Pulmonary artery coil embolisation prevented tumour progression in a patient with advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma CASE REPORT Pulmonary artery coil embolisation prevented tumour progression in a patient with advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma Virginija �Sileikien_ea, Viktorija Gurskyt_eb, Ingrida Zeleckien_ec, Elena Bernotien_ea and Sigitas �Cibirasd aClinic of Chest Diseases, Immunology and Allergology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania; bFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania; cCentre of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania; dCentre of Cardiology and Angiology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania ABSTRACT Background: Squamous cell lung carcinoma (SqCLC) is a type of non-small-cell lung cancer, account- ing for 25–30% of all lung cancer cases with a median advanced stage survival of 8–11 months. Here we present a rare case of long-term survival with metastatic SqCLC following coil embolisation of the right pulmonary artery. Case presentation: The 49-year-old patient was diagnosed with stage IV (cT4N3M1) SqCLC in 2007 due to a biopsy-proven central malignant tumour in the right lung and bilateral mediastinal lymph- adenopathy. A magnetic resonance imaging scan also revealed a metastatic lesion in the liver. Soon after the diagnosis, the patient experienced pulmonary haemorrhage, which was managed by obturat- ing the intermediate bronchus and performing coil embolisation of the right pulmonary artery. The patient also received chemotherapy in 2007 and 2009 without radiological changes. At three different time points in years 2010–2019, biopsies of the primary tumour were taken. All showed dense con- nective tissue with no indication of cancer growth. In 2020, a positron emission tomography scan showed no pathological metabolic activity in the lungs and liver. Currently, the patient remains in a stable clinical condition with a good performance status. Conclusion: The long-term clinical benefit indicates a direct effect of coil embolisation on tumour pro- gression. We suggest that coil embolisation of tumour-feeding arteries could be considered as a potential treatment method for patients with SqCLC. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 13 March 2020 Revised 3 April 2020 Accepted 3 April 2020 KEYWORDS Alternative therapy; coil embolisation; non-small cell lung cancer; spontaneous regression; squamous cell carcinoma Introduction Lung cancer remains the leading cause of malignancy-related mortality worldwide, accounting for approximately 25% of all cancer deaths (1,2). One of the most prevalent histological types of lung cancer is squamous cell lung carcinoma (SqCLC), which constitutes 25–30% of all lung cancer cases and is strongly associated with cigarette smoking (3,4). The survival rates of lung cancer are largely dependent on the cancer stage at the time of diagnosing and the histological type of the tumour. On average, 50.3% of patients with local- ised stage lung cancer survive for 5 years (2). Unfortunately, 48.7–57% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are diagnosed in late stages of the disease, when the options for treatment are limited and the chances of surviving are poor (2,5,6). For instance, the median survival of patients with advanced SqCLC receiving first-line platinum-based chemo- therapy is only 8–11 months (7). Nevertheless, there have been nearly 40 cases of spontaneous regression and longer survival in patients with advanced NSCLC documented in lit- erature from 1950 to 2020, most of whom were diagnosed with SqCLC (8,9). In this paper, we present a rare case of long-term survival with metastatic SqCLC following chemotherapy and endovascular embolisation of the right pulmonary artery with 33 coils due to massive haemoptysis. Case presentation In June 2007, a 49-year-old male suffering from chronic non- productive cough, episodic fever, and night sweats was referred to a pulmonologist. The symptoms lasted for approximately 6 months. The patient’s medical history revealed a myocardial infarction at the age of 47 years, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III chronic heart failure, and smoking. Upon chest auscultation, dimin- ished vesicular breathing sounds with crackles during forced expiration were heard in the right lung. Laboratory findings showed a slight leukocytosis (10,110/lL), elevated C-reactive protein level (40.2 mg/L) and high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (86 mm/h). A computed tomography (CT) scan was per- formed, which revealed a centrally located mass in the right lung, invading the mediastinum and occluding the right lower lobe bronchus. Multiple bilaterally enlarged paratra- cheal and subcarinal lymph nodes were also present (Figure 1). The patient underwent an endobronchial biopsy CONTACT Viktorija Gurskyt_e gurskyte.viktorija@gmail.com Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. �Ciurlionio str. 21/27, LT-03101, Vilnius, Lithuania � 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 2020, VOL. 125, NO. 3, 257–261 https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2020.1753863 http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1080/03009734.2020.1753863&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2020-06-25 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2020.1753863 http://www.tandfonline.com of the mass, which led to the diagnosis of SqCLC. Furthermore, a 2.6 � 2.3 � 2.0 cm hypovascular lesion in seg- ment VI of the liver was detected in an abdominal CT scan. Although no biopsy of the lesion was performed, it was con- sidered as a possible metastasis based on gadolinium- enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan results (Figure 2). Therefore, the SqCLC was clinically staged as cT4N3M1 (stage IV). Since the disease was diagnosed at an advanced stage, the patient was not a candidate for pneumonectomy and was scheduled for chemotherapy treatment instead. However, the initiation of chemotherapy was delayed as the patient experi- enced massive haemoptysis soon after being diagnosed with SqCLC. The pulmonary haemorrhage was managed by obtu- rating the intermediate bronchus and performing CT pulmon- ary angiography and coil embolisation of the right pulmonary artery in June 2007 (Figure 3). A total of 33 Gianturco 3–8 mm diameter coils were used for the embolisation, allowing only minimal residual blood flow to the right lung. Two weeks later, the bronchial obturator was removed and the haemor- rhage did not recur after the procedure. In July 2007, first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine was initiated for six cycles of treatment, which resulted in primary tumour size reduction from 6.4 � 3.0 � 6.5 cm to 1.5 � 1.2 � 1.2 cm in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes, with no effect on the liver metastasis. The patient remained stable until August 2009, when increased lung tumour size (2.8 � 2.2 cm) was observed in a follow-up CT scan and the disease was termed as progressive accord- ing to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST). At this point, no rebiopsy was performed. The patient was then included in a clinical trial and received six cycles of second-line chemotherapy with docetaxel and either a tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib or a placebo. It is unknown whether the patient was in the treatment or in the control group. Despite the chemotherapy, the disease appeared to progress further as the primary tumour contin- ued to grow in size based on evaluation of the CT scans (Figure 4). In contrast, the metastatic lesion in the liver has no longer been visible on ultrasound or CT imaging since 2011, which could be regarded as a mixed response to the treatment. In 2010, 2011, and 2019, three biopsies of the lung tumour were performed due to radiological changes sug- gestive of SqCLC progression, i.e., occurrence of several new pulmonary lesions and increased primary tumour volume. However, only excess connective tissue formation with no SqCLC cells was observed in each of the tissue samples. Since the biopsies have been non-informative, a whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) positron emission tomog- raphy-CT (PET-CT) scan was performed in January 2020 in order to exclude disease progression. The only notable find- ing in the 18FDG PET-CT scan was an area of low metabolic activity among the coils, which can be considered physio- logical. No pathological metabolic activity in the liver or Figure 1. Thoracic CT scan image at the time of diagnosing SqCLC. Contrast- enhanced CT image with soft-tissue window showing a centrally located mass in the right lung with mediastinal invasion (arrow), and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Figure 2. A hypovascular metastatic lesion in the liver. Liver MRI TI W image on post-contrast arterial phase showing a hypo-intense lesion with subtle con- centric perilesional enhancement in segment VI of the liver (arrow). Figure 3. Thoracic CT scan image after the pulmonary artery embolisation pro- cedure. Contrast-enhanced CT image with soft-tissue window showing multiple coils embolised to the right main pulmonary artery, as well as a partially decreased tumour and reduced occlusion of the right lower lobe bronchus. 258 V. ŠILEIKIENĖ ET AL. elsewhere in the body was detected. Due to the lack of evi- dence indicating cancer progression, the patient has not received treatment for SqCLC since 2009. Currently, the patient remains in a stable clinical condition with a good performance status—0 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale. Discussion We have demonstrated a rare case of spontaneous regres- sion of advanced stage SqCLC in a patient who has already survived for nearly 13 years since receiving the diagnosis. Spontaneous regression is frequently defined as the ‘partial or complete disappearance of a malignant tumour in the absence of treatment or in the presence of therapy consid- ered inadequate to exert a significant influence on the dis- ease’ in cases when the diagnosis of cancer is proven by histopathological examination in the first place (10,11). According to the widely accepted criteria formulated by Everson and Cole, the term can be applied to both the regression of the primary tumour as well as its metastases, the presence of which can be either confirmed histopatho- logically or suspected using radiological imaging (8,10). In our patient’s case, it appears that the phenomenon of spon- taneous regression occurred both in the primary tumour and the metastatic lesion of the liver. It is important to note that the diagnosis of metastatic disease was established solely on the basis of hepatic lesion appearance in the MRI scan. At the time, a PET scan was not available in our country for detection of metastatic lesions, and no biopsy of the sus- pected liver metastasis was taken. Nevertheless, according to a meta-analysis of 10 studies, gadolinium-enhanced MRI scan is an excellent diagnostic tool for metastatic lesions in the liver. The pooled specificity of gadolinium-enhanced MRI and 18FDG PET-CT is 0.99 and 1.00, respectively (12). Hence, only a minuscule possibility remains that the hepatic lesion in our patient was an unrelated finding, such as a haemangioma or an area of liver steatosis. The most prevalent explanations for spontaneous lung can- cer regression involve activation of the immune system. For instance, it has been observed that the phenomenon often occurs soon after acute infections, which led some authors to believe that the activation of innate immunity is responsible for the disease regression (11). Although the exact biological mechanism of this effect is unknown, it is thought that immunological response results in either T-cell-mediated apoptosis or inflammatory necrosis of the tissues (13,14). However, infection-related immune response in our patient is unlikely as there was no evidence of significant infections dur- ing the observation period. Tumour regression has also been observed after performing invasive procedures, such as a biopsy or surgery of the neoplasm, possibly due to the release of antigens into the bloodstream and subsequent activation of the immune response (15,16). Another theory involving the immune system is based on the psychoneuroimmunological mechanisms, suggesting that positive psychological changes can stimulate the cellular immune response and may thus induce cancer regression in some patients (13,17,18). Naturally, it is extremely difficult to prove or disprove this mechanism being responsible for disease regression in any given specific case, including the one we describe. We believe that in our case cancer regression was induced by performing endovascular embolisation of the right pulmonary artery with 33 coils due to pulmonary haemorrhage. We speculate that coil embolisation resulted in locally impaired angiogenesis, which led to primary tumour cell death and prevented further progression. When the tumour cells become deprived of oxygen and nutrients, they produce angiogenic growth factors which bind to the recep- tors located in the endothelium of pre-existing blood vessels. This results in morphological changes of the original vessels and formation of new ones during a multi-step process (19,20). However, in our patient’s case, the vascular supply of the neoplasm became inadequate after coil embolisation as the blood flow via the main tumour-feeding artery was dras- tically reduced. Therefore, both the blood supply and angio- genic potential of the tumour could have been impaired by this procedure. Upon review of the literature, we were unable to find any similar cases attributing primary lung can- cer regression to endovascular embolisation of tumour-feed- ing arteries. To our knowledge, only metastatic pulmonary lesions from primary renal cell carcinoma as well as some benign thoracic tumours have been reported to regress fol- lowing transarterial embolisation (21). Furthermore, the dis- appearance of our patient’s metastatic lesion in the liver is also obscure. It has been previously suggested that the removal of the primary tumour may provoke an immune response which can eliminate metastatic lesions (22). It is possible that a similar mechanism may have been triggered by the coil embolisation procedure and subsequent regres- sion of the primary tumour. Nevertheless, similarly to the other suggested possible underlying mechanisms of cancer regression, these theories are only hypothetical and require extensive further research to be confirmed. It should also be taken into account that our patient has received two courses of chemotherapy treatment. The first- line treatment with cisplatin and gemcitabine appeared to be rather effective in reducing the primary tumour size. However, the initiation of chemotherapy coincided with the Figure 4. Thoracic CT scan image in 2009. A follow-up contrast-enhanced CT image with soft-tissue window after 2 months of treatment with second-line chemotherapy showing an increased tumour in the right lung. UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 259 endovascular embolisation procedure, which could have also led to tumour volume reduction (21). Even if the initial radio- logical improvement can be attributed to systemic treatment, according to the literature, the chemotherapy regimens used for treating our patient are highly unlikely to induce a long- term remission. For instance, the median survival of advanced- stage SqCLC patients treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine is only 10.8months. Moreover, the median progression-free sur- vival is 5.1 months, and the survival rate at 24months post- treatment is 14% (23). Regarding second-line chemotherapy, the median survival of patients treated with docetaxel is 6 months, while the median progression-free survival is only 2.8 months (24). It is unknown whether a tyrosine kinase inhibitor was added to our patient’s treatment regimen along with docetaxel as he received the treatment in a clinical trial setting. Either way, the radiological appearance of the primary tumour did not improve after six cycles of second-line chemo- therapy. Thus, it seems improbable that the systemic treat- ment led to cancer remission in our patient’s case. Conclusions In this paper, we present a case of long-term SqCLC remis- sion following the procedure of pulmonary artery coil embol- isation. We suggest that coil embolisation of tumour-feeding arteries should be considered as a potential treatment method in patients with SqCLC and other histological types of NSCLC. However, further studies are needed to support our proposition and elucidate the molecular mechanisms behind cases of spontaneous cancer regression. Consent for Publication Written consent was obtained from the patient for publica- tion of this case report and for the use of accompanying images. The authors have fully anonymized the patient. Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). Notes on contributors Virginija �Sileikien_e, PhD, is an assistant professor in pulmonology at the Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, and a consulting pulmonologist at the Centre of Pulmonology and Allergology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania. Viktorija Gurskyt_e is a medical student at the Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, and a laboratory assistant at the Department of Anatomy, Histology and Anthropology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania. Ingrida Zeleckien_e is a doctor radiologist at the Centre of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania. The doctor specializes in cardiovascular and thoracic radi- ology. She is a member of the Lithuanian Association of Radiology (LRA), the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Elena Bernotien_e is a pulmonologist specialising in lung cancer at the Centre of Pulmonology and Allergology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, and the supervisor of resident doctors in pulmonology at the Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania. Sigitas �Cibiras, PhD, is an interventional cardiologist at the Centre of Cardiology and Angiology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania. References 1. Herbst RS, Morgensztern D, Boshoff C. The biology and manage- ment of non-small cell lung cancer. Nature 2018;553:446–54. doi: 10.1038/nature25183 2. Lu T, Yang X, Huang Y, Zhao M, Li M, Ma K, et al. Trends in the incidence, treatment, and survival of patients with lung cancer in the last four decades. CMAR. 2019;11:943–53. doi:10.2147/CMAR. S187317 3. Zappa C, Mousa SA. Non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment and future advances. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2016;5:288–300. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2016.06.07 4. Kenfield SA, Wei EK, Stampfer MJ, Rosner BA, Colditz GA. Comparison of aspects of smoking among four histologic types of lung cancer. Tob Control. 2008;17:198–204. doi:10.1136/tc.2007. 022582 5. Roth JA, Goulart BHL, Ravelo A, Kolkey H, Ramsey SD. Survival gains from first-line systemic therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the U.S., 1990–2015: progress and opportunities. The Oncol. 2017;22:304–10. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0253 6. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30. doi:10.3322/caac.21442 7. Suh Y-G, Cho J. Local ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Radiat Oncol J. 2019;37:149–55. doi:10. 3857/roj.2019.00514 8. Ariza -Prota M, Mart�ınez C, Casan P. Spontaneous regression of metastatic squamous cell lung cancer. Clin Case Rep. 2018;6: 995–8. doi:10.1002/ccr3.1502 9. Chung C, Park DI, Kim SY, Kim JO, Jung SS, Park HS, et al. Spontaneous regression of non-small cell lung cancer that pro- gressed after multiple chemotherapies: a case report. Thorac Cancer. 2015;6:805–7. doi:10.1111/1759-7714.12221 10. Everson TC. Spontaneous regression of cancer. Prog Clin Cancer 1967;3:79–95. 11. Jessy T. Immunity over inability: the spontaneous regression of cancer. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2011;2:43–9. doi:10.4103/0976-9668. 82318 12. Deng J, Tang J, Shen N. Meta-analysis of diagnosis of liver meta- static cancers: comparison of 18FDG PET-CT and gadolinium- enhanced MRI. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2014;58:532–7. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12231 13. Gladwish A, Clarke K, Bezjak A. Spontaneous regression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. BMJ Case Rep. 2010;2010: bcr0720103147. doi:10.1136/bcr.07.2010.3147 14. Tadmor T. Time to understand more about spontaneous regres- sion of cancer. Acta Haematol. 2019;141:156–7. doi:10.1159/ 000496680 15. Ogawa R, Watanabe H, Yazaki K, Fujita K, Tsunoda Y, Nakazawa K, et al. Lung cancer with spontaneous regression of primary and metastatic sites: a case report. Oncol Lett. 2015;10:550–2. doi:10. 3892/ol.2015.3243 16. Lopez-Pastorini A, Pl€ones T, Brockmann M, Ludwig C, Beckers F, Stoelben E. Spontaneous regression of non-small cell lung cancer after biopsy of a mediastinal lymph node metastasis: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2015;9:217. doi:10.1186/s13256-015- 0702-9 17. Ooi KH, Cheo T, Soon GST, Leong CN. Spontaneous regression of locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e11291. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000011291 18. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Robles TF, Heffner KL, Loving TJ, Glaser R. Psycho-oncology and cancer: psychoneuroimmunology and can- cer. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:165–9. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdf655 260 V. ŠILEIKIENĖ ET AL. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25183 https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S187317 https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S187317 https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2016.06.07 https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.022582 https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.022582 https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0253 https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21442 https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2019.00514 https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2019.00514 https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.1502 https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12221 https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.82318 https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.82318 https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12231 https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr.07.2010.3147 https://doi.org/10.1159/000496680 https://doi.org/10.1159/000496680 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3243 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3243 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-015-0702-9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-015-0702-9 https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011291 https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdf655 19. J�aszai J, Schmidt M. Trends and challenges in tumor anti-angio- genic therapies. Cells 2019;8:pii:1102. doi:10.3390/cells8091102 20. Niu G, Chen X. PET imaging of angiogenesis. PET Clin. 2009;4: 17–38. doi:10.1016/j.cpet.2009.04.011 21. Lorenz JM, Navuluri R. Embolization of chest neoplasms: the next frontier in interventional oncology? Semin Intervent Radiol. 2019; 36:176–82. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1692658 22. Kumar T, Patel N, Talwar A. Spontaneous regression of thoracic malig- nancies. Respir Med. 2010;104:1543–50. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2010.04.026 23. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J, Biesma B, Vansteenkiste J, Manegold C, et al. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemci- tabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non–small-cell lung cancer. JCO. 2008;26:3543–51. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0375 24. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crin�o L, Eberhardt WEE, Poddubskaya E, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373:123–35. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1504627 UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 261 https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8091102 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2009.04.011 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1692658 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2010.04.026 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0375 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504627 Abstract Introduction Case presentation Discussion Conclusions Consent for Publication Disclosure statement References