SUPS_A_548609 1..7 Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. 2011; 116: 1–7 REVIEW ARTICLE Influence of microenvironment on engraftment of transplanted b-cells PER-OLA CARLSSON Department of Medical Cell Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, and Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden Abstract Pancreatic islet transplantation into the liver provides a possibility to treat selected patients with brittle type 1 diabetes mellitus. However, massive early b-cell death increases the number of islets needed to restore glucose homeostasis. Moreover, late dysfunction and death contribute to the poor long-term results of islet transplantation on insulin independence. Studies in recent years have identified early and late challenges for transplanted pancreatic islets, including an instant blood- mediated inflammatory reaction when exposing human islets to the blood microenvironment in the portal vein and the low oxygenated milieu of islets transplanted into the liver. Poor revascularization of remaining intact islets combined with severe changes in the gene expression of islets transplanted into the liver contributes to late dysfunction. Strategies to overcome these hurdles have been developed, and some of these interventions are now even tested in clinical trials providing a hope to improve results in clinical islet transplantation. In parallel, experimental and clinical studies have, based on the identified problems with the liver site, evaluated the possibility of change of implantation organ in order to improve the results. Site- specific differences clearly exist in the engraftment of transplanted islets, and a more thorough characterization of alternative locations is needed. New strategies with modifications of islet microenvironment with cells and growth factors adhered to the islet surface or in a surrounding matrix could be designed to intervene with site-specific hurdles and provide possibilities to improve future results of islet transplantation. Key words: Engraftment, implantation site, islet transplantation Winner of the Eric K. Fernström Award for young investigators, 2010 at the Medical Faculty of Uppsala University. Correspondence: Per-Ola Carlsson, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Cell Biology, Uppsala University, Biomedical Center, Box 571, SE-75123 Uppsala, Sweden. (Received 2 December 2010; accepted 6 December 2010) ISSN 0300-9734 print/ISSN 2000-1967 online � 2011 Informa Healthcare DOI: 10.3109/03009734.2010.548609 Clinical pancreatic islet transplantation has, since the introduction of the concept, been almost exclusively performed through the intraportal route to the liver based on the pioneering work of the late Dr Paul Lacy (1). Early results of allogeneic islet transplantation were poor, with insulin independence 1 year post- transplantation less than 10% (2). However, in more recent years, transplantation of pancreatic islets from deceased donors has become a curative treatment for selected patients with type 1 diabetes (3,4). Never- theless, many problems still remain, including massive early islet cell death (5). The intravascular injection of pancreatic islets has been shown to elicit an instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR) triggered by tissue factor and cyto/ chemokines expressed by pancreatic islets in the whole blood microenvironment of the portal vein (6,7). Moreover, the liver tissue has a very low oxygen tension (8,9), high numbers of resident macrophages (Kupffer cells) (10), and possibly also high concentrations of immunosuppressive drugs exposing the islet cells fol- lowing intestinal uptake of the drugs. This means that in most cases at least two donor pancreases are needed to restore glucose homeostasis, which is far more than the alleged 10%–20% of the total islet volume sug- gested to be enough to maintain normoglycaemia in humans (3). Despite the large transplanted islet mass, the functional capacity of the transplanted islets has been shown to correspond to only about 20% of that found in a non-diabetic person (11). Within the first years post-transplantation most patients revert to insu- lindependence if not re-transplanted. However, only low doses of exogenous insulin are then usually needed, and the major problems with hypoglycaemic attacks most often no longer exist. It is presently unknown whether the progressive decline in islet graft function is site-specific or applies also to other implan- tation sites. Challenges for pancreatic islets early after transplantation A thrombotic reaction and complement cascade is elicited when human islets are exposed to blood, which is manifested by islet entrapment in blood clots, leucocyte infiltration, predominantly neutrophil gran- ulocytes, and disruption of the islet morphology (12) (Figure 1). This so-called IBMIR occurs in clinical islet transplantation as shown by an increase in concentrations of thrombin–antithrombin complex immediately after islet infusion, and the parallel increase in c-peptide release indicates massive b- cell death (7). A study by combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) technique indicates that early islet cell death can be estimated to be approximately 25% in patients intra- portally transplanted with islets (13). Besides innate immune reactions, islets transplanted to the liver may have restricted survival rates due to the low oxygen tension in the liver parenchyma. Experimental studies indicate that approximately 70% of the islets are hypoxic 1 day after intraportal transplantation, as evaluated by the biochemical marker pimonidazole which accumulates in islet cells at oxygen tension levels below 7.5–10 mmHg (14). Since this marker is not accumulated in dead or dying cells, the number of hypoxic cells may even be under-estimated. Clin- ically, also high concentrations of immunosuppressive drugs in the portal vein are likely to hamper islet survival by direct toxic effects (15,16). Experimentally, several sites besides the liver have been tested for islet transplantation, including the subcutis, muscle, the intraperitoneal site, the renal subcapsular site, the spleen, bone-marrow, pancreas, and the omental pouch. A more thorough character- ization of engraftment has recently been performed with regard to implantation of islets into the pancreas or muscle. Orthotopic implantation of islets, i.e. into the pancreas, has been described in experimental settings (17,18). Although being the most physiolog- ical environment for islets, the pancreas has rarely been considered as a potential implantation organ in clinical practice. Surgical interventions and injections in the pancreas are difficult, and there is a high risk of acute complications due to leakage of enzymes from the exocrine cells that causes tissue damage and inflammation. Clearly, implantation techniques need to be improved to minimize these early risks, e.g. by subcapsular implantation of islets or other techniques. Safety issues have also to be carefully investigated in large-animal models. Nevertheless, studies in small animals indicate that this site provides good conditions for early survival of implanted islets, with minimal inflammatory and fibrotic components (19). More- over, the oxygenation of the pancreas is much better than the liver, with a mean oxygen tension in the exocrine parenchyma of ~30 mmHg (20). Striated muscle has clinically been tested as implan- tation site for pancreatic islets based on the feasibility of this site for autotransplantation of parathyroid glands and its easy access. In one Swedish patient, islets were, due to severe hereditary chronic pancre- atitis, autotransplanted intramuscularly with a remain- ing high and stable c-peptide production (21). However, also this site seems to provide challenges for early survival of the islets based on the extensive fibrosis occurring in the islet grafts (21,22). Especially prominent central necrosis parts may occur in islet grafts, if islets are implanted as clusters, and cause central fibrosis (23). 2 P.-O. Carlsson Challenges for pancreatic islets late after transplantation For pancreatic islets to survive and regain function after transplantation they need to be properly revas- cularized. Experimental studies show that mouse and human islets transplanted intraportally are poorly revascularized, similar to islets implanted subcapsu- larly to the kidney or spleen (24–26). It is noteworthy that endothelial cells seem to be stimulated to grow towards the implanted islets, i.e. form a dense vascu- lature in the immediate vicinity of the islets, but few blood vessels enter the endocrine parenchyma. This is reflected in an impaired oxygenation of intraportally implanted islets that remains for at least 1month post- transplantation, and that is accompanied by increased apoptosis rates (Olsson R, Olerud J, Pettersson U, and Carlsson P-O; unpublished observation). Late maturation of the blood vessel system may occur, since numbers of pimonidazole-positive islets, sug- gesting prevailing hypoxia, decrease with time, and apoptosis rates become similar to those in endoge- nous islets at 3 months post-transplantation. Conse- quences of low blood vessel numbers for islets are not restricted merely to impaired oxygen and nutrient transport but also include less influence of paracrine supporting signals from islet endothelial cells on b-cell function and growth. Islet endothelial cells may normally support nutrient-stimulated insulin release and b-cell differentiation by their secretion of basement membrane components, especially lam- inin, and the glycoprotein thrombospondin-1 seques- tered to the islet matrix (27,28). Their secretion of laminin and hepatocyte growth factor is of importance to maintain b-cell proliferation and increase the b-cell mass when functionally demanded (29,30). Impaired drainage of islet hormones induced by a no-flow phenomenon in isolated islets and early after transplantation also predisposes for sequestration of islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) as amyloid in islets. Irrespective of mechanism, amyloid formation has been described to occur in isolated human islets during culture (31) and following experimental trans- plantation to the liver in mice (32). A recent autopsy report of an islet-transplanted patient who died from a myocardial infarct indicates that amyloid forms fol- lowing clinical islet transplantation to the liver (33). Late failure of islets transplanted to the liver may also Early challenges Known obstacles for intraportal islet transplantation Known obstacles for intrapancreatic islet transplantation Known obstacles for intramuscular islet transplantation Instant Blood Mediated Inflammatory Reaction (IBMIR) Hypoxia Hypoxia Lack of different portal drainage Extensive fibrosis Safety issues - Acute pancreatitis None so far reported Poor revascularization of intact islets Islet amyloid formation Lipotoxicity Changes in gene expression and functionality Kupffer cell activation Islet toxic effects of immunosuppressive drugs Late challenges Early challenges Late challenges Early challenges Late challenges Figure 1.Obstacles for successful pancreatic islet transplantation at different sites. Microenvironment and engraftment of transplanted b-cells 3 be caused by insulin-induced intense lipogenesis in nearby hepatocytes. Proof of principle of improved long-term graft function has been shown in a rodent model by blocking lipogenesis (34). Hepatic steatosis has been reported in the clinical situation after islet transplantation (35,36). There are reports on site- specific alterations in islet function after intraportal islet transplantation as well, such as defective gluca- gon response to hypoglycaemia (37,38) caused by increased glucose flux and glucose levels within the liver secondary to increased glycogenolysis caused by systemic hyperglycaemia (39), and substantial changes in the b-cell gene expression and function (40,41). A perturbed glucose-stimulated insulin release in intrahepatic islets has been shown to cor- relate with defects in glucose oxidation, (pro)insulin biosynthesis, and decreased insulin content and asso- ciated with decreases in the islet gene expression of the b-cell differentiation marker pancreatic and duo- denal homeobox gene-1 (PDX-1) and key enzymes in glucose transport and metabolism in the b-cells, such as glucose transporter-2, glucokinase, pyruvate carboxylase, and mitochondrial glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase (41). Pancreatic islets experimentally transplanted to the pancreas are much better revascularized than intra- hepatic islets (19). However, despite being implanted into their normal physiological microenvironment, intrapancreatically transplanted islets display some functional and gene expression changes, although not as profound as those observed in islets implanted in the liver. A characteristic finding for intrapancrea- tically transplanted islets seems to be their higher insulin release compared with endogenous islets at low glucose concentrations, and their high expression of the lactate dehydrogenase-A gene, which is nor- mally expressed in low levels in b-cells (41). This may explain why animals receiving large numbers of intrapancreatically transplanted islets are slightly hypoglycaemic (18). Pancreatic islets transplanted to striated muscle are rapidly and much better revascularized than intrapor- tally transplanted islets (23). This seems to be irre- spective of whether the islets are implanted in clusters or as single islets (22) and has been confirmed in patients autotransplanted with islets due to exocrine pancreas disease (23). The functionality of the newly formed capillaries is good, and oxygen tension levels in intramuscular islet grafts were only slightly decreased when compared to native islets (22). Despite lack of direct portal drainage, pancreatic islets implanted to muscle seem to have a superior function when compared to intrahepatic islets (23), although a prerequisite for this is the avoidance of cluster formation at islet implantation (42). Tentative strategies for islet microenvironment modification to improve islet graft survival and function Modifications of islet microenvironment in the liver Recent characterization of islet engraftment at the intraportal site has identified numerous problems that need to be targeted to optimize graft survival and function. However, since islets are dispersed and embolized deep into the liver tissue at transplantation, strategies to modify liver microenvironment per se are difficult. Instead such modifications must include the systemic blood environment, or modifications of islet tissue or surfaces prior to transplantation. In fact, several strategies in order to intervene with IBMIR have successfully been tested experimentally in vitro and/or in vivo and include modifications of blood with thrombin inhibition by megalatran (43), or with low-molecular-weight dextran sulfate (44), or mod- ifications of the islets and their surfaces with nicotin- amide (45), heparin (46), or endothelial coating (47). At present, a clinical trial is conducted in the Nordic countries investigating the effects of low-molecular- weight dextran sulfate on outcome in patients trans- planted intraportally with islets. Different anti-apoptotic strategies have been tested to improve early islet survival in experimental models. Most successful studies include gene transfection strategies difficult to implement in the clinical situa- tion. However, besides this, e.g. different caspase inhibitor therapies of recipients (48), or even of islets for transplantation (49), have proved effective in improving outcome in minimal islet mass models in mice. Moreover, merely prolactin or glucocorticoid supplementation of the culture medium has been shown to improve b-cell survival during human islet culture and early after experimental islet transplanta- tion (50–52). Also long-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 analogues improve human islet survival in culture (53), protect murine b-cells of intraportal islet transplants from apoptosis (54), and are beneficial for glucose homeostasis in marginal mass islet- transplanted mice (55). One of these long-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 analogues, exenatide, has been introduced in clinical islet transplantation protocols at some transplantation centres (56,57). Our recent studies indicate that damage to islets at intraportal transplantation may facilitate subsequent islet revascularization, whereas islets with maintained integrity are poorly revascularized and blood-perfused (Henriksnäs J, Lau J, Zang G, Berggren P-O, Köhler M, and Carlsson P-O; unpublished obser- vation). Different means to improve islet revascular- ization have been tested including over-expression 4 P.-O. Carlsson of the pro-angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the islet tissue by virus vectors (58). More recently, a non-viral gene delivery approach has been successfully tested in a small-animal model, where VEGF was delivered to intraportally transplanted human islets by ultrasound- targeted microbubble destruction (59). Translation into the clinical situation may, however, be hampered by technique limitations in penetration of ultrasound in larger organs. More feasible in the clinical sett- ing than trying to increase the expression of pro- angiogenic factors in the islet tissue may be to inhibit angiostatic factors. We recently showed proof of principle by inhibition of the angiostatic factor thrombospondin-1 in islets by a siRNA technique, which improved both islet graft revascularization and function (60). Unfortunately, at present there are no pharmacological receptor antagonists for thrombospondin-1 available. However, prolactin was found to decrease the expression of thrombospondin-1 in islets in culture and had bene- ficial effects for islet graft revascularization and func- tion both when injected to recipient animals during the first days post-transplantation, or merely added during culture of islets prior to transplantation (50). Cell coating provides interesting aspects to bioen- gineering of islets and to obtaining multiple effects that can diminish adverse events following transplan- tation. Besides previously mentioned endothelial coating, other cell types might be considered for modification of islet surfaces. As reported in a paper in the present issue of this journal, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) form an interesting approach to provide local immunosuppressive effects, at least early after transplantation (61). Positive effects of MSCs on revascularization in experimentally transplanted islets have recently been shown in vivo (62), and these cells can facilitate endothelial coating of the islet surface in vitro as well (63). Several other cell types are of interest to include in the islet microenvironment, including endothelial progenitor cells and neural crest stem cells. Endothelial progenitor cells seem to be able to diminish innate immune reactions and improve survival, revascularization, b-cell prolif- eration, and function in islet grafts (64). Neural crest stem cells have the ability to increase substan- tially b-cell proliferation and improve islet graft function (65). Modifications of islet microenvironment in extrahepatic sites As described above, extrahepatic sites to some part provide different challenges for survival and regain of function when compared to the liver. There are also site-specific differences to consider. In general, how- ever, in most cases transplantation to these sites does not include infusion of islets into blood, which diminishes IBMIR. Some innate immune reactions may remain, but the extent of these remains to be elucidated. It can be envisaged that hypoxia in newly transplanted avascular cells provides a limitation also in extrahepatic sites, especially when islets are implanted in clusters. Dispersion of islets at trans- plantation is of great advantage, and techniques for optimal implantation of islets need to be developed. Modifications of islet microenvironment can at most of these sites be obtained by the use of scaffolds and biomaterial implanted before or together with the islets in order to provide spatial and functional sup- port for the islets (66). The biomaterials can be biodegradable or not, and can also be modified e.g. by inclusion of oxygen carriers such as polymerized haemoglobin, anti-inflammatory components or cells, and growth factors and cells to stimulate angio- genesis. In this manner, also substances and cells that do not readily adhere to islet surfaces can be used to modify islet microenvironment and create new micro-organs. Studies are on-going to optimize such micromilieus. Conclusions In recent years, several hurdles that restrict the suc- cess of pancreatic islet transplantation into the liver have been identified. Possible solutions to some of these problems have also been tested and include interventions to the IBMIR and means to improve revascularization. In parallel, there has been an increased interest in change of implantation site in order to avoid the site-specific problems of the intra- portal route. Most alternative implantation sites have, however, not been well characterized with regard to engraftment of islets, and many unidentified obstacles at alternative locations may remain. New strategies with modifications of the islet microenvironment with cells and growth factors adhered to the islet surface or in a surrounding matrix provide possibilities to improve results of islet transplantation irrespective of implantation site. Such technologies may also pave the way for future improvements of the matu- ration and function of stem cells as a surrogate for native b-cells in vivo. Declaration of interest: Own studies herein were supported by generous grants from the Juvenile Dia- betes Research Foundation, EFSD/Novo, the Novo Nordisk foundation, the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Diabetes Association, and the Family Ernfors Fund. Microenvironment and engraftment of transplanted b-cells 5 References 1. Kemp CB, Knight MJ, Scharp DW, Ballinger WF, Lacy PE. Effect of transplantation site on the results of pancreatic islet isografts in diabetic rats. Diabetologia. 1973;9:486–91. 2. CITR Research Group. 2007 update on allogeneic islet trans- plantation from the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR). Cell Transplant. 2009;18:753–67. 3. Shapiro AM, Lakey JR, Ryan EA, Korbutt GS, Toth E, Warnock GL, et al. Islet transplantation in seven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:230–8. 4. Shapiro AM, Ricordi C, Hering BJ, Auchincloss H, Lindblad R, Robertson RP, et al. International trial of the Edmonton protocol for islet transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1318–30. 5. Eich T, Eriksson O, Sundin A, Estrada S, Brandhorst D, Brandhorst H, et al. Positron emission tomography: a real-time tool to quantify early islet engraftment in a preclinical large animal model. Transplantation. 2007;84:893–8. 6. Bennet W, Sundberg B, Groth CG, Brendel MD, Brandhorst D, Brandhorst H, et al. Incompatibility between human blood and isolated islets of Langerhans: a finding with implications for clinical intraportal islet transplantation? Diabetes. 1999;48:1907–14. 7. Moberg L, Johansson H, Lukinius A, Berne C, Foss A, Kallen R, et al. Production of tissue factor by pancreatic islet cells as a trigger of detrimental thrombotic reactions in clinical islet transplantation. Lancet. 2002;360:2039–45. 8. Carlsson PO, Palm F, Andersson A, Liss P. Markedly decreased oxygen tension in transplanted rat pancreatic islets irrespective of the implantation site. Diabetes. 2001; 50:489–95. 9. Arteel GE, Thurman RG, Yates JM, Raleigh JA. Evidence that hypoxia markers detect oxygen gradients in liver: pimonida- zole and retrograde perfusion of rat liver. Br J Cancer. 1995; 72:889–95. 10. Bottino R, Fernandez LA, Ricordi C, Lehmann R, Tsan MF, Oliver R, et al. Transplantation of allogeneic islets of Langer- hans in the rat liver: effects of macrophage depletion on graft survival and microenvironment activation. Diabetes. 1998;47: 316–23. 11. Ryan EA, Paty BW, Senior PA, Bigam D, Alfadhli E, Kneteman NM, et al. Five-year follow-up after clinical islet transplantation. Diabetes. 2005;54:2060–9. 12. Moberg L. The role of the innate immunity in islet transplan- tation. Ups J Med Sci. 2005;110:17–55. 13. Eriksson O, Eich T, Sundin A, Tibell A, Tufveson G, Andersson H, et al. Positron emission tomography in clinical islet transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:2816–24. 14. Olsson R. The microvasculature of endogenous and trans- planted pancreatic islets [dissertation]. Uppsala: Uppsala University; 2006. 15. Desai NM, Goss JA, Deng S, Wolf BA, Markmann E, Palanjian M, et al. Elevated portal vein drug levels of sirolimus and tacrolimus in islet transplant recipients: local immuno- suppression or islet toxicity? Transplantation. 2003;76: 1623–5. 16. Shapiro AM, Gallant HL, Hao EG, Lakey JR, McCready T, Rajotte RV, et al. The portal immunosuppressive storm: relevance to islet transplantation? Ther Drug Monit. 2005; 27:35–7. 17. Hayek A, Beattie GM. Intrapancreatic islet transplantation in experimental diabetes in the rat. Metabolism. 1992;41: 1367–9. 18. Stagner JI, Mokshagundam SP, Samols E. Induction of mild hypoglycemia by islet transplantation to the pancreas. Transplant Proc. 1998;30:635–6. 19. Lau J, Kampf C, Mattsson G, Nyqvist D, Köhler M, Berggren PO, et al. Beneficial role of pancreatic microenvi- ronment for angiogenesis in transplanted pancreatic islets. Cell Transplantation. 2009;18:23–30. 20. Carlsson PO, Liss P, Andersson A, Jansson L. Measurements of oxygen tension in native and transplanted rat pancreatic islets. Diabetes. 1998;47:1027–32. 21. Rafael E, Tibell A, Ryden M, Lundgren T, Savendahl L, Borgstrom B, et al. Intramuscular autotransplantation of pancreatic islets in a 7-year-old child: a 2-year follow-up. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:458–62. 22. Svensson J, Lau J, Sandberg M, Carlsson PO. High vascular density and oxygenation of pancreatic islets transplanted in clusters into striated muscle. Cell Transplant. 2010 Nov 5 (Epub ahead of print). 23. Christoffersson G, Henriksnas J, Johansson L, Rolny C, Ahlstrom H, Caballero-Corbalan J, et al. Clinical and exper- imental pancreatic islet transplantation to striated muscle: establishment of a vascular system similar to that in native islets. Diabetes. 2010;59:2569–78. 24. Mattsson G, Jansson L, Carlsson PO. Decreased vascular density in mouse pancreatic islets after transplantation. Diabetes. 2002;51:1362–6. 25. Carlsson PO, Palm F, Mattsson G. Low revascularization of experimentally transplanted human pancreatic islets. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:5418–23. 26. Lau J, Carlsson PO. Low revascularization of human islets when experimentally transplanted into the liver. Transplan- tation. 2009;87:322–5. 27. Johansson A, Lau J, Sandberg M, Borg LA, Magnusson PU, Carlsson PO. Endothelial cell signalling supports pan- creatic beta cell function in the rat. Diabetologia. 2009;52: 2385–94. 28. Olerud J. Role of thrombospondin-1 in endogenous and transplanted pancreatic islets [dissertation]. Uppsala: Uppsala University; 2009. 29. Johansson M, Mattsson G, Andersson A, Jansson L, Carlsson PO. Islet endothelial cells and pancreatic beta-cell proliferation: studies in vitro and during pregnancy in adult rats. Endocrinology. 2006;147:2315–24. 30. Nikolova G, Jabs N, Konstantinova I, Domogatskaya A, Tryggvason K, Sorokin L, et al. The vascular basement membrane: a niche for insulin gene expression and Beta cell proliferation. Dev Cell. 2006;10:397–405. 31. Westermark P, Eizirik DL, Pipeleers DG, Hellerstrom C, Andersson A. Rapid deposition of amyloid in human islets transplanted into nude mice. Diabetologia. 1995;38: 543–9. 32. Westermark GT, Westermark P, Nordin A, Tornelius E, Andersson A. Formation of amyloid in human pancreatic islets transplanted to the liver and spleen of nude mice. Ups J Med Sci. 2003;108:193–203. 33. Westermark GT, Westermark P, Berne C, Korsgren O. Wide- spread amyloid deposition in transplanted human pancreatic islets. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:977–9. 34. Lee Y, Ravazzola M, Park BH, Bashmakov YK, Orci L, Unger RH. Metabolic mechanisms of failure of intraportally transplanted pancreatic beta-cells in rats: role of lipotoxicity and prevention by leptin. Diabetes. 2007;56:2295–301. 35. Markmann JF, Rosen M, Siegelman ES, Soulen MC, Deng S, Barker CF, et al. Magnetic resonance-defined periportal steatosis following intraportal islet transplantation: 6 P.-O. Carlsson a functional footprint of islet graft survival? Diabetes. 2003;52: 1591–4. 36. Bhargava R, Senior PA, Ackerman TE, Ryan EA, Paty BW, Lakey JR, et al. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis after islet transplantation and its relation to graft function. Diabetes. 2004;53:1311–17. 37. Gupta V, Wahoff DC, Rooney DP, Poitout V, Sutherland DE, Kendall DM, et al. The defective glucagon response from transplanted intrahepatic pancreatic islets during hypoglycemia is transplantation site-determined. Dia- betes. 1997;46:28–33. 38. Paty BW, Ryan EA, Shapiro AM, Lakey JR, Robertson RP. Intrahepatic islet transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients does not restore hypoglycemic hormonal counterregulation or symptom recognition after insulin independence. Diabetes. 2002;51:3428–34. 39. Zhou H, Zhang T, Bogdani M, Oseid E, Parazzoli S, Vantyghem MC, et al. Intrahepatic glucose flux as a mecha- nism for defective intrahepatic islet alpha-cell response to hypoglycemia. Diabetes. 2008;57:1567–74. 40. Mattsson G, Jansson L, Nordin A, Andersson A, Carlsson PO. Evidence of functional impairment of syngen- eically transplanted mouse pancreatic islets retrieved from the liver. Diabetes. 2004;53:948–54. 41. Lau J, Mattsson G, Carlsson C, Nyqvist D, Kohler M, Berggren PO, et al. Implantation site-dependent dysfunction of transplanted pancreatic islets. Diabetes. 2007;56:1544–50. 42. Lund T, Korsgren O, Aursnes IA, Scholz H, Foss A. Sustained reversal of diabetes following islet transplantation to striated musculature in the rat. J Surg Res. 2010;160:145–54. 43. Ozmen L, Ekdahl KN, Elgue G, Larsson R, Korsgren O, Nilsson B. Inhibition of thrombin abrogates the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction triggered by isolated human islets: possible application of the thrombin inhibitor melagatran in clinical islet transplantation. Diabetes. 2002;51: 1779–84. 44. Goto M, Johansson H, Maeda A, Elgue G, Korsgren O, Nilsson B. Low molecular weight dextran sulfate prevents the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction induced by adult porcine islets. Transplantation. 2004;77:741–7. 45. Moberg L, Olsson A, Berne C, Felldin M, Foss A, Kallen R, et al. Nicotinamide inhibits tissue factor expression in isolated human pancreatic islets: implications for clinical islet transplantation. Transplantation. 2003;76:1285–8. 46. Cabric S, Sanchez J, Lundgren T, Foss A, Felldin M, Kallen R, et al. Islet surface heparinization prevents the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction in islet transplantation. Diabetes. 2007;56:2008–15. 47. Johansson U, Elgue G, Nilsson B, Korsgren O. Composite islet-endothelial cell grafts: a novel approach to counteract innate immunity in islet transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:2632–9. 48. Emamaullee JA, Stanton L, Schur C, Shapiro AM. Caspase inhibitor therapy enhances marginal mass islet graft survival and preserves long-term function in islet transplantation. Diabetes. 2007;56:1289–98. 49. Emamaullee JA, Davis J, Pawlick R, Toso C, Merani S, Cai SX, et al. The caspase selective inhibitor EP1013 augments human islet graft function and longevity in marginal mass islet transplantation in mice. Diabetes. 2008;57: 1556–66. 50. Johansson M, Olerud J, Jansson L, Carlsson PO. Prolactin treatment improves engraftment and function of transplanted pancreatic islets. Endocrinology. 2009;150:1646–53. 51. Yamamoto T, Mita A, Ricordi C, Messinger S, Miki A, Sakuma Y, et al. Prolactin supplementation to culture medium improves beta-cell survival. Transplantation. 2010; 89:1328–35. 52. Lund T, Fosby B, Korsgren O, Scholz H, Foss A. Gluco- corticoids reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines and tissue factor in vitro and improve function of transplanted human islets in vivo. Transpl Int. 2008;21:669–78. 53. Toso C, McCall M, Emamaullee J, Merani S, Davis J, Edgar R, et al. Liraglutide, a long-acting human glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue, improves human islet survival in culture. Transpl Int. 2010;23:259–65. 54. Toyoda K, Okitsu T, Yamane S, Uonaga T, Liu X, Harada N, et al. GLP-1 receptor signaling protects pancreatic beta cells in intraportal islet transplant by inhibiting apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;367:793–8. 55. Juang JH, Kuo CH, Wu CH, Juang C. Exendin-4 treatment expands graft beta-cell mass in diabetic mice transplanted with a marginal number of fresh islets. Cell Transplant. 2008;17: 641–7. 56. Gangemi A, Salehi P, Hatipoglu B, Martellotto J, Barbaro B, Kuechle JB, et al. Islet transplantation for brittle type 1 diabetes: the UIC protocol. Am J Transplant. 2008;8: 1250–61. 57. Faradji RN, Tharavanij T, Messinger S, Froud T, Pileggi A, Monroy K, et al. Long-term insulin independence and improvement in insulin secretion after supplemental islet infusion under exenatide and etanercept. Transplantation. 2008;86:1658–65. 58. Zhang N, Richter A, Suriawinata J, Harbaran S, Altomonte J, Cong L, et al. Elevated vascular endothelial growth factor production in islets improves islet graft vascularization. Dia- betes. 2004;53:963–70. 59. Shimoda M, Chen S, Noguchi H, Matsumoto S, Grayburn PA. In vivo non-viral gene delivery of human vascular endothelial growth factor improves revascularisa- tion and restoration of euglycaemia after human islet transplantation into mouse liver. Diabetologia. 2010;53: 1669–79. 60. Olerud J, Johansson M, Lawler J, Welsh N, Carlsson PO. Improved vascular engraftment and graft function after inhi- bition of the angiostatic factor thrombospondin-1 in mouse pancreatic islets. Diabetes. 2008;57:1870–7. 61. Duprez IR, Johansson U, Nilsson B, Korsgren O, Magnusson PU. Preparatory studies of composite mesenchy- mal stem cell islets for application in intraportal islet trans- plantation. Ups J Med Sci. 2011;116:8–17. 62. Ito T, Itakura S, Todorov I, Rawson J, Asari S, Shintaku J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell and islet co-- transplantation promotes graft revascularization and function. Transplantation. 2010;89:1438–45. 63. Johansson U, Rasmusson I, Niclou SP, Forslund N, Gustavsson L, Nilsson B, et al. Formation of composite endothelial cell-mesenchymal stem cell islets: a novel approach to promote islet revascularization. Diabetes. 2008; 57:2393–401. 64. Kang S, Park HS, Jung HS, Park KS. Effective revascularisa- tion and enhancement of islet engraftment by cotransplanta- tion of islets with endothelial progenitor cells. Diabetologia. 2010;53(Suppl 1):S60. 65. Olerud J, Kanaykina N, Vasylovska S, King D, Sandberg M, Jansson L, et al. Neural crest stem cells increase beta cell proliferation and improve islet function in co-transplanted murine pancreatic islets. Diabetologia. 2009;52:2594–601. 66. Blomeier H, Zhang X, Rives C, Brissova M, Hughes E, Baker M, et al. Polymer scaffolds as synthetic microenviron- ments for extrahepatic islet transplantation. Transplantation. 2006;82:452–9. Microenvironment and engraftment of transplanted b-cells 7