key: cord-293717-j4w6mq0f
authors: Meza, Herbert Tejada; Lambea Gil, Álvaro; Saldaña, Agustín Sancho; Martínez-Zabaleta, Maite; Juez, Patricia de la Riva; Martínez, Elena López-Cancio; Apilánez, María Castañón; Isasi, María Herrera; Enguita, Juan Marta; Alfonso, Mercedes de Lera; Arenillas, Juan F; Olaizola, Jon Segurola; Fernández, Juan José Timiraos; Sánchez, Joaquín; Castellanos-Rodrigo, Mar; Roel, Alexia; Menéndez, Ignacio Casado; Freijo, Mar; Rodriguez, Alain Luna; Portilla, Enrique Palacio; López, Yésica Jiménez; Castro, Emilio Rodríguez; Rivas, Susana Arias; García, Javier Tejada; Rodríguez, Iria Beltrán; Julián-Villaverde, Francisco; García, Maria Pilar Moreno; Trejo-Gabriel-Galán, José María; Iñiguez, Ana Echavarría; Juste, Carlos Tejero; Lázaro, Cristina Pérez; Moreno, Javier Marta; on behalf of the NORDICTUS Investigators,
title: Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on ischemic stroke admissions and in-hospital mortality in North-West Spain
date: 2020-06-26
journal: Int J Stroke
DOI: 10.1177/1747493020938301
sha: 
doc_id: 293717
cord_uid: j4w6mq0f

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spain has been one of the countries heavily stricken by COVID-19. But this epidemic has not affected all regions equally. We analyzed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital stroke admissions and in-hospital mortality in tertiary referral hospitals from North-West Spain. METHODS: Spanish multicenter retrospective observational study based on data from tertiary hospitals of the NORDICTUS network. We recorded the number of patients admitted for ischemic stroke between 30 December 2019 and 3 May 2020, the number of IVT and EVT procedures, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: In the study period, 2737 patients were admitted with ischemic stroke. There was a decrease in the weekly mean admitted patients during the pandemic (124 vs. 173, p<0.001). In-hospital mortality of stroke patients increased significantly (9.9% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.003), but there were no differences in the proportion of IVT (17.3% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.405) or EVT (22% vs. 23%, p = 0.504). CONCLUSION: We found a decrease in the number of ischemic stroke admissions and an increase in in-hospital mortality during the COVID-19 epidemic in this large study from North-West Spain. There were regional changes within the network, not fully explained by the severity of the pandemic in different regions.

Since the first reported case in early December 2019, severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, known as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), has become pandemic so rapidly that healthcare systems have been overwhelmed all around the world. [1] [2] [3] In Spain, by 16th May, 231,350 cases and 27,650 deaths had been confirmed. 4 Many extreme measures have been taken to contain the spread of the disease, such as locking down communities, which could have affected the optimal stroke care.

Spain has been one of the countries more heavily stricken by SARS-CoV-2, but this pandemic has not affected all regions equally. While some registered more than 3000 cases per day, others did not reach 120. In this context, there is general uncertainty in Spain regarding the real impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on hospital stroke admissions. Moreover, the necessary measures taken by hospitals, aiming to increase healthcare professionals' protection, and government measures to protect at risk patients from unnecessary admission, may have jeopardized the quality of care provided to stroke patients.

We aimed to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak on hospital ischemic stroke admissions as well as the use of reperfusion therapies and inhospital mortality in tertiary referral hospitals from North-West Spain.

This Spanish multicenter retrospective observational study was based on the NORDICTUS network data. NORDICTUS is a research and innovation network in cerebrovascular diseases that brings together all public hospitals with stroke units in North-West Spain, with a global catchment area of 11.5 million inhabitants. According to its territorial division, the Spanish State is divided into 17 autonomous communities (AC) and two autonomous cities, both groups being the highest or first-order political and administrative division in the country. AC are divided into 50 total provinces and NORDICTUS covers 23, grouped in 8 AC represented in Figure 1 , with the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in each region by 14th May. Sixteen of the 18 referral centers of the network offered their data. During pandemic, none of the participating regions changed its prehospital ischemic stroke care.

Epidemiological data of COVID-19 cases were obtained from the Ministry of Health, Consumer Affairs and Social Welfare. It considers confirmed cases those who have a positive polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2. Due to a change in the counting system in the AC of Galicia, historical data from that administration were obtained from its regional Department of Health (Conselleria de Sanidade). 5, 6 Study population

We reviewed the data from tertiary hospitals of the NORDICTUS network and recorded the number of patients admitted for ischemic stroke between 30 December 2019 and 3 May 2020. We grouped the cases in two periods, according to the setting of the state of emergency in Spain (14 March 2020) and considering the start of the COVID-19 period as the 11th week (W11) of 2020. We also recorded the number of intravenous (IVT) and endovascular treatments (EVT), as well as wake-up strokes or unknown-onset time. Finally, in-hospital mortality was recorded and analyzed as the key quality indicator of the stroke care process. Sixteen centers from eight different Spanish AC participated in this study.

We used descriptive statistics to compare the incidence of stroke admissions before and after the setting of the state of emergency in Spain, expressed in strokes per week (W) and the differences between the other study variables (IVT, EVT, in-hospital mortality, and wake-up strokes or unknown-onset time) in those periods. Qualitative variables are described using counts and percentages, and continuous quantitative variables as means with standard deviation and medians with interquartile ranges when necessary. Comparisons between groups were made using chi-square tests for comparing categorical variables and the Student test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables; p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Statistics 20.

The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of each participating center. Treatment of every data obtained in the registry was done following the Spanish data protection law (Data Protection and Digital Rights Guarantee Act).

In total, 2737 patients with ischemic stroke (male 1476, 53.5%; average age 73.5 years, SD AE 6.0) were attended to any of the hospitals participating in the study between 30 December 2019 and 3 May 2020. Table 1 shows global and specific results for each hospital and grouped by regions. Globally, there was a weekly average of 173 (IQR (interquartile range) 171.0-178.5) ischemic stroke admissions before the setting of the state of emergency against 124 (IQR 114.8-134.3) afterward (p < 0.001) ( Table 1 ). This drop in stroke cases occurred progressively from week 11 (W11, 9-15th March), persisting over time despite the decrease in confirmed cases of COVID-19, but it did not occur homogeneously in each hospital; the reduction was only significant in 6 out of 16 centers (Table 1, Figure 2 ).

There were no differences in the proportion of ischemic stroke undergoing IVT (17.3% vs. 16.1%, p ¼ 0.405) or EVT (22% vs. 23%, p ¼ 0.504) during the pandemic or in the proportion of wake-up/ unknown-onset strokes (39.4% vs. 39.1%, p ¼ 0.887). In-hospital mortality of stroke patients increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic (6.5% vs. 9.9%, p ¼ 0.003) ( Table 1 ).

This study demonstrates a decrease in stroke admissions and an increase in stroke mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic across 16 centers within the NORDICTUS network including Arago´n, Asturias, Cantabria, Castilla y Leo´n, Euskadi, Galicia, La Rioja, and Navarra in North-West Spain.

On 14 March 2020, the Government of Spain implemented extraordinary measures to control viral transmission, restricting free mobility over the entire country equally. This was reinforced from 31st March to 11th April, with essential workers the only ones allowed to leave their homes. These restrictions have been maintained until 4th May (W18). Since then, there has been a gradual return to normal by stages and which has varied between provinces. To date, Castilla y Leo´n is among the territories which maintain the most restrictive measures in Spain.

A decrease in hospital admissions for ischemic stroke in Europe is a situation that has already been referred to in different scientific media, 7-9 but just described in two regional studies. 10, 11 This is the first study of which we are aware describing this phenomenon in hospitals from different regions throughout a wide coverage area in this continent. We found a decrease in the absolute number of ischemic strokes admissions, and although this was observed in all of the hospitals participating in the study, it only reached statistical significance in 6 out of 16 centers. If we group them by AC, the proportion increases so that only three out of eight territories (Cantabria, La Rioja, and Navarra; uni-provincial AC) did not show a significant decrease.

The magnitude of the decrease varied markedly between study centers. This varied from a drop in ischemic stroke cases of more than 50%, in three most International Journal of Stroke, 0(0) affected hospitals compared to a drop of less than 10% drop in the three least affected hospitals (Table 1) . In some cases, the variations were seen even despite being in the same AC and apparently with no correlation with the COVID-19 cases per week curves for each region ( Figure 2 ). One example is the steep decline observed in hospitals from Asturias, which was less effected by COVID-19 cases than other regions. Possible explanations for the decrease in ischemic stroke admissions have been suggested. [10] [11] [12] These include changes in social behavior or attitude, minor non-disabling strokes staying at home, or admission to hospital isolation units where stroke might not be the major issue, or not enough attention being made to diagnose stroke. An argument against small strokes not being referred to hospital is our regional study from Arago´n, one of the AC within the NORDICTUS network, in which we did not find a higher proportion of patients with higher NIHSS or lower ASPECTS compared to the pre-COVID period. 10 Others speak about a possible real decrease in the incidence of strokes due to a reduction of risk factors such as air pollution. 9, 13 The increase in mortality, above the usual values in our area, 14 could be explained by some of the previously described situations, or others such as fewer minor stroke admissions, increasing the proportion of severe ischemic strokes. It may also reflect an increase in stroke severity in patients with co-existent COVID-19 infection. 15 Some authors have described a decrease in the number of IVT and EVT during this period. 11 We also found this, but with no change in the proportion of treatments performed, similar to the findings of Zhao et al., who suggest the drop in the absolute number of IVT and EVT cases merely reflects the decline in stroke admissions. 12 To the best of our knowledge, this study offers the biggest European sample to analyze the influence of COVID-19 pandemic in ischemic stroke admissions. We found a decrease in the number of ischemic stroke admissions and an increase in in-hospital mortality. Healthcare systems should be rapidly adapted to implement systems for COVID-19 care, but also to ensure the usual and effective stroke care despite system reorganizations. Since stroke is a life-threatening condition, it is important not to neglect the usual level of stroke care regardless of the difficult situation derived from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Our study has some limitations. The main limitation is inherent to its retrospective, observational nature. Besides, we did not investigate the incidence of virus infection among patients with stroke or whether it affected stroke outcomes. We did not obtain other stroke characteristics that could help to analyze the causes of the increasing mortality.

Second, although we analyzed data from sixteen hospitals with stroke units belonging to eight AC from the North of Spain, some ischemic strokes in the region are not admitted to these hospitals but instead to small hospitals without stroke units. However, due to their role as reference centers and as the hospitals with the highest volume of stroke patients in the area, we believe our data give a valid representation of the impact of COVID-19 in ischemic stroke over the whole region.

Finally, our results might not be extrapolated to other countries or regions with different stroke care protocols and different social and healthcare responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.

WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic

Covid-19 -navigating the uncharted

Covid-19: doctors are told not to perform CPR on patients in cardiac arrest

Datos agregados notificados por las

Xunta de Galiza. Datos de notifi-cacio´n de casos en Galicia

Likely increase in the risk of death or disability from stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic

Stroke care at the time of COVID-19 outbreak

Express: COVID-19 and stroke -a global World Stroke Organization perspective

Ischaemic stroke in the time of coronavirus disease

Impact of the Covid-19 outbreak on acute stroke pathways -insights from the Alsace region in France

Impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on stroke care and potential solutions. Stroke. Epub ahead of print 20

The Baffling case of ischemic stroke disappearance from the casualty department in the COVID-19 era

A set of care quality indicators for stroke management

Brain Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Complications of COVID-19

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: JF Arenillas reports having received honoraria as speaker/consultant for the following companies: BI, Pfizer, Daiichi, Bayer, Amgen, and Medtronic. E Palacio Portilla reports having received honoraria as speaker/consultant for the following companies: Esteve, Rovi, MSD and AMGEN. The rest of the authors have no conflict of interests.

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Herbert Tejada Meza https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6506-1037 Á lvaro Lambea https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1785-9201 Juan F Arenillas https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7464-6101 Jose´Marı´a Trejo-Gabriel-Gala´n https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9591-8452
