1666 | Miscellaneous

The Value of Neutrophil Elastase in Diagno-
sis of Type III Prostatitis
Jun Zhu, Changhai Yang, Zhichun Dong, Liming Li

Corresponding Author:

Changhai Yang, MD
Department of Urology, Tianjin Medi-
cal University General Hospital, 154 
Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin 
300052, China.

Tel: +86 22 6553 9807
Fax: +86 22 6553 9807
E-mail: ychanghai@yahoo.com

Received August 2013
Accepted April 2014

Department of Urology, Tianjin 

Medical University General 

Hospital, 154 Anshan Road, 

Heping District, Tianjin 300052, 

China.

MISCELLANEOUS

Purpose: To explore the value and significance of neutrophil elastase (NE) in diagnosis of 
type III prostatitis.

Materials and Methods: The prospective study recruited 123 patients diagnosed with type III 
prostatitis (IIIA, 36 cases; IIIB, 87 cases) and 84 healthy controls, between April 2008 and July 
2012. NE concentrations in expressed prostatic secretions (EPS), EPS routine examination, 
bacterial culture and The National Institute of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-
CPSI) score were detected in all the subjects. Difference of NE, CPSI score, and withe blood 
cell (WBC) count between 2 or more than 2 groups and relationships between NE concentra-
tions and WBC count were all analyzed. 

Results: There was significant difference in levels of NE (P < .05) between IIIA and IIIB 
groups, and obviously positive correlation between the level of NE and number of leukocyte 
in type IIIA prostatitis group was observed (P < .05). The values of CPSI score between IIIA 
and IIIB groups was statistically significant (P = .037). The levels of leukocyte mount, NE 
and CPSI were statistically significant between IIIA and the control group (P < .05). NE con-
centration and CPSI score were statistically significant between IIIB and control group (P < 
.05), while the numbers of leukocyte was not statistically significant (P = .360).  

Conclusion: The level of NE in EPS is a significant indicator in diagnosis of type IIIA and 
IIIB prostatitis. 

Keywords: prostatitis; classification; diagnosis chronic disease; leukocyte elastase; chem-
istry.



1667Vol. 11    |    No. 03    |     May - June 2014    |U R O LO G Y   J O U R N A L

The value of NE in Diagnosis of Type III Prostatitis  |  Zhu et al

INTRODUCTION

Prostatitis is an inflammation of the prostate and chronic prostatitis is the most common urologic disease in men less than 50 years old, accounting 
for approximately 8-25% of the urology outpatients.(1,2) In 
the US, over 2 million patient-visits per year are a result of 
prostatitis.(3) Data has shown that about 50% of men suffer 
from prostatitis in a period of their lifetime.(4) It is not only 
brought kinds of discomfort to the patients, but also took 
significant harm to their mental health(5-8) and caused huge 
economic burden on public health.(9-12) Due to the complex-
ity of its etiology and various symptoms, clinical diagnosis 
of the cause and therapy has been lack of effective programs 
and methods and the therapy effect is usually unsatisfactory. 
According to The National Institute of Health (NIH) clas-
sification method in 1995, type III prostatitis (chronic non-
bacterial prostatitis) is the most common disease, account-
ing for approximately 95% of the urology outpatients.(13) It 
is also divided into two subtypes IIIA and IIIB according to 
whether there are white blood cells (WBCs) in expressed 
prostatic secretions (EPS). More evidences revealed that 
the therapy and treatment were significantly different be-
tween two subtypes of type III prostatitis.(14,15) However, in 
clinical treatment, IIIA and IIIB of chronic prostatitis has 
similar clinical symptoms and it is difficult and not effective 
to distinguish them by WBC count only.(16,17) Researchers 
tried to find other factors, in addition to leukocytes, which 
could effectively differentiate IIIA and IIIB prostatitis, for 
chronic prostatitis caused the prostate secretory abnormal-
ity on prostate secretory functions.(18-21)

In this study, we detected concentrations of the neutrophil 
elastase (NE) in EPS among IIIA, IIIB prostatitis patients 
and normal control group and compared the difference of NE 
concentrations in EPS among type IIIA, IIIB chronic prosta-
titis patients and normal control group to attempt to provide 
a reliable measure for distinguishing and diagnosing the type 
III chronic prostatitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
An observational prospective design was applied in this 
study. A total of 123 patients diagnosed with type III prosta-
titis were recruited to participate in the study between April 

2008 and July 2012. The exclusion criteria were the pres-
ence of cancer of the genitourinary tract; active urinary stone 
disease or herpes of the genitourinary system; perirectal in-
flammatory disorders; inflammatory bowel disease; a history 
of pelvic radiation or systemic chemotherapy; a history of 
intravesical chemotherapy; urethral stricture 12 French (F) or 
smaller; neurologic disease or disorder affecting the bladder; 
and prostate surgery within the past 3 months. The inclusion 
criteria were, patients between 18 to 50 years old to reduce 
the effect of age factor, the course of the disease lasted for a 
period of at least three months, patients receiving no antibi-
otic treatment for any reason for the last 4 weeks, patients 
whose prostatic fluid having no bacterial growth and patients 
having symptoms of discomfort or pain in the pelvic region.
The diagnosis of patients was consistent with the NIH defini-
tion of the chronic prostatitis/pelvic pain syndrome.(22) Pa-
tients with type III prostatitis were classified as having sub-
type IIIA (36 cases) or IIIB (87 cases). Ejaculated samples 
from healthy men showed a good sperm density and progres-
sive motility and morphology (≥ 20%) and were considered 
normal ejaculates according to World Health Organization 
criteria.(23) Eighty-four normal volunteers who didn’t show 
any signs of prostatic diseases were used as controls. They 
were recruited from the subjects undergoing complete his-
tory and physical examination. Informed consent was ob-
tained from their parents. Study protocols were approved by 

Figure . Correlation analysis of NE and WBC count between IIIA and 
B groups. NE concentrations was positively correlated with WBC 
count (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, r = 0.596, P < .05).
Keys: WBC, white blood cell; NE, neutrophil elastase.



1668 |

the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of the General 
Hospital of Tianjin Medical University.
A complete history and physical examination were per-
formed, including laboratory analysis, which was micros-
copy and culture of the urine specimen before massage, 
and EPS and/or urine specimen after prostatic massage. For 
category IIIA the EPS and/or urine specimen after prostatic 
massage had to be sterile with no uropathogenic growth, and 
there had to be a documented inflammatory pattern on mi-
croscopy of EPS that was greater than 10 WBCs per high 
power field (hpf), and/or urine sediment after prostatic mas-
sage that was greater than 5 WBCs per hpf. To be classified as 
IIIB, the EPS and/or urine specimen after prostatic massage 
had to be sterile with no uropathogen growth, and there had 
to be no documented inflammatory pattern on microscopy of 
EPS that was less than 10 WBCs per hpf, and/or urine sedi-
ment after prostatic massage that was less than 5 WBCs per 
hpf. All patients had a complete medical history, a physical 
examination, and a 4-glass urinalysis, WBC counts in EPS, 
serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), NIH-CPSI score, and 
transrectal ultrasonography, according to Hochreiter and col-
leagues.(24) 
Prostatic fluid samples were obtained at the hospital by pro-
static massage, after a period of sexual abstinence of 3-5 

days. The samples were collected in a sterile container and 
transferred to a cryovial, stored at –20°C. Standard microbial 
investigations (e.g., for aerobic and anaerobic bacterial infec-
tions, ureaplasma urealyticum and mycoplasma infections, 
chlamydia trachomatis, trichomonas vaginalis and candida 
infections) were performed for all prostatic fluid samples. 
Some of the fluid was transferred for storage at –80°C until it 
was used for the analysis of NE. The remaining fluid on the 
glass slide was placed under a coverslip and examined for 
WBC count in 5 fields at high power (400 ×). The average 
number of WBCs per hpf was recorded.
NE was determined by quantitative sandwich enzyme immu-
noassay [Human PMN Elastase ELISA (enzyme-linked im-
munosorbent assay), Ray Biotech., Inc., Minneapolis, MN, 
USA] according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The in-
tensity of the color was measured at 450 nm. 
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed by using the statistical package for the 
social science (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA) version 
19.0. Normally distributed continuous data are presented as 
means ± standard deviation (SD) and were compared using t 
tests. Non-normally distributed continuous data are present-
ed as the median and range, and were compared using the 
rank test. Difference among 2 or more than 2 groups were 

Miscellaneous

Table 1. Changes in IPSS and uroflowmetry parameters after treatment with tamsulosin. 

Characteristics
Patients Controls

IIIA IIIB ---

Number of subjects 36 87 84

Mean age, years 32 30 28.88

Course (months)

3-6 22 52 ------

> 6 14 35

Bacterial infection  

Positive 0 0 0

Negative 36 87 84

CPPS symptom 36 87 -----

Associated symptom

                            LUTS 28 48

Non-LUTS 8 39

CPPS treatment

α-Blockers 28 65

NSAID 25 48

Keys: CPPS, chronic pelvic pain syndrome; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms.



1669Vol. 11    |    No. 03    |     May - June 2014    |U R O LO G Y   J O U R N A L

assessed by using t tests, ANOVA or post hoc Dunnett's T3 
tests, as required. Correlations of NE, NIH-CPSI score and 
WBC count were analyzed by Spearman's rank correlation 
coefficient. The P value < .05 was considered statistically 
significant.

RESULTS
Patients' Characteristics
A total of 207 participants in Tianjin Medical University 
General Hospital were studied. There were 36 cases of type 
IIIA prostatitis, 87 cases of type IIIB prostatitis and 84 cases 
of normal controls. The general characteristics of the recruit-
ed patients are shown in Table 1. 
NE Concentrations Were Elevated in Prostatitis Patients as 
Compared with Controls
We summarized the WBC count, NIH-CPSI score and NE 
concentrations in prostatitis IIIA, IIIB and control groups, re-
spectively (Table 2). NE concentration in patients with pros-
tatitis IIIA displayed significantly higher as compared with 
that of prostatitis IIIB group (median 907.33 ng/mL, in con-
trols vs. 94.92 ng/mL, respectively, P < .05; Table 3). 
Association Analysis of NE Levels CPSI Score and WBC 
Count 
As shown in Table 3 and Figure, the level of NE was posi-
tively correlated with WBC count (Spearman's rank correla-
tion coefficient, r = 0.596, P < .05). Data revealed that there 
was significant differences on the values of CPSI between 
prostatitis IIIA and prostatitis IIIB (P = .037). 
Test data of the experimental and control groups were also 
compared by SPSS 19.0. The NE in EPS of patients with 
prostatitis IIIA and IIIB was statistically different from that 
of control group (all P < .05). The CPSI score of patients with 
prostatitis IIIA and IIIB was also statistically different from 
that of control group (all P < .05). WBC count in patients 

with prostatitis IIIA displayed statistically significant differ-
ence as compared with that of control group (P < .05), but 
there was no statistical difference on WBC count between 
prostatitis IIIB group and control group (P = .360).

DISCCUSSION
It has been diagnosed as type III prostatitis that patients 
showing obvious symptoms of chronic bacterial prostatitis 
but microbiological culture results were negative.(25) How-
ever, with the improvement and optimization of culture 
methods, we observed the microbial growth in the EPS from 
patients that were traditionally diagnosed for type III prosta-
titis. For example, coagulase-negative cocci was difficult to 
grow in general medium, however, after obligate culture, it 
was demonstrated that coagulase negative cocci existed in 
the EPS of about 68% of patients with type III prostatitis, 
which was further to be confirmed by microscopic examina-
tion.(26) The traditional culture method had played an impor-
tant role in the diagnosis and treatment of prostatitis, but it 
was a time-consuming and laborious process and susceptible 
to contaminate, especially, only a small number of microbial 
species were able to cultivate.(27,28) Thus, the traditional cul-
ture method played a limited role in the course of recognition 
about type III prostatitis related microorganisms.
Elastase is a kind of enzyme that can hydrolyze elastin in 
the body and named by the generated sites, such as neutro-
phils elastase (NE), which was present in neutrophils. Under 
physiological conditions, NE played an effective protection 
in host defense system, and its activity was strictly regulated 
by the inhibitors of endogenous protease. In early stage of in-
flammation, WBCs were the first line of defense when patho-
gen invaded into the body. The gathered at the site of inflam-
mation by chemotaxis of kinds of chemokines and NE were 
released by neutrophils. NE can escape from the regulation 

The value of NE in Diagnosis of Type III Prostatitis  |  Zhu et al

Table 2. Related data in the test groups and the control group.*     

Groups No. WBC count NIH-CPSI score   NE

IIIA 36 17.89 ± 6.18 24.50 ± 5.41 907.33 ± 769.70
IIIB 87 4.01 ± 2.21 21.80 ± 5.01       0.119 ± 0.009

Control 84 3.60 ± 2.21 1.72 ± 0.74 0.068 ± 0.015a

Keys: WBC, white blood cells; NIH-CPSI, National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index; NE, neutrophil elastase (ng/mL).
* Data are expressed as means ± SD.



1670 |

of multiple protease inhibitors at the inflammation site. The 
balance was broke out between NE and its endogenous pro-
tease inhibitors and NE maintained the activated state, result-
ing in the damage and dysfunction of the tissues and organs.
Recent studies have found that infectious NE levels in EPS 
of prostatitis patients were significantly higher than that in 
patients with non-infectious prostatitis, which demonstrated 
that NE could distinguish infectious and non-infectious pros-
tatitis to a certain extent.(29) Some researchers reported that 
compared with C3, the terminal complement complex and 
plasma ceruloplasmin, NE was the best indicator to diagnose 
of the acute and chronic urethritis/prostatitis.(30,31)

Simultaneously, NE also can be used as a detected indica-
tor of clinical efficacy. NE concentration rapidly increased 
to more than 290 ng/mL from the normal level at the stage 
of acute inflammation until the inflammation was cured. 
Otherwise, the concentration of NE would maintain a high 
level.(32) Decreased NE levels showed that anti-inflammatory 
treatments were effective. If NE levels had not declined, the 
treatment plan should be redesigned, prompting doctors to 
find out the other chronic inflammatory lesions.(11)

In the study, we identified a NE cutoffs (246.4 ng/mL) for 
diagnosing type prostatitis patients, which is slightly lower 
than the revised cutoff of 280 ng/mL for diagnosing inflam-
matory disease as depicted in the literature. (30) This findings 
may be the results that NE secretion is different in various tis-
sues and organs or affected by different individuals or popu-

lations. Besides, we measured the NE concentration in EPS 
of patients with type IIIA and IIIB prostatitis. We found that 
NE concentrations in EPS of prostatitis IIIA was significantly 
higher than that of prostatitis IIIB. NE concentrations in EPS 
of patients with type IIIA and IIIB prostatitis were both sig-
nificantly higher than that in the normal control group. These 
results indicated that patients with type IIIA and type IIIB 
prostatitis were both infected with microorganisms. The in-
fection in patients with type IIIA prostatitis was more seri-
ous than that with type IIIB prostatitis. When tissues were 
infectious, NE was released by neutrophils. Thus, we can 
make a conclusion that antibiotic treatment may be a pos-
sible method for the type III prostatitis, especially type IIIA 
chronic prostatitis. In addition, we compared the correlation 
between NE concentration and leukocytes in EPS of patients 
and found that NE concentration positively correlated with 
leucocyte amount, which indicated that NE can be used as a 
meaningful indicator in the diagnosis of type III prostatitis, 
and also demonstrated that the levels of NE concentration 
were able to reflect the severity of chronic prostatitis. 
However, we also observed that higher NE concentration ac-
companied with few leucocyte amount or low CPSI score 
which was uncommon, but with some meaning. For example, 
the results that high NE concentration accompanied with few 
WBCs were observed and it was largely because prostate duct 
was blocked that the WBCs at inflammatory sites could not 
spread into EPS and were not calculated, but NE could spread 

Miscellaneous

Table 3. Difference of related indicators among 2 or more than 2 groups.   

Groups IIIA/IIIB IIIA/Control IIIB/Control III (A+B)/Control

MD (I-J) p MD (I-J) p MD (I-J) p t p

WBC count 14.061 < .05 14.591 < .05 0.530 .360 6.438937 < .05

NIH-CPSI score 2.695 .037 23.762 < .05 21.067 < .05 44.99526 < .05

NE 812.4092 < .05 834.7583 < .05 22.34914 .097 5.125425 < .05
Keys: WBC, white blood cells; NIH-CPSI, National Institutes of Health- Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index; NE, neutrophil elastase; MD, mean differ-
ence.

Table 4. Correlation analysis of WBC count, NIH-CPSI score and NE between IIIA and IIIB groups. 

Parameters WBC/NIH-CPSI score WBC/NE NIH-CPSI score/NE

r 0.402 0.596 0.382

P < .05 < .05 < .05
Keys: WBC, white blood cells; NIH-CPSI, National Institutes of Health- Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index; NE, neutrophil elastase; r, Pearson correlation coefficient.



1671Vol. 11    |    No. 03    |     May - June 2014    |U R O LO G Y   J O U R N A L

The value of NE in Diagnosis of Type III Prostatitis  |  Zhu et al

into EPS. Currently, the main criteria of prostatitis in clinical 
diagnosis were that WBC count was more than 10 in EPS, but 
it was not accurate only relying on one diagnostic indicator. 
Diagnosis of prostatitis should be a systematic work and all 
of the treatment should be checked including the symptoms, 
pathological examination (EPS microscopy), physiological 
and biochemical test, bacteriological examination, ultrasound 
examination and urodynamic examination and etc. All of the 
diagnostic treatments should be a comprehensive, objective 
and scientific on prostatitis. In conclusion, NE concentration 
in EPS of patients can be used as a reference for diagnosis of 
type III A and B prostatitis. With the promotion of inspection 
techniques, such as protein chip, the detection of NE concen-
tration would be more convenient and may become one of the 
diagnostic indicators of type III prostatitis.
 
CONCLUSION
The limitation of our study is the lack of a large group of 
patients which may create the risk of a type II statistical er-
ror, but despite that, the study has shown that the level of NE 
in EPS is a significant indicator in diagnosis of type IIIA and 
IIIB prostatitis. There was a positive correlation between NE 
concentration and the leukocyte mount, which demonstrated 
the levels of NE in EPS could reflect the severity of type III 
chronic prostatitis.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None declared.

REFERENCES

1. Krieger JN, Riley DE, Cheah PY, Liong ML, Yuen KH. Epidemiology of 
prostatitis. New evidence for a world-wide problem. World J Urol. 
2003;21:70-4.

2. Rizzo M, Marchetti F, Travaglini F, Trinchieri A, Nickel JC. Prevalence, 
diagnosis and treatment of prostatitis in italy: A prospective urol-
ogy outpatient practice study. BJU Int. 2003;92:955-9.

3. Izadyar F, Den Ouden K, Stout Ta, et al. Autologous and homolo-
gous transplantation of bovine spermatogonial stem cells. Repro-
duction. 2003;126:765-74.

4. Kulchavenya E, Azizoff A, Brizhatyuk E, et al. Improved diagnos-
tics of chronic inflammatory prostatitis. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 
2012;64:273-8.

5. Nickel JC, Tripp DA, Chuai S, et al. NIH-CPCRN Study Group. Psy-
chosocial variables affect the quality of life of men diagnosed 
with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. BJU Int. 
2008;101:59-64.

6. Tripp DA, Nickel JC, Wang Y, et al. National Institutes of Health-
Chronic Prostatitis Collaborative Research Network (NIH-CPCRN) 
Study Group. Catastrophizing and pain-contingent rest predict pa-
tient adjustment in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain 
syndrome. J Pain. 2006;7:697-708.

7. Clemens JQ, Brown SO, Calhoun EA. Mental health diagnoses in pa-
tients with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome and chron-
ic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A case/control study. J 
Urol. 2008;180:1378-82.

8. Lee KS, Choi JD. Chronic prostatitis: Approaches for best manage-
ment. Korean J Urol. 2012;53:69-77.

9. Calhoun EA, McNaughton Collins M, Pontari MA, et al. Chronic Pros-
tatitis Collaborative Research Network. The economic impact of 
chronic prostatitis. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1231-6.

10. Clemens JQ, Markossian T, Calhoun EA. Comparison of economic 
impact of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome and in-
terstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. Urology. 2009;73:743-6.

11. Schaeffer AJ. The economic impact of chronic prostatitis. J Urol. 

2005;173:844.

12. Duloy AM, Calhoun EA, Clemens JQ: Economic impact of chronic 

prostatitis. Curr Urol Rep. 2007;8:336-9.

13. Shoskes DA. The challenge of erectile dysfunction in the man with 

chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Curr Urol Rep. 

2012;13:263-7.

14. Nickel JC, True LD, Krieger JN, Berger RE, Boag AH, Young ID. Con-

sensus development of a histopathological classification system for 

chronic prostatic inflammation. BJU Int. 2001;87:797-805.

15. Kogan MI, Belousov, II, Shornikov PV. Neurophysiologic evaluation 

of patients with chronic prostatitis (iii b chronic pain syndrome). 

Urologiia. 2012:37-42.

16. Wise GJ. Prostatitis: Myths and realities. Urology. 1999;53:240-1.

17. Nickel JC. Prostatitis: Myths and realities. Urology. 1998;51:362-6.

18. Prando A, Billis A. Focal prostatic atrophy: Mimicry of prostatic can-

cer on trus and 3d-mrsi studies. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34:271-5.

19. Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H, Eberhardt SC, et al. Chronic prostatitis: MR 

imaging and 1h MR spectroscopic imaging findings--initial obser-

vations. Radiology. 2004;231:717-24.

20. Guo K, Qiu MX, Cai SL, et al. A multi-center clinical trial of qian-

lieantong tablets for chronic prostatitis. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 

2007;13:950-2.

21. Hu WL, Zhong SZ, He HX: Treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis 

with amikacin through anal submucosal injection. Asian J Androl. 

2002;4:163-7.

22. Krieger J N, Nyberg Jr L, Nickel J C. NIH consensus definition and 
classification of prostatitis. JAMA.1999;282:236-7.

23. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen 
and. Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th edn. Cambridge: Cam-
bridge university Press, 1999.



1672 | Miscellaneous

24. Hochreiter WW, Nadler RB, Koch AE, et al. Evaluation of the cytokines 
interleukin 8 and epithelial neutrophil activating peptide 78 as indica-
tors of inflammation in prostatic secretions. Urology. 2000;56:1025-9.

25. Magri V, Wagenlehner FM, Montanari E, et al. Semen analysis in 
chronic bacterial prostatitis: Diagnostic and therapeutic implica-
tions. Asian J Androl. 2009;11:461-77.

26. Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH. Phylogenetic identification and 
in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. 
Microbiol Rev. 1995;59:143-69.

27. Bjerklund Johansen TE, Gruneberg RN, Guibert J, et al. The role 
of antibiotics in the treatment of chronic prostatitis: A consensus 
statement. Eur Urol. 1998;34:457-66.

28. Delavierre D, Rigaud J, Sibert L, Labat JJ. Symptomatic approach 
to chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Prog Urol. 
2010;20:940-53.

29. Zorn B, Virant-Klun I, Meden-Vrtovec H. Semen granulocyte elastase: Its 

relevance for the diagnosis and prognosis of silent genital tract inflam-

mation. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1978-84.

30. Ludwig M, Kummel C, Schroeder-Printzen I, Ringert RH, Weidner W. 

Evaluation of seminal plasma parameters in patients with chronic 

prostatitis or leukocytospermia. Andrologia. 1998;30(Suppl 1):41-7.

31. Zopfgen A, Priem F, Sudhoff F, et al. Relationship between semen qual-

ity and the seminal plasma components carnitine, alpha-glucosidase, 

fructose, citrate and granulocyte elastase in infertile men compared 

with a normal population. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:840-5.

32. Cumming JA, Dawes J, Hargreave TB. Granulocyte elastase levels do 
not correlate with anaerobic and aerobic bacterial growth in semi-

nal plasma from infertile men. Int J Androl. 1990;13:273-7.