








key: cord-286932-2gjnpqqa
authors: Lee, Yung; Kirubarajan, Abirami; Patro, Nivedh; Soon, Melissa Sam; Doumouras, Aristithes G.; Hong, Dennis
title: Impact of hospital lockdown secondary to COVID-19 and past pandemics on surgical practice: A living rapid systematic review
date: 2020-11-12
journal: Am J Surg
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.11.019
sha: 
doc_id: 286932
cord_uid: 2gjnpqqa

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted surgical practice worldwide. There is widespread concern for surgeon and provider safety, and the implications of hospital lockdown on patient care during epidemics. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PubMed were systematically searched from database inception to July 1, 2020 and ongoing monthly surveillance will be conducted. We included studies that assessed postoperative patient outcomes or protection measures for surgical personnel during epidemics. RESULTS: We included 61 studies relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic and past epidemics. Lockdown measures were noted globally including cancellation of elective surgeries and outpatient clinics. The pooled postoperative complication rate during epidemics was 21.0% among 2095 surgeries. 31 studies followed the health of surgical workers with the majority noting no adverse outcomes with proper safety measures. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights postoperative patient outcomes during worldwide epidemics including the COVID-19 pandemic and identifies specific safety measures to minimize infection of healthcare workers.

The current COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted health services worldwide. 1, 2 There is a concern of nosocomial transmission, shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE), and limited resources for critical patients. [3] [4] [5] [6] As a result, many hospitals have undergone lockdown procedures in which staffing and services are limited. These lockdown procedures have inconsistent policies, often occurring on an urgent basis with little notice or preparation. In previous outbreaks such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Ebola, these precautionary measures have lasted several months with downstream effects on health outcomes. 7, 8 Surgical practice is particularly at risk for lockdowns during outbreaks and epidemics. 9 In particular, there may be a heightened risk for transmission of airborne pathogens during aerosolizing procedures in laparoscopic surgeries, though current evidence is unclear. In addition, there is risk of transmission of blood-borne viruses such as Ebola during accidental injuries. 9, 10 Operation techniques and equipment management may also be altered to reduce contact with potential vectors. 9 In addition, intensive care units and emergency departments are often overwhelmed with critical care patients, with a limited supply of ventilators and bedspace. 4 As such, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently published an interim surveillance was carried out until May 29, 2020. The search strategy (see Appendix 1) was designed in consultation with a medical librarian. This systematic review is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), with the PRISMA flow diagram presented in Figure 1 . 13 

Studies reporting outcomes of patients undergoing surgery during an epidemic-caused hospital lockdown and studies investigating the impact of lockdown on surgical HCW and surgical practice were included. Articles were excluded from our review if they (1) were a review article, case report, letter to the editor, opinion, commentary, or editorial (2) did not contain at least one relevant outcome of interest (3) investigated a lockdown caused by a local hospital outbreak. No language or geographical restrictions were applied. Titles, abstracts, and full-text citations were screened, and conflict was resolved by the third reviewer. Two investigators extracted study data using a standardized spreadsheet, and verification of the extracted data was carried out by a third investigator. The following variables were abstracted from the included studies: study characteristics (e.g. author, year of publication, study design, study duration, country, type of epidemic, type of institution), patient demographics (e.g. number of patients included, age, sex), and study outcomes. Surgical outcomes were reported using the

34 retrospective studies, 16 case series, 5 descriptive studies, and 6 prospective studies represented a combined 3948 patients across 17 countries up to June 2020 (Table 1) . Studies conducted during COVID-19 accounted for 98.6% of the included patients, while 1.2% were from studies during SARS, and 0.15% were from studies during MERS. Among papers describing patient demographics, 53.9% were female and median age was 62.0 years (range 1 -100 years). A total of 455 health care workers were also represented with 70.1% HCW included during COVID-19, 28.1% included during SARS, and 1.8% included during Ebola epidemics.

Hospital lockdown measures were described in 26 studies ( Table 2 ). The most common measures included cancelation of elective surgery as specified in 84.6% of those studies, and a reduction or cancellation altogether of outpatient clinics specified in 23.1% of studies. One study reported stopping all planned activities to convert its centre into a dedicated COVID-19 hospital. 21 Another study described a MERS outbreak resulting from an index case admitted to the cardiac surgery ward with no specific precautions described. 22 None of the included studies reported complete stoppage of educational activities to focus solely on patient care, as reflected by the ACGME Staging System scores. complication rate of 14.5% among studies reporting on complications. The most common complications included death accounting for 41.9% of complications and post-procedural bleeding accounting for 29.0%. As described above for surgical complications, multiple complications may have been reported following a single procedure.

Seven studies (11.5%; 7/61) reported active outpatient clinics during epidemics, though there was an overall reduction of clinic volume by 50% to 75%. Eight studies, all during the COVID-19 epidemics, also reported the use of telemedicine and virtual care modalities for outpatient consults and follow-up appointments. 26-34

Measures to protect surgical personnel during outbreaks were reported in 45 studies (see Table 4 ; detailed overview provided in Supplementary Table 1 ). For the purpose of analysis, protection measures were classified into one of the following categories: PPE (any form of physical protection used by HCW); PRE-OR (any precautions taken preoperatively including modified patient screening and disinfection processes); OR SETUP (measures taken during surgical intervention, such as the use of negative-pressure or segregated ORs); and LOGISTICS (all other measures including modification of work areas, modification of procedures, new hospital protocols and processes, and limitation/modification of HCW roles to help limit and prevent nosocomial disease transmission).

Modified peri-operative logistics were reported in 40 studies describing protection measures. Examples of workspace modifications as described in 20 studies included establishing ultrasound workstations in areas managing infected patients to perform point-of-care lung imaging, having a designated corner in a dialysis unit for the treatment of patients who were J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f suspected/confirmed infected, and designating doctors' and nurses' workstations as the "clean" area of a ward while other areas were considered contaminated. 21,30,35 Procedural and management modification for the purpose of minimizing exposure risk was reported in 25 studies and included measures such as slowing the speed of drilling intra-operatively in neurosurgical procedures, favoring use of percutaneous drainage over ERCP where possible for biliary drainage, and temporarily turning off mechanical ventilation during tracheal incision. [35] [36] [37] Modified hospital rules, protocols and patient transfer processes were described in 26 studies and included limiting or preventing visitations for patients, transferring patients between the ward and OR in a negative-pressure isolation transfer cabin, and use of designated transfer "lanes" between sections of the hospital to limit nosocomial spread. 23,29,35 Fourteen studies described modifying the roles of HCW during epidemics, including formation of an "Emergency Incident Command Team" to identify and separate infected patients from other patients, allowing only essential personnel to be present during procedures, and assigning staff to conduct patient screening full-time. 30 Modification of OR setup to reduce infectious exposure risk was noted in 17 studies describing protection measures. The most common modifications included use of a negativepressure OR for patients suspected or confirmed to be infected, as reported in 10 of these studies.

Other measures included geographically segregating OR complexes to reduce cross-infection, reducing humidity level and temperature of ORs to reduce HCW perspiration, and using plastic drapes around the tracheostomy operative field to create a closed sterile environment. 40, 42, 43 A summary of protection measures is provided in Table 4 . All studies which implemented more than 3 of the listed measures and also reported on HCW outcomes had an infection rate of 0% among HCW. (23/269) of HCW were infected. The other two infections among HCW occurred during the Ebola epidemics, where 25% (2/8) contracted the illness. Both of these HCW had died from the illness and were the only instances of death reported among the 405 HCW included in this review. One study did report the death of a nurse in its traumatology department during COVID-19, though the total number of HCW in the department was not specified and this instance was not captured in the pooled analysis. 21 No infections or adverse outcomes were reported for HCW during the SARS epidemics (0/128) from the included studies.

The rate of HCW infection based on the number of surgeries performed was 3.61% (41 HCW/1136 surgeries) among studies that reported both the number of HCW infected, and the number of surgeries conducted. One HCW was infected for every 27.7 operations performed.

Among studies during the COVID-19 pandemic, the HCW infection rate was 3.92% (39 HCW/995 surgeries) and one HCW was infected for every 25.5 operations performed.

The methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) was used to assess risk of bias in the included studies (Supplementary Table 2 ). 56 studies included in this review were non-comparative with a mean global score of 10.2 (SD 1.7), indicating fair methodological quality. 16 All 56 studies had a clearly stated aim and a loss to follow-up of less than 5% (56/56).

The majority of the studies adequately included consecutive patients (45/56), had adequate endpoints in relation to the stated aims (42/56), and had an appropriate follow-up period (44/56).

One study adequately conducted a prospective calculation of study size (1/56). The remaining 5 studies included in this study were comparative studies with a mean global score of 14 (SD 2.9).

Two of these studies had adequate control groups, 2 had adequate baseline equivalence of groups, and 3 had adequate statistic calculations. Prospective collection of data was reported in 7 studies (7/61). Adequately unbiased assessments of study endpoints were found in 7 studies (7/61). As such, there remain significant evidence gaps for health systems to implement evidence-based surgical care during epidemics.

Overall, our findings contribute to the growing literature on surgical care during the current COVID-19 pandemic. 44 The worldwide shortages in PPE as well as the numerous cases of HCW infection have highlighted the importance of infection control, which has been outlined in our review. 44 In addition, as the novel coronavirus can be transmitted via aerosol particles, there is particular risk of exposure during certain procedures such as endoscopy. Our review outlines potential strategies that have been used to mitigate risk in previous outbreaks, such as the use of negative pressure ORs for intubation. There is also concern for triaging surgical oncology cases, due to preliminary evidence that COVID-19 is dangerous for patients for cancer. 45,46 As a result, the American College of Surgeons has released recommendations for both the triage of non-emergent surgical procedures as well as recommendations for management of elective procedures. 47,48 Many of their guidelines, such as the limitation of non-essential visitors, were similar to the strategies reported in our included studies. The American College of Surgeons especially stresses the importance of PPE, which was highlighted in the included studies that discussed infection control.

However, while the American College of Surgeons recommends the postponement of elective surgeries, this systematic review demonstrates that there is a lack of long-term evidence regarding the potential impact on patient outcomes, particularly patient morbidity and mortality due to cancellations. 47 Of note, our review also found that the overall complication rate did not J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f seem to be increased based on the distribution of elective and emergency cases, as any association with elective surgeries is most likely due to the volume of patients rather than the distribution. In addition, while the American College of Surgeons has oncology-specific guidelines regarding deferral of surgeries and guidelines for multidisciplinary care, more pandemic-specific research is required to substantiate recommendations. 49 Of the included studies, 8 reported on postoperative outcomes following cancer surgeries. None of these studies examined oncology-related outcomes, such as remission rates or changes to chemotherapy cycles.

In addition, none of the included studies analyzed the motivations of surgeons to continue working during epidemics. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been increasing concern regarding HCW absenteeism and willingness to work in hazardous environments, particularly due to shortages in PPE. Previous literature has demonstrated that perceived personal safety was a large factor in whether HCW continue to practice during the previous SARS and influenza outbreaks. 50, 51 As our review outlines several strategies to protect surgical HCW, implementation could be useful in alleviating the anxieties of HCW and encourage frontline practice.

Finally, we did not review the impact of COVID-19 on surgical graduate medical education, which is an emerging area of concern. There is growing evidence that surgical residencies and postgraduate medical education has been significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. [52] [53] [54] Literature has suggested that residents have decreased opportunity to participate in surgical cases. Similarly, one of our included studies noted that operations were more likely to be performed by staff surgeons in comparison to trainees during epidemics. This may be due to university-based safety guidelines, the redirection of trainees to other specialties, J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f as well as reduced surgical volume. Technological options such as virtual curriculums and simulations have been posed in the interim to maintain the education of surgical residents. 55 The main limitation of our systematic review is the lack of published research on surgical care during epidemics. Due to the unpredictable and demanding nature of epidemics, it is often difficult for physicians to prioritize research while in the midst of disease outbreaks. This significantly limits the ability to collect prospective information. As such, much of the available literature was limited to case series and smaller scale retrospective reviews. In addition, considerations from previous pandemics may not necessarily translate to relevance for the COVID-19 pandemic or any future epidemics. The included studies have diverse health systems and delivery models, which reduce generalizability of considerations such as infection control and lockdown guidelines. This is especially relevant for low-resourced health systems, which may face additional shortages. Another limitation of our review is that we were unable to stratify our results in terms of lockdown measures taken, given that this information was reported in fewer than half of the included studies. We are therefore unable to comment on the impact of specific lockdown measures on patient and HCW outcomes.

Ultimately, it is often difficult for institutions to balance providing timely surgical care while ensuring safety during epidemics. While lockdown precautions have been used in previous outbreaks, it is unclear how the reduced access to surgical care will affect patient care in the long-term. In addition, it is unclear how to prioritize surgical care when lockdown precautions are eventually lifted. Future research should analyze the impact of COVID-19 on surgical waittimes and related complications, as well as patient and provider satisfaction. In the meantime, institutions should cooperate with policymakers to determine best precautions for surgical care.

Surgical practice during epidemics affects all levels of the hospital, from creating a new demand J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f on PPE to alleviating burden within the emergency department. As such, decisions regarding surgical care during epidemics should not occur in isolation from other medical specialties.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. 

A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China

Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19

World Health Organization. Shortage of personal protective equipment endangering health workers worldwide

The toughest triage -Allocating ventilators in a pandemic

Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia

Protecting Health Care Workers during the COVID-19

Coronavirus Outbreak -Lessons from Taiwan's SARS response

Can we contain the COVID-19 outbreak with the

Operation Ebola: Surgical Care during the West African Oubreak

Guidance for Risk Assessment and Work Restrictions for Healthcare Personnel with Potential Exposure to COVID-19 | CDC

2019-ncov's epidemic in middle province of northern Italy: Impact, logistic & strategy in the first line hospital

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

The clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience

Three Stages of GME During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education

Cancer Surgery Cases During the Acute and Recovery Phases of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

Survey of Hospital Healthcare Personnel

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Hong Kong in 2003: stress and psychological impact among frontline healthcare workers

Clinic Akron General Urology Residency Program's COVID-19 Experience

Residency and Fellowship Program Accreditation: Effects of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic

Emergency Restructuring of a General Surgery Residency Program during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: The University of Washington Experience

Using Technology to Maintain the Education of Residents During the COVID-19 Pandemic

SARS-CoV-1.mp

SARS-CoV-2.mp

The authors declare no conflict of interest.J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f

Feb to Apr 2020 

COVID-19

COVID-19

â�� â��

COVID-19

COVID-19

â�� â��

COVID-19

COVID-19 

