U J 02 - Spring 2012 - All 008- without adv.pdf 480 | Laparoscopic Urology Clipless Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection Using Bipolar Electrocoagu- lation for Sealing Lymphatic Vessels Initial Series Nasser Simforoosh,1 Hamidreza Nasseh,1 Parham Masoudi,1 Mohammad Aslzare,1 Seyyed Mohammad Ghahestani,1 Ramin Eshratkhah,1 Mohammad Hadi Radfar2 Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dis- - phatic vessels. Materials and Methods: - tients underwent transperitoneal LPRLND for nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis. In this experience, in contrast to other techniques, we did not use clips for ligation of the lymphatic vessels; instead, we used bipolar cautery for coagula- tion of the lymphatic vessels. We followed up the patients for lymphocele forma- tion or lymphatic leakage using abdominal computed tomography scan. Results: - - age or lymphocele formation during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that using bipolar electrocoagulation instead of clips, for sealing of the lymphatic vessels during LRPLND, does not hamper the outcome of the procedure. This should be further evaluated in randomized clinical trials with more subjects. Keywords: lymphatic vessels, electrocoagulation, laparoscopy, lymph node exci- sion, postoperative complications Corresponding Author: Nasser Simforoosh, MD Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sci- ences, Tehran, Iran Tel: +98 21 2258 8016 E-mail: simforoosh@iurtc. org.ir Received May 2011 Accepted February 2012 1Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sci- ences, Tehran, Iran 2Hospital Management Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sci- ences, Tehran, Iran Laparoscopic Urology 481Vol. 9 | No. 2 | Spring 2012 |U R O LO G Y J O U R N A L Laparoscopic RPLND Using Bipolar Electrocoagulation | Simforoosh et al INTRODUCTION After the introduction of laparoscopic ret-roperitoneal lymph node dissection (LR-- sible method, many studies were performed to investigate its safety, reproducibility, and long-term results. Today, several institutions have published and updated their experience with LRPLND. Complications associated with LRPLND are re- ported to occur in 6% to 17% of patients, the ma- jority of which are minor. Chylous ascites and lym- phocele are among minor complications, which are reported in up to 6.6% of patients following LRPLND. It is proposed that prevention of chy- lous ascites and lymphocele can be achieved by meticulous ligation of the lymphatic vessels with clips. However, using electrocoagulation instead of ligation could be time-saving and cost-effective without increase of lymphocele incidence. We evaluated the outcome of LRPLND elimi- nating clips and using bipolar cautery to seal the lymphatic vessels. We did not focus on oncologic outcomes, but on technical aspects of using bipo- formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed our experience with transperitoneal LRPLND for nonseminomatous germ cell tumor - der general anesthesia. Thereafter, we introduced four trocars, including three ports in the midline and one pararectally. In a transperitoneal approach, a wide dissection of the ascending colon and the with transection of the splenocolic ligament (left the lymphatic vessels between the aorta and the left sympathetic trunk, however, was preserved. Furthermore, the pre-aortic and inter-aortocaval and precaval lymphatic vessels cephalic to the in- ferior mesenteric artery insertion were removed right side included all the tissue around the vena the pre-aortic tissue cephalic to the inferior mesen- teric artery insertion. Only in one patient with positive lymph nodes - silateral to the contralateral ureter, including both We dissected the lymphatic vessels as much as possible en block with split and roll technique and removed the gonadal vein together with the surrounding lymphatic tissue from the ipsilateral orchiectomy ligature to insertion end point (the the cases. In this experience, in contrast to other techniques, we did not use clips for ligation of the lymphatic vessels. Instead, we used bipolar cautery for coagulation of the lymphatic vessels (Figures for lymph leakage or lymphocele formation using abdominal computed tomography scan. RESULTS - toneal LRPLND for nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis. Testis tumors were on the left side in 7 patients and on the right side in 6. Twelve patients had stage I and one had stage IIa tumor. One conversion occurred during our early experi- ence with LRPLND, due to bleeding of the lum- bar vessels. No re-operation was needed in any of the patients. Blood transfusion was needed only in Tumor pathology and peri-operative results are 482 | shown in Table. Because of success in perform- ing lymph node dissection and low-stage disease, chemotherapy was not needed postoperatively in any of the patients. No case of chylous ascites or prolonged lymphatic leakage from the drains was encountered during the postoperative period. follow-up, lymphocele was not observed in the pa- DISCUSSION Laparoscopic RPLND is a technically demand- ing procedure that should be undertaken only by Laparoscopic Urology Figure 1. Removing lymphatic tissue using bipolar cautery cautery during retroperito- neal lymph node dissection. Figure 2. Paracaval and inter-aortocaval lymphatic tissue are removed. SL indi- 483Vol. 9 | No. 2 | Spring 2012 |U R O LO G Y J O U R N A L experienced laparoscopic surgeons, who are also comfortable and adept at advanced vascular tech- niques in the event of open conversion. The indica- tions for LRPLND in low-stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis are the same as those for open primary RPLND, namely clinical stage I or IIA, negative serum tumor markers, and the absence of comorbidities that would preclude safe surgery, such as a bleeding diathesis. As experience with LRPLND has improved, sev- in order to make it more feasible and less compli- cated. One of the RPLND complications either in open or laparoscopic manner is lymphatic leak- age or lymphocele formation. Chylous ascites is the result of surgical transection of the major lym- phatic vessels. A symptomatic lymphocele occur- ring after transperitoneal RPLND is relatively un- common. The presenting symptom may be a sense to ureteral obstruction. Imaging studies, including ultrasonography and computed tomography, may reveal a thin-walled cystic lesion, but one must be aware of the possibility of a thick-walled lesion, which must be distinguished from a cystic terato- ma through biopsy. Prevention of these problems requires marked at- tention to closing the suspected lymphatic struc- tures. Traditionally, clip-ligation and division of the lymphatic channels is being practiced and believe that care must be taken to clip as many of the main lymphatic channels as possible to de- crease the risk of postoperative lymphatic leak- age. However, bipolar electrocoagulation and division is an alternative technique. Although this technique is criticized by some for the increased frequency of lymphatic leakage or lymphocele, - phocele formation. Box and colleagues described an animal study comparing monopolar, bipolar, and ultrasonic en- ergy devices for in-vivo lymphatic sealing in a por- cine model. They assessed the capability of the de- vices for sealing the thoracic duct. They concluded that bipolar electrocautery and ultrasonic devices, not monopolar device, provide a supraphysiologi- cal seal of lymphatic vessels, and are appropriate for being utilized in laparoscopic surgery. The - phatic vessels in comparison with suture ligation has been previously evaluated in the kidney trans- plantation. Farouk and Bano compared elec- trocoagulation with ligation of lymphatic vessels in the kidney transplant recipients. Their results showed that electrocoagulation is time-saving and cost-effective, with no increase in lymphocele in- cidence. To the best of our knowledge, using bipolar elec- trocoagulation to close lymphatic vessels in LR- PLND has not been assessed. We eliminated the use of clips for ligation of the lymphatic and blood vessels; instead, we used bipolar cautery. However, we did not confront chylous ascites or prolonged lymphatic leakage from the drains or lymphocele during long-term follow-up period. Table . Outcome of transperitoneal lymph node dis- section without using clips for ligation of the lymphatic vessels. ValueParameters 29.9 (3 to 70)Mean follow-up (range), month Testicular tumor pathology 1 Mixed germ cell tumor 1 Pure embryonal cell carcinoma Lymph node pathology 12 Free of tumor 1 Embryonal + teratoma Mean operation time (range), hr 1Conversion to laparotomy 1.33 (0.2 to 2.7)Mean hemoglobin drop (range), mg/dL 4.2 (3 to 6)Mean drain leakage (range), day 0Symptomatic lymphocele 0Lymphocele on follow-up imaging Laparoscopic RPLND Using Bipolar Electrocoagulation | Simforoosh et al 484 | It must be remembered that the most effective ap- proach for the management of symptomatic lym- phocele after retroperitoneal lymph node manipu- lation, such as the kidney transplantation and pelvic lymph node dissection, is surgical intraperitoneal drainage. It seems that because our approach was transperitoneal, minor degrees of lymphorrhea could be absorbed by the exposed peritoneum sur- face; thus, we did not have any case of lymphatic leakage or symptomatic lymphocele formation. Our study is not without limitations. Although re- currence occurred in none of our patients, longer follow-up period is needed to more precisely eval- uate recurrence. Another limitation of our study was lack of a control group; however, this is the - ture comparative ones. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates that bipolar electrocoagu- lation during transperitoneal LRPLND does not adversely affect the outcome of the procedure. Fur- thermore, the use of bipolar coagulation greatly fa- cilitates a bloodless tissue dissection, shortens the operation time, prevents unnecessary application of intraperitoneal foreign bodies, reduces the costs, and brings more convenience for the surgeon. Fur- CONFLICT OF INTEREST None declared. REFERENCES 1. Rukstalis DB, Chodak GW. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a patient with stage 1 testicular 2. Stone NN, Schlussel RN, Waterhouse RL, Unger P. Laparo- scopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in stage A 3. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Hobisch A, Bartsch G. Laparo- scopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J Endourol. Laparoscopic Urology 4. Zhuo Y, Klaen R, Sauter TW, Miller K. Laparoscopic retroperi- toneal lymph node dissection in clinical stage I nonsemi- nomatous germ cell tumor: a minimal invasive alternative. 5. Rassweiler JJ, Frede T, Lenz E, Seemann O, Alken P. Long- term experience with laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the management of low-stage testis 6. Giusti G, Beltrami P, Tallarigo C, Bianchi G, Mobilio G. Unilateral laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular cancer. J 7. Klotz L. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for high-risk stage 1 nonseminomatous germ cell tumor: Kenney PA, Tuerk IA. Complications of laparoscopic retrop- eritoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer. World 9. Smith RB, Ehrlich RM, eds. Complications of urologic surgery. 10. Farouk K, Bano U. Electocoagulation Versus Suture-Ligation of Lymphatics in Kidney Transplant Recipient surgery. J 11. Sheinfeld J, Bartsch G, Bosl GJ. Surgery of Testicular Tumors. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, eds. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Vol 1. 9 ed. Philadelphia: WB 12. Janetschek G. Laposcopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: evolution of a new technique. World J Urol. 13. Corvin S, Kuczyk M, Anastasiadis A, Stenzl A. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminoma- 14. Box GN, Lee HJ, Abraham JB, et al. Comparative study of in vivo lymphatic sealing capability of the porcine thoracic duct using laparoscopic dissection devices. J Urol. 15. 16. Musch M, Klevecka V, Roggenbuck U, Kroepfl D. Complica- - going radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1993 and 485Vol. 9 | No. 2 | Spring 2012 |U R O LO G Y J O U R N A L Laparoscopic RPLND Using Bipolar Electrocoagulation | Simforoosh et al 17. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, et al. Complications of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): 75. Zargar-Shoshtari MA, Soleimani M, Salimi H, Mehravaran K. Symptomatic lymphocele after kidney transplantation: a 19. Abou-Elela A, Reyad I, Torky M, Meshref A, Morsi A. Lapa- roscopic marsupialization of postrenal transplantation 20. Varga Z, Hegele A, Olbert P, Hofmann R, Schrader AJ. Lapa- roscopic peritoneal drainage of symptomatic lymphoceles after pelvic lymph node dissection using methylene blue