Wine Economics and Policy 10(1): 89-100, 2021 Firenze University Press www.fupress.com/wep ISSN 2212-9774 (online) | ISSN 2213-3968 (print) | DOI: 10.36253/wep-8873 Wine Economics and Policy Citation: Marcos Vinícius Araujo, Grégory Lo Monaco, Kelly Lissandra Bruch (2021) Social Mobility and the Social Representation of Sparkling Wine in Brazil and France. Wine Economics and Policy 10(1): 89-100. doi: 10.36253/ wep-8873 Copyright: © 2021 Marcos Vinícius Araujo, Grégory Lo Monaco, Kelly Lissandra Bruch. This is an open access, peer- reviewed article published by Firenze University Press (http://www.fupress. com/wep) and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attri- bution License, which permits unre- stricted use, distribution, and reproduc- tion in any medium, provided the origi- nal author and source are credited. Data Availability Statement: All rel- evant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information fi les. Competing Interests: The Author(s) declare(s) no confl ict of interest. Social Mobility and the Social Representation of Sparkling Wine in Brazil and France Marcos Vinícius Araujo1,2,*, Grégory Lo Monaco3, Kelly Lissandra Bruch1 1 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas em Agron- egócios, Brasil 2 Aix Marseille Université, Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale UR849, France 3 Aix Marseille Université, Laboratoire ADEF UR 4671, France E-mail: araujovmarcos@gmail.com; gregory.lo-monaco@univ-amu.fr; kelly.bruch@ ufrgs.br *Corresponding author. Abstract. Wine is a social object, established in the Old World and later migrated to the New World. Champagne is an internationally important and famous French spar- kling wine, signifi cantly present worldwide. Brazil, a New-World wine producer, has a recent but expanding history of sparkling wine production and consumption. As to its social aspect, this product has diff erent representations and roles in both these coun- tries. Th erefore, this study aims to understand how culture and social status infl uence the organization of social representations associated with sparkling wines in Brazil and France. Th us, we used the Social Representation approach, a theory of knowledge and communication. For content collection, we carried out a verbal association task. Two hundred and thirteen Brazilians and one hundred ninety-eight French participants provided the fi rst four words which came to mind aft er hearing four inducted words. Th e verbal associations were categorized using semantic contextualization. Th en, we performed a Correspondence Factor Analysis. Th e results supported our hypothesis that culture, social status, and social origins all infl uence social representations associ- ated with sparkling wine, revealing this kind of wine to be a product of social distinc- tion and affl uence. Keywords: social origins, social representation, wine culture, social norms, wine con- sumption. 1. INTRODUCTION Consumption is a symbolic act, as social behavior is infl uenced by sym- bolism around a given product, as well as its social role [1]. Buying a product is not an isolated action. It is rooted in social and cultural values and ideolo- gies. As a cultural product, wine [2, 3, 4, 5, 6] – with collective values and symbolism – projects diff erent representations [5] because of its ancestry. Wine has more than 8,000 years of history [7], and was evidenced in Meso- potamia, a region which developed a rich urban civilization [8], as far back 90 Marcos Vinícius Araujo, Grégory Lo Monaco, Kelly Lissandra Bruch as 3000 BCE. Wine culture was established in the Old World, represented by European countries, and was later migrated to the New World [9]. Represented by colonized countries, such as Brazil, New-World wine is undergoing an expansion in production [10] and consumption [11, 12], mainly in regard to sparkling wine, which has seen a significant increase in recent years [13, 12]. In Brazil, the conventional sparkling wine market grew around 160% from 2005 to 2017, and Moscatel sparkling wine grew around 400% [13]. France is still the main sparkling wine market in the world [14]. Over the last years, consump- tion there has remained stagnant, however, with low vari- ation to local products and an increase of around 60% in imported sparkling wines [15]. Despite said stagnation, France is still the world’s most important sparkling wine producer. The history of sparkling wine predates 77 CE, but its era of prestige began and continues with Champagne [16] in France. Therefore, Champagne has been followed and imitat- ed all over the world. In the USA, for example, locally produced sparkling wines have used the name “Cham- pagne” to convey a better reputation for themselves [17]. In Brazil, local sparkling wine was initially called “Brazilian Champagne” [18]. Inspired by the Cham- pagne region, replacement products have also emerged in France, such as the Crémants [19] and other sparkling wines. In Brazil, the same representations associated to Champagne are applied to these variants mentioned above. Champagne shares the same representation with conventional and Moscatel sparkling wine and Cider, and, in France, Crémants and other sparkling wines [20]. Despite the physical differences, these products share a social meaning and convey different, historically constructed representations in society. 1.1 Social mobility and sparkling wine consumption Social mobility concerns status changes, upward or downward in social standing, on a population over time [21]. It is a general aspect of the industrialization pro- cess [22]. Europe overwent an upward process during the 1980’s and 1990’s , but it is currently experiencing a downward process [23]. Nowadays, developing countries are going through an upward process [24], among them Brazil. Such changes in social standing affect consumers’ habitus asymmetrically [25]. According to the author, downward mobility provides no incentive to change their habitus as a devalued position. Contrarily, upward mobility works as an incentive to adjust the habitus, cre- ating a blended habitus. In short, a blend of the position of origin and destination, facilitated by a slow and steady upward movement [25]. Despite sharing the same economic access as others in their social class, consumers develop different percep- tions, depending on their social origins [26]. Social ori- gins are tied to the one’s family’s social class and edu- cation. Such perceptions are also expressed in behavior. In the high class, people tend to maintain their status throughout their lives, so they try to replicate their fam- ily’s behavior [27]. However, social origin is not the only influence. In alcohol consumption, one’s behavior and perceptions are influenced by their social class and age, particularly during their adolescence and early adult- hood [28]. In other cases, such as with music, preferenc- es are related to the origin of the individual’s capital and their environment [29]. We also have bandwagon effects. In this case, consumers replicate other people’s behavior as luxuries that all should have access to [30]. Privileged classes want to maintain their status and habits, and individuals seek to replicate their position throughout their lives [27]. However, this replication of behavior, the traditional cultural reproduction, might be different because of the education received by one’s parents [31]. Upon reaching a new class and amassing wealth, con- sumers are driven to demanding iconic European prod- ucts, such as wines, which provide a physical characteri- zation of their economic growth [9]. As a product, wine represents cultural and social distinction [2]. Drinking wine improves social relations [32] and has an elitist dimension, such as the main- tenance of one’s social status, as well as its differen- tiation and self-promotion [33]. For example, a woman in upward social mobility consumes more wine than women in her group of origin because wine is generally associated with affluence [34]. This is a possible effect of the social value of wine [35] and the different representa- tions associated with it [36], as well as the cultural con- texts which influence the way people think about wine [6]. The main context in wine culture is the difference between Old and New-World wine and traditional and non-traditional wine countries. The Old World retains a historical relation to wine, while the New World’s asso- ciation to it is much more recent, and mostly in former European colonies . Traditional wine nations, though they might belong to the New World, form a closer and more familiar bond with wine than non-traditional wine countries. For example, France bears much closer ties to Argentina, a traditional wine producing country, than to Switzerland, whose bond is nearer to Brazil, a non-tra- ditional wine country [38]. The Old World, composed of European countries, is the traditional producer and con- sumer. The New World is made up of former European colonies, such as Latin America, Africa, Oceania, and 91Social Mobility and the Social Representation of Sparkling Wine in Brazil and France the USA [9], the new consuming and producing coun- tries. Represented mainly by emergent markets, such as China, India, and Brazil, New-World wines have a social influence on wine consumption [37]. In those countries, consumers develop different rela- tions with wine and its different types. Usually, older consumers prefer still wine, while young adults prefer sparkling wine [39] because of their different represen- tations. Sparkling wine has different characteristics con- cerning types, countries, and segments [40, 41], besides the different consumption contexts [13]. In the New World, sparkling wine is more associated with enjoy- ment and self-image, while in the Old World, it is more associated with tradition and the product itself [42]. Champagne is the main product of this category. Champagne is an icon, a luxury, and a festive bever- age which has shaped modern consumption ideologies [43]. Nevertheless, over the last years, the most impor- tant consumption growth has been tied to other spar- kling wines. In France, the Crémant had an increase in sales of around 50% from 2005 to 2013 [44]. Brazil- ian consumers have increased the consumption of local sparkling wines, unlike the increase of consumption of imported wines, mainly from countries in the New World. 1.2 The Theory of Social Representations Social representation (SR) is a theory of common sense in knowledge and communication. It ref lects socially constructed knowledge, maintained and shared, aiming to build a reality [45] and beliefs shared by indi- viduals in the same social and historically determined group [46]. SRs may influence individual behavior in collectivity [47] because they aim to understand how people think, communicate, and behave [48]. From them, one can understand how individuals and groups build a stable and predictable world, from an unfamil- iar object to a familiar one [49]. Two processes allow this social construction: objectification and anchoring. The former reduces uncertainty, making an abstract object concrete. The latter incorporates the new object in a familiar category based on preexisting knowledge [50, 51, 52]. An SR’s activity and construction are the same for all individuals, but objects and their content may vary across cultures [6]. People think and interact according to their own culture, and depending on their group of origin and level of knowledge [53]. An SR might also explain and influence collective behavior [54, 55]. It is a lens we use to see the world and understand the dynam- ics of social interactions and practices [56]. It was made to persist and is not constantly changing [57]. According to Abric [58, 59, 60], SRs are structured around a cen- tral core and a peripheral system. The central core is rigid and may be activated differently to signify particu- lar objects or practices according to the social context in which they occur [59]. Elements composing the periph- eral system are more dynamic, accessible, and adapt- able to a concrete reality. They also affect behavior [61, 62, 63] and allow us to understand products and objects from a social and cultural perspective [64], because an SR — as a collectively shared representation — classifies individuals as belonging to a specific group [65]. 1.3 Summary and hypothesis The present study aims to understand how culture, social origins, and social class influence the social rep- resentations of sparkling wine. Some studies aim at understanding the social aspect of sparkling wine con- sumption [13; 20, 42], and others focus on sparkling wine preferences [66, 67, 39, 68, 42], its intrinsic and/ or extrinsic attributes [69, 70, 71, 41], and the sparkling wine market [72, 73, 74]. No studies have explored social representations of sparkling wine or made a comparison between the Old World and traditional wine countries against the New World and non-traditional wine coun- tries, such as France and Brazil, or even that sparkling wine is a distinct category of wine, and an important product in the wine sector. As to social representations, some studies have been developed about wine. It has been observed that still wine and sparkling wine are traditional and cultural products in France, one of the most important wine pro- ducing countries in the world. Contrarily, when com- pared to France, Brazil’s history of wine production and consumption is recent, but has enjoyed significant growth in recent years. Sparkling wine was the most important reason for this growth, mainly due to inter- nal sales, as this product has become linked to partying, luxury, celebrations, and a symbol of social affluence. Previous studies have already approached social rep- resentations of wine in general. Those studies applied different approaches. Consumer proximity to wine improves their knowledge about the product, and, thus, there is an influence on how the object is represented in the consumer’s mind [75]. Similarly, social representa- tions allow highlighting how social groups understand the ill-defined concepts of wine [53]. Wine is seen as a traditionally French beverage [36], a cultural object of sociability and heritage [76] in which representations are influenced by culture and expertise level [6]. France is considered a traditional wine producing country, while 92 Marcos Vinícius Araujo, Grégory Lo Monaco, Kelly Lissandra Bruch Brazil a non-traditional wine producing country [38]. Wine has an “ideal” context of consumption [32, 77] and may have an “ideal” label and bottle [78]; furthermore, it is an object of polemical representations and part of intergroup conflict, connected to social identity [5], rep- resented as a product of social standing and affluence [20, 33]. Social representations are a worldview used by indi- viduals or groups to understand the dynamics of social interactions and to clarify determinants of social prac- tices [56]. Additionally, we have seen that social repre- sentations are constructed knowledge, socially and his- torically maintained, and they influence social behavior. Similarly, social origins, such as the education received by one’s parents’, also affect behavior and cultural prac- tices. Due to these different social representations of wine, class, social origins, and cultural influence, our hypotheses were the following: H1 – Social status and social origins will influence the way individuals represent sparkling wine, but they will be more important for Brazilian consumers due to their social mobility and the recent rise of the sparkling wine culture. H2.a – Because the French are closer to and have historical contact with sparkling wine culture – being from a traditional country – social representations shared by them will be more related to wine culture and wine knowledge. H2.b – Brazilians have a recent history with spar- kling wine culture – being from a non-traditional coun- try – and will thus share more trivial representations, showing ignorance about the product. H3 – Sparkling wine will have shared representa- tions with still wine as well as representations distin- guishing the two. H4 – Consumers will confuse sparkling wine with more familiar sparkling beverages. 2. METHOD 2.1 Participants Participants were recruited using the online snow- ball sampling method via online social networks. This method consists of participants inviting others to share the questionnaire link. The link was shared on Face- book and WhatsApp groups in Brazil and France, and we invited participants to share the link in turn. Two hundred and fifteen Brazilians (151 females and 64 males) and one hundred ninety-eight French men and women (142 females and 56 males) of legal drinking age (see table 1) answered the questionnaire. Wine and sparkling wine habits were assessed on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0 = non-consumer (never), 1 = very occa- sional (exceptional parties and events), 2 = occasional (occasionally, other occasions besides parties), 3 = regu- lar (regularly throughout the year), 4 = frequent (several times per month) [see 6]. Most participants were regu- lar wine consumers (Brazil M = 3.31, SD = 1.01; France M = 3.37, SD = .92) and occasional to regular sparkling wine consumers (Brazil: M = 2.74, SD = 1.00; France: M = 2.58, SD = .78). Social origins were measured by their parents’ educational level [see 27, 31]. Socio-demographic questions were also asked, such as age, gender, occupa- tion, income range, and educational level. 2.2 Procedure We collected the content using a word associa- tion task, followed by two steps referring to hierarchi- cal evocation and semantic contextualization [see 65, 60, 79, 80, 81]. Information such as social origins, con- sumption habits, and sociodemographic data were also requested. Participants wrote (04) words or phrases that came to mind [82] when we asked them about the four different inducing words. The inducing words in Brazil were: “vinho espumante” (sparkling wine), “espumante moscatel” (Moscatel sparkling wine), “sidra” (cider), and Champagne; in France: “vin mousseux,” “vin pétillant,” “vin crémant” – terms used to designate sparkling wine in French, and Champagne. These words were taken in referenced blogs and official content from wine asso- ciations, explaining the difference between those prod- ucts, as well as how the product was misunderstood by the consumer [see 20]. To verify the context and the real meaning of the expressions and words, partici- pants wrote a sentence expressing the meaning of the word and expressions through semantic contextualiza- tion [80,81]. The questionnaire was pretested with some Brazilian and French participants to verify their under- standing of the terms and the organization in Portu- guese and French. Table 1. Participants age distribution across culture, socio-profes- sional category, and social origin. Age Total Brazil France SPC+ SPC- SO+ SO- 18-20 4 1 3 0 4 1 3 20-29 166 94 72 80 86 80 86 30-39 99 68 31 56 43 36 63 40-49 54 20 34 31 23 12 42 50 and over 90 32 58 49 41 16 74 93Social Mobility and the Social Representation of Sparkling Wine in Brazil and France 2.3 Data analysis The words collected were categorized according to their meaning and similarity. This technique is based on intuitive-content analyses and aims to exhaust the mean- ings produced on a word association task [83]. The catego- rization was done by groups of meanings, based on seman- tic contextualization, that is, “Champagne,” when related to the wine from Champagne, and “non-Champagne,” when the participants affirm the difference from Cham- pagne [see 81]. Participants’ data was dichotomized by cul- ture (Brazil and France), socio-professional category (SPC + and SPC-), and Social Origins (SO+ and SO-). Socio- professional category and social origins were dichotomized using the average of participants. Their social status was measured by socio-professional category [see 84, 85, 86]. Social origins were measured by their parents’ education level, following traditional cultural emulation [31]. Educa- tion levels were split by 2 years or less, and more than 2 years of a Bachelor’s degree or equivalent (university edu- cation). Finally, we performed the Correspondence Factor Analysis (CFA) from a contingency table [see 87], and the results are illustrated with a CFA Graph. 2.4 Correspondence Factor Analysis (CFA) CFA is a technique for processing different types of data matrixes, in which we can analyze interdependence between dimensions [88]. In this study, we look for the interdependence between representations associated by participants in the verbal association task (categories) and country of origin, socio-professional category, and social origins as independent variables. This technique allows us to simultaneously analyze independent vari- ables and the verbal production of participants [83, 6], and also highlights the correspondence between the var- iable modalities and their associated words [6]. Through this method, CFA allows us to highlight social anchor- ing and helps us identify how the considered object is regarded, according to which positions it occupies in the social field [60]. It was developed to identify the most significant factorial axes [87]. This factorial analysis highlights the differences between association frequen- cies related to independent variables and their corre- spondence [80]. The graphical representation of results shows how social representations are organized [88, 83]. 3. RESULTS Correspondence Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to study the correspondence between our observations and modalities (Figure 1). We used Deschamps’ approach [83], applied in recent studies, to define contributions by factors (CF) [see 87, 79, 6]. Factor 1 receives contributions related to the vari- able “culture”: Brazil = .44, France = .49, a contribution of 93% of inertia. Factor 2 is related to social status and social origins. High social origins = .44, low social ori- gins = .23, and low socio-professional category = .13, a contribution of 80% of inertia. The high socio-profes- sional category was excluded because it did not contrib- ute significantly to any factor = .12. Figure 1 shows the organization of factors. The main opposition, related to culture, is observed in factor 1. For Brazilians, the term “beverage” refers to many different sparkling beverages, such as Cider, Moscatel sparkling wine, and conventional sparkling wine, which have the same usage, such as toasting, cork popping, bubbles, special glasses, “a Champagne flute,” the ideal temperature for consumption, and as a light drink. “Apple” refers to Cider, derisively presented by Figure 1. Graphical representation of the results from correspond- ence factor analysis (factors 1 and 2). Note: It is important to read the figure following these instructions: Abbreviations in capital letters which are inside frames represent the terms of independent variables. BR – Brazilians; FR: French; SO-: Low social origin; SPC-: Low socio-professional category; SO+: High social origin; SPC+: High socio-professional category. “TERM” means that the term of independent variables accounts for the construction of Factor 1. “TERM” means that the term of independent variables accounts for the construction of Factor 2. “Item” means that the item accounts for the construction of Factor 1. “Item” means that the item accounts for the construction of Factor 2. “Item” means that the item accounts for the construction of Factors 1 and 2. Items not considered as important are not showed on the graph, except to SPC+. 94 Marcos Vinícius Araujo, Grégory Lo Monaco, Kelly Lissandra Bruch some participants as a “poor man’s Champagne.” The terms: “brand”, “usage”, “aesthetic”, and “romantic” refer to visual and social status due to the prestige associ- ated with product consumption. Brazilian participants shared representations of a visual and refreshing bever- age, such as with the terms “refreshing”, “beverage” and “temperature”. They are also associated with an easy to drink beverage, soft and sweet, with specific consump- tion practices. For the French, “type” and “origin” refer to differ- ent products from different regions, such as the different regions where Crémant, in France, or other sparkling wines are produced, such as Prosecco, in Italy, and Cava, in Spain. “Champagne” and “non-champagne” refer to the importance of a good differentiation between the Champagne AOP and substitute sparkling wine. The word “entertain” refers to amusing moments in which sparkling wine is consumed, such as parties and happy hours. Factor 2 opposes high and low social status, socio- professional category, and social origin. However, there is more consensus in France than in Brazil, which can be explained by the fact that wine is a cultural product in France [6]. There, sparkling wine is seen as “Cham- pagne” and “non-Champagne” - substitute products [20]. Low social status represents sparkling wine as more visual and general characteristics, “refreshing”, “good”, “soft”, “provenance”, “aroma”, and “health”. “Provenance” refers to the raw material used to produce sparkling wine, such as must and grape, and methods in which low status participants affirm they know how sparkling wine is produced. They give more superfi- cial and general information about the product and not details of organoleptic properties, as a traditional wine consumer would [see 38]. Those from high social origins associate sparkling wine with the protection of social standing and distinc- tion, showing their knowledge about the product, the difference between substitutes, or lack of knowledge about them. In France, “non-champagne”, “unfamiliar”, and “accompaniment” show that substitute products are not Champagne. In Brazil, substitutes are not conven- tional sparkling wine. “Unfamiliar” refers to the lack of knowledge about substitute products. The brand is relat- ed to how consumers differentiate products and social standing, mainly in Brazil. The results show evidence of sparkling wine as a product of social standing and distinction. The object has different social meanings depending on the country in question. In France, “Champagne” and “non-Cham- pagne”, in Brazil, the different sparkling beverages and sparkling wine. In France, the representation is more related to the different wine types than to the sparkling characteristic; in Brazil, it is related to consumption, rules, and general beverages, not just wine. 4. DISCUSSION This study aimed to understand how culture and social status influence the organization of social repre- sentations associated with sparkling wine in Brazil and France. According to our H1 hypothesis, results show that sparkling wine is seen as a product of social stand- ing and distinction, but in different ways, depending on the country. One can observe that there is a convergence of associations from low social status, origins, and socio- professional category. High social status, social origin, and socio-professional category, which do not contribute significantly to the factor, do in fact converge. Among the French and Brazilians, in line with our theoretical elements, we can see the influence of culture. Indeed, results highlight a cultural difference between tradition- al and non-traditional wine countries [38]. Moreover, the process and construction of social representations are universal, but the subject differs across cultures [6] and depends on its country of origin [53]. Brazilians have a recent wine history [18, 89], but sparkling wine culture is on the rise. Differently, wine is part of the French identity and culture [90, 5, 6, 38]. Therefore, France is the origin of modern sparkling wine culture [91, 92, 8]. The results show social representation divergences in Brazil and convergences in France, probably due to their tradition of sparkling wine production and consump- tion. The results support H2.a, and H2.b hypotheses, in which one’s culture and proximity to wine culture influ- ence social representations associated with sparkling wine. Results confirm prior research about the differ- ences between traditional and non-traditional countries [38]. In Brazil, sparkling wine is more often related to a general, soft, sweet, refreshing, easy-to-drink bever- age, and with different brands. In France, it is related to Champagne and substitute products – non-Champagne — from different origins, regions, and countries, and different types: representations linked to knowledge and ignorance regarding the product. This aspect highlights social standing and dominance related to wine con- sumption [33] and the proximity to wine culture. There are also differences concerning social status, more diver- gent in Brazil and convergent in France. That evidence likewise contributes to validating our H1 hypothesis. Wine, in general, is a cultural and social product [2]. Other authors have also showed the different rep- 95Social Mobility and the Social Representation of Sparkling Wine in Brazil and France resentations associated with it [77, 75, 5, 6, 78, 53, 36, 93]. In our study, according to our H3 hypothesis, the most important difference between still wine and spar- kling wine is the presence of bubbles, foam, aesthetics, and entertainment. However, in Brazil, sparkling wine is represented as a general or common beverage with bub- bles. In France, it is represented as wine with bubbles, consumed for entertainment, according to intrinsic and extrinsic quality characteristics [see 94], such as origin and type. In both countries, bubbles are an important element. They emphasize sparkling wine as a distinct category in the wine field, with bubbles, prestige, fun, and a product to be flaunted. In France, we can observe the association between Champagne and non-champagne and, in Brazil, spar- kling wine as a general sparkling beverage, includ- ing Cider. It is observed that there is a misunderstand- ing about the definition of sparkling wine. This result validates our H4 hypotheses about social anchoring, in which individuals familiarize novelty and reduce its strangeness [95]. Both countries anchor in familiar prod- ucts to understand “new” products. Substitute products, Crémant, Cava, and Prosecco, are compared to Cham- pagne; Champagne, technically a sparkling wine, holds a better reputation [16] and is represented in a different category. In Brazil, substitute beverages, such as Cider, a fermented beverage made from apples, are compared to conventional sparkling wine, sharing representation of sparkling wine, in some cases called “a poor man’s Champagne.” That is an anchoring process in which individuals give sense to a non-familiar object from pre- existing knowledge [50, 51, 52]. The process is related to social representation origins and reinforces social posi- tion and sociability [33, 96]. Brazilians in higher social positions have more knowledge about sparkling wine, and the French, about Champagne. Otherwise, results show the symbolic aspect of spar- kling wine consumption related to social factors, such as social standing, position, and mobility. Sparkling wine is a product of social affluence and with a strong visual appeal. However, social representations of spar- kling wine, its consumption, and social distinction must be studied further. Thus, our study shows the future directions of social standing and sparkling wine con- sumption. The rise of sparkling wine consumption in Brazil and France could be explained by social distinc- tion and mobility, mainly in Brazil, where social repre- sentations differ depending social origins, suggesting the use of sparkling wine as a product of social standing. Brazil has increased economic and social development in recent years, showing upward social mobility [97]. In upward mobility, individuals try to adapt to a new social class, in an attempt to become a part of it and to be accepted by it [24]. Then, future research could study the correlation of the social representations of sparkling wine and social domination orientation (SDO), and con- spicuous consumption, social representations of spar- kling wine supporting a social hierarchy. SDO is the society that tends to have a social structure based on social hierarchies and dominance of hegemonic groups at the top [98]. Conspicuous consumption is “a deliber- ate engagement in the symbolic and visible purchase, possession and usage of products and services imbued with scarce economic and cultural capital with the moti- vation to communicate a distinctive self‐image to oth- ers” [99, p. 217]. 5. CONCLUSIONS Considering consumption as a symbolic act which bears a social role [1], sparkling wine consumption must be seen as a social and cultural phenomenon. Our research highlights the origins of sparkling wine repre- sentation and the anchoring process with Champagne and French practices, as well as the context of its con- sumption. As proposed by Rodrigues et al. [38], less- known regions must improve wine education as a mar- keting strategy to increase wine awareness, as it could be an important alternative for the wine market. Despite its organoleptic characteristics, sparkling wine is an object of representation, and its consump- tion is a social phenomenon with cultural meaning. The object is used to communicate social class and the need for social affiliation. We highlighted the differ- ences between traditional and Old-World wine, and non-traditional and New-World wine representations. These differences show the influence of Old-World wines and opportunities for wine marketers to build prod- uct brands according to consumers’ beliefs and culture, and the openness to new sparkling wine types, mainly in emerging countries, where upward social mobility is occurring and where there is a non-tradition of spar- kling wine consumption. 6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors thank the Higher Education Improve- ment Coordination – CAPES - for the grant allocated to the first author (Grant PDSE-CAPES 47/2017 and Finance Code 001). 96 Marcos Vinícius Araujo, Grégory Lo Monaco, Kelly Lissandra Bruch REFERENCES [1] Solomon, M. R. (1983). The Role of Products as Social Stimuli: A Symbolic Interactionism Perspec- tive. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(3), 319- 329. https://doi.org/10.1086/208971 [2]Beckert, J., Rössel, J., & Schenk, P. (2017). Wine as a Cultural Product: Symbolic Capital and Price Formation in the Wine Field. Sociologi- cal Perspectives, 60(1), 206–222. https://doi. org/10.1177/0731121416629994 [3] Demossier, M. (2001). The Quest for Identities: Consumption of Wine in France. Anthropology of Food, (S1). https://doi.org/10.4000/aof.1571 [4] Lo Monaco, G., & Bonetto, E. (2019). Social rep- resentations and culture in food studies. Food Research International, 115, 474–479. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.10.029 [5] Lo Monaco, G., & Guimelli, C. (2011). Hegemonic and Polemical Beliefs: Culture and Consumption in the Social Representation of Wine. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 237–250. https://doi. org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.21 [6] Mouret, M., Lo Monaco, G., Urdapilleta, I., & Parr, W. V. (2013). Social representations of wine and culture: A comparison between France and New Zealand. Food Quality and Preference, 30(2), 102– 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.04.014 [7] McGovern, P. E. (2007). Ancient Wine: The search for the origins of viniculture. New Jersey: Prince- ton University Press. [8] Johnson, H. (1989). Une histoire mondiale du vin: de l’Antiquité à nos jours (Traduction). Paris: Hachette. [9] Banks, G., & Overton, J. (2010). Old World, New World, Third World? Reconceptualising the Worlds of Wine. Journal of Wine Research, 21(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2010.495854 [10] Hollebeek, L. D., Jaeger, S. R., Brodie, R. J., & Balemi, A. (2007). The influence of involvement on purchase intention for new world wine. Food Quality and Preference, 18(8), 1033–1049. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.007 [11] Campbell, G., & Guibert, N. (2006). Introduc- tion: Old World strategies against New World competition in a globalising wine industry. Brit- ish Food Journal, 108(4), 233–242. https://doi. org/10.1108/00070700610657092 [12] OIV. (2019). 2019 Statistical Report on World Viti- viniculture. Retrieved from: http://www.oiv.int/ public/medias/6782/oiv-2019-statistical-report-on- world-vitiviniculture.pdf (Acessed: 20 January 2020) [13] Araujo, M. V., da Silva, M. A. C., & Bruch, K. L. (2019). The phenomenon of moscatel sparkling wine in Brazil. BIO Web of Conferences, 12, 03012. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20191203012 [14] OIV. (2014). The sparkling wine market. In: Inter- national Organization of Vine and Wine. [15] France AgriMer. (2019). Ventes et achats de vins effervescents. Retrieved from https://www. franceagrimer.fr/Bibliotheque/INFORMATIONS- ECONOMIQUES/VIN-ET-CIDRICULTURE/VIN/ CHIFFRES-ET-BILANS/2019/Achats-et-ventes-de- vin-effervescent-en-France-Bilan-2018. (Accessed: 03 December 2019) [16] Liger-Belair, G., & Rochard, J. (2008). Les vins effervescents: Du terroir à la bulle. Paris: Dunod. [17] Robertson, C. (2009). The Sparkling Wine War. Business Law Today, 18, 19–22. [18] Ferreira, V. C., & Ferreira, M. de M. (2016). Vin- hos do Brasil - Do passado para o futuro. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Editora. [19] Emmanuelle, B., Diemer, A., & Perronet, A.-S. (2000). La diffusion des innovations institution- nelles de la Région Champagne- La diffusion des innovations institutionnelles de la Région Cham- pagne-Ardenne à la Bourgogne et à l’Alsace le cas du crémant I. Contexte historique et innovations institutionnelles. Colloque « Economie Agricole », LAME, 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.oecono- mia.net/private/recherche/blouet-diemer-perronnet- cremant-2000.pdf. (Accessed: 15 December 2019) [20] Araujo, M. V., Lo Monaco, G., Callegaro de Men- ezes, D., & Bruch, K. L. (2019). The different rep- resentations of sparkling wine, convergences and divergences between designation in Brazil and France. BIO Web of Conferences, 15, 03017. htt- ps://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20191503017 [21] Day, M. V., & Fiske, S. T. (2019). Understanding the Nature and Consequences of Social Mobility Beliefs. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Inequality (pp. 365–380). Switzer- land: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-030-28856-3_23 [22] Martin Lipset, S., & Bendix, R. (1992). Social mobility in industrial society. New York: Routledge. [23] Vaughan-Whitehead, D. (2016). Europe’s Disap- pearing Middle Class? (D. Vaughan-whitehead, ed.). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786430601 [24] Birdsall, N. (2015). Does the rise of the mid- dle class lock in good government in the devel- oping world? European Journal of Development Research, 27(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1057/ ejdr.2015.6 97Social Mobility and the Social Representation of Sparkling Wine in Brazil and France [25] Paulson, E. L. (2018). A habitus divided? The effects of social mobility on the habitus and con- sumption. European Journal of Marketing, 52(5/6), 1060–1083. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2017- 0240 [26] Pla, J.L. (2017). Trayectorias de clase y percep- ciones temporales sobre la posición ocupada en la estructura social. Un abordaje multidimensional de las clases sociales argentinas (2003-2011 ). Revista Internacional de Sociología, 75(3), 072. https://doi. org/10.3989/ris.2017.75.3.16.05 [27] Julien, A., & Laflamme, S. (2008). Les pratiques culturelles sont-elles vraiment définies par l’origine de classe sociale ? Sociologie de l’Art, OPuS, 11(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.3917/soart.011.0171 [28] Hemmingsson, T., Lundberg, I., & Diderichsen, F. (1999). The roles of social class of origin, achieved social class and intergenerational social mobility in explaining social-class inequalities in alcoholism among young men. Social Science and Medicine, 49(8), 1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277- 9536(99)00191-4 [29] Coulangeon, P. (2005). Social Stratification of Musical Tastes: Questioning the Cultural Legiti- macy Model. Revue française de sociologie, 46, https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.465.0123 [30] Kastanakis, M. N., & Balabanis, G. (2012). Between the mass and the class: Antecedents of the “band- wagon” luxury consumption behavior. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1399–1407. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.005 [31] Willekens, M., Daenekindt, S., & Lievens, J. (2014). Whose Education Matters More? Mothers’ and Fathers’ Education and the Cultural Participation of Adolescents. Cultural Sociology, 8(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975514533686 [32] Lo Monaco, G., Bonetto, E., Codaccioni, C., Arau- jo, M. V., & Piermattéo, A. (2020). Alcohol’ use’ and ‘abuse’: when culture, social context and iden- tity matter. Current Opinion in Food Science, 33, 9–13. [33] Lo Monaco, G., Tavani, J. L., & Codaccioni, C. (2020). Social factors and preference for quality cues: Towards a social construction of wine quality. Food Research International, 134(April), 109270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109270 [34] Hart, C. L., Smith, G. D., Upton, M. N., & Watt, G. C. M. (2009). Alcohol Consumption Behav- iours and Social Mobility in Men and Women of the Midspan Family Study. Alcohol and Alcohol- ism, 44(3), 332–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/ agn125 [35] Wiedmann, K.-P., Behrens, S., Klarmann, C., & Hennigs, N. (2014). Customer value perception: cross-generational preferences for wine. Brit- ish Food Journal, 116(7), 1128–1142. https://doi. org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2013-0027 [36] Simonnet-Toussaint, C., Lecigne, A., & Keller, P.-H. (2005). Les représentations sociales du vin chez de jeunes adultes : du consensus aux spécificités de groupes. Bulletin de Psychologie, 479(5), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.3917/bupsy.479.0535 [37] Dholakia, U. M., & Talukdar, D. (2004). How social influence affects consumption trends in emerging markets: An empirical investigation of the con- sumption convergence hypothesis. Psychology & Marketing, 21(10), 775–797. ttps://doi.org/10.1002/ mar.20029 [38] Rodrigues, H., Rolaz, J., Franco-Luesma, E., Sáenz-Navajas, M.-P., Behrens, J., Valentin, D., & Depetris-Chauvin, N. (2020). How the country-of- origin impacts wine traders’ mental representation about wines: A study in a world wine trade fair. Food Research International, 137(June), 109480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109480 [39] Lerro, M., Vecchio, R., Nazzaro, C., & Pomarici, E. (2019). The growing (good) bubbles: insights into US consumers of sparkling wine. British Food Journal, 122(8), 2371–2384. https://doi. org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2019-0139 [40] Martinelli, L. A., Moreira, M. Z., Ometto, J. P. H. B., Alcarde, A. R., Rizzon, L. A., Stange, E., & Ehleringer, J. R. (2003). Stable Carbon Isotopic Composition of the Wine and CO 2 Bubbles of Sparkling Wines: Detecting C 4 Sugar Additions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51(9), 2625–2631. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf026088c [41] Verdonk, N., Ristic, R., Culbert, J., Pearce, K., & Wilkinson, K. (2020). Understanding Australian Wine Consumers’ Preferences for Different Spar- kling Wine Styles. Beverages, 6(1), 14. https://doi. org/10.3390/beverages6010014 [42] Velikova, N., Charters, S., Fountain, J., Ritchie, C., Fish, N., & Dodd, T. (2016). Status or fun? A cross- cultural examination of young consumers’ respons- es to images of Champagne and sparkling wine. British Food Journal, 118(8), 1960–1975. https:// doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2015-0497 [43] Rokka, J. (2017). Champagne: marketplace icon. Consumption Markets and Culture, 20(3), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2016.1177990 [44] Arribard, L. (2015). Le marché des vins efferves- cents français (Internal report). Paris. Retrived from UNIGRANS website: https://www.unigrains. 98 Marcos Vinícius Araujo, Grégory Lo Monaco, Kelly Lissandra Bruch fr/wp-content/uploads/ 2017/11/2015-Marche-des- vins-effervescents.pdf [45] Jodelet, D. (1989). Représentations sociales : un domaine en expansion. In D. Jodelet (Ed.), Les représentations sociales (5th ed., pp. 47–78). Par- is : Presses Universitaires de France. https://doi. org/10.3917/puf.jodel.2003.01 [46] Rateau, P., Moliner, P., Abric, J.-C., & Moliner, P. (2012). Social Representation Theory. In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (pp. 477–497). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n50 [47] Moscovici, S. (2003). Representações sociais: inves- tigações em psicologia social (Traduzido). Petrópo- lis: Vozes. [48] Guareschi, P. A. (2007). Psicologia Social e Repre- sentações Sociais avanços e novas articulações. In M. V. Veronese, & P. A. Guareschi (Eds.), Psicolo- gia do cotidiano : representações sociais em ação (pp. 17–40). Petrópolis: Vozes. [49] Moscovici, S. (2000). O fenômeno das represen- tações Sociais. In G. Duveen (Ed.), & P. A. Guare- schi (Trans.), Representações sociais: investigações em psicologia social (pp. 29–109). Petrópolis: Voz- es. [50] Jovchelovitch, S. (2001). Social representations, public life, and social construction. In K. Deaux & G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 165–182). New York (NY): Blackwell. [51] Moliner, P. (2015). Objectivation et ancrage du message iconique. Propositions théoriques et pistes de recherche. Sociétés, 130(4), 81. https://doi. org/10.3917/soc.130.0081 [52] Moscovici, S. (2011). Psicologia das minorias ativas (Pedrinho, trans.). Petrópolis: Vozes. [53] Rodrigues, H., Ballester, J., Saenz-Navajas, M. P., & Valentin, D. (2015). Structural approach of social representation: Application to the concept of wine minerality in experts and consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 46, 166–172. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.07.019 [54] Moscovici, S. (1982). The Comming Era of Rep- resentations. In J.-P. Codol & J.-P. Leyens (Eds.), Cognitive Analysis of Social Behavior. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-94-009-7612-2 [55] Wagner, W. (1993). Can representations explain social behaviour? A discussion of social representa- tions as rational systems. Papers on Social Repre- sentation - Textes Sur Les Représentations Sociales, 2(3), 236–249. [56] Abric, J.-C. (2004). Prácticas sociales y representa- ciones. México: Ediciones Covoacén. [57] Rouquette, M. L. (2009). 5. Pensée sociale et con- tradiction. In M.-L. Rouquette (Ed.), La pensée sociale (pp. 91–98). Toulouse : Erès. https://doi. org/10.3917/eres.rouqu.2009.01.0091 [58] Abric, J.-C. (1994). Les représentations sociales : Aspects théoriques. In J.-C. Abric (Ed.), Pratiques sociales et représentations (pp. 15–46). Paris: Press- es Universitaires de France. [59] Abric, J.-C. (2001). L’approche structurale des représentations sociales : développements récents. Psychologie et Société, 4, 81–116. [60] Lo Monaco, G., Piermattéo, A., Rateau, P., & Tava- ni, J. L. (2017). Methods for Studying the Structure of Social Representations: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Research. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47(3), 306–331. https://doi. org/10.1111/jtsb.12124 [61] Bonetto, E., Girandola, F., & Lo Monaco, G. (2018). Social Representations and Commitment. Euro- pean Psychologist, 23(3), 233–249. https://doi. org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000317 [62] Lo Monaco, G., Girandola, F., & Guimelli, C. (2016). Experiments inter-connecting the structure of social representations, cognitive dissonance, commitment and persuasion: Past, present and future. Papers on Social Representations, 25(2), 5.1-5.25. [63] Piermattéo, A., Lo Monaco, G., & Girandola, F. (2016). When Commitment Can Be Overturned. Environment and Behavior, 48(10), 1270–1291. htt- ps://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515597511 [64] Penz, E. (2006). Researching the socio-cul- tural context: Putting s o cial repres enta- tions theory into action. International Mar- keting Review, 23(4), 418–437. https://doi. org/10.1108/02651330610678985 [65] Delouvée, S. (2016). La théorie des représenta- tions sociales : quelques repères socio-historiques. In G. Lo Monaco, S. Delouvée, & P. Rateau (Eds.), Les représentations sociales. Théories, méthodes et applications (pp. 39–50). Bruxelles : De boeck [66] Culbert, J., Verdonk, N., Ristic, R., Olarte Man- tilla, S., Lane, M., Pearce, K., Wilkinson, K. (2016). Understanding Consumer Preferences for Austral- ian Sparkling Wine vs. French Champagne. Bev- erages, 2(3), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverag- es2030019 [67] Dal Bianco, A., Boatto, V., Trestini, S., & Caracci- olo, F. (2018). Understanding consumption choice of prosecco wine: an empirical analysis using Ital- ian and German Homescan data. Journal of Wine Research, 29(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 9571264.2018.1506322 99Social Mobility and the Social Representation of Sparkling Wine in Brazil and France [68] Onofri, L., Boatto, V., & Bianco, A. D. (2015). Who likes it “sparkling”? An empirical analysis of Pro- secco consumers’ profile. Agricultural and Food Economics, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100- 014-0026-x [69] Cerjak, M., Tomić, M., Fočić, N., & Brkić, R. (2016). The Importance of Intrinsic and Extrin- sic Sparkling Wine Characteristics and Behavior of Sparkling Wine Consumers in Croatia. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 28(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2 015.1053162 [70] Culbert, J. A., Ristic, R., Ovington, L. A., Saliba, A. J., & Wilkinson, K. L. (2017). Influence of pro- duction method on the sensory profile and con- sumer acceptance of Australian sparkling white wine styles. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 23(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/ ajgw.12277 [71] McMahon, K. M., Culver, C., & Ross, C. F. (2017). The production and consumer perception of spar- kling wines of different carbonation levels. Journal of Wine Research, 28(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/09571264.2017.1288092 [72] Fedoseeva, S. (2020). (Dynamic) willingness to pay and e-commerce: Insights from sparkling wine sec- tor in Russia. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jret- conser.2020.102180 [73] Kostovčík, T., Šrédl, K., & Hommerová, D. (2019). Competition in the sparkling wine market in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 32(1), 1–21. https://doi. org/10.1108/IJWBR-07-2017-0048 [74] Rossetto, L., & Gastaldello, G. (2018). The Loyalty Structure of Sparkling Wine Brands in Italy. Jour- nal of Wine Economics, 13(4), 442–450. https:// doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2018.43 [75] Lo Monaco, G., & Guimelli, C. (2008). Représenta- tion sociales, pratique de consommation et niveau de connaissance : le cas du vin. Les Cahiers Inter- nationaux de Psychologie Sociale, (78), 35–50. [76] Lo Monaco, G., Guimelli, C., & Rouquette, M.-L. (2009). Le sens commun actuel à la lumière des petites histoires du passé: analyse diachronique de la représentation sociale du vin. Psihologia Socială, 24(2), 7–28. [77] Lo Monaco, G., Gaussot, L., & Guimelli, C. (2009). Consommation de vin, pensée sociale et construction sociale de la normalité. Pratiques Psychologiques, 15(4), 473–492. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.prps.2009.03.002 [78] Piermattéo, A., Guimelli, C., Lo Monaco, G., & Brel, P. (2012). Représentations sociales et applica- tions dans le champ du marketing du vin. Psiholo- gia Sociala, 29(1), 53–70. [79] Moliner, P., & Lo Monaco, G. (2017). Méthodes d’association verbale pour les sciences humaines et sociales. Fontaine: PUG. [80] Piermattéo, A., Lo Monaco, G., Moreau, L., Giran- dola, F., & Tavani, J. L. (2014). Context variations and pluri-methodological issues concerning the expression of a social representation: The exam- ple of the gypsy community. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/ sjp.2014.84 [81] Piermattéo, A., Tavani, J.-L., & Lo Monaco, G. (2018). Improving the Study of Social Representa- tions Through Word Associations: Validation of Semantic Contextualization. Field Methods, 1–21. [82] Masson, M., Delarue, J., Bouillot, S., Sieffermann, J. M., & Blumenthal, D. (2016). Beyond sensory characteristics, how can we identify subjective dimensions? A comparison of six qualitative meth- ods relative to a case study on coffee cups. Food Quality and Preference, 47, 156–165. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.003 [83] Deschamps, J.-C. (2003). Analyse des correspon- dances et variations des contenus de représen- tations sociales. In J.-C. Abric (Ed.), Méthodes d’étude des représentations sociales (pp. 179–199). Toulouse : Erès. [84] Desrosières, A., & Thévenot, L. (1988). Les caté- gories socio-professionnelles. Paris: Éditions La Découverte. [85] Lebaron, F., & Pereira, L. P. (2015). Outils statis- tiques, outils d’analyse : les nomenclatures socio- professionnelles et les classes sociales en Europe et au Brésil. Brésil(s), 8, 37-72. https://doi. org/10.4000/bresils.1721 [86] Tafani, É., Haguel, V., & Ménager, A. (2007). Des images de marque aux représentations sociales : une application au secteur de l’automobile. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, Numéro 73(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.3917/ cips.073.0027 [87] Lo Monaco, G., Piermattéo, A., Guimelli, C., & Abric, J.-C. (2012). Social Representations, Cor- respondence Factor Analysis and Characterization Questionnaire: a Methodological Contribution. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 1233–1243. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n3.39410 [88] Clemence, A., Doise, W., & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (2014). The Quantitative Analysis of Social Rep- 100 Marcos Vinícius Araujo, Grégory Lo Monaco, Kelly Lissandra Bruch resentations. In The Quantitative Analysis of Social Representations (ebook). https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315040998 [89] Mello, C. E. C. de. (2007). Presença do vinho no Brasil - Um pouco de história (2nd ed.). São paulo: Editora de Cultura. [90] Do, V.-B., Patris, B., & Valentin, D. (2009). Opin- ions on Wine in a New Consumer Country: A Comparative Study of Vietnam and France. Jour- nal of Wine Research, 20(3), 253–271. https://doi. org/10.1080/09571260903471894 [91] Forbes, P. (1967). Champagne - The wine, the land and the people. London: Victor Gollancz LTD. [92] Garrier, G. (1998). Histoire sociale et culturelle du vin. Paris: Larousse. [93] Simonnet-Toussaint, C., Lecigne, A., & Keller, P. H. (2004). Social representation of wine among young adults. Journal International Des Sciences De La Vigne Et Du Vin, 38(2), 97–108. https://doi. org/10.20870/oeno-one.2004.38.2.926 [94] Charters, S., & Pettigrew, S. (2007). The dimen- sions of wine quality. Food Quality and Preference, 18(7), 997–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.food- qual.2007.04.003 [95] Bonetto, E., & Lo Monaco, G. (2018). The funda- mental needs underlying social representations. New Ideas in Psychology, 51(April), 40–43. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.06.003 [96] Rouquette, M. L. (1997). La Chasse à l’immigré : violence, mémoire et représentations. Liège : Mard- aga. [97] Costa, S. (2018). Entangled Inequalities, State, and Social Policies in Contemporary Brazil. In M. YSTANES & I. Å. STRØNEN (Eds.), The Social Life of Economic Inequalities in Contem- porary Latin America (pp. 59–80). https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-61536-3_3 [98] Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social Domi- nance: An intergroup theory of social hierar- chy and oppression. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781139175043 [99] Roy Chaudhuri, H., Mazumdar, S., & Ghoshal, A. (2011). Conspicuous consumption orientation: Conceptualisation, scale development and valida- tion. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(4), 216– 224. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.364