Erratum to: Does the use of supraglottic device in rabbits cause less injury than other airway management devices? | Veterinary Evidence Skip to main content KNOWLEDGE SUMMARY Keywords: ANAESTHESIA; RABBIT; INTUBATION; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; TRAUMA; INJURY; AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; V-GEL®; SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE; FACE MASK; LARYNGEAL MASK Erratum to: Does the use of supraglottic device in rabbits cause less injury than other airway management devices? Jasmine Gheini1* Sanaa Zaki, PhD BVSc(Hons) MANZCVs GradCertEdStud (Higher Education)1 1 Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW 205 * Corresponding author email: jghe8559@uni.sydney.edu.au Vol 8, Issue 2 (2023) Erratum published: 05 May 2023 Original paper published: 02 Dec 2022 The original article was published in Veterinary Evidence Vol 7, Issue 4 (2022): https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v7i4.608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v8i2.663 Erratum Unfortunately the original version of the article was missing the following statement. This Knowledge Summary has reviewed the available evidence on the use of a SGAD (v-gel®) in rabbit anaesthesia. Since writing a new design of a single use supraglottic airway device (SGAD) has been introduced; currently there is no published evidence on whether this new device has an impact on the risk of injury. This error was in both the HTML and PDF versions. This has now been updated in both the HTML and PDF versions, and can be found in the clinical bottom line and the evidence section. Intellectual Property Rights Authors of Knowledge Summaries submitted to RCVS Knowledge for publication will retain copyright in their work, and will be required to grant to RCVS Knowledge a non-exclusive licence to publish including but not limited to the right to publish, re-publish, transmit, sell, distribute and otherwise use the materials in all languages and all media throughout the world, and to licence or permit others to do so. Disclaimer Knowledge Summaries are a peer-reviewed article type which aims to answer a clinical question based on the best available current evidence. It does not override the responsibility of the practitioner. Informed decisions should be made by considering such factors as individual clinical expertise and judgement along with patient’s circumstances and owners’ values. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help inform and any opinions expressed within the Knowledge Summaries are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the view of the RCVS Knowledge. Authors are responsible for the accuracy of the content. While the Editor and Publisher believe that all content herein are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication, they accept no legal responsibility for any errors or omissions, and make no warranty, express or implied, with respect to material contained within. For further information please refer to our Terms of Use.   Veterinary Evidence is an RCVS Knowledge initiative. ISSN: 2396-9776 First Floor, 10 Queen Street Place, London EC4R 1BE Resources Student Awards Staff Login Policies Privacy Policy Accessing Information Policy Cookie declaration Terms of Use Copyright notices Stay Connected Podcasts Twitter Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Back to top Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Trust (trading as RCVS Knowledge) is a registered Charity No. 230886. Registered as a Company limited by guarantee in England and Wales No. 598443.