Fall 2012 - 08.pdf 685Vol. 9 | No. 4 | Fall 2012 |U R O LO G Y J O U R N A L Validity and Reliability of the Internation- al Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form and Its Correlation With Urodynamic Findings Sakineh Hajebrahimi,1 Davoud Nourizadeh,2 Roghayeh Hamedani,2 Mohammad Zakaria Pezeshki3 Purpose: To validate the Persian version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) as a standard questionnaire for assessment of urinary incontinence (UI). Materials and Methods: After translation and back translation of the questionnaire, the harmo- The psychometric aspects of the questionnaire, such as reliability and construct validity, were as- Results: Mean age of the participants was 46.30 ± 13.14 years (range, 16 to 72 years). Based urgency urinary incontinence was 35%, 34.1%, and 30.9%, respectively. Cronbach’s alpha co- - Conclusion: Persian version of ICIQ-UI SF is a simple, valid, and reliable method for evaluation parameters. Keywords: urinary incontinence, validation studies, questionnaires, translating, diagnosis Corresponding Author: Davoud Nourizadeh, MD Department of Urol- ogy, Imam Reza Hospital; Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sci- ences, Tabriz, Iran Tel: +98 411 335 7328 Fax: +98 411 335 7328 E-mail: davoudnourizadeh @yahoo.com Received April 2011 Accepted January 2012 1Department of Urol- ogy, Iranian Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sci- ences, Tabriz, Iran 2Department of Urol- ogy, Imam Reza Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sci- ences, Tabriz, Iran 3Department of Com- munity Medicine, Iranian Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran FEMALE UROLOGY 686 | ???Female Urology INTRODUCTION U rinary incontinence (UI) is a major health prob- lem worldwide, with a 5% to 72% prevalence rate, depending on the study.(1) Age, vaginal de- livery, obesity, menopause, smoking, chronic cough, consti- pation, and previous pelvic surgery are among its primary risk factors.(1,2) Appropriate diagnosis and assessment of UI is crucial for its treatment. To cure or improve the symp- to growing interest in clinical evaluation with subjective methods. Various different questionnaires have been used to assess and diagnose UI, each with advantages and disad- vantages. Few diseases-related quality of life (QOL) ques- tionnaires have been developed for clinical practice, and most are too long and unclear. The International Consultation on Incontinence Question- naire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) con- sists of 6 questions developed by the International Consul- tation on Incontinence. The original version is in English and has been translated into 26 other languages, including Spanish,(3) Chinese,(4) Turkish,(5) Arabic,(6) Portuguese,(7) Japanese,(8) and Taiwanese.(9) A valid and reliable question- naire may prevent the need for unnecessary UI studies.(10) In prior reports, the ICIQ-UI SF has been translated and validated for initial diagnosis, management, and patient’s follow-up.(11-15) It can be used as a self-administrated ques- tionnaire or can be administered by the physician.(14) The ICIQ-UI SF has not yet been translated into Persian; there- fore, its reliability and validity have not been assessed in Iran, which has a UI prevalence of 23.5%.(2) Urodynamic studies are performed to investigate the function of the consuming, and invasive. A less complicated method for determining this urodynamic information would therefore For this cross-sectional study, the ICIQ-UI SF was trans- lated into Persian according to the ICIQ and reliability pro- and the results were compared with the clinical urodynamic to translate the ICIQ-UI SF into Persian with appropriate cultural adaptations, validate it for clinical and research practices in Persian-speaking countries, and evaluate its correlation with urodynamic studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS from 123 consecutive patients with UI referred to the Fe- male Urology Clinic at Tabriz University of Medical Sci- ences from May 2008 to June 2009. A written informed consent was obtained from each participant. The patients younger than 16 years. The original ICIQ-UI SF was translated into Persian by 2 - pert. The English and Persian versions were reviewed by 2 physicians who were aware of the research aims. The Persian translation was then back-translated into English unaware of the research objectives of this study. After the grammatical corrections, the Persian version was evaluated by a committee of 5 bilingual health workers. To observe the appropriate translation methodology, the back-transla- tion of the questionnaire was sent to the ICI advisory board for review in England. This was to ensure that the content of the translation remained consistent with the original ver- sion. A pilot test was conducted on 28 patients with pretested UI using the Persian translated ICIQ-UI SF to assess reliability and validity. The questionnaire was read to the patient and - tent validity, the patient responses were analyzed based on previously validated results from the pre-translated origi- nal ICIQ-UI SF. Concurrent validity, a core criterion of this study, was investigated by cross-validating the results of the ICIQ-UI SF with the urodynamic results. Because uro- dynamic studies are considered to have high validity, they were used here as a criterion standard, making it possible to assessment. The purpose of this study was not to assess the diagnostic value of the ICIQ-UI SF. For this reason, sensi- concurrent validity. The questionnaire was administered at 687Vol. 9 | No. 4 | Fall 2012 |U R O LO G Y J O U R N A L Correlation between ICIQ-UI SF and Urodynamic Findings | Hajebrahimi et al 2 separate times with an interval of 1 week to ensure lack of recall-induced agreement. According to the results of the pilot study, some of the pa- tients did not understand question 4 regarding QOL. We attributed this to cultural reasons. Therefore, we made a second pretest to improve the cultural implications of this question. The results of the pilot and main studies were separately ana- calculated to assess the reliability of the questions, and the were calculated to determine the test-retest value. To evaluate the correlation between the results of the questionnaire and P The construct validity was evaluated by comparison of the Persian version of the ICIQ-UI SF with the urodynamic studies. Validity of the Persian ICIQ-UI SF was determined by its ability to distinguish between different types of UI, To assess the predictive ability of the questionnaire, true positives, false positives, true negatives, false negatives, voiding cystometry and Valsalva leak point pressure, was performed using a Laborie Delphis B urodynamic system, with the patient in a sitting position according to Interna- tional Continence Society standards. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-three women with some degree of UI in the previous 4 weeks were enrolled in this study. The mean patients’ age was 46.30 ± 13.14 years (range, 16 to 72 years). More than 68% of the participants had low levels of literacy. The mean questionnaire scores of the patients are shown in Table 1. According to the ICIQ-UI SF, 43 (35.0%) patients had MUI, 42 (34.1%) had SUI, and 38 (30.9%) had UUI. Based on the urodynamic and stress test results, 6 (4.9%) patients had MUI, 38 (30.9%) had SUI, and 63 (51.2%) had patients, including 9 (7.3%) with underactive detrusor, 2 (1.6%) with acontractile detrusor, and 2 (1.6%) with blad- der outlet obstruction. Three (2.4%) subjects had normal urodynamics study. Patients who had more severe symp- level of reliability of this questionnaire in determining UI. - tial questionnaire and the translated version was 0.70. The between the questionnaire and the urodynamic study. The - ed in Table 2. DISCUSSION The Persian version of the ICIQ-UI SF demonstrated good - ing effects were observed, suggesting that it enabled dis- crimination among an adequate range of UI conditions. As tended to score higher than those with less severe symp- toms. The Persian version showed good internal consist- ency and test-retest reliability, suggesting that it can be ef- The construct validity was analyzed by measuring the cor- urodynamic study. There was generally a moderate asso- ciation between the two approaches. This was not entirely - study (P < .01). The questionnaire measured an MUI with a sensitivity of Table 1. Average questionnaire scores. Number of question Mean score Standard deviation 1st 3.52 1.27 2nd 3.9 1.81 3rd 7.85 2.35 Total score 16.6 4.07 688 | women with UI may adapt their lifestyles to avoid situa- criterion standard. Patients with low levels of literacy had problems under- standing the QOL scale in the pilot study. For this reason, we changed the number scale for these patients to a visual scale, but the results were not completely satisfactory and The ICIQ-UI SF has been translated into more than 26 lan- guages and is used worldwide as a common instrument for assessing the symptoms and QOL of patients with UI.(11) questionnaire in Persian-speaking countries. Using this method, the outcomes of studies on UI conducted world- ICIQ-UI SF consists of only 3 scored questions and is there- fore not time-consuming for the patient. The simplicity of this method renders it especially useful for clinical practice, where time and resources are limited. However, because a short questionnaire cannot always provide detailed infor- mation about symptoms and QOL,(12,13) other assessment measures may be necessary. CONCLUSION The Persian version of the ICIQ-UI SF is a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of patients with UI. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was conducted by grant of Urology Research Team and Research Vice Chancellor of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Their great help is appreciated. CONFLICT OF INTEREST None declared. Table 2. Comparison of questionnaire results with urodynamics study.* Type of incontinence Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) MUI 0.84 (0.653 to 0.936) 0.78 (0.689 to 0.85) UUI 0.525(0.402 to 0.645) 0.953 (0.871 to 0.984) SUI 0.636 (0.466 to 0.778) 0.826 (0.736 to 0.89) *CI indicates confidence interval; MUI, mixed urinary incontinence; UUI, urgency urinary incontinence; SUI, stress urinary incontinence. Female Urology REFERENCES 1. Nitti VW. The prevalence of urinary incontinence. Rev Urol. 2001;3 Suppl 1:S2-6. 2. Hajebrahimi S, Madaen SK. Prevalence of urinary inconti- nence in Tabrizian women. Iranian J Urol. 2001;61-4. 3. Espuna Pons M, Rebollo Alvarez P, Puig Clota M. [Validation of the Spanish version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form. A questionnaire for assessing the urinary incontinence]. Med Clin (Barc). 2004;122:288-92. 4. Huang L, Zhang SW, Wu SL, Ma L, Deng XH. The Chi- nese version of ICIQ: a useful tool in clinical practice and research on urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27:522-4. 5. Cetinel B, Ozkan B, Can G. The validation study of ICIQ-SF Turkish version. Turkish J Urol. 2004;30:332–8. 6. Hashim H, Avery K, Mourad MS, Chamssuddin A, Ghoniem G, Abrams P. The Arabic ICIQ-UI SF: an alternative lan- guage version of the English ICIQ-UI SF. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25:277-82. 7. Tamanini JT, Dambros M, D'Ancona CA, Palma PC, Rodri- gues Netto N, Jr. [Validation of the "International Consulta- tion on Incontinence Questionnaire -- Short Form" (ICIQ-SF) for Portuguese]. Rev Saude Publica. 2004;38:438-44. 8. Gotoh M, Homma Y, Funahashi Y, Matsukawa Y, Kato M. Psychometric validation of the Japanese version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire- Short Form. Int J Urol. 2009;16:303-6. 9. Chang SR, Chen KH, Chang TC, Lin HH. A Taiwanese version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Ques- tionnaire--Urinary Incontinence Short Form for pregnant women: instrument validation. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20:714-22. 689Vol. 9 | No. 4 | Fall 2012 |U R O LO G Y J O U R N A L Correlation between ICIQ-UI SF and Urodynamic Findings | Hajebrahimi et al 10. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23:322-30. 11. Espuna-Pons M, Dilla T, Castro D, Carbonell C, Casariego J, Puig-Clota M. Analysis of the value of the ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire and stress test in the differential diagnosis of the type of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:836-41. 12. Seckiner I, Yesilli C, Mungan NA, Aykanat A, Akduman B. Correlations between the ICIQ-SF score and urodynamic findings. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:492-4. 13. Tamanini JT, Dambros M, D'Ancona CA, Palma PC, Rod- rigues-Netto N, Jr. Responsiveness to the Portuguese version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) after stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Braz J Urol. 2005;31:482-9; discus- sion 90. 14. Klovning A, Avery K, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. Comparison of two questionnaires for assessing the severity of urinary incontinence: The ICIQ-UI SF versus the incontinence sever- ity index. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28:411-5. 15. Kieres P, Rokita W, Stanislawska M, Rechberger T, Galezia M. [The diagnostic value of chosen questionnaires (UDI 6SF, Gaudenz, MESA, ICIQ-SF and King's Health Questionnaire) in diagnosis of different types of women's urinary inconti- nence]. Ginekol Pol. 2008;79:338-41. 690 | ICIQ UI SF Female Urology | | | | ………… | |