https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ 1WPSAR Vol 12, No 4, 2021 | doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2021.12.4.857 COVID-19: Original Research C oronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory disease caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The COVID-19 pandemic, first reported in Wuhan, China in December 2019,1 spread quickly worldwide. As of mid-October 2021, there have been over 240 million confirmed cases and 4.9 million deaths.2 The first case of COVID-19 in Viet Nam was recorded on 22 January 2020 in a person who had returned from Wuhan, and that case was linked to a further 15 cases related to Wuhan.3 By the end of February, all 16 cases had recovered and Viet Nam remained clear of COVID-19 for the following 20 days. By early March, the world saw a major shift in the distribution of COVID-19 cases from China to Europe and the United States of America, while China’s incidence decreased.4 This sparked a second wave of imported COVID-19 cases in Viet Nam, of non-Chinese origin, starting on 6 March a Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Viet Nam. b National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. c School of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Viet Nam. d General Department of Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam. e National Agency for Science and Technology Information, Ministry of Science and Technology, Viet Nam. f National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Viet Nam. g National Hospital of Tropical Diseases, Hanoi, Viet Nam. h The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. * These authors contributed equally. # These authors contributed equally. Published: 13 December 2021 doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2021.12.4.857 Objective: Asymptomatic infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and test re-positivity after a negative test have raised concerns about the ability to effectively control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of COVID-19 asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic infections during the second wave of COVID-19 in Viet Nam, and to better understand the duration of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the dynamics between the evolution of clinical symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 test positivity among confirmed COVID-19 cases. Methods: We conducted a cohort analysis on the first 50 confirmed cases during the second COVID-19 wave in Viet Nam using clinical, laboratory and epidemiological data collected from 9 March to 30 April 2020. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to assess time to clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and log-rank tests were used to explore factors related to time to SARS-CoV-2 infection clearance. Results: Most cases (58%) had no typical signs or symptoms of COVID-19 at the time of diagnosis. Ten cases (20%) were re-positive for SARS-CoV-2 during infection. Eight cases (16%) experienced COVID-19 symptoms after testing negative for SARS-CoV-2. The median duration from symptom onset until clearance of infection was 14 days (range: 6–31); it was longer in re-positive and older patients and those with pre-existing conditions. Conclusion: Asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic infections were common during the second wave of COVID-19 in Viet Nam. Re-positivity was frequent during hospitalization and led to a long duration of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Re-positive testing, clinical evolution and clearance of infection: results from COVID-19 cases in isolation in Viet Nam Ngoc-Anh Hoang,a,b* Thai Quang Pham,a,c* Ha-Linh Quach,a,b Khanh Cong Nguyen,a Samantha Colquhoun,b Stephen Lambert,b Duong Huy Luong,a Quang Dai Tran,d Dinh Cong Phung,e Tran Nhu Duong,f Nghia Duy Ngu,a Tu Anh Tran,a Hue Bich Thi Nguyen,g Duc-Anh Dangf,# and Florian Vogtb,h,# Correspondence to Ha-Linh Quach and Thai Quang Pham (email: linh.quach@anu.edu.au and pqt@nihe.org.vn) WPSAR Vol 12, No 4, 2021 | doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2021.12.4.857 https://ojs.wpro.who.int/2 Hoang et alRe-positive testing, clinical evolution and clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Viet Nam National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology and the Medical Services Administration. Data included in this analysis were obtained from the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology. Case classification and definitions This study used case definitions from guidelines developed by the Viet Nam Ministry of Health.12 Case confirmation required a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2. A symptomatic COVID-19 case was de- fined as a confirmed case showing any COVID-19 compat- ible symptom according to Ministry of Health guidelines, including cough, fever, muscle soreness, shortness of breath, sore throat, headache, nausea and fatigue with symptom onset within 14 days before the first positive PCR test result.12 An asymptomatic case was a confirmed case without COVID-19 compatible symptoms throughout the incubation and infection period. This period was counted from 14 days before the first SARS-CoV-2 positive test result until the first negative PCR test, in a series of three negative PCR tests, with at least 24 hours between each test. A pre-symptomatic case was defined as a confirmed case without COVID-19 compatible symptoms at the time of the first positive PCR test but who then developed symptoms during the course of infection. A re-positive case was defined as a patient who had tested positive, then negative and then returned to positive. A close contact was defined as a person with direct contact (≤2 metres distance) with a confirmed case.13 In Viet Nam, if the confirmed case had a flight travel history within 14 days from the date of symptom onset or date of confirmation, whichever came first, all passengers on those flights were categorized as close contacts and were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection. As per Ministry of Health guidelines, case severity was categorized as mild, severe or critical.13 A mild case was a patient with COVID-19 symptoms who was con- scious and did not require oxygen support. A severe case was a symptomatic patient who was conscious but re- quired oxygen support. A critical case was an unconscious patient either being treated with mechanical ventilation or receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Patients who had a chronic medical condition (e.g. cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases or diabetes) were defined as having pre-existing conditions at the time of infection. 2020 when an international passenger arriving from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland tested positive.5 Case investigations conducted during the second wave suggested the occurrence of cases without compat- ible signs or symptoms of COVID-19 at the time of the first positive test, raising concerns about the community spread of COVID-19 in Viet Nam. Some cases remained asymptomatic until discharge, whereas others developed symptom onset after testing positive (pre-symptomatic infections). Also seen at that time was reversion of test results in patients who had tested negative following a positive result, and then returned to positive (re- positivity). As in other settings, pre-symptomatic and fully asymptomatic infections were also recorded but not systematically investigated.6,7 Important evidence gaps remain for asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic cases, and for patients with re- positive test results.8,9 In particular, the duration until clearance of infection and the dynamics between clinical symptoms and test positivity are poorly understood.10,11 The testing and quarantine policy during the initial phase of the second wave of infections in Viet Nam provided us with a setting to investigate these questions. Using clinical, laboratory and epidemiological data of arriving air travel passengers to Viet Nam and their secondary cases during March and April 2020, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic COVID-19 infections and to better understand the dura- tion of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the dynamics between the evolution of clinical symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 test positivity. METHODS Design A cohort analysis was conducted on the first 50 labora- tory-confirmed cases during the second COVID-19 wave in Viet Nam using clinical, laboratory and epidemiological data collected as a part of the national epidemic response between 9 March and 30 April 2020. Data sources In Viet Nam, all hospitals reported clinical and treatment information and test results for COVID-19 cases to the WPSAR Vol 12, No 4, 2021 | doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2021.12.4.857https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ 3 Re-positive testing, clinical evolution and clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Viet NamHoang et al describe the number of cases of each type (asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic and symptomatic), demographics and clinical symptoms in the study’s time range. Pearson’s chi-squared and Fisher’s exact test were applied to com- pare demographic and clinical characteristics between re-positive and non-re-positive cases, and between cases with a negative test presenting with COVID-19 symptoms versus those without COVID-19 symptoms. The Kaplan- Meier estimator was used to assess time to clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection; that is, the time between the date of symptom onset and the date of the first of three consecutive negative SARS-CoV-2 tests. Asymptomatic cases were excluded from this analysis. Log-rank tests were applied to explore the relationship between time to SARS-CoV-2 infection clearance and patients’ age, sex, pre-existing conditions, inconsistent PCR results and clinical severity. RESULTS Among the first 50 COVID-19 cases in the second wave in Viet Nam, the proportions of pre-symptomatic, symp- tomatic and asymptomatic cases were 38%, 42% and 20%, respectively. Male (54%) and female (46%) repre- sentation was approximately equal. Vietnamese nationals accounted for 64% of cases. The prevalence of people under 30 years old in pre-symptomatic, symptomatic and asymptomatic groups was 15.8%, 57.2% and 50%, respectively. Most of the asymptomatic and symptomatic cases were less likely than the pre-symptomatic cases to have a pre-existing condition (Table 1). Two thirds of cases (n = 34, 68%) were interna- tional arrivals, with the remaining cases identified locally (n = 16, 32%). Among international passengers, 23% (n = 8) were detected through airport screening, 56% (n = 19) were detected through case-finding activities among flight passengers and 21% (n = 7) were detected during self-presentation at health facilities. All 16 local cases were close contacts of international passengers and were detected by case-finding activities (Supplementary Fig. 1). Supplementary Table 2 illustrates symptoms at onset and total numbers of symptoms during infection (combining symptoms at onset and during treatment or isolation) for the 40 pre-symptomatic and symptomatic cases. The most common symptom at onset was cough (70%), followed by fever (25%) and sputum production Among confirmed cases, the status of being free from SARS-CoV-2 infection began on the date of the first of three consecutive negative SARS-CoV-2 tests before discharge. We used a sampling interval of 1 day between each test. Case finding and management Cases were identified through PCR testing at the time of arrival in Viet Nam, during self-presentation at health facilities because of health concerns (due to travel history to regions recording confirmed cases) or through active case-finding measures among passengers and their con- tacts. All passengers on incoming flights from COVID-19 affected areas were tested for SARS-CoV-2 upon arrival and entered a mandated 14-day quarantine, irrespec- tive of test results or symptoms. (The evolving test and quarantine policies for passengers arriving from affected areas into Viet Nam are included in Supplementary Table 1.) During this period, passengers could leave the airport without testing or quarantine if they did not depart from defined designated areas, and passengers were only contacted when any co-passengers were confirmed to be positive for SARS-CoV-2. Any person who presented to health facilities with symptoms compatible with COVID-19 and who reported a travel history to COVID-19 affected areas within the past 14 days was directly transferred to a reference hospital for SARS-CoV-2 testing and quarantine. Once SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed, an in-depth epidemiological investigation and contact tracing were conducted. All identified close contacts of confirmed cases were advised to self-quarantine immediately at their residence until contacted by local health authorities. They were then tested for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR and were placed into compulsory quarantine at a designated site for 14 days, irrespective of the test result. All quarantined individuals were tested at the start of their quarantine (day 0) and then systematically on days 3–5 and day 14. An additional test was undertaken if an individual devel- oped symptoms. Anyone who tested positive or became symptomatic was transferred to a reference hospital for isolation and treatment. Statistical analysis Data were cleaned using Microsoft Excel and exported to the statistical software package R version 3.6.3 for analysis.14 Frequencies and percentages were used to WPSAR Vol 12, No 4, 2021 | doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2021.12.4.857 https://ojs.wpro.who.int/4 Hoang et alRe-positive testing, clinical evolution and clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Viet Nam Eight cases (16%) still experienced COVID-19 symptoms after testing negative for SARS-CoV-2, among which four (50%) were symptomatic and four (50%) were pre-symptomatic at the time of testing. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the 10 (20%) re-positive COVID-19 cases and eight (16%) cases who had COVID-19 symptoms after testing negative for SARS-CoV-2 are shown in Table 2. There was no significant difference in age, sex, nationality, pre-existing conditions and symptoms at onset between re-positive and non-re-positive cases. This was also observed among symptomatic cases who had a negative test versus cases without symptoms. Most re-positive cases and cases with COVID-19 symptoms after test- ing negative were categorized as severe or critical, and experienced more than two symptoms during infection. The overall median duration from onset of symp- toms to clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 14 days (range: 6–31). Twenty days after symptom onset, 75% (30 cases) were free from SARS-CoV-2 infection (Supplementary Fig. 2). (15%). Most cases experienced multiple symptoms, with 70% having more than one symptom and 15% having six or more symptoms. Fig. 1 presents the clinical evolution and PCR results of SARS-CoV-2 testing during treatment or isolation in symptomatic, pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic cases. Among 40 (80%) patients who experienced symptoms during infection, eight (20%) were clinically classified as severe and four (10%) as critical. Three of the four criti- cal cases had pre-existing conditions, namely, vestibular disorder, type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Ten cases (20%) returned a positive SARS-CoV-2 result after returning one or more negative result (re- positivity). The number of re-positive cases who were pre-symptomatic, symptomatic and asymptomatic was four, five and one, respectively. Most re-positive cases (90%) had one loop of reversion (i.e. one positive test after a negative test, then negative test results until being free from SARS-CoV-2). Only one re-positive case (case 19, who was pre-symptomatic at the time of testing) had more than one loop of reversion. Table 1. Characteristics of COVID-19 cases by symptomatic category (n = 50) Total Pre-symptomatic Symptomatic Asymptomatic n = 50 % n = 19 % n = 21 % n = 10 % Age, mean (SD) 40.6 (19.2) 48.6 (18.2) 35.1 (16.7) 36.7 (22.5) <20 4 8 2 10.5 1 4.8 1 10 20–29 16 32 1 5.3 11 52.4 4 40 30–39 8 16 2 10.5 4 19 2 20 40–49 3 6 3 15.8 0 0 0 0 50–59 8 16 5 26.3 2 9.5 1 10 60–69 7 14 5 26.3 2 9.5 0 0 70+ 4 8 1 5.3 1 4.8 2 20 Sex Male 27 54 12 63.2 11 52.4 4 40 Female 23 46 7 36.8 10 47.6 6 60 Nationality Vietnamese 32 64 10 52.6 15 71.4 7 70 Other 18 36 9 47.4 6 28.6 3 30 Pre-existing condition Yes 12 24 6 31.6 4 19 2 20 No 38 76 13 68.4 17 81 8 80 SD: standard deviation. WPSAR Vol 12, No 4, 2021 | doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2021.12.4.857https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ 5 Re-positive testing, clinical evolution and clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Viet NamHoang et al Fig. 1. The evolution of clinical symptoms and results of SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests during treatment of symptomatic, pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic cases in Viet Nam Cases are aligned by date of symptom onset for symptomatic and pre-symptomatic cases and date of first positive test for asymptomatic cases. a “Free from infection” is defined as the date of the first of three consecutive negative SARS-CoV-2 tests before discharge, with a sampling interval of at least 1 day between each test. Note: In the “Disorders” column, “”: having at least one pre-existing condition and “”: free from pre-existing conditions. ID Disorders -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 Day 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 C01  ª ¢ª è C02  ª ¢ª ª è C03  ª ¢ª è No symptoms C04  ª ª ¢ ª ª è Mild C05  ª ¢ ª ª è Severe C06  ª ¢ª ª ª è Critical C07  ª ª ¢ ª è ª Postive test result C08  ª ¢ª ª è R Negative test result C09  ª ¢ ª ª è ¢ Symptom onset C10  ª ¢ ª ª è è Free from infection* C11  ª ¢ ª ª ª è C12  ª ¢ ª ª ª è C13  ª ª ª ª ¢ ª R ª ª è C14  ª ª ¢ ª ª ª ª ª è C15  ª ª ¢ª R R R ª ª ª ª è C16  ª ¢ª ª ª ª ª ª ª ª R ª è C17  ª ª ¢ ª ª ª ª ª ª è C18  ª ¢ ª ª ª ª è C19  ª ¢ª ª ª ª ª ª ª R R R ª ª ª ª R R ª Day 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 C20  ¢ ª ª ª è C21  ¢ª ª ª ª è C22  ¢ª ª ª è C23  ¢ª ª ª ª è C24  ¢ª ª ª ª è C25  ¢ ª ª ª ª è C26  ¢ ª ª ª ª è C27  ¢ ª ª ª ª è C28  ¢ ª ª ª ª ª è C29  ¢ª ª ª ª ª è C30  ¢ ª ª ª è C31  ¢ ª ª è C32  ¢ ª ª ª è C33  ¢ª ª R R ª è C34  ¢ ª ª ª è C35  ¢ ª ª ª ª è C36  ¢ ª ª ª ª ª ª ª è C37  ¢ ª ª ª R R ª è C38  ¢ ª R ª ª ª è C39  ¢ ª ª ª ª ª ª R ª è C40  ¢ª ª ª ª ª ª ª R R R ª ª è ID Disorders Day 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 C41  ª è C42  ª ª è ª Postive test result C43  ª ª è R Negative test result C44  ª è è Free from infection* C45  ª ª ª ª ª è C46  ª ª ª ª è C47  ª ª ª è C48  ª ª ª è C49  ª ª ª è C50  ª ª ª ª R R ª ª è sesac cita mot p mys A sesac cita mot p my S sesac cita mot p mys-er P ID Disorders -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 Day 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 C01  ª ¢ª è C02  ª ¢ª ª è C03  ª ¢ª è No symptoms C04  ª ª ¢ ª ª è Mild C05  ª ¢ ª ª è Severe C06  ª ¢ª ª ª è Critical C07  ª ª ¢ ª è ª Postive test result C08  ª ¢ª ª è R Negative test result C09  ª ¢ ª ª è ¢ Symptom onset C10  ª ¢ ª ª è è Free from infection* C11  ª ¢ ª ª ª è C12  ª ¢ ª ª ª è C13  ª ª ª ª ¢ ª R ª ª è C14  ª ª ¢ ª ª ª ª ª è C15  ª ª ¢ª R R R ª ª ª ª è C16  ª ¢ª ª ª ª ª ª ª ª R ª è C17  ª ª ¢ ª ª ª ª ª ª è C18  ª ¢ ª ª ª ª è C19  ª ¢ª ª ª ª ª ª ª R R R ª ª ª ª R R ª Day 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 C20  ¢ ª ª ª è C21  ¢ª ª ª ª è C22  ¢ª ª ª è C23  ¢ª ª ª ª è C24  ¢ª ª ª ª è C25  ¢ ª ª ª ª è C26  ¢ ª ª ª ª è C27  ¢ ª ª ª ª è C28  ¢ ª ª ª ª ª è C29  ¢ª ª ª ª ª è C30  ¢ ª ª ª è C31  ¢ ª ª è C32  ¢ ª ª ª è C33  ¢ª ª R R ª è C34  ¢ ª ª ª è C35  ¢ ª ª ª ª è C36  ¢ ª ª ª ª ª ª ª è C37  ¢ ª ª ª R R ª è C38  ¢ ª R ª ª ª è C39  ¢ ª ª ª ª ª ª R ª è C40  ¢ª ª ª ª ª ª ª R R R ª ª è ID Disorders Day 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 C41  ª è C42  ª ª è ª Postive test result C43  ª ª è R Negative test result C44  ª è è Free from infection* C45  ª ª ª ª ª è C46  ª ª ª ª è C47  ª ª ª è C48  ª ª ª è C49  ª ª ª è C50  ª ª ª ª R R ª ª è sesac cita mot p mys A sesac cita mot p my S sesac cita mot p mys-er P DISCUSSION This study examined the clinical and laboratory findings of the first 50 SARS-CoV-2 confirmed cases at the start of the second COVID-19 wave in Viet Nam. There was a high prevalence of cases without compatible signs or symptoms of COVID-19 at the time of the first positive test (i.e. asymptomatic infections and pre-symptomatic infections). We found that 20% of cases tested positive following a negative result, and 16% of patients still experienced COVID-19 symptoms after testing negative for SARS-CoV-2. The median duration until clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 14 days, with the duration being longer in older people, those with pre-existing condi- tions and re-positive cases. The median duration until clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 12 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11–20) for males and 14 days (95% CI: 13–22) for females (P = 0.44), and was higher in older people (14 days among all those aged 30 years and older, 10 days in those aged 30–44 years, 12.5 days in those aged 45–59 years, 20 days in those aged 60 years or more; P < 0.001) (Fig. 2). The duration until SARS-CoV-2 clearance for re-positive cases was nearly double the duration for those without test conversion (22 days vs 13 days, P = 0.00034). Critical cases had a longer time to freedom from infection (26.5 days) than did mild cases (13 days) and severe cases (14 days) (P = 0.015) (Fig. 3). WPSAR Vol 12, No 4, 2021 | doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2021.12.4.857 https://ojs.wpro.who.int/6 Hoang et alRe-positive testing, clinical evolution and clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Viet Nam Table 2. Characteristics of COVID-19 cases with a re-positive PCR test and symptomatic cases with a negative PCR test (n = 50) Characteristics Re-positive test P Negative test with COVID-19 symptoms PNo n (%) Yes n (%) No n (%) Yes n (%) Demographics Age <45 26 (65) 3 (30) 0.10 28 (66.7) 1 (12.5) 0.01 45–64 8 (20) 5 (50) 8 (19) 5 (62.5) 65+ 6 (15) 2 (20) 6 (14.3) 2 (25) Sex Male 23 (57) 4 (40) 0.32 24 (57.1) 3 (37.5) 0.31 Female 17 (43) 6 (60) 18 (42.9) 5 (62.5) Nationality Vietnamese 25 (63) 7 (70) 0.66 27 (64.3) 5 (62.5) 0.92 Other 15 (38) 3 (30) 15 (35.7) 3 (37.5) Pre-existing condition Yes 7 (18.5) 5 (50) 0.03 9 (21.4) 3 (37.5) 0.33 No 33 (82.5) 5 (50) 33 (78.6) 5 (62.5) Disease characteristics Symptoms at onset Cough 23 (57.5) 5 (50) -- 23 (54.8) 5 (62.5) -- Fever 7 (17.5) 3 (30) 7 (16.7) 3 (37.5) Headache 4 (10) 0 (0) 4 (9.5) 0 (0) Fatigue 4 (10) 0 (0) 4 (9.5) 0 (0) Sputum production 3 (7.5) 2 (20) 3 (7.1) 2 (25) Sore throat 2 (5) 2 (20) 3 (7.1) 1 (12.5) Chill 0 (0) 1 (10) 0 (0) 1 (12.5) Nasal congestion 0 (0) 1 (10) 1 (2.4) 0 (0) Diarrhoea 0 (0) 1 (10) 0 (0) 1 (12.5) Number of symptoms during infection 1–2 24 (60) 6 (60) 1 26 (61.9) 4 (50) 0.53 >2 16 (40) 4 (40) 16 (38.1) 4 (50) Patient category Pre-symptomatic 15 (38) 4 (40) 0.66 15 (35.7) 4 (50) 0.3 Symptomatic 16 (40) 5 (50) 17 (40.5) 4 (50) Asymptomatic 9 (23) 1(10) 10 (23.8) 0 (0) Severity Asymptomatic 9 (23) 1 (10) 0.009 10 (23.8) 0 (0) <0.001 Mild 28 (70) 4 (40) 29 (69) 3 (37.5) Severe 2 (5) 2 (20) 2 (4.8) 2 (25) Critical 1 (3) 3 (30) 1 (2.4) 3 (37.5)  Groups were compared using Pearson’s chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test. WPSAR Vol 12, No 4, 2021 | doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2021.12.4.857https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ 7 Re-positive testing, clinical evolution and clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Viet NamHoang et al Fig. 2. Cumulative probability by sex, age and pre-existing condition of clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection from the day of first positive laboratory test among 40 pre-symptomatic and symptomatic cases Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and interpreted as the probability of clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection (the probability of having the first of three consecutive negative SARS-CoV-2 tests). P values were calculated using log-rank tests. P = 0.0009 Pre-existing condition P = 0.44 P = 0.22 WPSAR Vol 12, No 4, 2021 | doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2021.12.4.857 https://ojs.wpro.who.int/8 Hoang et alRe-positive testing, clinical evolution and clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Viet Nam CoV-2 transmission appears to vary among asymptomatic cases. A study in China showed that transmissibility from asymptomatic cases is comparable to that of symptomatic cases.18 A study in Singapore suggested that people with asymptomatic COVID-19 might be less infectious than symptomatic cases.19 Meanwhile, the World Health The findings showed that 58% of cases did not exhibit compatible signs or symptoms of COVID-19 at the time of the first positive test, although fewer than half remained asymptomatic. This finding aligns with current published evidence of the expression of asymptomatic, symptomatic and pre-symptomatic cases.15–17 The degree of SARS- Fig. 3. Survival analysis by re-positivity and severity of 40 pre-symptomatic and symptomatic cases P = 0.00034 P = 0.015 Positive retest after an earlier negative result Disease severity Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and interpreted as the probability of clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection (the prob- ability of having the first of three consecutive negative SARS-CoV-2 tests). P values were calculated using log-rank tests. WPSAR Vol 12, No 4, 2021 | doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2021.12.4.857https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ 9 Re-positive testing, clinical evolution and clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Viet NamHoang et al when determining criteria for discharge and ending isola- tion, health authorities should consider multiple factors such as symptom resolution, time elapsed since the onset of symptoms, disease severity, immune system response and evidence of viral RNA clearance from the upper respiratory tract.32 Viral shedding is used as a marker of infectivity when detected via an upper respiratory tract PCR sample a few days before symptom onset.33 Viral shedding persists for varying periods of time, with a median duration of 11 days.22 In our study, the median duration was 14 days. The viral shedding period in our study was defined as the day of diagnosis to the day of the first of three negative tests, each 24 hours apart; this excludes shedding before diagnosis. Although viral shedding has been identified during both the asymptomatic and symptomatic phases, its relation to transmissibility is unclear. Because real- time PCR cannot distinguish between infective virus and inactive virus, a positive PCR result does not necessarily represent the potential for viral transmission. The amount of viral RNA detected does not necessarily indicate greater infectivity.33 Older age and having pre-existing conditions have been reported as important independent predictors of worse outcomes in severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome.34 Our results also confirmed that increased age and pre-existing conditions were associated with longer SARS-CoV-2 infection in COVID-19 patients, which is consistent with other find- ings.35 Further in-depth studies are encouraged to explore additional factors related to the duration of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We acknowledge that there were several limitations to this study. First, the relatively small number of cases and specific context might limit the generalizability of our study findings. Second, we acknowledge the lack of cycle threshold (Ct) values (the number of cycles necessary to detect the virus by PCR). Ct is a semi-quantitative value that categorizes the concentration of viral genetic material in a testing sample following PCR testing. This value in- dicates how much viral genetic material is in the sample: a low Ct indicates a high concentration of viral genetic material, which is typically associated with a high risk of infectivity and vice versa. Knowing this value might have helped us to understand re-positivity tests and to com- pare symptomatic, pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic Organization declared that asymptomatic cases are much less likely to transmit the virus than those who develop symptoms.20 However, there is still a lack of comprehen- sive studies with representative samples on SARS-CoV-2 transmission during the asymptomatic period. In our study, 20% of confirmed COVID-19 cases returned a positive SARS-CoV-2 result after one or more negative test result. Findings from China indicated that the prevalence of a positive test following a negative test was about 17% after discharge.21,22 Most current evidence about re-positivity focuses on the recovery or post-discharge phase. However, re-positivity during hospitalization might contribute to the need for ongoing admission and repeat testing, and cause distress for both patients and health care staff, which has not been the fo- cus of published studies to date. In this study, all critical cases returned to positivity during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Re-positive cases had a substantially longer duration until viral clearance, which aligned with current evidence.21 Although re-positive tests for SARS-CoV-2 in recovered COVID-19 patients are common, there is insufficient evidence about the underlying mechanism leading to a re-positive test.23 Most reported re-positive results could not be explained as simple viral relapse or secondary infection.24 Some potential reasons included virology (biological characteristics of the virus),25 speci- men issues (sample collection, processing, virus at the limit of detection)26–28 or patient condition (underlying conditions, degree of infection, treatment methods).29 A study in post-symptomatic individuals showed that persistent positivity is associated with elevated cellular immune responses, and thus the viral RNA may repre- sent replicating virus.30 However, transmission to close contacts was not observed. Other evidence suggested that re-positive cases are not infectious after an initial negative test, indicating that persistent PCR-positive individuals are not infectious at the post-symptomatic stage of infection.11,31 However, further work is needed to understand the likelihood of transmission from these patients. Our findings showed that several cases still expe- rienced COVID-19 compatible symptoms after testing negative for the virus or even after meeting SARS-CoV-2 clearance criteria. Defining and measuring COVID-19 transmissibility should be more sophisticated than only checking for a negative test. It has been suggested that WPSAR Vol 12, No 4, 2021 | doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2021.12.4.857 https://ojs.wpro.who.int/10 Hoang et alRe-positive testing, clinical evolution and clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Viet Nam Funding This work was conducted as part of the Master of Ap- plied Epidemiology programme at the Australian National University. Authors N-A.H. and H-L.Q. were trainees of the programme and received funding from the ASEAN- Australia Health Security Fellowship by the Common- wealth Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. References 1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):727–33. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 pmid:31978945 2. Coronavirus cases. Dover, DL: Worldometers.info; 2021. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/, accessed 14 Oc- tober 2021. 3. Van Cuong L, Giang HTN, Linh LK, Shah J, Van Sy L, Hung TH, et al. The first Vietnamese case of COVID-19 acquired from Chi- na. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(4):408–9. doi:10.1016/S1473- 3099(20)30111-0 pmid:32085849 4. Quach HL, Hoang NA. COVID-19 in Vietnam: a lesson of pre- preparation. J Clin Virol. 2020;127:104379. doi:10.1016/j. jcv.2020.104379 pmid:32361325 5. The fight against COVID-19: everything is still under control (in Vi- etnamese). Hanoi: Ministry of Health Portal; 2020. Available from: https://moh.gov.vn/tin-tong-hop/-/asset_publisher/k206Q9qkZOqn/ content/cuoc-chien-chong-covid-19-moi-chuyen-van-trong-tam- kiem-soat, accessed 14 October 2021. 6. Long QX, Tang XJ, Shi QL, Li Q, Deng HJ, Yuan J, et al. Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infec- tions. Nat Med. 2020;26(8):1200–4. doi:10.1038/s41591-020- 0965-6 pmid:32555424 7. Arons MM, Hatfield KM, Reddy SC, Kimball A, James A, Jacobs JR, et al. Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections and transmission in a skilled nursing facility. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(22):2081–90. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2008457 pmid:32329971 8. Enhanced screening to reduce the spread of COVID-19. Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi: US Embassy & Consulate in Vietnam; 2020. Available from: https://vn.usembassy. g o v /e n h a n c e d - s c r e e n i n g - t o - r e d u c e - t h e - s p r e a d - o f - c o v - id-19 -2 / ?_ ga=2.20458 4023.617558 323.16341654 40 - 64551874.1634165440, accessed 14 October 2021. 9. Day M. Covid-19: four fifths of cases are asymptomatic, China fig- ures indicate. BMJ. 2020;369:m1375. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1375 pmid:32241884 10. Qiao XM, Xu XF, Zi H, Liu GX, Li BH, Du X, et al. Re-positive cases of nucleic acid tests in discharged patients with COVID-19: a follow- up study. Front Med. 2020;7:349. doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.00349 pmid:32656223 11. Lan L, Xu D, Ye G, Xia C, Wang S, Li Y, et al. Positive RT-PCR test results in patients recovered from COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323(15):1502– 3. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2783 pmid:32105304 cases over time. Although Ct is important, this single value depends on several factors, including the quantity of specific gene targets and reagent variability, and other factors that do not reflect a person’s infectivity in the absence of clinical context.36 Large-scale, multicentre studies that include Ct values are required to explore the importance of this issue. CONCLUSION A high proportion of asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic infections were evident in the first 50 confirmed cases during the second wave of COVID-19 in Viet Nam. In this study, re-positive cases were common during hospitaliza- tion and had a long duration of SARS-CoV-2 infection. High-quality longitudinal studies to explore the trans- missibility of re-positive and asymptomatic COVID-19 patients are needed. Acknowledgements We acknowledge the important contributions and guidelines from the Viet Nam National Steering Commit- tee for COVID-19 Prevention and Control, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Science and Technology and the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology. We thank the health care workers from designated hospitals for COVID-19 treatment in Viet Nam for their great work in COVID-19 case management and treatment. We also thank the community health care workers in provincial centres of disease control for their excellent contributions to surveillance, contact tracing and disease control and prevention measures. Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Ethics statement The conduct of this analysis was approved by the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology and was exempted by the institute’s Institutional Review Board as part of routine outbreak investigation and response activities. WPSAR Vol 12, No 4, 2021 | doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2021.12.4.857https://ojs.wpro.who.int/ 11 Re-positive testing, clinical evolution and clearance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Viet NamHoang et al 24. Xiao AT, Tong YX, Zhang S. False-negative of RT-PCR and pro- longed nucleic acid conversion in COVID-19: rather than recur- rence. J Med Virol. 2020;92(10):1755–6. doi:10.1002/jmv.25855 pmid:32270882 25. An J, Liao X, Xiao T, Qian S, Yuan J, Ye H, et al. Clinical character- istics of recovered COVID-19 patients with re-detectable positive RNA test. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(17):1084. doi:10.21037/atm- 20-5602 pmid:33145303 26. Pan Y, Long L, Zhang D, Yuan T, Cui S, Yang P, et al. Potential false- negative nucleic acid testing results for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from thermal inactivation of samples with low viral loads. Clin Chem. 2020;66(6):794–801. doi:10.1093/ clinchem/hvaa091 pmid:32246822 27. Xie X, Zhong Z, Zhao W, Zheng C, Wang F, Liu J. Chest CT for typical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia: relation- ship to negative RT-PCR testing. Radiology. 2020;296(2):E41–5. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200343 pmid:32049601 28. Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, Liang L, Huang H, Hong Z, et al. SARS- CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected pa- tients. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(12):1177–9. doi:10.1056/NE- JMc2001737 pmid:32074444 29. Liu W, Tao ZW, Wang L, Yuan ML, Liu K, Zhou L, et al. Analy- sis of factors associated with disease outcomes in hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus disease. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;133(9):1032–8. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000000775 pmid:32118640 30. Vibholm LK, Nielsen SSF, Pahus MH, Frattari GS, Olesen R, An- dersen R, et al. SARS-CoV-2 persistence is associated with antigen- specific CD8 T-cell responses. EBioMedicine. 2021;64:103230. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103230 pmid:33530000 31. Kang YJ. South Korea’s COVID-19 infection status: from the perspec- tive of re-positive test results after viral clearance evidenced by nega- tive test results. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020:14(6);762– 4. doi:10.1017/dmp.2020.168 pmid:32438941 32. Guidance for discharge and ending of isolation of people with COV- ID-19. Solna: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control; 2020. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications- data/guidance-discharge-and-ending-isolation-people-covid-19, ac- cessed 14 October 2021. 33. Widders A, Broom A, Broom J. SARS-CoV-2: the viral shedding vs infectivity dilemma. Infect Dis Health. 2020;25(3):210–5. doi:10.1016/j.idh.2020.05.002 pmid:32473952 34. Peeri NC, Shrestha N, Rahman MS, Zaki R, Tan Z, Bibi S, et al. The SARS, MERS and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemics, the newest and biggest global health threats: what lessons have we learned? Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(3):717–26. doi:10.1093/ije/ dyaa033 pmid:32086938 35. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054–62. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3 pmid:32171076 36. Henderson DK, Weber DJ, Babcock H, Hayden MK, Malani A, Wright SB, et al. The perplexing problem of persistently PCR-posi- tive personnel. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021;42(2):203–4. doi:10.1017/ice.2020.343 pmid:32772942 12. Decision No. 963/QD-BYT interim guidance on management of COVID-19 (in Vietnamese). Hanoi: Ministry of Health; 2020. Available from: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/The-thao-Y-te/ Decision-963-QD-BYT-2020-Interim-Guidance-for-prevention- and-control-of-COVID-19-438489.aspx, accessed 14 October 2021. 13. Decision No. 1344/QĐ-BYT: guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute respiratory infections caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) 3rd edition (in Vietnamese). Hanoi: Ministry of Health; 2020. Available from: https://kcb.vn/huong-dan-chan-doan-va- dieu-tri-viem-duong-ho-hap-cap-do-sar-cov-2-covid-19-phien-ban- lan-thu-3.html, accessed 14 October 2021. 14. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical com- puting. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/, accessed 14 October 2021. 15. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic COV- ID-19 in China. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9(1):72. doi:10.1186/ s40249-020-00679-2 pmid:32564770 16. Kimball A, Hatfield KM, Arons M, James A, Taylor J, Spicer K, et al. Asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infec- tions in residents of a long-term care skilled nursing facility — King County, Washington, March 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(13):377–81. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6913 pmid:32240128 17. Tabata S, Imai K, Kawano S, Ikeda M, Kodama T, Miyoshi K, et al. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in 104 people with SARS- CoV-2 infection on the Diamond Princess cruise ship: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(9):1043–50. doi:10.1016/ S1473-3099(20)30482.5 pmid:32539988 18. Yi C, Aihong W, Bo Y, Keqin D, Haibo W, Jianmei W, et al. [Epidemiological characteristics of infection in COV- ID-19 close contacts in Ningbo city] (in Chinese). Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020;41:667–71. doi:10.3760/ cma.j.cn112338-20200304-00251 pmid:32447904 19. Sayampanathan AA, Heng CS, Pin PH, Pang J, Leong TY, Lee VJ. Infectivity of asymptomatic versus symptomatic COVID-19. Lancet. 2021;397(10269):93–4. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32651-9 pmid:33347812 20. Transmission of COVID-19 by asymptomatic cases. Cairo: World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean; 2020. Available from: http://www.emro.who.int/health-topics/co- rona-virus/transmission-of-covid-19-by-asymptomatic-cases.html, accessed 14 October 2021. 21. Zhu H, Fu L, Jin Y, Shao J, Zhang S, Zheng N, et al. Clinical fea- tures of COVID-19 convalescent patients with re-positive nucleic acid detection. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34(7):e23392. doi:10.1002/ jcla.23392 pmid:32506726 22. Hu X, Xing Y, Jia J, Ni W, Liang J, Zhao D, et al. Factors associated with negative conversion of viral RNA in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Sci Total Environ. 2020;728:138812. doi:10.1016/j.sci- totenv.2020.138812 pmid:32335406 23. Dao TL, Hoang VT, Gautret P. Recurrence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in recovered COVID-19 patients: a narrative review. Eur J Clin Mi- crobiol Infect Dis. 2021;40(1):13–25. doi:10.1007/s10096-020- 04088-z pmid:33113040