Narrowing of the Dorsal Vein Complex Technique during Laparoscopic Rad- ical Prostatectomy: A Simple Trick to Simplify the Control of Venous Plexus Alejandro García-Segui,* Manuel Sánchez, Aleixandre Verges, Juan P. Caballero, Juan A. Galán LAPAROSCOPIC UROLOGY Purpose: The control of the Dorsal Venous Complex (DVC) is crucial to the recovery of urinary continence during Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP). The size of DVC may affect the venous control. We developed a trick to simplify the suturing of the DVC. Materials and Methods: Forty-seven patients with localized prostate cancer were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 24) underwent LRP with a conventional ligature of DVC, and in group 2 (n = 23) the venous control was done with “Narrowing” of DVC technique (N-DVC). Our technique involves maintaining pressure on a metallic urethral sound inserted into the urethra, just at the time of ligature. The width of DVC in group 2 was measured before and after applying the technique. The numbers of attempts to place the stitch adequately were recorded and compared in both groups. The demographic and perioperative data, perioperative data and results were compared retrospectively. Results: Operation time, estimated blood loss, prostate weight, positive surgical margins rates and potency results showed no significant differences between the groups. The immediate 1-month, and 3-month continence rates were significantly greater in group 2 (30.4% vs. 12.5%, P = .048; 73.9% vs. 50%, P = .037, respectively). For all patients in group 2, width of DVC decreased and the ligation stitch was effective at the first attempt. In 37.5% of patients in group 1, the controlling of the DVC was obtained in more than one attempt. Conclusion: The N-DVC simplifies the control of DVC during LRP and may contribute to the early recovery of continence. Keywords: prostatic neoplasms; surgery; laparoscopy; ligation; methods; prostatectomy; adverse effects; sutures. INTRODUCTION Robot Assisted-Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) are usually applied in the treatment of organ confined prostate cancer. During these surgeries, an anatomical ap- proach for management of the Dorsal Venous Complex (DVC) is crucial to recover urinary continence, control bleeding and ensure precise apical dissection.(1,2) The ure- thral sphincter is covered by the central portion of DVC, and its veins run in parallel. Sutures are employed usually to control the venous plexus, but the depth of the stitch for ligation cannot be clearly visualized. Thus, suturing may lead to injury of the muscle fibers of the rhabdosphincter, which could affect the functional outcome of continence. (3-6) The critical points in the control of the DVC include the proper identification of the plane between the venous plexus, urethra and sphincter and the full incorporation of the veins without injury to the sphincter muscle.(7) How- ever, several factors increase the difficulty of controlling the DVC, including the following: variability of the pel- vic space, the anatomy of the pubic bone, the different morphologies of the prostatic apex, the presence of large prostate, and plentiful amount of fatty tissue in Retzius space in obese patients.(8-10) In these cases, the ligature of the venous plexus may be more difficult because the ana- tomical space between the prostatic apex and pubic bone may be short and it is uncomfortable to place stitches. Several efforts to optimize the control of the DVC have been made by applying various techniques and devices. (3-5,9,11-15) Extremely large venous plexus can make the surgical procedure more difficult by demanding vascular control.(16) We developed a simple maneuver named “Nar- rowing” of Dorsal Vein Complex technique (N-DVC) in order to get better exposure and optimal vision with the aim to simplify the suturing of venous plexus, mobilizing the urethra by a metallic urethral sound. We observed that pushing down urethra with a metal sound deforms api- cal tissues and produces anatomical changes that can im- prove vision. Employing the view of the 30° scope, these small changes may optimize the vision to simplify DVC ligation. The perioperative parameters and functional outcomes were compared with those of conventional su- ture in a non-randomized retrospective study. Our main objective was to present our technique and evaluate its potential benefits in the ligation of DVC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-seven consecutive patients who had clinically lo- calized prostate cancer with indication for LRP were in- cluded in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 24) underwent LRP with conven- tional ligature, and group 2 (n = 23) underwent ligature with N-DVC. All patients were enrolled consecutively without eligibility criteria and they were analyzed in a retrospective, non-randomized and descriptive study. The Department of Urology, Hospital del Vinalopó, Alicante, Spain. * Correspondence: C/Tónico Sansano Mora, 14, Elche-Alicante, 03293-Spain. Tel: +34 966 67 9800. E-mail: agarciasegui@gmail.com. Received July 2013 & Accepted February 2014 Vol 11. No 05 Sept-Oct 2014 1873 demographic and perioperative variables were record- ed: age, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, stage, body mass index (BMI), operation time, estimated blood loss, specimen prostate weight and sur- gical margin. Included patients were followed up for 12 months. The surgical videos of all patients were recorded and reviewed with emphasis on the step of DVC ligation. Two items were recorded to evaluate the impact on the simplification of the ligature: 1. The width of DVC: The decrease in the width of the DVC produced by urethral sound wasconsidered as cri- teria of simplification. Screen shots were taken before and after applying the maneuver, and the venous plex- us was measured in each situation. The pictures stored in compressed JPG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) and the Adobe Photoshop® program was used to mea- sure the width of DVC mark was placed. In order to take photos at the same distance, a mark on the outside of the endoscope, which provide guidance for the assistant to hold the instrument immobile during capture. DVC mea- surements were standardized as a percentage of decrease of the width. Although measurement provides some im- precision, the decrease of the width of DVC is obvious and unquestionable to the eye, and was used in an effort to standardize and to quantify the impact of the technique. 2. The attempts to place the stitch: The numbers of attem- pts to place the stitch in both groups were recorded. Continence and potency were evaluated during follow up at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery. The continence was defined as the absence of the requirement of wearing Figure 1. A metallic urethral sound is inserted into the urethra, and the assistant’s hand maintains pressure on the distal tip of this device in a posterior direction, just at the time of passing of the ligature stitch of venous plexus, displacing the urethra posteriorly and caus- ing stretching of dorsal venous complex. Figure 2. Pushing down the urethra with a metallic urethral sound results in the narrowing of the dorsal venous complex. (A) Intraop- erative, schematic and sagittal views of the dorsal venous complex in a conventional position; (B) Intraoperative, schematic and sagittal views of the dorsal venous complex narrowed while the urethra was pushed down. Variables Group 1 (n = 24) Group 2 (n = 23) P Value Age (years) 64.04 ± 6.10 62.05 ± 6.96 NS PSA (ng/mL) 7.32 ± 3.24 9.72 ± 4.31 NS Gleason score 5.95 ± 0.97 6.2 ± 0.89 NS Stage, no (%) T1 15 (62.5) 17 (73.9) NS T2 9 (37.5) 6 (26.0) NS BMI (kg/m2) 26.02 ± 3.87 26.96 ± 2.92 NS Operation time (min) 201 ± 33.20 196.75 ± 32.69 NS Blood loss (mL) 553 ± 338 580 ± 295 NS Prostate weight (g) 45.59 ± 13.53 49.16 ± 19.11 NS Positive surgical margins (%) 20.83 21.73 NS Potency (%) 66.6 61.53 NS Table 1. Demographic and perioperative characteristics of study subjects.* Abbreviations: NS, not significant; PSA, prostate specific antigen; BMI, body mass index. * Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Narrowing of Dorsal Vein Complex Technique during Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy-García-Segui et al Laparoscopic Urology 1874 pads. The groups were retrospectively compared. Statistical Analysis The statistical tests used were student’s t-test for contin- uous variables and chi-squared analysis for categorical variables (Stata Corp, Stata Statistical Software, Version 10.1, Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA). A P value of < .05 was considered to be statistically sig- nificant. Technique The 4-trocar LRP transperitoneal technique was ap- plied in all patients. A 30° scope was employed in both groups. Dissection of the Retzius space was performed to expose the puboprostatic ligaments; and the endopelvic fascia was bilaterally incised. A blunt dissection of the periapical tissues of the gland was performed to expose the DVC. A midprostatic suture was placed to prevent venous back-bleeding. The puboprostatic ligaments were preserved in all patients. In group 1 (conventional ligatu- re), the control of DVC was done with a figure-of eight suture employing a polyglactin suture on a CT-1 needle. In group 2, the N-DVC technique was applied. Our tech- nique involves a metallic urethral sound that is inserted into the urethra, and the assistant’s hand maintains pres- sure on the distal tip of this device in a posterior direction, just at the time of passing the ligature stitch of venous plexus (Figure 1). It produces cephalic displacement of the prostate, and si- multaneously the urethra is pushed down and the DVC is stretched (Figures 2A and 2B). A 30° scope was placed in the lateral view to enhance the visualization of the anatomical structures and guide nee- dle insertion during suturing(10,14) (Figures 3A and 3B). After the suture passed, the scope was switched to the contralateral position to visually control the exit of the needle tip in the correct anatomical location (Figures 3C and 3D), and finally the threads are knotted like a fig- ure-of-eight suture over the venous plexus. Once again, during the athermal transection of the DVC, the assistant repeated the maneuver to avoid injury to the sphincter during cutting. At the end of the cut, the anterior aspect of the urethra was immediately exposed by the presence of the urethral device, which expanded its lumen (Figures 4A and 4B). The urethra was incised at the prostatic apex to expose the metallic urethral sound. The prostate was dissected with a nerve-sparing technique without using thermal energy in a retrograde approach. The vesico-ure- thral anastomosis was performed in a running fashion us- ing absorbable polyglyconate self-retained barbed suture. Results The two groups were comparable in terms of age, serum PSA levels, Gleason score, stage and BMI. The perioper- ative parameters (operation times, estimated blood loss, specimen prostate weight and positive surgical margins rates) and functional potency results showed no signifi- cant differences between the groups (Table 1). In group 1, 29.16% of the patients were transfused, which was 26.085% in group 2. The immediate continence included cases that were continent after catheter removal 1 month after surgery. The continence results are shown in Table 2. The early continence rates (immedate and 3 months) were significantly greater in group 2 than in group 1. At 6 and 12 months, the continence rates were similar in both Figure 3. (A and B) A 30° scope was placed in the lateral view to en- hance the visualization of the anatomical structures and guide needle insertion during suturing; (C and D) The scope was switched to the contra-lateral position to visually control the exit of the needle tip in the correct anatomical location. Figure 4. At the end of the cut of the dorsal venous complex, the an- terior aspect of urethra was immediately exposed by the presence of the urethral device, which expanded its lumen.(A) Schematic view; (B) Intraoperative view. Continence Group 1(n = 24) Group 2 (n = 23) P Value Immediate 3 (12.5) 7 (30.4) .048 (1 month) Three months 12 (50) 17 (73.9) .037 Six months 18 (75) 20 (86.9) NS Nine months 20 (83.3) 21 (91.3) NS Twelve months 22 (91.6) 22 ( 95.6) NS Table 2. Continence results in study groups. Abbreviation: NS, not significant. * Data are presented as no (%). Narrowing of Dorsal Vein Complex Technique during Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy-García-Segui et al Vol 11. No 05 Sept-Oct 2014 1875 groups. There were no conversions or complications at- tributable to the use of the urethral sound. Positive surgi- cal margin rates (group 1, 20.83% and group 2, 21.73%) and potency functional results at 12 months (group 1, 66.6% and group 2, 61.53%) showed no significant dif- ferences between groups. Our study did not evaluate the oncological results of the N-DVC technique, whereby lo- cation of the surgical margins were not analyzed. In all patients of group 2, the N-DVC technique causes modifications in the shape of venous plexus and decreas- es its size by up to 20% of original size. The ligation stitch was positioned properly at the first attempt in group 2, and 9 patients (37.5%) in group 1 required more than one attempt. The N-DVC technique was successful in all patients of group 2, and we did not need conversion to “conventional” ligature. DISCUSSION The adequate control of the DVC ensures bloodless sur- gery and optimizes the conditions for an accurate apical dissection.(15) The DVC is commonly controlled by a sin- gle suture prior to the apical dissection; however, to avoid bleeding, the suture may be placed deep, which could damage the rhabdosphincter and affect the recovery of urinary continence.(3,4) Occasionally, the suture ligation of the DVC may be a challenge, especially for a novice laparoscopist,(13) in obese patients(8) or those with adverse anatomical characteristics, such as a deep and narrow pel- vis, a bulky prostate, a prominent apex, or exostosis of the symphysis pubis. Jeong and colleagues(16) showed that DVC varies in sizes among individuals, and they found it is a significant predictor for recovery of the continence and the incidence of transfusions. These authors explain that a large DVC can make the surgical procedure more difficult by demanding vascular control. We developed a simple surgical trick to get better exposure and opti- mal vision to simplify the control of the DVC. In our technique the prostatic apex moves away from the pubic bone, which slightly increases the workspace while the DVC elongates, narrows and its anatomical boundaries are defined more clearly. Furthermore, employing the view of the 30° scope, these small changes optimize the vision below the pubic bone and may simplify DVC liga- tion. In our opinion, it is obvious that the control of a nar- row venous plexus is easier and the passage of the needle is faster than a larger size DVC. Subjectively, we observe that our technique makes a more comfortable control of the DVC. Additionally, the N-DVC technique keeps away the urethra of the passage of the needle, which may reduce the risk of injuring the sphincter and favorably af- fect early continence recovery. During the transition of the DVC, the maneuver is repeated, avoiding injury to the sphincter. Previously, several authors have reported using a metallic urethral sound to displace the urethra to avoid the inadvertent transgression of the urethra by devices used for ligation,(9,13) and many authors routinely use a urethral sound during LRP. Our trick not only involves the insertion of a urethral sound, but also includes main- taining pressure on it to push down the urethra and modi- fy the shape of the DVC to better recovery of continence. Several alternatives have been proposed to control the DVC. Lei and colleagues,(3) Porpiglia and colleagues,(4) Guru and colleagues(5) and Sasaki and colleagues(12) re- ported using athermal DVC control prior to apical dissec- tion followed by a subsequent or selective ligation during LRP or RARP. They reported shorter operation times, reduced apical positive surgical margins and faster recov- ery of continence. Moreover, some automated devices have been used to effectively control the DVC, as report- ed by Nguyen and colleagues(9) and Wu and colleagues,(11) who used the endovascular stapler. Abreu and colleagues (13) employed an automated system with a titanium knot during ligation of the venous plexus. Recently, Tüfek and colleagues(15) described a novel technique to control the DVC during RARP and demonstrated a shorter operation time and quicker recovery of continence using a bulldog clamp. The critical point in control of DVC is the proper identifi- cation of the plane between the venous plexus, urethra and sphincter through accurate visualization of the anatomical structures; this identification is crucial to prevent bleed- ing or injury to the sphincter.(7,10) The N-DVC technique modifies the shape of the venous plexus and exposes the edges more clearly, simplifying the identification of an- atomical structures. Sasaki and colleagues(14) demonstrat- ed the impact of a lateral view apical dissection in LRP on the reduction of surgical margins and the recovery of postoperative continence. For procedures with restricted views using a rigid scope, they significantly improved the view of the apical structures by inserting the scope at McBurney’s point. Tewari and colleagues(10) reported the advantages of circumferential visualization of the pros- tatic apex and membranous urethra for precise dissection by employing a 30° scope during RARP. In our study, we obtained similar perception because the lateroapical view of the 30° scope improved the visualization of the anatomical aspects of the prostatic apex and apical tissues that were not observed with the rigid 0-degree scope. Fur- thermore, the N-DVC technique in combination with the use of the 30° scope optimized the identification of ana- tomical structures allowing placement of the stitch under excellent visual control. Our manuscript has several limitations. It is a retrospec- tive, descriptive and non-randomized study. The number of patients is very small and the groups were not matched. Furthermore, there may be many sources of potential bias or imprecision, and more studies involving larger num- bers of patients, with statistical analysis are needed to es- tablish solid conclusions. The N-DVC technique did not report better results with respect to rates of bleeding or transfusion, nor was it effective to shorten the operation time or improve the status of surgical margins, however, it is an effective and very simple trick which may im- prove the exposure and simplify the ligature of DVC, that is inexpensive, safe, without risks, not time consuming, may be applicable in all scenarios and may contribute to the recovery of continence. CONCLUSION The N-DVC technique simplifies the control of the DVC during LRP and may contribute to the early recovery of continence because it may reduce the risk of injuring the sphincter. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Narrowing of Dorsal Vein Complex Technique during Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy-García-Segui et al Laparoscopic Urology 1876 None declared. REFERENCES 1. Reiner WG, Walsh PC. An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and San- torini’s plexus during radical retropubic surgery. J Urol. 1979;21:198-200. 2. Hrebinko RL, O’Donnell WF. Control of the deep dorsal venous complex in radical retropubic prosta- tectomy. J Urol. 1993;149:799-800. 3. Lei Y, Alemozaffar M, Williams SB, et al. Athermal division and selective suture ligation of the dorsal vein complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2011;59:235-43. 4. Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Grande S, Morra I, Scarpa RM. Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effects on continence, blood loss, and margin status. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1377-83. 5. Guru KA, Perimutter AE, Sheldon MJ, et al. Apical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Does technique matter? J Endourol. 2009;23:123-7. 6. Cathelineau X, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, et al. Radical prostatectomy: evolution of surgical tech- nique from the laparoscopic point of view. Int Braz J Urol. 2010;36:129-39. 7. Koch MO. Management of the dorsal vein complex during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Semin Urol Oncol. 2000;18:33-7. 8. Zilberman DE, Tsivian M, Yong D, Albala DM. Surgical steps that elongate operative time in ro- bot-assisted radical prostatectomy among the obese population. J Endourol. 2011;25:793-6. 9. Nguyen MM, Turna B, Santos BR, et al. The use of an endoscopic stapler vs suture ligature for dorsal vein control in laparoscopic prostatectomy: opera- tive outcomes. BJU Int. 2007;101:463-6. 10. Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Mudaliar K, et al. An- atomical retro-apical technique of synchronous (posterior and anterior) urethral transection: a novel approach for ameliorating apical margin positivi- ty during robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2010;106:1364-73. 11. Wu SD, Meeks JJ, Cashy J, Perry KT, Nadler RB. Suture versus staple ligation of the dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2010;106:385-90. 12. Sasaki H, Miki J, Kimura T, et al. Upfront transec- tion and subsequent ligation of the dorsal vein com- plex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol. 2010;17:960-1. 13. Abreu SC, Rubinstein M, Messias FI, et al. Use of titanium knot placement device (TK-5) to secure dorsal vein complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy. Urology. 2006;67:190-4. 14. Sasaki H, Miki J, Kimura T, et al. Lateral view dis- section of the prostato-urethral junction to reduce positive apical margin in laparoscopic radical pros- tatectomy. Int J Urol. 2009;16:664-9. 15. Tufek I, Atug F, Argun B, et al. The Use of Bulldog Clamp To Control the Dorsal Vein Complex during Narrowing of Dorsal Vein Complex Technique during Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy-García-Segui et al Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2012;26:1605-8. 16. Jeong CW, Oh JJ, Jeong SJ, et al. Effect of dorsal vascular complex size on the recovery of conti- nence after radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2013;31:383-8. Vol 11. No 05 Sept-Oct 2014 1877