An Unusual Foreign Body in the Bladder and Percutaneous Removal YOUNESI M1, AHMADNIA H2, ASL ZARE M2 1- Department of Uorology, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran 2- Department of Uorology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran KEY WORDS: bladder, foreign body, endoscopy, percutaneous 53 Urology Journal UNRC/IUA Vol. 2, 53-54 Spring 2004 Printed in IRAN Introduction Foreign bodies in the bladder have been com- monly reported. However, we describe a rare for- eign body which was a carpule containing lido- caine that was removed percutaneously. Case Report A 28-year male, married patient was referred to this center with irritative urinary symptoms (fre- quency, nocturia, and dysuria) initiated a week before. In his history, he mentioned the existence of an ampule in his body and masturbation for seven years. Psychological disorder or drug abuse was not reported. Physical examination was nor- mal except for a mild tenderness in the suprapu- bic area. A foreign body was observed in pelvic anteroposterior radiography (fig. 1). Cystoscopy under local anesthesia was performed and a lido- caine carpule was detected. Removal throughout urethra was not viable as it was fragile. Thus, we considered percutaneous extraction as the treat- ment of choice. Open surgery could be an alterna- tive approach.(1,2) Laparoscopic technique has recently been reported as well.(3) The patient was secured in the supine position. Under general anesthesia a 18 F foley catheter was inserted, the bladder was filled up to its nor- mal capacity with normal saline, and the skin was incised 1 cm long in the suprapubic area, 1.5 cm over the symphysis pubis using scalpel. We entered the bladder with a puncture needle and placed a 0.035 inches J type guide wire as soon as we confirmed that the needle was within the blad- der. Tract dilatation up to 30 F was done by a tel- escopic dilatator and finally a 30 F Amplatz sheet was placed. Cystoscopy was performed using a Wolf 25° nephroscope and a dentistry type lido- caine carpule was seen. It was successfully removed with a grasp (fig. 2,3). Eventually, the skin was sutured with a 2.0 nylon and a 18 F foley catheter was placed for three days. Tree-month fol- low-up showed complete improvement and no com- plication. Accepted for publication in August 2003 FIG. 1. anteroposterior radiography demonstrates Lidocaine carpule FIG. 2. The nephroscope, grasp, and Amplatz sheet used in this case AN UNUSUAL FOREIGN BODY IN THE BLADDER AND PERCUTANEOUS REMOVAL Discussion Bladder is the most susceptible part of the gen- itourinary system for foreign bodies. Usually for- eign bodies are pushed to the urethra while trying to eliminate them or involuntary perineal muscle contraction that makes them enter the bladder. In men, they should be passed through a 20-25 cm pathway to reach the bladder. Surprisingly, the urethral curve remains intact and there is no per- suading explanation for this event.(4) Almost everything surrounding the human has been reported as bladder foreign body such as nasal mucosa, hair, pieces of broom-straw, per- fume bottle, pearl shaped bottoms, wires, beans, cables, sutures, clips, and toothbrush.(5) According to their main characteristics and origin, foreign bodies are classified as: 1. Particles from animal bodies or insects: dog penis, ant, snake, tail verte- bra, etc., 2. Plants and vegetables: grass, wood stick, elm used for abortion, etc., 3. Liquefiable materials: wax, chewing gum, glue, etc. However, some foreign bodies can't be included in this clas- sification. In some cases they may enter to the bladder unintentionally such as hair while catheteriza- tion.(6) A common one is thermometer that slips into the bladder in females.(7) In exceptional cases, foreign bodies has been pushed into the bladder in sexual harassments.(8) Trauma, particularly gun- shot is another causal factor. In addition, iatro- genic entrance and migration of foreign bodies from adjacent organs have been described as the mechanism.(5,9) Percutaneous approach to remove foreign bodies is a safe and effective method and is of great help in the cases in which removal is not possible through the urethra. We successfully used this method considering the limitations of our case. Percutaneous approach is also an ideal alternative to open surgical operation. References 1. Najafi E., Maynard JF. Foreign body in lower urinary tract. Urology 1975; 5: 117. 2. Osca JM, Broseta E, Server G, et al. Unusual foreign bod- ies in the urethra and bladder. BJU 1991; 68: 510. 3. Ejstund P, Roulsen J. Laparoscopic removal of an electric wire from the bladder. BJU 1997; 30: 338. 4. Aliabadi H, Cass AS, Gleich P, et al. Self-inflicted foreign bodies involving lower urinary tract and male genitals. Urology 1985; 26: 12. 5. Abdulla MM. Foreign body in the bladder. BJU 1990; 65:420. 6. Zeitlin AB, Cottrell TL, Lloyd FA. Hair as a lower urinary tract foreign body. J Urol 1957; 77: 840. 7. Aspinall A. Removal of clinical thermometer (half minute) from the bladder by manipulation. Med J Aust 1931; 2:454. 8. DeTarnowsky G. A unique foreign body in the urinary blad- der. JAMA 1915; 64: 1495. 9. Kyriakidis A, Stokidis D, Giannopoulos A. Urological com- plications due to foreign bodies in the alimentary tract. Aeta Urol Belg 1982; 50:331. 54 FIG. 3. Lidocaine carpule extracted from the bladder