 0.0001 15-44 444.490 21.0 79.0 Gender Female 315.061 31.0 69.0 1.19 1.17 —1.21 0.0001 Male 294.036 27.4 72.6 Education < junior high (SMP) 435.168 33.7 66.3 2.27 2.21 —2.32 0.0001 > senior high (SMA) 171.683 18.3 81.7 Occupation Housewife 127.782 34.3 65.7 1.99 1.92 —2.07 0.0001 Employee 62.156 19.9 80.1 0.95 0.90 —0.99 Entrepreneur 85.103 30.3 69.7 1.66 1.59 —1.72 Farmer/fisherman/laborer 210.866 37.3 62.7 2.27 2.19 —2.35 Other 15.621 26.4 73.6 1.37 1.29 —1.46 No occupation and no educati on 53.769 13.6 86.4 Type of residence Rural 378.712 32.3 67.7 1.38 1.34 —1.42 0.0001 Urban 230.385 25.7 74.3 Per capita expen ditur e Quintile 1-3 344.551 30.4 69.6 1.13 1.11 —1.16 0.0001 Quintile 4-5 262.178 27.9 72.1 Table 1. Bivariate relationship between individual characteristics and rheumatic disease *OR = Odds Ratio; **95%CI = 95% Confidence Interval Tana, Mutiatikum Smoking and obesity on rheumatic disease 99 Univ Med Vol.29 No.2 obese 10.5% and underweight 12.8%. The respondents who smoked daily accounted for 27.6%, those who smoked occasionally 6.3%, ex-smokers 3%, and those who never smoked (non-smokers) 63.2%. The proportion of respondents in the age range of 15-64 years with rheumatic disease was 29.3% and those without rheumatic disease 70.7%. The results of the bivariate analysis on the relationship between individual characteristics and type of occupation on the one hand and rheumatic disease on the other hand are shown in Table 1, while the bivariate analysis results o n B M I a n d s m o k i n g b e h a v i o r v e r s u s rheumatic disease are shown in Table 2. From the bivariate relationship in Table 1 it is apparent that the proportion of rheumatic diseases increases significantly with advancing age, lower educational level, rural residence and lower per capita household expenditure. I n c o m p a r i s o n w i t h t h e g r o u p w i t h o u t occupation, the proportion of rheumatic disease was higher in farmers/fishermen/ laborers and housewives. Table 2 shows the bivariate relationship between BMI and smoking behavior on the one hand and rheumatic disease on the other. From Table 2 it can be seen that in comparison to t h e p r o p o r t i o n o f r h e u m a t i c d i s e a s e i n respondents with normal BMI, the proportion of rheumatic disease was higher in overweight a n d o b e s e r e s p o n d e n t s a n d l o w e r i n underweight respondents. The proportion of rheumatic disease in respondents who smoked daily and in ex-smokers was higher when compared with the non-smokers. The multivariate relationship between several factors and rheumatic disease is shown in Table 3. The variables fulfilling the criteria for multivariate analysis were age, gender, education, type of residence, occupation, monthly per capita household expenditure, BMI, and smoking behavior. From the multivariate relationship shown in Table 3, it appears that all eight factors included in the analysis were significantly a s s o c i a t e d w i t h r h e u m a t i c d i s e a s e . I n comparison to the respondents in the age group of 15-44 years, the proportion of rheumatic disease was 3.2-fold higher in the age group of 45-64 years. Compared with the respondents who never smoked, the proportion of rheumatic disease in the respondents who smoked daily was 1.6-fold, in ex-smokers 1.8-fold, and in non-smokers 1.4-fold higher. The proportion of rheumatic disease in respondents with an educational level of SMP and below was 1.6- fold higher than in those who had an SMA certificate or higher. In comparison with the group without occupation, the proportion of Table 2. Relationship of BMI and smoking with rheumatic disease *OR = Odds Ratio; **95%CI = 95% Confidence Interval 100 rheumatic disease was higher in farmers/ f i s h e r m e n / l a b o r e r s a n d h o u s e w i v e s . I n comparison with the respondents with normal BMI, the proportion of rheumatic disease in the overweight and obese were 1.2- and 1.5- fold, respectively. DISCUSSION In the present study the proportion of rheumatic disease was 21.0% in Indonesians of productive age between 15-44 years and 50.7% in the age group of 45-64 years. The r e s u l t s o f t h e 1 9 9 7 U S N a t i o n a l H e a l t h Interview Study (NHIS) showed a prevalence of arthritis of 30% in the age range of 55-64 years and of 45-46% in the age range of 65-84 years, thus differing from the present study results.(15) The results of the present study indicate that the prevalence of rheumatic disease is higher females than in males and increases with age. This is consistent with the results of the US National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) for 2003–2005, showing a higher prevalence of rheumatic disease for females (25.4%) as Table 3. Multivariate relationship between several factors and rheumatic disease *OR = Odds Ratio; **95%CI = 95% Confidence Interval Tana, Mutiatikum Smoking and obesity on rheumatic disease 101 Univ Med Vol.29 No.2 compared to males (17.6%). In this survey the prevalence of rheumatic was also higher in the older age groups, namely 29.3% in the age range of 45-64 years and 50% in the 65+ group, as compared to 7.9% in the age group of 18- 44 years.(16) Similarly, the present study results showed that the risk of rheumatic disease in the age group of 45-64 years is 3 times that in the age group of 15-44 years. One of the rheumatic diseases frequently encountered is OA, which is a degenerative disorder. Age is the principal determinant of OA, as the incidence and prevalence of OA is proportional to age, and OA is the main cause of rheumatic disease in the 65+ population group.(17) In respect to occupation, the risk of rheumatic disease was higher in the group of farmers/fishermen/laborers and in housewives. In the occupations of farmer/fisherman/laborer, the persons involved commonly must perform muscular work, such as lifting of loads and working in non-ergonomical positions, which in the long run may lead to complaints of pain in the involved joints. Similarly, the occupation of housewife is connected with lifting and stooping movements or working in non- ergonomical positions. In addition, as the occupation of housewife is predominantly a female occupation and the female gender is one of the risk factors of rheumatic disease, this c o m b i n a t i o n o f f a c t o r s i s p r e s u m a b l y a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e h i g h p r e v a l e n c e o f rheumatic disease detected in the present study. Similar results were obtained in male Japanese workers aged > 45 years, comprising factory laborers, construction workers, farmers or fishermen, who had a significantly higher risk of OA of the joints (OR = 2,54;95% CI 1.3- 4 . 8 2 ) . ( 1 8 ) H o w e v e r, t h e s t u d y f o u n d n o association of activities such as standing, climbing stairs, kneeling, driving, and sitting with a higher risk of OA in male Japanese workers. Similar results were found in female Japanese workers.(19) Compared with the respondents with normal BMI, the risk of rheumatic disease was respectively 1.2 and 1.5 times higher in overweight and obese respondents. With respect to BMI, it was found that overweight a n d o b e s i t y w e r e a t h i g h e r r i s k f o r t h e o c c u r r e n c e o f r h e u m a t i c d i s e a s e , i n comparison to normal body weight. The results obtained in the present study are consistent with those in the literature, in that one of the risk factors of rheumatic disease is overweight. A person with OA of the knee joint has in general a higher body weight as compared to persons without OA of the knee joint. A number of studies similarly showed that obesity increases the risk of OA. These studies also showed a positive correlation between BMI and severity of OA of the knee.(20-22) OA is due to the aging process, resulting in damage to joint cartilage. The involved joints are the frequently moved and weight-bearing joints, such as the carpal, elbow, lumbar, knee and tarsal joints. There were several limitations in this study, such as lack of specific data on the type of rheumatic disease and on the location, n u m b e r a n d s i z e o f t h e i n v o l v e d j o i n t s . Therefore the present study was unable to p r o j e c t t h e p r e v a l e n c e o f s p e c i f i c j o i n t disorders. As arthritis may cause functional impairment, disability, and impaired quality of life, this may lead to future socio-economic problems. Attention should be focussed on prevention of OA in order to reduce the problems associated with this disease. Obesity is a remediable risk factor for several types of joint disorder, thus epidemics of obesity s h o u l d b e c o n t a i n e d b y w e i g h t c o n t r o l , changes in dietary patterns and increased physical activity, in order to impact on the prevalence of arthritis. Every patient with rheumatic disease should receive counseling regarding this disorder. Changes in lifestyle are necessary to ensure that these patients r e m a i n p h y s i c a l l y f i t a n d b e c a p a b l e o f controlling their disease. In the case of severe disease the patient should be referred to a physiotherapist. 102 CONCLUSION In Indonesians of productive age, BMI, s m o k i n g , a n d o c c u p a t i o n a r e t h e m o s t influential among the various factors affecting rheumatic disease, indicating the importance of obesity prevention and the urgent need of a behavioral approach to weight control. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We hereby express our deepest gratitude to Dr.Triono Soendoro, PhD, DR. dr. Trihono, MSc, dr Emiliana Tjitra MSc, PhD, and Riskesdas 2007 data managers, enabling us to conduct this study using the Riskesdas 2007 data from the National Institute of Health Research and Development, MOH RI. REFERENCES 1. Feinglass J, Nelson C, Lawther T, Chang RW. Chronic joint symptoms and prior arthritis diagnosis in community surveys: implications for arthritis prevalence estimates. Public Health Rep 2003;118:230-9. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of self-reported arthritis or chronic joint symptoms among adults-United States, 2001. MMWR 2002; 51:948–50. 3. Leveille S, Ling S, Hochberg MC, Resnick H, Bandeen-Roche KJ, Won A, et al. Widespread musculoskeletal pain and the progression of disability in older disabled women. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:1038-46. 4. Minaur N, Sawyers S, Parker J, Darmawan J. Rheumatic disease in an Australian Aboriginal community in North Queensland, Australia. A WHO-ILAR COPCORD survey. J Rheumatol 2004;31:965-72. 5. Haq SA, Darmawan J, Islam MN, Uddin MZ, Das BB, Rahman F, et al. Prevalence of rheumatic diseases and associated outcomes in rural and urban communities in Bangladesh: a WHO-ILAR COPCORD study. J Rheumatol 2005;32:348-53. 6. Chopra A, Saluja M, Patil J, Tandale HS. Pain and disability, perceptions and beliefs of a rural Indian population: a WHO-ILAR COPCORD study. J Rheumatol 2002;29:614-21. 7. Minh Hoa TT, Darmawan J, Chen SL, Van Hung N, Thi Nhi C, Ngoc An T. Prevalence of the rheumatic diseases in urban Vietnam: a WHO- ILAR COPCORD study. J Rheumatol 2003;30: 2252-6. 8. Brooks PM. Impact of osteoarthritis on individuals and society: how much disability? Social consequences and health economic implications. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002;14:573- 7. 9. Arthritis Foundation. Osteoarthritis fact sheet. Available at: http://www.arthritis.org/media/ newsroom/media-its/Osteoarthritis_fact_ sheet.pdf. Accessed Januari 6, 2010. 10. Anthony D. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 2003;81:646-56. 11. Veerapan K, Wigley RD, Valkenburg H. Musculoskeletal pain in Malaysia: a COPCORD survey. J Rheumatol 2007;34:207-13. 12. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Departemen Kesehatan RI. Laporan Nasional Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2007. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Departemen Kesehatan RI; 2008. 13. Daroham M. Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan penyakit sendi dan penyakit turunan hasil Riskesdas di Indonesia. Available at: http:// digilib.litbang.depkes.go.id/go.php?id=jkpkbppk -gdl-res-2009-mutiatikum-3141&PHPSESSID =xmgwjcghxhek. Accessed February 21, 2010. 14. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Departemen Kesehatan RI. Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2007: pedoman pengisian kuesioner. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Departemen Kesehatan RI;2007. 15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Prevalence of arthritis—United States, 1997. MMWR 2001;50:334-6. 16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation — United States, 2003–2005. MMWR 2006;55:1089-92. 17. Cicutini FM, Teichtahl AJ, Wluka AE, Davis S, Strauss BJ, Ebeling PR. The relationship between body composition and knee cartilage volume in healthy middle-aged subjects. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:461-7. 18. Yoshimura N, Kinoshita H, Hori N, Nishioka T, Ryujin M, Mantani Y, et al. Risk factors for knee osteoarthritis in Japanese men: a case-control study. Mod Rheumatol 2006;16:24–9. 19. Yoshimura N, Nishioka S, Kinoshita H, Hori N, Nishioka T, Ryujin M, et al. Risk factors for knee osteoarthritis in Japanese women: heavy weight, past joint injuries and occupational activities. J Rheumatol 2004;31:157–62. Tana, Mutiatikum Smoking and obesity on rheumatic disease 103 Univ Med Vol.29 No.2 20. Felson DT, Goggins J, Niu J, Zhang Y, Hunter D. The effect of body weight on progression of knee osteoarthritis is dependent on alignment. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:3904-9. 21. Jadelis K, Miller M, Ettinger WH, Messier SP. Strength, balance, and the modifying effects of obesity and knee pain: results from the observational arthritis study in seniors (OASIS). J Am Geriatric Society 2001;884-91. 22. Sharma L, Lou C, Cahue S, Dunlop D. The mechanism of the effect of obesity in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:568-75.