key: cord-030872-qhyjhk1r authors: Wissow, Lawrence S.; Platt, Rheanna; Sarvet, Barry title: Policy recommendations to promote integrated mental health care for children and youth date: 2020-08-25 journal: Acad Pediatr DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.08.014 sha: doc_id: 30872 cord_uid: qhyjhk1r nan Public health and health care systems face many challenges as indicators of acuity and demand for child mental health services increase. 1,2,3 These systems have not been designed to detect problems early and intervene with potentially preventive interventions. 4, 5 In addition, the child mental health workforce lacks sufficient capacity as it is presently configured. 6 Integration of mental health services into primary care has been promoted as one answer to these challenges, 7 and is endorsed by national and international organizations. 8, 9 Nearly all children have primary care visits, 10 and the philosophy of pediatric primary care in the US is oriented toward universal prevention, surveillance, and early intervention. 11 Primary care providers are seen as credible sources of psychosocial information and guidance, 12 and many families express a preference for getting psychosocial care in a primary care rather than a mental health setting. 13 Some of this preference comes from primary care being a more familiar and potentially less stigmatizing place to receive mental health care, 14 a factor that may be especially salient to patients who already experience racial or ethnic stigma. 15 Incorporating mental health as part of "routine" medical care also sends a message that emotional well-being is an essential part of one's overall wellness. 16 Prior to the beginning of this century, very few pediatricians worked in close coordination with mental health professionals. Despite evidence that child/youth integrated care can be effective and practical, 17, 18 still only about half of US pediatricians consider that they work in practices co-located with a behavioral health professional. 19 Integration continues to face significant barriers, including lack of consensus on how primary care and co-located mental health professionals should share roles, the need for substantial transformation in how practices operate if they are to provide mental health care, 20 financing schemes that do not incentivize treatment in primary care or collaboration with mental health providers, 21 and a lack of mental health practitioners trained to work in primary care settings (especially in linguistically and culturally diverse communities). 22, 23 To these structural barriers, however, additional dilemmas have emerged as the field of integrated care has evolved. First, there is the realization that conceptualizing integrated care as a binary partnership between mental health and primary care does not address the high level of co-occurrence of mental health, developmental, and psychosocial problems that limit the effectiveness of mental health treatments when they are applied in isolation. 24 As the US and much of the world enter into an era of unprecedented social and economic challenge related to the novel coronavirus, which has disproportionately impacted populations already experiencing limited access to mental health services, the need to expand the scope of integration will only become greater. 25 Second, there is the difficulty of translating the most widely known models of integrated care, developed in adult medicine, into pediatrics. 26 Compared to adult integrated care, child mental health integration must contend with presentations that vary significantly with age, which complicates screening and other forms of case-finding. 27 Child mental health treatment relies more on brief, practical psychosocial interventions compared to easier-to-deliver medication titration. 28, 29 In addition, while nearly everyone's mental health is related to that of the people they live with, children's mental health outcomes are particularly dependent on their parents' own mental health, 30 and thus treatment often must include plans to address parents' treatment needs and parent-child interactions. 31 The American Academy of Pediatrics has issued a policy statement outlining what it sees as pediatric providers' responsibilities to address parental mental health, 32 but there remains little precedent for directly addressing parent mental health in pediatric primary care, despite its profound effects on children. 33 To date, integrated care has benefited from attempts at federal, state, and professional society levels to promote its implementation. With some exceptions, however, such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' InCK initiative, and efforts by the American Board of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Pediatrics, 8, 34, 35 there has been a greater emphasis on doing so with care for adults. 36. Other policy analyses have addressed how health systems as a wholeincluding those with integrated care components, can promote child and family well-being in general. 37 The following recommendations focus more narrowly on integrating mental health into pediatric primary care. The recommendations are intended as a guide to policymakers, health system leaders and educators, and research funders; they address four goals that, based on the analysis above, we believe are central to the growth and effectiveness of pediatric integrated care: First and foremost, policies must promote changes in the scope of pediatric primary care so that it can comprehensively address families' psychosocial needs. 38 Multi-generational social and emotional wellness needs to be accepted as an integral part of pediatric care and these aspects of health need to be effectively assessed and treated by pediatricians and/or in collaboration with community-based services that address social determinants of health. 31, 39 State and federal programs have the ability to influence these transformations through regulatory changes, financial incentives, and corresponding technical assistance. Individual providers and health care organizations need the clear guidance, motivation and knowledge of how to go about modifying their practices and building the community alliances they will need to provide truly integrated care. Requiring health care systems to report mental health-related metrics will allow state and federal authorities to optimally leverage incentives. Specific initiatives could include: a. Federal and/or state incentives for implementing "Advanced Medical Home" or "High Performing Medical Home" 40,41 models that are foundations for integrated care. States can support these models by giving practices additional payments if they meet criteria for certification (see financing recommendations below). Incentives could be tailored to reward the use of integrated care to address disparities in mental health services and outcomes, as well as to reward coordination of child/youth and adult mental health services. b. The federal government could expand past policy statements regarding the detection and treatment of parental mental health problems as part of pediatric primary care. 42 Expansions could include that attention to parental mental health extends beyond concern for maternal depression in the perinatal period, as well as stating the appropriateness of including relevant parent mental health information in the child's medical record. These statements, coupled with increased training for pediatricians in the detection and initial assessment of parental health issues, could help to clearly include attention to parental mental health as within the scope of pediatric practice. d. HRSA could expand and institutionalize its support so that all states could have so-called "child psychiatry access programs" that promote interprofessional collaboration and education supporting mental health service delivery in the pediatric primary care. 46, 47 These programs provide informal mental health consultation to primary care providers around specific patient's problems, and many currently have primary care provider training and practice transformation components which could be expanded to include helping integrated behavioral health providers (including those in schools) adopt and use evidencebased brief interventions or telepsychiatry when necessary. Coordinated with these "access programs," states, health care organizations, and philanthropy could fund additional mental health skills training for primary care providers, taking advantage of the "access programs" ability to provide long-term, ongoing consultation and support for practice c. States can expand the use of billing codes that support collaborative work so that both primary care and psychiatric providers can be paid for indirect consultation, case review, and coordination of referrals for both children and parents. 58 As part of paying for collaborative care, states can also allow billing for the services of community health workers or navigators who can link families to needed follow-up services and reinforce/deliver mental health treatments (see below in workforce). d. The federal government and private insurers could allow wider latitude for billing for parent-directed services that also have potential for impact on the child. 42 Third, policies need to encourage development of the workforce so that integrated care can be delivered at scale. 6 Not only is there a general lack of child mental health workforce in most areas of the country, there is an even greater lack of providers trained to work at the interface of medicine, mental health, and community supports. 6, 23, 59 In our increasingly diverse society, this workforce has to speak multiple languages and be capable of delivering care to families from multiple cultures. a. The federal government, states, and philanthropy could subsidize mental health training for peer/community health workers/navigators who would ideally be recruited from diverse communities and whose services could be paid for through Medicaid prevention or case management mechanisms. 56, 60 Subsidies to payers or health care providers could be tied to increasing the linguistic and cultural diversity of the workforce and providing long-term career pathways for those who start out in these important but entry-level positions. 61,62 b. States could finance additional residency/fellowship slots in pediatrics, family practice, and child psychiatry that focus on integrated care. c. States could require exposure to integrated care skills and meaningful training in mental health for any existing slots that the state currently funds, especially those aimed at producing physicians who will go into primary care. 23 States would have more leverage if medical education accreditation and licensing bodies required robust mental health curricular components in training programs for all primary care disciplines including MDs, DOs, physicians assistants and nurse practitioners. 35 d. States could additionally finance slots or tracks in nursing (including advanced practice), social work, and psychology, programs that target work in co-located or community settings. 63,64 Finally, research dollars are needed to develop the case-finding methods and interventions that will bring pediatric integrated care to its full potential. This includes further development of screening processes that promote actionable discussions with families about their psychosocial strengths and weaknesses, trans-diagnostic and trans-system (medical and social) approaches to treatment, 29, 65 more potent and deployable psychotherapeutic interventions suitable for primary care (including those that specifically address parent-child interaction), 33 a. Development and testing of brief, broadband (trans-diagnostic) therapies that can be readily learned by individuals with and without formal mental health training and that can be delivered to families in a variable number of short sessions. 29, 68 b. Adaptation of parent support and parent-child interaction interventions for primary care, both in early childhood and across the pediatric age range. 4, 69 c. Investigation of alternative models of well-child care (such as group visits) that recognize the priority within well-child care for supporting the mental health and psychosocial needs of families. 38, 70 d. Exploration of novel uses of eHealth for providing integrated care services, including expanded use of telemedicine, the use of follow-up text messages and other modalities to prolong the impact of brief in-person mental health interventions, and the integration of on-line treatments for parents and other caregivers into services based in pediatrics. 71, 72 e. Development of efficient training and ongoing support programs for community health workers, peer navigators, and others who can both extend the mental health workforce and increase its capacity for providing care in diverse languages and from diverse cultural perspectives. 73, 74 f. Studying processes related to practice transformation and interaction across systems, 75 with particular focus on 1) methods for including diverse families in the design and adaptation process of interventions, 76 and 2) efficient methods for providing initial and long-term assistance to practices and systems as they implement and refine integrated care. 77 Integrated care is considered to be one of the most promising directions for addressing inadequacies in the delivery of child and youth mental health services. It offers the opportunity to build problem detection and early intervention into an existing system of child health monitoring and promotion, as well as to create a greatly expanded number of sites where child and youth mental health care can be delivered. However, growth of pediatric integrated care continues to face barriers built into the way that pediatric primary care is delivered and financed. Policies need to support transformations in the scope of pediatric primary care, as well as financing mechanisms that make these transformations sustainable. A larger and more diverse mental health workforce will be needed to support an expansion of pediatric integrated care. Training programs for both primary care providers and a variety of current and potential mental health providers must provide clinicians with the skills they need to engage and help families in the primary care setting. Finally, there remains much to be learned about interventions that could make pediatric integrated care more potent and easier to implement. Fortunately, there are strong foundations on which to address all of these needs; it should be possible to coordinate efforts in these directions and move pediatric integrated care forward at a time when it is particularly needed. Time trends in symptoms of mental illness in children and adolescents in Canada Trends in psychiatric emergency department visits among youth and young adults in the US Years in the United States Primary health care: Potential home for familyfocused preventive interventions Preventing the incidence of new cases of mental disorders: a meta-analytic review Leveraging collaborative care to improve access to mental health care on a global scale Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health, Mental Health Leadership Work Group. Mental health competencies for pediatric practice Caring for children and adolescents with mental disorders: setting WHO directions. Geneva, World Health Organization Summary health statistics for U.S. children: National Health Interview Survey, 2010. National Center for Health Statistics Bright Futures in Practice: Mental Health -Volume I, Practice Guide. Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health Which sources of child health advice do parents follow? Patient preferences of a low-income Hispanic population for mental health services in primary care Persons with depressive symptoms and the treatments they receive: a comparison of primary care physicians and psychiatrists Improving treatment engagement of underserved U.S. racial-ethnic groups: a review of recent interventions The untapped power of allostasis promoted by healthy lifestyles Integrated medical-behavioral care compared with usual primary care for child and adolescent behavioral health: A meta-analysis What's known about implementing co-located paediatric integrated care: a scoping review Where is behavioral health integration occurring? Mapping national co-location trends using National Provider Identifier data The need for practice transformation in children's mental health care Improving mental health services in primary care. Reducing administrative and financial barriers to access and collaboration Cross-cultural aspects of depression management in primary care Training in integrated mental health-primary care models: a national survey of child psychiatry program directors The relationship between social risks and the mental health of school-age children in primary care The effects of poverty on the mental, emotional, and behavioral health of children and youth: implications for prevention Collaborative care models for depression: time to move from evidence to practice Prevalence and development of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence Efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and placebo for common psychiatric disorders among children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis Practitioner Review: Empirical evolution of youth psychotherapy toward transdiagnostic approaches Parental depressive symptoms as a predictor of outcome in the treatment of child internalizing and externalizing problems Rethinking evidence-based practice and two-generation programs to create the future of early childhood policy Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. Incorporating recognition and management of perinatal depression into pediatric practice Embedded maternal mental health care in a pediatric primary care clinic: A qualitative exploration of mothers' experiences Preparing future pediatricians to meet the behavioral and mental health needs of children Payment for progress: investing to catalyze child and family well-being using personalized and integrated strategies to address social and emotional determinants of health Six questions for well-child care redesign Optimizing the early parent-child relationship: windows of opportunity for parents and pediatricians AAP Agenda for Children: Medical Home Plan/Pages/AAP-Agenda-for-Children-Strategic-Plan-Medical-Home.aspx Maternal depression screening and treatment: a critical role for Medicaid in the care of mothers and children. Department of Health and Human Services Integrating mental and physical health services using a socio-emotional trauma lens Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Project 2.0: a case study in child psychiatry access program redesign A national examination of child psychiatric telephone consultation programs' impact on children's mental health care utilization Effectiveness of the Extension for Community Health Outcomes model as applied to primary care for autism: a partial stepped-wedge randomized clinical trial Massachusetts Food Is Medicine State Plan Overcoming barriers to rural children's mental health: an interconnected systems public health model Psychometric properties of the emotion dysregulation inventory in a nationally representative sample of youth Pragmatic health assessment in early childhood: the PROMIS® of developmentally based measurement for pediatric psychology Regional health eDecisions: a guide to connecting health information exchange in primary care. AHRQ Publication No. 13-0018-EF Behavioral health services following implementation of screening in Massachusetts Medicaid children Challenge Guide: Payment Reform to Address Social Determinants of Health in Children Fostering social and emotional health through pediatric primary care: a blueprint for leveraging Medicaid and CHIP to finance change Behavioral health integration in pediatric primary care: considerations and opportunities for policymakers, planners, and providers Integrated Pediatric Behavioral Health: Implications for Training and Intervention Models Community health workers for patients with medical and behavioral health needs -Challenges and opportunities Mental illness and well-being: an affect regulation perspective Improving parenting skills for families of young children in pediatric settings: a randomized clinical trial PRIME: A programme to reduce the treatment gap for mental disorders in five low-and middle-income countries A single-session growth mindset intervention for adolescent anxiety and depression: 9-month outcomes of a randomized trial Enhancing parent talk, reading, and play in primary care: sustained impacts of the Video Interaction Project Well-child care clinical practice redesign for serving low-income children A telehealth-enhanced referral process in pediatric primary care: a cluster randomized trial A computer-assisted depression intervention in primary care Lay counselor perspectives of providing a child-focused mental health intervention for children: task-shifting in the education and health sectors in Kenya. Front Psychiatry Ensuring quality in psychological support (WHO EQUIP): developing a competent global workforce Transforming physician practices to patientcentered medical homes: lessons from the National Demonstration Project Co-designing an intervention to prevent overweight and obesity among young children and their families in a disadvantaged municipality: methodological barriers and potentials Change in patient outcomes after augmenting a low-level implementation strategy in community practices that are slow to adopt a collaborative chronic care model: a cluster randomized implementation trial The authors are grateful to Drs. Marian Earls, Jane Foy, J. David Hawkins, and Robert Hilt for suggestions as we compiled this set of policy goals and recommendations.