Microsoft Word - Artikel Karolus 2


E-Journal of Cultural Studies                                                  Feb 2020 Vol. 13, Number 1, Page 9-14   
DOAJ Indexed (Since 14 Sep 2015) 
ISSN 2338-2449                                                                                    https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ecs/ 

9 
 

 
THE DYNAMIC OF CACI MULTIFUNCTION IN MANGGARAI ETHNIC 

NOWADAYS 
 

Karolus Budiman Jama1, I Wayan Ardika2, I Ketut Ardhana3, I Ketut Setiawan4 

 
1Nusa Cendana University,2,3,4Cultural Studies Study Program, Faculty of Arts, Udayana 

University 
 

email: 1karolus1007@yahoo.com , 2ardikawayan52@gmail.com, 
3phejepsdrlipi@yahoo.com, 4setiawan58@yahoo.com  

 
 

Received Date : 19-11-2019 
Accepted Date : 03-01-2019 
Published Date : 29-02-2020 

 
ABSTRACT 

 
Manggaraian ethnic has a special art named Caci. The art holds and became an identity of 
the whole of Manggaraian. The art was begun as the ritual of farmer’s land fertility. In its 
developing, the aesthetic has gone under the multifunction in it show time. The art is not only 
performing for the shake of the local people culture, but also perform for the political interest 
as well as the catholic church in Mangggarai.  This research used ethnographic method, data 
collected through the observation, interview, documentation, and triangulation. The research 
was done in Manggaraian ethnic of Flores. Every Caci performance has its own unique 
ideology. The ideology goes behind the cultural Caci performance is the ideology of fertility. 
The ideology goes behind the government interest of Caci performance is capitalism 
economy and political power.  The church ideology is inclusivism through the inculturation 
languages.  
Key word: dynamic, multifunction, caci, ideology, culture identity 
 
 
INDTODUCTION 

Manggaraian ethnic is one of numbers of ethnic spread out through Flores island of 

East Nusa Tenggara Province. The ethnic of Manggarai known with is art called Caci. The 

art of Caci valued as the unifier in diversity of subculture of Manggaraian ethnic. The art that 

was begun as the fertility ritual of the local farmers as well as performs for the other five 

important cultural rituals. 

Now days, Caci is not perform only for interest of cultural ritual, but also on some 

ceremonies, either it is government ceremonies, Catholic church in Manggarai or the other 

ceremonies such as thanks giving ceremony as well as the political achievement. The 

dynamic of multifunction of Caci performance is not only related to cultural ceremonies, but 

also related to its esthetic value. The dynamic can be seen through the shapes and the style 



E-Journal of Cultural Studies                                                  Feb 2020 Vol. 13, Number 1, Page 9-14   
DOAJ Indexed (Since 14 Sep 2015) 
ISSN 2338-2449                                                                                    https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ecs/ 

10 
 

of the esthetic. The dynamic of multifunction implicates to the social life, religion, and the 

culture of Manggarai ethnic.  

The implication and expansion of Caci performance showing the interested point of 

the art. The government of Manggarai and catholic church assume that the art that is unified 

the subcultural of Manggarai ethnic is capable in managing local potentiality. The potential 

religiosity  toward the catholic belief, political potential to get the people interest, and the 

economy in industry cultural. Even, some individua Caci perform for the shake of political 

achievement. For example, the chosen one in political competition. The aesthetic value of 

Caci has power and interesting point in multifunction dynamic that goes to the deepest point 

of Caci ideology in the practical of social, cultural, economy, and politic in Manggarai. The 

expansion of dynamic multifunction of Caci aesthetic comes up with new ideologies in 

aesthetic value of Caci nowadays.  

 

RESEARCH METHOD 

The research method used in this research is ethnographic method. Atkinson and 

Hammersley (Denzin &Lincon, 2009: 325) stated that the characteristic of ethnographic is 

seems exist, ethnographic texts conventionality, representation of self and other in those text, 

the character of ethnographic as the genre textual, the characteristic of base argumentation 

of ethnographic, and rhetoric proven. The fours method of data collection used in this 

research were observation, interview, documentation, and triangulation or merging, ( 

Sugyono, 2013). The location of the research was done in Manggarai ethnic of Flores. The 

informant selection was done by purposive and snowball, which was sourced from the 

speaker and the doer of Caci. After data collected, the proceed to the analysis based on the 

culture paradigm study. Data presentation is done verbally and through pictures illustration.  

 

RESULT AND DISCUSSION  

The Caci aesthetic tradition was begun from the farmer’s land fertility. The ceremony 

is done for thank giving toward the creator through the worship of the ancestor and the 

worship to nature. The tradition is then brought along with other thank giving ceremony among 

the five cultural ceremonies and became a legitimation up on the cultural ceremonies. It is 

related to the draft of habit and domain according to Bourdieu (Takwindalam Harker, 2009:xx) 

stated that the practical of aesthetic Caci is related product from the habitual as the histories 



E-Journal of Cultural Studies                                                  Feb 2020 Vol. 13, Number 1, Page 9-14   
DOAJ Indexed (Since 14 Sep 2015) 
ISSN 2338-2449                                                                                    https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ecs/ 

11 
 

product of civilization of Manggarai ethnic. Caci aesthetic is product from the field of efforts in 

Manggarai ethnic.  

The power of Caci aesthetic tradition is on the holly ceremony before and after the 

Caci performed. The Caci player also doing the purifying ceremony individually before the 

Caci performance. The purifying ceremony then implicate not to have sexual harassment as 

the prohibition during the purifying session as well as not to make other people get hurt. In 

this context Caci aesthetic is domain of self purifying and life reflection domain. The process 

of purifying which is by Langer (Djelantik, 1999: 154) stated that art is the representation 

towards the value for life. Langer’s view is same as schiller (Sugiharto, 2013) that human 

being as a soul are able to see deeper his spirituality. The soul is able to control the power, 

sense of careless, desires, greedy desire, change them in to love solidarity, humble, and 

compassion became a noble.  

The special model of Caci aesthetic tradition is relied on the power of ceremony’s soul 

that able to control the desires. The dimension of the aesthetic Caci tradition is practice in 

ritual of ancestor feeding in the night time before departure, on the day of departure( in local 

language wuatwa’i), crossing the river between the two villages as the host of Caci 

performance which called letangwae, Welcoming ritual, the ritual of walking around the altar 

of scarification it called lilik, and ended with Caci ritual called caca selek.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The practical reality of Caci performance in its developing, is not only perform by local 

people, but also by the government as well as the catholic church in Manggarai. Since the 

regency of Manggarai formed legally and formally on 14 august  1958 or it is now called 

  

  



E-Journal of Cultural Studies                                                  Feb 2020 Vol. 13, Number 1, Page 9-14   
DOAJ Indexed (Since 14 Sep 2015) 
ISSN 2338-2449                                                                                    https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ecs/ 

12 
 

KabupatenManggarai. Government especially under the leadership of Frans Sales Lega, 

Caci seems like an interesting point all at once as the important identity that should be taking 

care and be defended.  

The government through the regency, subdistrict, village, are became hands to collect 

people to perform Caci in order to commemorate the independent day of the Republic of 

Indonesia every august. The Caci performance became a standard made by the government 

that is leading by new era government. Maria Erbin the book entitled “Adat dan Politik 

Indonesia” stated that since the new order government of Manggarai regency has done the 

Caci performance and the cultural art competition. The activity that is mentioned above is 

done in order to find out the standard and become an identity of Manggarai ethnic as national 

culture. In addition, the performance of cultural art for the shake of tourism as the contributor 

of national infrastructures (Davidson, dkk. 2010: 275). 

For the shake of inculturation, the catholic church in Manggarai also perform Caci. 

Jehandut (2012: 99) said that, firstly the church has to fertilize the wealth of religion from the 

nations. Second, acknowledged the pluriform of liturgy as the creation of holly spirit. Third, 

the church should become a pioneer and adapting the liturgy to the culture and tradition of 

nations. Fourth, for the shake of authentic belief, the church has to do radical renewal based 

on the incarnation demands and based on unity principles as the shape of cultural. The 

catholic church believes that the local culture of Caci as the unique wealth based on 

experiences religion-aesthetic Manggarai ethnic. The church believes Caci has religion 

values and unity. The value then taken as language and the spirit of the church in performing 

Caci. The church performs Caci during the purification of the priest, building up the church, 

and division or inauguration of parish.  

Nowadays, the dynamic of aesthetic multifunction of Caci, in the practical 

performance, Caci either by the government or the church are implicated to the standard 

design and style. The standardize of practical are accordingly to the need and shake of Caci 

performed. Those design are mixing the position of the players who become a host and the 

invited players. There is no limit between the host players and the invited players as in the 

tradition of Caci itself. There is no sacred and magical situation appeared during the Caci 

performance undergoing by the government and the church as basic Caci performance used 

to be. The ceremony doing by the government and the church seems like a simulation or a 

fake awareness about Caci dance. In one hand, it is an awareness of doing the ritual, but on 

the other hand it is delegitimate the ritual. There are some circumstances dealing with 



E-Journal of Cultural Studies                                                  Feb 2020 Vol. 13, Number 1, Page 9-14   
DOAJ Indexed (Since 14 Sep 2015) 
ISSN 2338-2449                                                                                    https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ecs/ 

13 
 

delegitimate of the ritual, for example doing the ritual as if there is an altar of scarification, 

moreover in the practicalCaci is not performed as in its tradition.  

Caci performed by the government and the church are made as their design either the 

location or the draft that supported the Caci is being performed. For example, Caci performed 

by the government, the ideology of Caci being performed is a political power and economy 

issues.  

Reading the dynamic of Caci multifunction is strongly indicated as Foucault said that 

there is a controlling power on the players and the local people by the government and the 

church in Manggarai. As Foucault writtenDiscipline and punish and history of sexuality that is 

how he isolate and conceptualize the way where all bodies are become the most important 

component for the relationship of power and the modern society (Santoso, dkk. 2015). He 

also stated that the years dominance rulersaffected by the political and intellectual authority 

that supported by the government as the ideology being run in the discourse (Ratna, 2011). 

In the context of power and political ideology, Caci is perform in the field which has a 

great stage. People who watch the performance of Caci are looking directly forward to the 

great stage. These kind of design are made to watch the official who watch the Caci 

performance. The blueprint of Caci performance location as well as the set of Caci players 

when they sing a folk song are directly overlooking to the stage that has been prepared. The 

kind of design are contradicted to the tradition Caci itself. The most important of tradition of 

Caci is that the sacrifice altar is not block by anyone in the performance. The place of 

nagagolo lying down and all souls who protect the village. It is made in order to avoid from 

great wound and disorder during the Caci performance. Dealing with the economic ideology, 

the government also doing it to support the tourism. It is supported by the attendance of 

foreigners who come to watch Caci dance performance by becoming a honoring first hit and 

involving in dende. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

  



E-Journal of Cultural Studies                                                  Feb 2020 Vol. 13, Number 1, Page 9-14   
DOAJ Indexed (Since 14 Sep 2015) 
ISSN 2338-2449                                                                                    https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ecs/ 

14 
 

 

CONCLUSION  

Based on the dynamic multifunction of ManggarainessCaci dance performance 

nowadays, it is found that the performance of characteristic design and ideology. It is different 

between the characteristic of tradition Caci performance the Caci dance perform by the 

government and the catholic church in Manggarai. The difference is tradition Caci is perform 

for ritual space and self-purifying. While, Caci performance by the government and the 

catholic church is a Caci profanity. The ideology of tradition Caci is the ideology of fertility. 

While, the ideology of Caci perform by the government is the ideology of political power and 

economy capitalism, and the catholic church ideology of Caci is inclusivism through 

inculturation languages.  

 
 

REFERENCES 
 
Bonefasius Jehandut. 2012. Uskup Wilhelmus Van Bekkum & Dere Serani Mengintegrasikan 

Unsur Religiositas Asli Mansyarakat Manggarai ke Dalam Liturgi. Jakarta: Nera 
Pustaka. 

Denzin & Lincoln. 2009. Hand Book of Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar:  

  Djelantik, M. A.A. 1999. Estetika. Bandung: MSPI. 

Jamie. S. Davidson, dkk. 2010. Adat Dalam Politik Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor 
Indonesia. 

Nyoman Kuta Ratna. 2011. Teori, Metode dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka 
Pelajar. 

Richard, Harker, dkk. 2009. Pengantar Paling Komprehensif kepada pemikiran Pierre 
Bourdieu. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra 

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.CV. 

 Sugiharto, Bambang. 2013. Untuk Apa Seni. Bandung: Matahari.