Female Urology

24 Urology Journal   Vol 4   No 1   Winter 2007

Bacteriuria in Pregnant Women—Hazhir

Urology Journal   Vol 4   No 1   Winter 2007 25

Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Pregnant Women
Samad Hazhir

Introduction: The aim of  this study was to evaluate the frequency of  bacteriuria 
in pregnant women referred to the medical centers of  Tabriz, Iran, for prenatal 
care.
Materials and Methods: A total of  1100 healthy pregnant women who were 
referred to 50 medical centers in Tabriz for a regular prenatal care were evaluated 
for bacteriuria.
Results: The frequency of  asymptomatic bacteriuria was 6.1%. Maternal age 
was lower in the women with a positive urine culture (P = .02). Asymptomatic 
bacteriuria had no relationship with gestational age, parity, level of  education, and 
body mass index. 
Conclusion: We found a relatively high rate of  bacteriuria in our cohort of  
asymptomatic pregnant subjects, especially the younger ones. For prevention 
from the complications of  the asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women, 
such as pyelonephritis, hypertension, preeclampsia, low birth weight, prematurity, 
septicemia, and even maternal and neonatal death, it is recommended to perform 
urine culture as a routine evaluation during the pregnancy.

Urol J (Tehran). 2007;4:24-7. 
www.uj.unrc.ir

Keywords: bacteriuria, pregnancy, 
urine culture

Urology Department, Sina Hospital, 
Tabriz University of Medical 

Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Corresponding Author:
Samad Hazhir, MD

No 2, Zhan Ln, Shariati St, Vali-e-
Asr district, Tabriz, Iran
Tel: +98 914 115 7380

E-mail: samadhazhir@yahoo.com

Received December 2005
Accepted November 2006

INTRODUCTION
Special attention to the pregnant 
women is one of  the most important 
points in health care. One of  the 
problems in pregnancy is urinary tract 
infection (UTI).(1,2) The prevalence of  
asymptomatic UTI has been reported 
to be 2% to 11% in pregnant women 
(6% to 8% in average).(3-7) Neglecting 
the treatment of  UTI in pregnant 
women may result in some health 
and economic problems. Due to the 
increase in sex hormones and the 
anatomic and physiologic changes 
during pregnancy, bladder and kidney 
infection is more likely and may result 
in hypertension, preeclampsia, low 
birth weight, prematurity, septicemia, 
and maternal death.(2,4,5,8,9) It has been 
estimated that the costs of  screening 
and treatment of  asymptomatic 
bacteriuria and pyelonephritis during 

the pregnancy are about US$ 1605 
and US$ 2864, respectively, in the 
United States.(4) In our country, no 
precise information exists about 
the prevalence of  asymptomatic 
bacteriuria in pregnancy and the its 
treatment costs. We designed this 
study to evaluate the prevalence 
of  bacteriuria in pregnant women 
referring to the medical centers of  
Tabriz, Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
We designed a cross-sectional study 
to evaluate asymptomatic bacteriuria 
in pregnant women. According to 
the results in the previous studies 
on asymptomatic bacteriuria in 
pregnant women, a sample size 
of  1100 subjects was considered 
adequate and a total of  50 family 
programming and pregnancy control 



Female Urology

24 Urology Journal   Vol 4   No 1   Winter 2007

Bacteriuria in Pregnant Women—Hazhir

Urology Journal   Vol 4   No 1   Winter 2007 25

centers in Tabriz were selected for this study.(7,10-12) 
The study population and the sample size of  each 
center were determined according to the proportion 
of  the patients referring to each center. Women 
at any gestational age who presented for a regular 
prenatal care were included and those with a history 
of  urinary tract symptoms (dysuria, frequency, and 
urgency, etc), pregnancy-induced diabetes mellitus 
or hypertension, antibiotic administration within the 
previous 7 days, and active regional bleeding were 
excluded.

The doctors and midwives in all of  the 50 centers 
were instructed in the method of  the study. They 
were asked to record the required information of  
the pregnant women and to introduce all of  those 
without any urinary symptoms to the reference 
laboratory of  Tabriz University of  Medical Sciences. 
To perform urinalysis, the midstream urine samples 
were taken in the lithotomy position after cleaning 
the vestibule of  the vagina. Women with more than 
105 bacteria in each milliliter of  urine were considered 
as the patients with bacteriuria.(13) Urine culture was 
carried out for this group of  women to confirm the 
diagnosis. 

Patients’ demographics including age, BMI, level of  
education, gestational age, and parity, as well as the 
laboratory results, were recorded. Data were evaluated 
by the chi-square test and t test, as appropriate. A P 
value less than .05 was considered significant..

RESULTS
A total of  1100 pregnant women in Tabriz 
participated in this study. The prevalence of  
asymptomatic bacteriuria was 6.1%. The prevalence 
rates in relation to the clinical and demographic 
characteristics of  the patients are illustrated in Table. 
The maternal age was significantly lower in the 
subjects with asymptomatic bacteriuria (P = .02). 
Asymptomatic bacteriuria did not have any significant 
relation with the trimester of  the pregnancy (P = .53), 
parity (P = .84), the level of  education (P = .52), and 
the BMI (P = .17).  The mean BMI was 26.4 kg/m2 
and 26.6 kg/m2 in the women with and without 
bacteriuria, respectively. 

DISCUSSION
Most of  the anatomic and physiologic changes in 
pregnancy influence the urinary tract and can result 

in urologic diseases and changes in kidney function 
which are serious threats for both the mother 
and the fetus. Asymptomatic bacteriuria must be 
treated during the pregnancy in order to prevent 
complications such as pyelonephritis, premature 
labor, hypertension, preeclampsia, and septicemia.(14) 

In a study by Uncu, 270 pregnant women were 
evaluated and the prevalence of  asymptomatic 
bacteriuria was reported to be 9.3%.(11) In a study 
performed in Turkey, 110 pregnant women were 
evaluated and the prevalence of  asymptomatic 
bacteriuria was reported to be 8.1%, being more 
prevalent in the third trimester which is in contrast 
with our findings.(12) Also, in their study, the 
prevalence of  bacteriuria was higher in women 
older than 25 years, while in our study, it was more 
prevalent in younger women. In another study, 268 
women were evaluated and the need for disease 
detection and prevention from the pyelonephritis was 
emphasized.(15)  

McIsaac and colleagues evaluated the urine cultures 
obtained from pregnant women before 20 weeks’ 
gestation and at 28 weeks’ and 36 weeks’ gestation. 

Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Pregnant Women

Characteristic Positive Urine Culture (%) Total Number 

Pregnancy trimester   
First 13 (6.7) 194 
Second 32 (6.8) 473 
Third 22 (5.1) 432 

Age, y   
< 20 22 (9.9) 223 
20 to 30 33 (4.7) 704 
> 30 12 (6.9) 173 

Parity   
1 18 (5.8) 313 
2 32 (6.8) 469 
3 13 (6.0) 216 
> 3   4 (3.9) 102 

BMI, kg/m2   
< 20   3 (6.1) 49 
20 to 25 30 (7.9) 382 
> 25 33 (5.0) 662 

Education   
Illiterate   2 (2.6) 76 
Primary education 21 (7.1) 296 
Secondary 

education 18 (6.1) 296 

High School degree 25 (6.5) 387 
Higher education   1 (2.3) 43 

Total 67 (6.1) 1100 



Bacteriuria in Pregnant Women—Hazhir

26 Urology Journal   Vol 4   No 1   Winter 2007

Bacteriuria in Pregnant Women—Hazhir

Urology Journal   Vol 4   No 1   Winter 2007 27

They found that a single urine culture before 20 
weeks’ gestation missed more than one-half  the 
asymptomatic bacteriuria cases and recommended 
culture in each trimester to identify most cases.(7) 
We observed a consistent risk of  bacteriuria in all 
3 trimesters of  the pregnancy, warranting screening 
program over the whole conception period. Other 
studies have also emphasized the necessity of  
screening and treatment of  bacteriuria during the 
pregnancy period in order to prevent its dangerous 
complications.(1,16-19)  

Studies show that urine culture is the gold standard 
method of  diagnosis for this disease.(3,10) It is shown 
that urine dipstick testing for nitrites, urinalysis, and 
enzymatic urine screening tests can poorly detect 
all the culture positive bacteriuria cases in pregnant 
women.(3,10,20) Kutlay and colleagues(3) evaluated 406 
pregnant women admitted for an initial obstetric 
examination during the first trimester. They 
performed clean-catch urine culture, microscopic 
urinalysis and dipstick urine tests and found that the 
sensitivity and specificity of  microscopic urinalysis 
were below 75% and those for dipstick testing were 
about 35%. We could detect a comparable rate of  
bacteriuria with the findings of  other studies by 
clean-catch urine culture.

One of  the most important points of  our study was 
the large sample size in comparison with the previous 
studies and evaluation of  other variables including 
the mothers’ age and its relation with the trimesters 
of  pregnancy.(3,7,10-12,15,21) Additionally, in our study, 
variables including BMI, parity, and level of  education 
were evaluated for the first time.

CONCLUSION
Bacteriuria was present in about 6.1% of  the 
pregnant women in this study. A most sensitive test 
for its detection is urine culture with clean-catch 
sampling from the midstream urine. Regarding the 
frequency of  asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant 
women younger than 20 years, it is recommended 
to perform urine culture as a part of  the routine 
examinations of  the pregnant women, and provide 
them with complete information about the 
complications of  pregnancy at younger ages.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None declared.

REFERENCES
1. Mittal P, Wing DA. Urinary tract infections in 

pregnancy. Clin Perinatol. 2005;32:749-64. 

2. Saidi A, Delaporte V, Lechevallier E. [Urological 
problems encountered during pregnancy]. Prog Urol. 
2005;15:1-5. French.

3. Kutlay S, Kutlay B, Karaahmetoglu O, Ak C, Erkaya S. 
Prevalence, detection and treatment of asymptomatic 
bacteriuria in a Turkish obstetric population. J Reprod 
Med. 2003;48:627-30.

4. Delzell JE Jr, Lefevre ML. Urinary tract infections 
during pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61:713-
21.

5. Abyad A. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in 
pregnancy: urinalysis vs urine culture. J Fam Pract. 
1991;33:471-4.

6. Christensen B. Which antibiotics are appropriate 
for treating bacteriuria in pregnancy? J Antimicrob 
Chemother. 2000;46:29-34. 

7. McIsaac W, Carroll JC, Biringer A, et al. Screening 
for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. J Obstet 
Gynaecol Can. 2005;27:20-4.

8. Klein LL, Gibbs RS. Use of microbial cultures and 
antibiotics in the prevention of infection-associated 
preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1493-
502.

9. Grio R, Porpiglia M, Vetro E, et al. Asymptomatic 
bacteriuria in pregnancy: a diagnostic and therapeutic 
approach. Panminerva Med. 1994;36:195-7.

10. Teppa RJ, Roberts JM. The uriscreen test to detect 
significant asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy. 
J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2005;12:50-3.

11. Uncu Y, Uncu G, Esmer A, Bilgel N. Should 
asymptomatic bacteriuria be screened in pregnancy? 
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2002;29:281-5.

12. Tugrul S, Oral O, Kumru P, Kose D, Alkan A, Yildirim 
G. Evaluation and importance of asymptomatic 
bacteriuria in pregnancy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 
2005;32:237-40.

13. Gerber GS, Brendler CB. Evaluation of the urologic 
patient: history, physical examination, and urinalysis. 
In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, et al, 
editors. Campbell’s urology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: WB 
Saunders; 2002. p. 109. 

14. Raz R. Asymptomatic bacteriuria. Clinical significance 
and management. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003;22:
45-7.

15. Bookallil M, Chalmers E, Andrew B. Challenges 
in preventing pyelonephritis in pregnant women 
in Indigenous communities. Rural Remote Health. 
2005;5:395.

16. Le J, Briggs GG, McKeown A, Bustillo G. Urinary 
tract infections during pregnancy. Ann Pharmacother. 
2004;38:1692-701. 

17. Varma R, Gupta JK, James DK, Kilby MD. Do 
screening-preventative interventions in asymptomatic 
pregnancies reduce the risk of preterm delivery--a 
critical appraisal of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 



Bacteriuria in Pregnant Women—Hazhir

26 Urology Journal   Vol 4   No 1   Winter 2007

Bacteriuria in Pregnant Women—Hazhir

Urology Journal   Vol 4   No 1   Winter 2007 27

Reprod Biol. 2006;127:145-59. 

18. Sheffield JS, Cunningham FG. Urinary tract infection 
in women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1085-92. 

19. Caputo S, Ciardo A. [Asymptomatic bacteriuria in 
pregnancy]. Clin Ter. 2001;152:315-8. Italian.

20. Bachman JW, Heise RH, Naessens JM, Timmerman 
MG. A study of various tests to detect asymptomatic 

urinary tract infections in an obstetric population. 
JAMA. 1993;270:1971-4.  

21. Lumbiganon P, Chongsomchai C, Chumworathayee B, 
Thinkhamrop J. Reagent strip testing is not sensitive 
for the screening of asymptomatic bacteriuria in 
pregnant women. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002;85:922-7.