U J All Final for WEB.pdf 756 | 1Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran 2Student Research Com- mittee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran Sadrollah Mehrabi,1 Ali Mousavi Zadeh,1Mehdi Akbartabar Toori,1 Farhad Mehrabi2 General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Corresponding Author: Sadrollah Mehrabi, MD Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Yasuj University of Medical Sci- ences, Yasuj, Iran Tel/Fax: +98 741 222 6517 E-mail: sadrollahm@yahoo. com Received December 2011 Accepted August 2012 Purpose: percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and Methods: - t tests. Results: P P P Conclusion: cost-effective method for performing PCNL in adult patients. Keywords: percutaneous nephrolithotomy, anesthesia, complications ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE Endourology and Stone Disease 757Vol. 10 | No. 1 | Winter 2013 |U R O LO G Y J O U R N A L INTRODUCTION Urinary tract stone disease is a major health-care problem, and after urinary tract infections and prostate pathology, is the third in rank among the diseases of the urinary system. Although there are - (ESWL), transurethral lithotripsy (TUL), and percutane- ous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) during the last three decades, diagnostic and treatment methods for this kind of disease have been changed remarkably.(2) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a minimally-invasive therapy for treatment of upper ureteral and renal stones. It is the treatment of choice for kidney stones larger than multiple or resistant to ESWL. In most cases, PCNL is and the costs of general anesthesia are higher than spinal anesthesia.(6) changed from supine to prone. The most common compli- - - fects related to displacement of tracheal tube. - ther spinal, epidural, or intrapleural anesthesia. Due to high rate of complications and cost in general anesthesia MATERIALS AND METHODS mm, staghorn stones, multiple renal stones, and stones re- sistant to ESWL. They have been referred to our urology department for performing PCNL. - ing to Zelen randomization method. History and physical Pre-operative laboratory tests, such as sodium, potassium, complete blood count (CBC), coagulation tests, renal func- tion tests (urea and creatinine), urinalysis, and urine culture, done for better decision. - - traindication for spinal anesthesia, such as skin infection over lumbar spine, elevated intracranial pressure, or severe kyphoscoliosis, and failure of spinal anesthesia (inability to - dazolam, thiopental, and atracorium, and inhalation of iso- pulmonary, visceral, and vascular complications, a nephros- position and the bed changed to Trendelenburg position - General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in PCNL | Mehrabi et al 758 | gently and by assistance of anesthesiologists in the operat- obtained using hypnotic and narcoleptic drugs, such as ket- - recorded from the beginning of the anesthesia procedure - checked by 7-point verbal test and visual analogue scale (VAS), respectively. On the 2nd - ity to remove kidney stones completely or residuals stone (2,3) and t test. RESULTS - time (P - - controlled by ephedrine and metoclopramide. The compli- - plications related to anesthesia, such as hypotension (2 pa- tachycardia (2 patients). The complication not related to an- Endourology and Stone Disease Table 1. Comparison of demographics and stone characteristics in two groups before operation.* Variable General anesthesia Spinal anesthesia P Gender Male, n (%) Female, n (%) 35 (67.3) 17 (32.7) 31 (53.4) 27 (46.6) .07 Stone location Pelvic + staghorn, n (%) Others, n (%) 29 (55.8) 23 (44.2) 37 (64.9) 20 (35.1) .11 Mean age ± SD, y 43.7 ± 8.2 47.4 ± 7.6 .17 Mean stone size ± SD, mm 30.9 ± 10.6 32.8 ± 9.6 .06 Mean body mass index ± SD, kg/m2 24.1 ± 5.6 24.1 ± 7.2 .07 *SD indicates standard deviation. 759Vol. 10 | No. 1 | Winter 2013 |U R O LO G Y J O U R N A L - type of anesthesia and intra-operative complications (P groups regarding intra-operative hypotension (P Postoperative complications in spinal anesthesia group - - - sion, and postoperative fever due to atelectasia occurred in and postoperative minor complications (P - Successfulness of operation in general and spinal groups according to radiography and ultrasonography results after surgery (complete clearance of system from stone or resid- - thesia and result of radiography and renal ultrasonography after surgery (P P - erage cost of drugs and materials used in spinal and general - P DISCUSSION Although general anesthesia is preferred in many centers for performing PCNL, but it can be a challenge in some situations, such as PCNL for staghorn calculi or patients - cular disorders. - sorption and electrolyte imbalance, especially in staghorn stones and also in morbid obese patients, regional or local anesthesia may be a good alternative for general anesthesia in these patients. has been addressed. In a study by Kuzgunbay and col- leagues, general versus combined spinal-epidural anesthe- regarding pre and postoperative variables, such as opera- stay.(7) - studies. - General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in PCNL | Mehrabi et al Table 2. Comparison of two groups based on intra-operative and postoperative variables. pSpinal anesthesiaGeneral anesthesiaVariable .0982.2 ± 9.892.3 ± 10.1Mean operation time ± SD, min .238 (77.2)40 (80)Patient satisfaction, n (%) .0230Postoperative headache, n .0220Low back pain, n .01112Hypotension, n .6611.5212.35Mean postoperative Hb, g/dL *SD indicates standard deviation. 760 | esthesia, but if suitable anesthetic level can not be achieved and success decrease. Regarding postoperative hemoglobin - cacy and complications of spinal anesthesia in PCNL. The - - ing operation and postoperative rest and analgesics.(2) The - - tients had mild hemodynamic instability and hypotension, during the operation and improved spontaneously or by in- jection of ephedrine and metoclopramide. - - In our study, the combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl - - nd Regarding dose of narcotic drugs after surgery and post- operative complications, this study is similar to Andreoni candidate for PCNL. In the present study, need for opioid - st used in spinal anesthesia. - fentanyl and bupivacaine could be a good alternative for general anesthesia in PCNL. - Gonano and asso- less than general anesthesia in orthopedic surgeries. Al- Despite general opinion that spinal anesthesia is not suit- able for PCNL procedure of staghorn stones and stones in the upper pole of the kidney, our study results denote that also provides a good operation scope for access to all parts complications, such as pulmonary, neurologic, and vascular CONCLUSION remove the kidney stones in both spinal and general anes- - Endourology and Stone Disease Table 3. Need to opioid drugs (mg per day) after percuta- neous nephrolithotomy in two groups. Pt test Spinal anesthesia General anesthesia Time .032.23 7.8 ± 2.3 12.4 ± 3.11st postoperative day .061.8711.1 ± 2.1 13.2 ± 2.12nd postoperative day 761Vol. 10 | No. 1 | Winter 2013 |U R O LO G Y J O U R N A L General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in PCNL | Mehrabi et al 9. Saied MM, Sonbul ZM, el-Kenawy M, Atallah MM. Spinal and interpleural bupivacaine for percutaneous nephroli- thotomy. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 1991;11:259-64. 10. Andreoni C, Olweny EO, Portis AJ, Sundaram CP, Monk T, Clayman RV. Effect of single-dose subarachnoid spinal anesthesia on pain and recovery after unilateral percutane- ous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2002;16:721-5. 11. Singh I, Kumar A, Kumar P. "Ambulatory PCNL" (tubeless PCNL under regional anesthesia) -- a preliminary report of 10 cases. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37:35-7. 12. Schuster M, Gottschalk A, Berger J, Standl T. A retrospective comparison of costs for regional and general anesthe- sia techniques. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:786-94, table of contents. 13. Gonano C, Leitgeb U, Sitzwohl C, Ihra G, Weinstabl C, Kettner SC. Spinal versus general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery: anesthesia drug and supply costs. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:524-9. REFERENCES 1. Rozentsveig V, Neulander EZ, Roussabrov E, et al. Anesthet- ic considerations during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Clin Anesth. 2007;19:351-5. 2. Mehrabi S, Karimzadeh Shirazi K. Results and complications of spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol J. 2010;7:22-5. 3. Stoller ML, Wolf JS, Jr., St Lezin MA. Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates associated with percutaneous neph- rolithotomy. J Urol. 1994;152:1977-81. 4. Trivedi NS, Robalino J, Shevde K. Interpleural block: a new technique for regional anaesthesia during percutane- ous nephrostomy and nephrolithotomy. Can J Anaesth. 1990;37:479-81. 5. Aravantinos E, Karatzas A, Gravas S, Tzortzis V, Melekos M. Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under assisted local anaesthesia: a prospective study on selected patients with upper urinary tract obstruction. Eur Urol. 2007;51:224-7; discussion 8. 6. El-Husseiny T, Moraitis K, Maan Z, et al. Percutaneous endourologic procedures in high-risk patients in the lateral decubitus position under regional anesthesia. J Endourol. 2009;23:1603-6. 7. Kuzgunbay B, Turunc T, Akin S, Ergenoglu P, Aribogan A, Ozkardes H. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general versus combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. J Endourol. 2009;23:1835-8. 8. Kanaroglou A, Razvi H. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under conscious sedation in morbidly obese patients. Can J Urol. 2006;13:3153-5. ureteral stones. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS - nology Department of Yasuj University of Medical Sci- Beheshti Hospital of Yasuj for their cooperation. CONFLICT OF INTEREST None declared.