LETTER Mean Values after Treatment or Mean Difference? Behnam Amani1, Arash Akbarzadeh2, Bahman Amani,1* In a systematic review and meta-analysis Published in the Urology(1) entitled “Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” by Libo and Guizhong in 2017, the authors in methods section state that “weighted mean difference (MD) was used for continuous var- iables in their meta-analysis”. While, the authors used the endpoint scores as the mean difference in each group regardless of the baseline scores and one study(2) that baseline used as mean difference Based on statistical literature in meta-analysis, the “mean difference” is change average from baseline to endpoint. So, to calculate the mean difference, we should use endpoint minus baseline mean score(3). In our understanding, , it seems that the result of Libo’s meta-analysis(1) should revise for the mean difference as mentioned above. REFERENCES 1. Libo M, Guizhong L. Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urology. 2017. 2. Vardi Y, Appel B, Kilchevsky A, Gruenwald I. Does low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy have a physiological effect on erectile function? Short-term results of a randomized, double-blind, sham controlled study. The Journal of urology. 2012 May;187(5):1769-75. PubMed PMID: 22425129. Epub 2012/03/20. eng. 3. Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009. 1Department of Health Sciences Education Development, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Correspondence: Department of Health Sciences Education Development, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Email: B-Amani@alumnus.tums.ac.ir Urology Journal/Vol 17 No. 3/ May-June 2020/ pp. 324-324. [DOI: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4646]