Bioactive glass S53P4 eradicates Staphylococcus aureus in biofilm/planktonic states in vitro ORIGINAL ARTICLE Bioactive glass S53P4 eradicates Staphylococcus aureus in biofilm/planktonic states in vitro Torstein Grønsetha,b, Lene K. Vestbyc, Live L. Nessed, Magnus von Ungee,f and Juha T. Silvolaa,b,e aInstitute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; bDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; cDepartment of Analysis and Diagnostic, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway; dDepartment of Animal Health and Food Safety, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway; eDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Akershus and Oslo, Norway; fCenter for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, V€asterås, Sweden ABSTRACT Background: Increasing antimicrobial resistance to antibiotics is a substantial health threat. Bioactive glass S53P4 (BAG) has an antimicrobial effect that can reduce the use of antibiotics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of BAG in vitro on staphylococci in biofilm and in planktonic form. Secondary aims were to investigate whether supernatant fluid primed from BAG retains the antibacterial capacity and if ciprofloxacin enhances the effect. Methods: BAG-S53P4 granules, <45 mm, primed in tryptic soy broth (TSB) were investigated with gran- ules present in TSB (100 mg/mL) and after removal of granules (100, 200, and 400 mg/mL). The efficacy of BAG to eradicate Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in vitro was tested using 10 different clinical strains and 1 reference strain in three test systems: the biofilm-oriented antiseptic test based on metabolic activity, the biofilm bactericidal test based on culturing surviving bacteria, and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) combined with LIVE/DEAD staining. Results: Exposure to 48 h primed BAG granules (100 mg/mL) produced bactericidal effects in 11/11 strains (p ¼ 0.001), and CLSM showed reduction of viable bacteria in biofilm (p ¼ 0.001). Supernatant primed 14 days, 400mg/mL, reduced metabolic activity (p < 0.001), showed bactericidal effects for 11/ 11 strains (p ¼ 0.001), and CLSM showed fewer viable bacteria (p ¼ 0.001). The supernatant primed for 48 h, or in concentrations lower than 400mg/mL at 14 days, did not completely eradicate biofilm. Conclusion: Direct exposure to BAG granules, or primed supernatant fluid, effectively eradicated S. aureus in biofilm. The anti-biofilm effect is time- and concentration-dependent. When BAG had reached its full antimicrobial effect, ciprofloxacin had no additional effect. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 15 September 2019 Revised 20 April 2020 Accepted 4 May 2020 KEYWORDS BAG; biofilm; confocal laser scanning microscopy; Staphylococcus aureus Introduction Bacteria can alternate between a planktonic and a biofilm state. As biofilm, bacteria are attached to a substratum, or to each other, and are embedded in a self-produced extracellu- lar polymeric substance. Since the 1970s, when Nils Høiby observed a link between the aetiology of a persistent infec- tion and aggregates of bacteria in cystic fibrosis patients (1), biofilm infections have become increasingly recognised in chronic infections. A common pathogen is Staphylococcus aureus, a potent biofilm producer (2–6). Bacteria living in bio- film display an altered antimicrobial resistance phenotype through a lower metabolic rate and a reduced rate of cell division (7,8). In addition, the biofilm can act as a diffusion barrier, and also cause deactivation of antimicrobial substan- ces (9–11). As a result, the minimum inhibitory concentration of antimicrobial compounds on bacteria in biofilm can reach 500–1000 times that of their planktonic counterparts (9,12). Mature biofilm can further shed off planktonic bacteria or micro-colonies that may travel to other parts of the body, causing relapsing infections (10). Because of these biofilm defense mechanisms and grow- ing antimicrobial resistance (13,14), we need innovative new treatments in addition to conventional antimicrobial treat- ment. One such option is bioactive glass (BAG), a synthetic silica-based material. BAG gradually releases ions from the granules’ surfaces when in contact with biological fluids. This leads to an increase in osmotic pressure and pH, thus mak- ing the surrounding environment unsuitable for microbial growth (15–17). There are several types of BAG with differing antibacterial activity, one of which, BAG-S53P4, has been well studied (15,18). In clinical practice, BAG has been used to fill bone cavities (19) and treat osteomyelitis in ortho- paedic surgery (20), chronic frontal sinusitis during frontal sinus obliteration (21), and chronic otitis media during mas- toid obliteration (22,23). The diameter of the granules is usu- ally between 0.5 mm and 3.15 mm. CONTACT Torstein Grønseth t.gronseth@gmail.com Øre- nese og halsavdelingene, Oslo universitetssykehus HF, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, Oslo, 0424, Norway � 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 2020, VOL. 125, NO. 3, 217–225 https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2020.1765908 http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1080/03009734.2020.1765908&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2020-06-29 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2020.1765908 http://www.tandfonline.com The main aim of the study was to evaluate the antimicro- bial efficacy of BAG-S53P4 in vitro on clinical strains of S. aur- eus in biofilm and planktonic form. The sub-aims were to investigate whether the supernatant fluid primed from BAG retained anti-biofilm properties after removal of the granules, and to evaluate whether addition of ciprofloxacin causes an increased anti-biofilm effect. Methods Study design Ten clinical strains of S. aureus and one reference collection strain were first studied to verify their biofilm-producing cap- acity. The 11 bacterial strains were then tested in a plank- tonic state for sensitivity to BAG (broth dilution test) and ciprofloxacin (disc diffusion test). If a strain was not sensitive in the planktonic state, it was excluded from further tests in the biofilm form. The antimicrobial effect on bacteria living in biofilm in vitro was then tested using three different meth- ods: biofilm-oriented antiseptic test (BOAT); biofilm bacteri- cidal test; and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Bacterial strain collection and verification Ten clinical strains of S. aureus were collected from 10 ran- domly selected unique individuals with draining ears at Oslo University Hospital, in a period from April to October 2014. S. aureus ATCC 29213, a previously described strain known for its biofilm-producing capabilities, was used as a positive con- trol (24,25). The strains from the draining ears were obtained by using an otomicroscope and a sterile swab (VWR trans- port swabs, Copan, Breschia, Italy). The identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing did not reveal any MRSA strains (MALDI-TOF-MS, Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany; VITEKV R 2, bioM�erieux S.A. France). The bacteria were stored in a freezing broth at �70 �C (Frysebuljong, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway). Before the tests, each strain was plated onto blood agar plates (Blod agar plater, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway) for amplification and verification of purity. The blood agar plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 ± 1 �C. Test substance Our study evaluated the antimicrobial efficacy of smaller granules of BAG-S53P4, <45 mm, (donated by BonAlive Biomaterials, Turku, Finland), which have previously been shown to have greater antimicrobial activity compared with larger-sized granules (16). The concentrations and exposure times used are shown in Table 1. The concentrations were selected based on our broth dilution test and on previous studies (26). The test substance was obtained by adding BAG- S53P4 < 45 mm to tryptic soy broth (TSB) with 1% glucose/1% NaCl, pH 7.0, and vortexed (60 s) to ensure that all granules were in contact with the broth. The test substances were placed at room temperature prior to the experiment. One test substance was prepared for 48 h, and one 14 days prior to the test day. The time that the TSB was exposed to the BAG granules prior to test day is called priming time. On the test day, the 48-h solutions were further divided into one group with granules (Granule contact test) and one group with only the supernatant (Supernatant test). The 14- day solutions were only tested in the supernatant form (Supernatant test) (Table 1). Granule contact test Only 100 mg/mL BAG primed for 48 h was tested because of its complete eradication of biofilm at this concentration. Supernatant test BAG granules were removed from the test solutions, and only the supernatant was used for further testing. It was div- ided into two sub-tests: i) addition of ciprofloxacin; and ii) without added ciprofloxacin. The concentration of ciprofloxa- cin was 0.5 mg/mL, based on a previously published study on the expected concentration of ciprofloxacin in the middle ear mucosa (27). No comparisons were made between the efficacy of BAG þ ciprofloxacin and BAG alone for the con- centrations of 14-day primed 400 mg/mL and 200 mg/mL. The reason is that the bactericidal test for BAG alone showed 0 strains (400 mg/mL) and 3 strains (200 mg/mL) surviving of the total 11 strains. TSB (with 1% glucose/1% NaCl) broth was pH-adjusted with NaOH, to pH 9.7, 10.7, and 11.7 and used as controls to similar pH-level BAG. The pH was chosen as a result of the highest measured pH from the BAG in TSB for 14 days. All pH measurements used a pH metre (inoLabV R pH 7310 P, WTW GmbH, Weilheim, Germany). Table 1. Test substance and exposure time. Test substance Priming time BAG-S53P4 < 45 mm, TSB with 1% glucose/1% NaCl Granule test BAG - TSB, 100 mg/mL 2 days Supernatant test BAG - TSB, 100 mg/mL 2 days BAG - TSB, 200 mg/mL 2 days BAG - TSB, 400 mg/mL 2 days BAG - TSB, 100 mg/mL 14 days BAG - TSB, 200 mg/mL 14 days BAG - TSB, 400 mg/mL 14 days BAG - TSB, 100 mg/mL with ciprofloxacin 5 mg/mL 2 days BAG - TSB, 200 mg/mL with ciprofloxacin 5 mg/mL 2 days BAG - TSB, 400 mg/mL with ciprofloxacin 5 mg/mL 2 days BAG - TSB, 100 mg/mL with ciprofloxacin 5 mg/mL 14 days BAG - TSB, 200 mg/mL with ciprofloxacin 5 mg/mL 14 days BAG - TSB, 400 mg/mL with ciprofloxacin 5 mg/mL 14 days pH-adjusted (NaOH) TSB with 1% glucose/1% NaCl pH-adjusted TSB, pH 7.0 pH-adjusted TSB, pH 9.7 pH-adjusted TSB, pH 10.7 pH-adjusted TSB, pH 11.7 All TSB with 1% glucose/1% NaCl solutions were from the Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway. BAG: bioactive glass; TSB: tryptic soy broth. 218 T. GRØNSETH ET AL. Disc diffusion susceptibility testing of ciprofloxacin Each of the strains of the S. aureus was tested in its plank- tonic state to evaluate the efficacy of ciprofloxacin by a disc diffusion test according to the EUCAST disc diffusion method, version 5. Single colonies from a fresh overnight bacterial culture on blood agar were collected and trans- ferred into sterile saline. The suspension was measured to McFarland 0.5 and the spread on M€uller Hinton agar plates using an automated plate spreader. Diffusion discs (CIP 5, Sensi-DiscTM, BBLTM, Discs, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA) with ciprofloxacin 5 mg were applied to the agar plates. Inhibition zones were evaluated with callipers after 18 h of incubation at 36 ± 1 �C. Broth dilution test for planktonic bacteria A modified broth dilution test was employed to evaluate the efficacy of BAG on planktonic-state bacterial strains (28). First, 48-h suspensions of TSB with BAG were made at con- centrations of 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg/mL, separately. Two test sets were prepared for the granule contact and super- natant test. In the granule test, further tests were carried out with the BAG granules in the test solution. In the super- natant test, the supernatant of the primed fluid was pipetted into new sterile tubes without the granules for fur- ther testing. Bacterial preparation McFarland standard 0.5 turbidity suspensions of 1 � 108 colony-forming units (cfu)/mL in sterile saline were pre- pared from 24-h agar incubations of pure cultures from each bacterial strain. The McFarland 0.5 solutions were then diluted in sterile 48-h primed test solution as described above to reach the standard inoculum of 5 � 105 cfu/mL. In the granule test, the supernatant fluid was first moved into new test tubes. In the new test tubes the desired inoculum concentration was reached. Thereafter the supernatant with the inoculum was trans- ferred back to the original test tubes with the BAG. In the supernatant test, the supernatant of the primed fluid was pipetted into new sterile tubes without granules. From the supernatant the described inoculum concentration was pre- pared, and 200 mL of bacterial inoculum with different primed supernatant concentrations was transferred in trip- lets to a sterile 96-well microtiter plate (Nunclon Delta Surface, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Roskilde, Denmark). Prepared samples were used within 30 min of preparation. Sterility control with broth only and each concentration of TSB/BAG were included in all experiments. Each bacterial strain was grown in TSB to provide a positive growth con- trol. The test tubes for the granule test and the micro- plates for the supernatant test were kept at 35 ± 1 �C for about 20 ± 0.5 h before being visually evaluated for growth or no growth (28). Biofilm assay The ability of the S. aureus strains to form biofilm was tested in a 96-well microtiter plate (Nunclon Delta Surface) accord- ing to a previously published method (29). One colony of each bacterial strain was inoculated in 5 ml of TSB, which was cultured overnight at 37 ± 1 �C. The next day, 180 mL of TSB with 1% glucose/1% NaCl was transferred to each of the wells on the microtiter plate, except for the first three blank control wells, where 200 mL was transferred. The overnight cultures were then vortexed for 40 s, and 20 mL was trans- ferred to all the wells, except for the blank control. Each strain of the S. aureus was tested in three parallel wells. The microtiter plate was incubated at 37 ± 1 �C for 48 h. The wells were then washed three times with 220 mL of tap water and left to dry at room temperature for 30 min. After drying, 220 mL of crystal violet (1% solution, Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was added and incubated for 30 min. The wells were washed five times with 220 mL of tap water. To extract the crystal violet from the biofilm, 220 mL of ethanol:acetone (70:30 w:w) was added. The results were calculated by meas- uring the optical density at 570 nm (Siemens BEP 2000 Advance, Germany). The experiment was repeated three times. Biofilm-oriented antiseptics test (BOAT) In the presence of viable metabolically active bacteria, tetra- zolium chloride (TTC) is reduced from a colourless compound to red formazan, which correlates to the number of viable cells (30–32), utilised in the BOAT method (33). Ten clinical strains of S. aureus and the reference collec- tion strain S. aureus ATCC 29213 were tested. The same 96- well microtiter plate was used as in the biofilm assay and the biofilm was produced as described above with 12 paral- lel wells for each strain. After 48 h of incubation, the wells were washed with 220 mL sterile 0.85% NaCl, before adding the active or control substances. The microtiter plate was incubated at 37 ± 1 �C for 24 h. For each strain, three parallel wells were exposed to BAG at concentrations of 400 mg/mL, 200 mg/mL, and 100 mg/mL. Three wells were used as con- trols. The content in all wells was then removed and Dey Engley neutralising broth was added for 5 min. The wells were filled with 200 mL of TSB:TTC in the ratio of 20:1. The microtiter plate was incubated at 37 ± 1 �C for 7.5 h. The results were evaluated visually by colour change and meas- ured calorimetrically. The amount of formazan produced was calculated calorimetrically by measuring the optical density at 492 nm (Siemens BEP 2000 Advance, Germany). The experiment was repeated three times (34). Biofilm bactericidal test To confirm the eradication effects of BAG solutions on staphylococcus biofilm, a model described by T. Mah was used, modified for staphylococci (33). All 11 strains were tested. The first steps of establishing a biofilm, and applying the test solution, sterile 0.85% NaCl, and neutralising broth UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 219 were identical to those of the BOAT method described above and as described in our previous study (34). However, instead of then adding TSB:TTC, 200 ml of TSB was added to each well and incubated at 37 ± 1 �C for 24 h. Of the over- night culture 5 ml was transferred from each well onto a blood agar plate and incubated at 37 ± 1 �C for 24 h before the results were evaluated visually. If there was no growth, the tested substance was considered bactericidal. The experi- ment was repeated three times. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) The first steps of making biofilm, applying test solutions, and adding neutralising broth were identical to those of the BOAT method described above, except that a Lab-Tek II Chambered Coverglass with cover 8-well (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was used instead of a microtiter plate. The slides were stained with FilmtracerTM LIVE/DEADV R Biofilm Viability Kit, (Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Images of the stained biofilm were generated on a CLSM (Zeiss LSM710, Germany). A 488 nm argon laser line was used for the SYTOV R 9 and a 561 nm DPSS laser line for the propidium iodide. The ratio of dead or dying cells to the total number of cells in the biofilm was determined by ImageJ software (open source, public domain). The experiment was repeated twice. Statistical analysis Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical soft- ware (release 25.0 SPSS Inc., Chicago, Il, USA, and STATA MP/ 15.1, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). p < 0.05 was con- sidered to be statistically significant. In the BOAT, paired t test was performed to identify any significant differences between the test substance groups compared to the controls. In the bactericidal test, a McNemar asymptotic test (using STATA MP/15.1) was per- formed to identify any significant differences between the test substance groups compared to the controls. In CLSM, significant difference between the treated groups and control was calculated by paired t test. Approval The collection of specimens from human subjects was approved by the regional ethical committee (2014/1956, REK sør-øst C). Results Disc diffusion susceptibility testing of ciprofloxacin Ciprofloxacin showed clear inhibition zones �21 mm in the disc diffusion tests, indicating sensitive bacteria for all strains, except strain 3, which was not used for further testing with ciprofloxacin. Broth dilution test for planktonic bacterial strains A BAG concentration of 50 mg/mL showed growth for all strains (11/11) in both the granule and the supernatant tests. In the test with BAG granules, 100 mg/mL, there was no growth for any strains (p ¼ 0.001), but the supernatant test, 100 mg/mL, showed growth in 9/11 strains (p ¼ 0.160). The concentrations of 200 and 400 mg/mL of BAG showed no growth for any of strains (p ¼ 0.001) in either test. Biofilm assay All strains of staphylococci grew biofilm within 48 h in 96- well microtiter plates. Mean optical density ±1 SD of biofilm produced by 11 S. aureus stains was 1.864 ± 0.945. The min- imum optical density was 0.851, and the maximum optical density was 3.00. Biofilm-oriented antiseptics test (BOAT) BOAT was only performed in supernatants, since it was impossible to remove the BAG granules before measuring optical density, thus giving a misleading optical density. The reduction in optical density as an indirect measure of meta- bolic activity was significant for all concentrations of the test solutions primed for 14 days. After 48 h of priming only the 400 mg/mL concentration showed a significant reduction (Table 2). The optical densities in the 14-day primed test at 400 mg/mL and 200 mg/mL concentrations were similar to the blank control, while the other concentrations and dura- tions showed some metabolically active bacteria in biofilm (Table 2). This was also observed visually, where all wells treated with the 400 mg/mL concentration for 14 days appeared blank (Figure 1). The wells exposed to other test concentrations produced different shades of red, which indi- cated surviving metabolically active bacteria for at least some of the strains. A pH-adjusted TSB solution was used as a control and shown to have a significant effect on the reduction of staphylococcal metabolic activity at pH 11.7 and 10.7, but not pH 9.7. All wells were completely blank with no visible shades of red colour only for the highest pH of 11.7. The efficacy of BAG in the supernatant test was per- formed with and without ciprofloxacin. The tests showed an additional reduction of viable bacteria with ciprofloxacin only in concentrations of 100 mg/mL (p ¼ 0.005) and 200 mg/mL primed for 48 h (p ¼ 0.001). There was no additional effect of ciprofloxacin at any concentration of the supernatants primed for 14 days. Biofilm bactericidal test In the granule test, all 11 strains of staphylococci biofilm were eradicated. In the supernatant tests, no bactericidal effects were recorded for the 48-h primed 100 and 200 mg/ mL or the 14-day primed 100 mg/mL. In the supernatant test, only the 14-day primed 400 mg/mL concentration eradi- cated all strains (Table 2). For the remaining concentrations 220 T. GRØNSETH ET AL. Ta b le 2. A C om p ar is on of BA G ef fe ct s ve rs us co n tr ol . BO A T Ba ct er ic id al te st C on fo ca l la se r sc an n in g m ic ro sc op y w it h LI V E/ D EA D st ai n in g Te st so lu ti on n M ea n ± 1 SD p V al ue Su rv iv in g st ra in s/ to ta l n o. st ra in s p V al ue Ra ti o d ea d / to ta l ce ll n o. ± 1 SD p V al ue U n tr ea te d b ac te ri al st ra in s (c on tr ol ) 11 2. 88 4 0. 11 – 11 /1 1 – 0. 19 0 0. 01 – Su p er n at an t te st BA G -S 53 P4 < 45 m m , 10 0 m g /m L, 2 d ay s 11 2. 70 4 0. 49 0. 30 11 /1 1 – 0. 17 6 0. 12 0. 85 BA G -S 53 P4 < 45 m m , 20 0 m g /m L, 2 d ay s 11 2. 40 2 0. 96 0. 15 11 /1 1 – 0. 74 6 0. 35 0. 07 BA G -S 53 P4 < 45 m m , 40 0 m g /m L, 2 d ay s 11 0. 78 9 0. 72 < 0. 00 1 8/ 11 0. 08 0. 93 1 0. 21 0. 01 BA G -S 53 P4 < 45 m m , 10 0 m g /m L, w it h ci p ro flo xa ci n , 2 d ay s 10 1. 63 5 0. 86 0. 00 1 10 /1 0 – 0. 81 1 0. 32 0. 04 7 BA G -S 53 P4 < 45 m m , 20 0 m g /m L, w it h ci p ro flo xa ci n , 2 d ay s 10 0. 75 4 0. 80 < 0. 00 1 10 /1 0 – 0. 83 6 0. 11 0. 00 2 BA G -S 53 P4 < 45 m m , 40 0 m g /m L, w it h ci p ro flo xa ci n , 2 d ay s 10 0. 20 8 0. 09 < 0. 00 1 4/ 10 0. 01 1. 09 9 0. 07 < 0. 00 1 BA G -S 53 P4 < 45 m m , 10 0 m g /m L, 14 d ay s 11 1. 20 8 1. 07 0. 00 1 11 /1 1 – 0. 68 6 0. 13 0. 00 8 BA G -S 53 P4 < 45 m m , 20 0 m g /m L, 14 d ay s 11 0. 17 3 0. 05 < 0. 00 1 3/ 11 0. 00 5 0. 95 8 0. 26 0. 01 5 BA G -S 53 P4 < 45 m m , 40 0 m g /m L, 14 d ay s 11 0. 15 2 0. 03 < 0. 00 1 0/ 11 0. 00 1 1. 08 6 0. 05 < 0. 00 1 BA G -S 53 P4 < 45 m m , 10 0 m g /m L, w it h ci p ro flo xa ci n , 14 d ay s 10 1. 16 3 0. 44 0. 00 2 10 /1 0 – 0. 87 1 0. 13 0. 00 3 BA G -S 53 P4 < 45 m m , 20 0 m g /m L, w it h ci p ro flo xa ci n , 14 d ay s 10 0. 25 7 0. 10 < 0. 00 1 2/ 10 0. 00 8 1. 09 9 0. 12 0. 00 1 BA G -S 53 P4 < 45 m m , 40 0 m g /m L, w it h ci p ro flo xa ci n , 14 d ay s 10 0. 20 7 0. 11 < 0. 00 1 0/ 10 0. 00 2 1. 12 9 0. 12 0. 00 1 G ra n ul e te st BA G -S 53 P4 < 45 m m , 10 0 m g /m L 11 N /A N /A N /A 0/ 11 0. 00 1 1. 04 6 0. 11 0. 00 1 p H -a d ju st ed TS B TS B w it h 1% g lu co se /1 % N aC l, p H 9. 7 11 2. 91 5 0. 11 0. 56 7 11 /1 1 – 0. 23 6 0. 05 0. 17 TS B w it h 1% g lu co se /1 % N aC l, p H 10 .7 11 0. 74 9 0. 80 < 0. 00 1 6/ 11 0. 02 5 0. 73 1 0. 20 0. 02 TS B w it h 1% g lu co se /1 % N aC l, p H 11 .7 11 0. 12 9 0. 02 < 0. 00 1 0/ 11 0. 00 1 1. 17 0 0. 04 < 0. 00 1 Si g n ifi ca n ce ca lc ul at ed b y p ai re d t te st or M cN em ar as ym p to ti c te st . BA G : b io ac ti ve g la ss ; BO A T: b io fil m -o ri en te d an ti se p ti cs te st ; N /A : n ot ap p lic ab le ; SD : st an d ar d d ev ia ti on ; TS B: tr yp ti c so y b ro th . UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 221 Figure 1. Biofilm-oriented antiseptics test (BOAT). Supernatant test: BAG 14-day priming time (a); BAG 2-day priming time (b). BAG concentration from left to right is 400 mg/mL, 200 mg/mL, 100 mg/mL, and 0 mg/mL; 3 wells per concentration. Rows 1–7: strains 1–7; row 8: negative control. Red formazan is a sign of viable cells. (96-well microtiter plate; Nunclon Delta Surface, Thermo Fischer Scientific). Figure 2. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) stacks of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm. 1) Control; pH-adjusted TSB: 2) pH 9.7; 3) pH 10.7; 4) pH 11.7; 5) Granule test; Supernatant test, 2-day exposure: 6) 100 mg/mL; 7) 100 mg/mL with ciprofloxacin; 8) 200 mg/mL; 9) 200 mg/mL with ciprofloxacin; 10) 400 mg/mL; 11) 400 mg/mL with ciprofloxacin; Supernatant test, 14-day exposure: 12) 100 mg/mL; 13) 100 mg/mL with ciprofloxacin; 14) 200 mg/mL; 15) 200 mg/mL with cipro- floxacin; 16) 400 mg/mL; 17) 400 mg/mL with ciprofloxacin. The units are in mm. 222 T. GRØNSETH ET AL. and durations, there was a significant bactericidal effect, but not complete eradication for all strains (Table 2). There was an additional effect of ciprofloxacin in the bactericidal test only with 400 mg/mL, 48-h primed (p ¼ 0.046). Ciprofloxacin showed no additional bactericidal effect for the other concentrations. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) In the granule test, the ratio of compromised cells to the total number of cells was close to 1, indicating that all bac- teria were dead or dying (Table 2; Figure 2). In the super- natant test, there was a reduction in the 48-h primed solutions only for the concentration of 400 mg/mL (Table 2; Figure 2). Some viable biofilm bacteria were still observed. There was a significant reduction in viable cells for all con- centrations primed for 14 days. The ratio of dead to total number of cells was close to 1 only for the concentrations of 200 and 400 mg/mL (Table 2). CLSM showed an additional effect of ciprofloxacin only in the group with 100 mg/mL (48 h primed). Summary of results � BAG granules (100 mg/mL) eradicated Staphylococci aureus in planktonic form. � BAG supernatant (200 mg/mL) eradicated Staphylococci aureus in planktonic form. � BAG granules (100 mg/mL) eradicated Staphylococci aureus in biofilm in the biofilm bactericidal test. � BAG supernatant (400 mg/mL) primed for 14 days eradi- cated Staphylococci aureus in biofilm in the biofilm bac- tericidal test. � BOAT tests showed that there was a reduction in meta- bolic activity for all concentrations after 14-day priming, but only for the 400 mg/mL concentration after 48 h priming. � BAG granules (100 mg/mL) showed reduction in viable bacteria in biofilm on CLSM. � BAG supernatant showed reduction in viable bacteria in biofilm for all concentrations primed for 14 days, and for 400 mg/mL primed for 48 h on CLSM. � Ciprofloxacin had an additional effect only with a 48 h pri- ming time. Discussion Several studies have indicated a difference in the antimicro- bial sensitivity of laboratory and clinical strains (35–37). The strength of the present study is the relatively large number of clinically relevant strains compared to previous studies, and the use of three separate test systems. All three tests showed significant antibacterial properties exhibited by BAG against staphylococci in biofilm and in planktonic states. Our results show that primed BAG granules in direct contact with biofilm eradicate all viable bacteria even at the lowest con- centration and shortest priming time. This indicates that BAG is a potent anti-biofilm substance. Previous studies have indicated that small granules have a significantly stronger antimicrobial effect, and reach a higher pH in solution, compared with larger granules, supposedly because of a greater surface area (16). Therefore we used the smallest available granules (BAG-S53P4, <45 mm). Our results support the use of small granule size to rapidly gain full anti- microbial effect. It is of great interest to know if the supernatant fluid primed with granules retains its antimicrobial and anti-bio- film properties after physical removal of the granules. To our knowledge, this has not been previously investigated for staphylococcal biofilms. The results show that the sur- rounding fluid itself assumes anti-biofilm properties after long enough priming, even when isolated from the phys- ical granules. Complex bone cavities, such as the mastoid cell system, are often difficult to surgically pack, and may have pockets that remain incompletely filled with granules despite efforts to pack them completely. Therefore it is important to know whether the supernatant has the same effect as granules. When the supernatant from the lowest concentration and 48-h priming time was tested, there was no reduction in viable biofilm (Table 2). The same concentration with 14-day priming resulted in reduction in viable biofilm bacteria when using CLSM and BOAT. However, only the supernatant from the concentration of 14-day primed 400 mg/mL BAG eradicated all the biofilm bacteria strains in all three test systems. This shows that the anti-biofilm effect on biofilm-associated staphylococci is dependent on concentration and priming time and that it could be beneficial to use pre-primed saline solution. This can be of importance when packing chronically infected bone cavities with biofilm-associated staphylococci. Ciprofloxacin, which has good penetration into biofilms (38), was evaluated regarding possible additional antimicro- bial effect when combined with BAG. CLSM and BOAT showed a significant reduction in viable bacteria in biofilm by combining BAG and ciprofloxacin for the two lowest concentrations primed for 48 h, compared with BAG only (Table 2). However, the combination did not show com- plete bactericidal effects. This indicates that the addition of ciprofloxacin to a BAG treatment could render some additional antimicrobial effect, which could be clinically beneficial during the first days of treatment before BAG reaches its maximal effect on biofilm-associ- ated bacteria. The antibacterial properties of BAG have been attributed to its high pH and osmotic effects caused by the non- physiological concentration of dissolved ions (39). Pre-adjusted pH-buffered (NaOH) TSB broth was used as a control to compare with BAG at similar pH. The most alkaline control was set to pH 11.7, the same as achieved by BAG primed for 14 days at 400 mg/mL. At this pH level, there was a significant reduction in amount of viable bacteria in biofilm in all three test systems. It was also the only pH that eradi- cated all bacteria in the bactericidal biofilm test. Previous studies have shown that S. aureus can survive up to a pH of 9.83 (40,41). This explains why the TSB control broth (pH 9.7) and BAG supernatant (100 mg/mL, primed for 48 h) (pH 9.9) UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 223 showed no reduction in the amount of viable biofilm- associated bacteria. When the pH of the TSB control broth was raised to 10.7, five out of eleven strains were eradicated. Supernatant from BAG 400 mg/mL 48-h priming resulted in a pH of 10.6, and three out of eleven strains were eradicated. This finding is in line with previous studies (42) and indicates that high pH is an important factor against biofilm-associated bacteria. These in vitro results are promising, but several factors in vivo can affect the clinical response. If the environment around the biofilm does not achieve bactericidal pH, S. aur- eus can upregulate a Naþ/Hþ antiporter system in response to a sudden alkaline shock environment (43). Although fur- ther clinical studies are required to explore the antimicrobial effects on biofilm in vivo, this in vitro study indicates that both supernatant and granules of BAG can give bactericidal anti-planktonic and anti-biofilm properties. This reduces the likelihood of recurrent infections after incomplete filling of the bone cavity with BAG (20,44). The tested granules are smaller than the granules typically used in bone packing. Our study suggests that the risk of recurrent infections could possibly be reduced by using small granules, <45 mm, which proved to give a more rapid and higher rise in pH. We also showed that the bactericidal effect of BAG is dependent on exposure time and concentration. When BAG has reached its full antimicrobial effect it is as efficient as ciprofloxacin in vitro and could reduce the use of conventional antibiotics where S. aureus biofilm is suspected. Our results also suggest that short-term use of antibiotics at the beginning of treat- ment may be beneficial. We conclude that BAG-S53P4, <45 mm, has powerful anti- microbial effects on S. aureus in both planktonic and biofilm states. Duration of exposure and concentration are important factors for achieving maximal effect on biofilm-associated bacteria. Ciprofloxacin may have an additional effect during the first days of treatment. Acknowledgements The authors thank the staff at the Department of Microbiology at the Oslo University Hospital and the Norwegian Veterinary Institute for their excellent support that allowed us to perform the sample analysis in this paper. Disclosure statement The authors have no conflict of interest in the subject matter or materi- als discussed in this manuscript. Author contributions TG and JTS conceived the study; TG, LKV, LLN, MvU, and JTS conducted research and analysed data; TG wrote the first draft and reviewed it with JTS. All authors contributed to, read, and approved the manuscript. Funding The project was funded by the University of Oslo. Notes on contributors Torstein Grønseth is a consultant at the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway and a research fellow at the Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. Lene K. Vestby is Head of Section for immunology and virology, Department of Analysis and Diagnostics at the Norwegian Veterinary Institute. She is also a senior researcher and hold a PhD in bacteriology. Live L. Nesse, DVM, PhD, Dr.med.vet, is a senior research scientist at the Norwegian Veterinary Institute. Magnus von Unge, MD, PhD, is a ear surgeon and a professor emeritus at the Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway. Juha T. Silvola is a senior consultant in Otology-otoneurology and Audiology in Akershus university hospital (Ahus) and Head for the Research department in the Surgical division of Ahus. In addition, he is an associate professor at the Institute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo, Norway. References 1. Hoiby N. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa precipitins determined by means of crossed immunoelectrophor- esis. A survey. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Suppl. 1977;(262):1–96. 2. DeAntonio R, Yarzabal JP, Cruz JP, Schmidt JE, Kleijnen J. Epidemiology of otitis media in children from developing coun- tries: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;85: 65–74. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.03.032 3. Percival SL, Hill KE, Williams DW, Hooper SJ, Thomas DW, Costerton JW. A review of the scientific evidence for biofilms in wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2012;20:647–57. doi:10.1111/j.1524- 475X.2012.00836.x 4. Burmølle M, Thomsen TR, Fazli M, Dige I, Christensen L, Homøe P, et al. Biofilms in chronic infections – a matter of opportunity – monospecies biofilms in multispecies infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010;59:324–36. doi:10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010. 00714.x 5. Lampikoski H, Aarnisalo AA, Jero J, Kinnari TJ. Mastoid biofilm in chronic otitis media. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33:785–8. doi:10.1097/ MAO.0b013e318259533f 6. Nason R, Chole RA. Bacterial biofilms may explain chronicity in osteoradionecrosis of the temporal bone. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28: 1026–8. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318157f102 7. Lewis K. Persister cells. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2010;64:357–72. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134306 8. Hall-Stoodley L, Stoodley P. Evolving concepts in biofilm infec- tions. Cell Microbiol. 2009;11:1034–43. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822. 2009.01323.x 9. Nickel JC, Ruseska I, Wright JB, Costerton JW. Tobramycin resist- ance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells growing as a biofilm on urinary catheter material. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985;27: 619–24. doi:10.1128/aac.27.4.619 10. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:95–108. doi:10.1038/nrmicro821 11. Singh R, Ray P, Das A, Sharma M. Penetration of antibiotics through Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:1955–8. doi:10.1093/ jac/dkq257 12. Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin- Scott HM. Lappin-Scott HM. Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995;49:711–45. doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195. 003431 13. Li~nares J, Ardanuy C, Pallares R, Fenoll A. Changes in antimicrobial resistance, serotypes and genotypes in Streptococcus pneumoniae 224 T. GRØNSETH ET AL. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.03.032 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00836.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00836.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00714.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00714.x https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318259533f https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318259533f https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318157f102 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134306 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01323.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01323.x https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.27.4.619 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro821 https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkq257 https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkq257 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431 over a 30-year period. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:402–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03182.x 14. Moxnes JF, de Blasio BF, Leegaard TM, Moen AE. Methicillin-resist- ant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is increasing in Norway: a time series analysis of reported MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus cases, 1997-2010. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70499. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0070499 15. Drago L, Toscano M, Bottagisio M. Recent evidence on bioactive glass antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity: a mini-review. Materials 2018;11:326. doi:10.3390/ma11020326 16. Coraca-Huber DC, Fille M, Hausdorfer J, Putzer D, Nogler M. Efficacy of antibacterial bioactive glass S53P4 against S. aureus biofilms grown on titanium discs in vitro. J Orthop Res. 2014;32: 175–7. doi:10.1002/jor.22463 17. van Gestel NA, Geurts J, Hulsen DJ, van Rietbergen B, Hofmann S, Arts JJ. Clinical applications of S53P4 bioactive glass in bone heal- ing and osteomyelitic treatment: a literature review. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:684826. doi:10.1155/2015/684826 18. Baino F, Hamzehlou S, Kargozar S. Bioactive glasses: where are we and where are we going? JFB. 2018;9:25. doi:10.3390/jfb9010025 19. Kluge A, Neudert M, Kunert-Keil C, Lailach S, Zahnert T, Kemper M. The obliteration of noncritical size bone defects with bone dust or bone replacement material (bioactive glass S53P4). Otol Neurotol. 2019;40:e415–23. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002178 20. Lindfors NC, Hyv€onen P, Nyyss€onen M, Kirjavainen M, Kankare J, Gullichsen E, et al. Bioactive glass S53P4 as bone graft substitute in treatment of osteomyelitis. Bone 2010;47:212–8. doi:10.1016/j. bone.2010.05.030 21. Peltola M, Aitasalo K, Suonp€a€a J, Varpula M, Yli-Urpo A. Bioactive glass S53P4 in frontal sinus obliteration: a long-term clinical experience. Head Neck. 2006;28:834–41. doi:10.1002/hed.20436 22. Sarin J, Grenman R, Aitasalo K, Pulkkinen J. Bioactive glass S53P4 in mastoid obliteration surgery for chronic otitis media and cere- brospinal fluid leakage. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012;121:563–9. doi:10.1177/000348941212100901 23. Silvola JT. Mastoidectomy cavity obliteration with bioactive glass: a pilot study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147:119–26. doi: 10.1177/0194599812438168 24. Hakanen A, Huovinen P, Kotilainen P, Siitonen A, Jousimies-Somer H. Quality control strains used in susceptibility testing of Campylobacter spp. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:2705–6. doi:10.1128/ jcm.40.7.2705-2706.2002 25. Masadeh MM, Mhaidat NM, Alzoubi KH, Hussein EI, Al-Trad EI. In vitro determination of the antibiotic susceptibility of biofilm-form- ing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus: possible role of proteolytic activity and membrane lipopolysaccharide. Infect Drug Resist. 2013;6:27–32. doi:10.2147/IDR.S41501 26. Munukka E, Lepp€aranta O, Korkeam€aki M, Vaahtio M, Peltola T, Zhang D, et al. Bactericidal effects of bioactive glasses on clinically important aerobic bacteria. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:27–32. doi:10.1007/s10856-007-3143-1 27. Massias L, Buffe P, Cohen B, Cudennec Y, Gehanno P, Sterkers O, et al. Study of the distribution of oral ciprofloxacin into the mucosa of the middle ear and the cortical bone of the mastoid process. Chemotherapy 1994;40:3–7. doi:10.1159/000239309 28. Wiegand I, Hilpert K, Hancock RE. Agar and broth dilution meth- ods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:163–75. doi:10.1038/ nprot.2007.521 29. Stepanovi�c S, Vukovi�c D, Hola V, Di Bonaventura G, Djuki�c S, Cirkovi�c I, et al. Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: over- view of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. Apmis. 2007; 115:891–9. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_630.x 30. Moussa SH, Tayel AA, Al-Hassan AA, Farouk A. Tetrazolium/forma- zan test as an efficient method to determine fungal chitosan anti- microbial activity. J Mycol. 2013;2013:1–7. doi:10.1155/2013/ 753692 31. Tengerdy RP, Nagy JG, Martin B. Quantitative measurement of bacterial growth by the reduction of tetrazolium salts. Appl Microbiol. 1967;15:954–5. 32. P�erez LM, Alvarez BL, Codony F, Fittipaldi M, Adrados B, Pe~nuela G, et al. A new microtitre plate screening method for evaluating the viability of aerobic respiring bacteria in high surface biofilms. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010;51:331–7. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010. 02902.x 33. Junka A, Bartoszewicz M, Smutnicka D, Secewicz A, Szymczyk P. Efficacy of antiseptics containing povidone-iodine, octenidine dihydrochloride and ethacridine lactate against biofilm formed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus measured with the novel biofilm-oriented antiseptics test. Int Wound J. 2014;11:730–4. doi:10.1111/iwj.12057 34. Grønseth T, Vestby LK, Nesse LL, Thoen E, Habimana O, von Unge M, et al. Lugol’s solution eradicates Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in vitro. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;103:58–64. doi:10. 1016/j.ijporl.2017.09.025 35. Mah TF. Establishing the minimal bactericidal concentration of an antimicrobial agent for planktonic cells (MBC-P) and biofilm cells (MBC-B). J Vis Exp 2014;(83):e50854. doi:10.3791/50854 36. Zenga J, Gagnon PM, Vogel J, Chole RA. Biofilm formation by oto- pathogenic strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is not consistently inhibited by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Otol Neurotol. 2012; 33:1007–12. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825f249e 37. Wang EW, Agostini G, Olomu O, Runco D, Jung JY, Chole RA. Gentian violet and ferric ammonium citrate disrupt Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:2050–6. doi:10.1097/ MLG.0b013e3181826e24 38. Ara�ujo PA, Mergulh~ao F, Melo L, Sim~oes M. The ability of an anti- microbial agent to penetrate a biofilm is not correlated with its killing or removal efficiency. Biofouling 2014;30:675–83. doi:10. 1080/08927014.2014.904294 39. Stoor P, S€oderling E, Salonen JI. Antibacterial effects of a bioactive glass paste on oral microorganisms. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998;56: 161–5. doi:10.1080/000163598422901 40. Smolka LR, Nelson FE, Kelley LM. Interaction of pH and NaCl on enumeration of heat-stressed Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Microbiol. 1974;27:443–7. 41. Genigeorgis C, Foda MS, Mantis A, Sadler WW. Effect of sodium chloride and pH on enterotoxin C production. Appl Microbiol. 1971;21:862–6. 42. Allan I, Newman H, Wilson M. Particulate Bioglass reduces the via- bility of bacterial biofilms formed on its surface in an in vitro model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:53–8. doi:10.1034/j.1600- 0501.2002.130106.x 43. Anderson KL, Roux CM, Olson MW, Luong TT, Lee CY, Olson R, et al. Characterizing the effects of inorganic acid and alkaline shock on the Staphylococcus aureus transcriptome and messenger RNA turnover. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010;60:208–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00736.x 44. Roman�o CL, Logoluso N, Meani E, Roman�o D, De Vecchi E, Vassena C, et al. A comparative study of the use of bioactive glass S53P4 and antibiotic-loaded calcium-based bone substitutes in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis: a retrospective compara- tive study. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:845–50. doi:10.1302/0301-620X. 96B6.33014 UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 225 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03182.x https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070499 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070499 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11020326 https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22463 https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/684826 https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb9010025 https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002178 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.05.030 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.05.030 https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20436 https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941212100901 https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599812438168 https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.40.7.2705-2706.2002 https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.40.7.2705-2706.2002 https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S41501 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3143-1 https://doi.org/10.1159/000239309 https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.521 https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.521 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_630.x https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/753692 https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/753692 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02902.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02902.x https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12057 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.09.025 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.09.025 https://doi.org/10.3791/50854 https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825f249e https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181826e24 https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181826e24 https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2014.904294 https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2014.904294 https://doi.org/10.1080/000163598422901 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130106.x https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130106.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00736.x https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B6.33014 https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B6.33014 Abstract Introduction Methods Study design Bacterial strain collection and verification Test substance Granule contact test Supernatant test Disc diffusion susceptibility testing of ciprofloxacin Broth dilution test for planktonic bacteria Bacterial preparation Biofilm assay Biofilm-oriented antiseptics test (BOAT) Biofilm bactericidal test Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) Statistical analysis Approval Results Disc diffusion susceptibility testing of ciprofloxacin Broth dilution test for planktonic bacterial strains Biofilm assay Biofilm-oriented antiseptics test (BOAT) Biofilm bactericidal test Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) Summary of results Discussion Acknowledgements Disclosure statement Author contributions References