C:\Users\UNIVERSA MEDICINA\Docu 105 ABSTRACT UNIVERSA MEDICINA Propranolol decreases DRD3 and SLC1A2 gene expression in patients with essential tremor Nefise Kandemir*@, Murat Gultekin**@, Mehmet Kara***, Arslan Bayram†‡ Nazife Tascioglu*, Meral Mirza**, and Munis Dündar* BACKGROUND Essential tremor (ET) is the most common disease among movement disorders. Genes such as essential tremor 1-4 (ETM 1-4), HS1-binding protein-3 (HS1BP3), dopamine receptor D3 (DRD3), leucine-rich repeat and Ig domain containing 1 (LINGO1), glial high affinity glutamate transporter member 2 (SLC1A2), FUS, high temperature requirement A2 (HTRA2) and TENM4 had been shown to be responsible for the genetic inheritance of the disease. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of propranolol on the expression of DRD3, SLC1A2, and HTRA2 genes in patients with ET. METHODS A study of non-randomized experimental design was conducted involving 76 subjects. They were divided into two groups: 38 patients with ET in the patient group (Group 1) and 38 healthy people in the control group (Group 2). DRD3, SLC1A2 and HTRA2 gene expressions were assessed before and after 8 weeks of propranolol treatment. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor scale results were compared before and after propranolol administration. Kruskal Wallis test was used to determine differences in gene expressions between the groups. RESULTS D3 dopamine receptor and SLC1A2 gene expression in the patient group appeared to be lower than in the control group (p<0.001). However, the HTRA2 gene expression level was significantly higher in the patient group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION D3 dopamine receptor and SLC1A2 gene expressions were decreased in ET patients which at first glance can be explained in relation to etiology, but after the treatment it was not increased as expected but decreased even more. Key words: Essential tremor, DRD3, gene expression, HTRA2, propranolol, SLC1A2 ORIGINAL ARTICLE pISSN: 1907-3062 / eISSN: 2407-2230 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18051/UnivMed.2020.v39.105-112 May-August 2020 Vol.39- No.2 @These authors have made an equal contribution to this study and should be considered as co-first authors. *Department of Medical Genetics, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey **Department of Neurology, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey ***Ministry of Health, Republic of Turkey †Department of Medical Genetics, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Diseases Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey ‡Department of Medical Genetics, DETA-GEN Genetic Diagnosis Centre, Kayseri, Turkey *This study was funded by Erciyes University, project no TTU-2016- 6761. Correspondence: Dr. Nefise KANDEMIR, MD Erciyes University Medical School, Department of Medical Genetics Talas Kayseri / TURKEY Telephone: +90-(352) 2076666 Mobile: +90-(533) 3013827 E-mail: dr.nefise86@gmail.com ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2151-7300 Date of first submission, March 16, 2020 Date of final revised submission, July 21, 2020 Date of acceptance, July 23, 2020 This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License Cite this article as: Kandemir N, Gultekin M, Kara M, et al. Propranolol decreases DRD3 and SLC1A2 gene expression in patients with essential tremor. Univ Med 2020;39:105-12. doi: 10.18051/UnivMed.2020.v39.105-112 106 Kandemir, Gultekin, Kara, DRD3, SLC1A2 and essential tremor INTRODUCTION Essential tremor (ET) is the most common movement disorder with motor and non-motor symptoms. Although the disorder can occur at any age, the incidence increases with age.(1, 2) Positive family history in individuals with ET varied between 17.4% and 100%.(2) Most of the patients with ET were not diagnosed correctly and had missed the appropriate treatment options. The pathophysiology of the disease is still unknown. The clinical presentation of ET was the 6-12 Hz kinetic and postural tremor, which occurred in the hands and arms by the voluntary movements. Other anatomical parts affected by tremors were head, vocal cords, trunk, legs and face regions. Essential tremor is currently revealed as a heterogeneous disease.(3, 4) The etiology of ET is mostly unexplained. About half of the cases of ET appear to result from a genetic mutation, although a specific gene has not been identified. This form is referred to as familial tremor and is an autosomal dominant disorder. The variability in age of onset, the presence of sporadic cases, and incomplete concordance of ET among monozygotic twins suggest that environmental factors play a role.(5- 8) The relationship of the disease to non-motor symptoms of such entities as parkinsonism, dystonia, c erebe llar dysfunction, sleep disturbances, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitive disorder, personality and temperament disorder, showed that the disease included not only the motor but also non-motor dysfunction.(9- 11) Essential tremor is autosomal dominantly inherited with an incomplete penetration. However, some families may also have polygenic inheritance.(12) A study at Yale University found that ET patients and their families knew the most basic, observable features of ET (e.g., the presence of hand tremors). However, 16.7% of the affected did not endorse genes as a cause for ET.(13) Treatment of patients with ET can be divided into two parts, i.e. medical and surgical parts. Pharmacological agents such as propranolol, pirimidone, topiramate, and gabapentin are preferred as a medical treatment, whereas surgical treatment may include thalamotomy, lesion surgery, or deep brain stimulation.(14, 15) A randomized controlle d tr ia l showed that propranolol reduced tremor amplitudes as measured by accelerometry by a mean of 55%.(14) The dopamine receptor D3 (DRD3) gene is localized on chromosome 3q13.31 and has been shown to be associated with ET together with the ETM1 locus. The D3 receptors are primarily expressed in mesolimbic areas associated with cognitive functions and motivated behaviour and have been implicated in the antipsychotic effects of neuroleptics as well as in the conditioning to psychostimulants.(16) The glial high affinity glutamate transporter member 2 (SLC1A2) gene as a member of the glutamate transport system, also known as glutamate transporter 1, contains five different members with variable expression patterns in the central nervous system. Due to the physiological and pathological effects of possible mutations in the solute carrier family 1 member 2 (SLC1A2) gene, these mutations were assumed to cause glutamatergic defects in the central nervous system of ET patients. Although the SLC1A2 expression was shown in peripheral organs, the SymAtlas results showed that the SLC1A2 gene is mostly expressed in the brain. This astroglial specific high-affinity glutamate transporter has been reported for expression alterations in psychiatric disorders.(17,18) The high-tempe rat ure -regulate d A2 (HTRA2) gene is a serine protease that is released during apoptosis from the mitochondria to the cytosol and plays role in many neurodegenerative diseases. (19-21) High-temperature-regulated A2 has already been designated as PARK13 which may cause Parkinson’s disease, although there are still discrepancies among the study results.(22) A case control study involving 45 subjects with ET and 13 subjects without tremor showed that the genotype frequencies did not differ significantly between subjects with ET and healthy controls. (23) 107 To the best of our knowledge this is the first study aiming to present the expression change in DRD3, SLC1A2, and HTRA2 genes before and after the treatment of ET patients with propranolol. METHODS Research design This non-randomized experimental study was carried out in the Departments of Medical Genetics and Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University between July 2016 and January 2019. Research subjects A total of 76 subjects with the diagnosis of ET and healthy subjects were recruited. They were stratified into the ET group and the control group consisting of the healthy subjects. The sample sizes were determined using effect size =0.6; α=0.05 and β=0.2, resulting in 38 subjects for each group. The inclusion criteria of the ET patients presenting with an involuntary rhythmic sinusoidal oscillation of a body part without any known causes, were age between 18 and 60 years, having no additional disease and being only on propranolol treatment at 40 mg twice per day for 8 weeks. Exclusion criteria were hyperthyroidism, psychiatric disorders such as depression, anxiety, psychosis , etc. , cere brova scular disea se, diabetes mellitus, other forms of tremor in the patient including neuropathic tremor, dystonic tremor, orthostatic tremor, etc. and being on t re a tme nt tha t i nc r ea s es tr e mo r se ve r it y (valproic acid, etc.). The study included 38 patients with ET and 38 healthy individuals as a control group. The control group included healthy people with the age of 18-60, chosen from the epidemiological area of the EUMF hospital, who had no other neurological disorder or chronic medical disease as a result of the evaluation done by an experienced neurologist. Patients admitted to the neurological movement disorders outpatient clinic of Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine and diagnosed with ET by an experienced neurologist were included into the study using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor scale (FTM). (24) Tremor severity was given a score between 0 and 4 in FTM. In order to determine the tremor severity- frequency of the patients with the FTM, the device was given to patients to measure the tremor frequency with both hands and they were asked to hold for 10 sec. P r i m e r se que nc es us e d f o r ge ne expression The RNA was isolated by leukocyte isolation using Red Cell Lysis solution (Sigma-Aldrichý, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) and TRIzol, a chemical solution used in the extraction of DNA, RNA, and proteins from cells (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, California, United States). Quantitative real-time PCR which is a PCR- based technique that compares amplification of a target DNA sequence with quantification of the concentration of the selected refe rence (housekeeping) DNA were performed on Light Cycler 480 II (Roche Diagnostics Ltd., Rotkreuz, Switzerland). The expression levels of DRD3, SLC1A2 and HTRA2 genes were measured via specific Real Time ready Catalogue primary-probe kits (Roche Diagnostic GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) (Table 1). The β-Actin gene was used as the reference housekeeping gene. Data were analyzed via the Light Cycler 480 Software (version 1.5.0 SP4) (Roche Diagnostics Ltd., Rotkreuz, Switzerland) using the ‘delta-delta Ct’ formula to calculate the relative fold gene expression. Gene expression results were compared between control, pre- and post- treatment groups. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA). The histogram, Quantile-Quantile Plot and Shapiro-Wilks tests were used to evaluate the normal distribution of the data and an independent- test was used. In the case of an abnormal data Univ Med Vol. 39 No.2 108 Kandemir, Gultekin, Kara, DRD3, SLC1A2 and essential tremor distribution being found, the nonparametric Mann- Whitney test was us ed to determine the difference between the groups. A Chi square test was used for comparison of distribution regarding gender of participants. p<0.05 was considered as the significance level. Ethical clearance Ethical approval (No: 2016/297) was obtained from the Ethical Committee of Erciyes University Medical Faculty. RESULTS A total of 76 subjects participated in the study, and were stratified into the ET group and the healthy control group. The ET subjects were given propranolol for 8 weeks (Figure 1). At base line there was no significant difference in age and gender between the ET and control groups. But the gene expression was significantly different between the ET and control groups. The DRD3 and SLC1A2 expressions A B C Gene Assay ID Primer sequence (5’-3’) SLC1A2 111792 F: CCTGCCAACAGAGGACATC R: GACTGAAGTTCTCATCCTGTCCA DRD3 113554 F: TTCGGGAGAAGAAGGCAAC R: GCAGCCAGCAGACAATGA HTRA2 145466 F: TCAGCATGGTGTACTCATCCA R: AGCTTCATAA Table 1. Primer sequences used in expression Figure 1. Flow diagram of the participants 109 were significantly lower in the ET group in comparison to the healthy group (p<0.001), but the HTRA2 gene was significantly higher in the ET group (p<0.001) (Table 2). Pre- and post-treatment expression levels of the DRD3, SLC1A2 and HTRA2 genes were compared in the ET gr oup. Propranolol significantly decreased SLC1A2 expression, but the decrease in HTRA2 and DRD3 ge ne expressions were not significant. We did not compare gene expression after 8 weeks between the ET group and the control group, as the latter did not receive any treatment. DISCUSSION Our results showed reduced DRD3 and SLC1A2 gene expression and increased HTRA2 gene expression levels in the patient group. The DRD3 receptor is a protein consisting of 446 amino acids. (25) The DRD3 receptor is found widely in the brain in the control centers for sensing, affect and motor functions, nucleus accumbens, ventral tegmental area, substantia nigra, limbic region, and basal ganglia.(26, 27) In the present study, the expression level of the DRD3 gene was lower in the patients with ET than in the control group. Expression of the DRD3 gene was lower after treatment with propranolol. Since the dopamine level was low in the patients with ET, the low mRNA level might be due to polymorphisms in this gene.(28) A further decrease in DRD3 e xpression unde r the propranolol treatment observed in our study possibly indicates that propranolol does not affect the expression of this gene and that decreased level of mRNA is a feature of ET. Jiménez-Jiménez et al.(23) in a study with DRD3 rs6280, SLC1A2 rs3794087, and MAPT rs1052553 gene variants, which was carried out on 11 Spanish families with ET clinical signs and the risk of these genes for ET inheritance, concluded that no relationship exists between DRD3 and SLC1A2 gene variant and ET. Although an increased risk for the MAPT variant was detected, this result was not confirmed by a family-based study. SLC1A2, which encodes the glutamate transporter and exhibits high affinity especially in astroglial cells, is a brain-specific gene. (23) The present study found that the expression level of the SLC1A2 gene was lower in the patient group. The expression level of the SLC1A2 gene was found to be even lower in the post-propranolol Univ Med Vol. 39 No.2 Table 2. Distribution of demographic characteristics and FTM-TRS grade within the ET and control groups Table 3. Gene expression comparison between the treatment (before and after 8 weeks propanorol treatment) and control groups Characteristics Treatment group (n=38) Control group (n=20) p value Age (years) 36.7 ± 12.2 37.35 ± 1.1 >0.05 Gender Male Female 25 13 12 8 >0.05 FTM-TRS Grade Before treatment After treatment - <0.0001 2.7 ± 1 2.1 ± 0.8 ET diagnosed patient group Control group p value Before treatment After treatment DRD3 1.2 ± 1.6 0.7 ± 0.6 5.3 ± 4,7 <0.0001 SLC1A2 2.3 ± 3 0.4 ± 4 10.6 ± 8.2 <0.0001 HTRA2 6.2 ± 7.5 4.3 ± 6 1.8 ± 0.98 >0.05 110 Kandemir, Gultekin, Kara, DRD3, SLC1A2 and essential tremor treatment period. As the glutamate level is high in ET patients, the low level of SLC1A2 mRNA, which is known as one of the glutamate carriers, may be due to polymorphisms in this gene. In another study on exome sequencing done by Gulsuner et al. (29) a rare variant of the ET- associated HtrA se ri ne peptidase 2 gene (HTRA2) was described in a family of 6 generations. The HTRA2 gene encodes a 458 amino acid serine pr ote ase found in the intermembrane region of mitochondria. The high- temperature-regulated A2 is known to be eff ective in the d evelopment of ma ny neurodegenerative diseases as well as in apoptosis. (30, 31) In the present study, the expression level of the HTRA2 gene was higher in the patient group. Despite a slight decrease in the post-propranolol treatment period, there was a higher expression in the patient group than in the control group. However, the statistically insignificant difference in HTRA2 gene expression seen in the present study could be in parallel with the fact that the effect of propranolol on apoptosis has not yet been fully elucidated. Propra nolol is a nonselective beta- adrenergic receptor antagonist. The mechanism of action suggests that it blocks a protein target in the form of peripheral beta-2 receptors. There are different studies in the literature about the effect of propranolol on genes.(32) The mechanisms underlying the properties of propranolol in gene expression are unclear at present. To explain these mechanisms more comprehensive investigations (in vivo and in vitro) should be carried out with different doses of propranolol and the protein levels in 3D cultures should be determined in future. Although HTRA2 expression level was found to be increased in the ET group, the increase was not statistically significant. Therefore further investigations are needed with larger samples to find out whether our results occurred by chance or there actually was a statistically significant increase in gene expression level. As a limitation of this study, only the sample size can be pointed out. For validation of obtained results other similar projects with larger samples must be carried out. Also, the effects of different dosages of propranolol could not be compared because of budget limitations. CONCLUSION The gene expression study previously performed with propra nolol showed that propranolol generally suppresses protein synthesis and gene expression. According to our findings, DRD3 and SLC1A2 gene expressions were deceased in ET patients which at first glance can be explained in relation to etiology, but after treatment it was not increased as expected but decreased even more. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study wa s f unded by Erciyes University, project no TTU-2016-6761. CONFLICT OF INTEREST There is no conflict of interest between authors. CONTRIBUTORS NK conceived the concept and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. MG analyzed the data. MK contributed to the writing of the manuscript. AB, NT, MM jointly developed the structure and arguments for the paper. MD made critical revisions. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript. REFERENCES 1. Kuhlenbäumer G, Hopfner F, Deuschl G. Genetics of essential tremor: meta-analysis and review. Neurology 2014;82:1000-7. doi: 10.1212/ WNL.0000000000000211. 2. Louis ED, Ferreira JJ. How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor. Mov Disord 2010;25:534-41. doi:10.1002/mds.22838. 111 Univ Med Vol. 39 No.2 3. Pahwa R, Dhall R, Ostrem J, et al. An acute randomized controlled trial of noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation in essential tremor. Neuromodulation 2019;22:537–45. doi: 10.1111/ ner.12930. 4. Prasad S, Bhalsing KS, Jhunjhunwala K, Lenka A, Binu V, Pal PK. Phenotypic variability of essential tremor based on the age at onset. Can J Neurol Sci 2019;46:192-8. doi: 10.1017/ cjn.2018.384. 5. Agarwal S, Biagioni MC. Essential tremor. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 6. Benito León J, Serrano JI, Louis ED, et al. Essential tremor severity and anatomical changes in brain areas controlling movement sequencing. Ann Clin Trans Neurol 2019;6:83-97. doi: 10.1002/acn3.681. 7. Vogelnik K, Kojovic M. From beta blockers to Parkinson’s disease in respect of essential tremor. Mov Disord 2019;34:153.doi: 10.1002/mds.27586. 8. Prasad S, Pal PK. Reclassifying essential tremor: Implications for the future of past research. Mov Disord 2019;34:437.doi: 10.1002/mds.27615. 9. Musacchio T, Purrer V, Papagianni A, et al. Non- motor symptoms of essential tremor are independent of tremor severity and have an impact on quality of life. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov 2016; 6:361. doi:10.7916/D8542NCH. 10. Bermejo-Pareja F, Puertas-Martýn V. Cognitive features of essential tremor: a review of the clinical aspects and possible mechanistic underpinnings. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov 2012;02-74-541-1. doi: 10.7916/D89W0D7W. 11. Benito-Leon J, Louis ED, Bermejo-Pareja F. Short sleep duration heralds essential tremor: a prospective, population-based study. Mov Disord 2013;28:1700–7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/mds.25590. 12. Clark LN, Louis ED. Challenges in essential tremor genetics. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2015;171:466–74. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2015.02.015. 13. Cristal AD, Chen KP, Hernandez NC, et al. Knowledge about essential tremor: a study of essential tremor families. Front Neurol 2018;9:27. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00027. 14. Deuschl G, Raethjen J, Hellriegel H, Elble R. Treatment of patients with essential tremor. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:148–61. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70322-7. 15. Rajput AH, Rajput A. Medical treatment of essential tremor. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis 2014;6:29– 39. doi: 10.4137/JCNSD.S13570. 16. Morozova A, Zorkina Y, Pavlov K, et al. Association of rs4680 COMT, rs6280 DRD3, and rs7322347 5HT2A with clinical features of youth- onset schizophrenia. Front Psychiatry 2019;10: 830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00830. 17. Lee M, Cheng MM, Lin CY, Louis ED, Faust PL, Kuo SH. Decreased EAAT2 protein expression in the essential tremor cerebellar cortex. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2014;2:157. doi: 10.1186/ s40478-014-0157-z. 18. Parkin GM, Udawela M, Gibbons A, Dean B. Glutamate transporters, EAAT1 and EAAT2, are potentially important in the pathophysiology and treatment of schizophrenia and affective disorders. World J Psychiatr 2018;8:51-63. DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v8.i2.51. 19. Desideri E, Martins LM. Mitochondrial stress signalling: HTRA2 and Parkinson’s disease. International J Cell Biol 2012, Article ID 607929, 6 pages. doi:10.1155/2012/607929. 20. Zesiewicz TA, Chari A, Jahan I, Miller AM, Sullivan KL. Overview of essential tremor. Neuropsychiatr Dis T reat 2010;6:401. Doi: 10.2147/ndt.s4795. 21. Hu Q, Wang G. Mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Transl Neurodegeneration 2016;5:14. DOI 10.1186/s40035-016-0060-6. 22. He YC, Huang P, Li QQ, et al. Mutation analysis of HTRA2 gene in Chinese familial essential tremor and familial Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson’s Dis 2017;2017:3217474. Doi: 10.1155/ 2017/3217474. 23. Jiménez-Jiménez FJ, García-Martín E, Alonso- Navarro H, et al. A family study of DRD3 rs6280, SLC1A2 rs3794087 and MAPT rs1052553 variants in essential tremor. Neurol Res 2016;38:880-7. Doi: 10.1080/01616412.2016.1210355. 24. Fahn S, Tolosa E, Marín C. Clinical rating scale for tremor. In: Jankovik J, Tolosa E, editors. Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1993.p.225- 34. 25. Cormier F, Muellner J, Corvol JC. Genetics of impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm 2013;120:665–71. DOI: 10.1007/ s00702-012-0934-4. 26. Sokoloff P, Le Foll B. The dopamine D3 receptor, a quarter century later. Eur J Neurosci 2017;45:2– 19. 27. Caravaggio F, Borlido C, Wilson A, Graff-Guerrero A. Examining endogenous dopamine in treated schizophrenia using [11C]-(+)-PHNO positron emission tomography: a pilot study. Clin Chim Acta 2015;449:60–2. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.03. 020. 28. Delay C, Tremblay C, Brochu E, et al. Increased LINGO1 in the cerebellum of essential tremor patients. Mov Disord 2014;29:1637-47. https:// doi.org/10.1002/mds.25819. 29. Gulsuner HU, Gulsuner S, Mercan FN, et al. Mitochondrial serine protease HTRA2 p. G399S in a kindred with essential tremor and Parkinson 112 Kandemir, Gultekin, Kara, DRD3, SLC1A2 and essential tremor disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:18285- 90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419581111. 30. Goo HG, Jung MK, Han SS, Rhim H, Kang S. HtrA2/Omi deficiency causes damage and mutation of mitochondrial DNA. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 2013;1833:1866–75. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.03.016 31. Darreh-Shori T, Rezaeianyazdi S, Lana E, et al. Increased active OMI/HTRA2 serine protease displays a positive correlation with cholinergic alterations in the Alzheimer’s disease brain. Mol Neurobiol 2019;56:4601–19. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12035-018-1383-3. 32. Salehifar E, Ebrahim S, Shiran MR, et al. Pharmacokinetic parameters and over- responsiveness of Iranian population to propranolol. Adv Pharm Bull 2017;7:195-202. doi: 10.15171/apb.2017.024.