college and research libraries the printed book catalogue in american libraries: 1723-1900. by jim ranz. (acrl monograph no. 26) chicago: ala, 1964. vii, 144 p. paper. $3. (6417055). the scope of this study is broader than its title suggests; it is actually a concise history of cataloging in the united states to 1900. in fact, this slender volume comes close to being a terse history of american librarianship, thus demonstrating the central role that cataloging has played in library development. the great names in american librarianship of the period are all here, charles c. jewett ("probably the outstanding librarian of the day"), william f. poole, charles a. cutter, melvil dewey, and william i. fletcher, along with many of lesser stature. the contribution of each is told succinctly. although biographical data are kept to a bare minimum, the personalities of these men are still clearly discernable. issued originally in 1960 at the university of illinois as a doctoral dissertation comprising some 332 pages, this work has been effectively abridged to about one-third its original length. although produced inexpensively from typewritten copy, the volume is attractively printed and is free from typographical ,errors. the author's style is brisk, his words are well chosen, and, though a predilection for library history is probably requisite to the choice of this book for sunday afternoon reading, it deserves the attention of every responsible cataloger and library administrator. its ninety-nine pages of text provide the over-all view of the evolution of the dictionary catalog that is essential not only to understand why cataloging is done as it is today, but also as a basis for considering alternatives to current practice. noting the misplaced enthusiasm that greeted such an impractical innovation as the "rudolph indexer" in the early 1890's should give one pause before waxing eloquent over a modern counterpart. the treatment is in part chronological and in part topical, with, a brief initial section on the european cataloging heritage review articles with which our colonial librarians began. the formulation of cataloging rules, the framing of subject headings, the evolvement of corporate entry, and the long debate over the very purpose of a catalog are all treated with remarkable clarity. although not purporting to -trace the development of the card catalog, dr. ranz has, nevertheless, provided the essential historical data on its origin. the natural progression from the preparation of copy for a printed catalog on slips or cards, to the use of these same slips or cards as entries in a catalog arranged in drawers, first for the exclusive use of librarians, then for the public, is related simply and convincingly. during the course of his study, dr. ranz examined some one thousand library catalogs published by american libraries. "the great majority of them," he reports, "were rather poorly done, exhibited few innovations in cataloging techniques, and were frank imitations of the leading library cata. logs of the day." of these one thousand, ranz describes 179 "which, collectively, embody most of the significant developments in printed book catalogs prior to the end of the nineteenth century." this list, filling some fifteen pages, should prove a valuable source to future students of cataloging history. there is also a bibliography of the books and periodical articles that the author found "most useful."-russell e. bidlack, university of michigan. the myth of the britannica. by harvey einbinder. new york: grove press, 1964. 390p. harvey einbinder, a consulting physicist, appears to be a disillusioned young man. until a few years ago he had assumed, as had most people, that whatever he read in the encyclopaedia britannica was accurate and reasonably up-to-date. then one day he discovered that the article on galileo in the 1958 edition of the set still retained the legend of the leaning tower, disproved by cooper more than twenty years before. 432 college and research libraries college and research libraries membership subscription to the society is $6.00 per annum, a fee entitling each individual member to all publications. a l though the gutenberg-festschrift (i.e., volume x x v of the jahrbuch) is being sold for $14.27 in the book trade, it is still possible to acquire it as a part of the relatively modest membership fee for 1949-50. memberships are received by d r . aloys ruppel, director of the society, at rheinalle 3 3/10, mainz, germany (french z o n e ) . — l a w rence s. thompson, university of kentucky libraries. subject cataloging in germany lehrbuch der sachkatalogisierung. von heinrich roloff. leipzig, otto harrassowitz, 1950. xii, h5p. t h e problem of subject cataloging is considerably more complicated in europe than it is in america for the average research library simply because of the age of the holdings and the nature of the cataloging traditions. with a few exceptions, american research libraries began to assume significant proportions only in the latter part of the nineteenth century; and before acquisition rates were stepped up to the present astronomical proportions, widely accepted cataloging codes, classification schemes and subject heading systems had taken hold in america. precisely the opposite is true in europe. moreover, european library systems have never combined attempts to serve scholars as well as the masses, and neither has the european university library ever had to serve undergraduates comparable to ours. roloff, librarian of the deutsche akademie der wissenschaften in berlin, is thus free to describe a multiplicity of practice in this textbook without feeling obligated to set up inflexible standards or condemn apparently clumsy systems which originated in past generations and have been adapted to peculiar institutional needs. he does not offer a "sachkatalogische kodifikation" such as hans trebst demanded in his article, " d e r heutige erkenntnisstand in der formalund in der sachkatalogisierung," zentralblatt fiir bibliothekswesen, l i (1934), 449; but he does present a quite complete survey of current cataloging problems in germany and a number of points of departure for constructive discussion. t h e text is divided into four sections: ( 1 ) historical development of subject cataloging together with definitions and a statement of functions; (2) t h e problems involved in shelving books (formats; shelving in alphabetical order, by numerus currens, by groups, by classification; housing new acquisitions; call numbers); (3) shelf lists in general and for shelving by numerus currens, by groups and in alphabetical order; (4) t h e classed catalog, with discussions of the basis of classification, a description of various classification schemes (with special attention to the basic decimal classification as well as its variants), the logic of form divisions and subdivisions, the shorthand of notation, conspecti (rotuli) and subject indices and classed catalogs as shelflists or as^subject guides independent of shelving systems; and (5) t h e rules for a subject catalog with special attention to the form of the headings, filing and a tentative subject heading code. it is particularly interesting in the latter case to note how many common sense rules for the establishment of new headings transcend linguistic and national differentiation and would seem to be well-nigh universally applicable. for this very reason it is regrettable that roloff did not cite practices in english-speaking countries more extensively. except for the section on the decimal classification little discussion is devoted to routines familiar to us; and of the 85 references in the bibliography, all were printed in europe. on the other hand, this book grew from lectures in a library school and was intended as a textbook for german students of librarianship; and we can only wonder whether anyone doing a similar book in this country would have given equal attention to the european literature of subject cataloging. nevertheless, a similar book is needed in english, and when it is published, it should refer frequently to the european practices described by roloff.—lawrence s. thompson, university of kentucky libraries. 302 college and research libraries college and research libraries marc; user programs and package deals; subject retrieval in u.k. marc; why marc?; rules for alphabetical filing by computer; marc in a special library environment, marc in the current scene; marc and the future in libraries; marc and the national bibliography. the purpose of the seminar was to consider the several facets of marc so that a better evaluation of the relevance of a centrally produced, machine-readable, catalog record can be made, and also so that the designers of the system ( s) can bend it to the requirements more effectively. each paper is tied to the basic acceptance of standardization. this standardization of a cataloging code, a book numbering scheme, and a subject retrieval system, such as a classification scheme, is implicit, perhaps assumed in all presentations. in some instances marc appears to be almost an afterthought, and indeed, several authors acknowledge this. such is the case in the paper on computer filing, subject retrieval and to some extent that of the british national bibliography. but this should not be considered a fault in light of the stated purpose of the seminar; also, the reader can project for himself the impact of marc. there are several aspects of the seminar which appear most refreshing. one of these is the attitude of both the authors and the participants who have apparently assumed that the projects and its problems are cooperative, that the solutions are a national concern, and that only by working through a central organization (in this case bnb) with government support can marc be used effectively. there are few illusions in relation to financial investment. one paper leaves the reader with a vaguely negative feeling, but generally the attitude is one of positivism and imagination, as well as a seemingly clear idea of the task ahead. another refreshing note is provided by the papers themselves. they are short, concise, to the point, and substantive, not only in relation to marc and its characteristics but also to general library problems, e.g.: the card catalog versus the book catalog; doing speedily what does not need to be done at .all; and the varying requirements of libraries. all too often seminar and conrecent publications i 231 ference presentations fall so far short of being either substantive or informative, so that it is truly a work of art to provide both. why is the volume of any use to the american librarian? mr. batty in his discussion supports the preliminary work of marc i and four experimental studies done in the united states, and cautions the british librarian not to minimize it. american librarians can and should learn a great deal from these papers. some of the positive, constructive attitude of our british counterparts is sorely needed. the identification and description of specific problems is well done and would be helpful for librarians planning for marc in the u.s. a very pertinent .analogy is provided by p. r. lewis in his discussion of marc and the future of libraries based on what he labels the "tower crane syndrome." this identifies a prevalent attitude and approach of many american librarians and systems designers which must be avoided. hopefully, the centralized, cooperative answers provided by these papers may filter into the planning and design of american library systems. this small volume is recommended to the library administrator and library school student because of the information it provides, and to the technical service and systems personnel for both the information .and the identification of problems and pitfalls it provides.-ann f. painter, drexel university. introduction to cataloging. vol. 1: descriptive cataloging and an overview of catalogs and cataloging. john j. boll. (mcgraw-hill series in library education) new york: mcgraw-hill, 1970. 400p. $6.95. this text is the first of three volumes which, when used together, form an inb·oduction to cataloging. volume one covers descriptive cataloging, volume two will cover personal name entry headings, and volume three will treat the subject approach to cataloging. these texts are designed for individual study, for extension courses, and as a substitute for formal classroom instruction. volume one is a combination of text il' 232 i college & research libraries • may 1971 lustrations, and exercises, with answers provided in an accompanying answer book. after providing a general discussion of cataloging, types of catalogs, catalog arrangements, and catalogs as compared to bibliographies and indexes, boll attempts to summarize the logic behind cataloging and cataloging rules and to explain and illustrate the most important rules for monographs, cited by rule number, in the anglo-american cataloging rules, north american text. coverage includes card format, punctuation, title statement, author statement, edition statement, imprint, collation, series statement, notes, and a good summa1y which stresses the variations found in cataloging due to individual judgment, local needs, and rules which change with time. exercises reinforce principles and allow the student to test comprehension. the general explanations are basically sound and clear. unfortunately, the text is marred by errors, occasional oversimplifications, and belaboring of the obvious. there are typographical errors and problems for which an answer is incorrect or omitted in the answer book. the desire for clarity often results in a misleading statement such as: "we prepare a catalog by creating a description of, say, a book and then filing multiple copies of that description under entry headings for the names of persons who helped to create its intellectual content (usually this is only one author) and under subject headings for all subjects with which it deals thoroughly." multiple and corporate authorship occur as frequently as single authorship, and catalogers seldom list more than three subject headings for a book. introductory remarks on good study methods are trivial, and the sixty pages devoted to the format of a catalog card are excessive. the problems are neither difficult nor challenging. at a time when many library schools require only one cataloging course of students and when publication and use of nonbook materials is increasing rapidly, a beginning graduate-level course must cover more details of descriptive cataloging than this text does, in spite of boll's assertion that a suitable level of bibliographical precision should not be confused with detail. boll states that the principles of monographic description can be applied to the other forms of material. such application is not as simple for students as he implies, and some exposure to serials and the major nonbook materials is desirable. the oversimplified and narrow coverage stems, in this reviewer's opinion, from the attempt to have one text serve all cataloging students, whether in extension, undergraduate, or graduate courses. the amount of material covered and the degree of difficulty experienced will not be the same for all three levels of instruction. this text is suitable for the first two levels primarily, though instructors might use it as a supplementary text at the graduate level-mrs. nancy l. eaton, catalog librarian, the university of texas, austin. katalog. leo baeck institute, new york. bibliothek und archiv. band i. hrsg. von max kreutzberger unter mitarbeit von irmgard goerg. tubingen: j. c. b. mohr (paul siebeck), 1970. xli, 623p. plates dm 143. (schriftenreihe wissenschaftlicher abhandlungen des leo baeck institute, 22.) it is ironic that the german-jewish community, which produced the father of modern jewish bibliography-the incomparable steinschneider-and which fostered the development of jewish bibliography with the framework of the "wissenschaft des judentums," should have been denied the opportunity of recording its bibliographic history while that community was still alive. the compilation of a gesamtbibliographie of german judaica was long a desideratum of german-jewish scholarship. however, it was not until 1932 that the first substantial effort was made. in that year there appeared the first and only volume of the katalog of the stadtbibliothekfrankfurt am main, edited by aron freimann, and listing the judaica holdings of what was probably the most extensive collection of german judaica at that time. alas, this was but a year before the infamous year of 1933; the rise of the nazis to power in germany heralded the end of german jewry, and, of course, college and research libraries 950 books, the result of an exchange program between the united states and china. since then the collection has grown steadily; as of 1977 it held a total of approximately 430,000 volumes. s. c. hu, who is on the faculty at st. francis college of pennsylvania, has carefully examined the social , cultural, and political forces of sino-american relations that led to the building and development of the collection , as well as the acquisitions policies that have evolved and been implemented and the personnel and financial sources involved . of special interest to bibliophiles and scholars is the detailed account of the collection's holdings of chinese local histories, collectanea, and rare books . based largely upon annual reports and official documents , supplemented with secondary sources and personal interviews, the work provides , in historical perspective, a comprehensive , well-documented, and interesting description of a vernacular-language collection at the library of congress. the primarily expository, rather than comparative , approach that the author has taken leaves the work open to the criticism of a general lack of critical evaluation of its subject. as mentioned above , the collections of chinese local histories , collectanea, and rare books are noted as being strong; but it would have been more useful to indicate how these holdings compare with those in other libraries . what , for example, are the library of congress ' strengths and weaknesses in terms of the holdings of similar material at the harvardyenching library of harvard university and the gest oriental library of princeton university? hu stresses that " the chinese collection in the library of congress contained 1,622 rare items as of 1942" (page 108). by item he means "title ," not "volume. " given that the gest oriental library has 24,024 volumes of ming (1368-1644) editions, not including the pre-ming publications, what is the significance of this figure for the number of the chinese rare books the library of congress owns? elsewhere, hu writes: "speaking of the ming imprints, mention should be made of the _great yung-lo ta-tien, of which the library has 41 volumes, constituting more than 10% of its extant volumes" (page 111) . recent publications i 257 although the yung-lo encyclopedia indeed belongs to the ming period, it seems inaccurate to refer to this handwritten manuscript as an imprint. in general, this volume should probably be recommended as supplemental reading material for students of world library history and chinese studies. it surpasses the amount of information formerly found only in scattered articles and is definitely superior in quality and quantity compared with the japanese counterpart, "a history of the japanese collection in the library of congress, 1874-1941, " which was published in 1970 (senda masso kyoju koki kinen toshokan shiryo ron shu [tenri, japan], pages 281-327).-william s. wong , university of illinois at urbana-champaign. international federation of film archives . cataloging commission. film cataloging. new york: burt franklin, 1979. 174p. $17.95. lc 78-2769. isbn 0-89102-076-4. both experienced and novice film archivists , as well as film librarians , will welcome the international federation of film archives' (fiaf) 1979 publication of their valuable manuscript on film cataloging. fiaf' s cataloging commission views cataloging as a complex task involving the gathering and arranging of data and the creation of a system or systems around which the entire film archive revolves (page 3) . the guide's seven chapters and extensive appendixes offer a wide variety of methods that have been used successfully by film archives throughout the world to catalog their films . topics covered span a broad range of subjects including film cataloging problems and their effects on the entire cataloging process, the strengths and weaknesses of cataloging systems and their application to archival operating conditions, the processes of actual cataloging, and determining which records are important enough to keep. practical recommendations are given for each area. the advisory , rather than prescriptive, method used by the guide enables readers to form their own opinions and adapt appropriate methods to their own institutions . in addition, procedures discussed are followed by examples from at least three fiaf libraries, suggesting the usefulness of each 258 i college and research libraries • may 1980 method. factors readers should consider before implementation of any particular approach are thoroughly explored. concurrently, warnings to avoid excessive detail and to investigate all variables before adopting a procedure are emphasized. while valuable for avoiding expensive, time-consuming errors and for generating new ideas, the book does have drawbacks. this is especially obvious in the chapter on cataloging systems, in which automation is referred to with innumerable warnings. automation in film libraries has increased considerably since 1975. however, while logical, judicious reasons are given for the perpetuation of archaic manual systems, referrals to successful automated systems do not receive ample notice. another problem relates to the audience level for which the book is written. although detailed examples and frequent referrals to original sources are made, a moderate to high degree of reader knowledge about film archives and cataloging is often assumed. one perplexing paragraph opens with the following sentence: "most organizations wish to index subject contents, catalogs, and documents." examples then given are "those operating stockshot services or those with substantial holdings of actuality film" (page 47). closer attention to sentence clarity and inclusion of a glossary of terms would have minimized problems such as these and would have increased the guide's appeal to a wider audience. a final problem relates to the guide's bibliography. while it is extensive, only one addition to the selected bibliography has been made since the manuscript was originally copyrighted in 1975. more up-to-date citations in such rapidly changing areas as automation would be welcome. although extremely important for film librarians, guidelines dealing with the ·unique problems of film cataloging standardization have been rare. as michael gorman points out (in nancy allen's film study collections [ungar, 1979], page 118), cataloging rules such as those in the second edition of the anglo-american cataloguing rules attempt to provide a detailed set of guidelines for standardized cataloging for a wide range of materials. however, these rules have generally been inadequate for many aspects of film cataloging. the fiaf cataloging commission's guidelines are intended exclusively for the cataloging of film stock itself, thus filling an important gap in the cataloging literature. this authoritative book by a reputable source should be highly welcomed by both film archivists and non-archival film librarians alike, all of whom will benefit from following and embellishing upon its suggestions.-jill provan, state university of new york, college at buffalo. mcwilliams, jerry. the preservation and restoration of sound recordings. nashville, tenn.: american assn. for state and local history, 1979. 138p. $8 .95 paper; $7 to aaslh members. lc 79-17173. isbn 0-910050-41-4 . those familiar with the development of the preservation of materials as a distinct specialization within librarianship are aware that, in the not so distant past, a negative attitude surrounded sound recordings. in fact, recordings were often not taken very seriously by librarians, nor were they given the respect accorded to print sources. most certainly this earlier, almost cavalier, regard for the recorded media has now changed. presently a considerable body of material has developed related to the restoration and preservation of sound recordings . mcwilliams' work will be welcomed by librarians and archivists at all levels of the library world as the piece that successfully draws together many of the conclusions·, admonitions, and advice set forth in much of the relatively recent, and at times obscure, sources of literature on the subject. not only does the work have application all the way from the rural public library to the national archives, but it also covers the entire field of sound preservation and restoration in a manner not found in any other single volume. the author has based his book on extensive research at major sound archives in the united states and has been a frequent contributor to professional recording journals and magazines. the book will be seen as a useful and practical handbook of immediate value to those contemplating setting up, maintaining, or improving their library sound recording preservation programs. college and research libraries cataloging cataloging sampler: a comparative and interpretative guide. by laura c. colvin. hamden, conn.: archon books, the shoe string press [ cl963] 368p. $10. this is a guide "developed as a visual reference manual of the cataloging process." it was originally compiled as a manual that students at simmons college library school, where professor colvin is a member of the faculty, have used in their cataloging courses. now it is available to the library profession at large. the sampler includes eleven sections: cataloging control records (involving multiple order forms, serial processing slips, searching slips--primarily from the library of congress operations, michigan and yale-authority cards, official catalog entries, and subject authority cards); the dictionary card catalog (involving all kinds of catalog entries); monograph publications (with references to rules and examples of publications which demonstrate the application of the rules, including european and oriental names); serial publications (including general serials, government serials, and newspapers); publications issued in series (including types of series entries and the variety of approaches in treatment); analytical entries (including monographic publications and serials); works related (abridgments, adaptations, commentaries, etc.); relationships in the card catalog (main and secondary entries and references); works of special type and special collections (theses and dissertations, technical reports, works for the blind); nonbook materials (art photographs and slides, manuscripts, maps, globes, atlases, etc.); and the shelf list (official record, types of en tries, call numbers vs. numerical location vs. location designation, reference works, and shelflisting for branches). in addition, there are eight appendixes dealing with book numbers, library of congress cataloging process case study, branch cataloging (boston public library), classified catalog (boston university), brieflisting catalog (university of california at los angeles), synchronized book processing (wayne county, michigan, library), color band card system for instruction (nonnovember 1963 book) materials (montgomery county public schools, rockville, maryland), and corporate body under successive names (national library of medicine). the work contains a bibliography which lists compilations of sample cards which are used in other library schools-eleven of them. some of these are similar in content to the present work by professor colvin, but none approaches its sweep and scope. the various control records, and the _ materials in the appendixes, as well as a wider range of sarriples, contribute to make this a major reference source of cataloging as well as a useful work for students and practitioners in the field of cataloging. the mere listing of the variety of entries and the treatments provided by catalogers might well raise again a question regarding the complexity of cataloging. professor colvin has shown that it may not be cataloging that is complex, but rather publishing. perhaps this would be a good volume ior publishers as well as administrators and catalogers in libraries to study and ponder. there is little doubt that it should be useful to all library schools, even though they may continue to maintain their own instructional sample cards in connection with particular courses. -maurice f. tauber ) columbia university. ifla libraries in the world; a long-term programme for the international federation of library associations. the hague: martinus nijhoff, 1963. 62p. 4.20 guilders. the growth of the international federation of library associations to include representation from fifty-two countries is a testimony to the increased interest of all libraria,ns in the development of libraries throughout the world. this interest has been reflected in a change not only in the structure of ifla, which now has a permanent secretariat, but also in the attitudes of others towards libraries. the monograph which was developed by many hands but especially by sir frank francis, f. b. g. hutchings, dr. hermann liebaers, and professor l. brummel, who apparently edited it, considers not only the framework and background of ifla, but major problems of 523 such areas of librarianship as developing collections, legal deposit, the growth of libraries, cataloging, union catalogs, the use of materials, rare and precious materials, libraries, types of libraries (public, university, technical university, special, and national), and special s~bjects (buildings, mechanization, international exchange of publications, and copyright problems). in general, the monograph provides an interesting basis on which to consider the extension of library services on a worldwide basis. in the present world struggle for balance, with nuclear war as a persistent possibility, libraries may seem to be somewhat on a low level of importance. the truth of the matter is that only thro\].gh international cooperation on all matters, including library services, can there be developed solutions to many national and international problem~. ifla's program is designed to help libraries extend their services, and to direct attention to steps that may be taken that will be beneficial to libraries as a group.maurice f. tauber, columbia university. italian studies con11egno di studi sulle biblioteche universitarie, 16-17 maggio 1!;60. (pubblicazioni della soprintendenza bibliografica per la campania e la calabria, n.8.) napoli: 1962. 67p. this small collection of papers and recorded discussions is a byproduct of the professional activities of robert vosper in italy during the short period he spent there as a fulbright lecturer from march through may 1960 (see crl 22: 199-210). these papers w.ere presented during a two-day regional conference organized under the auspices of the italian library association (alb) and the local usis in naples. following an introductory statement by dr. guerriera guerrieri, regional chairman of the alb, mr. vosper read the opening paper. after paying due tribute to the great names and wisdom of early italian giants such as panizzi, and some allusions to earlier americanitalian professional exchanges, he swiftly sketched the pattern of growth in american university libraries. his outline of current developments is devoted to three areas of library work, (1) services to students, (2) services for research, and (3) cooperative services. he traces the use of libraries by students from early days in american academic libraries to the recent trend toward undergraduate libraries and completely open shelves. as a disciple of powell, he could not fail to nod in the direction of free reading with the inclusion of competitions for the best student personal library. his review of services to research starts with the growth of the great academic collections and goes on to the usual aids of interlibrary loan and microcopy. this leads naturally to the third subject, cooperation. as a chairman of the farmington plan committee of american research libraries, robert vosper was well qualified to speak on this subject. he ends his paper with comments on national programs designed to coordinate united states resources and suggests that international programs of similar scope cannot be far behind. the second paper, by the director of the university library of naples, presents a lucid picture of the principal academic library organization of italy. vosper's article contains an extensive description of this fairly complex system, so very different from ours. on reading professor lanzara's paper, one feels a most striking contrast between the italian pattern and ours. while the historic development of italian institutions is much different from ours, it still is difficult for us to conceive of the great academic institutions in italy with libraries as poorly supported, staffed, and housed as they are. in fact , however, they differ little from other european libraries, and the same diffuse organization exists in many other non-european countries. one cannot help but be impressed by the obviously high level of intelligence and dignity exhibited in this paper expressing the frustration of able people limited by minimal support and administrative understanding. the third paper, offered by an academic, not a librarian, brings to view a stark picture of the modest level of support assigned to the academic libraries. this paper is thoroughly documented with statistical tables. the professor illuminates the weaknesses of the old and even present systematics of italian academic libraries, deploring the modest level of support they are able to offer 524 college and research libraries college and research libraries 258 i college and research libraries • may 1980 method. factors readers should consider before implementation of any particular approach are thoroughly explored. concurrently, warnings to avoid excessive detail and to investigate all variables before adopting a procedure are emphasized. while valuable for avoiding expensive, time-consuming errors and for generating new ideas, the book does have drawbacks. this is especially obvious in the chapter on cataloging systems, in which automation is referred to with innumerable warnings. automation in film libraries has increased considerably since 1975. however, while logical, judicious reasons are given for the perpetuation of archaic manual systems, referrals to successful automated systems do not receive ample notice. another problem relates to the audience level for which the book is written. although detailed examples and frequent referrals to original sources are made, a moderate to high degree of reader knowledge about film archives and cataloging is often assumed. one perplexing paragraph opens with the following sentence: "most organizations wish to index subject contents, catalogs, and documents." examples then given are "those operating stockshot services or those with substantial holdings of actuality film" (page 47). closer attention to sentence clarity and inclusion of a glossary of terms would have minimized problems such as these and would have increased the guide's appeal to a wider audience. a final problem relates to the guide's bibliography. while it is extensive, only one addition to the selected bibliography has been made since the manuscript was originally copyrighted in 1975. more up-to-date citations in such rapidly changing areas as automation would be welcome. although extremely important for film librarians, guidelines dealing with the ·unique problems of film cataloging standardization have been rare. as michael gorman points out (in nancy allen's film study collections [ungar, 1979], page 118), cataloging rules such as those in the second edition of the anglo-american cataloguing rules attempt to provide a detailed set of guidelines for standardized cataloging for a wide range of materials. however, these rules have generally been inadequate for many aspects of film cataloging. the fiaf cataloging commission's guidelines are intended exclusively for the cataloging of film stock itself, thus filling an important gap in the cataloging literature. this authoritative book by a reputable source should be highly welcomed by both film archivists and non-archival film librarians alike, all of whom will benefit from following and embellishing upon its suggestions.-jill provan, state university of new york, college at buffalo. mcwilliams, jerry. the preservation and restoration of sound recordings. nashville, tenn.: american assn. for state and local history, 1979. 138p. $8 .95 paper; $7 to aaslh members. lc 79-17173. isbn 0-910050-41-4 . those familiar with the development of the preservation of materials as a distinct specialization within librarianship are aware that, in the not so distant past, a negative attitude surrounded sound recordings. in fact, recordings were often not taken very seriously by librarians, nor were they given the respect accorded to print sources. most certainly this earlier, almost cavalier, regard for the recorded media has now changed. presently a considerable body of material has developed related to the restoration and preservation of sound recordings . mcwilliams' work will be welcomed by librarians and archivists at all levels of the library world as the piece that successfully draws together many of the conclusions·, admonitions, and advice set forth in much of the relatively recent, and at times obscure, sources of literature on the subject. not only does the work have application all the way from the rural public library to the national archives, but it also covers the entire field of sound preservation and restoration in a manner not found in any other single volume. the author has based his book on extensive research at major sound archives in the united states and has been a frequent contributor to professional recording journals and magazines. the book will be seen as a useful and practical handbook of immediate value to those contemplating setting up, maintaining, or improving their library sound recording preservation programs. technical considerations are always dis. cussed in lay terminology. those of us who have compassion for the preservation of our collections but have no compassion, or endurance, for reading works that continually bog one down in technical detail will actually have fun reading this book. where there seems to be some point of difference among experts regarding various technical considerations, mcwilliams attempts to bring out both points of view. several points could stand some clarification, however. mcwilliams, in his discussion of disc cleaning, does not note that the use of detergents generally is not recommended for vinyls, as essential oils can be removed from the disc. fotoflo or mild soaps are the preferred cleaning mode. however, detergents or freon is fine for acetates. the discussion of "tails-out" storage for tape is good and presents both pros and cons but neglects a thorough discussion of the preprint and postprint phenomenon. while mcwilliams makes a strong point regarding the use of top-quality cassettes with hand-driven screws it should be noted that sonic sealed cassettes are not necessarily inferior. a bad product can occur with either screws or sonic welds. practical information is given regarding styluses, cartridges, tone arms, and turntables, but a stronger point, perhaps, could have been made regarding the criticalness of cartridge, tone arm, and tracking force matching. in some combinations the maximum force will often cause far less record wear than the minimum force. additional discussion would have been useful in this important area of equipment maintenance. the book is supplemented by excellent pictures, with the final section of the book detailing considerations that should be encompassed within a well-developed preservation policy. shelving, environment, and dedicated equipment considerations are carefully brought forth. finally, a directory of manufacturers and suppliers is given, along with an excellent annotated bibliography. this is a work that every library possessing a tape or record collection should have. even at the latest closing gold prices, it's worth its weight!-edward d . garten, northern state college, aberdeen, south dakota. recent publications i 259 king, alec hyatt. printed music in the british museum: an account of the collections, the catalogues, and their formation, up to 1920. london: clive bingley; new york: k. g. saur, 1979. 210p. $30. isbn 0-85157-287-1. alec hyatt king joined the staff of the british museum in 1934 and was responsible for printed music from 1944 until his retirement in 1976. he wrote a number of important books, about mozart and music printing, during that long period of service, but the volume in hand is his first that concerns the music library itself. it is in fact the first substantial monograph by anyone about any music library-the historical aspect of music librarianship being one of the lacunae in the literature of that young discipline. (most of the relevant bibliography is cited in the articles clustered under "music libraries and collections" in volume 18 of the encyclopedia of library and information science.) the story is intriguing, illuminating, and very well told: intriguing, as a dramatic case study in the universal struggle of music to mcgregor "personalized subscription service" every customer is assigned an experienced ''home office" representative. you correspond direct; any title needs, changes, cancellations or problems can be handled promptly by 1ett1r or phone. this makes your job easier and keeps you abreast of your subscription needs at all times. with over 45 years ~ce. mcgregor has built a reputation of prompt and courteous service on both domestic and international titles. we prepay subscriptions ahead of time. our customers, large and small, like the prompt attention we give them. we think you would tool ask about mcgregor's "automatic renewal" plan described in our new brochure. wrltll today for your free copy. our 47th year mount morris, llllnolsl1054 college and research libraries lorraine williams the shared cataloging program; the importance of being ordered the shared cataloging program at the library of congress attempts to assign top priority to the cataloging of items for which copy has been requested by research libraries. r egrettably the process is slowed considerably by the large number of inaccurate and unrevised citations submitted by participating libraries. care should be taken in research libraries to assure that only accurate references are given, that national bibliography number is included, that the requesting institution is identified, and that orders are typed. examples of bad citations are given. by according top priority to each university order for a current foreign title, from the ordering through the printing process, the library of congress is expending considerable effort to provide research libraries with the cataloging copy they need at the earliest possible moment. it has been less generally recognized that research libraries have a corresponding responsibility for the efficient functioning of the title ii program; that is, the bibliographical screening of all orders forwarded to the library of congress. thus far no coherent policy for the submission of these orders seems to have been devised, and any and every order that might conceivably come within the province of the shared cataloging division is being submitted, regardless of whether the library of congress had undertaken to catalog such material or not. moreover, many submissions have totally inadequate bibliographical identification. this creates unnecessary work miss williams is assistant acquisitions librarian in the cornell university library. 342/ and threatens to impede the speed and efficiency of the program. the following strictures therefore represent an attempt to point out a policy for the screening of foreign orders forwarded to the library of congress for cataloging priority. ideally all such orders should be screened by acquisitions librarians with cataloging experience if duplication and incorrent searching are to be avoided and orders correctly controlled. each order forwarded to the library of congress must, of necessity, be accepted there at face value, .and, if not in stock, ordered; therefore an incorrect order can result in a costly and time-consuming duplicate. as a recent article in library resources & technical services1 points out, however, the growth of new schools and increasing book budgets have resulted in many librarians being assigned to acquisitions work with inadequate training and job experience. the most important and desirable element in an order submitted for cataloging priority is the national bibliography 1 a. dahl-hansen and r. m. dougherty, "acquisitions in 1967," library resources & technical seroices, xii (spring 1968), 182. number, .e.g., au 66-14-192, gdb 66a29-67, gdnb 66-a42-117, b 67-8637, sw 66-a22-4645, ne 67-5. this entails more initial searching than is usually provided presently, but it is a vital identification in the event of any query, and in so comprehensive a collection queries occur with unfortunate frequency. this bibliographical identification enables the searcher to pinpoint and order exactly what is needed from the plethora of available variations; such exact identification ensures speedier cataloging. it would seem to be stating the obvious to say that all requests should be identified with the name of the submitting library (this also applies to all orders to the card division), but many arrive anonymously. it would also seem superfluous to ask that all entries be typewritten; it is surprising how many handwritten orders arrive, the best of which are open to misinterpretation. in the vast files of the library of congress, an error of only one letter can often cause the irretrievable burial of the desired citation, despite sheer genius on the part of the searching staff. for this reason such variants as umlauts should always be spelled out in full. carbon copies must be legible; many unfortunately are not. ideally a standard form should be used for all orders submitted, but this is at best a future development. for the present, serials are specifically excluded from the shared cataloging program; likewise series are omitted, although individual titles are accepted. it is therefore a waste of time and money to submit orders for such items. there must be no ambiguity as to the author, as far as he is ascertainable at the time of ordering. it is awkward and time-consuming for the searcher to be confronted with ""erzaehlt von eugen heberle" as the author; and certainly '"author: roth, eugen, introduction by', and "title: panorama buecher'' leave something to be desired. similarly, a series should not be quoted as the author. shared cataloging program i 343 the following entry, with its duplicate-causing potential, should not have been submitted to the library of congress in this fashion, and yet it was submitted: "'author: luck, george, 1926, ed. title: ovid. tristia." correct bibliographical identification, the result of intensive searching, is essential. at first sight "'author: paulywissowa, august friedrich von. title: der kleine pauly," would seem satisfactory, yet careful searching would have revealed that this is cataloged under title, and a $26.00 duplicate would have been saved. genius, and a superb knowledge of the resources, unravelled the mystery of "author: halbkuegel, nordliche. title: prakaembrium." cataloging scrutiny would have realized the possibility of error in an order submitted as "'author: w.eber, max. title: gedaechtnisschrift der ludwig-maximilians universitaet muenster zur 100. wiederkehr seines geburtstages . ... hrsg. von karl engisch, bernard pfister, johannes winckelmann." scrutiny would also ensure more accurate detail; for example, ''ganzleinen'' is unlikely to be the place of publication. the classic example of a totally incomprehensible order is "title: form 36 -?$ koeln, w estdeutscher verlag redaktion." this was returned to the offender with a large red question mark. as a general rule it seems pointless to submit reprint editions for cataloging priority, when the original has already been cataloged by the library of congress; this principle could be applied to the subsequent editions of many works and reduce, to a substantial extent, the sheer volume of orders handled. the current hood of unrevised orders slows down the operational speed of the shared cataloging program, and intensive screening could reduce this to somewhat more manageable proportions. •• college and research libraries 374 i college & research libraries • july 1980 providing access to information for a fee and that libraries "may find it difficult to compete in ease of use or speed of response unless they become highly effective managers of technology." in the remaining chapters, filled with examples and quotes from the literature and the author's experiences, the manager is alerted to the steps in the planning process (define, analyze, synthesize, evaluate, and iterate); the need to train staff; the political requirements to sell the system of choice; failures and pitfalls of automation; and the manager's role. there is a brief glossary of automation terms, a very selected reading list, and a list of selected sources for automated products and services. the guide is very general, organized like a handy shopping list of topics with a brief description or list of things ta remember under each. there are shortcomings, however, which must be noted. first, the inevitable complexities, alternatives, and combinations in automation decision making are lost in the effort to simplify, list, and report in a telegraphic style. for example, the possibilities of combining lmprovedf vlsi·tape period leal lallellne a revolutionary system that allows quick visual review of shelved periodicals. simply apply this pressure sensitive tape to publications in their order of issue. fast, inexpensive, efficient. one of hundreds of bright new products in the newest highsmith catalog . send for your free copy. rlehsmlth p.o. 25 cr9 ft . atkinson , wi 53538 minicomputer applications with network use or in-house systems are not addressed in favor of discussing each as discrete options. second, the discussion of the management process is so abbreviated as to leave the novice unsure of what to do, especially in the requirements and problem definition phase. third, the information about current vendors and services will become outdated quickly, given the rapid pace of development. fourth, the guide frequently advises using consultants because library managers cannot, should not, or do not master some of the complexities involved in automation decisions or implementation. the reviewer appreciates the role of consultants but suggests that library managers are appropriately becoming increasingly sophisticated consumers and managers of technology and should be encouraged to continue in this direction. the appropriate audience for the guide is the inexperienced librarian/manager or the interested nonlibrarian. others will find it incomplete and less useful-eleanor montague, university of california, riverside. the nature and future of the catalog: proceedings of the ala's information science and automation division's 1975 and 1977 institutes on the catalog. edited by maurice j. freedman and s. michael malinconico. a neal-schuman professional book. phoenix, ariz.: oryx, 1979. 317p. $16.50 (plus $. 95 for postage and handling). lc 79-21629. isbn 0-91270008-4. malinconico, s. michael, and fasana, · paul j. the future of the catalog: the library's choices. the professional librarian series. white plains, n.y.: knowledge industry publications, 1979. 134p. $24.50. lc 79-16619. isbn 0-91423632-6. libraries today are faced with two momentous prospects for 1981-the closing of the library of congress catalog and the adoption of the anglo-american cataloguing rules, second edition. consequently, librarians must decide whether or not to close their own catalogs in order to adjust to these changes. such decisions are made on the basis of information, primarily in the form of conferences, journal articles, and books. two of the newest sources for librarians are the nature and future of the catalog and the future of the catalog: the library's choices. the nature and future of the catalog contains the edited proceedings of two american library association-sponsored conferences: "the catalog: its nature and prospects" (1975) and · "the catalog in the age of technological change" (1977). these papers are especially valuabie to readers in that they represent the thoughts of eminent individuals in the field of cataloging, including seymour lubetzky, joan k. marshall, frederick g. kilgour, sanford berman, and michael gorman. the work is further enhanced by transcripts of audience discussion appended to each presentation . one can therefore, according to the editors, "relive with some degree of verisimilitude the excitement and stimulation created by these institutes and such colloquies as the kilgour-lubetzky exchange" (p.vii). the subject for the 1975 conference is "the catalog: its nature and prospect"-its past, present, and possible future. the highlights of the conference were talks by lubetzky, marshall, and kilgour. lubetzky' s "ideology of bibliographic cataloging: progression and retrogression" is a description of past and present cataloging theories and their conflict with the first edition of aacr. marshall's paper, "the catalog in the world around it," deals with library of congress subject headings and how they conflict with the needs of nonresearch library users; -many headings were found to be misleading and outdated. kilgour describes the format and use of the automated catalog in the "design of online catalogs." other papers represent a wide range of interests from public to research libraries: s. michael malinconico's "the library catalog in a computerized environment," william j. welsh's "the continuing role of the library of congress in national bibliographic control," marvin h. scilkin' s "the catalog as a public service tool," hugh c. atkinson's "the electronic catalog, .. and kenneth bierman's "the future of the catalog in north american libraries." although these lectures took place five recent publications i 315 years ago and precede such developments as aacr 2, the research libraries information network, and the closing of the library of congress catalog, they remain timely and recommended reading. the central theme for the 1977 conference, · "the catalog in the age of technological change," is the impact of the new technology on cataloging. a substantial number of the papers are devoted to aacr 2: john d. byrum, \jr., and frances hinton's "the newest anglo-american cataloging rules," a history and brief summary of the new rules ; phyllis a. richmond's "the aacr, second edition, what next?" a discussion of the implications of the new code; bernadine e. abbott hoduskf s "a critique of the draft aacr, 2nd edition: impact of the rules on documents cataloging, .. a treatise on the effect of aacr 2 on government documents cataloging; and jean riddle weihs' "problems and prospects in nonbook cataloging," a description of the effect of aacr 2 on cataloging of audiovisual materials. additional papers presented are gorman's "cataloging and the new technologies," a study of the impact of automation on cataloging services; lubetzky' s "the traditional ideas of cataloging and the new revision," an analysis of isbd versus charles cutter's idea of the catalog; joseph h. howard's "the library of congress as the national bibliographic service, .. the effect of the library of congress' policies on the nation's libraries; berman's "cataloging for public libraries," a treatment of the cataloging interests of public libraries; and anne grodzins lipow' s "the catalog in a research library and alternatives to it," a study of the catalog and research library patrons. those deciding what alternative catalog form to use may consult the future of the catalog: the library's choices, a readable though slightly overpriced book. the work, which can serve as an introductory text, presents an overview of the catalog and the effect of automation on cataloging. each chapter is well documented, and a five-page bibliography appears at the end of the book. the work is divided into six sections in addition to an epilogue and introduction: "traditional catalog forms, .. "machinereadable cataloging data," "computer376 i college & research libraries • july 1980 supported catalogs," "on-line interactive catalogs," "comparison of catalog alternatives," and "implementation of catalog alternatives." "traditional · catalog forms" is an analysis of the catalog's objectives, treating theories of lubetzky, charles jewett, charles cutter, and thomas hyde, plus a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of traditional catalog forms. "machine-readable cataloging data" describes the library of congress marc format, isbd, authority control, and the major networks, oclc, rlin, and wln. "computer-supported catalogs" deals with alternative catalog forms such as the automated book form catalog system, printed book catalogs, and com catalogs. "on-line interactive catalogs" is a study of the automated catalog and how it may be accessed. "comparison of alternative catalog forms" and "implementation of catalog alternatives" present the problems involved when a library closes its catalog and chooses alternative forms. an especially valuable aid is a hypothetical cost analysis for each catalog form. the nature and future of the catalog and the future of the catalog furnish librarians with needed information on how to manage the coming changes in catalog formats. tha volumes complement each other, offering different points of emphasis to readers. it should be stressed, however, that these works only scratch the surface in regard to the catalog's future. librarians are advised to make a thorough study of the literature available. nevertheless, both volumes are recommended for purchase by libraries. they will be useful additions to a much needed collection on the future of the catalog.-lucy t. heckman, st. john's university, jamaica, new york. saffady, william. "the economics of online bibliographic searching: costs and cost justifications," library technology reports 15:567-653 (sept.-oct. 1979). single issue $40. issn 0024-2586. (available from american library assn., 50 e. huron st., chicago, il 60(>11.) the first, and longest, section of this report lays out the cost components of an on-line search service in a library and, by making some not unreasonable assumptions about volume of traffic, salaries, and overhead, etc., attempts to build up a model of the true and complete costs per search. the second section uses concepts from value engineering to give an overview of the main arguments that can be employed to justify those costs.either the on-line service must produce greater efficiency compared to the same task (bibliographic searching by librarians) performed in the old way, or it must be justified by its provision of added value, in the form of enhanced library service to patrons. the report deliberately does not address the question of how the costs of on-line services might be met (the fee-for-service issue). to juxtapose the costs of an on-line search against the costs of a manual search is, of course, to enter dangerous waters. first, a regular search service encompassing from 250 to 1,000 manual searches per year was not a feature of life in most librariesnot even in most libraries which did adopt on-line services when they came upon the scene. and, second, when performed at all, such a manual bibliographic searching service was not often rigorously accounted for. thus, even though saffady is careful to use the same assumptions for costing out a manual operation as he does for the computerized version, his model inevitably starts to sound somewhat artificial. however, this is more a reproach to traditional library accounting practices than to the author's determination to pursue his comparison to a logically consistent conclusion. not surprisingly, the on-line search is shown to be less expensive than its manual equivalent would have been-between 37 and 42 percent, on average. as long as such figures are used only as ratios, for comparison against each other, they are unexceptionable, although minor discrepancies might be argued over. when the author attempts to use the on-line cost figures as real numbers, to be compared against the real cost of subscriptions to printed periodical indexes, then it seems to me the methodology becomes questionable. appendix c is presented as a type of decision table, based upon dividing the annual printed subscription cost by the cost of an on-line search, to yield an approximate number of uses per year below which the college and research libraries cataloging cataloging sampler: a comparative and interpretative guide. by laura c. colvin. hamden, conn.: archon books, the shoe string press [ cl963] 368p. $10. this is a guide "developed as a visual reference manual of the cataloging process." it was originally compiled as a manual that students at simmons college library school, where professor colvin is a member of the faculty, have used in their cataloging courses. now it is available to the library profession at large. the sampler includes eleven sections: cataloging control records (involving multiple order forms, serial processing slips, searching slips--primarily from the library of congress operations, michigan and yale-authority cards, official catalog entries, and subject authority cards); the dictionary card catalog (involving all kinds of catalog entries); monograph publications (with references to rules and examples of publications which demonstrate the application of the rules, including european and oriental names); serial publications (including general serials, government serials, and newspapers); publications issued in series (including types of series entries and the variety of approaches in treatment); analytical entries (including monographic publications and serials); works related (abridgments, adaptations, commentaries, etc.); relationships in the card catalog (main and secondary entries and references); works of special type and special collections (theses and dissertations, technical reports, works for the blind); nonbook materials (art photographs and slides, manuscripts, maps, globes, atlases, etc.); and the shelf list (official record, types of en tries, call numbers vs. numerical location vs. location designation, reference works, and shelflisting for branches). in addition, there are eight appendixes dealing with book numbers, library of congress cataloging process case study, branch cataloging (boston public library), classified catalog (boston university), brieflisting catalog (university of california at los angeles), synchronized book processing (wayne county, michigan, library), color band card system for instruction (nonnovember 1963 book) materials (montgomery county public schools, rockville, maryland), and corporate body under successive names (national library of medicine). the work contains a bibliography which lists compilations of sample cards which are used in other library schools-eleven of them. some of these are similar in content to the present work by professor colvin, but none approaches its sweep and scope. the various control records, and the _ materials in the appendixes, as well as a wider range of sarriples, contribute to make this a major reference source of cataloging as well as a useful work for students and practitioners in the field of cataloging. the mere listing of the variety of entries and the treatments provided by catalogers might well raise again a question regarding the complexity of cataloging. professor colvin has shown that it may not be cataloging that is complex, but rather publishing. perhaps this would be a good volume ior publishers as well as administrators and catalogers in libraries to study and ponder. there is little doubt that it should be useful to all library schools, even though they may continue to maintain their own instructional sample cards in connection with particular courses. -maurice f. tauber ) columbia university. ifla libraries in the world; a long-term programme for the international federation of library associations. the hague: martinus nijhoff, 1963. 62p. 4.20 guilders. the growth of the international federation of library associations to include representation from fifty-two countries is a testimony to the increased interest of all libraria,ns in the development of libraries throughout the world. this interest has been reflected in a change not only in the structure of ifla, which now has a permanent secretariat, but also in the attitudes of others towards libraries. the monograph which was developed by many hands but especially by sir frank francis, f. b. g. hutchings, dr. hermann liebaers, and professor l. brummel, who apparently edited it, considers not only the framework and background of ifla, but major problems of 523 college and research libraries another compromise with the desirable is that the circulation file contains cards, not only for all books on loan, but also for books not yet due which have already been returned. the file is of value for reference only after the shelves and all possible way stations for newly returned books have been checked. despite these limitations, the brooklyn college system is probably the most effective mechanized system devised for a medium sized university or college library situation. it is certainly not the ultimate, and newer technological developments will in time reduce the compromises between expediency and desirability. perhaps the ultimate system can achieve the advantages of the former book card systems, using simpler procedures and requiring the borrower to write nothing. -ralph h. parker, university of missouri library. cataloging-in-source the cataloging-in-source experiment; a report to the librarian of congress by the director of the processing department. washington, library of congress, 1960. xxiv, 199 p. this well-organized, well-written document will surely earn a permanent place on the shelves of most libraries throughout the country and undoubtedly in a good many of the large foreign libraries. it makes one wish that it had been printed instead of duplicated by offset lithography, as it may very well stand for a good many years as the record of the second major, unsucessful attempt to print full cataloging information in books. this is not a progress report, but the final statement by the library of congress on an experiment which led to the conclusion that cataloging-in-source should not be continued-at least as presently conceived. l. quincy mumford, librarian of congress, describes the experiment in the preface in this way: "the immediate purpose of the experiment was to test once more, under modern conditions, the feasibility of a proposal which was first advanced, and tested, during the 1870's and 1880's. the presentnovember 1960 day phase of the proposal, denominated as "cataloging-in-source," envisaged the printing by publishers in their current publications of facsimiles of library of congress cards. this would be made possible by having the library of congress catalog these titles in advance of publication from page proofs and data sheets supplied by the publishers." after stating that the experiment proved that it is possible for the library of congress to catalog some books from page proofs before they are published, that it is possible for a selected number of publishers to print catalog entries in a considerable number of their publications, and that a representative group of libraries would wel· come having cataloging information printed in the books, mr. mumford goes on to say: "the underlying purpose of the experiment, however, was to ascertain whether a permanent, full-scale program of cataloging-insource could be justified in terms of financing, technical considerations, and utility. as regards this, the answer must be a regretful negative." the two basic problems tested were: (1) the financial and technical probler:ns and the practicability of the proposal from the viewpoint of the library of congress and the publishers, and (2) what actual use could libraries and other consumers make of the catalog entries appearing in the publications. among the reasons given for the decision, the rna jor determining factors were: (1) the very high cost to both the publishers and the library of congress, (2) the disruptions of publishing schedules, (3) the high degree of unreliability of catalog entries based on texts not in their final form, and (4) the difficulty libraries would have in using this unreliable information and adapting it to their individual requirements. the criticisms to cataloging-in-source that are reported are very interesting to note. some of the major ones are: ( l) en try of a book under the original author when published as the original author's work but largely rewritten by an editor, (2) entry under the first named author when the editors consider a later-named author as being principally responsible, (3) the publishers' strong objections to real name entries for pseudonymous works (and none were printed in the books that way), (4) the authors' objection to the use of their birthdates in the headings, (5) even the 493 catalogers found the work "unrewarding and taxing" because of the inevitable inaccuracies in the cataloging and the rushing pressure. of the cataloging entries printed 48 % had some discrepancy with the book as published. the cataloging-in-source experiment was begun in may 1958. many publishers of varying sizes and types were contacted; 157 of them were willing and able to cooperate and sent in proof for cataloging. the goal was to catalog 1,000 titles, and by the end of february 1959, 1,203 publications had been cataloged by the library of congress, 100 of which were cataloged cooperatively by the · department of agriculture library. after the cataloging phase more than 200 libraries were visited by the consumer reaction team. consumer reaction was sought from libraries of various sizes and degrees of specialization. this report is very complete in including all of the procedures followed. this does not have to detract from the ease of reading it by those who wish to skim over these details. however, if anyone has difficulty in understanding the complications of the special cataloging routines involved for the library of congress, let him be sure to read pp. 5-7 where the basic routines are outlined. the make-up of the report involves first twentyfour pages of introductory remarks and acknowledgements-including a chronology of events. then follows the main text for ninety-nine pages. here the experiment is described step by step along with the library of congress' viewpoint, the publishers' experience and attitude, the report on the consumer reaction survey, the report of the ala cataloging policy and research committee, as well as the final considerations and possible alternatives. the rest of the report is taken up with fourteen appendixes which include among others: samples from a similar experiment in the late nineteenth century, the forms, procedures, and other material sent to the publishers, the report on cataloging-in-source in the department of agriculture library, the tables of statistics that were accumulated, the libraries that were visited during the consumer reaction survey and the questionnaire used, and even a bibliography entitled "a chronological description of the more important published accounts of the experiment." the library world is grateful to the coun494 cil on liprary resources, inc. for the grants which made this experiment possible, to the publishers who cooperated in it, and to the library qf congress for carrying it out. this fine report records in one convenient place all that has been involved in the experiment, the results, the conclusions drawn, and the possible future alternatives. librarians everywhere will certainly want to read it.-kenneth w. sod erland, university of chicago library. studies in microforms production of micro -forms. by reginald hawkins. (the state of the library art, edited by ralph r. shaw, vol. 5, pt. 1.) new brunswick, n. j.: rutgers university press, 1960. 208p. $5.00. reading devices for micro-ima ges. by jean stewart and others. (the state of the library art, edited by ralph r. shaw, vol. 5, pt. 2.) new brunswick, n.j.: rutgers university press, 1960. 205p. $5.00. these two volumes are the first to appear out of the rutgers project on "targets for research in library work" sponsored by a grant from the council on library resources, and directed by ralph r. shaw. part three on the "production of full-size copies," due shortly, will complete the portion devoted to "reproduction of materials." the purpose of these volumes is to show what has been done in the past, evaluate those previous studies, and point out directions for future work. the arrangement of materials is somewhat different in each book. hawkins starts out with the review of what has been written on the production pf microforms. this covers the history of microcopying, equipment in general, types and characteristics of microcopies, quality factors, production costs, and storage. this 149-page review is based on a list of some 439 references. it is followed by a thirteen · page summary and suggestions for future study. hawkins lays out five research projects ranging from a study to determine which types of microforms are necessary to one on information retrieval based on microforms. college and research libraries college and research libraries 490 i college & research libraries • november 1973 liberate attempt to exclude materials that have appeared in recently published collections." for a teacher or student of technical services to use a reader of this nature effectively, it must contain all outstanding pertinent materials no matter where else they have appeared nor how recently. this approach, then, makes the volume less useful as a text but important as a supplementary resource. mr. applebaum has done an admirable job in presenting the historical perspective to the basic problems which are facing us in technical services today. the discussions on cooperative cataloging and dewey's classification system, at the first conference of the american library association in 1876 and the presentation and discussion of cataloging at the london conference of librarians in 1877, are classics. the remainder of the volume covers the areas of acquisitions; bibliographic control; cooperative and centralized processing endeavors; and future prospects. who would be better than mr. applebaum to select outstanding articles in the area of acquisitions, from policies to blanket-order plans, from administration to futtue trends? articles by metcalf, downs, veaner, and the excellent symposium chaired by perry morrison are good examples . the section on bibliographic control is less cohesive. certainly all articles included are important ones but perhaps not all should be included here. for instance the introduction to the anglo-american cataloging rules must have been read at least once, if not a dozen times, by all students of cataloging-probably all have their own copies-and the articles on serials by clara brown, delightful as it is, doesn't really seem to fit into the sequence. otherwise it contains a good representation of articles on bibliographic control of monographs and serials. one previously unpublished article on "book catalogs" by scott allison, is a very good state-of-the-art paper. classic pieces such as the one by w. w. bishop, as well as current deliberations such as the ones on the national serials data program, are valuable items for discussion. cooperative and centralized processing is an area with which mr. applebaum has been very intimately involved for several years and has used his expertise in bringing together a chronology of developments on this subject. the final section deals almost exclusively with marc and its national and international implications-those being the solving of some important problems in technical services. particular criticism could be leveled at the volume for the exclusion of any discussion on nonprint materials, their acquisition, storage, and accessibility.-robert d. stuearl, graduate school of librarianship, u niversity of denver~ colorado. !~pope, s. elspeth. the time-lag in cataloging. metuchen, n.j.: scarecrow press, 1973.209 p. this book is the result of the author's doctoral dissertation at the university of pittsburgh. it is primarily concerned with the attempts made by the library of congress and american publishers over a long period of time to bring books and catalog copy together quickly. these efforts culminated finally in the cataloging-in-source program ( 1958-59) and its reincarnation in the cataloging-in-publication program ( 1971). the aims of the study were ( 1) to discover whether the various programs at the library of congress were sufficient to decrease the time-lag in cataloging, and ( 2) whether it is possible for the library of congress to accept bibliographical data as provided by publisher's catalogs. to answer the first question, a statistical sample of 5 percent of american trade publications in 1969 was taken from the n ational union catalog. the selected entries were checked against the time of their appearance in copyright office records, library of congress cards, marc tape input, and publisher's weekly. programs were designed and data fed to a computer. the results were compared to an earlier study done by roger greer in 1961, and it was found that, in spite of the various attempts which had been made by the library of congress to expedite the cataloging of books, the time needed to get cataloging information had in fact increased. the full details of the greer study, an unpublished doctoral dissertation, are not given, so it is difficult to assess the validity of the comparison. however, taking only pope's work into consideration, the median time for catalog copy to appear in 1969 was ninetyone days. whether or not the time-lag has increased since 1961, this would still make it difficult for a library to decide whether to wait for lc copy or do original cataloging. in fact, pope concludes at this point that the library of congress is incapable of closing the time gap. in regard to the second question, a comparison was made between entries as they appeared in prepublication sales catalogs and subsequent library of congress entries. the agreement between the two on most items was remarkably high, and the one item which showed the most discrepancy, the collation statement, is not even presently included in the cip record. it is in this area that pope has the most to contribute. elsewhere in the book it is pointed out that delays in producing catalog copy result from a book being "cataloged" many times -by the publisher, by the copyright office, by the library of congress, and by individual libraries. pope feels that, in as much as the library of congress is willing to accept intact cataloging provided by foreign countries, it should also be willing to accept cataloging by publishers. this would be more likely to happen if a mutually acceptable manual of bibliographic description were to be adopted. as of this review, the cip project has yet to be fully evaluated, although there are indications that it is becoming more viable. this is shown by the fact that slightly more than 50 percent of the american book publishing output is represented. if publishers find it worth their while to cooperate, and if libraries across the country are willing to accept cip copy, then this book will simply be a record of past failures. nevertheless, pope's extensive research forms a basis for any future studies in this area.-dianne ]. ellsworth, university of connecticut, storrs, connecticut. j-the university-the library. papers presented by samuel rothstein, richard blackwell, archibald macleish at york university, toronto, on the occasion of the dedication of the scott library, 30 october, 1971. oxford: shakespeare head press, 1972. 62 p. recent publications i 491 this slender, impeccably printed volume contains, in addition to the essays by the three authors mentioned in the title, a preface and introduction by thomas f. o'connell, and brief biographical sketches of the three authors who were recipients of honorary degrees at the colloquy. dedication of a new library building is a highly important affair in an institution of learning, and perhaps even more so at york university, because of its comparative youthfulness and rapidity of growth-both in student enrollment and in library resources. the three chief participants in the dedication represented different but allied professions. they addressed themselves to the topic: "the u niveristy-the library." samuel rothstein, library educator, sketched briefly some of the academic and curricular changes of the last century in higher education, which have led to the rise of a trained, service-directed class of professionals in modem libraries. richard blackwell spoke of the close dependence existing between librarian and bookseller, drawing with charm and discernment upon his experiences with the firm of b. h. blackwell. archibald macleish, poet, was concerned with the importance of a book collection as more than a mere institutional statistic. one paragraph quoted from his remarks may suffice to indicate his affirmations in the essay, "the premise of meaning": for the existence of a library, the fact of its existence, is, in itself and of itself, an assertion-a proposition nailed like luther's to the door of time. by standing where it does at the centre of the university-which is to say at the centre of our intellectual lives-with its books in a certain order on its shelves and its cards in a certain structure in their cases, the true library asserts that there is indeed a "mystery of things." or, more precisely, it asserts that the reason why the «things" compose a mystery is that they seem to mean: that they fall, when gathered together, into a kind of relationship, a kind of wholeness, as though all these different and dissimilar reports, these bits and pieces of experience, manuscripts in bottles, messages from long before, from deep within from miles beyond, belonged together and might, if understood together, college and research libraries catalogers found the work "unrewarding and taxing" because of the inevitable inaccuracies in the cataloging and the rushing pressure. of the cataloging entries printed 48 % had some discrepancy with the book as published. the cataloging-in-source experiment was begun in may 1958. many publishers of varying sizes and types were contacted; 157 of them were willing and able to cooperate and sent in proof for cataloging. the goal was to catalog 1,000 titles, and by the end of february 1959, 1,203 publications had been cataloged by the library of congress, 100 of which were cataloged cooperatively by the · department of agriculture library. after the cataloging phase more than 200 libraries were visited by the consumer reaction team. consumer reaction was sought from libraries of various sizes and degrees of specialization. this report is very complete in including all of the procedures followed. this does not have to detract from the ease of reading it by those who wish to skim over these details. however, if anyone has difficulty in understanding the complications of the special cataloging routines involved for the library of congress, let him be sure to read pp. 5-7 where the basic routines are outlined. the make-up of the report involves first twentyfour pages of introductory remarks and acknowledgements-including a chronology of events. then follows the main text for ninety-nine pages. here the experiment is described step by step along with the library of congress' viewpoint, the publishers' experience and attitude, the report on the consumer reaction survey, the report of the ala cataloging policy and research committee, as well as the final considerations and possible alternatives. the rest of the report is taken up with fourteen appendixes which include among others: samples from a similar experiment in the late nineteenth century, the forms, procedures, and other material sent to the publishers, the report on cataloging-in-source in the department of agriculture library, the tables of statistics that were accumulated, the libraries that were visited during the consumer reaction survey and the questionnaire used, and even a bibliography entitled "a chronological description of the more important published accounts of the experiment." the library world is grateful to the coun494 cil on liprary resources, inc. for the grants which made this experiment possible, to the publishers who cooperated in it, and to the library qf congress for carrying it out. this fine report records in one convenient place all that has been involved in the experiment, the results, the conclusions drawn, and the possible future alternatives. librarians everywhere will certainly want to read it.-kenneth w. sod erland, university of chicago library. studies in microforms production of micro -forms. by reginald hawkins. (the state of the library art, edited by ralph r. shaw, vol. 5, pt. 1.) new brunswick, n. j.: rutgers university press, 1960. 208p. $5.00. reading devices for micro-ima ges. by jean stewart and others. (the state of the library art, edited by ralph r. shaw, vol. 5, pt. 2.) new brunswick, n.j.: rutgers university press, 1960. 205p. $5.00. these two volumes are the first to appear out of the rutgers project on "targets for research in library work" sponsored by a grant from the council on library resources, and directed by ralph r. shaw. part three on the "production of full-size copies," due shortly, will complete the portion devoted to "reproduction of materials." the purpose of these volumes is to show what has been done in the past, evaluate those previous studies, and point out directions for future work. the arrangement of materials is somewhat different in each book. hawkins starts out with the review of what has been written on the production pf microforms. this covers the history of microcopying, equipment in general, types and characteristics of microcopies, quality factors, production costs, and storage. this 149-page review is based on a list of some 439 references. it is followed by a thirteen · page summary and suggestions for future study. hawkins lays out five research projects ranging from a study to determine which types of microforms are necessary to one on information retrieval based on microforms. college and research libraries in miss stewart's book, the summary and evaluation come at the beginning, and the review is broken into two parts. the first part, which is chronologically arranged, takes up ninety-four pages and is based on some 284 references. the second part, a topical summary, takes sixty-seven pages to list some forty-two features by which the reading machines are classified. these range from cost of the equipment, through the various optical and mechanical features, to end with use costs. the chief value of these two volumes lies in their chapters of recommendations and their bibliographies. the former will be fertile fields for doctoral candidates looking for subjects for dissertations. they will also be used by industry to help lay out research projects on present and future equipment. the two bibliographies bring together just about all that one could find in this field up to 1957. i suspect that many students will be shuffling these lists into manifold arrangements for some time to come. the outstanding shortcoming of both books lies in the lack of illustrations. the descriptions of equipment and techniques cry for pictures and diagrams. the evaluation of equipment and processes in both books is somewhat undescriminating. there is little weight given as to who made what judgment when. there are surprisingly few errors when one considers what a wide range of time and subject matter is covered. one that will amuse those who know him is the appearance of frank and frederic luther, both writing about dagron. library trends, viii (1960), no. 1 (photoduplication in libraries. edited by james e. skipper.) photoduplication has been the subject of single articles appearing in four previous issues of library trends. now it has an issue of its own. of the ten papers presented here, seven are on the administrative aspects and three on the technological phases of the field. of an administrative nature are: lester k. born, "history of microform activity"; lawrence s. thompson, "microforms as library resources"; john a. riggs, "the state of microtext publications"; george a. schwegmann, jr., "the bibliographical control of microforms"; h . gordon bechanan, "the november 1960 organization of microforms in the library"; robert e. kingery, · "copying methods as applied to library operations"; miles 0. price, "photocopying by libraries and copyright: a precis." of greater interest to the technologists in the field are: robert h. muller, "policy questions relating to library photoduplication laboratories"; charles g. la hood, jr. , "microfilm as used in reproduction and transmission systems"; peter scott, "advances and goals in microphotography." this issue is recommended reading for all who are interested in microfilming. librarians responsible for organizing microform reading rooms will benefit by bechanan's report on harvard's progress in this line. heads of library photoduplication laboratories will be thankful to muller for his survey of their problems. commercial microphotographic agencies about to embark on projects aimed at libraries would do well to study the articles by thompson, riggs, and schwegmann. this issue will be on library school reading lists for some time to come. microt exts as media for publication: the papers and discussion of a symposium held at hatfield technical college on the loth november 1959 ... hatfield, herts., england: hertfordshire county council, 1960. 87p. 9s. hatfield is located twenty miles north of london (about as far from its center as scarsdale is from times square) and is the source of an increasing number of important publications on photoduplication. in january 1958 a symposium on microtexts and microrecording was held, and its papers published. a symposium on modern copying techniques followed in january 1959, resulting in another booklet. the third publication is perhaps of greatest interest to librarians. it consists of papers presented ·on microfilm, microfiche, and microcard, and considers them from the standpoint of their sujtability for publication of scholarly material. the first paper is on "microfilm-the versatile academic tool" by eugene power of university microfilms. it contains a wealth of information based on twenty-five years of experience with this medium. this is followed by dr. l. j. van der wolk's report on "publishing on microfiche." this presents a 495 college and research libraries later, are we as a profession still hesitant to declare ourselves unilaterally as open storehouses and dispensers of the recorded resources of knowledge and information, regardless of format? the intuitive answer may be that information in form other than print is suspect as being less than intellectual. let us look a little more closely at some of the monographs on our shelves, where in the name of thoroughness and academic freedom we have collected biased, poorly written, out of date and occasionally unreadable works. and let us -compare these with some of the nonprint media which vividly capture in sight and sound, history, skill techniques, procedures, beauty and ugliness, and engaging entertainment. our shelves should proudly contain the totality of the human experience, in all the forms devised by mind and technology, providing total access for that vitally-concerned segment of society which is our clientele. nonbook materials, the organization of integrated collections is a guide and a precept for those who have accepted this challenge.-gloria terwilliger, director of learning resources, alexandria campus, northern virginia community college. recent publications i 489 in professor lorenz's biography hugh caine emerges as a talented and dedicated editor who only wanted to print the news and make money. however, in those days an editor had to ally himself and his paper with a special interest group if he intended to stay in business, and thus c aine was forced to change sides frequently in the tumultuous years preceding the revolution in order to ensure his livelihood. caine made a fateful decision when he decided to abandon the patriot cause in 1776, and return to new york to resume the publication of his new y ark mercury in that occupied city. once he had made his choice there was no turning back and he soon became one of the most hated and maligned tory editors in revolutionary america. his notoriety was further enhanced when he became the subject of phillip freneau' s long and cutting poem, "hugh gaines life." freneau maintained that caine would: always adhere to the sword that is longest and stick to the party thats like to be strongest. . . .. unfortunately, caine underestimated the patriots, and chose to support the wrong "party." nevertheless, he remains a major lorenz, alfred lawrence. hugh gaine; a figure in the annals of american publishing, colonial printer-editor's odyssey to and professor lorenz's balanced, well-writloyalism. carbondale and edwardsville: ten, and timely study should be acquired southern illinois university press, 1972. by every library with an interest in the his192 p. $6.95. tory of the american revolution.-michael there have been few serious biographh. harris, associate professor, college of ical studies done on the major figures in library science, university of kentucky, revolutionary journalism. edes and gill, lexington. rivington, john holt, james parker, and others still await biographers. fortunately, yappleba~m, edm~nd l., e~. reader in hugh caine, one of the most controversial techn1cal serv1ces. washmgton, d.c.: and enigmatic of the revolutionary editors, ncr microcard editions, 1973. has now been given the careful and unthis seventh in a series of readers in libiased treatment he has so long deserved. brary and information science is a compilaprofessor lorenz has written an importion of articles covering the whole field of tant book. for he has revealed, better pertechnical services. in one small sense the haps than anyone else, the tremendous obtitle is misleading for in actuality descripstacles encountered by an editor who tive cataloging and classification have been wished to remain independent of "special excluded from this volume and covered in interest" in a time when emotions ran high another of the series. and neutrality was viewed as a traitorous the collection brings together materials act. in doing so he shows clearly the reaof a historical nature, some state-of-the-art sons for caine's erratic editorial course from articles, and some attempts at predicting 1752 to 1776. the future. one big disadvantage is a "de490 i college & research libraries • november 1973 liberate attempt to exclude materials that have appeared in recently published collections." for a teacher or student of technical services to use a reader of this nature effectively, it must contain all outstanding pertinent materials no matter where else they have appeared nor how recently. this approach, then, makes the volume less useful as a text but important as a supplementary resource. mr. applebaum has done an admirable job in presenting the historical perspective to the basic problems which are facing us in technical services today. the discussions on cooperative cataloging and dewey's classification system, at the first conference of the american library association in 1876 and the presentation and discussion of cataloging at the london conference of librarians in 1877, are classics. the remainder of the volume covers the areas of acquisitions; bibliographic control; cooperative and centralized processing endeavors; and future prospects. who would be better than mr. applebaum to select outstanding articles in the area of acquisitions, from policies to blanket-order plans, from administration to futtue trends? articles by metcalf, downs, veaner, and the excellent symposium chaired by perry morrison are good examples . the section on bibliographic control is less cohesive. certainly all articles included are important ones but perhaps not all should be included here. for instance the introduction to the anglo-american cataloging rules must have been read at least once, if not a dozen times, by all students of cataloging-probably all have their own copies-and the articles on serials by clara brown, delightful as it is, doesn't really seem to fit into the sequence. otherwise it contains a good representation of articles on bibliographic control of monographs and serials. one previously unpublished article on "book catalogs" by scott allison, is a very good state-of-the-art paper. classic pieces such as the one by w. w. bishop, as well as current deliberations such as the ones on the national serials data program, are valuable items for discussion. cooperative and centralized processing is an area with which mr. applebaum has been very intimately involved for several years and has used his expertise in bringing together a chronology of developments on this subject. the final section deals almost exclusively with marc and its national and international implications-those being the solving of some important problems in technical services. particular criticism could be leveled at the volume for the exclusion of any discussion on nonprint materials, their acquisition, storage, and accessibility.-robert d. stuearl, graduate school of librarianship, u niversity of denver~ colorado. !~pope, s. elspeth. the time-lag in cataloging. metuchen, n.j.: scarecrow press, 1973.209 p. this book is the result of the author's doctoral dissertation at the university of pittsburgh. it is primarily concerned with the attempts made by the library of congress and american publishers over a long period of time to bring books and catalog copy together quickly. these efforts culminated finally in the cataloging-in-source program ( 1958-59) and its reincarnation in the cataloging-in-publication program ( 1971). the aims of the study were ( 1) to discover whether the various programs at the library of congress were sufficient to decrease the time-lag in cataloging, and ( 2) whether it is possible for the library of congress to accept bibliographical data as provided by publisher's catalogs. to answer the first question, a statistical sample of 5 percent of american trade publications in 1969 was taken from the n ational union catalog. the selected entries were checked against the time of their appearance in copyright office records, library of congress cards, marc tape input, and publisher's weekly. programs were designed and data fed to a computer. the results were compared to an earlier study done by roger greer in 1961, and it was found that, in spite of the various attempts which had been made by the library of congress to expedite the cataloging of books, the time needed to get cataloging information had in fact increased. the full details of the greer study, an unpublished doctoral dissertation, are not given, so it is difficult to assess the validity of the com30 information technology and libraries | march 2010 the path toward global interoperability in cataloging ilana tolkoff libraries began in complete isolation with no uniformity of standards and have grown over time to be ever more interoperable. this paper examines the current steps toward the goal of universal interoperability. these projects aim to reconcile linguistic and organizational obstacles, with a particular focus on subject headings, name authorities, and titles. i n classical and medieval times, library catalogs were completely isolated from each other and idiosyncratic. since then, there has been a trend to move toward greater interoperability. we have not yet attained this international standardization in cataloging, and there are currently many challenges that stand in the way of this goal. this paper will examine the teleological evolution of cataloging and analyze the obstacles that stand in the way of complete interoperability, how they may be overcome, and which may remain. this paper will not provide a comprehensive list of all issues pertaining to interoperability; rather, it will attempt to shed light on those issues most salient to the discussion. unlike the libraries we are familiar with today, medieval libraries worked in near total isolation. most were maintained by monks in monasteries, and any regulations in cataloging practice were established by each religious order. one reason for their lack of regulations was that their collections were small by our standards; a monastic library had at most a few hundred volumes (a couple thousand in some very rare cases). the “armarius,” or librarian, kept more of an inventory than an actual catalog, along with the inventories of all other valuable possessions of the monastery. there were no standard rules for this inventory-keeping, although the armarius usually wrote down the author and title, or incipit if there was no author or title. some of these inventories also contained bibliographic descriptions, which most often described the physical book rather than its contents. the inventories were usually taken according to the shelf organization, which was occasionally based on subject, like most libraries are today. these trends in medieval cataloging varied widely from library to library, and their inventories were entirely different from our modern opacs. the inventory did not provide users access to the materials. instead, the user consulted the armarius, who usually knew the collection by heart. this was a reasonable request given the small size of the collections.1 this type of nonstandardized cataloging remained relatively unchanged until the nineteenth century, when charles c. jewett introduced the idea of a union catalog. jewett also proposed having stereotype plates for each bibliographic record, rather than a book catalog, because this could reduce costs, create uniformity, and organize records alphabetically. this was the precursor to the twentieth-century card catalog. while many of jewett’s ideas were not actually practiced during his lifetime, they laid the foundation for later cataloging practices.2 the twentieth century brought a great revolution in cataloging standards, particularly in the united states. in 1914, the library of congress subject headings (lcsh) were first published and introduced a controlled vocabulary to american cataloging. the 1960s saw a wide array of advancements in standardization. the library of congress (lc) developed marc, which became a national standard in 1973. it also was the time of the creation of anglo-american cataloguing rules (aacr), the paris principles, and international standard bibliographic description (isbd). while many of these standardization projects were uniquely american or british phenomena, they quickly spread to other parts of the world, often in translated versions.3 while the technology did not yet exist in the 1970s to provide widespread local online catalogs, technology did allow for union catalogs containing the records of many libraries in a single database. these union catalogs included the research libraries information network (rlin), the oclc online computer library center (oclc), and the western library network (wln). in the 1980s the local online public access catalog (opac) emerged, and in the 1990s opacs migrated to the web (webpacs).4 currently, most libraries have opacs and are members of oclc, the largest union catalog, used by more than 71,000 libraries in 112 countries and territories.5 now that most of the world’s libraries are on oclc, librarians face the challenge and inconvenience of discrepancies in cataloging practice due to the differing standards of diverse countries, languages, and alphabets. the fields of language engineering and linguistics are working on various language translation and analysis tools. some of these include machine translation; ontology, or the hierarchical organization of concepts; information extraction, which deciphers conceptual information from unorganized information, such as that on the web; text summarization, in which computers create a short summary from a long piece of text; and speech processing, which is the computer analysis of human speech.6 while these are all exciting advances in information technology, as of yet they are not intelligent enough to help us establish cataloging interoperability. it will be interesting to see whether language engineering tools will be capable of helping catalogers in the future, but for now they are ilana tolkoff (ilana.tolkoff@gmail.com) holds a ba in music and italian from vassar college, an ma in musicology from brandeis university, and an mls from the university at buffalo. she is currently seeking employment as a music librarian. the path toward global interoperability in cataloging | tolkoff 31 best at making sense of unstructured information, such as the web. the interoperability of library catalogs, which consist of highly structured information, must be tackled through software that innovative librarians of the future will produce. in an ideal world, oclc would be smoothly interoperable at a global level. a single thesaurus of subject headings would have translations in every language. there would be just one set of authority files. all manifestations of a single work would be grouped under the same title, translatable to all languages. there would be a single bibliographic record for a single work, rather than multiple bibliographic records in different languages for the same work. this single bibliographic record could be translatable into any language, so that when searching in worldcat, one could change the settings to any language to retrieve records that would display in that chosen language. when catalogers contribute to oclc, they would create the records in their respective languages, and once in the database the records would be translatable to any other language. because records would be so fluidly translatable, an opac could be searched in any language. for example, the default settings for the university at buffalo’s opac could be english, but patrons could change those settings to accommodate the great variety of international students doing research. this vision is utopian to say the least, and it is doubtful that we will ever reach this point. but it is valuable to establish an ideal scenario to aim our innovation in the right direction. one major obstacle in the way of global interoperability is the existence of different alphabets and the inherently imperfect nature of transliteration. there are essentially two types of transliteration schemes: those based on phonetic structure and those based on morphemic structure. the danger of phonetic transliteration, which mimics pronunciation, is that semantics often get lost. it fails to differentiate between homographs (words that are spelled and pronounced the same way but have different meanings). complications also arise when there are differences between careful and casual styles of speech. park asserts, “when catalogers transcribe words according to pronunciation, they can create inconsistent and arbitrary records.”7 morphemic transliteration, on the other hand, is based on the meanings of morphemes, and sometimes ends up being very different from the pronunciation in the source language. one advantage to this, however, is that it requires fewer diacritics than phonetic transliteration. park, whose primary focus is on korean–roman transliteration, argues that the mccune reischauer phonetic transliteration that libraries use loses too much of the original meaning. in other alphabets, however, phonetic transliteration may be more beneficial, as in the lc’s recent switch to pinyin transliteration in chinese. the lc found pinyin to be more easily searchable than wade-giles or monosyllabic pinyin, which are both morphemic. however, another problem with transliteration that neither phonetic nor morphemic schemes can solve is word segmentation—how a transliterated word is divided. this becomes problematic when there are no contextual clues, such as in a bibliographic record.8 other obstacles that stand in the way of interoperability are the diverse systems of subject headings, authority headings, and titles found internationally. resource description and access (rda) will not deal with subject headings because it is such a hefty task, so it is unlikely that subject headings will become globally interoperable in the near future.9 fortunately, twenty-four national libraries of english speaking countries use lcsh, and twelve non-english-speaking countries use a translated or modified version of lcsh. this still leaves many more countries that use their own systems of subject headings, which ultimately need to be made interoperable. even within a single language, subject headings can be complicated and inconsistent because they can be expressed as a single noun, compound noun, noun phrase, or inverted phrase; the problem becomes even greater when trying to translate these to other languages. bennett, lavoie, and o’neill note that catalogers often assign different subject headings (and classifications) to different manifestations of the same work.10 that is, the record for the novel gone with the wind might have different subject headings than the record for the movie. this problem could potentially be resolved by the functional requirements for bibliographic records (frbr), which will be discussed below. translation is a difficult task, particularly in the context of strict cataloging rules. it is especially complicated to translate among unrelated languages, where one might be syntactic and the other inflectional. this means that there are discrepancies in the use of prepositions, conjunctions, articles, and inflections. the ability to add or remove terms in translation creates endless variations. a single concept can be expressed in a morpheme, a word, a phrase, or a clause, depending on the language. there also are cultural differences that are reflected in different languages. park gives the example of how angloamerican culture often names buildings and brand names after people, reflecting our culture’s values of individualism, while in korea this phenomenon does not exist at all. on the other hand, korean’s use of formal and informal inflections reflects their collectivist hierarchical culture. another concept that does not cross cultural lines is the korean pumasi system in which family and friends help someone in a time of need with the understanding that the favor will be returned when they need it. this cannot be translated into a single english word, phrase, or subject heading. one way of resolving ambiguity in translations is through modifiers or scope notes, but this is only a partial solution.11 because translation and transliteration are so difficult, 32 information technology and libraries | march 2010 as well as labor-intensive, the current trend is to link already existing systems. multilingual access to subjects (macs) is one such linking project that aims to link subject headings in english, french, and german. it is a joint project under the conference of european national librarians among the swiss national library, the bibliothèque nationale de france (bnf), the british library (bl), and die deutsche bibliothek (ddb). it aims to link the english lcsh, the french répertoire d’autorité matière encyclopédique et alphabétique unifié (rameau), and the german schlagwortnormdatei/ regeln für den schlagwortkatalog (swd/rswk). this requires manually analyzing and matching the concepts in each heading. if there is no conceptual equivalent, then it simply stands alone. macs can link between headings and strings or even create new headings for linking purposes. this is not as fruitful as it sounds, however, as there are fewer correspondences than one might expect. the macs team experimented with finding correspondences by choosing two topics: sports, which was expected to have a particularly high number of correspondences, and theater, which was expected to have a particularly low number of correspondences. of the 278 sports headings, 86 percent matched in all three languages, 8 percent matched in two, and 6 percent was unmatched. of the 261 theater headings, 60 percent matched in three languages, 18 percent matched in two, and 22 percent was unmatched.12 even in the most cross-cultural subject of sports, 14 percent of terms did not correspond fully, making one wonder whether linking will work well enough to prevail. a similar project—the virtual international authority file (viaf)—is being undertaken for authority headings, a joint project of the lc, the bnf, and ddb, and now including several other national libraries. viaf aims to link (not consolidate) existing authority files, and its beta version (available at http://viaf.org) allows one to search by name, preferred name, or title. oclc’s software mines these authority files and the titles associated with them for language, lc control number, lc classification, usage, title, publisher, place of publication, date of publication, material type, and authors. it then derives a new enhanced authority record, which facilitates mapping among authority records in all of viaf’s languages. these derived authority records are stored on oai servers, where they are maintained and can be accessed by users. users can search viaf by a single national library or broaden their possibilities by searching all participating national libraries. as of 2006, between the lc’s and ddb’s authority files, there were 558,618 matches, including 70,797 complex matches (one-to-many), and 487,821 unique matches (one-to-one) out of 4,187,973 lc names and 2,659,276 ddb names. ultimately, viaf could be used for still more languages, including non-roman alphabets.13 recently the national library of israel has joined, and viaf can link to the hebrew alphabet. a similar project to viaf that also aimed to link authority files was linking and exploring authority files (leaf), which was under the auspices of the information society technologies programme of the fifth framework of the european commission. the three-year project began in 2001 with dozens of libraries and organizations (many of which are national libraries), representing eight languages. its website describes the project as follows: information which is retrieved as a result of a query will be stored in a pan-european “central name authority file.” this file will grow with each query and at the same time will reflect what data records are relevant to the leaf users. libraries and archives wanting to improve authority information will thus be able to prioritise their editing work. registered users will be able to post annotations to particular data records in the leaf system, to search for annotations, and to download records in various formats.14 park identifies two main problems with linking authority files. one is that name authorities still contain some language-specific features. the other is that disambiguation can vary among name authority systems (e.g., birth/death dates, corporate qualifiers, and profession/ activity). these are the challenges that projects like leaf and viaf must overcome. while the linking of subject headings and name authorities is still experimental and imperfect, the frbr model for linking titles is much more promising and will be incorporated in the soon-to-be-released rda. according to bennett, lavoie, and o’neill, there are three important benefits to frbr: (1) it allows for different views of a bibliographic database, (2) it creates a hierarchy of bibliographic entities in the catalog such that all versions of the same work fall into a single collapsible entry point, (3) and the confluence of the first two benefits makes the catalog more efficient. in the frbr model, the bibliographic record consists of four entities: (1) the work, (2) the expression, (3) the manifestation, and (4) the item. all manifestations of a single work are grouped together, allowing for a more economical use of information because the title needs to be entered only once.15 that is, a “title authority file” will exist much like a name authority file. this means that all editions in all languages and in all formats would be grouped under the same title. for example, the lord of the rings title would include all novels, films, translations, and editions in one grouping. this would reduce the number of bibliographic records, and as danskin notes, “the idea of creating more records at a time when publishing output threatens to outstrip the cataloguing capacity of national bibliographic agencies is alarming.”16 the frbr model is particularly beneficial for complex canonical works like the bible. there are a small number of complex canonical works, but they take up a the path toward global interoperability in cataloging | tolkoff 33 disproportionate number of holdings in oclc.17 because this only applies to a small number of works, it would not be difficult to implement, and there would be a disproportionate benefit in the long run. there is some uncertainty, however, in what constitutes a complex work and whether certain items should be grouped under the same title.18 for instance, should prokofiev’s romeo and juliet be grouped with shakespeare’s? the advantage of the frbr model for titles over subject headings or name authorities is that no such thing as a title authority file exists (as conceptualized by frbr). we would be able to start from scratch, creating such title authority files at the international level. subject headings and name authorities, on the other hand, already exist in many different forms and languages so that cross-linking projects like viaf might be our only option. it is encouraging to see the strides being made to make subject headings, name authority headings, and titles globally interoperable, but what about other access points within a record’s bibliographic description? these are usually in only one language, or two if cataloged in a bilingual country. should these elements (format, contents, and so on) be cross-linked as well, and is this even possible? what should reasonably be considered an access point? most people search by subject, author, or title, so perhaps it is not worth making other types of access points interoperable for the few occasions when they are useful. yet if 100 percent universal interoperability is our ultimate utopian goal, perhaps we should not settle for anything less than true international access to all fields in a record. because translation and transliteration are such complex undertakings, linking of extant files is the future of the field. there are advantages and disadvantages to this. on the one hand, linking these files is certainly better than having them exist only for their own countries. they are easily executed projects that would not require a total overhaul of the way things currently stand. the disadvantages are not to be ignored, however. the fact that files do not correspond perfectly from language to language means that many files will remain in isolation in the national library that created them. another problem is that cross-linking is potentially more confusing to the user; the search results on http://www.viaf.org are not always simple and straightforward. if cross-linking is where we are headed, then we need to focus on a more user-friendly interface. if the ultimate goal of interoperability is simplification, then we need to actually simplify the way query results are organized rather than make them more confusing. very soon rda will be released and will bring us to a new level of interoperability. aacr2 arrived in 1978, and though it has been revised several times, it is in many ways outdated and mainly applies to books. rda will bring something completely new to the table. it will be flexible enough to be used in other metadata schemes besides marc, and it can even be used by different industries such as publishers, museums, and archives.19 its incorporation of the frbr model is exciting as well. still, there are some practical problems in implementing rda and frbr, one of which is that reeducating librarians about the new rules will be costly and take time. also, frbr in its ideal form would require a major overhaul of the way oclc and integrated library systems currently operate, so it will be interesting to see to what extent rda will actually incorporate frbr and how it will be practically implemented. danskin asks, “will the benefits of international co-operation outweigh the costs of effecting changes? is the usa prepared to change its own practices, if necessary, to conform to european or wider ifla standards?”20 it seems that the united states is in fact ready and willing to adopt frbr, but to what extent is yet to be determined. what i have discussed in this paper are some of the more prominent international standardization projects, although there are countless others, such as eurowordnet, the open language archives community (olac), and international cataloguing code (icc), to name but a few.21 in general, the current major projects consist of linking subject headings, name authority files, and titles in multiple languages. linking may not have the best correspondence rates, we have still not begun to tackle the cross-linking of other bibliographic elements, and at this point search results may be more confusing than helpful. but the existence of these linking projects means we are at least headed in the right direction. the emergent universality of oclc was our most recent step toward interoperability, and it looks as if cross-linking is our next step. only time will tell what steps will follow. references 1. lawrence s. guthrie ii, “an overview of medieval library cataloging,” cataloging & classification quarterly 15, no. 3 (1992): 93–100. 2. lois mai chan and theodora hodges, cataloging and classification: an introduction, 3rd ed. (lanham, md.: scarecrow, 2007): 48. 3. ibid., 6–8. 4. ibid., 7–9. 5. oclc, “about oclc,” http://www.oclc.org/us/en/ about/default.htm (accessed dec. 9, 2009). 6. jung-ran park, “cross-lingual name and subject access: mechanisms and challenges,” library resources & technical services 51, no. 3 (2007): 181. 7. ibid., 185. 8. ibid. continued on page 39 tagging: an organization scheme for the internet | visser 39 international and o’reilly media, web 2.0 refers to the web as being a platform for harnessing the collective power of internet users interested in creating and sharing ideas and information without mediation from corporate, government, or other hierarchical policy influencers or regulators. web 3.0 is a much more fluid concept as of this writing. there are individuals who use it to refer to a semantic web where information is analyzed or processed by software designed specifically for computers to carry out the currently human-mediated activity of assigning meaning to information on a webpage. there are librarians involved with exploring virtual-world librarianship who refer to the 3d environment as web 3.0. the important point here is that what internet users now know as web 2.0 is in the process of being altered by individuals continually experimenting with and improving upon existing web applications. web 3.0 is the undefined future of the participatory internet. 3. clay shirky, “here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations” (presentation videocast, berkman center for internet & society, harvard university, cambridge, mass., 2008), http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/inter active/events/2008/02/shirky (accessed oct. 1, 2008). 4. ibid. 5. lawerence lessig, “early creative commons history, my version,” videocast, aug. 11, 2008, lessig 2.0, http://lessig.org/ blog/2008/08/early_creative_commons_history.html (accessed aug. 13, 2008). 6. elaine peterson, “beneath the metadata: some philosophical problems with folksonomy,” d-lib magazine 12, no. 11 (2006), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november06/peterson/11peterson .html (accessed sept. 8, 2008). 7. clay shirky, “ontology is overrated: categories, links, and tags” online posting, spring 2005, clay shirky’s writings about the internet, http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_ overrated.html#mind_reading (accessed sept. 8, 2008). 8. gene smith, tagging: people-powered metadata for the social web (berkeley, calif.: new riders, 2008): 68. 9. ibid., 76. 10. thomas vander wal, “folksonomy,” online posting, feb. 7, 2007, vanderwal.net, http://www.vanderwal.net/folksonomy .html (accessed aug. 26, 2008). 11. thomas vander wal, “explaining and showing broad and narrow folksonomies,” online posting, feb. 21, 2005, personal infocloud, http://www.personalinfocloud.com/2005/02/ explaining_and_.html (accessed aug. 29, 2008). 12. shirky, “ontology is overrated.” 13. ibid. 14. michael arrington, “exclusive: screen shots and feature overview of delicious 2.0 preview,” online posting, june 16, 2005, techcrunch, http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/ exclusive-screen-shots-and-feature-overview-of-delicious-20 -preview/(accessed jan. 6, 2010). 15. smith, tagging, 67–93 . 16. vander wal, “explaining and showing broad and narrow folksonomies.” 17. adam mathes, “folksonomies—cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata” (graduate paper, university of illinois urbana–champaign, dec. 2004); peterson, “beneath the metadata”; shirky, “ontology is overrated”; thomas and griffin, “who will create the metadata for the internet?” 18. shirky, “ontology is overrated.” 19. peterson, “beneath the metadata.” 20. cory doctorow, “metacrap: putting the torch to seven straw-men of the meta-utopia,” online posting, aug. 26, 2001, the well, http://www.well.com/~doctorow/metacrap.htm (accessed sept. 15, 2008). 21. marieke guy and emma tonkin, “folksonomies: tidying up tags?” d-lib magazine 12, no. 1 (2006), http://www.dlib .org/dlib/january06/guy/01guy.html (accessed sept. 8, 2008). 22. shirky, “ontology is overrated.” global interoperability continued from page 33 9. julie renee moore, “rda: new cataloging rules, coming soon to a library near you!” library hi tech news 23, no. 9, (2006): 12. 10. rick bennett, brian f. lavoie, and edward t. o’neill, “the concept of a work in worldcat: an application of frbr,” library collections, acquisitions, & technical services 27, no. 1, (2003): 56. 11. park, “cross-lingual name and subject access.” 12. ibid. 13. thomas b. hickey, “virtual international authority file” (microsoft powerpoint presentation, ala annual conference, new orleans, june 2006), http://www.oclc.org/research/ projects/viaf/ala2006c.ppt (accessed dec. 9, 2009). 14. leaf, “leaf project consortium,” http://www.crxnet .com/leaf/index.html (accessed dec. 9, 2009). 15. bennett, lavoie, and o’neill, “the concept of a work in worldcat.” 16. alan danskin, “mature consideration: developing bibliographic standards and maintaining values,” new library world 105, no. 3/4, (2004): 114. 17. ibid. 18. bennett, lavoie, and o’neill, “the concept of a work in worldcat.” 19. moore, “rda.” 20. danskin, “mature consideration,” 116. 21. ibid.; park, “cross-lingual name and subject access.” lib-s-mocs-kmc364-20140601051731 58 book reviews descriptive cataloguing; a student's introduction to the anglo-american cataloguing rules 1967. by james a. tait and douglas anderson. second ed.; rev. and enl. hamden, conn.: linnet books, 1971, 122p. $5.00 this second edition contains some corrections to the errors made in the 1968 edition, and includes the changes and clarifications brought out by the aacr amendment bulletin. the number of exemplary title pages has been increased from twenty-five to forty, thus giving the student more practice in determining entries and doing descriptive cataloging. this reviewer believes that a more exact title would be "descriptive cataloging and determining entries and headings," because this introductory text not only covers descriptive cataloging as defined and explained in "part iidescriptive cataloging" of the anglo-american cataloguing rules, but also includes some of the basic rules for determining entries and headings in aacr's "part !-entry and heading." there are three distinct sections: descriptive cataloging; determining entries and headings; and facsimile title pages for student practice. descriptive cataloging is covered in just thirteen pages, but all the basic elements are there. the explanations are clear and examples are shown, but not in the context of a full card. (unfortunately only one full catalog card is illustrated in the entire book.) it is in this section, more than in any other, where the differences between british and american cataloging become obvious. british descriptive cataloging varies in so many ways from its american counterpart that a beginning student in an american library school would be quite confused by these variations. the next section consists of twenty-five pages and is devoted to the basic rules on entries and headings. examples are used to illustrate the rules and the authors point out some differences between the british and american texts of the aacr. the remaining seventy pages contain the forty reproduced title pages which are followed by some commentary and a key corresponding to each title page. these title pages give the student a wide range of experience in transcribing the proper information onto the card and in determining main and added entries. even though this book is an excellent introduction to the rudiments of descriptive cataloging and the determination of main and added entries, book reviews 59 its use of british descriptive cataloging precludes its being widely adopted in beginning cataloging courses in american library schools. donald /. l ehnus centmlized processing for academic librm·ies. by richard m. dougherty and joan m. maier. metuchen, n.j.: scarecrow press, 1971. 254p. $10.00 this is the final report of the colorado academic libraries book processing center ( calbpc) two-part study investigating centralized processing. phase i, reported by laurence leonard, maier, and dougherty in centralized book processing, scarecrow, 1969, was basically a feasibility study, whereas this final report describes the beginning six months of operations that tested the phase i recommendations. partially funded by the national science foundation, the experiment measured anticipated time and cost savings, monitored acquisitions and cataloging operations, and tested product acceptability for six libraries participating in the 1969, six-month study. even though centralized book processing might hold little appeal for the reader, this volume nonetheless is valuable to technical service heads because of its above average sophistication in applying a systems analysis approach to technical services problems. the authors objectively report their findings, outlining in detail the mistakes, the unanticipated problem areas, and what they believed to be the successes. from the start the authors encountered problems with scheduling. by the time the experiment began most participants had a large portion of their book money encumbered, and the center was forced to accept cataloging arrearages in addition to book order requests. those who did send in orders did not conform to patterns predicted in phase i. instead, the center was used as a source of obtaining more difficult materials, including foreign language items. it was discovered that in actual practice calbpc had no impact on discounts received from vendors. the vendor performance study lacked relevancy because it was based upon the date invoices were cleared for payment rather than the date books were received in house. in evaluating the total processing time, four libraries reduced their time lag by participating in the center's centralized processing, and the cost of processing the average book was reduced from $3.10 to $2.63. the product acceptance study showed that the physical processing was only partially accepted with most of the libraries modifying a truncated title that was printed on the book card and book pocket as a by-product of the automated financial subsystem. other local modifications were made on books processed by the center but that cost or local error correction costs were not reported in the study. calbpc's automated financial subsystem was beseiged with many problems resulting from lack of programming foresight and adequate consulting 60 journal of library automation vol. 5/1 march, 1972 by those who had previously designed such systems. individuals interested in the automation of acquisitions should read this section of the report. calbpc's problems were typically those of building exceptions to exceptions in order to accommodate unanticipated program omissio.ns. simply not recognizing that books could be processed before invoices were paid caused delays and bottlenecks of such magnitude that procedures had to be devised to circumvent requirements of the automated subsystem. many recommendations were particularly relevant to cooperative ventures. in formulating processing specifications such as call number format and abbreviation standardization, calbpc had not anticipated the infinite local variations they would have to accommodate. they quickly recognized the need for both greater quality control to minimize errors within the system and better communications and educational programs for participants. a reoccurring message was that librarians emphasized the esthetics of catalog cards rather than the content, thus a recommendation was made to investigate whether a positive correlation exists between the esthetics of the product and the quality of the library service. the authors emphasized that a cooperative program depends more upon competencies and willingness of individuals than the technical aspects of the operations. some diversification of services was called for but no mention was made of the possibilities of an on-line system. it was felt that in future operations the center should accept orders for out-of-print and audiovisual materials. those libraries participating in approval programs had received no benefit by having books sent first to the center, thus it was suggested that the center forward those libraries a bibliographic packet only and that the approval books bypass the center. this well-documented study, half of which is devoted to charts and appendix materials, concluded its recommendations with a positive evaluation of the service the center had performed and suggested that public and school libraries should also be participants. ann allan college and research libraries many other points that lyle rais~s would also deserve comment. space does not permit discussing here, however, various questions that have vexed many a college librarian, be it the desirable size of the open-stack book collection, the . usefulness of browsing rooms, or the educational value of departmental libraries. suffice it' to say that the forward-looking college librarian will do well to buy not qnly a copy of lyle's book for the library but to add another to his private collection. it is one of those fairly rare volumes of our profession:al literature th~t warrants re-reading.-felix · e. hirsch, librarian, bard college,, annandale-on-h udson, n.y. . the eleventh catalogers, y earboo.k catalogers, and cla;si/iers, yearbook no. i i, 1945. compiled by the division of cataloging and classification of the american library association. chicago, a.l.a., 1945· 96p. this, the eleventh number of the catalogers, and classifiers, yearbook, represents a resumption of the series . (the tenth number appeared in 1941) after the plans for a quarterly journal were at least temporarily abandoned. sponsored, as in the past, by the division of cataloging, and classification of the a.l.a. and under the general editorship of a special committee of which margaret oldfather, of ohio state university, is chairman, the volume closely follows the pattern and format of its predecessors. the first six contributions to the symposium · were presented originally at the milwaukee conference in 1942. that their publication has been so long delayed seems not in the least to have diminished their usefulness-a virtue which may be either attributed to the timelessness of their contents or to the eternal repetitiousness of library literature, depending upon one's point of view. to these have been added two special papers by robert b. downs and herman h. henkle and the text of the report made at the close of 1943 by the library of congress to the general education board concerning the status of the cooperative cataloging project. · the compilation concludes with a listing of the officer's and committees of the division of cataloging and classification, and the entire work is dedicated to the memory of]. c. m. hanson. truly a modest libation for one whose career was so distinguished. as one might expect, the implications of the new a.l.a. catalog code loom large in the several papers, for it was during the period covered by these essays that the september~ 1945 a.l.a. catalogcode revisio~ committee brought to completion its prelimin:ary work. but if one were to point out a common denominator for all the papers which comprise this collection, it would be a recognition of the growing awareness among catalogers that they are on the defensive against charges of steeply . mounting cataloging co~ts. . that these accusations are not without foundation is evident from the seriousness with which all the writers re-gard them and th~ impressive array of statistical · evidence that is beginning to accumulate from cost. analysis investigations in various types of institutions . . it is too easy to dismiss the seriousness of the growing financial burden invol~ed in the maintenance . and expansion of our swelling card catalogs as being merely an inevitable by-product of the increasing size and complexity of libraries themselves. the problem is much more than a mere exer~ise in the projection of a parabolic curve; it strikes at the very raison d,etre of the dictionary catalog and asks frankly and bluntly whether the instrument really justifies the tremendous expense involved. julia pettee, in the opening paper of the collection, hastens to defend the "authorship principle" elaborately set forth in the new code as being in reality a long-term economy and denies that the code should be made a "scapegoat" for "all the costs that new modern demands make upon our catalogs" (p. 19). grace p. fuller is equallystaunch in her support of econ9mies made possible by the present methods of establishing corporate entry; and a similar poi~t of view .is maintained by clara beetle when she writes of personal authors and anonymous classics in the library of congress catalog. that the card catalog is a focal point in library operation is implicit in the trilogy on 371 cataloging for the college library. frances l. yocum, after examining her survey of ten college libraries, urges greater care in developing and expanding the resources of the catalog and more attention to its interpretation on the part of both library staff and faculty. she would be among the first to argue for the values inherent in this increasingly expensive index of the library's resources. in an effort to determine haw far simplified cataloging practices could contribute to the current demand for decreasing the cost of cataloging, evelyn hensel surveyed twenty college librari'es. she concludes, however, that there has been "too much attention to the problem of simplification of the details on catalog cards without having determined what simplication is desirable" ( p. 50). finally winifred a. johnson reverts to the age-old cry of the cataloger that "economies" in cataloging do not always result in economies elsewhere in the library system. the papers contributed to the yearbook terminate with robert b. downs's cursory examination of the perplexing problems of library statistics, duplicate copies, pamphlets, and rare books, and herman h. henkle's report on the library of congress conference on .cataloging held in washington from oct. 18 to nov. 19, 1943. at these meetings there apparently was much agitation for a simpli_fication of cataloging processes that would result in a material reduction of costs, but little seems . to have been accomplished except a general expression of faith in pooling resources and intensifying cooperation. one perhaps can best summarize the cumulative impression of the symposium under review by saying that it is professionally wholesome to see catalogers and library admm1strators alike alarmed by the increasing costs of the catalog, which are certain to increase if present-day procedure and methods are maintained in the face of the growth and increasing complexity of book stocks. it is heartening to see this new awareness because the recognition of any problem is an essential preliminary step to its solution. but these essays also testify to the degree to which the thinking of catalogers is still too strongly molded by tradition to admit of effective action in dealing with rising catalog costs. the real problem of the catalog is not one of costs but of values, and until we can view the catalog, especially the subject catalog, objectively and in its proper relation to the other bibliographical resources of the library and can say with certainty that it can accomplish with greater efficiency than any other bibliographical instrument the task which it purports to perform, then and then only can its mounting costs be justified. this is a problem which is certainly not impossible of solution, but it cannot be solved by conferences and armchair speculation. it is one that can be met adequately only through the united effort of practicing catalogers and the library schools; for only by research and experimentation, based on a sincere attempt , to examine all the factors involved, can the true answer be found. one scarcely needs labor the point that if libraries continue to grow as they have in the past the dictionary catalog in its present form cannot long survive; and if a more effective substitute is not developed catalogers will soon discover that the house of cards which they have so painstakingly built will come fluttering down about their ears.-] es-se h auk sh era, chief, preparations d epartment, university of chicago library. liberal education in america teacher in america. jacques barzun. boston, little, brown, 1945. (an atlantic monthly press book) vi, 321p. better colleges-better teachers. russell m. cooper, et al. [new york, macmillan , 1945] viii, 167p. the rebirth of liberal education. fred b. millett. new york, harcourt, brace, 1945· [xii] 179p· college librarians looking for a simple answer to all problems confronting teachers will not find it in any of these studies. there is no blueprint for the good life. each of the books is pregnant with the complexities of our present-day culture. recognition of these complexities should stimulate rather than frighten, should encourage rather than depress. the greatest ultimate strength of 3i2 college and research libraries college and research libraries grosch, university of minnesota, minneapolis. townley, helen m. systems analysis for information retrieval. institute of information scientists monograph series. a grafton book boulder, colo.: westview p,ress; london: andre deutsch, 1978. 121p. $13.50. isbn 0-233-96920-9. exactly how does one go about designing and implementing an information retrieval system for a particular organization? what are the various options that the designers and programmers must choose among? how does it all work? one can get a pretty good feeling for the answers to these questions from this very readable little book of about ninety pages (plus a few appendixes). the author has almost twenty years of experience designing and implementing information retrieval systems. in her book she has interspersed little gems of wisdom only that experience can give. these range from the seemingly trivial "never make a note of anything without dating it" to the key observation that the system is likely to veer off course, or flounder entirely. hence the statement of project goals "is to be the most important single document . . . for obtaining (and keeping!) backing for the project and for keeping control of the evolving system as it comes into being." it is refreshing to read someone who realizes that systems analysis is very subjective, "partly technique and partly flair." townley realizes that there are numerous designs that can result from analysis and that we will create and destroy dozens of such seemingly clear-cut things as record specifications before we settle on one to actually implement. in this book we are once again reminded that the job of the analyst is only possible if he or she can get people to talk-and it is important to talk to all levels of workers and to more than one at each level. townley takes great pains to demonstrate to us exactly how dumb the computer is (without going through the boring details of binary number systems!). by providing clear and concise descriptions of the concepts of files, records, and fields, as well as several major file and field addressing techniques, we can begin to get a picture of how sophisrecent publications i 89 ticated systems are built out of simple elements. the illustrations of computer searching techniques (such as boolean logic) bring out the work that computers do in information retrieval systems in order to perform their amazing feats. the author's final word of warning is something that we are only now beginning to appreciate: "it must not be forgotten that the computer based service will not save labour: it will only permit more work to result from the same effort. management must never underestimate the manpower and time that will be required to keep the new system working." in short, this is a very down-to-earth and practical book on systems analysis for information retrieval, filled with good advice to those who are about to embark on projects in this field.-stephen m. silberstein, university of california, berkeley. smith, lynn s. a practical approach to serials cataloging. foundations in library and information science, volume 2. greenwich, conn.: jai press, 1978. heritage on microfilnt rare and out-of-print titles and documents on 35mm silver halide microfilm. • french books before 1601 • scandinavian culture • 18th century english literature • victorian fiction • literature of folklore • hispanic culture send for catalog and title information today. genew\l microfilm comp~y 100 inman st., cambridge, ma 02139 tel. (617) 864-2820 90 i college & research libraries • january 1979 424p. $32.50. lc 77-25282. isbn 0-89232-007-9. a practical approach to serials cataloging ostensibly aims to teach librarians how to catalog a serial, but for a number of reasons the text is not geared for instruction. the author has covered everything that might conceivably fall within the scope of serial cataloging and as a result has highlighted the problems without offering workable solutions. through emphasis on coverage, organization and brevity have suffered. the future cataloger is not guided logically through the stages required to create a catalog entry, and the rambling text makes it difficult to extract the portions on the practical aspects of cataloging. of the eighteen chapters, only about eleven are concerned with the construction of a serial catalog entry. basic cataloging tools and reference works essential to the cataloger are not mentioned in the opening portion of the text, nor is searching. almost at once the reader is plunged into a discussion of serial entry, which focuses on rule six of the anglo-american cataloging rules (aacr). when the discussion reaches aacr 6b1, the reader is not informed that only certain categories of material are covered by this rule, and that the exception accompanying the rule relates only to these categories. the chapter on title changes discusses the pros and cons of earliest, latest, and successive entry cataloging without adequately identifying the major differences between the cataloging entries. large portions of chapter seven of aacr have been reproduced in the chapter on descriptive cataloging, but revised chapter six is rarely even cited. yet rules from both of these chapters are followed when transcribing bibliographic data onto the catalog entry. often the author claims the rules in chapter seven are obvious, but history has proved otherwise, for catalogers have been subjected to endless interpretations. although she recommends practices and procedures that violate the aacr in this chapter and elsewhere in the text, she often does not make it clear that they are nonstandard. selection of the title page, which is crucial to accurate bibliographic description, is mentioned briefly on page 97 in the chapter on descriptive cataloging. the author dismisses the subject because the majority of serials do not have title pages. the majority of periodical issues are published without title pages, but not the majority of serials. and even if her observation were true, the cataloger still has to know how to select a title page or a title page substitute. this erroneous statement is one of many that are made, particularly when the author embarks upon a discussion of serial cataloging at the library of congress. unfortunately, the impact of automation on serials cataloging in the past couple of years has dated the book prior to publication. for example, cooperative on-line cataloging, a result of the conser project, is not mentioned. an unusual and admirable feature of the book is the emphasis on the relation between technical and public service. although excellent indexes and useful lists accompany the text, there is no glossary of cataloging and bibliographic terms. in fact, the author gives little attention to defining the library terms she uses. regretfully, for all of the above reasons, the text fails in its main purpose, to teach the basic principles of serial cataloging.judith p. cannan, washington, d.c. abstracts the following abstracts are based on those prepared by the eric clearinghouse on information resources, school of education, syracuse university. documents with an ed number here may be ordered in either microfiche (mf) or paper copy (hc) from the eric document reproduction servic~, p.o. box 190, arlington, va 22210. orders should include ed number, specify format desired, and include payment for document and postage. further information on ordering documents and on current postage charges may be obtained from a recent issue of resources in education. planning information services in the liberal arts college library. by richard e. miller and bruce morton. 1977. 27p. ed 154 780. mf -$0.83; hc-$2.06. college and research libraries by h e n r y b a r t l e t t v a n h o e s e n perspective in cataloging1 henry bartlett van hoesen is librarian of brown university library, providence. ha b i t h a s built a sort of fence be-tween cataloging and administration. i have been on both sides of this fence—and i still am. t o say that this fence is one of hostility would be an exaggeration. it's something like this: one librarian, questioned about his cataloging department said, " w e l l , the catalog department turns out about so many books in its own fashion, and there's nothing you can do about it." he may be right, but i won't admit it. on the other hand, d r . bishop seems to dash our dream of selective cataloging with a realistic epigram: " i think it requires more sense and discrimination than are usually found in our cataloging departments." t h i s may be true, but, again, i won't have it so. here are two examples of the opposing extremes. in a time of reduced budget and staff, one librarian ordered: " w e must not pile up arrears. t h e catalog department must do the best it can, and books must be sent to the shelves within twenty-four hours of their receipt in the catalog department." set against this a head cataloger who shrugs her shoulders: " y e s we have thousands of arrears and they are increasing. if the university wants them cataloged, they'll have to find more money for it—that's all." more recently, d r . branscomb's teaching with books2 appears to view the cata1 paper read before the new york regional catalog group, april 26, 1940. 2 branscomb, harvie. teaching with books. association of american colleges and a . l . a . , 1940. log exclusively as an obstacle to the use of books and, in talking about costs of library service and suggesting economies, makes cataloging costs his chief, almost his only, burden of complaint. t h i s attitude of mind and this manner of speaking make one who is astraddle the fence want to jump to the cataloger's side —if they will let him. studies of the cost of cataloging have been based on the number of items cataloged, not on the use of the catalog. it is customary to distinguish between acquisition and cataloging on the one hand and service on the other, but does not the service begin with the use of the catalog? inadequate as circulation statistics are, can they not be used as fairly for estimating the service contributed by the catalog as for estimating the service of the circulation division? in fremont rider's "library cost accounting,"3 cataloging labor cost is 70 cents per volume cataloged, circulation cost is 24 cents per volume of regular circulation, but if both are figured on the basis of regular circulation, the cataloging cost is only 33 cents as compared with 24 cents circulation cost. if one compares labor costs of acquisition, periodical checking, accessioning and cataloging, with labor costs of circulation, public use (reading and reference) and storage, the preparations services cost 5 ° cents and the public services 42 cents per volume of regular circulation. then why the complaint about the high cost of cataloging? and now i shall try to get back into 3 rider, fremont. " l i b r a r y cost accounting." library quarterly 6 : 3 3 1 8 1 , oct. 1936. 330 college and research libraries the role for which i am cast, get over on the other side of the fence, and hazard some answers to my own question. first, economies are necessary, urgently so at this time. in the second place, the function of the cataloging department is most difficult for the layman to understand. ( t h e layman's private library needs no catalog; or only a very crude one.)4 t h e manufacturer's or tradesman's stock, though its items outnumber any library's, needs only an inventory, and that with a comparatively limited number of entries. third, cataloging processes are most complex and intricate, and so, as my librarian friend said, it seems that nothing can be done about it—but as i have said, i won't have it that way.5 finally, if it appears that the librarian can do nothing about it, it also sometimes appears that the catalogers don't want to do anything about it. t h i s is severe treatment of the catalogers, which most of them do not deserve, but i am thinking of the cataloger whom i quoted. a f t e r interesting myself in different organization plans and divisions of labor in the catalog department, and even in machinery (though i hate it) and in many other, more specific remedies, i have developed my own perspective successively from "short cataloging" to "selective cataloging," and from "selective cataloging" to "perspective in cataloging," for i won't have it that catalogers can't discriminate. perspective on work accomplished t h e first phase of perspective is a perspective simply of work—work and accomplishment. i have always been so intent 4 cf. hanson, j . c. m. " s o u n d and unsound economy in cataloging." library quarterly 4:6575, j a n . 1934. 0 cf. osborn, andrew d. "cataloging costs and a changing conception of cataloging." catalogers' and, classifiers' yearbook, a . l . a . , 1936, pp. 45-54. on getting a job done, once it was assigned, that i have had no time to worry about whether it was interesting or not—and i have dug ditches, pitched hay, and picked stones out of the road. perspective on the material cataloged following the perspective on work as an opportunity for satisfaction in accomplishment, there is the perspective of interest in the materials with which the work is concerned. here cataloging books has an advantage over shoveling dirt. a german professor emigre, who took a job shelving books in a library, told me that the year he spent at it was the most interesting of his life, because he saw all the important new books as they came in, and all the important old books as they came from circulation. t h e cataloger has the advantage of being able to see inside the books. t h e cataloger is both accomplishing something and working with interesting materials. perspective on people t h e third perspective is perspective on people. i have known persons who thought they would prefer the routine of circulation to that of cataloging, because they like to deal with people. in my own experience, i find the people i meet in catalog departments interesting personalities. it is the cataloger's perspective on his fellow-catalogers that makes his organization function flexibly and smoothly according to its personnel. and it is the cataloger's perspective on the varieties of people who use the library which determines the adaptability of cataloging results to their uses. one need not see the patrons as they charge out a book, or ask where the world almanac is, or where they left their hats. one can learn more about them from the september, 1940 34 7 books ordered for their use, from the courses they teach and from the books they write—"by their works shall ye know them." t h i s is the perspective i mean— a sort of combined perspective on books and people, a perspective on the use-objective of the library catalog. perspective on financial exigencies finally, there is the financial perspective, and here the fault, where and if it exists, is most probably with the head cataloger, or the librarian, or the college administration. t h e college president cannot with propriety take every member of the college staff into his confidence on details of finances and budgets. t h e librarian is in a similar situation as regards the library staff. t h e chief cataloger cannot tell his assistant all he knows, whether of financial, educational or administrative policies. but they should all be able and willing to pass on enough of their perspective so that the staff member will want to be a cooperator, rather than a perfectionist, to go along with a new proposal as far as possible, to find ways over obstacles, not to magnify them. i once accused one of my staff of not wanting to change anything unless it would improve matters, while i wanted to change everything if it would improve matters. t h e two attitudes sound pretty much alike, but there is a world of difference between them. miss macpherson suggests this in "some thoughts on the philosophy of cataloging."6 n o w , grant, as you must, that the remedy of more money and still more money is not available in endowed institutions, and grant, as you should, that the high cost of cataloging must be reduced, 6 m a c p h e r s o n , h a r r i e t d. " s o m e thoughts on the philosophy of c a t a l o g i n g . " 'library quarterly 9 : 6 3 7 1 . j a n . 1939. and grant, as you probably will, that specific remedies have thus far not been generally effective, you will surely sympathize with my appeal for the cultivation of perspective on cataloging work as work, on the material cataloged, on cataloging personnel, on users and uses of catalog cards, and on the financial necessity of applying the various specific remedies with a maximum of gain in work accomplished and a minimum loss in usefulness to readers. in achieving economies in organization, much depends on the size and flexibility of the staff as a whole, as well as on the flexibility and caliber of the individual members of it. one cataloger may organize himself quite simply and satisfactorily —granted full perspective—and two catalogers may agree to get on together, but it takes three to make a crowd—and several more, plus typists, filing assistants, etc., to make an organization flexible enough to experiment with divisions of work either by subject or by process. t o introduce machinery you must have enough work to keep the machine busy, enough personnel to spare one person to operate the machine, and enough other people to profit by the machine's saving of time. for example, if enough of us have enough card duplication to do and enough staff to operate the machine and still leave typists and other junior assistants free to relieve the catalogers, then we will get the right kind of duplicating machine—one that will avoid the necessity of putting every card on the typewriter for addition of subject headings, added entries, etc. t h e n we can make use of such job analyses as m r . miller's.7 some libraries with a staff sufficiently 7 m i l l e r , robert a . " c o s t a c c o u n t i n g f o r l i b r a r i e s : acquisition and c a t a l o g i n g . " library quarterly 7 : 5 1 1 3 6 , oct. 1 9 3 7 . 332 college and research libraries large, flexible, and experienced have been able to make use of junior catalogers or typists to relieve catalogers of two of these items (searching and checking, and completion of cataloging) which, together, according to miller, take 45 per cent of ''direct labor time" in cataloging a new book. chance for economy another useful breakdown of cataloging activities is miss akers' "relation of the professional and clerical division of cataloging activities to cataloging courses."8 for our purposes, we need to make four instead of two divisions: ( 1 ) supervision—i.e. chief cataloger, reviser, or first assistant; ( 2 ) cataloger; ( 3 ) junior cataloger (semi-professional) ; ( 4 ) clerical. of course, the more divisions we make, the more they overlap one another and the more any division of labor must be kept flexible and adaptable to individual capabilities. applying this four-fold division to miss akers' 72 professional activities indicates a good possibility of economy within the professional and semi-professional group, and some possibility of more profitable use of the time of the experienced clerical workers. if in a given library the clerical staff has been well developed over a period of years, it is possible that they may relieve the professional staff of 19 of their 72 activities— only, however, if the chief cataloger and her immediate assistants have a perspective on people (for psychoanalysis is fully as important as job analysis in personnel w o r k ) , a perspective on the objectives of the catalog in the college milieu, and a perspective on the financial exigencies s akers, susan grey. " t h e relation of the professional and clerical division of cataloging activities to cataloging courses." library quarterly 5 : 1 0 1 3 6 , j a n . 1935. of the institution and of the times.9 when clerical assistants, particularly typists, can be made to relieve catalogers' time for more expert work, the economy of typists' time becomes important. t w e n t y years ago, when i became interested in the possibilities of short cataloging and in the selective use of it, i was not concerned with the saving of typists' time nor with the congestion and unwieldiness of the card catalog, as i am now. when one of my superior officers said, " e v e r y click of the typewriter costs money," i took the attitude of the old bridgetender who looked at the town clock and set the clock at one end of the bridge, then set the clock at the other end of the bridge, and denied that his two clocks could disagree, because he walked across the bridge "in no time." t h a t is the way i felt about clicks of the typewriter (but with 30,000 arrears of typing, i don't feel that way any more). t h a t may be the way the typist feels, and that's the way the cataloger feels—the way every perfectionist feels who takes pride in his work. perhaps i should have listed two perspectives instead of f o u r : a sense of time, and a perspective on the importance of details relative to their cost in time and money and to the use to be made of them. w e say glibly, "whatever is worth doing is worth doing w e l l , " but we should say, "whatever is worth doing is worth doing well enough to serve the purpose for which it is undertaken."10 many suggestions have been made for economizing on the clicks of the typewriter. i shall note only a few of them. 8 cf. gjelsness, rudolph h . , and wright, wyllis e. "organization of the preparation division, new y o r k public l i b r a r y . " catalogers' and classifiers' yearbook, 1936, pp. 26-35. currier, thomas f . " p r e l i m i n a r y cataloging." college and research libraries 1:235-40, j u n e 1940. 1 0 cf. smith, esther a . " f o r m c a r d s . " catalogers and classifiers' yearbook, 1936. september, 1940 34 7 1. machines for reproducing cards. the chief obstacles are the expensiveness of some, the relatively impermanent and unsightly results of others, and the necessity of putting all the cards on the typewriter to add subject and added entries— unless or until the library of congress or other card printing agencies can supply complete sets of cards ready for filing. meanwhile, suppose you have large arrears of typing and of cataloging and a lifetime's work of reclassification, at the same time urgent needs of added personnel in reference and other departments, and no reasonable prospect of additional appropriations. one might try the improved hektograph machines, buy the best, operate it as expertly as possible, and be satisfied if the results are no better than legible for twenty years. with the ditto machine, it is possible easily to pick up subject and added entries from the tracings on the master card and place them at the top of the respective additional cards. 2. reduction in number of cards written. bishop's statement, made nearly thirty years ago, on subject entries remains true today, and the situation is aggravated by the growing unwieldiness of card catalogs. at one time during the depression, the catalog at brown university needed respacing. as an experiment i tried retiring cards that seemed to me unnecessary; the reference librarian revised my selection and approved removal of about 5 per cent of all the cards in the trays with which we experimented. the catalogers soon asked, "should we write and file cards that are going to be retired ?" and i replied, " y o u shouldn't but i don't know how to stop you." they then took over the experiment, with the result that now we probably use not more than two-thirds as many subject cards as the library of 334 c o l l congress, and not half as many title cards. this is a difficult undertaking, lacking any code. the only safe solution that i can suggest is a study of some large catalog with the library of congress list of subject headings in hand. such a case study would result in many unforeseen economies i am sure, and one can foresee profitable comments on the too specific subject as a most unlikely place to look, on the piling up of "related" subjects that might be eliminated in favor of references, on the duplication of titles under headings which refer to each other, on the unnecessary subject cards for research material that will be consulted on the shelves or via the shelf list.11 this is a case where one can't see the wood without having seen the trees—a case study is needed, and it could be combined with osborn's suggestion of special subject lists by class. 3. shortening of cards written. (a) headings. we have been amused at our own lincoln collection catalog, where some 3000 cards are headed "lincoln, abraham, pres. u.s., 1809-1869." (b) the other contents of the card. there are too many details to discuss here, and nothing new to say about them and the limited applicability of omission or abbreviation, but by special request, here is an illustrative problem: there are many kinds of periodicals, used in different ways—all the way from the most authoritative learned journal, down to the house organ, and pulp magazines, and advertising and propaganda sheets, which are used, if at all, to see what they or their sponsoring organizations are like and of which "enough is as good as a feast." falling heir to some 3000 volumes of trade association and 1 1 hitchcock, jennette eliza. " s u b j e c t coverage in university l i b r a r y catalogs." library quarterly 10:69-94, j a n . 1940. ege and res e arc li l i b r a r i e s trade union journals and newspapers only more or less complete, would you throw them out against what the department of instruction alleges and what you believe to be their interest? would you tackle the impossible job of completing them, spend five thousand dollars on binding them and another thousand or so on cataloging them ? h o w would you meet the suggestion that you "don't bother to catalog them but just arrange them somewhere on the shelves where we can find them"? t h e perfectionist who would say "all or none" would be lacking in perspective on subject matter of books, on the people likely to use them, and on the catalog as a tool for these users.12 selective cataloging i have been a disciple of the late ernest cushing richardson and while i think some of his reasoning and mathematics fallacious and some of his proposed remedies worse than the disease, he was one of the great philosophers of our profession. it is always a temptation to quote him. t a k e this from his startling paper on " t h e curse of bibliographical cataloguing:" a study of printed cards in the union catalog shows a great percentage of books that oughtn't to be in existence at all, except for very remote bibliographical purposes, and extremely remote specialized research for which a single short author card at two and four-tenths cents would be quite sufficient.13 there remains a question which i have put before—whether, since the order department of a research library is not permitted to apply the principles of book selection, may not the catalog department apply these principles to the selection of 1 2 smith, esther a . loc. cit. 1 3 richardson, ernest c. " t h e curse of bibliographical cataloguing." american library institute, 1 9 3 1 . books for prompt and complete cataloging, as against books which may be deferred or cataloged more briefly. t o sum up, the librarian alone can have the broad perspectives that come from contacts with the administration and faculty on the one hand, and with the library and library staff on the other. he may say to his faculty colleagues that they are entitled to tell him what they want, but not how to get it. it is his duty to pass on to his heads of departments as much as possible of his perspective on what is wanted, and he must depend on their cooperation to get it. it is the cataloger alone who can get results, and it is his duty to absorb as much perspective as he can, and, when he can't, to credit his superior officers with the perspective he has not. he must go along with them as far and as fast as is practicable—to be willing to change everything if it will improve matters. a sharing of perspectives on cataloging w o r k ; on books and their place in the college; on staff and readers; on the uses of cataloging results, and on what results the college can afford —this is the only cure for the high cost of cataloging. with this cumulative perspective, the many specific remedies invented already, or to be invented, may be applied with safety and curative effect. head catalogers should keep fully up to date on specific devices: new tricks in organization and division of labor, and in cataloging economies. and they should not forget the old ones, since these may become applicable, and are suggestive of new inventions. without perspective, the specific remedies are likely to fail of application, to be misapplied, to be applied in overdoses, to be given to the wrong patients—all to the ultimate aggravation, rather than the cure, of the high cost of cataloging. september, 1940 34 7 college and research libraries 204 i college & research libraries • may 1970 zens will benefit enormously. every city can and should have such a library as dr. martin envisions for chicago, a "nerve center ... for contemporary information, in substance functioning as th~ fact bank, information switchboard, and special library for the general populace."-edwin castagna, enoch pratt free library. library automation; a state of the art review. ed. by stephen r. salmon. chicago: american library association, 1969. 175p. $7.50. (73-77283). the papers presented at the ala preconference institute on library automation at san francisco in june 1967 constitute this volume. the purpose of the institute was to inform ala members of the state of the art of library automation. it achieved its purpose, and with the principal exception of on-line applications described since 1967, it still constitutes an informative review for librarians not directly involved in research and development. separate sections of the report are devoted to acquisitions, cataloging, serials, and circulation, but the publication lacks an adequate review of information retrieval. necessarily lacking are descriptions of on-line systems in acquisitions, serials, and circulation that have been activated since 1967. other sections discuss the marc project at the library of congress, networks, system analysis and design, and buildings. the marc project has had major developments since 1967, which of course are not in library automation. on the other hand, system analysis and design is a timeless topic. one of the most interesting sections is that by robert h. rohlf entitled "building-planning implications of automation." this section does not give cookbook answers to those who wish detailed replies to the question "how will library automation affect the building i am planning?" but it does give a valuable basis from which effective planning can proceed. library automation will be a useful and informative publication for some years to come.-frederick g. kilgour, the ohio college library center. cataloging u.s.a. by paul s. dunkin. chicago: american library association, 1969. 159p. $5.00. ( 69-17830). paul dunkin has given us a brief survey of cataloging theory in the united states. he prefaces his book with an annotated list of the most influential writings on cataloging; after which he summarizes the cataloging codes from cutter's on. then, under each problem area-entry, description, subject, classification, the catalog-he discusses the major points of view and their theoretical bases. his expressed intention is to show why we catalog as we do. the categories, assumptions, and objectives of the transcendent theories are presented with clarity. we see how we arrived at our current practices, that they do not form a coherent whole and reflect historical not logical development. they are largely "the accumulation of what has been done in lc" ( p. 143) , a compromise of conflicting bibliographical objectives, particularly of conflicting theories on "the public's needs and/ or wants. (they are not necessarily the same.)" we index the book collection both to locate a work and to relate it to other works. that is our first principle. cataloging attempts to do this systematically, and parts of cutter's coherent but expensive system still stand. parts have fallen under attack. but no matter how cogent or inviting later theories have been, the system has remained closed to any but peripheral and compromised changes, adopted usually for economic reasons and tending to make the system a less coherent whole. mr. dunkin shows us why we have arrived at our current practices. we all know what they are and what problems they raise in application and comprehension. thus we enter works on "principles of authorship," not according to the title page statement the author and publisher have agreed on. our forms of entry reflect wave after wave of opinion. we relate some types of material by added entries, others by uniform titles, and still others by form headings. our subject headings reflect a number of views on the uses of language, and a continual reduction of attempts to apply them systematically or to relate them fully. marc finds it necessary to bolster our descriptions with explicit statements on such points as language of text, country of origin, and index. even the paging statement, shown to be most important in es..: tablishing editions, has gone wild with the acceptance of title ii descriptions. the catalog gets larger and more confusing. the attempt to tie cataloging at least physically to books was dismissed ten years ago in the library of congress' the cataloging-in-source experiment. this report, called by dunkin "an amazing document," is one still deeply resented by catalogers outside the library of congress, who did not feel the experiment's pressures. nothing since has promised immediate practical relief. attempts to tie cataloging more logically or even more simply to books have added to the cost or to the confusion or to both. mr. dunkin has tried to limit himself to descriptive rather than critical analysis. the reader will be grateful to have the history laid out concisely. this is an important book, intelligently done; if it emerges as a kind of epitaph to cataloging theory as we have known it, perhaps machines will someday release us and give us a chance at theories again.-lois hacker, cornell university libraries. prolegomena to library classification. 3d ed. by s. r. ranganathan, assisted by m. a. gopinath. new york: asia publishing house, 1967. 640p. (73-427373). it is with deep gratitude that i remember my first encounter with the prolegomena. it (then in its second edition) opened my eyes with its clear statements of the problems of classification, as well as with its amazing revelation that anyone had gone so far toward their solution. this third edition is not a revision in the usual sense, but r ather a development of those parts of the second edition of the greatest generality, excluding much of the historical, speculative, and practical discussions which (the author informs us) are being developed in two other books: classification: retrospective and prospective, and d epth classification and its d esign. thus the new prolegomena consists, in a way, of three separate titles. libraries ·with the recent publications j 205 second edition should not retire it to inactive storage unless they acquire all three new titles. if there is a work in which is concentrated (and the word must be taken in a very strong sense) all that is most germinal in the theory of classification, it is the prolegomena. nothing else can rank with it except the 1876 dewey and cutter works, and perhaps the gardin team's l'automatisation des recherches documentaires. in this new incarnation it has become more than ever nothing but what-must-be-considered-before ... , less a survey that includes prolegomena! matter. no one (except the beginning student, who would in all but a very few cases be quite put off by the unaccustomed rigor of the mode of exposition and who would be in principle unaware of the aporia in the praxis that have led to this theoria) who is serious about understanding, constructing, applying, or using any classification or system of indexing can afford to be uninformed about what ranganathan works through here. the new edition would better have been (like the second) printed in england; there are misprints in abundance, though most are not too serious-just irritating. but there are a few weaknesses of a more serious sort. interpolation (internal hospitality) in chain ( §lg) is not really explained, though ranganathan along with everyone else assumes that dewey's radixfractional principle makes it possible. but it may instead be that only a faceted notation does-and then only in a somewhat weak sense. dichotomy is discussed in the proper pejorative light (§pc) , but its real function (positive/negative = enumeration/" others") is not mentioned. figure 16 ( p. 367) is intended to show the complexity of "the tree of knowledge"; it is so complex as to confuse, and the lack of explanatory text makes it not a help but a hindrance to the reader. udc is made to seem to have anteriorising common isolates (p. 448-449), which would assuredly surprise most of its adherents; the lack of phase-relational flexibility in udc (p. 462) is largely true, but the pioneer efforts of kervegant have led at least to an official t est of a relator-schema of my own college and research libraries by c l i f f o r d b. c l a p p critique and design on the cost of cataloging mr. clapp is head of the catalog department, university of pennsylvania library, philadelphia. th i s y e a r a call has been issued to re-consider cataloging. it has been a call so clear and insistent that it cannot be disregarded either by catalogers, or administrators of cataloging, or administrators of libraries. it concerns the theory or philosophy of cataloging, its efficiency, and even more its cost. in recent talks on the subject at the meetings of the american library association in boston and cambridge stress has been laid on the cost of cataloging. both m r . m e t c a l f 1 and m r . osborn2 have issued a challenge to catalogers and administrators to remedy the increasingly difficult situation of mounting costs.3 w h e n , with their papers before us, we rehearse their analyses and appeals, we find them both taking a very sympathetic position in placing a joint responsibility on library administrator and cataloger and in appealing for more mutual understanding and more collaboration. 1 m e t c a l f , k e y e s d . " t h e a t t i t u d e of the lib r a r y administrator toward cataloging." a.l.a. bulletin 3s:p-48-5i, sept. 1941. 2 osborn, a n d r e w d. the crisis in cataloging. 1941. a l s o in the library quarterly 11:409-10, oct. 1941. 3 since the present paper was written the experimental division on library cooperation of the l i b r a r y of congress has issued as its first bulletin herbert a . k e l l a r ' s memoranda on library cooperation, sept. 1941, which contains an important section on the same situation and the related problems of cataloging arrears. a t the same time there seems to be an implication that the difficulties are mainly the cataloger's problem, which the librarian must study and help her to solve. t h e feeling is probably pretty general that the major responsibility is the cataloger's. a somewhat different view is shown in miss macdonald's paper,4 which followed m r . metcalf's at boston. it is evident that she expects the librarian to take more of the responsibility than merely to insist and discuss and agree, that she expects of him at least a full partnership in the question and probably more. is not that implied when she says, "librarians need to develop a positive attitude to the card catalog"? it is evident, i am sure, when, after pointing out the development of specialized collections and services she asks (and answers), " w h o is primarily responsible for such increases? certainly not the catalogers." it is not fair nor wise to place much stress on the share of responsibility to be borne by librarian or catalog department administrator or any group in the personnel. m r . metcalf and m r . osborn agree that administrators and catalogers have grown too far apart. t h e present paper, written from the point of view of the manager of a catalog department, is an attempt to lay the basis for some remedial 4 macdonald, m. ruth. " t h e cataloger's response to the a d m i n i s t r a t o r . " a.l.a. bulletin 35:58-59, sept. 1941. march, 1942 15 7 action in the face of this situation. w h a t is written here is no catholicon. it teems with disputable assertions. but it is in some respect representative of conditions and needs observed by the writer in various libraries and may afford to librarians and catalogers some suggestions for definite cooperation and improvement. t h e r e is a tendency to think about cataloging in general terms and in bulk. viewed in such general fashion there is really no such thing as the cost of cataloging. there is forgetfulness of the fact that the cataloging dollar, like the housewife's dollar, is a relative thing. t h e r e is some disregard of the professions of catalogers that they are responding to the demands of reference departments, the cost of whose service is more seldom questioned. if these things seem to show too little thinking about cataloging, some other things indicate one-sided thinking or insufficient basic knowledge about cataloging. for example, there is a tendency to blame the complexity of catalog cards and the multiplicity of entries and of special catalogs for the entire sin of cataloging expense. overelaboration of records is, of course, a feature of costliness, but it is not per se the prime offender. its main significance is not, in this age of rules and of machines, that it is time-consuming but that it tends to disproportionately expensive organization and personnel. m r . osborn devotes several pages to the theories and niceties of cataloging and related functions of catalog departments and only two to the organization of the department. but he perfectly appreciates the importance of the organization to problems of cost, for he says, "organizational questions are equally pressing," and he indicates several of these questions. place of personnel t h e place of personnel in catalog department work is probably the hardest thing to discuss in library publications. questions of personnel are vital elements in cataloging cost, and they present the most serious problems of both catalog department heads and librarians, or at least they ought to be so considered. in a paper like the present one, no allinclusive design for catalog department economy could possibly be set up. but it seems very important to present something, and for the sake of emphasis i am offering my little something with the personal pronoun. m r . osborn has suggested that the library administrator needs to know a good deal about cataloging from the inside, and that a prospective administrator might well spend a year as an intern in a good catalog department. let me suggest as an alternative to this that an actual library administrator spend a month in a bad cataloging department, or at least in one where the cost is running too high. i think that if that were done a sort of pattern would form in his conception of his catalog department, which would embrace much more than the questions of cataloging codes, theories of cataloging, and multiplicity of records. in some libraries he would find that costs suffer because of poor equipment, because of great distances between points within the scope of everyday activities, and because reference tools are lacking. aside from such local conditions, first, he would criticize bad habits in administration, like neglecting to see things through, toleration of disorderliness, and use of caustic criticism. next, he would observe inadequate cooperation by superiors and coordinate departments in furnishing in164 c o l l e g e , and research libraries formation or making decisions. t h e n he would notice improper assignment of duties, especially neglect of possibilities of using lower-priced people on some work. i think he would discover that there was want of a simple system of dealing with portions of the material coming for cataloging. i think he would criticize the department for its habit of applying maximum instead of minimum standards of treatment in classifying and cataloging and shelflisting and marking. among his classifiers and catalogers he would see that there was failure to discriminate between the permanent and the temporary and between the pristine and the already indexed or described. he would find, if it were an old catalog department, an inadequate psychological reaction to the situation, by higher-priced people especially, shown by overmeticulousness in unimportant matters, inability to place reliance on others, unadaptiveness to new work or methods, and, finally, slowing down. conditions affecting cost such are some of the conditions affecting the cost of cataloging that would be found in some departments. it would be silly, of course, to infer any implication here that they are characteristic of all catalog departments or that all these conditions would prevail in one department. a longer period in the catalog department would bring out some factors of larger scale and significance that dominate the work no matter what may be its personnel and organization. t h e first is the exceeding importance of machines of the right type and quantity, like typewriters, electric erasers, and book trucks, and, in some circumstances, mimeograph and pasting machines. t h e next is proper light and air and some degree of medical inspection. another is the planned flow of books into the department. t h e n there is the need for better budgeting of libraries and catalog departments. it is a fact, strange as it may seem, that many cataloging chiefs are less bound by tradition and seemingly inexorable precedent than librarians and the heads of the public departments and less afraid of doing wrong than the principal members of their own staffs. supposing that in the search for efficiency and reformation of costs such a catalog department head is sitting at a council table with the librarian or his deputy, with papers and plans giving a broad view of the department. a candid exposition would probably reveal three main things appearing as immovable as mountains: first, a well-developed organization on traditional lines; second, a high cataloging standard; and third, a practical disregard of the possibility of dispatching collections of books, papers, and costs on anything like a budgetary basis. librarian knows functions t h e librarian would know the individual positions and salaries of the members of the catalog department, and he would know in a general way the functions they were performing, like classifying, shelflisting, filing, and so on, and the types of material they were handling, such as art, science, and education. o f course he would know their individualities and capabilities. it is doubtful whether he would know that card work was 25 per cent of cost, and administration 7 per cent, or that the work of a shelflister was one tenth or one twenty-fifth of the cost of cataloging. in a library adding ten, twenty, or thirty thousand volumes a year and handling a considerable amount of special colmarch, 1942 16 7 lection and departmental library work, together with cooperative work, films, maps, and the like, there are at least a dozen basic positions or functions in the cataloging service. from two to four of these may be combined into single positions. in smaller libraries the functions of these positions exist but may be still further combined. for example, in a library handling six thousand volumes without much departmental library work the dozen places might be combined into about four. in a very large library the skeleton outline would be developed according to need by adding more persons in some positions, more catalogers, more typists, and so on. t h i s is a standard organization, not necessarily the ideal one. positions in catalog department these dozen positions are ( i ) superintendent, ( 2 ) distributor, ( 3 ) classifier, ( 4 ) general cataloger, ( 5 ) serials cataloger, ( 6 ) shelflister, ( 7 ) card secretary, (8) reviser, ( 9 ) card filer, ( 1 0 ) typist, ( 1 1 ) book preparer, ( 1 2 ) departmental library agent. t h e distributor receives books from half a dozen different sources and routes them to classifiers and catalogers, may interpose at any point in the routine to forward books, and is the natural follow-up agent for anything that is searched for or anything that is unduly delayed. hers is a key position, which demands one of the most intelligent and well-balanced persons on the staff. nevertheless, her salary rating will average five against a classifier's six or seven. t h e serials cataloger may catalog new serials and adjust old ones, but she must (if the position is a single one) devote most of her time to routine adding of volumes and parts. in salary she may rate as low as four, but, if there is a full-fledged serials division with two or more members, she may go as high as seven. t h e card secretary orders and receives printed cards, directs mimeograph work, and supervises the typists. in smaller departments her work may be combined with shelflisting, revision, filing, searching files, etc. t h e book preparer pastes and marks books. t h e departmental library agent forwards books to departmental libraries, receives books from them, visits them, advises their librarians and the officers of the department, sometimes does their filing, and in general acts as liaison agent with the main library. she has to be a person of tact and ability, but her rating is only three or four, unless she acts as classifier or cataloger for departments. t h e card filer, responsible only for filing in the public catalog, rates at three or four on the basis of her main work, and since she files only about half time she does other work of about the same grade. in a small library she may be responsible for other files. in a library with a depository library of congress catalog a separate filer is necessary. in the very large library the work of neither filing position can be handled by one person alone. t h e ratings of which i have spoken are salary ratings, based on a unit system in which a page is one unit. t h e ratings are those which it is necessary to give to the positions in order to obtain and keep competent people. t h e y are as follows: ( 1 ) superintendent, 7 to 1 4 ; ( 2 ) distributor, 4 to 6 ; ( 3 ) classifier, 5 to 8 ; ( 4 ) cataloger, 4 to 7 ; ( 5 ) serials cataloger, 4 to 7 ; ( 6 ) shelflister, 3 to 5 ; ( 7 ) card secretary, 3 to 4 ; (8) reviser, 4 to 5 ; ( 9 ) card filer, 3 to 4 ; ( 1 0 ) typist, 2 to 3 ; ( 1 1 ) book preparer, 2 to 3 ; ( 1 2 ) departmental agent, 3 to 4. 166 c o l l e g e , and research libraries minimum requirements a f t e r a couple of combinations of positions, with a skeleton staff of ten, at the lowest ratings, the catalog department's minimum requirements will be just under f o r t y ; without such combinations, and with average ratings, the requirements will be between fifty-five and sixty. if the unit of rating is valued at $ 3 0 0 , the department must pay a minimum of about $ 1 2 , 0 0 0 and a maximum of $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 , the latter at average and not maximum salaries, to carry on the twelve functions that have been detailed. w h a t can be obtained for this money? m a t c h i n g volumes cataloged against number of people in the department, calculations made on the basis of figures from several large university libraries show production ranging all the way from eight hundred to twenty-five hundred or three thousand volumes cataloged per year per person in the department. in the case of the eight hundred there is reason to think that the department employed quite a number of low-priced people, w h o gave either part-time or else low-degree service. in the case of the other extreme, twentyfive hundred or three thousand, i apprehend that everything went through the mill, foreign dissertations, multiple copies of textbooks, etc. w h e n you try to match volumes cataloged against salaries of people in the departments, there are closer similarities between some libraries and greater discrepancies between some. figures for several show cost per volume ranging from 85^ to $ 1 . 1 5 , and i hear sometimes of 65<> cancelled—reprinting, n e w ed. in prep., n.y.p., out of stock, no report. university of toronto library collection. also 12 per cent of these were new editions and required subprofessional editing. the next 35 per cent were cataloged from library of congress proofslips, and the final 7 per cent required professional attention. one professional cataloger, six cataloging assistants, and three revisors, one of whom was professional, were required for this work. library of congress ( l c ) classification was used with the following modifications: canadian history was classed in f 5000-5949, english canadian literature in ps 8001-8549, and french canadian literature in ps 9001-9549. (pz class was not used for fiction.) lc subject headings were used but were modified in length for book catalog production, a concession to the onulp machine system. the onulp subject authority list printed by computer contained 24,600 name and topical headings, scope notes, and references ( s e e but not see also) and was distributed to each of the participating libraries. lc cataloging was followed closely, with only slight modifications. cuttering was changed only where a conflict with the university of toronto library's shelf list was found or where reasonable expansion was not allowed with the lc number. the latest printing date was used in the imprint and the call number. certain notes were omitted, and as a concession to the machine system the order of title and author's name was reversed in all contents notes. multiple copy cataloging required rigid standardization. where imprint dates varied between one or two copies of a title the date most common to all five copies was chosen for the catalog 106 / college 6research libraries • march 1968 record. no attempt was made to prepare individual records for the libraries adversely affected by this rule. each of the 44,510 volumes cataloged for each library was pocketed and labelled, using the se-lin label. onulp provided catalog card sets (six cards per set) to three of the participating libraries, in addition to the computer printed book catalogs and shelflist cards. card reproducing equipment was not located in the department, however, hence catalog card sets were not shipped in their books; the libraries involved complained of shelving delays. there were several aspects to the success of this centralized processing projt a b l e 2 operational t i m e factors ( i n m o n t h s ) pr oc ess ing pe rio d co op era tiv e bo ok ce ntr e bl ac kw ell 's ni jho ff selection-ordering * % ordering-receiving includes preparation for catalogingt 3% 6/2 receiving-cataloging includes preparation for shipping to 5 libraries* 2% 3j4 3m total time factor— selection-cataloging 5)4 7% 10% " foreign items were batch ordered. f certain restrictions were placed on each dealer. first, regular orders were not shipped by any dealer until he had all five (or t e n ) copies of the title in stock. second, no incomplete orders were accepted unless a report was received in advance enabling o n u l p to choose to accept or refuse less than five copies or incomplete multi-volume sets and to report back. third, no automatic claim and cancel period or replacement program was planned ( o n u l p was not a continuing service). fourth, it was not foreseen in the early stages that the budget would provide twice the number of titles originally contracted ( a large number for a f e w dealers). all these factors contributed to high average time lapses between ordering and receiving. t most foreign material required original cataloging. n o cataloging priorities were established, hence material with cataloging copy was processed more readily. ect not the least important of which was that it was planned to come to an end. its policies were not well enough defined to have operated successfully on a continuing basis. the advantages it enjoyed were that it served only a university community, each book collection was new, no subscription files were required, and no individual library idiosyncracies were allowed. under these conditions the processing was carried out successfully on a steady basis. c o m m e n t on the m a c h i n e system the computer production of the onulp book catalogs has been ably described in two or three papers, and does not need repeating here. with the conclusion of the project a f e w features of the system deserve comment. some good features of the system: 1. full cataloging information was retained in the maih entry records and laid out as in a conventional catalog. 2. secondary entries were constructed automatically in abbreviated form from the master record. 3. headings in both catalogs were checked for uniformity by the matching programs, and non-uniform headings were discarded with error messages to ensure correction. 4. initial articles in twenty-seven languages were disregarded in filing title main and added entries. (texts in more than one language were manually controlled.) 5. qualifiers in name headings, e.g. jt. author, ed., comp., were disregarded in filing. 6. author and title analytics were generated where required. some desirable features that were unavailable to onulp for a variety of reasons, mostly economic: 1. longer sort fields (maximum was sixty characters, capitals, diacritics removed) to ensure more accurate ontario new universities library project / 107 t a b l e 3 s t a f f — s a l a r y c o s t analysis s a m p l e y e a r job description salary per cent, section work days per cent, section per cent, total salary acquisition: 8 clerical staff— 1963/67 turnover 13 staff: preparation of orders (bibliographical details; estimate; assign agent), type order forms, reports . $ 4,286 19 295.5 18 5 books: receiving and processing, invoice preparation, returns . 15,734 65 1,128 72 19 supervision, revision, statistics, special jobs 3,339 16 178.9 10 4 totals $23,809 100 1,672.4 100 28 searching: 5 clerical staff— 1963/67 turnover 11 staff: preparation of titles for cataloging preparation of titles for cataloging $14,145 100 1,071 100 17 cataloging: 12 staff incl. 2 librarians—1963/67 turnover 20 staff: data sheet preparation and revision $12,172 28 815 30 15 keypunching and revision, keypunch training 3,278 7.6 248 9 4 book shipping, book pockets and label preparation . 7,615 16.5 567 21 9 master card typing and revision—sort xeroxed card sets 6,005 9.6 375 11 8 filing and revision (master cards, working shelf list, 2 authority files, computer printed shelf list) . 2,893 6.5 236 9 4 original cataloging . . . . 2,063 4.5 92.5 4 3 administration 5,045 11.1 181 7 6 book catalog preparation and correction (monthly machine cycle) 3,058 12.2 156.5 6 4 secretarial 1,718 4 85 3 2 total $43,847 100 2,756 100 55 total salaries $81,801 100 108 / college 6research libraries • march 1968 filing particularly in the subject catalog. 2. consolidation of all titles by one author under his name, listed once. 3. consolidation of see references to avoid waste space. 4. ability to generate a changed shelflist record for one library at a time and to suppress the record where other libraries not affected; and to keep such changes from reappearing in the book catalogs. 5. although unchangeable, the rigid automatic filing of the computer, based on spacing and punctuation, is somewhat inconvenient for the catalog user. 6. although not essential, the lack of non-roman alphabets, italics, or printing in red has been noted by some users of the catalogs. there was general consensus that a book catalog produced monthly was not the most satisfactory index to a working collection, despite its advantage of portability. also, a sample study in 1964 revealed that the cost of listing 5,220 titles in the book catalogs (150 copies) was 1.7 times greater than that of listing the same titles in manually produced card catalogs ( 1 copy). the real future for automating bibliographic records apparently lies in a more detailed, flexible, and enlarged data format, with international compatibility and accessibility. • • catqc and shelf-ready material | jay, simpson, and smith 41 michael jay ([e-mail?]) is information technology expert, software unit, information technology department; betsy simpson is chair, cataloging and metadata department; and doug smith is head, copy cataloging unit, cataloging and metadata department, george a. smathers libraries, university of florida, gainesville. michael jay, betsy simpson, and doug smith catqc and shelf-ready material: speeding collections to users while preserving data quality libraries contract with vendors to provide shelf-ready material, but is it really shelf-ready? it arrives with all the physical processing needed for immediate shelving, then lingers in back offices while staff conduct itemby-item checks against the catalog. catqc, a console application for microsoft windows developed at the university of florida, builds on oclc services to get material to the shelves and into the hands of users without delay and without sacrificing data quality. using standard c programming, catqc identifies problems in marc record files, often applying complex conditionals, and generates easy-to-use reports that do not require manual item review. a primary goal behind improvements in technical service workflows is to serve users more efficiently. however, the push to move material through the system faster can result in shortcuts that undermine bibliographic quality. developing safeguards that maintain sufficiently high standards but don’t sacrifice productivity is the modus operandi for technical service managers. the implementation of oclc’s worldcat cataloging partners (wcp, formerly promptcat) and bibliographic record notification services offers an opportunity to retool workflows to take advantage of automated processes to the fullest extent possible, but also requires some backroom creativity to assure that adequate access to material is not diminished. n literature review quality control has traditionally been viewed as a central aspect of cataloging operations, either as part of item-byitem handling or manual and automated authority maintenance. how this activity has been applied to outsourced cataloging was the subject of a survey of academic libraries in the united states and canada. a total of 19 percent of libraries in the survey indicated that they forgo quality control of outsourced copy, primarily for government documents records. however, most respondents reported they review records for errors. of that group, 50 percent focus on access points, 30 percent check a variety of fields, and a significant minority—20 percent—look at all data points. overall, the libraries expressed satisfaction with the outsourced cataloging using the following measures of quality supplied by the author: accuracy, consistency, adequacy of access points, and timeliness.1 at the inception of oclc’s promptcat service in 1995, ohio state university libraries participated in a study to test similar quality control criteria with the stated goals of improving efficiency and reducing copyediting. the results were so favorable that the author speculated that promptcat would herald a future where libraries can “reassess their local practices and develop greater confidence in national standards so that catalog records can be integrated into local opacs with minimal revision and library holdings can be made available in bibliographic databases as quickly as possible.”2 fast forward a few years and the new incarnation of promptcat, wcp, is well on its way to fulfilling this dream. in a recent investigation conducted at the university of arkansas libraries, researchers concluded that error review of copy supplied through promptcat is necessary, but the error rate does not warrant discontinuance of the service. the benefits in terms of time savings far outweigh the effort expended to correct errors, particularly when the focus of the review is to correct errors critical to user access. while the researchers examined a wide variety of errors, a primary consideration was series headings, particularly given the problems cited in previous studies and noted in the article.3 with the 2006 announcement by the library of congress (lc) to curtail its practice of providing controlled series access, the cataloging community voiced great concern about the effect of that decision on user access.4 the arkansas study determined that “the significant number of series issues overall (even before lc stopped performing series authority work) more than justifies our concern about providing series authority control for the shelf-ready titles.” approximately one third of the outsourced copy across the three record samples studied had a series, and, of that group, 32 percent needed attention, predominantly taking the form of authority record creation with associated analysis and classification decisions.5 the overwhelming consensus among catalogers is that error review is essential. as far as can be determined, an underlying premise behind such efforts seems to be that it is done with the book in hand. but could there be a way to satisfy the concerns without the book in hand? certainly, validation tools embedded in library management systems provide protections whether records are manually entered or batchloaded, and outsourced authority maintenance services (for those who can use them) offer further control. but a customizable tool that allows libraries to target specific needs, both standards-based and local, without relying on item-by-item handling can contribute michael jay (emjay@ufl.edu) is information technology expert, software unit, information technology department; betsy simpson (betsys@uflib.ufl.edu) is chair, cataloging and metadata department; and doug smith (dougsmith@uflib.ufl .edu) is head, copy cataloging unit, cataloging and metadata department, george a. smathers libraries, university of florida, gainesville. 42 information technology and libraries | march 2009 to an economy of scale demanded by an environment with shrinking budgets and staff to devote to manual bibliographic scrutiny. if that tool is viewed as part of a workflow stream involving local error detection at the receiving location as well as enhancement at the network level (i.e., oclc’s bibliographic record notification service), then it becomes an important step in freeing catalogers to turn their attention to other priorities, such as digitized and hidden collections. n local setting and workflow the george a. smathers libraries at the university of florida encompasses six branches that address the information needs of a diverse academic research campus with close to fifty thousand undergraduate and graduate students. the technical services division, which includes the acquisitions and licensing department and the cataloging and metadata department, acquires and catalogs approximately forty thousand items annually. seeking ways to minimize the handling of incoming material, beginning in 2006 the departments developed a workflow that made it possible to send shelf-ready incoming material directly to the branches after check-in against the invoice. shelf-ready items represent approximately 30 percent of the libraries’ purchased monographic resources at this time. by using wcp record loads along with vendor-supplied shelf-ready processing, the time from receipt to shelf has been reduced significantly because it is no longer necessary to send the bulk of the shipments to cataloging and metadata. exceptions to this practice include specific categories of material that require individual inspection. the vendor is asked to include a flag in books that fall into many of these categories: n any nonprocessed book or book without a spine label n books with spine labels that have numbering after the date (e.g., vol. 4, no. 2) n books with cds or other formats included n books with loose maps n atlases n spiral-bound books n books that have the words “annual,” “biennial,” or a numeric year in the title (these may be a serial add to an existing record or part of a series that will be established during cataloging) to facilitate a post–receipt record review for those items not sent to cataloging and metadata, acquisitions and licensing runs a local programming tool, catqc, which reports records containing attributes cataloging and metadata has determined necessitate closer examination. figure 1 is an example of the reports generated, which are viewed using the mozilla firefox browser. copy catalogers rotate responsibility for checking the report and revising records when necessary. retrieval of the physical piece is only necessary in the 1 percent of cases where the item needs to be relabeled. n catqc report catqc analyzes the content of the wcp record file and identifies records with particular bibliographic coding, which are used to detect potential problems: 1. encoding levels 2, 3, 5, 7, e, j, k, m 2. 040 with non-english subfield b 3. 245 fields with subfields h, n, or p 4. 245 fields with subfields a or b that contain numerals 5. 245 fields with subfields a or b that contain red flag keywords 6. 246 fields 7. 490 fields with first indicator 0 8. 856 fields without subfield 3 9. 6xx fields with second indicators 4, 5, 6, and 7 the numbers following each problem listed below indicate which codes are used to signal the presence of a potential problem. minimal-level copy (1) the library’s wcp profiles, currently in place for three vendors, are set up to accept all oclc encoding levels. with such a wide-open plan, it is important to catch records with minimal-level copy to assure that appropriate access points exist and are coded correctly. the library encounters these less-than-full encoding levels infrequently. parallel records (2) catqc identifies foreign library records that are candidates for parallel record treatment by indicating in the report if the 040 has a non-english subfield b. the report includes a 936 field if present to alert catalogers that a parallel record is available. volume sets (3, 4, 5) the library does not generally analyze the individual volumes of multipart monographic sets (i.e., volume sets) even when the volumes have distinctive titles. these catcq and shelf-ready material | jay, simpson, and smith 43 “volume,” “part,” and “number” as well as common abbreviations of those words (e.g., v. or vol.). serial vs. monograph treatment (4, 5) titles owned by the library and classified as serials sometimes are ordered inadvertently as monographs, resulting in the delivery of a monographic record. a similar problem also occasionally arises with new titles. by detecting numerals, keywords, or the presence of one or more of the subfields in the 245 field, we can quickly scan a list of records with these characteristics. of course, most of the records detected by catqc are false hits because of the broad scope of the search; however, it takes only a few minutes to scan through the record list. non-print formats (3) the library does not receive records for any format other than print through wcp. consequently, detecting the presence of a subfield h in the 245 field is a good signal that there may be a problem with the record. alternate titles (6) alternate titles can be an important access point for library users. sometimes text that should properly be in subfield i (e.g., “at head of title”) of the 246 field is placed in subfield a in front of the alternate title. this adversely affects user access to the title through browse searching. catqc checks for and reports the presence of a 246 field. the cataloger can then quickly confirm that it is coded correctly. untraced series (7) as a program for cooperative cataloging (pcc) participant, the library opted to follow pcc practice to continue to trace series despite lc’s decision in 2006 to treat as untraced all series statements in newly cataloged records. because some libraries chose to follow lc in its decision, there has been an overall increase in the use of untraced series statements across all types of record-encoding volumes are added to the collection under the title of the set. the june 2006 decision by lc to produce individual volume records when a distinctive title exists caused concern about the integrity of the libraries’ existing open volume set records. because such records typically have enumeration indicated in the subfield n, and sometimes p, of the 245 field, the program searches for instances of those subfields. in addition, the program detects the presence of numerals in the 245 and keywords such as figure 1. an example report from catcq 44 information technology and libraries | march 2009 levels. to address this issue, catqc searches all wcp records for 490 fields with first indicator 0. catalogers check the authority files for the series and make any necessary changes to the records. this is by far the most frequent correction made by catalogers. links (8) to provide users with information about the nature of the urls displayed in the catalog, catalogers insure that explanatory text is recorded in subfield 3 of the 856 field. catqc looks for the absence of subfield 3, and, if absent, displays the 856 field in the report as a hyperlink. the cataloger adds the appropriate text (e.g., full text) as needed. subject headings with second indicators 4, 5, 6, and 7 (9) the catqc report reviewed by catalogers includes subject headings with second indicator 4. when these headings duplicate headings already on the record, catalogers delete them from our local system. when the headings are not duplicates, the catalogers change the second indicator 4 to 0. typically, 6xx fields with second indicators 5, 6, and 7 contain non-english headings based on foreign thesauri. these headings can conflict with lc headings and, in some cases, are cross references on lc authorities. the resulting split files are not only confusing to patrons, but also add to the numbers of errors reported that require authority maintenance. for these reasons, our policy is to delete the headings from our local system. catqc detects the presence of second indicators 5, 6, or 7 and creates a modified file with the headings removed with one exception: a heading with second indicator 7 and subfield 2 of “nasat,” which indicates the heading is taken from the national aeronautics and space administration thesaurus, is not removed because the local preference is to retain the “nasat” headings. n library-specific issues catqc resolves local problems when needed. for example, when more than one lc call number was present on the record, the wcp spine manifest sent to the vendor used to contain the second call number, which was affixed to the item. when the wcp records were loaded into the library’s catalog, the first call number populated the holding. as a result, there was a discrepancy between the spine label on the book and the call number in the catalog. prior to generating the report, catqc found multiple instances of call numbers in the records in the wcp file and created a modified file with the call numbers reordered so that the correct call number was used on the holding when the record was loaded. previously, the library’s opac did not display the text in subfield 3 of the 856 field, which specifies the type of material covered by the link, and to the user it appeared that the link was to a full-text resource. this was particularly troublesome for records with lc links to table of contents, publisher descriptions, contributor information, and sample text. to prevent user frustration, catqc was programmed to move the links on the wcp records to 5xx fields. when the opac interface improved and the programming was no longer necessary, catqc was revised. n analysis to see how well catqc and oclc’s bibliographic notification service were meeting our goal of maintaining high-quality bibliographic control, 63 reports were randomly selected from the 171 reports generated by catqc between october 2007 and april 2008. catqc found no problems in twelve (19 percent) of the selected reports. these twelve were not used in the analysis, leaving fifty-one catqc reports examined with at least one potential problem flagged for review. an average of 35.6 percent of the records in the sample of reports was flagged as requiring review by a cataloger. an average of thirteen possible problems was detected per report. of these, 55 percent were potential problems requiring at least some attention from the cataloger. the action required of the cataloger varied from simply checking the text of a field displayed in the report (e.g., 246 fields) to bringing up the record in aleph and editing the bibliographic record (e.g., verifying and correcting series headings or eliminating unwanted subject headings). why the relatively high rate of false positives (45 percent)? to minimize missing serials and volumes belonging to sets, catqc is designed to err on the side of caution. two of the criteria listed earlier were responsible for the vast majority of the false positives generated by catqc: 245 fields with subfields a or b that contain numerals and 245 fields with subfields a or b that contain red-flag keywords. clearly, if every record with a numeral in the 245 is flagged, a lot of hits will be generated that are not actual problems. the list of keywords was purposefully designed to be extensive. for example, “volume,” “vol.,” and “v.” are all triggers causing a record to be flagged. therefore a bibliographic record containing the phrase “volume cost profit analysis” in the 245 field would be flagged as a potential problem. at first glance, a report filled with so many false positives may seem inefficient and burdensome for catalogers to use; however, this is largely mitigated by the excellent display format. the programmer worked closely with catcq and shelf-ready material | jay, simpson, and smith 45 the copy cataloging unit staff to develop a user-friendly report format. each record is framed separately, making it easy to distinguish from adjoining records. potential problems are highlighted with red lettering immediately alerting catalogers to what the potential problem might be. whenever a potential problem is found, the text of the entire field appears in the report so that catalogers can see quickly whether the field triggering the flag is an actual problem. it takes a matter of seconds to glance through the 245 fields of half a dozen records to see if the numeral or keyword detected is a problem. the catalogers who work with these reports estimated that it took them between two and three hours per month to both review the files and make corrections to bibliographic records. a second component of bibliographic quality maintenance is oclc’s bibliographic record notification service. this service compares newly upgraded oclc records with records held by the library and delivers the upgraded records to the library. because catqc flags records with encoding levels of 2, 3, 5, 7, e, j, k, and m, it was possible to determine if these records had, in fact, been upgraded in oclc. in the sample, thirty-three records were flagged because of the encoding level. no upgrade had been made to 21.2 percent of the records in oclc as of august 2008. upgrades had been made to 45.5 percent of the records. the remaining 33.3 percent of the records were manually loaded by catalogers in copy cataloging. these typically are records for items brought to copy cataloging by acquisitions and licensing because they meet one or more of the criteria for individual inspection discussed previously. when catalogers search oclc and find that the received record has not been upgraded, they search for another matching record. a third of the time, a record of higher quality than that received is found in oclc and exported to the catalog. the reason why the record of better quality is not harvested initially is not clear. it is possible that at the time the records were harvested both records were of equivalent quality and by chance one was enhanced over another. in no instance had any of the records originally harvested been upgraded (this is not reflected in the 21.2 percent of records not upgraded). encoding level 8 records are excluded from catqc reports. because of the relatively quick turnaround for upgrades of this type of copy, the library decided to rely solely on the bibliographic record notification service. n technical specifications catqc is a console application for windows. written in standard c, it is designed to be portable to multiple operating systems with little modification. no graphic interface was developed because (a) the users are satisfied with the current operating procedure and (b) the treatment of the records is predefined as a matter of local policy. the user opens a command console (cmd.exe) and types “catqc”+space+“[name of marc file]”+enter. the corrected file is generated; catqc analyzes the modified file and creates the xml report. it moves the report to a reviewing folder on a file server across the lan and indicates to the user that it is terminating. modifications require action by a programmer; the user cannot choose from a list of options. benefits include a 100 kb file size and a processing speed of approximately 1,000 records per second. no quantitative analysis has yet been done related to the speed of processing, but to the user the entire process seems nearly instantaneous. the genesis of the project was an interest in the record structure of marc files brought about in the programmer by the use of earlier local automation tools. the project was speculative. the first experiment contained the programming structure that would become catqc. one record is read into memory at a time, and there is another array held for individual marc fields. conceptually, the records are divided into three portions—leader, directory, and dataset—when the need arises to build an edited record. initially there was no editing, only the production of the report. the generation of strict, valid xml is a significant aspect of catqc. an original document type was created, along with a corresponding cascading style sheet. the reports are viewable to anyone with an xml–capable browser either through file server, web server, or e-mail. (the current version of internet explorer does not fully support the style sheet syntax.) this continues to be convenient for the report reviewers because they do not have to be client application operators. see appendix a for an excerpt of a document instance and appendix b for the document type definition. catqc is not currently a generalized tool such as marcedit, a widely used marc editing utility that provides a standard array of basic capabilities: field counting, field and subfield deletion (with certain conditional checks), field and subfield additions, field swapping and text replacement, and file conversion to and from various formats such as marcxml and dublin core as well as between marc-8 and utf-8 encodings.6 marcedit continues to grow and does offer programmability that relies on the windows scripting host. this requires the user to either learn vbscript or use the wizards offered by marcedit. the catqc development goal was to create a report, viewable through a lan or the internet, which alerts a group of catalogers to potential problems with specific records, often illustrating those problems. although it might have been possible to use a combination of marcedit capabilities and local programming to help achieve this goal, it likely would have been a more cumbersome route, particularly taking into consideration the multidimensional 46 information technology and libraries | march 2009 conditionals desired. it was deemed easier to write a program that addresses local needs directly in a language already familiar to the programmer. as catqc evolved, it was modified to identify more potential problems and to do more logical comparisons as well as to edit the files as necessary before generating the reports. catqc addresses a particular workflow directly and provides one solution. it is procedural as opposed to event driven or object oriented. with version 1.3, the generic functions were extracted into a marclib 1.0, a common object file format library. functions specific to local workflow remain in catqc. the program is freely available to interested libraries by contacting the authors. as of this writing, the university of florida plans to distribute this utility under the gnu public license version 3 (see www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html) while retaining copyright. n conclusion catqc provides catalogers an easy way to check the bibliographic quality of shelf-ready material without the book in hand. as a result, throughput time from receipt to shelf is reduced, and staff can focus data review on problem areas—those affecting access or interfering with local processes. some of the issues addressed by catqc are of concern to all libraries while others reflect local preferences. the program could be easily modified to conform to those preferences. automation tools such as catqc are of key importance to libraries seeking ways to streamline workflows to the benefit of users. references and notes 1. vinh-the lam, “quality control issues in outsourcing cataloging in united states and canadian academic libraries,” cataloging & classification quarterly 40, no. 1 (2005): 101–22. 2. mary m. rider, “promptcat: a projected service for automatic cataloging—results of a study at the ohio state university libraries,” cataloging & classification quarterly 20, no. 4 (1995): 43. 3. mary walker and deb kulczak, “shelf-ready books using promptcat and ybp: issues to consider (an analysis of errors at the university of arkansas),” library collections, acquisitions, & technical services 31, no. 2 (2007): 61–84. 4. “lc pulls plug on series authority records,” cataloging & classification quarterly 43, no. 2 (2006): 98–99. 5. walker and kulczak, “shelf-ready books.” 6. for more information about marcedit, see http://oregon state.edu/~reeset/marcedit/html/index.php. wcp file analysis: 201 records analyzed. record: 71 oclc number: 243683394 timestamp: 20080824000000.0 245: 10 |a difference algebra /|c levin alexander. 245 h 245 n 245 p numerals keywords appendix a. catqc document instance excerpt catcq and shelf-ready material | jay, simpson, and smith 47 490: 0 |a algebras and applications ;|v v. 8 . . . appendix b. catqc document type definition 48 information technology and libraries | march 2009 college and research libraries some prerequisites to cooperative cataloging a cooperative cataloging center that would be equipped to process efficiently and quickly current non-american materials acquired by our research libraries would be of immeasurable help. the plans for such a center suggested by ralph e. ellsworth1 and the library of congress2 merit attention and detailed study. if such a center can be established, either as part of the library of congress or outside of it, library administrators should act promptly and decisively. the high cost of original cataloging of identical materials in many libraries and the mounting of backlogs in most catalog departments are compelling reasons for urgent action. the proposed plans suggest two basic alternatives: centralized cataloging, or dispersed and coordinated cataloging. the former alternative assumes that the library first acquiring a given item forwards it to the proposed center for cataloging; the latter alternative prefers that the proposed center function as a clearinghouse receiving and distributing requests for cataloging to be performed by the library first acquiring the given item. both of these alternatives have their advantages and their disadvantages. the coordinated cataloging plan which is an expanded national union catalog technique would require a relatively smaller capital investment since most of ~he cataloging would be done by the larger re1 ralph e. ellsworth, "another chance for centralized cataloging," the colorado academic library, i (fall 1963), 1-4. 2 united states library of congress, items suggested for agenda of arl, midwinter meeting, 1963-1964 (draft), 1964. november 1964 by ritv ars bregzis mr. bregzis is head of the catalog department in the university of toronto library. search libraries. its principal disadvantages seem to be the burden on the larger research libraries and above all the resulting nonstandard entries which in practice, although helpful, have proved to require considerable additional cataloging effort on the part of the recipient library. the larger library in particular feels this nonstandard entry to be short of the expected and required form. moreover, whether this complex scheme can be made to work with sufficient speed is doubtful as the success of the scheme would depend on work in many individual catalog departments laboring under a variety of different handicaps and pressures. the centralized cataloging concept seems to be more promising, as there would be only one system with its complexities to -contend with. however, even in this concept the principal factor, at least for the larger library, seems to be the expeditious lending of the copy for cataloging with its attendant problems, rather than the cost of this service. a $20,000 per annum service charge would be amply justified if in return the library could receive proof slips for some 40 per cent of new titles acquired. as the plan suggested by the library of congress has indicated, there would be a great number of technicalities to be agreed upon by the participating libraries and many details to be worked out. the scope of the proposed plan would have 497 to be defined, as it may not be feasible to include materials that are not likely to be acquired by at least several libraries. more important still is the system of records that would have to be designed to control the lending of the items to the center for cataloging. many research libraries will have automated acquisitions control in operation within the next few years. provision for compatibility of mechanized records is an important factor to consider. similarly, very important and not easily resolved is the problem of insuring uniformity of the interpretation and application of the rules governing entry, classification, and subject analysis between the participating libraries and the center. it will be a difficult task for the center to design the entry, classification, and subject headings acceptable in the catalogs of any one and all of the participating libraries. a great deal more standardization of rules in these three key areas and a standardized code of interpretation of these rules would have to precede any cooperative effort if the participating libraries are to expect the cataloging done by the center to be reasonably acceptable and therefore economical. in libraries that presently "follow lc" in entry, classification, and subject heading there is ample evidence that the merging of lc · authority with the local authority for entry, interpretation of classification, and application of subject headings produces considerably less than duplication of the lc system, although the aim and rule is to follow lc. the reasons for this growing incongruence are well known. the entry that lc establishes today in a certain form may already exist in a slightly variant form in the catalog of the participating library, which had to establish it in the absence of any record of this entry in the lc catalogs. the new lc proof slip or card now presents a conflict of entry, and the library is faced with two choices: either to modify its existing records under this entry to correspond with the lc form, or to adhere to its own form and decide to modify all future lc cards under this entry. both are costly and uneconomical alternatives. the same problem exists in the area of classification, and to a lesser extent in that of subject heading use. the cooperative system would have to find a solution to this problem of identical interpretation of cataloging rules; without it much of the benefit of cooperation would be lost. it should also be mentioned that the rules of entry, classification, and subject analysis presently in force vary from library to library, and the integration of bibliographical data emanating from the center into the large existing files of the participating libraries may be a task for which the librarian's art is hardly prepared with the present tools of bibliographical control. this brings the proposed scheme of cataloging cooperation and centralized cataloging face-to-face with the conventional systems of bibliographic control and the form of catalog record which the participating libraries do and will wish to receive. the impact of electronic data processing on library techniques has just begun to be felt in its relatively milder forms: circulation control, indexing, simple information retrieval, and lately attempts to automate the compilation of catalogs. the initial success in these areas seems to indicate that within the next few years there will be a pronounced turn toward the automated catalog. the number of libraries that today would like to receive the catalog record in machine useable form in preference to proof slips or printed cards is still small. but there seems to be little doubt that this number will increase rapidly. therefore the catalog record produced by the cooperative center would have to be available both in printed card and in machine useable form. it is this need for a machineable bibli498 college and research libraries ographic record that amplifies the problems which librarians have attempted for half a century to resolve by codifying and systematizing their methods of bibliographical control. considerations of bibliographic service and economy require a machineable record that is based on a logical and uniform system of entry, systematization of subject matter, and systematic terminology control (subject headings) . present experience with automated catalog design indicates, however, that the existing rules of entry, most classification systems, and subject heading systems incorporate logical and structural deficiencies that prohibit the automation of bibliographical control to work with effectiveness comparable to that of the available electronic data processing equipment. automation applied to the existing systems of entry, classification, and terminological analysis may be likened to the installation of a jet engine in an ox cart set on a superhighway. the present systems of .bibliographic control-i.e., entry, classification, subjects-do not incorporate a ·structural design that would allow a logical summation, specification, and association of concept within the whole spectrum of the system. thus the structure of all conventional title entries or all corporate entries of one kind is not identical. there are many rules that determine the choice and form of entry for an institution, and too much is left to the discretion of the cataloger. thus entries for all conferences in a given field cannot be mechanically summarized without involving human effort. the result is the individual coloration of bibliographic control in each library to a degree that hinders cooperation through automated bibliographic record exchange. similarly, all library classification schemes, with the possible partial exception of the colon classification, are built predominantly on arbitrary and superficial arrangement of subject matter, and november 1964 they do not permit systematic representation of the subject matter in its correct structure and context. thus the structure that underlies the classification of the history of fifteenthcentury england has little in common with that of nineteenth-century england, or with fifteenth-century germany, or with nineteenth-century russia. the lack of common structure to the scheme for fields prevents any automated approach to the information which has been classified purportedly with the aim of systematization. a classification system that aspires to be an effective counterpart of the electronic machine should incorporate logic that permits effective search by a single country, selected countries, or all countries; or search by period of any degree of generalization or specification; or search by any other desired qualification. a classification structure that has been designed to reflect the prevailing philosophy of organization of subject fields obviously cannot fulfill such a function. required is a system of a more basic structure, a system that ceases to be lineally heirarchical and can function as a heterogeneous logical complex of various aspects. recent research in classification theory seems to indicate that this structure of concepts can be substituted for conventional structurization of subject fields. in our example-history, england, germany, russia, fifteenth-century and nineteenth-century are concepts each of which can be considered individually as elements of a classification system. any combination of these concepts with the aid of any one of a limited number of forms of relationships between concepts should be designed to result in a heterogeneous system which would respond to systematic, multiple, specific, or generalized search that could be conducted for any concept, or group of concepts, or any concept in specified relationship with any other concept. 499 such a classification structure would not only be ideal for the automated handling of bibliographical information; it would in addition convert the conventional system of subject headings, or its improved version of descriptors, into a conceptual system of terminology. such a terminology system could be used in conjunction with the concept classification system and serve as a terminological index to that system. this would permit direct conversion from terminology to classification, or from classification to terminology. it is interesting to note that some of our subject heading lists have attempted to do this by indicating the corresponding classification numbers where the logic of the subject heading and the logic of the class correspond. it is suggested that such correspondence within the entire system is essential. it is in these three key areas, then, that automation is revealing the fundamental importance of the dormant problems of bibliographical control. if, along with cooperative recording of bibliographic information in the conventional form, automation is considered as an inescapable development, one cannot avoid seeing the depth of the problem which may not require altogether different parameters of bibliographical control but does require a basis that equals the automated methods in power of logic. apart from these problems of bibliographic representation any serious effort to establish cooperative processing or bibliographic information transmission on an automated basis will require a standard bibliographic data format that lends itself to direct recording and reading by data processing equipment. such a standard data format would permit a mechanized exchange of cataloging data, it would assure a certain minimum of completeness of bibliographic data, it would permit programed editing in order to produce the bibliographic forms required by the individual library, and it would provide compatibility that would permit each library to choose its own definitions of bibliographic completeness and specificity for its own material, but it would also facilitate mechanical exchange of bibliographic information between libraries. in conclusion, there appear to be two levels of problems that would have to be resolved before cooperative cataloging could become the efficient, quick, and lasting benefit it is expected to be. the first of them concerns technicalities of various kinds that are related to and implied in the conventional system and form of cataloging. these problems should not be impossible to solve given a genuine will for cooperation and ingenuity for simplicity and economical feasibility. the second level of problems concerns cooperation viewed in broader perspective. it recognizes the fact that conventional methods of cataloging which already are overtaxing the capacity of most catalog departments, buried under mountains of books and avalanches of catalog cards, will not be much longer capable of solution by further increasing library staffs and the complexity of their work. it appears reasonable to assume that different approaches will have to be taken and that some of the very basic systems of bibliographical control will have to be re-examined. it is suggested that these basic systems could benefit from the logic and consistency that is implied in and suggested by modem data processing. in view of these comments it may be suggested that, before our libraries begin hammering out the technical details of cooperative cataloging, librarians-and library administrators in particularshould concern themselves with a basic re-evaluation of the conventional philosophy of bibliographic organization. the cooperative cataloging that we plan to establish should serve the needs of tomorrow as well as those of the present day. •• 500 college and research libraries college and research libraries 170 i college & research libraries • march 1981 in the text and captions are haphazardly capitalized and some illustrations are illchosen. why, for example, reproduce a page from the basilisk press' facsimile edition of the kelmscott chaucer, which through the various reproduction processes is at least six times removed from the original? moreover, a bibliography that purports to be a guide to some of the most imaginative and finely crafted books being produced today must have at least a modicum of allusive charm. the whole private press philosophy is centered on craftsmanship and respect for the printed word. as one proprietor noted, "i am far more interested in having my work go into the hands of people who are readers and booklovers, not the picky packrats who 'collect' press books .... " finally, though "printing for pleasure" is usually a private avocation, paradoxically it is a form of communication as well; it bears noting that the concluding chapter of bellamy's book, "reaching the customer," presents a candid summary of the marketing problems that plague the "business end" of many private presses.-david pankow, rochester institute of technology, rochester, new york. wynar, bohdan s. introduction to cataloging and classification. 6th ed. littleton, colo.: libraries unlimited, 1980. 657p. $22.40 cloth ($27 foreign); $14 paper ($17.50 foreign). lc 80-16426. while reviewing a text on cataloging and classification could be viewed as an ordeal, it can be handled reasonably if the usual method of reading cover to cover is not followed. one possible method, which is followed here, is to read selected parts, try application of some of the instructions, compare with aacr2 (for descriptive cataloging), look for outstanding features or notable omissions, and compare with earlier editions. it is interesting to see the many ways this work has changed since it began as a "preliminary edition" in 1964. in format it has changed from a slim mimeographed paperback to a hefty book with effective graphic design that is offered in cloth and paper. the contents, of course, have been chang'ing over the years to treat catalog code revisions, new editions of dewey and sears, developments in subject analysis, and the changes wrought by bibliographic networking. in the latest edition these changes have dictated more a rewriting than a revision. there is still a healthy portion of background theory to support the main topics. brief outlines of some of the lesser-used classification systems and newer methods of verbal analysis are included with examples, and the sections on library of congress subject headings and library of congress classification are considerably expanded and fully illustrated. the section on centralized services, cataloging routines, and catalog and shelflist filing is updated and expanded. the descriptive cataloging section, which constitutes more than half of the book, is keyed to aacr2 by rule number and is illustrated by numerous examples. in recognition of the increasing use of machinereadable cataloging records, rule examples are no longer given in traditional card format. in some cases transcriptions or copies of the chief source of information are supplied as an aid to interpretation. the rules are conveyed by many direct quotes from aacr2, to which are added discussions of problem areas and words of advice regarding interpretation and possible future changes. a good deal of enumeration of rule numbers and captions without comment shows the problem of condensing the code to a size that would not overwhelm the rest of the book. most of the omissions are understandable, but the slight treatment of capitalization and abbreviation places full burden on the examples. this is a work of shared responsibility, with principal responsibility attributed to one person (aacr2, rule 21.6b1). in the preface bohdan wynar gives credit to other authors for either "writing," "preparing," or "revising" many of the chapters. arlene taylor dowell handled aacr2, while jeanne osborn covered document indexing, filing, centralized processing, and cataloging records and routines. wynar was wise in his choice of these assisting authors. their sections are well written and show excellent understanding of background, current practices, problems, and future trends. the workability of the instructions and the effectiveness of the examples will have to be judged by teachers, students , and other users. there seems to be adequate information to give the reader a general idea of foundations and procedures, but students will certainly need a helping hand, and practicing catalogers should not find much they don't already know or have access to in standard tools. continued revisions of this book attest to a certain demand , but it is hard to visualize the audience for this particular mix of introductory and advanced material. covering the contents in one course would not be easy. it should be noted that the text is fully documented and a ~bliography of several pages on cataloging and classification aids is included. there is an excellent index and a glossary of terms and acronyms. the only mistake meriting mention is in the aacr2 section, in which .-is used to separate the items in a contents note , rather than without the full stop . only a former cataloger would quibble over a punctuation mark-suzanne massonneau, university of vermont , burlington, vermont. benge, ronald charles. cultural crisis and libraries in the third world. london: clive bingley; hamden , conn.: linnet books, 1979. 255p. $17.50. lc 79-12.929. isbn 0-85157-281-2 bingley; 0-20801668-6 linnet. in nigeria, as in other third world countries, "when social action is taken to create a new environment, then libraries will be a necessary part of it" (cultural crisis and libraries in the third world, p .242). at that time , it will be verified that third world librarians can be strong forces for the welfare of their country. to do this , they must understand the meaning of development in their country, they must perceive how technology can be transferred appropriately to it, and they must avoid the pitfalls of education and mass communication imposed from without, in disregard of their country ' s native genius. in developing this thesis through an essay-style approach , ronald c . benge devotes ten chapters to the general premises of development, education, and communicarecent publications i 171 tion ; then he turns, in the last five chapters, to the particulars concerning libraries and librarians. such a procedure gives students of cultural crisis in the third world food for thought , without , however, providing a thorough treatment of that crisis; and it gives students of libraries in the third world some guiding principles, but only a minimum of facts about the library milieu there. this essay also poises itself on the edge between · the general and the particular by drawing extensively from a vast literature concerning third world affairs in general and by reporting on the author's years of personal experience, especially in nigeria. the strong affective tone of the work surely derives from the latter source , and the reader has the feeling that as long as the author had the praiseworthy intention of avoiding a dry monograph on his topic, he could have presented his insights and feelings with more power by giving greater emphasis to his nigerian experience against a lower profile of general background knowledge.-paul tutwiler , school of library science , university of wisconsin-milwaukee. mcgregor "personalized subscription service" every customer is assigned an experienced "home offk:e" representative. you cormpond direct; any title needs, changes, cancellations or problems can be handled promptly by lettlr or phone. this makes your job easier and keeps you abreast of your subscription needs at all times. with over 45 years exper~mce, mcgregor has built a reputation of prompt and courteous service on both domestic and international titles. we prepay subscriptions ahead of time. our customers, large and small, like the prompt attention we give them. we think you would tool ask about mcgregor's "automatic renewal" plan described in our new brochure. write today for your free copy. our 48th year mount morris, illinois 81054 college and research libraries 204 i college & research libraries • may 1970 zens will benefit enormously. every city can and should have such a library as dr. martin envisions for chicago, a "nerve center ... for contemporary information, in substance functioning as th~ fact bank, information switchboard, and special li­ brary for the general populace."-edwin castagna, enoch pratt free library. library automation; a state of the art review. ed. by stephen r. salmon. chi­ cago: american library association, 1969. 175p. $7.50. (73-77283). the papers presented at the ala pre­ conference institute on library automa­ tion at san francisco in june 1967 consti­ tute this volume. the purpose of the insti­ tute was to inform ala members of the state of the art of library automation. it achieved its purpose, and with the prin­ cipal exception of on-line applications de­ scribed since 1967, it still constitutes an in­ formative review for librarians not directly involved in research and development. separate sections of the report are de­ voted to acquisitions, cataloging, serials, and circulation, but the publication lacks an adequate review of information retriev­ al. necessarily lacking are descriptions of on-line systems in acquisitions, serials, and circulation that have been activated since 1967. other sections discuss the marc project at the library of congress, networks, sys­ tem analysis and design, and buildings. the marc project has had major devel­ opments since 1967, which of course are not in library automation. on the other hand, system analysis and design is a time­ less topic. one of the most interesting sec­ tions is that by robert h. rohlf entitled "building-planning implications of auto­ mation." this section does not give cook­ book answers to those who wish detailed replies to the question "how will library automation affect the building i am plan­ ning?" but it does give a valuable basis from which effective planning can proceed. library automation will be a useful and informative publication for some years to come.-frederick g. kilgour, the ohio college library center. cataloging u.s.a. by pauls. dunkin. chi­ cago: american library association, 1969. 159p. $5.00. ( 69-17830). paul dunkin has given us a brief survey of cataloging theory in the united states. he prefaces his book with an annotated list of the most influential writings on cata­ loging; after which he summarizes the cat­ aloging codes from cutter's on. then, un­ der each problem area-entry, description, subject, classification, the catalog-he dis­ cusses the major points of view and their theoretical bases. his expressed intention is to show why we catalog as we do. the categories, assumptions, and objec­ tives of the transcendent theories are pre­ sented with clarity. we see how we arrived at our current practices, that they do not form a coherent whole and reflect histori­ cal not logical development. they are largely "the accumulation of what has been done in lc" ( p. 143) , a compromise of conflicting bibliographical objectives, par­ ticularly of conflicting theories on "the pub­ lic's needs and/ or wants. (they are not necessarily the same.)" we index the book collection both to lo­ cate a work and to relate it to other works. that is our first principle. cataloging at­ tempts to do this systematically, and parts of cutter's coherent but expensive system still stand. parts have fallen under attack. but no matter how cogent or inviting later theories have been, the system has re­ mained closed to any but peripheral and compromised changes, adopted usually for economic reasons and tending to make the system a less coherent whole. mr. dunkin shows us why we have arrived at our cur­ rent practices. we all know what they are and what problems they raise in applica­ tion and comprehension. thus we enter works on "principles of authorship," not according to the title page statement the author and publisher have agreed on. our forms of entry reflect wave after wave of opinion. we relate some types of material by added entries, others by uniform titles, and still others by form headings. our sub­ ject headings reflect a number of views on the uses of language, and a continual re­ duction of attempts to apply them system­ atically or to relate them fully. marc finds it necessary to bolster our descrip­ tions with explicit statements on such points as language of text, country of ori­ gin, and index. even the paging state­ ment, shown to be most important in es..: tablishing editions, has gone wild with the acceptance of title ii descriptions. the catalog gets larger and more confusing. the attempt to tie cataloging at least physically to books was dismissed ten years ago in the library of congress' the cata­ loging-in-source experiment. this report, called by dunkin "an amazing document," is one still deeply resented by catalogers outside the library of congress, who did not feel the experiment's pressures. noth­ ing since has promised immediate practical relief. attempts to tie cataloging more log­ ically or even more simply to books have added to the cost or to the confusion or to both. mr. dunkin has tried to limit himself to descriptive rather than critical analysis. the reader will be grateful to have the his­ tory laid out concisely. this is an impor­ tant book, intelligently done; if it emerges as a kind of epitaph to cataloging theory as we have known it, perhaps machines will someday release us and give us a chance at theories again.-lois hacker, cornell university libraries. prolegomena to library classification. 3d ed. by s. r. ranganathan, assisted by m. a. gopinath. new york: asia pub­ lishing house, 1967. 640p. (73-427373). it is with deep gratitude that i remem­ ber my first encounter with the prolego­ mena. it (then in its second edition) opened my eyes with its clear statements of the problems of classification, as well as with its amazing revelation that anyone had gone so far toward their solution. this third edition is not a revision in the usual sense, but r ather a development of those parts of the second edition of the greatest generality, excluding much of the histori­ cal, speculative, and practical discussions which (the author informs us) are being developed in two other books: classifica­ tion: retrospective and prospective, and d epth classification and its d esign. thus the new prolegomena consists, in a way, of three separate titles. libraries ·with the recent publications j 205 second edition should not retire it to inac­ tive storage unless they acquire all three new titles. if there is a work in which is concen­ trated (and the word must be taken in a very strong sense) all that is most germinal in the theory of classification, it is the prolegomena. nothing else can rank with it except the 1876 dewey and cutter works, and perhaps the gardin team's l'automa­ tisation des recherches documentaires. in this new incarnation it has become more than ever nothing but what-must-be-con­ sidered-before ... , less a survey that in­ cludes prolegomena! matter. no one (ex­ cept the beginning student, who would in all but a very few cases be quite put off by the unaccustomed rigor of the mode of exposition and who would be in principle unaware of the aporia in the praxis that have led to this theoria) who is serious about understanding, constructing, apply­ ing, or using any classification or system of indexing can afford to be uninformed about what ranganathan works through here. the new edition would better have been (like the second) printed in en­ gland; there are misprints in abundance, though most are not too serious-just ir­ ritating. but there are a few weaknesses of a more serious sort. interpolation (internal hospitality) in chain (§lg) is not really explained, though ranganathan along with everyone else assumes that dewey's radix­ fractional principle makes it possible. but it may instead be that only a faceted nota­ tion does-and then only in a somewhat weak sense. dichotomy is discussed in the proper pejorative light (§pc) , but its real function (positive/negative = enumera­ tion/"others") is not mentioned. figure 16 (p. 367) is intended to show the complexi­ ty of "the tree of knowledge"; it is so com­ plex as to confuse, and the lack of explana­ tory text makes it not a help but a hin­ drance to the reader. udc is made to seem to have anteriorising common iso­ lates (p. 448-449), which would assured­ ly surprise most of its adherents; the lack of phase-relational flexibility in udc (p. 462) is largely true, but the pioneer efforts of kervegant have led at least to an offi­ cial t est of a relator-schema of my own college and research libraries by r o b e r t f. t e a r e microphotography and cataloging: a forecast the impact of microfilm upon catalog-ing may seem superficial to some, but to others it provides implications of important changes. t h e current problems of high unit cost of cataloging books and the mounting work loads are forcing catalogers to reorganize their routines and utilize new techniques. more specifically, control of the vast and ever growing body of published materials not adequately covered by the present centralized cataloging services is one of the major problems facing college and university cataloging staffs. some catalogers may consider the microfilm as merely an added burden, but others regard it speculatively as a possible new tool. in current professional literature, many writers advocate an extension of centralization in cataloging, either by cooperative arrangements between colleges and universities or by commercial methods. t h e cry heard on every hand is: "let there be printed cards for all books," and "let the cards come with the books." should cards come with all films, as well ? in the future, might cards and films be integrated, in some new form of publication ? against the background of the general problems which face catalogers, the specific topic—that of cataloging microfilm and associated materials—may seem a minor matter, at least at present. if the task is considered from the routine point of view, it can be said: treat the film as a book. make a regular catalog card for the item contained on the strip of film and add a few notes covering the form in which the material appears. state that the item is on a film, which is so many millimeters wide; that it is a negative (or a positive print) ; that there are so many "frames" or exposures on the film, with the text reproduced one or more pages to the frame, and the lines of type running with or across the long way of the film (this last information being conveyed in code form with the words "placement i, ii," or " i i i " ) . also give credit to the institution owning the film which is reproduced or to the book of which the film was taken. these items of information are those requested by the philadelphia bibliographic center in compiling the union list of microfilms. the inclusion of this information on the catalog card should adequately complete the matter of physical description and should provide all necessary help to the patron in the use of the film in a projector. from the subject point of view, full contents notes, which give a clue to the material contained in each reel, are probably needed by the patron. form subject added entries and/or a separate card list of microfilms would also prove helpful. since the film itself is in a box or a filing cabinet somewhere, a call number indication of its location must be provided. then, to make the shelflist complete, the item could be closely classified and a card provided in the appropriate place, so that searchers using this tool should not be disappointed. also, a dummy of the item filmed could be placed in the book stacks or vertical file so that patrons looking in those places would be rewarded. by this time, at least, the average cataloger may feel overwhelmed. yet each item on this list has been advanced in the literature for inclusion in the routine for handling microfilm. can all of it be done? is it all necessary? is any of it july, 1946 231 necessary? since catalogers, as a group, do not agree about methods or even about certain fundamental aims and purposes, it is difficult to answer these questions, even the last one. shall the film be thought of as not just another book but as something quite different—because of its form, the uses to which it is put, and the type of service it is capable of rendering? materials filmed t h e types of materials which are filmed and with which librarians deal may be considered. generally speaking, a university will buy film when it is cheaper to do so than to obtain the original book or periodical, or when it is impossible to obtain it. w h e n the expected use is heavy, enlarged prints or photostats will be preferable to film, but, in the case of lengthy research items, film is desirable because of its smaller bulk and lower cost. a t present there are certain major categories of film : newspapers and serial publications photographed in long runs; old, out-of-print, and rare books, usually unobtainable in the original by the average institution; and a miscellaneous hodpepodge of theses, manuscripts, maps, and articles from serials. newspapers and other serials, when considered as units and not analyzed, present no new problems. rare books, as such, deserve careful treatment and justify the expenditure of time by the cataloger; cards for such items are increasingly available from centralized cataloging undertakings. in the beginning the cataloging of films of these materials may follow in the pattern of our present handling of the originals. but what about the third group? a start is being made in the centralized handling of doctoral dissertations by the microfilm abstracts project. but there is nothing to help with periodical articles, which come frequently as a substitute for the interlibrary lending of originals. at this point there is trouble. if these items are handled as analytics—and the decision on this point is a matter of institutional policy—then considerable work results. side by side with the problem of reprint via film, there is that of the "publication" of manuscript material. t h e recent phenomenal increase in the bulk of near-print publications, issued in small editions, indicates something of what may be expected from this quarter. the rider book it might be profitable at this point to refer to an important recent book: fremont r i d e r ' s the scholar and the, future of the research library. in it, m r . rider makes a frontal attack on the problem of handling the types of material under discussion— theses, manuscript material, maps, ephemeral publications of small editions, and serial publications; all research material, most of it of limited use. yet so important does m r . rider believe the need for detailed cataloging of these items, that he advocates centralized handling of such materials to effect a publication or republication in microprint form on catalog cards. serials would be analyzed, one article to a card. t h i s is a significant matter, since the process is essentially one of modifying the present methods of microreproduction with the object of incorporating the benefits of centralized cataloging. t h e form of the card which m r . rider advocates is also worth noting. first of all, there is no call number and no numerically expressed classification, since the book is on the back of the card. t h e subject of the item is indicated in a "classificational subject heading" printed at the top of the card at first indention. instead of the present classification systems expressed in numerical notation, m r . rider would use one utilizing word notation. in 232 college and research libraries place of the present alphabetical subject catalog he would use a printed index in book form, similar to dewey's "relativ index." t h e next thing which strikes the cataloger is the fact that the microcard is a true unit card. no added entries are to be supplied by typewriter. by widely separating the indention and by varying the type face of the three entry lines, which indicate the subject classification, the author, and the title, m r . rider believes that recognition of the entry will be automatic to any patron who flips over a few cards in the file. i t may be added parenthetically that underlining the entry letter with red ink would permanently "locate" the card. useful information t h i r d , each card bears an annotation and a vita, which give consistently more information of a kind useful to the research worker than is provided in our present code for routine cataloging. since the text itself is reproduced in miniature on the reverse of the card, the bibliographic description can be shortened and simplified, thus reducing cost. w i t h the microcard, true centralized cataloging and cataloging at the publishing level are provided. in other words, the cataloger has something to say about the form of the published item, taking advantage of the moneyand timesaving features of mass reproduction. each university would be supplying copy in its chosen field of concentration, to be edited and published in its own plant or, in cooperation with other institutions, at central laboratories. m r . rider would literally have us all participating in this new cataloging-publishing venture. at this point the weary cataloger will say: " w h a t about all this saving us time? look at the bulk of the union list of serials. h o w long do you think it will take us to wade through that, analyzing everything?" under any plan of cataloging, such a program would take many years. but, under any plan of centralized cataloging, time is usually saved. translated into budgetary terms, the saving of catalogers' time is a major saving of money for libraries in the aggregate. furthermore, if the most-used serials are handled first (and usestudies already made can be utilized as guides in this), the time elapsing before accomplishing reasonably complete coverage in many fields may be less than believed. microcard suggestions but what about the present? microcards are still just a topic for discussion. can a start be made? present microfilm equipment, for example, can be used to experiment. several writers have advocated that short strips of microfilm be mounted on catalog cards and filed by an entry typed in the usual way on the front of the card. t h e card could then be read in a readex machine (an easier procedure for the patron than using a projector). using this idea as a starting point, a modest program of institutional publication of certain items of limited use could be worked out. master's theses rarely circulate in carbon copy form outside the walls of originating institutions. t h e thesis of average length can be filmed in the unbound state for a dollar or two. t h e resulting five feet of film (average) can be cut into twelve strips, trimmed, and mounted three together at a time in a printing frame to make positive prints, the size of a catalog card, containing twentyfour pages of microtext. o n the unsensitized sides, a catalog entry for the item could be mimeographed. t h i s would include an annotation, or abstract of the thesis, and a vita. t o t a l cost may be estijuly, 1946 24 7 mated at something under ten cents a card, including labor and materials for filming, printing, and cataloging, in an edition of thirty copies. larger editions and blanket subscription arrangements would reduce costs slightly. t h i s total cost of forty or fifty cents a title would be only a little higher than the cost of an interlibrary loan for the bound book. if desired, sets of "regular" catalog cards to accompany the photocards could be mimeographed at the same time at little extra cost. not only theses but out-of-print titles in university serial publications and all sorts of material previously denied publication because of high costs could be issued. it might prove more economical if material to be filmed, with its catalog card copy, could be sent from several institutions in an area to a single central laboratory for processing. wilson and tauber, in the university library, suggest such a laboratory for the los angeles area. group publishing i t is not wise to confine thought to one style of technique. catalogers think largely in terms of cards, though they use book-style catalogs and bibliographies as a matter of course and as a matter of preference when a choice is offered between books and cards. for many years, the wilson cumulative indexes have been a boon to libraries. t h e development of mimeographing, miniature printing, and other low-cost methods of reproduction has made book catalogs increasingly practical for many uses. it is possible to contemplate a program of handling serial publications which would use the filming of continuous runs of text, accompanied by book catalogs similar to the wilson periodical indexes. publications could be filmed and published in groups. for example, serials in the field of organic chemistry which were not widely distributed in the original could be handled as a block. nor would the plan restrict itself to serials. all dissertations in the field of education could be reduced to film and issued annually in one alphabet, on a few large reels, and indexed in a single volume. t h e cost of film and index should be only a fraction of that of the publications alone, as originally issued. t h e main difficulty would be in handling film. special projectors, with high speed rewind, and provision for stroboscopic indexing of the film itself would be necessary. such a program would be larger in unit scale than the microcard one and would raise problems of commercial backing and publication. since films, not books, would be forwarded with the index copy to the central "publishing" plants, the handling of materials would not prove difficult. in essence, the plan would not be as flexible as that of microcards, and would be harder to keep up to date—a fact that would not enter into the matter of issuing older titles. other suggestions in the july 1945 issue of the library quarterly, ralph eugene ellsworth outlines a proposed book type national union catalog, with annual supplements and a parallel series of subject bibliographies in book form. following this idea, there appeared in the november 1945 a.l.a. bulletin an article on "microbibliography: a possible alternative to microcards" by edwin e. williams. h e proposed subject bibliographies with "supplements containing the full text in microprint of all the materials they list." t h i s idea, also, is capable of further development. w h y not reprint groups of serials or similar materials, as suggested above, in book form rather than on film? if the cost could be brought down from the present readex price of more than fifty cents a sheet to ten cents, 234 college and research libraries the text of the approximately seven thousand dissertations normally purchased by a large university library during the year could be available in ten quarto loose-leaf volumes costing a hundred dollars a volume. t h e format and degree of reduction assumed here is that used in the present readex process. greater reductions are foreseen by fremont rider and others. should they be achieved, possibilities would increase tremendously. if space were the only factor to be considered, the proposed national union catalog, by tripling its contemplated size of 1900 volumes, could include not only the catalog cards for all books in the united states but the microtext of all the books as well. indexing whatever form microphotography may take in the future, those who forecast its growth and development also forecast a parallel development of centralized indexing in a form not interfilable in the present card catalog (and this applies to microcards, if one looks at the matter practically). t h i s is a trend that scholars and librarians may deplore but it is determined by economic necessity. if research materials are distributed, they should be indexed, but the amount of use to which these materials will be subjected does not justify adoption of the present costly methods of piecework cataloging. undoubtedly, there will always be items not included in the large, centrally issued blocks of micro-materials; these can only be handled as separate cards or reels, as is now done. it is to be expected, however, that the cataloging of such items will be patterned after that of other large compilations of microprint and not after the style of the present card catalog. i t may be that the library will issue book catalogs of its own unique items or prepare cards interfilable with the unit style microcards. t h e writer is aware that this point is debatable. for example, keyes d . metcalf, in t h e library journal of s e p t . i , 1945, asserts: "if microcards are filed separately, a catalog card for [each one of] them must be in the regular catalog and that of course adds to the expense." at the present time, the cards for a small group of "rare book" or "manuscript" films would be lost if not in the main catalog. but, one may inquire, is a card in the main public catalog now deemed necessary for every government document, for every periodical article now indexed by the wilson services? is it too much to expect that the research worker of the f u t u r e shall look in two or more files rather than in one? whatever decision is made about the desirability of extending double cataloging coverage, an arbitrary division of materials will almost inevitably be effected. t h e matter of cost, it would seem, is a decisive factor here, as well as the large-scale development of the new medium. new processes developed t h e war interrupted the development of the use of microphotography in libraries just at the point where it was ceasing to be merely an auxiliary to the other, principal categories of material. t h e development of new technical processes in the field, however, was stimulated by wartime needs. n o doubt new processes and devices will appear shortly on the market ready for use. it is not difficult to foretell that the use that libraries make of the new techniques will be determined to a large extent by the cooperation of catalogers. t h e economies and increase in volume of service made possible by microphotography will be in large part nullified if we persist in adding a dollar cataloging charge to the cost of each item. whatever is done in planning the future july, 1946 24 7 of cataloging of microfilm and related materials, two things should be kept in m i n d : first, it must be decided what type of service catalogs are to render and what type of patron is to be served principally. probably, we shall incline more and more to the subject approach—at least, in current largescale cooperative cataloging projects more attention is being paid to this kind of detail than was before felt necessary. f o r the full coverage of a book from the subject point of view, we may have to wait, however, for some device such as vannevar bush's filmed catalog cards, with code indicators in dot form, to be scanned at tremendous speeds by photoelectric eyes and rephotographed on the fly by high-speed cameras to form films of selected cards for the formation of bibliographies. t h e second thing that should be remembered is this: t h e only device yet evolved to avoid duplication of work and multiplication of the costs of cataloging is centralized and cooperative cataloging. once standardization of approach is achieved, this shall follow. in the meantime, so long as there remains this chaos of varying sizes of film, types of projector equipment, methods of housing and storing materials, there will exist the problem of hand-typed, custommade cards, tied to the present card cataloging system. i t is only when microphotography can break away from the present routines that the fullest measure of independent and efficient service can be rendered, as independent as the government document collections but much more versatile, supplementing and, in part, even supplanting them. n e w german library ̂ service (continued from page 225) t h e principal questions predeek's card catalog was prepared to answer w e r e : ( 1 ) w h o was doing research in what field? ( 2 ) w h a t had been the results of previous research? information would be furnished free of charge. t h e fields covered were general science, engineering, medicine, agriculture, and forestry. in fields adequately covered elsewhere, notably chemistry and mining, the card index was to supply only supplementary data. extension of coverage to the social sciences and humanities was contemplated. h o w effective the kartei was in aiding the nazi war effort could not be ascertained from the sources at hand. h a d such a research information service been available earlier in the war, it would undoubtedly have helped to expedite emergency research in germany. i t was an attempt to avoid duplication of effort and to coordinate scientific research activities on a national scale, but it came too late in the game to be of much value. several facts seem significant concerning this german venture in research library service: ( 1 ) at a time of critical shortage of personnel and materials, library techniques received recognition as indispensable tools in an important governmental enterprise; ( 2 ) professionally trained library personnel was recruited for key positions within the framework of science and technology; ( 3 ) bibliographic investigation was deemed so essential a phase of scientific research that a special administrative unit was established and substantial funds appropriated for accomplishing the work. 236 college and research libraries 116 journal of library automation vol. 14/2 june 1981 tions only. they do not list the individual works that may be contained in publications. if an analytic catalog were to be built into a computerized system at some time in the future , the structure code would be a great help in the redesign, because it makes it easy to spot items that need analytics, namely those that contain embedded works, or codes 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13. a searcher working with such an analytic catalog could use the code to limit output to manageable stages-first all items of type c, for example; then broadening the search to include those of type d; and so forth, until enough relevant material has been found. the structure code would also be useful in the displayed output. if codes 5 or 8 appeared together with a bibliographic description on the screen, this would tell the catalog user that the item retrieved is a set of many separately titled documents. a complete list of those titles can then be displayed to help the searcher decide which of the documents are relevant for him. in the card catalog this is done by means of contents notes . not all libraries go to the trouble of making contents notes, though, and not all contents notes are complete and rtliable . the structure code would ensure consistency and completeness of contents information at all times. codes 10 and 13 in a search output, analogously, would tell the user that the item is a serial with individual issue titles. there is no mechanism in the contemporary card catalog to inform readers of those titles. codes 4 and 7 would tell that the document is part of a finite set, and so forth. it has been the general experience of database designers that a record cannot have too many searchable elements built into its format. no sooner is one approach abandoned "because nobody needs it," than someone arrives on the scene with just that requirement. it can be anticipated, then, that once the structure code is part of the standard record format, catalog users will find many other ways to work the code into search strategies. it can also be anticipated that the proposed structure code, by adding a factor of selectivity, will help catalogers because it strengthens the authority-control aspect of machine-readable catalog files. if two publications bear identical titles, for example, and one is of structure 1, the other of structure 6, then it is clear that they cannot possibly be the same items. however, if they are of structures 1 and 7, respectively, extra care must be taken in cataloging, for they could be different versions of the same work. determination of the structure of an item is a by-product of cataloging, for no librarian can catalog a book unless he understands what the structure of that book is-one or more works, one or more documents per item, open or closed set, and so forth . it would therefore be very cheap at cataloging time to document the already-performed structure analysis and express this structure in the form of a code. references l. herbert h. hoffman, descriptive cataloging in a new light: polemical chapters for librarians (newport beach, calif.: headway publications, 1976), p.43. revisions to contributed cataloging in a cooperative cataloging database judith hudson: university libraries , state university of new york at albany. introduction oclc is the largest bibliographic utility in the united states. one of its greatest assets is its computerized database of standardized cataloging information . the database, which is built on the principle of shared cataloging, consists of cataloging records input from library of congress marc tapes and records contributed by member libraries. oclc standards ln. order to provide records contributed by member libraries that are as usable as those input from marc tapes, it is imperative that the records meet the standards set by oclc and that the cataloging and formatting of the records be free of errors. member libraries are requested to follow the nationally accepted cataloging code (anglo-american cataloging rules, north american text, 1 • 2 for records input before december 12, 1980, and angloamerican cataloguing rules, second edition, 3 for records input later), the library of congress' application of the cataloging code, and the various marc formats in preparing records to be input. 4 • 5 the cataloging rules dictate what kind of bibliographic information should be included in the cataloging records, a prescribed system of punctuation that identifies the various fields of the cataloging record (international standard bibliographic description, isbd), which access points should be provided, and what form the entries should take. the marc formats provide a standardized method of identifying the various fields and subfields in a cataloging record and, through the use of indicators, information necessary to make the record easily manipulated by computers. in addition, fixed fields provide coded information about the cataloging records. the form of main, added, and series entries can be verified in the national union catalog to ensure that member libraries are following the library of congress' application of the cataloging code . by the same token, subject entries can be verified in the appropriate subject heading list (e.g., library of congress subject headings, sears subject headings, etc.). a study of oclc member cataloging a major problem with the use of contributed cataloging is the amount of revision needed to bring the records up to the standards described above. in 1975, a study of the quality of a group of membercontributed catalog records was conducted by c. c . ryans. 6 the first 700 monographic records input into oclc after september 1, 1975, to which kent state university attached its holdings were examined. 7 the analysis included changes in or additions to main, added, or series communications 117 entries, changes in descriptive cataloging, and changes in or additions to subject headings . the study dealt only with the revision of cataloging; revision of the formatting of records was not noted. the kent state study found that 393 revisions were necessary to 283 records. the remaining 417 records were considered to be acceptable, i.e., they adhered to aacr and isbd rules and to the oclc standards for input cataloging. recent developments relating to quality control since these records were studied, the internetwork quality control council was formed in 1977 by the oclc board of trustees. 8 its primary purpose is to identify problem areas regarding quality control and distribute information to networks concerning problems and solutions. its role is to promote quality control through education and by monitoring the implementation of standards. in addition, oclc' s documentation has steadily improved. the recent publication of the books format9 and the recent revision of the cataloging manual10 provide clear and specific information on oclc' s formatting requirements. with these developments in mind, it would seem likely that the quality of the contributed cataloging has improved since 1975. in order to test this assumption, a number of cataloging records were analyzed in an effort to replicate the kent state study. the analysis of these records differed from the earlier study in that differences in the treatment of series were not noted because one library's treatment of series can reasonably be expected to differ from that of another . methodology the records included in this study consist of 1,017 monographic catalog records to which the state university of new york at albany (sunya) library added its holding symbol during an eight-month period from november 1979 to july 1980. the records included only those that were entered into the oclc database after 1976. cataloging revisions that were noted 118 journal of library automation vol. 14/2 jun e 1981 consisted of changes in main and added entries to make them consistent with library of congress form of entry, and the inclusion of other added entries that were deemed necessary to provide adequate access to the material. in addition, corrections or additions to the imprint and the collation· were noted, as were typograph_ ical errors in all fields . subject headings that were changed to make them consistent with library of congress subject headings and subject headings and/or subdivisions added to provide better subject access to the material were also noted . analysis of cataloging cataloging revisions were required for 43 percent of the 1,017 records examined (596 changes or additions were made to 437 records). changes or additions to subject headings were made to 22.4 percent of all the records in the sunya sample, and represented the most common revision . changes in descriptive cataloging were made to 20 percent of the records, and changes or additions to main or added entries were made to approximately 16 percent of the records. table 1 compares the results of this analysis with the findings of the e arlier study . it should be emphasized that the two studies are not exactly comparable because the kent state study included differences in the treatment of series, while this study noted only typographical errors in series statements. the findings of this analysis do not bear out the hypothesis that the quality of member-contributed cataloging has improved since 1975. the overall percentage of records requiring cataloging revision is similar in both the kent state and the sunya samples . the percentage of changes made in the various areas of the cataloging records was similar, with the exception of added entries and subject headings . in the sunya sample , more revisions and additions were made to these two areas. this difference between the two samples may reflect variation in the cataloging policies of the two libraries rather than the presence or absence of more errors in member-contributed catalog records . analysis of oclc reportable errors and additions in the fall of 1979, oclc distributed its revised cataloging manual, which includes a chapter dealing with quality control. 11 the chapter delineates the errors and changes that are to be reported to oclc for correction or addition . the cataloging records examined in this study were also analyzed with these criteria in mind. this analysis (table 2) revealed that 661 reportable errors or changes were found on 486 records (47.8 percent of all the records). reportable errors or changes included formatting errors or omissions such as incorrect assignment of tags, incorrect or missing indicators, subfield codes or fixed fields, and errors affecting retrieval or card printing . other types of errors intable 1 . comparison of two studies of cataloging revision area needing kent state sample* sunya sample revision or addition number percentage number percentage main entry 44 6.2 46 4.5 title statement 28 4.0 76 7.5 edition statement 4 0.6 2 0.2 imprint 29 4.4 64 6.3 collation 111 15.9 58 5.7 series 55 7.9 3 0.3 subject heading 88 12.6 228 22 .4 added entries 44 6.2 119 11.7 total records in study 700 100.0 1017 100.0 records requiring revision 283 40.4 437 43.0 number of revisions made 393 596 *source: constance c . ryans, "a study of errors found in non-marc cataloging in a machineassisted system," journal of library automation 11 :128 (june 1978). communications 119 table 2 . errors and additions reportable to oclc number percentage of total records percentage of total errors and additions 19 6 13 17 59 errors in transcription of data incorrect assignment of tags incorrect or missing subfield codes incorrect assignment of 1st indicator incorrect assignment of 2d indicator incorrect fixed fields incorrect isbd incorrect form of entry (less than lc) errors affecting retrieval or card printing bibliographic information missing addition of access points 313 8 87 3 1 135 total number of records containing reportable errors or additions total number of reportable errors or additions 486 661 eluded incorrect or omitted access points (added or subject entries, isbn, lc card numbers, etc.), errors in transcription of data, incorrect isbn, and the omission of needed bibliographic information. approximately 40 percent (408) of the records contained formatting errors, with over 29 percent (300) of the records containing incomplete or incorrect fixed fields. the apparent unconcern with fixed fields may stem from a lack of understanding of the value of correct fixed-field information. the recent addition of date and type of material as qualifiers in a search of the database is one example of the use of fixed fields. in order to underscore their importance, it might be useful for oclc to highlight this use of fixed fields and further explain to its members how other fixed fields might be used in online search strategies in the future. errors in or omission of access points were found in 222 records (21.8 percent). these errors were also noted in the study of cataloging revisions discussed above, as were errors in transcription of data, in isbd, and in omission of necessary bibliographic information. summary of findings although the quality of the sunya sample seems equivalent to that of the kent state sample, an analysis by date of input of the records examined indicates a slight decrease in the percentage of rec1.9 0.6 1.3 1.7 5.8 30.8 0.8 8.6 0.3 0.1 13.3 47.8 2.9 0.9 2.0 2.6 8.9 47.4 1.2 13.2 0.5 0.2 20 .4 100.0 ords needing correction for those records input in 1979 and 1980 (table 3). perhaps this is the beginning of a trend toward more careful cataloging and formatting of records input by members. in summary, 589 of the 1,017 membercontributed records studied were found to require revision. of these, 486 records contained er.rors or omissions that may be reported to oclc, and 437 required cataloging revision. it is discouraging to realize that approximately 60 percent of the member records used required revision. such a high percentage of records needing revision necessitates the review of all member records .used if a library wishes to adhere to oclc standards for cataloging. this leads to tremendous duplication of effort and negates, in part, the purpose of shared cataloging. table 3. yearly breakdown of catalog records total records percentage year number needing needing of input of records correction correction 1977 186 115 61.8 1978 332 202 60.8 1979 339 184 54.3 1980 160 88 55.0 influences for change the implementation of aacr2 in 1981 provides the impetus for greater adherence to standards. since all catalogers 120 journal of library automation vol. 14/2 june 1981 have had to learn the new cataloging requirements, greater care may be used in the formulation of records by member libraries. the publication of clear and specific guidelines for reportable errors may help to alleviate the situation in two ways . first, the careful articulation of errors or desirable additions may impel member libraries to place more emphasis on the quality control of input. second, member libraries may report more errors, thus allowing oclc to correct the master records. a change in the method of correcting errors and the rate at which they are corrected might be beneficial. presently, errors on the master records can only be corrected by oclc or by the inputting library if it is the only library that has used the record. such an arrangement is clumsy and time-consuming. if other member libraries were trained and authorized to correct errors on master records, errors might be corrected as often as they are detected. in the long run, however, the responsibility for inputting catalog records that meet the standards for cataloging and formatting rests with the member libraries. oclc and the networks must develop methods of encouraging libraries to input records that are correctly formatted and cataloged . one way of alleviating the problem might be to develop training programs conducted by oclc or by network staff that are aimed at those libraries identified as having high error rates. another approach might be to give public recognition to libraries that contribute cataloging of high quality to the database. one example of this approach is the pittsburgh regional library council's fred award, which annually honors the library with the lowest error rate in the prlc network. 12 through the use of peer pressure the member libraries and networks of oclc can encourage adherence to the standards. in addition, they must continue to insist that oclc address this annoying, expensive, and seemingly perennial problem. references l. anglo-american cataloging rules, north american text (chicago: american library assn., 1967), 409p. 2. anglo-american cataloging rules, chapter 6 (rev. ed.; chicago: american library assn., 1974), 122p. 3. anglo-american cataloguing rules, second edition (chicago: american library assn., 1978), 620p. 4. oclc, inc . , cataloging: user manual (columbus: oclc, 1979), 1v. (looseleaf). 5. oclc level i and level k input standards (columbus: ohio college library center, 1977), 1 v. (looseleaf). 6. constance c. ryans, "a study of errors found in non-marc cataloging in a machine-assisted system," journal of library automation 11:125-32 oune 1978). 7. ibid., p . 127. 8. frederick g. kilgour, "establishment of inter-network quality control council" (unpublished document, ohio college library center, 1977), 2p. 9. oclc, inc., books format (columbus: oclc, 1980), 1v. (looseleaf). 10. oclc, inc., cataloging: user manual, 1v. (looseleaf) . 11. ibid. 12. "prlc peer council cites pittsburgh theological seminary library for high cataloging standards," oclc newsletter 131:4 (sept. 1980). college and research libraries 504 i college & research libraries • september 1981 isbn 0-85365-593-6. available in u.s. from oryx press. in this very slim volume of proceedings, the library association's cataloguing and indexing group attempts to cover a very broad topic, namely the principles and applications of the second edition of the angloamerican cataloguing rules. the group's aprill979 seminar at the university of nottingham featured eight papers; in addition to opening and closing presentations, papers were read on the use of the new rules for cataloguing monographs, music, audiovisual materials, maps, and serials. there was also a report on the status of cataloguing codes in sweden, norway, denmark, and finland presented by karen lunde christensen of the bibliotekscentralen in copenhagen. these published proceedings have been augmented by an appendix that contains two more papers derived from a 1978 library association meeting, outlining the major ways in which aacr2 differs from aacr. both opening and closing remarks labor hard to defend the cataloger and assert the importance of his or her role in contemporary library practice. as for aacr2, the opening paper (by norman roberts at the university of sheffield) is quite positive and optimistic, praising the new code for its clear principles and international outlook and downplaying its economic side effects. the quality of the papers dealing with specific material types is generally good, but presumably because of the newness of the code at the time these papers were written, they only skim the surface of the issues to be examined. while the paper on the nordic countries' response to aacr2 provides interesting information, its inclusion in this volume does not help it maintain a sense of focus. the decision to add the two 1978 papers further detracts from the published work's focus, and the information contained in these two papers was widely available elsewhere by 1980, this book's publication date. the value of seminar on aacr2 doubtless lies in its ability to serve as a record of the initial reaction to the revised code in the united kingdom. it is also a very readable book, and the style of the speakers is warm and sometimes pleasantly informal. for those who are trying to build collections reflecting the history of cataloging or com parative librarianship, this is likely to be a sensible item to acquire. it will not, however, be of much practical use to the 1981 cataloger who already has a number of more up-to-date and thorough discussions of aacr2 on which to rely.-karin a. trainer, new york university. downing, mildred harlow. introduction to cataloging and classification with 58 exhibits. 5th ed. revised and enlarged in accordance with aacr2 and the 19th edition of the dewey decimal classification. jefferson, n.c . : mcfarland & co., 1981. 320p. $14.95. lc 80-20299. isbn 089950-017-x. slocum, robert b. sample cataloguing forms: illustrations of solutions to problems of description (with particular reference to chapters 1-13 of the anglo-american cataloguing rules, second edition). 3d ed. metuchen, n.j.: scarecrow, 1980. 12lp. $11.00. lc 80-21507. isbn 0-8108-13645. mildred harlow downing's introduction to cataloging and classification "is intended, as were previous editions, for students beginning the study of cataloging and classification" (p.iii). that any introductory survey of cataloging and classification should make generalizations is understandable; that this work contains many misleading statements is not. the most serious of these appears on pages 43-45 where the use of standardized punctuation as prescribed by the isbd standards is discussed under the section on the isbn. question four (p.47), "how does isbn punctuation clarify the content of the descriptive catalog record?" confirms the author's confusion on these points. some of the other errors include: the isbds are referred to as manual (p. 6); the statement of responsibility area in aacr2 is discussed as the "statement of authorship area" (p.l6); a definition of a periodical is given as the definition of a serial (p.37); an example of a traced subject series (p.39) appears in the exhibits as an example of an untraced publisher's series (p.l93); the beginning cataloger is advised not to make a title-added entry when a subject heading and the title are the same (p.53), but there is no indication that this applies only to a dictionary card catalog; and two invalid library of librarians ... check out our great reviews! college, university and other research libraries may enroll in the pprc program for an annual fee of $300. aei will then send you every title (over 120) published for the next twelve months as soon as they come off the press. in addition, new pprc 's will receive all aei back titles, including those listed here, for the cost of shipping and handling only. this will increase your collection of aei publications by over 500 titles . become a repository of aei publications and build your collection with some of the timeliest and best-researched public policy materials around today. write or call for full details. american enterprise institute @ __ ,~ public policy research center program ._., 1150 seventeenth street, n .w. washington, d .c. 20036 (202 ) 862-6454 506 i college & research libraries· september 1981 congress subject headings are given: architecture in albania and albania-architecture (p.55). the treatment of nonbook materials (chapter 14) muddies the issue of intellectual responsibility in these kinds of materials, and then states typical patterns as if they were rules. an example of this appears in the discussion of "statement of responsibility" (p.166-67). first is the suggestion that the main entry and the statement of responsibility are always the same; second that it is necessary to use lengthy statements of responsibility to identify "authorship." in fact, while the main entry and the statement of responsibility in bibliographic records may frequently be the same, the author is confused by the wording in aacr2 that describes what kinds of statements should be given in the statement of responsibility in the case of nonbook materials as opposed to the principles used to ascribe primary responsibility (i.e., determine a main entry). suggestions for various kinds of added entries are generally good, but the use of the term "corporate author" and the suggestion that an added entry should be made for the creator of the original when cataloging a microform are puzzling. the appendix of exhibits is no less problematic. aacr2 and pre-aacr2 treatment is confused; the exhibits contain curious practice and some outright errors. among the more obvious are: peculiar spacing for the series statement (p.184, example2); incorrect tracing of a series (p.195, example 23); missing relators (p.201, example 36); incorrect capitalization (p.203, example 40); nonstandard dates in headings (p.240ff., examples 41-48); and a punctuation error in a uniform title (p.217, example 58). the comparatively adequate introduction to classification in lc and dewey is overshadowed by these errors and others and by a barely adequate treatment of automation. this book cannot be recommended. robert b. slocum's sample cataloguing forms emphasizes bibliographic description. it is a compendium of cataloging records chosen by the author as illustrations of difficult cataloging problems. examples appear under alphabetically arranged captions, which run from "abridgement of text" to "year of publication" (in the first section on books, pamphlets, and printed sheets). useful crossreferences to captions appear throughout. the system of captions is supplemented by an index. in addition, each used caption contains references to specific rules in aacr2 that relate to the examples. the pertinent part of the example is underlined. this third edition of work has been revised to reflect aacr2 in a number of ways. first, the organization parallels that of part one of aacr2. second, the descriptions and main entries have been formulated using aacr2, as interpreted and applied by slocum. it is important to realize that timely publication of this work required slocum to create these examples prior to the implementation of aacr2 in most american libraries. as a result this book must be used with some care. nevertheless this is the kind of work that is exceedingly useful to practitioners of cataloging. the display of "complete" descriptions allows the cataloger to see specific problems solved in a broader context. some solutions such as the interpolation of information about a pseudonym or the use of expanded collations extend provisions of aacr2. critical evaluation of examples and judicious application of solutions is necessary. this work will be valuable to catalogers in academic libraries who deal with a wide variety of materials and are frequently confronted by these problems. the treatment of material outside the print medium is especially useful to those who only occasionally catalog these kinds of materials. these two titles are among the dozens of titles revised or published as a result of the publication of aacr2 and dewey 19. caveat emptor.-nancy r. john, university of illinois at chicago circle. maruskin, albert f. oclc: its governance, function, financing, and technology. books in library and information science series, v.32. new york: marcel dekker, 1980. 160p. $22.75. lc 80-23417. isbn 0-824 7-1179-3. i have empathy with the author who attempts to research and analyze an entity like oclc, which is both a recent phenomenon and a moving target. oclc changes not from decade to decade or year to year but month to month. we must realize, however, that the author has to "stop time" or he would college and research libraries revte\v articles progress in cataloging u.s. library of congress. processing department. studies of descriptive cataloging. a report to the librarian of .congress by the ,director of the processing department. washington, u.s. government printing office, 1946. 48p. u.s. library of congress. advisory committee on descriptive cataloging to the librarian of congress. report. washington, library of congress, 1946. 15p. these two pamphlets are among the significant documents in the history of american cataloging. they record the events leading toward, the data supporting, and the decision of the library of congress to accept a new statement of the functions and principles of descriptive cataloging upon which a revised code of rules will be based. this decision not only brings to a head several controversies of l long standing but also projects the theory of descriptive cataloging well beyond the horizons of present practice. . the ,studies which resulted in the publication of these pamphlets began early in 1942 following widespread criticism of the descriptive cataloging section of the preliminary second edition of the a .l.a. catalog rules, a code which reflects current library of congress practice. that this practice is no longer acceptable as a national standard is evinced by the fact that some of the major libraries of the country, one after the other, are abandoning the l.c. rules and developing more effective ones for their own purposes. from these and other libraries comes a persistent and growing demand for the simplification of cataloging rules and practice, a demand which cannot be ignored without endangering not only the position of leadership so long held by the library of congress but also the future of the cooperative enterprises which depend upon that leadership. the first attempts to redefine the functions of descriptive cataloging and to evaluate current practice in the light of those functions occurred in the first half of 1943. during october and november of that year the chief of the descriptive cataloging division and the director of the processing department held a series of conferences in fifteen cities throughout the nation in order to sound out opinion and gather data. early in 1944 officials of the american library association suggested that if the library of congress were prepared to draft a new code of rules for its own use which would also be acceptable to other american libraries, the descriptive cataloging section of the preliminary second edition of the a .l.a. catalog rules would not be revised. the library of congress indicated its willingness to proceed with the development of such a code. in december 1945 a two-day conference on descriptive cataloging was held at the library of congress, with nineteen members of the l.c. staff and seven consultants from the outside participating. the basis of the discussions at this conference was a newly formulated statement of the functions and principles of descriptive cataloging, supplemented by examples illustrating the ap}:flication and effect of these principles. the statement and examples were then distributed to twentyeight additional catalogers and administrators, and a detailed study was made of all the facts and opinions collected. the full report of this investigation, together with the original statement of principles and the list of examples, constitute the studies of descri'ptive cataloging. in transmitting this report to the librarian of congress, the director of the processing department, herman h. henkle, recommended not only the adoption of the new principles but also the appointment of an advisory committee representing the library of congress and the profession outside to advise the librarian on the disposition of the report and "on questions and conflicts of opinion to be resolved in the course of the development of the code." the committee was appointed, consisting of three members of the library of congress reference and acquisition staffs and 278 college and research libraries six members from the library profession at larg~. the committee held meetings at the library of congress, june 24-27, 1946, and later drafted its own report to the librarian of congress. · this report generally approves the recommendations of the director of the processing department, proposes solutions to problems involving conflicts of opinion, and points out areas in which further study is needed. the librarian of congress approved the committee's report and directed the processing department to proceed with the preparation of a code of descriptive cataloging rules in accordance with the committee's recommendations. 'fhe completed draft is to be submitted to the staff of the library of congress and the profession generally for criticism before its final adoption as a part of the cataloging policy of the library. toward defining objectives that .this elaborate procedure was aimed, not primarily at the discussion of specific cataloging rules, but at the clarification and formulation of general principles is in itself noteworthy. rarely, perhaps never, in american library history has such a concerted effort been made to define the acceptable objectives of cataloging before a code of rules was written. the new library of congress descriptive cataloging code promises to be unique in that it will present first a statement of the functions which it will undertake to serve, then the principles which will be employed to serve those functions, and finally the rules themselves, the last being intended only to detail the application of the stated principles in typical cases. the sense of direction, purpose, and logical procedure which such a code would provide should be a welcome relief to many catalogers from the overelaboration of rules to fit specific cases. the general functions of descriptive cataloging are stated in these pamphlets with almost deceptive simplicity. these functions are: 1. to describe the significant features of the book which will serve (a) to distinguish it from other books and other editions of this book and (b) characterize its contents, scope, and bibliographical relations 2. to present the data in an entry which wilt (a) fit well with the entries of other books july, 1947 and other editions of thi!! book in the catalog and (b) respond best to the interests of the majority of rea'ders. in arriving at this statement and the principles which follow, several important decisions were made. it is in the effect of these decisions on cataloging practice that the real significance of the new l.c. code will rest. first, the decision is unequivocally rendered that the library of congress will not undertake so-called "bibliographical cataloging," the reasons being that such cataloging would be too costly, could not be justified for more than a very small fraction of the library's acquisitions, and would result in cards too cumbersome and inefficient to meet the constant needs of the majority of readers. to the question·, is there any reason why the library of congress should undertake this extra bibliographical service, mr. henkle answers, "emphatically no ." simplify the entry the second decision, complementary to the first, is to simplify the catalog entry. while "simple cataloging" as an objective is perhaps no more defensible than "bibliographical ' cataloging," it has become apparent that greater simplicity is essential to intelligibility. thus "the book is to be described as fully as necessary for the accepted functions, but with an economy of data, words, and expression." information is not to be duplicated on the catalog card, publishers' names are to be abbreviated, only one place of publication is to be given, pagination is to be limited to the last numbered page of each section that is separately numbered, the illustration statement in the collation is to be generally limited to the term "illus.," and ellipses are to be used only to indicate the omission of parts of statements and not the omission of entire statements. these and other simplifications have, of course, long been practiced by a number of libraries, both large and small, as well as by many bibliographers, apparently with more benefit than injury to library service. in abandoning "bibliographical cataloging" and adopting a more simple catalog entry, the library of congress is only catchi~g up with recent developments in the profession. in another area, however, it is moving distinctly ahead of the profession. with respect to the 279 organization of the elements of description, the following principle, as revised by the advisory committee, is set forth: the bibliographical elements of the book are to be given in the entry in the order that will best respond to the normal approach of the reader and that will enable the entry to be readily interfiled in the catalog with cards for other editions and books. for these purposes the following order is in general prescribed: title, subtitle, author statement, edition statement, and imprint; followed by the collation, series j)ote, and supplementary notes. these bibliographical elements are to be given in the prescribed order regardless of the order in which they appear on the title page or of the source, other than the title page, from which the information is obtained. in other words, the entry will describe the book, not the title page as such. this is the third major decision which the library of congress has made, and in the long run it may prove to be the most significant. in the application of this principle, however, it appears that important concessions may still be made to the more traditional practice of title page transcription in the "body of the entry." the "body of the entry," which represents the title page, at least historically, is to be preserved as a matter of form; and there is a fair chance that transpositions ·in the order of information, as given on the title page, may be indicated by symbols of one kind or another. in the opinion of this reviewer, the use of symbols to identify transposed statements would be unfortunate, since it would make the entry more complex and less intelligible to the reader while serving only to preserve a principle the validity of which has be.en denied-the principle that the entry should describe the title page. this is not to minimize the importance of the information on the title page as a description of the book or to deny its identification value but only to point out that, if the objective is really to describe and identify the book, the order in which the information is given on the title page is of little consequence for the great majority of modern books. it should also be recognized that the continued use of the bodyof-the-entry form will have only a vestigial meaning in relation to the new code, although it will facilitate the interfiling of the new cards with the old. in the interests of clarity and understanding, however, the advisability of distinguishing the new cards from the old by adopting some modification of this form might be considered. the principle of giving the descriptive elements in a prescribed order, regardless of their order on the title page, is supplemented by the further principle that "all information relating to a given bibliographical item should be integrated, except where the length or construction of a given statement make its integration with the other data undesirable." this principle is so closely related to the former one that it might have been combined with it.) if the information from all sources is to be brought together in the prescribed places on the card, the impracticability of trying still to keep the titl~ page inviolate by using symbols to indicate interpolations, as well as transpositions, is further apparent. the complexities and ~onfusions which might result are manifest in the fact that the two terms, transposition and interpolation, are in themselves inconsistent with the cataloging principles here professed, since they are meaningful only in relation to the transcription of title pages. in describing a book, as contrasted with its title page, in the prescribed manner, the questions of transposition and interpolation seem irrelevant. in all other respects, however, the suggested applications of the new principles and the derivation of those principles from the accepted functions of descriptive cataloging are developed in these pamphlets with admirable insight, logic, and inner consistency. the work of mr. henkle and his associates in this project exhibits a quality of intellectual integrity, a sincerity of purpose, and a validity of method which cannot help advancing in a substantial way the theory and practice of library cataloging. among these advances several may be anticipated. for the reader, the new l.c. code should result in more simple, direct, and intelligible descriptions of books, with greater consistency of form and integration of data, and with less irrelevant and comparatively useless information added. for the cataloger, it should be a challenge to lift his work above the mechanical application of specific rules in specific instances to the considered and purposeful application of general principles to the construction of a 280 college and research libraries catalog designed to perform definite functions. there will still be rules, but they will be fewer, let us hope, and less inviolate, the attention of the cataloger being focused primarily on the objectives to be achieved. for the administrator, the new code may mean some reduction in the cost of cataloging, although this is doubtful. it will certainly check for a time, however, additional increases in costs that might have otherwise accrued from the further elaboration of "bibliographical" techniques. for the cataloging profession as a whole, it should mean unification again on the basis of an acceptable standard of descriptive catalog:. ing, with an immediate revival of cooperative enterprise. there is every reason to believe that all or most of the libraries which have recently departed from library of congress practice will find it possible and desirable to adopt the new code, not only because it will do what they have already been trying to do, but also because the new code will enable them to do it better. in preparing this new code, the processing department of the library of congress has assumed a great responsibility.. if the work is finished with the same display of imagination, reason, ~nd courage which has distinguished it thus far, the responsibility will have been nobly discharged. we now have the principles; we eagerly await the code. raynard c. swank resources for research the first century of the fohn carter brown library, a history wt'th a guide to the collections. by lawrence c. wroth. providence, r.i., the associates of the john carter brown library, 1946. vi, 88p. william andrew clark memorial library, report of th irst decade, 1934-1944. [edited by lawrence clark powell.] berkeley and los ' angeles, calif., university of california press, 1946. vii, 78p. the psychology of custodianship of rare books has undergone certain rather profound but inevitable changes in recent decades. administrators of special collections for literary and historical research have become increasingly active in carrying out a responsibility which is at least twofold, and "preservation" and "availability for scholarly use" are companion requirements in today's scheme of service for the library that finds itself possessed of valuable books and manuscripts. this is not to infer that librarians of the past have not understood the nature of their responsibility but only that the means of meeting it have not always been at hand. it has been necessary for administrators to devise standards-often complicated and always costly to apply-whereby the two objectives could be brought into accord. and before that could be done; it had to be realized that the objectives are not irrevocably at opposite poles from each other. curators of the watchdog type had to be persuaded julyj 1947 that books are, for the most part, quite sturdy objects and not fragile things with which no scholar, no matter how righteous his need, is to be trusted. they had to be shown that their cause would be strengthened and their function made more comprehensible if the sterner rules were applied only to those books that are truly fragile-illuminated manuscripts, books printed on brittle paper, historic bindings, and the like. on the other hand, the scholar has had to submit to reading under supervision. no longer may he stuff a rare colonial tract in his pocket, to be mulled over in the comfort of a private office or cubicle. that is the prerogative of ownership, and the books and manuscripts contained in a research library are not the property of any one scholar but of all scholars. there is simply no choice in the matter. the two progress reports under consideration here relate to the john carter brown and william andrews clark libraries, and furnish excellent examples of the modern approach to the problems of administering large and important collections of rarities, near rarities, and basic resources. in addition, a third facet of the responsibility of custodianship is brought forcibly to the forefront of attention-that of assuring constant and intelligent growth. both discussions begin by tracing the origins of the respective collections which were founded and fostered as the personal hobbies of the men whose names 281 college and research libraries as baker and taylor's libris. george lowry's a searcher's manual (shoe string, 1965), based on the searching unit of the acquisitions department of the columbia university libraries, is a similar manual that is less slanted toward one library's unique practices. in gaining its universality, it sacrifices some of its potiential to spark ideas for new methods springing from specific practices. also, because of its age, it does not include searching in the data bases of any of the computer networks such as oclc' s. it would be worth having, however, if one needs to make a study of existing manuals before developing one's own. another source for ideas is ted grieder's 1978 book acquisitions: where, what, and how (greenwood press). this book contains a useful chapter on compiling a search manual. however, it also was published before the author had much experience with network searching and, in addition , is intentionally more general than lowry's manual. anyone wanting a good example of a detailed search manual for a large university library will find cornell' s to be a worthwhile purchase.-martha willett, indiana state university, evansville. cargill, jennifer s. , and alley , brian. practical approval plan management. phoenix, ariz. : oryx, 1979. 95p. $12.95. lc 79-23389. isbn 0-912700-52-1. after several years in hiding, articles and books on approval plans have reappeared , with an entire conference being devoted to the subject last fall . jennifer cargill, head of acquisitions at miami university (ohio) and brian alley , head of technical services at miami, have joined this renaissance with a study directed to the librarian who needs guidance in actually establishing and operating approval plans . since the two major books on acquisitions (ford, acquisitions of library materials ; grieder, acquisitions) give little guidance in this area, a practical study is certainly a worthwhile goal. unfortunately, the book falls short of its promise . the slim volume (only eighty-eight pages, not including a very short bibliography and index) covers establishment of approval plans, selection of a dealer, profiling, processing of material received, bids and conrecent publications i 469 tracts, and fiscal management. the latter two chapters, which are the strongest, provide some information not readily available. the majority of the book, however, gives only a general overview and fails to convey to the reader the complexity involved in operating a successful approval plan. the authors do not provide a critical analysis of approval plans but unwarrantably assume that such plans are the most efficient and economical way to obtain books. the study is based primarily on approval plan services offered by blackwell north america and baker and taylor; these two dealers are often quoted and used uncritically as sources of information. this is a questionable practice, something akin to quoting oclc to prove the advantages of networking. variations of approval plans , such as those designed to obtain publications of certain presses or authors, are not mentioned, nor is there any information on foreign plans (except for a few comments about blackwell's, ·england), a major oversight as such plans can't be built on the same model used to construct domestic plans. also missing is any -description of monitoring the plans to verify receipt of materials, or how to claim nonreceived items. the simplistic view of approval plans and the lack of coverage of many important topics related to approval plans make it impossible to recommend this book. this is unfortunate, for not only is the topic important, but also the authors have demonstrated much better work in their quarterly publication, iulc technical services newsletter .-william schenck, university of north carolina at chapel hill . united states. library of congress. processing dept. library of congress cataloging service, with a comprehensive subject inckx. bulletins 1-125. detroit: gale, 1980. 2v. $78. lc 79-25343. isbn 0-8103-1103-8. this handsomely bound two-volume set is a reprint of all cataloging service bulletins emanating from the library of congress, beginning with the first in june 1945 through spring 1978. the bulletins, which reflect lc policy and practice in every area of monographic and serials cataloging, are an indispensable tool in every cataloging de470 i college & research libraries • september 1980 partment seeking to adhere to an identifiable bibliographic standard. their pages reflect also the revolutionary changes that have taken place in recent cataloging history, and as a dramatic example, "cf.," if you will, the discussion of the "preparation of rubber stamps . . . which will embody the individual subscriber's specifications for card orders" (csb 3:3) with marc tagging instructions (124:7-11 and 21-26). in between are such diverse topics as lc' s interpretations of aacr and its _two 1949 predecessors (american library association cataloging rules for author and title entries, 2d ed., and rules for descriptive cataloging in the library of congress), subject cataloging of variant editions of the same work, and, as one illustration of growing international cooperation in the standardization of bibliographic records and practice, the ifla working group on corporate headings. all of the foregoing is, of course, the work of lc' s processing department; the editors at gale have added only what they call a "comprehensive subject index." no annotations to the text of the bulletins have been attempted, although incorporating cancellations, changes, or corrections at point of occurrence (e.g., noting in 110:3 that the discussion on serials with generic titles is continued in 112: 10) would have facilitated use and surely would have been easy to do. the criticism holds also for expansion of examples, such as those for freefloating subdivisions of subject headings in 114:9, originally published in 111:8. as it is, one must check all of the bulletins cited in the index under a particular subject to be sure that earlier information has not been superseded; the difference is a historical rather than a working document. the only feature distinguishing this publication from a straight reprint, then, is its thirty-eight-page index, an index that has been preceded by those of nancy b. olson (no.1-125; lake crystal, minn., cl979) and james h. montgomery (no. 79-121; stillwater, okla., 1979?). (another by joan b. dible, stanford, cl977, covers only no.10~ 23 and is not considered here.) the gale typeface is clearer and more ·readable than either olson or montgomery, which are printout and typescript respectively. olson's printout also dictates the repetition of a subject as often as it occurs in the bulletins, rather than neatly grouping the relevant bulletin numbers behind each once-listed subject, as gale does. whereas olson has numerous listings under both the superseded term "transliteration" and its successor "romanization" and fails to connect them, and montgomery uses the later term but fails to refer from the old, gale does right by both, using the later term and referring from the old. all three indexes list additions and changes to specific catalogin,g rules under the rule number, a most welcome feature, and all three are generous with cross-references, gale offering "more than three hundred., given that large number, however, there are some curious lacunae. there is no crossreference from "generic title,, and one must scan the numewus entries under "serial," "serials," and "series" to find "series with generic titles," where a single citation (119:12-13) is given. in contrast, olson lists five separate bulletins, and montgomery, who cross-referenced to both monographic series and serials, lists four. neither "limited cataloging,, important for libraries doing retrospective buying, nor "superimposition,, impor·tant for consistency of names, are listed either as entries or as cross-references (the latter subject also true of montgomery), but turn up under "cataloging policies at lc." only three other subjects join "limited cataloging" and "superimposition" as cataloging policies (cataloging memoranda, categorization of material, and priorities), although it could be argued that practically all of the bulletins and their myriad contents represent lc cataloging policy. another very broad subject, "lc printed cards," which consumes almost three of the thirty-eight pages and is heavily subdivided, could usefully have had its subdivisions entered directly or at the very least consistently cross-referenced for easier access to the information. well, not to pick nits. the instantgratification school of index users would argue for limitless cross-references, and its radical wing even for repetition of citations under various forms of the subject. the strict structuralist school prefers indexes heavily indented under "logical" _entries, new from noyes up-to-date references for your specialized needs available fall1980 pesticide manufacturing and toxic materials control encyclopedia; edited by marshall sittig: describes manufacturing processes for 514 pesticide materials; as well a:; health data relating to toxicity. isbn 0-8155-0814-x; $96. large and small scale ethyl alcohol manufacturing processes from agricultural raw materials; edited by j.k. paul: gives considerable design details for manufacturing ethyl alcohol in plants with capacities of 25 gallons per hour to 100 million gallons per year. isbn 0-8155-0815-8; $48. enhanced recovery of residual and heavy oils-second edition; edited by m.m. schumacher: describes numerous secondary and tertiary recovery processes for oil recovery; as well as other methods for augmenting production and heavy oil recovery. isbn 0-8155-0816-6; $48. zeolite technology and applications-recent advances; edited by jeanette scott: describes numerous processes for manufacturing zeolite materials, as well as important and rapidly increasing applications. isbn 0-8155-0817-4; $64. electroless and other nonelectrol ytic plating techniques-recent developments; edited by j.l. duffy: describes numerous processes for plating thin metallic coatings on various substrates; an important consideration in the electronics and related industries. isbn 0-8155-0818-2; $45. small and micro hydroelectric power plants-technology and feasibility; edited by robert noyes: considerable information is given on small scale (<15 mw) and micro (<100 kw) hydroelectric power technology. isbn 0-8155-0819-0; $42. exterior water-based trade paint formulations; by ernest w. flick: a practical volume containing 292 paint formulations intended for professionals in the coatings and related raw materials industries. isbn 0-8155-0820-4; $36. flotation agents and processes-technology and applications; edited by m.w. ranney: describes numerous methods and agents used to recover a greater percentage of valuable minerals from ores of low assay. isbn 0-8155-0821-2; $48. cement and mortar techi\iology and additives-developments since 1977; edited by m.h. gutcho: describes the latest cement and mortar technology and the numerous additives utilized to impart specific properties. isbn 0-8155-0822-0; $54. ndc noyes noyes data corporation noyes medical publications 118 mill road, park ridge, nj 07656 472 i college & research libraries • september 1980 with every foray into its pages a test of seriousness of purpose. the gale index fortunately falls somewhere in between, is undeniably good, and could be better; it is neither clearly superior nor demonstrably inferior to what is already available. libraries that have not kept their earlier csbs, or did not require a working knowledge of how and why lc did it so well until networking forced the issue, or for whatever rea·son need a complete run of the csbs, compactly packaged, with a within-covers index, could hardly do better. others will need to weigh carefully the outlay of seventy-eight big ones against living in annotated and dog-eared comfort with what they already have .-eleanor r. payne, university of california, davis. kaser, david. a book for a sixpence: the circulating library in america. beta phi mu chapbook number 14. lexington, kentucky : beta phi mu, 1980. 194p. $9. lc 79-4298. isbn 0-910230-14-5. this publication gives american library history a full-dress counterpart to the history of circulating libraries in great britain presented in devendra p. varma's the evergreen tree of diabolical knowledge (washington: consortium press, 1972). the very topic seems to inspire care in design, for both are especially pleasing examples of bookmaking. the circulating library seems to have originated in america in 1762 when william rind added a rental collection to his annapolis bookstore. patterned on agencies known in britain and on the continent for at least a half century and soon joined by others in america , rind's circulating library was evidently a response to a widespread need rather than the consequence of a unique idea. interesting and important though it is to consider circulating libraries for themselves , the greater s·ignificance of such study is their meaning and contribution to the growth of libraries in general and the free public library in particular. that important agency was established as a conseque nce of two major developments , the acceptance of the principle of public support for education ambassador book service, inc. ambassador book service, inc. "serving academic and research libraries" 42 chasner street • hempstead, ny 11550 call us 516/489-4011 collect! college and research libraries 410 college & research libraries july 1986 tors who need an improved sens~ of why and in what way museum practices are different from archival practices. the product is a volume that treats the initia­ tion of an archival program in a very gen­ eral manner. it is a starting point for those interested in the subject, concluding with a useful bibliography where one might pursue the subject in more depth. museum archives: an introduction is therefore not recommended for anyone with a substan­ tial amount of training or knowledge of the archival profession. the first half of the volume discusses the justification for an _archival program in a museum as well as critical issues related to how a program is started. examples of the uses of archival materials include adminis­ trative activities, publicity purposes, and exhibits. other preliminary information provided in the first section includes ex­ plaining archival terminology, conducting a records survey, and defining archival priorities. examples are prolific in the vol­ ume and are given in the context of mu­ seum experiences. photographic and other illustrative materials derive from museum environments as well. the second half of the volume is a re­ view of basic archival procedures, begin­ ning with records surveys, continuing through appraisal, accessioning, and ar­ rangement and concluding with outreach and public programs. the manual ends with a series of appendixes that are, in fact, types of archival forms appropriate to museum use. museum archives: an introduction is un­ questionably very basic but will serve well initially to acquaint museum practioners with the basic procedures and issues of the archival profession. given the level of the volume, it might only have been strengthened by expanding the appen­ dixes to include actual examples of mu­ seum archives forms rather than the pro­ totypes reproduced here. this would not only add further points of reference but would also demonstrate that some muse­ ums have taken to heart deiss' claim that "the resources of museums vary greatly, · but all of them need to make some provi­ sion for the preservation of archival re­ cords.''elizabeth c. stewart, folsom library, rensselaer polytechnic institute, troy, new york. ~ foundations of cataloging: a source­ book. ed. by michael carpenter and elaine svenonius. littleton, colo. : li­ braries unlimited, 1985. 276p. $27.50 lc 85-10333. isbn 0-87287-511-3. this chronologically arranged collection of philosophical essays written from 1841 through 1983 recounts the history of mod­ ern cataloging. the selections range from panizzi's 1841''rules for the compilation of the catalog" to the 1983 essay by pat­ rick wilson, ''catalog as access mecha­ nism: background and concepts." the editors have also included charles jewitt' s 1853 work, ''smithsonian catalog sys­ tem/' which encouraged a standard and uniform style of cataloging, and c. cut­ ter's classic 1904 "rules for a dictionary catalog: selections," along with several other equally meritorious selections. with balanced coverage and method, the edi­ tors have succeeded in illustrating the past and recent changes in cataloging, cata­ logs, and theory with these historical es­ says that conclude with m. gorman's 1981 "most concise aacr2" and his 1979 "cataloging and the new technologies" as well as the p. wilson article ''the cata­ log as access mechanism: background and concepts.'' these essays present ma­ jor issues: each is a highlight in the history of cataloging, preceded by an introduction from the editors, placing the individual work in its proper historical context. read­ ers will find this approach useful, be­ cause, by providing us with these influen­ tial essays on cataloging, the editors give a perspective on the past and a feel for the direction in which cataloging is heading. the book is timely, extremely readable and authoritative, and serves as a lively backup for current debate in the catalog­ ing field. its audience, however, may be limited to those in the cataloging field. as is said in the preface, "this anthology is ad­ dressed to teachers and students of cata­ loging." and indeed it is. those in public service might find this book of marginal interest, as would those involved in online system design, since the essays deal more "easily the best index in the field ... an invaluable guide." american reference books annual coverage increased by25% art index has long been regarded as a classic reference source a reliable, easy-to-use, affordable guide to the information contained in leading publications in virtually all areas of artistic endeavor. now, fol­ lowing an intensive content study, this single-alphabet subject-author index expands its coverage to in­ clude 52 additional publications, for a total of 230 periodicals, yearbooks, and museum bulletins, effective with the january 1986 issue of art index . used by professionals, students, and art enthusiasts art index has won an audience in all areas of interest and specializa­ tion , among them : • archaeologists • architects • art historians • city planners • designers • film students • gallery owners • librarians • museum directors • painters • performance artists • photographers • private collectors • sculptors . int ernational coverage offering an international perspec­ tive on developments in the art world , art index covers the major english-language publications , as well as periodicals published in french , italian, german , spanish , dutch , and swedish . current and easy-to-use art index provides thorough , timely indexing of a great variety of infor­ mation , including feature articles and coverage of book reviews , exhibitions , and performances , and offers : • specific subject headings that reflect current terminology . • extensive cross-references and subheadings. • entries for reproductions of works of art which appear any­ where in the magazines indexed . now available online art index is now available for online searching through wilsonline the h.w. wilson company's online coverage beginning october1984 , the art index database includes the same data as the printed version , as well as added features which enhance retrieval. for a brochure desc ribing wilsonline, along with pricing information and an order form, call the toll-free number below. retros_pective volumes now frat-rated permanent retrospective cumula­ tions of art index from 1929-1980 are now available at special flat ratesmaking this the perfect time to fill gaps in your collection. to order a subscription to the printed version of art index brings your library quar­ terly paperbound issues published in january, april , july, and october, and a permanent annual cloth­ bound cumulation. this index is sold on the service basis . the price you pay is based on the degree of use, or service , which art index pro­ vides for your library. to request a periodicals checklist which will en­ able us to determine your no-obli­ gation price quotation for a sub­ scription to art index or for any of the bound volumes sold on the ser­ vice basis, please call toll -free : 1·800-367·6770 in new york state , call 1-800-462-6060; in canada, call collect 1-212-588-8400. wilsonline is a service mark of the h .w. wilson company retrieval service. offering indexing dthe h.w.wilson c~~-~~" 950 university avenue , bronx , new york 10452 212-588-8400 p y 412 college & research libraries with philosophical issues than the actual mechanics of automation. recent writings {post-1983) have not been included be­ cause of their preponderance on engineer­ ing and system interface design, with less attention given to the underlying philo­ sophical issues of cataloging. by placing the selections in such an orderly and logi­ cal fashion, these essays show the changes the profession is experiencing, not only in its philosophy but also in the technology shaping the development of cataloging. the issues raised by this collection result from a multitude of well-known factors, among them the problems of defining . user and cataloger needs, economics, and more recently, the advent of automation. a variety of age-old issues and questions are presented in the book, including the problem of defining the catalog's purpose and the method of arranging materials: how does the cataloger meet the objec­ tives of the catalog? what has the cata­ loger chosen through time to include in the catalog entry? what are the important points to consider? what points of consid­ eration have been used in the past? how can cataloging be made economically fea­ sible_? the question of cost-effectiveness is july 1986 appropriately addressed time and again. several selections deal with the question of authorship: who is an author? should the name of the author be the primary way of identifying library mate_rials? in consid­ ering this point several essays investigate the need for main entries, both corporate and noncorporate. is an author main entry necessary with the automated catalog? will keyword searching eliminate or dras­ tically alter current cataloging practices? issues like these are addressed in great enough detail to give the reader a grasp of the problems at hand and the difficulties catalogers will face in the future. since the definition of a catalog and the needs of its users have changed dramati­ cally over the last century and a half, the methods employed by catalogers also need to change to keep up with the user's requirements and the technology of the times. foundations of cataloging provides a refreshing and thought-provoking look at the past, present, and future of catalog­ ing. in view of this it becomes apparent that we can't know where we're going un­ til we find out where we've been.-k. juri­ cek, university of wyoming library, laramie, wyoming. abstracts the following abstracts are based on those prepared by the eric clearinghouse of infor­ mation resources, school of education, syra­ cuse university. documents with an ed number here may be ordered in either microfiche (mf) or paper copy (pc) from the eric document reproduction service, p.o. box 190, arlington, va22210. orders should include ed number, specify for­ mat desired, and include payment for docu~ ment and postage. further information on ordering documents and on current postage charges may be obtained from a recent issue of resources in educa· tion. the role of fees in supporting library and information services in public and aca­ demic libraries. national commission on libraries and information science. washington1 d.c., 198s. ssp. ed 2s8 s84. mf-$0.7s; pc-$s.40. an overview study was sponsored by the council on library resources to gather existing information on the extent to which fees are charged for library and information services, the percentage of libraries charging for any ser­ vices, and the services for which fees are charged. the review panel that conducted the study found that there is little data available on who is charging fees or the services for which they are charged and even less about the effect of fees on access to information. this report of panel's findings is divided into six sections: (1) the context of the fee issue in public and aca­ demic libraries; (2) the types of existing fee structures and mechanisms and rationale for setting price; (3) the arguments for and against fees; (4) the types of services for which libraries are charging fees; (5) selected sun1maries of re­ college and research libraries r. w. meyer and rebecca panetta two shared cataloging data bases: a comparison the ohio college library center (oclc) and blackwell north america (bin a) have data bases used by many libraries to produce catalog copy. these data bases are compared for availability of cataloging for english language books. although oclc provides cataloging for a larger p·ercentage of titles, the bin a data base produces a high enough percentage of hits to be very valuable. the greater number of titles available through oclc is attributable to the larger group of contributors, not necessarily to quality of the data base. the difference in cost between the two systems and the comparable peripheral services available make utilization of bin a data base appealing. the "annual buyers' guide" in the september 1, 1975, issue of library ] ournal lists twelve vendors which provide cataloging services.1 not included in the list are three other commercial vendors and all of the various noncommercial cataloging centers, such as the ohio college library center ( oclc). of this total there are six commercial services with data bases comparable to the oclc data base. however, five services ( brodart, baker & taylor, library processing systems, t.elemark of josten's, and cardset of information design) have automated data bases containing essentially cataloging records based on the marc distribution services. some of these services (cardset, for example) provide access to more extensive files. this access is usually via some nonautomated technique such as microform editions of nu c r. w. meyer is director of library technical services, indiana state university, terre haute; and rebecca panetta is chief of book processing, the university of texas at dallas. with special indexes. only bibnet and b/na technical services compare to oclc in the approach to their development and utilization. the bibnet system of 3m corporation (formerly a product of information dynamics, inc.) and the title index of blackwell north america, inc. (bin a), both contain those records distributed by marc plus other contributed records. the bibnet system, however, primarily adds non-marc records based on mcrs (micrographic catalog retrieval system) records selected by users. bibnet is an online system like oclc, but, instead of the user adding records · on line, additions are requested by users and added by bibnet staff. because there is no basis of experience with the bibnet system at the library of the university of texas dallas (utd) no further comparison is made here. based on direct experience with both b/na and oclc, this paper reports a snapshot comparison of these two data bases as sources of cataloging copy. since these are two of the largest shared cataloging data bases, this i 19 20 i college & research libraries • january 1977 seems to be a useful comparison. similar peripheral aspects of the two systems are also briefly compared here. data base descriptions from early 1971 through april 1974 the utd library acquired its catalog copy by searching the richard abel co. (selected assets of abel were acquired by bina in january 1975) data base via the bina title index and requesting cards by lc card number or bina card number. the library retains a subscription to the b ina title index for original cataloging of nonprint media not yet available on oclc and for some preorder search verification. the library joined the oclc system with the amigos bibliographic council network in april 197 4. since then, all cataloging of monographs has been produced via oclc. the ohio college library center ( oclc) data base contains over 2,100,000 entries as of april 1976 in the marc format, of which some 65 percent are user contributed. as of april 1976 the oclc data base is accessible by crt terminal on-line 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. eastern time monday through friday and 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. eastern time on saturday. the terminal user can find a cataloging record by keying in, on a typewriter-like keyboard, algorithms representing the title, author i title, or author of a book, or the lc card number. after, occasionally, some further dialogue, the terminal screen displays a complete cataloging record in an expanded marc format. the blackwell north america basic data base contains over 1,164,000 entries as of april 1976, of which approximately 40 percent are user contributed. the bina data base is accessible via a computer output microfiche (com) title index. the title index is completely regenerated quarterly and is updated biweekly with a cumulative supplement. each entry in the index displays title, author, imprint, lc card number, bl na card number, the source of the cataloging copy, and source of the marc record. a new format which began may 1, 1975, also shows collation, isbn, and lc and dewey class numbers. both data bases contain virtually all the marc records for monographs and for serials. both are routinely updated as marc tapes are received. entries contributed to oclc by member libraries are input directly on-line. this input costs the user nothing except staff time and $0.037 per card produced. contributed copy to b ina costs $2.00 to be input into the system, and this includes the cost of the card set. cost of cataloging copy retrieved from bin a will vary depending on the source of the marc copy and the method of access.2 the bina data base contains a lower percentage of duplicate entries because all contributed entries are pre-edited by a central staff. the oclc data base has a larger group of contributors, so it is growing at a faster rate, but little central control over contributed entries is maintained, i.e., duplicates are deleted by central staff only after detection by users. before a library can effectively participate in oclc, it has been suggested that it should have an annual acquisition rate of at least 2,500 titles. bina requires no minimum acquisition rate. the practical minimum annual cost of tying into oclc is approximately $4,000.00. a subscription to the title index is currently $680.00 per year plus the cost of card sets purchased. these figures for tying into oclc of 2,500 titles and $4,000.00 .are not absolute, but they have been suggested as guidelines to potential participants. they will vary depending on contract terms and the approach to utilization by the individual library. bina reports that only 10 percent of its users subscribe to the title index, and 90 percent two shared cataloging data bases i 21 order cataloging by lc card number, isbn, or author i title, thus eliminating need for a subscription. cataloging operations the amount of time needed to train personnel to search on either system is about the same. the use of oclc seems more complicated than a microfiche search at first glance. but because the com programs employed to produce the bina title index result in a different sort sequence than most libraries use in card filing, some staff training is necessary. computers have been improved in their ability to produce sophisticated filing sequences, but some familiarity with computer sorting is required before effective searching is possible. the reader is referred to the preface of books in print or to library of congress catalogs: films, 197 4 for some interesting reading on computer filing. 3 using a microfiche reader does not offer the same initial excitement as using an on-line terminal, and eagerness to learn about computerized cataloging usually facilitates training on oclc. the use of the title index for cataloging required a routine which, at utd, included an area of shelving designated for books for which cataloging had been ordered. each title was individually searched against the bina title index, and when located the lc card number and bina card number were listed. for new titles with late lc card numbers (prefix of 69 or higher), the title index search was skipped, and the lc card number was listed. the books were then set aside in lc card number order. (since lc and dewey class numbers now appear in title index entries, it would be possible to process titles immediately and merely retain a p-slip for control.) books without late lc card numbers and not located were set aside for future searching or original cataloging. the list of bina card numbers and lc card numbers was then submitted to bina with a request for card sets. catalog card sets from bina usually arrived at utd from one to three weeks after being ordered. these sets included all the necessary entry headings but had to be sorted into author, title, shelflist, and subject groups before filing. (bin a has offered a presorting service since mid-1975.) any needed additions and changes to the catalog copy had to be made after receipt of cards. however, users can now modify any record supplied by sending modified unit cards, or worksheets, or field-updates with card orders. with this fieldupdate service for each library, bina is thus able to preserve local practices and ensure that master marc records remain true to lc practice as a minimum standard of bibliographic control. cataloging monographs on oclc is accomplished via the following routine at utd. books are searched on the terminal. if found, the call number is marked in the book, and the book is processed. any editing of the record, e.g., change of call number, is made before producing cards. books not found are set aside to be searched again or for original cataloging. a daily record of cards produced is kept by filing, in shelflist order, p-slips for all titles processed. cards arrive in about ten days, and all cards produced on the same day arrive together. cards come presorted and prefiled into shelflist, author, title, and subject packs. a brief check of the shelflist cards against the p-slips is made before filing in order to double check for errors and possible losses in the mail. it should be noted here that utd also receives from oclc the same bibliographic information that the cards contain in the form of marc records on magnetic tape. these are utilized to produce a computer output microform (com) catalog. this is explained in detail elsewhere.4 actual time of receipt of cataloging 22 i college & research libraries • january 1977 copy varies from both sources. oclc hypothetically prints cards the night of the day they are requested, but experience has shown their scheduling to slip on occasion. cards are usually received within ten days. for cards ordered from b/na, time of receipt varies from one to three weeks depending on the mail both ways and on batch queuing of requests. comparison to compare the availability of catalog copy on the two data bases, the following study was made. three sample sets selected from current imprints were gathered from approval books received from b/na in july, august, and october of 197 4. the samples were limited to english language imprints, because marc records at that time included english language only. sample sizes were based only on the size of approval shipments received. each sample was searched twice at an interval of about two months. search time of each data base averaged thirty titles per hour. this included time to alphabetize p-slips or books by title when searching the title index. the title index is actually faster to search because there is no dependence on response time or computer down time. searches on oclc were made by lc card number when available and title or author i title when necessary. ability to search oclc by more than just title may have resulted in a bit better hit rate except that this was obviated because all items were monographs with reasonably straightforward titles. search time on oclc varied depending on time of day and the status of the system during the search period. the increase in subscribers to oclc affected the response time of the system negatively, but the addition of more computing equipment has improved the situation. there were a total of 344 titles in the three samples searched. table 1 gives a summary view of these samples, showing that most of the titles were published in the u.s. in 1974 and included lc card numbers. presumably, marc records were available for many of the titles. since the books were supplied by bin a, it would seem the study might be slanted toward b/na. interestingly, however, oclc demonstrated a higher percentage of hits in each of the three samples. altogether, 27 4 titles ( 72 percent) were located in the b/na title index; 315 (92 percent) in oclc; and 232 ( 67 percent) were listed in both. only fourteen titles were located in neither data base. table 1 distribution of sample of titles and location in b/na and oclc data bases by place of publication, imprint date, and presence of lc card number total sample located in b/na located in oclc number number percent number percent place of publication u.s. 267 204 76 258 97 u.k. 56 33 59 45 80 other 21 10 48 12 57 totals 344 247 72 315 92 date of publication 1972 2 2 100 2 100 1973 45 27 60 37 82 1974 297 218 73 276 93 totals 344 247 72 315 92 lc card number present in book 274 210 77 264 96 absent 70 37 53 51 73 totals 344 247 72 315 92 two shared cataloging data bases i 23 six months after the original searches were completed, a new search was conducted for these fourteen titles. thirteen were then available in oclc and seven in bina. from this it seems that both data bases will eventually contain cataloging records for even obscure english language titles; but oclc with its many contributors is able to produce them sooner. the basic advantage, then, of the oclc system is the availability of cataloging for more publications, particularly non-marc titles. table 1 shows a listing of the titles located in each of the data bases by place of publication, date of publication, and presence or absence of lc card number. for example, there were seventy titles that did not include lc card numbers. of this total, thirty-seven (53 percent) were located in bin a, and fifty -one ( 73 percent) were located in oclc. in the original searches of the samples, oclc was able to provide cataloging for more of the titles initially, but most of these were found in the title index in later searches. those found originally in the title index, but not on oclc, were all available on oclc by the time of the second search. searching for marc records produced equal results, for as marc tapes were added to oclc, supplements to the title index arrived, usually at about the same time. on occasion, because of technical problems, oclc has held marc tapes and added two or three in one week. this delays cataloging operations somewhat, but no major problems are apparent. having once searched the title master for a title, one need check only the supplement in future searches during that quarter of the year. search time on oclc varies with the time of day during which the system is being used. for example, early in the morning, late in the afternoon, during the evening, and on saturdays response time is faster because there are fewer users. peripheral aspects neither bina nor the oclc system is designed to be used exclusively for the generation of catalog cards. part of the underlying philosophy of oclc is to reduce the rate of increase in per-unit processing costs for libraries by sharing the work load. this same philosophy works with b ina also, though less well since there are fewer users sharing the burdep. both systems also attempt to provide for other library operations. both systems provide some acquisition help. oclc is in the process of designing a complete acquisition package which would allow users to generate and keep track of orders through the system. total implementation of the system is probably some years off, but the data base already provides a point for preorder search verification. the title index also provides a source for preorder searching, but this is of a different nature since no indication is given in the index as to which users already have cataloged (thus own) specific titles, as does the oclc system. a glance at the holding library symbols on an oclc record shows immediately which institutions have cataloged the item. because of this last capability of oclc there is the obvious, and well used, spin-off feature of interlibrary loan information. by searching oclc' s data base, one can tell which institutions have cataloged any specific title; thus interlibrary loan requests can be made with prior knowledge that the loaning institution will be capable of supplying the book. oclc will soon add a communications capability to facilitate ill further. oclc is in the last phase of implementing a serials control system for users which provides for check-in, claiming, and binding as well as cataloging. this is due for full implementation during 1976. b/na provides no help for serials beyond cataloging. b/na provides along with catalog 24 i college & research libraries • january 1977 copy, to any user who desires them, circulation materials. these can be spine labels, pockets, circulation cards, label sets, ibm cards, or whatever is required. books ordered from bina can be purchased preprocessed or with complete processing kits. oclc provides no help with circulation or processing, although a complete circulation control system is planned. oclc is also in the process of developing a subject retrieval component of a public service syst~m which may be tested in 1976. bina does not provide subject retrieval on its full data base but can generate com or printed subject catalogs for any user. bina can also provide subject bibliographies from any of its data bases. this subject capability of bina is part of the overall data base management available for their users. bina programs keep track of every record used in or contributed to b ina. the production of complete or partial book catalogs is thus possible at any time for any user by employing programs developed by bina. these catalogs can be printed or produced on com in any number of formats and with cumulative supplements. complete subject authority control is also part of the system. the important aspect of the bina system is the total management control over each user's subset of records within the bina data base and the production of viable products from this system in addition to traditional catalog cards. oclc as yet provides in addition to catalog cards only archival tapes of records used by individual institutions in the sequence used and with no duplicates deleted. it is a long step from this tape service to data base management for individual institutions. conclusion both data bases are very useful. although access differs, both can be used effectively to generate catalog copy. from 62 to 76 percent of the titles searched were found in the bina title index, and from 76 to 98 percent were found in oclc. this appears to make ·oclc significantly more valuable. the higher hit percentage is accounted for by the greater number of contributed records since both contain the same marc records. the acceptability of the contributed records, of course, depends on the degree to which the contributors meet the standards. · during the interval between searches the number of records available in the oclc data base increased more than in the bin a title index. some sort of logical extrapolation of this increase would imply that it will be an obscure item that doesn't appear in oclc eventually. for the cataloging of english language monographs the oclc data base is a very valuable tool; so is the title index. in view of the cost of tying into oclc versus the cost of subscribing to bin a service, the microfiche system can appear very appealing where budgets are small or acquisitions rates moderate or where total data base management is required. references 1. "annual buyers' guide," library journal 100:1500 (sept. 1, 1975). see also nancy hoyt knight, "microform catalog data retrieval systems: a survey," library technology reports 11 (may 1975), and howard pasternack, "microform catalog data retrieval systems: the b/na title index and marcfiche systems," library technology reports 12:371-405 (july 1976). 2. blackwell north america, inc., "1974/75 pricing for cataloging and book processing services." available from b/na, 10300 s.w. allen blvd., beaverton, or 97005. 3. books ·in print (new york: bowker, 1975), v.1, preface. u.s. library of congress, films and other materials for projection, 1974 (washington, d.c., 1975), p.vii-viii. 4. r. w. meyer and john knapp, "com catalog from oclc records," journal of library automation 8:312-21 (dec. 1975). college and research libraries used. however, two noticeable omissions might be considered, especially for reviews of databases: database review and the "sources" section of r q. a good contribution to the small group of basic introductions to online searching, this is a recommended text for general training or for reference use, particularly for the british perspective. it does not however replace vendor or database manuals for those conducting specific online searches.-danuta a. nitecki, university of illinois at urbanachampaign. olson, nancy b. cataloging of audiovisual materials. mankato, minn.: minnesota scholarlypr., 1981. 154p. $17.50. lc 7983907. isbn 0-933474-07-5. this work is "designed to accompany aacr2." it is intended for catalogers to use as a reference when working with the more specialized types of nonbook material and is not a "stand alone" guide for media cataloging. examples and notes on the cataloging of nonmusic sound recordings, motion pictures recent publications i 255 and video recordings, graphic materials, realia, kits, and original microform publications are presented in the order in which their cataloging rules are found in aacr2. cataloging notes provide the corresponding aacr2 rule number, making it easy to refer from the code to the manual and vice versa. each example is illustrated by a photograph of the item, a particularly good idea that enables the cataloger to see the material under discussion. although the examples are few in number, they are well chosen and provide a good sampling of the more unusual media problems a cataloger may encounter, such as cannonballs and unique audio formats. the most frequently encountered types of nonbook material, music sound recordings and microform reproductions of previously published material are not discussed in this volume. this would appear to be a major weakness. the author may believe that catalogers are more accustomed to dealing with this type of material, and the problems encountered will only be with the more esoteric types of material-with which this book deals. but, reference should have been made only .!~~~in:~~;.~.~! f: that evolves with your changing needs. get the complete story on linx. there's no competition! on d datalinx for direct access to computerized faxon data bases and files. mail coupon to: uld d linx sc-10 for on-line check-in co and claiming. d linx for instantaneous electronic messages and comprehensive, faxon 15 southwest park westwood, massachusetts 02090 usa tel: 800-225-6055 (toll-free) 617-329-3350 (collect in mass. and canada) ha' ~e on-line training. (.1,, ~ r--------------, ni1 d name i create i =:::,y/lnfmmotion cen lications that have been filmed by various libraries and agencies. it is highly desirable that all the cooperative project's of filming the elusive material abroad have their results recorded in the union list. in the introduction we find the statement: "it is expected to continue the publication of this catalogue, with the prospect of a cumulative edition when personnel and resources permit a thorough bibliographical revision and a more complete indexing." here is a hope that we all wish to see fulfilled.g. f. sheph e rd~ jr.~ head~ circulation d epartment~ and in charge of microphotography~ university of north carolina library. stepping--stones to cooperative cataloging coop erative cataloging manual for th e use of contributing .libraries. library of congress. descriptive cataloging division. washington, u.s. government printing office, 1944· 104p. the library of congress has issued a small coop erative cataloging manual which should help to facilitate present-day cooperative cataloging. at the same time it may serve as a point of departure for a discussion of cooperative cataloging of the future. the manual~ prepared principally by helen b. stevens, describes the procedures of the cooperative cataloging centered in the library of congress. it tells how libraries should proceed in supplying copy for printing but does not attempt to explain the intricate art of cataloging. in a brief introduction the h'istory of cooperative cataloging in the united states is sketched , from charles coffin jewett's plan for st er eotyping catalogues by separate titles in 1851 to the activities of the a.l.a. cooperative cataloging committee, begun in 1932 and merged, in january 1941, with the work of the library of congress. the cooperative cataloging associated with the library of congress has been concerned chiefly with the analyzing of serial publications and. the cataloging of foreign books. lately the work has been expanded to include the cataloging of american doctoral dissertations, the output of a number of university presses, and the official publications of some of the states of the union, while the cooperative cataloging of the acquisitions by · several federal libraries in washington, begun in 1902, has been .continued. copy for printing is thus of various types and originates from many sources. the manual gives useful information as to the manner in which copy should be prepared by the cooperating libraries. a special section devoted to the preparation of authority cards is in severfll respects more instructive and detailed than the corresponding section in the 1941 preliminary a .l.a. catalog rules. the work at the library of congress is likewise described, details being given as to · the re ceipt and revision of copy, leading finally to the printing and distribution of catalog cards. an appendix contains a list of the 365 libraries that have participated in cooperative cataloging, a list of 615 reference books useful in establishing and verifying author headings, and a list of easily understandable abbreviations that may be used aq.vantageously by both the library of congress and the collaborating libraries. the latter feature constitutes in large measure the realization of a project that has for years been on the agenda of the a.l.a. division of cataloging and classification. the manual emphasizes that with respect to entries the a .l.a. catalog rules are generally to be followed, while "beyond the heading, uniformity of practice is essential only so far as filing and intelligibility of the cards are concerned" (page i 6). nevertheless, we learn on page 20 that the title of the book, including name of author, edition statement, and imprint, "should be accurately transcribed . . . according to l.c. cataloging rules." collation, series note, and full name note are likewise to follow l.c. rules, while subject headings should be assigned according to the l.c. list of subject headings. standardiz~­ tion, thus, seems to be more thorough than at first suggested. this contradiction touches upon a point of considerable importance for the future of american cataloging. when the revolt against overelaborate cataloging took place at the time of the publication of the new a .l.a. catalog code~ a distinct tendency 188 college and research libraries to disregard standardization of descriptive cataloging was felt, many a library proceeding according to its own idea of rugged individualism. it is obvious, however, that, although the specific phrasing of a note may be immaterial, some uniformity of book description is necessary if cards prepared by one library are to be used profitably by others. if, for example, some libraries use a full collation statement while others list only the last page of the main group of pages, how is one to interpret the collation symbols appearing on any given card? the library of congress realizes this; although it pays lip service to the new individualism, it is hardboiled when it gets down to cases. for the cooperating libraries which have to follow the l.c. rules the situation is not so simple. the rules have been in a constant flux, and their latest version is not easily verifiable, if at all. caught in the maelstrom of conflicting opinions, the a.l.a., having for three years delayed action, has not yet decided whether it wants to sponsor a descriptive catal0ging code, pending the next move of the library of congress. plainly, what is needed is standardization of descriptive cataloging by as many libraries as possible, as soon as possible and preferably in as simple a form as possible. this becomes more obvious the more we consider the results of coop~rative cataloging to date. cooperative cataloging has been a noble experiment but, it must be admitted, not an entirely successful one. two facts stand out clearly. the output has been far too small and the cost far too high. during the ten-year period from july 1933 through june i943 only about sixty thousand titles were cooperatively cataloged, or about six thousand titles a year, figures that in the words of the librarian of congress "are far from impressive." 1 cost as to the cost, a study made by john r. russell in •19372 reveals that the administrative and editorial expenditures involved in preparing for the press the 19,473 titles cata1 an.nu.al report of the librarian of congress for the ftscal year ended june 30, 1943. washington u.s. government printing office, 1944, p. 46-47. ' 2 russell, john r. report on the work of the cooperative cataloging committee." catalogers' and classifiers' yearbook, no. 7 (r g38), p. 69-74. ll;f a rchj 1945 loged under the project of the a.l.a.. cooperative cataloging committee from 1933 through 1936 amounted to $30,621, or $1.57 per title. in other words, it cost more ·to initiate and prepare for printing copy for a single title than it ordinarily does to catalog a title. in spite of all good efforts, the cooperative cataloging project failed to become self-supporting. clearly, anything that · can be done to decrease the cost of editing the copy should be done. the m apualj we hope, will help somewhat in eliminating costly correspondence concerning points that should be clear to every cooperating library, but still more would be accomplished if we could remedy the weakness the manual reveals: the absence of clearcut cataloging rules. although lack of uniform rules for descriptive cataloging militates against communal cataloging, it does not necessarily follow that, having agreed on certain fundamental rules for descriptive cataloging, we could not allow a fair .degree of freedom in applying these rules. the resulting minor variations would probably not cause more trouble than the variations we have been accustomed to accept on l.c. cards seen through the press by different revisers. if this is correct, we might in the future conceivably dispense with central revision of cooperative cataloging copy, except possibly for the headings. since, according to mr. russell's study, the revision of the 19,473 titles produced during the period 1933-36 cost $r9,19i, or almost $1 a title, very considerable savings should be possible if revision could be largely eliminated. going a step further, we might ask: if libraries can accept certain rules for copy contributed ·to the cooperative cataloging project, why can they not use th~se same rules for materials cataloged for their own libraries? if they would do that, it should be possible to have locally produced catalog cards universally used in other libraries provided they were made available through an exchange pool. weaknesses the library of congress has for a number of years operated a service through which cards contained in the union catalog have . been made available to other libraries by 189 photostating. this service, temporarily suspended because of the war, · had, however, certain qbvious weaknesses: i. a separate charge was made for all searching for copy in the union catalog irrespective of whether o.r not the searching resulted in the location of a usable card. 2. many of the entries in the union catalog were unsatisfactory since it was found that in i938 "not over 40 per cent of the entries • . • [were] of any appreciable use to catalogers."3 3· the cost of a complete set of cards . consisting of positive photostats was expensive (about thirty-five cents for five cards, including searching charge) . . it would seem that these weaknesses could in ,a large measure be overcome: i. if a second copy of each card submitted by a contributing library were interfiled in the card division's master file with the library of congress's own card, a separate search--costly and frequently without result-would be eliminated, since the card would be located in the process of the ordinary checking of l.c. card orders. 2. if adherence to ·uniform rules were made a prerequisite for including a local card in the master . file, the cards supplied would be certain to . be of a generally acceptable standard. 3· if the most economical process of multiple card reproduction were used rather than photostating, which is expensive except when a single negative is all that is needed, it should be possible t(') cut the cost considerably. until inexpensive facsimile reproduction on satisfactory card stock is available, mimeographing may be the answer. the university of texas has estimated that mimeographing costs amount · to about seven and one-half cents for five cards,' while the university of california has found the expense to be in the neighborhood of ten ceqts. allowing for somewhat higher rates at the library of congress and a small f fee covering administrative expenses and filing, it would seem that the present cost of supplying a set of five cards could be cut in half. if a system of this nature, modified to meet 3 library of congress. cooperative work of card division, union catalog, cooperative cataloging and classification service and a.l.a. cooperative cataloging committee. thir d circular. june i938. washington, i938, p. 25.-this publication, although a forerunner of the cooperative cataloging manual, is not mentioned in the manual. 4 coney, donald [and others]. report of a survey af the indiana university library. chicago, a.l.a., i940, p. 96. the specific requirements of the library of congress and the collaborating libraries, were adopted, the output of cards would increase and the cost decrease-the two ·objectives before us. , it would seem, then, that we would be well on the way to abolishing the present indefensible duplication of cataloging. cards supplied by l.c. briefly, the library of congress would supply three types of cards: its own cards; cooperatively prepared printed cards of wide interest, for which stocks would be kept in the library of congress ; and mimeographed or otherwise duplicated cards, produced from unrevised exchange cards of more limited interest submitted to the library of congress by a group of libraries agreeing to follow certain specifications. in the case of exchange cards emanating from libraries willing to print and keep in stock a sizable supply of cards, orders for such cards might, after having been checke'd at the library of congress, be forwarded to the card-producing library to be filled. this system, obviously, wemld fit in well with the recording aspect of the metcalf-boyd-macleish· plan of division of fields of acquisition but could be adopted should this plan fail to materialize . . it is quite likely, however, that eventually . we shall have to do more drastic things than to expand the present cooperative cataloging program and to arrange for the exchange of locally produced cards. there is no reason we should not, simultaneously with meeting the immediate demands, work seriously towards doing on a national basis what mr. rider has suggested we do on a regional one, · publish "a continuously cumulative book catalog" that would serve at the same time as a national union catalog and, through location symbols, as the main catalog of individua,l libraries.6 the first step in this direction would be the publishing of the national union catalog in convenient book form, with a typography easier on the eye than that of the catalog of books represented by library of congres·s printed cards. it would be a fitting memorial to mr. jewett if, in 1951, we could 1 rider, fremont. "real cooperative catalogingthe concrete app.roach." library quarterly i 3 :99-i i 2, ,april i943· we need not think that the potentialities of microprint, so stimulatingly discussed in mr. rider's latest book, should make us abolish the idea of the union book catalog. · 190 college and research libraries initiate a work that wpuld constitute the fulfilment of a vision doomed to failure a hundred years earlier but realizable now, thanks to a century's progress in printing processes.-] ens nyholm, librarian, northwestern university. dissertations ·of 1943"44 doctoral dissertations accepted by a m'erican universities,1943-44· (number ii) compiled for the association of research libraries. edited by edward a. henry. new york, h. w. wilson co., 1944. 88p. this new list, the eleventh in the series and the fifth under the present editorship, again shows thoughtful editing and increasing usefulness. in general arrangement it is similar to previous lists. the seven main subject divisions have been retained but with ' literature and art now more appropriately· headed humanities. a few changes have been made in the subdivisions. metallurgy _has been moved from earth sciences to physical sciences, and geophysics has been added to earth sciences. there is the usual author index. the impact of the war upon graduate studies is reflected in the carefully prepared preliminary tables and introductory material. the number of dissertations presented has again declined. this edition lists 2117, the lowest number since 1930 and one almost 40 per cent lower than the high figure . of 1941. a brief table showing the distribution by large subject divisions indicates the increase in studies in the physical sciences. sixty-five titles, largely in chemistry, are withheld because they are "secret war research." the most useful of the introductory tables will doubtless be the one showing the practice of publication and loan of dissertations, and the list of periodic abstracting p~blications. although the practices of publishing and lending are too varied to be tabulated in exact detail, these two should prove especially ·valuable to librarians on the borrowing end of interlibrary loan. study of the table showing the distribution of doctorates for the years 1934-35 through 1943-44 by subject and years and of the one showing their distribution for 1943-44 by university and by subject, will reward anyone interested in the general trends of graduate work on this level or in the relative strength of the v~rious graduate schools represented. the necessity for timeliness precludes the possibility of indicating in the annual issues notes regarding the actual publication of individual dissertations. it is to be hoped that at some not too distant date, however, it will be possible to have a cumulative index which will not only pick up the necessarily omitted titles b~t also show when dissertations have been published.-] ean m acalister, reference assistant, c9lumbia university libraries, new york city. study of the army medical library the national medical library: report of a survey of the army m edi~al library financed by the rockefeller foundation and made under the auspices of the american library association. keyes d. metcalf, ] anet doe, thomas .p. fleming, mary louise marshall, l. quincy mumford, a~d andrew d. osborn. xvi, 94p· chicago, american· ·librar.y a~sociation, 1944. though we in this country have done some notable pioneering in the development of our municipal libraries, we have been slow in applying the same concepts of administration and service to our national libraries. indeed, march, 1945 until quite recent times ·we have scarcely thought of ourselves as having any national libraries. outstanding as it has been for many years the library of congress, partly by virtue of its name, has taken a long while to establish itself in our consciousness as the national library of the united states. for a similar reason, the army medical library (until about 1936 called by the still more restrictive name, library of the surgeongeneral's office), the largest medical library in the country, was the army medical library to us and not the national medical library. the unfortunate result of all this 191 college and research libraries l.etters the 0 dismal science" revisited to the editor: the january 1989 issue of library quarterly contains an article which i commend to you, george harris' essay, "historic cataloging costs, issues, and trends." in his piece harris, senior cataloger, humanities cataloging team, university of missouri, columbia, reports the findings that grew out of his efforts to gather data about changes in the length and complexity of lc cataloging copy between 1956 and 1981, changes in academic library cataloging costs over the past century or so, changes in average academic library salaries since the late nineteenth century, and the average cost among reporting academic libraries to catalog a monograph at the time he gathered his data. harris' findings are interesting, and i wish to call your attention in particular to his discoveries concerning changes in lc cataloging copy between 1956 and 1981: the length of lc cataloging copy, in number of characters, increased 24.5 percent; the number of entries grew 130.2 percent; the number of fields essentially doubled; and the number of subject heading subdivisions increased 156.2 percent. harris concludes that ''cataloging copy has definitely become both much longer and much more complex,'' which he attributes to the growth in collections, with ''many more books in libraries to differentiate,'' and to the increased voluminousness and complexity of library material. harris' findings concerning the significant increase in cataloging copy should remind the librarian-especially the librarian making decisions about the allocation of scarce resources-of the need to bear in mind one of the most pervasive and powerful laws of what carlyle referred to as the "dismal science" (i.e., economics): the law of diminishing marginal returns. put simply, the law holds that, in the case of whatever process we are interested in, as the amount of some input is increased, beyond some point the amount or size of the resulting additions to the output will decrease. concerning application of the law of diminishing marginal returns to the creation of cataloging copy, the relevant input is cataloging staff time; the output we should be concerned with is not mere cataloging copy, which is after all a means and not an end in itself, but rather with that end, that is, with useful and sought access points. the law lends itself to graphic depiction in the well-known (to economists) toppling-over s-curve (figure 1). let us see what the graph would like if the law of diminishing marginal returns does in fact apply to the creation of cataloging copy. the input we are considering, cataloging staff time, is measured along the horizontal axis, and the output, useful and sought access points, along the vertical. the graph shows what happens to increases in useful and sought access points as we increase the amount of staff time devoted to cataloging. in the graph, the distance from a to b is the same as that from c to d; but notice that the distance from w to x, the increase in useful and sought access points which results when cataloging staff time is increased from a to b, is significantly greater than the distance from y to z, the increase in useful and sought access points due to the addition of staff time from c to d. in other words, the increase in cataloging staff time represented by c to d 485 486 college & research libraries useful and sought access points figurel july 1989 cataloging staff costs d c b a x ":! i useful and sought access points figure2 resulted in a significantly smaller increase in useful and sought access points than did the increase in staff time from a to b. it is possible to express the relationship between increases in cataloging staff time and the resulting increases in useful and sought access points in an alternative manner, which may make the relationship even more graphic. in the second graph (figure 2), the vertical axis depicts the costs of cataloging staff (i.e., salary and benefits, which are of course a function of cataloging staff time), while the horizontal axis depicts useful and sought access points. the distances from w to x and from y to z are the same, indicating equal increases in useful and sought access points. however, the costs to achieve the increases are substantially different. note that the cost c to d, to achieve increases y to z, is significantly greater than cost a to b, required to increase useful and sought access points from w to x. perhaps a good way to express the implications of the law of diminishing marginal returns is thts: beyond a certain point, further increases in output become very expensive. the trick, then, is to strike a sensible balance between increases in input and the ever more costly increases in output. we are, of course and unfortunately, unable to refine this analysis as it applies to cataloging copy and useful and sought access points to anything like the degree possible in many processes. about the best we can hope for in the case of the creation of cataloging copy is that the librarian responsible for making decisions pertaining to this process be acutely aware of the law of diminishing marginal returns. dennis p. carrigan assistant dean, college of library and information science university of kentucky n e w f r 0 m cataloging resources from ala books handbook for aacr2, 1988 revision: explaining and illustrating the anglo-american cataloging rules margaret maxwell $27 .50pbk. approx. 480p. 0-8389-0505-6 july 1989 catalogers in all types of libraries will welcome the expanded and revised edition of margaret maxwell's classic companion to aacr2. the journal of librarianship described the first edition as " ... an extensive commentary further illustrated by some 400 worked examples ... provides a wealth of supplementary material and interpretation which makes the volume a mine of useful information for the cataloguer." serials cataloging handbook: an illustrative guide to the use of aacr2 and lc rule interpretations carol leong $50.00cl. 320p. 0-8389-0501-3 may 1989 addresses nearly 200 problems in one of the most difficult areas of cataloging. the user-oriented "guide by example" format draws together aacr2 rules and lc rule interpretations with illustrations of the bibliographic record, oclc record, and title page or title page substitutes, allowing the user to see at a glance both the nature of and the solution to a partigular problem. aacr2 1988 revision: an introduction eric hunter $21.00cl. 160p. ala order code 8457-2 june 1989 the new and expanded edition of hunter's popular programmed learning manual incorporates the rule changes published in the aacr2 1988 revision. college & research libraries called the 1979 edition " ... a model of clarity that makes the revised rules much less intimidating." published by the library association, london, under the clive bingley imprint; distributed exclusively in the u.s. by ala publishing. ala books american library association 50 east huron street, chicago, il 60611 you can have it all. others can place your order, but only faxon provides a complete line of serials acquisition and management services to guide you through every step of your purchasing cycle. our accurate pricing information facilitates budgeting and planning, while other faxon services simplify ordering and renewal, speed check-in and claiming, and provide fast, easy access to all the information you need. _ start putting faxon's comprehensive set of services to work for you. call today at 1-800-225-6055. (in ma, call 617-329-3350 collect.) fa:on college and research libraries ,...----------------------------------~ --------. 444 college & research libraries there is very little experimentation and constructive adaptation of experience from other organizations. thus interest in ii scientific management" or ii quality circles" trickles down to library organizations some time after the principles have experienced a revision or redefinition. martin posits that the answer to this deficiency is more systematic preparation of library managers-including required study of classical and contemporary management thinking-and therefore has devoted roughly a third of this volume to building a conceptual background. a central conclusion of martin's examination is that libraries should be viewed as complex social institutions interacting with a dynamic environment rather than as rigidly defined bureaucratic structures. successful functioning of library organizations requires leadership and group processes that effectively incorporate complex roles and relationships, rather than ·a neatly defined job-task hierarchy. there are few management principles that can be applied blindly by libraries, but there are lessons that may be exploited. the remainder of the work systematically examines specific library organization issues within this all-important philosophic framework. martin begins with an overview of library service patterns employed by school, special, college, research, and public libraries, including a description of the external relationships so critical to the success of any organization. at this point, a major shortcoming of the author's survey approach becomes apparent. in his · references to academic libraries, martin's lack of understanding of their nature and function constitutes a rather significant shortcoming in his generally astute perceptions. for example, his view of the college library as a supply agency simply acquiring books needed to support the courses offered is a glaring oversimplification. the author states the following: "college libraries can in part be thought of as extensions of high school libraries"; ''the academic librarian is more accurately referred to as 'the keeper of the book'"; large research libraries ''strive for selfsufficiency''; and ''in academic library adseptember 1985 ministration, this is a time not for the builder but for the conservator.'' these inaccuracies compromise an otherwise in.. sightful overview. martin proceeds to review the coverage of management topics in the professional literature, the relationships of libraries with external agencies and the public, and the internal organization of different types of libraries . these summaries are thoughtful and well done although inaccuracies regarding academic libraries continue to creep into the review (e.g., the author states that the library directors at the universities of utah and texas are vicepresidents). finally, martin provides chapters dealing with the several distinct levels of staff positions that exist in libraries, patterns of supervision and management, and administrative functions of direction and coordination. throughout this coverage, he contributes a seasoned and broad perspective on the comparative practices of these various types of libraries. the excellence of this coverage is only limited by an incomplete understanding of the current practices of academic libraries. while this volume is therefore not the definitive text on library management, it is a useful sur, vey of management practices within the profession.-duane e. webster, office of management studies, washington, d. c. greenberg, alan m., and carole r. mciver. lcandaacr2: an album of cataloging examples arranged by rule number. metuchen, n.j.: scarecrow, 1984. 179p. $19 .50 lc 83-27144. isbn 0-81081683-0. cataloging government documents: a manual of interpretation for aacr2. documents cataloging manual corn. rnittee, government documents round table, ala. ed. by bernadine abbott hoduski. chicago: american library assn., 1984. 259p. $49. lc 84-6499. isbn 0-8389-3304-1. the authors of the second edition of the anglo-american cataloguing rules sought to avoid some of the shortcomings of the previous code by providing the user with copious examples of rule interpretations. don't go looking for the articles your patrons needgenuine article· delivers them to you! the genuine article has the articles your patrons need: articles from any of over 7,000 journals in virtually all scientific and scholarly disciplines. and we'll make sure your articles get to you quicklythey'll be in the mail to you within 48 hours after we receive your order. if that isn't fast enough, you can use our hotline phone or facsimile delivery. the cost is surprisingly low. for more information on how the genuine article can save you time, save you trouble, and get you copies of the articles your patrons need, phone toll-free 800-523-1850, extension 1352, or write to the address below. do it today. ~@~~nstitute for scientific information® customer services department 3501 market street, philadelphia, pennsylvania 19104 u.s.a. tel: (215) 386-0100, cable: scinfo, telex: 84-5305 european office: 132 high street, uxbridge, middlesex u88 1 dp, united kingdom tel: 44-895-70016, telex: 933693 ukisi ©1985151 i 0 i ·3859 446 college & research libraries despite the great improvements in this area the new code has given rise to anumber of interpretive companion volumes. two very different examples are lc and aacr2 and cataloging government documents. aacr2 provides a theoretical framework for the cataloging of various types of materials and is considered to be espe. ,cially strong in its descriptive section. nevertheless, a cataloger on many occasions will come across particular questions which are not dealt with in the examples given in the code, and a question of rule · application arises. the practice of the library of congress is generally regarded as authoritative, but it is not always an easy matter to locate the lc rule interpretation that will apply to the situation at hand. in some cases there is no specific interpretation, and the cataloger turns to analogy for the solution. lc and aacr2 is quite descriptively subtitled an album of cataloging examples. it consists almost exclusively of reproductions of lc catalog cards arranged by aacr2 chapter and rule number, with the specific rule in question highlighted on the cards. a brief preface and two indexes make up the remainder of the work. the examples are heavily weighted toward monographs and serials. those working with other types of materials will not find it of much help, though it is often in the nonbook areas, where little marc cataloging is available, that some of the greatest difficulties are encountered. the major drawback of lc and aacr2 is that it is destined to be incomplete, as the nature of cataloging makes it impossible to gather an example for every contingency. the compilers caution that some examples may already be outdated, and because of photoreduction the few blank spaces provided for expansion are too small for a 3by-5-inch proof slip. some users will question the wisdom of including a twenty-four-page author/title index to the cards reproduced and may wish the pages had been used instead for explanatory text or for more examples. few catalogers will argue with the utility.of lc example, howseptember 1985 ever, and the format could hardly be simpler to use. with these limitations in mind a cataloger may wish to add a copy of this work to the department's stock of ready reference works. while it will not answer some complex questions, nor provide a theoretical basis for certain decisions, lc and aacr2 is a reliable source of example for a variety of problems. its major advantage is in presenting in one place a large number of potential solutions to frequent cataloging dilemmas. cataloging government documents: a manual of interpretation for aacr2, produced by the godort documents cataloging manual committee, is a very different approach to cataloging. it is another of the rapidly growing number of special cat· aloging aids for interpretation and application of aacr2 to various classes of materials ranging from maps to microcomputer software. the general introduction states that the purpose of this manual is to ''clarify'' unclear aacr2 rules regarding documents cataloging, to "address" special problem areas, and to "interpret these features in a manner consistent with the spirit of aacr2." it is further stated that "no new rules or additions to aacr2 are proposed/' and that the manual is designed for use in conjunction with the cataloging code. the latter point is very important, for the thorough treatment of the chapters may tempt some users to neglect double checking both the code and lc rule interpretations. the manual concentrates on items most likely to be cataloged by those working with government documents: books, serials, and cartographic materials, plus brief chapters on microforms and machinereadable data files. one somewhat surprising omission is the lack of coverage of the laws and treaties sections of chapter 25 on uniform titles, though both are mentioned in chapter 21. like aacr2 itself, this guide is evenly divided between description and access. an index is provided. a notable feature of this work is its prescriptive tone. whereas cataloging guides such as lc and aj\cr2 do more than supacquisition perspectives 2. book house guarantees to order each book you request, with regular claiming to publishers. from major publishers on open account to the most obscure press requiring prepayment and offering no discount, our persistence and experience enables us to deliver every available title. there is no substitute for complete delivery. call toll-free today 1-800-248-1146 in canada & michigan call collect (517) 849-2117 oclc vendor no. 17397 san 169-3859 the bbok h ijse jobbers serving ubraries with any book in print since 1112 208 west chicago street jonesville, michigan 49250 448 college & research libraries ply lc example, cataloging government documents is an attempt to fill a void in cataloging practice . the authors often advise catalogers of what they should do in a given situation. while this tone is very appealing to a newcomer or student, it also becomes a weakness of this work, for one can never be certain of the source of this prescriptive tone. the preface states that the godort documents cataloging manual committee ''worked closely with the library of congress, the superintendent of documents, and the federal library committee to develop rule interpretations that would provide the best treatment of documents." a hasty reading of this, coupled with the many references to lc and gpo in the text, might lead the unwary to accept this work as quasi-official policy of the library of congress . instead, the book must be read as an informed commentary on aacr2 and lc/gpo policy as interpreted and augmented by the committee. the layout of cataloging government documents is attractive; it is presented as an annotated version of those sections of aacr2 applicable to documents. however, a readet will find difficulty in distinguishing between material that is quoted and that which has been paraphrased or edited. for instance, the definition of the chief source of information for a cartographic item given under 3.0b2a appears to be taken verbatim from aacr2, but actually is an expanded version of the definition appearing in the code. (the reader would be alert for this possibility only if the specific chapter introduction had been read.) likewise a reader must be aware that indented material introduced by the phrase "lc rule interpretation says" is not always an exact quote. in the latter case lack of csb citation numbers often makes it cumbersome to locate the issue being quoted for comparison. ' the rule interpretation cited for 21.1bl is an illustration. in the first paragraph on . p.124 following" 'colloquium,' etc. , " the interpolation "are some examples; the particular word · is not important'' has been added to the csb statement. the named/unnamed conference examples september 1985 ·given at the end are from csb18, while part of the interpretation is from csb22, minus its last four paragraphs. while a cataloger using this or a similar manual will always need to consult csb to see if there is a later rule interpretation, here the lack of specific citations makes use of the · section more difficult than it should be. the full range of problems presented by this style is illustrated in section 24.4cl. in this four-page section, which appears to the casual reader as an exact reproduction of lc rule interpretation, closer examination reveals that two csb paragraphs have been omitted and that, while most of the interpretation is taken from csb18, some wording is retained from csb15. furthermore, there are eight instances of minor insertions or rewordings of lc text, several typos, and words that are left out. the example given for qualifying "center for materials science" is an incorrect alteration of the proper aacr2 form given in csb18. there are other cases where the authors appear to contradict lc or aacr2 policy, as in the contradictory statement of responsibility examples given under l.lf and 1.1f7. the former includes the authors' position titles and separates corporate affiliation with a comma, while the latter lc example omits titles and separates with parentheses. on p.37 there is a directive that statements of responsibility· appearing on bibliographic data sheets "are to be regarded as prominent in all cases." this is contrary to the policy · stated in csb16 that "no special exception for these data sheets" be made. such problems detract from the potential usefulness of this work. a rule-by-rule guide for the application of aacr2 to government materials could be a greafhelp both to catalogers who deal extensively with documents and those who catalog them only occasionally. the last paragraph of the general introduction, with its note that "complex materials call for complex cataloging," is an admirable summation of the difficulties encountered in this area. the chapter introductions all contain valuable overviews on their topics and despite the problems touched on above, there is a great deal to be learned about documents cataloging in this book. the user will also find information on diverse topics not readily available in one source, such as a definition of'' star prints,'' information about sudoc and ntis numbers, and how to compute scale on maps. cataloging government documents must be approached with caution as a cataloging aid. the user should be aware that lc rule interpretations are sometimes edited, and that the examples given are often not from aacr2 or csb. closer proofreading of examples and text would be desirable, as typographical errors always loom large in a cataloging work such as this. no errata sheet is currently available. documents departments that do full aacr2 cataloging will certainly want to take advantage of the godort committee's experience and efforts but, given the shortcomings mentioned above and a price of $50, general academic cataloging departments are unlikely to make this book a priority for their collections.-gunnar knutson, university of illinois at chicago. advances in librarianship. v. 13. ed. by wesley simonton. new york: academic, 1984. 284p. $32. lc 79-88675. isbn 0-12-024613-9. in a review written some years ago of volume 8 of the same title, i made the claim that advances in librarianship is one of the few places in library literature where one finds literate, comprehensive, and brief overviews of advances in the field. this statement still appears to be true. the latest volume of advances covers a very wide range of topics, from management information to information systems and library automation in latin america to collection development and management. there is something in the eight sections of this short volume for librarians of most tastes, persuasions, and interests. those of us who struggle with a sometimes overwhelming amount of information will appreciate the systematic approach suggested by charles r. mcclure. he presents a good overview of how various forms of organizational information recent publications 449 processing, e.g., mis and dss, might be applicable to libraries. in so doing, he also presents a good review of the literature that has appeared since 1975. nancy williamson raises and discusses many of the issues involved with information storage and retrieval but especially that of subject access to online systems. one of the main issues at present appears to be whether online access should be constructed from the top down or from the bottom up. williamson claims that the · needs of the future need to be more completely assessed and that more research is necessary. public libraries have often been at the ·· forefront of library innovation. john durrance discusses one of these innovations, community information services, specifically the provision of local information, information and referral, and public policy information. in an era when community · information services could be flourishing, poor communication seems to hav_e reqi mcgr,egor cal;!~~ "personalized" .subscription service mcgregor can simplify complex and time consuming problems of periodical procurement involving research, ordering, payments, renewals and record keeping. prompt courteous service has been a tradition with mcgregor since 1933. call or write for catalog today 8151734-4183 mcgregor magazine agency college and research libraries the use of overseas central cataloging in australia with special reference to library of congress cataloging library of congress cataloging as a form of central cataloging has taken the place of british cataloging in british countries, and in particular australia. it. is, however, one library's cataloging, and on the all important subject cataloging or information retrieval side, in its subject headings and their arrangement, it is, in its own words, "the product of evolutionary forces" from 1897 to date. not all its headings are the fittest to survive; they are not evenly up-to-date in choice, and they are inconsistent in form, so that for information retrieval they are a functionally inferior mixture. this paper does not propose to be an exhaustive proof of these propositions, nor is it the result of an exhaustive study; it is rather evidence that there should be one-constructive as well as destructiveof by-product central cataloging becoming the cataloging not only of libraries in its own country, not only of libraries fairly contemporary with it, but also of new libraries-new bottles in which the old wine turned to vinegar is being increasingly poured; of libraries in foreign countries (which are however close, "free world" allies of america in every respect). in two books, one 1957 and one 1959, both published in america, the writer attempted a more general and exhaustive study, mainly at the technical level; in this he found far more fault with other january 1964 by john metcalfe mr. metcalfe is university librarian, university of new south wales. his paper is here reprinted with permission from seminar on technical services, baillieu library, university of melbourne, 17-18 august, 1961, directed by maurice f. tauber, edited by ira d. raymond. (canberra: australian advisory council on advisory services, 1962 .) cataloging methods than he did with those of lc and said somewhere in it that lc cataloging should be criticized, not because it is bad, but because it is so good, with so . much achievement and so much promise, so widely found useable and used; whereas most of the panaceas which are its competitors have got little further than boast and ballyhoo-in which lc does not indulge-even in its own country. of course lc cataloging as central cataloging is not that of a system under one authority. it is of the take it or leave it kind, you don't have to take it if you don't want to, not even in america. it is offered and taken, but not with clear explanation or understanding of just what it is; not with enough caveat emptor, yet with immense prestige and authority of a moral kind. the allegations being made cannot only be of foreign interest, but the writer is not telling americans-it would be impertinent of him to do so-and opinion of the relevance to the home situation of what he has to say must be entirely their own. 13 the bm catalogue in its still latest complete edition, in volumes, was once much used in some australian research and reference libraries, both university and public. in one in which i worked, constant reference to it in a recataloging program was, i think, a strong influence in giving the new catalog a bibliographical bias, and in drawing interest and attention away from the essential indexing function of a library catalog, especially on the subject side. being only an author catalog it was no use on the subject side; it is not linked with the library's subject index by any tracing notes, and this is only in quinquennial cumulations without any current supplementation. also it is alphabetico-classed, whereas subject cataloging in australia as in america is mainly alphabetico-specific, more or less based on cutter's rules. even at the time when british and bm catalogue influence were at their height the ala subject headings list was a tool, at least for reference, although australia had produced one of its own in 1896 (with a fourth edition in 1902) in h. c. l. anderson's guide to the system of cataloguing, of the public library of new south wales. in 1934 charles martel told me that this list, and anderson's 101 rules had been used in the formative years of the present lc catalog. we knew of the current availability of lc cards, but thought of them as printed cards, not as a subject cataloging service, and made little or no use of them. we were not able to accommodate a depository set anywhere in the country although one stood on offer to us. the first lc influence on our cataloging was through its published headings list. i was at the reference desk but had become interested in subject cataloging, and i well remember first coming across headings with round bracketed qualifications, where i would have expected just phrases or sub,.. headings in our catalog, and, horror of horrors, an upward see reference, from specific to general. i traced these innovations to their source and found, as happened increasingly, that a cataloger laudably eager for turnover or put-through had found a secret or private weapon not in general use; but i could not make my point that there should be-and had been in our catalog-entry which, if it was not always as specific as it could have been, was at least not explicit class entry with upward reference, and a consistency of form and function or logic in headings on which arrangement or filing depended, and on which in turn indexing efficiency depended, and that lc practice cut across all this. apart from being put in my place, i was met with counter-argument, which has been used in america, that the dictionary catalog is illogical, and anyway the public doesn't understand. of course alphabetical arrangement is not illogical for its own purposes. it is a perfect form of classification, as j evons pointed out in 1873, and it will allow-even with specific entry-of very useful classified suborders in its arrangement. the lc rules or arrangement are based on this, but the possibilities are largely nullified in its own cataloging by the formal inconsistencies of its headings. as for the public not understanding, i usually found this to mean that the catalogers do not understand a relation of form of headings and their arrangement which would benefit users even though they were not aware of its logical basis. lc cataloging is like that of any old established card catalog, only more so than most, and what is wrong with its byproduct central cataloging is the inconsistencies that come with the cumulation, which is the only virtue of the card catalog. even this might not be so bad if the results were sufficiently understood but its own explanation in its introduction to its headings list is not read, or if it is, it is too guarded· and not explicitly enough a warning. in consequence new editions of the list are assumed to be 'updated,' somewhat as the sixteenth edition of dc 14 college and research libraries is, and the list is · taken as an ideal one, issued as such by a great authority. a very leading american librarian, in administration, once assured me that there could not be any inconsistencies in the list, and that if only he could get hold of his head cataloger and it was a weekend or holiday, she would be able to explain to me just how consistent were such headings as artificial flowers, and flies, artificial; animals, legends and stories of, and birds-legends and stories. another lead.··· ing librarian who had worked in lc freely admitted the inconsistencies, which are going directly into comparatively new catalogs, or indirectly through the sears popular abridgment of the lc headings, or through local central cataloging. the use of cataloging aids is promoted by patriotism or feeling for another country which is at least neutral-not definitely hostile-but these are not enough. the goods have to have a genuine selling point, and they have to be delivered. the old bm catalog~e had the very important selling point that up to a point it was complete in a set of volumes that did not take up the room of a card catalog; and it was delivered. i remember it in one cataloging room slowly but surely weighing a great revolving bookcase down through the floor, and in another filling a press and bound in kangaroo skin. when i told some american librarians about this, ne·arly thirty years ago, one asked if the volumes had pockets, and i have been grateful for the story ever since. quite apart from any abstract loyalty, and veneration for a library that still had a name to conjure with, the bm catalogue was there, to impress itself on every young librarian. but it was dating; a new edition was announced in a very promising prospectus, and we put our money on the line; but _over decades it made little progress, and only recently it has been started all over again, in the way in which it should have been begun originally. and not only with this but other things there was an ever increasing gap, or vacuum, january 1964 and america was filling it, whether we liked it or not; we did not have to be americanized to have a use and a need for the wilson indexes, the engineering index, and by far the most useful and used abstracts, chemical abstracts. the only headings lists we had with up-to-date subject coverage, though inconsistent forms, were lc and sears. the only new british attempt, and opportunity, was bnb, the british national bibliography. this was, and is, a useful classified book selection aid, and in this respect it was better than any american offering until some years later; but as well as being promoted as this, and as british to the backbone-with an association with the british museum which sounded to be more than it was-it was also promoted as a cataloging aid, as in effect the british answer to lc (as years earlier brown's now dead subject classification was supposed to be the scholarly, scientific, and british answer to dewey). orthodox tracing notes to bnb entries, of both subject headings and class numbers, would have made them a cataloging aid for both the dictionary and the classified catalog, and with some initiative and organization on the part of the british museum or bnb council they could have been supported by a list of subject headings-a british list-or an arrangement might have been made to use lc headings. the writer advocated and begged for something like this, for the colonial dictionary catalog customers whose subscriptions were being solicited, but nothing of the sort was done. bnb was made what it still is, a propaganda instrument for very unorthodox and much questioned theories of classificatioq and alphabetical indexing, based on class number analysis, and what may prove to have been the last opportunity of restoring british and british museum prestige and usefulness in central cataloging for, at least, british commonwealth countries was sacrificed to the enthusiasm of a few for a new panacea, out of which they still dream of extracting 15 subject headings and references by their chain analysis of class numbers which have to be impossibly elaborated for no other purpose: whom the gods destroy they first make mad. despite british assumptions of its americanization, australia and its libraries still buy far more british than american published books, but the imprints in bnb itself show that an increasing proportion of british published books-and especially of those bought for reference and research libraries-is one of american books issued in both countries. these are of course cataloged by lc, and in addition lc catalogs books in english which are not american or british, which bnb does not do. it catalogs them, as well as other foreign books, in astonishing numbers, and with no longer the time lag which was once threatening its efficiency and its support. its proof copy cards by air mail are now reasonably up-to-date book selection aids and they can be used in integrated processing from selection to dictionary cataloging, as bnb cards cannot be, so that it is becoming doubtful whether these are now worth getting by air mail. these proof copy cards are only part of what may be called, on analogy with population explosion, a bibliographical explosion, or chain reaction, which began overseas from america with the general availability after the 1939-45 war of the lc catalog in volume form-only an author catalog-but with the familiar unit card tracing note, and a little later with current supplementation and cumulation in volume form. what the british museum at first did not do-photoprint its catalog from its ~lip catalog-was done first by some enthusiasts and then by lc itself, from lc cards. lc cataloging was now in overseas libraries, and it was complete and up-to-date in ways in which bm or bnb cataloging were not intended to be. the situation of about thirty years earlier was more than reversed. lc cataloging could be used to full advantage, but also it could be swallowed, hook, line and sinker. not only the form of headings but also subject determination and heading assignment could be taken, uncritically, completely, from the tracing notes of lc entries, and by this we may in some important respects be sunk. the disease of lc headings, from being only sporadic, may become-may have already become--epidemic and pandemic with further risk that not only may the forms of lc headings be not as good as they might be, but in addition its determination of the subjects of particular books and its assignment of headings may not be as good, on the average, as they might be. the greatest danger of centralization and standardization becomes very real. many british librarians had always used standardization or uniformity in itself as an argument against it a~d so against centralized cataloging, but this was through years when their own diversity did not show up very well against american uniformity, and in any case uniformity itself is hardly a fault in this field any more than in book printing. the obvious danger, however, still flows from centralization-that if there are defects at the center then they are everywhereand here we have centralized cataloging in a rapidly increasing volume taken to or coming down from an international or supranational level, with the added dangers that the final source is one library in one nation with perhaps some cooperative .control nationally but none internationally; and that the cataloging is not primarily central cataloging; as such it is simply byproduct cataloging, with its only justification in economy. now the question is, what damage, what amount or sum total of damage is being done, if any, and this question is put here rather than answered. in any assessment there must be either an assumption that what may be wrong should 16 college and research libraries be righted at all costs, or an assumption that there is possibly some compensation in other directions and that the account must be balanced as one of profit and loss if there is profit or gain in having lc more or less uncritically copied; and there is some gain. a mere glance at what the other fellow has already done is helpful, even if we end in doing the opposite; if we go-as we may be justified in going-to the other extreme, local cataloging can be reduced to completely uncritical copying of central cataloging. there need not even be copying; ready-made cards complete with headings can be filed, and even this may be done mechanically according to some punching of the ready-made cards, with all the advantages of nutrition without mastication and health without exercise; the century old dream of central cataloging would be complete reality, perhaps, just as the manless missiles were raining down. just before his death in 1903 cutter said in the preface to the fourth and latest edition of his rules, "on seeing the great success of . . . congress cataloguing . . . i cannot help thinking that the golden age ... is over, and that difficulties and discussions which have furnished an innocent pleasure to so many will interest them no more." the end of an age, if it is ended, was not as close as he thought then but there is no doubt that the difficulties, real or imagined (or only difficult to insufficiently able and trained people) and the associated discussions with all their innocent pleasure have brought local or independent cataloging into disrepute and have come near to ending the halcyon days, willy nilly and at whatever cost to the functional as opposed to the processing efficiency of cataloging. in terms of the labor and the money that is in fact being allowed for cataloging even by an affluent society, and for librarianship, and bibliography, and documentation, and information retrieval altogether, there is a need and an insistent demand from adjanuary 1964 ministrators and purse-bearers for economy in the cataloging process. librarians reply that what is sometimes expected or supposed by laymen to be all that is really needed is not as simple as they think and not enough for functional efficiency, but most librarians themselves and many catalogers are in some agreement, and many are prepared to pay for processing economy a price in possible loss of functional efficiency which they may not look at closely. they may simply want to recommend themselves as administrators and budget-balancer.s, or may not themselves be professionally competent or experienced enough to know how bad or how good cataloging can be, and how. cataloging is at the very heart of librarianship, and yet it has become a special mystery in more senses than one and many chief librarians or directors assert almost with pride that they know nothing about cataloging and cannot discuss the simplest problem in it without calling for their head cataloger, who in the management of his or her special domain can often rely on the boss's ignorance. cataloging is in large part a mystery, especially on the subject side, because it has not been much more than half solved with general agreement on the solution, or the teaching of it, and this is a major factor in the present situation. despite the efforts of cutter and others there is as yet no body of theory and practice which is generally accepted as the means of maximum efficiency. bibliosophists cry lo here and lo there, with astrology where there should be astronomy and alchemy where there should be chemistry. administrators and even catalogers are sceptical of what can so easily be dismissed as perfectionism. and an unfortunate conclusion may be drawn that many catalogers might as well be replaced by clerks just copying lc, because they have not been taught, or have not learned, principles on which to criticize and improve lc. now, 17 before drawing further conclusions, what sort of thing is supposed to be wrong with lc subject cataloging? we can state very briefly as to subject determination and headings assignment, that the specific subject qualification or limitation of a book is not always clearly realized or distinguished, and to be on the safe side the cataloger has given the book too many entries, which reduces both processing economy and functional efficiency; that what has been called a fifth column in the catalog is common-that is, the use of title word entry instead of, or to supplement, proper subject entry, usually because there is not an appropriate heading already in the list and the process of getting a new one in is probably too troublesome and time consuming; it is not sufficiently realized that some catalogers in lc probably work to the list as it is, and make it a procrustean bed for their cataloging, just as half-trained, inexperienced local catalogers often do with the very much abridged sears. as to the supposedly basic principle of its cataloging, there is considerable if not quantitatively important use of class entry with upward reference which reduces functional efficiency; for example, an inquirer looking under "milk substitutes" is referred to "food substitutes," and out of the many more entries under this he has to sort out those for literature on milk substitutes, which is not good information retrieval in a catalog which does distinguish about sixty kinds of dog and has at last got round to distinguishing some kinds of football as well as soccer. as to the form of headings there are such inconsistencies as "artificial limbs," but "eyes, artificial"; "agricultural research" and "agricultural exhibitions," but "agriculture -competitions," and "architectureexhibitions"; "composition (music)," but "music.-:-lnterpretation"; "catslegends and stories," but "cats (in religion, folklore, etc.)" and "cats in literature," without the brackets. such examples could be multiplied by the hundred. they are not justified by usage, that is, by differences which the inquirer would expect and anticipate. they make for reduced economy in processing because they increase the number of cross references to be put in and the number of filing difficulties, and they reduce functional efficiency because they increase cross reference use, and reduce the subject or subject aspect grouping which is quite possible and allowable with specific entry-mainly by the use of subheadings · -and is well established in its own headings. such inconsistencies are understandable and excusable in a large catalog with long cumulation and would be found in many smaller and younger catalogs. it is understandable that they are being copied into many smaller and younger catalogs when it is realized, first, that lc central cataloging, and its headings list as an aid, are only by-products of its cataloging of its own collections; and, second, that this central cataloging is only an unmodified by-product of its own cataloging and all the implications and consequences are not generally realized. we are getting highly centralized cataloging cheap, without realizing the price we may really be paying in the product. all these suggested defects in lc cataloging and its transmission as central cataloging may be quantitatively serious, or they may be only the magnification of a perfectionist riding a hobby horse, but their removal or reduction would mean some improvement in both processing economy and functional efficiency in cataloging based on that of lc. but how could they be removed or reduced? lc cataloging is published for more purposes than central cataloging through copying, though this is a lot of the justification and use of its publication. but published bibliography with or without uses other than central cataloging need not be the cataloging of a particular li18 college and research libraries brary, as that of bnb shows, but some association with a library can be useful, as bnb also shows; its cataloging is not done by the british museum, but is done in it from the museum's acquisitions, especially its copyright deposit acquisitions. the bm catalogue and its subject index are certainly not bnb's ranganathanite version of dc classified cataloging, but in their preparation some use may now be made of bnb entries. the point is that there may be economical advantage, and even necessity in some association of a large library and its acquisitions with cen. tralized cataloging for other libraries, but there need not be identification of cataloging, either way. the writer had something to do with another, far, far less important case than either lc of bnb. in this, central cataloging was done mainly but not entirely from a large library's own acquisitions, and this central cataloging was then modified in the library's own cataloging of those acquisitions. it had to be modified for the same reasons the other way round that lc cataloging needs modification; for example "economics" was used as a heading in the central cataloging for other libraries but the central library was still using "political economy" as a heading because it had hundreds of entries under it. the central library's cataloging could have been modified for central cataloging, which would probably have been delayed by this order; or the central library's cataloging could have been published on the do-what-you-like-with-it principle, but this would have defeated the purpose of aiding comparatively inexperienced catalogers by giving them up-to-date headings and of checking the spread of infection from an old, long cumulated catalog. it may not be irrelevant to notice that some british librarians say that cataloging in their large urban and county library systems is primarily cataloging for branches-that the cataloging of the central reference library is often subordinated january 1964 to this and made a mere makeshift adaptation of it. we must be careful to look both ways, and upwards and downwards, before stepping off the pavement we are on. by-product central cataloging looks the cheapest, but even this may not be certain; two associated cataloging processes and two associated processing bodies, even though there is association and cooperation, appear to raise costs; but they also distribute costs and may reduce a deflection of one of the bodies from its original purpose. whether justified by its original charter or not, the british museum seems very wary of taking on what are now thought to be functions of a national library; the library of congress on the other hand has embraced those functions and may have given them their current definition but not without recurrent complaint that it is, after all, the library of congress. the setting up of a separate body of council for central cataloging-but working in close association with lc-might meet some of these complaints at what would be comparatively small cost, especially if the services rendered were not so much thought of as a by-product to be given away. the desire to give away, to help as freely as possible may have motivated and justified the byproduct line of thought and economy and at the same time made the thinkers blind to some of the by-products of the byproduct approach. for what the information may be worth, there is now in australia an advisory council on bibliographical services which directs the work of, but does not administer a bibliographical center; this was in a parliamentary library which was also a national library on the lc plan but the two have been recently separated and the bibliographical center (with the same relation with aacobs) is now in the national library of australia. central cataloging associated but not identified with that of a particular library 19 can be more flexible, directed to and even varied according to the needs of its users, but it must have a consistent practice or it will not avoid inconsistencies, partly caused-as lc says of its own headings-by "varying theories of subject heading practice over the years." in the writer's view, and of course he is not alone, a new body of theory and practice must be laid down and taught not only as the basis for the specific entry of the dictionary catalog, divided or undivided, but also as the basis of any indexing or information retrieval. he does not accept the view that documentation or information retrieval must be, or is, essentially different from library subject cataloging, but he does think that librarians who have neglected their own half -solved problems of cataloging are at least as much to blame for the opposition of information retrieval and library cataloging as the amateurs, the engineers, and the chemists are, with their usually ignorant and prejudiced assumptions of what is covered by the word cataloging. he is sceptical of theorizing with little relation to the proven theory and practice of the past, and of new names for old things such as documentation and information (continued from page 12) comparative study of alternative approaches. without comparative studies it is not possible to demonstrate objectively the practicability of any system. finally, the study underscored the importance of administration. an information center, like any other organization, is retrieval for subject . indexing, descriptors for subject headings, and so on; he thinks cutter in his specific entry definitions and rules and kaiser with his concrete-process breakdown made permanent progress, independently but essentially on the same lines. theirs were major steps towards logical subject indexing, whether mechanized or not, and whether arrangements of subject names such as theirs are used directly or indirectly. cutter's theory and practice was exemplified in lc cataloging in its subject headings, though with some unexpected deviations from the master. the writer thinks a development of cutter's practice, and kaiser's, should be exemplified in an ideal subject headings list, the compilation of which would be the inductive corrective of the deductive approach, from principles. but this would be detail at the technical level. the cataloging in question is american, and even as it isthough we may receive it critically-we receive it with admiration and gratitude. whatever might be done to improve it would have to be done in america, and whatever is done or not done, we hope that we may continue to receive it with admiration and gratitude. • • information centers ... subject to the principles of administration. while this is axiomatic, and certainly not startling, its importance has again been demonstrated. in the absence of sound administration, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to blend the varied skills described above into an integrated, effective organization. • • 20 . college and research libraries -· college and research libraries paul metz and john espley the availability of cataloging copy in the oclc data base a sixteen-week longitudinal study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of oclc as a source of cataloging data and to optimize the timing of searches for cataloging copy for various categories of materials. the findings indicated a high rate of success and, further, suggested that for many types of materials a holding pattern might be unnecessary. a midsized research library should be able to clear about half of its monographic receipts immediately, if it is willing to accept cip copy. for materials not searched immediately , or for subsequent searches of materials not cataloged at once , the data may be used to determine the best timing and frequency of searches. any library that relies on an on-line bibliographic utility as its primary source of cataloging copy confronts a number of critical decisions that determine how effectively and efficiently the on-line data base can serve its needs. for example, a blanket decision to accept, to reject, or to inspect and modify cataloging copy from particular sources represents an important choice between the goal of quality and the goals of speed and economy. an especially critical series of decisions must be made addressing the questions of when it is most profitable to search the data base for contributed copy, how often and at what intervals to repeat the search when copy is not found, and at what point to abandon the search in favor of original cataloging. decisions of this nature represent a balancing of several goals, in that the library seeks simultaneously to minimize the extent of original cataloging, to process materials as quickly as possible, ' and to minimize the number of searches required to find copy. the library will also paul metz is acting user services librarian and john espley is automation supervisor, cataloging department , at the carol m . newman library, virginia polytechnic institute and state university, blacksburg. 430 i generally seek to safeguard the integrity of its authority structure, often by maximizing its use of library of congress copy. this study presents empirical data that might provide a basis for informed decisions about cataloging searches of oclc, the largest and most heavily used cataloging data base. other studies have evaluated the effectiveness of oclc as a resource for ill and preacquisitions verification and for cataloging data. 14 meyer and panetta, in their comparison of oclc and b/na as cataloging data bases , touch briefly on how the probability that copy for a new title will be found on oclc increases with time. 5 but even the most comprehensive and authoritative study, hewitt's oclc: impact and use, while pointing to the need for "an evaluation of the relationship between original find rates , holding patterns , and final find rates," could not specify these relationships. hewitt did point to a reduced turnaround time for cataloging under oclc, mainly due to an escape from the inefficiencies of local card production but partly due to the speedier arrival of cataloging copy in useful form. he also made the significant point that the characteristics of the materials being acquired would be an important determinant of find rates and of the effects of holding patterns. 6 methodology the study was conducted at the carol m. newman library of virginia tech (virginia polytechnic institute and state university) in blacksburg, virginia. newman is a medium-sized arl library that adds about fifty thousand monographic titles per year. newly acquired titles . represent a broad range of subjects and come from a wide variety of sources. since variations among the ways books come to the library are crucial in determining the relationships of interest, the findings will be reported in terms of the sources of receipt. reporting in this fashion should make it possible for other libraries to adjust the findings to their own collections ' patterns and thereby to generalize about their own situations. for each of three consecutive weeks beginning in march 1979, approximately 140 newly unpacked monographic receipts were selected for the study. serials were excluded. selection was not strictly random, but was guided to achieve a rough match between the distribution of sampled books and the distribution of the library's annual receipts in terms of country of origin and means of purchase. as table 1 shows , american imprints, british imprints, and imprints from other nations were sampled in an approximate ratio of 4:2:1. blanket orders accounted for half the sample, while standing orders (which are like blanket orders, but are specific to a publisher and not a dealer) and firm-order books accounted for about one-quarter of the distribution apiece . ft should be noted that the sample of firm-order materials was confined to monographs with either 1978 or 1979 dates of imprint . this decision was based on the assumption that for older materials, cataloging data would most often be available at the beginning of the test period and that if it were not, it would be unlikely to arrive during the period. one result of this decicataloging copy i 431 sion was to focus the study quite specifically on the use of oclc as a source of cataloging data for current imprints. in order to keep the distinction between firm orders and other materials as clear as possible, the study included as firm orders only those materials that wold fall outside the scope of all of the library's blanket and standing orders, either because of their subject matter or because their publishers were not covered by any of the vendors. trained oclc searchers looked for copy for each item, using all reasonable access points to find cataloging copy, the results of each search were coded for one of the five categories: full library of congress copy, lc cataloging in publication (cip) copy, " good" copy , " other" copy , and no copy found . a code of "good" indicated that copy had been contributed by a library on a list , compiled by virginia tech's cataloging professionals , of twenty libraries whose contributed cataloging has been of noticeably superior quality for some time and is considered less apt to need close review and revision. "other" refers to copy from oclc members other than the library of congress and "good" libraries. if multiple cataloging copy was found for a given imprint, the best data available at the time was coded, with priorities assigned in the order listed above. only copy for the exact piece in hand was considered; in the relatively rare cases in which copy for a different edition was found but not copy for the piece in hand, the search was coded as "no copy." each title in the sample was searched during the week of its receipt , one week later, the next week, and then every alternate week until the sixteenth week. searching ended only with the sixteenth week or with the arrival of full lc copy , whicheve r came first . mter the test period had ended, the coded sheets were compiled to identify the table 1 distribution of sampled monographs am e rican british other totals (source) blanket order 120 57 29 206 standing order 59 14 17 90 firm orders 58 30 12 100 totals (nation) 237 101 58 grand total = 396 432 i college & research libraries • september 1980 arrival dates for the first copy found and for the best copy ultimately found. cumulative statistics were also kept for incidents in which copy was "upgraded," with copy being supplanted by other copy higher in priority. general findings before considering the arrival of cataloging copy and the effects of various library policies, it might be useful to make some general observations about the frequency with which a library like virginia tech's can expect to find useful oclc copy for various . categories of materials. the data showed that oclc is a highly productive tool for the distribution of cataloging copy. some copy for the full piece in hand was found within sixteen weeks for 87.1 percent of the books. full library of congress copy was available for 59.3 percent of the sample. these results are displayed by category of materials in tables 2 and 3. as table 2 shows, copy is almost invariably ·present for american imprints and for firm-order materials. copy is least likely to be found for british and other blanket orders; thirty-four of the fifty-one cases without copy, or twothirds, came from these two categories. the distribution of full lc copy (table 3) shows the same general pattern as the distribution of any found copy, except that the gaps between the success rates for american versus british and other imprints and for firm-order materials versus the other two sources widen. while full lc copy is available within sixteen weeks for about three-fourths of american imprints, it is available for only about one-third of the rest. and while full lc copy is obtained for 81 percent of the firm orders, it is found for only about half of blanket and standing orders. whereas there is more overall copy for standing orders than for blanket orders (table 2), full lc copy is more frequently found for blanket orders; this difference is due to the very low incidence of lc copy for foreign standing orders. the difference between the overall rate of 87.1 percent and the 59.3 incidence of full lc copy is of course accounted for by those cases where the best available copy came from "good" or "other" libraries, or represented cip data that had not been upgraded. table 4 shows the distribution of the best copy that had been found within sixteen weeks across the five categories. the table seems to suggest two conclusions for an oclc member library. the first is that the availability of member-contributed (non-lc) copy, which for. many members is a prime motivation for joining a network, is substantial: nearly 22 percent of materials would have no copy at all except for the contributions of members other than the library of congress. a second, more tentative conclusion is that the maintenance of a "good" list is more trouble than it is worth. only 8 percent of best copy came from "good" libraries. whether such a list is worth keeping depends on how much less review a library gives to cataloging copy from highly regarded members, and on how difficult it is to train searchers to recognize table 2 blanket order standing order firm orders totals (nation) blanket order standing order firm order totals (nation) percentage of materials fgr which copy found within sixteen weeks , by category american british other totals (source) 98.3 68.4 44.8 82.5 93.2 78 .6 76.5 87.8 98.3 93.3 91.7 96.0 97.0 77.2 63.8 grand total = 87.1 table 3 percentage of full lc copy, by category of materials american british other totals (source) 76.7 29.8 10.3 54.4 66.1 7.1 11.8 46.7 91.4 66.7 66.7 81.0 77.6 37.6 22.4 grand total = 59.3 cataloging copy i 433 table 4 distribution of best copy found (sixteen weeks) full lc cip number 235 24 percentage percentage of materials 59.3 6.1 with copy 68. 1 7.0 the symbols of all approved libraries and to give their copy special treatment. the advice of hogan in oclc : a national library network supports the view that the categorical distinction between "good" and "bad" libraries is not worth making. 7 holding patierns and the timing of copy availability as noted, the key purpose behind this study was to provide information useful in determining holding patterns for the various categories of materials, so that a balance could be achieved between minimizing the number of searches for copy and making materials available as quickly as possible. for this purpose, the emphasis must not be on what type of copy is available, but rather on when it appears. taken together, tables 5 and 6 show that while some copy is available for two-thirds of materials as soon as they arrive, the most desirable copy, full lc, is immediately available only about 18 percent of the time. in fact, the only category for which full lc copy is immediately available more than half the time is american imprints ordered on a title-by-title basis. for both lc full copy ·and for copy in general, rates of im(member good other subtotal) none 28 58 (86) 51 7.1 14.6 (21.7) 12.9 8.1 16.8 (24.9) na mediate availability are far better for american imprints and for firm orders than for other materials. if a library considers cip copy to be nearly as good as lc full copy (in other words, if it considers the effort of supplying missing data preferable to extended waiting), rates of immediate availability are greatly improved, especially for american imprints. table 7 shows the rates of immediate availability for any lc copy, whether full or cip. the data shown so far suggest that not all materials need to be put into a holding pattern. copy is immediately available for a significant proportion of materials in some categories, such as firm orders. american imprints would also be such a category, if a library were to decide to accept cip copy when available, such a decision would have significant consequences, since cip constitutes such a large percentage of the immediately available cataloging copy. only 31.3 percent of the exact lc copy that was available at the end of the test period had been there from the beginning, while 44.7 percent represented upgrades of cip copy that was extant at week one. the decision to . accept cip copy makes an immediate table 5 immediate availability of copy , by category of materials (percentage) american british other totals (source) blanket order 89.2 29.8 3.4 60.7 standing order 69.5 35.7 52.9 61.1 firm order 93.1 76.7 58.3 84.0 totals (nation) 85.2 44.6 29.3 grand total = 66.7 table 6 immediate availability of full lc copy, by category of materials (percentage) american british other totals (source) blanket order 5.8 0.0 0.0 3.4 standing order 13.6 0.0 5.9 10.0 firm orders 69.0 43.3 33.3 57.0 totals (nation) 23.2 12.9 8.6 grand total = 18.4 434 i college & research libraries • september 1980 table 7 immediate availabiuty of full lc copy or cip, by category of materials (percentage) american british blanket order 80.8 3.5 standing orders 49.2 7.1 firm orders 84.5 46.7 totals (nation) 73.8 16.8 search for copy for many materials much more attractive and may help to reduce inprocess time significantly. the data showed that waiting for cip copy to be upgraded can introduce a significant delay. for the 105 books for which cip copy was ultimately superseded by full lc copy, the latter was typically not available until the sixth or eighth week. moreover, there were twentyfour additional cases where cip was still the best available copy after the entire sixteen weeks of the study had expired. the virginia tech library has accepted · the conclusions of this study and has instituted a policy of immediate searching for copy for all monographs obtained on firm order or through american blanket or standing orders. as expected, this change has resulted in a reduction of about one-half in the proportion of monographic titles going into a holding pattern. public service librarians have expressed strong approval of the new policy. as a necessary part of the new plan, searchers have been trained and authorized to upgrade cip records by supplying collation and other omitted data. this has represented a modest addition to their workload, but an efficient reduction in the load of work previously performed by library assistants. it should be noted that in deciding to use cip data, as upgraded by its own clerical staff, the library has made a judgment that the demands of efficiency and prompt user availability justify some possible sacrifice in cataloging data. differences between cip and final lc cataloging often involve more than simply the collation portion of the record. dowell has pointed out that about twothirds of cip copy is ultimately changed by lc, that the mean number of changes per cip title is about 1. 2, and, most important, that about one cip title in four will generate subsequent differences in final lc cataloging that could be called "significant." other totals (source) 0.0 48.1 17.6 36.7 33.3 67.0 12.1 grand total = 50.3 significant changes include differences in main entry, title, series, subjects or other added entries, isbn, or call number. many, but by no means all, of the differences that fall into these categories could be expected to affect user access, according to dowell . 8 according to a recent survey of libraries participatjng in oclc, the majority of libraries have decided to delegate cip upgrading to nonprofessional staff. 9 in order that individual libraries may draw their own inferences from the data and not be limited to the conclusions drawn here, the most salient data have been laid out in tables 8 and 9. in table 8, the times at which various categories of materials had any copy available are laid out in four-week intervals, beginning with the date of receipt. summary statistics are given for each purchase source and point of origin, as well as for all materials taken together. the data can be used as the basis for determining holding patterns, though where the number of cases is small (for example, firm orders from "other" countries) the findings cannot be precise. table 9 is analogous to table 8, but is restricted to arrival patterns for library of congress copy (full or cip). the data do appear to support a few final generalizations. the very small increase with time in the proportion of firm orders having copy helps to underscore the suggestion that these should be searched immediately and further suggests that if copy is not found, original cataloging might be called for. the significant growth in the find rate for british and other materials demonstrates that for these materials a holding pattern pays definite dividends. it is really in the categories of other blanket and standing orders that member copy is most useful, as a comparison of the data shown here with other data indicates that in these cases member copy constitutes an actual majority (63. 2 percent) of the best copy available cataloging copy i 435 table 8 percentage of materials having any copy, by category and over time immediate 4wks. 8 wks. 12 wks . 16 wks . american blo 89.2 95.8 96.7 97.5 98.3 120 british blo 29.8 45.6 49.1 61.4 68.4 57 other blo 3.4 20.7 24.1 37.9 44.8 29 american so 69.5 81.4 81.4 83.1 93.2 59 british so 35.7 64.3 71.4 78.6 78.6 14 other so 52.9 64.7 64.7 64.7 76.5 17 american firm 93.1 94.8 98.3 98 .3 98.3 58 british firm 76.7 80.0 86.7 90.0 93.3 30 other firm 58.3 91.7 91.7 91.7 91.7 12 american total 85.2 92.0 93.2 94.1 97.0 237 british total 44.6 58.4 63.4 72.3 77.2 101 other total 29.3 48 .3 50.0 56.9 63.8 58 blo total 60.7 71.3 73.3 79.1 82.5 206 so total 61.1 75.6 76.7 78.9 87 .8 90 firm total 84.0 90.0 94.0· 95 .0 96.0 100 grand total 66.7 77.0 79 .3 83.1 87.1 396 table 9 percentage of materials having full lc or cip copy. by category of materials and over time immediate 4 wks. american blo 80.8 82.5 british blo 3.5 14.0 other blo 0.0 0.0 american so 49.2 54.2 british so 7.1 7.1 other so 17.6 17.6 american firm 84.5 84.5 british firm 46.7 46.7 other firm 33.3 66.7 american total 73.8 75.9 british total 16.8 22.8 other total 12. 1 19.0 blo total 48.1 51.9 so total 36.7 40.0 firm total 67.0 71.0 grand total 50.3 54.0 within sixteen weeks. finally, with respect to exactly what holding pattern might be best, the data indicate that each additional four weeks of waiting pays rewards but suggest that the greatest incremental benefit comes in the first four weeks. for all categories of materials the growth in the find rate after the first four weeks is so gradual that it would be difficult to justify a researching interval of less than eight or twelve weeks. of course, local variations in policy or in collection patterns may lead to different conclusions for other libraries. for example, a library who'se jobbers were slower to deliver materials than virginia tech's 8 wks. 12wks. 16wks. 85.8 87.5 89.2 120 15.8 28 . 1 35.1 57 0.0 6.9 10.3 29 55.9 61.0 72.9 59 7. 1 14.3 14.3 14 17.6 17.6 17.6 17 90.0 90.0 91.4 58 46.7 50.0 66.7 30 66.7 66.7 66.7 12 79.3 81.4 84.0 237 23.8 32.7 41.6 101 19.0 22.4 24 . 1 58 54.4 59.7 62. 1 206 41.1 45.6 53.3 90 74.0 75.0 81.0 100 56.8 60.9 65.4 396 could expect to discover that the find rate for first searches would be higher, and vice versa. conclusions the most general conclusion to which this study points is that oclc provides its member libraries access to an impressive wealth of cataloging data. for a library like virginia tech's, copy is available within sixteen weeks for the great majority (87 percent) of materials, while full lc copy is available for a high percentage (59 percent). some 22 percent of the best cataloging records available for monographs comes from 436 i college & research libraries • september 1980 members other than lc. this may be taken ; as one index of the value of network participation (stated otherwise, a library that does not use these records has little reason to use a utility for cataloging). with respect to the arrival times of copy, the study shows that it is apparently in a library's best interest to search all firmorder materials immediately. full lc copy will usually be there, and even for recent monographs there is only a fairly small likelihood that first copy or improved copy will appear during the course of any reasonable holding pattern. it is not so clear that other materials should be searched immediately. there is only a small chance that useful copy will be immediately present for some materials, though this depends on the criteria of acceptance. a critical decision point is whether to accept cip cataloging when it is immediately· available rather than waiting for full lc copy. a library that decides to accept cip data will probably find that an immediate search for all american monographic receipts is justified. together with the firm orders cleared by immediate searching, these materials should bring the rate of immediate clearance up to the neighborhood of 50 percent. it is harder to draw definitive conclusions about the optimum holding pattern for other materials or for american imprints and firm orders that are not found at first. the data, however, indicate that the most productive period for any holding pattern is the first month or so and that thereafter the hit rate will grow steadily but slowly. no doubt an asymptotic upper limit is approached at some point, but this apparently does not happen until materials have been in the holding area for quite some time. references 1. marion t. reid, "effectiveness of the oclc data base for acquisitions verification ," journal of academic librarianship 2, no. 6:303, 326. 2. joe a. hewitt, oclc: impact and use (columbus: the ohio state university libraries, office of educational services, 1977). 3. christian m. boissonas, "quality of oclc bibliographic records : the cornell law library experience," law library journal 72:80-85 (winter 1979). 4. cynthia c . . ryan, "a study of errors found in non-marc cataloging in a machine-assisted system," journal of library automation ll:12s-32 (june 1978). 5. r. w. meyer and rebecca panetta , "two shared cataloging data bases: a comparison," college & research libraries 38:19-24 (jan. 1977). 6. hewitt, oclc, p .68. 7. allan d. hogan, "acceptance of cataloging contributed by oclc members," in anne marie allison and ann allan, ed., oclc: a national library network (short hills, n.j. : enslow, 1979), p.133. 8. arlene t. dowell , "discrepancies in cip: how serious is the problem?" library journal104 :2281-81 (nov. 1, 1979). 9. sally braden, john d. hall, and helen h. britton, " utilization of personnel and bibliographic resources for cataloging by oclc participating libraries," library resources & technical services 24:'135-54 (spring 1980). college and research libraries his attempt to use the early history of the book as a paradigm for the continuing emergence of present-day electronic communications technologies. his notion of the importance of the free market in the development of late medieval information dissemination carries with it the echoes of similar debates on the desirability of commercially viable networks as opposed to publicly supported ones outside the market structure. the question of competition between the old scriptographical tradition and the new typographical science is likewise reflected in the current struggle between the proponents of the paperless society and those whose ideas of scholarship and culture are inextricably bound to the printed book as artifact. this volume is an original and valuable addition to the literature of the book's history, but the force of its argument is somewhat diluted by its sheer size and the degree of detail to which it resorts to buttress its premises. a more general statement of its principal theses, with a less elaborately documented defense of them, would probably be a desirable middle ground for most potential readers; in its present form it demands an intense and prolonged concentration which is perhaps more appropriate to the narrowest technical specializations than to more broadly conceived humanistic views of the history of the book.-james henry spohrer, university of california, berkeley. cataloging heresy: challenging the standard bibliographic product. proceedings of the congress for librarians, february 18, 1991, st. john's university, jamaica, new york, with additional contributed papers. ed. bella hass weinberg. medford, n.j.: learned information, 1992. 217p. $30 (isbn 0-938734-60-1). lc 92-9374. although the title cataloging heresy might suggest that this book proposes radically different ways of looking at cataloging and bibliographic control, it is instead a rather useful overview of some of the problems with uniform titles, subject headings, classification, and the description of special types of library materials. book reviews 77 editor bella hass weinberg has compiled a well-edited volume of papers from the 1991 congress for librarians at st. john's university. it provides a framework for library school students and practitioners to think critically about cataloging data in standard bibliographic records. managers who look for the most expeditious, most economical method to process library rna terials are warned of the conflicts and inaccuracies inherent in shared records. the papers examine what data should be included in these shared bibliographic records and how those data might be altered in response to a given collection, special type of material, or special user group. part 1 consists of edited papers from ten invited speakers as well as introductory and concluding remarks. the seven contributed articles in part 2 remind · us that for some types of materials (special collections of literature and music, musical sound recordings, nonprint materials, digital cartographic databases), standard practices may not be adequate. the library of congress is attacked, as usual, for not keeping up with current, politically correct terminology in its library of congress subject headings and for its practice of assigning insufficient and inadequate headings and subdivisions (articles by sanford berman and hope olson). fortunately, alternatives and positive recommendations for future direction are provided. the reader is also reminded of the increased efforts on the part of the library of congress, as the national bibliographic agency, to inform and consult widely on changes to cataloging policy in order to reflect consensus within the library community (article by john byrum). apart from criticisms of library of congress subject headings, there are the expected papers on the shortcomings of anglo-american cataloguing rules, library of congress rule interpretations, and library of congress classification. other papers provide wonder-ful historical background for library school students and those in the profession who may have forgotten about the national library of medicine classification (sally sinn), 78 college & research libraries the art & architecture thesaurus (cathy whitehead), the bliss classification system (alan r. thomas), and oclc and rlin standards and practices to meet the needs of individual libraries (liz bishoff i glenn patton and ed glazier, respectively). the biases and problems with descriptive cataloging are pointed out by norman anderson. an index by ed swanson should add to the volume's usefulness as a supplemental text in library schools. the exceptionally tiny type used in many of the examples and notes almost requires a magnifying glass to read. several papers specifically focus on academic libraries. mary parr's "standard cataloging data and the academic library: the technical services manager's point of view'' provides a very brief identification of questions and an addendum of pragmatic opinion on what to do with inaccurate or superseded data on copy. she reminds catalogers of cuttering variations due to changed rules for main entry, classification decision differences for general indexes and bibliographies, variant practices for traced and not traced series, typographical errors on copy, and erroneous data printed in publications with cip copy, including fixed call numbers. additionally, academic libraries will find useful information in several of the other papers about cataloging needs for special collections (an article by patricia elliott and celia bakke) and for special types of materials (articles by charles whitlow, bob armintor, and pohchin lai and ming-kan wong). the article by sook-hyun kim examines the practice of including serials holdings information in notes in bibliographic records, rather than relegating such information to a linked holdings record. standards change over time and should be questioned periodically in order to improve and to develop even better standards. as noted in the article by sheila intner, it is not enough just to teach current practices. students should also be introduced to nonstandard systems and organizational theory so they will be prepared to design future bibliographic systems. january 1993 cataloging practices have long recognized the need and desire to permit variations for particular types of materials and for needs of special users. this is reflected in the existence of cataloging rule options and rule interpretations and in the acceptance of specialized thesauri and classification schemes-all part of the standard bibliographic record. economic pressures to accept shared bibliographic records blindly must be weighed against the possible negative impact on access to the local collection and the needs of local users. this compilation of papers assures that we will retain that perspective.-barbara b. tillett, university of california, san diego, la jolla. collectiotr management: a new treatise. ed. by charles b. osburn and ross atkinson. greenwich, conn.: jai, 1991. 494p. in 2 vols. $75.25 per volume (isbn 1-55938-231-7) lc 91-33499. this new treatise is a sequel of sorts, following by nearly a dozen years the similar compilation edited by robert d. stueart and george b. miller, jr., collection development in libraries: a treatise. it has been issued by the same publisher, appears in the same series as its predecessor, and is virtually indistinguishable from it in design and format. it is tempting, therefore, simply to read this collection of essays as stueart/miller revised. upon closer examination~ however, it ·becomes clear that this is a very different work. in the first place, the editors of new treatise, in contrast to their forerunners, have been freed from the mission of filling a gaping hole in the professional literature. a glance at the bibliographic notes in these volumes demonstrates that the 1980s were busy times for authors writing on the various fields subsumed under collection management; many of them may have been inspired to some degree by articles appearing in the first treatise. charles osburn and ross atkinson, in their brief forward, emphasize the dynamism, evolution, diversity, and challenges evident in collection management, and they appear to have accepted as their primary goal the provision of a forum for critiques, new ideas, revisions, and glimpses of future college and research libraries by beverley ruffin to-ward a sound national program iri cataloging' dr. ruffin is librarian, state teachers college, farmville, va. i n current library literature, refere~ce is made to three phases of catalogmg history : the period which precedes the turn of the nineteenth century; the middle period, embracing the first four decades of the twentieth century; and the period since 1941. the early period: the librarian as cataloger the early period falls roughly into two parts: a pioneer period, extending to 1876, when institutional practices were in the process of a slow evolution, and the period from 1876 to 1908, during which time everything in the profession, including cataloging techniques, was being organized and ~odified fdr the mutual benefit of practicing librarians. this period was so full of vitality, so overflowing with conflicting ideas so realistic in its approach to ideas greatiy conceived and executed that it has been labeled the romantic age in the history of american librarianship. in both the pioneer period and this romantic period we find the library administrator as cataloger. in the earlier period the listing of books was a minor activity in this librarian's daily routine. it represented a means to the accomplishment of some library obj.ective. at harvard the 1 paper pr esented at the works~op for <:;ollege an? unive r sity librarian s, _s chool of library science, umvers ity of north carohna, july 2 8, 1948. july, 1949, part i . first catalog, published in i 723, was for the purpose of acquainting certain prospective donors in london with the book holdings in the infant college in the colony of massachusetts. the primary object of this catalog was the acquisition of books. at yale the first catalog, dated 1745, was compiled because the new head of the college saw "that the students were deprived of much benefit and advantage of the library, for want of a proper catalogue of books." this catalog was dedicated "to the students of yale college," so that they might "readily know and find any book, upon any particular subject." the sole object of this catalog was to meet the needs of the college student. by 1876 librarians had developed a lively interest in cataloging. the activities of the newly organized american library association centered on such technical subjects as the analytic indexing of periodical literature the classification ~f books in libraries, the ~elative merits of book and card catalogs, and the perfecting of cutter's rules for a dictionary catalog. under the impetus of the new movement, administrative heads became expert technicians. cataloging had emerged not only as a major activity in librarianship, but was a major field of emphasis in the professional activities of the library administrative heads. soon after the turn of the century, this constructive phase in the history of cataloging reached its peak. cutter's rules had gone through four editions; and the ameri227 can library association had published its catalog rules · and list of subject headings. centralized cataloging at the library of congress was underway, and the classification schedules and the standardized subject headings used in this national institution were becoming accessible to libraries throughout the country. administrative heads assumed less and less responsibility for the cataloging activity of their libraries, many of which by this time had become functionally organized. in the words of charles a. cutter, the golden age of cataloging with -its challenging difficulties and exhilarating discussions was over, and a great change was to come upon the status of cataloging in the united states.2 cutter's prophecy came true. the printed codes on the techniques of cataloging, which had been produced since i876, brought about a demand for a body of specialists, skilled in the manipulation of these techmques. the burden of the cataloging activity was assigned to these specialists, and the narrow concept of cataloging as the process of preparing entries for a card catalog slowly crystallized. since such importance thus became attached to catalog entries for books, it is only right that we should have some knowledge of . their technical evolution. before i876 we find that the character of cataloging was peculiar to individual institutions. the early history of cataloging was therefore a history of local developments. the compiler of a book catalog was free to choose his own set of rules. individuality in catalog entries thus held its own against the day of catalog codes, and uniformity had yet to be achieved. in their early manifestations cataloging techniques we~e crude and rough, bu.t they were plastic. evolution was thus possible. 2 cutter, charles a . rules for a dictionary catalog. u.s. bureau of education, special report on public libraries, part ii (4th ed., rewritten) washington, u.s. government printing office, 1904, p. 3· the instrument through which their development can be traced is the printed book catalog. in a study of the early book catalogs of harvard and yale the writer traced a series of representative catalog entries through i 50 years of parallel development in cataloging t hniques. 3 these entries were checked insofar as possible in consecutive catalogs for fullness of entry as to author's name, title, imprint and physical description. added entries (including subject entries), as well as related cross references, were also considered. the entry for plutarch's livesj for example, was traced through 66 college and society catalogs, dating from i 723 to i873· the data resulting from such :;t study give evidence to the historical evolution of cataloging theory. a definite body of principles had emerged by i876, and a demand for specific and uniform rules followed. in answer to this demand the british museum had published as early as i841, along with its catalogue of printed booksj its rules for the compilation of the catalogue.4 these rules came into print again in i 866. they continued, however, to be local in their purpose and in their application. in the meantime, in 1853, charles c. jewett, librarian of the smithsonian institution, published his report on the construction of catalogues of libraries. 5 although based on the practices in use at the smithsonian institution, this manual had the distinction of being published for the express purpose of assisting librarians in the compiling of printed catalogs. the 3 ruffin beverley. "some developments towards modern cataloging practice in university libraries as exemplified in the printed boo~ catalogs of harvard and yale before the year 1876." unpublished master's thesis, school of library service, columbia university, 1935. 4 british museum. dept. of printed books. catalogtm of printed books in the british museum. v. 1, 1841, p. v-ix. 11 jewett, charles c. on the constructiott of catalogues of libraries. 2d ed., 1853. the first edition, printed in 1852, was limited to a few copies which were distributed among those likely to suggest improvements. 228 college and research libraries science of cataloging was thus groping toward uniformity on a national scale. the complete divorce from the institutional point of view came about in r876 with the publication of cutter's rules for a printed dictionary catalog. in his preface mr. cutter presents this publication as a first attempt to investigate the principles of cataloging and to set forth the rules in a systematic way. thus our so-called theory of cataloging was born, and put into use by means of "settled rules of action." even so, the leaders in the profession for yet another quarter-century centered their major attention on the perfecting of cata oging rules and other techniques having to do with the cataloging and classification of books. these efforts culminated in rgo8 in the publication of the a.l.a.'s catalog rules. the middle period, rgo8-i94i: the technical specialist as cataloger if tpe golden age of cataloging was over by the turn of the century, what took place from that time until the beginning of the 1940's? what happened in the · first four decades of the present century? what impiications lie in the fact that this middle period was ushered in with the publishing of the first edition of the a.l.a.'s catalog rules, and that it was set for a knockout blow coincident with the appearance of the second edition of these same cataloging rules? answers to such questions can be found only if one is familiar with the characteristics of the era under discussion. what are these characteristics? attention may be called to three which are deemed to be of primary importance. . we shall note first that this middle era was a period of productivity in cataloging. bibliographical machinery for the proper cataloging of books had been set up for action by rgo8. full time specialists directed by master technicians were put to july, 7949, part i work. department heads organized the routine of their operations. card catalogs resulted: trays of cards, cabinets of trays, and acres of catalog cabinets. duplicate card catalogs appeared: official , for the use of the staff; departmental, for the convenience of seminar groups; union, to show different institutional holdings. the millions of catalog cards, which were being processed by typewriters, by varied kinds of mimeographing equipment and by printing presses, were also the sources of information for shelves of printed catalogs, indexes and bibliographies. the a.l.a.'s catalog rules had to be supplet:nented by codes for the cataloging of periodicals and for serials. codes were issued for music and for maps. l. c. classification schedules multiplied. the dewey decimal system changed its mathematical symmetry to ragged outlines resembling those of a giant amoeba. lists of subject headings also multiplied: supplements to those used at the library of congress; new editions of the same; a subject · heading list for pedagogical materials, another for chemistry, and still another for physics-all striving to keep up with the jargon of a fast moving social and academic milieu. unable to discard its obsolete parts and staggering under increased size and weight, card catalogs nevertheless have rendered a remarkable service. these catalogs, varying in size from a single tray to hundreds of cabinets; are evidence that productivity was a marked characteristic of this period. . classicism was a second characteristic of this period. it was andrew h. osborn who first applied this te.rm to cataloging. by classicism dr. osborn means that the making of card catalogs was regulated ~y a body of technical rules. simplicity in the application of these rules seemingly gave way to elaborate and highly compli229 cated technical procedures. therein lies the danger. yet it has been said that, insofar as cataloging is concerned, every rule grew out of a definite need, either brought forward by the use;s of the catalog or else inherent in the complex character of the processing machinery. be that as it may, it might well be agreed that only by adherence to uniform rules for cataloging well-defined types of materials was the mass production of catalog records made possible during those 40 years. mass production of any sort rarely takes place without sacrificing quality; it also does not cater to individual tastes or needs. it was the mass production of l.c. cards, therefore, with their apparently needless elaboration of technical detail, that brought on a storm of protest. jewett's program for a national standard had overshot the mark. as a consequence the interests of the individual institution were obscured and neglected. there were other destructive forces at work. in institutions where authority had been placed above reason, decadence had set in. · such a condition inevitably stifled the professional growth of the individual cataloger. protest against an authority based on prestige rather than on ability and sound judgment ohen took the form of inertia, with morale dropping to a low ebb. destructive elements obtaining from such situations can hardly be gauged ·solely from the evidence found on catalog cards. the results were far more detrimental in their total effect. decadence also resulted from a management which was divorced from administra. tion. by this i mean that the manager of the catalog department, i.e. the head of the department, was not in a true sense an administrative officer in the library. the h~ad of the department was a catalog librarian, not an assistant librarian. he, or she, was delegated to look inward at the cataloging processes. the welfare of the library, with its social implications, was other people's business. thus the catalog librarian's allegiance was fostered on the department rather than 3:ttached ·to the library as a whole. there was little chance to discuss library policies and less chance to act on them. there was no contact with governing officials over and above the head librarian, whose position thus took the form of a complete bottleneck between· two groups. the department head was forced to view his product from the inside. having more often than not come up from the ranks as a technician, he took on the activities of a manager without the privileges and attributes of an administrative officer. such an organizational pattern increased the dangers inherent in an age of classicism. a third major characteristic of the period from 1908 to 1941 ·was an excess of raw material. cataloging machinery could not absorb the unforeseen avalanche of material on hand to be processed. in his "memoranda on library cooperation," herbert a. kellar spoke of this material as a tidal wave which threatened to inundate the library world. 6 he noted that almost 500,000 items, excluding manuscript, were received in 1940 at the library of congress. this institution, according to a report made by lucile morsch in 1941, was cataloging at a rate of 53,000 titles a year. 7 an annual arrearage of 30,000, reported for this library at that time seems an understatement in the face of such figures. in other research libraries of the country, the situation at the library of congress was more or less duplicated. the impact resulting from such conditions affected the tempo in libraries of every sort. the crisis in cataloging had arrived. 6 kellar, herbert a. "memoranda on library cooperation," no. i (seftember 1941). washington, d.c., the library o congress, 1941. · (mimeographed.) 7 morsch, lucile. "simplified cataloging," in catalogers' and classifiers' yearbook, no. ro. chicago, american library association, 1944, p. 25-3 2'. 230 college and research libraries the renaissance in cataloging history~ i94ithus we see that at the end of four decades of intensive activity, librarians suffered their first great defeat in their effort to supply a complete catalog record for all printed materials of nationally recognized importance. whose was the blame? of the large functional groups within the profession, the catalogers, in the very wealth of their handiwork, had supplied the most concrete source of evidence for examination as to work effectiveness. with the critical eye of the profession already ferreting out case after case in which catalogers had shown a lack of judgment in the making of catalog cards, a veritable storm of protest against the rules themselves broke loose with the publication in i 94 i of the new edition of the a .l.a. catalog rules. this storm had long been gathering. indeed it was pretty well under way by i 94 i. the battle cry was sounded by dr. osborn in his description of the "crisis in cataloging,"8 and the publication of the new rules simply marks the turning point in a controversy in which catalogers caught the blame. catalogers, before and after this turning point, faced a barrage of destructive criticism largely from administrative officers · and other noncataloging librarians, few of whom acknowledged any share of responsibility for the impending crisis. not only was the cataloger as a person isolated and stigmatized, but the catalog itself was ridiculed and avoided. in the discussions which appeared in print, the inevitable foibles of classicism were exposed. the cataloger's attempts to defend his position often revealed his narrowed point of view and showed ·his curtailed powers in setting up the very cataloging policies for which he was being held responsible. more recently a phase of constructive 8 osborn, andrew d. "the crisis in cataloging." library quarterly i i :393-4ii, october i94i. july~ 1949~ part i criticism has predominated the scene. administrative and reference librarians are admitting a share of the responsibilit~ for the crisis. catalogers themselves have engaged in an analysis of their procedures in an effort to sift the wheat from the chaff. one notable effort of this type is julia pettee's article in the catalogers' and classifiers' yearbook for i945,· in which she considers the basic principles of our author catalogs. 9 here she points out instances where simplification~ rather than complexity, has been achieved. an example in case is the use of rules governing the assembling of all variants of a literary unit under the responsible personal or corporate author. miss pettee evaluates cataloging rules in order to ~stimate their worth rather than to find evidence of decay. she offers up her findings for continued use in the cataloging of books, rather than as defense machinations in a professional warfare. in the field of administration, proposals for the reorgani~ation of catalog departments have ranged from the combination of order and catalog department, now an accomplished fact in many libraries, to the complete elimination of the catalog department in libraries, with the idea of turning over the descriptive cataloging to the order department and the subject cataloging to the reference department. such radical proposals as this latter one serve at least to arouse healthy, if heated, discussions of cataloging, which we must remember has in recent years been designated the profession's number one problem. destructive criticism brought forth defense measures. constructive criticism is being translated into action. a renaissance, breaking through the bonds of classicism, has caused a resurgence of ideas which are revitalizing old techniques and creating 9 pettee, julia. "the new code: a consideration of basic principles of our author catalogs," in catalogers' and classifiers' yearbook, no. ii. chicago, american library association, i945, p. 7-i9. 231 new ones. the library of congress has taken a series of important steps which should result not only in a simplification of cataloging rules, but will insure a greater degree of good judgment in their application . . any improvements in standards made at this great cataloging center will be followed by libraries throughout the country, even as some of their not so wise practices have been followed in the past. on the other hand some institutions are breaking away from l. c. practices which are not applicable to their own situations, compromising on those common elements necessary in centralized and cooperative cataloging. many small libraries have turned to the h. w. wilson company for unit cards more nearly suited to their needs. institutional purchasing in fields of specialization, and other cooperative programs, have placed certain controls on the acquisition of library materials, even if they have not directly affected the annual increase in arrearage. the unification of order and catalog departments under a single administrative head has succeeded in eliminating certain duplication of records and in making it possible to shift personnel from one section to another according to the pressure· of work. this unification has also had some effect upon the character of materials accepted for processing. as a rule catalogers have had no control over items accepted for processing. it would seem that they would take advantage of the present situation to go on the offensive for a change. their own position in the rank and file of librarians has made them exceptionally vulnerable to attack. with arrearages accumulating on their doorsteps, no other group is in a more strategic position to secure damaging evidence concerning the admittance of items which are physically unfit and bibliographically unsound. with the unification of cataloging and order work under the charge of an assistant librarian, an administrative hierarchy, hitherto lacking, has been created. this administrative assistant-a partner in the firm, as it were-works with the librarian in the making of library policies, turning then to cataloging as one major means of furthering the objectives which he has helped to set up for the institution as a whole. since, however, this administrative assistant is responsible to the librarian for a group of administrative units , of which cataloging is one, he must work in close harmony with the head of each unit. if he is to contribute vitally to the best interests of the library, he must not only have the at~ributes of an administrator but he must also be familiar with sound theory and practice in cataloging. for much of this, he can look to the department head, who is still to be a master technician · with a knowledge of such technical organization and skills as have been developed to the present time. this head of the department will continue to supervise the work of trained catalogers who will handle the bulk of the material to be processed. conclusion the revolt which broke loose in i 94 i has also concerned itself with the training of these catalogers. indeed, the whole structure of education for librarianship is under revision. fast moving changes are seen in library school catalogs and announcements. a wealth of ideas on library education is reflected in current library literature. conferences on the subject gather in all parts of the country. at the southern conference on library education which took place in atlanta in the spring of i948 two alternative plans were considered: ( i) whether to have one basic program suitable for the education of all beginning librarians ; or ( 2) whether to have a curricul urn (continued on page 235) 232 college and research libraries devices have, however, as their common denominator the above stated demand for removal. and it is this demand for removal that finally throws out, as impracticable, all mechanical methods .of catalog card searching. let's take a specific example. . you as a reference librarian are asked to ascertain if your library possesses a copy of pennsylvania genera of permian brachiopoda by one william selzer. which process for the answering of this question is the easier one? to do what you do now, i.e. to go to your ten million card catalog and to look in it, under the author entry, "selzer, william," for a title beginning "pennsylvania genera?" or to resort to a mechanical searching process, which means to take all of your catalog's ten million cards out of their ten thousand catalog drawers and to run them through a mechanical sorting machine (then putting them back into their drawers again) until finally the machine come& to that one "william selzer" card that you are looking for, and is automatically thrown out for your inspection? the answer is obvious. not so obvious at first glance, however, are a host of additional collateral difficulties. • we must remember for one thing that a large library catalog is usually servicing not one card searcher but a dozen--or a hundred-searchers simultaneously. if each one of these hundred searchers is to be mechanically served, it is clear that not one but a hundred sorting machines are going to be required, working simultaneously to find for each patron the single card--or the two or three cards--that each one wants. but for each patron (with ten million cards to be gone through) the automatic searching process is clearly going to be a matter of hours, taking the handling time of dozens of library attendants, and creating an enormous confusion of cards and files simultaneously going through the machine searching routine. finally, fifth, what of the physical wear and tear on your cards if they are going to be run constantly through these sorting machines? obviously this runmng through is going to involve a certain amount of card erosion. all · of which would seem to sum up to this: that mechanical card filing applied to library card catalogs sounds appealing, but as yet cannot be deemed a practicable proposition . national program in cataloging (continued from page 232) for each type of librarianship-school, public and college or university. 10 insofar as cataloging is concerned, are there not lessons to be learned from the past? since jewett's time have we not got rather far away from the institutional point of view? in the brief account here presented of certain phases of cataloging history, we have learned that the institutional point of view 10 "southeastern conference on library education, february 29-march 6, 1948." atlanta, ga., southeastern library association, 1948, p. 4. july~ 1949~ part i prevailed in the pioneer period of cataloging history, that it steadily lost ground after 1876, and that since 1908 it has been overwhelmed by a national pattern in card production--a pattern which has been actually detrimental to the welfare of some institutions. in the present renaissance in cataloging history, we hope that the cataloging interests of all types of libraries will find an adequate niche in a sound national program. 235 college and research libraries by susan m. haskins something new in cataloging miss haskins is head cataloger at the harvard college library. this paper was read at the conference of new england college libraries at wellesley college~ june 10~ 1944. i n recent years much emphasis has been placed upon the cost of cataloging, with the result that catalog departments have become acutely aware of the problem and are always on the alert for new economies. how often an administrator will ask the question: how much does it cost you to catalog a book? or how many books can a cataloger do in a day? margaret mann, in discussing the subject, says: "this question of cost belongs ultimately to the chief librarian, . but the economies ·should be the concern and responsibility of the head of the catalog department who shoul,d constantly study ways and means for simplifying routines and records without impairing the service."1 in considering costs and economies in cataloging there are several factors which must be considered. the following are those which are especially significant at the present time at harvard college and which are causing a reconsideration of methods of work. first of all, there is the competition for the time and services . of the · cataloger. material is constantly pouring into the library in the form of monographs, serials, and documents -received by purchase, gift, or exchange--all · of which has to be 1 mann, margaret. introduction to cataloging and the classification of books. 2d ed. (library curriculum studies) chicago, american library association, 1943, p. 249· . 291 handled by the catalog department. unless the work is carefully organized, the department may become a bottleneck through which the work passes in an unsystematic fashion. as the material comes in, decisions have to be made as . to what is to be handled · promptly, what classes are to receive precedence, and what may be postponed for some time. some types of work are regularly competing ·for first place. the order department cries· to have the purchased. books sent along rapidly because its files are clogging up; or someone has asked if a certain title is · on order, only to find that the book was receiv:ed some time ago· but that there is no record of it in the catalog. certain books come through to be cataloged in haste. these may have been ordered for an individual or for some· course. in either case the cataloger drops whatever she is doing and sends the books through as rapidly as possible. but it is not the time of just one person which is thus interruptedit is the time of several all along the line through whose hands the books must pass. similarly, the library of congress requests cooperative cataloging for a large number of the current titles received:. in addition to taking at ~east the' full time of one c~taloger; this form of cataloging slows up the routine for these particular books because · more detailed work is required for them. again, special requests for service come to the catalog department from var.ious sources and vie with each other for priorities. the reference department has made contacts with an enthusiastic donor and asks that precedence be given to his gifts, in order to please him by getting them on the shelves promptly or in order that photographs may be taken of them for a newspaper article. too much cannot be done to remain on the good side of this friend of the library and keep him interested. or, a special collection is given to the library, and the request is made that it be cataloged by a certain date in the near future. the material may be of such a nature that there will be little or no call for it, but the catalog department must organize its work in order to put it through in the specified time. there is also the instance in which a professor is placed in charge of a new special library and is anxious to put the collection into working order as soon as possible; or in which another special library is in need of reorganization. the responsibility for the work falls upon the catalog department. in addition to all th~ above are the many little duties which are an accepted part of a cataloger's life but which prevent full time being given to putting books through. these consist of answering reference questions, searching for titles in process, conducting tours of the library for new staff members or guests, training new people, interviewing applicants, and so on. space a second factor in considering costs and economies is the question of space. dr. osborn, in his paper on "the crisis in cataloging," says: "far too little attention has been given in library literature to the organization of catalog departments, while in actual practice physical conditions have controlled matters to an undesirable extent."2 how many catalog departments have the space necessary for systematic handling of the material? at harvard 2 osborn, andrew d. "the crisis in cataloging." library quarterly 11 : 40 s, october 1941. there are now adequate accommodations for the staff and a liberal amount of working space, but difficulties still arise when a large quantity of material suddenly arrives. shortage of space complicates the method of handling large collections of books and often necessitates shifting them several times before they are finally disposed of. in addition, crowded conditions have a bad effect on the morale of the cataloger. m eihods of work methods of organizing the material are a third determining factor in considering the question of costs. in most libraries books are cataloged in a piecemeal fashion; that is, each book is considered individually, as it comes up, from the autho.r and title approach and often from the subject approach. there is little system possible in this method of working. those books which cannot be handled in a day are set aside until finally a large accumulation results. then the question arises as to the best way of ~orking this off. some libraries attempt to tackle it on a chronological basis by cataloging the books in the order of receipt, but this still means working by the piecemeal method. · organization of w o~k the last factor is the plan, common in catalog departments, of organizing from the subject point of view. this has much in its favor, but, according to the experience of several large libraries which have attempted to work out cost figures, it is the descriptive cataloging which is the more costly. therefore, does it seem logical to plan the organization on a basis that favors the less expensive side of the work, namely, subject cataloging? in march 1942 the harvard catalog department moved into new quarters made possible by the building of the houghton library for the housing of the rare books. 292 college and research libraries up to that time the department was organized by subject. there were many advantages in this organization, but it was very difficult to control the flow of work. one person would be swamped with work while another would he looking around for something to do, all depending upon the subjects with which each was working. taking advantage of the shift and of more space, the department 'was reorganized on the basis of two groups-the one to handle material that can move along rapidly, such as titles for which library ~f congress cards are available, nonfiction which presents no difficulties, fiction, other editions, second copies, and books which may be sent directly to the new england deposit library; the other group to handle the more difficult material involving research problems, out-of-the-way languages, and so on. this second group is organized on the traditional subject and language basis. in such an organization the flow of work can be better controlled-the difficult books do not slow up the work on the easier books and the quantity of easy books does not prevent working on those requiring research. cataloging drives however, during the last two years, material poured in at such a rate that it was impossible to keep up with it, and finally all available space for storing it was filled. most of it was acquired by the library through large-lot purchases. with the realization that this accumulation must be worked off before the end of the war, when there would be an influx of material from europe, the first cataloging drive was organized in march 1943· . a period of "total cataloging" ' was declared for nine weeks. all members of the department who could possibly be spared were drafted for either full or part time. this meant that the efforts of the entire department were concentrated on cataloging alone and that the september, 1945 variety of noncataloging duties which occupy so much of a cataloger's .time were eliminated or suspended as far as possible. four full-time people were delegated to handle the newly-purchased books al)d the cooperative cataloging. the total number of professional people taking part in the drive proper totaled eighteep. they were divided into several groups for literature, nonliterature, and deposit library books. serials, documents, and pamphlets were not treated. there was no arrangement of the titles within the groups; the cataloging was on the piecemeal basis. in this period of nine weeks, 19,858 titles and 22,183 volumes were put through. this represents an average of 367 titles cataloged per day or 25 titles per cataloger per day. 3 just a year later working space was again filled to overflowing and .the stacks were being used to store the thousands of books which had been acquired by the library. another drive was inevitable. from f experience gained in the first, it was realized that better preliminary arrangement of the material was necessary. this would result in less duplication and more systematic cataloging. therefore, it was decided to arrange all the books alphabetically before starting to catalog them. since there was not room enough to alphabetize all the books at once, the drive was divided into two parts: the first, on books for the deposit library only; the second, on books for the stacks. in april i 944 all available catalogers (seventeen, of whom nine were full time) were again drafted, but only for a two weeks' period. this time just two groups were formed, one for literature and the other for nonliterature. no current work was done during this period, 3 a few words of explanation should be made concernin g catalo gin g as it is done at harvard. this term covers only the actual descriptive and subject catalo ging. all clerical processes, such as preliminary s earching, typing, s helflisting, filin g, etc., are quite separate and distinct from the work of the catalogers. 293 with · the exception of haste ·books and cooperative cataloging. for each group the books were arranged alphabetically, with the result that many titles by a single author could be cataloged at one time. the final figures for this drive were 13,001 titles and 13,729 volumes. when broken down, .these figures show that for this class of material a daily average of i ,083 titles was achieved, or 83 titles per cataloger per day. the books were sent along daily, by the hundreds, for the end processes of classification, stamping, and tagging. it was an impressive sight to see them come pouring in and at the same time to watch them being packed into boxes and shipped right out to the deposit library. the fact that so many volumes were handled in two weeks is due in large part to the simplified cataloging which is used for the deposit library books. ~ince there is expected to be little call for the books sent to the deposit library, detailed description is not considered necessary and, therefore, a simplified method of cataloging them has been worked out. the principal difference is the omission of the en tire collation with the exception of the volume statement. this single factor saves an immense amount of time. the transcription of the title is the same as for books in the stacks, but little or no time is given to establishing full names of authors, dates of _publication, and so on. a minimum of research is spe'nt on determining the authorship of anonymous books and on other bibliographical points. only those notes ·are given which are essential in identifying a book in ordinary searching. there is no classification by subject; the books are arranged by size and are assigned running numbers within designated size groups. having thus disposed of thirteen thousand volumes, enough space was now available to arrange the rest of the books which were to be cataloged for the stacks. in june a third drive was held, over a period of two and one half weeks, but this time was interrupted by a holiday and irregular hours. the same organization was followed as for the previous drive, but since these books were for the stacks, more detailed cataloging was required and subject classification was necessary. during the drive descriptive cataloging and subject heading were done for all titles and classification for those titles to which notations could readily be assigned. the only titles which were · completely put tqrough, that is, shelflisted and sent to the stacks, were those falling in english and american literature. the rest were arranged by broad classes and were actually classified as soon as possible after the drive. in this way 7,848 titles and 8,342 volumes were cataloged, or 504 titles per day, each ~ataloger averaging 55 per day. new ideas on organizatiqn of work the amount of work accomplished by means of these drives has led to the d~­ velopment of new methods of organizing the current work. broadly speaking, the material coming into the library seems to fall into three classes, each of which can be treated in a particular way. as dr. madan a former librarian of the bod-, lei an has said : "we have learnt not ·to , regard books in a library as all equal in appearance and all to be treated alike, as if they were a rank of drilled soldiers. the lesser books must stand back, and the b b h . . "4 greater e roug t mto prommence. the first class consists of those purchased and gift books which should be put through as promptly as possible. these have to be handled on the piecemeal basis, because they cannot be allowed to accl_lmulate. from figures kept two years ago it 4 as quoted in sharp, ;ejen~y a!exander. cataloguing; a textbook for use tn ltbranes. 2d ed., rev. and enl. london, grafton & co., 1937, p. 163. 294 college and research libraries i is estimated that. a cataloger at harvard averages about sixteen books a day for this type of material. this is an expensive method, but for this class it is unavoidable. economies in catalogip.g these books will have to be worked out along the lines of simplification of records and routines rather than in the basic method of organization. cooperative cataloging naturally falls here, but the same figures do not apply since more detailed work is required by the library of congress. gifts · and purchases for which there is no pressure make up the second group of material currently coming into the library. if carefully selected, there is no reason why this class of books should not be allowed to accumulate for a short time. the period would naturally be determined by local conditions. at harvard space is the chief factor which has to be considered. since it is known, from experience on the drives, approximately how many books can be put through in a week, the plan suggests itself to all~w the books to accumulate until that number is reached. a week's drive can then be organized to send the material along. during this period the books should be arranged alphabetically, in order that any title may be easily located upon request. they are then ready for systematic and economical handling when the time comes. it was this kind of material which was cataloged' in the last drive. the books which are kept for historical or bibliographical interest, but for which we expect there will be little call, make up the third and last type. to this class belong the books which harvard sends to the deposit library. they are selected chiefly from incoming gifts and large-lot purchases, although occasionally an individually bought book may be included. there is no harm in accumulating such material indefinitely, but here again the length of the period is necessarily determined by the september~ 1945 space which is ,available. eventually these books also should be arranged alphabetically before they are worked on, but there is little likelihood of having to search for a particular title during the period of accumulation. interpretation of the figures before summarizing the results of the cataloging done at harvard on the three classes of material, several words ofcaution must ~e used. as with virtually all library statistics, the figures ·have no value apart from the set of local circumstances that applied at the time the work was done. to interpret the harvard data a variety of factors must be considered: the quality and experience of the catalogers involved, the benefits that come from the system of preliminary cataloging, 5 the amount of time spent on establishing names and dates, etc. moreover, it is not to be expected that the same figures would necessa~ily hold in future work of this kind at harvard. what can be said is that approximately 50 per cent more work can be done on books handled on a piecemeal basis if. conditions of "total cataloging" exist; approximately three times as many books as normally can be cataloged under similar conditions if the books are arranged alphabetically for the benefit of the descriptive cataloger; and approximately five times as many class iii books can be cataloged as other books. in addition it must be stated that these averages hold only for concentrated work during a short period and could not be maintained over any extended length of time. class i material (consisting of books to be cafaloged promptly) is handled piecemeal, and for this class it is estimated that a harvard cataloger can average 16 titles 11 this system is described in currier, thomas franklin. "preliminary cataloging." · colleg~ and research libraries i: 235-40, june 1940. 295 per day. · in the first drive the books were cataloged on the same basis by the equivalent of fourteen and one-half full-time catalogers. each averaged 25 titles a day, making a daily total average for the group of 367. class ii (consisting of gifts and purchases for which . there is no pressure) was cataloged in the third drive by the equivalent of eleven full-time catalogers, each averaging 55 titles a day, with a daily total of 504. class i i i (consisting of books for the deposit library) was cataloged in the second drive by thirteen full-time catalogers, with a daily average of 83 titles apiece and a total of 1 ,083. for this class simplified cataloging is used. therefore, if asked how many books a cataloger can do in a day, the following answer might be given: for class i, normally sixteen, and on a drive, twenty-five; for class ii, fifty-five; and for class iii, eighty-three. it is also interesting to note that in one month the descriptive and subject cataloging was done for half as many titles as the total production for the year. for the sake of emphasis, let it be repeated here that these figures have value only for crystallizing thinking about various cataloging procedures. they have no intrinsic value; they have no value for any other library. in other words, they are not norms. conclusions there are certain conclusions which have been drawn, based on experience from these cataloging drives. 1. if the work is organized into the three classes just mentioned, adequate working space must be provided. it takes plenty of room (just as it needs an adequate staff) to arrange thousands of books alphabetically, but the resulting economy when they are finally put through should warrant the provision of both. 2. on the basis of such an organization, the number of factors competing for the cataloger's time will be reduced and the sense of pressure will be greatly lessened. other departments in the library will be notified that the catalog department is organizing its · work in this way, so there should then be no misunderstanding or criticism when the material is allowed to accumulate. the department. will always be ready to change a book from one class to another if the treatment of a certain title is questioned. 3· an alphabetical arrangement of an accumulation of books results in economical and systematic cataloging. if the · material comes in, in large lots, it will be advantageous to alphabetize the books before they are searched. ordinarily, however, they will be arranged as they are added to the accumulation. in the end a second rapid sorting may weed out duplicates and allow a redistribution of some of the titles. when they are put through, it takes much less time to catalog six books by one author at one time than to handle the titles separately six different times. in this connection also, the new library of congress printed catalog provides a distinct advantage. during the drives the catalogers were able to take the volumes to their desks and make the greatest use of the bibliographical information · contained there. the books of a number of authors could be worked on from just one volume of the printed catalog. · 4· the drives should be organized for short periods of time and held more frequently. this was very apparent from the figures of the first drive, which continued for nine weeks. the maximum production was reached in the sixth week, after which there was a decided slump, showing that the staff was tired. 5. as a mark of appreciation and for the welfare of the staff, it would seem proper to grant some time off after such concentrated work. the major interest in these drives and in the ideas for organization that have resulted from them is not only the saving in cost, which would naturally follow a more systematic treatment of the work, but also the opportunity which may be afforded for {continued on page 321) 296 college and research libraries functionary was supposed to cute "many of the librarian's headaches while occupying, from the library school's point of view, an especially attractive past-a post in which to place promising young men who, understandably, wanted to become librarians by short-cutting the generally accepted methods. in some cases this worked out, and is still working out, in a manner satisfactory to all concerned, but the idea has never progressed beyond the trend stage. it is possible that the number of actual appointments of readers ' division chiefs may re~ main a mere trend and never reach · the proportions of a movement. however, the two positions are not analogous because of the potential markets. the most casual consideration of the placement possibilities for the post of assistant to the librarian shows the demand circumscribed by the number of very large libraries-the only ones that can afford to carry the extra cost of a relatively highsalaried staff member whose duties will be, at best, policy interpretation of a high degree. but in the case of the readers' division chief, the potential market may be said to include every college and university something new in: cataloging (continued from page 296) doing the many things a catalog department always wants to do but for which it never has the time. if several drives of a week's duration are planned, the bulk of the work for the year will be compressed into about two months. this should mean that during the remainder of the year the cataloger will september~ 1945 library where it is recognized that a close relationship between the faculty and st'!,ff is desirable and is worth paying for and where it is also recognized that the librarian himself cannot find time to act as a complete liaison officer. small libraries should and will depend upon the librarian and the department heads. some of the larger libraries will want to employ a sort of supercirculation chief or superreference chief. in such cases the supercirculation or superreference chief will, in many instances, be a readers' services chief with merely another title. except as one of the already heavily stressed accouterments for entree, the actual title of assistant librarian in charge of readers' services is not advocated here because of any inherent magical quality in the combinatio·n of words. other and better solutions will undoubtedly present themselves or be discovered later for a proper medium of readers' service coordination and library-faculty cooperation, but for the time being, in college and university libraries, the authors suggest unification of readers' service under a readers' division chief. · ·not be under pressure and will be free to work on a number of matters which normally have to be set to ofl:e side waiting for a better day which never seems to come. this will provide a variety and interest in the cataloger's program which is now often lacking. 321 reviews 288 college & research libraries may 1998 proposal: the best way to do content de­ scription would be to describe informa­ tive potentials. in that form, it clearly par­ allels the proposal, which has been around for years, to describe content by predicting subjective utilities of docu­ ments (which the author oddly does not discuss, though it obviously provides another striking case of subjectivism to be opposed by methodological collectiv­ ism.) in that form, of course, it is subject to the objection that prediction of future epistemological or informative potentials is bound to be excruciatingly difficult, made all the more so by the author’s in­ sistence on long-range as opposed to short-range utilities (he rejects “short­ term pragmatism,” which he blames on william james). and it is oddly optimis­ tic to suppose that many documents now produced actually have any future util­ ity or informational value for solving fu­ ture scientific problems. so hjørland’s proposal faces very serious challenges. despite this, however, it is a major pro­ posal, an addition to the small repertory of serious alternative approaches to con­ tent description, and deserves to be re­ flected on and worked over carefully by others. some of the other proposals, such as the advocacy of domain analysis, are less controversial. every good subject special­ ist in a research library practices an in­ formal kind of domain analysis simply by accumulating knowledge of the bibli­ ography of a field, of its literature patterns and types, its intellectual leaders and cen­ ters of activity, and the like. many of hjørland’s proposals will sound intu­ itively plausible to the subject specialist. the emphasis on the philosophically pragmatic foundation of the proposals probably will seem attractive as well; ac­ tivity theory is not described in enough detail to provide really solid backing, and in effect is treated as a russian version of john dewey’s approach. the whole di­ rection of this work will make sense to those familiar with the literature on the sociology of knowledge and, in particu­ lar, the sociology of scientific knowledge and of social epistemology. however, a big question remains. hjørland starts by proposing that infor­ mation seeking is the key problem for in­ formation science but then concentrates exclusively on literature searching by re­ search workers. what about information seeking by others? what about informa­ tion seeking that does not take the form of literature search? as one works through this book, it appears that the au­ thor really does think that information science has as its subject matter prima­ rily, or exclusively, the research use of lit­ erature. the study of information use by others is apparently to be left to others— for example, students of the mass media. this seems a quite unnecessary limitation on the scope of information science, for which the author presents no convincing argument. we should ignore this limita­ tion, but we should welcome method­ ological collectivism and apply it widely to the study of knowledge and of infor­ mation production, distribution, and uti­ lization.—patrick wilson, university of california-berkeley. outsourcing library technical services op­ erations: practices in academic, public, and special libraries. eds. karen a. wil­ son and marylou colver. chicago: ala, 1997. 239p. $38 ($34.20 ala members) (isbn 0-8389-0703-2). lc 97-22901. published by ala, this volume was is­ sued under the sponsorship of the asso­ ciation for library collections and tech­ nical services’s commercial technical services committee whose members in 1995 “. . . were aware of the lack of pub­ lished case studies on technical services outsourcing in the 1990s. . . . this book was conceived to provide readers with greater insight on the managerial aspects of outsourcing, based on a variety of suc­ cessful experiences in different kinds of library settings.” the introduction and book reviews 289 various chapters within the work remind us that outsourcing is not a new concept; shelf-ready book services have existed since the 1950s and blanket order plans have been in widespread use since the 1960s. the preface states that the recent interest “. . . is evidenced by the fact that over 90 articles on various aspects of tech­ nical services outsourcing appeared in li­ brary literature from 1993 to mid-1996, preceded by almost no information on this activity during the two previous de­ cades.” nowhere is mention made that the outpouring of current literature fol­ lowed wright state university’s decision to outsource its entire cataloging opera­ tion. although this is not a flaw per se, failure to mention the controversy that surrounds outsourcing within the profes­ sion ignores important context. despite its subtitle, the bulk of the work, eleven of sixteen chapters, is com­ posed of reports from academic libraries. three chapters describe public library ventures, and two discuss cases from spe­ cial libraries. the nature and scope of the projects described are as eclectic as the institutions from which they emanate, although the majority are concerned with the outsourcing of cataloging and cata­ loging-related activity. the smallest op­ eration reported on was that of central oregon community college library, where the fewer than fifty items per year that require original cataloging are outsourced. claremont colleges have outsourced the copy cataloging of ap­ proval books from yankee book peddler to oclc techpro since 1994; and the uni­ versity of arizona began to outsource the copy cataloging, item record creation, and physical processing of its approval books from blackwell north america in 1996. north of the border, the university of alberta has outsourced the cataloging and physical processing of most newly acquired monographs since 1995, whereas the university of manitoba started to outsource copy cataloging and the physical processing of monographs in 1994 and expanded its contract to in­ clude original cataloging in 1996. both of the canadian schools employ ism/lts (information systems management/li­ brary technical services). the university of california-santa barbara and emory university used outsourcing for retro­ spective authority control and continue to use it for current authority control. florida atlantic university has used oclc techpro to catalog music scores and foreign language materials which otherwise would have remained in a backlog. the fort worth public library uses five different vendors for its various outsourcing operations. outsourced ac­ tivities include copy cataloging and physical processing as well as selection, cataloging, and physical processing for all best-sellers and children’s books. the houston public library outsources physi­ cal processing, copy cataloging, and au­ thority control. baker & taylor, inc., has supplied shelf-ready books for three new branches (each with collections of around 35,000 volumes) of the albuquerque/ bernalillo county public library system. an interesting exception to the case studies on cataloging was the description of the outsourcing of document delivery and table of contents service by stanford university’s graduate school of business library. also of interest were two reports from institutions that chose alternatives to outsourcing. at the university of ne­ braska-lincoln, staff were given the op­ tion to be hired for overtime work to pro­ cess a special collection. the indiana his­ torical society hired a retired employee for part-time work instead of outsourcing a job. in both instances, the projects were finite and the use of staff who were fa­ miliar with institutional procedures was judged to be advantageous. certain common themes emerged in the case studies reported. the most fre­ quent reason stated for outsourcing was the need to maintain or expand services with no increase in monies. several writers 290 college & research libraries may 1998 mentioned that staff were reassigned from technical to public service positions as a result of outsourcing. everyone indi­ cated the need for careful planning in ad­ vance and for periodic evaluations. in gauging the success of outsourced work, several authors granted that no figures existed for making certain comparisons. a surprising number of institutions lack data on cataloging error rates, turnaround time from order to shelf for new acquisi­ tions, and so on. more appendices outlining contract specifications would have strengthened the case studies and provided potential assistance to those who are anticipating the outsourcing of some operations. the book was intended to present case stud­ ies of successful outsourcing, however; and this purpose was fulfilled. the text proper is followed by an annotated bibli­ ography. included are almost 125 citations to materials that present both the nega­ tive and positive aspects of outsourcing. anyone with an interest in the subject will find this work a useful addition to the literature.—james w. williams, university of illinois-urbana. radway, janice a. a feeling for books: the book-of-the-month club, literary taste, and middle-class desire. chapel hill: univ. of north carolina pr., 1997. 424p. alk. paper, $29.95 (isbn 0-8078-2357-0). lc 96-52037. janice a. radways’s first book, reading the romance: women, patriarchy, and popu­ lar literature, dared to take seriously one of the most despised genres of mass fic­ tion and to listen to the voices of real read­ ers. those were the days when popular culture was still unmentionable in many english departments. in this new project, radway tackles a tamer, but more am­ biguous, subject: the book of the month club and the middlebrow culture it both reflected and promoted. she seems deter­ mined to repeat her earlier triumphant vindication of reading matter scorned by highbrow critics. but times have changed since 1984. attacking the modernist canon, validating the reader’s desires, in­ terpreting the economic, social, and psy­ chological meanings of cultural texts—all this is old hat today. radway acknowl­ edges her uncertainty about what she herself describes as a work of self-discov­ ery whose focus “oscillates continually between critique and appreciation.” a feeling for books consists of three sec­ tions, each with a distinctive subject mat­ ter and methodology. it begins with a field study of the book of the month club or­ ganization that radway undertook in 1985 as part of an “ethnographic” study of reading. she recounts her impressions of the club’s editors as they responded to a takeover by time incorporated. the sec­ ond and longest section uses a more de­ tached, scholarly approach to survey the history of publishing in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the rise of the book of the month club, and responses to it. in conclusion, radway offers per­ sonal interpretations of several club titles she read as a fourteen year old: marjorie morningstar; gods, graves, and scholars; and to kill a mockingbird. when the well-read advertising man harry scherman launched the book of the month club in 1926, he knew exactly what he was doing. he applied modern techniques of marketing and distribution to bookselling to “sell new books as an identifiable category with recognizable uses for potential buyers.” the books were selected by a carefully chosen panel of judges who were presented as both experts and generalists. the ingenious “negative option,” which allowed read­ ers to reject a book, enabled the club to maintain an illusion of freedom and in­ dividuality. (the irrepressible scherman described readers’ rejection of a chosen title thus: “the country didn’t want the heart of emerson’s journals; they didn’t want any part of emerson’s journals.”) the number of subscribers quickly stabi­ lized at a million. by the 1950s, the club had become a cultural icon, subject of an issn: 2474-3542 journal homepage: http://journal.calaijol.org automating cataloging workflow of library traditional materials elaine dong abstract: this paper describes the author’s experience with automating and streamlining cataloging workflows of traditional materials at the florida international university libraries using a combination of various cataloging tools, including marcedit, a local batch loading tool genload, as well as oclc services including worldcat updates service, oclc connexion’s batch process searches and local file manager. the paper addresses the old cataloging processes of these traditional materials, the developing process of new workflows and their impacts, and concludes with lessons learned and success factors. the new workflows have improved work efficiency and metadata control. the hope is that this paper will be of interest to libraries desiring to automate their cataloging workflow of traditional materials. to cite this article: dong, e. (2021). automating cataloging workflow of library traditional materials. international journal of librarianship, 6(1), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2021.vol6.1.183 to submit your article to this journal: go to https://ojs.calaijol.org/index.php/ijol/about/submissions https://ojs.calaijol.org/index.php/ijol/about/submissions international journal of librarianship, 6(1), 73-88. issn: 2474-3542 automating cataloging workflow of library traditional materials elaine dong florida international university, fl, usa abstract this paper describes the author’s experience with automating and streamlining cataloging workflows of traditional materials at the florida international university libraries using a combination of various cataloging tools, including marcedit, a local batch loading tool genload, as well as oclc services including worldcat updates service, oclc connexion’s batch process searches and local file manager. the paper addresses the old cataloging processes of these traditional materials, the developing process of new workflows and their impacts, and concludes with lessons learned and success factors. the new workflows have improved work efficiency and metadata control. the hope is that this paper will be of interest to libraries desiring to automate their cataloging workflow of traditional materials. keywords: batch cataloging, batch processing, batch searching, batch loading, traditional materials introduction over the last decade, cataloging departments in academic libraries have seen many challenges, especially during difficult economic times. the budget and staff size have been reduced while workload remains the same or is increasing; simultaneously, cataloging staff are expected to keep up with new technology and emerging areas of focus. facing these challenges, cataloging staff in academic libraries have explored ways to streamline cataloging workflows of traditional materials through batch processing using oclc services and other tools. barbara anderson described her experience of using the worldcat updates service and load services of the alma library system to batch process and batch upgrade the local bibliographic (bib) records that have oclc numbers in the institutional zone at virginia commonwealth university (2015). similarly, grace riordan and corinna m. baksik used the worldcat updates service to batch process and enhance their book records in the local catalog at harvard library (2017). nancy lorimer described a project that uses oclc connexion’s batch-processing utility to batch search oclc records of 78 rpm sound recordings, and batch loaded the matching oclc records using some locally developed program (2012). jean harden discussed how to expedite the cataloging of similar items, such as a large stack of piano etudes, using oclc connexion’s batch-processing utility to batch search oclc records for the library items, using microsoft access to enter data for the items without oclc records, and then processing it through marcedit and importing it into connexion to create original https://wiki.harvard.edu/confluence/display/~13284 https://wiki.harvard.edu/confluence/display/~2163 dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 74 records for those items (2017). in order to enhance the records of the main circulating collection by batch adding contents notes and library of congress classification numbers, buswell memorial library at wheaton college used marcedit’s z39.50 client, batch searching service in oclc connexion, and the bulk import function in the local catalog (strickler, 2017). most recently, rebecca b. french developed a method to batch catalog a jazz lp collection using the connexion batch searching service, local save file manager, and microsoft access at james madison university (2020). at florida international university (fiu) libraries, most of the library’s traditional materials were cataloged individually, and a backlog was developed due to the complex process of traditional cataloging. the author of this paper has batch loaded marc records of e-resources into the local catalog using a locally developed batch loading tool called genload1 at the fiu libraries for many years. the batch loading process helps provide timely access to the increasing amounts and variety of e-resources. in order to eliminate the backlog of the traditional materials waiting to be cataloged and to improve work efficiency, the author investigated various ways of using the batch loading process with other cataloging tools to expedite the cataloging process of some traditional materials, including two print approval collections and one music collection. for one print approval collection, worldcat updates service2 was used to collect upgraded oclc master records and then genload was used to batch load the upgraded records into the local catalog. for the other print approval collection and the classical music collection, oclc connexion’s batch process searches and local file manager3 were used to batch search oclc records for library copies and editing records. marcedit4 was used to batch retrieve oclc master records and then genload was used to batch load the upgraded records into the local catalog. the new workflows have largely improved cataloging efficiency and metadata quality. background the fiu libraries migrated from northwestern online total integrated system (notis)5 to the aleph integrated library system6 in 2006. in june 2012 the fiu libraries’ catalog was merged into the shared bib (sb), a consortium library catalog consisting of shared records of 12 state university libraries (suls) in florida. since then, the fiu libraries has followed the cooperative principle of sharing and maintaining bib records among the member suls: before bringing in new records to the sb, library staff from the suls searches the sb to ensure duplicate bib records are not generated; if a bib record already exists for the searched title, the staff adds the institutional holdings and item record to the bib record. currently, there are three ways to add records into the sb: the first is to catalog the item individually, either through original cataloging by creating an original oclc record and exporting it into the sb or through copy cataloging – finding a pre-existing oclc record, editing it if necessary, and exporting it into the sb. the second method is to batch load marc records through genload, a batch loading program created by the florida center for library automation (fcla),7 the predecessor of the florida academic library services cooperative (falsc);8 and the third way is to batch load brief vendor acquisition records with orders through aleph advanced generic record loader (p-file 90).9 the green library, the main library of the fiu libraries, received the majority of new print books through approval plans: specifically, the ybp approval plan (contract with yankee dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 75 book peddler, inc. (ybp) library services for u.s. and u.k. publishers), and latin american and caribbean collections (lac) approval plans covering publications from caribbean and latin american countries. the green library also purchases physical audiovisual materials such as lps, cds, and dvds to support curricular and research needs. in the past, most of these traditional materials were cataloged individually, and a backlog was developed due to the complex processes of traditional individual cataloging. cataloging staff were overwhelmed and stretched thin with the additional workload of dealing with increasing amounts of e-resources and other tasks. automate cataloging workflows of traditional materials in order to eliminate the backlog of these traditional materials and improve work efficiency, the author investigated various services and tools in order to automate and streamline the cataloging workflows of the following three collections: ybp print approval books, latin american and caribbean collections (lac) print approval books, and a classical music lp collection. below, the author describes the old cataloging process, new workflow, and its impact for each collection. fiu green library received weekly shipments of new print books through the ybp approval plan (about 10,000 titles per year, majority of them are published in english) until 2018 when the plan was migrated to an ebooks patron-driven acquisitions (pda) plan. old process (before april 2015) prior to june 2007, ybp print approval books were cataloged individually in-house and cataloging staff did all the physical processing. in june 2007, the green library added shelf-ready services to their contract with ybp library services. this new service included physical processing of the books (new books come in with property stamps, magnetic strips, barcodes, and spine labels already attached), and marc records of the new books through oclc promptcat service,10 so they can be batch loaded to the library catalog. our initial reviews found errors in many marc records; therefore, in order to maintain high quality metadata and assure accurate access, from june 2007 to april 2015, the cataloging department adopted the following workflow for ybp approval books: after receiving books and their marc records, genload was used to sort out dlc records (dlc records are created by the library of congress and regarded as top quality records that do not need further review), and then batch loaded these dlc records into the library catalog by genload. these books (about 4,000 books, 40% of total) were sent directly to circulation to be shelved. for the remaining books (about 6,000 books, 60% of the total), their marc records were batch loaded to the library catalog using a different genload loading profile which generates fiu holdings and items with a status of incomplete cataloging. the online public access catalog (opac) displays these books as “in process.” these books stayed in the cataloging department until they were examined and upgraded individually. at the beginning of 2015, there was a backlog of several thousand physically processed ybp books sitting in the cataloging department, and several hundred associated names and series waiting to be established. dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 76 developing new processes (february – april 2015) in order to get the backlog under control, the ybp approval process task force as well as the authority work task force, both composed of the cataloging department head and several department staff members, were formed in early 2015 to find more efficient ways of processing these books. for the ybp approval process, we decided to use the worldcat updates service to collect upgraded full-level11 oclc master records, and then use genload to batch load the fulllevel oclc records into the sb, which would replace the individual upgrading process of the old workflow. for the authority work, since most of full-level oclc master records include established headings backed by complete authority work, we decided to rely on the above upgrading process for authority control and stop doing individual authority work on ybp print approval books, allowing us to focus our individual authority work on non-english language materials, special collections, and other unique collections. the worldcat updates service is now a part of worldshare collection manager,12 and can be set up to receive updated records when selected oclc master records matching specified criteria (in fiu’s case, ybp approval promptcat records) are enhanced. in worldshare collection manager, the author created a query collection ybp15for the fiu ybp approval books and set up the collection selection criteria (figure 1). the query collection automatically harvests oclc records that meet the following criteria: li (library): fxg (the symbol of fiu green library) and vn (vendor): ybp and yr (publication year): 2015..9999 (published since 2015) and mt (material type): bks (books) not mt (material type): elc (electronic resources). in other words, the collection hosts oclc records that: a) have fiu green library’s holdings; b) created or ordered by ybp (oclc records have marc 938 field indicating vendor records of ybp); c) published since 2015; and d) material type is book, but not electronic resources. figure 1. query collection ybp15and selection criteria dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 77 for the query collection, it was set up to receive upgraded records biweekly when the oclc master records met either one of the following conditions (figure 2): • encoding levels (elvl) changed to full-level, indicated by elvl=blank, i, 1, or l • marc 830 field changes (indicating series authority record is established or modified) figure 2. worldcat updates service update conditions after receiving the upgraded full-level oclc marc records from the worldcat updates service, the next step is to load these oclc records by genload to batch update existing sb records. for this purpose, a genload profile was created and set to match the oclc marc records with the sb records by oclc number, and to batch update the matching bib records (not fiu holdings or item records) in the sb while protecting local data such as local notes in marc 590 field. during test runs, a small percentage (about 5%) of upgraded oclc records couldn’t find matching records in the sb since the corresponding oclc master records of these sb records were merged with better oclc records. for these cases, the old oclc numbers in marc 035 fields of sb records need to be replaced manually with the new oclc numbers from the upgraded oclc marc records so that the existing sb records could be replaced by better oclc records through batch upgrading process. new workflow (may 2015 – present) after the test and evaluation process, the following new workflow has been implemented since may 2015: the first step after receiving books and their marc records is to sort out records with complete call numbers in the marc 050 or 090 field using genload. then batch load these records into the sb by genload. the loading also creates fiu holdings and item records with a cataloging status of complete. these books (about 9,000 books, 90% of total) are sent directly to circulation to be shelved as they come with physical processing. dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 78 the second step is to keep the remaining books (about 1,000 books, 10% of total) in the cataloging department. then batch load their marc records into the sb by genload with a different genload profile, so that the loading creates fiu holdings and item records with a cataloging status of incomplete. as a result, the opac shows these books as “in process.” the next step is to load the upgraded oclc marc records received from worldcat updates service by genload on a biweekly basis to batch update existing sb records. finally, the “in process” books that were updated by the batch upgrading process are identified and their cataloging process is completed using the load logs generated by genload to get the associated fiu holdings of the replaced bib records. then use an aleph report and excel to separate the “in process” titles. lastly, the “in process” books are located and cataloging is completed by updating fiu holdings and item records to a status of complete according to their updated bib records. impacts of new workflow after implementing the new workflow, the following impacts were observed: provide users timely access: the new workflow sends about 90% (vs. 40% with the old workflow) of new ybp approval books directly to the stacks upon arrival. users have access to these books almost immediately, and the catalog record can be enhanced without keeping the books in the cataloging department. the batch upgrading process updates the records of both cataloged and “in process” books, and clears the majority of the “in process” books sitting in the cataloging department, so very few books need to be cataloged individually. as a result, new books have been cataloged quickly with the number of ybp approval books being added to the backlog reduced largely from 60.5% in jan. 2015 with the old process, to 8.2% in july 2015 (two months after implementing the new workflow) as shown below in table 1, and eventually all the backlog was eliminated. table 1. backlog information of ybp print approval books ybp print approval books received backlogged % backlogged jan. 2015 with old process 1,081 654 60.5% july 2015 with new workflow 1,359 111 8.2% save staff time: the old workflow developed a backlog despite the efforts of many hours per week of several cataloging staff members, whereas the new workflow needs only about 2 hours biweekly of two staff members. enhance quality control and reduce human errors: the new batch upgrading process has improved metadata quality in both bibliographic and authority records by updating the existing fiu records to full-level in the local catalog in a timely fashion. it has also reduced human errors. for example, set in the genload profile, the batch loading process removes redundant marc dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 79 fields (such as 9xx fields and 072 field) from oclc marc records and protects local data before updating existing sb records. another example is that the new workflow includes a step to check and fix the url fields of oclc marc records (correct indicator errors and remove unnecessary url fields) using marcedit before batch upgrading process. latin american and caribbean collections (lac) print approval books fiu green library receives print books through lac approval plans from several foreign vendors (once a week mostly, about 2,000 titles per year). the majority of them are published in spanish; the rest are published in portuguese, haitian creole, or french. fiu hasn’t purchased marc records from these vendors; however, a couple of vendors, such as iberoamericana, provide brief marc records of their published books for free. for physical processing, acquisitions staff add magnetic strips, and cataloging staff complete the rest including adding property stamps and barcodes, and printing and applying spine labels. old process (before 2018) before 2018, lac approval books were cataloged in-house individually. after receiving lac books, cataloging staff create sb records within a week so that acquisitions staff could attach order records for payment in a timely fashion. since lac books are non-english publications from foreign countries, many of them don’t have oclc records or established names/series readily available. for these books, cataloging staff initially create brief sb records including only a few fields to allow acquisitions to complete payment, and later on upgrade these records individually. in many cases, cataloging librarians need to create original oclc records for some books and then overlay the brief sb records to complete their cataloging process. at the beginning of 2018, there were 413 lac approval books waiting to be cataloged and many associated names and series needed to be established. developing new process (january – february 2018) lac approval books with brief marc records to improve efficiency, we worked with falsc on developing a batch loading process for the brief marc records (which include title, isbn number, order information, and other fields) provided by iberoamericana. the batch loading process was implemented in february 2018 using the aleph advanced generic record loader (file-90), which is a perfect tool for loading these brief vendor records with order information into the sb. in october and november 2019, we replicated the batch loading process for the brief marc records now provided by two other lac approval plan vendors, rettalibros and libro andinos. the batch processes have freed both cataloging and acquisitions staff from creating individual brief bib records and order records for half of fiu’s lac vendor books, increasing productivity. lac approval books with oclc master records with the help of a staff member, the author developed a batch process for the lac books with full-level oclc master records using marcedit, genload, and oclc connexion’s batch process dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 80 searches and local file manager. the author did the following test run on the backlog of 413 lac books to find out whether it worked: the first step was to call up the sb records of these lac books by searching a standard tkr field in the holdings records (a field routinely added by fiu cataloging staff at initial processing). then, the oclc record numbers from the marc 035 field on bib records (for example, =035 \\$a(ocolc)25416038) were gathered by an aleph report. it was discovered that all these sb records had oclc numbers, which confirmed that, eventually, the brief sb records initially created by fiu staff were later overlaid by oclc records brought in by other suls. lastly, their corresponding oclc master records were batch retrieved using the marcedit z39.50 client’s batch processing mode (figure 3). figure 3. batch retrieve oclc records via marcedit z39.50 client the second step involved sorting oclc master records by genload in order to separate full-level from non-full-level records. the genload file sorter identified 406 records with complete call numbers (has subfield $b in marc 050 or 090 field) (figure 4) out of a total of 413 records; identified 404 records that are cataloged in english (subfield $b of marc 040 field=eng), and identified and separated 341 full-level records (marc leader field (ldr) encoding level (position 17)= blank, i, 1, l) from 63 non-full-level records. file://///$a(ocolc)25416038) dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 81 figure 4. sort records with complete call number via genload the third step was to review and update non-full-level oclc master records. after batch importing the 63 non-full-level records into the oclc local save file, the author reviewed them one by one and discovered that 53 of them are actually full-level records with established headings and complete call numbers. the author changed these 53 records’ elvl codes to full-level in oclc, and then batch exported their marc records. step four involved an authority check on full-level oclc master records. the author checked the access points of 100 randomly selected records out of 341 full-level oclc master records: 91 out of the 100 selected records had complete authority control, and only nine out of 100 records have incomplete authority control: among them, four have unestablished series; two have established personal headings, but their forms in the marc records are slightly different than those of naco13 national authority record (nar); the remaining three are personal or corporate names that don’t have nars (table 2). dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 82 table 2. oclc records with incomplete authority control step five was to share information and obtain departmental approval. the author demonstrated the batch process and authority check results at the department meeting. the group discussed and approved the batch process and reached a consensus on using lac books’ full-level oclc master records to batch upgrade the existing sb records without performing authority checks individually. the final step was to batch load full-level oclc master records by genload to upgrade sb records. after departmental approval, the author combined all the full-level oclc master records (394 records in total including the 341 records identified from the genload sorting process and the 53 records updated from non-full-level), and batch loaded them into the sb by genload. the genload profile was set to match the oclc master records with the sb records by oclc number, then replace the matching sb bib records while protecting local data. the batch load also completed the cataloging process of these lac books by updating the associated fiu holdings and item records to a completed status. lac approval books without full-level oclc master records for the remaining 19 lac books without full-level oclc master records (including two oclc records not cataloged in english and seven records without a complete call number), the author changed their tkr field value in the sb holdings records, and placed them alongside oclc record number encoding level (elvl) note 975491662 blank personal name in marc 100 field is established; series in marc 830 field is not established 1001907037 i has marc 490 0_ field; no marc 830 field 987257621 i personal name in marc 100 field is not established 966300663 i 2 corporate names in marc 710 fields are established; 1 personal name for editor in marc 700 field is not established 988992036 i personal name in marc 100 field is established; has marc 490 0_ field, no marc 830 field 992722210 i personal name in marc 100 field has no birth date; established nar does 47740852 i personal name in marc 700 field has birth date; established nar doesn't 56726555 i series in marc 830 field is not established 26380041 i corporate name in marc 710 field is not established dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 83 iberoamericana books (which had brief records loaded in the sb) on a different shelf in the cataloging department. the author developed a different batch process using genload and oclc connexion’s batch process searches and local file manager, and did the following test run on these books: the first step was to call up the sb records of these books by searching a different tkr field value in the holdings. then, the isbn numbers were gathered from the marc 020 field of the bib records by using an aleph report. lastly, the author batch searched in oclc by isbn number (batch-enter bibliographic search keys) (figure 5). the search saved matched oclc master records in an oclc local save file. figure 5. batch search records in oclc by isbn number for the second step, the best records in the oclc save file were selected. the records were sorted by the column catl (cataloging language) (figure 6) for the purpose of removing the records not cataloged in english (catl≠eng). then, the records were re-sorted by the column save file number. since multiple records exist for some titles, the best record for each title was selected and the other records were removed. oclc master records with elvl (encoding level)=blank, i, 1, l and most holdings are usually the best. lastly, the selected oclc master records in oclc local save file were batch exported after updating their holdings. figure 6. sort records by cataloging language in oclc local save file dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 84 the third step involved sorting oclc master records by genload to separate full-level from non-full-level records. following the sorting, full-level oclc records were batch loaded by genload to update matching sb bib records and associated fiu holdings and item records to completed status. non-full-level oclc records were batch loaded using a different genload profile which updates matching sb bib records and associated fiu holdings (adds a tkr field value) but not fiu items, so that associated fiu holdings and item records still have incomplete status. the lac books without any oclc master records were kept on the same shelf for future batch process or original cataloging. the new batch processes for lac print approval books have been implemented since february 2018. the new lac processes have helped us eliminate the lac approval book backlog. additionally, as with the new workflow for the ybp print approval books, it has had a positive impact on providing timely access of books, saving staff time, reducing human errors, and has improved cataloging efficiency and metadata quality. classical music lp (long play) collection fiu green library houses a donated classical music sound recording collection consisting of over 12,000 recordings, mostly in lp format. this collection was slowly being cataloged since its receipt. old process (1/2013 – 8/2017) in the past, music recordings from this collection were cataloged in-house individually except for about 1,000 recordings in foreign languages outsourced to backstage library works. new process (9/2017 – 4/2018) in order to facilitate timely access of this valuable collection, the author developed and implemented the following batch cataloging process using marcedit, genload, and oclc connexion’s batch process searches and local file manager, which is similar to the ones for lac approval books: the first step was to search uncataloged music recordings by their publisher numbers (a music recording has a publisher number, instead of isbn number, as its unique identifier) in the sb and enter their publisher numbers on a spreadsheet. the next step was to deal with music recordings without sb records. these records were batch searched in oclc by publisher number. the search saved matched oclc master records in an oclc local save file. then, the best records were selected for each title in the oclc local save file and exported in batch. lastly, the oclc master records were batch loaded by genload to create new bib records and add associated fiu holdings and item records with completed status in the sb. for the music recordings without oclc records, the cataloger conducts original cataloging. finally, for music recordings that found sb records (added by other suls), the oclc numbers from marc 035 fields of bib records were gathered by an aleph report. then, a batch retrieve was performed for their oclc master records using the marcedit z39.50 client’s batch dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 85 processing mode. lastly, the oclc master records were batch loaded by genload to upgrade bib records and add associated fiu holdings and item records with completed status in the sb. impact of new process with about the same amount of staff working on the collection, the new process achieved 533 cataloged titles per month compared to 133 titles with the old process, and we were able to complete cataloging the remaining one third of the collection in 8 months (table 3). table 3. classical music collection statistics titles cataloged time spent titles cataloged per month cataloged in-house by batch process 4,263 8 months (9/2017-4/2018) 533 cataloged in-house individually 7,474 56 months (1/2013-8/2017) 133 cataloged by backstage library works 1,023 24 months (7/2015-7/2017) 43 total cataloged 12,760 conclusion during this process, several lessons were learned regarding workflow changes: • the first step before developing a new workflow is to have a thorough understanding of the old process from all the staff involved in the workflow. • while developing a new workflow, always do a test run first on a small batch of items, and adjust and improve the workflow as needed. • documenting the process along the way will help in refining the procedures at a later stage. • after the new workflow is developed, discuss it with staff for feedback. • it’s important to evaluate and assess its impact, and asking questions such as: who will be affected by the new process? will the new process benefit them? • after the new workflow is approved for implementation, select qualified staff for the new process. • it’s crucial to walk staff through the new process, answer their questions, and ask for their suggestions. dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 86 • it’s always necessary to follow up, collect feedback, and adjust workflow and procedure accordingly. the author would like to share her experience with automating cataloging workflows of traditional library materials because it could be beneficial to libraries that plan to implement automation workflows in cataloging. overall, the author’s experience has been highly positive: the batch processes and various tools applied on these traditional materials have improved cataloging efficiency and productivity; they have also enhanced metadata accuracy, consistency, and display, and as a result, facilitated timely and accurate access to valuable library resources for users. the new workflows have been successful, largely due to the support from the department head and staff members who have made valuable suggestions and positive feedback, and also due to the great interest, ability, and persistence of our staff to take on new challenges. in july 2021, the libraries at the 40 public colleges and universities of the state of florida, including fiu, will migrate to a new shared integrated library system (ils), ex libris’ alma. the new system necessitates new workflows and procedures. so the new challenge for the author is to learn the functions and tools of the new ils, and develop similar or improved cataloging workflows in the new ils and continue to adapt as the new system changes. acknowledgements the author would like to express her deepest appreciation to her department head, rita cauce. the new workflows would not have been possible without her valuable advice and support. she also provided the backlog information of ybp print approval books in table 1 and very helpful comments and suggestions for the article. the author would also like to extend her deepest gratitude to her colleague, kelly rowan, who has provided generous help proofreading and editing the paper. endnotes [1] genload: https://falsc.libguides.com/c.php?g=850314&p=6454676 [2] worldcat updates service: https://help.oclc.org/metadata_services/worldshare_collection_manager/choose_your_collecti on_manager_workflow/worldcat_updates/about_worldcat_updates_through_collection_man ager/about_worldcat_updates [3] oclc connexion client guides: batch processing in the client: overview. https://files.mtstatic.com/site_10606/5147/0?expires=1610991390&signature=l4si8hryiikeu9 lpd4r4zeroq9a6sbltsgjqwp8ojqsn6sexa4lbfaufehzg2ibjnkq8eqf9oqfvdbhnnig6guk uldz7dtrxbi1qxll6vbepfv87p~4ot2g5lvwyn2faquqhf00jx~rlyyaphuj5omoqtmsal2v-6knpryih~s_&key-pair-id=apkaj5y6av4gi7a555na [4] marcedit: https://marcedit.reeset.net/about-marcedit [5] notis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/notis dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 87 [6] aleph integrated library system. https://exlibrisgroup.com/products/aleph-integratedlibrary-system/ [7] fcla. https://members.educause.edu/florida-center-for-library-automation [8] falsc. https://libraries.flvc.org/ [9] how to load records using the advanced generic vendor records loader (file-90). https://files.mtstatic.com/site_11811/27603/0?expires=1613765885&signature=rtyt404zmsj5o z1lgxhjn1ju9wzqo5j3foi0xkwlffdn2ln-wtrjkfuicgvzd9omcf3xmx0ejrysm3u2lk~kjnd55nhafuoh6sfk7e2j6uaunj8azjek7hunaetrg zrrj5g8lv-uiirrlkhadwigjbms-6ajpm1tlpyojqkrrk_&key-pairid=apkaj5y6av4gi7a555na [10] oclc promptcat service: https://library.oclc.org/digital/collection/p15003coll74/id/18/ [11] full-level cataloging: https://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/onlinecataloging.html#bcggbafc [12] worldshare collection manager: https://www.oclc.org/en/worldshare-collectionmanager.html [13] naco-name authority cooperative program: https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/naco/ references anderson, b. (2015). updating alma records with the worldshare marc update service. retrieved from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&context=libraries_pre sent french, r. b. (2020). secrets of the save file: using connexion and microsoft access for efficient batch cataloging projects. retrieved from https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1196&context=letfspubs harden, j. (2017). batch processes: using connexion client, marcedit, and microsoft access. retrieved from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1036580 lorimer, n. (2012). unlocking historical audio collections: collaborative cataloging and batch searching of 78 rpm recordings. technical services quarterly, 29:1, 1-12, doi: 10.1080/07317131.2011.597682 riordan, g. & baksik, c. m. (2017). oclc worldcat updates (bns/wms) implementation. retrieved from https://wiki.harvard.edu/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageid=181077967 strickler, c. (2017). testimony: using marcedit and oclc connexion to enhance bibliographic records in a batch. retrieved from https://www.atla.com/blog/testimony-using-marceditand-oclc-connexion-to-enhance-bibliographic-records-in-a-batch/ https://libraries.flvc.org/ https://library.oclc.org/digital/collection/p15003coll74/id/18/ https://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/onlinecataloging.html#bcggbafc https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/naco/ https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1196&context=letfspubs https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1036580/#who https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1036580/ https://wiki.harvard.edu/confluence/display/~2163 https://www.atla.com/blog/testimony-using-marcedit-and-oclc-connexion-to-enhance-bibliographic-records-in-a-batch/ https://www.atla.com/blog/testimony-using-marcedit-and-oclc-connexion-to-enhance-bibliographic-records-in-a-batch/ dong / international journal of librarianship 6(1) 88 about the author elaine dong (edong@fiu.edu) is the database and metadata management librarian at florida international university libraries in miami, florida. she holds a m.s. in library and information science from mcgill university. her professional interests include eresource management, database maintenance, and data analytics. 006-title-183-article text-986-2-11-20210624-cl 006-183-article text-969-3-11-20210624-huang_ct lib-mocs-kmc364-20140103101924 13 shawnee mission's on-line cataloging system ellen washy miller: library systems analyst, and b. j. hodges: senior systems analyst, shawnee mission public schools, shawnee mission, kansas an on-line cataloging pilot project for two elementary schools is discussed. the system components are 27 40 terminals, upper-lower-case input, ibm's faster generalized software packo.ge, and usual cards/labels output. reasons for choosing faster, software and hardware features, operating procedures, system performance and costs are detailed. future expansion to cataloging 100,000 annual k-12 acquisitions, on-line circulation, retrospective conversion, and union book catalogs is set forth. introduction the shawnee mission public schools, serving several affiuent suburbs of the kansas city metropolitan area, began automated library operations in 1968. as the school districfs computer center was then equipped with a 1401 computer and tape/disk store, the first library system was designed for batch ordering and cataloging. later, a batch circulation system for three of the school district's fourteen secondary libraries was started. library automation in that period was similar to that described by scott (1) and auld (2). two years saw a profound change in the shawnee mission school district. by unification, it had added 50 elementary schools and a new high school, makin9 a total of 65 schools, all of which had libraries. at the school districts computer center, the configuration had passed through the 360/30 stage to a 360/40; 2314 disk packs were on order; and 2741 term~als, using ibm's remote access computational system (rax) had been ~stalled at all five high schools for computer science courses. wlule the batch library system could handle the 28.000 items ordered 14 journal of library automation vol. 4/1 march, 1971 and cataloged annually up to that point, it was impossible to justify using it for an estimated 100,000 annual acquisitions needed by 65 libraries. computer time to process autocoder programs on a mod/40 would be excessive; the librarians desired many improvements (upperand lowercase i/0; longer fields; shortened time to process items; and more accurate data on cards and labels) . the need for data processing and library improvements resulted in rethinking of the approach to ordering, cataloging, and circulation. naturally, on-line processing came to mind. ibm 274fs for computer science courses had given management and data processing staff some experience with a dedicated on-line system; the 360/40 and 2314 disks would support large files, indexed sequential file organization, and multiprogramming (simultaneous use of the cpu for terminal and batch jobs). the experiences of stanford and university of chicago ( 3) and ibm ( 4) pointed out that on-line systems could be built for larger and more complex organizations than for shawnee mission, where the collections are 95% english language and the system covers only books and audio-visual items. cataloging is based on title-page information; tools used are children·s catalog, sears, n.u.c., a. a. rules, and other standard works. also very important was the fact that the computer center management wanted experience in multiprogramming prior to considering it for student scheduling, student records, payroll and business functions. a proposal was made to library and data processing management by the library systems analyst in mid-december 1969 that on-line cataloging in multiprogramming mode be begun by mid-march 1970 for two elementary schools on a test basis. an improved batch order system using cobol programs was also proposed. finally, it was suggested that a carefully designed cataloging system could include fields to be used later for circulation control. the specific purposes of the on-line cataloging pilot project were 1) to test whether direct access to master disk files is an efficient, accurate, and economical method of creating and updating bibliographic and holdings data; and 2) to allow data processing management to ascertain if multiprogramming is feasible and practical at this time locally. a search of library literature revealed no on-line systems for cataloging and circulation functions; rather, either circulation or order functions were real time. moreover, truly on-line systems were rare; columbia had designed a circulation system that could be used in that mode, but as of october 1968, was operating batch (5). chicago's book processing system does input data on line, although ordering and cataloging functions are performed off-line (6) . bellrel is an on-line circulation system (7). comparing the circumstances of the above institutions with that of shawnee mission school district brought out one sterling difference: the latter had no yant money nor huge parent institution upon which to rely. rather, it ha a modest hardware-software configuration, a need to be on-line cataloging system/ miller and hodges 15 operational within three months if the two test librarians were to see any output by the end of the school year, and a small team of data processors and librarians devoted to redesign and implementation. methods and materials having earlier seen demonstrations of the kansas city, missouri, police department's faster system, with its on-line access to constantly updated alphanumeric files, the senior systems analysts turned to ibm for further information. the police department's system was based on a software package developed in alameda, california, for law enforcement. it was also available in a general form called faster (filing and source data entry techniques for easier retrieval). the proven ability of this system to accept on-line data via 2740 terminals and to display it on 2260 crt's, its ease of adaptation to user requirements, the quickness with which analysts and programmers had learned to use it at the police department, and a local, positive experience decided the issue. in mid-january 1970, faster was chosen as the software framework for on-line cataloging. software faster has been programmed in modular form, with each module performing a particular task ( 8). modules supporting functions that vary because of hardware must be coded by the user. this coding is done in macro form (brief program statements in higher level language which generate many machine instructions) and therefore is not a tedious task. one of the hardest, most complicated portions of implementing a teleprocessing system is programming the support from the cpu to the terminal; with faster, this took about a day. the macros use basic teleprocessing access method (btam) support. with line support taking little time, the user may spend more effort on his own processing needs. the user may have only a query or an update requirement; shawnee mission needed both. because faster is a modular system, the user is permitted to describe each of his needs as a transaction. this transaction must be programmed as a tpd (transaction processing d~scription) using macros. coding and listing time for a tpd will vary w1th the processing description. those familiar with detailed programming will note that the programmer does not have to concern himself with 1/0. the tpd will prepare the data for output, and the faster interface module will handle 1/0. some of the major functions supported by the macro language include: 1) retrieval of records from indexed sequential ( isam ) files-files accessed only through hierarchic indexes; 2) modifications and additions to isam ides; 3) data manipulation; 4) formatting of responses to selected terminals; 5) message switching and 6) recording audit data on a logging file. faster under dos requires fixed-length records; this has been modified under the os version. 16 journal of library automation vol. 4/1 march, 1971 retrieval from the !sam files required for processing a given transaction may be performed in one of three ways: 1) retrieval of a unique record, 2) sequential retrieval of a specified number of records from a logical grouping, or 3) retrieval of a specified number of records from a logical grouping, in which the retrieval records represent the best qualified from the group based upon the user's selection criteria. hardware hardware supported by the faster system is as follows: machine configuration: ibm 360 mod/30, 40, or 50 storage requirements: minimum-dos 65k; minimum-os 128k disks supported: 2311 or 2314 logging file: disk or tape line control: btam witb 2701, 2702, or 2703 terminals: 2740, 1050, 2260 crt systems at shawnee mission computer center: ibm 360/40 dos 256 k eight 2314 disks three 2401 tape drives one 2702 line control 27 40 and 27 41 terminals the system operates in three partitions. partition f1 houses apl (a programming language) for student use with 27 41 terminals. partition f2 houses faster. partition bg is used for batch jobs (both cobol and autocoder under cs monitor). file organization and access faster supports !sam files only (as data sets) with the exception of the logging file; the logging device must be sequential. faster's support of disk files is accomplished by using the same software modules that al and cobol use in maintaining !sam files. therefore, standard programming languages may be used for creating files and data retrieval. shawnee mission chose cobol as its main fanguage and found it to complement the faster system. files the batch library system was based on a 400-character record, repeated in its entirety for every copy in each library. this space consumption for redundant information was undesirable in a system with 65 collections, and therefore two basic files were designed. the first is the disk title file, containing one record with bibliographic information for each unique title in the school district. its fields include author, title, dates, subject headings, annotation, etc. (table 1). each record is 562 characters long. on-line cataloging system/miller and hodges 17 table 1. main fields input by operators record title copy field form code publication date copyright date author title annotation publisher edition price dewey number cutter number grade level collation series language code lc card number subject heading 1 subject heading 2 subject heading 3 added entry title number number of copies building code funding code volume number print instructions length 2 4 4 35 50 105 30 3 5 8 10 4 40 35 3 14 24 46 60 30 7 4 5 comments distinguishes physical format may be continued in annotation use marc language codes use sears headings " , , , , for name or title 2 if other than general funds 3 for volume or other sequence number 16 kept only until labels and cards printed in distinction, the disk copy file contains a 56-character record for each copy of a title, comprised of fixed-length fields for building number, special funding, volume information, and circulation control. copy and title records are linked through the title number. the third file is the isam title index, comprised of records with a phon.etic code and key for each title record. this file is called up by a t~rnu~al transaction containing title; the incoming phonetic code for the htle ~~ matched with any equal ones on the index. for matches, biblio~rap~tc data is pulled from the title and typed on the terminal. the main unction of the title index is to determine duplicates. 18 journal of library automation vol. 4/1 march, 1971 tests on 45,711 title records showed that a 16-character phonetic code resulted in a maximum of 36 different titles having the same phonetic code. the 16-character code chosen consists of the first character of title followed by numeric values for most consonants. the on-line cataloging system input recognizing that the pilot project might be expanded into a full-scale operation, librarians drew up procedures for entering data from either shelf list cards or new arrivals. conversion from shelf lists required that cards be edited to eliminate confusing information and to add implicit data. for new acquisitions, most information needed by the terminal operator is annotated on the title page and its verso. a grid sheet to be slipped into the book contains subject headings, added entry, annotation and some other fields. all of these practices were set forth in a user's manual (9), along with instructions on how to enter transactions into the disk files. limits on the input buffer permit a maximum of 120 characters to be transmitted by any transaction, which means that several transactions are required to add all cataloging and location data necessary to describe a new title. there are two sets of transactions. the lt series adds to and updates records in the title file; the lc series does the same for the copy file. for instance, entering a new title requires an lt01 transaction to start the record and assign a title number, one or more lt02's to complete cataloging data, and an lc01 for building assignment. operators find transactions easy to key and understand. by category, lc and lt transactions set up new records, add on fields, update fields, delete or activate records, and query the contents of a specified record. these transactions are a simple, understandable, and powerful method of maintaining library files. several transactions also add data to fields, thus saving the operator keying time. for instance, the cutter number is automatically derived from the first three letters of the author's last name, unless specifically superseded by the operator. also, "f" is assigned to dewey for all items unless replaced by another classification. finally, a standard set of output, consisting of 1) two author cards, overprinted cards, a copy card, and 2) one three-up label, is assumed when an lc01 transaction is input to show location. if other outputs are needed, the operator uses an lc05 transaction to specify them. there are also several instances of data being input in lower case (to save time and buffer space for a shift) and being edited on output to upper case. the result of all these program aids is that the operator knows she is keying only important data; highly invariable fields are input and edited by the faster programs, saving operator time. on-line cataloging system/ miller and hodges 19 output two basic card formats were chosen. the unit card contains all cataloging information; the copy card shows a library's holdings of a given title (figures 1 and 2) . a unit card and copy card (giving all cataloging and holdings information) go into the school's shell list; the usual set of main and added entry unit cards goes into the public catalog. gunthf'r , j()lln hlr the gr < ·r l'< ' l'l'<'ll l 1:3 2.'5.00 11 2 1.1.'5 10 1!-1.2:} 1-1 2g.!-j2 -1 7.g9 .52 !-19.!-j!-j ' i) al' ()10\ ' isl ' .-\l l\1.-\tehi.-\ls 6 43 49 l'l'l'l'l' lll 12.24 87.76 100.00 .-\udim i"'"' \i at~~ · black'10:~~t ~-i .. college and research libraries the birth of a network: the brazilian struggle janet frederick a national plan for university libraries in brazil recommends a center for cooperative cataloging, a standard format for computerized cataloging, and development of an online network of libraries. problems associated with online network implementation in brazil, such as computer import restrictions, changes in government agencies, and an historical lack of resource sharing, are discussed. the prognosis is positive; the need and motivation are strong. ibrarians in brazil are seeking to link university libraries via a cooperative cataloging network. during a five-month visit there spent attending a national conference, visiting libraries, and, most importantly, talking to librarians at the forefront of technological change, i learned of the national plan for university libraries and of progress toward its implementation. 1 these librarians described the history of computers in brazil, library automation development, the politics of change, and the attitudes and ideals of those involved. 2 although progress toward building a network continues to be a struggle, expertise and the desire to succeed are evident. brazil's economic situation is but one hurdle; a new spirit of cooperation will be necessary to ensure better service and further technological advances. librarians in brazil seek technological improvements to upgrade service and bibliographic control and to increase cooperation. in addition, last year the ministry of education and culture approved the creation of a national center for a cooperative cataloging network and the adoption of a standardized format for machine-readable cataloging. in some ways the progress toward a shared cataloging network paralleis that of the united states; in many other ways the brazilian experience is quite different. attaining the lofty goal of linking libraries throughout brazil through technological means, thereby improving cooperation and resource sharing, will not be easy. because their country is also engaged in a struggle for more rapid economic development, librarians face an uphill battle. still, the desire to succeed is strong, and many dedicated individuals are working hard to realize this dream. the setting brazil is the world's fifth largest country in area and the sixth largest in population (140 million people). the language is portuguese and catholicism is the predominant religion. due to the massive importation of africans for slave labor and the large influx of european and japanese immigrants, however, brazil's cultures and customs are diverse. brazil is largely urban. the two largest cities, rio de janeiro and sao paulo, have around twelve and fifteen million inhabitants respectively. brazil is industrializing rapidly; one of the largest industries is automobile manufacturing. volkswagen do brasil, for example, exports parts and cars janet frederick is head, bibliographic database management department, general library, university of new mexico, albuquerque, new mexico 87131 . 76 to countries throughout the world, including the united states. brazil's gross national product ranks among the top ten in the world. in contrast to the modem cities of brazil with their multinational corporations and sprawling factories, technological advancement has lagged in such areas as the information industry. one reason for slow growth in computerization has been the informatica legislation that brought coordination of research, development, and production of electronic components under government control and established a protected microcomputer market. 3 computers in brazil computers made their debut in the 1950s as brazilian industry modernized rapidly. the first computers, principally ibm and burroughs mainframes, were imported. by the 1960s brazilian universities were training engineers in electronics and data processing. specialists went to the united states or europe for advanced training and many were frustrated on their return by the absence of a high technology industry in brazil. according to peter evans, "modernization of brazilian higher education and of the labor market generated a group of 'frustrated nationalist technicians' with strong personal and ideological interests in the creation of a local computer industry. '' 4 the 1970s saw advances in the computer area, and from 1969 to 1974 hardware imports increased by 600 percent. 5 brazil saw the need to develop its own computer industry, and in 1972 the government created capre, the commission for the coordination of electronic processing activities. capre became a ''powerful regulatory organ capable of generating an industrial policy for the brazilian industry."6 after a challenge to brazil's import restrictions by multinational computer companies, the government saw the need for a more decisive policy if it were to succeed in this highly competitive field. in 1979, a stronger agency was created: the special informatics secretariat (sei). sei became "an aggressive defender of the nationalist line."7 by 1983, local computer companies accounted for almost birth of a network 77 half the market, and with the advent of the microcomputer, the industry grew even faster. brazil was able to change its posture from relying on imported computers to importing components and creating domestic products. the informatics debate continues. the dilemma hinges on the lack of resources to address pressing problems of illiteracy, inadequate housing, and unemployment. still, the country cannot afford to be without modern technology. as cavan mccarthy observes, automated information systems ''are not only products of industrialised societies, they are also tools which in themselves promote industrialisation. " 8 moreover, brazilian computers often cost two to three times as much as the u.s. equivalents, and complications abound due to the independent development of systems and software and the lack of standards and guidelines. victor rosenberg notes that although the government of a developing country must appear independent of more powerful countries, the truth is that countries are becoming more interdependent in areas of technology.9 thus, changes in government agencies, industries, and import laws related to automation and information science have had a negative impact on library automation. computers in libraries development of automated library systems has occurred independently, in most cases without guidelines or standards. in some instances institutions automated library functions simply because time was available on the local mainframe. mccarthy's study of library automation in brazil (conducted between 1980 and 1984) included direct information on thirty-one institutions and indirect data on twelve others that reportedly had automated some functions. 10 he found that 40 percent of the institutions surveyed acknowledged having been influenced by another system; another 40 percent developed their systems independently. import restrictions have certainly interfered with installations of turnkey systems or even widespread use of software programs developed for library operations. however, 78 college & research libraries there are other factors that contribute to isolated development of automated library systems. thirty-one schools offer bachelor's degrees in library science; five, master's degrees; and one, the university of brasilia, a doctoral degree. because of the proliferation of library science programs, most librarians can and do stay in one place throughout their careers. communication and exchange of ideas between librarians have been difficult in the past. distances are great between metropolitan areas in brazil, and there have been few national conferences. until the present decade, very little knowledge regarding library automation was shared. all this is changing. in 1980 the brazilian institute for information in science and technology (ibict), the body responsible for assigning issns and publishing the national union catalog of serials, was charged with coordinating library automation activities in the country. in 1981, the second seminar on university libraries included a symposium on automated systems, and in 1984 two national seminars were devoted to library automation. in early 1987 i visited fifteen libraries throughout brazil and talked with numerous librarians. i was able to learn of problems with developing and continuing automated library systems. many of the larger university libraries have automated at least cataloging activities, and special libraries have automated other functions as well. for the most part, only special libraries can afford to use online retrieval systems such as dialog. telecommunication capability has only recently been available in brazil, since the introduction of interdata (international network) in 1982 and renpac (domestic network) in 1984. one of the first (1972) and most impressive systems is that of the data processing center of the federal senate, prodasen, which includes scion, the national congressional information system. scion contains a bibliographic database (bipe, bibliotecas e peri6dicos), an authority file (autr) for personal and corporate names, and a controlled vocabulary database (vcbs) as an online thesaurus. the january 1989 system handles acquisition records, cataloging, circulation, and online public access. as of march 1987, the bipe database contained more than 100,000 monographic titles and more than 100,000 periodical articles. other governmental and specialized bibliographic databases in brazil include binagre (national library of agriculture), bireme (regional medical library, sao paulo), camara (federal chamber of deputies), cenagri (national center for documentary information in agriculture), cimec (center for informatics of the ministry of education and culture), cin (nuclear information center), ipen (institute for energy and nuclear research), electrobras (brazilian electrical generating company), and petrobras (brazilian petroleum company). two public libraries have automated some activities: the public library of sao paulo (using a dobis-like system), and the library in sao bernardo do campo, which developed its own integrated system called taubipe (total automation of public and special libraries). 11 several university libraries have automated systems for various functions. the catholic university of rio de janeiro has implemented serials control, ,the university of brasilia and the university of sao paulo have automated cataloging and acquisitions, and the catholic university of pernambuco has online indexing of periodical articles, to name a few. the university of sao paulo's system, sibi (integrated system for libraries), is currently the largest cataloging database in brazil. developed in 1981 to handle bibliographic records for 42 libraries at four campuses, they planned to have over 700,000 monographic titles and 32,000 periodicals entered into the system by june 1987. many librarians in brazil feel a need for cooperative development of library automation but see it hindered by these independently developed systems, which lack standards. nice figueiredo states, "these initial systems in brazil were isolated, with few possibilities for continuity and were implemented to satisfy local needs only, with restricted performance." 12 a common complaint is that even the libraries of the senate and chamber of deputies, located in the same building, have separate, incompatible systems. nevertheless, work is progressing toward the development of a framework for an online network for brazilian libraries, as the following brief history and discussion of · plans will show. sistema bibliodata-calco in 1972, alice principe barbosa proposed the brazilian marc format, called calco ("catalogac;ao legivel por computador-machine-readable cataloging''), in her master's thesis. 13 calco was based on the library of congress marc ii format. barbosa had been director of the cataloging interchange service (sic), under the auspices of the department of public service administration (dasp). sic was founded in 1942 by lygia de queiroz sambaquy, then director of the brazilian institute for bibliography and documentation (ibbd), after her visit to the u.s. library of congress, where she was impressed with the cooperative cataloging program. through sic, libraries in brazil contributed cataloging data and received free catalog cards. cards were also made available to other libraries. from 1972 the calco format was studied and revised by the ministry of education and culture at the urging of the national library. jannice de mello monte-mor was director of the national library at that time and, upon her retirement in 1979, further work on the calco format was discontinued because the new director had no interest in the project. around the same time ibbd became ibict and, due to organizational changes, work on the calco format was suspended. nevertheless, by 1978 two manuals on the calco format were available: one produced by the national library for bibliographic data input and the other b~ ibict for bibliographic data interchange. 4 in the late 1970s, the getulio vargas foundation (fgv) in rio de janeiro began using the calco format, contracting with other libraries to computerize their cataloging activities. the national library joined fgv for computerized cataloging, and thus cooperative cataloging was reinbirth of a network 79 stituted in brazil. a shared cataloging database was born, and national standards began to be implemented. twenty-seven libraries have since contracted with the fgv for cataloging services and products. currently libraries enter cataloging onto floppy disks. the disks are sent to fgv, and the libraries receive catalog cards, spine labels, and other items in return. libraries also receive monthly the bibliodata database (about 160,000 titles) on microfiche for searching prior to cataloging. future plans include adding music and audiovisual formats, an authority file, and telecommunication access for online searching and cataloging. the national plan at the fifth seminar for university libraries held in porto alegre in january 1987, the main topic was the national plan for university libraries (pnbu), whose goals included the promotion of'' computerization of technical and administrative procedures within university libraries.'' the objectives listed were (a) to develop a network for exchanging of bibliographic and documentary data with an extensive data bank . . . (b) maintaining a center which shall supply information concerning library automation ... (c) encouraging development of suitable software for achieving automation of all library functions; and (d) supporting adoption of the calco interchange format . . . and ensuring compatibility with international standards. 15 during the previous year, representatives from the major federal university libraries had visited fgv and the university of sao paulo (usp) to look at both cataloging systems. the usp system was considered a viable database due to its size. there had been little quality control in the sibi database, however, and a great many entries had been duplicated. bibliodata, on the other hand, has maintained extremely high standards of data input, to the point of offering the participating libraries authority work done by the staff at fgv' s central library. at the porto alegre conference, a working group of representatives from the university libraries was formed to make rec80 college & research libraries ommendations to the government regarding implementation of the steps in the national plan. 16 they recommended that the calco format be adopted by university libraries and that fgv be the central network office. by june 1987, a great deal of discussion was underway about coordination, contracts, and costs. one of the main problems is cooperation. brazilian librarians are not used to this concept. for example, interlibrary loan is virtually non-existent in brazil. murilo da cunha states that as use of online databases increases so will resource sharing; but currently document delivery is the only measurable type of interlibrary loan that occurs. 17 with regard to sharing cataloging, some librarians remark that their library will be providing cataloging for other libraries, but that they will find little in the database for their own use. this sort of skepticism is understandable in light of the fact that online shared cataloging is a relatively new concept in brazil. professor da cunha, director of the university of brasilia library and library school, believes that university libraries in brazil must join together to achieve their service objectives. according to him, in 1979 there were three million uncataloged books in university libraries; by sharing cataloging via an online network, the processing time and cost will decrease considerably. 18 economic necessity often spawns resource sharing, and this is certainly a factor motivating brazilian librarians as they look toward online networking for help. beginnings of a network: united states/brazil online library networking can be defined as ''a group of libraries linked together in a computer and telecommunications system for the purpose of particigating in a common system or service.'' certain conditions must exist for networking to succeed. among the seven listed by glyn evans, three exist in brazil today and a fourth is in development. economic pressures and the laborintensive nature of library services, which combine to form one of the conditions necessary for networking, are of prime imporjanuary 1989 tance to brazilian librarians. budgets are small and cataloging work is extensive. for example, most periodicals are analyzed because indexes are not available. a great deal of detail goes into cataloging activities: aacr2 rules and isbd standards are rigorously applied; authority work is extensive because brazilian names are complicated. 20 the existence of technical standards, such as the marc formats, is another condition evans mentions. the calco format is operational and is, in fact, being used by 27 or more libraries sharing the bibliodata system. it has also served as a guide for formats developed independently at other institutions. some revision is still being done, notably the addition of new formats and enhancements for bibliographic interchange. ibict began development of a standard format for bibliographic and cataloging interchange called "formato ibict (intercambio bibliografico e catalografico)" in 1981:21 another factor motivating online networking is the societal need for timely information. as a developing country, brazil requires access to up-to-date sources of data. according to rosenberg, "the importing of information is critical to national development and [to] the ultimate reduction of dependence on foreign resources."22 evans' fourth condition has to do with the development of online computing and telecommunications. as reported above, brazil's telecommunications network, renp ac, began in 1984. a consortium of university libraries would be more likely to afford the costs of renp ac and interdata by using a group contract that offered discounts for increased usage. but exactly how the university libraries plan to interconnect, or how the getulio vargas foundation can link the libraries to their computer, had not been determined by june 1987. the remaining three items listed by evans have to do with the volume and variety of published material in the united states and the decrease in computing costs. the publishing industry is small in brazil, and foreign books are expensive and difficult to acquire. however, periodical indexing and other massive data files are needed for access to information. computing costs, as reported above, are generally higher than in the united states. but the cost of not sharing resources is greater. the conditions outlined above may not be the primary motivations for brazilian librarians, but they are helping in efforts toward the cooperative development of a network. at the 1979 indianapolis conference on networks for networkers, norman stevens discussed the fundamental concepts of a network. these concepts can be compared to evans' conditions. more significantly, however, stevens pointed out that ii the actual developments in the operation of networks ... have shaped the concepts and not the reverse." 23 the design of brazil's operational network will not imitate development in another country but, rather, will reflect its own history. there are about 850 institutions of higher education in brazil, 22 of which are federal universities. twenty-seven libraries, including the national library and two federal universities, were using the bibliodata system by june 1987. if the remaining federal university libraries were to participate, fgv could certainly be considered a national bibliographic utility. the development of networks in the united states may serve as an example. oclc went online in 1971, ballots (now rlin) in 1972, and wln in 1975. these bibliographic utilities began as networks to serve local needs. oclc, for example, started at ohio college library center as a statewide network for ohio. ballots was created to serve stanford birth of a network 81 libraries and was later acquired by theresearch libraries group (rlg), and became rlin (research libraries information network). wln, first called washington library network, was designed by boeing for the washington state library. it is now the western library network. the phenomenal growth of oclc1 from 100,000 database records in 1971 to over five million within fewer than ten years, might serve as an example to brazilian librarians. whatever concerns early members of oclc had about computerized, shared cataloging were quickly dispelled when the benefits of lower costs, faster processing, and access to an enormous national union catalog were realized. summary the way has been paved. in late 1987, the fgv came under the auspices of the federal ministry of education and culture. this change can improve financial support, but can also encourage cooperation among the federal universities. at the beginning of the present decade, it was noted that "we [the united states] are in the midst of a library revolution as a result of computer-based networking and none of us can predict all of the impacts as change begets chanpe in the evolution of network service.' ' 2 brazil is now in the midst of a similar library revolution. but many of the problems faced by librarians in a developing country are so different from those encountered in the united states that the outcome-the resultant network-will assuredly operate in distinct and perhaps unusual ways to some u.s. eyes. references and notes i. this article is a result of a research allocation grant award by the university of new mexico in 1986-87 to study library automation in brazil. 2. the librarians interviewed in brazil are extraordinarily accommodating people. i wish to thank them all for their hospitality. especially helpful were jannice monte-mor and lydia sambaquy of the getulio vargas foundation, nice figueiredo of the federal university of rio de janeiro, murilo bastos da cunha of the university of brasilia, dinah poblacion of the university of sao paulo, and cavan mccarthy of the catholic university of pernambuco. 3. nice figueiredo, "the application of micro-computers in libraries: a case study on brazil," in the application of micro-computers in information, documentation and libraries (elsevier, north holland, 1987), p.543-48. 82 college & research libraries january 1989 4. peter b. evans, "state, capital, and the transformatton of dependence: the brazilian computer · case," world development 14:791-808 ouly 1986). 5. ibid ., p .794. 6. ibid., p.793. 7. ibid ., p.796 . 8. cavan m. mccarthy, "problems of library and information system automation in brazil," journal of information science 7:149-58 (dec. 1983). 9. victor rosenberg, "information policies of developing countries: the case of brazil," journal of the american society for information science 33:203-7 ouly 1982). 10. cavan mccarthy, the introduction of automated library and information services in a newly industrialised country: a case study of brazilian experience (halifax, nova scotia: dalhousie university, 1986). 11. janet frederick, "the computerization of a public library in a developing country: sao bernardo do campo, s.p., brazil," (submitted for publication, 1987). 12. figueiredo, "the application of micro-computers," p .545 . 13. alice principe barbosa, projecto calco: adapta<;ao de marc ii para implanta<;ao de uma central de processamento de cataloga<;ao cooperativa. (rio de janeiro, master's thesis, 1972). 14. sistema bibliodata-calco (rio de janeiro, funda<;ao getulio vargas, 1982); jannice montemor, unpublished history of sistema bffiliodata-calco (rio de janeiro, fgv, 1985); mccarthy, introduction of automated library and information services, p.154-55. 15. national plan for university libraries (pnbu) directive no. 287 (brasilia, sesu/bibl./doc plan/86-001, 1986). 16. janet frederick, "university libraries in brazil to share cataloging," college & research libraries news 48:201-04 (apr. 1987). 17. murilo bastos da cunha, "effects of data bases on brazilian libraries," (ann arbor, michigan, ph.d. thesis, univ. of michigan, 1982). 18. murilo bastos da cunha, "rede de dados bibliograficos no brasil: uma necessidade real," paper presented at the fifth national seminar of university libraries oan. 12-14, 1987) porto alegre, rio grande do sul, brazil. 19. glyn t. evans, ''on-line library networking: a bibliographic essay,'' bulletin of the american society for information science 5:11-14 oune 1979). 20. brazilians change their names, spell them differently at various times, and names are often a mix~ ture of portuguese and another nationality. 21. "formato ffiict," ciencia da informa9ao 14:175-80 (july/dec. 1985). 22. rosenberg, "information policies," p.204. 23. norman d. stevens, "an historical perspective on the concept of networks: some preliminary considerations," in networks for networkers (new york: neal-schuman, 1980), p.45. 24. barbara evans markuson, "revolution and evolution: critical issues in library network development," in networks for networkers (new york: neal-schuman, 1980), p.5 . in the past, reading instruction has been limited to the lower elementary grades. but because of the widespread criticism of the inability of college students to read, there are indications that in the years just ahead reading instruction will be part of the instructional program of all schools from first grade through college. -mildred hawksworth lowell, ''reading and the training school library ijune 1941), p.229 reviews book reviews 569 between users and creators of information; a british professor describes the develop­ ment of copyright guidelines by the joint information systems committees (jisc) in british higher education; and a british publishing consultant stresses the need for librarians and information providers to work together to create agreements rather than rely on copyright as it is created by the software and entertainment industries. the electronic publishing section opens with a description of the creation and development of the electronic publi­ cation journal of high energy physics. it concludes with an essay emphasizing the need for authors, readers, libraries, and referees to all be involved in marketing strategies for electronic publications in order to find “the right model for jour­ nals publishing in the 21st century.” the first practical case study describes the development of the british national electronic library for health (nelh) de­ signed to provide information to both health professionals and their patients. a chapter on the lombard interuniversity consortium for automated processing (cilea) explains how the group shares subscription costs by loading electronic journals on a shared server. “the italian digital library project (biblioteca telematica italiana)” describes how a digital library will be built “of texts highly representa­ tive of the italian cultural tradition from the middle ages to the 19th century.“ the need for standards and protocols to ensure accurate, accessible resources is addressed in the fourth section with an essay that examines the use of two inter­ national standards—the search and re­ trieve protocol (iso 29350) and the inter­ library loan protocol (iso 10160/1). “metadata and metatag: the indexer be­ tween author and reader” is about im­ portant metadata projects in progress and the role of the cataloger as a “third party” between author and reader. “a standard for the legal deposit of on-line publica­ tions” is concerned with the need to en­ sure continued access to electronic publi­ cations as technology and format con­ tinue to change. “projects” includes “co-operation among university library organizations in italy,” explaining the need for im­ proved cooperative efforts among italian university libraries; a chapter on sistema biomedico lombardo (sbbl), composed of sixteen libraries that provide health information to at least eighty lombard institutions through the internet; and an abstract for a presentation on the use of issn-based identifiers. “document delivery as an alterna­ tive to subscription” begins the section on electronic document delivery. “the digital future—realities and fantasy— a view from marketing” concludes that the transition from printed resources to the electronic library is not inevitable and, in fact, is progressing more slowly than has been predicted. “electronic document delivery: new tools and opportunities” focuses on the importance of the use of standards for successful document deliv­ ery, and the final presentation, “electronic document delivery—the corporate competitive edge,” consists only of the slides used by the presenter; the text was not available for publication. this book is an interesting review of british and italian library cooperation. it describes a number of digital library projects that are either under way or com­ pleted in both countries, as well as several projects in other parts of the world. con­ ference presenters were reasonably bal­ anced between creators and disseminators of electronic information. the main draw­ back, as is true for most proceedings even in an increasingly digital age, is that those interested in particular projects under de­ velopment at the time of presentation will have to go elsewhere to find current infor­ mation on them. however, that caveat is minor compared to the overall advantage of expanding one’s familiarity with digi­ tal library development beyond one’s own region or even country.—ann hamilton, georgia southern university. the future of cataloging: insights from the lubetzky symposium. eds. tschera harkness connell and robert l. max­ 570 college & research libraries november 2000 well. chicago: ala, 2000. 184p. $65 paper (isbn 0-8389-0778-4). lc 99-87247. although i had received a number of other suggestions for books to take with me, on a recent vacation to the beach, i chose to bring this cataloging book. i do love cataloging. it is fun, challenging, and rewarding, but i can live without it for a week, especially if i am on vacation. how­ ever, i knew that i had a book review i needed to write and vacation just seemed to be the only time available. in a way, i pitied the authors. they would have to hold my attention against the raging sea, the deep and soft sand, and the smells of salt air and seafood. it was almost unfair. or so i thought until i started reading. this book contains fourteen papers originally presented at a symposium in honor of seymour lubetzky held ten days before his one hundredth birthday. despite the book’s title, the papers actually cover the history, present concerns, and future of cataloging. in fact, because the majority of the papers do not deal with the future, i found the title to be inaccurate and mis­ leading. however, the content is excellent. for the most part, the papers are clear, con­ cise, and written in nontechnical language. this book is not written in “catalogerese.” instead, it discusses cataloging concepts and issues in terms that any librarian and most patrons could understand. the first part of the book contains three papers that focus on the history of cataloging concepts and especially on the contributions of seymour lubetzky. i found the first two papers by seymour lubetzky, in collaboration with elaine svenonius and michael gorman, respec­ tively, to be excellent overviews. after cataloging for almost ten years, i finally learned how and why the cataloging rules were originally conceived and developed. these two chapters should be read by every cataloging student and probably by many experienced catalogers. the second part of the book consists of five papers on current thinking in catalog­ ing, most of which also include historical information that relate current develop­ ments to lubetzky’s guiding principles. of these principles, the one that receives the most attention is his concept of the “work.” the “work” is not a distinct bibliographic entity but, rather, the intellectual work behind the bibliographic entity. lubetzky statement of ownership, management, and circulation college & research libraries, issn 0010-0870, is published bimonthly by the association of college and research libraries, american library association, 50 e. huron st., chicago, il 60611-2795. the editor is donald riggs, nova southeastern university, 3301 college avenue, ft. lauderdale, fl 33314-7796. annual subscription price, $60.00. printed in u.s.a. with second-class postage paid at chicago, illinois. as a nonprofit organization authorized to mail at special rates (dmm section 424.12 only), the purpose, function, and nonprofit status of this organization and the exempt status for federal income tax purposes have not changed during the preceding twelve months. extent and nature of circulation (average figures denote the average number of copies printed each issue during the preceding twelve months; actual figures denote actual number of copies of single issue published nearest filing date: september 2000 issue.) total number of copies printed: average 12,778; actual 12,640. sales through dealers, carriers, street vendors, and counter sales: none. mail subscription: av­ erage 12,447; actual 12,599. free distribution: average 33; actual 33. total distribution: average 12,480; actual 12,632. office use, leftover, unaccounted, spoiled after printing: average 298; actual 8. total: average 12,778; actual 12,640. statement of ownership, management, and circulation (ps form 3526, oct. 1999) for 2000 filed with the united states post office postmaster in chicago, october 1, 2000. book reviews 571 felt that all versions of a “work” should be linked so that if a patron searched one ver­ sion, he or she would automatically find all the others available in the catalog. this is what we attempt to accomplish through the use of uniform titles and other special­ ized catalog entries. martha m. yee’s pa­ per addressing these linkages is especially interesting and well conceived. she has great ideas about how to group informa­ tion in a catalog so that the user can see the relationships, and she includes excel­ lent examples to illustrate these ideas. also especially noteworthy are allyson carlyle’s paper on indexes of search results and their organization and michael carpenter’s paper on the online catalog display of searches in which he argues for a more web-type display, employing dif­ ferent fonts, etc., for helping the user see the various relationships. the last part of the book contains six papers on the future of cataloging. i found this to be the most enjoyable section of the book. the chapters are concise and yet packed with information. although one does not find the answers to the catalog­ ing problems of the future here, one does find many thought-provoking discussions on the future of cataloging. topics covered index to advertisers acrl 544, 565, 566 aiaa 480, 545 archival products 489 choice 565, 573 ebsco cover 4 elsevier science 493, 495, 497 endocrine society 554 faxon/rowecom 490 getty trust 574 greenwood publishing 499 grove’s dictionaries cover 3 lexis-nexis 479 library technologies 483 m. moleiro 509 oclc 485 pnas 535 primary source microfilm cover 2 salem press 534 theatre research data group 524 include: putting the urls in the authority file; providing access to “virtual collec­ tions”; providing a subject structure to the web; and revising aacr2. the paper by maurice j. freedman on the philosophy of cataloging was especially insightful and clearly written. john d. byrum jr’s paper, which offers some important thoughts on certain cataloging rules that should be re­ vised, and marcia j. bates’s paper on the web were especially stimulating, and both included many pertinent examples. overall, i was quite pleased with this book. i found it to be well conceived, clearly written, and thought provoking. in fact, i was musing over the concepts so much that i even found myself asking my friends questions as we lay together on the beach. “how would you want an index of a famous author ordered?” “should the catalog display the author’s name as an added entry differently from his name as a main entry in the index?” reading this book really made me aware of the philosophical underpinnings of many cataloging concepts and made me question some of the cataloging rules that i have always just accepted. it made me question and it made me think, and that’s always good. i’m going back to the beach later this summer. i’ll probably bring a novel this time. i just hope it’s as thought provok­ ing as this book.—isabel del carmen quintana, harvard university. hannah, stan a., and michael h. harris. inventing the future: information services for a new millennium. stam­ ford, conn.: ablex, 1999. 170p. $54.50 cloth (isbn 1-56750-450-7); $24.95 pa­ per (isbn 1-56750-451-5). lc99-28306. inventing the future, sequel to into the future by the same authors, is a compact book that reads as a call to arms for li­ brarians—who wish to stay relevant—to change the way they approach their work. the authors offer no “utopian fantasies”; instead, they assume a world where print and paper will exist but argue that infor­ mation technology will be the core tech­ nology in the library’s future. the authors reviews 470 college & research libraries september 2002 470 book reviews bade, david. the creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs: language and subject knowledge in a technological era. champaign-urbana, ill.: graduate school of library and information science, univ. of illinois (occasional papers, no. 211), 2002. 33p. $8 (isbn 087845120x). serious cataloging, as is well known by those who have done it, can be both a humbling and frustrating experience—humbling because the vast number of subjects, languages, and types of publications the cataloger must deal with can be daunting, even to seasoned veterans; and frustrating because nearly all catalogers find themselves torn between the demands of producing high-quality records and, at the same time, turning out a high volume of work in order to keep up with the flow of materials. in this issue of the university of illinois’ occasional papers series, david bade demonstrates more frustration than humility with the process but has some useful and important things to say about cataloging in this age of shared, online databases. as his title makes clear, bade’s focus is on the number and persistence of errors in shared cataloging databases such as oclc and rlin, a problem he sees as only worsening with time. he categorizes errors into six types: (1) typographical, (2) isbd formatting and punctuation, (3) marc tagging, (4) misapplication of cataloging rules, (5) linguistic errors, and (6) intellectual errors. the first four types of errors have been discussed a good bit in the literature, and bade mentions them only briefly here. his real concern is with linguistic errors, which he understands as cataloging errors that result from an inadequate understanding of the language in which the work is written, and intellectual errors, which he understands as errors (usually of subject analysis and classification) that occur because of a lack of subject knowledge on the part of the cataloger. how common are these errors in our shared databases, and what are their causes and consequences? despite the fact that he has entitled a couple of sections of his book “the extent of the problem,” bade never really tells us the extent of the problem. the evidence he cites is anecdotal, and we are left to wonder how pervasive the problem is. in fairness to the author, i think no one else knows either. lois chan, among others, has published studies of errors in subject heading assignment, but these focus mainly on whether assigned headings match current lc authorities, whether they are constructed properly, and so on, not on whether they accurately reflect the content of the work in question. given the complexity of the problem, it may be that all our evidence is anecdotal; but experienced librarians who regularly use these databases know that the problem is not a phantom. what is worse, as the author makes clear, after these errors are created in the bibliographic utilities, they propagate through local catalogs across the country as librarians and library database managers too often blithely load records without adequate quality control at the local level. what is to be done? bade offers both specific and general suggestions for ameliorating the problem. to catalogers, he recommends learning more languages, broadening their subject backgrounds by taking additional courses, making use of local and contracted knowledge sources to improve the quality of records, and, most important, abstaining from adding records to the shared databases when the necessary expertise—especially linguistic expertise—is lacking. to library administrators, he recommends recognizing the intellectual nature of cataloging and being willing to pay for it, hiring enough catalogers so that good ones are not made incompetent by being forced to cover too book reviews 471 many languages and too many subjects, and making use of intellectual talent in the library among staff whether or not they are professional librarians. it is hard to argue against any of these ideas in principle, but how practical are they? sad to say, most library catalogers who work a forty-hour week for eleven months of the year and keep house and body together in modern times have little time (or energy?) for advanced learning. and in a time of diminishing budgets, library administrators will not be overwhelmed with the creativity of a suggestion to solve the quality control problem in cataloging by hiring more catalogers, or even paying highly qualified nonprofessional staff more money to do specialized cataloging work. bade is right to insist that we have a problem and that its consequences can be severe, but i am not sure how far his recommendations can go toward mitigation. surely, a big part of any solution must be to reinvigorate and expand our efforts at cooperative cataloging, especially in the area of standards and in the sharing of expertise. whatever its limits and defects, cooperative cataloging has been a monumental success in the library community, making possible the creation of giant world bibliographic databases such as oclc worldcat and providing cataloging to local libraries at reduced costs. bade is concerned that this open, cooperative process, together with the lack of a sufficient number of adequately trained catalogers, threatens to slay the goose that laid the golden egg. this is an important warning. but just as we sometimes fight fire with fire, so perhaps we fight the downside of cooperative cataloging with better cooperation. that may mean more rigorous standards and stricter control on the input of bibliographic records to the national utilities. it may mean paying a little more for cooperative cataloging products (rather than a lot more for catalogers in-house) to enable oclc and rlg to do better quality control cleanup of the databases, although this is unlikely to do much for the correction of linguistic and intellectual errors that generally require having the work in hand. it may mean improving and expanding initiatives such as the program for cooperative cataloging. i also would suggest the idea of allowing catalogers to join the pcc as individuals, making their special skills and knowledge available on a contract basis to other libraries as the need arises. bade ends his paper on a somewhat vociferous note, asking whether cataloging is now a matter of intelligence or artificial intelligence. he does a good job of reminding us that it is still very much a matter of human intelligence because it is the knowledge and the judgment of human catalogers that create the records that become the substance of our bibliographic behemoths. but it also is, of course, a matter of artificial intelligence, with computers processing, communicating, and, in some ways, correcting bibliographic records. it is likely to continue this way long into the future, with the proportions depending on what we value and what we can afford.—robert bland, university of north carolina at asheville. brown, carol r. interior design for libraries: drawing on function & appeal. chicago: ala, 2002. 143p. $45, alk. paper (isbn 0838908292). lc 2002-1325. carol brown is assistant director of the fort bend county library in richmond, texas. she has held library positions at indiana university and the houston public library, and has been a library planning consultant. in addition, she is the author of planning library interiors and selecting library furniture (oryx, 1989). this book is a good hands-on, basic manual written in a concise, easy-to-understand style. short and approachable, it is filled with interesting and enlightening information. it contains fifteen color plates and thirty-two black-and-white illustrations. in her second chapter, “the planning phases of a library building project,” the author clearly delineates what is entailed by the programming, schematic design, design development, and development of construction drawings phases and what, as librarians and planners, we need to expect to see and have happen during those << /ascii85encodepages false /allowtransparency false /autopositionepsfiles true /autorotatepages /all /binding /left /calgrayprofile (dot gain 20%) /calrgbprofile (srgb iec61966-2.1) /calcmykprofile (u.s. web coated \050swop\051 v2) /srgbprofile (srgb iec61966-2.1) /cannotembedfontpolicy /warning /compatibilitylevel 1.3 /compressobjects /tags /compresspages true /convertimagestoindexed true /passthroughjpegimages true /createjobticket false /defaultrenderingintent /default /detectblends true /detectcurves 0.0000 /colorconversionstrategy /cmyk /dothumbnails false /embedallfonts true /embedopentype false /parseiccprofilesincomments true /embedjoboptions true /dscreportinglevel 0 /emitdscwarnings false /endpage -1 /imagememory 1048576 /lockdistillerparams false /maxsubsetpct 1 /optimize true /opm 1 /parsedsccomments true /parsedsccommentsfordocinfo true /preservecopypage true /preservedicmykvalues true /preserveepsinfo true /preserveflatness false /preservehalftoneinfo true /preserveopicomments false /preserveoverprintsettings true /startpage 1 /subsetfonts false /transferfunctioninfo /apply /ucrandbginfo /preserve /useprologue false /colorsettingsfile () /alwaysembed [ true ] /neverembed [ true ] /antialiascolorimages false /cropcolorimages false /colorimageminresolution 151 /colorimageminresolutionpolicy /ok /downsamplecolorimages true /colorimagedownsampletype /bicubic /colorimageresolution 300 /colorimagedepth -1 /colorimagemindownsampledepth 1 /colorimagedownsamplethreshold 1.10000 /encodecolorimages true /colorimagefilter /dctencode /autofiltercolorimages true /colorimageautofilterstrategy /jpeg /coloracsimagedict << /qfactor 0.15 /hsamples [1 1 1 1] /vsamples [1 1 1 1] >> /colorimagedict << /qfactor 0.15 /hsamples [1 1 1 1] /vsamples [1 1 1 1] >> /jpeg2000coloracsimagedict << /tilewidth 256 /tileheight 256 /quality 30 >> /jpeg2000colorimagedict << /tilewidth 256 /tileheight 256 /quality 30 >> /antialiasgrayimages false /cropgrayimages false /grayimageminresolution 151 /grayimageminresolutionpolicy /ok /downsamplegrayimages true /grayimagedownsampletype /bicubic /grayimageresolution 300 /grayimagedepth -1 /grayimagemindownsampledepth 2 /grayimagedownsamplethreshold 1.10000 /encodegrayimages true /grayimagefilter /dctencode /autofiltergrayimages true /grayimageautofilterstrategy /jpeg /grayacsimagedict << /qfactor 0.15 /hsamples [1 1 1 1] /vsamples [1 1 1 1] >> /grayimagedict << /qfactor 0.15 /hsamples [1 1 1 1] /vsamples [1 1 1 1] >> /jpeg2000grayacsimagedict << /tilewidth 256 /tileheight 256 /quality 30 >> /jpeg2000grayimagedict << /tilewidth 256 /tileheight 256 /quality 30 >> /antialiasmonoimages false /cropmonoimages false /monoimageminresolution 600 /monoimageminresolutionpolicy /ok /downsamplemonoimages true /monoimagedownsampletype /bicubic /monoimageresolution 1200 /monoimagedepth -1 /monoimagedownsamplethreshold 1.16667 /encodemonoimages true /monoimagefilter /ccittfaxencode /monoimagedict << /k -1 >> /allowpsxobjects false /checkcompliance [ /none ] /pdfx1acheck false /pdfx3check false /pdfxcompliantpdfonly false /pdfxnotrimboxerror true /pdfxtrimboxtomediaboxoffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /pdfxsetbleedboxtomediabox true /pdfxbleedboxtotrimboxoffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /pdfxoutputintentprofile () /pdfxoutputconditionidentifier () /pdfxoutputcondition () /pdfxregistryname () /pdfxtrapped /false /createjdffile false /description << /enu (ipc print services, inc. please use these settings with indesign cs4 \(6.x\). these settings should work well for every type of job; b/w, color or spot color. contact pre-press helpdesk at prepress_helpdesk@ipcprintservices.com if you have questions or need customized settings.) >> /namespace [ (adobe) (common) (1.0) ] /othernamespaces [ << /asreaderspreads false /cropimagestoframes true /errorcontrol /warnandcontinue /flattenerignorespreadoverrides false /includeguidesgrids false /includenonprinting false /includeslug false /namespace [ (adobe) (indesign) (4.0) ] /omitplacedbitmaps false /omitplacedeps false /omitplacedpdf false /simulateoverprint /legacy >> << /addbleedmarks true /addcolorbars false /addcropmarks true /addpageinfo true /addregmarks false /bleedoffset [ 9 9 9 9 ] /convertcolors /converttocmyk /destinationprofilename (u.s. web coated \(swop\) v2) /destinationprofileselector /documentcmyk /downsample16bitimages true /flattenerpreset << /clipcomplexregions true /convertstrokestooutlines true /converttexttooutlines true /gradientresolution 300 /linearttextresolution 1200 /presetname ([high resolution]) /presetselector /highresolution /rastervectorbalance 1 >> /formelements false /generatestructure false /includebookmarks false /includehyperlinks false /includeinteractive false /includelayers false /includeprofiles true /marksoffset 9 /marksweight 0.250000 /multimediahandling /useobjectsettings /namespace [ (adobe) (creativesuite) (3.0) ] /pdfxoutputintentprofileselector /na /pagemarksfile /romandefault /preserveediting true /untaggedcmykhandling /leaveuntagged /untaggedrgbhandling /usedocumentprofile /usedocumentbleed false >> << /allowimagebreaks true /allowtablebreaks true /expandpage false /honorbaseurl true /honorrollovereffect false /ignorehtmlpagebreaks false /includeheaderfooter false /marginoffset [ 0 0 0 0 ] /metadataauthor () /metadatakeywords () /metadatasubject () /metadatatitle () /metricpagesize [ 0 0 ] /metricunit /inch /mobilecompatible 0 /namespace [ (adobe) (golive) (8.0) ] /openzoomtohtmlfontsize false /pageorientation /portrait /removebackground false /shrinkcontent true /treatcolorsas /mainmonitorcolors /useembeddedprofiles false /usehtmltitleasmetadata true >> ] >> setdistillerparams << /hwresolution [2400 2400] /pagesize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice reviews.indd 460 college & research libraries in the meantime, “the history of the book” remained the province of antiquarians, book collectors, curators, and sundry printers—a dedicated band of amateurs who, nonetheless, did much of the basic spade work for later academics. by contemporary standards, moran’s review of de worde’s career seems almost quaint, circumscribed as it is by the narrow horizons of moran’s own interests and his understanding of his task. it relies heavily on a book i can recommend, h. s. bennett’s english books and readers 1475 to 1557 (cambridge 1989). for moran, de worde was the first printer in london to truly take advantage of the new technology as a medium of popular communication. over the course of his career, he churned out hundreds of titles aimed at a more popular market and so became, for his biographer, the “precursor” of the fleet street baron. as william caxton’s “journeyman,” de worde enjoys his own cult following today. there is a wynkyn de worde society in the uk, and it seems to have underwritten some of the costs of the reissue of the present work. perhaps its members are the driving force behind the volume. however welcome the bibliography by lotte hellinga and mary erler, though, i cannot really urge anyone to rush out and buy this slim monograph. librarians and scholars coming to it from the perspective of current work in the history of the book will probably be neither impressed nor enlightened. in its day, it was a welcome addition to the literature. it is good to have it in our libraries. but i find it difficult to make the case for its enduring presence today.—michael ryan, university of pennsylvania. sauperl, alenka. subject determination during the cataloging process. lanham, md.: london: scarecrow, 2002. 173p. alk. paper, $47.50 (isbn 0810842890). lc 2001-57698. september 2004 this reviewer, who finds it diffi cult to dislike any book, was disappointed by this one. based on the author’s doctoral dissertation (university of north carolina, 1999), the work reports on a study made to identify and examine the cognitive processes involved in the assignment of subject headings through a case study of catalogers. the thought processes that go into subject cataloging have received sparse attention and the topic is deserving of scholarly exploration. this study makes a definite contribution to the quite limited body of literature. sauperl’s failure to explain certain aspects of her research methodology frequently causes the reader to become puzzled, however, if not frustrated. the printed text itself could have been improved by careful editing and some rewriting. the work is organized into seven chapters. an introduction discusses the purpose of the study and very briefl y describes the research strategy. the second chapter reviews the treatment of subject determination as presented in cataloging and indexing textbooks and discusses the previous research concerned with subject analysis and indexing. the inclusion of indexing research strengthens the study and is to be applauded. the third chapter describes the research methodology. chapter four, “twelve personal approaches to subject cataloging,” presents the case studies. being ninety-fi ve pages in length, it forms the core of the book. chapter five summarizes what was learned from the case studies. chapter six presents a model for subject analysis. chapter seven discusses the author ’s findings in relation to earlier studies and the implication of those findings for cataloging education and cataloging in libraries. the section concerned with previous research has a fair amount of redundancy with chapter three. although repetition of this nature is not uncommon in dissertations, less detail in one chapter or the other would have been preferable in the book. a bibliography and an index conclude the volume. sauperl’s case study participants were twelve experienced original catalogers from three academic libraries in the southeastern united states. each institution had “more than a million volumes... several branch libraries and large central cataloging departments with several catalogers performing original cataloging. all the libraries used oclc.” each participant performed original cataloging for three books of his or her own selection. however, except for the fi rst case study, participants only “describe cataloging of one of the three items.” the reason for imposing this limitation in a study, that by its very nature is already quite limited, is not stated. six catalogers were observed by sauperl, who used the “think-aloud method ...to capture the cognitive process of the catalogers during their work.” the other six were interviewed. the respective methodologies are discussed, but the rationale for their dual employment is nowhere stated. sauperl does comment that the different methods had a substantial impact on the reports of the case studies. “while the observed catalogers actually cataloged books during the observation session, the interviewed catalogers only talked about their cataloging approach. this means the stories of the observed catalogers are much more detailed and based on evidence from the observation, whereas the stories of the interviewed catalogers are quite brief and skeletal.” interviewed participants were asked to describe some recent work that they had cataloged, given the opportunity to explain their philosophy of cataloging, and so on. the interviews were structured inasmuch as individuals were asked to respond to and discuss, as they deemed book reviews 461 appropriate, the relation of a number of factors to subject cataloging. each participant was presented with several factors that “were selected from the observation session of one or two catalogers in another library in the study.” participants were therefore not responding to a uniform set of factors, a circumstance that sauperl leaves unexplained. the responses given to the variables were interesting and informative. this reviewer believes the study would have been stronger had a comprehensive set of variables been developed and each participant in the three groups presented with the same identical factors to prompt discussion. there are several problems with the handling of the variables. given their importance to the interviews, sauperl’s failure to discuss them in a separately labeled section of the text must be faulted. she also must be faulted for explicitly stating the complete set of variables for just one interviewee group. no comparable sets are provided for interviewees in the other two groups. one learns the factors used to prompt discussion with these interviewees only in the text. variables or concepts presented to the first group included such expected elements as authority fi le, local catalog, title page, record for a previous edition, tentative heading and subject heading, as well as such factors as time and cost. participants in this group were not asked to comment on the importance of the author’s intention, skimming the work, and thinking of the library user as a part of the process when choosing subject headings, variables included as prompts to another group of interviewees. cooperation with colleagues and “saturation point...that feeling when you had to stop” working with a given book, were among the other variables. despite its shortcomings, this is not an unimportant work. scholars of subject cataloging will obviously be its primary 462 college & research libraries september 2004 audience. the study provides a base for future research and, given its moderate price, should be owned by any library and information science collection that supports serious scholarship. the book is worth consideration as supplementary reading for cataloging courses. catalogers should at least skim the work, especially those at entry level and midcareer. by way of conclusion, it seemed only appropriate to check worldcat to look at the subject headings assigned to this work. a title search (done on august 9, 2002) retrieved five records, two for the book and three for the preceding dissertation. the record for the book in hand (oclc: 48588266) had two subjects: “subject cataloging” and “subject cataloging—united states—case studies.” a second record (oclc: 50100464), which had an identical bibliographic description except for pagination being noted 192 (versus 173 for the copy in hand), gave the single subject: “subject cataloging.” the record for the printed version of the dissertation (oclc: 42810541) had three subjects: “subject cataloging,” “subject headings,” and “catalogers—united states—att itudes.” the final records were for microform versions of the dissertation. the records for both the microfilm (oclc: 44492710) and microfi che (oclc: 44161585) gave the two identical headings “subject cataloging” and “subject headings.” the subjects given all seem appropriate, even if they are not entirely consistent. this reviewer would suggest adding another subject heading to bring out the cognitive aspects of the study. but that’s just a thought.—james w. williams, university of illinois at urbanachampaign. call for nominations and many other award opportunities information may be obtained on the acrl web site: www.ala.org/acrl/award2.html or by contacting megan bielefeld, (312) 280-2514, e-mail: mbielefeld@ala.org excellence in academic libraries award $3,000 and a plaque sponsored by blackwell’s book services academic or research librarian of the year $3,000 and a citation sponsored by ybp library services college and research libraries cataloging u.s. depository materials: a reevaluation alice harrison bahr automation is reshaping the rhetoric and content of an old debate: to catalog or not to catalog federal publications. the availability of quality records online, keyword search capabilities of online catalogs, and other developments argue persuasively against patent acceptance of old premises. this article reviews previous arguments, discusses conditions redefining them, and proposes partial guidelines for reevaluating current u.s. depository cataloging policies and practices. ataloging united states government depository materials is an old debate. beginning in the 1930s and continuing into the 40s, it was sparked by an increase in the number of depository materials. from 400 in 1900, for example, the number rose to 4,300 by 1930. 1 typically, numbers dictated organization. libraries that selected small numbers cataloged them, a practice endorsed for the smaller library by mary hartwell, cataloger for the office of the superintendent of documents. 2 those that received larger numbers maintained separate collections arranged alphabetically by agency, by type of material, or by superintendent of documents (sudocs) classification number, thus organizing materials br, agency and series rather than by subject. the latter system was particularly easy, since materials were sent to depository libraries with shipping lists supplying sudocs numbers. other libraries used both approaches. they cataloged some materials and placed others in separate collections. in time, arguments for the two basic arrangements became set. as waldo points out, their bases "were merely unsupported opinions and assumptions.'' 4 separatists pointed to the shortcomings of the card catalog: its inability to .index serial publications, its paucity of subject headings, and its difficulty of use, especially for the user confronting the unwieldy u.s. author drawer. there were shortcomings with cataloging itself. it was not suitable for all materials, particularly pamphlets and posters. it imposed a classification system, either dewey or library of congress, that precluded arrangement by agency, useful to some researchers. it increased delays between receipt and availability of materials. it was expensive. quality records were sparse, necessitating original cataloging, and frequent title and agency name changes required multiple record handling. relying on higherquality indexes, with better quality indexing, provided better access to materials and information. promoting staff familiarity with government materials, separate collections improved the quality of reference service. on the other side, advocates of cataloging acknowledged its expense, but justified cost on the basis of improved, simplified access. cataloging spared users the aggravation of consulting several indexes and the annoyance of learning a second classification system. it also provided immediate feedback on library holdings. in alice harrison bahr is project librarian for online systems at the libraries at cedar crest and muhlenberg colleges, allentown, pennsylvania 18104. 587 588 college & research libraries short, it was expensive and timeconsuming, but resulted in better service. the old arguments are changing. technology is bypassing them and raising new questions. the availability of government printing office (gpo) cataloging on networks, record retrieval on some networks by sudocs number, and online catalogs and their related use studies both beg the assumptions of the past and highlight new needs. among these are the need to keep abreast of technological developments, to reevaluate present policy in light of those developments, and to formulate policies based on both demonstrated user needs and technological developments. technological considerations technology is reshaping old arguments by creating access other than through the card catalog, by streamlining cataloging procedures, and by creating a new form of the card catalog. bypassing traditional card catalog access altogether, for example, bruce morton made use of available software and carleton college's dec v ax-11 to produce a sudocs shelflist accessible not only by sudocs number but by title, keyword, and boolean operatives. 5 this is an exception, however; most libraries have relied on online vendors, national agencies, and bibliographic utilities to create new options. the basis for most new possibilities is cooperation among the government printing office (gpo), library of congress and online computer library center (oclc). deciding to speed up production of its monthly catalog, the official catalog of u.s. government congressional and departmental publications, gpo began cataloging on the oclc shared cataloging network in 1976. to do so, it had to abandon its local thesaurus and conform to anglo-american cataloging rules and library of congress subject headings. 6 conformance ushered in gpo's new role as cataloging authority for u.s. government materials, which became official on january 2, 1981. gpo's use of oclc produced the major benefit to libraries: availability of a substantial number of timely, high-quality records. the type of records available has exnovember 1986 panded, and reported hit rates are excellent. in october 1981 gpo assumed cataloging responsibility for materials distributed by the national audiovisual center. 7 in 1982 the university of washington reported finding 75 percent of materials on oclc. its hit rate for u.s. government materials was 95 percent. 8 a 1985 muhlenberg college study reported a 96 percent hit rate for selected categories of u.s. materials (see table 1). backlog at gpo is not significant. as soon as gpo catalogs materials, records are available on oclc. in 1984 a onemonth study of "priority one" cataloging items (congressional materials) indicated that 72 percent were input in 15 days and average input time was 24.4 days. 9 the suny/potsdam library (state university college at potsdam, new york), which catalogs u.s. materials on oclc, begins searching one to two months after receipt of documents. 10 cooperation -between gpo and bibliographic utilities has increased the number of quality records available to libraries relatively soon after publication. it has also created new means of access to those records and new cataloging services. in 1980, oclc surveyed libraries to determine their interest in an even quicker cataloging process, darp (automatic distribution of cataloging). targeted initially for regional depositories (those libraries receiving all available depository materials), the service would have created individual catalog records for libraries receiving depository series. cataloging would have been automatic, completed as soon as gpo cataloged an item in a series but due to the cost of the service, darp never got off the ground. there is a difference between having records available and having quick, convenient access to them. for cataloging purposes, access by sudocs number is desirable. it allows catalogers to work directly from shipping lists to search for records. oclc made sudocs number access (oclc's gn: government number key) available in 1980. in 1985 it became possible to search for records by any sudocs number attached to a title, as of the point of cataloging. sudocs numbers change when an issuing agency changes, which cataloging u.s. depository materials 589 table 1 oclc record availability p840601-1 to p840831-5#* m840601-1 to p840831-8:j: total p840904-1 to p841123-4 m840904-1 to m841129-5# total combined total 97 12 109 66 14 80 189 *p = paper shipping lists . available series cataloging (#) 4 4 5 5 9 hearings 27 10 37 15 9 24 61 geological survey professional papers(#) 12 6 6 18 geological survey bulletins (#) 6 6 8 8 14 non-gpo record (#) 15 (14/dlc)t 12 27 (15/dlc) 10 (7/dlc) 8 (1/dlc) 18 (8/dlc) 45 (23/dlc) nooclc record (#) 4 4 3 3 7 oclc record availability (%) 96% 100% 96% 95% 100% 95% 96% tdlc = th e number of non-gpo records that are library of congress records . :j:m = microfiche sh ipping lists. means one title may have several sudocs numbers. both searching capabilities enhance access to records. another benefit of gpo's use of oclc is the generation of machine-readable records on tape. used to produce monthly catalog, the tapes have other uses. they are loaded regularly onto other shared cataloging networks like the research libraries information network (run) and western library network (wln) to provide users of those systems with access to the same gpo records as oclc users. availability is not as immediate as in oclc, since gpo tapes are loaded monthly, and these networks do not yet provide sudocs number access. 11 tapes have another potential use for libraries using or planning to implement an online catalog. they provide an alternative means of including gpo records in a local online catalog. one possibility is to download records from a shared cataloging network by means of an interface. the other is to load gpo tapes into the online catalog. this requires tape manipulation both to load the tapes and to eliminate records neither received nor cataloged, i.e. maps, serials, etc. cooperation between national agencies and shared cataloging networks weakens the argument that quality records are unavailable, a main pillar in the argument against cataloging u.s. materials. similarly, the existence of the online catalog erodes another premise, that excessive record handling contributes to the high cost of cataloging. in manual catalogs, record changes require pulling, editing, and refiling cards, usually seven to a set. an online catalog eliminates these steps. while this is a benefit regardless of what materials are being cataloged, it is a particularly strong one for depository materials, which undergo frequent main entry and title changes. those frequent changes are inherent in the nature of both serials and government organizations. while little can be done to eliminate the former, technology can help simplify the latter. some online catalogs incorporate authority control for personal authors, and a few offer it for corporate authors and series. if the catalog also offers online global change, one change to an authority record will automatically alter in the same way all affected headings throughout the database. a common argument against cataloging u.s. materials is the paucity and inade590 college & research libraries quacy of subject headings. online catalogs have the capacity to increase the traditional author, title, and subject heading access points. to search the manual catalog successfully, users must know precise authors and titles, guess the correct subject term, or know how to use lc subject headings volumes. most online catalogs are more forgiving. they provide keyword access to some or all fields as well as sudocs number access. the latter is increasingly useful as more and more sources include these numbers. public affairs information service announced recently that 65 percent of indexed u.s. government materials include sudocs numbers. by simplifying record changes, eliminating filing, and increasing access points, online catalogs can facilitate a variation of the old either/or proposition to catalog u.s. materials or to house them separately. these catalogs make it easy to combine approaches, namely, to catalog materials, classify them by sudocs, and yet keep them separate. the same arrangement is possible in a manual catalog, but filing alone argues against it. the library at suny/potsdam, which has cataloged on oclc and classified by sudocs since the 70s, reduces filing by cataloging selectively. technology, of course, is not a panacea. an automated sudocs shelflist has the advantage of creating more access points than a traditional card catalog, but it also forces users to consult more than one catalog to locate information. the availability of records on shared cataloging networks has been an important technological advance. however, not every library uses one, and not every network offers sudocs access. for libraries using networks, whether or not sudocs access is available, there are other possible constraints. gpo is slow to catalog certain materials. 12 possible downscaling of cataloging might also present problems. there has been no report about gpo's 1982 discussions on the possibility of downscaling aacr2 cataloging to augmented level ii and no longer providing corporate and personal name authority work. 13 specific gpo practices may be of greater concern. for example, gpo provides no november 1986 collective series entries for titles in monographic series, only individual analytics. this means, for example, that if a library staff decide that a few subject headings will suffice to lead users to the content of u.s. geological survey professional papers series, they must, if using gpo copy, provide individual analytics for titles in those series. the depository library council, an advisory body comprised of librarians, has repeatedly passed resolutions requesting series cataloging, but official gpo response has been that current practice conforms to depository law. this problem is not insurmountable, however; it requires only that a library create a few collective series entries. technological changes are catalysts. they provide new possibilities and challenges, not perfect answers-microfiche records provide an example. gpo catalogs only paper copies of publications that are converted to microfiche for depository distribution. a note indicates that distribution to some depositories was on microfiche, and the word microfiche appears after the item number. however, libraries with substantial fiche collections might not welcome the editing required. exchanges between the depository library council and gpo have thus far produced only the following resolution: gpo's policy is in accord with title 44 of the u.s. code, and librarians are free to modify records.14 actually, a number of libraries do so, creating suitable records in most cases. this is especially true for government hearings. shipping lists from gpo are not always correct, creating another cause for concern depending on the delay between receipt of lists and actual cataloging. revisions to shipping lists, called "corrections lists," are issued periodically to clear up incorrect sudocs numbers, typographical errors, and wrong item numbers (the numbers used to order depository series). gpo tape users face greater problems. for example, tapes include all gpo cataloging, and unless a library has received all these materials (some of which are nondepository, that is, not offered to depository libraries), records must be eliminated either in-house or by a vendor. regardless of who processes the tapes, records are cataloging u.s. depository materials 591 usually extracted by item number. since it is not uncommon for depository libraries to fail to receive some items ordered, records may be created for titles not in fact held. the result is like cataloging on the basis of what is ordered instead of what is received. in addition, tape loading on an online system requires manipulation of data. not every library has, or plans to have, an online catalog. even for those who do, gpo tapes present additional difficulties: they come without documentation. control numbers like oclc, sudocs, technical reports, and contract numbers are either omitted or appear in incorrect fields. 15 correction tapes are not issued. consequently, errors must first be detected and then corrected manually. there are multiple records for errata slips and periodical issues, and not all series, subjects, and names conform to lc form. fortunately, many of the gpo tape errors and limitations have been corrected. the depository library council has been requesting since spring 1979 that gpo convert traced names, series, and subjects to lc form; add control numbers such as item, sudocs, and stock numbers (used for direct purchase of materials) to appropriate fields; and correct typographical and other errors. 16 the public printer announced at the fall 1984 council meeting that the project would be undertaken and supervised by judy myers at the university of houston. 17 funds were never allocated. one year later brodart announced its gpo file, which includes lc subject and name headings and control number corrections. correction pages from annual monthly catalog volumes are being keyed in. while brodart is still investigating procedures to handle separate serial records, its gpo file offers dramatic evidence of how quickly technology changes situations. cost considerations the availability of quality records in various forms, a major obstacle to cataloging, is part of a larger consideration: cost. even if quality records are available, are they affordable? the assumption has been no, despite the absence of comparative cost data for processing, maintaining, and supervising separate collections. fortunately, new possibilities have been explored with an eye to reducing expenses. available cost data highlight the weakness of previous assumptions and also undercut them. the cost of carleton college's automated sudocs shelflist was determined by counting the bytes per record and then calculating the required disk space for a given number of records. at 310 bytes per record, the storage cost for 431,600 records was $8,500, the same price as a 260,000block disk and drive. 18 disregarding input time and use and storage costs, all of which were absorbed by the computer center, the unit cost for the shelflist was $1.98, slightly higher than oclc firsttime use charges. 19 in 1984 bowerman and cady, suspecting libraries might include records in their online catalogs if they were available at ''a small fraction of the cost incurred in a traditional cataloging environment, " 20 compared costs for various methods of obtaining records. the researchers took a sample .from a gpo test tape to develop a costeffectiveness model on which to base a comparison of four ways of obtaining machine-readable records. two of the four ways involved tapes: the first manipulated in-house, the second by marcive, a commercial firm that strips records from tapes for libraries. the other two options involved automated cataloging services, either online through oclc' s network or offline, inputting records on a microcomputer and sending them to library systems services, inc. (lssi) for tape or card production. the results were as follows: a library cataloging approximately twelve thousand publications (about 35 percent of available items exclusive of maps, serials, and microfiche) would spend about $1,500, $1,800, $17,000, and $2,600 to obtain records from gpo, marcive, oclc, and lssi, respectively. 21 record extraction by brodart, unavailable at that time, reduces costs further: $600 for twelve thousand records ($.05 per record), excluding tape and profiling charges. while the study notes the need for data processing personnel for in-house manipulation and raises appropriate questions 592 college & research libraries about quality control in marcive and ls.si processing, it confines costs to the acquisition, not the storage, of records. 22 regardless, it dispels the the idea that under any and all circumstances cataloging u.s. materials is prohibitively expensive. user considerations under some circumstances, then, cataloging of gpo materials is affordable. but is it desirable from the users' perspective? early studies indicate catalogs are under used and misused. recent studies reveal little enthusiasm for the enhanced search capabilities of online catalogs. one use study indicates certain faculty locate government publications outside of the library. all studies indicate that much more needs to be known about the use of libraries, government materials, and catalogs before a decision is made about cataloging u.s. depository materials. according to previous surveys, only 59 percent of library patrons use the catalog. 23 most catalog users look up one entry and stop. 24 they locate correct subject headings only 50 percent of the time. 25 in 1958 ala surveyed 5,494 catalog users in thirty-nine libraries. results showed a failure rate of 20 percent for known-item searches and 13 percent for subject searches. 26 the capabilities of the online catalog are not as important to user satisfaction as suspected. the council on library resources (clr) supported a 1982 study of twelve thousand online catalog users in twenty-nine libraries. eighty-five percent reported finding some or all of what they were searching for, and subject searching was of greater interest than the ala study concluded. 27 online catalog capabilities such as keyword access and search qualifiers by date, language, and boolean operatives, however, were not perceived universally as benefits. the clr study found that language and call-number search limits had a slightly negative effect on satisfact~on and that keyword and boolean operatives were unrelated to satisfaction. 28 some users bypass the catalog altogether. in his 1984 study of government publications use, peter hernon indicated that "academic social scientists rely upon november 1986 their subject literature and interpersonal sources (e.g., colleagues) for awareness of source material. they do not make extensive use of indexing and abstracting services and bibliographies housed in libraries. " 29 frequently, they obtain materials from outside the library. rather than making definitive statements, these studies point out how little is known and how much remains to be seen. after examining two hundred catalog use studies in the most extensive book on the subject, redesign of catalogs and indexes for improved subject access, author pauline a. cochrane concludes, "we come away from catalog use studies quite discouraged about the present state of use of our catalogs, with no sure guidance about improvements and the impact of changes. " 30 no evidence supports the assumption that cataloging is always desirable. no substantive evidence supports the opposite view. technological changes make that clear. they encourage investigation of present situations, their corresponding possibilities, their costs, and their effectiveness in meeting user needs independent of old assumptions. for single answers, they substitute questions. partial guidelines for reevaluating cataloging policies the old question of whether or not to catalog u.s. depository materials raises no single query. it was made into one by technologies that limited options, elevated and fixed cost considerations, and made assumptions about user needs. newer technologies suggest several questions: they focus on current and future levels of automation, available technologies, and the need to know more about collections and their use. 1. does the library catalog on a shared cataloging network? if so, what access does the network provide to gpo records? 2. does the library have or plan to implement an online catalog? will it permit keyword, sudocs number searching? does it include authority control and global change capability? 3. how does the library's clientele learn cataloging u.s. depository materials 593 of government publications (e.g., through journal articles, colleagues, indexes, gpo sales brochures, news broadcasts, etc.)? 4. how does the library's clientele look for and obtain government publications? do patrons look in the library? 5. what are the major strengths of the government publications collection (e.g., congressional materials, geological materials)? 6. is there a clientele for those collection strengths? 7. is cataloging the best means of addressing the needs of that clientele? 8. is manpower available to define the means and related costs of cataloging? 9. will cataloging be selective? if so, what categories or types of materials will be excluded? no single library can address all these questions, but, for some, gpo shipping lists may provide one option for testing assumptions, exploring possibilities, and determining costs. what can shipping lists do to answer these questions? for run and wln users, they can test the speed with which records can be searched without sudocs access. for all shared cataloging network users, they can help determine network costs for cataloging u.s. materials. (see table 2.) they can help identify the type of entries available for specific depository series (analytics or series), their timeliness, and their sources. the 040 field contains the cataloging agency. if gpo appears first, it was the first cataloging agent. if it appears elsewhere, gpo modified an existing record. if the library of congress has modified a gpo record, dgpo/glc will be found in this field. finally, for both network and nonnetwork users, shipping lists can assist in identifying collection strengths, providing crucial direction for determining what will be cataloged, and forming policy that reflects those decisions. realizing that the card catalog may not be the single most appropriate vehicle for locating government materials, that not all materials (e.g., posters, pamphlets) merit cataloging, and that cataloging all materials increases cataloging costs, a number of libraries have either established or recommended policies for cataloging select categories of u.s. materials. peter graham recommendeds that large research libraries concentrate cataloging efforts on collections that are not indexed. 32 at the university of houston, priority is given to "publications of agencies that the average user does not know are government agencies. " 33 whether policies are set or explored, careful arranging and coding of shipping lists can verify the feasibility and costs of policies. shipping lists must be representative of type and extent of receipts. monthly statistics can establish the latter. then lists can be separated into microfiche and paper piles to examine each format separately and into chronological piles to test the timeliness of available records. coding should reflect specific interests. for instance, items received on deposit can be checked, those considered for cataloging circled, and candidates for series cataloging marked with an s. special types of materials that could dramatically increase cost if cataloged may be studied separately (e.g., hearings might be preceded by an h), and cataloging agent can be indicated as gpo, lc, or other. such an examination begins to provide a picture of what a library can afford to catalog on the basis of type of catalog records table 2 oclc cataloging costs estmated extended extended number of extended oclc card oclc ffu cataloged unitoclc oclcffu unitoclc costs and card titles ffu cost cost card cost (dollars-7 cards costs (a nnu al) (dollars) (do llars) (do ll ars) per title) (dollars) 400 1.47 588.00 .0495 138 .60 726.60 notes: an online catalog wo uld eliminate the need for cards and reduce cos ts to $588 . no reliable es timate of staff costs exists . with minor record changes, most titles cou ld be processed in five minutes or less . at $10 an hour, 300 hours of professional cataloging time would cost $3,000 . 594 college & research libraries rather than on number of titles; whether records are available; whether they are timely; whether sufficient numbers of records are available for microfiche; and, consequently, whether or not fiche should be included in cataloging programs. for most libraries, whether or not they are able to determine these considerations by searching items on a shared cataloging network, shipping lists may suggest criteria for including or excluding certain types of materials from cataloging. in short, they can be used to qualify general assumptions about the feasibility and affordability of cataloging u.s. materials in a specific environment. summary arguments against cataloging u.s. materials have assumed that cataloging was difficult in the absence of available records, time-consuming because of numerous title and agency name changes, and expensive as a result. other negative reasons have been that cataloging limits shelf arrangements to dewey or lc and causes delays between receipt and availability of november 1986 materials to patrons. on the positive side, despite inadequate and difficult entries, cataloging the materials provides the most convenient, direct, and useful means of access. in an automated cataloging environment, all of these assumptions can be disproved. shared-cataloging network users have online access to records; online catalogs minimize the record-editing process and facilitate the simultaneous, separate sudocs shelf arrangement and cataloging of materials, thus eliminating the usual delays associated with cataloging: the availability of tape records, vendors who can manipulate tapes, and selective cataloging reduce traditional expenses. finally, studies have shown that the card catalog is not as pivotal to all users' needs as was once thought. the new cataloging environment mandates a new look at an old debate, encouraging exploration of alternatives and dismissal of some earlier assumptions. most important, the online alternatives highlight the central importance of knowing more about the need for, use of, and methods of obtaining government information. references and notes 1. michael waldo, "an historical look at the debate over how to organize federal government documents in depository libraries," government publications review 4:319-29 (1977). 2. ibid., p .320. 3. u.s. government printing office, public documents department, an explanation of the superintendent of documents classification system (washington, d.c.: govt. print. off., 1963). 4. waldo, p.322. 5. bruce morton, "implementing an automated shelflist for a selective depository collection," government publications review 9:323-44 (1982). in an earlier article, "an items record management system,'' government publications review 8:185-96 (1981), morton describes automation of an item file. in'' a microcomputer in a micro-sized library,'' small computers in libraries5:5-8 (1985), frederick a. marcotte describes yet another automated access system, a micro-based, checkin/retrieval system used prior to installation of a bus integrated online library system at clermont college (batavia, ohio). 6. loche mclean, "gpo cataloging and monthly catalog production," public documents highlights 41:1-2 (aug. 1980) . 7. "agreement set on audiovisual cataloging," lc information bulletin 40:389-90 (nov. 6, 1981). 8. sharon wallbridge, "government documents, oclc, and research libraries," research libraries in oclc: a quarterly 8:3-5 (oct. 1982). 9. "cataloging timeliness study," administrative notes 5:1 (nov. 1984). 10. selma v. foster and nancy c. lufburrow eldblom, "documents to the people in one easy stem-an update," documents to the people 8:119-20 (may 1980). 11. while run and wln networks provide subject access, they do not provide sudocs access to gop records. subject access to oclc gpo records is available for the last few years of gpo reccataloging u.s. depository materials 595 ords through brs. according to the february 1986 oclc newsletter, subject access should be available to libraries in early 1987. 12. cynthia bower, "oclc records for federal depository documents: a preliminary investigation," government information quarterly 1, no.4: 379-400 (1984). 13. "documents cataloging manual committee," lc information bulletin 41:285 (sept. 10, 1982). 14. "gpo cataloging for microfiched documents: fact sheet," administrative notes 6:20 (may 1985). 15. janet swanbeck, ''government printing office cataloging tapes,'' paper presented at the annual meeting of the american library association, dallas, june 25, 1984. 16. "responses to resolutions," administrative notes 5:9 (oct. 1984). 17. ibid., p.10. 18. morton, p.326. 19. ibid. 20. rose ann bowerman and susan a. cady, "government publications in an online catalog," information technology and libraries 3:331-42 (dec. 1984). 21. ibid., p.340. 22. a 354mb disk drive holds approximately 82,000 fully indexed records of 4,000 characters each and costs roughly $20,000. for this configuration, per-record storage costs would be $.24. 23. joseph r. matthews, public access to online catalogs: a planning guide for managers (new york: online, 1982), p.6. 24. ibid., p.29. 25. ibid. 26. f. w. lancaster, "studies of catalog use," in the measurement and evaluation of library services (washington, d.c.: information resources pr., 1977), p.19-68. 27. robert n. broadus, "online catalogs and their uses," college & research libraries 44:459-66 (nov. 1983). 28. ibid., p.465. 29. peter hernon and charles r. mcclure, public access to government information: issues, trends and strategies (norwood, n.j.: ablex, 1984). 30. pauline a. cochrane, redesign of catalogs and indexes for improved subject access (phoenix, ariz.: oryx, 1985). 31. government publications staff discarded a departmental card catalog after a one-month study indicated that 30 percent of questions could be answered on the basis of prior knowledge and so percent through indexes. 32. peters. graham, "government documents and cataloging in research libraries," government publications review 10:117-25 (1983). 33. ibid., p.124. reviews.indd book reviews 455 items out of circulation is complicated; censoring them conflicts with the right to free speech and the public domain policies in the united states. if control of their culture’s intellectual property is given to the indigenous groups, how can they effectively stop its distribution? brown offers the following insight: there may be a place for tightly framed legislation that would oblige cultural repositories to respond to requests from native nations that specific images, music, or texts be placed in long-term quarantine. but the administrative costs of such a measure would be high and its beneficial impact limited: there is simply too much of this information available to the world at large, far beyond the control of any institution. more important than determining ownership of specifi c objects, brown argues, is a culture’s control over its place in a pluralist democratic society. each chapter in the book is a discussion of varying conflicts concerning native cultures. the first part of each chapter gives background on actual court cases, struggles, or debates. this is followed by a discussion of legal, ethical, and historical issues in which brown gathers various viewpoints and insights into the question of ownership and offers them up for the reader. this book includes case studies involving indigenous art, religious symbols, botanical knowledge, and the use and protection of sacred sites that are on public lands. finally, brown tries to define how indigenous societies fi t into a pluralist democracy. the book includes a section titled “sources on indigenous cultural rights,” and the author maintains supplemental web site at www.williams. edu/go/native. who owns native culture? is an insightful and accessible introduction to the complex discussion of intellectual property. brown’s writing is engaging and humorous; the book is well organized, easy to read, and informative. recommended for anyone who wants to bett er understand the implications of intellectual property rights for indigenous groups.—jody l. gray, university of minnesota. education for cataloging and the organization of information: pitfalls and the pendulum. ed. janet swan hill. binghamton, n.y.: haworth (published simultaneously as cataloging and classifi cation quarterly, v.34, nos. 1–3, 2002), 2002. 398p. alk. paper, cloth $79.95 (isbn 0789020289); paper $49.95 (isbn 0789020297). lc 2002-15053. this book presents a clear examination of the current state of cataloging education, sets forth a brief synopsis of the history of education for catalogers, and explores where the future of cataloging education seems to be headed. writt en mostly by educators rather than professional catalogers, the emphasis is on the lack of traditional cataloging classes in most information science curriculums and the resources available for catalogers to further their education aft er graduation. the articles are, for the most part, very easy to follow, written in clear, anecdotal styles that draw the reader in, and present their cases plainly. some articles also delve deeper with detailed analyses of statistical research supplemented by tables and charts. each article is preceded by a summary. the book is divided into four overall sections. the first section, “a matter of opinion,” includes four opinion articles on the nature of cataloging and how people react to it. this was my favorite section. i found it inspiring to read the opinions of these authors, who explore the problems concerning the education of catalogers, including the trend toward more theoretiwww.williams 456 college & research libraries cal teaching versus hands-on experience in cataloging classes. articles are written with humor and yet offer sincere and seasoned insights into the nature of cataloging and the education of future catalogers. one article, “why does everybody hate cataloging?,” is particularly engaging. the second section, “the context,” focuses on current cataloging courses. again, most authors see a trend toward teaching theoretical concepts on the organization of knowledge, including metadata and indexing, instead of practical cataloging skills. traditional cataloging classes seem to be diminishing in most information science curriculums and in some schools are only available as advanced electives. the requirement tends to be a class on the theoretical organization of information. yet, there is a chapter devoted to a survey of lis graduates in which 89 percent of the graduates, most of whom were not catalogers, felt that a practical cataloging course was essential and should be required of all students. another article states that 67 percent of employers found that graduates were unable to perform entry-level professional cataloging. in a most stimulating article, “where are we and how did we get here?,” the author clearly explains his views on cataloging education and the balance he feels is necessary between theory and practice. he honestly admits that he loves cataloging and wishes it were given more importance and time in curriculums. the third section, “education for specific purposes,” covers such issues as format integration, metadata (including dublin core, etc.), subject cataloging, authority control, and cataloging managers. other than metadata, most of these topics are taught only in advanced classes, if at all. one chapter discusses the management skills that catalogers who are also managers need. most of these papers, september 2004 again, deal with the notion of theoretical learning versus practical learning, with the majority of the authors favoring the teaching of theory. the main emphasis in the fi nal section, “alternatives for instructional delivery,” seems to be on computers and cataloging education. one chapter presents the challenges of a web-based basic cataloging course that focuses on teaching students how to catalog internet resources. this course makes use of online mentors who are actual catalogers from around the country. the following chapters describe the students’ perspectives and the mentors’ thoughts on this class. other chapters deal with distance education and cataloging, the use of autocat (the cataloging listserve) as a mentoring tool for cataloging questions, and the training courses offered by the program for cooperative cataloging (pcc). two articles focus on oclc’s web-based course, “cataloging internet resources using marc21 and aacr2.” one evaluation found that people who completed this course gained a substantial amount of knowledge in the practical and theoretical aspects of cataloging these resources. there is also a chapter on teaching dublin core to noncatalogers, mostly museum staff and archivists, for a digitization project. although the chapters are well written, i was rather disappointed with this section because i had hoped to learn of innovative alternatives for cataloging instruction, but the articles included explore training options that have been around for some time. overall, i think this book presents a clear and rather bleak picture of cataloging education. despite the obvious need for more cataloging instruction in library schools, the emphasis seems to be on teaching theoretical concepts in broad basic classes and leaving it to the library departments, conferences, pcc, library associations, and others to pick up the slack. i have been a professional cataloger for twelve years, and although most of what i learned was on the job as a paraprofessional, i did have some in-depth, hands-on cataloging classes in school. colleagues of mine, who attended library school after i had graduated, received much less actual cataloging training. they have complained about the emphasis on the history and theory of cataloging (in most cases, they only cataloged a few books in an entire semester), as well as on the lack of advanced courses in cataloging. upon graduation, they have had a hard time matching the requirements of even entry-level professional positions. the state of cataloging education is indeed in need of analysis. this book offers some insights into these problems but seems to reach the general conclusion that most in-depth cataloging education in the future will happen outside library schools.—isabel del carmen quintana, harvard university. foerstel, herbert n. refuge of a scoundrel: the patriot act in libraries. westport, conn.: libraries unlimited, 2004. 232p. $35 (isbn 1591581397). lc 2003-065950. foerstel’s new book seems to address two needs. one is to recount an engaging and sometimes inspiring description of the continuing struggle in which library employees and others join forces against those who would impose police-state tactics to “protect our freedom” in the name of security. (or is it to protect our security in the name of freedom?) the second purpose would to be to document some of the legal issues involved. these include a listing of the components of the patriot act, homeland security act, and similar acts and policies that the justice department has initiated under the cover of fighting terrorism. this portion of the book is a reference source for those wishing to conduct further rebook reviews 457 search, those writing library policies on how to respond to investigative inquiries, or those actually facing the need to respond to such a request for information. to this end, sample court order forms are included in the appendices. many library workers will want to read the narrative but skip over the details of the legislation or proposed legislation. foerstel writes well, documents thoroughly, and provides both a bibliography and an index. the latter is almost detailed enough to overcome the lack of a glossary, which would have been useful to help readers keep the alphabet soup of initialisms mentioned in the text straight. the first fifth of the book is a summary of the author ’s 1991 surveillance in the stacks: the fbi’s library awareness program. even those familiar with the fbi’s library awareness program will find it instructive. it documents a continuing struggle in which the pendulum has swung back and forth over the past several decades between advocates of citizens’ freedom to read and the eff orts of government agents, particularly the fbi, to control subversive behavior by monitoring the information-seeking habits of citizens. reading this book, especially chapter one, cannot help but cause one to be proud to be a library worker and to realize the potential power we collectively wield in promoting democratic values. information is power, and those who control the flow of information are powerful. if the government controls information, the citizens are accountable to the government for their actions; if the citizens control information, the government is accountable to the citizens for its actions. it is a zero-sum game. every bit of control that one side gives up adds to the accountability it owes the other side. foerstel explains how difficult it is to evaluate comments made by fbi officials concerning their use of the patriot act to college and research libraries 50th anniversary featurethe future of the research library fremont rider mr. rider is librarian of wesleyan university. the editors asked him to try to summarize the main line of reasoning developed at length in his provocative new book, the scholar and the future of the research library, published last month. this article is the result of that request. appraisal should be withheld until the book itself is read. fall the problems which have of recent years engaged the attention of educators and librarians none have been more puzzling than those posed by the astonishing growth of our great research libraries. my own interest in this subject has, over the years, resulted in a series of papers, some of them mainly analyses but others endeavoring to suggest specific answers to parts of what has sometimes seemed to be an almost insoluble puzzle. i would be the first to admit that, as a whole, these papers were all tentative, inconclusive, even in places mutually contradictory. they made no claim then to be anything else. they were a "thinking out loud,'' an attempt to suggest directions along which solutions might possibly be arrived at rather than an offering of assured conclusions. but one very definite conclusion they did reach: that no emendations in library methods c¥one are going to solve our research library growth problem, for any savings so effected are quickly overwhelmed by its everincreasing magnitude. more and more over the years i became convinced that our only possible answer lies in interlibrary cooperation and cooperation on a much more sweeping scale than any we have ever envisaged. so when two years ago the committee headed by mr. metcalf made its epoch-making "division-offields" report, it seemed to me a very important step in the right direction. it is now four years since the idea came to me which is the subject matter of the book of which this paper is intended to give a sort of preview. it was an idea that seemed so obviously and completely "right" that i was very definitely afraid of it! i distrusted my own judgment. so there followed four years of making and remaking innumerable samples of it, of attacking it, testing it, criticizing it. but it had a disconcerting ability: it seemed able to convert every new objection brought against it into a new argument in its favor. in all the endeavors that we may make to solve the problem of research library growth we must always remember that no solution is going to be entirely satisfactory to the scholar if, directly or indirectly, it takes his books away from him. 1 having the text of his material conveniently near his elbow is his sine qua non. compared with this immediate availability of his text, every other service which we, as librarians, may offer him-no matter what it isis, to him, relatively unimportant. but, obviously, if research libraries are going to continue to double in size every sixteen years (or every twenty years or every thirty years for that matter), we are not going to be able to keep the scholar's books at his elbow unl~ss we can find some quite unprecedentedly inexpensive way to do it. four-part cost and we must always bear in mind a second premise, that the cost of maintaining a research library is not a matter merely of 49 50 college & research libraries the original purchase cost of its materials. these must be made amazingly cheap, to be sure. but purchase cost is only the first of four main categories of cost. 2 our cataloging of them must also be made amazingly cheap, our storage of them amazingly cheap. we must never forget that this problem of library growth of ours is always this four-part problem and that unless we are able to accomplish a reduction in the cost of all these four parts we arrive at no real solution of it. but, if one sits back and views the whole problem quietly and quite dispassionately, it becomes increasingly obvious that any such extreme reductions in cost as the situation demands are quite impossible of realization unless we are able to develop some entirely new synthesis, some entirely new integration of our materials. this was the point at which i had arrived four years ago. this is the question which, it would seem, faces the library world now: is any such a new synthesis possible? is it possible that we are approaching the end of an era in our library methodology? it is now sixty or seventy years since, under the compelling assurance of dewey and cutter and poole and their fellow pioneers, the library world crystallized a definite pattern of library technique which, although it has been greatly amplified and refined, has never been basically changed. there has even been a tendency in some library circles to take it for granted that it was a final technique. but no technology is ever final or finished. entirely new conditions arise. in the library world we see them already arisen: in fact they are pressing upon us for solution. can it be that we are standing on the threshold of changes in our libraries that are going to be far more sweeping than those which the library pioneers developed six or seven decades ago? mass and detail libraries are great complexes of tiny items, items which it is impossible to handle on a mass-production basis because each one, tiny though it is, is highly individualized and demands equally individualistic treatment. it is this combination of enormous mass and extreme individualjanuary 1989 ization of detail that has made the problem of research library growth so difficult a one to solve. and our search for a solution has been further complicated by our insistence on viewing the problem, not as one, but as a whole line of problems, problems interconnected at various points to be sure but apparently not in any way that helped us. we have tried-and this was just as true of my own efforts as of anyone else' s-to solve the various phases of our problem one by one as though each existed in a vacuum, not tied up-as they are-in a veritable mesh of methodological interrelationships. we have tried to solve our problem of swollen cataloging cost as though it were a separate and independent problem and our book storage problem as though it also were something separate and independent. we have tried to economize on binding costs as such, on circulation costs as such, on ordering costs as such, etc., etc. and the reason that we did this, the reason that we failed to integrate what were really interlinked factors of one single problem, was that we were blinded by the status quo. we insisted on continuing to accept as library axioms, unalterable and unquestionable, certain assumptions which had no validity as axioms, such pseudo-axioms as: libraries are collections of books, books are stored on shelves, library materials have to be cataloged, catalogs have to be made on cards, books must be arranged by their call numbers, etc., etc., etc. it is not until we have looked behind, and beyond, every one of theseand many other-supposedly basic axioms of library method and have seriously questioned their immutability, that we begin to make any real progress. for when we do this we are suddenly amazed to find the mismatched bits of our research library growth-puzzle falling, almost of themselves, into a quite astonishingly new synthesis. a sample of micro-reduction let us see if the phrase used above, "failed to integrate," can be made more concrete. some months ago we here at wesleyan bought, from the read ex microprint corporation, their reproduction of the two english literature volumes of the church catalog. their micro-print copy of these volumes came to us on six leaves of paper, each leaf six-by-nine inches in size and each printed on both sides. the six leaves were delivered to us enclosed in a substantially made, linen-bound slipcover box, six and one half by ten inches, and two inches thick, duly labeled on its back-strip edge so that it could be stored upright on the shelf like a book. the point we are getting at here is this: the church catalog had, by microreduction, been greatly reduced in purchase cost, had been reduced in fact to about one twenty-fifth of its established auction price in book form. and, obviously, that is a very substantial accomplishment. but book purchase cost, we must always remember, is only the first of four categories of book cost. what had the readex people done about the other three? clearly they might, in some way, have done something about storage cost at least; because they had, through the magic of micro-reduction, shrunk twelve hundred large pages down to twelve small ones, i.e., they had effected a more than 99 percent decrease in storage bulk. · failure to integrate but in this particular case, as in most of the attacks which we librarians have ourselves made upon the library growth problem, there had occurred at this point a failure to integrate all four of the factors of cost. what was the result? so far as storage was concerned our six leaves of microprinted church catalog were delivered to us as a complete unit in a form that negatived practically all of the saving in storage cost that micro-reduction had effected. we were, to all intents and purposes, put right back where we started: we were asked to handle and store a "book" again and a fairly bulky book at that. what of the last cost factor, cataloging? about it also the readex people did nothing. it never even occurred to them that it was any business of theirs to do anything. (and, very possibly, at this stage, it wasn't.) in any event their failure to integrate cost four into their over-all producthe future of the research library 51 tion picture meant that, when we received our six-leaf "book" from them, we had to catalog it ourselves; and, in doing our cataloging of it, we had to follow exactly the same procedure, and had to incur exactly the same expense, as we would have had if we had been cataloging the church catalog in its otigffial two-volume form. this particular illustrative example has been picked out, not because the readex people did anything short-sighted or at all out of the ordinary. quite the contrary. they did exactly what all other publishers and all librarians have been doing. but what they did shows, in essence, why the micro-reduction of books for libraries has been, to date, so relatively disappointing a development. for-all propaganda to the contrary notwithstanding-it has been disappointing. we have had coming into our research libraries a mere trickle of micromaterials, where our micro-enthusiasts had hoped for, and had expected to have, a flood. and the reasons why this flood has never come is the one just stated: micro-reduction has never yet really integrated itself into library practice. micromaterials have always been treated (by their makers, by their users-and by librarians) as though they were books. a different sort of books, to be sure, an annoyingly different sort, and so problem-making instead of _problem-solving. chance to begin again no one seems to have realized that, abruptly, for the first time in over two thousand years, libraries were here being offered a chance to begin all over again. in this first half of the twentieth century a.d. the recorded words of men were coming in to us librarians, not in the form of the books in which they have been coming in to us for two milleniums, but in a brand-new form, an utterly, completely, basically different form, a form that demanded and that, if we could only see it, would require an utterly and completely and basically different library treatment. 3 because we didn't see this, we tried our hardest to treat them in the way we treated books. and we became annoyed when this didn't seem to work out very well. did it work well? consider what we 52 college & research libraries have all been doing when we took in a twenty-page pamphlet which had been reduced for us to a ten-inch strip of microfilm. a ten-inch strip of film doesn't seem to fit into conventional library practice anywhere. how, for instance, have we tried to store it? some of us put it in a box on the shelves. but, if we did that, we canceled-exactly as the readex people did with the church catalog-all of the economy in storage space that microreduction has salvaged for us. some of us put such a snippet in an envelope, and then filed the envelope in some sort of a vertical file. this worked fairly well, provided we had enough similar snippets to make a real file out of them, which most of us have not had. some of us tried splicing a lot of such snippets together until we had created a composite reel of odds and ends. but this result was, of course, always a hodgepodge, awkward to useand a sad mess to catalog. cataloging "to catalog!" here we are, back again to the fourth great factor of our growth problem, to that cost which, in actual fact, bulks larger than any one of the other three. who has made any attempt whatever really to integrate micro-reduction and cataloging? remember that now we don't mean drawing up a set of supplementary cataloging ''rules,'' to be duly inserted in our cataloging "codes," rules to cover such questions as: ''what additional data, if any, should be given when we are cataloging materials in microform?" "what form of 'collation' is required when cataloging films?" "who, in the case of films, shall be deemed the 'publisher'?" and such similar cataloging minutiae. it can be granted that there is in the record any amount of this sort of cataloging discussion. but now we are talking about something far deeper and more fundamental. we mean: what thought has been given to the idea that micro-reduction might make possible some basically new concept of cataloging, might make practicable some entirely new approach to the whole cataloging process? for this sort of discussion one searches the literature of january 1989 microfilm almost in vain. almost. in his comprehensive compendium, photographic reproduction for libraries, published only a few months ago, herman h. fussier, of the university of chicago, does give a hint-not much but still a hint-of the sort of thing that we are now talking about. he says (here abridging his comment but italicizing some significant phrases): the use of microfilm by libraries . . . has notresulted in basic changes of methods or organization ... the question must be raised as to whether ... we have gone far enough. is it possible . . . to utilize reproductive techniques in new and radical ways which would result in ... greater efficiency . . . to library patrons . . . in ways ... entirely divergent from our present conception of library organization methods? and a little further along he answers this question of his in these words: there is a body of evidence in the experience of nonlibrary and nonresearch organization and in the inherent nature of the techniques themselves, to poi!_lt toward an affirmative ... answer. . . . the library profession cannot afford to be too complacent or too conservative . . . if the library is to keep its rightful place in these swiftly changing times. dr. bendikson's work for many years, if any of us had made any attempt to effect the sort of new integration that we are now talking about, we would have been handicapped by the form in which micro-materials were being given to us. two thousand years ago books in roll form gave place to books in folded flat-sheet form. but, although some of us have felt strongly that, sooner or later, micro-materials in roll form would make the same transition, there had, until recently, been discovered no practicable way to accomplish it. and, although we further suspected-some of us-that the material that was going ultimately to be used for these flat micromaterials would be paper, or its equivalent, primarily because paper is cheaper than film but also because it is more resistant to handling abuse, we had found no way to make this change either. but, because we had these two ideas, some of us felt that dr. bendikson, of the huntington library, had been on the right track in his work, a decade or more ago, with paper photo-micro-prints, and thought that the very significant pioneer studies that he then made did not receive as much attention as, perhaps, they deserved. he had, of course, been stymied at the time he made them by the difficulty of reading his small-scale micro-reductions in paper-print form; but one may suspect that he believed that some day the optical difficulties that stood in the way of this sort of micro-reading, as well as the technical difficulties that prevented the printing of micro-materials on paper, would both ultimately be solved. if he did have this faith it was justified. when word came to me one day three or four years ago that the readex people had found the answer to both of these problems i was so excited that i took the next train to new york to see exactly what they had accomplished. they had indeed made a vast stride forward: we as librarians are not yet fully aware how great a stride. before our eyes entirely new possibilities in the use of micro-reduced materials were opening up: entirely new micro-concepts were at last taking practicable shape. of course dr. bendikson and mr. boni are only two out of a great many micropioneers. there was the unknown manwhoever he was-who first took a miniature camera shot of a printed page. there have been binkley, draeger, tate, pratt, raney, metcalf, and a long list of others, who have struggled intelligently, unselfishly, and successfully to make microphotography the practicable library tool that it now is. these micro-pioneers are not the ones responsible for our failure to integrate their work more closely into our own. that was not their job. they were interested primarily in the technical problems which their new medium presented. they almost had to be. and, as a result of their ingenuity and vision and sacrifice, we have now attained a relative perfection of technical result which places us very much, and forever, in their debt. use of catalog cards the new idea that is the subject matter of the book of which this paper is a sumthe future of the research library 53 mary came into being, as many such things do, from a quite unexpected direction. in attacking the library growth problem from all sorts of angles i had, for one thing, become acutely dissatisfied with some of the aspects of our conventional catalog card. and one thing about it that kept bothering me was the way it wasted perfectly good-and relatively expensive-card space. in the first place, the face of the card was wasteful. measurement of the superficial area of a great many catalog entries showed that, in the great majority of cases, a half-size card (i.e., a card 61/4 x 7112 em.) would provide all the space that was needed. and such a small card could be read and handled almost as easily as our so-called standard-size catalog card. but, although i even went so far as to suggest in one of my early papers4 the possibility of giving such half-size catalog cards serious consideration and although, here at wesleyan, we have for several years been successfully using such cardsseveral millions of them-for another purpose, 5 i was still not at all convinced that we ought to change to them for cataloging. for one thing, half-size cards would not, of themselves, do anything about the wasted packs of our present cards. and, because this waste was twice as great as the waste on the fronts of the cards, it intrigued me that much more. use of waste space the waste of space on a standard catalog card-even though it is a waste of three quarters of every card and even though it is being repeated on billions of catalog cards all over the world-might not seem, to most people, important enough to spend very much time over. but, as i was thinking about it one day, this idea came to me: why might we not combine the microtexts of our books and the catalog cards for these same books in one single entity? in other words, why could we not put our micro-books on the (at present entirely unused) backs of their own catalog cards? and wasn't this that new "integration" of our basic materials that i had for years been looking for? i called this new concept, this new correlation of functions, a "micro-card." the more i considered this new micro54 college & research libraries card idea, the more it grew on me. for, with almost miraculous simplicity, it seemed, automatically, to solve, not one, but all four of the factors of our growth problem. in my remaining space let me-very briefly indeed-run over these four solutions. the cut in first cost, the original purchase cost of the text, is obvious. in the church catalog case the saving made was about 99 percent. in very few cases will it be less than 90 percent. storage cost second, storage cost. any one familiar with microfilm knows that a fair amount of micro-text can be put on the back of a standard-size catalog card, but even some microfilm enthusiasts may be surprised to · learn how much can be put there. we are assuredly today only in the first stages of inicro-reduction technique, yet even today it is possible-by using some very simple new methods in our photographing6to get as many as 250 pages of an ordinary twelvemo book on the back of a single catalog card. and there can be no doubt at all that, given just a slight further smoothness in film graining, just a little more technical skill in micro-photographing, just a little more improvement in lenses and in camera efficiency, we shall be able, and in a very few years at that, to put, if we wish, as many as five hundred ordinarysize book pages-in other words a regular full-size twelvemo book-on the back of one single catalog card. of course, as has just been suggested, we can't do this if we insist on following the conventional method that we have always followed in the microphotographing of our texts. but there isn't the slightest reason why we should follow them. furthermore, very often-in fact, in most cases-we shall not want to put 250 pages, or anything like that number of pages, on the back of a single catalog ,card, even if we are technically able to do so. other and very important factors indeed7 are going to enter into this particular question, and it is these factors rather than ultimate compactness in storage that are going to determine the number of pages we put on each card. january 1989 100 percent saving in one sense micro-cards will reduce our storage cost not 90 percent or 99 percent but a full100 percent. now it must be admitted that to claim a saving of 100 percent on storage cost sounds a little crazy. but consider. a single twenty-three-inch-long catalog drawer would, if it were full of micro-cards, hold twenty-three hundred author-entry catalog cards, for twentythree hundred books. it would also hold, on their backs-if we assume for the purpose of this example that none df this particular lot of books happened to be over 250 pages long-the complete unabridged texts of all these same twenty-three hundred books in micro-reduced form. and, obviously, to get in one single catalog drawer twenty-three hundred complete "books," books which would require for their storage in normal book form a row of eight bookcases, each case seven shelves high and three feet wide, would seem in itself to be quite enough of a miracle. but we said that our storage saving was 100 percent. and 100 percent it literally is. for our twenty-three hundred volumes, when they have been reduced to microcard form, actually occupy no space whatever, because what they occupy is the white space on the backs of the cards that would have had to be in that catalog drawer anyway if we had not printed our micro-texts on it. take next, the third category of research library growth costs-binding. with micro-cards, binding costs also have evaporated. they too have been cut a full100 percent. yet still we have not reached-in fact we have not begun to reach-the end of the economies which micro-cards offer us. there remains the fourth and last factor of our growth cost problem: cataloging. for decades librarians have been talking about cooperative cataloging, and yet, through all these same decades they have kept right on doing a large part of their cataloging over and over again, in each e.£ their libraries, independently. now micro-cards come to invite those libraries for which they are intended-namely research libraries-to save somewhere between 96 and 99 percent of their present entire cataloging cost. "invite" isn't a good word: "force" would be a better one. for with micro-cards it is hardly possible to avoid, even if one wanted to do so, the enormous economies of genuine and complete cooperative cataloging. why? because whoever prints one side of our microcard will in practice print the other side also. 8 and just as the cost of printing the microcard text, already small though it is in total, is divided up between a hundred or the future of the research library 55 . two hundred subscribing libraries, so the cost of cataloging will also be divided between the same one hundred or two hundred libraries. this means that our present costs for independently done cataloging will, for micro-cards, shrink almost to the vanishing point. instead of a dollar or so per cataloged item, they will become a matter of a cent per item or less. references and notes 1. the scholar and the future of the research library, part 1, chapters 4 and 6, discuss some of the '' solutions" that do propose taking the scholars books away from him. 2. further discussed in op. cit., part 1, chapter 3. 3. for the "circulation aspects of the 'solution' "here proposed see op. cit., part 2, chapter 6; for the cataloging side, see part 2, chapters 3 and 4. 4. "the possibility of discarding the card catalog." library quarterly 8:329-45, july 1938. 5. in the work of the american genealogical index. 6. discussed in detail in rider, op. cit., part 2, chapter 2. 7. these are discussed in op. cit., part 2, chapter 5, part 2, chapter 10. 8. the publishing of micro-cards is discussed in part 2, chapter 7, and in the two following chapters. 50th anniversary year: 1939-1989 in march college & research libraries guest editorial by david kaser, former editor personnel issues for academic librarians: a review and perspective for the future by sheila creth the status of research in library/information science: guarded optimism by charles mcclure librarians and library educators in the 1980s: shared interests, cooperative ventures by marianne cooper and shoshana kaufmann unobtrusive studies and the quality of academic library reference services by jo bell whitlatch the comparable effects of term paper counseling in group instruction sections by patricia morris donegan 292 college & research libraries march 2019 big data shocks will be well received by those who are looking to further their knowledge on big data, as well as those thinking about its role in the library. given the complexity of the topic, weiss is strategic yet comprehensive in addressing the changes, or shocks, that big data technology is playing in shaping our society. the author also does a good and often outstanding job in exploring the intersections and possible futures of big data and libraries. this work should help further the discussion and the work on approaching and using big data technologies in libraries, as well as the evolving role that librarians should and can have in the age of big data.—kara kugelmeyer, colby college jana brubaker. text, lies and cataloging: ethical treatment of deceptive works in the library. jefferson, nc: mcfarland & company, inc., 2018. 158p. paper, $55.00 (isbn 978-0-7864-9744-7). in text, lies and cataloging, jana brubaker explores the various issues that catalog professionals face in providing bibliographic descriptions of deceptive library resources. as she explains in her preface, creating accurate and useful catalog records for library users can be particularly challenging for works that contain inaccurate facts, deceive the reader through questionable authorship, or blur the boundaries of genre. the circumstances and possible cataloging solutions surrounding works of questionable authorship, authenticity, or veracity are multifarious, and brubaker’s stated dual goal is to provide “a resource that identifies, describes, and discusses questionable books” (pg. 1) and to “suggest a framework for navigating decisions that must be made when cataloging these materials” (pg. 2). taking into account the potential interest of this topic to noncatalogers, the author begins her book with an articulate introduction into relevant cataloging terms. brubaker, who has more than 25 years of cataloging experience, provides clear and concise explanations of the machine readable cataloging (marc) fields in which bibliographic records and authority records are encoded. she pays special attention to bibliographic fields that are relevant to the cataloging of questionable works and discusses the purposes of authority records such as disambiguation and collocation. her lucid explanations are accompanied by screenshots of two oclc-marc records, one of a bibliographic record and the other of an authority record, which have been altered to include explanatory labels and to provide complementary visual clarifications. the next three chapters of the book discuss briefly the category of deceptive works and the obstacles to accurate cataloging, followed by a survey of the cataloging standards and professional codes of ethics. brubaker describes the dilemmas that catalogers face in assessing the veracity of deceptive works and the questionable authenticity of their authors. she continues to detail the principles of the professional standards that guide catalogers in their daily cataloging tasks, including among others the previous and current cataloging rules, the statement of international cataloguing principles issued by the international federation of library associations and institutions (ifla) and the code of ethics of the american library association. collectively, these preliminary chapters provide an insightful review of the professional values and responsibilities of catalogers relevant to deceptive works and propose a useful “framework for assessing these works in order to help catalogers decide what is ethical, practical, and necessary” (pg. 4). book reviews 293 the balance of the book is devoted to the discussion of case studies, limited in scope to monographs in english and published between 1800 and the present, which serve both as a general reference of key deceptive works and as an instructive compilation of possible cataloging approaches. this practical section consists of 55 case studies that are organized into four genre categories: memoirs and autobiographies, other nonfiction, fiction, and poetry. brubaker discusses the circumstances of each case in detail, makes brief recommendations about how the books should be cataloged, and supports her assertions and claims with well-researched endnotes. there is a bibliography of the case studies, a selected bibliography of secondary sources, and a comprehensive index at the end of the book. while expressing preference for the broader term of deceptive works over terms such as literary forgeries, false memories, literary hoaxes, and fake literature, brubaker sensibly chooses to focus in her case studies on two particularly challenging situations. the first relates to questionable authorship. “the author takes on or creates the identity of another person for the purpose of laying claim to experiences and perspectives that are not his own” (pg. 9). the second concerns the veracity of works, specifically of “self-described nonfiction works that are actually fiction or contain factual errors” (pg. 10). by limiting her investigative scope, brubaker is able to conduct an extensive analysis of the seemingly countless variations of the two cases, thereby greatly enhancing her discussions and culminating with a nuanced and thoughtful summary of cataloging solutions. her suggestions are carefully crafted, always taking into account professional and ethical considerations. they are practical in nature and, at times, quite thought-provoking as they call for a more active role of the cataloger in the unmasking of deceptive works. in her final paragraph, brubaker acknowledges that her proposed solutions are mostly useful in the current marc environment, and she assures the reader that “grappling with questions of authenticity, identity, and veracity in relation to our profession’s responsibilities and ethical standards will remain relevant” in a linked data environment (pg. 129). the book under review is aimed toward selectors of materials, reference librarians, library science students, and, particularly, catalogers. the case studies, ranging from clifford irving’s elaborate ploy to publish a fake autobiography of howard hughes to david solway’s practical joke of inventing a fictional greek poet named andres karavis, represent a series of curious and delightful vignettes that might also be of interest to nonlibrarians. the book’s major accomplishment lies in the author’s ability to combine thoughtful deliberations on cataloging issues related to questionable works with a very entertaining selection of case studies, narrated and discussed in a fashion easily accessible to a wide audience.—danijela matković, yale university john levi martin. thinking through methods: a social science primer. chicago: the university of chicago press, 2017. 269p. paper, $30.00 (isbn 978-0-22-643172-7). lc 2016025207. thinking through methods: a social science primer, john levi martin’s new book on social science research, focuses on qualitative research methods as tools for thinking, with the ultimate goal of improving the quality of social science research output. martin, the florence borchert bartling professor of sociology at the university of chicago, undergirds his discussion of qualitative social sciences research methods with wide-ranging examples from the literature of the discipline, as he champions rigor in the work of social science research with humor and some snark. _goback _goback _goback _goback _goback college and research libraries carol f. ishimoto the national program for acquisitions and cataloging: its impact on university libraries the library of congress national program for acquisitions and cataloging has been in operation since 1966. it seemed timely to conduct a fact-finding study to examine the effects of this program on the organization of bibliographic activities in a selected group of university libraries. this report will attempt to prove that the program has had a significant impact on these libraries. with budget cuts experienced by most libraries in recent years, there is no doubt that this program has contributed a great deal towards reducing cataloging costs and increasing bibliographic compatibility with the library of congress. in 1964 the association of research lmraries ( arl), in its efforts to reduce the amount of original cataloging performed by research libraries, passed a resolution which would give high priority to developing a program of centralized cataloging. this led to the formation of the arl shared cataloging committee with william s. dix, university librarian, princeton university, as chairman.1 the committee's proposal, in consultation with the library of congress ( lc), resulted in the formation of the library of congress national program for acquisitions and cataloging (npac), commonly referred to as the shared cataloging and regional acquisitions program, and authorized ms. lshimoto is senior cataloger, harvard college library. this study was conducted in the fall 1971, under the auspices of the council on library resources fellowship program. the author extends her thanks to all who helped in the survey. 126 i by title ii, part c of the higher education act of 1965. according to the text of the act, funds would be transferred to lc from the department of health, education, and welfare for acquiring currently published library materials throughout the world of value to scholarship, and for providing and distributing bibliographic data in the form of printed catalog cards, or by other means, promptly after receipt of these materials. it was the hope of arl and lc that npac would accomplish speedier bibliographic control of increasing acquisitions into research libraries by sharing the bibliographic information from the national bibliographies, and thus would reduce cataloging costs by eliminating the unnecessary duplication of libraries cataloging the same work a number of times. in september 1966, john w. cronin, then director of the processing department of the library of congress, issued his first progress report on the title ii-c shared cataloging program. in it he reported that sixty-eight libraries had agreed to participate in the program and that the lc depository sets were being sent to these libraries. at that time the first overseas lc control center established in london for current british imprints was fully operational. today, nearly six years later, np ac coverage includes the following countries: australia, austria, belgium, bulgaria, canada, czechoslovakia, denmark, finland, france, german democratic republic, german federal republic, great britain, italy, japan, netherlands, new zealand, norway, rumania, south africa, spain, sweden, switzerland, ussr, and yugoslavia. in addition to these shared cataloging countries, npac regional acquisitions centers exist in southeast asia (indonesia, malaysia, singapore, and brunei), east africa, and brazil. there are presently eighty-three participating libraries receiving the title ii depository sets from lc. clearly, npac is one of the most ambitious and important federally supported programs undertaken by the library of congress. a fact-finding study of the effects of npac on the organization of bibliographic activities in a selected group of university libraries was made by this writer in the fall of 1971. thirteen large libraries of institutions founded in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, with one exception, were visited. the eighteenth century institutions were yale, university of pennsylvania, princeton, columbia, and the u niversity of north carolina; those established in the nineteenth century were the university of michigan, university of toronto, indiana university, cornell, university of california (berkeley), stanford, and the u ni~ersity of chicago; and the only twentieth century institution was the university of california at los angeles. there is no correlation between the age of the instiacquisitions and cataloging i 127 tution and the size of its library, with the exception of yale, which is the oldest ( 1701) and also the largest ( 5.5 million volumes). this report is limited to the central research collections of these libraries and any departmental libraries for which cataloging is centralized. the first part will discuss some effects of npac on the administration of technical services departments; it will then describe the systems of deferred cataloging used to optimize the utilization of the depository sets received from lc; the third part will analyze the percentage figures for materials cataloged with npac/lc copy and those which are cataloged originally. the concluding portion of this report will be an evaluation of npac, its future implications, and current trends in the development of parallel programs by several of these libraries. the effects of npac on the administration of technical services departments with the beginning of npac, technical services administrators for the most part began thinking in terms of restructuring their departments in order to capitalize on the economic advantage of using nonprofessionals for cataloging with lc copy. toronto was the only library that had an lc cataloging unit in operation since the early 1960s; for the american libraries this was not a conversion that could be made immediately, since it meant a gradual phasing from professional to nonprofessional. today the majority of these libraries have lc cataloging sections staffed with nonprofessionals, with a high caliber nonprofessional or professional in charge. those libraries not having a separate lc unit still employ nonprofessionals for cataloging with lc copy. it is difficult to quote figures as to how much np ac has saved in dollars. it is 128 i college & research libraries • march 1973 interesting to note that princeton, for instance, has not hired a professional cataloger in six years, but the number of nonprofessional catalogers has increased from two in 1966 to eight in 1971 due to the increase in the number of npacilc cards available. at indiana the number of "junior" catalogers increased from five to ten during the same period with some of the professional positions converted to nonprofessional posts. at cornell in 1964 only one nonprofessional existed in their catalog department; in seven years seven professional positions have been converted to nonprofessional posts. in 1966167 the staff of the catalog department at yale was equally divided between professionals and nonprofessionals; today the ratio is one third professional and two thirds nonprofessional. during the fiscal year 1970 i 71 yale converted two senior professional positions to two nonprofessional posts in subject cataloging; two nonprofessional posts held by college graduates in descriptive cataloging were replaced by two high school graduates. the actual savings due to these conversions amounted to $15,000, to cite a specific figure. in order to expedite processing with lc copy and to take advantage of the increase in the number of npacilc cards, four libraries have adopted the lc classification schedules since 1966: yale ( 1969), pennsylvania ( 1967), columbia (1966), north carolina (1966). others adopted lc earlier: stanford ( 1965), toronto ( 1959), cornell ( 1949). berkeley and michigan adopted lc in the 1920s, but their collections have not been totally reclassified. ucla, chicago, and indiana are totally classified by lc. princeton, as of 1971, has adopted several classes of the lc schedules and further expansion will be explored. the libraries which have adopted the lc classification schedules in recent years have not attempted to reclassify their entire collections. yale and pennsylvania, for instance, have limited their reclassification to their reference collections. shelving books in the stacks by two different classification schemes has not presented undue public service problems. it should be pointed out that these libraries have reorganized their stacks in order to bring corresponding subjects together as much as possible on a given floor. closing off the c'old" classification schemes meant that books in those areas could be shelved in compact storage fashion. browsers appear to have adjusted to browsing in two different areas. this is not to suggest that problems do not arise; the important issue is that some administrators were willing to take a long range point of view in adopting the lc classification schemes, regardless of the size of their collections, in order to conform as much as possible with lc, which in turn would result in a reduction of cataloging costs. for some, however, such a decision could only be interpreted as being made at the expense of the readers and users of the libraries. time and cost figures for cataloging with npac/lc cards versus original cataloging were not readily available. in two of the largest libraries it is estimated that titles with lc copy require about half the amount of time to catalog than those without. at another library the ratio seemed to be three titles with lc copy to one title cataloged originally. mrs. helen tuttle, assistant university librarian for preparations at princeton, made a time and cost study based on descriptive cataloging only, excluding subject analysis. the results indicate that in descriptive cataloging salary costs, roughly six titles with lc copy are equivalent to the cost of one original title. in her time study for titles cataloged descriptively only, approximately four titles with lc copy could be processed for each original title. ralph johnson, assistant head of technical serj j j 1 i j ) l 1 j ) j vices at ucla, reported that cataloging by nonprofessional lc copy catalogers averages twenty minutes per title, while original cataloging by professional catalogers averages forty-five minutes per title. to illustrate the time saved in man hours, mr. johnson pointed out that in 1970 at least 50 percent of the lc cards, or approximately 10,500 titles, retrieved from the depository file were actual npac titles. he stated that based on the above figures, lc copy catalogers would catalog these 10,500 npac titles in 3,500 hours while the professional catalogers would require 7,708 hours, had original cataloging been required. this is a time saving of 4,208 man hours. mr. ritvars bregzis, associate librarian for systems and technical services at the university of toronto, made a salary cost study for lc copy cataloging versus original cataloging in 1968/69. his figures included descriptive cataloging, subject analysis, and classification. the results indicate that at toronto the cost of original cataloging is nearly four times greater than lc copy cataloging. the advantages of conforming to lc as much as possible, and reducing cataloging costs by doing so, have encouraged technical services administrators to adopt a flexible attitude toward the delays which continue to exist in the distribution of npac data. deferred cataloging for optimizing the utilization of the depository file before discussing how some of these libraries are trying to improve the utilization of the depository file it might be appropriate to discuss the maintenance of the depository file itself. for some libraries, the maintenance of the depository file has presented budgetary and space problems. when the npac cards began arriving many of the libraries receiving the depository sets acquisitions and cataloging i 129 from lc did not anticipate the notable increase in the amount of filing that would be created and therefore did not adequately provide for this in their budgets. also, with the steady increase in the number of cards received from lc, the need for additional catalog cases and the space to locate them have led some administrators to the decision of maintaining temporary depository files, sorting out certain categories of cards either to be distributed to other locations, or discarded, and keeping the others received for the current year and either one, two, or four previous years. yale, michigan, and berkeley appear to be the only libraries that have continued to maintain the original depository files, although they have all started supplementary files due to the growth of their catalogs. four of the libraries have maintained their depository files, excluding certain categories, since the beginning of npac, but due to space problems may decide to weed their files once the lc quinquennial catalog ( 1968-1972) is published. cornell and chicago do not maintain depository files, but have instead integrated their depository cards immediately into their selection activities. only those npac/ lc cards for which books are ordered, anticipated on approval/blanket order plans, or which represent works being received on standing orders for monographic series are retained. chicago, however, maintains a cross-reference file; cornell keeps a selective group of references which includes history and information cards and cross-references for the hebrew, south asian, and east asian classes. it may be of some interest to note here some of the categories that libraries discard from the depository sets as they are received from lc: phonodiscs, filmstrips, motion pictures, maps, music, juvenile literature, revised cards, and those specific subjects and languages that do not fall within the collecting 130 i college & research libraries • march 1973 policies of the libraries. cross-references represented a category discarded by several libraries, but lc is now able to handle them as a separate unit in the distribution of cards to the np ac participants so those libraries have been given the opportunity of eliminating the receipt of these cards. there is increasing discussion today on the part of those libraries maintaining temporary files that a title arrangement is preferable to a main entry approach. their position is that a title arrangement of the depository file would result in more successful matches, since there are fewer variables with titles than with the main entry approach. the university of north carolina is one of the libraries that keep~ a temporary file and in 1969 it made the decision to rearrange the depository file to a title arrangement. if lc were to discontinue the arrangement of the depository sets by main entry, those libraries maintaining a permanent file, which also serves as an authority file, would find this arrangement very unsatisfactory. in order to optimize the utilization of npac/lc cards, the majority of the libraries have developed systematic deferred cataloging procedures for current materials with imprint dates for the current year and generally two previous years. the waiting period for npac/lc copy ranges from six months to an unlimited period of time, but usually not exceeding two years as a maximum. waiting for lc copy is justified for two basic reasons: ( 1) cataloging costs are reduced, and ( 2) bibliographic compatibility with lc is achieved. seven libraries file copies of their order slips in their depository files for works which are likely ·candidates for npac/lc copy and hopefully a match is eventually made between the book and the lc copy. for libraries participating in the various pl480 programs the books are generally held indefinitely for the lc/ pl480 cards to arrive. the alternative is to process these materials from the bibliographic information on the pl480 slips included with the shipment of books, or from the bibliographic data recorded in the corresponding accessions lists. while deferred cataloging is in effect at a majority of these libraries, service to readers has not been curtailed. u ncataloged materials are made available in a variety of ways. yale has an "in process list" on film and cornell has a "status list" which is a computer-produced printout, both of which list materials on order as well as received, and the location of the uncataloged materials. michigan, in 1964, established a procedure called "temporary one entry" (toe) whereby copies of the computer-produced order fanfolds are filed in the public and depository catalogs. the books are shelved in the stacks by accession number and are available for circulation. michigan's entries are reviewed by a professional cataloger at the time the books are received and any necessary changes of entry are noted on the order fanfolds before the slips are filed in the two catalogs. when the npac/lc cards are received the books are recalled from toe for standard cataloging. ucla, in 1968/69, developed a system patterned after michigan's toe, but in lieu of filing order slips into the public catalog, a computer-produced printout of toe titles, arranged by author entry, is updated every two weeks in the form of a catalog supplement. toe candidates include "notifies" and reserve books. the entries used in the catalog supplement are those established at the time of preorder searching, so presumably no additional time is spent on reviewing the entries. for several years berkeley has had a system of deferred cataloging termed "temporary cataloging pool" (tcp) which makes possible the circulation of uncataloged materials. at the present time, berkeley is ex' i perimenting with extending tcp to branch library materials which are cataloged centrally at the general library. copies of the order slip are filed both in the depository file and the author i title catalog for tcp materials; temporary records are sent to the branch libraries. in 1970 i 11 chicago established a circulating "w" class for uncataloged materials while waiting for npac/lc copy. the letter c'w" was used because it represented a letter not used in the lc classification schedules. therefore, ccw" plus the accessions number constitutes the call number for these books. earlier in this report chicago was mentioned as one of the libraries that does not maintain a separate depository file; however, those npacilc cards selected by the book selectors either to be ordered or to be saved are filed into an outstanding order file ( oof) which is arranged by title. since selection is by no means limited to titles found on npacilc cards, the establishment of the circulating ccw' class has been a step forward in service and has practically eliminated rush cataloging of these current titles for readers. copies of the order slips for these uncataloged books are filed by a title arrangement in a supplementary file at the end of the general catalog. this system appears to be one of the least expensive means of making uncataloged materials available; books which are candidates for this class are on the shelves ready for circulation on the third day after arrival in the library. of all the deferred cataloging systems used by these libraries, the most personalized public service system is that developed by princeton called c'reader liaison service." the service, which was started in 1968, is given by a nonprofessional of high caliber who is a member of the order division of the preparations department. order slips filed in the public catalog give instructions to acquisitions and cataloging i 131 the reader to consult the order division for information regarding the availability of the title. when books are received at princeton and npacilc copy is not immediately available for them, the books are arranged by date received and shelved by order number in a "hold area." a control file arranged by order number is stamped by date received and this is the key to locating uncataloged materials. an important result of this service is the elimination of most of the rush cataloging, including reserve books, which are also circulated on an uncataloged basis. the major difference between princeton's system of deferred cataloging and the four other systems described above is that princeton's uncataloged books are not shelved in the open stacks, but are shelved within the working area of the preparations department. in order to charge out an uncataloged book the order number serves as the call number and the book is simply stamped inside the cover showing marks of ownership and the statement to return the book to the order di~ vision. this system eliminates the temporary preparation of the books for _ the stacks. a procedure has been developed to circulate uncataloged monographs to branch libraries as well. this service costs princeton the salary of one nonprofessional, but with an average monthly circulation of 457 titles in 1970 i 71, one can assume that this is quite a successful approach to making uncataloged materials available while waiting for lc copy. it is important that libraries have a systematic reviewing process in order to prevent the development of large, uncontrollable backlogs. two obvious disadvantages of temporary records are that books are handled twice, however slight the first processing represents, and additional filing of temporary records is required during the interim of waiting for lc copy. an inconvenience which sometimes arises from circulating 132 i college & research libraries • march 1973 uncataloged books is the need for recalling or locating books when the npac/ lc cards arrive in the libraries. as long as deferred cataloging continues, it is necessary that a thorough analysis of the costs involved with temporary processing be made periodically to insure that costs are being kept to a minimum. materials cataloged with npac/lc copy and originally no distinction is made by these libraries between materials cataloged with npac copy from those cataloged with regular lc copy. therefore, it is virtually impossible to measure the extent of npac cards used by these libraries; however, most of these libraries have kept statistics since the beginning of npac for materials cataloged with lc copy in general, which includes shared cataloging cards and regular lc cards. ( see table 1.) in presenting cataloging production figures and the percentages of works cataloged with lc copy by these libraries, the following factors must be kept in mind: ( 1 ) the priorities of the libraries; ( 2) the size of the cataloging staff and the num her of hours spent on cataloging; ( 3) whether there is a cataloging backlog and the size of it; ( 4) the extent of area programs, special collections, and collecting policies which do not fall within the scope of npac; ( 5) the extent of deferred cataloging; and ( 6) the lack of standardization in the content of cataloging statistics. the investigation revealed that there are still types of materials that require original cataloging. certain categories appear to lend themselves to original cataloging on a somewhat continuing basis: ( 1) rare books; ( 2) retrospective materials; ( 3) specialized subject and language collections; ( 4) the institution's theses and foreign dissertations, excluding trade editions; ( 5) technical reports; ( 6) selective pamphlet materials; ( 7) microforms; and ( 8) the specific priorities of the libraries to meet the needs of their university communities. east asian rna terials represented a specialized area which was common to all thirteen institutions. in spite of the fact that npac coverage has included japan since 1968, many of these libraries felt that although the percentage of npac/lc copy has increased for works in the japanese language, the coverage was not yet up to their expectations. the real problem, however, seems to be with chinese materials for which a considerable amount of original cataloging is being done by these libraries because there is no program equivalent to npac for china. since the cultural revolution in mainland china in 1966, new current publications have practically ceased to exist. 2 in view of the recent developments between china and the united states perhaps there is some possibility that this new relationship may encourage the establishment of a program similar to npac, not limiting itself to current acquisitions, but extending the program to include retrospective materials dating back to 1949 or earlier. in 1970/71 princeton reported that out of a total of 4,119 chinese titles cataloged, only 20 percent of these titles were cataloged with lc copy; for j apanese titles, 36 percent out of i, 795 titles were cataloged with npac/lc cards. in 1969/70 yale performed an analysis of cataloging and time statistics and for east asian materials, the average number of titles cataloged per month was 85.7 with 23.4 percent cataloged with lc cards. robert vosper, university librarian of ucla, questioned the wisdom of continuing to classify chinese and japanese materials with the classic harvard yenching scheme. his point is well taken since these materials are becoming in-~ j acquisitions and cataloging i 133 table 1 library new titles cataloged 1966/67 1970/71 toronto 50,683 80,263 stanford 42,097 60,119 yale 59,826 74,0562 indiana 55,537 63,196 cornell 85,155 75,883 pennsylvania 25,380' 35,984' ucla 48,489 55,143 berkeley 38,901 53,513 columbia 55,443 61,141 chicago 56,719 57,o4gs michigan 49,394 59,096 north carolina 47,39w0 princeton 39,649 59,282 1. this lower figure is due to an increase in coverage of materials in the non-roman alphabet and retrospective works. 2. in 1969/70 when yale adopted the lc classification and subject headings were already revised to conform to lc, the count of new titles hit a new high of 76,451. in 1970/71, if southeast and east asian materials were excluded from the count, the percentage of lc copy would have risen to 63. yale has established a system of priorities in cataloging and only current imprints falling within a certain priority are held for lc cards. 3. cornell has a holding period of at least ten months for monographs in series. at the end of ten months, approximately 70 percent can be matched with npac/lc cards. 4. does not include serials or rare books cataloged within the central library. current books are held creasingly multidisciplinary in character and the time may have therefore arrived to adopt the lc classification. furthermore, if an npac type of program were ever developed for china, it would be highly advantageous to adopt lc in order to reduce classification costs for chinese as well as japanese materials. materials from spain and portugal were reported by these libraries as areas requiring original cataloging. spain has since been incorporated into npac so current spanish imprints for 1971 i 72 are now covered. however, due to the unfortunate delay of its national bibliography, portugal remains outside the scope of npac, although lc does supply some copy for works with portuguese imprints. serials continue to require a substantial amount of original cataloging. although lc has been giving u.s. serials percent of lc copy 1966/67 1970/71 56 521 53 ( approx. ) 40 53 36 54 43 573 60' 49 645 49 706 53 707 57 708 67 709 7si0 41 son six to eight months for lc copy. 5. figure reflects deferred cataloging (toe). 6, figure reflects deferred cataloging ( tcp). 7. current materials are held for about eight months before the first search. 8. in 1970 the regenstein library opened; there was also a reduction in staff by 6.3 percent. production figures for the two previous years were: 1968/69, 67,686 titles; 1969/70, 67,487 titles. the lc figure for 1970/71 reflects the deferred cataloging system. 9. both lc figures reflect michigan's toe system of deferred cataloging. 10. this figure was lower than previous years due to staff turnover. the figure includes lc adaptive cataloging. 11. figure reflects deferred cataloging, and includes cataloging derived from lc. higher priority than previously, a number of librarians expressed the need for npac coverage of foreign serials, at least on a selective basis. perhaps this suggestion is somewhat more reasonable today since lc has adopted the anglo· american cataloging rules for cataloging serials. documents, including foreign, international, and national, appeared to be an important class of materials which required a considerable amount of original cataloging. although lc is giving a higher cataloging priority to u.s. federal and state documents, the coverage is on a selective basis. the libraries would benefit a great deal if more documents were processed by lc, since documents are frequently difficult and timeconsuming for the individual libraries to catalog. the end result would be advantageous in that libraries would 134 i college & research libraries • march 1973 achieve greater bibliographic compatibility with lc. it is doubtful that original cataloging will ever cease entirely in large university libraries because of the nature of their collections and the communities they serve. however, it is reasonable to assume that with the increase in availability of lc copy, the number of original cataloging personnel can be gradually decreased, with personnel limited to those with special language and/ or subject expertise. the important question is at what point lc copy has achieved the ideal percentage figure for research libraries in general. one would expect that the percentage figure should be higher for smaller and medium sized research libraries than for large research libraries with collections of over two million volumes. of course, thoughts and opinions would vary widely on this question, and there is undoubtedly more than one answer. it would seem that a reasonable ideal lc copy availability figure for large research libraries would be in the vicinity of 70-75 percent, with a limited amount of deferred catalogin g. the evaluation of npac and its future implications research libraries owe a great deal to the association of research libraries and to the library of congress for the foresight and action taken in the development of the shared cataloging program. if npac receives sufficient funds to extend its coverage and the speed of its operations, the availability of cataloging copy will be increased, and therefore greater bibliographic compatibility will be attained. this in turn should prove to be a significant contribution toward the eventual goal of an automated national data base. without npac, virtually no major academic research library, in view of the tight budgetary situation in recent years, could have continued to maintain present levels of bibliographic control. although npac has not been able to produce cataloging copy within three to four weeks upon receipt of the titles at lc as was originally planned when the program was developed, libraries have for the most part adjusted their technical operations to the delays in order to optimize the utilization of npac/lc cards. it is encouraging to learn that the delays in card distribution to npac participants are not due to backlogs in the shared cataloging division at lc, but to delays in the card production unit of the government printing office (gpo). according to a recent statement made by lc, foreign language titles required ten to eleven weeks to be printed at gpo in april 1971; but in january 1972, this had been reduced to three to four weeks.3 npac cards have been valuable to book selectors in the acquisition of current materials. preorder searching has benefited from npac cards because entries can be verified at the time of ordering and this information passed on when the materials are received for processing. it can be said that npac has contributed to the realization that the activities of acquisitions and cataloging are interrelated and that the information recorded at the time a book is ordered should be as bibliographically correct as possible so that the same information can be used at the cataloging stage, eliminating unnecessary duplication of effort. it was encouraging to observe that the majority of the libraries studied were accepting the descriptive, subject, and classification information on npac/ lc cards as much as possible, except in cases of actual error.4 experienced catalogers, however, expressed concern over the lack of standardization of bibliographic description on npac cards. when npac began, catalogers were en... couraged to adopt a flexible attitude and accept the variations in bibliographic description as given in the various foreign national bibliographies. as the years go on, there is no doubt that greater uniformity is desirable, as variations could lead to problems in the identification of publications. at the international meeting of cataloguing experts in copenhagen in 1969, discussions were held regarding the development of an international standard bibliographic description ( isbd) which would include bibliographic data required for catalog cards, national bibliographies, and book orders. 5 a proposed draft standard of the isbd was presented at the meeting of the international federation of library associations ( ifla) in 1971. if the proposed isbd is adopted at the international level, libraries will not only benefit from the bibliographic standardization of npac cards, but they can look forward to a future expansion of the marc program to include foreign language materials in a standard bibliographic format. a parallel program of npac for u.s. publications is cataloging in publication ( cip). this deserves inclusion in this report because of its tremendous potential with 157 american publishers participating as of january 1972. libraries receiving the lc depository set will have the option of converting the library of congress cip data appearing in the book to catalog copy if the printed card has not been received, or subscribers to marc will be able to extract the bibliographic data from the marc tapes since cip books appear on marc four to six months before the books appear on the market. eventually, u.s. government documents will be included in cip. it is interesting to note that there are two cataloging in publication programs in existence today at the international level. brazil began its program acquisitions and cataloging i 135 in july 1971 and the national central library, taipei, taiwan, bega~ its project with four publishers in september 1971.6 at the time this study was conducted, automation programs for computerproduced catalog cards were at varying stages of planning and development at several libraries. these programs could be considered parallel or supplementary to the lc depository file. chicago was the only library with .an operational computer-based technical processing system, utilizing marc tapes and data from npacinon-marc lc cards, as well as materials cataloged originally in the roman alphabet for the computerproduced sets of catalog cards. toronto began its marc service in 1970; there was some question, however, as to whether this service would be continued, due to the relatively low level of use. when lc expands the data input of marc to include foreign titles from npac, this service would become more useful and economically attractive. -columbia was about to begin its computerbased cataloging system with the utilization of marc tapes. if appropriate funds could be obtained, stanford was ready to begin phase i of its on-line automated network system which would be the implementation of marc. berkeley (together with the san diego and santa cruz campuses) is planning a pilot project which would not only include the utilization of marc tapes, but would input data from npac i non-marc lc cards, as well as original cataloging. the key question is what the time and cost figures will be for computer-produced card sets as opposed to manually-produced sets. one of the important features of this pilot project is that it would provide input for the university of california book catalog supplement. as of early 1972, pennsylvania was expecting to gain access to the marc records stored in the ohio col136 i college & research libraries • march 1973 lege library center ( oclc) through an on-line, cathode-ray-tube computer terminal. beginning with the fiscal year 1972 npac funds were appropriated directly to the library of congress instead of being transferred from the department of health, education, and welfare under title 11-c of the higher education act of 1965. according to lc this direct appropriation helps to insure the continuity of npac. on the whole, _the library of congress has done a commendable job of operating a program of the magnitude and complexity of npac. the participating libraries, in the spirit of cooperation, should record meaningful facts and statistics, to be reported annually, which would give the library of congress the opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of the program. this in turn would give the library of congress the type of support it needs for budget justifications in order to continue the further expansion of such a significant program as npac. references 1. william s. dix, "centralized cataloging and university libraries-title ii, part c, of the higher education act of 1965," library trends 16:97-111 (july 1967). 2. national program for acquisitions and cataloging. progress report, no. 8 (april 1969). 3. technical services directors of large research libraries, service proposals for the library of congress (rev. feb. 1972) (unpublished) . 4. in 1968 yale began to revise its subject headings in order to conform to lc. the changeover took one and a half years and it is estimated that 30 percent of the headings were changed. the pz (fiction) class is not used by the majority of these libraries using the lc scheme because they prefer to classify the works falling within this class with the literature of the country. certain exceptions exist with the z (bibliography) class, as some libraries prefer to classify bibliographies with the subjects. 5. "international meeting of cataloguing experts, copenhagen, 1969," libri 20, no. 1, p. 105-32; dorothy anderson, "international standards in cataloguing," international library review 3:241-49 ( 1971). 6. library of congress, processing department, cip progress report no. 1 (jan. 1972); library of congress information bulletin 31, no. 7 (feb. 17, 1972), p. 74. t reviews.p65 166 college & research libraries march 2003 guage, beginning with a brief summary of the basics of u. s. copyright law and its implications for the profession. this is the most technical section of the book; however, it does an excellent job of describing the substance and nuances of these confusing sections of u.s. code, as well as the digital millennium copyright act, and a range of legal issues relating to technology, access, and potential legal changes with emerging technologies. in the section entitled �working with patrons,� the two chapters address the importance of protecting the privacy of patrons and the implications of the americans with disabilities act on library and electronic resources access. library security expert bruce shuman discusses levels of security and ways to ensure that those who work in and use public buildings enjoy a secure environment. although legal issues of immediate significance dominate this work, an important section deals with the somewhat more immutable subject of ethics and ethical behavior in the life of the information professional. one chapter limits its focus to ethics in the virtual realm of e-commerce, whereas a second places classical ethical norms of truth, justice, and freedom within the context of professional decision making on issues such as privacy, intellectual property, information quality, and information access. the third chapter in this thoughtful section deals specifically with putting professional ethics into practice. this book is written as a handbook to help information professionals under stand legal issues. it concludes with a section on drafting and implementing policies as well as a list of resources. it is important to note that no work can serve as a definitive guide to the shifting landscape of laws regulating museums, archives, and libraries, and none can substitute for an attorney�s legal advice. the most one can hope for in a book like libraries, museums, and archives is that it will offer a detailed overview of current playing field. this fine volume does that admirably.�gene hyde, lyon college. sauperl, alenka. subject determination during the cataloging process. lanham, md.; london: scarecrow, 2002. 173p. alk. paper, $47.50 (isbn 0810842890). lc 2001-57698. this reviewer, who finds it difficult to dislike any book, was disappointed by this one. based on the author �s doctoral dissertation (university of north carolina, 1999), the work reports on a study made to identify and examine the cognitive processes involved in the assignment of subject headings through a case study of catalogers. the thought processes that go into subject cataloging have received sparse attention, and the topic is deserving of scholarly exploration. this study makes a definite contribution to the quite limited body of literature. sauperl�s failure to explain certain aspects of her research methodology frequently cause the reader to become puzzled, however, if not frustrated. the printed text itself could have been improved by careful editing and some rewriting. the work is organized into seven chapters. an introduction discusses the purpose of the study and very briefly describes the research strategy. the second chapter reviews the treatment of subject determination as presented in cataloging and indexing textbooks and discusses the previous research concerned with subject analysis and indexing. the inclusion of indexing research strengthens the study and is to be applauded. the third chapter describes the research methodology. chapter four, �twelve personal approaches to subject cataloging,� presents the case studies. being ninety-five pages in length, it forms the core of the book. chapter five summarizes what was learned from the case studies. chapter six presents a model for subject analysis. chapter seven discusses the author �s findings in relation to earlier studies and the implication of those findings for cataloging education and cataloging in libraries. the section concerned with previous research has a fair amount of redundancy with chapter three. although repetition of this book reviews 167 nature is not uncommon in dissertations, less detail in one chapter or the other would have been preferable in the book. a bibliography and an index conclude the volume. sauperl�s case study participants were twelve experienced original catalogers from three academic libraries in the southeastern u.s. each institution had �more than a million volumes � several branch libraries and large central cataloging departments with several catalogers performing original cataloging. all the libraries used oclc.� each participant performed original cataloging for three books of his or her own selection. except for the first case study, however, participants only �describe cataloging of one of the three items.� the reason for imposing this limitation in a study, that by its very nature is already quite limited, is not stated. six catalogers were observed by sauperl, who used the �think-aloud method � to capture the cognitive process of the catalogers during their work.� the other six were interviewed. the respective methodologies are discussed, but the rationale for their dual employment is nowhere stated. sauperl does comment that the different methods had a substantial impact on the reports of the case studies. �while the observed catalogers actually cataloged books during the observation session, the interviewed catalogers only talked about their cataloging approach. this means the stories of the observed catalogers are much more detailed and based on evidence from the observation, whereas the stories of the interviewed catalogers are quite brief and skeletal.� interviewed participants were asked to describe some recent work they had cataloged, given the opportunity to explain their philosophy of cataloging, and so on. the interviews were structured inasmuch as individuals were asked to respond to and discuss, as they deemed appropriate, the relation of a number of factors to subject cataloging. each participant was presented with several factors that �were selected from the observation session of one or two catalogers in another library in the study.� participants were therefore not responding to a uniform set of factors, a circumstance that sauperl leaves unexplained. the responses given to the variables were interesting and informative. this reviewer believes the study would have been stronger had a comprehensive set of variables been developed and each participant in the three groups presented with the same identical factors to prompt discussion. there are several problems with the handling of the variables. given their importance to the interviews, sauperl�s failure to discuss them in a separately labeled section of the text must be faulted. she also must be faulted for explicitly stating the complete set of variables for just one interviewee group. no comparable sets are provided for interviewees in the other two groups. one learns the factors used to prompt discussion with these interviewees only in the text. variables or concepts presented to the first group included such expected elements as authority file, local catalog, title page, record for a previous edition, tentative heading and subject heading, as well as such factors as time and cost. participants in this group were not asked to comment on the importance of the author�s intention, skimming the work, and thinking of the library user as a part of the process when choosing subject headings, variables included as prompts to another group of interviewees. cooperation with colleagues and �saturation point � that feeling when you had to stop� working with a given book, were among the other variables. despite its shortcomings, this is not an unimportant work. scholars of subject cataloging will obviously be its primary audience. the study provides a base for future research and, given its moderate price, should be owned by any library and information science collection that supports serious scholarship. the book is worth consideration as supplementary reading for cataloging courses. catalogers should at least skim the work, especially those at entry level and mid-career. 168 college & research libraries march 2003 index to advertisers acrl 133 annual reviews 110 aiaa 99 archival products 162 biosis 100 choice 123 haworth press cover 2 library technologies 103 r.r. bowker cover 3 sciencedirect cover 4 by way of conclusion, it seemed only appropriate to check worldcat to look at the subject headings assigned to this work. a title search (done on august 9, 2002) retrieved five records, two for the book and three for the preceding dissertation. the record for the book in hand (oclc: 48588266) had two subjects: �subject cataloging� and �subject cataloging� united states�case studies.� a second record (oclc: 50100464), which had an identical bibliographic description except for pagination being noted 192 (versus 173 for the copy in hand), gave the single subject: �subject cataloging.� the record for the printed version of the dissertation (oclc: 42810541) had three subjects: �subject cataloging,� �subject headings,� and �catalogers�united states�attitudes.� the final records were for microform versions of the dissertation. the records for both the microfilm (oclc:44492710) and the microfiche (oclc: 44161585) gave the two identical headings: �subject cataloging� and �subject headings.� the subjects given all seem appropriate, even if they are not entirely consistent. this reviewer would suggest adding another subject heading to bring out the cognitive aspects of the study. but that�s just a thought.�james w. williams, university of illinois-urbana-champaign. warner, julian. information, knowledge, text. lanham, md.: scarecrow, 2001. 150p. alk. paper, $49.50 (isbn: 081083989x). lc: 00-067055. how did humans make their way from an oral tradition in homeric or pre-homeric times to the language of computer programs today? that is exactly the question that julian warner addresses in his 2001 book, information, knowledge, text. on the faculty of the school of management and economics, the queen�s university of belfast, warner may seem an unlikely candidate to find his way to a topic steeped in the academic study of information but, in fact, he has written extensively in this area. library literature and information science lists forty-two citations for his work, including many book reviews of related studies. his approach is thorough, academic, credible, and quite interesting. the bibliography at the back of the book is extensive and wide-ranging. the chapters have, as warner states in the preface, all �previously undergone editorial and � full peer review as either journal articles or conference presentations.� warner made appropriate revisions to the original articles to �avoid repetition and increase coherence.� he has looked well after his new readers, as the chapters do provide a coherent collection. regarding repetition, however, this reader could have done with fewer references to bacon�s famous statement, �writing [maketh] an exact man.� the book finishes with republished reviews written by warner of books that allow him to continue his exploration of the symbology and significance of writing. there is no index included at the back of this book, an omission this reviewer found unfortunate. taken individually, the chapters stand on their own. in the first chapter, �studying writing,� a careful analysis of roy harris�s the origin of writing (1986) and signs of writing (1995), warner begins to persuade the reader that the route from spoken to written communication was sure and inexorable. the chapters that follow build on exactly this argument. the semiotic approach to language and its relationship to signs throughout human history is persuasive, if not always easy. by the third chapter, �not the exact words�: writing, computing, and exactness,� warner has reviews.indd 482 college & research libraries september 2008 book—and certainly including the two examples of the university of pittsburgh and the university of arizona—is of a very large library connected to a large institution. very little, if anything, is said of libraries at smaller colleges going through structural transitions. they may face similar challenges as those larger libraries, but certainly smaller libraries have other challenges particular to them. since two of the authors are affi liated with one of the libraries described in detail, it makes perfect sense for them to focus on a situation that they know intimately. their broader study, however, would have benefited from input from academic librarians serving smaller populations. the final chapter, “positioning the academic library for a vibrant future,” is, unfortunately, mildly disappointing, for it leaves the impression that the final chapter was hastily assembled. while the authors do offer insight on how librarians can cope with the rapidly changing field of academic librarianship, their attempt at summarizing the book’s overarching argument is too abbreviated and leaves the reader wishing for a more cumulative summary. these weaker elements, however, should not obscure the incisive discussions that form the greater part of beyond survival. the unifying thread weaving through all of the chapters is the clear need for libraries to be user-focused and to seek out what their users need and want rather than assuming that the libraries and their staffs know what is best for their clientele. this user-focused philosophy, more than anything else, is the key element that causes the central arguments to adhere, and it’s the reason this book is worth reading. if users are changing, yet the library sees no need to do so, is the library effective in its mission to serve these users? all too oft en, libraries forget that they exist for a community of users and choose to prescribe services with little input form their patrons. the need to correct such thinking helps drive many of the transitions described in the book. so important is this issue that the authors dedicate chapter eight, “standing up to scrutiny,” to determining whether or not an academic library is successful in focusing on its users. despite the aforementioned weaknesses, the authors are largely successful in explaining the need for change in academic libraries and the ins and outs of how to go about such change. as time goes on, more and more academic libraries will find themselves facing decisions on how to go about changing with the times, and the mix of theory and practicality in beyond survival can serve as an important resource.—stephen pelton, the state university of new york at buffalo. understanding frbr: what it is, and how it will affect our retrieval tools. ed. arlene g. taylor. westport, conn.: libraries unlimited, 2007. 186p. alk. paper, $45 (isbn 9781591585091). lc 2007-13558. frbr, or functional requirements for bibliographic records, is a conceptual model created by the ifla (international federation of library institutes and associations) study group on the functional requirements for bibliographic records. the study group was formed in 1991, and frbr was first published in 1998. its purpose is to create a hierarchical structure of bibliographic records (as opposed to current cataloging practice, which uses a flat structure), via which the relationships between related titles will be clear to the user. the same ifla committee responsible for frbr later charged a subgroup to create a similar conceptual model for authority records (functional requirements for authority data, or frad; this subgroup was working on its fi nal draft as of this writing). in 2005, another ifla group, the working group on functional requirements of subject authority records (frsar) had begun to do the same for subject authority records, extending the frad model. understanding frbr consists of thirteen chapters, each written by experienced catalogers and specialists in their subfi elds. the first six chapters provide introductory and background material on frbr’s development; the last seven discuss the application of frbr to various classes of materials. the book is not intended to be an instructional text; rather, it is designed to provide an introduction to the conceptual model and to illustrate how it can facilitate improved access to resources via the clear delineation of the relationships between said resources. arlene taylor, the editor, has over 35 years of experience in cataloging and classification as a practitioner, a teacher, and a researcher and has published widely and extensively in the field of cataloging and bibliographic description, including a comprehensive introduction to cataloging and classification. the first six chapters clearly illustrate the concepts at the base of frbr. taylor’s introductory chapter discusses the means by which the card catalog provided for collocation of related works by one creator via filing rules and how this does not translate to online catalogs. frbr, she notes, can bring this organization and collocation to the online environment. taylor goes on to describe the frbr concept and its structure, the model of analysis on which it is based, and the user tasks that its implementation can facilitate. the subsequent five chapters discuss the structure of frad and its relation to frbr; frbr, and the history of cataloging (this chapter, by william denton, is a delightful and informative read that provides a broad perspective on the history of the organization of bibliographic information); the history of frbr research and its impact on the further development thereof; the concept of “bibliographic families” as groups of related works; and—the most direct area of professional concern—the incorporation of frbr concepts into the new cataloging code now being developed: rda (resource description and access). this last is especially important, as rda is slated to be released and implemented in 2009. the library of congress working group on the future of bibliographic control, in its final report, recombook reviews 483 mended that rda not be implemented until frbr is more fully understood and tested; however, it is yet unknown whether the library of congress will follow this recommendation. most libraries follow lc’s policy decisions; therefore, if rda is released for implementation at its scheduled date, not only the workfl ow of catalogers but the design of any ils and the public display of bibliographic information in the opac will be affected. as noted above, the remaining seven chapters address the application of frbr to nonprint and/or nonmonographic classes of materials. it is encouraging that the authors thereof do not shy away from criticism of the frbr model, either in general or as it specifically applies to classes of materials; this book is not a blanket acceptance of frbr but an honest assessment thereof. sherry vellucci, in the chapter on frbr and music, notes that frbr is “an important step to meeting the needs of this complexity [of the “musical bibliographical universe”] in a music catalog” and that “frbr is the first conceptual model to acknowledge the structural complexities that are such a large part of the music bibliographic universe.” several chapters, however, note the limitations of frbr as it applies to other areas of cataloging. alexander c. thurman notes that frbr would have to be a supplement to archival control as exhibited in finding aids or collectionlevel marc records, as frbr concepts cannot sufficiently represent the collection, which is the “central unit of archival organization.” steven c. shadle indicates that the structure of frbr is not easily adaptable for serials cataloging but that its introduction is an opportunity for serials cataloger to reexamine their practices. murtha baca and sherman clarke note that the frbr model would, in the cataloging of works of art, architecture, and material culture, chiefly be of use in determining groupings of resources in a more relational structure, although, due to the fact that these are actual objects 484 college & research libraries and not abstract items, there are better avenues for their cataloging. others are still more critical: mary lynette larsgaard not only notes that frbr, as it stands now and until ils vendors can incorporate frbr into their soft ware, will not work well for cartographic materials but begins her conclusion by stating “[w]hen frbr was issued, among the fi rst positive comments that i read were not just by noncatalogers but by nonlibrarians, which made for feelings of caution.” martha yee, an expert in the cataloging of moving-image materials, discusses not only the potential difficulties in the application of the frbr model to these materials but also those of the implementation of frbr and rda in general: “… we may be left with rules that are useful to no one and purchased by no one.” the book does end by noting that everyone concerned must be involved in the process, so that all varying opinions can be heard and considered. steven c. shadle, in his closing chapter on serials, notes: “i encourage everyone to get out there and kick the tires in whatever way possible!” understanding frbr is clearly written, well illustrated (many of the concepts are clarified by very helpful diagrams), and well indexed; additionally, chapters feature extensive bibliographies, many of which provide the urls to the ifla groups’ documents. while it may seem that this book is of interest only to catalogers, the application of frbr will change the structure of the catalog and the systems used to store and display it; therefore, it is an important text for systems librarians, reference librarians, and anybody else interested in the future of the organization and display of bibliographic information.—deborah degeorge, university of michigan. william h. sherman. used books: marking readers in renaissance england. philadelphia: university of pennsylvania press, 2008. 259p. (isbn 9780812240436). lc2008-271368. long in the making, this timely book, by a young american scholar now at the september 2008 university of york in the u.k., should be required reading for special collections librarians. its subject is one that has come to the fore in the history of reading: marginalia. while there have been several shelves’ worth of more focused studies on the reading practices of individuals and communities, few have attempted sherman’s mission: to survey the fi eld as a whole. sherman’s principal laboratory was the stacks of the huntington library, where he was given direct access to that institution’s formidable holdings of stc titles. (note to colleagues: good things can happen when we bend our access policies.) since cataloging typically does not disclose with any consistency the presence or absence of marginalia, sherman had to do so for himself, the old-fashioned way, one book at a time. needless to add, he handled a lot of books in the course of his project. if nothing else, sherman’s subject is a solid affirmation of the enduring value of the artifacts we steward. books are more than texts, sherman reminds us. the artifacts in our stacks are redolent of meaning and evidence that is only discernible through inspection. eebo and ecco, take note. so, what did he find? if sherman set out to provide a map of a new fi eld of study, what he learned was that there is no map, no grand narrative, no overarching theoretical perch. what he encountered in handling thousands of books were decidedly independent-minded readers responding to texts and using books in personal, opaque, and quirky ways. if we needed more proof that renaissance readers were not passive slaves to texts, here it is. sherman’s core finding—that about 20 percent of all the stc books he handled contained marginalia—is hard to evaluate in and of itself: is that a lot? a little? but that 20 percent does reveal the extent to which printed books were sites of engagement and activity, sometimes creative, sometime routine. here we find readers annotating texts, doodling, practicing penmanship, recording recipes and family information, customizing artifacts c&rl news march 2018 142 junli diao cataloging backlogs perennials, seaweeds, or others? the way i see it junli diao is assistant professor, head of cataloging and serials, at york college-cuny, email: jdiao@york.cuny.edu © 2018 junli diao cataloging backlogs are a perennial part of cataloging work, but they differ from library to library. in some libraries, cataloging backlogs are temporary imbalances between the fast growth of new acquisitions and shrinking of cataloging personnel and support. in other libraries, cataloging backlogs are simply those materials that go beyond the regular scope of bibliographical management. no matter the type of cataloging backlog, they are bulky, substantial, and visible. some might even use them as an advantage to contribute to their job security. however, when cataloging backlogs sneak into a library’s bibliographic system and build up there for years, they are not perennials any more. they become like seaweeds in the ocean: you know they are there, and you can even have a glance at their tips provocatively bouncing along with the waves; but if you really want to grasp them and dig out their roots, you will have to dive in deep. a metaphor is a metaphor, but it gives some sense of the real situation that i was facing when i started my substitute position as the head of cataloging at the york college library-city university of new york (cuny) in march 2016. at first, i was deeply impressed by how neat and well-organized the cataloging department was: newly arrived, shelf-ready books from coutts were resting on the shelves, awaiting processing; nice, shining book trucks were lined up next to boxes of toner supplies; well-preserved shelf-list files lined the hallway and those golden handles on the drawers glimmered when sunlight flicked through the blinds and illuminated the whole room. only occasionally could i hear the rhythm of therapeutic keystrokes from a keyboard break the tranquility. the profound serenity around me almost deceived my eyes, and my vision of work here nearly went astray. soon after i started cataloging music scores, i realized there were serious cataloging backlogs—not on the shelves or in boxes, but in the bibliographic database. a miscalculation in barcode printing a decade or more ago resulted in thousands of books carrying duplicate barcodes. some barcodes were overlaid by white labels as a simple remedy, resulting in the problem being covered up, but not fixed. some older books that had migrated from the old notis system had spine labels with call numbers, but did not have corresponding bibliographical records or barcodes in the system, which forced student workers at the circulation desk to generate brief records on the spot when users needed to check them out. what’s worse, there was no way for catalogers to trace when those books were returned to the library so that the brief records could be promptly updated. once shelved again, those books remain inactive and inaccessible to the public through the online catalog. system migrations, retrospective conversions, and personnel shortages could all be factors contributing to the creation and growth of backlogs. but is there any point for me to ask why they happened instead of how they should be solved? while stories of cataloging backlogs might be different, the solutions largely remain the same: employ more staff and/or change the workflow. so what’s next became simple, but not easy. kevin mailto:jdiao%40york.cuny.edu%20?subject= march 2018 143 c&rl news collins, systems librarian at the cuny central office of library services, generated a new list of 2,112 duplicate barcodes, and njoki kinyatti, chief librarian, assigned lesly previl, cuny office assistant, to specifically work with me on the cleanup. previl went to the stacks and pulled out books according to the list. i fixed item records and upgraded bibliographical records in the system. after resolving the duplicate barcodes, we gathered our strength to pick out those books without barcodes, which requires ongoing attention to every book on the shelves. backlogs are creatures of darkness and silhouettes of the amorphous. they thrive in the valley of ignorance and hesitation but vanish in the heights of exposing and trying. without dealing with all sorts of backlogs, my career as a cataloging librarian would not be complete. without working in this substitute position, i would not know what backlogs i myself had in the chambers of my heart. cuny librarians have held faculty status since 1946 and faculty ranks since 1965.1 at cuny, all faculty are evaluated in three areas: teaching, service, and scholarship. at york, all librarians participate in active reference and information literacy programs. thus, in addition to regular cataloging work, the cataloging librarian is required to undertake the responsibilities of providing reference services and teaching information literacy classes. with almost zero experience in these areas, i wasn’t sure whether i had ignored them in the past because i thought i couldn’t manage to do them, or if i could do them but failed to explore my potential. ever since i started my library school education, i fell into the trap of negative stereotypes about cataloging librarians: they are not “people persons,” and they can’t do good reference work or teach. apparently i wasn’t immune from these influences and, subconsciously, i inclined to fit myself within this “model.” in my first article, “passion of a young cataloger,” i even wrote cynically “i don’t want to spend my time sitting at the front desk and being asked ten times a day the same question, ‘where is the library’s washroom?’” when the york college library offered me a chance to make a difference, i took it and tried. more than half a year passed, and one day i received an email from a professor saying that my name would be added to the acknowledgments of her forthcoming book because i had helped her find the full citation information needed by the publisher—and at that moment, i realized i cleaned up some backlogs hiding in the corner of my heart. when i was stopped by a student on the stairs who told me how much he appreciated my information literacy class, which had helped him successfully complete his assignments, i realized i had already gotten away from the dark shadow that had attempted to hunt me down. defeating the backlogs in my heart is no different from fighting against cataloging backlogs: one relies on help from outside to change from within. what’s next is simple, but not easy. at york library, there are senior colleagues who do an excellent job in reference work and information literacy, for instance john drobnicki, di su, and scott sheidlower. i observed their work both at the reference desk and in the classroom. christina miller, head of reference, arranged for me to work at the reference desk with a partner until i felt comfortable with myself and confident in what i was doing. i explored these new territories and made adjustments. although i went through some turbulence and a little thunder, they were necessary and valuable assets leading me toward a magnificent view of a rainbow. the cleanup of backlogs in my work is just a regular task, but cleaning up backlogs in the chambers of my heart is a path of contemplation and reflection, which might possibly point to a new direction of understanding myself. if work is an extension of our minds and bodies, then taking care of backlogs in our work is actually an act of diagnosing the neglected areas of our souls. an intimate and daring action vis-à-vis backlogs offers us ways to explore our souls that are otherwise blocked by what we assume right and proper, and by who we are told we are and told what we can (and cannot) do. backlogs are the opportunities to make room for new possibilities to grow. possibility produces hope. hope calls for action. action will not let us down. note 1. john a. drobnicki, “cuny librarians and faculty status: past, present, and future,” urban library journal 20(1). reviews.indd book reviews baca, murtha, et al. cataloging cultural objects: a guide to describing cultural works and their images. chicago: american library association on behalf of the visual resources association, 2006. 396p. $75 (isbn 0838935648). lc 2006-13342. at my small library i am the only cataloging librarian. this means that i am responsible for cataloging materials in all formats. that having been said, though, the only realia i had ever cataloged was the shovel used to break the ground when our new building site was formally dedicated in 1973. therefore, when i was asked to write a review of this book, i wondered how i could make the review a practical assessment and not just a theoretical evaluation. then my supervisor presented me with a mold for a medal awarded in the field of archaeology. i jumped at the chance to use this guide to catalog the beautiful but unfamiliar object in my hand. however, i soon discovered the shortcomings, as well as the strengths, of the manual before me. cataloging cultural objects is a detailed and thorough manual that helps a cataloger, or noncataloger, deal with the attributes particular to cultural objects—from small pieces of realia, to buildings—from sections of a painting to digitized images of artworks. its scope includes all art and architecture but does not include natural history or scientific collections. the book is divided into three parts. the first part consists of theoretical considerations. topics covered include: the nature of a work versus an image; the concept of related works; and the importance of authority fi les and controlled vocabularies. the second part consists of a chapter on each element of the final metadata record. each chapter includes information about the metadata element, cataloging rules, and information on the presentation of the data. for example, for the element “object naming” (what a cataloger would call the title field) the book presents information about naming, cataloging rules, and information on how the object name should be displayed. at the end of each chapter, there are a number of extremely pertinent and useful examples. the third part deals with authority control. four different types of authorities are covered in separate chapters. they are personal/corporate names, geographic places, concepts (materials, form/genres, etc.), and subjects. for the task i had at hand, namely the cataloging of one piece of realia, the guide was helpful, but it was not what i had hoped it would be. this is because i do all of my cataloging following aacr2 (anglo-american cataloging rules, 2nd ed.) rules and in the marc (machinereadable cataloging) format. although the guide follows some aacr2 rules, it does not conform strictly to them. instead, it takes a relational approach, following many of the concepts presented in frbr (functional requirements for bibliographic records). this means that if you are cataloging just one object, you need to look at each element, match it up against the corresponding area in aacr2, and then map the information to the corresponding marc format. the guide was still helpful in bringing to my attention certain concepts and properties that are unique to cultural objects. for example, there was much information on how to measure and describe the object, as well as information on what kinds of notes were helpful to the community. the guide also provided me with lists of pertinent thesauri for each of the elements. however, i feel that the guide is most useful for the cataloging of an entire database of cultural objects, especially in a nontraditional (in other words, nonmarc) setting. the guide is extremely well presented and has a logical approach to 364 the subject. it can be used as a stand-alone manual to create a database of cultural objects. although it is not intended for system designers, it is so thorough and explains the issues of the relationships between, for example, a work and its creator, so well, that it can be used as the basis for designing a database of metadata about objects. it is especially useful for noncatalogers, in that it covers each element of a metadata record clearly and explains not only what should be present in the record, but why. the manual is not prescriptive. it allows the individual institution to decide at which level they need to catalog an item, but it offers clear guidelines on minimal cataloging requirements. it also seeks to establish a basic uniformity, especially in the use of thesauri, so that the exchange of information across institutions is made easier. finally, at the end of each chapter there are complete examples of cataloged cultural objects. the examples do not just include the element covered in the chapter, but instead include the entire record. this helps to put each element in context. likewise, the corresponding authority records are also included in the examples. again, these are very helpful in lett ing the cataloger understand and appreciate the concepts behind the metadata he or she is encoding. in summary, the book is helpful for the cataloger who is faced with cataloging one object, but it is not a manual based on aacr2/marc. so, unlike nancy b. olson’s cataloging of audiovisual materials and other special materials (1998), it is not going to relate every rule to aacr2 or present the examples in the marc format. however, that was not the authors’ intent. the intent of the guide is actually much broader, and the authors have come up with a guide that is extremely well thought out, forward-thinking, and very clearly presented. it is an enormous asset for any institution contemplating cataloging a set of cultural objects, especially if they do not have a metadata structure in place yet.—isabel del carmen quintana, harvard university. book reviews 365 libraries & culture: historical essays honoring the legacy of donald g. davis, jr. eds. cheryl knott malone, hermina g.b. anghelescu, and john mark tucker. washington, d.c.: library of congress center for the book, 2006. 294p. alk. paper, $25 (isbn 0844411558). lc 2006-18763. as a tribute to an admired and beloved person’s career, the festschrift lends a warm, personal touch to the chilly world of scholarly publishing. the individual contributions are heterogeneous, to be sure, but no more so than those in most other edited collections. libraries & culture: historical essays honoring the legacy of donald g. davis, jr., is a good example of the genre. originally published as a special issue of the journal libraries & culture (v. 40, no. 3, summer 2005), it is now being offered in book form by the center for the book at the library of congress. colleagues and former students offer personal reminiscences in glowing praise of davis’s activities as professor at the university of texas at austin, editor of libraries & culture, and leader in ifla, the library history round table, and the conference on faith and history. also included are a bibliography of davis’s works and an essay by john mark tucker, “fides et historia: christian sources for the professional contributions of donald g. davis, jr.” in this unusual piece, tucker attempts to interpret the intellectual and religious underpinnings of another person’s life, based on davis’s own extensive writings about his christian faith and the practice of librarianship as a life of service. davis’s lifelong interest in library history is the focus of the remainder of the collection, beginning with articles on library history and education research that assess the current state of the field. the pioneering contributions of davis’s generation of advocates for library history may be taken for granted today. but, as edward a. goedeken shows in his survey of literature reviews published in the journal of library history/libraries & culture from 1967 to 2002, the groundwork college and research libraries dissertations: a study of the scholar's approach joan m. repp and cliff glaviano four academic libraries in ohio participated in a study exploring how and why extramural researchers access locally produced dissertations. abstracts and indexes in hard copy were identified as the resources relied upon most heavily by all academic disciplines, with dissertation abstracts international and related university microfilms international products being named most often. researchers, regardless of discipline, were successful searching by subject more often than using any other form of access. dissertations were most frequently requested by those writing theses, dissertations, or research papers for publication. these findings may have implications for in-house cataloging of locally produced dissertations or for institutional participation in an indexing and abstracting program. he dissertation is a unique for, mat for scholarly information that is not available in its original form through established professional or commercial channels. though substantive information from the dissertation may subsequently appear in the scholarly literature as a journal article or book chapter, the original dissertation is deposited, virtually without exception, at the degree-granting institution. although an occasional dissertation is published in its entirety, more often this follows considerable editing of styl~ or content. since hard copy of the dissertation is not widely disseminated, access to the information it contains becomes a concern for the scholarly community. as library of congress priorities preclude cataloging of even depository copies of dissertations submitted for copyright, no lc cataloging for dissertations appears on the bibliographic utilities, and full responsibility for bibliographic control falls to the degree-granting institution. academic libraries necessarily must either negotiate with their parent institution, or themselves originate, all policies concerning preservation, circulation, availability, shelving and degree of bibliographic control for local dissertations. further, only the library and degree-granting institution determine the extent to which access to the dissertation is shared through an indexing service such as that provided by university microfilms international or through contributing cataloging copy to a bibliographic utility. implicit in accepting responsibility for bibliographic control of the dissertation is its indexing, so that it might be readily located when needed. presently most academic libraries provide full descriptive and subject cataloging for local dissertations and input such copy on oclc, rlin, or wln. since the dissertation format is developed by the university's graduate school, title pages are formulaic and descriptive cataloging can easily be done by a paraprofessional cataloger. subject analysis is an altogether different matter due to the timely, experimental nature of dissertation research. it is often both difficult and time-consuming for a professional cataloger to select lc subject headings (lcsh) appropriate to these in-depth, highly specialized studies. this problem of subject analysis is most often joan m. repp is chair, access services and cliff glaviano is principal cataloger, university libraries, bowling green state university, bowling green, ohio 43403. 148 j noted in science and technology though works in all disciplines potentially can deal with concepts for which lcsh terms are nonexistent at the time of cataloging. the problem of adequate classification and subject analysis is compounded by changing staffing patterns in cataloging departments. since cataloging has been automated, the number of original catalogers has decreased. 1 each cataloger is therefore responsible for a wider group of disciplines. this reduces the probability of high subject expertise in any one of them. coincident with the declining number of original catalogers, the number of dissertations produced has risen: doctoral degrees in the united states, for example, rose from 6,600 in 1950 to 32,700 in 1982.2 dissertation users users of dissertations can be divided into two groups: intramural scholars and extramural scholars. comparatively little is known about either group's behavior relative to seeking and using dissertations. informal observation from the reference desk suggests that intramural scholars writing their own theses and dissertations may use those already produced at their institution for reasons beyond obtaining scholarly information. in addition to checking bibliographies for references and determining the scope of an extant dissertation's coverage of a topic to avoid duplicating another's research, intramural scholars use local dissertations to determine a format acceptable to their institution, to evaluate research approaches that have been approved by particular dissertation committee chairs, and for other reasons not related to scholarly content. the in-house tools for locating a dissertation written at an institution significantly exceed those available to the extramural scholar, who may be assumed to be interested in the dissertation's content alone. while the extramural scholar can be expected to use standard indexes, abstracts, and databases, the intramural scholar, provided by his library with lcsh subject analysis and potentially, additional local access by adviser name, department/major, or other approach, dissertations 149 probably can ignore standard sources altogether for locating local dissertations. often libraries that do not provide full cataloging for dissertations aid the intramural scholar through separate in-house indexes or special shelving arrangements, amenities lost to the extramural scholar. should the library provide only minimal on-campus access to local dissertations, promoting the use of standard sources, the intramural scholar can still take advantage of maintaining close contact with others in his discipline, many of whom will have good knowledge of the dissertations produced in the discipline and available at the institution. it is reasonable to assume that information needs of the intramural and extramural scholar can differ in scope and emphasis and that the intramural scholar has resources in addition to standard sources for accessing local dissertations. standard tools of potential use to both groups have been enhanced considerably by technology. many institutions granting doctoral degrees participate in the dissertation abstracts international (dai) program, which generates indexes in both hard copy and online through commercial database services. broad subject access is available in dai and american doctoral dissertations (add) while lsch access is available for those cataloged dissertations in the portion of the oclc database available on brs. dai hard copy is indexed also by keyword from title and by author; add additionally by author and by institution. the database available on brs and dialog is compiled from both add and dai. in addition to searches available from the hard-copy indexes, search terms constructed from boolean combinations of keywords from title or the entire abstract can be used on brs and dialog to locate relevant dissertations. meanwhile, the technology for using the commercial databases is widely available to the scholar at the academic library: in 1980, all fortythree academic libraries responding to a survey indicated they had access to dialog for database searching.3 while answers to the basic questions of how a patron gains access to a local disser150 college & research libraries tation and how a patron uses its information can be assumed from observations by experienced reference librarians, no published research exists to affirm or deny these assumptions. costs associated with participating in the dai program and costs associated with original cataloging of locally produced materials should generate continuing interest in the question of how best to serve intramural and extramural scholars who seek dissertation information. clear reasons to modify cataloging procedures to include, for example, access by thesis adviser as suggested by george harris and robert huffman; reasons to support the cost of full cataloging of dissertations; and/or reasons to justify the expense of participating in a cooperative indexing program need to be determined. assessment of patron behavior in seeking and using dissertation information becomes necessary before institutional procedures can be modified or program participation evaluated. literature survey little has been published in the literature on the handling, cataloging, classification, and subject analysis of locally produced theses and dissertations. the literature concerning access is dated enough to preclude mention of the commercial databases, and institutional participation patterns have changed enough since the 1970s to make descriptions of the hard-copy indexes and their coverage quite. misleading. julie moore's article, "bibliographic control of american doctoral dissertatipns: a history,'' presents a brief historical summary of "national listings of dissertations which are a unique alternative to the control of published and unpublished dissertations in the united states and canada. " 4 the same topic, discussed from a slightly different perspective and with considerable perspicacity, may be found in donald davinson' s theses and dissertations as information sources. 5 the second part of moore's work, ''bibliographic control of doctoral dissertations: an analysis,'' focuses on a comparison of the usefulness and limitations of american doctoral dissertations and dissertation abstracts. she also found that only march 1987 2.1 percent of the dissertations she studied were published as books, an additional 1.4 percent could be identified as parts of a book, and that 15.2 percent were published as journal articles after heavy rewriting. 6 calvin boyer's work, the doctoral dissertation as an information source, itself originally a dissertation, assessed the extent to which dissertations in selected sciences produced between 1963 and 1967 served as information sources by studying citations and dissertation-based publications.7 kelly patterson and others, in "thesis handling in university libraries," reported the results of a survey of ninety universities granting doctoral degrees to determine local practice in ''binding, cataloging, classification, storage and checking of format practices" with the intent of recommending processing practices. 8 lois m. pauch' s "thesis/ dissertation processing and oclc'' details the impact of oclc on cataloging procedures for theses and dissertations at the university of illinois at urbanachampaign, speeding the process from three hours to one-half hour. 9 most recently, george harris and robert huffman completed a study of cataloging, classification, and subject analysis of locally produced dissertations. ''cataloging of theses: a survey'' summarizes their findings. in addition to surveying actual practices for dissertation cataloging in academic libraries, in effect what currently is done to serve the needs of intramural scholars and reference librarians, they found that without aacr2 rules specific to dissertations and the guidance of lc cataloging ''libraries are forced to improvise."10 · though the literature is informative regarding current practice in the local bibliographic control of dissertation information and its sharing on the bibliographic utilities, studies exploring the content of the various dissertation indexes, abstracts and databases, and the use of dissertation information within the scholarly community are so outdated as to be extremely misleading. purpose of the study the purpose of this study is to assist in the evaluation of current cataloging practices as applied to dissertations produced in-house at four academic libraries in ohio. the study is limited to exploring the behavior of the extramural scholar and attempts to identify user by type of institutional affiliation; purpose for which the dissertation was used; and what tools and approaches were successfully used in identifying and locating the dissertation. hypotheses 1. scholars access dissertations as an aid to writing dissertations . 2. due to the research orientation of the parent institution, more borrowing of dissertations is done through association of research libraries than other types of libraries. 3. as a generalization, the dissertations requested are newer by date than older but this behavior varies measurably between social scientists, hard scientists, and scholars in the humanities. 4. the major access is through dissertation abstracts international, its related precursors and products . 5. subject access is least often used to locate a relevant dissertation since subject control of dissertation information is very limited. assumptions 1. interlibrary loan usage is an accurate representation of extramural use. 2. the behavior of the extramural scholar differs significantly from that of the intramural scholar. 3. the dissertations of the participating institutions available through oclc, indexes, and databases accurately represent all of each institution's locally produced dissertations. methodology four academic libraries in ohio participated in this study: ohio state university, university of cincinnati, university of toledo, and bowling green state university. a census was taken of all dissertations borrowed through the interlibrary loan departments of the cooperating institutions for a period of one year. a questionnaire was mailed out with dissertations 151 each dissertation and a record was maintained in-house listing the borrowing institution, the subject of the dissertation as identified in the dissertation or by the department supervising the dissertation, discipline of the dissertation, and date on the title page. the borrower was requested to return the completed questionnaire with the dissertation. there was no ·follow-up. the data gathering covered a twelve-month period from july 1, 1983, to june 30, 1984. characteristics of the-institutions selected the four institutions selected represented a mix of academic programs leading to the doctorate and represented medium-sized and large universities. the institutions shared the following characteristics. all four 1. fully cataloged their dissertations according to national standards; 2. entered their cataloging record in a national bibliographic database, in this case, oclc; 3. participated in the dissertation abstracts international program; 4. permitted dissertations to circulate through interlibrary loan (ill). there are some variations among the institutions in the following areas: 1. each began entering records in oclc at different times (earliest, 1972; most recent, 1978). 2. participation in dissertation abstracts international varied from institution to institution (earliest, 1954; most recent, 1973) and by discipline within institutions. 3. one institution limited loans of dissertations produced after 1954 to reciprocating institutions only, since these dissertations are available through university microfilms international. 4. charging practices for ill varied widely and in<;:luded no charge, postage only, $4.50 flat rate, or reciprocal charging. 5. two institutions would not lend dissertations to high school libraries . there wen. no other restrictions on lending. results in all, 542 questionnaires were sent out with the dissertations as they were circu152 college & research libraries lated through ill. of these, 269 were returned for an overall return rate of 49.6%. the percentage base of several subpopulations was high enough to be reliable. results were treated with spss statistical package. table 1 summarizes the number of questionnaires sent and returned by institution. the borrowing institutions were categorized as holding membership in the association of research libraries (bowker annual, 1982); non-arl university libraries; college libraries; other institutions of higher education including junior and community colleges, technical and trade schools; public libraries; governmental corporate libraries; business corporate libraries; other corporate libraries including museum and hospital libraries; and high school libraries. institutions of higher education accounted for 93.2% of the loans, corporate libraries 5.1%, and public libraries 2.2%. one dissertation was loaned to a high school library. as can be seen in table 2, the most frequent borrowers were arl member libraries. the number and percentage of dissertations borrowed by discipline is reflected in table 3. of the dissertations borrow~d, the highest number, 235 (43.4%), were bormarch 1987 rowed in academic disciplines from the social sciences. of the social science loans, 176 (75%) dealt with education, excluding educational psychology. the results were highly institution dependent. no attempt was made to relate program offerings and number of degrees granted in each discipline to the observed frequency of borrowing of the discipline. table 4 compares the vintage and discipline of the dissertations borrowed. the currency of the dissertations borrowed ranged widely from 1906 through 1983, and some variation among the disciplines relative to the recency of dissertations borrowed is apparent. the data support the assumption that recently produced dissertations are more heavily used than those written earlier. figures produced at the same rate for the remainder of the 1980s would result in an n of 395 borrowings for the decade. the figures of table 4 must be interpreted with some caution, however, since a number of pertinent factors are unknown, including the number of dissertations produced by the cooperating institutions in each discipline for each time period. certainly the trend would be upward for total numbers produced at the four institutions, though program empha_sis would result in skewtable 1 responses by institution university of toledo bowling green state university university of cincinnati ohio state university total *total less than 100% due to rounding. number sent 49 84 121 288 542 number returned 31 61 59 118 269 table2 %returned 63 73 49 41 n/m borrowers by type of institution type of institution member of arl other university college (4 year) other institution of higher education corporate libraries other total *total less than 100% due to rounding. number loaned 291 181 20 12 28 9 541 %of total returned 11.5 22.7 21.9 43.8 99.9* %of total 53.7 33.4 3.7 2.2 5.1 1.7 99.8* dissertations 153 table3 borrowing by discipline discipline of dissertation social science applied science/technology languages/literature history business arts pure sciences philosophy health sciences religion total *total less than 100% due to rounding. number 235 98 65 40 38 26 24 10 4 1 541 percent 43.4 18.1 12.0 7.4 7.0 4.8 4.4 1.8 .7 .2 99.8* table4 number of dissertations borrowed by discipline/date discipline 1906-49 applied science/technology 3 arts 1 business 2 history 10 languages/literature 3 health sciences 0 philosophy 1 pure sctences 5 religion 0 social sciences 9 total 34 ing of figures for popular courses of study and possibly a decline in number of dissertations produced in less popular disciplines over time. another factor difficult to assess accurately from the data is the influence of indexes on the findings. indexes and abstracts, most particularly dissertation abstracts international (including its precursors and related products) are the tools most heavily relied upon by extramural scholars, yet these tools are neither as comprehensive nor as complete as one would wish. scholars were asked to identify the purpose for which the dissertation would be used, or, in other words, to identify the anticipated end product of their research. of extramural users, 57% indicated use in relation to the borrower's own dissertation or thesis; 30%, use for an academic paper or publishable research project other than a thesis or dissertation; 8.3%, use in solving a research problem for 1950-59 1960-69 1970-79 1980-83 total 4 5 2 3 3 0 1 3 0 10 31 10 55 26 98 4 9 7 26 2 16 15 37 2 21 4 40 8 39 12 65 0 3 1 4 2 2 4 10 3 9 4 24 1 0 0 1 17 115 84 235 49 269 157 540 which publication was not anticipated; while other uses accounted for the remaining 4.7%. respondents indicated that 90% of their anticipated products would be associated with an institution of higher education, the remaining 10% in government or business and industry. overall, scholars indicated that they were borrowing a dissertation in the same academic discipline as their work in progress 69% of the time. borrowers from social sciences, history, and languages/literature borrowed dissertations in their academic discipline at a rate of 80% or greater. in addition to indicating the purpose for which the dissertation was being requested, the borrowers were asked to name the tools they had used to identify and locate the dissertation, as well as their approach to the particular tools. table 5 reflects the resource used by type of borrowing institution. resources borrowers used most often in locating dis154 college & research libraries march 1987 tables general category of resource used by type of borrowing institution arl otheruniv. resource n % n % index/ abstract 80 57.8 38 44.2 journal, book, newsletter 21 15.1 16 18.6 automated database 31 22.3 29 33.7 word of mouth 7 5.0 3 3.5 total 139 100 86 100 sertation information were printed indexes and abstracts followed by automated databases. as a group, non-arl university libraries show the highest rate of database searches at 33.7%. the remaining non-arl institutions searched automated databases at rate of 27.8%. though both categories of institutions exceeded the rate of database searching in arl libraries (22.3%), the variation from chance distribution was not significant using a chi-square test. the scholar's approach to finding dissertation information appears to depend in part on the academic discipline of the borrower. the categories of resources used by those scholars identifying their disciplines as applied science/technology, languages/literature, the arts, or the social sciences are tabulated in table 6. these disciplines accounted for 80% of the total responses and the remainder appeared too scattered to yield meaningful results. borrowers in these categories relied more heavily on printed indexes and abstracts than on any other form of access surveyed. other printed sources, such as newsletters, books, and journal articles type of institution oilier :igher~. ncorpor~e other total n % n % 7 6 5 0 18 38.9 3 18.8 1 25 129 49.0 33.3 8 50.0 2 50.8 53 20.2 27.8 3 18.7 0 0 68 25.9 0 2 12.5 1 25 13 4.9 100 16 100 4 100 263 100 were identified as chief finding tools ranging from a rate of 32% for applied science/ technology to a low of 8.6% for social sciences of the total number of responses in the respective discipline. social sciet:ttists indicated using automated databases at a rate second only to their use of indexes and abstracts, while other disciplines mentioned database use at a much lower rate. in fact, scholars from the arts identified word-of-mouth sources more often than automated databases, but not at a rate that the chi-square test showed as significant. a chi-square test of table 6 data indicated variations significant at the .os level in the source choices of borrowers from applied science/technology and the social sciences, the former group relying on nonindex printed sources more heavily than could be expected, and the latter on using automated databases. the significant and near-significant (arts use of word of mouth) results clearly indicate disciplinespecific influences on borrowers' use of sources. though no data were gathered, the influences may include the availability of specialized indexes in certain discitable6 general category of resource used by selected discipline applied discipline science/ languages/ social technology arts literature sciences total resource n % n % n % n % n % index/ abstract 22 44.0 14 60.9 21 65.6 53 51.0 110 52.6 journal, book, newsletter 16 32.0 1 4.3 6 18.8 9 8.6 32 15.3 automated database 9 18.0 3 13.0 5 15.6 40 38.5 57 27.3 word of mouth 3 6.0 5 21.8 0 0.0 2 1.9 10 4.8 total 50 100 23 100 32 100 104 100 209 100 plines or that scholars in certain disciplines are more sophisticated in using automated databases either specific or germane to their area of study. certainly the quality and availability of databases in a discipline influence the scholar's willingness to search them, while both the nature of the discipline and the nature of dissertation information probably influenced all search behaviors. for example, the need for timeliness in applied science/ technology may induce its scholars to use the discipline's journal/newsletter network more diligently than scholars use similar resources in other fields. further speculation suggests that the experimental nature of dissertation research may · lead to dissertations being cited more often in the literature of applied science/ technology, thus making printed sources more valuable to the discipline. similarly, the performance nature of some music and fine-arts dissertations may result in deficient or nonexistent abstracts and perhaps a higher incidence of nondescriptive titles, leading borrowers from the arts to rely more heavily on word of mouth as an appropriate approach to such information. a closer examination of three or four broad categories of searching resources (the number of word-of-mouth responses being quite low) is of some interest. of total responses, the chief source of information was designated as ''index/ abstract'' 135 times. of this number, dissertation abstracts international and comprehensive dissertation index accounted for 99 and 21 responses respectively, or 89% of all indexes and abstracts used. while specialized indexes and abstracts accounted for the remaining 11% reported, the only other titles reported more than once were mla annual bibliography, music index, and agricultural education, each cited twice. borrowers reporting use of nonindex print sources to locate dissertations found information in subject bibliographies 30% of the time. professional newsletters accounted for 28%, separately published monographs 27%, and journals 15% of the print sources. of all responses, only 22% indicated dissertations 155 finding dissertation information by database searching, a lower rate than the 27.3% indicated for the selected disciplines of table 6. some 86% did not search the database themselves but had searches performed by third parties. all those who did their own searches were from nonarl university libraries. borrowers from the social sciences performed 70.2% of all database searches, their 40 searches accounting for 38.5% of all searches in the social sciences. responses to questions relating to use of specific databases and search terms used did not yield useful results. the majority of respondents either did not know the name of the database searched for them by an intermediary or supplied the acronym of the local inhouse database. though several indicated they had accessed dissertation abstracts online, there were no clear trends or implications for using it or any other database named. terms used to access dissertations scholars were asked to indicate the term by which they located the material borrowed regardless of the tools they used for access. in examining the responses it becomes apparent that some confusion existed concerning the differences among subject, academic discipline, and search term used to access the dissertation. responses received indicated successful searching by subject 53.1 %, by search term 8.9%, by browsing 5.4%, by academic discipline 4.3%, and by other means .8% of the time. although search term was intended to convey the concept of nonauthor, -title, or -subject searching, such as searching by keyword from title, perhaps combined with subject and/or discipline phrases or dates using boolean logical operators; it is unclear whether extramural scholars responding made much distinction between subject, search term, or academic discipline in categorizing the terminology by which they located dissertations. as large numbers of respondents (44.6% of overall returns) list dai or cdi as their chief source of information, it becomes necessary to investigate the termi156 college & research libraries nology used in these indexes. in both, groups are arranged by broad subject terms equivalent or nearly equivalent to academic disciplines (e.g., agriculture; biology; chemistry, organic; ecology; microbiology, etc.), which are then subarranged by keyword from title of the dissertation that often appears to be the subject of the work. in fact, prefatory material in cdi calls such a keyword from title the ''subject keyword.'' conclusions based on the initial hypotheses, the following conclusions can be drawn: 1. most extramural scholars use dissertation information to produce other schol.rrly and theoretical works such as dissertations, theses, or research papers, rather than applied works. as some dissertations are published later in whole or in part, it cannot be assumed that dissertations have only theoretical rather than practical applications, however. 2. though research libraries as identified by arl membership borrowed the majority of all dissertations loaned during the project, other university libraries also accounted for a substantial number of loans. 3. overall, more recent dissertations were requested than older works, and, although there were variations among the disciplines, the data will not support discipline-specific trends concerning the need for timely dissertation materials. closer examination of the history of the granting of u.s. doctoral degrees leads to the realization that since 1920 more than half were granted from 1971 to 1983. it may be premature to speculate as to whether scholars actually consider the recency of dissertation information as they choose a search tool or whether any discipline can establish a preference for recent dissertation material given the extremely skewed distribution of dissertations produced. 4. access was achieved more often through indexes and abstracts than any other source, in fact, more than all other sources combined. dissertation abstracts and its related products were the most heavily used tools within the category demarch 1987 spite limitations such as their lack of completeness in certain institutional holdings, and employment of broad, authorassigned subject categories. 5. extramural scholars most commonly approach dissertation information by subject. it is somewhat perplexing to realize that most scholars found their information by using subject terms that mimic the names of academic disciplines and that are often less descriptive than keywords from the dissertation's title. discussion and summary though it is clear that the majority of extramural scholars employ dissertation information in formulating theses, dissertations, or academic research projects, there is no obvious indication of how such information is employed. specifically, there is considerable difference between the borrower's use of a dissertation in ensuring that a project will not duplicate earlier work and use of dissertation data/results/ arguments for comparison or contrast with the borrower's own ideas. presumably, the majority of extramural scholars use dissertation information for comparison or contrast since these borrowers will have read the abstracts of relevant dissertations before requesting them on ill, borrowing dissertations most similar to their own research in relatively rare instances in order to determine that a particular aspect of the topic has been fully exhausted. even though access to dissertations is self-selected by the degree-granting institution through the amount of cataloging input in the utilities and the extent of participation in indexing services, there is an . audience for dissertation information outside research and university libraries. although access is limited by indexing services promoted and designed to serve higher education and cataloging data shared chiefly with other academic institutions, a portion of that ciludience still seeks dissertation information. to follow another line of thought, assume that dissertations per se are of interest only to other scholars writing their dissertations and that the process is an ,. + ~·. exercise in "how to do" research. this position has been supported by bernard berelson' s research in which graduate faculty were asked whether the dissertation was an original contribution to knowledge or an exercise in research training. more than 50% responded that it is primarily research training; only 15% responded that it is ~rimarily a contribution to knowledge. 1 assuming that authors of dissertations containing significant contributions to human knowledge will disseminate this information in another form, such as a monograph or as a journal article, perhaps the dissertation needs no wider dissemination than it has at present, and needs only minimal bibliographic control. nevertheless, some bibliographic control, including only access by author, title, and institution, would be necessary for those dissertations produced as exercises in research and for those cases in which authors may not realize the potential impact of their research. indications are that if dissertation content remains of value due to unique qualities of dissertation research and its rigorous methodology (something davinson and boyer both commented on in their works), then libraries might expect more interest in the dissertation from outside academia, especially as database searching becomes increasingly available to business. trends in higher education would also indicate potential increased use of dissertations outside academia as the number of ph.d.'s working outside higher education increases. though the survey was unable to gauge changes in use patterns by categories of borrowers and only surveyed use by ill of the four libraries' collections, there is some feeling of increased use outside academia, especially since so many dissertations are available at reasonable prices through university microfilms international (umi). umi products have a tremendous influence on the availability of dissertation access and consequently on all those seeking dissertation information. dissertation abstracts international (dai), comprehensive dissertation index (cdi), and ameridissertations 157 can doctoral dissertations (add) appear to be the most comprehensive hard-copy tools available to extramural scholars. the popularity of dai and cal over specialized indexes in the survey certainly invites speculation that extramural scholars prefer comprehensive coverage to the more focused approach offered in the specialized indexes. unfortunately, the umi indexes, hence the database, are incomplete. of potential significance, participation in the umi indexing programs may lead to decisions against the ill loaning of dissertations by participants who may suggest that prospective borrowers obtain such materials from umi. considering such possible restriction on ill borrowing, it may be necessary for future investigations into the use of dissertation information to consider umi order files as more indicative of demand for and use of dissertations than ill borrowing. if, in the future, relatively few academic libraries allow unrestricted borrowing of dissertations included in the dai program, umi may be the only good source of information on scholarly demand for dissertations. though the responsibility for providing subject access, as with providing for dissertation bibliographic control, falls to libraries at the degree-granting institutions, these libraries may be well advised to examine policies that prescribe lcsh subject analysis for dissertation cataloging, especially if they participate in the dai program. though it may seem an abdication of responsibility to leave subject analysis to commercial indexers or dissertation authors, applying subject analysis at the time of cataloging is of extremely limited value to the extramural scholar. it does not appear certain that including subject access with dissertation cataloging input on the utilities is of sufficient merit to justify its expense relative to its availability. since only a portion of oclc is available on brs, only a sampling of lcsh access is available to dissertations nationwide. the chief benefit of including subject analysis at time of cataloging is still to the intramural scholar, arguably a good investment in providing service to local clientele through manual or online public . 158 college & research libraries catalogs, even though these same researchers would be expected to behave much as the survey respondents when extending their inquiries to the external scholarly community. as subject access to the oclc database expands under a configuration expected to be in place by 1988, there may be greater reason for providing subject analysis in input cataloging for locally produced materials. on the other hand, as more searching hardware and software, more subject databases and offline databases on cdrom become available to potential end users, researchers may begin to make less use of the subject approach to dissertation information and make better use of the capabilities of keyword searching whether in the umi database or a discipline specific database. because the literature amply supports the superiority of boolean combinations of keyword search terms over the use of standardized subject headings in the context of the online environment, the question of whether or not to continue subject analysis in cataloging these materials, for potential use by other members of a bibliographic utility or potential use in the academic library public catalog, may yet be moot. suggestions for further research it should be apparent from the discussion of this study that there are many topics related to, or concerned with, the location and use of dissertation information march 1987 that are worthy of further study. among the greatest needs: 1. further in-depth study of the manifestations of dissertation information, dissertations and their derivations, in the scholarly community. existing studies are quite dated, and even narrow, disciplinespecific treatment on use would be very helpful. 2. a closer exploration of the relationship, if any, between particular disciplines and the recency of dissertation information. this could take dissertation-derived manifestations into account. 3. examiflation of whether or not the use of dissertation information is increasing outside academia. 4. a study of how anticipated use of dissertation information might influence the choice of tools or choice of search term in locating relevant information. 5. exploration of the relationship between the choice of search tools and a discipline: determining which factors contribute to furthering effective research methods concerning dissertation information; discovering which methods of training and promotion might be furthered by library involvement. 6. full study of the content and coverage of various general dissertatirm indexes with the intent of determining their reliability in providing full availability of dissertation information to respective disciplines, perhaps with the aim of conveying any discovered gaps to the scholarly community and suggesting more comprehensive resources available beyond a given hard-copy index. references and notes 1. peter spyers-duran, "the effects of automation on organizational change, staffing, and human relations in catalog departments" in requiem for the card catalog ed. daniel gore, joseph kimbrough and peter spyers-duran (westport, conn.: greenwood, 1979), p.36. 2. u.s. bureau of the census, statisticalabstractafthe united states (washington: u.s. govt. pr. off., 1985), p.157. 3. connie lamb, "searching in academia" online 5:80 (apr. 1981). 4. julie moore, "bibliographic control of american doctoral dissertations: a history," special libraries 63:227-30 (may/june 1972). 5. donald davinson, theses and dissertations as information sources (hamden, conn.: linnet, 1977), p.44-47. dissertations 159 6. julie moore, "bibliographic control of american doctoral dissertations: an analysis," special libraries 63:289 ouly 1972). 7. calvin james boyer, the doctoral dissertation as an information source: a study of scientific information flow (metuchen, n.j.: scarecrow, 1973), p.23. 8. kelly patterson, carol white, and martha whittacker, "thesis handling in university libraries," library resources & technical seroices 21:274-85 (summer 1977). 9. lois m. pausch, ''thesis/dissertation processing and oclc, '' research libraries in oclc: a quarterly 4:1-4 (oct. 1981). 10. george harris and robert huffman, "cataloging of theses: a survey," cataloging and classification quarterly 5:no.4:1 (summer 1985). 11. bernard berelson, graduate education in the united states (new york: mcgraw-hill, 1960}, p.174. college and research libraries the changing nature of jobs: a paraprofessional time series carol p. johnson this study attempts to determine if paraprofessional jobs have changed significantly as a result of automation during the period between 1975 and 1990. three raters reviewed job descriptions dated 1975, 1981, and 1990 from the technical services department of a small academic library using the position analysis questionnaire, a widely used structured job analysis tool. analysis of the resulting data-standard z scores on thirteen overall job dimensions using anova and omega-squared estimates-indicates no statistically significant differences among the jobs. although these results show that the change in jobs over time is more idiosyncratic than expected, they may also illustrate the de-skilling effect of computers on library functions. d n 1984,alan veanernoted that "once a technology is applied to carry out very complex, routine mental work, that work is driven downward in the work hierarchy .... the change has provided magnificent professional enrichment opportunities for librarians and has similarly enriched the jobs of support staff." 1 this insight raises an interesting question. with the downward shift in tasks from librarians to paraprofessionals, is there evidence of a corresponding upgrade in the parapro-fessional's responsibilities? have paraprofessional jobs changed significantly as a result of automation? much has been written in recent years about the working conditions and responsibilities of paraprofessionals by authors such as charlotte mugnier, larry r. oberg, and cathleen c. palmini. 24 other researchers, among them darla rushing and ann prentice, concentrated on the impact of automation on the library organization and specific departments. 5· 6 scholars such as harry braverman and shoshana zuboff have written about the complicated effects of automation on the workplace from deskilling to the difficulties of managing computer-mediated work. 7· 8 specific research by suzanne iacono and rob kling indicates that technology neither automatically degrades nor improves a job.9 the differences are because of the ways in which work is organized rather than because of the technology. a search of library literature does not indicate any studies examining library paraprofessional jobs over time to determine what changes, if any, have taken place as a result of technology. this study uses the position analysis questionnaire (paq), a widely used structured job analysis tool, to examine, carol p. johnson is director of libraries and audiovisual services at the college of st. catherine library, st . paul, minnesota. 59 60 college & research libraries on a micro level, the job descriptions of three paraprofessional jobs in an academic library technical services department at a small, private liberal arts college. dated 1975, 1981, and 1990, the job descriptions are examined to determine what, if any, changes occurred as a result of automation and to see if there are statistically significant differences among the jobs over time. to some extent, these three jobs do reflect both a job progression over time and changing responsibilities because of automation. structured job analysis tools differ from the job evaluation systems used to determine organizational compensation. research into statistical methods to analyze job data for the purposes of determining job similarities and differences began in the late 1970s and 1980s for equal employment opportunity commission purposes. according to roberts' dictionary of industrial relations, "job analysis is the systematic investigation or study of a job or position to determine the responsibilities, duties and qualifications required to perform the job." job evaluation is the "process of determining the classification, rating or value of an individual job in relation to the other jobs in an organization." 10 job analysis, often an informal process, provides the data for job evaluation, and typically, job evaluation systems reflect the values and politics of the local organization. this study attempts to study the jobs in question using a methodology that is not affected by local values and politics. there are a number of more formal job analysis methods available for organizations to use. among these are functional job analysis, the job-element approach, the paq, critical incidents methodology, and task inventories. however, this study required a job analysis tool that produces quantitative data for comparison and limjanuary 1996 its potential rater bias. the tool chosen was the paq, which rates jobs quantitatively on 187 elements of work activity and the work environment. the instrument is based on the concept that human work can be analyzed "in terms of meaningful 'units' or job elements of a workeroriented nature." 11 the designers assumed that there was a commonality across jobs resulting from the workers doing similar things and not as a result of the technology used or the product produced.12 the paq's present form evolved over several decades from its earliest form, the checklist of work activities, developed in 1958 by ernest j. mccormick and g. j. palmer. in its present form, job raters respond to each of the 187 questions using likert-format scales. these questions are organized into six divisions: (1) information input; (2) mental processes; (3) work output; (4) relationships with other persons; (5) job context; and (6) other job characteristics. results are provided for each of these categories, plus thirteen overall dimensions. overall dimensions include: (1) decision, communication, and general responsibilities; (2) machine/ equipment operation; (3) clerical activities; (4) technical activities; (5) service activities; (6) work schedule; (7) routine or repetitive activities; (8) work environment; (9) physical activities; (10) supervision; (11) public contacts; (12) hazardous environment; and (13) flexible schedule/ optional apparel. each division includes elements that tend to occur in combination on the job. the rater-scored sheets are analyzed by computer, and standard z scores are provided for each job i rater for each of the six divisions plus the overall dimensions. 13 research into statistical methods to analyze job data for the purposes of determining job similarities and differences began in the late 1970s and 1980s for equal employment opportunity commission purposes. these articles focused on the type of job analysis tool used to describe the job (task oriented, worker oriented, or abilities oriented) and the statistical techniques employed to analyze the data. 14 in a 1977 article, richard d. arvey and kevin m. mossholder proposed the use of analysis of variance (anova) combined with the omega-squared estimate to compare jobs and determine similarities for validity generalization purposes. 15 in a later study, arvey and fellow researchers found that given a reasonable sample size, the anova model was an effective design in detecting true differences among jobs, but the omega-squared estimates were more useful in determining job differences even across small sample sizes. they determined that a reasonable rule of thumb would be that "values near .30 indicate major job differences among jobs and values less than .15 indicate considerable job similarities."16 in an unpublished 1984 study, arvey and fellow researchers hypothesized that one way to measure changes in jobs over time was to measure job description information over time using the thirteen overall dimension z scores generated by the paqy this article reports the findings of a statistical analysis of the paq results from these three positions using the anova and omega-squared estimates. methodology the authors derived the information for the analysis from job descriptions dated 1975, 1981, and 1990. the three jobs reflect three paraprofessional library jobs in the cataloging department of a small, academic library. ]obi in 1975, one position that could be described as paraprofessional existed in the cataloging department of the library. master's-levellibrarians and clerks filled other positions. the position assisted the cataloging librarian in maintaining the public catalog and technical services-spethe changing nature of jobs 61 cific files, supervising and training student employees in filing cards in the main catalog, and searching for available copy cataloging using print tools. a high school education was required, and supervisory and typing skills were useful. the training curve was estimated at six months. ]ob2 by 1981, the number of paraprofessional positions increased and two levels existed. computerized cataloging via oclc began in 1976. the paraprofessional in this job (level 2) located, reviewed, and modified cataloging copy in the oclc database using the computer terminal. a second responsibility involved maintenance of the shelf list. two years of college-level study, one year of experience as a library technician, computer training, and typing skills were necessary. ]ob3 by 1990, computers had replaced catalog cards, and database record maintenance and editing had replaced card filing. the main responsibility of the position involved database coordination, supervision of catalog entries, and media cataloging. the job now required two years of experience as a library technical assistant, level 1. based on the changes in selection requirements and the tasks performed, the author expected that the anova model would find significant statistical differences among the jobs and reasonable omega-squared values for the job x dimension effects. three raters reviewed each job description (nine in all) to prevent biased results. they used the job analysis manual for the position analysis questionnaire. the raters, who were not experienced job analysts, consisted of one degreed librarian familiar with the job at the time in question; one degreed librarian who occupied a similar position in another library of the same size; and a third 62 college & research libraries table i job evaluation points for each job and rater job 1 (1975) job 2 (1981) job 3 (1990) rater 1 rater 2 rater 3 503 688 673 667 657 613 771 640 685 library staff person familiar with the job (librarian or incumbent). the results were submitted to paq services, inc., in utah for analysis. the paq results were then run on spss using the anova model. the anova model is used to detect significant differences among jobs. for the an ova model, the dimension scores are considered a within-job factor, the jobs, and a betweenjob factor with raters nested between jobs. a significant f-value for the between-job factor indicates that there are statistical differences between the jobs. january 1996 a significant f-value for the job x dimension interaction would indicate that the profiles of the jobs are significantly different; that is, the job dimensions differ across the jobs. the omega-squared estimate is calculated when the f-values indicate significant differences among jobs to determine the proportion of variance of the job dimensions (job similarities) and the proportion of variance because of job x dimension (job differences). results paq-derived job evaluation points (mean) (see table 1) for the three jobs were: job 1 (1975), 621; job 2 (1981), 645; and job 3 (1990), 698 (see the time series chart in figure 1 and table 2 for the job profiles and z scores on the thirteen overall dimensions) . for each job and rater, the paq provided z scores for the six divisions-information output, mental processes, work output, relationships with other persons, job context, and other job figure 1 time series job comparison on paq library technician series 15..--------------------------------, 10 .5 0.0 -05 -10 -15 c vl io u qj qj 0 w u ·c: u 3 ·u; c iii .c > u ·u £. u m qj qj u g ~ .c (/) 0 iu u ~ (/) dim qj > u .~ c ~ s w 0 vl >.c a: .c a_ a_ > .~ m :0 a. :::j :::j a_ (/) u ·a. >-c 0 z job one job two job three the changing nature of jobs 63 table2 z scores on overall dimensions for jobs 1-3, mean scores dimensions 1. having decision, communication, and general responsibilities 2. operating machines and/ or equipment 3. performing clerical and/ or related activities 4. performing technical and/ or related activities 5. performing service and/ or related activities 6. other work schedules vs. working regular day schedules 7. performing routing and/ or repetitive activities 8. being aware of work environment 9. engaging in physical activities 10. supervising/ directing/ estimating 11. public and/ or customer and/ or related contacts 12. working in an unpleasant/hazardous/ demanding environment 13. having a nontypical schedule/ optional apparel style job dim1 dim2 dim3 dim4 dims dim6 dim7 dim8 dim9 dim10 dimll dim12 dim13 1 -.35 -.77 -.03 -.14 .16 .22 2 -.08 -.30 .50 -.47 -.29 .29 3 .07 -.34 .13 -.17 -.40 .39 characteristics-as well as the thirteen overall dimensions. researchers tested the z scores for the thirteen overall dimensions (see table 3) to determine job differences. computed interclass correlation coefficients for each job ranged from .69 to .84, sufficient for preceding with the anova. these coefficients were minimally above the average reliability coefficient (.68) reported for a sample of over 1,000 jobs involving over 3,000 pairs of analysts in a study of the paq interanalyst reliability.18 .48 .18 .16 -.81 .66 .93 -.78 -.79 .32 -.90 .10 .92 -.45 -.49 .60 -1.01 -.02 .65 -.70 -.47 .15 the anova on the thirteen overall dimension z scores (table 4) indicated no significant statistical differences among jobs, nor a significant job x dimension interaction. the job x dimension accounted for .008 percent of the variance; the source of variance as a result of jobs accounted for .004 percent. the value resulting from the ratio of variance indicates there is almost eighteen times the variance because of job similarities than job differences. extremely low omega-squared scores ( <.15) indicated very strong job similarities, not differences. table3 z scores on overall dimensions for jobs 1-3, raters 1-9 job rater diml dim2 dim3 dim4 dims dim6 dim7 dim8 dim9 dimlo dimll dim12 dim13 i 1 -.83 -.84 -.56 .04 .38 .21 .65 -.60 -.16 1.09 -.58 -.55 .22 1 2 -.08 -.51 .33 .12 -.03 .21 .50 -.65 1.03 .94 -.70 -1 .35 .59 1 3 -.15 -.95 .16 -.56 .13 .25 .29 -1.17 1.11 .75 -1.09 -.49 .16 2 4 .20 -.13 1.21 -.30 -.45 .22 .19 -.90 .46 1.35 .17 -.19 1.06 2 5 -.14 -.31 .30 -1.04 -.12 .25 -.02 -.91 .25 .65 -1.02 -.73 .39 2 6 -.28 -.45 .02 -.08 -.31 .40 .37 -.88 -.41 .76 -.50 -.57 .38 3 7 .32 -.42 -.21 -.18 -.67 .26 -. 12 -.89 -.17 .72 -.71 -.79 .08 3 8 -.31 -.31 .30 -.03 .08 .62 .55 -1.02 -.43 .58 -.37 .08 -.12 3 9 .20 -.29 .31 -.31 -.61 .30 .06 -1.12 .57 .67 -1.02 -.69 .50 64 college & research libraries hypothesizing that the thirteen overall dimension scores were too abstract or general, the author ran anovas on the subscores of four selected divisional sets of z scores: division 1 • information input • interpreting what is sensed • using sources of information • watching devices and/ or materials for information • being aware of environmental conditions • using various devices division 2 • mental processes • making decisions • processing information division 3 • work output • using machines and/ or tools and/ or equipment • performing activities requiring general body movements • controlling machines or processes • performing skilled and/ or technical activities • performing controlled manual and/ or related activities • using miscellaneous equipment and/ or devices • performing handling and/ or related activities • general physical coordination division 4 • relationships with other persons communicating judgments and/or related information • engaging in general personal contact • performing supervisory and/ or coordinating and/ or related activities • exchanging job-related information • public and/ or related personal contacts january 1996 the anova results show no significant differences for any of the four divisions. discussion test results indicate that there are no significant statistical differences among the 1975, 1981, and 1990 jobs using the anovamodel to analyze the paq's thirteen overall dimensions . these results do not support a conclusion that technology has significantly upgraded the paraprofessional positions under review. indeed, the results indicate change, but of an unexpected nature: job redesign to meet the needs of the time (old skills discarded, new ones learned), resulting in the replacement of some duties by others. increased efficiency of work flow and operations, in this particular situation, resulted in a narrowing of functions, not an upgrading of responsibilities. although not statistically significant, the total mean job evaluation points have increased over time (from 621 to 698) as a result of the increased educational realthough not statistically significant, the total mean job evaluation points have increased over time (from 621 to 698) as a result of the increased educational requirements. quirements. mort mcphail of jeanneret and associates produced a list of twentysix paq elements likely to be affected by automation. he noted that technology can increase or decrease the worth of the job. increases "in such ratings as training and experience required may be offset by decreases in items dealing with decision making, combining and analyzing information, etc., and the jobs may have become simpler and less demanding to perform."1 9 also noticeable is a shift in responsibilities discernible by viewing the individual paq "item with highest percentile scores" sections of the paq reports (copies of these are available from the author). supervision, which had the highest percentile score in the the changing nature of jobs 65 table4 anova results on the thirteen overall dimensions 1975 job and is usually source of variation valued highly in job ---------------------------------------df ms f o:l evaluation systems, debetween jobs 2 .08 -.004 dined. the highest perjobs (a) centile paq item for the raters within jobs c(a) 6 .28 .28 .01 1990 job deals with rnawithin jobs chines and equipment, not dimensions (b) 12 2.21 20.78 .215 people. the next highest is inspecting, as opposed to students/trainees for the job x dimensions dimension x raters within jobs (b x c(a)) 24 72 . 15 1.42 .008 .11 .11 1975 job. the 1990 job is in....__ ____________________________________ ___. deed different, reflecting an apparent rearrangement of work activities brought on by automation. the history of library automation can explain much about the changes in these three jobs. automation for the smaller library began with cataloging functions. in the late 1970s, the majority of libraries became members of cooperative national cataloging bibliographic utilities, such as oclc. shared online cataloging produced the catalog cards and machinereadable archival tapes, and changed the job structure in some cataloging departments. the shift to online cataloging meant that more copy cataloging was done, particularly as the number of contributing libraries increased. copy cataloging (editing a specific record to meet local library requirements) did not require the skills of a degreed librarian. rather, it required an individual able to understand cataloging terminology, use computers, and learn the coding requirements of the bibparaprofessionals performed the same duties as some librarians: copy cataloging and supervision. automation at this time contributed to the confusion of roles between professional and paraprofessional. a review of division 4 (relationships with other persons) z scores supports the above contention that job responsibilities have changed. it is evident that the 1990 position requires more judgment communication, less general personal contact, less supervisory responsibility, and less public contact than the two previous jobs. the 1976 automation of cataloging functions increased the job level (1981) by including copy cataloging; but by 1990, a narrowing of job function had occurred as librarians learned to adapt office automation strategies of work flow and efficiency to cataloging functions. the 1990 job provides more responsibility for database management but decreased supervisory responsibility. liographic utility. those libraries that conclusion chose to employ nondegreed library staff this study began as an effort to underto perform copy cataloging incorporated stand the impact of computers on the these requirements by increasing the eduparaprofessional jobs in the technical sercational and training requirements for the vice department of one library, anticipatjob. all other job requirements remained ing a statistically significant difference. the same. the author believed that the addition of this is also reflected in the duties and responsibilities of the 1981 position. "relations with professional personnel" was the highest-ranking paq item for this job. oclc copy cataloging to the 1981 position, and definitely the addition of database record maintenance and media cataloging to the 1990 position, would make 66 college & research libraries a statistically significant difference. this did not occur. perhaps this is the result of the unique job history or pattern for this particular library, or it may result from the paq's worker orientation (as opposed to task orientation), which may not discriminate sufficiently to measure the "real" job difference. duplication of the study in other libraries should be undertaken to see if similar results are found. in this particular case, technology, often viewed as a way to upgrade the status of library positions, does not seem to have raised the job level. one reviewer of this article noted that it seems "counter intuitive" that increasing levels of required education do not make a differtechnology, a better educated work force, fewer accredited library schools, and the continuing democratization of the information process will all continue to exacerbate the problem in the future. ence. although qualifications (ksas) are used as data in the paq, in this case the unique blend of responsibilities in each job resulted in some dimensions, highly valued in job evaluation systems, decreasing. others, also highly valued, stayed the same or increased. the combination of increases, balanced against decreases was not enough to produce a statistically significant difference. all libraries attempt to recruit staff with high qualifications; however, this is a subjective judgment area . with the changing work environment, the question of what qualifications are necessary to perform the work at each level of the library organization is a legitimate subject for research. this study attempted to find a tool that would examine jobs over time with as little bias as possible, but further studies are needed to answer that question. the paraprofessional jobs under review have not been significantly upgraded because the responsibilities that january 1996 upgrade positions and typically lead to better pay (typically, autonomy; authority, including supervisory responsibility; and decision-making) are not reflected in the jobs under review. the national adoption of marc as the preferred way for most libraries to catalog library materials has resulted in the standardization of cataloging rules and practices. marc copy cataloging computerizes and standardizes the level of decision making. this permits non-mls staff to take over the bulk of copy cataloging. as shoshana zuboff noted, "the purpose of the intelligent technology at the core of a computer system is to substitute algorithms or decision rules for individual judgments. this substitution makes it possible to formalize the skills and know-how intrinsic to a job and integrate them into a computer program." 20 this study indicates that automation has not upgraded technical services library paraprofessional positions as much as the author had thought. the functions remain the same, but the tools change (and the level of the person doing the work). however, this study did not investigate the intrinsic rewards that technology may add to jobs by including responsibilities that are more interesting and central to the operation of libraries. there are new jobs in libraries that did not exist prior to the introduction of computers; it would be interesting to identify these and compare them with the more traditional jobs of libraries. the future library will have both. real improvement in the status of paraprofessionals is dependent upon the level of authority, autonomy, and skill assigned to the jobs they fill. this will not occur without further study of the necessary qualifications for all levels of library work and the appropriate ways to obtain those qualifications. technology is a means, not an end; and it is not the answer to the increasing uncertainty that besets the profession. the deskilling effects of computers certainly complicate an already complex situation. technology, a better educated work force, fewer accredited library schools, and the continuing democratization of the information process will all continue to exacerbate the problem in the future. rethe changing nature of jobs 67 searchers need more data to clarify both paraprofessional and professional positions and their respective roles in libraries. job analysis using tools such as the paq may provide useful data to aid in the discussion. notes 1. alan b. veaner, "librarians: the next generation," library journal109 (apr. 1, 1984): 62325. 2. charlotte mugnier, the paraprofessional and the professional job structure (chicago: ala, 1980). 3. larry r. oberg, mark e. mentges, p.n. mcdermott, and vitoon harusadangkul, "the role, status, and working conditions of paraprofessionals: a national survey of academic libraries," college & research libraries 53 (may 1992): 215-38. 4. cathleen c. palmini, "the impact of computerization on library support staff: a study of support staff in academic libraries in wisconsin," college & research libraries 55 (mar. 1994): 119-27. 5. darla h. rushing, "caught in the middle: systems, staff and maintenance in the mediumsized academic library," journal of library administration 13 (1990): 157-73. 6. ann e. prentice, "jobs and changes in the technological age," journal of library administration 13 (1990): 47-57. 7. harry braverman, labor and monopoly capital; the degradation of work in the twentieth century (new york: monthly review pr., 1974). 8. shoshana zuboff, in the age of the smart machine: the future of work and power (new york: basic bks., 1988). 9. suzanne iacono and rob kling, "changing office technologies and transformations of clerical jobs," in technology and the transformation of white-collar work, ed. robert e. kraut (hillsdale, n.j.: l. erlbaurn associates, 1987). 10. roberts' dictionary of indu strial relations, 4th ed. (washington, d.c.: bureau of national affairs, 1994). 11. ernest j. mccormick, paul r. jeanneret, and robert c. mecham, "a study of job characteristics and job dimensions as based on the position analysis questionnaire (paq)," journal of applied psychology monograph 56 (aug. 1972): 247-368 . 12. benjamin schneider and neal schmitt, staffing organizations, 2nd ed. (glenview, ill.: scott, foresman and co., 1986). 13. ernest j. mccormick, robert c. mecham, and paul r. jeanneret, technical manual for the position analysis questionnaire, 2nd ed. (paq services inc., 1989). 14. edwin t. cornelius iii, theodore j. carron, and marianne n. collins, "job analysis models and job classification," personnel psychology 32 (1979): 693-708. 15. richard d. arvey and kevin m. mossholder, "a proposed methodology for determining similarities and differences among jobs," personnel psychology 30 (1977): 363-74. 16. richard d. arvey and others, "detecting job differences: a monte carlo study," personnel psychology 34 (1981) : 709-30. 17. richard d. arvey and others, skills obsolescence: psychological and economic perspectives (unpublished paper, 1984). 18. mccormick, mecham, and jeanneret, technical manual for the position analysis questionnaire. 19. mort mcphail, paq items likely to be impacted by office automation (logan, utah: jeanneret associates, 1990). 20. shoshana zuboff, "new worlds of computer-mediated work," harvard business review 60 (sept./oct. 1982): 142-52. 170 information technology and libraries | december 2011 this paper summarizes a research program that focuses on how catalogers, other cultural heritage information workers, web/semantic web technologists, and the general public understand, explain, and manage resource description tasks by creating, counting, measuring, classifying, and otherwise arranging descriptions of cultural heritage resources within the bibliographic universe and beyond it. a significant effort is made to update the nineteenth-century mathematical and scientific ideas present in traditional cataloging theory to their twentiethand twenty-first-century counterparts. there are two key elements in this approach: (1) a technique for diagrammatically depicting and manipulating large quantities of individual and grouped bibliographic entities and the relationships between them, and (2) the creation of resource description exemplars (problem–solution sets) that are intended to play theoretical, pedagogical, and it system design roles. to the reader: this paper presents a major re-visioning of cataloging theory, introducing along the way a technique for depicting diagrammatically large quantities of bibliographic entities and the relationships between them. as many details of the diagrams cannot be reproduced in regularly sized print publications, the reader is invited to follow the links provided in the endnotes to pdf versions of the figures. c ataloging—the systematic arrangement of resources through their descriptions that is practiced by libraries, archives, and museums (i.e., cultural heritage institutions) and other parties1—can be placed in an advanced, twenty-first-century context by updating its preexisting scientific and mathematical ideas with their more contemporary versions. rather than directing our attention to implementation-oriented details such as metadata formats, database designs, and communications protocols, as do technologists pursuing bottom-up web and semantic web initiatives, in ronald j. murray and barbara b. tillett cataloging theory in search of graph theory and other ivory towers object: cultural heritage resource description networks this paper we will define a complementary, top-down approach. this top-down approach focuses on how catalogers, other cultural heritage information workers, web/ semantic web technologists, and the general public have understood, explained, and managed their resource description tasks by creating, counting, measuring, classifying, and otherwise arranging descriptions of cultural heritage resources within and beyond the bibliographic universe. we go on to prescribe what enlargements of cataloging theory and practice are required such that catalogers and other interested parties can describe pages from unique, ancient codices as readily as they might describe information elements and patterns on the web. we will be enhancing cataloging theory with concepts from communications theory, history of science, graph theory, computer science, and from the hybrid field of anthropology and mathematics called ethnomathematics. employing this strategy benefits two groups: ■■ workers in the cultural heritage realm, who will acquire a broadened perspective on their resource description activities, who will be better prepared to handle new forms of creative expressions as they appear, and who will be able to shape the development of information systems that support more sophisticated types of resource descriptions and ways of exploring those descriptions. to build a better library system (perhaps an n-dimensional, n-connected system?), one needs better theories about the library collections and the people or groups who manage and use them. ■■ the full spectrum of people who draw on cultural heritage resources: scholars, creatives (novelists, poets, visual artists, musicians, and so on), professional and technical workers, students, and other people or groups pursuing specific or general, long or short-term interests, entertainment, etc. to apply a multidisciplinary perspective to the processes by which resource description data (linked or otherwise) are created and used is not an ivory tower exercise. our approach draws lessons from the debates on why, what, and how to describe physical phenomena that were conducted by physicists, engineers, software developers (and their historian and philosopher of science observers) during the evolution of high-energy physics. during that time, intensive debates raged over theory and observational/experimental data, the roles of theorists, experimenters, and instrument builders, instrumentation, and hardware/software system design.2 accommodating the resulting scientific approaches to description, collaboration, and publishing has required the creation of information technologies that have had and continue to have world-shaking effects. ronald j. murray (rmur@loc.gov) is a digital conversion specialist in the preservation reformatting division, and barbara b. tillett (btil@loc.gov) is the chief of the policy and standards division at the library of congress. cataloging theory in search of graph theory and other ivory towers | murray and tillett 171 descriptions—accounts or representations of a person, object, or event being drawn on by a person, group, institution, and so on, in pursuit of its interests. given this definition, a person (or a computation) operating from a business rules–generated institutional or personal point of view, and executing specified procedures (or algorithms) to do so, is an integral component of a resource description process (see figure 1). this process involves identifying a resource’s textual, graphical, acoustic, or other features and then classifying, making quality and fitness for purpose judgments, etc., on the resource. knowing which institutional or individual points of view are being employed is essential when parties possessing multiple views on those resources describe cultural heritage resources. how multiple resource descriptions derived from multiple points of view are to be related to one another becomes a key theoretical issue with significant practical consequences. ■■ niels bohr’s complementarity principle and the library in 1927, the physicist niels bohr offered a radical explanation for seemingly contradictory observations of physical phenomena confounding physicists at that time.6 according to bohr, creating descriptions of nature is the primary task of the physicist: it is wrong to think that the task of physics is to find out how nature is. physics concerns what we can say about nature.7 descriptions that appear contradictory or incomparable may in fact be signaling deep limitations in language. bohr’s complementarity principle states that a complete description of atomic-level phenomena requires descriptions of both wave and particle properties. this is generally understood to mean that in the normal language these physics research facilities and their supporting academic institutions are the same ones whose scientific subcultures (theory, experiment, and instrument building) generated the data creation, management, analysis, and publication requirements that resulted in the creation of the web. in response to this development, we have come to believe that cultural heritage resource description (i.e., the process of identifying and describing phenomena in the bibliographic universe as opposed to the physical one) must now be as open to the concepts and practices of those twenty-first-century physics subcultures as it had been to the natural sciences during the nineteenth century.3 we have consequently undertaken an intensive study of the scientific subcultures that generate scientific data and have identified four principles on which to base a more general approach to cultural heritage resource description: 1. observations 2. complementarity 3. graphs 4. exemplars the cultural heritage resource description theory to follow proposes a more articulated view of the complex, collaborative process of making available—through their descriptions—socially relevant cultural heritage resources at a global scale. we will demonstrate that a broader understanding of this resource description process (along with the ability to create improved implementations of it) requires integrating ideas from other fields of study, reaching beyond it system design to embrace larger issues. ■■ cataloging as observation as stated in the oxford english dictionary, an observation is: the action or an act of observing scientifically; esp. the careful watching and noting of an object or phenomenon in regard to its cause or effect, or of objects or phenomena in regard to their mutual relations (contrasted with experiment). also: a measurement or other piece of information so obtained; an experimental result.4 following the scientific community’s lead in striving to describe the physical universe through observations, we adapted the concept of an observation into the bibliographic universe and assert that cataloging is a process of making observations on resources. human or computational observers following institutional business rules (i.e., the terms, facts, definitions, and action assertions that represent constraints on an enterprise and on the things of interest to the enterprise)5 create resource figure 1. a resource description modeled as a business ruleconstrained account of a person, object, or event 172 information technology and libraries | december 2011 purpose, its reformatting, and its long-term preservation must take into consideration that resource’s physical characteristics. having things to say about cultural heritage resources—and having many “voices” with which to say them—presents the problem of creating a well-articulated context for library-generated resource descriptions as well as those from other sources. these contextualization issues must be addressed theoretically before implementation-level thinking, and the demands of contextualization require visualization tools to complement the narratives common to catalogers, scholars, and other users. this is where mathematics and ethnomathematics make their entrance. ethnomathematics is the study of the mathematical practices of specific cultural groups over the course of their daily lives and as they deal with familiar and novel problems.10 an ethnomathematical perspective on cultural heritage resource description directs one’s attention to the existence of simple and complex resource descriptions, the patterns of descriptions that have been created, and the representation of these patterns when they are interpreted as expressions of mathematical ideas. a key advantage of operating from an ethnomathematical perspective is becoming aware that mathematical ideas can be observed within a culture (namely the people and institutions who play key roles in observing the bibliographic universe) before their having been identified and treated formally by western-style mathematicians. ■■ resource description as graph creation relationships between cultural heritage resource descriptions can be represented as conceptually engaging and flexible systems of connections mathematicians call graphs. a full appreciation of two key mathematical ideas underlying the evolution of cataloging—putting things into groups and defining relationships between things and groups of things—was only possible after the founding, naming, and expansion of graph theory, which is a field of mathematics that emerged in the 1850s, and the eventual acceptance around 1900 of set theory, a field founded amid intense controversy in 1874. between the emergence of formal mathematical treatments of those ideas by mathematicians and their actual exploitation by cataloging theorists—or by anyone capable of considering library resource description and organization problems from a mathematical perspective—lay a gulf of more than one hundred years.11 it remained for scholars in the library world to begin addressing the issue. tillett’s 1987 work on bibliographic relationships and svenonius’s 2000 definition of bibliographic entities in set-theoretic terms that physicists use to communicate experimental results, the wholeness of nature is accessible only through the embrace of complementary, contradictory, and paradoxical descriptions of it. later in his career, bohr vigorously affirmed his belief that the complementarity principle was not limited to quantum physics: in general philosophical perspective, it is significant that, as regards analysis and synthesis in other fields of knowledge, we are confronted with situations reminding us of the situation in quantum physics. thus, the integrity of living organisms, and the characteristics of conscious individuals, and most of human cultures, present features of wholeness, the account of which implies a typically complementary mode of description. . . . we are not dealing with more or less vague analogies, but with clear examples of logical relations which, in different contexts, are met with in wider fields.8 within a library, there are many things catalogers, conservators, and preservation scientists—each with their distinctive skills, points of view, and business rules—can observe and say about cultural heritage resources.9 much of what these specialists say and do strongly affects library users’ ability to discover, access, and use library resources in their original or surrogate forms. while observations made by these specialists from different perspectives may lead to descriptions that must be accepted as valid for those specialists, a fuller appreciation of these descriptions calls for the integration of those multiple perspectives into a well-articulated, accessible whole. reflecting the perspectives of the library of congress directorates in which we work, the acquisitions and bibliographic access (aba) directorate and the preservation directorate, we assert that the most fundamental complementary views on cultural heritage resources involve describing a library’s resources in terms of their availability (from an acquisitions perspective), in terms of their information content (from a cataloging perspective), and in terms of their physical properties (from a preservation perspective). for example, in the normal languages used to communicate their results, preservation directorate conservators narrate their condition assessments and record simple physical measurements of library-managed objects—while at the same time preservation scientists in another section bring instrumentation to acquire optical and chemical data from submitted materials and from reference collections of physical and digital media. even though these assessments and measurements may not be comprehended by or made accessible to most library users, the information gathered possess a critical logical relationship to bibliographic and other descriptions of those same resources. key decisions regarding a library resource’s fitness for cataloging theory in search of graph theory and other ivory towers | murray and tillett 173 by the modeling technique. what is required instead is theory-based guidance of systems development, alongside theory testing and improvement through application use. if software development is not constrained by a tacit or explicit resource description theory or practice, graph or other data structures familiar to the historically less well-informed, those favored by an institution’s system designers and developers, or those familiar to and favored by implementation-oriented communities may be invoked inappropriately.18 given graph theory’s potentially overwhelming mathematical power—as evidenced by its many applications in the physical sciences, engineering, and computer science—investigations into graph theory and its history require close attention both to the history and evolving needs of the cultural heritage community.19 the unnecessary constraint on resource description theory formation occasioned by the use of e-r or oo modeling can be removed by dispensing with it system analysis tools and expressing resource description concepts in graph-theoretical terms. with this step, the very general elements (i.e., entities and relationships) that characterize e-r models and the more implementation-oriented ones in oo models are replaced by more mathematically flexible, theory-relevant elements expressed in graph-theoretical terms. the result is a “graph-friendly” theory of cultural heritage resource description, which can borrow from other fields (e.g., ethnomathematics, history of science) to improve its descriptive and predictive power, guide it system design and use, and, in response to users’ experiences with functioning systems, results in improved theories and information systems. graph theory in a cultural heritage context ever since the nineteenth century foundation of graph theory (though scholars regularly date its origins from euler’s 1736 paper)20 and its move from the backwaters of recreational mathematics to full field status by 1936, graph theory has concerned itself with the properties of systems of connections—nowadays regularly expressed as the mathematical objects called sets.21 in addition to its set notational form, graphs also are depicted and manipulated in diagrammatic form as dots/labeled nodes linked by labeled or unlabeled, simple or arrowed lines. for example, the graph x, consisting of one set of nodes labeled a, b, c, d, e, and f and one set of edges labeled ab, bd, de, ef, and fc, can be depicted in set notation as x = {{a b c d e f}, {ab bd de ef fc}} and can be depicted diagrammatically as in figure 2. when graphs are defined to represent different types of nodes and relationships, it becomes possible to create and discuss structures that can support cultural heritage resource description theory and application building. the following diagrams depict simple resource description identified those mathematical ideas in cataloging theory and developed them formally.12 then in 2009, we were able to employ graph theory (expressed in set-theoretical terms and in its highly informative graphical representation) as part of a broader historical and cultural analysis.13 cataloging theory had by 2009 haltingly embraced a new view on how resources in libraries have been described and arranged via their descriptions—an activity that in principle stretches back to catalogs created for the library of alexandria14—and how these structured resource descriptions have evolved over time, irrespective of implementation. murray’s investigation into this issue revealed that the increasingly formalized and refined rules that guided anglo-american catalogers had, by 1876, specified sophisticated systems of cross-references (i.e., connections between bibliographic descriptions of works, authors, and subjects)—systems whose properties were not yet the subject of formal mathematical treatment by mathematicians of the time.15 murray also found that library resource description structures—when teased out of their book and card and digital catalog implementations and treated as graphs—are arguably more sophisticated than those being explored in the world wide web consortium’s (w3c) library linked data initiative.16 implementation-oriented substitutes for graph theory cataloging theory has been both helped and hindered by the use of information technology (it) techniques like entity-relationship modeling (e-r, first used extensively by tillett in 1987 to identify bibliographic relationships in cataloging records) and object-oriented (oo) modeling.17 e-r and oo modeling may be used effectively to create information systems that are based on an inventory of “things of interest” and the relationships that exist between them. unfortunately, the things of interest in cultural heritage institutions keep changing and may require redefinition, aggregation, disaggregation, and re-aggregation. e-r and oo modeling as usually practiced are not designed to manage the degree and kind of changes that take place under those circumstances. when trying to figure out what is “out there” in the bibliographic universe, we assert that focus should first be placed on identifying and describing the things of interest, what relationships exist between them, and what processes are involved in the creation, etc., of resource descriptions. having accomplished this, attention can then be safely paid to defining and managing information deemed essential to the enterprise, that is, undertaking it system analysis and design. but when an it-centric modeling technique becomes the bed on which the resource description theory itself is constructed, the resulting theory will be driven in a direction that is strongly influenced 174 information technology and libraries | december 2011 of the resources they describe. figure 4’s diagrammatic simplicity becomes problematic when large quantities of resources are to be described, when the number and kinds of relationships recorded grows large, and when more comprehensive but less-detailed views of bibliographic relationships are desired. to address these problems in a comprehensive fashion, we examined similar complex description scenarios in the sciences and borrowed another idea from the physics community—paper tool creation and use. ■■ paper tools: graph-aware diagram creation paper tools are collections of symbolic elements (diagrams, characters, etc.), whose construction and manipulation are subject to specified rules and constraints.23 berzelian chemical notation (e.g., c6h12o6) and—more prominently—feynman diagrams like those in figure 5 are familiar examples of paper tool creation and use.24 creating a paper tool resource diagram requires that the rules for creating resource descriptions be reflected in diagram elements, properties of diagram elements, and drawing rules that define how diagram/symbolic elements are connected to one another (e.g., the formula c6h12o6 specifies six molecules of carbon, twelve of hydrogen, and six of oxygen). the detailed bibliographic information in figure 4 is progressively schematized in a graphs that are based on real-world bibliographic descriptions. nodes in the graphs represent text, numbers, or dates and relationships that can be nondirectional (as a simple line), unidirectional (as single arrowed lines) or bidirectional (as a double arrowed line). the all-in-one resource description graph in figure 3 can be divided and connected according to the kinds of relationships that have been defined for cultural heritage resources. this is the point where institutional, group, and individual ways of describing resources shape the initial structure of the graph. once constructed, graph structures like this and their diagrammatic representations are then interpreted in terms of a tacit or explicit resource description theory. in the case of graphs constructed according to ifla’s functional requirements for bibliographic records (frbr) standard,22 figure 3 can be subdivided into four frbr sub-graphs, yielding figure 4. the four diagrams depict the initial graph of cataloging data as four complementary frbr wemi (w–work, e–expression, m–manifestation, and i–item) graphs. note that the item graph contains the call numbers (used here to identify the location of the copy) of three physical copies of the novel. this use of call numbers is qualitatively different from the values found in the manifestation graph in that resource descriptions in this graph apply to the entire population of physical copies printed by the publisher. the descriptions contained in figure 4’s frbr subgraphs reproduce bibliographic characteristics found useful by catalogers, scholars, other educationally oriented end users, and to varying extents the public in general. once created, resource description graphs and subgraphs (in mathematical notation or in simple diagrams like figure 4) can proliferate and link in multiple and complex ways—in parallel with or independently figure 3. library of congress catalog data for thomas pynchon’s novel gravity’s rainbow, represented as an all-inone graph labeled c figure 2. a diagrammatic representation of graph x cataloging theory in search of graph theory and other ivory towers | murray and tillett 175 6 graph is now represented explicitly by a black dot in a ring in the more schematic paper tool version. resource descriptions are then represented in fixed colors and positions relative to the resource/ring: the worklevel resource description is represented by a blue box, expression by a green box, manifestation by a yellow box, and item by a red box. depicting one aspect of the frbr way that reflects frbr definitions of bibliographic things of interest and their relevant relationships. as a first step, the four wemi descriptions in figure 4 are given a common identity by linking them to a c node, as in figure 6. the diagram is then further schematized such that frbr description types and relationships are represented by appropriate graphical elements connected to other elements. the result shows how a frbr paper tool makes it much easier to construct and examine complex large-scale properties of resource and resource description structures (like figure 7, right side) without being distracted by textual and linkage details. the resource described (but not shown) by the figure figure 4. the all-in-one graph in figure 3, separated into four frbr work (top-left), expression (top-right), manifestation (bottom-left), and item (bottom-right) graphs figure 5. feynman diagrams of elementary particle interactions figure 6. a frbr resource description graph 176 information technology and libraries | december 2011 expressions. the work products of scholars—especially those creations that are dense with quotations, citations, and other types of direct and derived textual and graphical reference within and beyond themselves—are excellent environments for paper tool explorations and more generally, for testing of exemplars—solutions to the potentially complex problem of describing cultural heritage resources. ■■ exemplars the fourth principle in our cultural heritage resource description theory involves exemplar identification and analysis. according to the historian of science thomas s. kühn, exemplars are sets of concrete problems and solutions encountered during one’s education, training, and work. in the sciences, exemplar-based problem finding and solving involves mastery of relevant models, builds knowledge bases, and hones problem-solving skills. every student in a field would be expected to demonstrate mastery by learning and using their field’s exemplars. change within a scientific field is manifest by the need to modify old or create new exemplars as new problems appear and must be solved.26 a cultural heritage resource description theorist would, in addition to identifying and developing exemplars from real bibliographic data and other sources, want to speculate about possible resource/description configurations that call for changes in existing information technologies. to the theorist, it would be as important to find out what can’t be done with frbr and other resource description models at library, archive, museum, and internet scales, as it is to be able to explain routine item cataloging and tagging activities. discovering system limitations is better done in advance by simulating uncommon or challenging circumstances than by having problems appear later in production systems. model graphically, the descriptions closest to the black dot resource/slot are the most concrete and those furthest away the most abstract. (readers wishing to interpret frbr paper tool diagrams without reference to color values should note the strict ordering of wemi elements: w–e–m–i–resource/ring or resource/ring–i–m–e–w.) finally, to minimize element use when pairs of wemi boxes touch, the appropriate frbr linking relationship for the relevant pair of descriptions (as explicitly shown in the expanded graph) is implied but not shown. with appropriate diagramming conventions, the process of creating and exploring resource description complexes addresses combined issues of cataloging theory and institutional policy—and results in an ability to make better-informed judgments/computations about resource descriptions and their referenced resources. as a result, resource description graphs are readily created and transformed to serve theoretical—and with greater experience in thinking and programming along graph-friendly lines, practical—ends. one example of transformability would arise when exploring the implications of removing redundant portions of related resource descriptions as more copies of the same work are brought to the bibliographic universe. the frbr paper tool elements and the more articulated resource description graphs in figure 8 both depict the consequences of a practical act: combining resource descriptions for two copies of the same edition of the novel gravity’s rainbow.25 the top-most frbr diagram and its magnified section depict how the graph would look with a single item-level description, the call number for one physical copy. the bottom-most frbr diagram and its magnified section depict the graph with two item-level descriptions, the call numbers for two physical copies. a frbr paper tool’s flexibility is useful for exploring potentially complex bibliographic relationships created or uncovered by scholars—parties whose expertise lies in identifying, interrelating, and discussing creative concepts and influences across a full range of communicative figure 7. a frbr paper tool diagram element (left) and the less schematic frbr resource description graph it depicts (right) cataloging theory in search of graph theory and other ivory towers | murray and tillett 177 drawing diagrams. use case diagrams are secondary in use case work.28 as products of and guides for theory making, resource description exemplars have different origins and audiences than those for use cases. while use cases and exemplars offer perspectives that can support information system design, exemplars were originally introduced as theoretical entities by kühn to explain how theories and theory-committed communities can crystallize around problem-solution sets, how these sets also can serve as pedagogical tools, and why and when problem-solution sets get displaced by new ones. the proposed process of cultural heritage exemplar creation and use, followed by modification or replacement in the face of changes in the bibliographic universe draws on kühn’s and historian of science david kaiser’s interest in how work gets done in the sciences, in addition to their rejection of paradigms as eerie self-directing processes.29 exemplars are not use cases use cases are a software modeling technique employed by the w3c library linked data incubator group (lld xg) in support of requirements specification.27 kühnstyle exemplars are definitely not to be confused with use cases, which are requirements-gathering documents that contribute to software engineering projects. there is a wikipedia definition of a use case that describes its properties: a use case in software engineering and systems engineering, is a description of steps or actions between a user (or “actor”) and a software system which leads the user towards something useful. the user or actor might be a person or something more abstract, such as an external software system or manual process. . . . use cases are mostly text documents, and use case modeling is primarily an act of writing text and not figure 8. frbr paper tool diagram elements and the frbr resource description graphs they depict 178 information technology and libraries | december 2011 ■■ a webpage and its underlying, globally distributed, multimedia resource network, as it changes over time. such exemplars can be presented diagrammatically through the use of paper tools. this use of diagrams in support of conceptualization and information system design is deliberately patterned after professional data modeling theory and practice.31 paper tool–supported analyses of a nineteenth-century american novel (exemplar 1) and of eighteenth-century french poems drawn from state archives (exemplar 2) will be presented to illustrate how information system design and pedagogy can be informed by exemplary scholarly research and publication, combined with narrativized diagrammatic representations of bibliographic and other relationships in traditional and digital media. exemplar 1. from moby-dick to mash-ups—a print publication history and multimedia mash-up problem document the publication history of print copies of a literary work, identifying editorially driven content transfer across print editions along with content selection and transformation in support of multimedia resource creation. solution the solution to this descriptive problem relies heavily on placing resource descriptions into groups and then defining relationships within and across those groups— i.e., on graph creation. after locating a checklist that documented the publication history of the novel and after identifying key components of a moby-dick and orson welles–themed multimedia resource appropriation and transformation network, murray used the frbr paper tool along with additional connection rules to create a resource description diagram (rdd) that represented g. thomas tanselle’s documentation of the printing history (from 1851 to 1976) of herman melville’s epic novel, moby-dick.32 the resulting diagram provides a high-level view of a large set of printed materials—depicting concepts such as a creative work, the expression of the work in a particular mode of languaging (i.e., speech, sign, image), and more concrete concepts such as publications. to reduce displayed complexity, sets of frbr diagram elements were collapsed into green shaded squares representing entire editions/printings, yielding figure 9.33 the vertical axis represents the year of publication, starting with the 1851 printings at the top. connected squares the resulting network of connections in figure 9 can be interpreted in publishing terms. one line or two or more lines descending downwards from a printing’s green in addition, resource description structures specified in an exemplar can and should represent a more abstract treatment of a resource description and not just data or data structures engaged by end users. exemplars on hand and others to come cultural heritage resource description exemplars have been created over time as solutions to problems of resource description and later made available for use, study, mastery, and improvement. while not necessarily bound to a particular information technology, such as papyrus, parchment, index cards, database records, or rdf aggregations, resource description exemplars have historically provided descriptive solutions of physical resources whose physical and intellectual structure had originally been innovative solutions to describing, for example, ■■ a manuscript (individual and related multiples, published but host to history, imaginary, etc.); ■■ a monograph in one edition (individual and related multiples); ■■ a monograph in multiple editions (individual and related multiples); and ■■ a publication in multiple media, created sequentially or simultaneously. with the advent of electronic and then digital communications media, more complex resource description problem-solution sets have been called for as a response to enduringly or recently more sophisticated creative/ editorial decision-making and to more flexible print and digital information technology production capabilities. the most challenging problem-solution sets involve the assembly and cross-referencing of several multipart—and possibly multimedia—creative or editorially constructed works, such as the following: ■■ a work published as a monograph, but which has been reprinted and reedited; translated into numerous languages; supplemented by illustrations from multiple artists; excerpted and adapted as plays, an opera, comic books, and cartoon series; multimedia mash-ups; and has been directly quoted in paintings and other graphic arts productions, and has been the subject of dissertations, monographs, journal articles, etc. ■■ a continuing publication (individual and related multiple publications, special editions, name, publisher, editorial policy changes, etc.). ■■ a monograph whose main content is composed nearly entirely of excerpts from other print publications.30 ■■ a library-hosted multimedia resource and its associated resource description network. cataloging theory in search of graph theory and other ivory towers | murray and tillett 179 by paper tool diagram creation, analysis, and subsequent action, namely, ■■ connecting the squares (i.e., assigning at least one relationship to a printing) ensures access based on the relationship assigned; and ■■ parties located around the globe can examine a given connected or disconnected resource description network and develop strategies for enhancing its usefulness. the wealth of descriptive information available in the moby-dick exemplar illustrates how previous and future collaborative efforts between cultural heritage institutions and other parties have already generated resource descriptions that possess a network structure alongside its content. with a more graph-friendly and collaborative implementation, melville scholars, scholarly organizations,34 and enthusiasts could more effectively examine, discuss, and through their actions enhance the moby dick resource description network’s documentary, scholarly, and educational value. in its original form, the moby dick resource description diagram (and the exemplar it partially documents) only depicted full-length publications of melville’s work. as a test of the frbr paper tool’s ability to accommodate both traditional and modern creative expressions in individual and aggregate form—while continuing to serve theoretical, practical, and educational ends—murray added a resource description network for orson whales,35 square are interpreted to mean that the printing gave rise to one or more additional printings, which may occur in the same or later years. two or more lines converging on a green square from above indicate that the printing was created by combining texts from multiple prior printings—an editorial/creative technique similar to that used to construct the mash-ups published on the web. connecting unconnected squares tanselle’s checklist did not specify predecessor or successor relationships for each post–1851 printing. this often unavoidable, incomplete status is depicted in figure 9 as green squares that are ■■ not linked to any squares above it, i.e., to earlier printings; and/or ■■ not linked to any squares below it, i.e., to later printings; or ■■ connected islands, without a link to the larger structure. recognizing the extent of moby-dick printing disconnectedness in tanselle’s checklist and developing a strategy for dealing with it only by analyzing tanselle’s checklist would be extremely difficult. in contrast, the disconnectedness of the moby-dick resource description network, and its implications for search-based discovery based on following the depicted relationships is readily discernable in figure 9. the ease with which the disconnected condition can be assessed also hints at benefits to be gained by collaborative resource description supported figure 9. a moby-dick resource description diagram, depicting relationships between printings made between 1851–1976 (greatly reduced scale) 180 information technology and libraries | december 2011 darnton’s book can stand on its own as an exemplar for historical method, with the diagram providing additional diagrammatic support. solution 2 darnton’s analysis treated each poem found in the archives as an individual creative work,38 enabling the use of the frbr paper tool (as a bookkeeping device this time) instead of a tool designed to aggregate and describe archival materials. the resulting diagram is a more articulated frbr paper tool depiction of darnton’s poetry communication network, a section of which appears as figure 11. the depiction of the poetry communication network shown in figure 11 is composed of: ■■ tan squares that depict individuals (clerks, professors, priests, students, etc.) who read, discussed, copied, and passed along the poems. ■■ diagram elements that depict poetry written on scraps of paper (treated as resources) that were police custody, were admitted to having existed by suspects, or assumed to have existed by the police. if one’s theory and business rules permit it, paper tool drawing conventions can depict descriptions of lost and nonexistent but nonetheless describable resources. ■■ arrowed lines that represent relationships between a poem and the individuals who owned copies, those who created or received copies of the poem, etc.39 with darnton’s monograph to provide background information regarding the historical personages involved, relationships between the works and the people, document selection from archival fonds, and the point of view of the scholar, the resulting problem-solution set can: ■■ serve as enhanced documentation for darnton-style communication network analysis and discussion. ■■ serve as an exemplar for catalogers, scholars, and alex itin’s moby-dick-themed multimedia mash-up, to the print media diagram. the four-minute long orson whales multimedia mashup contains hundreds of hand-painted page images from the novel, excerpts from the led zeppelin song “moby dick,” parts of two vocal performances by the actor orson welles, and a video clip from welles’s motion picture citizen kane. the result is shown in figure 10.36 the leftmost group of descriptions in figure 10 depicts various releases of led zeppelin’s “moby dick.” the central group depicts the sources of two orson welles audio dialogues after they had been ripped (i.e., digitized from physical media) and made available online. the grouping on the right depicts the orson whales mash-up itself and collections of digital images of painted pages created from two printed copies of the novel. exemplar 2. poetry and the police—archival content identification and critical analysis problem examine archival collections and select, describe, and document ownership and other relationships of a set of documents (poems) alleged to have circulated within a loosely defined social group. solution 1 in his 2010 work, poetry and the police: communication networks in eighteenth-century paris, historian robert darnton studied a 1749 paris police investigation into the transmission of poems highly critical of the french king, louis xv. after combing state archives for police reports, finding and identifying scraps of paper once held as evidence, and collecting other archival materials, darnton was able to construct a poetry communication network diagram,37 which, along with his narrative account, identified a number of parties who owned, copied, and transmitted six of the scandalous poems and placed their activities in a political, social, and literary context. figure 10. a resource description diagram of alex itin’s moby-dick multimedia work, depicting the resources and their frbr descriptions. cataloging theory in search of graph theory and other ivory towers | murray and tillett 181 with all of the adaptations and excerpts extant within a specified bibliographic universe (such as the cataloging records that appear in oclc’s worldcat bibliographic database). resource description diagrams, created from real-world or theoretically motivated considerations, would then provide a diagrammatic means for depicting the precise and flexible underlying mathematical ideas that, heretofore unrecognized but nonetheless systematically employed, serve resource description ends. if the structure of a well-motivated and constructed resource description diagram subsequently makes data representation and management requirements that a given information system cannot accommodate, cataloging theorists and information technologists alike will then know of that system’s limitations, will work together on mitigating them, and will embark on improving system capabilities. ■■ cataloging theory, tool-making, education, and practice this modernized resource description theory offers new and enhanced roles and benefits for cultural heritage personnel as well as for the scholars, students, and those members of the general public who require support not just for searching, but also for collecting, reading, writing, collaborating, monitoring, etc.40 information systems that others who seek similar solutions to their problems with identifying, describing, depicting, and discussing as individual works documents ordinarily bundled within hierarchically structured archival fonds at multiple locations. ■■ a paper tool into a power tool there are limits to what can be done with a hand-drawn frbr paper tool. while murray was able to depict largescale bibliographic relationships that probably had not been observed before, he was forced to stop work on the moby-dick diagram because much of the useful information available could not fit into a static, hand-drawn diagram. we think that automated assistance in creating resource description diagrams from bibliographic records is required. with that capability available, cataloging theorists and parties with scholarly and pedagogical interests could interactively and efficiently explore how scholars and sophisticated readers describe significant quantities of analog and digital resources. it would then be possible and extremely useful to be able to initiate a scholarly discussion or begin a lecture by saying, “given a moby-dick resource description network . . . ” and then proceed to argue or teach from a diagram depicting all known printings of moby-dick—along figure 11. a section of darnton’s poetry communication network 182 information technology and libraries | december 2011 the value of non-euclidean geometry lies in its ability to liberate us from preconceived ideas in preparation for the time when exploration of physical laws might demand some geometry other than the euclidean.41 taking riemann to heart, we assert that the value of describing cultural heritage resources as observations organized into graphs and of enhancing and supplementing the resource description exemplars that have evolved over time and circumstance rests in opportunities for liberating the cultural heritage community from preconceived ideas about resource description structures and from longstanding points of view on those resources. having achieved such a goal, the cultural heritage community would then be ready when the demand came for resource description structures that must be more flexible and powerful than the traditional ones. given the unprecedented development of the web and the promise of bottom-up semantic web initiatives, we think that the time for the cultural heritage community’s liberation is at hand. ■■ acknowledgments the authors wish to thank beacher wiggins and dianne van der reyden, directors of the library of congress acquisitions and bibliographic access directorate and the preservation directorates, respectively, for supporting the authors’ efforts to explore and renew the scientific and mathematical foundations of cultural heritage resource description. thanks also to marcia ascher, david hay, robert darnton, daniel huson, and mark ragan, whose scholarship informed our own; and to joanne o’brienlevin for her critical eye and for editorial advice. references and notes 1. oed online, “catalogue, n.” http://www.oed.com/view dictionaryentry/entry/28711 (accessed aug. 10, 2011). 2. peter galison, “part ii: building data,” in image & logic: a material culture of microphysics (chicago: univ. of chicago pr., 2003): 370–431. 3. gordon mcquat, “cataloguing power: delineating ‘competent naturalists’ and the meaning of species in the british museum,” british journal for the history of science 34, no. 1 (mar. 2001): 1–28. exclusive control of classification schemes and of the records that named and described its specimens are said to have contributed to the success of the british museum’s institutional mission in the nineteenth century. as a division of the british museum, the british library appears to have incorporated classification concepts (hierarchical structuring) from its parent and elaborated on the museum’s strategies for cataloging species. 4. oed online, “observation, n.” http://www.oed.com/ viewdictionaryentry/entry/129883 (accessed july 8, 2011). couple modern, high-level understandings about how cultural heritage resources can be described, organized, and explored with data models that support linking within and across multiple points of view will be able to support those requirements. the complementarity of cosmological and quantum-level views cataloging theory formation and practice—two areas of activity that did not interest many outside of cultural heritage institutions—can now be understood as a much more comprehensive multilayered activity that is approachable from at least two distinct points of view. the approach presented in this paper represents a cosmological-level view on the bibliographic universe. this treatment of existing or imaginable large-scale configurations of cultural heritage resource descriptions serves as a complement to the quantum-level view of resource description, as characterized by it-related specificities such as character sets, identifiers, rdf triples, triplestores, etc. activities at the quantum level—the domain of semantic web technologists and others—yield powerful and relatively unconstrained information management systems. in the absence of cosmological-level inspiration or guidance, these systems have not necessarily been tested against nontrivial, challenging cultural heritage resource description scenarios like those documented in the above two exemplars. applying both views to the bibliographic universe would clearly be beneficial for all institutional and individual parties involved. if ever a model for multilevel, multidisciplinary effort was required, the history of physics is illuminated by mutually influential interactions of cosmological and quantum-level theories, practices, and pedagogy. workers in cultural heritage institutions and technologists pursuing w3c initiatives would do well to reflect on the result. ■■ ready for the future—and creating the future to explore the cultural, scientific, and mathematical ideas underlying cultural heritage resource description, to identify, study, and teach with exemplars, and to exploit the theoretical reach and bookkeeping capability of paper tool –like techniques is to pay homage to the cultural heritage community’s 170+ year-old talent for pragmatic, implementation-oriented thinking,while at the same time pointing out a rich set of possibilities for enhanced service to society. the cultural heritage community can draw inspiration from geometrician bernhard riemann’s own justification for his version of thinking outside of the box called euclidean geometry: cataloging theory in search of graph theory and other ivory towers | murray and tillett 183 18. the prospects for creating graph-theoretical functions that operate on resource description networks are extremely promising. for example, combinatorica (an implementation of graph theory concepts created for the computer mathematics application mathematica) is composed of more than 450 functions. were cultural heritage resource description networks to be defined using this application’s graph-friendly data format, significant quantities of combinatorica functions would be available for theoretical and applied uses; siriam pemmaraju and steven skiena, computational discrete mathematics: combinatorics and graph theory with mathematica (new york: cambridge univ. pr., 2003). 19. dénes könig, theory of finite and infinite graphs, trans. richard mccoart (boston: birkhaüser, 1990); fred buckley and marty lewinter, a friendly introduction to graph theory (upper saddle river, n.j.: pearson, 2003); oystein ore and robin wilson, graphs and their uses (washington d.c.: mathematical association of america, 1990). 20. leonhard euler, “solutio problematis ad geometriam situs pertinentis,” commentarii academiae scientarium imperalis petropolitanae no. 8 (1736): 128–40. 21. “set theory, branch of mathematics that deals with the properties of well-defined collections of objects, which may or may not be of a mathematical nature, such as numbers or functions. the theory is less valuable in direct application to ordinary experience than as a basis for precise and adaptable terminology for the definition of complex and sophisticated mathematical concepts.” quoted from encyclopædia britannica online, “set theory,” oct. 2010, http://www.britannica.com/ebchecked/ topic/536159/set-theory (accessed oct. 27, 2010). 22. ifla study group on the functional requirements for bibliographic records, functional requirements for bibliographic records: final report (munich: k.g. saur, 1998). this document is downloadable as a pdf from http://www.ifla.org/vii/s13/ frbr/frbr.pdf or as an html page at http://www.ifla.org/vii/ s13/frbr/frbr.htm. 23. ursula klein, ed., experiments, models, paper tools: cultures of organic chemistry in the nineteenth century (stanford, calif.: stanford univ. pr., 2003); klein, ed., tools and modes of representation in the laboratory sciences (boston: kluwer, 2001); david kaiser, drawing theories apart: the dispersion of feynman diagrams in postwar physics (chicago: univ. of chicago pr., 2005). 24. for more examples and a general description of feynman diagrams, see http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/theory/ feynman.html. 25. an enlarged version of this diagram may be found online. ronald j. murray and barbara b. tillett, “frbr paper tool diagram elements and the frbr resource description graphs they depict,” aug. 2011, http://arizona.openrepository.com/ arizona/bitstream/10150/139769/2/fig%208%20frbr%20 paper%20tool%20elements%20and%20graphs.pdf. other informative illustrations also are available. murray and tillett, “resource description diagram supplement to ‘cataloging theory in search of graph theory and other ivory towers. object: cultural heritage resource description networks,” aug. 2011, http://hdl.handle.net/10150/139769. 26. thomas s. kühn, the structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. (chicago: univ. of chicago pr., 1970). 27. daniel vila suero, “use case report,” world wide web consortium, june 27, 2011, http://www.w3.org/2005/ incubator/lld/wiki/usecasereport. 5. david c. hay, uml and data modeling: a vade mecum for modern times (bradley beach, n.j.: technics pr., forthcoming 2011): 124–25. some scholars argue that decisions as to what the things of interest are and the categories they belong to are influenced by social and political factors. geoffrey c. bowker, susan leigh star, sorting things out: classification and its consequences (cambridge, mass.: mit pr., 1999). 6. gerald holton, “the roots of complementarity,” daedalus 117, no. 3 (1988): 151–97, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20023980 (accessed feb. 24, 2011). 7. niels bohr, quoted in aage petersen, “the philosophy of niels bohr,” bulletin of the atomic scientists 19, no. 7 (sept. 1963): 12. 8. niels bohr, “quantum physics and philosophy: causality and complementarity,” in essays 1958–1962 on atomic physics and human knowledge (woodbridge, conn.: ox bow, 1997): 7. 9. for cataloging theorists, the description of cultural heritage things of interest yields groups of statements that occupy different levels of abstraction. upon regarding a certain physical object, a marketer describes product features, a linguist enumerates utterances, a scholar perceives a work with known or inferred relationships to other works, and so on. 10. marcia ascher, ethnomathematics: a multicultural view of mathematical ideas (pacific grove, calif.: brooks/cole, 1991); ascher, mathematics elsewhere: an exploration of ideas across cultures (princeton: princeton univ. pr., 2002). 11. a timeline of events, people, and so on that have had or should have had an impact on describing cultural heritage resources is available online. seven fields or subfields are represented in the timeline and keyed by color: library & information science; mathematics; ethnomathematics; physical sciences; biological sciences; computer science; and arts & literature. ronald j. murray, “the library organization problem,” dipity .com, aug. 2011, http://www.dipity.com/rmur/libraryorganization-problem/ or http://www.dipity.com/rmur/ library-organization-problem/?mode=fs (fullscreen view). 12. barbara ann barnett tillett, “bibliographic relationships: toward a conceptual structure of bibliographic information used in cataloging” (phd diss., university of california, los angeles, 1987); elaine svenonius, the intellectual foundation of information organization (cambridge, mass.: mit pr., 2000): 32–51. svenonius’s definition is opposed to database implementations that permitted boolean operations on records at retrieval time. 13. ronald j. murray, “the graph-theoretical library,” slideshare.net, july 5 2011, http://www.slideshare.net/ ronmurray/-the-graph-theoretical-library. 14. francis j. witty, “the pinakes of callimachus,” library quarterly 28, no. 1–4 (1958): 132–36. 15. ronald j. murray, “re-imagining the bibliographic universe: frbr, physics, and the world wide web,” slideshare .net, oct. 22 2010, http://www.slideshare.net/ronmurray/frbrphysics-and-the-world-wide-web-revised. 16. for an overview of the technology-driven library linked data initiative, see http://linkeddata.org/faq. murray’s analyses of cultural heritage resource descriptions may be explored in a series of slideshows at http://www.slideshare.net/ronmurray/. 17. pat riva, martin doerr, and maja žumer, “frbroo: enabling a common view of information from memory institutions,” international cataloging & bibliographic control 38, no. 2 (june 2009): 30–34. 184 information technology and libraries | december 2011 36. the multimedia mash-up in figure 10 was linked to the much larger moby-dick structure depicted in figure 9. the combination of the two yields figure 10a, which is too detailed for printout but which can be downloaded for inspection as the following pdf file: ronald j. murray and barbara b. tillett, “transfer and transformation of content across cultural heritage resources: a moby-dick resource description network covering full-length printings from 1851–1976*,” july 2011, http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/136270/4/fig%2010a%20orson%20whales%20 in%20moby%20dick%20context.pdf. in the figure, two print publications have been expanded to reveal their own similar mash-up structure. 37. robert darnton, poetry and the police: communication networks in eighteenth-century paris (cambridge, mass.: belknap pr. of harvard univ. pr., 2010): 16. 38. ronald j. murray in a discussion with robert darnton, sept. 20, 2010. darnton considered the poems retrieved from the archives as distinct intellectual creations, which permitted the use of frbr diagram elements for the analysis. otherwise, a paper tool with diagram elements based on the archival descriptive standard isad(g) would have been used. committee on descriptive standards, isad (g): general international standard archival description (stockholm, sweden, 1999– ). 39. the complete poetry communication diagram may be viewed at http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/ bitstream/10150/136270/6/fig%2011%20poetry%20commun ication%20network.pdf. 40. carole l. palmer, lauren c. teffeau, and carrie m. pittman, scholarly information practices for the online environment: themes from the literature and implications for library science development (dublin, ohio: oclc research, 2009), http://www . o c l c . o rg / p ro g r a m s / p u b l i c a t i o n s / re p o r t s / 2 0 0 9 0 2 . p d f (accessed july 15, 2011). 41. g. f. b. riemann, quoted in marvin j. greenberg, euclidean and non-euclidean geometry: development and history (new york: freeman, 2008): 371. 28. wikipedia.org, “use case,” june 13, 2011, http://en .wikipedia.org/wiki/use_case. 29. kaiser, drawing theories, 385–86. 30. prime examples being jacques derrida’s typographically complex 1974 work glas (univ. of nebraska pr.), and reality hunger: a manifesto (vintage), david shield’s 2011 textual mashup on the topic of originality, authenticity, and mash-ups in general. 31. graeme simsion, data modeling: theory and practice (bradley beach, n.j.: technics, 2007): 333. 32. herman melville, moby-dick (new york: harper & brothers; london: richard bentley, 1851). moby-dick edition publication history excerpted from g. thomas tanselle, checklist of editions of moby-dick 1851–1976. issued on the occasion of an exhibition at the newberry library commemorating the 125th anniversary of its original publication (evanston, ill.: northwestern univ. pr.; chicago: newberry library, 1976). 33. ronald j. murray, “from moby-dick to mash-ups: thinking about bibliographic networks,” slideshare.net, apr. 2011, http://www.slideshare.net/ronmurray/from-mobydick-to-mashups-revised. the moby-dick resource description diagram was presented to the american library association committee on cataloging: description and access at the ala annual conference, washington d.c., july 2010. 34. the life and works of herman melville, melville.org, july 25, 2000, http://melville.org. 35. the new york artist alex itin describes his creation: “it is more or less a birthday gift to myself. i’ve been drawing it on every page of moby dick (using two books to get both sides of each page) for months. the soundtrack is built from searching ‘moby dick’ on youtube (i was looking for orson’s preacher from the the [sic] john huston film) . . . you find tons of led zep [sic] and drummers doing bonzo and a little orson . . . makes for a nice melville in the end. cinqo [sic] de mayo i turn forty. ahhhhhhh the french champagne.” quoted from alex itin, “orson whales,” youtube, jan. 2011, http://www.youtube .com/watch?v=2_3-gem6o_g. college and research libraries 50th ~nniversary featureyesterday's heresytoday' s orthodoxy: an essay on the changing face of descriptive cataloging michael gorman this article analyses four descriptive cataloging orthodoxies of the past-corporate authorship, uniform personal headings, the main entry, and the dominance of the card catalog-and contends that each has been overthrown, overtly or covertly. it contrasts the views of cutter and panizzi, mostly in the latter's favor, and alludes to the pronouncements of nineteenth and twentieth century luminaries and committees on the matters under discussion. the ways in which the marc format has influenced descriptive cataloging, for good and ill, are also treated. the article closes with a plea for reason and the application of utilitarian principles. rthodoxy is my doxy; heterodoxy is another man's doxy," said bishop warburton to lord sandwich. descriptive cataloging, that pleasant backwater of human endeavor, is as subject to the kind of situational ethics that the eighteenth century divine had in mind as is any other area of human thought. the good bishop thought of opinions and dogmas in terms of the frailties of the flesh ("doxy: a loose wench ... sometimes: mistress," webster's third new international dictionary), which tells us a good deal about the anglican church in the bad old days. i think it is as valid to think about orthodoxies and heresy in terms of chronology. in the last thirty years, we who are involved in descriptive cataloging have seen heresies become dogmas and wild speculations become received opinions. i, as have many others, have changed some of my opinions and have seen some other opinions move from the fringes to embodiment in the very codes that regulate the largest and most influential body of descriptive cataloging-that of the anglo-american tradition. i seek in this essay to describe some of the changes that have occurred in descriptive cataloging of the anglo-american tradition in the last fifty years. the most remarkable features of those changes are the way in which seemingly impregnable bastions of orthodoxy have been revealed to be as transient as sand castles and the way in which, on some occasions, the guardians of the descriptive cataloging establishment (the national libraries, the library associations, ifla, and the rest) have proved to be as nimble as adagio dancers in adapting to the accommodation of premichael connan is dean of library services at california state university, fresno, california 93740. this paper is a revised version of an essay which is part of a festschrift in honour of peter lewis, the recently retired director-general of the bibliographic services division of the british library. the festschrift, eating the menus, edited by ross bourne, was published by the british library in 1989. 626 viously abhorrent ideas. corporate authorship corporate authorship is as good a place to begin as any. the saintly and ingenious sir anthony panizzi (the fons et origo of the anglo-american cataloging tradition) rejected all but the smallest smidgeon of corporate authorship in his ninety-one rules. it was charles ammi cutter who began the whole farrago with his breezy observation ''i think that the american practice of regarding bodies of men as the authors of their own journals, proceedings, etc. . . . is preferable to the german practice of dispersing these works throughout the alphabet ... " (note the two kinds of chauvinism so characteristic of the period.) he went on, in his rules for descriptive cataloging, to state that "bodies of men are to be considered to be the authors of works published in their name or by their authority.'' it is interesting to see that the robust "bodies of men" (redolent of kipling at his most strenuous) are not flatly stated to be authors but are merely to . be considered to be such. however hedged his rule might have been, the fact remains that cutter had begun to stir the witches' cauldron of corporate authorship. the nineteenth century, the time of the single author giants of descriptive cataloging, was succeeded (with almost uncanny chronological neatness) by the time of the corporate creation of the anglo-american cataloging codes. since the committees that were responsible for those codes were corporate entities, is it any wonder that they espoused the concept of corporate authorship? that could be accepted as mere human frailty. what is almost inexcusable is the baroque indulgence with which they elaborated on the fundamentally silly idea. cutter's "bodies of men" were succeeded by the rube goldberg elaborations of the distinctions between societies and institutions and the ultimate absurdities of (for example) rules for observatories located outside municipalities and for institutions located in several places. as the years whirled down the alleys of time (1908, 1937, 1941, 1949), the whole crazy structure of corporate authorship became less and less stable. what yesterday's heresy 627 was needed was a dose of common sense to challenge the central idiocy of corporate authorship. cometh the hour, cometh the man (or woman). it was the great seymour lubetzky who dealt the first hammer blow. it was eva verona who finally demolished the whole thing. lubetzky assailed the corporate complex and tried to introduce logic into the application of the idea of corporate authorship. the only problem was that the notion of a corporate body being ''chiefly responsible for the intellectual or artistic content'' of a work is, except in certain narrow and infrequent cases, inherently implausible. even lubetzky's powerful mind was incapable of pulling off the trick of rationalizing the absurd. ''the notion of a corporate body being 'chiefly responsible for the intellectual or artistic content' of a work is, except in certain narrow and infrequent cases, inherently implausible." in the paris principles of 1961, a work that emanated from a conference that was dominated by lubetzkyan reformist ideas, we find reference to "entry under corporate body'' and provisions that are considerably less sweeping than they might appear to the casual reader. what this section of the principles represents is a political compromise between the anglo-american comprehensive view of corporate authorship and the much narrower provisions for corporate entry found in the descriptive cataloging codes of continental europe. corporate authorship is not mentioned in the principles, but entry under a corporate body is allowed in numerous cases. the idea behind the principles was that they were to form the basis for international standardization and that the future codes that took them as their bases would be in conformity. alas, the loo.seness of their wording, which was made necessary by the political compromises that made the paris meeting 628 college & research libraries ''work,'' made it possible for new national codes to drive a coach and horses through the idea of international uniformity. nowhere is this more apparent than in the use that was made of the section on corporate entry. the first edition of the angloamerican cataloging rules (aacr), in both its british and north american manifestations, explicitly embraced the concept of corporate authorship while cl~­ ing to be based on the paris principl~) at more or less the same time, european codes were published which did exactly the opposite while also claiming to be based on those self-same principles. but 'twas a famous victory! the reaction was not long in coming. seeing that the ambiguity of the paris principles had made it possible for national and international catalog4tg codes to remain far apart on a vital conceptual question, the ifla committee on cataloguing encouraged eva verona to do a study of corporate headings (published in 1975 as corporate headings: their use in library catalogues and national bibliographies: a comparative and critical study) which espoused the continental european idea that there is no such thing as a corporate author, though the limited use of corporate main entry headings in author catalogs may be justified. this distinction has the whiff of angels and pins that is characteristic of much of descriptive cataloging theory, but it did lead to an important theoretical and practical change in the second edition of the anglo-american cataloguing rules (1978). for the first time since panizzi, a major english language cataloging code abandoned the idea of corporate authorship and limited the application of corporate main entry to five (later six, see aacr2r, 1988) narrowly defined categories of works that (in the careful, if slightly otherworldly, term used in the code) "emanate" from corporate bodies. thus it was that the orthodoxy of corporate authorship was overthrown and the heretical "german practice" that cutter decried reigned in its place. the ultimate irony is that one of the categories allowed main entry by aacr2 is probably the only true case of corporate authorship that has ever been. the provision to enter sound november 1989 and video recordings and other works created by a performing group under the name of the group seems to me to be a recognition of a plain fact. that fact is that it is hard to dispute that, say, the rolling stones are the authors of sound recordings that contain songs that the group has written, performed, and produced. so, as corporate authors steal from the scene to be replaced by a few "emanators," modem society and technology have given us a type of material in which corporate authorship is indisputable. uniform personal headings charles ammi cutter was, in paul dunkin's phraseology, the prophet upon whose dicta the law of our cataloging codes was based. his most mosaic utterance is to be found in his famous objects of a dictionary catalog. those few statements have been the cause of much that is good about the cataloging codes that took them unquestioningly as their basis. they have also been the cause of some persistent error and of some misunderstanding. i have never seen it pointed out that, for instance, the very first "object" makes little or no sense. it reads "to enable the reader to find a book of which . . . the author is known.'' the fact is, of course, that if one knows nothing of a book other than the name of its author, it will be impossible to locate that book with complete confidence. even if, in such a case, one were to find only one entry in a catalog under the name of that author, how would one know with ontological certainty that that entry represented the only book in the world by that author? the first object should read ''to enable the reader to find a book of which . . . the author and something else, preferably the title, is known." the most serious flaw in the objects, however, lies not in the first but in the fourth. this reads "to show what the library has by a given author." the way in which this object is to be achieved is stated to be "author entry with the necessary references." in other words, the works of an author are to be gathered together under a standard heading in all cases-even when an author uses different forms of his or her name or when an author uses two or more different names. this ruling by the prophet was among the most orthodox of the cataloging orthodoxies for nearly a hundred years. it caused a great deal of mischief. works identified with one name were, until comparatively recently, to be found under other names in catalogs and, in american libraries at least-because of the infamous cutter-sanborn numbers-to be located on the shelves in a place other than that in which the average sensual library user would look for them. ''this orthodoxy-that all the works of a person should be collocated regardless of the inconvenience to the majority of library users-need never have happened." this orthodoxy-that all the works of a person should be collocated regardless of the inconvenience to the majority of library users-need never have happened. that it did so is the product of two unfortunate happenings-neither of them, to my mind, the fault of the late c. a. cutter. the first is that in this matter, as in so many others, we were following the wrong prophet. the pragmatism and intellect of anthony panizzi had come to a very different conclusion. in the forty-first of his ninety-one rules for the compilation of the catalogue panizzi stated, ''in the case of pseudonymous publications, the book to be catalogued under the author's feigned name . . . " and, in the forty-second rule, ''assumed names . . . to be treated as real names." how much easier the life of the library user would have been had the cataloging profession followed the haloenglish prophet rather than the american! all the works of the multinamed ms. hibbert and mr. creasey (not to mention lauran bosworth paine, who is to pseudonyms what argus was to eyes) would have been entered in the catalog and found on the shelves under the names by which those worthies wished them to be identified. "what of scholarship?" i hear the traditionalists cry. ''what of the need for the researcher to survey all the works yesterday's heresy 629 of an author in one place?" there are three answers to those questions. the first is that scholarship begins when the book is in hand and does not consist of or comprise the arduous searching for materials that is imposed on the would-be scholar by ill-organized library catalogs. the second is that the rules of panizzi were followed for many a long year in the british museum's general catalogue of printed books-a work that a number of scholars have found to be a boon rather than an impediment to scholarship. the third answer is best put in the form of an existential question, "what is an author?" this latter question leads to the second error that i believe to have bedeviled the question of the entry of persons using two or more names. when cutter referred to ''the works of an author'' we seem to have assumed that he meant "the works of a person.'' i have always maintained that one person can be two or more authors. there is a well-known story of queen victoria being so entranced by the first of the ''alice'' books that she begged the reverend dodgson to send her his next book as soon as it was issued. she was rewarded for her importunity, some six months later, by the receipt of a huge tome on symbolic logic or some such. this illustrates that she may have been asking the right person but was certainly asking the wrong author. supposing cutter had meant that distinction all along? that is unlikely because his own rules follow the old orthodoxy on this question. however, prophets have been known to misinterpret their own prophecy and it could be that the cutter who, shaman-like, promulgated the objects was wiser than the less exalted cutter who wrote his justly famous rules. the paris principles were the last statement of the old orthodoxy on multiple names. they flatly prescribed a single uniform heading for each person consisting of the name most frequently found in ''his [sic] works." the 1967 aacr prescribed a single heading for such persons but gave an alternative rule that allowed entry for each work to be under the name that the author used in manifestations of that work. this, though a tip of the hat to real630 college & research libraries ity, was of small utility in a time when standardization was rapidly moving from being an ideal to becoming a necessity. it was, after all, a scant year later that saw the beginnings of the marc format and all the implications for cooperation that format represented. in 1978, aacr2 tried to wrestle with the problem anew. it revived the idea of a predominant name (thus consigning the works of the immensely serious reverend dodgson to the heading for the frivolous lewis carroll) but allowed as how, if no predominant name could be found, each work could be entered under the name found in its manifestations. this was superior to the aacr version because it prescribed only one rule and because it allowed multiple headings for certain persons. it did, however, still strive for a single heading when one could be found and it left a large grey area in which catalogers could contend happily and unendingly about whether a name was or was not "predominant." the 1988 aacr2r has taken a completely different tack-one that signifies the end, stated or not, of the old cutterian orthodoxy. for the first time, a code recognizes that one person may have two or more bibliographic identities. for example, the poet c. day lewis is one bibliographic identity and the mystery story writer nicholas blake another, despite the fact that, outside their books, they were one and the same person. aacr2 also prescribes multiple headings for "contemporary authors" (a phrase of seductive ambiguity that could return to haunt us). thus we see that, in the 148 years since panizzi's ninety-one rules, we have gone from his multiple entries for persons using different names to the iron orthodoxy of the standard heading for each person to a code (aacr2r) that embodies the panizzian heresy as the new orthodoxy. main entry i have so far identified two areas, corporate authorship and headings for persons using more than one name, in which, in my view, the good guys finally won and the unhelpful orthodoxies of the past have been swept away in favor of a more sensible and user-oriented approach. the next november 1989 orthodoxy, that of the dreaded main entry, still lingers on as, in the family of catalogers, the mad uncle in the attic that everyone wishes would go away but stays, in apparent good health, as an embarrassment to one and all. it has been pointed out, time after weary time, that the notion of the main entry-that is, a heading that is the chief access point and, thus, of more importance than the other "added" access points-is one that belongs to a longgone era of library technology. the book catalog has, to the sadness of some, gone the way of the dinosaurs. like them, it was too large and slow moving to survive in a changing world. one can see the attractions of the main entry in such a context. in the time of homemade catalog cards, the weary task of typing or writing the cards is ameliorated if all the information is given on only one card, the others being quasi-references. (when bad librarians die, they are sent to a special bibliographic hell in which they type and file catalog cards for all eternity.) however, the library of congress has been supplying printed cards for nigh on a century and such have been available from other sources for all of the last half of this century. why then do we persist in the foolishness of the main entry, devoting 72 pages out of the 677 (over 10 percent) of aacr2r to this perfectly absurd topic? there are those, most notably seymour lubetzky, who base their support for main entry on philosophical grounds. there are those who drag in ancillary topics such as single-entry list~gs and, gawd help us, cutter-sanborn numbers (the only bibliographic feature more futile than the main entry). there are those who see the main entry heading as a useful organizing device in classified catalogs, shelf lists, and the like. i find none of these arguments persuasive and am perfectly certain that the main entry is a bibliographic ghost that haunts current and future machine systems. the true reason why the orthodoxy of the main entry still prevails is that it is required by the marc format. people used to write articles called ''is the main entry dead?" the answer to that question is "yes, but the marc format has embalmed it." marc is, essentially, a catalog card encoded for machine manipulation. this fact (disputed as it may be by revisionist historians) has had many sad consequences. one of them is that the hapless cataloger in the wanning years of the twentieth century still has to decide which access point she or he is to put in the "1)0(" field, and, therefore, needs those otherwise unnecessary seventy-two pages of the cataloging code. is the situation hopeless? i think not. committees and catalog code editors may continue-boats beating against the current-to affirm the importance of the main entry. the crushing weight of the marc establishment may forbid the kind of reconstruction of marc of which the abolition of main entry is but a part. like the austro-hungarian empire, however, the glittering surface is but a shadow and the realities press ever inward. in many existing online catalogs and, i would suggest, in all online catalogs to be, there is no operational distinction between a main entry ''heading'' and added entry ''headings." either will take the user directly, via a visible or invisible authority record, to the relevant bibliographic records. the online catalog is not content with the subversion of the idea of the main entry. the user can get to the relevant authority record and on to relevant bibliographic records, as she or he can in an even halfwaydecent online system, from not only any type of access point but also from any form of an access point. this simple fact subverts most of the bases of our cataloging codes and of the marc record that so sedulously apes the conventions of those codes. in the real world of the electronic catalog, there is no practical difference between main and added access points and there is no practical difference between an access point and a reference to that access point. this means that the whole of the second part of aacr2 is of only marginal relevance to the creation of records for online systems. it seems as though the old orthodoxy reigns, as though distinctions between kinds of access point and between forms of access point really matter. in fact, the biggest heresy of all is triumphant in all but the codes and the trappings of the cataloging establishment. yesterday's heresy 631 ironically, bibliographic description, so long the poor relation of cataloging, has · proved to be the most stable and unquestioned element of the cataloging process. at the same time, the assignment of headings, for so long the glamour area, has become more and more marginal, and this aspect of descriptive cataloging, which dominated all our codes up to aacr2, may be a small part of future cataloging codes. how are the mighty fallen! ''the assignment of headings, for so long the glamour area, has become more and more marginal, and this aspect of descriptive cataloging, which dominated all our codes up to aacr2, may be a small part of future cataloging codes.'' how long will we go on pretending that the emperor marc ii is fully clothed? it is hard to say; the ability of those involved in cataloging to ignore the patently obvious seems above the human norm, and the vested interests of the national libraries, the creators and peddlers of marc-based systems, and of national cataloging committees are both numerous and powerful. it does seem, however, that no human system can live indefinitely with the kind of internal contradiction represented by the forms of marc and the cataloging codes on the one hand and the realities of online bibliographic access on the other. card catalogs when i began to work in libraries (when anthony eden was prime minister and hampstead was still a borough and not just a state of mind), the form of the catalog seemed immutable. the long history of the provision of catalog cards by the library of congress had affected american libraries immeasurably and the provision of a similar service by the british national bibliography was burgeoning. my first glimpse of the technology of cataloging was of an object that looked like an iron spinning wheel being wielded by our 632 college & research libraries head cataloger (who had, utterly irrelevantly but to my fascination, been piet mondrian' s landlady during hitler's war) so that it produced metal plates with catalog records embossed on them. the good lady actually pecked out the entries letter by letter, a task that involved a lot of physical exertion. my job was to be the understrapper to another lady who produced, on another alarming looking and inky machine, the requisite sets of catalog cards for the main and branch catalogs. the thing that struck me like a thunderbolt was how clever it was to produce a lot of standard entries and add the different headings rather than to type out each card in a set. i was at a very impressionable age but it still, more than three decades later, seems like a pretty good idea. the point of these autobiographical ramblings is not just to recall the dear dead days but to point out how utterly everything has changed about the physical form of our catalogs. the orthodoxy of the period was that the card catalog was the ne plus ultra of catalogs and that advances in technology, up to and including the marc format, would be devoted to the speedier and more cost-effective production of those 3by-5-inch cards. the only dissension that i can recall came from those who, rather than foreseeing new kinds of catalogs, predicted a future in which catalogs (and, indeed, libraries) would be irrelevant. i forget which particular kind of "patent double million magnifyin' gas microscope of hextra power'' was going to accomplish this great feat, but the paperless society boys were with us then as now. ''the card catalog orthodoxy has been completely demolished." the card catalog orthodoxy has been completely demolished. planning to maintain a card catalog indefinitely in any but the tiniest libraries is the bibliographic equivalent of wearing spats. how could this have happened in such a relatively short time? the answer is, i think, twofold. one is that the computer revolution november 1989 has transformed almost an the practical aspects of life in the soi-disant first world. this is inescapable but easily confused by the easily confused. in our particular neck of the woods, many, including some librarians and almost all ''information scientists," are seduced by the transformation of the practical aspects of life into a belief that the nature of things has changed. they believe that the fundamentals of librarianship are different when, of course, it is the means of carrying out our abiding mission that has changed. in the case of cataloging, we have always wanted to make our materials as accessible as possible in as speedy a manner as could be. we have always wanted to create huge cooperative union catalogs (a concept as old, almost, as librarianship itself). we have always wanted to share the burden of cataloging with others. we have always sought to standardize cataloging procedures. the century and a half of anglo-american cataloging codes stands witness to the latter. what has changed is that we now have a technology that enables us to do the things for which we have hungered. the second reason for the overthrow of the card catalog is luck. in many ways we have blundered into the future. by and large, our fortune is' that schemes toward one end have, happily, ended up by producing another and better result. the most obvious example of this latter is the marc format. despite its many shortcomings and despite the fact that its true origin was the sustaining of the library of congress' immensely profitable card service and, in britain, maximizing the cost-efficiency of the production of the british national bibliography and its cards, marc has proved to be a mechanism that has made the creation and maintenance of online systems possible. this is not to say that it would have been far better had we had a format that was rethought to deal with the necessities of computerized catalogs. it is merely to say that marc, the only available system, proved, almost by accident, to be up to the · task. another example of backing into the truth is the formation of the bibliographic networks-most notably the oclc meganetwork-that were intended to provide shared cataloging (mostly via the provision of catalog cards) and have ended up being the providers of marc tapes for local online catalogs; the providers of effective interlibrary loan services; the potential providers of cd-rom catalogs and other high-tech wonders; and the only effective and current union catalogs in the whole history of librarianship. in the future they will, no doubt, provide hitherto undreamed of service to automated libraries (for example, direct connection to pr~·v te sector indexing and abstracting se ~ es for libraries with online systems). i app ud all these present and future good things, merely pausing to remark that those who see in this progress the fulfillment of deep and prescient plans are surrendering to the human desire to believe that those in authority have been vouchsafed some wisdom to which we cannot aspire. the truth is that most of what has been predicted about the future of the catalog has proved to be wrong and that most of the advances in the technology of the catalog have been the result of happenstance and the ability of a strategically placed few to recognize an opportunity when it swims into their ken. the future it is my view, then, that the orthodoxies about, inter alia, corporate authorship, the treatment of persons using two or more names as authors, the main entry, and the forms in which catalogs are preyesterday's heresy 633 sented to the library user have been overthrown, either overtly or covertly. does this mean that they have been replaced by new and equally foolish orthodoxies? i think not. it is my belief and my hope that we are in a time of realism in the field of cataloging-a time in which dogma and theory are being forced to yield place to the exigencies of the practice of librarianship in the electronic world of today. i am, in librarianship as in other aspects of life, a benthamite. if one believes in the greatest happiness of the greatest number and applies that belief to the wonderfully democratic catalogs that modern technology has made possible, discussions of the arcana of cataloging become less and less relevant, if no less absorbing to the surviving handful of cataloging mavens. cutter famously wrote of the passing of the golden age of cataloging (in 1904). i do not believe that age has passed or, in fact, has yet been achieved. the age of the petty discussion of petty aspects of the lore of cataloging may well have passed, but the age of the creation and maintenance of catalogs that meet the needs of the mass of people-catalogs based on utility rather than dogma-has only just begun. o'shaughnessy wrote . . . each age is a dream that is dying or one that is coming to birth we can still be, in his famous words "the dreamers of dreams," as long as we remember that the death of orthodoxy can lead to freedom and to a new and better world. references 1. a. l.a. cataloging rules for author and title entries, 2d ed., ed. clara beetle (chicago: american library assn., 1949), 265p. 2. anglo-american cataloging rules, prep. by american library association and others, general ed. c. sumner spalding, north american text (chicago: american library assn., 1967}, 400p. 3. anglo-american cataloguing rules, 2d ed., ed. michael gorman and paul w. winkler (chicago: american library assn., ottawa: canadian library assn., 1978}, 620p. 4. anglo-american cataloguing rules, 2d ed., ed. michael gorman and paul w. winkler, 1988 rev. (ottawa: canadian library assn.; london: library assn. publishing; chicago: american library assn., 1988}, 677p. 5. catalog rules, author and title entries, comp. by committees of american library assn. and (british) library assn., american ed. (chicago: american library assn., 1908), 88p. 6. charles a. cutter, rules for a dictionary catalog, 4th ed. (washington, d.c.: govt. print. off., 1904), 173p. (special report on public libraries, part ii, u.s. bureau of education). 634 college & research libraries november 1989 7. paul s. dunkin, cataloging usa (chicago: american library assn., 1969), 159p. 8. seymour lubetzky, cataloging rules and principles: a critique of the ala rules for entry and a proposed design for their revision (washington, d.c.: library of congress, 1953), 65p. 9. anthony panizzi, rules for the compilation of the catalogue. the catalogue of printed books in the british museum, v.1 (london: british museum, 1841). 10. [paris principles]. statement of principles adopted at the international conference on cataloguing principles, paris, oct. 1961, annot. ed., with commentary and examples by eva verona and others (london: ifla committee on cataloguing, 1971). 11. eva verona, corporate headings: their use in library catalogues and national bibliographies: a comparative and critical study (london: ifla committee on cataloguing, 1975). in january 1990 college & research libraries the paradox of public service: where do we draw the line? by rebecca r. martin reviving a retrospective conversion project: strategies to complete the task by jay lambrecht a social history of madness; or, who's buying this round? anticipating and avoiding gaps in collection development by paul metz and bela foltin the representational rights of academic librarians: their status as managerial employees and/or supervisors under the national labor relations act by ronald l. gilardi the serial/monograph ratio in research libraries: budgeting in light of citation studies by robin b. devin and martha kellogg the do-it-yourself move for a 1.5 million-volume library by pauline s. bayne untitled-2 empirical examination of subject headings 129 an empirical examination of subject headings for women’s studies core materials kristin h. gerhard, mila c. su, and charlotte c. rubens the acrl women’s studies section technical services committee in­ vestigated the assignment of subject headings to core works in women’s studies. annotations for the works were compared with subject head­ ings on oclc cataloging copy, mainly created by the library of con­ gress. inadequacies were identified and traced to three sources: inad­ equacy of terminology, the complexities of assigning headings in inter­ disciplinary and/or emerging fields, and standard cataloging practices. recommendations for amelioration of these problems are made. he technical services commit­ tee of the acrl’s women’s studies section focuses on is­ sues related to access and other relevant practices in areas such as ac­ quisitions, cataloging, classification, and preservation. membership on the c o m m i t t e e i n c l u d e s b o t h t e c h n i c a l services and reference librarians. in 1992, the committee compiled a bib­ liography on issues in subject access to women’s studies materials. there was a great deal of important enu­ merative and impressionistic work describing deficiencies in subject ac­ cess to women’s studies literature, in­ cluding calls and suggestions for im­ proved access. however, no empirical study had been published that identified specific changes needed to improve ba­ sic access to the core literature in the field. the study described below, designed and carried out by the group, seeks to rem­ edy this situation. second, there has been no system­ atic evaluation of cataloger knowl­ edge in terms of appropriate appli­ cations of women’s studies subject headings. this study gives a prelimi­ nary glimpse into cataloger knowledge and identifies some fruitful areas for further research. kristin h. gerhard is catalog librarian/associate professor in parks library at iowa state university; email: kgerhard@iastate.edu. mila c. su is associate librarian/reference coordinator in the robert e. eiche library at pennsylvania state university; e-mail: mcs@psulias.psu.edu. charlotte c. rubens is head of interlibrary services in the university of california berkeley library at the university of califor­ nia-berkeley; e-mail crubens@library.berkeley.edu. in addition to the three authors, seven other librarians participated in planning this study, collecting data, and discussing the raw results. they were: shelley almgren, oklahoma panhandle state university; daren callahan, southern illinois university; anne moore, boston college; susanne nevin, st. olaf college; g. margaret porter, university of notre dame; françoise puniello, rutgers university; and debbie tenofsky, university of illinois at chicago. 129 mailto:crubens@library.berkeley.edu mailto:mcs@psulias.psu.edu mailto:kgerhard@iastate.edu 130 college & research libraries march 1998 literature review three major areas addressed in the litera­ ture contribute to concerns about subject access in women’s studies: subject head­ ing terminology, the nature of interdisci­ plinary studies, and the cataloging pro­ cess. subject heading terminology the terminology chosen for library of congress subject headings (lcsh) is the most immediately obvious source of sub­ ject access problems. more than one au­ thor has pointed out sexist language and limited concepts reflected in the lcsh.1 sanford berman’s book on lc subject headings for people documents sexism throughout lcsh; joan k. marshall’s on equal terms documented extensive prob­ lems with subject headings about women.2–3 according to judith hudson and victoria a. mills, alcsh reflects a white male bias in its representation of the world: men are the norm and women, the exception. the fact that lcsh con­ tains sexist and biased terminology has troubled many librarians for years.4 another problem with lcsh terminol­ ogy is that precise subject headings may be lacking. hudson and mills note that, “[b]ecause the library of congress is of­ ten slow to add or change subject head­ ings relating to women, the terminology used to provide subject analysis is often neither current nor specific.”5 hope olson, on examining a sample of 100 bib­ liographic records, finds that almost 50 percent of the sample has less than use­ ful headings; she describes lcsh as “weak in addressing women-centered re­ search topics.”6 interdisciplinary nature oj women's studies the interdisciplinary nature of women’s studies complicates subject cataloging of its materials. materials are assessed by catalogers in order to determine the pri­ mary subject area upon which both the classification and the first subject head­ ing are based. in the case of interdiscipli­ nary materials, this determination may result in assignment of overly broad sub­ ject headings. there is a further compli­ cation in the case of women’s studies. ellen gay detlefson raises the issue that women’s studies material is not the same as material about women.7 subject head­ ings designed to describe material about women (generally discipline specific) may not be suitable to describe women’s studies materials (generally interdiscipli­ nary). women’s studies provides funda­ mentally new, integrative approaches to many established topics, but this is diffi­ cult to bring out when describing these materials using lcsh. olson, for ex­ ample, details four basic orientations of feminist research and notes specific defi­ ciencies in the lcsh in describing each of the four categories.8 in themselves, however, boolean and key word searching do not solve access difficulties. where multiple subject headings are available and appropriately assigned, technological advances with databases and online catalogs and the use of bool­ ean and key word searching have im­ proved accessibility for women’s studies materials. in themselves, however, bool­ ean and key word searching do not solve access difficulties. loretta p. koch and barbara g. preece refer to various discus­ sions about the interdisciplinary nature of women’s studies, pointing out that, too often, terms can be too broad for “mean­ ingful searching.”9 cindy faries and patricia a. scott highlight the problems: since the average user has neither the time nor the inclination to mas­ ter the intricacies of library of con­ gress subject headings, library staff must do so. to avoid the difficulties of subject searching, users often rely on poorly constructed keyword empirical examination of subject headings 131 searches that result in a discourag­ ing overabundance of hits.10 although automation of catalogs has helped to improve access to resources, it does not remove the responsibility of those who provide or assign subject head­ ings to be diligent in clearly identifying correct headings. the cataloging process the cataloging process raises several is­ sues. first, subject headings assigned may not accurately or completely reflect the subject content of the item. this may be due to time constraints, cataloger unfa­ miliarity with the subject area, or failure to review pertinent information such as the introduction, preface, or table of con­ tents. many times, broad or inaccurate subject headings are assigned. where appropriate subject headings exist, they may not be used as frequently as neces­ sary to provide precise access. olson highlights this in her evaluation of head­ ings assigned to a hundred titles by the library of congress. her first recommen­ dation for improving access is that “the library of congress follow its own prin­ ciple of specific entry and use its own subject headings to their fullest poten­ tial.”11 margaret n. rogers points out that heading formulation is influenced, among other factors, by “the views of the selector who does the books the library of congress has in a given field.”12 some help is available to catalogers handling women’s studies materials. in women in lc’s terms, ruth dickstein, victoria a. mills, and ellen j. waite collected, re­ viewed, and organized “subject headings used for women and topics of relevance to women’s lives.”13 their intent was to help meet the needs of both catalogers and researchers by identifying and gath­ ering established lcsh terminology into one source. second, the heavy reliance of academic libraries on copy cataloging, while en­ hancing cataloging efficiency, means that any problems in the initial assignment of subject headings are likely to perpetuate themselves. the initially assigned subject headings may not reflect the subject of the material accurately. according to olson, “virtually no library using widely ac­ cepted controlled vocabularies such as lcsh relies entirely on original catalog­ ing. most library cataloging comes from a shared source such as a bibliographic utility. therefore, good subject access de­ pends not only upon the standard sys­ tem (lcsh), but also on the quality of cataloging copy contributed.”14 because original cataloging is not used commonly, copy cataloging can perpetuate imprecise description. one cannot assume that cata­ loging copy will be rechecked in subse­ quent libraries for appropriateness or ad­ equacy of subject headings. third, cataloging norms and standards suggest that each work be assigned a fairly limited number of subject headings. susan e. searing observes that this is more damaging to subject access in the long run than the limits of lcsh terminology.15 in her words, computerization makes it feasible to present many more access points by subject to a single book, yet li­ brary catalogs have not followed the lead of automated indexes and ab­ stracts. the reality of the library budget, rather than the bright potential of technology, defines the scope of the catalog. excellent cataloging is la­ bor intensive. it requires a firm grasp of the book’s subject and knowledge of its potential readers.16 this is a practical approach from the point of view of cataloging management, given the kind of subject analysis needed by works in traditional disciplines. on the other hand, these norms may not serve interdisciplinary materials, which cover the intersections of ideas from multiple disciplines, as well as would be desired. http:readers.16 http:terminology.15 132 college & research libraries march 1998 finally, a study by elaine svenonius and dorothy mcgarry hypothesized “that to a considerable degree [their italics] there is a clear-cut right and wrong to lcsh subject heading assignment.”17 in their review of bibliographic records for a hundred items, they found that “true fuzziness” existed in very few cases, af­ fecting only four items. “on the basis of this finding, it would seem that in­ deed objectivity in assessing subject heading assignment is feasible.”18 this suggests that evaluating subject head­ ings in a large set of records would be a reasonable approach to assessing the state of subject access for women’s stud­ ies materials. research questions the questions that remained for the au­ thors of this study were: how poor or inadequate is subject access to women’s studies materials, and to which factors can we assign the most weight? to inves­ tigate this in some depth, the authors pro­ posed the following research questions: 1. what subject concepts present in the core women’s studies literature are in­ adequately represented in the subject headings on oclc records for these ma­ terials? 2. which of these subject concepts could have been expressed adequately using lcsh? 3. which of these subject concepts suggest the need for new main subject headings or subdivisions in the lcsh scheme? 4. is there a set of recommended prac­ tices for practicing catalogers who cata­ log women’s studies materials which could significantly improve access to these titles in the future? methodology the methodology for this research was a systematic comparison of important works in women’s studies to the subject headings they have been assigned. to develop a large enough data set to be meaningful, the com­ mittee carried out this comparison by using annotations for the works rather than the works themselves. a standard list of central women’s studies works was needed to serve as the source of the annotations. the com­ mittee selected catherine loeb, susan e. sear­ ing, and esther stineman’s women’s studies: a recommended core bibliography, 1980–1985, second edition, a critical annotated bibli­ ography covering most subject areas in women’s studies.19 literary works were excluded because they tend not to be assigned subject headings. following ala’s 1993 annual confer­ ence, the chair of the committee divided the bibliography by subject and assigned each committee member several sections based on interest and expertise. literary works were excluded because they tend not to be assigned subject headings. even­ tually, reference works and periodicals also were eliminated from the sample because they tend to be assigned broad headings rather than the more specific subject head­ ings that were the object of the study. oclc was searched for each title listed and a bibliographic record identi­ fied. library of congress (dlc) records were preferred, but records contributed by member libraries were used when no dlc record was found. only one t i t l e l a c k e d o c l c c o p y a n d w a s dropped from the study. subject head­ ings in the record then were compared to the abstract in loeb, searing, and stineman to determine whether the main concepts covered by each book were represented adequately. to provide for consistent data collec­ tion, the committee developed a uniform data collection form (udcf). the udcf requested the following information for each range of citations investigated: 1. subject area; 2. entry numbers of annotations in loeb, searing, and stineman; http:studies.19 empirical examination of subject headings 133 table 1 udcf numerical data summary concepts absent or inadequately represented dlc non-dlc lcsh lcsh subject area n copy copy n exists needed anthropology, cross-cultural 49 49 0 16 10 6 surveys, and international surveys art and material culture 102 100 2 64 64 0 autobiography, biography, 92 90 2 8 5 3 diaries, memoirs, and letters business, economics, and labor 48 48 0 20 6 14 education and pedagogy 27 25 2 9 2 7 history 89 89 0 11 11 0 language and linguistics 10 9 1 7 5 2 law 22 22 0 9 4 5 literature: history and criticism 83 76 7 22 21 1 medicine, health, sexuality, 31 30 1 16 4 12 and biology politics and political theory 18 18 0 12 2 10 psychology 35 35 0 23 5 18 religion and philosophy 42 42 0 5 4 1 science, mathematics, 17 17 0 6 3 3 and technology sociology and social issues 71 69 2 27 17 10 sports 17 17 0 11 10 1 women's movement and 73 65 8 16 9 7 feminist theory totals 826 801 25 282 182 100 3. number of entries for which dlc/ dlc records were located and used in analysis; 4. number of entries for which only a member library cataloging (non-dlc/ dlc) record was located and used in analysis; 5. any concepts relating to women’s studies that were present in one or more annotation, but absent or inadequately represented in one or more of the cata­ loging records examined (list); 6. any lc subject headings or subdi­ visions corresponding to a missing con­ cept in item 5 above which could have been (or could now be, if they are new) used if the cataloger had been aware of the headings and realized that they were appropriate (list); 7. any concepts listed in item 5 above that do not have a matching lc subject heading or subdivision, suggestions for lc-like subject headings or subdivisions for any concepts where lc subject head­ ings are lacking currently (list); 8. any additional trends, observa­ tions, or areas for further investigation that arise in the research process. in completing the udcf, participants consulted both the library of congress sub­ ject headings and subject heading manual, and women in lc’s terms by dickstein, 134 college & research libraries march 1998 table 2 sample concepts missing from bibliographic records asian american women battered woman syndrome clitoridectomy eating disorders feminist research methods feminization of poverty gender gap in politics gender identity gender-free science history of the legal status of women images of women jewish women lesbians nontraditional students nonverbal communication and gender pioneer women premenstrual syndrome prochoice movement women and achievement women and depression women artists women in the labor movement women in the military women in world war i women political leaders women refugees women's health women's sexuality mills, and waite for ideas on other head­ ings that might be more accurate or use­ ful. information was compiled and sub­ mitted to the committee cochairs. the fi­ nal lists generated in items 5, 6, and 7 above were reviewed to further increase consistency and accuracy in the data set. study results the numerical data compiled from the udcfs is given in table 1. of the 826 cita­ tions used in the study, 801, or about 97 percent, had dlc/dlc copy in the oclc union catalog. these records set the standard for cataloging in the united states and should represent the assign­ ment of available subject headings. how­ ever, there were many disturbing discov­ eries in these records. the subject head­ ing problems that emerged seriously af­ fect access to the materials. citations were noted in every subject area that had one or more of the following problems: 1. obsolete subject headings or subdi­ visions appeared in the cataloging record. 2. there was an absence of existing relevant subject headings or subdivisions in the cataloging record. 3. no relevant lc subject heading or subdivision was available. 4. subject headings assigned in the cataloging record were too general. 5. subject headings assigned in the cataloging record were too specific. in every subject area, there were works for which entire major concepts had been either represented inadequately or not represented at all in the cataloging. this was the case approximately 30 percent of the time. the authors identified 282 con­ cepts as inadequately represented or missing entirely. most of the time, the missing concepts were not exotic but, rather, were the types of concepts a women’s studies scholar would be look­ ing for. a sample of the concepts that seemed important when reading the an­ notations, yet were not evident in the bib­ liographic records, is given in table 2. in addition, there were many instances where aspects regarding race, national­ ity, religion, profession, gender, or sexual orientation were totally omitted, includ­ ing concepts such as lesbian christians, women anthropologists, jewish women, and african women authors. understanding that lc subject head­ ings and subdivisions have evolved dur­ ing the decade since the second edition of women’s studies: a recommended core bibliography, 1980–1985 was published, the committee attempted to determine whether appropriate subject headings and subdivisions now exist which might have been used at the time of the original cataloging had the cataloger been aware of them. although the participants did empirical examination of subject headings 135 table 3 sample of existing established lc subject headings lacking in bibliographic records achievement motivation in women battered woman syndrome feminism and art feminist literary theory middle-aged women psychoanalysis and feminism women in trade unions subdivision-women underfheadingsf or individualfwars women-employment women and war women athletes women authors, french women film critics women in motion pictures not attempt a historical analysis of whether these specific subject headings existed at the time the titles were cataloged, the authors did identify existing subject headings in 182 cases which would be rel­ evant for these titles but were not in the catalog record. some of these subject head­ ings are shown in table 3. this left a total of one hundred absent concepts that could not be expressed by lcsh. some of these concepts are shown in table 4. discussion through this study, the committee iden­ tified a large number of basic concepts that were either overlooked in cataloging or lacked an established subject heading at the time the item in question was cataloged. these concepts averaged out over the study sample to a little more than one in three records, which is a sizeable proportion. revisiting the authors’ initial concerns about the impact of terminology, the na­ ture of interdisciplinary fields, and the cataloging process, the results indicate definite and interrelated problems in all three areas. multiple examples of every kind of problem were enumerated in the literature. the lack of established lcsh headings for basic women’s studies con­ cepts continues to be discouraging. one or two broad headings frequently were as­ signed to works when a greater number of more specific headings would have pro­ vided more appropriate access. as noted above, the cataloging process both contrib­ utes to and perpetuates this problem. it is not news that the library of con­ gress plays catchup in authorizing sub­ ject headings. a widely accepted concept may not receive an authorized subject heading for years. it was only in august of 1996 that lc replaced the heading “man” with “human beings.” the works cited in loeb, searing, and stineman gen­ erally were produced between 1980 and 1985, in most cases well into the era of recognizable feminist critical thought when women’s concerns were being ar­ ticulated and researched. although there may be cases where automation has aided in changing outdated subject headings, it is generally a difficult task. in the case table 4 sample of concepts lacking adequate established subject headings depression in women des daughters female correspondance feminist nuns gender-free science lesbian authors segregation of women sex role socialization sports stories-women free-floating subdivision-feminist approaches free-floating subdivision-feminist critiques pattern subdivision under individual names -female influences des (drug) (currentlyfx-refffrom diethylstilbestol) family law (currentlyfx-refffrom domestic relations) pms (currentlyfx-refffrom premenstrual syndrome) 136 college & research libraries march 1998 of women’s studies and feminism, it is not a viable solution because of the absence of relevant subject headings in the origi­ nal cataloging. rogers comments on the gradual in­ crease of subject headings added during the past decade and remarks that it is more efficient for lc to add new subject headings than to apply any retrospective adjustments.21 the concepts identified in this study were those found in core titles for a maturing interdisciplinary field. it is understandable that appropriate sub­ ject headings might not have existed at the lack of established lcsh headings for basic women’s studies concepts continues to be discourag­ ing. the time these works were published. the discouraging facts are that (1) where ap­ propriate headings have been established after the fact, they have not been added to the relevant records; and (2) many of those headings have yet to be established today. this can be summed up in two se­ rious questions for subject catalogers: 1. how do we avoid denying access to mature as well as to pioneering work in a field just because there were inad­ equate subject headings available at the time the work was issued? 2. how do we guarantee that works in a new and not necessarily widely ac­ cepted discipline will receive adequate subject access? conclusions what should be done to improve the sub­ ject access provided to women’s studies materials through lc subject headings? the committee recommends a threepronged approach, based on the deficien­ cies identified by this research. first, the many concepts for which no appropriate lc subject heading is available can be approached by submitting revised and suggested new headings to the library of congress for considerations. the liter­ ary warrant required by the library in order for a heading to be revised or es­ tablished can be presented clearly by ref­ erence to the annotations in loeb, sear­ ing, and stineman and their description of the core literature of women’s studies. the committee has begun to assemble these submissions. although the authors recognize that the library of congress establishes headings based on the works it catalogs rather than by the systematic analysis of intellectual concepts, area by area, the fact that these books had been cataloged by lc without the creation of adequate subject headings is disturbing. the library of congress would serve the cataloging community better by being more proactive in its creation and assign­ ment of subject headings. where lc does not perform analysis to interlink and in­ terrelate subject headings in emerging fields, it may be advisable for catalogers and scholars to work together to accom­ plish this task, field by field. second, the lack of retrospective re­ view of bibliographic records when new subject headings eventually are established confounds access to research materials. this warrants a serious reevaluation of cataloging policies that establish new headings without consideration of older works for which they would be appropriate. materials in emerg­ ing fields are particularly hard hit by this phe­ nomenon, and this should cause concern to those responsible for making the nation’s research collections accessible to cuttingedge researchers. finally, it is clear from the results of this research that too few catalogers are aware of the range of subject headings already available for use, or of the necessity of bringing out the woman-centered or femi­ nist aspects of a work in separate subject headings. the committee recommends the development of a brief catalogers’ tool to aid those learning or practicing cataloging in subject analysis and subject heading as­ signment for women’s studies and other interdisciplinary materials. http:adjustments.21 empirical examination of subject headings 137 notes 1. these references are too numerous to give a complete listing. the discussion that follows includes representative examples. 2. sanford berman, prejudices and antipathies: a tract on the lc subject heads concerning people (metuchen, n.j.: scarecrow pr., 1971). 3. joan k. marshall, on equal terms: a thesaurus for nonsexist indexing and cataloging (new york: neal-schuman, 1977). 4. judith hudson and victoria a. mills, “women in the national online bibliographic data­ base,” in women online, eds. judith hudson and steven atkinson (new york: haworth, 1990), 245. 5. ibid., 245. 6. hope olson, “subject access to women’s studies materials,” in cataloging heresy: chal­ lenging the standard bibliographic product: proceedings of the congress for librarians, february 18, 1991, ed. bella hass weinberg (medford, n.j.: learned information, 1992), 163. 7. ellen gay detlefson, “issues of access to information about women,” in women’s collec­ tions: libraries, archives and consciousness, ed. suzanne hildenbrand (new york: haworth, 1986), 164. 8. olson, “subject access to women’s studies materials,” 162–65. 9. loretta p. koch and barbara g. preece, “table of contents services: retrieving women’s studies periodical literature,” rq, 35 (fall 1995), 76–86. 10. cindy faries and patricia a. scott, “invisible collections within women’s studies: practi­ cal suggestions for access and assessment,” paper presented at the acrl 7th annual confer­ ence, pittsburgh, penn., mar. 31, 1995, 5. 11. olson, “subject access to women’s studies materials,” 166. 12. margaret n. rogers, “are we on equal terms yet? subject headings in lcsh, 1975–1991,” library resources and technical services 37, no. 2 (apr. 1993): 195. 13. ruth dickstein, victoria a. mills, and ellen j. waite, women in lc’s terms: a thesaurus of library of congress subject headings relating to women (phoenix, ariz.: oryx pr., 1988). 14. olson, “subject access to women’s studies materials,” 165. 15. susan e. searing, “how libraries cope with interdisciplinarity: the case of women’s studies,” issues in integrative studies, no. 10 (1992): 13. 16. ibid. 17. elaine svenonius and dorothy mcgarry, “objectivity in evaluating subject heading as­ signment,” cataloging & classification quarterly 16, no. 2 (1993): 7. 18. ibid., 16. 19. catherine loeb, susan e. searing, and esther stineman, women’s studies: a recommended core bibliography, 1980–1985, 2nd ed. (littleton, co: libraries unlimited, 1987). 20. library of congress subject headings (washington d.c.: library of congress, annual). sub­ ject heading manual, 5th ed. (washington, d.c.: library of congress, 1996). 21. rogers, “are we on equal terms yet?” 195. 218 an analysis of cost factors in maintaining and updating card catalogs j. l. dolby and v. j. forsyth : r&d consultants company, los altos, california this study enumerates and compares costs of manual and computerized catalogs. the difficulties of making comparative cost studies are examined. the report concentrates on the problems of cost element definition and on the reporting of as many comparable sources as possible. results of cost studies are presented in the form of tables that show comparative costs of cataloging, card processing, conversion, and manual and computerized processing. there are also tables on card catalog costs. conclusions are that the costs of manual and automated methods are essentially the same for short entries, and that there is a substantial economic advantage for automated methods in full entries. a side benefit of the present interest in library automation is the amount of attention now being given to study of the traditional methods of librarianship. this phenomenon is hardly unique to librarianship; in almost every area of human endeavor where attempts have been made to introduce the use of computers, workers in the field have suddenly discovered that they did not understand some of their long-standing methods quite as fully as they had believed. the source of this seeming anomaly is easy to find: to program a computer, it is necessary to specify the work to be done in much greater detail than is necessary to explain the same problem to a human being, that curious human phenomenon known variously as "common sense" or "experience" making up the difference. it has not been uncommon over the past decade to hear many survivors of the "automation experience" admit that a main benefit of use of the machine was catalog cost factors/dolby and forsyth 219 acquisition of better procedures through a more detailed understanding of the process involved. improved knowledge of "processes about to be automated" extends to the cost of the process as well, and with added force. in recommending the substitution of one procedure for another in a cost-conscious atmosphere, it behooves one to proffer sound financial reasons for doing so. computers are expensive devices. they also represent expenditure of a different kind of money: capital or lease funds in place of labor expense. thus, although one can still hear the occasional cry that it is difficult to obtain reasonable cost data on various parts of library operations, it is becoming increasingly difficult to pick up an issue of almost any library journal that does not include at least one piece of cost information. this paper is concerned with the cost of maintaining and updating card catalogs. as the authors have observed elsewhere (l), the cost of computing is going down at a rather spectacular rate, while the cost of labor is increasing. if this trend continues, almost every library will be forced to automate certain aspects of the catalog operation at some point in time. the cited report provided some information about the cost of computerized library catalogs. by adding a summary of the cost factors in the use of card catalogs, this article should place in slightly better perspective the more difficult problem of deciding (in the context of a particular library) when the crossover point between manual and automated methods is to be reached. the plan of attack remains essentially the same as in the previous report: selection from among the growing number of papers on the subject those that provide comparable sets of cost information pertinent to the various cost elements of the card catalog operation. it is appropriate, therefore, to begin this study with a brief description of the difficulties in comparing cost statistics in such a way. problems of comparative cost studies although comparative cost studies have much to recommend them, they are fraught with certain difficulties ( 2). in the first place, few librarians would group elementary cost operations in precisely the same way. one library may consider a particular element of cost as part of the acquisitions operation and a second as a part of the cataloging operation; a third may ignore it altogether, or include it in the burden or overhead cost. nor is this mere capriciousness on the part of members of the library community. library operations not only differ from one another, but they also change with time. consider, for example, the problem of obtaining a set of catalog cards for a particular monograph. any or all of the following alternatives might be in use at a given library: the cards may be l) supplied with the book as a service provided by the bookseller at some extra cost; 2) ordered from the library of congress; 3) provided by a centralized cataloging 220 journal of library automation vol. 2/4 december, 1969 operation serving several libraries (as in a county or state library system); 4) prepared by catalogers working in the library; or 5) generated by computer program from standard listings (e.g., from marc tapes). comparing any two of these procedures within a given library does not present any overwhelming problems, although minor questions of definition do occur (for example, how much of the cost of ordering should be allocated to the acquisitions department and how much to the cataloging department when both the book and the catalog cards are obtained simultaneously from the same source?). however, to compare costs from two different libraries, it is essential to know what proportion of each card source was used by each library. fortunately for the purposes of this study most libraries are presently using a mix of method 2 ( lc) and method 4 (own catalogers), and at least some provide sufficient information to enable determination of the appropriate mix for each. however, the problem is indicative of one essential difficulty in comparative cost analyses; and one that, although eased, would not be eliminated by having all libraries band together for adoption of a standard costing procedure. a second difficulty arises from temporal and geographic differences in the cost of manpower. on the surface, this problem can be eliminated, or substantially reduced, by having all studies based on man-hours spent, rather than on dollars required per item, and a number of writers have suggested such a change in reporting procedure. however, the problem is not quite so simple. for example, determining the number of man-hours spent on cataloging adds cost to the study that tends to reduce the number of libraries willing to report; those that do report may or may not be a representative sample of the total. however, there is a more basic problem. in almost all libraries the real restraint on activities is financial: there are just so many funds available for cataloging and these must be used to at least keep the backlog of uncataloged material down to the amount of space available to store it. suppose, for instance, that the amount of material to be cataloged increases by ten percent from one year to the next and that the catalogers are fortunate enough to obtain ten percent salary increases over the same period. it is not impossible to consider that in some libraries the catalogers may be forced to "earn" this raise by absorbing at least a part of the increased load without extra help. balancing salary increases by productivity increases is, of course familiar in industry and may well exist in libraries. as evidence that such an effect is present, it is noted later in this report (see table 4) that three studies made in three rather different libraries over a period of six years showed costs of from $0.228 to $0.235 per card for preparation, production, and filing. the total range ( $0.007) is only three percent of the average cost pef card. ($0.230). such close agreement would be startling if it were found in three simultaneous studies of three nearly identical library operations. to set this agreement aside as pure coincidence seems unwarranted. it is catalog cost factors/dolby and forsyth 221 more reasonable to assume that librarians are forced to operate under strong financial constraints and that they adjust their performance to those constraints through hiring of less well-trained personnel, increased time pressures on all personnel, etc. if this is the case, "standardized" reporting through time figures might be quite misleading unless cost figures were reported as well. finally, there is the question of allocating burden or overhead. potentially, burden could present a severe problem, and occasionally it may. however, in most of the reports cited here, burden is either ignored or separately stated and there is no reason to suspect that the results given in the summaries are noticeably biased by unseen burden differences. nevertheless, it would be of interest to determine proper overhead figures for library operations, as the switch to automation (which seems inevitable), will entail the use of more machines and fewer people, which in turn may drastically alter the overhead structure. the use of cost information having noted some of the difficulties that tend to cloud cost comparisons, it is perhaps useful to investigate how cost information is likely to be used. the nature of the problem can be illustrated by two rather different situations. one is exemplified by library "a", a large public library of some years' standing. it is considering the possibility of changing from its present manual procedures to some form of automation, and wishes to determine a reasonable strategy for implementing such a change over the next five years. library "b", otherwise comparable to "a", has been keyboarding the catalog records of its current acquisitions for the last three years. it has now decided to convert its retrospective catalog and wishes to choose the most economic procedure for this step. the differences in the problems facing two such libraries are basically the classic differences between strategy and tactics. library "a", must lay out a long-term plan, taking into account the growth in its collection over the five-year period, likely changes in equipment and personnel available to it, increases in labor costs, decreases in equipment usage costs, etc. library "b", on the other hand, is in the position of making a specific set of decisions as to whether the work should be done in-house or subcontracted; whether the library should use punched cards, punched paper tape, or optical character-recognition devices; and so forth. in terms of cost, library "b", has to prepare a specific budget request for its funding agency, and it is reasonable to assume that that funding agency will require assurance that the task is to be accomplished at the minimum cost consistent with the designated quality level. cost differences of as little as five percent may be quite important to library "b". general cost summaries can be of use only in enumeration of the possible alternatives. even the accounting procedures in effect in the local system will have a bearing on the final decision. 222 journal of library automation vol. 2/ 4 december, 1969 thus, the primary utility of a general cost summary to the library about to commit itself in a tactical situation is the information it can provide about the problem statement: which cost factors other libraries have been able to identify in similar situations; which of the various alternatives may be safely eliminated from consideration on the grounds that their present costs are considerably higher than other existing methods; and so forth. the likelihood seems remote that any general study, or, for that matter, any particular study, will be sufficiently applicable to the library now undertaking the problem to enable it to take over cost structures unchanged. library "a", faced with establishing a long-range plan, has much more flexibility available to it. its interest in specific costs will be established by some gross notion as to what quantity of funds are likely to be available over the period under plan. some procedures may be seriously considered because they are relatively new and untried and hence of potential interest to national funding agencies who would not consider funding further experiments with procedures that have been thoroughly tested. access to good cost information of such well-tested procedures will help in establishing the likely costs for important aspects of the overall plan. of even greater interest is the possibility that certain costs are likely to undergo substantial change over the planning period. for instance, in reference 1 it was noted that optical character recognition may be a very attractive long-run option for catalog conversion problems precisely because it is so new, and hence has not had time to allow a sufficient number of service centers to spring up to provide truly competitive service capabilities. computer typesetting with the new generation of hardware is in much the same category. in both situations it is clear that what is most needed is the enumeration of cost elements on the one hand and operating cost experience on the other. precise estimates of any one cost element are of relatively little importance, either because they are so likely to change over the long run, or because they are likely to be not appropriate to a specific application even in the short run. comparative cost information would therefore seem to provide a good basis for either application. the comparison forces an enumeration of cost elements precisely because one must evaluate the cost structure of each source to be sure that a reasonable comparison is possible. reporting of the actual experience of several libraries provides a range of experience, not only over several libraries but also over time, so that the extremes reported give an indication of the variability that must be allowed for. in what follows, therefore, concentration is on the problems of cost element definition and on the reporting of as many sources as are comparable in the broad sense. because precise estimates are not only difficult to ob' tain, but also unlikely to be relevant to most users, no attempt has been made to provide formal estimates either of the average cost figures or of their underlying variability. catalog cost factors/ dolby and forsyth 223 the cost of cataloging the preparation of catalog information for a given monograph is perhaps the most sophisticated operation in the entire catalog operation. as such it is probably the last to be considered a candidate for automation, although it is not unreasonable, even now, to consider the use of computers as aids to the cataloger. consequently in many operations the cost of cataloging will continue to be an invariant regardless of whether automation is introduced into other aspects of the catalog operation or not. nevertheless, it is useful to study the cost of catalogs, both to establish the relative cost of cataloging and the subsequent processing steps, and to establish the line of demarcation between the catalog step and the subsequent steps. any enumeration of the detailed steps involved in a complex process must be tentative. this is nowhere more true than in the cataloging operation. fortunately the number of descriptions in detail is growing. for the cataloging operation, three sources of information were used: 1) a detailed analysis made as part of an overall time and motion study of operations in the lockheed research library ( 3); a detailed study of the cataloging and processing activities of the new york public library as a preliminary to possible automation of some of these operations ( 4); and a detailed study of the acquisitions, cataloging, and other processing operations for the columbia university science libraries ( 5) . a summary of these studies is given in table 1. in addition to the eight items in table 1, the lockheed library study included five other items that we have chosen to include in subsequent operations. it is generally true that professionals do not like to have their jobs subjected to the minutiae of time and motion study. there is always the ugly feeling that the creative (and most important) aspects of the job cannot be subjected to simple measurement. nevertheless, cataloging is a continuing effort in most libraries and it is possible to establish some average production rates in terms of number of books cataloged per month or the number of minutes needed per book. the problem, as with most statistical studies, is not with the establishment of objective measurements but rather in the manner in which they are interpreted. use of comparative statistics does not eliminate the possibility of misinterpretation but it does tend to minimize it. the comparative studies selected for the cataloging operation, in addition to those already cited, were: a colorado study based on average cataloging times for eleven librarians from six cooperating libraries ( 2), and a study of ordering, cataloging, and preparations in several southern california libraries ( 6). the catalog cost information for these five studies is summarized in table 2. table 1. cataloging cost elements columbia university science (with lc information) 1. assign class number 2. compare book and card, check entries in general catalog, establish subjects, etc. 3. make necessary changes in lc proof slip, or type temporary slip giving brief descriptive information and class number 4. completed books revised and sent for shelf listing ( without lc information) i. supply descriptive cataloging 2. subject analysis, classification and authority work 3. type workslip for processing section. new york public 1. review work done by searcher. reconcile conflicts and approve new entry forms 2. full descriptive cataloging 3. assign subject entries 4. assign divisional catalog designators 5. check authority files and establish new authorities and cross references 6 . determine classmark lockheed research laboratory 1. 2. 3a. 3b. 4. 5. 6. 7. get book and analyze for subject. obtain dewey and cutter numbers check shelf list for duplicates and copy number (with lc information ) insert and type copy slip and temporary catalog card, check lc subject headings and other references. descriptive and subject catalog book pencil call number on title page (without lc information) insert and type descriptive part only on copy slip and temporary catalog card. write subject data only on catalog card. pencil call number on title page tear and separate copy slips and temporary cards. proof and correct as necessary. take report to reports cataloging travel to library, check national union catalog or other reference book count and tally titles cataloged 1:'0 ~ ....... ~ 5 ..... ..a t'"'l .... c::s-' a ~ :;t.. ~ ~ .... g· 6!:""" 1:'0 ~ tj (b (') (b s 0"' $ ..... co ffi catalog cost factors/ dolby and forsyth 225 table 2. comparative costs of cataloging library source date average cataloging implied avg. time, min. cost salary (per hour) lockheed 1967 10.0 colorado 1969 28.6 $ 2.07 $ 4.34 new york 1968 39.8 6.30 5.25 so. cal. 1961 44.8 2.23 2.98 columbia 1967 84.0 5.85 4.17 in the lockheed and colorado studies, basic times of each operation were studied and then "standard" time factors added to allow for nonproductive time. the standard factors increased the lockheed times by 13 percent and the colorado times by 48 percent. (the times in the table include these allowances.) the figures for new york were derived from their reported statements that they processed 65,000 books using 49 catalogers at a total cost of $409,500 (not including fringe benefits). the columbia figures have been reduced by 20 percent to eliminate fringe benefits. the implied average salary for each source was obtained by dividing the total cataloging cost by the average time and multiplying by 60 to convert to cost per hour. the simplest conclusion to reach from a study of table 2 is that cataloging costs vary widely from one library to another. average times differ by more than 8 to 1 and total cost varies by more than 3 to 1. the low salary for the southern california study is presumably explained by the fact that that study was done in 1961. adjustment of this figure for average salary increases from 1961 to 1968 would undoubtedly bring their total cost more directly in line with the other studies (bureau of labor statistics shows hourly wages increased approximately 30 percent over this period) . it would be interesting to know if the presumed increased salaries of the southern california catalogers has led to a decrease in the average time they spend on cataloging. the more recent data on colorado and new york suggest that this might be expected. the columbia and lockheed time data represent, perhaps not unreasonably, the extremes in this table. the lockheed research library is small compared to the others, and lockheed is, of course, a private corporation, whereas the other sources represent public and university libraries. columbia, on the other hand, is a large university library; however, the figures given are from a study of cataloging of science monographs, which may be more time-consuming. as these cataloging cost figures will be used only as a point of comparison with subsequent operations, it is not necessary to further resolve the apparent differences. the average time for the five sources is 41.4 minutes. assuming that a cataloger currently earns $4.50 an hour, the average cost for the five sources would be $3.11 for the unit cost of cataloging. 1:-0 1:-0 table 3. processing cost elements ~ ....... c columbia university new york public sacramento state ~ '"'t 5 ...... 1. card production 1. receive and distribute plan1. type master cards from c -2. card set completion ning sheets handwritten slips ~ .... 3. sorting and preliminary 2. type headings for added en2. produce subject cross refer<:l"' a filing tries and subject entries ence cards '"'t <.s::: 4. shelf listing 3. mark designators and sort 3. maintain guide cards > 5. typing of book pockets completed cards 4. card production and pur~ ..... 6. filing 4. distribute cards to filing chase c ~ section 5. complete card sets ~ ..... 5. paint edges of cards when 6. proof .... c ;:s required 7. alphabetize 6. glue and separate batches 8. file and revise < c 7. type masters for offset print9. card shifting !'""" to ing 10. update existing cards ........ 8. prepare copy for itek masters 11. correction of problems 11:>9. check format of entry on 12. withdrawals t:) (1) masters 13. weed order slips (') (1) 10. check letter for letter on 14. assembly of statistics s 0" planning sheet 15. file temporary slips (1) 11. gather statistics and keep 16. file permanent slips u'"t ...... log of card preparation 17. shelf list shifting co ~ 12. prepare itek masters and 18. blank catalog card stock co print cards on offset 13. file catalog cost factors/dolby and forsyth 227 card processing costs if cataloging is the least likely part of the library operation to be automated in the near future, the procedures that immediately follow cataloging are precisely opposite in character. card preparation, production, and filing all involve time-consuming routine operations that can be done automatically, thus relieving the library community of a significant proportion to man-hours to apply to problems of greater intellectual content. cost factors must nonetheless be considered. as with cataloging, description of basic cost elements will vary from one library to another. for the detailed breakdown in table 3, use is again made of the columbia and new york public studies previously cited. added to them is data from an unpublished study made available by neil barron of sacramento state college library. barron's cost elements are given in finer detail than those in the other studies reported in this section. in table 4, data from the new york public library and from the sacramento state college library have been grouped into three categories (preparation, production and filing) to achieve maximum compatibility with data from other sources reported in the table. these sources are: a study (7) at the university of toronto of manual costs made in conjunction with early machine methods; a comparative study ( 8) of manual methods and a special-purpose machine procedure at the air force cambridge research laboratory library; and results of three years of computerized card production at the yale medical library (9). costs shown in table 4 are on a "per-card" basis, rather than on a title basis, as differing library requirements show averages ranging from 4.6 cards per title at sacramento to 9.8 cards per title at new york public. most significant in table 4 is the extraordinary agreement between two of the studies: the total processing costs amount to 23.2c per card and 23.5c per card for these two sources, even though the reports were prepared over a six-year period and include significant changes in the cost of labor and materials. furthermore, these costs are reasonably constant for the individual categories in all three sources: card preparation varies from 11.4c per card to 11.6c per card; card production varies from 6.4c per card to 7.9c per card; and card filing varies from 4.2c per card to 5.2c per card. in one sense this close agreement should not be surprising. if it is indeed true that cataloging involves relatively high intellectual content that is difficult to automate, and card processing involves straightforward operations that are relatively easy to automate, it is reasonable to argue that the latter should show much less variability from one operation to the next. the fact that the new york public operation has significantly higher costs can be partially explained by the following observations. the nypl costs are based on the supposition that all cards are locally produced. the to to 00 ....... 0 ~ table 4. comparative costs of card processing ~ -0 date 1968 1969 1965 1963 1968 ~ .... ~ i:s library nypl sse onulp afcrl ch¥ ~ > cards per title (9.8) ( 4.6) (-9) (7) (9.3) ~ ..... 0 ~ (local) (lc (machine) ~ ..... .... 0 cat.) ~ preparation 0.140 0.116 0.114 0.088 < } 0 !"""" 0.233 0.166 0.075 to production } 0.064 0.079 ~ 0.186 tj filing 0.052 0.042 0.043 0.043 0.043 (b () (b totals 0.336 0.232 0.235 0.276 0.209 0.118 9 c"' ~ (b ~~ 0.228 ~ co 0':> co t catalog cost factors/ dolby and forsyth 229 other libraries indicate that a significant proportion of their work is based on the acquisition of lc cards. the breakdown for the afcrl study is shown in table 4 and the breakdown for sacramento is approximately the same. secondly nypl is clearly the largest of the operations under consideration here, and it is not unreasonable to expect that the size of the file will have an effect on the cost of filing. in fact, assuming that the nypl cost of preparation and production is the same as that for the afcrl' s locally produced cards ( 27 .6c) and assigning the rest of the nypl cost to filing, the latter figure becomes 10.3c per card, or a little more than twice the average for the other three sources ( 4.8c per card). if this is the case, it would be of interest to know whether the problem is one of sheer size of the catalog or rather one of increased density that naturally occurs in larger files. e.g., is it more costly to file "smith, adrian j." in a file with 100 smith's or 1000 smith's? finally, in the two cases of partial automation ( afcrl and yale) the cost of card preparation and production is significantly lower (7.5c and 8.8c) than that indicated for lc cards ( 16.6c), or the average for the three closely agreeing sources ( 23.2c). this observation alone should point the library community strongly towards automation of the card processing function. nor is this observation new; both authors of the preliminary studies at afcrl and yale made the point more than adequately. furthermore, as will be demonstrated shortly, the cost of filing is also reduced in an automated system. several factors may be contributing to the slowness of the library community to introduce changes to achieve such cost savings. first, there is inevitably a substantial initial cost involved in any automation project. second, although the potential cost saving is a substantial proportion of the processing cost, it is still small when compared to the cost of cataloging; a librarian under pressure to reduce costs could gain more by cutting back on the time allowed for cataloging without the initial investment necessary for automation. third, there is a persistent difficulty in finding trained personnel in the automation field. finally, librarians are certainly aware of the rapid changeover in equipment in the computing field with the concomittant costs of adapting programs to new equipment. case and space the preceding discussion has provided some notion as to the cost of obtaining the required cataloging information, encoding it on catalog cards, and entering those cards in a catalog file. these costs can be compared with other possible approaches to the problem, including those that involve some degree of automation. there are, of course, a number of associated costs that must be taken into account to obtain a full picture of the cost of card cataloging. they would include, at a minimum, the cost of the space occupied by the catalog, the purchase price of catalog filing 230 journal of library automation vol. 2/4 december, 1969 cases, the cost to the user of consulting th~ catalog, and the cost to the library of maintaining the catalog in usable form. the allocation of capital expenditure costs to a form comparable to the costs per title and the costs per card used in the earlier sections of this rep01t raises certain difficulties. accounting procedures vary from one institution to another. further there is the real but difficult-to-measure problem of comparing funds of various types in a particular situation. nonetheless, it is useful to know whether under any reasonable accounting system the cost of space and cabinets is of sufficient magnitude to make it worthwhile to consider these costs in the overall evaluation. assuming, therefore, that a filing case capable of storing 72,000 cards fully packed costs $800 and occupies approximately 30 square feet of space, including room for aisles and access area, and further assuming that land and construction costs are approximately $30 per square foot, the total cost of the cabinet and the space it occupies would be approximately $1,700. finally if it is assumed that on the average a catalog is approximately 60 percent full, the initial cost of space and case is approximately 4c per card. four cents a card is not negligible, but it is only about 15 to 20 percent of the cost of producing the cards and an even smaller fraction of the total cost when cataloging is included. hence, it seems reasonable to put this cost for space and case in the category of a secondary cost item that will favor book catalogs, microfilm catalogs, and other high-density forms. it is unlikely to be a determining factor unless other cost factors are very closely balanced. book and card catalogs: some relative advantages among the various cost factors involved in cataloging, the most difficult to assess objectively is the cost to the user. the problem is that no one really knows what a user does in a library, nor what impact a given change will have on its utility to him. whether they like a card catalog or not, library users do consult it and it is thus a usable device for providing access to library materials. equally, many libraries in times past, and again more recently, have had book catalogs; and they also are viable devices. but which is better? a card catalog is updated by the simple expedient of entering recently obtained cards in the file. a book catalog is updated by periodically printed revisions. hence any search for a particular item will in general require fewer specific searches in the card catalog than in the book catalog, if the proper information is available to the searcher. card catalogs are large and costly and there are few savings over the original cost in producing a second copy. reproducing books after the first copy is relatively inexpensive. libraries with many branches, or a decentralized set of users, will provide better service with book catalogs. the added cost of maintaining more than a few files is heavy with cards and light with books. whether card or book catalogs are used, the existence of a machine table 5. comparative conversion costs per title mar. 68 1968 1964 1968 1966 1964 1966 lc lacp onlup nypl uc/ b chy sul 446 char. -450 char. 400 char. 300 char. 317 char. 243 char. 180 char. coding/editing $0.169 $0.0801 $0.044 keying 0.207 } $0.480 $0.307 } $0.450 0.188 $0.198 } 0.183 re-keying 0.033 ) 0.030 } 0.117 ~ ~ 0.259 ~ proofing 0.125 0.127 0.085 0.103 s" j 0 ~ rental 0.156 0.084 0.6502 0 .036 0.037 ~ 0 0., ..... conversion & list } 0.359 0.020 }o.096 0.046 0.020 0.024 } 0.1043 ~ ~ c) edit list 0.084 0.141 ..... 0 ~ 0., sort & merge 0.165 0.121 '-. t::l 0 supplies 0.080 0.036 0.5084 0.033 r-c t:d supervision 0 .183 0.580 ....::: ~ ~ 0... 1 includes provision for keypunch rental, and supplies "tj 0 ::::0 2full keypunch rental absorbed by pilot project u) ....::: ..., 3includes use of automatic error-detection routines ::r:: 4includes cost of magnetic tapes and other supplies t--:l cn 1-' 232 journal of library automation vol. 2/4 december, 1969 readable catalog provides much greater flexibility as time goes on. revisions of cataloging practice become much simpler if the revisions can be programmed on a computer. in sum, machine readable book catalogs appear less advantageous than card catalogs only when immediate updating is the primary criterion for comparison. comparative costs of catalog conversion table 5 (an extension and revision of table 7 appearing on page 42 of reference 1) gives comparative conversion costs for three public libraries (library of congress (10), new york public library and los angeles public library), the library of the university of california at berkeley, the stanford undergraduate library (11), the ontario new universiti~s library project, and the columbia-harvard-yale study. although the data was gathered for the most part independently over a fouryear period, it is worth making a number of internal comparisons to test for consistency. the most outstanding comparison is between the encoding costs for the library of congress and those for the los angeles public library. for records of essentially the same average length ( 446 characters versus 450 characters) the coding costs agree to the penny! yet the methods of production are significantly different. the library of congress invested heavily in the coding and editing operation and used paper tape typewriters with their relatively high rental. as a result its costs in this area are significantly higher than those for lacp. on the other hand these procedural changes resulted in significantly lower keying costs, so that the overall cost for encoding was the same. the encoding costs of uc/b, chy, and sul are all very close (within three cents per title) even though there is a fair range of record size (from 180 for sul to 317 for uc/b). these three studies probably provide a more reasonable picture of the underlying variation in cost than the unusually close figures for lc and lacp. as a further test of consistency, average cost is plotted against average record length (in characters per record) in figure 1. the rightmost points are for lc and lacp, and the line is simply drawn through the origin (zero dollars, zero cost) and those points. the points of uc/ b, chy and sul cluster about the center of the line. following is an interpretation of the other points charted. the nypl point of $.45 for a 300-character record is not based on actual nypl experience, but rather on a study of information from other investigations. its proximity to the line suggests that nypl's analysis of existing information reaches a conclusion similar to that of this paper. the average encoding cost used to plot the onulp point does not contain the full rental charge reported in the onulp study, because the entire cost of keyboard rental was charged against the project although catalog cost factors/ dolby and forsyth 233 100 § ....l 80 8 z lc lacp ..... lzl ....l onulp • h ..... 60 h ~ lzl ll< h "' 0 u • nyp '-' 40 z sul • • uc/b h q .chy 0 u ~ 20 hul . o~-----.lon0------~2~00~----~j~00~-----4~00~----~j~00~----~6~00 average record length in charact ers fig. 1. encoding costs per title as a function of average record length. the machines were only partially utilized. the point for harvard university library ( hul) is based on information received in a private communication. although there is a significant amount of variation from one study to another it seems reasonable to conclude that the cost of encoding is approximately $.15 per title per hundred characters. the cost of computation is not as well-documented as the cost of conversion. studies that reported computer costs all include the following three operational costs: the first is the cost of conversion and listing. this cost includes the cost of converting the original machine readable form (be it cards or paper tape) to magnetic tape form. in most cases a byproduct of this operation was a listing (all-caps only) of the material on the tape. the second is the cost of an edit run, including a listing in upperand lower-case. the latter was eschewed in a number of cases because of the added costs. however, many libraries would require a proper edit run and many librarians would prefer to edit from an upper/ lower-case printout than from an all-caps printout. 234 journal of library automation vol. 2/4 december, 1969 the third is the cost of sorting and merging the tapes. many of the early studies did not explicitly report on this cost because they were primarily concerned with the cost of converting the retrospective list. however, in an on-going operation this would be a continuing cost of some magnitude. the available information points to a uniform cost of approximately $.02 per record for conversion and list, and approximately $.08 per record for editing. the two studies where both these costs are given indicate that a ratio of 4 to 1 is appropriate. the only study giving a ratio between the sort and merge operation and the edit operation is the nypl study and this is based on before-the-fact-information only; the ratio is approximately 8 to 7. for convenience, one can assume that this ratio is unity, giving an overall ratio of 4-4-1. the most complete history of total computer cost is given by lc: a total of $.36 per record for 446 character records. applying the above ratio to the lc total yields a breakdown of $.04 for conversion and list, $.16 for editing, and $.16 for sort and merge. extending the stanford cost of $.12 for conversion and list and editing gives a total cost for sul of $.22 for its 180 character records. this figure is considerably more than 180/ 446 parts of the lc cost. one other pertinent piece of information is available from the sul data. in the production of the annual catalog, stanford estimates a cost of $.121 per title for what is roughly comparable to the cost of sort and merge. this cost is then roughly 1.2 times the sul cost for conversion and list and editing, verifying the notion that the cost of "sort and merge" is of the same general magnitude as the cost of editing. the ratios of sul costs to lc for encoding are .367/.690 = .532 and .225/.359 = .625 for computer time. this suggests that the means of computing average record length may be different for the two institutions. taking the lc figures as the standard and assuming that both computing and encoding costs are strictly a function of record length, the sul record length should be between .532x446 = 238 and .625x446 = 279. this discrepancy may be a result of one source (presumably lc) counting all delimiter and other non-printing characters while the other does not. nypl indicates that the ratio of printed characters to total characters is approximately 3:4. if the sul figure of 180 is expanded by one third, one obtains the figure of 240 which agrees well with the lower limit (based on encoding costs) given above. the cost of sort and merge is a function of the size of the data base, not the amount of material being put into it. the library of congress points this out in its study ( 11) and report on an average month (where the data base grows for a period and then is reduced to zero.) stanford undergraduate library figures are based on its second year of operation, in which 16,000 titles were added to form a total base of 41,000 titles. the actual cost of this step in the operatiqn will therefore depend strongly on the operating strategy employed. clearly, the number of times one catalog cost factors/dolby and forsyth 235 has to sort and merge the entire data base should be minimized, particularly taking into account the fact that sorting costs go up faster than linearly. if the master file is arranged in n orders (author, subject, title, class number, etc.), it will generally be less expensive to sort the updating material into those n orders and make n merge runs with the sorted master files than to make a single merge with a single ordering of the master file and then sort the master file n times to obtain the required updated orderings of the master file. manual and computer processing: comparative cost one objective of this paper is to define factors whose costs enter into calculations of relative costs of manual and computer processing of catalog information and to report these factor costs. the following paragraphs present a simplified comparison of actual costs of manual and machine processing for a "typical" library characterized by average costs approximating those in the preceding tables. table 5 yields average figures for two cases: catalogs with approximately 425 characters per entry and catalogs with approximately 250 characters per entry; they may be called "full entries" and "short entries," respectively. from table 4, it is possible to compute similar figures for "full catalogs" and "short catalogs" by clustering the three larger cases (those having 9.8, 9.0, and 7.0 cards per title) and the three smaller cases (those having 3.0 and 4.6 cards per title). for the full catalogs the average cost of processing is 26.7c per card and 8.6 cards per title, or a total cost of $2.29 per title. for the short catalogs the average cost of processing is 20.3c per card and 3.8 cards per title, or $0.78 per title. combining these two sets of figures gives the results in table 6. table 6. comparative costs of manual and computerized processing short full entries entries manual $0.78 $2.29 computer $0.84 $1.31 table 6 shows that an hypothesized "typical" library would be slightly better off with manual methods if it chose the short form entries, and noticeably better off with the machine if it chose the full form of the entry. in making this quick comparison, consideration has not been given to several factors that should obviously be taken into account even in this simple example. first, there is not included either the initial cost of programming or the initial cost of converting the retrospective records. either or both of these costs could be substantial, but as they are one-time costs and as libraries are basically long-term institutions, such costs should be written off over a relatively long period, even though they must be financed out of a given year's budget. 236 journal of library automation vol. 2/4 december, 1969 second, the cost of printing the catalog is not included (assuming a book catalog is in fact to be used in the computerized system). thus the comparison in table 6 is between a card catalog and a catalog in machine readable form. such a comparison is complicated by the fact that a card once filed stays in the catalog indefinitely, subject only to longterm wear and tear and a certain rate of attrition due to unauthorized removal, misfiling, and so forth, whereas the machine readable catalog must be updated periodically and supplemented by interim publications. and, of course, the comparison is also complicated by the corresponding low cost of producing a number of copies of the book catalog where this is useful for a given system. however, to put the printing cost in some degree of perspective, one may make a quick calculation based on the production of a single book catalog using a standard upperand lower-case print chain. at present commercially available prices this would cost between 35c and 50c per 10,000 characters, or approximately 9c per entry for the full form entries and 5c per entry for the short form entries (assuming four complete listings for author, title, subject, and class number listings). this added cost would make the comparison between manual and computerized methods even less favorable for the short form, but still substantially better for the long form entries $1.40 to $2.29). conclusion it may be concluded that the card-processing operations in typical libraries can be automated economically in many situations today. libraries using the short form of a catalog and having no immediate need for multiple copies of the catalog may find it desirable to wait a year or two, depending upon their local situation, the availability of trained personnel and, of course, the availability of capital to finance the initial cost of programming and retrospective conversion. however, libraries using the full form in their catalogs, or those needing multiple copies of their catalogs, will almost certainly find that there is a substantial economic advantage to computerization at the present time. even when allowance is made for substantial departures from the "typical" costs found in this study, it is difficult to visualize any library using full form information not finding significant economic gains in computerization. considering the further advantages of the greater flexibility available in machine readable records, the increased services that can be offered to the user, and the fact that machine costs are decreasing while labor costs are increasing, one is led to the conclusion that more and more libraries will move towards catalog automation. tables 7 to 11 appearing on the following pages are reference tables for calculating costs. catalog cost factors/dolby and forsyth 237 acknowledgments the work reported in this paper was supported by the u . s. office of education under contract number oec-9-8-00292-0107. mrs. henriette avram (library of congress) and mr. neil barron (sacramento state college, sacramento, california) made important contributions of cost figures and other technical data used in this report. various state libraries supplied detailed cost information. bibliography a 400-item bibliography on cost and automation is available from the national auxiliary publication service of asis (naps 00696). references 1. dolby, j. l.; forsyth, v. j.; resnikoff, h. l.: computerized library catalogs: their growth, cost and utility (cambridge, mass.: m.i.t. press, 1969). 2. dougherty, richard m.: "cost analysis studies in libraries : is there a basis for comparison," library resources and technical setvices, 13 (winter 1969), 136-141. 3. kozumplik, william a.: "time and motion study of library operations," special libraties, 58 (october 1967), 585-588. 4. henderson, j. w.: rosenthal, j. a.: libmry catalogs: theit preservation and maintenance by photographic and automated techniques (cambridge, mass. : m. i.t. press, 1968). 5. fasana, paul j.; fall, james e. : "processing costs for science monographs in the columbia university libraries," libmry resources and technical services, 11 (winter 1967), 97-114. 6. macquarrie, catherine: "cost survey: cost of ordering, cataloging, and preparations in southern california libraries," library resources and technical services, 6 (fall 1962), 337-350. 7. bregzis, ritvars: "the onulp bibliographic control system: an evaluation," in university of illinois graduate school of library science: proceedings of 1965 clinic on library applications of data processing (urbana: university of illinois, 1966), pp. 112-140. 8. fasana, paul j.: "automating cataloging functions in conventional libraries," libmry resources and technical services, 7 (fall 1963), 350-365. 9. kilgour, frederick g.: "costs of library catalog cards produced by computer," journal of libmry automation,. 1 (june 1968), 121-127. 10. avram henriette: the marc pilot pro;ect (final report on a project sponsored by library resources: chapter viii: "cost models" (washington, d. c.: library of congress, 1968). 11. johnson, richard d.: "a book catalog at stanford," journal of libmry automation, 1 (march 1968), 13-50. to table 7. cost/ card-library of congress catalog cards (july 1968) co 00 extra ..... c ~ all chgs/title -t 5 titles au orders ...... 1st cd of 3 add'l copies same specific subsc for lacking .a lc cards ordered by/for 1-2 cds only or more order cd ordered same tm. subject all cds req info l:"'t .... <:3-' 1) lc # $ .22 $ .10 $ .06 **-~ ~ > 2) author & title .27 .15 .06 ~ 0 ~ 3) series .10 .06 1:::. ..... s· ;::s 4) subject -~---.10 .06 ---<: 0 5) chinese/ japanese/ korean .22-.27 .10-.15 .06 .04 $ .04 !'"""' to .......... .;:.. 6 ) motion pictures & .22-.27 .10.15 .06 .10 .04 filmstrips tj (!) (") (1) 7) phonorecords .22.27 .10.15 .06 .10 .04 3 0"' (1) 8) revised & cross ref. .04 ~'"i ---...... co "' 9) anonymous $ .04 co source-lc cds, july 1968 table 8. catalog card costs cards cost/ card cost/ hour time lc cards $.22-.27 (min order 1-2 cds) } $.04 extra chg all .10-.15 ( 1st cd-3 or more order) orders lacking .04-.06 ( add'l copies same cd-same order ) req. info. blank cards < 3-< 4 for $.01 (j ~ soriginal card ..... c ()'q prepantion $.20-2.34 $2.40-4.70 5-30 min/ cd (j c «> .... card checking ~ before filing $.21 $4.20 3 min/ cd ~ c") 8' ~ correcting «> .......... detected $.12 $2.40 3 min/ cd tj 0 errors t"'' t:p file $.024 $2.40 100 cds/ hr ~ ~ .03 3.00 100 cds!hr l:l p.. .047 4.71 100 cds/ hr "%j 0 store $.01 ~ rj:j ~ reproduce $.0023-.00208 ( ab dick offset press = $.125/bk( 54-60 cds ) ::i: .045 ( xerox-1k-100k cds ) 1:-0 c.:> td 240 journal of library automation vol. 2/4 december, 1969 table 9. (estimated) annual cost of 1000 sq ft of storage space 1)" minnesota state dept. of education ( 1968 )-$520 "source-private communication 2) r&d estimate 04 1968 construction cost $30 sq ft x 1000 sq ft $30,000 100 yrs (life of bldg) +maintenance costs, clean up, etc. ($1 yr/sq ft) $50,000 197 4 construction cost $50 sq ft x 1000 sq ft 100 yrs (life of bldg) +maintenance costs, clean up, etc. ($1 yr/sq ft) ""source-e. graziano, univ. calif. at santa barbara table 10. card catalog cost/ year $ 300/yr $ 1000 $ 1300/ yr $ 500/yr $ 1000 $ 1500/yr given the following variables, 1 card catalog case with a maximum card capacity of 72,000 cards (purchase price-$789) -the cost/ card to store would be $.01. estimated construction cost cost sq ft $30/sq ft maintenance rental@ --;100 yrs est. $.42 sq ft/mo life bldg @ $1/sq ft cost/ yr cabinet ( 6 sq ft) $30.24 $1.80 $ 6.00 $ 38.04 room for users ( 16 sq ft) 80.64 4.80 16.00 101.44 aisles ( 3 sq ft) 15.12 .90 3.00 19.02 catalog table ( 5 sq ft) 25.20 1.50 5.00 31.70 $190.20 + 72,000 cards @ $ .01 (to store) 720.00 total cost /yr $910.20 catalog cost factors/ dolby and forsyth 241 table 11. card catalog maintenance costs estimated requirement space cost/sq ft cost/mo cost/year card catalog cabinet 6 sq ft $ .42 $ 2.52 $ 30.24 room for users -16 sq ft 6.72 80.64 aisles 3 sq ft 1.26 15.12 catalog table 5 sq ft 2.10 25.20 30 sq ft $12.60 $151.20 source-e. graziano, univ. calif. at santa barbara and r&d consultants co. college and research libraries resource sharing or cost shifting?-the unequal burden of cooperative cataloging and ill. in network charles b. lowry the values and reward system that characterize library cooperation are drawn from an environment quite different from that of the modern library network, which is founded on the shared cataloging/ill utility. reflecting as it does an earlier system of values about participation, the reward system for the technology-based network encourages use of but not contribution to the "national library database." this paper examines the dilemmas of participation in resourcesharing networks and proposes solutions based on shifting the inducements toward contribution by remunerating the contributing library for the unit cost of original cataloging and the suggested restructuring. the restructuring suggested is applicable to library network/utilities in general. however, oclc's recently announced "contribution pricing" may serve as a model for changing the reward system, which is a prerequisite to preserve the "national library database" that the oclc represents. cooperation-what is it? in the post-world war ii period, the concept of library cooperation has tended to focus on two primary and critical activities-shared cataloging and interlibrary lending. but in recent years, a more comprehensive notion of the dimensions of library cooperation has become essential to our lexicon. this extends right down to local cooperative activities and includes shared collection development, preservation, and training, particularly for technological purposes .1 to understand the dimensions of library cooperation today, we must understand the modem development of library networks. joan segal notes that "there are implicit levels of networking . . . of several sorts: type-of-library networks, sizeof-library networks, and geographicalarea networks at various aggregations of 2 . area. recently edward walters has applied the social sciences concept of institutions to provide an organizing model to group the variety of organizations that we call library systems, networks, consortia, associations, and cooperatives. he has identified five forms of networking: (1) the unit · cost networks such as oclc or run, with the size and revenue sources to raise . substantial capital for development; (2) the multistate regional auxiliary enterprise networks such as amigos or 50linet, with their low capital investment and fee-based assessment with a more limited ability to amass capital; (3) the authority-sanctioned networks such as illinet and fed link established by governments or government agencies that have jurisdiction and draw on those aucharles b. lowry is director of libraries at the university of texas at arlington, arlington, texas 76019. this article is based on a paper delivered as a keynote address for a miniconference on the cost of cooperation in academic and research libraries jointly sponsored by the university of north texas, school of library and information sciences, and amigos bibliographic council held in denton, texas, may 11, 1988 . • 11 12 college & research libraries thorities for their power to coerce the acceptance of standards and as a source of capital for new projects; (4) the discipline and type-of-library networks that are created for the purpose of sustaining either a discipline, (e.g. law, medicine, and agriculture), or an institutional form (e.g. university or corporation); and (5) local consortia or proximity networks that are founded and sustained because geographical proximity makes library cooperation more timely and often more effective. these latter vary greatly in the kinds of organizations they include, size, governance, and programs. each of the five types of library networks is part of a national library "network picture" that is interlocking in its services and belief systems. one cannot talk about a type of network without defining its relationship with the others. 3 moreover, most academic libraries are members of several of these types of networks. the university of texas at arlington and the university of south alabama-two libraries where the author has most recently been director-have been simultaneously members of four or five types. this degree of participation brings attendant cost and benefits. the question becomes "is the cost outweighed by the benefit?" several problems arise in this networking environment because of the underlying assumptions we have about cooperation, and the need for managerial control based on a realistic cost model in our "not-for-profit industry." there are also numerous hidden or indirect costs to which no attention is paid as we work towards the abstract ideal of cooperation. dilemmas of network resource sharing it has been pointed out frequently that resource sharing in any type of network environment may be used by libraries as a prop to reduce their own obligations to build adequate local resources. 4 moreover, there is a growing concern among larger research libraries that the primary objectives they have for cooperating through utilities-cataloging and interli-: brary loan-are heavily subsidizing services they neither need nor want. 5 there is january 1990 considerable anecdotal and some empirical evidence to illustrate that libraries, including members of arl, take unfair advantage in relation to their contributions to network participation. the assumption is often made that research libraries with the largest budgets and collections are the largest ill net-lenders. however, among those twenty-five arl libraries with the largest budgets, only ten are among the top twenty-five net-lending libraries in arl. of the other fifteen, eleven are not among the arl top forty largest lenders. curiously, of the arl libraries with the twenty-five largest collections, fifteen are not among the twenty-five largest lenders and eleven are not among the arl top forty-exactly the same numeric result. by contrast, nine of the top twenty-five ill net-lenders in arl have budgets that are not among the arl top forty, and eight of the top twenty-five net-lenders have collections which are not in the top forty. 6 these striking numbers indicate clearly that the ethos of ill resource sharing is not necessarily associated with either the largest budgets or collections. an examination of contributed cataloging would likely produce similar results. there certainly has been no lack of conjecture at oclc users council meetings that libraries with extremely high search levels and low holdings and ftu use are ''ripping off" the database. "networking becomes more an economic decision than one of 'apple pie and motherhood.' '' daily, library managers must refuse to acquire new journal titles, cut book expenditures, and in numerous ways decline to acquire materials for patrons because they do not have the money to do so. only in the area of "free" ill do we assume we can get something for nothing. indeed, free ill can become a straw man used in defense of inadequate budgeting for access to materials primary patrons need. paul gherman argues that ''networking becomes more an economic decision than one of 'apple pie and motherhood.' accordingly, the goal of 'the greatest good for the greatest number' is tempered by the recognition that nothing is free, by the desire to avoid exploitative imbalance of services between libraries, and by preference for contractual or cost-based transactions over open-ended moral commitment."7 criticism of the value of network cooperatives comes not just from the academic research libraries but also from the public library sector. notable among these is thomas ballard. he states that, ''an entirely unsubstantiated belief in cooperative resource sharing as the best way to improve library services has been considered sufficient reason to spend millions of dollars. this is dogma-purely and simply." ballard offers criticism at another level, calling into question the basic assumptions of cooperative network activities with a belief that ''for the patron, bibliographic networking is merely a return to closed stack concept," and that the ''levels of inter-library loan indicate that people really don't want everything. " 8 such opinions from colleagues no doubt raise hackles among the majority in our profession. this occurs because of an intricate belief system that (1) no library has the resources to satisfy all its patrons' needs, (2) library cooperative efforts will fill the gap between patron needs and resources, (3) a national library network built from the bottom up is a self evident good, and (4) libraries have a democractic responsibility to minimize the gap between the information rich and the information poor. 9 library networking even received pontifical support when in 1982 "pope john paul ii ... expressed deep interest in the theological library network founded . . . in rome by 60 representatives of pontifical universities and other catholic as well as non-catholic institutions. " 10 squaring "belief systems" and behaviors how do we reconcile our belief systems with the reality of behavior among institutional participants in library cooperation? resource sharing 13 with the emergence in the 1970s of major bibliographic utilities containing large extraordinarily rich electronic databases, the foundation was laid for the development of a complex array of networking arrangements. today, the local library cooperative is possible only as part of this larger scheme. these utilities came into existence and libraries became cooperating members for two primary reasons-toreduce the cost of cataloging library materials and to use the databases built in this process as a new vehicle for interlibrary lending. no one wants to go back to doing things pre-1970, because the utilities have been extraordinarily effective in helping libraries reduce the cost of labor-intensive manual systems. 11 nonetheless, there are inherent temptations in the way we structure member participation, which encourage libraries to ignore the belief system and to take advantage of their peers. two examples of this structural problem-ill and shared cataloging-are the focus of the balance of this paper. these two activities alone are fundamental illustrations of the great success of automated/electronic networks, and probably point the way to the most cost-effective cooperative activities of the future. 12 however, they are not without flaws. in the discussion which follows, oclc is the prominent example, but the other major bibliographic utilities are affected by similar conditions with the same results. interlibra y loan interlibrary loan should properly be characterized as interlibrary sacrifice, because we have tended to focus narrowly when determining the cost on a tightly defined range of issues, including local staff time, equipment costs, lending charges by the utilities, charges from the lending library, success or fill rate, and turnaround time. 13 these are not inconsequential issues, but they are not sufficient to help us in determining the real cost benefit of ill cooperation or in defining new ways toestablish an adequate added value to this service. it has been frequently argued that the tradition of "free" interlibrary loan is no longer adequate in the electronic environment of the modern bibliographic utility . 14 college & research libraries and that small libraries will lose their initial euphoria over the good of participation as they approach net lending versus net borrowing. 14 herbert white recently stated that ''our attitude comes from acceptance of interlibrary loan not as a pragmatic commodity, but as a moral precept .... this premise now conflicts directly with our evolving responsibilities as resourse managers accountable to those who fund us and those we serve directly. ''15 the problem, as he sees it, is that the lowest priority in ill becomes lending our materials and the highest priority becomes borrowing materials for our patrons. ''the pricing of oclc/ill charges from the perspective of actual costs or as an inducement to lend makes little sense.'' the ill system as presently constituted tempts participants to make cooperation a one-way street, though many avoid the temptation. "the net lenders know who they are, and they also know that they provide far more than they receive.'' 16 an example of the dilemma is ut arlington libraries' ill department which has long prided itself on handling an oclc/ill request within twenty-four hours and has a well-earned reputation for responding quickly. the net result is that lending is on the increase. if it were not for the fact that requests for borrowing have skyrocketed due to a major surge in doctoral education and externally funded research, uta would have long since been a large netlender. in this situation, a library manager is faced with the dilemma of either adding staff and equipment to the ill department in order to meet demands to lend materials, or setting the principle that borrowing is the first priority and responses to requests to lend will be allowed only when all of the borrowing is done. if we were to adopt this stance, requests to borrow would bypass uta in the oclc queue and, before long, requests would begin to decline. january 1990 the pricing of oclc/ill charges from the perspective of actual costs or as an inducement to lend makes little sense. the borrowing charge is 83 cents, and the lending credit is 20 cents. there is no palpable difference between these two costs from oclc' s perspective, and certainly no reason to encourage lending at so insignificant a level. the 20 cents credit for lending does not even qualify as a sop, although oclc' s primary objective is to support system costs, not encourage ill lending. increasingly we hear calls for the actual ''determination of cost honestly, in terms that meet the accounting criteria of the supplier whose perception is ultimately all that matters. cost is not the same thing as price."17 a recent experiment by the missouri state library in which "lending libraries were reimbursed $5.00 for each item loaned, above the number of items borrowed by that library'' seems to point in a reasonable direction.18 likewise, medical libraries participating in talon pay a $4.00 fee per item borrowed. but the determination of standard costs or the call for standard fees19 will take more than guesswork, and must include new cost elements which will be discussed below. shared cataloging it is curious that the cost structure of shared cataloging has not had the same scrutiny nor produced as much literature as ill. there are two obvious omissions here. the first is that studies of pricing tend to focus on the surcharges added by regional networks to oclc costs. 20 these are of some importance, but they are not paramount since the surcharges are a small percentage of the total cost of cataloging and contribute to direct services of the regional networks. the credit on oclc for original contributed cataloging is $1.00 a record. libraries participating in the "enhance project" receive $1.29 for records which they upgrade. one wonders how many libraries could demonstrate that $1.00, or even a $1.29 compensated them adequately for the expense of original cataloging. on the other hand, the oclc charge for prime time use of a record in the database is $1.29. if there ever was a disincentive to contribute original cataloging, this price structure is it. the truth is that utilities, particularly oclc, have reaped the benefit of added value of cataloging supplied by libraries to their union databases. at present oclc estimates that member input (including gpo and nal) is about 76 percent of current cataloging in the oluc (oclc online union catalog). although libraries have viewed utilities as entities they have created to do work for hire, the reality is that libraries are supplying piece-work cataloging to the utilities at a sweat labor price which is resold to other libraries for a tidy sum. how do we correct these shortcomings and remove the temptation to reduce our costs at the expense of other libraries by waiting for some other library to assume the cost of original cataloging? cost -benefit criterion and unit cost method the cost benefit criterion theme stated simply is that as a system changes its expected additional benefits usually must exceed its expected additional costs. 21 there have been numerous calls for cost benefit or cost effectiveness analysis. this always sounds complex. perhaps it can be simplified. 22 kaye gapen says it is time to begin treating the ''access cost'' as equal to the "collection cost." put another way, ''there will be new choices to be made in smaller libraries between low fixed costs and high incremental costs per search strategy. larger libraries are more likely to choose the high fixed cost and low incremental cost strategy at least for very commonly used datafiles. " 23 . cost benefit would work something like this: a library borrowing on ill pays to the lending institution a cost based on the high fixed cost experienced by the lending institution for maintaining materials in its collection and recovering them for lending purposes. similarly, a library contributing original cataloging benefits from this labor in a manner equivalent to the effort and expense of its work. in either case, there is a positive inducement to cooperate and share collection resources or cataloging labor and no inducement to take advantage of the system. the actual unit cost for ill activities resource sharing 15 must be established in order to judge the cost benefit. "techniques have been developed permitting uniform cost analysis for varying libraries. these techniques take into account the fact that nearly all the direct budget contributes to more than one service (book stock and technical services), are a kind of overhead, and that details of cost allocation depend on the actual levels of service rendered. " 24 obviously, unit cost will vary from library to library, but a sample can provide a relatively standard method of determining unit costs. a good example of the unit cost method is the work done recently at virginia tech. 25 how would this work in our electronic network environment? put another way, how will unit cost be established and who will pay? examples of ill and cataloging help explain the use of the cost benefit and unit cost approach. to use white's phrase, ill is temporary acquisition. ''the real decision is between permanent and temporary acquisition. permanent acquisition costs more initially, but that cost is not repeated for each future use. temporary acquisition costs less one time, but if it is repeated the costs reach an equal level. " 26 we should also recognize that each time a library lends through ill it may lose an opportunity for its own patrons to use an item in which it has invested at high fixed cost. this happens in two ways. first, the item may not be on the shelf when the patron goes to look for it. second, there is a loss due to wear-and-tear on the item which now has one less circulation in its expected ''life span." a recent in-house study entitled ''cost data for the virginia tech library" established the total cost of purchase and shelving monograph volumes at $106 each and the total cost for purchase and shelving of serials volumes at $181 each. this per item investment represents a finite number of uses, and each time a library lends materials to non primary patrons the net result is a potential loss on that investment. assuming 25 circulations per item for a typical publishers book binding, virginia tech is dissipating $4.24 per monograph for each ill loan that it makes. 17 likewise, if a "class a" serial binding lasts 50 circulations, the loss per photocopy-loan 16 college & research libraries amounts to $3.62. conversely, the borrowing library is saving an equal amount. an arl library lending 70,000 items per year (half books and half serial copies) has lost $275,100 of its capital investment in collections. using the unit cost method, a formula could be developed that factors in the lending libraries staff expenditures, periodical expenditures and monograph expenditures of over a five-year period. the staff expenditure would have to be indexed on the average salary for staff. periodical expenditures would be indexed on the average cost per title and book expenditures on the average cost per volume. this would take into account regional differences in wages and the variable character of collecting costs depending on the relative emphasis in each institution on different types of materials. it might also be helpful to develop an index of collection size, because there is an implicit cost for maintenance, although this may be captured in the staff cost index. by gathering these statistics, annually libraries would provide the basis for establishing the unit cost for lending both photocopy and book stock. this unit cost would be an added value to the interlibrary loan transaction, which would be paid directly to the lending institution by the borrowing institution. a palpable billing nightmare could be caused by such a system, but there is a simple way out. it has been suggested that ''since oclc already bills requestors for its own transaction fee, it could possibly expand that accounting capability to include collecting and disbursing ill fees. " 28 at its march 16, 1989, meeting the amigos board voted to request formally that such a scheme of payment be incorporated into the oclc "new system" design. that action was based on a white paper submitted by the amigos ill policy review committee. the white paper proposes that each year participating libraries supply oclc with their ill charges based on type of materials. ~hese ill charges, or the actual unit cost, would be posted on the oclc system in the name and address directory. obviously, libraries would make borrowing choices, at least in part, based on these borrowing january 1990 charges. when a library borrowed material, the unit cost (ill charge) of the lending library would be added to the oclc borrowing charge. on a monthly basis the difference between lending and borrowing costs would be reconciled for oclc billing. this sort of system would not cause a billing and paying nightmare, but would eliminate one that currently exists for some libraries. for instance, a state of texas payment voucher for ill costs uta libraries, the university and the state more than $40.00 in paperwork expenses just to pay the lending library as little as a dollar. moreover, this sort of unit-cost system would not prevent libraries from continuing existing arrangements of reciprocal borrowing agreement,s if they chose to do so. ''the real cost of original cataloging is significantly higher than the oclc payment for original contributed cataloging or the 'enhance project.' " many libraries are moving toward unit cost recovery, whether they call it that or not. furthermore, each library could choose to fund this real ill acquisition cost or pass on the expense to their patrons. in any event, a library choosing in favor of a ''high cost per transaction but a small fixed cost'' would bear the responsiblity for that choice and interlibrary loan would cease to be interlibrary sacrifice.29 the cost of cooper:ative cataloging presents a slightly different set of issues, but deserves much more discussion than it has received. the point was made earlier that the cost of original cataloging is significantly higher than the oclc payment for original contributed cataloging or the ''enhance project.'' establishing the unit cost for cataloging in an individual library is probably not necessary. instead, a sample of cost elements in cataloging for a number of libraries could be used to establish an average unit cost for original cataloging of different formats perhaps at a minimum of $50 per title. any library would be entitled to payment for its contributions to the oluc based on these unit costs which would certainly be far higher than the present payment for original input. when would a library be entitled to payment? there are several possibilities. payment could be made at the time of the initial input of the record if the title had not already been cataloged or if the recataloging was being done by an "enhance" library. a better system would pay a library when the cataloging copy was used by another library, either by paying in a lump sum (e.g., $50.00) or paying incrementally for each use of the record until the lump sum was reached (e.g., $5.00 a use up to the maximum of $50.00). the latter method has the advantage of letting re-use of the record establish its fair market value. this brings us to one final question. who will pay the unit cost for this original cataloging? the point was made earlier that the added value for original cataloging is contributed by the member libraries, and at least in some measure it is represented in oclc' s corporate equity $49 million or net worth. 30 thus, oclc should pay the lion's share of this new unit cost. conclusions oclc recognizes that the structure of member participation-whether ill or contributed cataloging-induces use of, but not contribution to the oluc. during the last year, oclc has been exploring ways to resolve this dilemma. recently it announced a highly innovative restructuring of pricing arrangements called ''contribution pricing.'' if implemented as planned in 1990, the structure of "contribution pricing'' may well provide a foundation for resolving the problems of the present network arrangement. briefly, the new scheme makes ''least cost participation occur at full database contribution levels" by charging for access (bibliographic searches and holdings displays) and giving credits for contribution (original cataloging, add/ delete holdings, create/update ldr' s, and ill lending and requesting). removal of economic temptation to contribute less and reward resource sharing 17 for continued full cataloging and holdings contribution are among the benefits the oclc says should arise from ''contribution pricing." whether the reward for contributed cataloging will reflect the real unit cost depends on how realistic oclc is about paying libraries for the added value they provide to oluc. whether the temptation to borrow first and lend later is diminished will depend on whether an accounting mechanism for recovery of the unit cost of lending is provided in the new system for those libraries that wish to use it. oclc deserves credit for understanding a fundamental flaw inherent in the structure of network participation and praise for a creative new approach to remedying it. 31 moreover, the preservation of the national library database, which has figured largely in recent debates over ownership of bibliographic records (e.g., oclc copyright) and the encouragement of broad participation by libraries in building that database is likely to be dependent on just such a change. so long as the inducements in our network arrangements reward borrowing, using original cataloging contributed by other libraries, or downloading records without setting the holdings byte-we may expect the present state of affairs to continue. unequal contribution is a natural and expected outcome. what should surprise us is that many, perhaps most, libraries make an honest effort to contribute their share. the point argued here is that the inducements should have long since been arranged to reward participation. this paper touches on the two most successful examples of cooperation in the electronic environment-shared cataloging and interlibrary lending. there are potential areas of cooperation that we are just beginning to explore including collection development, preservation, and training. these incipient activities will present many of the same issues as those of cataloging and ill. thus, the library community faces a significant challenge in resolving the current dilemmas explored in this paper. we should be reminded in this undertaking of the old adage "not to decide, is to decide." 18 college & research libraries january 1990 references and notes 1. richard m. dougherty, "resource sharing among research libraries: how it ought to work/' collection management 9:79-80 (2/3, summer/fall 1987); edward m. walters, "the issues and needs of local library consortium," journal of library administration 8:25-28 (3/4, fall/winter 1987); and irene b. hoadley, "the future of networks and oclc/' journal of library administration 8:85-87 (3/4, fall/winter, 1987). 2. joan s. segal, "networks," in financing information services: problems, changing approaches, and new opportunities for academic and research libraries, ed. by peter spyers-duran and thomas w. mann, jr. new directions in librarianship, no.6, p.141 (westport, conn.: greenwood press, 1985). 3. walters, p.15-24. 4. richard degennaro, "resource sharing in a network environment/' library journal104:355 (feb. 1, 1980); dougherty, p.80; and donald e. riggs, "networking and institutional planning/' journal of library administration 8:64 (3/4, fall/winter 1987). 5. thomas w. shaughnessy, "management perspectives on network membership," journal of library administration 8:10 (3/4, fall/winter 1987). 6. association of research libraries, arl statistics, 1987-88 (washington, d.c.: association of research libraries, 1989), p.42, 49, 54, 55. 7. paul m. gherman, "vision and reality: the research libraries and networking," journal of library administration 8:52 (3/4, fall/winter 1987). 8. thomas ballard, "dogma clouds the facts/' american libraries 257 (april, 1985); see also richard t. sweeney, "financial impacts of networking and resource sharing/' public library quarterly 2:91-94 (3/4, fall/winter 1981). 9. walters, p.23. 10. "pope encourages library network/' catholic library world 53:418 (may/june, 1982). 11. see, for instance, kazuko m. dailey, grazia jaroff, and diana gray. "rlin and oclc-side by side: two comparisons studies,'' in advances in library administration and organization, ed. by gerard mccabe, bernard kreissman, and w. carl jackson, v.1 (greenwich, conn.: jai press, 1982); elaine kemp and others, "a comparison of oclc, rlg/rlin, and wln," journal of library automation 14:215-30 (3, september, 1981); danuta a. nitecki, "online interlibrary services: an informal comparison of five systems/' rq 20:7-14 (fall1981). 12. sweeney, p.95. 13. gloria s. cline, "the high price of interlibrary loan service" rq 27:80-86 (fall1987); izabella taler, "automated and manual ill: time effectiveness and success rate" information technologies and libraries 1:277-80 (september 1982). 14. de gennaro, p.353. 15. herbert s. white, "interlibrary loan: an old idea in a new setting" library journal112:53 (july 1987). 16. ibid. 17. ibid. 18. richardt. miller, "net lending: a follow-up report" show-me libraries 38:3-4 (august 1987). 19. see, for instance, cline, p.80-86. 20. leslie r. morris, "network prices: let the buyer beware" technical services quarterly 4:57-66 (summer 1987). 21. charles t. horngren, introduction to management accounting (englewood cliffs, n.j.: prenticehall, inc., 6th ed., 1984), p.13-16, 685. · 22. martin m. cummings, "cost analysis: methods and realities/' library administration and management, 3:181-83 (fall1989); and paul metz, "special pleading versus self-discipline in the financing of public services" journal of academic librarianship, 14:208-13 (sept. 1988). 23. d. kaye gapen, "strategies for networking in the next ten years" journal of library administration 8:118-27 (fall/winter 1987). 24. paul b. kantor, "the relation between costs and services in academic libraries/' p.74. in financing information services: problems, changing approaches, and new opportunities for academic and research libraries. ed. by peter spyers-duran and thomas w. mann, jr. new directions in librarianship, no.6 (westport, conn.: greenwood press, 1985). resource sharing 19 25. paul m. gherman and lynn scott cochran, "developing and using unit costs: the virginia tech experience" library administration and management 3:93-96 (2, spring 1989). 26. white, p.54. 27. for an average number of circulations, see maurice f. tauber. ed., library binding manual: a handbook of useful procedures for the maintenance of library volumes (boston, mass.: library binding institute, 1972), p.22-24, 36-37, 140. 28. de gennaro, p.354. 29. gapen, p.127. 30. online computerized library center, inc., oclc annual report, 1987/88 (dublin, ohio: oclc, inc., 1988), p.l. 31. the description of "contribution pricing" provided here is based on handouts and presentations by oclc staff given during the amigos bibliographic council, inc. membership meeting in dallas, texas, may 17, 1988, and the oclc users council meeting in dublin, ohio, may 25-26, 1989, both attended by the author. bordeianu.p65 532 college & research libraries november 1999 paraprofessional catalogers in arl libraries sever bordeianu and virginia seiser the authors conducted a survey of arl member libraries to identify the minimum education and experience required of paraprofessional cata­ logers. the majority of surveyed libraries responded that they use para­ professionals to catalog various types of materials. a higher number of libraries use paraprofessionals in copy cataloging than in original cata­ loging. although no single model of education and training for parapro­ fessional catalogers exists, certain patterns emerge. the educational expectations for copy catalogers are lower than those for original cata­ logers. training takes place on the job. the library profession is not as far along in developing structured paraprofessional degree requirements along the same lines as other professions, such as law or medicine. t the beginning of this century, graduates of the newly created library schools were being hired to fill positions formerly held by staff members who had acquired their knowledge of library work on the job. the appearance of librarians with professional degrees diminished the op­ portunities for nondegreed staff to work their way up within the system. as we approach the end of the century, the pen­ dulum appears to be swinging the other way. a number of academic libraries are hiring paraprofessionals to do some jobs that were formerly restricted to librarians with the mls degree. however, this is not uniformly the case. nor is there general agreement about important issues such as hiring prerequisites, on-the-job train­ ing, and promotion criteria among those libraries that are hiring paraprofession­ als to fill higher-level positions. the university of new mexico gen­ eral library has a number of successful examples of staff members with little postsecondary education, but high apti­ tude, and many years of library experi­ ence, who have taken advantage of op­ portunities for on-the-job training to work their way up to higher-level paraprofes­ sional positions. recently however, the university of new mexico human re­ sources department implemented a new staff job classification system for the en­ tire campus, including the libraries. from the library perspective, two of the more controversial features of the new staff classification system were the signifi­ cantly more stringent education require­ ments for higher-level paraprofessional positions and the absence of a provision to allow experience to be substituted for years of education in meeting minimum requirements. some library staff members sever bordeianu is head of the serials cataloging section at the university of new mexico; e-mail: sbordeia@unm.edu. virginia seiser is director, budget and personnel, at the university of new mexico; e-mail: vseiser@unm.edu. 532 mailto:vseiser@unm.edu mailto:sbordeia@unm.edu paraprofessional catalogers in arl libraries 533 who had worked their way up to higherlevel positions under the old system now found themselves “grandfathered in” to positions they could not have qualified for under the new system. for some, per­ sonal circumstances made it unfeasible to take more than one college course per semester. at that rate, such staff members would qualify for retirement before they could meet the degree requirements even to qualify for a transfer to another posi­ tion in their current grade, much less for a promotion to the next higher grade. this had a significant negative effect on the morale of some of the library’s outstand­ ing staff members. the university had created a “sheepskin ceiling.” when the university established a committee to make recommendations about career ladders within the library “job family,” the opportunity was taken to address the issue of education require­ ments for specific library positions. to provide more context for the discussion, information was gathered from compa­ rable libraries elsewhere in the country. literature review discussions about the role of paraprofes­ sionals in libraries abound in the library literature. this is not surprising, given the estimate that paraprofessionals constitute between 50 and 85 percent of the library workforce.1 jennifer a. younger has as­ serted that support staff have assumed increasingly responsible assignments in libraries, and by the mid-1990s, the bal­ ance in libraries is shifting toward more support staff and fewer librarians.2 these statements pertain to all areas of librarianship, in both public and techni­ cal services. this article focuses on the role of paraprofessionals in cataloging. the term paraprofessional is used here to mean a library employee who does not have master ’s degree in library/information science. the participation of paraprofessionals in cataloging activities is amply docu­ mented in the library literature. several studies performed during the past two decades have indicated that paraprofes­ sional participation in cataloging has been increasing steadily since 1977.3 two sur­ veys of arl libraries confirm these find­ ings. in 1986, sharon e. clark found that of fifteen respondents to a survey sent to nineteen arl member libraries, most re­ ported that staff performed copy catalog­ ing.4 in 1997, deborah a. mohr and anita schunemann reported that 77 percent of arl respondents to a 1995 survey indi­ cated that paraprofessionals were in­ volved in some form of original catalog­ ing.5 most other articles on this topic have reported similar findings and agree with daren callahan and judy macleod’s as­ sertion that “responsibility for much of the copy cataloging and even some simple original cataloging is increasingly given to paraprofessionals.”6 although the trend toward increased participation of paraprofessionals in cata­ loging is recognized in the literature, there is also agreement that these catalogers need to be trained. opinions differ about the level of cataloging appropriate to as­ sign to paraprofessionals, ranging from simple copy cataloging to complex origi­ nal cataloging. the literature provides little detailed information on the educa­ tional background or number of years of relevant experience necessary for a para­ professional to perform specific catalog­ ing assignments. in a study of job descriptions for para­ professional catalogers for the years 1975, 1981, and 1990, carol p. johnson found that during this period, paraprofessional jobs were not significantly upgraded due to automation. however, she stated that due to this changing environment, the analysis of qualifications needed to per­ form at each level of the library organiza­ tion is “a legitimate subject of research.”7 sheila s. intner, a prominent library educator, asserted that the education of copy catalogers is different from that of professionals and envisions an educa­ tional system for paraprofessional cata­ logers similar to that for paraprofession­ als in the fields of law and medicine, with­ out giving specifics as to what should be taught in these programs.8 claire-lise 534 college & research libraries november 1999 benaud mentioned a bachelor’s degree and an unspecified number of years of experience as a minimum requirement for paraprofessional catalogers.9 callahan and mcleod concluded that because re­ quired skills for paraprofessional catalog­ ers have changed from typing and filing skills to experience with computer appli­ cations and an understanding of library organization, paraprofessionals need a comprehensive education that encour­ ages critical thinking.10 two articles have addressed specific requirements for either education or train­ ing. robert m. hiatt described in detail the education and training required of paraprofessional catalogers at the library of congress in 1987.11 at that time, cata­ logers at the library specialized in either descriptive or subject cataloging. the sys­ tem had an elaborate formula for provid­ ing an equivalent to the mls through substitution of a ba and three years of general or two years of specialized library experience for descriptive catalogers. in the case of subject catalogers, a subject master’s degree could be substituted for the ba and/or mls. in both cases, exper­ tise in at least two foreign languages also was required. james s. chervinko pro­ vided a five-step model to be used in the training of paraprofessional catalogers.12 the model assumes certain prerequisites, such as the trainee’s familiarity with the marc record and aacr2, broad subject competence, knowledge of a foreign lan­ guage, the capacity to recognize problems and the willingness to ask questions, as well as compatibility between trainer and trainee. the five steps consist of learning and mastering increasingly complex cata­ loging tasks, starting with simple adap­ tive cataloging and ending with less-than­ complex original cataloging. these two reports provide useful information on some of the educational and training re­ quirements for paraprofessional catalog­ ers. the most comprehensive study on the role of paraprofessionals in libraries was conducted by larry r. oberg, mark e. mentges, p. n. mcdermott, and vitoon harusadangkul in 1992. from a sample of nearly 500 libraries, consisting of arl libraries and carnegie classification uni­ versities, the authors received 390 usable responses. the study was broad and looked at all aspects of paraprofessional involvement in libraries. for cataloging, the findings indicated that over 90 per­ cent of arl libraries assign copy catalog­ ing to paraprofessionals, 51 percent assign original description, and 36 percent as­ sign original description, subject analy­ sis, and classification. the numbers are slightly lower for the study’s non-arl sample.13 regarding education, the study found 93 percent of arl respondents re­ quired a high school degree of all or some of their employees, 58 percent an associ­ ate degree, 76 percent a bachelor ’s degree, and 24 percent a graduate degree. of the carnegie sample libraries, the study re­ ported that 98 percent required a high school degree, 62 percent an associate degree, 64 percent a bachelor ’s degree, and 9 percent a graduate degree.14 ninetyseven percent of arl libraries and 65 per­ cent of carnegie libraries reported that they employ at least some paraprofession­ als who hold a degree higher than what is required. this finding seems to indi­ cate that educational requirements for paraprofessionals in research libraries does not present a problem in the area of employee recruitment, as candidates of­ ten exceed the minimum required edu­ cation level. another landmark study was con­ ducted by patricia a. eskoz over a fouryear period. eskoz sent a survey to the cataloging departments of 106 libraries in 1983–1984 and followed up with forty of the original respondents via phone inter­ views in 1986–1987.15 although the pur­ pose of the study was to determine the organizational structures of cataloging departments and to analyze their evolu­ tion over the time period under scrutiny, the study did reveal the increased in­ volvement of paraprofessionals in cata­ loging activities. the article did not ad­ dress the issue of qualification or train­ ing but did state that “cataloging is not a http:1986�1987.15 http:degree.14 http:sample.13 http:catalogers.12 http:thinking.10 paraprofessional catalogers in arl libraries 535 mystical art and most of the skills re­ quired can be learned on the job.”16 this observation, though not empirical, is sig­ nificant because it expresses unequivo­ cally the attitude of many professionals toward the learning and acquisition of cataloging skills. the decision was made to focus on paraprofessional cataloging posi­ tions because the tasks performed in cataloging are more standardized across libraries than seems to be the case for other types of library positions. the literature indicates that most librar­ ies have in-house training programs for paraprofessional catalogers. jane b. robbins stated that the teaching of cata­ loging is taking place in libraries rather than library schools.17 clark’s 1987 survey of nineteen arl libraries found that slightly more than half the responding li­ braries operated a formal training pro­ gram.18 judith hudson reported that these programs vary from structured classes to individualized one-on-one training.19 there is also some indication that the train­ ing of paraprofessionals is similar to that of entry-level professional catalogers.20,21 several authors mentioned that whatever the format of the training programs, they are unnecessarily time-consuming.22,23 finally, there is agreement in the lit­ erature that the status of paraprofessional catalogers is an issue. despite the fact that paraprofessionals are increasingly re­ sponsible for the creation of cataloging records in libraries, their salaries and per­ quisites lag behind those of professional catalogers. several authors expressed opinions on how to address these inequi­ ties. johnson stated that improvement in the status of paraprofessionals depends on the level of authority, autonomy, and skill assigned to a job.24 chervinko as­ serted that after paraprofessionals have reached the highest level of competency, presumably similar to that of professional catalogers, they should be given the same rewards and rights as the professionals: job classification upgrades, travel sup­ port, time off to study foreign languages, and the proper computer equipment.25 methodology arl has 121 members representing the major research institutions in the united states and canada. the membership in­ cludes 110 academic libraries, among them, the university of new mexico. arl maintains an electronic list service link­ ing the library directors for its academic library members by e-mail. in august 1998, the unm general library submit­ ted a brief questionnaire by electronic mail to that list. the decision was made to focus on paraprofessional cataloging positions be­ cause the tasks performed in cataloging are more standardized across libraries than seems to be the case for other types of library positions. the questionnaire was designed to be short and simple to encourage quick response. the questions concerned minimum education and ex­ perience requirements for paraprofes­ sional cataloging positions at two levels: copy cataloging and original cataloging. the results of the initial survey were sufficiently interesting to encourage the authors to send out a second request for information to those arl academic librar­ ies that had not initially responded. this was done in february 1999. the same questions were asked and the same ex­ planatory paragraph used, but this time the query was sent to the library admin­ istrator who appeared to have responsi­ bility for the library’s overall cataloging effort. usually, that individual was the head of the catalog department. all but four of the queries were sent electronically to the personal e-mail address of the ad­ ministrator; the remaining four were sent by u.s. mail when a personal e-mail ad­ dress could not be readily identified. results thirty-one arl academic library direc­ tors provided responses to the august 1998 query, and an additional twentyseven libraries responded to the febru­ http:equipment.25 http:training.19 http:schools.17 536 college & research libraries november 1999 table 1 postsecondary education as a minimum requirement for a paraprofessional cataloging position no equivalent position no postsecondary requirement copy cataloger 9 15.5% 26 44.8% original cataloger 19 32.8% 13 22.4% postsecondary education can substitute for experience education and experience interchangeable postsecondary education required 4 8 11 6.9% 13.8% 19.0% 6 2 18 10.3% 3.4% 31.0% total 58 100% 58 99.9%* *due to rounding ary 1999 query, for a total of fifty-eight responses. the combined response rate was 52.7 percent. the questionnaire responses were di­ vided into five categories: 1. no equivalent position (paraprofes­ sionals do not perform the cataloging tasks described in the questionnaire). 2. no postsecondary requirement (education beyond high school is not a prerequisite for hiring paraprofessionals at this level). 3. postsecondary education required (education beyond high school is a pre­ requisite for hiring paraprofessionals at this level). 4. postsecondary education can be substituted for experience (education be­ yond high school is not an absolute pre­ requisite but can be counted in lieu of some the years of work experience required for hiring paraprofessionals at this level). 5. education and experience inter­ changeable (prerequisites for hiring para­ professionals at this level can be met by a specified number of years of postsecondary education or work experi­ ence or a combination of both). the number of responses in each of these five categories are shown in table 1. paraprofessional copy cataloging positions following are the results for questions about paraprofessional copy cataloging positions: 1. no equivalent position: nine librar­ ies (15.5%) reported that they did not have copy cataloger positions for paraprofes­ sional staff. 2. no postsecondary requirement: twenty-six libraries (44.8%) did not count postsecondary education toward the minimum requirements for paraprofes­ sional positions for copy catalogers. of these twenty-six, three required no expe­ rience and three required a passing grade on an examination. the work experience for the remaining libraries ranged from one to six years: three libraries required one year of experience; seven required two years; one required three years; three required four years; and one required six years. five libraries required experience but did not specify the number of years required. these results are summarized in table 2. 3. postsecondary education required: eleven libraries (19%) required postsecondary edu­ cation for paraprofessional copy cataloger positions. the number of years of postsecondary education required ranged from two to four: four libraries required two years of postsecondary education; one required a three-year diploma (cana­ dian); and six required four years of col­ lege and/or a bachelor ’s degree. of the eleven libraries, ten required experience in addition to education. for those libraries that had a specific requirement for years of work experience, the range was from one to five years: five libraries required paraprofessional catalogers in arl libraries 537 5. education and expe-table 2 rience interchangeable: experience required when postsecondary eight libraries (13.8%)education does not count toward meeting had requirements that al-minimum requirements lowed years of expericopy cataloger no experience required 3 exam required 3 "some" experience required 5 1 year of experience required 3 2 years of experience required 7 3 years of experience required 1 4 years of experience required 3 5 years of experience required o 6 years of experience required 1 total 26 one year of work experience in addition to a specified number of years of postsecondary education; one library required two years of work experience; one required three years; and one, five years. two libraries required work experience in addition to a bachelor’s degree but did not specify the number of years. these results are shown in table 3. 4. postsecondary education can be sub­ stituted for experience: four libraries (6.9%) required work experience but allowed years of postsecondary education to be substituted for part of the experience. the formulas used varied, but all specified at least one year of experience with some level of postsecondary education or four to five years of experience without addi­ tional education. ence and postsecondaryoriginal education to be countedcataloger interchangeably, using o variations on a one-to­2 one or two-to-one for­2 mula. the sum of yearso required varied from two 6 to five years.1 1 paraprofessional2 original cataloging2 positions16 following are the re­ sults for the questions about paraprofessional original catalog­ ing positions: 1. no equivalent position: nineteen li­ braries (32.8%) reported that they did not have original cataloger positions for para­ professional staff. 2. no postsecondary requirement: thir­ teen libraries (22.4%) did not count postsecondary education toward the minimum requirements for paraprofes­ sional positions for original catalogers. all thirteen required either a passing grade on an examination or years of work ex­ perience. two libraries required a pass­ ing grade on an examination. the work experience requirement for the remaining libraries ranged from two to six years: three libraries required two years of ex­ perience; one required three years; one table 3 combined minimum requirements for those paraprofessional copy cataloging positions requiring postsecondary education years of experience o "some" 2 3 4 5 2 years of college 3-year degree* 4 years of college bachelor's degree 2 2 3 *canadian technical program diploma 538 college & research libraries november 1999 table 4 combined minimum requirements for those paraprofessional original cataloging positions requiring post-secondary education. years of experience o "some" 2 3 4 5 2 years of college 3-year degree* 4 years of college bachelor's degree 3 2 2 4 2 2 *canadian technical program diploma required four years; two required five years; and two required six years. two libraries required work experience but did not specify the number of years. the results are summarized in table 2. 3. postsecondary education required: eighteen libraries (31%) required post­ secondary education for paraprofessional positions for original catalogers. the number of years of postsecondary edu­ cation required ranged from two to four: one library required two years of postsecondary education; two required a three-year diploma (canadian); and fif­ teen required four years of college and/ or a bachelor ’s degree. all but one of the eighteen libraries required work experi­ ence. for those libraries that had a spe­ cific requirement for years of work expe­ rience, the range was from one to three years: four libraries required one year of experience; six required two years; and four required three years. three libraries required work experience in addition to a bachelor ’s degree but did not specify a number of years of experience. these re­ sults are shown in table 4. 4. postsecondary education can be sub­ stituted for experience: six libraries (10.3%) required experience but allowed years of postsecondary education to be substi­ tuted for part of the experience. the for­ mulas used were quite varied. 5. education and experience interchange­ able: two libraries (3.4%) had require­ ments that allowed years of experience and postsecondary education to be counted interchangeably, on a one-to-one basis. the sum of years required was four in one case and five in the other. comments a number of responding libraries quali­ fied their responses concerning minimum requirements by indicating that addi­ tional education and/or experience was preferred and that most or all of the in­ cumbents in the positions had more than the minimum. the brief questionnaire did not ask specifically about the existence of an examination, so it is possible that more libraries in the sample required an exam than were reported here. several librar­ ies noted that although they had a sys­ tem on paper specifying the minimum re­ quirements that outside applicants needed to be considered for positions at that level, the fact was that all the exist­ ing positions had been filled by promo­ tion from within the library. a number of libraries qualified their responses regarding minimum require­ ments for experience with terms such as relevant or cataloging or library experience. in the case of original cataloging posi­ tions, a few libraries specified that candi­ dates had to have experience in the next lower grade; paraprofessionals in those libraries were expected to “work their way up” from copy cataloging to origi­ nal cataloging within the employing li­ brary. some libraries volunteered information about specific skill requirements, such as computer skills or foreign-language abil­ ity, in addition to years of experience and paraprofessional catalogers in arl libraries 539 education. of the libraries requiring postsecondary education, a few were spe­ cific about the type of academic program or courses taken. some required a two-year associate degree (u.s.) or a three-year tech­ nical program diploma (canada); others specified course work in cataloging. discussion as shown in table 1, most of the respond­ ing libraries reported that they employed paraprofessionals to do cataloging. how­ ever, fewer libraries reported using para­ professionals to do original cataloging than copy cataloging. a higher number of libraries use paraprofessionals in copy cataloging (84.5% of respondents) than in original cataloging (67% of respon­ dents). the majority of libraries that did em­ ploy paraprofessional copy catalogers did not require postsecondary education to meet the minimum qualifications for the position. however, many indicated that additional education was desirable and some implied that it was highly unlikely that anyone without additional education would be a successful candidate, given the competition for the job. most required some experience to meet the minimum qualifications regardless of level of educa­ tion, and some were very specific about the type of experience required. the librar­ ies indicating that an examination was re­ quired implied that this was a measure of work experience, in lieu of specifying a specific number of years of experience. the responses from the libraries em­ ploying paraprofessional original catalog­ ers were less clear-cut regarding postsecondary education as a minimum requirement (see table 1). excluding the gray area of libraries using formulas for comparability of education and experi­ ence, a few more libraries reported a mini­ mum requirement for postsecondary edu­ cation than those who reported no mini­ mum requirement. of those reporting no minimum postsecondary education re­ quirement, many volunteered the informa­ tion that it was preferred. only one library did not require either some experience or a passing grade on a qualifying examina­ tion for a paraprofessional position doing original cataloging, and that one was a case requiring a bachelor ’s degree. of those reporting a minimum requirement for postsecondary education, the largest clus­ ter of responses was for four years of col­ lege and/or a bachelor ’s degree, as well as two years of experience (see table 4). conclusion the findings of the current study agree with other reports from the literature. the majority of surveyed libraries responded that they use paraprofessionals to cata­ log various types of materials. a higher number of libraries use paraprofession­ als in copy cataloging (84.5% of respon­ dents) than in original cataloging (67% of respondents). although no singular model of education and training for para­ professional catalogers exists, certain pat­ terns become apparent when analyzing the data from responding libraries. as would be expected, the educational requirements for copy catalogers are lower than they are for original catalogers. only 19 percent of respondents required a postsecondary degree for copy catalogers. for the rest of the respondents, the require­ ments ranged from no postsecondary edu­ cation to a combination of either some edu­ cation or some years of experience. postsecondary education for original para­ professional catalogers was required by 31 percent of respondents. the rest of the li­ braries required a variety of other qualifi­ cations, ranging from a passing grade on an examination to multiple years of expe­ rience. in some cases, experience or postsecondary education can be used in­ terchangeably, but libraries use different formulas for calculating their equivalence. comments provided by respondents to the questionnaire corroborate another finding from the literature. in many cases, appli­ cants or incumbents in library paraprofes­ sional positions exceed the minimum re­ quirements for that position. 540 college & research libraries the picture that emerges from this study is that although the educational require­ ments for paraprofessional catalogers are not codified to the same extent as for pro­ fessional catalogers, there is some similar­ ity among libraries in their expectations for these staff. informal comments provided by respondents, findings from the literature, and direct observation also suggest that the higher-level paraprofessional catalogers usually reach their position by promotion from within, presumably after learning the necessary skills and advancing to the next stage of cataloging complexity. november 1999 the library profession is not as far along in developing structured parapro­ fessional degree requirements as other professions are (such as law or medicine), even though the literature discusses this possibility.26 the canadian system and the u.s. system appear to be developing different standards (e.g., the three-year technical diploma versus the two-year associate degree). the fact that a relatively low number of libraries require postsecondary degrees implies that the workplace is still the preferred place to learn cataloging. notes 1. terry rodgers, the library professional: notes from the underground (jefferson, n.c.: mcfarland, 1997), 1. 2. jennifer a. younger, “support staff and librarians in cataloging,” cataloging & classifica­ tion quarterly 23, no.1 (1996): 29. 3. deborah a. mohr and anita schunemann, “changing roles: original cataloging by para­ professionals in arl libraries,” library resources & technical services 41 (july 1997): 206. 4. sharon e. clark, “managing copy cataloging in arl libraries,” spec flyer 136 (july– aug. 1987): 1. 5. mohr and schunemann, “changing roles,” 216. 6. daren callahan and judy macleod, “management issues and the challenge for catalog­ ing education,” technical services quarterly 13, no. 2 (1996): 16. 7. carol p. johnson, “the changing nature of jobs: a paraprofessional time series,” college & research libraries 57 (jan. 1996): 66. 8. sheila s. intner, “the education of copy catalogers,” technicalities 11 (mar. 1991): 4. 9. claire-lise benaud, “the academic paraprofessional cataloger: underappreciated,” cata­ loging & classification quarterly 15, no. 3 (1992): 86. 10. callahan and macleod, “management issues and the challenge for cataloging educa­ tion,” 17. 11. robert m. hiatt, “education and training of cataloging staff at the library of congress,” cataloging & classification quarterly 7, no. 4 (1987): 123. 12. james s. chervinko, “the changing state of original cataloging: who’s going to do it now?” illinois libraries 74 (dec. 1992): 494. 13. larry r. oberg, mark e. mentges, p. n. mcdermott, and vitoon harusadangkul, “the role, status, and working conditions of paraprofessionals: a national survey of academic li­ braries,” college & research libraries 53 (may 1992): 224–231. 14. ibid., 221. 15. patricia a. eskoz, “the catalog librarian—change or status quo? results of a survey of academic libraries,” library resources & technical services 34 (july 1990): 380. 16. ibid., 391. 17. jane b. robbins, “fiction and reality in educating catalogers,” in sheila s. intner and janet swan hill, eds., cataloging: the professional development cycle (new york: greenwood pr., 1991), 60. 18. clark, “managing copy cataloging in arl libraries,” 2. 19. judith hudson, “on-the-job training for cataloging and classification,” cataloging & clas­ sification quarterly 7, no. 4 (1987): 72. 20. younger, “support staff and librarians in cataloging,” 33. 21. hiatt, “education and training of cataloging staff at the library of congress,” 126. 22. clark, “managing copy cataloging in arl libraries,” 2. 23. robbins, “fiction and reality in educating catalogers,” 66. 24. johnson, “the changing nature of jobs,” 60. 25. chervinko, “the changing state of original cataloging,” 494. 26. intner, “the education of copy catalogers,” 4. http:possibility.26 libby.indd 550 a survey on the outsourcing of cataloging in academic libraries katherine a. libby and dana m. caudle katherine a. libby is catalog librarian at sherrod library at east tennessee state university; e-mail: libby@access.etsu-tn.edu. dana m. caudle is science/technology cataloger at auburn university libraries; e-mail: dcaudle@lib.auburn.edu the authors conducted a survey on outsourcing of cataloging in academic libraries in order to determine the extent of outsourcing being done in academic libraries and the overall success of such projects. the survey instrument included questions about factors that might affect the decision to outsource, what reasons libraries had for outsourcing or not outsourcing, what was being outsourced, and how vendors were chosen. libraries were also asked to evaluate the success of outsourcing projects. the results show that outsourcing of cataloging is not a strong trend in academic libraries, but that libraries which outsourced were generally pleased with results. there also seems to be a correlation between size of collection and number of new titles cataloged annually and the decision to outsource. utsourcing has been a hot topic in cataloging circles in the last decade, especially since the wright state university library made its controversial decision to outsource all of its cataloging operations to oclc techpro in 1993. this sparked many heated discussions regarding the value and quality of outsourced cataloging, as well as many articles describing outsourced projects. however, no one has determined the extent to which academic libraries actually outsource cataloging or the overall success of these endeavors. therefore, we decided it would be both interesting and appropriate to conduct a survey to address these issues. claire-lise benaud and sever bordeianu of the university of new mexico are also researching outsourcing in academic libraries and include several general questions on outsourcing of cataloging in their recent survey. because our survey focuses on cataloging in greater detail and includes an assessment of the results of outsourcing projects, our results should complement, rather than duplicate, their effort. literature review the literature review mainly covers the literature published in the 1990’s, since li�le was published on outsourcing in the 1980’s (a finding borne out by the comprehensive literature review on outsourcing in an article by karen a. wilson).1 also, cataloging technology and methods have changed too much for earlier articles to be germane. this review is not a comprehensive survey of the topic. rather it includes representative pieces. we found three basic types of materials: general writings on outsourcing, descriptions of outsourcing services offered by various vendors, and accounts of outsourcing projects at specific libraries. general writings the first of the general writings is the pamphlet outsourcing cataloging, authority work and physical processing: a checklist of considerations, issued by the commercial technical services commi�ee of alcts.2 this is a comprehensive guide on how to plan an outsourcing project which outlines what questions should be asked to determine if outsourcing is the best course of action for a library. it also includes further questions and checklists on which tasks will remain with the library if they outsource, how to choose a contractor, what information the contractor will need to process the library’s materials, what type of materials the library plans to outsource, the cataloging standards to be adhered to, authority work, the form of output the contractor is to provide, physical processing, and financial considerations. there is also an excellent, if brief, bibliography of recent outsourcing literature. carlen ruschoff discusses recent trends in libraries and how they affect cataloging.3 he gives a number of options for responding to the four major “forces” affecting libraries, including streamlining procedures, simplifying cataloging standards, cooperative cataloging, contract cataloging, and expert systems for cataloging. the analysis of each of these points is both cogent and interesting, but for the focus of this article, we will limit ourselves to summarizing his comments on contract cataloging, or outsourcing. there are two basic reactions among catalogers to the notion of outsourcing. one is the negative reaction: the concern that outsourcing will lead to loss of local cataloging expertise, damage cooperative cataloging efforts, and cause a degradation in the quality of new cataloging records. other facets of this reaction are the fears that, in an effort to keep costs down, vendors will not hire professional catalogers and that vendors may impose proprietary restrictions on the sharing of records. the positive reaction is that, with outsourcing, professional catalogers will be able to devote their time to tasks requiring their expertise. ruschoff concludes that “contract cataloging…may prove a cost-saving alternative to processing titles within the library. its effectiveness depends upon the unique needs and special circumstances within each library”4 and points out that these needs and circumstances should be considered in planning to outsource. in a similar vein, daniel canncasciato wrote an article prompted by reactions to oclc’s unveiling of promptcat and a similar service called infosmart in 1993, and to an autocat discussion regarding wright state university’s announcement that they were outsourcing all their cataloging operations.5 the general reaction in both cases was much alike: concern that the role of catalogers and cataloging departments would be reduced, and that the quality of cataloging would diminish. canncasciato admits that both of these results are possible, but states that it is up to catalogers to take the lead and prevent it. outsourcing can provide an opportunity for catalogers to spend their time on original cataloging, participate in national-level authority work, enhance existing records, and other such activities. commercial cataloging agencies would a survey on the outsourcing of cataloging in academic libraries 551 not be economically feasible without the existence of major databases of cataloging records, such as the oclc online union catalog, and plenty of catalogers to contribute to and maintain them. canncasciato also maintains that one of the advantages in the current system is the depth and breadth of expertise in cataloging. libraries are not in the business of making money; if all operations were looked at from the viewpoint of financial solvency, he asks, what would happen to labor-intensive cooperative projects such as naco? rick j. block examines issues to be considered before outsourcing from the perspective of a retrospective conversion project at tu�s university which had disappointing results.6 block points out that outsourcing is not necessarily a bad thing, only that it should be carefully evaluated. outsourcing of approval plan items, special and archival collections, large uncataloged backlogs, and other projects could certainly enhance a library’s mission. he cautions that libraries which choose to outsource all or part of cataloging should carefully consider such factors as the real cost of cataloging, the impact on users and database quality, ease of rush processing, system implications, workflow, size and content of backlogs, turnaround time, and staff skills assessment before making their decision. libraries which eliminate cataloging entirely risk giving up staff with valuable skills in organization of knowledge which might be needed in the future.7 they also risk losing local bibliographic control, flexibility, and historical perspective. finally, libraries which decide to outsource everything will have a hard time either restoring their cataloging department or changing vendors. clare b. dunkle compares the current discussion of outsourcing of cataloging to the recent business trend of outsourcing information systems, citing business literature on outsourcing over the past few years, as well as library literature, to support her case.8 if it is planned carefully, outsourcing can be a good solution, while if it is gone about carelessly, it can be a spectacular failure. dunkle addresses a number of assumptions that are made about outsourcing: that it will save money, that vendors will use the most current technology, that outsourcing leads to greater flexibility for the outsourcing institution, and that the vendor will provide a high-quality product without being specifically instructed to do so. in her discussion, she points out the fallacies and pitfalls of these assumptions, and outlines what is needed for successful outsourcing. this boils down to careful planning and contract negotiation, including determining exactly what the tasks to be outsourced involve to ensure that the vendor really can provide be�er service, working with the vendor to make sure that all the performance goals and guidelines are clearly understood, and continuing to monitor the vendor to make sure that they are being met. dunkle then asks the big question of why outsource at all. one of the common rationales for outsourcing is that the activity being outsourced is a “non-core” activity to the mission of the institution. arnold hirshon used this argument in discussing wright state’s reasons for outsourcing cataloging, although dunkle questions his assertion that it is possible for the output of a technical services department (cataloging records and processed books) to be core if the activity to create the output is not. another reason is to remove a perceived problem from an institution. dunkle maintains that managers who do not understand cataloging will be more likely to outsource it, especially if there are communication problems between the catalogers and managers, or personnel and productivity problems in the cataloging department. while 552 college & research libraries november 1997 outsourcing selectively is an option for most libraries, total outsourcing is probably not feasible for many. dunkle adds that “in-house cataloging departments have the opportunity to develop unique solutions for local users, and some of these unique solutions become the new state of the art…. in-house catalogers and library vendors must work in a symbiosis to bring about change.”9 magda el-sherbini and mary harris report in detail on an ohio state university libraries ad hoc task force which examined the advantages and disadvantages of cataloging done outside the cataloging department.10 one option was the use of commercial vendors. in dealing with a vendor, the library must spell out goals for outsourcing and determine exactly what it wants done. pricing structure can be complex, so libraries need to study the nature of the collection to determine if per item or per hour charges are cheaper. el-sherbini and harris also discuss requirements for vendors, such as whether the vendor has appropriate staff and access to oclc or rlin. libraries should seek proposals from several vendors to compare price and quality, and should also obtain opinions of vendors from other institutions. problems include finding a vendor that can accomplish the task, the expense of commercial cataloging, lack of guarantee about quality, and cataloging unresponsive to the needs of the end user. el-sherbini and harris conclude that outsourcing might be appropriate for a small collection that does not require difficult cataloging or a library with a small staff.11 vendor services there are several articles about outsourcing services provided by bibliographic utilities. cynthia whitacre details the workings of oclc’s techpro service, including customization options for the contract, the determination of pricing, acceptable surrogates for materials, and methods of quality control.12 while techpro would certainly be happy to handle all of a library’s cataloging operations, outsourcing is not for every library.13 techpro intends to focus on large academic or public libraries with backlogs or special groups of materials such as audiovisual or foreign language materials. jim dwyer describes the promptcat service currently offered by oclc.14 with promptcat, vendors send approval lists electronically to oclc and oclc sends the matching marc record to the libraries via electronic data transfer or tape. promptcat’s “fatal flaw” is the large number (50% to 80%) of incomplete cip records.15 this is not as much of a problem as it once was, thanks to the collaboration of oclc and yankee book peddler to establish a cip upgrade service.16 david griffin describes the wln cataloging service, focusing on its treatment of serials.17 gary m. shirk examined outsourcing of technical services from a vendor ’s perspective.18 he observes that vendors view technical services as a logical extension of their relationship with libraries and provision of outsourcing for those services as an opportunity to strengthen that relationship.19 carmel c. bush, margo sasse, and patricia smith survey the capabilities of different vendors to provide outsourcing for acquisitions, cataloging, and collection development.20 a�er presenting detailed findings on the type of cataloging offered by materials jobbers, contract cataloging agencies, and library consortia, they reach several conclusions. materials jobbers and library consortia can supply timely cataloging for mainstream materials, but are less likely to offer special services like customized classification. contract cataloging agencies such as bibliographic utilities and private companies offer more a survey on the outsourcing of cataloging in academic libraries 553 complete services including original cataloging, customized classification, and cataloging of foreign language materials. outsourcing projects the remaining articles in this literature survey consist of descriptions of various outsourcing projects. two focus on the situation at wright state university. karen wilhoit describes wright state university’s decision to outsource its cataloging operation and the result.21 wright state discovered that they could save significant money by outsourcing and deal with problems such as an unproductive staff, a backlog of 5000 items, an uneven workload, and the lack of original cataloging being done. in 1993, they issued a request for proposal and hired oclc techpro to handle all cataloging operations. wilhoit considers the operation to be a success in terms of reduced cost and turnaround time without loss of quality. barbara a. winters’ article complements wilhoit’s description of how wright state arrived at its decision and implemented it.22 wright state realized definite savings in the cost of cataloging and achieved much quicker delivery of materials to patrons. winters believes that in the future, mundane cataloging will be outsourced, while professionals will manage and evaluate cataloging contracts. karen a. wilson wrote a detailed discussion of an outsourcing project at stanford university’s j. hugh jackson library.23 the library’s management had several goals in mind for this project, including consolidating as many purchases as possible to one major vendor, acquiring shelf-ready materials with complete cataloging and physical processing from that vendor, maintaining high quality in cataloging and physical processing of outsourced materials, reducing technical services costs, and reallocating technical services personnel to public services.. stanford chose blackwell north america (bna) and b.h. blackwell ltd. (bhb) as their primary vendors and limited the outsourcing activity to library of congress copy cataloging and physical processing of monographs. for the initial period of one year for bna material and four months for bhb, the library received new materials and cataloging records, fine-tuned procedures, and kept careful records of the results of their outsourcing. a�er an initial shake-down period, the quality of records received was consistently high. stanford eventually decided that materials with cip records would be cataloged in-house, because of the large number of cip records that had to be edited locally. the library was pleased with the success of the pilot project, and has continued to use bna’s and bhb’s outsourcing services. colleen f. hyslop describes the implementation of promptcat at michigan state university.24 the library now sends 90 percent of its approval plan items straight from acquisitions to labeling, with acquisitions handling any needed cip upgrade.25 hyslop feels that promptcat is a great tool for enhancing cataloging productivity, so that copy catalogers can do more complex materials and original cataloging. magda el-sherbini reports on ohio state university libraries’ pilot project to outsource cataloging of slavic language books.26 the goals were to test the quality of records obtained from the vendor (oclc techpro) and determine the cost for in-house cataloging versus outsourcing. el-sherbini described at length the methods used to determine quality and cost of cataloging. contract cataloging turns out to be a viable method, with acceptable cataloging at a lower cost.27 laura tull describes the outsourcing of retrospective conversion for a technical 554 college & research libraries november 1997 report collection at texas a&m.28 a�er stressing the importance of a good contract for telling the contractor what to do and for maintaining quality control, tull details the provisions of the texas a&m contract, such as procedures for determining a match on oclc, what fields to edit, what authority was needed, and problems to be returned. the main advantage to outsourced retrospective conversion is the speed with which a large volume of material can be cataloged, but this is offset by the decline of quality.29 karen dornseif offers an interesting perspective in her article on the outsourcing project at the larimer campus of the front range community college in fort collins, colorado.30 the library there employs only one full-time librarian, and two part-time temporary library assistants. larimer had depended on a part-time cataloger at another campus to catalog their materials, but a backlog had built up, and had to be eliminated. the librarian went to a cataloging training session at the bibliographical center for research (bcr), and realized that in-house cataloging was not feasible for her library. larimer contracted with bcr to catalog the backlog, then decided to continue the contract for new acquisitions. outsourcing has worked well for larimer, which is receiving good quality records at a reasonable cost. there have been a few problems, which were quickly resolved. one disadvantage is the lack of local control over cataloging. an in-house cataloger could get materials on hot topics to users more quickly, and could add additional subject headings for local use. records are sometimes loaded into carl, the on-line catalog, up to two weeks before materials can be shelved. there is no local authority control, and bcr does not add larimer’s holdings to oclc. dornseif concludes that “while outsourcing is not the perfect cataloging solution…, it is the only one that allows the library to maintain a current automated catalog…and provide the services expected….”31 karen a. wilson summarizes the discussion from an alcts meeting on outsourcing at ala midwinter in 1994.32 some participants reported problems in dealing with item records and barcodes, access points, authority control, database maintenance, and workflow. large universities got faster and less expensive cataloging while those with a low volume experienced the same or greater turnaround time.33 the meeting ended with a discussion of the impact of outsourcing on oclc and rlin and a call for vendors to supply full-level marc records. as we examined the literature, some common themes emerged. one was the need to carefully consider the goals of outsourcing, and how they will be met by the vendor. another theme is the need for careful planning. survey instrument keeping these themes in mind, we formulated the survey questions. the survey focused on whether academic libraries were outsourcing, the reasons for their decisions, and an evaluation of the outsourcing project, especially whether the library in question would outsource choose to again. we also considered a number of factors that might affect whether a library chose to outsource cataloging, such as size of collection, staffing levels, and amount of new material received annually. the rest of the questions concerned other factors that would affect the success of an outsourcing project such as type of materials to be outsourced, choice of vendor, and the amount of planning that went into the process. in order to choose the institutions to receive surveys, we compiled a list of academic libraries in the united states a survey on the outsourcing of cataloging in academic libraries 555 from the american library directory 34 and picked every tenth library. any library, including medical and law libraries, located on the campus of an educational institution that offered a bachelor’s degree or higher qualified as an academic library. we did not include branch libraries lacking cataloging departments, on the assumption that cataloging was done in the main library. the survey was mailed to 187 libraries in january of 1997, with a request that responses be returned by march 15, 1997. each survey packet provided postage paid return envelopes, in order to ensure the anonymity of the respondents. of the 187 surveys sent, we received 117 replies, a return rate of 63%. results of the 117 responses received, thirtythree respondents (28%) said they were currently outsourcing, or had outsourced in the past. the remaining eighty-four respondents (72%), however, said they had never outsourced cataloging. clearly, outsourcing of cataloging is not a prevailing trend among academic libraries. in an a�empt to determine some of the conditions that might influence a library’s decision to outsource, we conducted ttest analyses with all libraries that had outsourced at any time in one class, and those that had not in a second. each ttest used one of the following variables: size of collection, number of professional librarians in the cataloging department, number of paraprofessional staff in the cataloging department, and number of new titles received annually. all statistical tests were conducted at a 95% confidence level. because some libraries did not provide data for all questions, degrees of freedom on the t-tests varied from 109 to 115. we obtained the expected t-value of 1.980 for each of the test using a standard table, in which 120 degrees of freedom was the closest value. the first t-test tested the null hypothesis that there is no correlation between the size of collection and the decision to outsource. the t-test yielded a t-value of 2.424. since the observed t-value is greater than the expected t-value, the null hypothesis should be rejected. this suggests that there is, in fact, a correlation between the size of the collection and the decision to outsource. the second t-test examined the null hypothesis that there is no correlation between the number of professional librarians and the decision to outsource. the t-test result of 1.614 is less than the expected value. therefore, we concluded that the null hypothesis is true, and there is no correlation between the number of professional librarians and the decision to outsource. for the third t-test, the null hypothesis stated that there is no correlation between the number of paraprofessional staff and the decision to outsource. the t-test yielded an observed t-value of 1.620, which is again less than the expected value. thus, the null hypothesis should be accepted as true. the final t-test null hypothesis that there is no correlation between the number of titles received annually and the decision to outsource produced a t-value of 3.352. this is greater than the expected value, so the null hypothesis is false. there is a correlation between the number of titles received and the decision to outsource. while staffing levels evidently have no effect on the decision to outsource, size of collection and the number of new titles received annually apparently do. the mean collection size of the libraries that outsource is 606,330 volumes as opposed to 311,238 for those that do not. the mean number of new titles received annually for libraries that outsource is 13,786, versus 5,751 for those that do not. it appears from these statistics, along with the results of the t-tests, that libraries with larger collections and 556 college & research libraries november 1997 larger numbers of incoming titles are more likely to outsource. in the following sections of the report, the percentages of answers for some of the questions add up to more than 100% because some libraries chose more than one option to answer the questions. we decided to break them out into individual answers instead of trying to detail all possible combinations. of the eighty-four libraries that have not outsourced cataloging, fi�y-two (62%) have never considered outsourcing, sixteen (19%) are currently considering outsourcing, and eighteen (21%) considered outsourcing in the past but decided against it. we chose to count two libraries in both categories of consideration, because they provided data on a past rejection of outsourcing and a current reconsideration. among those libraries which considered outsourcing but decided against it, six (33%) thought it would be too expensive, twelve (66%) thought it would not be cost-effective, and seven (39%) gave other reasons. one reason mentioned was concern about mistakes in and/or upgrading of cip records. several libraries thought that vendors would be unable to accommodate highly specialized materials or local cataloging practices, such as multiple classification systems, additional tracings required locally, and multiple shelving locations. concern about turn-around time were also a factor for some. in other libraries, there was simply local opposition to the practice, as in the case of one consortium member when the other libraries did not want non-lc records added to their shared database. one library commented that they felt it would be too complicated; another agreed and further categorized outsourcing as “an unnecessary luxury item.” yet another library stated that they never felt the need. currently sixteen libraries are considering outsourcing a variety of materials. four (25%) want to outsource all cataloging operations, together with physical processing and authority control, while four others (25%) want to outsource retrospective conversion. ten libraries (63%) seek to outsource special types of materials. these materials include approval plan items, library of congress or other copy cataloging, government documents, foreign language materials (japanese was specifically mentioned), videos and other audiovisual materials, and special collections materials. another five libraries (31%) are interested in outsourcing short-term special projects such as gi� collections and backlogs. one library wishes to conduct a test of fi�y titles to evaluate the feasibility of future outsourcing projects. the thirty-three libraries that have outsourced cataloging gave a variety of reasons for doing so. an overwhelming majority of twenty-three libraries (70%) said that they had insufficient staff to complete the task in a timely manner. this seems to support our previous statement that libraries with larger workloads, as evidenced by collection size and number of new titles received, tend to be more likely to outsource. seven libraries (21%) lacked the in-house expertise needed to complete the task. ten others (30%) thought it would be less expensive than doing the task in-house. three libraries (9%) felt that outsourcing would be faster. the last library’s administration made the decision for them. we asked each library how carefully they evaluated the need to outsource before commi�ing to their projects. of the thirty responses to this question, fourteen libraries (47%) said they carefully evaluated the need to outsource, thirteen (43%) said they thought it sounded feasible but didn’t do an extensive study, and three (15%) did not evaluate at all because of time constraints. a survey on the outsourcing of cataloging in academic libraries 557 the libraries went through a variety of processes to choose their vendors. five (15%) issued a request for proposal followed by a bid process. another sixteen (48%) chose their vendor based on reputation, while seventeen (52%) had had other dealings with their vendor. four (12%) gave other reasons. one was a law library who contracted with its parent institution. one checked another vendor and consulted with other institutions about their choice of vendors. one respondent said the decision had been made previously. at the last institution, the library administration made the choice. libraries primarily chose oclc (both techpro and promptcat), marcive, and baker and taylor, with oclc being the clearest preference. other vendors includes talx, amigos, bna, yankee book peddler, lti, brodart, mcsorley, capcom, professional media, and two consortia, the cooperative college library center and the pi�sburgh regional library center. these libraries are outsourcing a wide range of materials. six (18%) are outsourcing all cataloging operations, including physical processing and authority control. fi�een (45%) outsource retrospective conversion. some of the fourteen (42%) who outsource special types of materials chose such things as approval plan materials, national library of medicine or library of congress records, and original cataloging. others outsource government documents, foreign language materials (especially asian languages), videos and audiovisual materials, and theses and dissertations. one library receives vendor-supplied cataloging for a portion of its acquisitions. five library (15%) outsource special projects such as backlogs, including gi� items, foreign language materials, and upgrades to minimal cataloging records. one is outsourcing some monographic cataloging and physical processing as a short-term experiment. each library evaluated the success of its outsourcing project. when asked if outsourcing provided the desired result, seventeen (52%) said yes, twelve (36%) said not entirely, and four (12%) said no. the libraries also rated their experience with six (19%) excellent, eleven (34%) good, eight (25%) satisfactory, three (9%) fair, and four (13%) unsatisfactory response. this suggests that, while not all libraries were completely satisfied, on the whole outsourcing is a positive experience. in fact, of the libraries that outsourced, fi�een (47%) will definitely continue to outsource and seventeen (53%) would consider outsourcing again, depending on the project. on library chose not to answer the question. none categorically refused to consider it again. the sixteen libraries which were not entirely satisfied or dissatisfied with the results of outsourcing gave one or more reasons for their rating. these broke down as follows: three (19%) said that insufficient planning went into the process, twelve (75%) cited poor customer service from the vendor, two (13%) said the process did not save the money they expected, and four (25%) said the vendor was unable to deliver services as promised. ten libraries (63%) gave other reasons. most of these reasons involved cataloging errors such as incomplete or inaccurate records, wrong records, inability to deal with national library of medicine classification and medical subject headings, inability to deal with multiple shelving locations, and errors in physical processing. several libraries felt that the process was too slow. two libraries were satisfied with quality, but one said the vendor could only handle one third of their purchases and the other, whose goal was outsourcing all cataloging, still had to perform some original cataloging themselves. we performed three chi-square tests at 95 percent confidence level to determine 558 college & research libraries november 1997 what factors might influence the result of an outsourcing project. for the first factor, the null hypothesis stated that there is no correlation between the type of material outsourced and the result of outsourcing. with fourteen degrees of freedom, the chisquare value was 16.173, which is less than the expected chi-square value of 23.685, leading us to accept the null hypothesis. the next factor was the evaluation process before starting the outsourcing project. again, the null hypothesis stated that there is no correlation between the amount of evaluation performed and the result of the project. the chi-square value of 8.247 with four degrees of freedom is less than the expected value of 9.488. thus the null hypothesis is true. finally, we tested the null hypothesis that there is no correlation between the method used to choose the vendor and the result of outsourcing. we obtained a chi-square value of 10.979 with twelve degrees of freedom, which is less than the expected value of 21.026. again, we accept the null hypothesis. apparently, none of these factors affect the results of outsourcing projects. however, with only thirty-three outsourcing libraries responding, the survey sample may not be large enough to yield valid results. conclusions outsourcing doe snot seem to be a strong trend in academic libraries. out of 117 libraries who responded, only thirty-three libraries have outsourced at all and sixteen more are considering it. the majority of libraries (fi�y-two) have never outsourced and never considered it, while another eighteen had decided against it in the past. the t-tests indicate that size of collection and number of new titles received annually seem to affect the decision to outsource. of the thirty-three libraries which outsource, most seem to be generally pleased with the experience. regardless of the quality of that experience, no one refused to consider outsourcing again. slightly over half said they would consider it depending on the project. while we could not reliably determine from our sample whether factors such as the amount of planning, method of choosing the vendor, and type of materials outsourced affect the results, the chi-square tests seem to indicate that they do not. further research on a larger sample may shed some light on this. another option for further research might be to conduct a similar survey among all types of libraries to see if certain types of libraries tend to outsource more than others and how successfully they do so. our survey should have included other considerations, such as the reasons libraries considering outsourcing thought to do so, what quality control measures were used by libraries that did outsource, and whether the libraries in question were automated. future researchers may wish to consider these aspects. notes 1. karen a. wilson, “outsourcing copy cataloging and physical processing: a review of blackwell’s outsourcing services for the j. hugh jackson library at stanford university,” library resource and technical services 39, no. 4 (1995): 359-383. 2. association for library collections and technical services. commercial technical services commi�ee, outsourcing cataloging, authority work, and physical processing: a checklist of consideratons, ed. marie a. kascus and dawn hale (chicago: american library association, 1995). 3. carlen ruschoff, “cataloging’s prospects: responding to austerity with innovation,” journal of academic librarianship 21, no. 1 (1995): 51-57. 4. ibid., 55. 5. daniel canncasciato, “tepid water for everyone?: the future oluc, catalogers, and outsourcing,” oclc systems and services 10, no. 1 (1994): 5-8. a survey on the outsourcing of cataloging in academic libraries 559 6. rick j. block, “cataloging outsourcing: issues and options,” serials review (fall 1994): 73-77. 7. ibid., 74. 8. clare b. dunkle, “outsourcing the catalog department: a meditation inspired by the business and library literature,” journal of academic librarianship 22, no. 1 (1996): 33-43. 9. ibid., 42. 10. magda el-sherbini and mary harris, “cataloging alternatives: an investigation of contract cataloging, cooperative cataloging, and the use of temporary help,” cataloging & classification quarterly 15, no. 4 (1992): 67-88. 11. ibid., 85-86. 12. cynthia whitacre, “oclc’s techpro service,” serials review (fall 1994): 77-78. 13. ibid., 78. 14. jim dwyer, “from promptcat to recat, or, you only catalog twice,” technicalities 15 (may 1995): 4. 15. ibid., 4. 16. cynthia whitacre, “record selection quality from the perspective of an outsourcing vendor” (paper presented at an alcts ccs copy cataloging discussion group at the midwinter meeting of the american library association, washington, d.c., january 1997). 17. david griffin, “the wln cataloging service and the cataloging of serials,” advances in serials management 3 (1989): 213-232. 18. gary m. shirk, “outsourced library technical services: the bookseller’s perspective,” library acquisitions: practice & theory 18, no. 4 (1994): 383-395. 19. ibid., 388. 20. carmel c. bush, margo sasse, and patricia smith, “toward a new world order: a survey of outsourcing capabilities of vendors for acquisitions, cataloging and collection development services,” library acquisitions: practice & theory 18, no. 4 (1994): 397-416. 21. karen wilhoit, “outsourcing cataloging at wright state university,” serials review (fall 1994): 70-73. 22. barbara a. winters, “cataloging outsourcing at wright state university: implications for acquisitions managers,” library acquisitions: practice & theory 18, no. 4 (1994): 367-373. 23. wilson, “outsourcing copy cataloging,” 359-383. 24. colleen f. hyslop, “using promptcat to eliminate work: msu’s experience,” library acquisitions: practice & theory 19, no. 3 (1995): 359-362. 25. ibid., 361. 26. magda el-sherbini, “contract cataloging: a pilot project for outsourcing slavic books,” cataloging & classification quarterly 20, no. 3 (1995): 57-73. 27. ibid., 66-67. 28. laura tull, “contract cataloging: retrospective conversion of a technical report collection,” technical services quarterly 9, no. 1 (1991): 3-15. 29. ibid., 14-15. 30. karen dornseif, “outsourcing cataloging: an alternative for small libraries,” colorado libraries 21 (spring 1995): 48-49. 31. ibid., 49. 32. karen a. wilson, “vendor-supplied cataloging and contract cataloging services: a report of the alcts creative ideas in technical services discussion group, american library association, midwinter meeting, los angeles, february 1994,” technical services quarterly 12, no. 2 (1991): 60-63. 33. ibid., 61-62. 34. american library directory, 49th ed. (new york: r.r. bowker, 1996). 560 college & research libraries november 1997 buttlar.p65 catalogers in academic libraries 311 catalogers in academic libraries: their evolving and expanding roles lois buttlar and rajinder garcha catalogers in academic libraries who belong to ala’s technical ser­ vices division were surveyed to determine if and how their job functions have changed over the past ten years. the 271 respondents indicated a change from print to electronic formats, involvement of nonprofession­ als in higher levels of cataloging, a trend toward outsourcing (particu­ larly, copy cataloging and foreign-language materials), and more cata­ loging of specialized items, audiovisual materials, and digital documents by professional librarians. the latter now use their expertise to edit prob­ lematic records, engage in managerial tasks, catalog and attempt au­ thority control of internet resources, do internet training or web page design, and use html. more and more catalogers are involved in activi­ ties formerly in the domain of systems librarians (selecting and imple­ menting catalog products, database maintenance, etc.). he library catalog, now often merged with the concept of a database, has been at the fore­ front of technological innova­ tion in libraries. automation definitely has decreased the amount of original catalog­ ing done in academic libraries, and there is agreement in the literature that tasks for­ merly assigned to professional catalogers have shifted downward to paraprofes­ sional support staff members.1–4 much dis­ cussion has focused on what has been called the “deprofessionalization” of tech­ nical services and cataloging, with various attributions of cause.5–7 the commonplace nature of biblio­ graphic utilities, user-friendly opacs, keyword searching, cd-rom formats, and, more recently, outsourcing; and the increasing availability and popularity of the internet have resulted in a multifac­ eted and evolving role for catalogers in academic libraries.8–11 not only must cata­ logers learn standard general mark-up language (sgml) and hypertext mark-up language (html), but also new stan­ dards must be developed for the new multimedia delivery formats that are now available. according to marsha starr paiste and june mullins, “the cataloging position of the future is germinating now.”12 they said professional catalogers can expand their basic cataloging skills into nonconventional areas and develop skills as information access analysts, systems designers, telecommunications experts, or online analysts/technical resource managers. in a recent two-part article on the cataloger ’s workstation, which delois buttlar is a professor in the school of library and information science at kent state university; email: lbuttlar@kentvm.kent.edu. rajinder garcha is a monograph cataloger in the carlson library at the university of toledo; e-mail: fac3236@uoft01.utoledo.edu. 311 mailto:fac3236@uoft01.utoledo.edu mailto:lbuttlar@kentvm.kent.edu 312 college & research libraries july 1998 table 1 distribution of responding catalogers by library size size in volumes f % fewer than 100,000 36 13.6 100,000 to 499,999 91 34.3 500,000 to 999,999 33 12.5 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 51 19.2 more than 2,000,000 54 20.4 total 265 100.0 scribes the transformation of cataloging, roger brisson emphasized the new de­ mands made on the cataloger in terms of computing knowledge and experience, in addition to cataloging knowledge and subject expertise.13 ideally, he sees the cataloger’s role as mediator between com­ puting and cataloging activities. other roles suggested in the literature include: contract negotiators, designers or managers of automated systems, resource allocators, writers, speakers, fundraisers, researchers, subject experts, collection managers, proposal writers, or telecom­ munications experts.14–16 according to sheila b. intner, the necessity for catalog­ ers and technical services librarians did not change but, rather, the requirements of the positions did.17,18 comments such as these justify several questions, includ­ ing: � how do catalog librarians actually spend their time? � how have their roles changed since they became catalogers? � how many perform traditional cataloging functions, and how many, in­ stead, are involved with new roles that require more managerial skills or com­ puter and/or systems expertise? purpose of the study the purpose of this study was to deter­ mine the current job functions performed by catalogers in academic libraries and how these functions have changed over the past ten years in order to provide in­ formation of significance to library ad­ ministrators and library and information science educators. literature review wendy wood attempted to determine the changing role of catalogers at the univer­ sity of kansas.19 in a survey of fifteen pro­ fessional catalogers, she found that five were full-time supervisors and that four others supervised but also did some cata­ loging. she concluded that although the need for catalogers would not decrease, more and more catalogers would become primarily supervisors and/or managers of databases. paiste and mullins would agreed with this transition.20 hong xu compared and analyzed the job requirements and qualifications for catalogers and reference librarians in aca­ ninety-six percent of the libraries represented in the survey had fully automated opacs. demic libraries contained in job advertise­ ments between 1971 and 1990.21 he con­ cluded that catalog librarians had more management responsibilities than refer­ ence librarians did and that these respon­ sibilities steadily increased over the time period of the study. jennifer a. younger addressed the functions of professional librarians, par­ ticularly catalogers, in providing biblio­ graphic access services; and prescribed nine roles they should play.22 she called table 2 distribution of libraries by network affiliation network affiliation f % oclc 249 91.9 rlin 52 19.3 wln 7 2.6 other 19 7.1 http:transition.20 http:kansas.19 http:expertise.13 catalogers in academic libraries 313 for a formal team approach with profes­ sionals and paraprofessionals working in a close relationship in cataloging. urging catalogers to develop a broader perspec­ tive, she said that this does not mean abandoning cataloging rules in favor of indexing rules but, rather, adopting an awareness of how these rules work to­ gether to create an effective system of bib­ liographic access. patricia a. eskoz investigated the ex­ tent to which catalogers in academic li­ braries also are involved in activities typi­ cally labeled as public services.23 the majority of survey respondents were in­ volved, to some limited extent, in cross­ over activities such as reference and bib­ liographic instruction and/or collection development. in earlier surveys, eskoz concluded that although catalogers’ tools and resources had changed, ba­ sic cataloging skills had not changed that much and “catalog departments are still recognizable as catalog depart­ ments and catalogers are still recogniz­ able as catalogers.”24 methodology a list of sixty-seven traditional and emerging activities in which catalogers in academic libraries are involved was gleaned from the literature. these activi­ ties were incorporated into a question­ naire that was distributed to catalogers in academic libraries. the catalogers were identified via labels purchased from ala showing the addresses of members of its technical services division. the question­ naires then were mailed to a random sample of 500 catalogers; 271 useable re­ sponses were returned, for a response rate of 55 percent. findings femongaphic infogmation the largest category of respondents (91, or 34.3%) worked in libraries with collec­ tions ranging from 100,000 to 499,999 vol­ umes; however, about 40 percent of the respondents worked in larger libraries table 3 status of professional staff past 5–10 years number of professional staff f % decreased 105 39.2 increased 38 14.2 remained 125 46.6 about the same total 268 100.0 with collections of one million or more volumes (see table 1). ninety-six percent of the libraries rep­ resented in the survey had fully auto­ mated opacs. most of these (249, or 91.9%) were affiliated with oclc (see table 2). at 125 (46.6%) of the responding libraries, the number of professional cata­ loging staff members had remained about the same over the past five to ten years, and at 105 (39.2%) of them, the number had decreased (see table 3). the figures were almost parallel with regard to sup­ port staff, with the tendency for the num­ ber to remain the same in 123 (45.9%) of the libraries and to decrease in 112 (41.8%) of them (see table 4). at the time of the survey, having one professional staff member seemed to be a common pattern (85, or 31.6%), followed by an approxi­ mately equal number of libraries having from two (47, or 17.47%) to five (45, or 16.73%) catalogers with an mls degree. in terms of clerical or support staff memtable 4 status of support/clerical staff in past 5–10 years number of support! clerical staff f % decreased 112 41.8 increased 33 12.3 remained about 123 45.9 the same total 268 100.0 http:services.23 314 college & research libraries july 1998 bers, cataloging units were likely to have slightly more nonprofes­ sionals, with one (57, or 21.35%) or two (51, or 19.1%) being most typical (see table 5). primary roles more than 70 percent of the cata­ logers (185) responded that the cataloger ’s primary role was that of creating bibliographic records, although 199 (75.1%) saw a trend toward involving nonprofession­ als in higher levels of cataloging. the majority (194, or 77%) agreed that the cataloging unit had expe­ rienced an increase in productiv­ ity because of automation and technological innovation and that their tools and resources had changed (203, or 78.7%). the most repeated response, indicated by 158 (58.5%), was the obvious change from print to electronic formats such as online materials, cd-roms, cataloger ’s desk­ top, the web, or the internet. four (1.48%) of the respondents said they had moved to a windows environment, nine (3.3%) indicated the use of oclc, and ten (3.7%) others indicated that the computers and software they used had become much more sophisticated. distribution of cataloging only seventy-three (27%) of the respon­ dents indicated that their libraries outsourced cataloging. of those functions outsourced, copy cataloging (33, or 12.2%) and foreign-language materials catalog­ ing (30, or 11.1%) were by far the most popular (see table 6). only four respon­ dents (1.5%) reported that cataloging positions had been eliminated at their institutions as a result of outsourcing, and thirty-two (12%) said that their cataloging units had experienced an in­ crease in productivity due to outsourcing. at eighty-six (32%) of the institutions, cataloging was distributed across depart­ ments or by subject discipline. music, as table 5 distribution of staff members by number and level number of staff level of staff professional support/clerical f % f % 0 1 2 3 4-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-40 41-50 >50 total 4 1.49 11 4.12 85 31.60 57 21.35 47 17.47 51 19.10 40 14.87 22 8.24 45 16.73 39 14.61 36 13.38 42 15.73 7 2.60 21 7.87 0 0.00 8 3.00 5 1.86 9 3.37 0 0.00 3 1.12 0 0.00 2 .75 0 0.00 1 .37 0 0.00 1 .37 269 100.00 267 100.00 a subject discipline, was most likely to be cataloged in a special department, fol­ lowed by maps and archives/manu­ scripts (see table 7). changing trends catalogers indicated activities they were performing in 1987, 1992, and 1997 (see table 8). it would appear that in 1997, more catalogers were handling disserta­ tions and theses than in 1987 (55.1% com­ pared to 50.9%), rare books/special col­ lections materials (51.1% compared to 40.8%), and government documents (53.4% compared to 47.3%). this probably is explained by the fact that professional librarians have taken on more cataloging of specialized items because some of the monograph and other types of materials now are processed by copy catalogers. the major changes over the ten-year time period are reflected in the increased number of individuals cataloging av materials (66.7% in 1997 compared to 49.1% in 1987), digital documents (44.3% compared to 4.7%), and internet resources (31.4% compared to 1.2%). planning and conducting retrospective catalogers in academic libraries 315 conversions of library card catalogs to online databases are activities in which professional catalogers are less involved now (25.4% and 37.5%, respectively) than they were ten years ago (40.2% and 45%, respectively). in 1997, catalogers were more likely to be using their professional expertise in editing problematic records (45.8% compared to 32.5%) or engaging in more managerial tasks such as writing contracts with vendors (12.9% compared to 6.5%), writing proposals (20.9% com­ pared to 13.6%), supervising support staff (78.1% compared to 66.5%), coordinating work of subordinates (69.1% compared to 56.2%), monitoring budgets (30.6% com­ pared to 25.4%), managing cataloging work flows (71.3% compared to 59.8%), evaluating cataloging personnel (63.4% compared to 55%), and training copy cata­ logers (55.5% compared to 46.2%). they also became increasingly instrumental in affecting policy because their number expanded with respect to designing cata­ loging policies and procedures (77.7% in 1997 compared to 58.6% in 1987) and de­ signing technical services policies/proce­ dures (46.2% compared to 31%). although their involvement with the internet was still very modest, there was a slow, but steady, increase in the num­ ber of catalogers who cataloged internet resources (31.4% compared to 1.2%) or tried to maintain some authority control over internet files (11.4% compared to 2.4%). four respondents reported that they were involved in web page design and two in internet training for students. more and more catalogers were in­ volved in activities formerly in the do­ main of systems/automation librarians, such as selecting and implementing cata­ log products (64.4% in 1997 compared to 39.1% in 1987), developing specifications for microcomputer applications (14.1% compared to 5.4%), database mainte­ nance/bibliographic control (75.4% com­ pared to 43.5%), records management/ indexing (14.9% compared to 6.6%), man­ aging opac performance (20.6% comtable 6 distribution of cataloging functions outsourced function outsourced f % copy cataloging 33 original cataloging 15 serials cataloging 2 nonprint cataloging 7 special items cataloging 18 foreign-language cataloging 30 government documents 10 retrospective conversion 6 special projects 3 microforms 3 reclassification projects 2 catalog records 2 original scores 2 other 3 12.2 5.6 0.7 2.6 6.7 11.1 3.7 2.2 1.1 1.1 .7 .7 .7 1.1 pared to 9%), managing network and lo­ cal interfaces (9.2% compared to 1.8%), managing systems and tool selection and evaluation (11.5% compared to 3.6%), managing systems implementation (12.6% compared to 4.8%), and applying database management software (13.4% compared to 4.8%). additional activities responding catalogers added to the list included: e-mail and internet training for students, web page design, pc software installation and maintenance, cd-rom network management, one-on-one fac­ ulty opac training, purchase and distri­ bution of av hardware, management of satellite dish reception, coordination of table 7 distribution of cataloging across departments/subjects department f % music 20 23.3 maps 10 11.6 archives/manuscripts 9 10.5 rare books 5 5.8 law 5 5.8 nonprint 4 4.7 other 9 10.5 316 college & research libraries july 1998 table 8 evolving activities and roles of catalogers 1987–1997 1987 1992 1997 activity f % f % f % descriptive cataloging 157 92.4 203 92.3 240 90.9 assign call numbers 153 90.5 201 91.4 244 92.4 assign subject headings 153 90.5 200 90.9 246 93.2 copy cataloging 121 71.6 155 70.5 180 68.2 catalog non-english items 133 78.7 170 77.3 203 76.9 catalog dissertations/theses 86 50.9 116 52.7 145 55.1 catalog rare books/special collections 69 40.8 99 45.0 135 51.1 catalog monographs 142 84.0 186 84.5 229 86.7 catalog serials 90 53.6 127 58.0 151 57.4 catalog digital documents 8 4.7 21 9.5 117 44.3 catalog government documents 80 47.3 101 45.9 141 53.4 catalog av materials 83 49.1 135 61.4 176 66.7 catalog internet resources 2 1.2 2 0.9 83 31.4 set local catalog standards 106 62.7 153 69.5 206 78.0 authority control 130 76.9 175 79.5 221 83.7 plan retrospective conversion 68 40.2 73 33.2 67 25.4 conduct retrospective conversion 76 45.0 100 45.5 99 37.5 edit problem records 55 32.5 91 41.6 121 45.8 create bibliographic access system 22 13.1 34 15.6 33 12.6 write contracts with vendors 11 6.5 23 10.5 34 12.9 define library requirements 23 13.6 42 19.1 54 20.5 cost out direct/indirect costs 19 11.2 26 11.9 36 13.7 write rfps 16 9.5 29 13.2 29 11.1 write proposals 23 13.6 44 20.0 55 20.9 design technical servervices policies 52 31.0 76 34.5 122 46.2 select/implement catalog products 66 39.1 103 47.0 170 64.4 bibliographic access department head 72 42.6 98 44.5 139 52.5 manage technical services department 21 12.4 35 15.9 124 47.0 supervise proffessional staff 52 30.8 73 33.2 85 32.1 supervise support staff 109 66.5 162 73.3 207 78.1 supervise student workers 87 51.5 112 50.7 132 49.8 coordinate work of subordinates 95 56.2 140 63.3 183 69.1 plan budgets 36 21.3 54 24.4 67 25.3 monitor budgets 43 25.4 59 26.7 81 30.6 manage cataloging work flows 101 59.8 138 62.4 189 71.3 teleconferences or videoconferences, and coordination of campus involve­ ment in multicampus integrated library system. in 1987, only 1.2 percent of the profes­ sional catalogers were using html; in 1997, 33.3 percent were. the one single activity that showed the greatest expan­ sion in terms of cataloger involvement was related to e-mail. two hundred cata­ logers (76%) were involved in e-mail dis­ cussion groups in 1997, compared to five (3%) in 1987. with respect to crossover ac­ tivities, in 1987, 37.5 percent were in­ volved in reference desk work; in 1997, 47 percent reported that they were, and one reported doing reference work, but not having a reference desk assignment. catalogers in academic libraries 317 table 8 (cont.) evolving activities and roles of catalogers 1987–1997 1987 1992 1997 activity f % f % f % recruit/hire cataloging personnel 82 48.5 114 51.6 140 52.8 evaluate cataloging personnel 93 55.0 130 58.8 168 63.4 compile/maintain statistics 109 64.5 151 68.3 195 73.6 train copy catalogers 78 46.2 118 53.4 147 55.5 design cataloging policies/procedures 99 58.6 158 71.5 206 77.7 design technical services 52 31.0 76 34.5 122 46.2 policies/procedures participate in fund raising 4 2.4 7 3.2 12 4.6 authority control internet files 4 2.4 10 4.6 30 11.4 develop special mainframe applications 8 4.8 15 6.9 12 4.6 develop special microcomputer 9 5.4 22 10.0 17 14.1 applications database development 30 18.0 48 22.0 72 27.5 database maintenance/ 73 43.5 152 69.1 199 75.4 bibliographic control expert system design/application 3 1.8 6 2.7 6 2.3 records management/indexing 11 6.6 23 10.6 39 14.9 e-mail discussion groups 5 3.0 89 40.6 200 76.0 manage opac performance 15 9.0 32 14.7 54 20.6 manage network/local interfaces 3 1.8 15 6.9 24 9.2 manage system/tool 6 3.6 14 6.4 30 11.5 selection/evaluation manage systems implementation 8 4.8 19 8.7 33 12.6 manage/coordinate lan functions 1 0.6 6 2.7 12 4.6 apply database management software 8 4.8 17 7.8 35 13.4 design user interfaces 5 3.0 7 3.2 18 6.9 write abstracts 2 1.2 3 1.4 4 1.5 automated indexing 4 2.4 9 4.1 11 4.2 thesaurus use and construction 3 1.8 3 1.4 6 2.3 use sgml 2 1.2 1 0.5 12 4.6 use html 2 1.2 2 0.9 88 33.3 design integrated systems 4 2.4 8 3.7 11 4.2 computer programming 8 4.8 8 3.7 12 4.6 reference desk work 63 37.5 88 39.8 124 47.0 collection development 55 32.5 90 40.5 126 47.5 bibliographic instruction 42 24.9 56 25.3 84 31.7 about one-third were involved in collec­ tion development in 1987 as compared to 47.5 percent in 1997. the number of cata­ loging librarians involved in biblio­ graphic instruction rose from 24.9 percent in 1987 to 31.7 percent in 1997. other open-ended comments indi­ cated that some catalogers served in con­ sulting roles to serials control or acquisi­ tions systems. it appears that automation has led to a blurring of the lines between the traditional bifurcated roles for tech­ nical service and public service librarians. activities added to the list by respond­ ing catalogers included committee partici­ pation, including accreditation and col­ 318 college & research libraries july 1998 part of the work routine of more table 9 than 90 percent of all survey re-top twenty-five activities currently spondents, followed closely by performed by catalogers monograph cataloging (86.7%) and authority control work (221, activity f % or 83.7%). the top twenty-five ac­1. assign subject headings 246 2. assign call numbers 244 3. descriptive cataloging 240 4. catalog monographs 229 5. authority control 221 6. supervise support staff 209 7. set local catalog standards 206 8. design cataloging 206 policies/procedures 9. compile/maintain statistics 206 10. catalog non-english items 203 11. e-mail discussion groups 200 12. database maintenance/ 199 bibliographic control 13. manage catalog work flows 189 14. coordinate work of subordinates 183 15. copy cataloging 180 16. catalog av materials 176 17. evaluate cataloging personnel 168 18. catalog serials 151 19. train copy catalogers 147 20. catalog dissertations/theses 145 21. catalog government documents 141 22. recruit/hire cataloging personnel 140 23. bibliographic access 139 department head 24. catalog rare books/spec. coll. 135 25. supervise student workers 132 lege governance work; teaching library science courses and workshops; circula­ tion and/or stack maintenance; interli­ brary loan; preservation; library signage, displays, and exhibits; responsibility for bindery/repair unit; serials control; and service activities such as writing/editing the library newsletter, doing inventory, managing a gifts program, and research and publication. despite their expanded role, catalog­ ers were still very much involved in the activities that had long been associated with their careers. for example, descrip­ tive cataloging and the assigning of call numbers and subject headings were still 93.2 tivities in which at least 50 percent 92.4 of all professional catalogers re­90.9 sponding were currently engaged 86.7 are presented in table 9. it is inter­83.7 esting to note that, despite the78.1 downgrading of former catalog­78.0 ing functions to nonprofessionals, 77.7 180 respondents (68.2%) were cur­ rently involved in copy catalog­77.7 76.9 ing. 76.0 open-ended comments 75.4 an attempt to analyze and synthe­ size the open-ended comments71.3 solicited at the end of the ques­69.1 tionnaire proved to be both ex­68.2 tremely interesting and extremely 66.7 challenging. the diversity of atti­63.4 tudes and opinions, as well as the57.4 multifaceted aspects of the topics55.5 contributed to the difficulty of the 55.1 task, but some repeatedly occur­53.4 52.8 ring observations are categorized 52.5 as follows. areas of greatest concensus. 51.1 comments that reflected the great­ 49.8 est consensus definitely included those related to the observation that outsourcing and/or copy cataloging by support staff frees the catalogers to do more professional activities such as spe­ cial projects, foreign-language cataloging, more difficult original cataloging, serials management, policy writing, develop­ ment and maintenance of the library’s web site, reference consultation and other noncataloging tasks, and learning to use “a flood of electronic products.” the three areas mentioned most frequently were management functions, participation in bibliographic instruction, and mainte­ nance and upgrading of the database. one respondent said: “although cataloging departments are not disappearing, cata­ catalogers in academic libraries 319 log librarians are spending more of their time managing the system and less time cataloging.” impact of internet. several respon­ dents indicated that they were currently cataloging internet resources on a selected basis. one mentioned participation in oclc’s internet project, and another was involved in the development of national standards for internet cataloging. it ap­ pears from other references to the inter­ net that it is consuming more and more of some catalogers’ time. one respondent indicated that she used information from the internet in cataloging u.s. govern­ ment documents. areas of concern. some responding catalogers expressed concern that time and attention given to computer technol­ ogy and rapid cataloging at the expense of accurate cataloging, or that with the development of online systems in smalland medium-sized academic libraries, professional catalogers will become non­ existent, even though the need for their professional expertise will not disappear. one respondent said: “the quality of cata­ loging is lower because more cataloging is being done or handled by paraprofes­ sionals with less education and less in­ tellectual ability.” however, another re­ spondent claimed: we have high productivity because we have chosen to concentrate on the areas of records which affect re­ trieval and pay less attention to other areas. . . . many librarians are obsessive about cataloging practice. they enter every field they can think of, double-check and triplecheck authority records, and so slow down the whole cataloging process that high backlogs develop. this is a one way ticket to outsourcing. one must learn to balance thoroughness with practicality. work carefully but establish priorities. a second area of concern was reflected in respondent comments related to new system responsibilities. whether these were related to enhanced authority or bib­ liographic control or, as in one case, re­ sponsibility “for the automated system— all hardware in the building and all soft­ ware,” there was general agreement that the expectations for catalogers in terms of sophisticated knowledge of computer technology are increasing at a more rapid rate than is the necessary commensurate education and/or training. finally, some catalogers’ feelings were represented by the following: “we are not despite their expanded role, catalogers were still very much involved in the activities that had long been associated with their careers. recognized as we were twenty years ago, as performing valued work,” and in ref­ erence to library science students, the “majority of students do not want to take cataloging because they do not see how this relates to the job that they will be doing upon completion of the program.” in other words, library schools programs are not impressing on students the impor­ tance of building the library’s catalog in accessing and retrieving information. future of cataloging in the academic library. several comments addressed pre­ dictions related to the cataloger ’s role in the future. some of these included: the trend for catalogers to seek new positions of employment working for commercial outsourcers; increased cross-training of catalog librarians to take on more noncataloging responsibilities (without, necessarily, additional monetary compen­ sation); an increased proportion of para­ professional to professional positions in cataloging units; a merger of cataloging units into broader technical services units (e.g., cataloging, acquisitions, and serials, along with computer technicians, merged into a department of automation and bibliographic control, or abc depart­ 320 college & research libraries july 1998 ment); a new expectation for new hires to also be systems librarians; involvement of cataloging professionals in more html/sgml activities, more windows 95 applications, and more cd-rom cata­ loging resources; and more cataloging/ imaging (scanning) of special collections materials to the library’s web site. conclusions it is quite apparent that professional cata­ logers no longer are defined merely on the basis of performing their traditional roles of original cataloging, authority work, and assigning call numbers and subjects. rather, they are viewed as man­ agers, policymakers, upgraders of the da­ tabase, bibliographic instructors, collec­ tion development librarians, automation librarians, and more. job sharing is on the rise, especially transfers from the techni­ cal services area to the public services area, adding to the decrease in catalog­ ing staff and increase in reference staff. this trend of job sharing has some posi­ tive aspects, including heightened job in­ terest among participants, better under­ standing between technical and public services, and more flexibility. however, sometimes combinations of duties have drawbacks as well, including lack of ex­ pertise and thus lack of quality and con­ sistency in multiple job functions. per­ haps the term professional cataloger will have to be replaced by another term or title that would cover a variety of posi­ tion responsibilities carried on by the cata­ loger of the future. notes 1. hong xu, “the impact of automation on job requirements and qualifications for cata­ logers and reference librarians in academic libraries,” library resources and technical services 40, no. 1 (jan. 1996): 9–31. 2. kenneth furuta, “the impact of automation on professional catalogers,” information tech­ nology and libraries 9, no. 3 (sept. 1990): 242–52. 3. carol mandel, “cooperative cataloging: models, issues, prospects,” in advances in li­ brarianship, ed. i.p. godden. vol. 16, 33–82 (san diego: academic pr., 1992). 4. cherryl schauder, “faster than a speeding bullet: cataloguing education in the age of computers,” international cataloguing & bibliographic control 19, no. 3 (july/sept. 1990): 41–45. 5. leigh estabrook, “productivity, profit, and libraries,” library journal 106 (july 1981): 1377– 80. 6. furuta, “the impact of automation on professional catalogers.” 7. michael a. oliker, “the deprofessionalization story and the future of technical services,” illinois libraries 72, no. 6 (sept. 1990): 472–78. 8. clare b. dunkle, “outsourcing the catalog department: a meditation inspired by the business and library literature,” journal of academic librarianship 22, no. 1 (jan. 1996): 33–43. 9. janis l. johnston, “outsourcing: new name for an old practice,” law library journal 88, no. 1 (winter 1996): 128–34. 10. jennifer a. younger, “the role of librarians in bibliographic access services in the 1990’s,” journal of library administration 15, nos. 1–2 (1991): 125–50. 11. karen l. horny, “taking the lead: catalogers can’t be wallflowers!” technicalities 15, no. 5 (may 1995): 9–12. 12. marsha starr paiste and june mullins, “job enrichment for catalogers,” college & research libraries news 51, no. 1 (jan. 1990): 4–8. 13. roger brisson, “the cataloger’s workstation and the continuing transformation of cata­ loging: part ii.” cataloging & classification quarterly 20, no. 2 (1995): 89–104. 14. barbara a. winters, “cataloging outsourcing at wright state university: implications for acquisitions managers,” library acquisitions: practice & theory 18, no. 4 (winter 1994): 367–73. 15. furuta, “the impact of automation on professional catalogers.” 16. allen b. veaner, “librarians: the next generation,” library journal 109, no. 6 (apr. 1984): 623–25, quoted in miriam tees, “new roles for library school graduates,” canadian library journal (dec. 1986): 372. 17. sheila b. intner, “reengineering, outsourcing, downsizing, and perfect timing,” techni­ catalogers in academic libraries 321 calities 13, no. 11 (nov. 1993): 1,8. 18. ———, “the re-professionalization of cataloging,” technicalities 13, no. 5 (may 1993): 6–8. 19. wendy wood, “the changing role of the catalog librarian: a report of a study at one institution,” cataloging & classification quarterly 12, no. 2 (1991): 145–49. 20. paiste and mullins, “job enrichment for catalogers.” 21. xu, “the impact of automation on job requirements and qualifications for catalogers and reference librarians in academic libraries.” 22. younger, “the role of librarians in bibliographic access services in the 1990’s.” 23. patricia a. eskoz, “catalog librarians and public services—a changing role?” library resources & technical services 35, no. 1 (jan. 1991): 76–86. 24. ———, “the catalog librarian—change or status quo? results of a survey of academic libraries,” library resources & technical services 34, no. 3 (july 1990): 380–92. 280 liaising the catalog: collaborating across library departments to promote successful discoverability through enhanced cataloging tammie busch, debbie campbell, susan m. howell, mary s. konkel, dennis krieb, mingyan li, cathy mayer, and ross taft* academic libraries are increasingly asked to articulate connections between the work of library staff and student success. this article discusses how a team of librarians participating in carli counts, an immersive professional development program funded by a laura bush 21st century librarian grant through the institute of museum and library services, responded to the lack of research investigating the indirect impact of the work of technical services staff on student learning. an anonymous online survey distributed to library staff of the consortium of academic and research libraries in illinois (carli) member institutions explored the perceived value of enhanced cataloging in supporting student research. survey results point to opportunities for communication and collaboration among technical services and public services librarians to improve understanding of enhanced catalog functionality and user needs. introduction bibliographic information contained in a marc record enables library catalog users to find and identify resources when conducting research using the library catalog. additional bibliographic information may provide more satisfactory results, as enhanced cataloging provides additional access points. when a student seeks assistance from reference and instruction librarians or staff in locating resources, the level of bibliographic information in a catalog record can impact the success of this interaction. a student’s ability to conduct a successful search affects the forward trajectory of their research and its outcome. if resources are described more comprehensively, the outcome is likely to yield greater success.  *tammie busch is catalog and metadata librarian at southern illinois university edwardsville, email: tabusch@ siue.edu; debbie campbell is senior library services coordinator, consortium of academic and research libraries in illinois, email: dmcmpbll@uillinois.edu; susan m. howell is cataloging and metadata librarian at southern illinois university carbondale, email: showell@lib.siu.edu; mary s. konkel is head of technical services at college of dupage library, email: konkel@cod.edu; dennis krieb is director of institutional research & library services at lewis & clark community college, email: dkrieb@lc.edu; mingyan li is metadata librarian at university of illinois chicago, email: mli5@uic.edu; cathy mayer is director of grants research and development at elgin community college, email: cmayer@elgin.edu; ross taft is library specialist at illinois state library, email: rtaft@ilsos.gov. ©2023 tammie busch, debbie campbell, susan m. howell, mary s. konkel, dennis krieb, mingyan li, cathy mayer, and ross taft, attribution-noncommercial (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) cc by-nc. mailto:tabusch@siue.edu mailto:tabusch@siue.edu mailto:dmcmpbll@uillinois.edu mailto:showell@lib.siu.edu mailto:konkel@cod.edu mailto:dkrieb@lc.edu mailto:mli5@uic.edu mailto:cmayer@elgin.edu mailto:rtaft@ilsos.gov https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ liaising the catalog 281 due to staff reductions in technical services departments, catalogers may be discouraged from describing resources comprehensively or from enhancing catalog records: they are sometimes directed to create records that are “good enough.” what if all bibliographic records created by catalogers are only ever “good enough?” what impact might this have on library staff’s ability to help students find suitable resources for their research? through a survey conducted in 2020, authors of this article explored how reference and instruction librarians and staff perceive the value of enhanced cataloging in identifying resources to support students’ curricular needs. although the authors eventually hope to survey students’ perceptions of catalog records, such exploration was not initially feasible due to an ils and discovery system migration and temporary institutional closures during the covid-19 pandemic. literature review jon r. hufford published the results of a study that “determined the extent to which elements of a bibliographic record were consulted by reference staff members of three arl libraries.”1 hufford’s research demonstrated that reference staff members “generally consulted only a limited number of elements” in a bibliographic record.2 however, he also acknowledged that he did not know how comprehensive or enhanced these records were and, given local cataloging practices, it would be difficult to estimate the probability of each element within a record. drawing on research from peter hernon and charles mcclure, hufford also raised the question of the skill of surveyed reference staff in using bibliographic data. hufford suggests that reference staff “may be neglecting their catalogs’ potential for enhancing the quality of service to patrons.”3 with the rapid evolution of library discovery systems come new methods for users to interact with a library’s catalog, as well as new methods for displaying enhanced bibliographic information. as a result, scholarship surrounding the importance of these enhanced records in the discovery process has revealed new opinions discussed below. subject headings/description historically, subject headings using controlled vocabularies have been the foundation of librarian search strategies. this was confirmed by william schultz, jr. and lindsay braddy in their 2015 survey of public services and technical services librarians.4 additionally, tina gross, arlene taylor, and daniel joudrey found that even with summary and content data enrichment, the mean percentage of hits that would be lost in the absence of subject headings was 27 percent.5 nevertheless, for a sole cataloger responsible for cataloging a wide range of resources across many subject areas and formats, finding suitable library of congress subject headings (lcsh) can be challenging. in a study of dissertation cataloging practices in arl academic libraries, catherine sasson found that subject information was included more often in notes or local or uncontrolled access points than with library of congress subject headings.6 this decline in the use of lcsh in dissertation cataloging was also reflected in the literature, which confirms the need to look beyond traditional controlled vocabulary when enhancing records. subject headings translate the “aboutness” of a resource, not of the creator. researchers have found creator information to be a promising tool for providing better access to works by specific demographics.7, 8 the marc 21 field 386 allows catalogers to record demographic terms for creators and contributors. use of this field comes with some controversy, such as the risk of “othering” minorities due to the lack of available lcsh terminology, or limited search 282 college & research libraries march 2023 results if demographic information is not added comprehensively. nevertheless, ethical and comprehensive application of this information could increase discovery for certain materials. circulation in addition to increasing discovery, enhancements also have the potential to increase circulation. mina chercourt and lauren marshall looked at the impact of enhancing bibliographic records with table of contents in terms of circulation statistics.9 their results suggest enhancing with table of contents does have a positive effect on circulation, especially in items cataloged prior to january 1, 2000, and those books that fall into the general literature or american literature subjects. as well as supporting the work of record enhancing, this study also suggests the need for collaborative work between cataloging librarians and reference librarians and staff. communication and collaboration with library staff the importance of collaboration between cataloging and reference librarians was highlighted in a report published by the online computer library center, inc. (oclc) that looked at the impact of catalog data on end users’ experiences.10 it was discovered that in addition to addressing duplicate records and typographical errors, reference librarians want upgrades to brief records and added evaluative content such as table of contents, summaries or abstracts, and cover art. without these upgrades, brief records can impede the discovery of entire collections for some end users, a finding highlighted by janelle zetty.11 when reference staff at edith garland dupre library were having difficulty locating scores for music because of a lack of contents notes, they brought it to the attention of their cataloging department. working together, reference and cataloging staff devised a workflow for enhancing records, resulting in an improved user experience. however, catherine sassen, rebecca welch and kathryn loafman found that concerns with cataloging services are not always expressed by library staff outside of cataloging.12 catalogers may need to request feedback from public services staff in order to improve services and increase visibility and value. the authors surveyed personnel in both the public services and cataloging and metadata services departments at the university of north texas to assess the perceived importance of various cataloging services. their survey results help to highlight the misunderstanding in the profession at large regarding what catalogers actually do. for instance, in regard to authority control, public services staff indicated that adding birth and/or death dates to personal name headings was a low priority in terms of enhancements. however, they also indicated that grouping all works by the same author together in the catalog was a high priority. catalogers likely understand that both relate to authority control, and could use this as an opportunity to inform public services staff of how authority control works and the role catalogers play in enhancing discovery and access for end users. returning to sassen’s 2017 study on dissertation cataloging, she suggests that the decline in use of lcsh could be due to limited catalog staffing and recommends consulting with reference and it staff to better understand patron information-seeking behavior prior to enhancing brief records.13 these consultations may help ensure the greatest impact of a cataloger’s work. furthermore, decisions about the approach to cataloging dissertations should be shared with reference and instruction librarians so they can best serve library users. catalogers cannot work in a vacuum. input from reference librarians and library staff is integral to ensuring the best discovery process for our end users and optimum use of our collections. liaising the catalog 283 background the carli counts technical services team project was prompted by the carli technical services committee (tsc). during the september 2019 tsc meeting, committee discussion identified the need for promoting the value and importance of technical services departments in connection to student success. via the library catalog, a professional cataloger provides the bridge between a student and library resources to enhance information discovery and research, thus supporting student success. to create this bridge, a cataloger must have proper training and understand bibliographic control in relation to cataloging and indexing. therefore, tsc recognized the important guiding role professional catalogers play in providing training, development and implementation of best practices, and keeping abreast of the most updated cataloging standards. yet, the committee acknowledged a lack of data and research connecting the work of catalogers to student success. at the november 2019 carli annual meeting, there was a call for participants to form a second cohort of carli counts. carli counts is an immersion program designed to prepare librarians to make effective use of research findings on the impact of academic libraries on student success for the twin purposes of service development and library advocacy. upon learning of the opportunity, tsc members proposed the formulation of a technical servicesfocused team to explore the value and impact of cataloging on student success. with the support of carli staff, a multi-institutional team was formed consisting of librarians with expertise in cataloging, reference, and administration from five institutions. the team also incorporated program mentors and a carli staff liaison. methodology an irb-approved survey was drafted using qualtrics experience management software licensed by the university of illinois chicago (see appendix a). quantitative data were gathered using multiple-choice questions, which were crafted by article coauthors to focus on catalog fields with enhanced cataloging potential. where applicable, a likert scale was used to measure the level of agreement with statements provided as to how valuable participants perceived various parts of a bibliographic record. qualitative data were elicited by providing participants with the opportunity to share comments and elaborate on answers. a pilot survey was distributed randomly in june 2020 to ten carli counts mentors to respond and provide feedback. responses were requested by july 2020. the authors also used the pilot study to test for internal consistency. using cronbach’s alpha, inter-rater reliability of the pilot survey was deemed highly consistent, based on an alpha of .9135. the pilot study was amended to incorporate minor changes based on feedback from carli counts mentors. the final survey was released in october of 2020 with a closing deadline of december 2020. the focus for distribution was on carli member institutions and other illinois academic libraries. participation in the survey was solicited at the november 13, 2020, carli annual meeting and highlighted in the november 20, 2020 carli news, an e-newsletter sent to all 129 carli member institutions. the survey was disseminated to several academic library discussion lists in illinois, including the illinois association of college & research libraries (iacrl). the authors also shared the survey within their professional networks and institutions. there were 171 eligible survey respondents. the data were extracted from qualtrics and tested using anova and t-tests to test for statistical significance. qualitative responses were 284 college & research libraries march 2023 reviewed individually by each of the authors to look for common trends, and observations were then further analyzed through discussion. data analysis the survey administered was designed to collect feedback from reference and/or instruction staff regarding the value of enhanced cataloging. eligible respondents have experience providing reference and/or instructional services. by answering “yes” to the qualifying question, “do you have experience in providing reference and/or instruction?” 171 respondents qualified and completed the survey. among those, a little over half (52 percent) had cataloging experience. most participants were professional librarians (89 percent) followed by paraprofessionals (10 percent), and one graduate student. quantitative data analysis table 1 lists the survey results for the question, “when selecting resources for a student, indicate the degree to which information in a catalog record is helpful.” the question was accompanied by a 4-point likert scale with assigned values: “0 = not useful at all,” “1= somewhat useful,” “2= very useful,” and “3= essential.” analysis of the feedback on selected fields of the catalog record revealed that the highest mean values were subject headings (2.60), summary/abstract (2.49), and table of contents (2.48) (see table 1). summary/abstract librarians and paraprofessionals showed high variability when responding to the question: “in determining the suitability of a resource for a student, how often do you review the summary/abstract within a catalog record?” (see figure 1). data reveals that librarians utilize the summary/abstract more often than paraprofessionals when assisting users. table 1 mean values and number of responses for perceived usefulness of selected catalog fields (likert scale 0–3) mean of perceived usefulness number of responses variant titles 1.51 166 supplementary content 1.58 168 summary/abstract 2.49 166 notes 1.40 166 table of contents 2.48 167 local notes 0.97 166 other authors 1.58 166 accompanying material 1.53 165 subject headings 2.60 167 specific subject headings 1.96 166 statement or responsibility for creation 1.37 166 genre of resource 1.74 165 genre form of resource 1.75 165 related works 1.55 165 liaising the catalog 285 there is a statistically significant difference (p=.003, effect size= .756) in perception between professional librarians and paraprofessionals regarding the importance of the abstract/ summary (see table 2). figure 1 perceived value of summary/abstract within catalog record figure 2 information literacy sessions and perceived value of summary/abstract table 2 responses (n) and mean value of librarians & paraprofessionals reporting perceived value of summary/abstract within catalog record *p=.003. (statistically significant at an alpha of .05, effect size=.756) group librarian paraprofessional mean 2.11 1.59 n 152 17 286 college & research libraries march 2023 for those teaching information literacy, there was also variability according to the number of sessions taught (see figure 2). among these library professionals, statistical significance (p=.034, effect size= .23) of perception toward abstract/summary was also identified regarding information literacy teaching load (see table 3). data reveals that librarians with greater teaching load utilize an abstract/ summary more frequently when assisting users (see table 3). table of contents on the contrary, the responses to the question, “in determining the suitability of a resource for a student, how often do you review the information contained in the table of contents of a catalog record (such as chapters, soundtrack titles, conference paper titles)?” no statistical differences in perceptions were observed between library professionals and paraprofessionals (see table 4) or teaching load (see table 5) although the table of contents and summary/abstract have very similar mean values in aggregate, when broken down by job classification there is no statistically significant difference in perception between professional librarians and paraprofessionals regarding the importance of the table of contents. no statistical significance was revealed by the survey responses for summary/abstract, nor for table of contents in relation to years of academic experiences. table 3 responses (n) and mean value of librarians & paraprofessionals in relation to information literacy teaching load *p=.034. (statistically significant at an alpha of .05, effect size=.23) group no teach 1 class 2 classes 3 + classes mean 1.83 2.06 2.28 2.08 n 42 63 40 25 table 4 responses (n) and mean value of librarians & paraprofessionals reporting perceived value of table of contents within catalog record *p=.100. (no statistical significance) group librarian paraprofessional mean 1.89 1.59 n 151 17 table 5 responses (n) and mean value of librarians & paraprofessionals in relation to information literacy teaching load *p=.680. (no statistical significance) group no teach 1 class 2 classes 3 + classes mean 1.8 1.9 1.8 2 n 41 63 40 24 liaising the catalog 287 filtering & faceting regarding the feedback from the question “how often do you use filtering/faceting or an advanced search to narrow down search results when helping a student?” the researchers found library professionals who have been in the field longer tend to use the filtering/faceting function more often than those new to the profession. however, the p value .078 is only slightly higher than the established alpha value of .05 and therefore is not statistically significant (see figure 3 and table 6). the way these fields are indexed in discovery layers could account for these differing perceptions in regard to the abstract/summary and the table of contents. generally, the table of contents can be discovered with a title search, while the abstract/summary can only be retrieved by a keyword search. the effectiveness of the filtering/faceting also heavily depends on the design of the discovery system. feedback regarding specific cataloging fields was also collected from the survey, including biographical or historical data information (545 field), related resource information (76x-78x fields), and creator/contributor characteristics (386 field). in examining trends to include more creator/contributor demographic information in catalog records, most participants perceived this information as valuable (see figure 4). figure 3 filtering and faceting usage by years of experience table 6 responses (n) and mean value of years of experience in relation to filtering/faceting usage *p=.078 (no statistical significance) group 0-4 years 5-9 years 10-14 years 15-19 years 20+ years mean 2.4 2.5 2.4 2 2.3 n 20 37 40 26 46 288 college & research libraries march 2023 qualitative data analysis from the survey results, respondents made valuable suggestions regarding cataloging enhancements. some of these enhancements can be readily implemented by catalogers while others, such as the use of delimited content notes, are not yet operational due to limitations of discovery system local configurations. others are simply beyond the scope of the catalog record. enhancement suggestions that can be implemented regularly include making sure catalog records include edition statements, which one study participant indicated as essential. in reference to table of contents, another participant stated that for “music materials this information is critical.” respondents also stressed the importance of summaries/abstracts, age ranges, reading levels, and award winners for teacher education students. there were a few cataloging enhancement suggestions that are challenging because of the constraints of out-of-the box discovery system configurations. moving beyond the out-ofthe-box configuration, a trained systems librarian is required to counter system limitations. most bibliographic records contain publication information, which some respondents wanted as a searchable field. such a field would have to be indexed by the discovery system to make it an access point. finally, some suggestions mirrored functionality seen in article databases or did not fall within the scope of the bibliographic record’s capability, such as the number of times a work is cited or the number of times an item is circulated. other suggestions are not standard practice, such as having textbooks searchable by class name, but rather are addressed through localized system functionality. it was also suggested that there are implicit biases in the library of congress subject headings. although subject heading bias is within the realm of the catalog record, it is beyond the scope of this article. figure 4 value of enhanced cataloging features: q14 biographical or historical data, q15 related resource information, & q16 author demographic information liaising the catalog 289 while some suggestions cannot be simply achieved by enhancing catalog records, they imply a greater need for communication. by communicating and closely collaborating with public services colleagues, catalogers can gain a greater understanding of what information is most valued and helpful. through improving communication with discovery system vendors, technical services librarians can offer more effective suggestions and feedback on how to increase the usability of the information provided in catalog records. these collaborations will allow librarians and paraprofessionals to have a greater impact on student success. next steps & future possibilities communication and collaboration catalogers should first and foremost seek opportunities to communicate and collaborate with reference and instruction librarians. this dialog will provide technical services staff with meaningful insight into how public services colleagues use cataloging fields within a record to assist users with their research, further contributing to their institution’s mission and goals. in addition, this dialog will also equip reference staff with a better understanding of what fields go into a “complete” record, as well as potential enhancements that improve metadata and access. our survey results indicate there is a fundamental divide between what reference staff would like to see included in a record in order to support user queries, and what is actually feasible to include due to limitations with the library’s discovery system. intentional collaboration between cataloging and reference departments would allow for a more holistic understanding of the inherent limitations and possibilities for the catalog. ultimately, this enables the library to better address user needs. collaboration between reference, instruction, and technical services departments should be tailored to the needs and capacity of the library and its staff. based on our survey results, conversations with reference staff on the extent and limitations of catalog records may promote a more collaborative environment within the library. interactive discussion could offer reference and technical services departments the opportunity to unpack specific examples of how the catalog is used locally. ultimately, dialog between departments serves the goal of improving patron access to resources. communication and collaboration regarding cataloging fields should also include paraprofessional staff who, based on our survey results, indicate they use cataloging field enhancements differently. these conversations may improve their understanding of enhanced catalog records and aid cataloger’s judgment in prioritizing cataloging fields for enhancement. furthermore, conversations and research with students should be pursued to collect data identifying which enhanced cataloging fields they find useful when independently searching the catalog. cataloging, training and discovery library staff should never lose sight of a basic cataloging tenet—we catalog for our users. in addition to communication and collaboration with public services colleagues, it is imperative that catalogers keep abreast of updates in cataloging fields and emerging standards in cataloging practice. since cataloging is an organic and iterative process, professional catalogers should be having ongoing conversations with all cataloging staff, guiding training within their institutions and working toward developing best practices that will optimize the discovery experience. 290 college & research libraries march 2023 changes in institutional cataloging practices may take time and effort to effectively implement. enhancing the catalog record with additional indexed access points might serve as an interim solution for improved discovery. being able to search by publisher information is valuable to library users and staff alike, and our survey respondents concur. however, due to publisher name variations in bibliographic records, concatenation of this search is difficult. in addition, publisher name changes are not always reflected in authority records, so an authorized access point in a record alone would not solve this problem. for example, when westminster press merged with john knox press, their name became john knox westminster press, which is not reflected in the library of congress authority record. oclc attempted to address this issue with the publisher name server research project, which resulted in worldcat publisher pages.14 this prototype allowed users to select a major publisher and then explore its publication history as represented in the worldcat database. this prototype may be the closest solution to the creation of authority records that reflect these important relationships. unfortunately, this prototype was decommissioned in june of 2012 because the process could not be automated. additionally, the rda overriding principle of “take what you see and accept what you get” does not lend itself to standardization of publisher names with a keyword search. cataloging for users also requires familiarity with the mapping profiles and limitations of the library system from back end to public user interface. how is cataloging data being displayed to the user? are there additional fields from default settings that can be turned on to display fields that will provide enhanced information? catalogers and public services librarians should actively participate in the development of the library system by recommending functional improvements to vendors and championing those system enhancements that result in enhanced cataloging fields indexed for discovery and display. the library catalog today is not your grandmother’s catalog. it has evolved into a launch pad for reference, research, acquisitions, data collection, biographical and demographic information, links to related works—and the list goes on. enhanced cataloging is a critical component in discoverability of our library resources and ultimately our student’s success. our research has provided an increased awareness of the value of enhanced cataloging and the professional staff needed to achieve it. limitations and further research geographic location limited the scope of our research to libraries in illinois, most of which are using the same library services platform. as carli member libraries collectively migrated to the platform in june 2020, most respondents were new users of the system. to further explore the impact of cataloging on student success, we suggest further research to explore student perceptions through surveys, interviews, and focus groups. ethnographic research may be particularly helpful in answering questions such as, how are students using catalog records? what fields are students using? why do they select particular resources? acknowledgements we would like to thank our carli colleagues for their participation in our survey. we also wish to thank carli staff for the training and support provided throughout the carli counts cohort 2 experience. specifically, we are grateful to lisa janicke hinchliffe and anne craig for providing feedback on the development of our survey and this article. liaising the catalog 291 appendix a—survey instrument carli counts ts team survey descriptive information about the survey respondents q1 do you have experience in providing reference and/or instructional services? □ yes (1) □ no (respondents with this answer would leave the survey) (2) q2 do you have cataloging experience? □ yes (1) □ no (2) q3 what is the job classification of your position? □ librarian (mls/mlis) (1) □ paraprofessional (2) □ graduate student worker (3) □ student worker (4) q4 in a typical week during the academic semester, do your current library responsibilities include providing reference service or information literacy/instruction? □ yes (1) □ no (respondents with this answer would leave the survey) (2) q5 in a typical week during the academic semester, how many hours are devoted to providing reference assistance, including desk, chat, phone, or by appointment? □ 0-4 hours (1) □ 5–10 hours (2) □ 11–14 hours (3) □ 15 or more hours (4) q6 in a typical week during the academic semester, how many information literacy/instruction classes do you teach, including in person and online? □ i do not teach information literacy/instruction classes (1) □ 1 class (2) □ 2 classes (3) □ 3 or more classes (4) q7 how long have you worked in an academic library? □ 0–4 years (1) □ 5–9 years (2) □ 10–14 years (3) □ 15–19 years (4) □ 20 years or more (5) general survey questions q8 in determining the suitability of a resource for a student, how often do you review the summary/abstract within a catalog record? □ never (1) □ rarely (2) □ often (3) □ always (4) 292 college & research libraries march 2023 □ if you would like to provide more information, please click and leave your comments below: (5) ________________________________________________ q9 in determining the suitability of a resource for a student, how often do you review the information contained in the table of contents of a catalog record (such as chapters, soundtrack titles, conference paper titles)? □ never (1) □ rarely (2) □ often (3) □ always (4) □ if you would like to provide more information, please click and leave your comments below: (5) ________________________________________________ q10 how often do you use filtering/faceting or an advanced search to narrow down search results when helping a student? □ never (1) □ rarely (2) □ often (3) □ always (4) □ if you would like to provide more information, please click and leave your comments below: (5) ________________________________________________ targeted survey questions q11 when selecting resources for a student, indicate the degree to which information in a catalog record is helpful. 0=not useful at all (1) 1=somewhat useful (2) 2=very useful (3) 3=essential (4) variant titles (such as preferred/also known as, published in another country as, title on container) (1) supplementary content (such as a bibliography, appendix, discography, filmography, index, etc.) (2) summary/abstract (3) notes (such as history of work, details of conference/symposium, closed-captioning, target audience, reading level, braille, other language tracks, dissertation information, system requirements for playback/access, etc.) (4) table of contents (such as chapters, soundtrack titles, conference paper titles) (5) local notes (such as retention, part of a specific donation, signed by author) (6) other authors (such as producers, directors, translators, narrators, cinematographers, costume designers, performers, actors, screenplay writers, musicians) (7) liaising the catalog 293 accompanying material (such as reader discussion guides, answer keys, test banks, supplements, booklets, maps, designs/plans, model key guides, etc.) (8) subject headings (such as library of congress, library of congress children’s) (9) specific subject headings beyond library of congress (such as mesh (national library of medicine) and subject headings in other languages) (10) statement of responsibility for creation/ content with authors credentials & affiliations (11) genre of resource (such as mystery, romance, detective, cookbooks, graphic novels, animated movies, western, sci-fi, etc.) (12) genre form of resource (such as large print, alphabet books, pop-up books, artists’ books, etc.) (13) related works (such as earlier, later, based on, translated from, contained in, etc.) (14) q12 is there information you would add to a cataloging record to help students determine if a resource is useful? if yes, what information would you include? future cataloging record enhancement q13 questions 14–16 address the concept that creating cataloging records often requires complex decisions in order to provide complete and rich detail, which enhances the users’ ability for resource discovery. cataloging is also an organic process, with national standards continuously updating new fields. the following are newer information fields that can now be added to cataloging records. q14 would biographical or historical data information within a catalog record be useful in determining the suitability of a resource for a student? (marc 545) this is an example of the 545 field in a bibliographic record: 545 0 randall mason is associate professor of city and regional planning, former chair of the graduate program in historic preservation, and senior fellow of pennpraxis at the university of pennsylvania’s school of design. max page is professor of architecture and history and director of the historic preservation program at the university of massachusetts in amherst. □ strongly agree (1) □ agree (2) □ disagree (3) □ strongly disagree (4) □ no opinion (5) 294 college & research libraries march 2023 q15 would related resource information within a catalog record be useful in determining the suitability of a resource for a student, especially if this information were hyperlinked? (marc 76x-78x fields) these are examples of 76x-78x fields in bibliographic records: 770 08 supplement (work): breslin, john. banking law. first supplement to the third edition. dublin, ireland : round hall, thomson reuters, 2015. 773 08 contained in: austin, alfred, 1835–1913. poetry of the period. london: r. bentley, 1870. 776 08 online version: garfinkel, irwin. feminization of poverty. madison : university of wisconsin—madison, 1985. □ strongly agree (1) □ agree (2) □ disagree (3) □ strongly disagree (4) □ no opinion (5) q16 would author demographic information within a catalog record would be useful in determining the suitability of a resource for a student? (marc 386 field) this is an example of the 386 field in a bibliographic record: 245 00 eyes of desire: a deaf gay & lesbian reader / raymond luczak, editor. 386 deaf; gays; americans 386 deaf gays □ strongly agree (1) □ agree (2) □ disagree (3) □ strongly disagree (4) □ no opinion (5) q17 is there anything else you would like to share with us in regard to enhanced cataloging information? notes 1. jon r. hufford, “elements of the bibliographic record used by reference staff members at three arl academic libraries,” college & research libraries, 52, no. 1 (january 1991): 54–64, https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_52_01_54 2. hufford, “elements of the bibliographic record.” 3. ibid. 4. william n. schultz, jr., and lindsay braddy, “a librarian-centered study of perceptions of subject terms and controlled vocabulary,” cataloging & classification quarterly, 55, no. 7–8 (2017): 456–66, https://doi.org/10.10 80/01639374.2017.1356781 5. tina gross, arlene g. taylor, and daniel n. joudrey, “still a lot to lose: the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching,” cataloging & classification quarterly, 53, no. 1 (2015): 1–39, https://doi.org/10.1080/01 639374.2014.917447 6. catherine sassen. “enhancing bibliographic access to dissertations,” technical services quarterly, 34, no. 1 (2017): 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2017.1238202 7. eric wiley and angela yon, “applying library of congress demographic group characteristics for creators,” cataloging & classification quarterly, 57, no. 6 (2019): 349–68, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2019.1654054 8. elizabeth hobart, “recording creator characteristics for native american authors: an analysis of bibliographic records,” cataloging & classification quarterly, 58, no. 1 (2020): 59-75, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374. 2019.1704333 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_52_01_54 https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1356781 https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1356781 https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.917447 https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.917447 https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2017.1238202 https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2019.1654054 https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2019.1704333 https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2019.1704333 liaising the catalog 295 9. mina chercourt and lauren marshall, “making keywords work: connecting patrons to resources through enhanced bibliographic records, technical services quarterly, 30, no. 3 (2013): 285–95, https://doi.org/10 .1080/07317131.2013.785786 10. karen calhoun et al., online catalogs: what users and librarians want: an oclc report, (dublin, ohio: oclc, online computer library catalog, inc., 2009), https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/onlinecatalogs/fullreport.pdf 11. janelle zetty, “different departments, same goals: improving user experience through collaboration,” codex: the journal of the louisiana chapter of the acrl, 4, no. 3 (2017): 82–9, https://journal.acrlla.org/index.php/ codex/article/view/132/267 12. catherine sassen, kathryn loafman, and rebecca welch, “assessment of cataloging services in an academic library,” technical services quarterly 33, no. 1 (2016): 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2015.1093820 13. sassen, “enhancing bibliographic access to dissertations.” 14. “worldcat publisher pages,” oclc research, accessed february 26, 2022, https://www.oclc.org/research/ activities/pubpages.html https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2013.785786 https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2013.785786 https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/onlinecatalogs/fullreport.pdf https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/onlinecatalogs/fullreport.pdf https://journal.acrlla.org/index.php/codex/article/view/132/267 https://journal.acrlla.org/index.php/codex/article/view/132/267 https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2015.1093820 https://www.oclc.org/research/activities/pubpages.html https://www.oclc.org/research/activities/pubpages.html college and research libraries david c. weber / '1 a century of cooperative programs among academic libraries .~ a review of cooperative programs among colleges and universities over the last century leads to the conclusion that a few very significant developments and changes have taken place during the past decade after ninety years of laborious and diverse effort toward cooperative programs dominated by the effects of national policy and economic conditions. it is an interesting history, one made difficult by the plethora of data. the present paper uses a historical perspective in order to assess b~er the present and the immediate future. the first part chronologically prese~ts selected examples of cooperative programs. the latter section includes details on a few programs of current special significance, comments on some strengths and weaknesses, and reaches 111 . a few conclusions. early historical review before reviewing the past century, it ...., may be worthwhile taking a brief look at circumstances in academic libraries >1 two hundred years ago. at that time academic libraries in america were indeed insignificant by today's perspective. dartmouth had 305 volumes. brown university owned 312 volumes including 't fifty-two received in 1772 which were "by far the greatest donation our little ~ library has yet had." princeton had more than 1,200 volumes, all to be consumed by fire in 1801. the university of pennsy~vania' s chief distinction in 1776 was that during the revolution it had received a gift of scientific books from louis xvi. columbia stor~d its volumes during the war in the city hall or elsewhere; british soldiers took them to barter for grog, and only six or seven hundred volumes were found-thirty years later-in st. paul's chapel. by the time of the revolution, yale had collected over 4,000 volumes in its library. the college of william and mary had a very few thousand volumes. harvard had lost all but 404 volumes of its library by fire in 1764, yet by the revolutionary war it had been rebuilt probably to nearly 10,000 volumes. by 1876 the circumstances were markedly different. great libraries had come upon the american scene. some remarkable librarians had created most of the essential concepts and policies for library administrative methods. collections began to grow rapidly, with a great deal of attention necessarily given to cataloging and classification. the year 1876 was momentous in that the american library association was formed. 1 the american library ] ournal was founded with four of its twenty-one associate editors "leading the profession" from university libraries. the library bureau was established as a supply house providing a major force toward i 205 206 1 college & research libraries • may 1976 standardization. it also was the year in which the classic -volume, public libraries in the united states of america; their history, condition and management, was published by the united states bureau of education. one looks in vain, however, in that major volume of 1,187 pages for any statement regarding cooperation among academic libraries. cooperative cataloging was one of the very first interests of the new library association. a committee was formed to devise a plan for continuation of poole's "index to periodical literature," and another committee tackled the matter of standardization of cataloging. several articles in the library i ournal discussed plans for cooperation in indexing and cataloging. yet it was a committe·e on cooperation in indexing and cataloguing college libraries, which was appointed august 1876, that is significant with respect to academic cooperation. it was formed by the librarians of the university of rochester, cornell university, vassar college, syracuse university, and the new york state library. this committee presented to the university convocation of the state of new york in july 1877 a substantial report which called upon college libraries to speak out on any special adaptation of the cooperative cataloging movement which was required for their special wants: at present the work is chiefly in the hands of the public libraries. . . . in making this report your committee do not wish to be understood as endorsing fully all the methods proposed by the committees of the library association. it is very doubtful whether as good cataloging can be done, in the manner proposed, by a considerable number of libraries, even under very explicit rules, as might be expected of one or two experts, who should work for pay under the general direction and criticism of the committee. cooperation can be secured quite as effectively by a combination of capital as by a combination of labor. in.such an enterprise the first most important thing to be aimed at is perfection of work. . . . other points might be mentioned but a review of the methods proposed is not the object of this report. we believe that it will be far better for us to work with the library association, though we may differ in opinion as to some details, than to undertake any separate work in this state.2 the decade of the 1890s witnessed the beginnings of major national programs of academic library cooperation. it did not come unannounced onto the scene. there had indeed been discussions over several previous decades, at least since 1851, and no doubt there may have been a large number of local arrangements of such cooperation. in 1898 the librarian of the university of california announced willingness to lend to other libraries that would lend to the university of california. in january 1898 the american library association began publishing analytic cards as a shared indexing/ cataloging program. the copy for these cards was prepared by five major libraries for articles in some 250 serials. the h. w. wilson company took over this analytic activity in june 1919 for incorporation into the international index of periodicals. into the twentieth century in another consideration, the librarian of princeton university, ernest c. richardson, proposed in the spring of 1899 "a lending library for libraries" and suggested that this might be the library of congress or an independent organization. the library of congress issued a policy governing interlibrary loans in 1907 and lent to such an extent that by 1909 it loaned. 1,023 volumes to 119 libraries -including forty-nine academic libraries which accounted for half of these loans. an ala interlibrary loan • + • a century of cooperative programs i 207 code was first published in 1916. if a union catalog of holdings is permitted within the definition of cooperation, there were then major developments, notably so in the first decade of this century. the first regional union catalog was created in 1901 at the california state library. after first being limited to periodicals, it was soon enlarged to cover all nonfiction. the national union catalog was established in 1900. in november 1901 the library of congress began selling copies of its printed catalog cards as well as galley proofs of these cards. during the winter of 1901-02 it began the donation of complete "depository" sets of cards to certain libraries. some libraries receiv,.; ing these began immediately to file them t 1 into their public card catalogs, thus constituting union catalogs. the university of chicago library from 1913 and the harvard college library from 1911 published printed cards, the scope designed to supplement lc and complement each other. chicago distributed its cards from 1913 until1917. (when chicago began distributing its cards may 2, 1913, those titles also owned by harvard, about 30 percent, appeared with the symbol "ucl-hcl.") the university of california issued them from 1915 to 1917. in july 1918 the university of chicago began publishing analytic cards for certain european serials. the university of michigan published for some time after 1924; the university of illinois started in 1926. wesleyan university published cards sold to thirtytwo research libraries from 1934 until world war ii. the library of congress established its cooperative cataloging division in 1932.3 another cooperative endeavor is that of joint acquisition programs. perhaps the earliest example is the 1913-14 south american buying trip to eleven countries by walter lichtenstein, the librarian of northwestern university. he acquired 9,000 volumes plus newspapers and a few manuscripts on behalf of harvard university, brown university, northwestern university, the john crerar library, and the american antiquarian society. one or two features of this joint effort are of note: in venezuela and bolivia and partly also in brazil the purchases consisted of collections which had to be divided among the cooperating institutions, and naturally included a fair amount of material which, either because the cooperating institutions already had it or because the class of material in question is not collected by the institutions which i represented, can be sold to other libraries in this country. the purchase of collections on joint account in this manner was a new experiment. it did not seem to me to be wholly satisfactory. the chief difficulty was that the material could not be readily divided until my own return to this country, with the result that no one knew until i did return how much each institution was liable, and hence i was considerably hampered in making further purchases. as it finally turned out, one institution acted to a large extent as banker for the other institutions, which evidently is pleasant enough for the latter, but is not quite fair to that institution which has the misfortune to be the banker .... when the collections came to be divided it was soon felt that the only possible way to divide the cost among the institutions interested was to devise a system of points. a pamphlet was counted as one point, an unbound volume as four, and a bound volume as eight.4 it seems quite certain that the increase in publishing in the 1850s and the economics surrounding the civil war brought an end to the common practice of publishing library catalogs periodically in book . form. it also there. by hastened the adoption of unitary catalog cards which during the last quarter of the nineteenth century became the prevalent mode for listing 208 i college & research libraries • may 1976 holdings and facilitated sharing of bibliographic data. if the more affluent times of the 1880s and 1890s resulted in phenomenal growth of collections, it may have been predictable there would be an upsurge in cooperative proposals and the beginning of national cooperative programs. despite the 1927 publication of the great union list of serials in libraries of the united states and canada, it would seem that the decade of the 1920s was not a period of new concepts in academic library cooperation. with the crash of 1929 and conditions of the great depression, however, there was impetus for cooperation which led to new programs of which a few among academic libraries may be cited. dozens of new union card catalogs were begun in the 1930s, stimulated by the vast federal relief program. one result was the 1940-41 survey under the sponsorship of the ala board of resources of american libraries which recommended their future coordination to assure thorough coverage, minimum overlap, and sound fiscal support. as a predecessor to cataloging-in-publication and the national program for acquisitions and cataloging (npac), the cooperative cataloging program began in 1932. within ten years nearly 400 u.s. and canadian libraries contributed data for 60,000 scholarly titles for lc editing and publication. an informal arrangement among several institutions constituted the cooperating libraries of upper new york, cluny. formed in 1931, it included buffalo university, colgate university, the grosvenor library, hamilton college, syracuse university, cornell university, and union college. this group functioned until 1939 as a clearinghouse for mutual problems and cooperated on a union list of periodicals and the joint purchase of microfilm of early english publications. an example of a formal agreement is the duke university and the university of north carolina interlibrary project. in 1931 these two institutions agreed to ~pedal book collecting areas, and the libraries exchanged author cards for their catalogs. four years later a messenger service commenced. two other ;north carolina institutions joined in 1955, and full borrowing privileges were extended to all members of each institution. an example of contractual arrangements among several libraries is the joint university libraries founded in 1936 by vanderbilt university, george peabody college, and scarritt college for christian workers. operating under a joint board of trustees, the facility is an independent entity, jointly owned and financed by the participants. 5 ano.ther example is the claremont colleges library system which began in 1931 when a contractual arrangement among the claremont graduate school, pomona college, and scripps college established a joint order and catalog department to serve the three libraries. a 1933 example of an arrangement for reciprocal borrowing privileges is the atlanta university center corporation in atlanta, georgia. with an initiating grant from the general education board it included atlanta university, morehouse college, spelman college, morris brown college, clark university, and in 1957 the interdenominational theological center. · another variation of interinstitutional cooperation is the unification of academic libraries under state control. this was pioneered in 1932 by the oregon state board ·of higher education which appointed one director of libraries for the entire state system and established the principle of free circulation among all state institutions. it also set up a central order division which now takes the form of a combined author list of all books and periodicals in the state .. ,. + a century of cooperative programs f 209 system maintained in the order department of the oregon state university library "to eliminate unnecessary duplication of materials."6 more recent events a highly selective list of other cooperative programs of the past forty years would include the following: 1942-0pening of the new england deposit library ( nedl) as a cooperative storage facility of boston college, boston university, harvard university, m.i.t., radcliffe college, simmons college, tufts university, and four nonacademic libraries. 1944-the cooperative committee on library building plans initiated by president dodds of princeton to concern itself with common problems in the planning for and design of academic library buildings. 1946-the cooperative acquisitions project for wartime publications conducted by the library of congress which, over three years, shipped nearly a million volumes from europe to 113 participating american libraries. 1948-formation of the universal serial and book exchange, inc. (previously named the u.s. book exchange). of the initial members, 106 ( 76 percent) were college or university libraries; they continue to deposit about 70 percent of the material exchanged, and they receive about the same percentage of 'the total distributed. 1948-start of servic.e under the farmington plan to about sixty research libraries of a coordinated foreign acquisition program for current matejcials of research value-a cooperative program born of disconcerting experiences with european acquisitions during and immediately following world war ii. this major cooperative program was one of the most effective and • significant over many years. with 1965 as an example, fifty-two libraries acquired 22,419 volumes, constituting the total research publications from fourteen countries, in addition to area assignment receipts from the lessdeveloped countries. 1951-0pening of the midwest interlibrary center, later to be known as the center for research libraries, by ten midwestern university libraries as a cooperative akin to the nedl but with a program for joint buying and different categories of deposit or center ownership. 1956-initiation of the foreign newspaper microfilm project a_s a cooperatively filmed, sharedpositive-copy program managed by the association of research libraries, the offspring of harvard's duplicate sale program begun in 1938. 1959-the latin american cooperative acquisitions program (la cap), begun as a commercial endeavor for about forty academic libraries. 7 1961-congress authorized · expenditures under public law 480 of blocked currencies for acquisition and cataloging of multiple copies of publications from eight countries. managed by the library of congress, this pl 480 program benefited over 300 academic libraries, with materials from ceylon, india, indonesia, israel; nepal, pakistan, united arab repub210 i college & research libraries • may 1976 lie, and yugoslavia. 1965-the medical library assistance act, creating, among other programs, the eleven regional medical libraries providing interlibrary loan and reference and consultation services to a broad region. seven are located in universities: harvard, university of washington, wayne state, ucla, emory, texas, and nebraska. 1966-the national program for acquisitions and cataloging (npac), managed by the library of congress and initiated by the association of research libraries. 1966-the new york state reference and research library resources program ( 3rs program) established to .facilitate use of research library materials. 1967 -incorporation of the ohio college library center ( oclc) as a cooperative cataloging service for ohio colleges and universities. 1968-the center for chinese research materials, formed by the association of research libraries for acquiring, reprinting, and distributing selected valuable but inaccessible chinese scholarly materials. 1973-the research libraries group, formed of harvard university, yale university, columbia university, and the new york public library, to undertake a program of coordinated collection building, reciprocal access privileges, delivery service, and a common computer storage of catalog records for their collections so as to enhance coordinated acquisitions and resource sharing. the composition of prograins for four cooperatives begun in the late 1960s may be cited as typical. the five associated university libraries (faul) in new york (buffalo, rochester, syracuse, cornell, and binghamton) currently includes assigned subject specialization for acquisitions, delivery service, photocopying, reciprocal borrowing, expanded interlibrary loan service, and joint research projects. ·the librarians of the council of independent kentucky colleges and universities encompasses twenty-one colleges active in joint purchase, assigned subject specialization, reciprocal borrowing privileges, expanded interlibrary loan service, and production of union lists and directories. the middle atlantic research libraries information network (marlin) of seven universities includes delivery services, photocopying, mutual notification of purchase, production of union lists and directories, expanded interlibrary loan, and special communication services. the north dakota network for knowledge of seventeen college and university libraries plus thirteen public and special libraries includes all of marlin's program except purchase notification and also provides mutual reference services, reciprocal borrowing, and operation of a special bibliographic center. one or two cooperative liaisons were ·formed every year or so from 1930 until 1960 when there was a sharp increase. the delanoy-cuadra directory lists the births: four in 1964;· seven in 1965; eleven in 1966; sixteen in 1967; twentyfour in 1968; twenty-four in 1969; and at least nineteen in 1970.8 if one had a comparable mortality list, one might speculate that some of these would falter. yet a spot check found none of those listed as formed during the 1960s were deceased by 1975. short-lived efforts also provide lessons yet it must also be recorded that some • • + a century of cooperative programs i 211 major attempts at cooperation among academic libraries petered out or failed, though much may have been learned. an evaluative history of library cooperation is faced with problems. joe w. kraus has written: several difficulties present themselves at the outset. the literature of library · cooperation is very large and most of the articles are uncritical. although most of the cooperative enterprises of libraries are announced and described in some detail in library periodicals, there are few evaluative reports that give a clear account of the success of a venture and the factors leading to success or failure. unsuccessful ones, in fact, simply seem to fade away. costs of a cooperative effort are particularly hard to ascertain, in part because many expenses are absorbed in the participating libraries, and in part because standard reporting procedures have generally not yet been developed.9 one may here cite the columbia-harvard-yale medical library computerbased cooperative c·ataloging program that was terminated after operating from 1963 to 1966. as stated in the research proposal issued in december 1962 from the yale medical library, the objective of the project was to test the feasibility of using a computerized catalog to provide rapid and improved information services in medical libraries. an on-line system was projected; the significant achievements were the recording of 23,000 titles and the automated production of catalog cards. (it was the precursor of oclc.) an array of technical problems concerned input procedures. a change in data format standards was needed. authority files were lacking. the subject treatment caused great problems, as did error-detection procedures. there were problems of staff cooperation. and communication.10 operational methods among the three participants varie·~ or;. [:>.,\( • .-<' fig. 2. catalog profile questionnaire. expand, a modified yale program written in mad and run on an ibm 7094. by combining the number of tracings and pdt requirements, expand developed a card image for each catalog card required by the requesting library. it also prepared a sort tag for each image so that the image could be subsequently sorted by library into packs and alphabetized within each pack. expand essentially did the formatting of catalog cards except for the complex lc call number formatting carried out by cnvt. the file of card images was passed to a program named build print tape (bldpt) written in bal and run on the ibm 360/ 75. bldpt first converted the external ibm 7094 bcd characters to ebcdic. next bldpt sorted the images, and finally, it arranged the images on a single tape to allow printing on continuous, two-up catalog card formsthe first half of the sorted file was printed on the left-hand cards and the second half on the right. the print program was also written in bal but run on an ibm 360/ 50. it was designed so that either the entire file or a segment as small as four cards could be printed; the latter feature was of greatest use in reprinting cards that for one of several reasons were not satisfactorily printed during the first run. cards were printed six lines to an inch and the print train used was a modified version of the train designed by the university of chicago which in turn was a modified version of the ibm tn train. shared cataloging systemjkilgour, et al. 163 the printer attached to the ibm 360/50 was an ibm 1403 n1 printer. this printer appears to be superior to any other high-speed printer currently available, but to obtain a product of high quality, it was necessary to fine-tune the printer, to use a mylar ribbon from which the ink does not flake off, and to experiment with various mechanical settings to determine the best setting for tension on the card forms and for forms thickness. above all, patience in large amounts was required during initial weeks when it seemed as though a messy appearance would never be eliminated. oclc off-line catalog card production programs were written in assembler language and higher level languages. use of higher level languages for character manipulation incurs unnecessarily high costs. therefore, for a large production sys tem like oclc, it is absolutely required that processing programs and subroutines that manipulate all characters, character by character, be written in an assembler language to obtain efficient programs that run at low cost. programs that do not manipulate characters, such as the oclc program for embedding pdt's in cnvt, may well be written in a higher level language. materials and equipment-a summary off-line catalog production was based on availability of marc ii records on magnetic tapes disseminated weekly by the library of congress. without the marc ii tapes, the off-line procedure could not have operated. each week, the new marc ii records were added to the previous cumulated master file also on magnetic tape, and previously unfilled and new requests were run against the updated file. osu computers employed were an ibm 360/75, an ibm 360/50, an ibm 7094, and an ibm 1620. the run procedure was complex and therefore somewhat inefficient, but this inefficiency was traded off against a predictably high expense to write a new card formatting program. members submitted a request for card production on a punch card on which the member had written an lc card number. members could specify a recycling period of from one to thirty-six weeks for running their request cards against the marc ii file before unfulfilled requests would be returned. in general, request cards bore lc card numbers for that section of the marc ii file that was complete; at first, the file was inclusive for only "7" series numbers, but in early 1971 the recon file for "69" numbers was added. request cards often numbered several thousand a week. catalog card forms are the now-familiar two-up, continuous forms with tractor holes along each side for mechanical driving. the card stock is permalife, one of the longest-lived paper stocks available. a thin slit of about one thirty-second of an inch in height converts each three-inch vertical section of card stock to 75 mm. the lowest price paid in a lot of a half million cards has been $8.065 per thousand. after having been printed, the card forms are trimmed on a modified uarco forms trimmer, model number 1721-1. this trimmer makes four 164 journal of library automation vol. 5/3 september, 1972 continuous cuts in the forms and produces cards with horizontal dimensions of 125 mm. cards are stacked in their original order as printed and are therefore in filing order. the trimmer operates at quoted speeds of 115 and 170 feet per minute or 920 and 1,360 cards per minute. measurements of speeds of operations confirmed these ratings. results the off-line catalog production system produced 529,893 catalog cards from july 1970 through august 1971 at an average cost of 6.57 cents per card. this cost includes over twenty separate cost elements plus a threequarter cent charge for overhead. the firm of haskins & sells, certified public accountants, reviewed the costing procedures that oclc employs, found that all direct costs were being included, and recommended the three-quarter cent overhead charge. the number of extension cards varies from library to library depending almost entirely on the types of cards on which libraries have elected to print tracings. however, one university library with a half-dozen department libraries and requiring tracings on only shelf list and main entry cards averages approximately six cards per title. cataloging using the oclc off-line system results in a decrease of staff requirements, and some libraries that used the system during most of the year found that they needed less staff in cataloging. reduction of staff by taking advantage of normal staff turnover facilitated financial preparation for the oclc on-line system in these libraries. evaluation despite the obvious inefficiences generated by running production computer programs on four different computers in two different locations and despite inefficiencies in the programs themselves, computer costs to process marc ii tapes and to format catalog cards, but not to print them, was 2.27 cents per card. as will be shown later, newer and more efficient programs have halved this cost, but even at 2.27 cents per card for formatting and .33 cents per card for printing, the cost of oclc off-line card production is less than half the cost of more traditional card production methods ( 7). two features originally designed into the system were never implemented, somewhat diminishing the usefulness of the system for some libraries. one of the incompleted features was a technique for deleting, changing, or adding a field to a marc record (this capability exists in the on-line system). absence of this procedure meant that libraries had to accept lc cataloging without modification except to call numbers. the second missing feature was the ability to print multiple holding locations on cards (this capability also exists in the on-line system) although it was possible to print multiple holdings in one location. this deficiency limited the usefulness of the system for large libraries processing duplicates into shared cataloging systemjkilgour, et al. 165 two or more collections. both of these features could have been activated, . but shortage of available time prior to activation of the on-line system prevented their implementation. figure 3 shows the high quality of the catalog cards produced. subsequent to attainment of this level of quality, there have been no complaints from members except in cases where a piece of chaff from the card forms went through the printer and caused omission of characters. oclc continues to vary the design of its continuous forms to achieve completely chaff-free stock. the shortest possible time in which cards could be received by the member library after submitting a request card was ten days, but it is doubtful that this response time was often achieved. the minimum average response time for the three-quarters of requests for which a marc record was located on the first run was two weeks. delays at a computer center or incorrect submission of a run could extend this delay to three and four weeks, and unfortunately such delays were cumulative for subsequent requests until the "weekly" runs were made sufficiently more often than weekly to catch up. if another delay occurred during a catch-up period, the response time further degraded. during the fourteen months of operation, there were two serious delays. the amount of normal turnover that occurred in oclc libraries during the fourteen months and that was taken advantage of by not filling positions was too small to reduce the financial burden incurred in starting up the on-line system. a few libraries demonstrated that it was possible to take advantage of such attrition. however, 20 percent of the libraries did not participate in the on-line system and perhaps half of those who did participate were uncertain as to whether the on-line cataloging system would operate or would operate at a saving. when feasibility of on-line shared cataloging has been substantiated and other centers begin to implement similar systems, it should be possible to activate off-line catalog production sufficiently in advance of on-line implementation to enable participants to take adequate advantage of normal attrition to minimize, or nearly eliminate, additional expenditures. experience such as that of oclc will enable new centers to calculate the number of months necessary for off-line production required to reduce salary expenditures by an amount needed to finance the on-line system. shared cataloging-on-line the cataloging objectives of the on-line shared cataloging system are to supply a cataloger with cataloging information when and where the cataloger needs the information and to reduce the per-unit cost of cataloging. catalog products of the system are the same as the off-line systemcatalog cards in final form alphabetized for £ling in specific catalogs; the on-line system is not limited to marc ii records but also allows cataloging input by member libraries. the shared cataloging system, which accommo166 ]oumal of library automation vol. 5/3 septembe r, 1972 jc423 oll7 ctt tt 171 oe45 1971 oaku la~reit de lacharr~ere repe. stude& sur ta theorle deaocratlc: spinoza, rousseau, beaet, marx. paris, pa:yot, 1963o 218 p• 23 c •• c8ibllotheque politique et econoaique) bibliocraphical ~ootnotes. dawis, mildred j., edo babroider:y desians, 1780-1820; 1ro• the aanuscript collection, the textile resource and research center, the valentine museua, richaond, virginia. edited by mildred j. davis. new york, crown publishers f1971 1 xiii, 94 p• (chie1l:y illus. (part colo)) 29 c•• commercial policy. 338.91 1:875in l:reinin, wordechai elihau, 193000 international econo•ics; a polic y approach (b:y) mordechai e. ~reinin• mew york harcourt, brace, jovanovich [ 1971 1 x., 379 p• it lus. (the harbrace series in business and econo•i cso) dc 430.5 • z9 c34 oako intersectoral capital ~tows in the econoaic dewelopaent o~ taiwan, 1 89 51960. lee, tena-hui • intersectoral capital ~lows in th e econoaic developaent o~ taiwan, 1 8&~1960. ithaca (n.y.] cornell univ ers it y press [ 1971 1 xxt 197 p• 23 cao an out&rowth o~ the author's the~is , cornell oniwersit:y, 1968. bibliography: p• (183)-1 8 1. 0 a"rnt 76-1 59031 ( fl(;uh e fig. 3. computer-produced catalog cards. hed uced 25%) dates all cataloging done in modern european alphabets, builds a union catalog of holdings in oclc member libraries as cataloging is done. one library, wright state university, is converting its entire catalog to machinereadable form in the oclc on-line catalog. the third major goal is a communications system for transacting interlibrary loans. system design and equipment selection figure 4 depicts the basic design of computer and communication comshared cataloging systemf kilgour, et al. 167 ponents for th e comprehensive system comprised of the five subsystems described in th e introduction. the machine system for shared cataloging was designed to be a subsystem of the total system so that subsequent modules could be added with minimal dismption . similarly, the logical d esign of the shared cataloging subsystem was constructed so that the modules of shared cataloging would be common to the remaining file requirements as shown in figure 1. design of the on-line shared cataloging system began with a redefinition of the catalog products of off-line catalog production ( 5) . in this exercise, the advisory committee on cataloging, comprised of members from seven libraries, contributed valuable assistance. the committee was also most helpful in designing the formats of displays to appear on terminal screens. important decisions in the design of the computer, communications, and terminal systems were those involving mass storage devices and terminals. random access storage was the only type feasible for achieving the objective of supplying a user with bibliographic information when and where he needed it. hence, random access memory devices were selected for the comprehensive system and ipso facto for shared cataloging. data channel system file catalog f1 l e data channe i memory drive contr ol data channe l ----connect1on made 1f cpu #i malfunct ions ·connect1on made if cpu #2 ma l funct1ons fig. 4. computer and communication system. 168 ]oum.al of library automation vol. 5/ 3 september, 1972 the cathode ray tube (crt) type of terminal was selected primarily because of its speed and ease of use by a cataloger. crt terminals are far more flexible in operation than are typewriter terminals from the viewpoint of both the user and machine system designer. for these reasons, crt terminals can enhance the amount of work done by the system as a whole. it was originally planned to select a computer without the assistance of computerized simulation, but in the course of time, it became clear that it was impossible to cope with the interaction among the large number of variable computer characteristics without computerized simulation. therefore, a contract was let to comress, a firm well known for its work in computer simulation. ten computer manufacturers made proposals to oclc for equipment to operate the five subsystems at peak loading (an average five requests per second over the period of an hour ) . all ten proposed computer systems failed because simulation revealed inefficiencies in their operating systems for oclc requirements. oclc and comress staff then proposed a modification in operating systems, which the manufacturers accepted. the next series of trials revealed that more than half of the computers or secondary memory files would have to be utilized over 100 percent of the time to process the projected traffic. as a result of these findings , one computer manufacturer withdrew its proposal, and five others changed proposals by upgrading their systems. on the final simulation runs, the percent of simulated computer utilization ranged from 19.70 percent to 114.31 percent. a subsequent investigation of predictable delays due to queuing in such a system showed that unacceptable delays could arise if computer utilization rose above 30 percent at peak traffic. three manufacturers proposed computer systems that were under 30 percent utilization and, for these, a trade-off study was made that included such characteristics as cost, reliability, time to install the applications system, and simplicity of program design. the findings of the simulation and trade-off studies provided the basis of the decision to select a xerox data systems sigma 5 computer. major components of the oclc sigma 5 are the central processing unit (cpu), three banks of core memory with a total capacity of 48 thousand 32-bit words or 192 thousand 8-bit bytes, a high speed disk secondary memory, 10 disk-pack spindles with total capacity of 250,000,000 bytes plus two spare spindles, two magnetic tape drives, two multiplexor channels, five communications controllers, a card reader, card punch, and printer. the character code is ebcdic. figure 5 illustrates the sigma 5 configuration at oclc. in this configuration, the burden of operating communications does not fall on the cpu so that there is no requirement for "cycle stealing" that slows processing by a cpu. the lease cost to oclc of the equipment represented in figure 5 is $16,317 monthly. the listed monthly lease of the equipment is $21,421 from which an educational discount of 10 percent is deducted. (the remaining difference is due to a rebate because the original order included secondary shared cataloging system j kilgour, et al. 169 memory units that xds was to obtain from another manufacturer who proved incapable of supplying units that fulfilled specifications. hence, xds was forced to supply other memory units having a higher list price but has done so at a cost per bit of the units originally ordered.) the printer furnished with the sigma 5 does not provide the high-quality printing required for library use. at the present time, oclc prints catalog cards on an osu ibm 1403-n1 printer that without doubt provides the highest quality printing currently available from a line printer. however, oclc is designing an interface between a sigma 5 and an ibm 1403 memory bonk no. i --dolo ---control memory bonk no. 2 memory bonk no. 3 i i i --------------~ l i 1 r----------r sigma 5 cpu multiplexor opera! or's console cord punch magnetic tope units cord reader dolo bose disk bonk no. i doto bose disk bonk no. 2 _______ !j bus-shor in g 1---+----, mull iplexor fig. 5. xds sigma 5 configuration. 170 journal of library automation vol. 5/3 september, 1972 printer; xds is also developing a new type of printer that will provide high quality output. when the sigma 5 can produce quality printing, it will be fully qualified to be used for nodes in national networks. as has already been stated, the crt-type terminal was selected because of its ease of use. moreover, the simulation study confirmed that crt terminals would place far less burden on the central computer and therefore, for the oclc system, would make possible selection of a less expensive computer than would be required to drive typewriter terminals. although typewriter terminals cost less, the total cost could be higher for a system employing typewriter terminals than for one using crt's because of greater central computer expense. library requirements for a crt terminal are: 1) that the terminals have the capability of displaying upperand lower-case characters and diacritical marks; 2) that the image on the screen be highly legible and visible; 3) that the terminal possess a large repertoire of editing capabilities; and 4) that interaction with the central computer and files be simple and swift. system requirements were: 1) that the terminal accept and generate ascii code; 2) that it make minimal demands for message transmissions from and to the central site; 3) that it have the capability of operating with at least a score of other terminals on the same dedicated line; and 4) that its cost, including service at remote sites, be about $150 per month. data were collected on crt's produced by fifteen manufacturers, and three machines were identified as being prime candidates for selection. oclc carried out a trade-off study in which thirty-three characteristics were assessed for these three machines. one of the thirty-three (reliability) could not be judged for any of the three because none had yet reached the market. for the remaining characteristics, the irascope lte excelled or equaled the other two terminals for twenty-eight characteristics including all nineteen characteristics of importance to the oclc user. moreover, the irascope was outstandingly superior in its ability to perform continuous insertion of characters, line wrap-around during insertion of characters, repositioning of characters so that each line ends in a complete word, and full use of its memory. however, the irascope was the most expensive$175 a month as compared with $153 and $166. nevertheless, the irascope was selected because of its obvious superiority. pilot operation by library staffs has not produced complaints concerning visibility or operability; complaints during pilot operation have sprung from failures caused by a variety of bugs in telephone systems and a couple of bugs in the terminals that were subsequently exterminated. the number of terminals needed by a member library for shared cataloging was calculated on the assumption that six titles could be processed per terminal-hour. it was also assumed that a library might have only one staff member to use the terminal throughout the year. it was further assumed that as much as three months of the terminal operator's time would be lost to vacations, sick leave, and breaks. at the rate of six titles per terminal-hour shared cataloging system f kilgour, et al. 171 and with 2,000 working hours in a year, 12,000 titles would be processed annually assuming full-time use. since only nine months was assumed to be available, it was estimated that 9,000 titles would be processed at each terminal. in large libraries where there would be more than one staff member to operate a terminal, there would be three months of time available to do input cataloging, and since only a few libraries will be obtaining less than 75 percent of cataloging from the central system, it appears that a formula of one terminal for every 9,000 titles or fraction thereof cataloged annually would give each library sufficient terminal-hours. in actual operation, operators have been able to work at twice the assumed rate of six titles per terminal-hour so that there is reason to believe that these guidelines will provide adequate terminal capability. file organization the primary data that will enter the total system are bibliographic records, and since the system is being designed to conform to standards, the national standard for bibliographic interchange on magnetic tape ( 8) has been complied with in file design. in other words, the system can produce marc records from records in the oclc file format; more specifically, the system can regenerate marc ii records from oclc records derived originally from marc ii records, although an oclc record contains only 78 percent of the number of characters in the original marc ii record. similarly, the system can generate marc ii records from original cataloging input by member libraries. the simulation study clearly showed that bibliographic data would have to be accessed in the shortest possible time if the system were to avoid generating frustrating delays at the terminal. imitation of library manual files or of standard computer techniques for file searching would not provide sufficient efficiency. oclc, therefore, set about developing a file organization and an access method that would take advantage of the computation speeds of computers. oclc research on access methods has produced several reports ( 9,10,11) and has developed a technique for deriving truncated search keys that is efficient for retrieval of single entries from large files. these findings have been employed in the present system that contained over 600,000 catalog records in april1973, arranged in a sequential file on disks, and indexed by a library of congress card-number index, author-title index, and a title index. the research program on access methods did not, however, investigate methods for storing and retrieving records. research on file organization included experiments directed toward development of a file organization that would minimize processing time for retrieval of entries or for the discovery that an entry is not in the file. since the oclc system is designed for on-line entry of data into the data base, it was not possible to consider a physically sequential file for the index files. 172 ]ottmal of library automation vol. 5/ 3 september, 1972 the indexed sequential method of file organization obviates the data-entry obstacle posed by physical sequential organization, but is inefficient in operation. consequently, scatter storage was determined to be the best method for meeting the efficient file organization requirements of the system. the findings of the investigation have shown that very large files of bibliographic index entries organized by a scatter-store technique in which search keys are derived from the main entry can be made to operate very efficiently for on-line retrieval and at the same time be sparing of machine time even in those cases where requests are for entries not in the file ( 12). this research also produced two powerful mathematical tools for predicting retrieval behavior of such files, and a design technique for optimizing record blocking in such files so that, on the average, only one to two physical accesses to the file storage device are needed to retrieve the desired information. the files displayed in figure 1 are constructed by a single file-building program designed so that additional modules can be embedded in the program. the program accepts a bibliographic record, assigns an address for it in the main sequential file, and places the record at that address. having determined the bibliographic record address, the program next derives the author-title search key and constructs an author-title index file entry which contains the pointer to the bibliographic record. then the program produces an lc card number index entry and a title index entry, each of which contains the same pointer to the bibliographic record. when a bibliographic record is used for catalog card production, an entry is made in the holdings file. when the first holdings entry is made for a bibliographic record, a pointer to the holdings entry is placed in that record; the pointer to each subsequent holdings entry is placed in the previous holdings entry. an entry is made at the same time in the call number index containing a pointer to the holdings entry. this file organization operates with efficiency and economy. the files containing the large bibliographic records and their associated holdings information are sequential, and hence, are highly economical in disk space. the technique used ensures that only a low percentage of available disk area need be reserved for growth of these large sequential files. disk units can be added as needed. each fixed-length record in the scatter-store files is less than 3 percent of the size of an average bibliographic record, and since 25 percent to 50 percent of these files are unoccupied, the empty disk area is small because of the small record lengths. sequential files the bibliographic record file and holdings file are sequential files, the holdings file being a logical extension of the bibliographic record file. a record is loaded into a free position made available by deletion of a record or into the position following the last record. whenever a new version of a shared cataloging system/kilgour, et al. 173 record updates the version already in the file, the new record is placed in the same location as the old if it will fit; otherwise, it is placed at the end of the file and pointers in the indexes are changed. there is a third, small sequential file containing unique notes for specific copies, dash entries, and extra added entries. each bibliographic record contains the information in a marc ii record. each record also contains a 128-bit subrecord capable of listing up to 128 institutions that could hold the item described by the record. at the present time, only 49 of the 128 bits are used since there are 49 institutions participating in oclc. the record also includes pointers to entries in index files, so that the data base may be readily updated, and a pointer to the beginning of the list of holdings for the record. in addition, each record has a small directory for the construction of truncated author-title-date entries, which are displayed to allow a user to make a choice whenever a search key indexes two or more records. although each bibliographic record includes all information in a standard marc ii record, records in the bibliographic record file have been reduced to 78 percent of the size of the communication record largely by reducing redundancy in structural information. oclc intends to compress bibliographic records further by reducing redundancy in text by employing compression techniques similar to those described in the literature ( 13,14). the holdings file contains a string of holdings records for each bibliographic record; individual records are chained with pointers. information in each record includes identity of the holding institution and the holding library within the institution, a list of each physical item of multiple or partial holdings, the call number and pointers to the next record in the chain, and to the call number index. the last record in the chain also has a back-pointer to the associated bibliographic record. whenever there is a unique note, dash entry, or extra added entry coupled to a holding, that holding has a pointer to a location in the third sequential file in which the note or entry resides. index files indexes include an author-title index, a title index, and an lc card number index. research and development are under way leading to implementation of an author and added author index and a call number index. a class number index will be developed and implemented in the future. with the exception of the class number index, which by its nature is required to be a sequentially accessible file, the oclc indexes are scatter storage files. the construction of and access to a scatter storage file involves the calculation of a home address for the record and the resolution of the collisions that occur when two or more records have the same home address. the calculation of a home address comprises derivation of a search key from the record to be stored or retrieved and the hashing or randomizing of the key to obtain an integer, relative record address that is converted to a 174 journal of library automation vol. 5/3 september, 1972 storage home address. the findings of oclc research on search keys has been reported (9,10,11). the hashing procedure employs a pseudo-random number generator of the multiplicative type: home address= rem ( k x.jm) where k is the multiplier 65539, x,. is the binary numerical value of the search key, and m is the modulus which is set equal to the size of the index file; 'rem' denotes that only the remainder of the division on the right-hand side is used. philip l. long and his associates have shown that efficiency of a scatter storage file is rapidly degraded when the loading of the file exceeds 75 percent ( 12 ); therefore, oclc initially loads files at 50 percent of physical capacity. hence, the modulus is chosen to be twice th e size of initial number of records to be loaded. when 75 percent occupancy is reached a new modulus is chosen and the file is regenerated. collisions are resolved using the quadratic residue search method proposed by a. c. day ( 15) and shown to be efficient ( 12). in this method, a new location is calculated when the home address is full; the first new location has the value (home address 2), the second (home address 6 ), the third ( home address 12 ) and so on until an empty location is found if a record is being placed in the file, or the end of the entry chain is found if records are being retrieved. when the file size m is a prime having the form 4n + 3, where n is an integer, the entire file may be examined by 1n searches. retrieval techniques the retrieval of a record or records from the oclc data base is achieved in fractions of a second when a single request is put to the file, and rarely exceeds a second when queuing delays are introduced by simultaneous operation of upwards of 50 terminals. response time at the terminal is greater than these figures because of the low communication line data rate, but terminal response time rarely exceeds five seconds. figure 6 shows the map of a record in the author-title index file and the title file. in the author-title file, the search key is a 3,3 key with the first trigram being the first three characters of the author entry and the second being the first three characters of the first word of the title that is not an english article (9). for example, "str,cha" is the search key for b. h. streeter's the chained library. however, any or all of the characters in the trigrams may be all in lower case. the author-title index also indexes title-only entries, but the title index provides a more efficient access to this type of entry. the pointer in the record map in figure 6 is the address of the bibliographic record from which the search key was d erived. the entry chain indicator bit is set to 0 (zero) if there is another record in the entry chain and to 1 if the record is last in the chain. when this bit is 0, the search skips to the next record as calculated by day's skip algorithm. the shared cataloging systemjkilgour, et al. 175 bibliographic record presence indicator bit is set to 0 (zero) to indicate that the bibliographic record associated with this index entry has been deleted; it is set to 1 to indicate that the bibliographic record is present. an author-title search of the data base is initiated by transmission of a 3,3 key from a terminal. a message parser analyzes the message and identifies it as a 3,3 author-title search key by the presence of the comma and by there not being more than three characters on either side of that comma. next, the hashing algorithm calculates the home address and the location is checked for the presence of a record. if no record is present, a message is sent to the terminal stating that there is no entry for the key submitted and suggesting other action to be taken. if a record is present and its key matches the key submitted and if the entry-chain indicator bit signifies that the record at the home address is the only record in the chain, the bibliographic record which matches the key submitted is displayed on the terminal screen. if the entry-chain bit signifies that there are additional records in the chain, those records are located by use of the skip algorithm. if more than one record possesses the same key as that submitted, truncated author-titledate entries derived from the matching bibliographic records are displayed with consecutive numbering on the terminal screen. the user then indicates by number the entry containing information pertaining to the desired work, and the program displays the full bibliographic record. the title-index record has the same map as the author-title record and is depicted in figure 6. the title index is also constructed and searched in entry chain indicator bit 4 bytes bibliographic record pointer nometitle search key bibliographic record presence indicator bit bibliographic record pointer title search key fig. 6. author-1'itte and title index records. 8 bytes 176 ]ou,-nal of library automation vol. 5/ 3 september, 1972 the same manner as the author-title index. the title search key ( 3,1,1,1) consists of the first three characters of the first word of the title that is not an english article plus the initial character of each of the next three words. commas separate the characters derived from each word. the title search key is "cha,l," for b. h. streeter's the chained libmry, the three commas signifying that the message is a title search key. the bibliographic record pointer and the two indicator bits have the same function as in the authortitle record. figure 7 exhibits the map for a record in the lc card number index. the three left-most bytes in the lc card number section contain an alphabetic prefix to a number where this is present, or, more usually, three blanks when there is no alphabetic prefix. similarly the right-most byte contains a supplement number or is blank. the middle four bytes contain eight digits packed two digits to a byte after the digits to the right of the dash have been, when necessary, left-filled with zeroes to a total of six digits. the dash is then discarded. for example, lc card number 68-54216 would be 68054216 before being packed. the pointer and the two indicator bits have the same function as in the author-title index record. an lc card number search is started with the transmission of an lc card number as the request. the parser identifies the message as an lc card number search by determining that there is a dash in the string of characters and that there are numeric characters in the two positions immediately to the left of the dash. the remainder of the search procedure duplicates that for the author-title index. on-line programs as is the case with all routinely used oclc programs, the on-line programs are written in assembly language to achieve the utmost efficiency in processing. in addition, every effort has been made to design programs to run in the fastest possible time. in other words, one of the main goals of the oclc on-line operation is lowest possible cost. the simulation study had shown that it was necessary to modify the operating system of the xds sigma 5 so that the work area of the operating system would be identical with that of the applications programs. the xds real-time batch monitor, which is one of the operating systems furnished by xds for the sigma 5, has been extensively altered, and one of the alterations is the change to a single work area. another major change to the operating system was building into it the capability for multiprogramming. at the present time, the on-line foreground of the system operates two tasks in that two polling sequences are running simultaneously, and the background runs batch jobs at the same time. this new monitor is called the on-line bibliographic monitor ( obm). an extension of obm is named motherhood (mh); mh supervises the operation of the on-line programs. mh also keeps track of the activities of these programs and compiles statistics of these activities. in addition, mh shared cataloging systemjkilgovr, et al. 177 contains some utility programs such as the disk and terminal 1/0 routines. the principal on-line application program is catalog (cat); its functions are described in detail in the subsequent sections entitled cataloging with existing bibliographic information and input cataloging. in general, cat accepts requests from terminals, parses them to identify the type of request, and then takes appropriate action. if a request is for a bibliographic record, cat identifies it as such, and if there is only one bibliographic record in the reply, cat formats the record in one of its work area buffers and sends the formatted record to the terminal for display. if more than one record is in the reply, cat formats truncated records and puts them out for display. after a single bibliographic record has been displayed, cat modifies the computer memory image of the record in accordance with update requests from the terminal. for example, fields such as edition statement or subject headings may be deleted or altered, and new fields may be added. when the request is received from the terminal to produce catalog cards from the record as revised or unrevised, cat writes the current computer memory image of the record onto a tape to be used as input to the catalog card production programs. the catalog card production programs operate off-line, and the first processing program is convert ( cnvt), which formats some of the fields and call numbers. the major activity of cnvt is the latter, for libraries require a vast number of options to set up their call numbers for printing. cnvt also automatically places symbols used to indicate oversized books above, below, or within call numbers as required. format is the second program; it receives partially formatted records from cnvt. format expands each record into the total number of card images corresponding to the total cards required by the requesting library 4 bytes bibliographic record pointer lbibliogrophic 8 bytes lc cord number record presence indicator bit entry choin indicator bit fig. 7. library of congress card number index record. 178 ] ournal of libm1·y automation vol. 5/3 september, 1972 for each particular title. format determines this total from the number of tracings and pack definition tables previously submitted by the library that define the printing of formats of cards to go into each catalog. format, which is an extensive revision of expand, contains many options not found in the old off-line catalog card production system. format can set up a contents note on any particular card, and puts tracings at the bottom of a card when tracings are requested. the author entry normally occurs on the third line, but if a subject heading or added entry is two or more lines long, format moves the author entry down on the card so that a blank line separates the added entry from the author entry. in other words, each card is formatted individually. the major benefit of this feature, which allows the body of the catalog data to float up and down the card, is that the text on most cards can start high up on the card, thereby reducing the number of extension cards. the omission of tracings from added entry cards has a similar effect. table 1 presents the percentage of extension cards in a sample of 126,738 oclc cards for 18,182 titles produced for twenty-five or more libraries during a seventeen-day period, compared with extension cards in library of congress printed cards and in a sample of nelinet cards "for over 1,300 titles" ( 16). the table shows that the oclc mixture of cards with and without tracings and with the floating body of text yields about 10.8 percent more extension cards compared to library of congress printed cards. were libraries to restore the original meaning to the phrase "main entry" by printing tracings only on main entry cards, the percentage of extension cards in computer produced catalog cards printed six lines to the inch would probably be less than for lc cards. format also sets up a sort key for each record and a sort program sorts the card images by institution, library, catalog, and by entry or call number within each catalog pack. another program, build-print-tape (bpt), arranges the sorted images on tape so that cards are printed in consecutive order in two columns on two-up card stock. f inally, a print program prints the cards on an ibm 1403 n1 printer attached to an ibm 360/50 computer. cataloging with existing bibliographic information this section describes cataloging using a bibliographic record already in the central file; the next section, entitled input cataloging describes cataloging when there is no record in the system for the item being cataloged. the cataloger at the terminal first searches for an existing record, using the lc card number found on the verso of the title page or elsewhere. if the respon se is negative or if there is no card number available, the cataloger searches by title or by author and title using the 3,1,1,1 or 3,3 search keys respectively. if these searches are unproductive, the cataloger does input cataloging. when a search does produce a record, the cataloger reviews the record shared cataloging systemjkilgour, et al. 179 table 1. extension catalog card percentages number oclc lilnary of nell net of marc ii congress marc ii cards cards printed cards cards 1 77.2 87.8 79.9 2 18.9 10.0 16.7 3 2.5 1.6 2.5 4 1.1 .3 .6 5 .2 .2 .1 6 .1 .2 to see if it correctly describes the book at hand. if it is the correct record and if the library uses library of congress call numbers, the cataloger tra nsmits a request for card production by depressing two keys on the keyboard. cataloging is then complete. if the lc call number is not used, the cataloger constructs and keys in a new number and then transmits the produce-cards request. if the record does not describe the book as the cataloger wishes, the record may be edited . the cataloger may remove a field or element, such as a subject heading. information within a field may be changed by replacing existing characters, such as changing an imprint date by overtyping, by inserting characters, or by deleting characters. finally, a new field such as an additional subject heading may be added. when the editing process is complete, the cataloger can request that the record on the screen be reformatted according to the alterations. having reviewed the reformatted version, the cataloger may proceed to card production. when a cataloger has edited a record for card production, the alterations in the record are not made in the record in the bibliographic record file. rather, the changes are made only in the version of the record that is to be used for card production. the edited version of the record is retained in an archive file after catalog card production so that cards may be produced again from the same record for the same library, should the need arise in the future. the author index currently under development will enable a cataloger to determine the titles of works in the file by a given author. the call number index, also currently being developed, will make it possible for a cataloger to determine whether or not a call number has been used before in his library. the class number index that will be developed in the future will provide the capability of determining titles that have recently been placed under a given class number or, if none is under the number, the class number and titles on each side of the given number. liijjul cataloging input cataloging is undertaken when there is no bibliographic record in the file for the book at hand. to do input cataloging, the cataloger requests 180 ]ounwl of library automation vol. 5/3 september, 1972 that a work form be displayed on the screen (figure 8 ) . the cataloger then proceeds to fill in the work form by keyboarding the catalog data, and transmitting the data to the computer field by field as each is completed. a~ shown in figure 8, a paragraph mark terminates each field ; each dash is to be filled in by the cataloger for each field used. input cataloging may be original cataloging or may use cataloging data obtained from some source other than the oclc system. type: form: intel i vi: bib i lv i: 1t ~ t> 1-t> 2 24t> 3 250 t> 4 260t> 5 300 t> 6 4-t> 7 5-t> 8 6-t> 9 7-t> 10 8-t> i i 092 t> 12 049 -t> 13 590 fig. 8. workform for a dewe y library. lang: isbn card no: d ~ b c ~ 1t b c ~ b c ~ d 1t ~ -« d ~ 1t b-j 4[ 1t shared cataloging systemjkilgour, et al. 181 when the catalog data has been input, revised, and correctly displayed on the terminal screen, the cataloger requests catalog card production. in the case of new cataloging, not only are cards produced, but also the new record is added to the file and indexed so that it is available within seconds to other users. if a marc ii record for the same book is subsequently added to the file, it replaces the input-cataloging record but does not disturb the holdings information. union catalog each display of a bibliographic record contains a list of symbols for those member institutions that possess the title. in other words, the central file is also a union catalog of the holdings of oclc member libraries, although in the early months of operation these holdings data are very incomplete. nevertheless, they will approach completeness with the passage of time and with retrospective conversion of catalog data. titles cataloged during the operation of the off-line system have been included in the union catalog. the union catalog function is an important function of the shared cataloging system, for it makes available to students and faculties, through the increased information available to staff members, the resources of academic institutions throughout ohio. libraries also use the union catalog as a selection tool since they can dispense with expensive purchases of little-used materials residing in a neighboring library. members also use the file to obtain bibliographic data to be used in ordering. assessment with over nine hundred thousand holdings recorded in the union catalog as of april 1973, it is clear that having this type of information immediately at hand will greatly improve services to students and faculties. enlargement of holdings recorded will enhance the union-catalog value of the system. wright state university is in process of converting its holdings using the oclc system, and the ohio state university libraries-the largest collection in the state-has already converted its shelf list in truncated form. the osu holdings information will soon be available to oclc members. members using the oclc system report a large reduction in cataloging effort. two libraries using lc classification report that they are cataloging at a rate in excess of ten titles per terminal hour when cataloging already exists in the system. libraries using dewey classification are experiencing a somewhat lower rate. the original cost benefit studies were done on the basis of a calculated rate of six titles per hour for those books for which there were already cataloging data in the system. the net savings will be realized when the file has reached sufficient size to enable the largest libraries to locate records for 65 percent of their cataloging and for the smallest to find 95 percent. to reach this level, members collectively would have to use 182 journal of library automation vol. 5/3 september, 1972 existing bibliographic information to catalog 350,000 titles in the course of a year, or an average of approximately 1,460 titles for the total system per working day. it was thought that this rate would be attained by the end of the second year of operation. however, at the end of the first month of on-line operation, over a thousand titles per day were being cataloged. the new catalog card production programs operating on the sigma 5 are much more efficient than the programs used in the older off-line system. earlier in this paper it was reported that cost of the older programs to format catalog cards, but not to print them, was 2.27 cents per card. if costs of the sigma 5 are calculated at commercial rates, the new programs format cards at 2.21 cents per card. however, if actual costs to oclc are used and with the total cost being assigned to one shift, the cost of formatting each card becomes 0.86 cents. the total cost of producing catalog cards is, of course, much more than the cost to format them on a computer. nevertheless, either the 2.21 cents or 0.86 cents rate might serve as a criterion for measuring the efficiency of computerized catalog card production. the low terminal response-time delay for the operation of seventy terminals is a good gauge of the efficiency of the on-line system. in particular, the file organization is efficient, for it enables retrieval of a single entry swiftly from a file of over 600,000 records. moreover, no serious degradation in retrieval efficiency is expected to arise as the result of the growth of file size. the system operates from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on mondays through fridays, and at times the interval between system downtimes has exceeded a week. it is rare that the system will be down on successive days, and when a problem does occur, the system can be restored within a minute or two. moreover, when the system goes down, only two terminals will occasionally lose data, and most of the time, there is no loss of data. hence, it can be concluded that the hardware and software are highly reliable. in summary, it can be said that the oclc on-line shared cataloging system is easy to use, efficient, reliable, and cost beneficial. acknowledgments the research and development reported in this paper were partially supported by office of education contract no. oec-0-70-2209 ( 506), council on library resources grant no. clr-489, national agricultural library contract no. 12-03-01-5-70, and an l.s.c.a. title iii grant from the ohio state library board. references 1. ellen washy miller and b. j. hodges, "shawnee mission's on-line cataloging system," ]ola 4:13-26 (march 1971). shared cataloging systemjkilgour, et al. 183 2. john p . kennedy, "a local marc project : the georgia t ech library," in proceedings of th e 1968 clinic on library a pplications of data processing. (u rbana , ill.: university of illinois gradu ate school of library science, 1969 ) p . 199-215. 3. new england board of high er education, new england librm·y information netw01·k; final r ep01t on council on library resources grant #443. (feb. 1970 ). 4. charles t. payne and robert s. mcgee, the university of chicago bibliographic data processing system: documentation and report supplement, (chicago, ill. : university of chicago library, april1971). 5. judith hopkins, manual for oclc catalog card production (feb. 1971). 6. ohio college library center, pt·eliminary description of catalog cards produced from marc ii data (sept. 1969). 7. f. g. kilgour, "libraries-evolving, computerizing, personalizing," american libraries 3:141-47 ( feb. 1972). 8. american national standards institute, american national standard for bibliographic information interchange on magnetic tape (new york: american national standards institute, 1971 ). 9. f. g. kilgour, p. l. long, and e. b. l eiderman, "retrieval of bibliographic entries from a name-title catalog by use of truncated search keys," proceedings of the american society for information science 7:79-82 ( 1970 ). 10. f. g. kilgour, p. l. long, e. b. leiderman, and a. l. landgraf, "titleonly entries retrieved by use of truncated search keys," lola 4: 207-210 (dec. 1971 ) . 11. philip l. long, and f. g. kilgour, "a truncated search key title index," lola 5:17-20 ( mar. 1972). 12. p. l. long, k. b. l. rastogi, j. e. rush, and j. a. w yckoff, "large on-line files of bibliographic data : an efficient design and a mathematical predictor of re trieval behavior." ifip congress '71: ljubljana -aug ust 1971. ( amsterdam, north holland publishing co., 1971 ). bookle t ta-3, 145-149. 13. martin snyderman and bernard hunt, "the myriad virtues of text compaction," datamation 16:36-40 (dec. 1970). 14. w. d. schieb er and g. w. thomas, "an algorithm for compaction of alphanumeric data," lola 4 :198-206 (dec. 1970). 15. a. c. day, "full table quadratic searching for scatter storage," communications of the acm 13:481 (aug. 1970). 16. new england board of higher education, new england libmry in formation . .. , p. 100-101. college and research libraries the higher education act of 1965: at acrl's membership meeting in new york on july 13, three speakers-each from his own vantage point-discussed the meaning of the higher education act to the nation's academic libraries. germaine krettek, director of the ala washington office, began with a report on the background and status of the act. charles f. gosnell, director of libraries, new york university; everett t. moore, assistant librarian, university of california, los angeles; and helen m. a symposium welch, acquisitions librarian, university of illinois, spoke respectively on implications for library administration, reference service, and resources and technical services. maurice tauber, columbia university school of library service, summarized the speakers comments, and spoke on guidelines for preparation of grant requests, and implications for library education, and recommended future ala division activities. the higher education act of 1965: background, provisions, administration by germaine krettek at this possible three-quarters point in the second session of the eighty-ninth congress, senate committees are still considering several measures relating to the higher education act of 1965. the status of the proposed amendments and the appropriations is this: on may 13, six months after the higher education act of 1965 became law, president johnson signed the supplemental appropriations bill which provided limited funds to implement p.l. 89-329 for the fiscal year which ended june 30, for title ii -college lmrary assistance and lmrary training and research. ten million dollars was appropriated for part a-college library resources; $1 million for training of librarians; and $300,000 for the library of congress program of acquisition and cataloging of research materials. no appropriation was made for library research. facing a deadline of june 30, the library services division of the u.s. office of education did a remarkable job in getting the guidelines and regulations approved, necessary forms and information out to the approximately twenty-one hundred institutions, over nineteen hundred applications processed, and the checks totaling over $8 million mailed within the brief period of two weeks (sent out may 20-21; back by june 4). it was an almost round-the-clock operation. on the other side of the coin, colleges and universities did an equally fine job of getting their applications mailed in record time and we trust the eighteen hundred and ten institutions who received grants got their funds obligated by the end of june. on july 1, the new 1967 fiscal year began but appropriations are not yet available. this year, however, the president's budget included recommended amounts for all titles of hea and for all parts of title ii. the administration asked a total of $35.3 million for title ii. of this amount it is expected $25 million will be allocated for resources, $3.75 million for training, $3.55 million for research, and $3 million for the library of i 335 336 1 college & research libraries • september, 1966 congress acquisition program. the american library association testified at both house and senate hearings on the hew appropriations bill (h.r. 14745) and strongly urged the appropriation of the amounts authorized-$71,315,000 rather than $35.3 million. the house of representatives, however, has approved the budget recommendations. the senate appropriations committee has completed hearings but has not yet issued its report. according to sec. 205 (a) of the law, an advisory council on college library resources is to be established in the u.s. office of education, consisting of the commissioner as chairman, and eight members appointed by the commissioner with the approval of the secretary of hew. it is anticipated that president johnson shortly will announce the establishment of this council to advise the commissioner with respect to establishing criteria for making supplemental and special purpose grants. after the council is established, new guidelines and regulations will be drafted and promulgated. the commissioner is also authorized to appoint a special advisory committee of no more than nine members to advise him on matters of general policy concerning research and demonstration projects relating to the importance of libraries and the importance of training in librarianship. in connection with part b of title ii -library training and research, it should be kept in mind that this section provides for the training of all types of librarians. in relation to the training of school librarians, there is specific provision for the continuation of the school library institutes, which are included in title xi of the ndea, through the next fiscal period but thereafter will be funded under title ii, b. at this very hour, carolyn whitenack, associate professor of library science and audio-visual education, purdue university, and president-elect of aasl, 1s 1n washington testifying before the education subcommittee of the senate labor and public welfare committee on those aspects of the higher education amendments of 1966 which are of particular concern to libraries and librarians. some of the provisions of s. 3047 and h.r. 14644 that ala is supporting relate to facilities, the extension of title iii of rea-strengthening developing institutions, and a technical amendment to title ii, part a, to correct certain inequities in the maintenance-of-effort provisions in the program for college library resources. a statement concerning the importance of the school library institute program is also being stressed in her testimony. two other titles of the higher education act of 1965 have important implications for libraries which have been overlooked by some college librarians because of the emphasis on title ii. title v, part c, provides fellowships for recent college graduates and other college graduates who plan a career in elementary and secondary education. fifteen hundred and thirty of these prospective teacher fellowships have been awarded for study beginning in the 1966-67 academic year; seventy of these fellowships are in librarianship. a separate program exists for experienced teachers. another title with specific implications for college libraries is vi-financial assistance for the improvement of undergraduate instruction. audio-visual equipment for the college library is specified and in part b-faculty development programs, provision is included for the training of librarians in the use of educational media equipment. these are the highlights of the major portions of the higher education act of 1965. it is a landmark measure, and should do il_luch to improve college and university libraries if full advantage is taken of all titles. •• the higher education act of 1965 i 331 the promise for reference librarians by everett t. moore no words could please reference librarians more than those which appear in the higher education act of 1965 under the matter-of-fact heading of "strengthening college and research library resources." granted, this endeavor is not ordinarily considered to be the principal concern of reference librarians, if their responsibility continues to be that of assisting readers in using the resources that have been amassed and organized by many hands. but as we read the text of the act under this heading we find that appropriations are authorized therein to enable the commissioner of education to "transfer funds to the librarian of congress for the purpose of ( 1 ) acquiring, so far as possible, all library materials currently published throughout the world which are of value to scholarship; and ( 2) providing catalog information for these materials promptly after receipt, and distributing bibliographic information by printed cards and by other means, and enabling the library of congress to use for exchange and other purposes such of these materials as are not needed for its own collections." to reference librarians, this statement of intent in our federal statutes is full of promise. to acquire (so far as possible) "all library materials currently published throughout the world which are of value to scholarship" is an amazing objective in this age of exploding knowledge. we have, in these post-world-war-ii years, been adjusting ourselves to the fact that no single library, no matter what its resources and skills, can attempt a real measure of completeness in all the fields in which it professes interest. how far toward such a goal the provisiol! of federal fu~ds might be able to carry the library of congress-acting in the interests of all the research libraries of the nation -has not been calculated, for this is an incalculable matter. but the aim and purpose are noble, and all librarians would have to applaud the intent of the act. awareness of this broad and comprehensive program of acquisitions by the national library should give reference librarians throughout the nation a new sense of confidence in the ability of our libraries jointly to meet the requirements of scholarship in every field. even more practical and concrete is the promise of the next subsection of the act, in which it is specified that the library of congress shall be enabled to provide catalog information for these materials-"promptly after receipt" -and to "distribute bibliographic information" by printing catalog cards and other means, so that every library in the nation may thereby share in the benefits of this grandly conceived program of acquisitions. it is a fact well known to us all that at present the university libraries of the country can obtain library of congress catalog cards for only a little more than half of the books they acquire each year. increasingly they have had to resort to methods of organizing and recording many of their important acquisitions-including many vital foreign imprints-in economical but bibliographically inadequate fashion, in order to make them available for use. such minimal bibliographical control as the systems of single-entry listing in card catalogs which a number of libraries have adopted have had to be employed in lieu of the fuller cataloging we still believe in but must often forego, even for many of the books which need it most. promise, therefore, of a greatly extended program of centralized cataloging, to bring these essential materials of 338 1 college & research libraries • september, 1966 research under bibliographical control to an extent we had almost ceased to hope for, is important news indeed. this promise relates directly to the world of today. there is nothing complex about it, and every reference librarian can recognize the proposed measures as being simple extensions of present systems. greater efficiency in acquiring the materials of research and providing bibliographic information about them to all the research libraries in the nation are logical, natural steps toward a better utilization of our resources. not so direct and simple, but more far-reaching in their implications, are the provisions in that other section of the higher education act entitled "research and demonstrations relating to libraries and the training of library personnel." here it is specified that the commissioner of education is authorized to make grants "for research and demonstration projects relating to the improvement of libraries or the improvement of training ·in librarianship, including the development of new techniques, systems, and equipment for processing, storing, and distributing information, and for the dissemination of information derived from such research and demonstrations. . . ." this part of the act looks to research to help us develop new methods and techniques, new systems and equipment for better organizing information and making it available for use. "information," i judge, refers not only to the substance and content of scientific and technological knowledge, but to the body of bibliographical information which is the key to all literature and learning. the potentialities of the library applications of the new technology have been finely described by william dix in a recent article in university: a princeton quarterly. "at the national or regional level," he writes, "there will emerge networks which will bring the book resources of the nation under much greater control, providing much greater depth of indexing and subject analysis, available locally through computer-produced book catalogs or through machine-readable tapes or discs. more rapid and efficient dissemination of the product of the basic intellectual operation of cataloging, performed centrally, may come fairly soon. the actual storage of the intellectual content of books in computers and remote facsimile transmission of texts, while of course actually possible now on a small scale, seem to be fairly remote as regular library operations because of their costs."1 the promise of the research and demonstrations section of the act is one, therefore, of helping to bring such potentialities closer to realization. reference librarians look with anticipation to the development of library catalogs in machine-readable form, stored in memory devices, and capable of printing out selected portions on demand. to achieve such capability, libraries will of course have to work toward the standardization of bibliographical entries, so that information may be adapted to machine uses. hence the importance of the plan for greater centralization of cataloging in the library of congress. to serve the bedazzling variety of needs that are being created by interdisciplinary programs and area study centers, institutes for special studies, and joint research enterprises that are such important programs in many colleges and universities today, librarians may in many cases need to organize their services according to new patterns. the general reference librarian may give way in some situations to bibliographers or library specialists in a number of fields of interest: specialists who can work closely with scholars in providing information about library resources and in 1 william s. dix, "new challenges to university libraries," university: a princeton quarterly, no. 26 (fall 1965), 14. the higher education act of 1965 1 339 developing collections for research and study. to perform such services will require more complete, more detailed bibliographic information about every kind of material for research: ephemeral materials not in book form, magnetic tapes, technical reports, official and nonofficial documents. hence, again, the importance of greater, not less, attention to thorough and detailed cataloging and organization of materials. most of the new institutes and centers, as frederick wagman has observed, are "based on the premise that existing curricular and department organization, like library subject classification, has virtue and should not be abandoned, yet is inadequate to meet current research and instructional needs."2 the area studies, mr. wagman points out, "have a new orientation, demanding not only a high rate of current acquisition but significant retrospective resources in which the major libraries of the country have always been deficient."3 and, when the university organizes itself to cope with the problem of acquiring, organizing, and giving service on publications from an area of africa, or of asiatic or near eastern or east european countries, the staff member initially engaged is likely to be "charged with responsibility for selection, acquisition, cataloging, and reference-the last only if students and faculty can find his desk in either the cataloging or acquisitions departments. when additional professional staff can be provided, the functions of book selection and cataloging may be separated, and eventually a staff specialized in reference work may be employed."4 to meet the multifarious language needs for dealing with the publications which come in from all the less-familiar 2 frederick h. wagman, "the general research library and the area-studies programs," library quarterly, xxxv (october 1965}, 345. a ibid, p. 345. 4 ibid, p. 348. areas of the world we can only turn reasonably to programs of centralized acquisitions and cataloging. federal aid which will make this possible seems our only salvation. douglas bryant has noted that: .. as research more and more frequently crosses traditional lines and as scholars work more in groups and become peripatetic both physically .and intellectually, libraries must inevitably alter in significant ways if they are to continue to provide the means for teaching and research. the lawyer and the mathematician in a school of education, the psychiatrist in a divinity school, and the oceanographer recently become director of a center of population studies are going to approach their research in ways quite different from those of their colleagues who continue to work within the traditional framework of their subject fields. and their library requirements will be quite different."5 in the higher education act's provision for research and demonstration there is promise even in the vexing matter of interlibrary loans, for here are prospects for better bibliographic organization on a truly national basis. systems for facsimile transmission of rnaterial from one library to another, as they are ultimately developed, will need to utilize the best organized and standardized media for published bibliographic information that can be devised, so that both location of material and transmitting it for use by the scholar who needs it can be provided. our present chaotic procedures for locating and borrowing materials can only be relieved in this day of burgeoning research activity by utilizing new techniques and systems as they become available to us. certainly no functions or services of academic libraries will be more thoroughly affected by the fulfillment 6 douglas w. bryant, "university libraries and the future," library association record, lxviii (january 1966}, 7. . 340 i college & research libraries • september, 1966 of the higher education act's provisions than will those of the reference librarian. we have already glimpsed enough of the bibliographical world of the future to be impressed by the necessity of taking every advantage of the kind of investigation and planning that this act will make possible. • • implications for resources and technical services by helen m. welch it's great to be a librarian in 1966 even a technical services librarian! it's re~pect­ able, now that libraries are costing the federal government so much. education -including libraries-and wehare, they tell us, will be second only to national defense in the federal budget during fiscal year 1967.1 if you want to be profession-proud, browse in the four volumes which make up the senate and house committee hearings preceding the passage of public law 89-329. the set should be a bestseller for academic librarians. note the easy acceptance by the congressmen of the importance of libraries to this country, and consider that this is the result of a steady building process since the first major library bill in 1956. note the implied and sometimes explicit request to librarians for guidance on what is needed. note the gratitude expressed by both chairman morse and chairman green for the introduction by librarianwitnesses of the completely new proposal which became part c of title ii. and note senator morse's appreciative statements on edmon low and germaine krettek. it's all in the record. for technical service librarians, title ii, part c is much the most important part of the higher education act. it has several aspects that lift the heart. first of all, it's so short. only seventeen lovely lines out of a document of fifty-two pages! secondly, it establishes centralized cataloging-the thing we've wanted so much that we've even talked of pay1"news," library journal, xci (march j., 1966), 1184. ing for it ourselves! thirdly, it was inserted in the bill by members of our own profession and was welcomed by the congressional subcommittees working on the bill. it's pleasant to ask for something you need very much, to be granted that thing, and then to be thanked for asking for it. according to john cronin, the proposal had its beginnings in a meeting of the rtsd subcommittee on the national union catalog, held at lc in 1963. the committee's request that lc prepare alternative proposals for a centralized cataloging program led eventually to arl's creative use of the hearings on the higher education act to insert part c into title ii. the whole process can give us pride in our profession: the subcommittee's request; lc's response to it; the arl insertion into the hearings; the careful watching of the legislative process, and guidance through it by the ala washington office; and lc's masterly planning to implement the act. those of us who work in day-to-day operations, acquiring books and giving them bibliographic addresses in our collections, sometimes feel that the great powerhouse of research libraries which the association of research libraries represents is pretty far removed from ~ur operation~, that the head of a large library doesn t recognize the desperate flailing of the arms as we try to keep from going under for the last time in the flood of materials which come to us in ever increasing waves. but it was arl which set up a committee on · shared cataloging and in 1964 voted unanimously to give its highest priority to the higher education act of 1965 i 341 "developing a program for decreasing the amount of original cataloging." and it was chairman william dix of the committee who with great skill inserted centralized cataloging into the act. at the hearings, chairman green of the special subcommittee on education of the house committee on education and labor called the proposal "perhaps more significant than any part covered in the bill."2 chairman dix was abetted by other heads of libraries and by executive secretary jim skipper, whose library career from acquisitions to technical service head to university librarian had familiarized him with the problem and made him see it as a basic one which would have to be solved if liqraries were to meet their increasing responsibilities, and who was determined that the problem would be solved. (we're not fools. last midwinter rtsd made the arl executive secretary an ex officio permanent member of its planning committee.) librarians must see that centralized cataloging is continued beyond the original five years authorized by the act. first, we must do all we can to make it work and to show better services and savings as a result of it. second, we must be ready when the ala washington office warns us to speak and write to those who will decide its future. lack of full initial funding for fiscal year 1966 has already reduced the proving period to four years. lc implementation plans let me remind you now of the library of congress plans to implement centralized cataloging and the acquiring, so far as possible, of "all library materials currently published throughout the world which are of value to scholar2 u.s. congress, house special subcommittee on education of the committee on education and labor, higher education act, hearings, 88 cong., 1st sess. (washington, gpo, 1965), p. 368. ship."3 the main emphasis of the program at the outset is on foreign publications, omitting periodicals and nonbook materials. with these exceptions, lc is attempting to secure all significant titles published with imprint date 1966 and later and all titles listed in 1966 issues of current foreign national bibliographies regardless of imprint date. close working arrangements with the publishers of national bibliographies provide early acquisition of new titles, which are delivered by air mail. acceptance of the bibliographic descriptions in the national bibliographies for descriptive cataloging copy provides swift cataloging of each title. in countries where the book trade is not well organized and there are no national bibliographies, lc is expanding its already existing purchase arrangements, sometimes adding an agent in the field. to insure against loopholes in its acquisition arrangements, lc duplicates orders made by libraries in this country, such as: 1) blanket orders of several libraries with foreign book dealers; 2) farmington plan receipts; and 3) all series on continuation order in reporting libraries. · coordinated acquisition controls, consisting of a depository file of lc catalog cards for current imprints, are sent to cooperating libraries, i.e., all arl members and other interested libraries, and offer both early distribution of cataloging copy and a means of notifying libraries which titles have already been cataloged. titles ordered by cooperating libraries and not found in the control file are reported to lc, so that early acquisition and cataloging can be arranged. implications of title ii-c what are the implications of these lc arrangements for technical services? in cooperating libraries all orders for 1966 and later imprints must be searched in 3 u.s. congress, higher education act of 1965, public law 89-329, november 8, 1965, p. 10. 3421 college & research libraries • september, 1966 the control file and procedures must include some satisfactory way of reporting to lc those titles not found. the chance of finding most monographs proposed for order-whether foreign or domestic imprints-are excellent, and the bibliographic information on the catalog card is complete, including price and bibliographic citation. noncooperating libraries can gain the same information in the published national union catalog. the increasing completeness of this prompt record should greatly reduce the amount of time now spent in bibliographic verification during the order process. title ii-c benefits all libraries, but, like a tax cut, it benefits the large operation more than the small. earlier and more inclusive supplying of cataloging copy is, of course, its prime objective, and it is hoped that, in place of the approximately 50 per cent availability of needed catalog copy reported under various studies made last year, eventually more than 90 per cent will be available under the new procedures. the ltc cards provided for the depository control file can be used either for card reproduction or for ordering lc cards by number. although initially this lc catalog copy comes in card form, it may be provided in machine-readable copy later. both major cooperative acquisitions projects-the farmington plan and the pl 480 program-will probably be affected by the new program. farmington plan participants will continue to receive publications under their assignments but will no longer be responsible for cataloging them. this change will keep the better part and drop the worse, since as the plan worked out, it sometimes seemed to insure late cataloging of those titles received under it. participants in the pl 480 program may be able to reduce their substantial annual contributions for the cooperative cataloging of pl 480 receipts. with the gradual reduction of cataloging duplication in libraries across the country and the concenb·ation of standard cataloging in the library of congress, we can expect a high quality of cataloging, both in relation to materials which present difficulties because of format or language and in relation to fullness of description and added entries. standardization those who now modify lc catalog cards will have greater need to justify such activity when centralized cataloging is fully implemented. a greater number of hours will be going into this activity than before, and savings for such libraries will be less than for those li..: braries which accept all elements on the card. when lc cataloging copy is delivered in machine form, even more ingenuity will be required to justify a tailoring of the copy, since it is more costly to change the machine record than to make a modification manually. both centralized cataloging and automation, then, are forcing libraries toward standardization. in time the modification of catalog copy to fit local conditions may come to seem as impractical and unwarranted as it would be to tailor subject headings in periodical indexes to bring them closer to local needs. subject headings used in periodical indexes are accepted as they are received-and gratefully. the prospect of a foreseeable future in which lc will supply machinereadable cataloging copy almost as soon as a title is published makes the locally tailored catalog seem an indefensible luxury, particularly when, in the far distant future, the great collections at the library of congress are open to inspection through on-line computer access, and the advantage is apparent of being able to approach both the home collection and the lc collection through the same avenues. the higher education act of 1965 i 343 acquisition -cataloging balance the new lc acquisition-cataloging program under title ii-c invites those libraries which have not achieved a balanced acquisition-cataloging program, i.e., one in which each year's acquisitions are processed for use during the year of receipt, to make again the effort to put the year's program on balance and to move toward reducing arrearages. the goal is to subdue bibliographically all the publications which the library needs and can afford to acquire. in general, those libraries which have solved the problem have done so by being content with modest collections. those which have not solved the problem have generally tried to build substantial collections and have created cataloging backlogs. the latter practice of taking collections while they are available and hoping to catch up one day might be said to have been reduced to an absurdity by one university library which last year spent close to four million dollars on its acquisition program, of which less than 1 per cent went for binding, compared to the average 10 per cent binding expenditure in the libraries listed in the arl «academic library statistics." the same library spent 20 per cent of its total operating budget for staff salaries and wages compared to an average 57 per cent for all libraries reporting. with centralized cataloging opening up the possibility of processing so many more titles, a balanced operation with a respectable acquisition program begins to seem possible. more extensive use of standing orders for current publications offers dividends in decreased processing costs. blanket order titles arriving in the library with no records yet made can be matched with the catalog card in the control file, cards can be reproduced within the library, and volumes marked for the shelves with none of the intermediate records which add to processing expenses but which in the end produce nothing of permanent value for the collection. serials the forgotten people in all of this, as in the past, are the serials librarians, particularly the serials catalogers. the library of congress does not catalog new periodical titles until the first volume is complete. in addition, lc has considerable arrearages among its serials awaiting cataloging. the decision to omit periodical titles from the initial stages of centralized cataloging was a practical one, but it seems to put the serials librarians and users even further from the promised land. whether a proposed proofsheet service, including all titles listed in new serial titles with lc classification numbers provided, can give serials operations some relief is yet to be seen. resources part a of title ii, directed toward increasing college library resources, is commendably broad in its interpretation of «library materials." for small college libraries, the basic grant of $5,000 may represent a significant increase in book budget, and supplemental grants to fill demonstrated special needs for additional library resources may be even more significant. for libraries already large and well supported, the $5,000 basic grant and supplemental grants are most welcome, and the _ assistance to smaller libraries might also be thought of as aiding large libraries by reducing requests for interlibrary loans and photographic reproductions. actually, i suspect that the more resources a small collection offers, the more titles scholars can identify to request. the special purpose grants of title ii and funds provided in title iii to strengthen developing institutions both point toward interinstitutional projects, 344 1 college & research libraries • september, 1966 either the consortium to develop common programs, or the partnership of an established and a developing institution, to offer a helping hand. in the area of resources, such cooperative programs not only stretch library funds, but also stretch the dwindling supply of older books in the open market. perhaps the greatest boost in resources growing out of the higher education act will be the aid to libraries in catching up with their cataloging backlogs and thus making bibliographically available those resource's which are presently hidden. demonstrations part b of title ii offers the possibility of providing demonstrations of wellplanned technical services departments employing the best available tooling, a project which rtsd executive secretary elizabeth rodell has been advocating for some time. for the host library of such a project, able to create a model operation with adequate financial resources, how exciting an opportunity! for the questioning technical service librarian, how useful to be able to see in operation well-designed and wellequipped procedures! some libraries have been asked to assume a large portion of the burden of entertaining visitors with no regular outside support. staff shortages in the matter of available staff to process our collections, the act offers several vectors pulling in different directions. we can hope they will add up to a state of equilibrium. title 11-b aids in training more librarians; title 11-c, by offering centralized cataloging, reduces the number of catalogers needed across the country; title 11-a, with its funds to increase library purchasing power, implies increased needs for processing personnel; and the act as a whole, with its splendid infusion of energy into higher education, suggests more bodies moving busily among the book trucks, the bibliographies, the catalogs, and/or the magnetic tapes. international implications the library of congress, in its excellent plans to carry out the intent of title 11-c, has pointed out the bridge it offers to greater international cooperation in cataloging. lc proposes, you will remember, to use for cataloging purposes the descriptions offered by the national bibliographies of practically all european countries. only the form and choice of main and secondary entries are adjusted. too often u.s. foreign programs start with the assumption that our way is best, and cooperation means that the foreign country changes to conform to our way. the lc report, following its close scrutiny of the national bibliographies, showed that the title description used in national bibliographies is equivalent to or fuller than the present lc standard as established in the lc rules for descriptive cataloging. recognition of the good bibliographic standards of other countries and acceptance of the work produced under those standards offers a long stride toward international cooperation in cataloging. thus the suggestion of an anonymous englishman, made in 1876, even before ralph ellsworth's efforts in the forties to centralize cataloging, may now be taken up. edward holley reports in his 'forthcoming book on the organizational meeting of the american library association in 1876 that an ex-librarian writing anonymously in the academy (london) on march 18, 1876, observed: when i was a librarian myself, i always wondered at the extraordinary waste of power in cataloguing new books. while i was· writing iny slip, according to the rules followed in most english libraries, i felt that there were probably a hundred people doing exactly the same work which i was doing, not only in england, but in every civilised country of the world. yet what would be easier than to have the higher education act of 1965 i 345 my slip printed, and any number of copies sent round by book-post to every library in europe. with a little arrangement, every english book might be catalogued at the british museum, every french book at the bibliotheque n ationale, every german book at the royal library at berlin, every russian book at st. petersburg, &c. at a trifling expense these printed slips might be sent to every small or large library, and each of them might have three or four kinds of catalogues-an alphabetical catalogue of the authors, a chronological catalogue, a local catalogue, a catalogue classified according to subjects, &c. even when a by charles f. gosnell although i have not been asked to be brief, my remarks will be. anything that brings in new and usable money-to an administrator-is certainly good. the implication of my assignment, given months ago, was that there were or would be many problems to which we should give deep thought and attention. my paper was to be submitted many months ago, so that day after tomorrow, you might read again what you hear here today. i objected to that time schedule for two reasons. one was that things might happen between the deadline for the paper and today. i did not want to be in the position of throwing overboard what had been written months ago, and what would be published next week, for something really worthwhile today. as you all know we did get the money like lightning, just two weeks ago. the administrator is supposed to be a problem solver. last march, as far as i was concerned, the only problem was that we did not have any problems. there was a law, but there was no money, no rules and regulations, no blanks to fill out. i felt like an ms student at columbia library school of years ago, trying to get a thesis subject approved. the problem was to find a good library is too poor to buy a book, the slip might be useful in its catalogue. the saving that might thus be effected would be very considerable. the staff of librarians might be greatly reduced, and the enormous expense now incurred for catalogues, and mostly imperfect catalogues, would dwindle down to a mere nothing. perhaps one hundred years later, in 1976, the anonymous ex-librarian's rational suggestion may well be a reality. •• from the point of view of library administration problem. my only problem was to explain to my president why we were not doing anything-no money. it is characteristic nowadays for the federal government to take off with grandiose plans, to pass ambitious enabling legislation-to please everybodyand then fail to provide any money. what problem we had was a political · one. it was handled admirably by our ala washington office and by our college and university presidents: by now you may suspect that i had some skepticism about this program. i did. i still do, but not as much. it got off to a good start in the best bureau .. cratic fashion, there were regional meetings to explain everything to everybody. of course the real details could not be explained, because there were none. and nobody knew when, if ever, there would be any money. when it began to look as though we might get the five thousand dollar basic grant, i ventured the opinion that .it might take some $5,000 in administrative time and effort to gather data, fill out forms, etc., to get the $5,000. that often happens, particularly in a large and efficient organization. hut i was wrong. we studied the provisions of the law, and tried to guess what we would have to do. fortunately, we did not work too hard at it. 346 1 college & research libraries • september, 1966 on may 13 the president signed the supplemental appropriation bill. within two weeks we had the application forms. miraculously these forms were unusually simple. a few names and addresses were asked for, a few boxes to be checked, and eight simple financial figures which any well administered library should have on hand anyway. the form was quickly filled in (seven copies, to be sure) and within another two weeks the approval came. what could be simpler? paxton price and his associates deserve a hearty, ''well done!" i objected to an assignment which implied that i should indulge in prophecy and pontification, rather than comment on real facts and definite situations, but now i shall proceed to do the armchair bit. i am in the position of the fellow who began by saying, "before i begin my speech i have something important to say." i have said it, and now i shall take off into the wild blue yonder. getting money from the federal government has become a profession in itself. washington is full of experts, who, for a fat fee, will help you get federal money. the federal bureaucracy has created conditions where these experts can flourish. the basic fallacy is that the government tries to treat everybody exactly alike. there is almost infinite accountability. but no two people or institutions are exactly alike. the professionals are the people who can take unlikes and make them look like the very model which the legislators had in mind. they take rugged individuals and dress them in plausible uniforms to qualify for the handouts. soon after the higher education act of 1965 ·was passed and the regional meetings were held, new york u niversity took formal administrative action and designated its director of libraries to be coordinator of the university by program for title ii. other coordinators were appointed for other sections corresponding to their respective official concerns. this only demonstrates that nyu is an old hand at getting federal money, and has an effective operating procedure. on december 15 the director of libraries made a report to the administrative council of the university outlining the legislation, its background, and its purpose. being an administrator he immediately began to try to figure out how much money would be available and when. under maximum terms nyu might hope to get as much as a quarter-million dollars; so far, we have received ten thousand. we do not have a library school and i cannot presume to speak on that aspect. spending the basic grant, for a large institution, even in a hurry, is no problem. spending the quarter million will take a little more effort-and we will have to wait for the appropriation and the guidelines. for the very small institutions the basic grant may be a relatively large sum, and may even involve difficulty in matching. but with a little planning ahead, this should not be a serious problem. for large and small alike any help to the library of congress for centralized cataloging should be no problem, but a great benefit. on its face, section 203, "supplemental grants" does not look too difficult, especially if the guidelines follow the path marked in may 1966. section 204, "special purpose grants" looks more tricky, and i hesitate to let my imagination run wild to conjure up the flights of fancy that might be proposed :s eligible for "special purpose grants. section 205 provides for an advisory council to advise the commission on supplemental and special purpose grants. this seems to be a very good idea. at this time there has been no appropriathe higher education act of 1965 i 347 tion for these purposes, and i have no information that the committee has been appointed. section 206 provides for nonaccredited institutions on a provisional basis. this is in line with what seems to be the underlying philosophy of the act, "a little something for everybody." section 207 bars use of grants to buy material for religious purposes. section 208 represents a passing nod to the agencies responsible for higher education in the several states. this administrator concludes that so far, at least, the act has posed no serious problems. some of the later sections will necessarily be a little more difficult to handle, and may contain "sleepers." more generous appropriations are needed to make the act really effective. a continuation of the present policy of the department of health, education and welfare will certainly be welcome. •• guidelines for the preparation of grant requests, and implications for library education and ala divisions by maurice f. tauber when miss brown wrote to me some time ago, she told me that my responsibility was to summarize the other papers that would be presented by miss krettek, dr. gosnell, mr. moore, and miss welch. i was to single out those areas of concern that our membership should be aware of, if the greatest advantages are to be made of the sections of the higher education act (public law 89-329), affecting libraries. this did not seem to be an impossible assignment, unless the participants failed to write papers. i did not think there would be any trouble from this angle. i was wrong in at least one instance, and in another i received the paper monday afternoon. dr. gosnell has indicated the reason why he delayed writing his paper. i think he thought if he waited long enough he might not have to write it at all. my assignment, however, when the first supplement of college and research libraries appeared in may listing the program, had been enlarged to the following: .. guidelines for the preparation of grant requests, including a summary of the working papers (those presented to you), implications for library education, and recommendations for future ala divisional activities." thus, i have a wide range of targets, and if i miss any or all of them it is not because i have not been given the chance to shoot. within the framework of some facts, and also some fancy or speculation, i will try to summarize the points made in the papers, suggest guidelines, so far as i can, for the preparation of grant requests, discuss library education and research, and to indicate general implications for acrl and other ala divisions. background and administration the points made by miss krettek, as always, are to be the heart of the matter. the act has been described, and the extent of the potential aid to libraries analyzed. miss krettek and mr. low, too, must be praised again and again for the wording of the statements regarding the library assistance, because it is quite obvious that librarians have been given every opportunity to utilize the available funds in direct relation to their problems. both of them, i understand, had much to do with the eventual wording. the various librarians who have gone to washington to support the legislation should also be thanked for their aid. 348 1 college & research libraries • september, 1966 the actual relationship of the sections of the act to administration, reference services, and the technical services, as well as to personnel and training, has been spelled out in the several comments of the preceding speakers. points may be made on some of these comments. dr. gosnell has directed his attention to the fact that the library (and library school, too) will need to have considerable organization of talent familiar with governmental procedure if the institution is to obtain the funds desired for a particular project. know-how and ability to follow through .are implicit, and anyone familiar with a government contract realizes that the operations may be tedious in some situations. dr. gosnell has indicated that in this case, however, there has been an effort to make applications for funds simple, and it is hoped that this simplicity will speed up decisions by review groups so that the funds will be quickly forthcoming and applied to the projects outlined. as a matter of fact, our office of education has done a remarkable job in their speed, and has caught some libraries and library schools unprepared. at new york university the administration decided that the library would be the coordinator of the ~atters relating to the act. this is a satisfactory pattern in an institution which has had a decentralized policy in regard to such requests. in some institutions, it may be somewhat more complex, particularly if there is a centralized control. whatever the pattern is, however, it is quite clear that there is an essential series of steps, related to many forms that are to be filled out, and records kept, for any funds provided for programs under the act. mr. moore, as a reference librarian, :has singled out those aspects of the act which may have implications for the reference services of libraries. he has called attention to the development of resources, and the introduction of procedures to make these resources bibliographically available on a wider scale than most of us dared hope for in recent years. those of you who attended the university libraries section of acrl-rtsd joint meeting monday evening will recall the observations made by the various speakers on the potential for developing collections at the library of congress and for cataloging them quickly for library use. mr. skipper particularly pointed out that there appeared to be no limit to the opportunity, if the personnel were available for the task. this was also supported by mr. cronin in his remarks. mr. moore could not avoid emphasizing the need for sufficient and qualified personnel, as it is obvious that funds available could not be properly expanded unless staff could handle the obligations that the funds bring. shortage of personnel, of course, is coupled naturally with inadequacies in operations, equipment, and technology. the need for research in technique, systems .analysis, and national outlook are therefore cited. an important point, to which i will refer later, made by mr. moore is to the promise of research and demonstration. miss welch, of course, had a wide opportunity in regard to the implications for technical services. the act is quite broad in respect to this field of libr.arianship, and her comments on centralized cataloging, the library of congress potential, cooperative acquisitional programs, standardization, automation, serials, resources, personnel shortages, demonstrations, and international implications do not need to be repeated here. it may be said that they interweave with the comments by mr. moore, and give strength to the observation that the reference services are supported by effective technical services. it is important to recognize a most significant ingredient in the acquisithe higher education act of 1965 i 349 tions aspect of the higher education act. resources in libraries have been developed by librarians but only in concert with bookdealers and other individuals concerned with the production of books such as publishers of all kinds and now, especially, reprint publishers. the markets for books are expanding rapidly, and stocks of older works are diminishing. bookdealers and publishers all over the world will be put upon not only by the act in terms of both acquisitions and cataloging but also by the greater demands which new or embryonic libraries will place upon them. the importance of streamlining acquisitions operations to help bookdealers is obvious. the effectiveness, energy, and interest of bookdealers in carrying out the implications of the act are obviously of paramount importance. fortunately, american bookdealers as a group have been friends of american libraries, and i feel certain that they will accept (they are even already in the middle of it, including wholesalers and general trade book sellers) the pressures that are involved in helping libraries develop their collections wisely. i understand that the library of congress, in its activities under the act, is to use stevens and brown in london, stechert-hafner in paris, and harrassowitz in wiesbaden. dealers in scandinavia, spain, and latin-america will also be used for this purpose. the library of congress has recognized the need for strong personnel in the various parts of the world from which it will seek its literature, and it is obvious that these people will be given full financial and other support to make the job as efficient as possible. in latin-america the library of congress will establish lines of supply similar to those in europe, and work on the success of the latin-american cooperative acquisition progr.am (lacap, as it is called) in its acquisitions program. publishers similarly will be called upon to reprint many titles which have not been available to· small and growing libraries. · guidelines for preparing projecr requests at new york university, if dr. gosnell made his point, the procedures for requesting funds are well established. undoubtedly, this is a pattern in other institutions. at columbia university, for example, the office ot contracts and grants takes an intensive part in the preparing of request applications, and making certain that all elements involved in the request are included. requests for funds for resources and construction are relatively simple. requests for research require somewhat more detail. these requests follow a form of presentation, and contain not only a clear-cut delineation of the proposal but also a well-workedout design, a precise statement of methodology, discussion of any possible builtin evaluative approaches, related studies (if a research project is intended), personnel descriptions, and an extended budget to show how the funds are to be used. time schedules are always included, and should be marked out as carefully as possible, as many studies have been underestimated in terms of months or years needed. overhead, of course, is always included, and may be as high as 20 per cent, and if on personnel basis only, as high as 30 per cent. indeed, the directions for filling out forms are rather direct and specific. despite the clarity, however, as has been noted by miss krettek and others concerned, the institutions that have no special office for contracts and grants may be at a disadvantage in competition with the larger institutions which specialize in obtaining government funds. one can only say that every institution that is interested in obtaining such help should have staff members trained in developing such requests; if not, they should acquire such personnel by train350 1 college & research libraries • september, 1966 ing individuals to do this work. the various agencies, such as the american council on education, for example, have issued bulletins to help institutions, and the april issue of special report on federal programs, of the american council on education, is entitled, "the college equipment grant program," which discussed title vi of the higher education act, which is "to improve the quality of the classroom." although we have in library service miss krettek' s excellent reporting on what is going on in washington, and how to take advantage of developments in legislation that affect libraries, it may be said that in education there appears to be a more direct assembling of related activities in this publication. perhaps this is something that may be done by ala for the smaller libraries, or the individual librarian who may not be aware of the developments and procedures. indeed, it may not be too late to issue as quickly as possible a handbook for preparing project requests for government awards and contracts. titles i, iv, vi mentioned by miss krettek are examples of an area that might be included. individual institutional requests for awards relating to building construction, teaching awards, or demonstrations of various kinds follow a pattern that has been related to forms and instructions for filling them out. as a reviewer for the office of education, and as a consultant in research proposals, i have seen many of these as they come in for examination and decision. the ones that receive high priority follow the stipulations set forth, and make sure that no single element in the series of requirements is omitted. at this point, it may be worthwhile to refer to the general program of research and demonstration that the office of education is concerned with in title ii of the higher education act. at a meeting of various individuals (librarians, library school educators, and representatives of library associations ) in washington in march 1966, which i was given the privilege to attend, there was a discussion of ( 1) title ii with emphasis on library research, ( 2) the provisions of title ii, part b, and plans for program administration, ( 3) considerations that are required for implementation of the program, ( 4) policy decisions that are related to making the program most effective, ( 5) considerations of writing of the guidelines for library research programs, and ( 6) developments of priorities in research, and specification of research criteria. at this meeting, which was directed by lee burchinal, who is acting director of the division for research training and dissemination of the office of education, it may be said that the effort has been so to structure the program as to make it easy to submit proposals. the review of title ii, part b, particularly section 223, dealing with grants for training in librarianship, and section 224, concerned with research and demonstrations relating to libraries and the training of library personnel, and specification of review criteria was particularly useful to all members present. the following comments may be made about this meeting that are relevant to the progress of the relation of libraries and library schools to the higher education act. it was pointed out that there would be $103 million for research for education generally, and that part of the total allotted to library service could be applied on every level from elementary education to post-graduate training. the character of the program in research is worth special comment, as some of you may not be familiar with the types of programs that are available. they are as follows: 1. small grant program. this program includes studies with a grant of from $7,500 (minimum usually) to $9,000, which would be primarily on an eighteen-month basis, and which may the higher education act of 1965 i 351 be more useful even on a shotter period. these grants would be of the kind that might be particularly applicable to doctoral students in library schools. 2. regular projects. these are those projects that may be carried on over a period of two to three years, and would go up to several more thousands of dollars over the small grant projects, if such funds are necessary. 3. program support. this concept is directed to the support of an individual who has demonstrated capacity and has issued reports that relate directly to proposals. on the basis of past achievement, grants are given to such individuals for exploration of given areas. there is no set limit for funds, although there is tendency to limit grants to the periods involveq. 4. research and development program. this type of program involves the establishment of nine centers throughout the country, and would require interested institutions to match funds and make a substantial investment in carrying out the project. large scale library projects are possible here. 5. regional laboratory program. this is the largest effort applied to educational research, and is supported up to the needs of the project, and within the framework of the funds available to the office of education. it is not likely that libraries will be involved but it also is not impossible in terms of a major cooperative project. at our meeting, the process for reviewing proposals was discussed in some detail. it was indicated that in the past some time would elapse between the submission of a proposal, and the decision on it. it was estimated at that time that it would be about three months. it was hoped that this would be reduced to eight weeks. this period would depend on the cooperation of consultants and readers in the field. the group made an effort to list areas of present concern, and to indicate the relationship of the u.s. office of education projects being received to those being considered by ala (library technology program with its office of research and development), national science foundation, air force office of research and development, national institutes of health and various other separate agencies of the government in-:cluding maj0r national libraries (library of congress, national library of medicine, national library of agriculture), and the new committee on science and technology located at the national academy of science (f. j. weyle, executive director) ; this was an outgrowth of the work of committee on science and technical information ( cosati). it was also pointed out that eric ( educational information research center), established at the office of education, with related centers distributed at other institutions, would be in a position to coordinate research activities, and to eliminate overlapping or duplicate re-: search. it was apparent that any research program in librarianship would need to examine priorities in the field. after various plans or analysis of the field, the following rubrics appeared to represent a consensus of the group: 1. values of librarianship, including studies of users, uses, goals of services, and social utility. 2. intellectual problems, involving bibliographic control, cataloging, classification, indexing, abstracting, and data processing and retrieval. 3. systems analysis and planning, including allocation of resources, national responsibilities, and placement of men and machines. 4. operations, involving mechanization, accounting, access to materials, and utilization of manpower. 5. social and professional issues, including education of librarians, librianship as a profession, and the pro/ 352 1 college & research libraries • september, 1966 gressive development of various types of libraries. 6. resources and preservation, including the building of collections on a national basis, and caring for them in ways that we have not done in the past. these areas are not new; they have been discussed in the literature of library service generally, as well as in library education. verner clapp includes them in his «problems for research" in the future of the research library, issued last year by the university of illinois. implications for lmrary enucation the preceding comments are directed at the problem of education for librarianship. i need not dwell on shortages in various areas of library service ( and especially the serious gap in providing cataloging personnel, and personnel with some knowledge of automation). the development of new library schools in all parts of the country has raised the additional problem of staffing with teaching personnel. the higher education act is concerned with developing personnel in these areas. the need to inform all library schools of the implications of the act is the basis for this meeting this morning, if any needed such information. the issuance of rep~>rts and papers on the act, however, might be supplanted by the brochure suggested earlier, which would also include an explanation to all those in library education, of opportunities under various parts of the act and related acts. miss krettek has been trying to do this, and has done a remarkable piece of work, but the issuance of such an analytical bulletin, with instructions for procedure, might be of especial help to those libraries or institutions where there is not a mighty contracts and grants office. in all library schools of any size, there should be an interest in obtaining funds available for improvement of the teaching personnel in the profession; announcements of advanced and doctoral study were made in may 1966. a large number of schools have been awarded grants for either advanced study or doctoral programs, with the expectation that many of these people (and it is going to be rough to recruit suitable personnel) will go into teaching. the $3,550,000 available for research should be the basis for needed studies in the field as outlined earlier. there is a wide range of projects possible, as outlined in section 225 of the act, involving all levels of library service, and in all areas, . including demonstrations, which would involve libraries themselves. this means that libraries, apart from individuals or library schools, can submit proposals separately, or in conjunction with library schools. the pattern of applications is quite flexible. it is also quite clear, particularly after attending the meeting here of the association of hospital and institutional libraries division on monday morning, that section 223 (which is administered by another unit of the office of education, the research training branch) should be coordinated with the medical library assistance act (which is supported by the public health service) in terms of recruiting and training of personnel. the existence of this latter activity may be well known to medical librarians, but is not generally known to librarians as a group. the implications for library education for individual schools of library service are quite clear. if library schools have not made proposals for obtaining funds for specific projects, they should do so. the various committees in library schools concerned with recruiting of students, and fellowships for advanced study, doctoral programs and research, or other relevant activities, should be involved in such proposals. any projects of course imply that the schools are in a position, on the basis of personnel, facilities, and the higher education act of 1965 i 353 equipment to perform on a high level if grants are awarded. all of us have a responsibility of not asking for funds if they cannot be used effectively. i am told that some of the nonaccredited schools or educational agencies are concerned about grants that have been given only to accredited schools. i am sure that eligible nonaccredited institutions are in a position to obtain grants and do effective work in the areas outlined. the law provides for criteria for selection and it is expected that some schools not now accredited will thereby improve their status and become eligible for accreditation. title vi of the higher education act (public law 89-329) established a new program of federal grants to institutions of higher education for the acquisition of laboratory and other special teaching equipment, or audiovisual materials. miss krettek has pointed out that this act included libraries among the areas that might be assisted. the act in general is intended to help those institutions that are making an effort to improve themselves. other divisions of ala my assignment was to point out the implications for the various divisions of ala. mr. moore and miss welch have done a complete job in describing relevant implications for the reference services and technical services respectively. in its various sections, the higher education act cuts across all divisions of the association, and it would seem that each unit of the ala should be concerned about obtaining as much assistance as it can in the months ahead, to further its specific program. this does mean that there probably should be committees or groups representing the individual divisions of ala. they probably should be coordinated at some point, so that overlap and duplicative projects would be minimal or non-existent. the reference services division, the association of college and research libraries, the resources and technical services division, the library administration division, the public library association, the library education division, and the various other divisionsthe children's services division, the american association of school libraries, the adult services division, and any other division of the ala concerned with training of personnel (and all of them are), facilities, and services-are apparently able to qualify for participation in one or more of the several sections of the act. we need to read the act carefully, so that implications or possibilities are not overlooked. the act, as i indicated earlier, has been written so that libraries can be helped to the utmost, if they take advantage of the opportunity. in addition to miss krettek, who has worked so tremendously at getting the act through, one might not overlook our legislative general, who has come through the wars with great success-our moderator, edmon low. •• lib-mocs-kmc364-20131012113423 $c this subfield will contain all but the first character (or all but the first if a longer escape sequence is used) of every escape sequence found in the record. if the same escape sequence occurs more than once, it will be given only once in this subfield. the subfield is repeatable. this subfield does not identify the default character sets. example: l'>l'l~c)w a record containing the iso extended cyrillic character set. l'>l'>$c)w$c)x a record 3.4 discussion-other details containing both the iso greek and extended cyrillic character sets. when a field has an indicator to specify the number of leading characters to be ignored in filing and the text of the field begins with an escape sequence, the length of the escape sequence will not be included in the character count. when fields contain escape sequences to languages written from right to left, the field will still be given in its logical order. for example, the first letter of a hebrew title would be the eighth character in a field (following the indicators, a delimiter, a subfield code, and a three-character escape sequence). the first letter would not appear just before the end of field character and proceed backwards to the beginning of the field. a convention exists in descriptive cataloging fields that subfield content designation generally serves as a substitute for a space. an escape sequence can occur within a word, after a subfield code, or between two words not at a subfield boundary. for simplicity, the convention that an escape sequence does not replace a space should be adopted. one other convention is also advocated: when a space, subfield code, or punctuation mark (except open quote, pareports and working papers 215 renthesis or bracket) is adjacent to an escape sequence, the escape sequence will come last. wayne davison of rlin raised the following issue. after the library of congress has prepared and distributed an entirely romanized cataloging record for a russian book, a library with access to automated cyrillic input and display capability will create a record for the same book with the title in the vernacular. (since aacr2 says to give the title in the original script "wherever practicable," the library could be said to be obligated to do so.) in such an event the local record could have all the authoritative library of congress access points. to keep this record current when the library of congress record is revised and redistributed, it would be necessary to carry the lc control number in the local record. most automated systems are hypersensitive to the presence of two records with the same control number. the two records can be easily distinguished: in the library of congress record, the modified record byte in field 008 will be set to "o" and it will not have any 066, character sets present field. a comparison of oclc, rlg/rlin, and wln university of oregon library the following comparison of three major bibliographic utilities was prepared by the university of oregon library's cataloging objectives committee, subcommittee on bibliographic utilities. members of the subcommittee were elaine kemp, acting assistant university librarian for technical services; rod slade, coordinator of the library's computer search service; and thomas stave, head documents librarian. the subcommittee attempted to produce a comparison that was concise and jargonfree for use with the university community in evaluating the bibliographic utilities under consideration. the university faculty library committee was enlisted to review this document in draft form and held three meetings with the subcommittee for that purpose. the document was also shared with library faculty and staff in order to elicit suggestions for revision. 216 journal of library automation vol. 14/3 september 1981 a copy of the draft was sent to each utility with a request for suggestions for correction and/or clarification of the report. each of the utilities responded promptly, and their recommendations were reviewed by the subcommittee and have been incorporated into the report as it appears here. in reading this report two considerations should be kept in mind: (1) the information is current as of december 1980, and (2) the efforts at brevity and jargon-free comparison may have resulted in oversimplification in some areas. this report is one aspect of the sixmonths-long decision-making process that led the university of oregon library to select oclc, inc. (now the online computer library center). introduction an online bibliographic utility provides computer services to member libraries who, in turn, contribute computer-readable records to a common database. the database is a collection of catalog records input by the members and other sources such as the library of congress, the government printing office, and the national library of medicine. use of the database is online, meaning that each member library accesses the computer directly and carries out its work in an interactive, conversational manner through a computer terminal located in the library. communications with the central computer are carried over a leased long-distance telephone line. the bibliographic utility produces two primary products-catalog cards and magnetic tapes of a library's catalog records-and offers many other services for processing and bibliographic control in libraries. in addition to providing the products and services of a bibliographic utility through the research libraries information network (rlin), the research libraries group (rlg) has three other goals: (1) to provide a structure through which common research library problems can be addressed, (2) to provide scholars and others with increasingly sophisticated access to bibliographic and other forms of information , and (3) to promote, develop, and operate cooperative programs in collection development, preservation of library materials, and shared access to research materials. the purpose of this report is to provide an overview of considerations in selecting an online bibliographic utility and a comparison of the three utilities being reviewed by the university of oregon library. each consideration is accompanied by a brief definition or explanation, and a summary of each utility's capability in providing the necessary services or products. an attempt has been made to distinguish between currently available services and those that are planned for the future, but technological and organizational changes in the utilities have complicated this task and, in some cases, made it difficult for the subcommittee members to distinguish between operational and projected capabilities. basic characteristics history oclc oclc, inc., was founded in 1967 by the ohio college association as the ohio college library center, to be the first online shared cataloging network. it has since expanded beyond the confines of the state of ohio and is currently used by nearly 2,400 member libraries in the united states and abroad. in 1977 it adopted its present name. rlgirlin the research libraries group, inc. , was established in 1974 by four major research libraries. in 1978 it acquired from stanford university the ballots bibliographic data system, which became the foundation for rlin (research libraries information network), rlg's wholly-owned bibliographic utility. besides being the basis for rlg's cooperative processing activities, rlin supports its other three programs: shared resources, cooperative collection development, and preservation. rlg presently has 23 owner-members. wln in 1975 the washington library network began testing its online system using as its base a computerized bibliographic database that several washington libraries had been building since 1972. wln is a project of the washington state library and presently has over 60 members, primarily in the northwest. membership configuration oclc oclc had 2,392 member libraries, in early 1981, including about 1,300 college and university libraries, 330 public libraries, 250 federal libraries, 145 special libraries, 77law libraries, 71 members of the association of research libraries, 168 medical libraries, 37 state libraries, and at least 48 art and architecture libraries. rlg!rlin in december 1980, there were 23 ownermembers (21 university libraries, the new york public library, and the american antiquarian society), two associate members, two affiliate members, and several museum and three law library special members. libraries which formerly contracted for ballots cataloging services from stanford university are still being served by rlin. these include 52 libraries using rlin for online cataloging and 136 libraries using rlin on a search-only basis. wln wln had 65 members, in early 1981 , including 34 college and university libraries, 21 public libraries, two special libraries, three state libraries, five law libraries, and the pacific northwest bibliographic center. governance methods of governance are of concern to libraries considering membership inasmuch as they determine to a great extent the responsiveness of the utilities to the needs of their members and the ability of members to participate in setting the direction and priorities for the utility. oclc a 15-mem ber board of trustees holds the powers and performs the duties necessary for governance (including filling management vacancies and approving policy and budgets). a users' council, elected by the members, participates in the election of trustees and represents the interests of the membership in an advisory capacity. it also reports and working papers 217 must ratify amendments to the oclc code of regulations and articles of incorporation. of the 69 delegates to the council, 44 are from academic libraries. various advisory groups exist representing the interests of special groups within the membership, including a research libraries advisory group. twenty regional networks contract with oclc to provide services to their members. oclc libraries in oregon participate through the oclc western service center, claremont, ca, and are served by oclc's portland office. rlg!rlin rlg /rlin operates through a board of governors consisting of one representative from each full member institution with the president as chief operating officer. standing committees for collection management, public services, preservation, and library technical systems & bibliographic control; and program committees for east asia, art, law, theology, and music are composed of appointees from member institutions and report to the president. wln an 11-member computer services council is elected directly by the online participant libraries. legal responsibility for wln resides with the washington state library commission. financial stability an indicator of a utility's financial stability is its proven ability to generate sufficient revenues to cover expenses with the least recourse to outside funding sources. financial stability in a utility is a concern to a library considering membership not only from the standpoint of a utility's mere survival, but because of its implications for future system developments, possible dramatic fee increases should outside funding evaporate, and maintenance of high quality services and products. oclc oclc, inc., is a not-for-profit corporation, with tax-exempt status having been granted under section 501 ( c)(3) of the internal revenue code . it is self-supporting, receiving no government or private subsidies, 218 journal of library automation vol. 14/3 september 1981 and issuing no stock. its revenues alone support existing operations, expansion, and research and development activities. revenues result from fees charged member libraries for products and services. oclgs estimated assets for fiscal year 1980 were over $55 million and its revenues approximately $24 million. its revenue base is its 2,400 member institutions. rlgirlin the research libraries group, inc., is a tax-exempt corporation owned by its 23 owner-member institutions. revenues result from fees charged members for use of the rlin database. rlg currently must supplement this income with foundation grants and loans from stanford university, because of relatively high development costs and relatively low revenues. as of this year, nearly $5.25 million has been received in grants and a $2.2 million loan was obtained, to be repaid by august 1986. rlg has projected that in 1982-83 ongoing operating costs will be met by feegenerated income. rlg's board of governors recently approved a new income/ expense structure to take effect september 1, 1981: "operating expenses matched by rates for services; system development matched by grants and loans; program and administration matched by a program partnership fee." this new program partnership fee will be a flat annual rate for full members in the range of $20,000 to $25,000. a decline in the number of units cataloged by member libraries (due in part to decreased acquisitions budgets), which is the basis for fees charged, forced the board lo inslilute this new fee. il.lg is encouraging member libraries to seek these additional funds from institutional sources outside the libraries' own budgets. the new financial structure appears to reflect a recognition of the need for outside resources to provide for research and development for at least the immediate future, and at the same time an effort to reconcile income and expense in the areas of operating expenses and program administration. its revenue base is its membership of 23 institutions. in the past rlg has estimated that financial stability would be reached when membership reached 35, but it is unclear how the new rate structure will affect that projection. wln the washington library network receives revenues in the form of fees for services and products. as a division of the washington state library, it also receives some funding from the state of washington. wln has been the recipient of some outside grants, but does not appear to rely heavily upon grant monies to meet ongoing expenses or system development costs. wln would like to lessen its dependency upon the state of washington, and has taken the first step by broadening the base of its advisory committee to include out-ofstate members. its revenue base is its membership of approximately 60 libraries. the committee preparing this report does not have information as to the proportion of revenues generated by fees. however, a recent (july 1, 1980) 10% increase in service rates was put into effect for these stated purposes, among others: "to recover the cost of operation of the computer service" and to "allow a modest margin to insure stability." track record in meeting past system developme11t deadlines past success or failure in meeting announced deadlines for system developments may be indicative of future performance in this regard. all three utilities are heavily engaged in research and development and, while we are primarily interested in the features that are presently available, it is also important to try to gauge what each system will look like several years from uuw. the amount of information available to the committee varied according to the utility, so these columns are not directly comparable, but merely suggestive. oclc oclc tries not to attach dates to its projections because of early failures to meet announced deadlines. however, its interlibrary loan system was implemented one year early and its searching improvements are claimed to be ahead of schedule. the planned acquisitions subsystem had been scheduled for completion in summer 1980, and is currently being tested by a small number of member libraries. the conversion of oclc's database to accommodate the new cataloging rules and include new forms of names was completed on schedule in december 1980. the serials union listing capability was also completed on time. (seep. [224]) rlgirlin a study dated august 1978 performed for the university of california listed planned ballots system developments with projected completion dates. this list follows, with actual completion dates or revised projections added: • network file system (now called "reconfigured database" by rlin) projected january 1979 revised projection april 1981 serials cataloging projected january 1979 actual completion late 1979 authority control system, phase 1 projected january 1979 revised projection spring 1981 authority linking and control, phase 2 projected fall1979 revised projection spring 1981 generalized acquisitions projected fall1979 revised projection (in two phases) june 1981, october 1981 serials control projected 1980 revised projection post-1982 library management information system projected 1979 no projected date, no resources allocated book/com catalog interface projected 1980 revised projection 1981 wln wln's present online system was one year late, and its acquisitions module was also late. the processing of retrospective conversion tapes which had been three months behind was current by early 1981, *since 1978 the rlg board of governors has determined the order of priorities for research and development. reports and working papers 219 with the exception of two special projects. large-scale system adjustments to accommodate new cataloging rules were completed on schedule, as was implementation of roll-microfilm catalogs. database size and components the size and makeup of the utility's database is of concern to libraries considering membership because those factors have the greatest bearing on the library's likelihood of obtaining a large portion of its cataloging information from the system. oclc size. over 7.1 million bibliographic records (february 1981) books: 4.9 million (october 1979) serials: 341,000 (october 1979) other: 340,000 (october 1979) name authority records: 500,000 (est. by 1981) formats available. books serials films (av) maps manuscripts music recordings music scores sources of data. member-contributed records library of congress-produced machinereadable cataloging records (marc) (1968 to date) government printing office-produced records (cataloged directly into oclc by gpo) conser records (conversion of serialsa project of 15 major libraries to produce machine-readable serials cataloging records). data are entered directly into oclc, then authenticated by the library of congress and the national library of canada. national library of medicine-produced records additional sources include the following databases: canadian marc serials minnesota union list of serials pittsburgh regional library center serials 220 journal of library automation vol. 14/3 september 1981 rlg/rlin size. over 3 million bibliographic records 0 une 1980) books: 2.5 million (june 1980) serials: 460,000 (june 1980) authority records: 1.6 million (early 1981) formats available. books serials films (av) maps music recordings music scores sources of data. member-contributed records marc (excluding 19681972) gpo records (to be added spring 1981) conser records cataloging records from columbia and yale universities and university of minnesota biomedical libraries, previously put into machine-readable form, have been added to rlin. records from the new york public library, northwestern and pennsylvania state universities will be added in the near future. additional sources include the avery index to architectural periodicals. wln size. 2 million bibliographic records (january 1981) authority records: 2.3 million (january 1981) holdings records: 2.3 million (december 1980) formats available. books serials films (av) music recordings• music scores• sources of data. member-contributed records marc (1968 to date) gpo records conser records (except those not yet authenticated by the library of congress) machine-readable records from the university of illinois will be added to wln's • awaiting implementation by the library of congress. database on a weekly basis by mid-1981. records from certain libraries in the southeastern library network (solinet) will be added in the future, ,as part of an arrangement whereby wln made its computer software package available for use by illinois and solinet. resource sharing interlibrary loan (ill) ill is the process by which library materials are lent and borrowed by libraries in the u.s. and foreign countries. a bibliographic utility provides two tools to aid in this process: an online union catalog used to determine which library owns the needed material, and a message switching system used to communicate among libraries and to carry out the transaction. ill at the university of oregon library is currently accomplished using a large number of printed union catalogs and is communicated by mail or western union teletype. a bibliographic utility will not completely replace ill transactions carried out in this manner. the number of requests for materials from the library collection will probably increase due to the "visibility" gained in the online union catalog. oclc the oclc database provides the largest online union catalog through a holdings record listed with each catalog entry. the ill message system transfers records from the database to the lending library in a request form, automatically sends the request to up to five libraries, generates records on the status of each request, and provides statistics on ill transactions. oclc ill transactions are generally faster than traditional methods of interlibrary loan because of the ability to move data directly from the online union catalog to the request form without re-typing and the ability to have requests automatically forwarded if a library is unable to fill the request immediately. oclc's ill subsystem has been in operation for a year and participating libraries have reported general satisfaction with its performance. rlg/ rlin the rlin database provides an online union catalog through a holdings record listed with each catalog entry. materials not located in the rlin database may be referred to the bibliographic center at yale university for further manual searching through printed union catalogs. the rlg message system may be used to create and send ill requests to other rlg libraries, though this system is not specifically designed as a comprehensive ill support system. the shared resources program committee has recently formed a task force charged with the responsibility to create a functional specification for an automated interlibrary loan system, and to determine the priority for its implementation. rlg resource sharing policy requires members to give priority to ill requests from other rlg members, to suspend fees to members, to provide on-site access to users from members' libraries' institutions, and to provide free photocopies of non-circulating materials. wln the wln database provides an online union catalog through a holdings record listed with each catalog entry. this online union catalog includes the local library call number and, for serials, the specific holdings of the library. the wln resource directory is a microfiche listing of the bibliographic and holdings information in the database. wln offers no message switching system for ill, though this is their highest priority for future development. in cooperation with pacific northwest bibliographic center, wln is planning experiments with a message switching system for interim use until the comprehensive ill system is developed. cooperative acquisitions cooperation in purchasing library materials is done in order to minimize the duplication of expensive purchases and to ensure that important works are easily available to users of the library, whether they are actually owned or not. oclc member libraries may search the database to determine the holdings of particular items by other member libraries, in order to reports and working papers 221 avert undesirable duplicative purchases. rlgirlin members actively coordinate purchases of certain categories of materials in designated fields in order to avoid extensive duplication and to ensure that at least one copy of every item of research value be acquired by a member institution. in support of this effort is an automated "cooperative purchase file," containing limited bibliographic information and acquisition decisions of rlg members for all new serials on order and for all expensive items ($500 or more). member institutions agree to develop conspectuses reflecting their level of holdings and development in certain fields (subjects, language, and formats). these conspectuses are time-consuming to develop. a survey of holdings in chinese, japanese, and korean languages has been finished by 12 members. older members have completed language and literature, fine arts, philosophy, and religion. history is expected by march, 1981, to be followed by the hard sciences. based upon these conspectuses, rlg members will build a system-wide collection development policy. new members are expected to begin work on their conspectuses as soon as possible, but not necessarily immediately after joining rlg. wln members may search the database to determine the holdings of particular items by other member libraries, in order to avert undesirable duplicative purchases. libraries may also search the in-process file to determine if items are on order by one of the 23 libraries using wln's acquisitions subsystem. support for collection development activities a bibliographic utility is potentially useful for collection development in that it provides a large file of bibliographic records that may be searched to assist in a) determining the existence of published materials in specified categories (on a particular subject, by a particular author, in a particular series, for example), and b) obt~ining cor222 journal of library automation vol. 14/3 september 1981 rect bibliographic information about specific items to assist in ordering them. important features in a utility in this regard are database size and variety of access points (subject, author, series titles, etc.). oclc useful access points by which the database may be searched include: • personal author • corporate author • title • series title • variant names (e.g. clemens or twain) • conference names the database must be searched using a "search key" (a code based upon a sequence of initial letters in the words to be searched), not real words. rlg/rlin useful access points by which the database may be searched include: • personal author • corporate author • conference names • title • series title • subject heading or call number range (excluding items cataloged by the library of congress) • publisher, using a truncated isbn (international standard book number) [restricted to items cataloged by the library of congress] a search of rlin is likely to produce multiple records for particular items because an item held by more than one member will be displayed for as many libraries as have cataloged it through the system. it is projected that by april, 1981, run's "reconfigured database" will have solved that problem by attaching holdings information to one unified record. it will also have merged the two bibliographic subfiles (library of congress and member cataloging) so that access by subject heading, call number range, and isbn will be available for the entire database. wln useful access points by which the database may be searched include: • personal author • corporate author or corporate author keyword (keyword searching permits the user to search for items using either the full heading: american society for information science; or words from the heading: "society" and "information. " this capability is useful when the complete phrase is not known.) • title • corporate or conference author/title series (keyword) • series title or truncated series title • subject heading and/or subdivision or truncated subject heading • corporate and conference name subject headings (keyword) preservation of library materials all bibliographic utilities, because of their function as a union catalog of their members' machine-readable cataloging information, have some usefulness for libraries making decisions about preservation priorities. a library may, for example, choose to give preservation treatment to item a rather than item b because item b is owned by several other libraries in the vicinity, whereas item a appears to be unique. it must be remembered, however , that many older items will not appear at all, because they were cataloged long before the utilities came into existence. oclc members may search holdings information in the database to determine the relative rarity of an item that is a candidate for preservation treatment. rlgirlin members may search holdings information in the database to determine the relative rarity of an item that is a candidate for preservation treatment. a computerized list of members' micropreservation activities is provided. experimental programs are conducted to test new preservation technologies and applications of existing processes . preservation microfilming is being done for members by staff at yale and princeton. funds are provided to members for preservation activities. r these activities are part of rlg's preservation program, one of its four major programs. wln members may search holdings information in the database to determine the relative rarity of an item that is a candidate for preservation treatment. technical processing acquisitions the steps by which the library purchases books and other materials include: l. pre-order searching to determine that a requested item is not already owned by the library or on order. 2. selecting a dealer likely to be able to supply desired item. 3. placing the order. 4. receiving the item. 5. clearing the order records. 6. processing the invoice for payment. 7. maintaining precise accounting of all book funds. 8. inquiring about the status of items which are not received when expected. 9. cancelling orders and adjusting accounting records when items are not available. at the uo most acquisitions forms and files are created and maintained manually. in an automated acquisitions system the placing of the initial order generates an acquisition record for each item, which is updated as the item moves through the cycle outlined above. this eliminates the need for maintaining separate files according to the status of an order. oclc operational. oclc has an online nameaddress directory which presently can be searched while using other oclc subsystems. this file contains information about publishing, educational, library, and professional organizations and associations. this information will be automatically transferrable to forms being produced online. planned. oclc's acquisitions subsystem, which is presently being tested by sereports and working papers 223 lected member libraries, is projected to be generally available in spring 1981. when operational the acquisitions subsystem will permit users to: place orders for all types of bibliographic materials (forms generated will be sent directly to supplier with copy to library) renew subscriptions request publications or price quotations create deposit account orders send prepaid orders cancel orders create and adjust fund records receive periodic fund reports rlgirlin operational. rlin does not have an operational acquisitions subsystem. stanford university is continuing to use a system developed as part of ballots. planned. the rlg board of governors has approved functional specifications for an acquisitions subsystem to be introduced in two phases. by june 1981, rlin plans to have a centralized in-process file which will contain records of all new orders, gifts, subscriptions, etc. of members, and will be able to support non-accounting aspects of the acquisitions process. the capability to store and maintain an online book fund accounting system will be achieved in october 1981. rlin expects to be able to support all files, processing, and products necessary to establish, coordinate, and monitor materials acquisitions from the point of selection decision, request, order, or receipt through completion of technical processing activity. wln operational. wln's acquisitions subsystem, which has been operational since may 1978, is comprised of four files: 1. in-process file which supports the majority of acquisitions activities. 2. standing orders file which has records for subscriptions and other items which are renewed or reordered on a continuing or periodic basis. 3. name and address file which contains names and addresses of book dealers and other vendors, main libraries, branch libraries, etc. 4. account status file which provides ca224 journal of library automation vol. 14/3 september 1981 pability to maintain up-to-date accounting. information keyed into the terminal during the day is entered against the accounts nightly and is reflected in the account totals available online the following day. records of completed transactions are transferred to a magnetic tape history file and can be used for generating statistical and other reports. with each step of the order cycle, appropriate forms and reports are generated. special system reports reflecting the status of the four files may be generated on request. instructions entered at the time of the initial order provide for automatic generation of notification forms for individuals requesting the specific item being ordered or inquiry notices for materials not received after a specified period. planned. further refinements of the procedures and capabilities of the system. cataloging the creation of a cataloging record involves: i. describing an item 2. assigning headings for names of persons or organizations and titles by which the user might be expected to seek the item in the catalog 3. assigning a unique call number which will place the item with others of a similar nature, and 4. assigning subject headings which reflect the content of the item. because most libraries collect many of the same materials, the concept of sharing the responsibility for cataloging was developed which makes materials available more quickly at reduced cost. with the establishment of national and international cataloging rules and standards, and the growth of large online computerized databases, it is becoming increasingly feasible to have each item cataloged only once with that cataloging information available for all libraries to use. the library of congress catalogs approximately 250,000 titles per year into machine-readable form . this cataloging is available through each of the bibliographic utilities and may be used for the creation of local catalogs. when the library of congress has not yet cataloged a specific item, a utility member library may prepare the cataloging according to specified standards and enter its cataloging into the database for use by other member libraries and for its own catalog. another aspect of the cataloging activity is the creation of a local database which can be used as the basis of not only the local library catalog, but also of a local circulation, acquisitions, and serials system, as well as for regional union catalogs. in order to provide total access to a library's collection in this machine-readable database, information concerning every item in the library must be entered into the system. this process is called retrospective conversion. during the retrospective conversion process the library can choose to eliminate existing inconsistencies in the treatment of library materials including reclassifying books so that most materials are retained in one main classification system. the university of oregon library has as a long-term goal completing total retrospective conversion of its collection so that all materials can be searched and located in an online catalog. oclc operational. oclc's online cataloging subsystem has been operational since 1971. based on the experience of similar libraries, the university of oregon library might expect to find entries in oclc's database for over 90 percent of the items searched . • these cataloging records can be modified online or accepted as is. the local library's symbol is added to indicate that it has used the cataloging record and then presorted, alphabetized catalog cards are ordered. the cards are printed overnight and shipped on a daily basis. many oclc libraries print their call number labels by means of a printer attached to their terminal. once a cataloging transaction has been completed, it is not possible to retrieve your local modifications online in the oclc system. the record of your transaction is stored and sent to your library on magnetic tape on a periodic basis. these magnetic archive tapes can be used by a vendor or •see footnote on page 225. local computing center to generate a local microform or online catalog, run a circulation system, etc. it is presently possible to catalog most types of materials in the oclc system including books, serials, microforms, motion pictures, music, sound recordings, maps, and manuscripts. increased emphasis has been placed on quality control and adherence to specified standards in the creation of cataloging records, but there is no official editing of cataloging records by oclc staff. in 1979-80 nearly 45 percent of the activity on oclc's cataloging subsystem was related to retrospective conversion. oclc's large database, extended hours of service, and special pricing schedules for retrospective conversion and reclassification make it attractive for these activities. oclc charges 60 c~nts per retrospective conversion record during hours of peak system activity (prime time) and five cents per retrospective conversion record during less busy hours (non-prime time). planned. oclc continues to explore means of improving quality control. after moving their central facility to new quarters in early 1981, oclc will reconsider the possibility of storing and displaying the number and location of local copies of a title. rlgirlin operational. at this time the university of oregon might expect to find cataloging available for 70 to 90 percent of its ongoing work in rlin. t a search of rlin's database retrieves multiple records because each library's records are stored separately. the reports and working papers 225 library selects the desired record, modifies or accepts it, enters the library's symbol, and orders cards which are printed nightly and sent in presorted, alphabetized batches. no call number labels are produced, and it is not presently possible to print labels from the terminal. local library modifications are accessible online. magnetic tapes or cataloging transactions may be purchased and used to create local online or microform catalogs. most materials may be cataloged with rlin including books, serials, microforms, motion pictures, music, sound recordings, and maps. member libraries agree to catalog in conformity with rlin standards, but there is no formal editing of records by rlin staff on an ongoing basis. sample quality checking is the responsibility of a newly-created position of quality assurance specialist. with only 23 owner-members, rlg must carefully consider the impact on the system of allowing individual members to undertake retrospective conversion projects. each project must be approved by the board of governors, and members are encouraged to seek outside financial support rather than asking rlin for reduced rates. rlin has just received a 1.25 million dollar grant including $600,000 to support retrospective conversion projects. rlin does not charge for retrospective records which are completely recataloged and upgraded with the book in hand. the prices for other levels of retrospective conversion cataloging range from fifty-five cents to $1.85 per record. planned. in april 1981, rlin plans to reformat its database so that there will be t a wide range of success rates for searching each system are cited in the literature, each dependent on the sample procedures used. the university of oregon library had 100 items searched against each database. this sample excluded books with printed library of congress card numbers, and included books, serials, microforms, music scores, recordings, documents, and non-book materials. of this sample oclc found 96, rlin found 65, and wln found 38. the range of figures cited in this report allows for variation between studies cited in the literature, word-of-mouth reports from librarians using these systems, and the university of oregon library's own sample. an analysis of this sample is being prepared. recent comparisons of searching success are found in the following: linking the bibliographic utilities: benefits and costs, submitted to the council on library resources ... by donald a. smalley [and others). columbus, ohio, battelle, 1980; matthews, joseph r. , "the four online bibliographic utilities: a comparison," library technology reports 15:6 (november-december 1979), p. 665-838; tracy, juan i. and remmerde, barbara, "availability of machine-readable cataloging: hit rates for ballots, bna, oclc, and wln for the eastern washington university library," library research 1:3 (falll979), p. 227-81. 226 ] ournal of library automation vol. 14/3 september 1981 only one copy of each cataloging record. member libraries' symbols and local cataloging information will be displayed with the appropriate records. wln operational. based on the experience of others, the university of oregon library might currently expect to find cataloging records available for 50 to 70 percent of its ongoing work in the wln database. • libraries search wln's database, accept or modify the cataloging records, and order cards and labels which are printed nightly and shipped weekly. (card sets are not presorted for filing.) local cataloging information is accessible online through the library's wln terminal. magnetic tapes of a library's cataloging transactions may be purchased to run a local online or microform catalog. wln also provides microform catalogs on either microfilm or microfiche. books, serials, and audio-visual materials, but not music, sound recordings, and maps may be cataloged on wln's system. libraries cataloging in wln must conform to well-defined wln standards. new cataloging records go through an edit cycle and are reviewed by central wln staff before being added to the wln database. presently this review takes about two weeks. during this period, the cataloging record may not be retrieved online. the wln batch retrospective conversion subsystem has been operational since august 1980. using this system a library enters brief cataloging records which are collected by the system and searched later as a unit through the wln database. records for which a match is found are billed at six cents. records not matched are billed at one cent and may be searched again at a later date. over 30 wln libraries are using this capability, which can be made available to non-members under special circumstances. planned. wln is considering dispersing among selected member libraries responsi~ility for editing member-created catalogmg records. wln :will make music cataloging available within the near future. •see footnote on page 225. serials check-in serials are publications issued in successive pa~ts be~ring n~merical or chronological designations which are intended to be co~tinued indefinitely. they include periodicals; newspapers; annual reports and yearbooks; i?urnals, memoirs, proceedings an~ transactions of societies; and numbered senes. the average research library will have between 15,000 and 20,000 such titles. precise data must be maintained to enter ~ach issue as received, to discover missing ~ssues, to requ_est replacements for missing issues, to momtor accounting information, to ~enew or cancel subscriptions, and to mamtain binding information. serials files contain such information as title, relationship to earlier publications, name and address of publisher volumes the library owns, call number a'nd location date, volume, and number of each issue' date each issue was received, subscriptio~ dates, price, etc. at_ t?e university of oregon library all of this mformation is maintained in manual files. once the serials check-in operation is co_mpute~ized, it is possible to generate a w1de ~anety of serials finding lists, analyses of senals subscriptions by subject, location, department, etc., and to provide current serials information online. oclc operational. oclc introduced its serials control subsystem in 1976 and improvements to the system in 1979. participants create online local data records with information necessary to monitor and cont~ol each iss~e o~ each serial received by the hbr~ry. i_nshtutwns can check-in currently received issues online. ~recent ancillary to this system is the ability to create and maintain online a cooperativ~ r~or~ of serials owned by any group of mshtutwns (a union list of serials). pl~nned. oclc plans to continue upgradmg the capabilities of its serials control subsystem as needed. rlg!rlin operational. none. planned. automated serials check-in is one of several items listed for consideration after current development activities are released, probably in late 1982. no resources are presently committed to this project. wln operational. while wln has no current serials check-in capabilities, it does support maintenance of serials subscriptions in the acquisitions subsystem, including automatic renewal and reorder reminders. wln also produces union lists of serials. planned. wln is investigating existing commercially-created check-in systems to see whether they can purchase an existing system to incorporate into wln's services. management lnfonnation precise up-to-date information concerning library operations can be very useful in planning improvements in library services and in attaining efficient utilization of available personnel, resources, and materials. without the computer, the laborious record-keeping necessary to obtain useful management information almost negates the benefits of having the information. oclc operational. oclc produces cataloging, interlibrary joan, and serials check-in system use and system performance statistics on a regular basis. libraries can make local arrangements to create additional analyses of the information stored on subscription archival tapes of their local cataloging activity. oclc offers semimonthly, monthly, or quarterly accession lists of new materials cataloged by each library. these lists may be in call number or subject sequence. oclc has produced some special studies for institutions based on their cataloging records. planned. when the acquisitions subsystem is operational, libraries may choose to receive a cumulative, monthly fund activity report and a periodic, cumulative fund commitment register. these reports will provide institutions with current financial control data. oclc plans to continue to develop its ability to provide management information. reports and working papers 227 rlgirlin operational. system use statistics are provided in the form of the monthly invoice, which may be used to monitor cataloging and public service activity, and may be broken down into appropriate accounts by pre-planning. lists in call number order of materials cataloged by a library into rlin could be produced from local printers attached to the terminal. planned. the generation of management information is a future development project; no special management reports are prepared presently. among the management reports included in the specifications for the acquisitions subsystem, projected for implementation by october 1981, are status reports on in-process files, materials awaiting receipt, materials received, and book fund balances. wln operational. wln produces aggregate system activity reports monthly, but does not analyze the cataloging activity or subject holdings. wln's acquisitions subsystem can be used to produce acquisitionsrelated management reports concerning account transactions, account history, standing orders, renewals and reorders, receipts, detailed encumbrances, etc. a microform accession list by title is available. a general-purpose text-editing facility may be used by management to maintain data not derived from wln operations and to produce formatted reports of this data. planned. wln is developing the capability to store and maintain detailed collection information for each library online, including copy numbers and location symbols for each copy of a title owned by a library. no specific management information plans have been outlined at this point. public services reference use of the utility's terminal a bibliographic utility has potential for use in library reference services in three major areas: 1. verification of bibliographic information. the utility's database may be searched for cataloging information 228 journal of library automation vol. 14/3 september 1981 not in the uo library catalog. a verification search is made to locate a complete catalog description of a specific, known item and is carried out most easily using one of the unique numbers assigned to a publication (library of congress card number, international standard book number, etc.). if one of these is not known, a combination of author and title words, or a "search key"• based on author and title is used to retrieve the information. verification places a greater reliance on the quality of bibliographic information in the utility's database than on search techniques used to locate the information. 2. compilation of subject bibliographies. the utility's database is searched through words in the titles and subject headings in a bibliographic record in order to produce a list of materials on a given subject. this subject query can be modified using the logical relationships and, or, and not to indicate, respectively, limitations, synonyms, or exclusions in the search. the ability to obtain a printed list of references is convenient, if not required. 3. compilation of author bibliographies. the database is searched to find all material created by a particular individual or corporate body. the size of the utility's database is a major consideration, as is the source of the cataloging found in an author search. again, a printed list is necessary. oclc the oclc database can be searched in a variety of ways to support reference ser• a search key is a code based on a certain number of characters drawn from a particular element in the bibliographic reference. for instance, to find a record for william manchester's american caesar, an author/title search key using the first four letters of the author's name and the first four letters in the title would be manc,amer. various combinations of letters are used to search author names, titles, or author/title combinations. a search key may not necessarily be unique to a given item , and may retrieve other items beside the one desired. vices, though there is no subject search capability in the system. the following access points may be used in a search: 1. lc card number 2. international standard book number (isbn) 3. international standard serial number (issn) 4. coden (an abbreviation developed by chemical abstracts service for designating periodical titles) 5. government documents number 6. oclc identification number 7. personal author (search key, not full words) 8. corporate author (search key) 9. performer (search key) 10. title (search key) 11. author/title (search key) 12. series title (search key) 13. variant names (search key) 14. conference names (search key) searches may be restricted by year or by type of material, such as books, manuscripts, maps, etc. the logical operators and, or, and not are not used in oclc. the oclc search system is primarily based on search keys and is best utilized to locate a known item. local printing is available on any oclc terminal so equipped. there is one standard print format offered. rlgirlin the following access points may be used in a search of the rlin database, though not all are currently active in each subfile of the database: 1. lc card number 2. isbn 3. issn 4. coden 5. government documents number 6. rlin identification number 7. call number (complete or truncated) 8. recording label number 9. personal author 10. corporate authors or conference names (keyword or phrase) 11. title words 12. subject headings (keyword or phrase) 13. music publisher truncation (searching of partial entries) is available to aid in searching incomplete entries and the logical operators and, or, and not may be used to broaden or restrict a search. local printers may be attached to the rlin terminals. a variety of print formats is offered. plans include unified search access points for all subfiles of the database as of april, 1981. wln the "following access points may be used to search the wln database: 1. lc card number 2. isbn 3. issn 4. wln identification number 5. personal author 6. corporate authors or conference names 7. title words 8. series title (complete or truncated) 9. corporate or conference author/title series (keyword) 10. subject headings (complete or truncated) for a variety of reasons, the wln search system is the most powerful of the three utilities. truncation is available and the logical operators and, or, and not may be applied to broaden or restrict a search. records may be printed locally in a variety of formats on any wln terminal so equipped. wln will also provide printing at the central computer for reference bibliographies. wln search software may be purchased for local database management applications (see the section on online public catalogs.) links to other computerized services there are presently over 150 reference databases available through commercial computerized reference service vendors. during the last ten to fifteen years, standard bibliographic indexing and abstracting publications such as chemical abstracts, historical abstracts and dissertation abstracts international have used computerized methods to organize and print references to periodical articles, reports, dissertations, conference papers, etc. the vendor creates a computer searchable version of the reference database and makes reports and working papers 229 it available to libraries for a fee based on their use of the computerized search system. membership in a bibliographic utility can provide two benefits in the use of other computerized reference services: 1. discounts on fees through membership in large group contract administered by the utility. 2. access to the reference vendor's computer through the utility's terminal and communication network. oclc oclc's affiliated online services program provides access at discounted rates to the information services of bibliographic retrieval service (brs), lockheed information systems (lis), and the new york times information bank. oclc's communications network does not yet permit users to link to the hosts using an oclc terminal, though this capability is anticipated in the near future. rlg!rlin rlin does not offer a formal program in this area, though the rlg 40 terminal is compatible with other information retrieval systems. wln wln does not offer a program in this area, but anticipates offering access to brs, lis, and new york times information bank. circulation none of the bibliographic utilities under consideration currently support circulation functions on their computers. however, each system can provide a machinereadable archive tape of our cataloging information to be used in developing a computerized circulation system. in order to keep track of circulation transactions, it is necessary to have complete retrospective conversion of the uo library catalog. another important consideration is the transferability of data between the utility's computer and the circulation computer. oclc oclc anticipates offering support for local circulation systems on their computer 230 journal of library automation vol. 14/3 september 1981 for member libraries and will demonstrate their system in mid-1981. oclc data has been successfully transferred to many local circulation systems. rlg/rlin rlin does not anticipate offering local circulation services for member libraries. rlin data has been successfully transferred to several local circulation systems. wln wln does not anticipate offering local circulation systems on their computer for member libraries. wln data has been successfully transferred to local circulation systems and an agreement has been reached with dataphase, a computerized circulation system vendor, to discount purchase of their system by wln member libraries. public online catalogs again, none of the bibliographic utilities under consideration currently support public online catalogs of an individual library's collection. a public online catalog requires further programming in order to make it easy for the public to locate materials of interest without extensive training; the bibliographic utility's searching procedures are too esoteric to be used by the general public. as in circulation, issues of data transferability and full retrospective conversion of the uo library's catalog are paramount. oclc oclc does not currently encourage public access to their database and does not support use of local online catalogs on their computer due to the tremendous demand for computer resources exerted by 2400 member libraries. oclc and rlg/ rlin are participating in a study of user requir~ ments for a public online catalog. oclc data has been successfully transferred to several local online catalogs, including eugene public library's circulation and online catalog system, ulisys. rlgirlin rlin anticipates being able to offer public access to their database. they are participating in a study with oclc of user requirements for such a system, but no date has been announced for the development of this capability in rlin. rlin data has been successfully transferred to a local public online catalog at northwestern university. wln wln does not believe that a local online patron accessed catalog should be provided through the wln computer, even though they anticipate having such a capability within one year. instead, they encourage libraries to develop local systems for public access to the online computerized catalog and to obtain data from the wln cataloging system . the university of illinois is adapting the wln computer search and database management software to provide a local online catalog and computerassisted instruction in its use for the public. checklist for cassette recorders connected to crts prepared by lawrence a. woods: purdue university libraries, west lafayette, indiana, for the technical standards for library automation committee, information science and automation section, library and information technology association . introduction a data cassette recorder connected to a printer port is an effective, low-cost method of collecting data in machine-readable form from display terminals such as the oclc 100/105. it is important that a data recorder be used rather than an audio recorder although the cassette itself can be a goodquality audio tape. it is also important to note that the data recorded on the tape are not the same as the data originally transmitted to the display terminal, but are simply a line-by-line image of what appears on the screen. a typical installation will have a minimum of two devices: one attached to the display terminal to collect data, and one attached to a printer or an input device to another computer for playback of the data. there are more than 150 various data reacrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries 125 classified advertising deadlines: orders for regular classified advertisem ents must reach the acrl office on or before the second of the month pre­ ceding publication of the issue (e.g., september 2 for the october issue). late jo b listings will be accepted on a space-available basis after the second of the month. rates: classified advertisements are $2.25 per line for acrl members, $2.80 for others. late jo b notices are $7.00 per line for members, $8.50 per line for others. organizations subm itting ads will be charged according to their m embership status. telephone: all telephone orders should be confirmed by a writ­ ten order mailed to acrl headquarters as soon as possible. orders should be accompanied by a typewritten copy of the ad to be used in proofreading. guidelines: for ads which list an application deadline, that date must be no s ∞ n e r than the last day of the month in which the notice appears (e.g., october 31 for the october issue). all jo b an­ nouncements must include a salary figure. job announcements will be edited to exclude discriminatory references. applicants should be aware that the terms faculty rank and status vary in meaning among institutions. jobline: call (312) 944 -67 95 for late-breaking jo b ads for academic and research library positions. a prerecorded summary of positions listed with the service is revised weekly; each friday a new tape includes all ads received by 1:00 p.m. the previous day. each listing subm itted w ill be carried on the recording for two weeks. the charge for each two-week listing is $ 25 for acrl members and $30 for non-members. fast job listing service: a special newsletter for those actively seeking positions. the service lists job postings received at acrl headquarters four weeks before they appear in c&rl news, as well as ads which, because of narrow application deadlines, will not ap­ pear in c&rl news. the cost of a six-month subscription is $5 for acrl members and $10 for non-members. contact: kathy van voorst, a d m inistra tive secretary, acrl, american library association, 50 e. huron st., chicago, il 60611; (312) 944-6780. for sale encyclopedia. allgemeine encylop;adie der wissenschaften und k ;unste (ersch und gruber encyclop'pdie) leipzig, 1818-89. 1st sec., vols. 1-89; 2nd sec., vols. 1-31; 3rd sec., vols. 1-25. original edition, good condition. $15 0 plus cost of transportation. contact dr. robert f. cayton, college librarian, marietta college dawes li­ brary, marietta, ohio 45750. foreign microforms. any foreign m icroform from anywhere in the world at the foreign list price. free searching. monographs and serials. imds, 1995 broadway, ny, ny 10023, (212) 873-2100. lc printed cards issued to 1942 (in fine condition); purchase price: $1,950 u.s. lc nuc author list 1942-1962; a master cum u­ lation (fine condition); purchase price: $1,600 u.s. asking $1,600 u.s. for both. lc nuc q uinquenniums: 196 3 -1 9 6 7 and 19 6 8 1972; purchase p rice: 1 9 6 3 -1 9 6 7 — $ 7 4 5 u.s. (o u t of prin t); 1968-1972— $1,950 u.s. asking: $1,300 u.s. for both: or all 4 sets for $2,900 u.s. plus shipping. please contact: pat nicholls, school of library and information science, university of western ontario, london, ontario, canada n6a 5b9. marv broadbent, box 6, beltsville, md 20705. government publications. standing, subscription, single, or search orders. no prepayment. no foreign surcharge. (301) 937-8846. search service. e x-librarians locate title s or subject, plus 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 indexed stock. pab 29 1 7 a tla n tic , a tla n tic city, nj 08401. phone 609/344-1943. information wanted in preparation: the catalogue raisonn9e of ernest l. blum en­ schein (1 8 7 4 -1 9 6 0 ). requesting inform ation about all paintings and watercolors, as well as illustrations, correspondence, photo­ graphs, original prints and engraver’s plates. sherry brown, 1018 n. country club, tucson, az 85716; (602) 299-1354. positions open acquisitions librarian. for library serving 2 colleges. re­ sponsible for acqu isitio n of m onographs. required: mls from ala-accredited school, ability to com municate effectively with fac­ ulty. preference given to applicants with experience in acquisitions and/or academic libraries. salary range $12,500 -$1 7,0 00. position available july 1, 1981. send resume and references by may 1 to jack ray, loyola/notre dame library, 200 winston avenue, balti­ more, md 21212. acquisitions librarian. responsible for developing collec­ tions of european literature, languages, history, and culture for the main library. administrative duties include: revising bibliographic searching and verification; assigning vendors; monitoring approval plans; assisting faculty with book selection; corresponding with b ∞ k dealers and publishers. mls from ala-accredited school re­ quired. knowledge of french or german; five years’ professional experience, supervisory and public relations ability essential. initial appointm ent at the rank of associate librarian, $13 ,860-$23,100. florida state retirem ent, faculty status, blue cross/blue shield group plan, 22 days’ vacation. send letter of application with com ­ plete resume and with names of three references and salary re­ quirements by may 1, 1981, to: james h. renz, associate director for technical services, 216 library west, gainesville, fl 32611. eeo/aae. assistant catalog/humanities librarian. split appoint m ent in the cataloging dept. (cataloging science, technology, and german materials) and in the humanities library (providing refer­ ence services). requires ala/mls, cataloging experience and three years’ of humanities-area reference experience in an academic or research library; facility in the german language; good written and oral com munication skills. prefer ability to read french, experience with collection development and bibliographic verification, university instruction and lecturing, oclc, aacr 2, and dewey. require­ ments for tenure and promotion include publishing, research, and service, in addition to job performance. $14,500 m inim um salary on 12 month basis. instructor (non-tenured track) or assistant pro­ fessor, commensurate with applicant’s qualifications. generous sick leave, vacation, insurance benefits. state university retirement sys­ tem. position available july 1, 1981. send resume and names and addresses of three references by may 15, 1981, to charlotte clark, chairperson, search committee for assistant catalog/humanities librarian, morris library, southern illinois university, carbondale, il 62901. an equal-opportunity/affirmative-action employer. assistant photographic archives librarian. duties in­ clude organizing and cataloging photographic archives and m anu­ script collections, preparing bibliographic aids and assisting re­ searchers, and sharing reference duties in the in ternatio nally known c enter for creative photography. q ualifications: ala accredited degree, broad knowledge of the history of photography, and a m inim um of one year of experience in archival work or a re­ lated area. salary: m inim um $14,400. faculty status, 12 month appointment, 22 days’ annual vacation, fringe benefits. send re­ sume and list of three references by may 15, 1981, to: w. david laird, university librarian, university of arizona library, tucson, az 85721. an equal-opportunity/affirmative-action employer. assistant reference librarian in charge of docum ents and microforms but does other reference work as required. qualifi­ cations and abilities: strong academic credentials including an ac­ credited mls with ability to communicate with students and faculty as well as an ability to work harmoniously with other staff members. occasional evening and weekend work required. library faculty has full faculty status with faculty rank, appointm ent will be made at instructor or assistant professor level depending upon qualifications and experience. m inim um salary $14,900. position available au­ gust 24, 1981. applications close may 1, 1981. an affirmative action and equal-opportunity employer. apply to: james m. hillard, director, the daniel library, the citadel, charleston, sc 29409. audiovisual. general libraries, emory university, atlanta, ga. available not later than september 1, 1981. head, candler library and coordinator of audiovisual services. responsible for the can­ dler library departm ent, in c lu d in g audiovisual services, repair shop, language and listening laboratories, reserve room, and other facilities. an administrative position with responsibility to: assist fac­ ulty and students in using audiovisual facilities and services crea­ tively; expand existing services in support of classroom instruction for arts and sciences; design and develop audiovisual services in support of university-wide events and other university divisions as appropriate. present staff includes one additional professional and seven general and technical staff members. opportunity for en­ thusiastic, creative individual to develop and promote an emerging and growing service. m inim um qualifications: graduate degree in audiovisual field from accredited institution and a m inim um of two years’ professional, administrative audiovisual experience in a col­ lege or university. preference given to candidates with additional professional, audiovisual experience, library experience, and/or ad126 vanced degree. salary dependent upon qualifications and experi­ ence, but not less than $20,000. send letter of application, re­ sume, names of three references, and have graduate school cre­ dentials forwarded by may 15, 1981, to herbert f. johnson, direc­ tor of libraries, robert w. woodruff library, emory university, at­ lanta, ga 30322. affirmative-action/equal-opportunity employer. bibliographic and technical services librarian. academic library seeks person to combine skills of technical ser­ vices with opportunities for personal contact of reader services to expand the scope of library services. qualifications include an mls degree from an a la-accredited institution and three years of pro­ fessional experience. knowledge of lc classification system, and experience in the use of oclc and in collection development are preferred. position open september 1981. tenure track position with faculty rank; minimum salary: $16,289. application deadline: april 30, 1981. address application to bruce e. thomas, library search committee, lock haven state college, lock haven, pa 17745. an aff¡rmative-action/equal-opportunity employer. catalog librarian. assists in planning and implementing an online catalog and quality control of data base; participates in the coordination of authority work and establishment of cataloging pol­ icy; catalogs as required. qualifications: accredited mls; minimum of 4 years’ cataloging experience, preferably in a medium or large research library, including experience of original and online copy cataloging; knowledge of lc, aacr, marc formats, file design and structure, file access methods, and the development and control of standards; demonstrated ability to identify and analyze problems and to recommend solutions; ability to communicate clearly both orally and in writing; supervisory experience preferred; knowledge of a foreign language desirable. salary: minimum $16,000, negotiable depending on qualifications. send resume and names of three ref­ erences by may 15 to jane titus, personnel librarian, paley li­ brary, temple university, philadelphia, pa 19122. an equal opportunity/affirmative-action employer. catalog librarian. authorities specialist/sen¡or cataloger re­ sponsible for accuracy of headings in the libraries' catalogs. duties include resolving conflicts in headings where there is no lc or existing local authority; assistance in training for and revision of original cataloging; and original cataloging of monographs in social sciences and/or humanities. qualifications: mls degree from an ala-accredited program. three years of cataloging experience in an academic or research library; working knowledge of at least two foreign languages, one of w hich m ust be russian. benefits: minimum salary of $17,000); tiaa retirement; paid medical insur­ ance. send resume to: mathilda o’ bryant, head, cataloging de­ partment, university of notre dame libraries, notre dame, indiana 46556. notre dame is an equal-opportunity, affirmative-action em­ ployer. catalog librarian. the houston academy of medicine-texas medical center library is seeking a new or recent graduate to fill an entry level position in the library’s cataloging department. this position will begin on june 1, 1981. the library serves and is jo intly supported by nineteen health science institutions in the texas medical center including two major medical schools, three nursing schools and various allied health science programs. it is also a regional resource library for the south central regional medical library program and actively serves the library needs of health professionals throughout central texas. responsibilities of this cataloging position include original cataloging of book and non-book materials in the health sciences, revision of catalog assis­ tants’ work in oclc, continuous editing of all library catalogs, pro­ vision of assistance to library personnel with bibliographic problems related to cataloging. qualifications: mls from an ala-accredited library school. degree in life sciences and/or course work in medi­ cal librariansh¡p desirable. familiarity with oclc and/or nlm classification and mesh would be an asset. no previous work ex­ perience required. minimum salary is $14,000. fringe benefits in­ clude m edical insurance, life insurance and retirem ent plan (tiaa/cref), credit union, two days paid vacation per month (al­ most 5 full weeks per year). send resume and names of three ref­ erences to: janis sharp, personnel librarian, houston academy of medicine-texas medical center library, jesse h. jones library building, 1133 m.d. anderson blvd., houston, texas 77030. clos­ ing date: may 15, 1981. cataloger. search extended. responsibilities: catalog and classify av materials using the oclc marc formats for av and sound recordings, aacr ii, and lc classification. supervise and train para professional to work with av cataloging. organize and di­ rect card catalog maintenance. department cataloged 14,200 titles, reclassified 2,000 titles, and converted 33,000 titles to machine readable form last year; staff of 20 includes 5.5 fte professionals. requirements: accredited mls, additional graduate degree pre­ ferred; m inimum of three years’ original cataloging experience (some previous av cataloging desired). familiarity with aacr ii. ef­ fective organizational, training, and interpersonal skills,and a commitment to scholarship. terms of appointment: faculty rank (a ssistant professor); 12-m onth tenure tra ck a p p ointm ent; minimum salary $15,500; 24 days’ annual leave; tiaa/cref or tn state retirement plan. position available may 15, 1981. send letter of application, postmarked no later than april 30, 1981, with com­ plete resum e and 3 letters of recom m endation to ju d ith j. johnson, head, catalog department, memphis state university li­ braries, memphis, tn 38152. an equal-opportunity university. cataloging. the florida state university library invites applica­ tions for the following positions at the assistant university librarian rank: (1) head, records maintenance unit in the bibliographic records management department. this position is responsible for decisions regarding the library’s database, including changes to the manual records as well as changes made necessary by im­ plementation of aacr 2. the unit consists of three full-time posi­ tions and student assistants. (2) monographic cataloger, responsi­ ble for original cataloging of monographic titles. experience with the library of congress classification, lc subject headings, aacr 2, the marc authority files and the oclc cataloging system, and a background in german is desired. qualifications for both positions in c lu d e a gradua te degree in lib ra ry scie n ce from an ala accredited school and two years' professional experience since the degree. salary range for both positions begins at $11,520. closing date for applications: april 30. send resume and letter of interest to lucille higgs, associate director, robert manning strozier library, florida state university, tallahassee, fl 32306. an affirm ative action/equal-opportunity employer. circulation librarian (instructor). lamar university, beau­ m ont, texas. responsible for c irc u la tio n/reserve reading activities— mls from ala-accredited library school. familiarity with automated circulation systems. two years' appropriate experience in academic library required. salary: $14 ,500-$16,000 for 10.5 months, starting date may 1, 1981. submit applications, resume, letters of reference, and library school dossier by april 30, 1981, to maxine johnston, library director, box 10021 lamar station, beaumont, tx 77710. an equal-opportunity/affirmative-action em­ ployer. collection development/acquisitions librarian. sus­ quehanna university seeks an energetic individual to coordinate acquisitions activities and to develop outside sources of funding for library materials and services. acquisitions: determine goals and priorities for collections in consultation with faculty and staff, super­ vise acquisitions function, perform some book selection. develop­ ment: act as liaison with existing university associations and out­ side groups, work toward the establishment of a friends of the li­ brary, prepare grant applications. requirements: mls from ala accredited school, at least two years' experience with some in­ volvement in public relations or fund raising in an academic library. facility in a modern european language and additional graduate study desirable though not requisite. position open september 1, 1981. salary: $13,000-$15,000 per annum. apply with resume and names of three professional references by may 15, 1981, to james b. smillie, director, roger m. blough learning center, sus­ quehanna university, selinsgrove, pa 17870. susquehanna uni­ versity is an equal-opportunity/affirmative-action employer. curator. curator of james j. hill papers. to prepare for the opening of the hill papers and to encourage their use by scholars and others. to develop archival and historical programs relating to the papers and the economic and social development of the upper midwest. ph.d. or mls by august 1981 preferred, and relevant professional archival and historical experience, skills, and/or publi­ cations. salary low to mid-$20s, dependent on qualifications. send letter of application, curriculum vita, and three letters of reference by may 1, 1981, to virgil f. massman, executive director, j. j. hill reference library, fourth and market streets, st. paul, mn 55102. eoe. general cataloger. responsibility for original cataloging and classifying of monographs, using aacr and lc classification and subject headings; may include some microforms. duties include searching and tagging on oclc cataloging system. faculty are ex­ pected to meet university’s research, service, and publication re­ quirem ents for tenure and promotion. available july 1, 1981. $13,320-$15,000. required: mls from ala-accredited program; reading know ledge of french; know ledge of aacr and lc classification and subject headings; two years of cataloging experi­ ence in an academic or research library. desirable: working knowl­ edge of another western european language; experience in marc tagging and use of oclc cataloging system. apply by may 15, 1981, to: sharon a. sullivan, personnel librarian, ohio state uni­ versity libraries, 1858 neil avenue mall, columbus, oh 43210. in­ clude resume with names and addresses of at least 3 references. an aa/eeo employer. qualified women, minority and handicapped persons, as well as others, are encouraged to apply. head, commerce library. administers library of 132,000+ volumes which serves undergraduates, graduate students, and fac­ ulty in the departments of administrative science, public adminis­ tration, accounting, finance, management, marketing, economics, and geography. responsible for supervision of staff (half-time ref­ erence librarian, 4.6 support staff and student assistants); refer­ ence services; bibliographic instruction; collection development; re­ 127 sponding to research queries; preparing budgets; keeping abreast of latest library developments in the field. reports to head of de­ partment libraries. faculty are expected to meet university’s re­ search, service, and publication requirements for tenure and pro­ motion. available july 1, 1981. $21,000-$24,000. required: mls from ala-accredited program; five or more years of relevant profes­ sional experience, including supervision in a research library; dem­ onstrated knowledge of the literature in administrative science and related subjects. highly desirable: mba or advanced degree in one of subject areas noted above. apply by may 15, 1981, to sharon a. sullivan, personnel librarian, ohio state university libraries, 1858 neil avenue mall, columbus, oh 43210. include resume with names and addresses of at least 3 references. an aa/eeo em­ ployer. qualified women, minority and handicapped persons, as well as others, are encouraged to apply. head of public services. university of minnesota, university l¡braries-twin cities, st. paul campus libraries. under the direc­ tion of the director of st. paul campus libraries, the head of pub­ lic services is responsible for the organization, coordination, and planning of all public services activities, including reference and circulation in the central library and in the seven special subject libraries of the st. paul campus. duties include collection de­ velopment coordination, staff training and development, coordina­ tion of and participation in online data base searching, and acquisi­ tions budgeting. the incumbent will also fulfill direct reference and collection development responsibilities. this is a tenure track posi­ tion, and the candidate will be expected to meet university and university libraries requirements for promotion and tenure. eight professional librarians and one library assistant will report to the head of public services. the st. paul campus library system serves 5,000 students in 33 programs in agriculture, home eco­ nomics, forestry, veterinary medicine, and biological sciences. can­ didates for the position must have a master's degree in library sci­ ence, plus three years of relevant library experience, preferably in a science library. exceptional ability in interpersonal relations, data base searching experience, and management or supervisory ex­ perience are very desirable, as is a background in some area of science. appointment will be at the assistant professor rank or higher depending upon qualifications and background. the salary is $23,000+ for a 12-month appointment. the university of min­ nesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer and specif­ ica lly invities and encourages app lica tions from women and minorities. applications must be received by the deadline date of may 1, 1981. applications postmarked by may 1, but received after may 1, will not be accepted. if interested in applying, please send letter of application, vita, and names of four references to charlene mason, director of administrative services, university libraries, 499 wilson library, 309 19th avenue south, minneapolis, minnesota 55455. japanese cataloger/bibliographer (half-time). re­ sponsible for cataloging and classification of japanese language materials (monographs, serials, microforms, and other types of ma­ terials), using aacr and lc classification and subject headings; applies transliteration schemes. responsibility for building the japanese portion of the east asian collection in consultation with teaching faculty. establishes good rapport with faculty to determine present and future collection needs. responsible to head, catalog division and head, acquisitions department for respective areas of work. limited public service responsibilities may be established by library administration. faculty are expected to meet university’s re­ search, service and publication requirements for tenure and promo­ tion. available july 1, 1981. $7,620-$9,660. required: mls from ala-accredited program. fluency in reading japanese; some knowledge of japanese history, literature, and culture. cataloging experience using aacr and lc classification and subject headings. knowledge and experience in book selection, with japanese book trade, publishers, and vendors. desirable: speaking knowledge of japanese; advanced graduate study in some aspect of japanese culture. knowledge of marc tagging and oclc cataloging system; experience in technical services in an academic or research library. apply by may 15, 1981, to sharon a. sullivan, personnel librarian, ohio state university libraries, 1858 neil avenue mall, columbus, oh 43210. include resume with names and addresses of at least 3 references. an aa/eeo employer. qualified women, minority and handicapped persons, as well as others, are encouraged to apply. latin american/general cataloger. responsibility for orig­ inal cataloging and classifying of monographs, using aacr and lc classification and subject headings. includes microforms and se­ rials in latin american studies; may include materials published in spain and portugal. duties include searching and tagging on oclc cataloging system. reports to head, catalog division. faculty are expected to meet university’s research, service, and publication re­ quirem ents for tenure and promotion. available july 1, 1981. $14,000—$15,720. required: mls from ala-accredited program, reading knowledge of spanish and portuguese; knowledge of aacr and lc classification and subject headings. desirable: working knowledge of additional western european language; cataloging ex­ perience in an academic or research library, including knowledge of marc tagging and oclc cataloging system; advanced degree in some area of latin american studies. apply by may 15, 1981, to 128 sharon a. sullivan, personnel librarian, ohio state university li­ braries, 1858 neil avenue mall, columbus, oh 43210. include re­ sume with names and addresses of at least three references. an aa/eeo employer. qualified women, minority and handicapped persons, as well as others, are encouraged to apply. librarian. assistant collection development librarian to assist in the evaluation and acquisition of serials, government documents, microforms, and other non-book materials; oversee production of union list of serials; help with supervision of full and part-time staff; and participate in evaluation of gift materials and the exchange process. qualifications: ala-accredited mls; two years of profes­ sional experience in government documents, microforms, or serials; familiarity with automated systems and budgeting. eleven month appointment, academic rank and status. salary range $16,000 $17,000. available immediately. send resume, three letters of rec­ ommendation, and transcripts by april 30, 1981, to: library search committee, college of charleston, charleston, sc 29401. an equal-opportunity employer, and solicits applications from women and minorities. librarian. head of interlibrary loan department in an academic library. position open september 21, 1981. the library is a mem­ ber of center for research libraries, has eight oclc terminals, of which four are in the interlibrary loan department. position is lo­ cated in a college town of 50,000 close to tuttle creek reservoir and the flint hills. twelve month contract with one month's vaca­ tion, faculty rank and status, and tiaa. under the supervision of the associate director for technical services, budget, and automa­ tion, the appointee will (1) be responsible for the management and operation of interlibrary lending and borrowing services for the main library and four branch libraries with combined collections of 90 0 ,0 0 0 volumes, 11,000 serial subscriptions, 5 00 ,000 m i­ croforms, 525,000 documents, and 70,000 audiovisual materials; (2) provide, with other staff, evening and weekend reference ser­ vices; and (3) plan, direct, coordinate, and evaluate the work of 6.5 fte staff, including the kansas regent libraries courier driver. the department handles 20,000 requests per year on oclc with a net lending ratio of 1.56. requirements include a master’s degree in library science, two years’ successful academic library experience, and a working knowledge of oclc and other major bibliographic tools. supervisory experience at the department head level; knowl­ edge of interlibrary loan practices, including those affected by pub­ lic law 94-553 and aacr 2; and extensive experience with oclc/ ill preferred. salary: $16,560-$20,620, depending on qualifica­ tions and experience. applications, together with resume, tran­ scripts, and placement file (if placement file is not current, submit three letters of reference) must be submitted by may 15, 1981, to: meredith litchfield, assistant director, kansas state university li­ braries, manhattan, ks 66506. ksu is an equal-opportunity/ affirmative-action employer. personnel librarian. reports to the library director and holds a staff position with responsibilities for personnel functions for a staff or 182 plus 125 student assistants. under university and li­ brary policies and procedures this person has primary responsibility for planning, organizing, and coordinating all activities related to re­ cruitment, employment, and staff development. assists in the de­ velopment and interpretation of library policies and procedures; re­ cruits applicants for librarian positions; supervises staff of the per­ sonnel office in the hiring of support staff and student assistants; maintains required personnel records and files; coordinates staff development and training programs. qualifications: mls degree from ala-accredited school, or equivalent, required; library experi­ ence and previous personnel training and experience desirable; proven ability to work effectively with staff of diverse interests and cooperatively with university officials at all levels required; supervi­ sory experience necessary. tenure-track position, rank and salary dependent upon qualifications, salary range $16 ,000 -$ 18,000. twelve month appointment, tiaa/cref, health insurance, usual holidays, 24 days’ annual and 12 days’ sick leave, tuition remis­ sion. applicants should submit letter of application, resume, and placement folder or three letters of reference by april 30, 1981, to donald r. hunt, director, the university of tn library, knoxville, tn 37916. utk is an eeo, affirmative-action, title ix, section 504 employer. reference librarian in the humanities. (readvertised.) librarian to design and coordinate a bibliographic instruction pro­ gram, in clu d in g the use of online searching, for selected humanities departments of a liberal arts college. duties include some night and weekend work. accredited mls required two years' experience with bibliographic instruction or subject master’s in the humanities desired. minimum salary: $14,000. available summer 1981. apply with resume and three current letters of ref­ erence to: peter c. haskell, director of the library, franklin and marshall college, box 3003, lancaster, pa 17604, before may 1 an equal-opportumty/affirmative-action employer. science and engineering librarian. the university of saskatchewan library invites applications and nominations for the position of science and engineering librarian. the science and engineering librarian will report to the assistant director, public services. duties will include the coordination of staff and the de­ velopment of services in four branch libraries, as well as service to other science-related departments. initially, special emphasis will be placed on the extension of reference and online services. the successful candidate will have a degree from an accredited school of librarianship, as well as a science or engineering degree. admin­ istrative ability and three to five years of relevant experience includ­ ing online services is also required. the position is available im­ mediately and will be filled at the rank of librarian iii. salary will be competitive and commensurate with qualifications and experience. the 1980-1981 salary range of librarian iii is $23,722-$29,746. the competition will remain open until the position is filled. appli­ cants should send a complete resume and the names of at least three references to: frank winter, library personnel officer, main library, university of saskatchewan, saskatoon, saskatchewan, canada s7n 0w0. 129 serials librarian. 12-month, tenure-track. open july 1. holds administrative responsibility for a serials departm ent with 3,000 current subscriptions and a staff of two clerical assistants plus part-time students, trains and supervises staff of serials, maintains serials records and automated serials holdings list, recommends procedures for further automation, and provides specialized refer­ ence service relating to journals. duties also include cataloging with oclc and aacr 2 and supervising public areas of the library on a rotating basis (evenings and weekends). ala-accredited mls re­ quired, second master’s preferred; 2 years’ professional library ex­ perience in serials and/or cataloging required; experience with on­ line cataloging systems and with cataloging serials preferred; some supervisory experience desired. m inimum salary $16,000. applica­ tion deadline is april 30, 1981, or until suitable candidate is hired. send resume, academic credentials, and three letters of recom­ m endation to.p h ilip brown, public services librarian, south dakota state university library, brookings, sd 57007. an aa/eeo employer. slavic cataloger. responsible for original cataloging and classifying of slavic language materials, including monographs, se­ rials, and microforms, using aacr and lc classification and sub­ je c t headings. duties in clu d e searching and tagging on oclc cataloging system. reports to head, catalog division. faculty are expected to meet university’s research, service, and publication re­ quirem ents for tenure and prom otion. available july 1, 1981. $14 ,280 -$ 18,600. required: mls from ala-accredited program. proficiency in russian language; knowledge of aacr, lc classifica­ tion and subject headings. desirable: working knowledge of polish, czech, and other slavic languages; reading knowledge of a ger­ manic or romance language; advanced degree in related area; three years of cataloging experience in an academic or research li­ brary, including knowledge of marc tagging and oclc cataloging system. apply by may 15, 1981, to sharon a. sullivan, personnel librarian, ohio state university libraries, 1858 neil avenue mall, columbus, oh 43210. include resume with names and addresses of at least 3 references. an aa/eeo employer. qualified women, minority and handicapped persons, as well as others, are encour­ aged to apply. social science/education librarian. louisiana tech uni­ versity. responsible for collection development, bibliographic in­ struction, database searching, and general and subject reference service. work flexible schedule of night and weekend rotation. re­ quired: ala-accred¡ted mls; 3 5 years experience in traditional reference service; academic training in social science or education; database searching experience; demonstrable creativity and innova­ tion in providing general and subject reference. preferred: appro­ priate subject area master’s; 3 5 years’ experience in computer assisted reference services; good interpersonal skills. faculty rank, tenure track, 12-month contract. usual finge benefits, excellent re­ tirement. salary range $16,000-$17,500, commensurate with ex­ perience. send resume and 3 letters of reference to bill serban, c h airperson, search c o m m itte e, p rescott m em o rial library, louisiana tech university, ruston, louisiana 71272. deadline may 15, 1981, position available july 1, 1981. louisiana tech univer­ sity is an affirmative-action/equal-opportunity employer. technical services librarian. manages the acquisitions, cataloging, and serials functions of andrews library. coordinates planning for improvements in processing operations, including the autom ation of existing procedures and catalogs. mls from an ala-accredited library school, and at least three years of successful processing experience in an academic library using oclc systems. m in im u m salary $ 1 7 ,5 0 0 . a p p ly by a p ril 3 0 to m ichae l s. freeman, director of library services, college of wooster, wooster, oh 44691. l a t e j o b l i s t i n g s library director. state university college at buffalo, a unit of the state university of new york, is a 4-year liberal arts college in an urban setting with 12,000 students and 750 faculty and professional staff. e.h. butler li­ brary staff: 26 librarians and 32 support staff. holdings: 43,000+ vol­ umes. oclc, batab and 3m security systems in operation. director reports to the office of the vice president for academic affairs. ala-accredited mls required. doctorate or additional master’s preferred; 7 years’ professional experience in academic libraries, including 5 years in progressively respon­ sible administrative positions; knowledge of library automation technology; strong communications skills. salary commensurate with qualifications, mini­ mum $30,000. effective date of appointment: september 1, 1981. affirma tive-action/equal-opportunity employer. please send nominations or letter of application, including 3 references, before may 1, 1981, to: richard a. wie­ sen, associate vice president for academic affairs, state university college at buffalo, gc 519, 1300 elmwood ave., buffalo, ny 14222. information specialist. corporate technical library, the upjohn company. provides a variety of scientific information services to world-wide manage­ ment, marketing & technical staff on demand or as a continuing service: fact­ finding and general reference services, retrospective literature searching, current literature alerting (internal and vendor-supplied data bases) and other specialized services. keeps informed of current upjohn research activ­ ity; anticipates user information needs, plans and implements services de­ signed to meet them; helps increase visibility of the corporate technical library and utilization of its information services; participates in user education programs and acts as liaison to specific user groups; keeps informed of developments in library systems, information science, new information re­ sources and techniques for their utilization. the corporate technical library has a staff of 30 and a collection containing 20,000 books, 30,000 bound journals, and 1,300 current periodical subscriptions. the upjohn company is located in kalamazoo, a medium-sized southwestern michigan university city with excellent cultural/recreational opportunities. qualifications: library information specialist ii— bs/ba in science plus ma/ms in library/information science or ms in science plus one year information-related experience (bio130 chemical/biomedical environment); sr. library information specialist iii- same as above plus 3-4 years' information-related experience, 2-3 in a bio chemical/biomedical environment. both levels require: training and exper­ ience in searching scientific bibliographic and non-bibliographic data bases; skill in providing general reference and information services including abil­ ity to utilize medical, biological, and chemical reference tools effectively. prefer biology or chemistry degree. salary: $21,093-$31,640 or $24,231 $36,346 depending on level at which position is filled. excellent benefits. an eeo/aa employer. apply to jerry flowers, the upjohn company, 7171 por­ tage road, kalamazoo, mi 49001. systems librarian. houston academy of medicine-texas medical center library. to be responsible for: systems design, development, and implementation; evaluation and maintenance of current automated circulation system; planning subsequent phases of library's automation program; creating and conducting meaningful research projects; serving as a liaison between the library, the common computer service facility and the other texas medical center libraries regarding automation activities. in-house circulation system on pdp11/34 in operation. this position requires programming skills, knowledge of systems analysis techniques, and the ability to analyze complicated library opera­ tions in order to specify new or modified procedures. an ability to work with statistics, management information systems and data processing equipment is highly desirable. both written and verbal communication skills are also im­ portant and applicants must be interested in the public relations aspect of this job. education requirements include an mls from an ala-accredited li­ brary school or an appropriate equivalent degree. salary will be commensurate with experience (minimum $18,000). excellent fringe benefits. send letter of application, resume and references tp janis sharp, personnel librarian, houston academy of medicine-texas medical center library, jesse h. jones library building, houston, texas 77030. head, audiovisual services department. under the direction of the associate director for public services at the houston academy of medicine-texas medical center library, the audiovisual services librarian is responsible for the development and maintenance of the audiovisual collection. responsibilities also include: maintaining a suitable complement of audiovisual equipment in working order; planning audiovisual services and facilities; designing pro­ cedures and recommending policy; providing audiovisual reference service; supervising audiovisual department personnel; orienting and educating users. this position requires 2-3 years of relevant work experience (some supervisory experience preferred). mls from ala-accredited school is essential. minimum starting salary is $19,000. excellent benefits. the houston academy of med­ icine-texas medical center library serves and is jointly supported by nine­ teen health science institutions in the texas medical center including two major medical schools, three nursing schools and various allied health sci­ ence programs. it is also a regional resource library for the south central regional medical library program and actively serves the needs of health professionals. send letters of apllication, resumes and references to janis sharp, personnel librarian, houston academy of medicine-texas medical center library, jesse h. jones library building, 1133 m.d. anderson blvd., houston, texas 77030. university bibliographer. responsible for planning and coordinating collec­ tion development in a subject divisional library of over 1.3 million volumes. will chair collection development committee and work closely with subject librarians in establishing collection development goals, policies, and pro­ cedures. other responsibilities will include faculty liaison and participa­ tion in setting library-wide policies in the areas of management, personnel, 131 and budget as a member of the director's administrative council. required qualifications include an ala-accredited mls, several years of increasingly responsible academic library experience, collection development or related experience and knowledge of national collection development trends. addi­ tional desired qualifications include additional graduate work in a subject field, knowledge of the book trade, substantial knowledge of texas or south­ west history and literature, and basic knowledge of one foreign language, preferably spanish. available september 1, 1981. minimum salary $20,000. twelve month contract. send resume and names of three references by may 1, 1981, to dr. edward r. johnson, director of libraries, north texas state university, denton, tx 76203. an aa/eo employer. head of reference services, associate librarian or librarian, avail. july 1, 1981, univ. of calif., santa cruz. responsible for management of main li­ brary, reference services (primarily humanities and social sciences), central­ ized ill and gov't publ. units. staff of 5 librarians, 9 library assistants, plus students. reports to univ. librarian and serves on principal library admin, council. quals: mls, substantial ref. and admin, experience, excel­ lent supervisory and communication skills, exp. with gov't publ., ill and computerized reference service, and library instruction preferred. social science background helpful. salary: $20,088-$28,908. send resume and three references by may 8, 1981, to kathryn beiers, asst. univ. librarian, univ. library, univ. of calif., santa cruz, ca 59064. catalog editor. new position. responsible for maintaining catalog depart­ ment, centralized aacr2 in lc subject heading authority control system. in­ tegrating previously used headings with new headings in a single catalog for central and departmental libraries. also assists in planning for converting the authority control system and catalogs to an online system. in addition acts as a consultant to other departments and departmental library on aacr2 problems, training their staff in the various methods of resolving aacr2 con­ flicts, and interpreting filing rules. qualifications: mls, 3 years rele­ vant library experience including catalog experience, using lc classification and subject headings, one year using oclc cataloging system or similar auto­ mated cataloging system, and familiarity with aacr2 forms of entry, reading knowledge of one modern european language, ability to work and communicate clearly with library staff at all levels. minimum professional rank: assis­ tant librarian. minimum salary: $14,200. send resume with at least 3 ref­ erences postmarked by may 1, 1981, to: personnel officer, university of cincinnati libraries, 640 central library, ml #30, cincinnati, ohio 45221. university of cincinnati is an affirmative-action/equal-opportunity employer. two general reference positions. both require an ma in library science from an ala-accredited library school. position #1 requires 2 years professional library experience, and a knowledge of government documents. salary $13,000 $14,000 annually. position #2: no experience necessary but favorably con­ sidered. salary $12,000-$13,000 annually. both: academic rank, retirement and illness benefits. applicants must have the ability to work and communi­ cate effectively with faculty, staff and students. interested applicants should apply by april 30, 1981, to mrs. lucille m. jones, head, administra­ tive services, drexel university libraries, philadelphia, pa 19104. affirma tive-action/equal-opportunity employer. college & research libraries news acrl c ontinuing e d u ca tio n c ou rses, san f ra n cisco acrl will offer five continuing education courses and three section-sponsored preconferences prior to the ala annual meeting in san francisco this june. the ce courses, ranging from one to three days in length, are: ce 1—the librarian as consultant. ce 2—planning and procuring a turnkey library system. ce 3— effective supervisory skills. ce 4—career planning and development for academic librarians: you can get there from here! ce 5— basic archives management for librarians. the preconferences are: pc 1—prem ises, problems, promises: views and ap­ proaches to bibliographic instruction. pc 2—the impact of the new technology on lrc pro­ grams. pc 3—the collection builders: booksellers, collectors, li­ brarians. advance registration is required for these meetings and attendance will be strictly limited. your early registration for the ce courses by june 10 is encouraged to ensure enrollment. registration information for the preconferences is found fol­ lowing each detailed program description. t he librarian as c onsultant this course represents a comprehensive view of the major aspects of consultation and provides participants with the knowledge to interact effectively with clients. consulting skills can be valuable to specialists, managers, organization leaders, and program directors, w hether they are external or internal consultants. topics will include: i. initiating contact or responding to a request for consulta­ tion. • consulting definitions; • issues, concerns, and choices; • why are consultants utilized; • what clients expect. ii. the effective consultant. • maintaining professional competence; • what consultants contribute; acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries 4 news from the field acquisitions • on september 27 archbishop fulton john sheen, dedicated the sheen room to house his personal and public archives which he has giv­ en to st. bernard’s seminary, rochester, n.y. these consist of books and pamphlets which he has written since 1925; about 1,500 tapes of sermons, retreats, lectures, and infor­ mal talks; phono-recordings and tv tapes of the “life is worth living” series, 1951-1957; radio and tv tapes of the catholic hour broad­ casts, 1930-1952; newspaper clippings and photographs; correspondence and memorabilia. the dedication of the sheen room marked the beginning of a major library renovation for the 83-year-old seminary to house its 80,000 plus-volume collection. the sheen archives have not yet been cataloged and will be subject to standard archival practices. the rev. jasper pennington, historiographer and priest of the episcopal diocese of roches­ ter, is library director. a sheen chronology and bibliography has been published by the librarian, and copies are available for two dol­ lars each. • sam goldman of denver has given his personal library of approximately 5,000 books to the university of colorado lirrary at boulder, the most important gift of books in the history of the university. the collection con­ tains an important range of materials on music and art, and a large number of first editions of twentieth-century writers, including inscribed first editions of edna st. vincent millay, theo­ dore dreiser, and robert frost. there are more than 2,000 albums of classical music, mostly produced before world war ii, which include performances by the greatest conductors and musicians of that time, including toscanini, fürtwangler, and koussevitsky, and recordings of the great performances of the mozart operas at glyndebourne, england. the largest concentration of the collection is about 2,000 books from the revival of print­ ing as a fine art by the poet william morris in 1891 to the end of that great movement, which profoundly influenced contemporary book pro­ duction, in 1939. the collection includes all 53 books published by morris’ kelmscott press, including the kelmscott chaucer. there are 32 of the 40 books published by the ashendene press, and 42 books published by the doves press, including an immaculate copy of their five-volume bible and a number of inscribed presentation copies by t. j. cobden-sanderson to his wife. there is also a complete set of all publica­ tions of the nonesuch press, one of the finest commercial presses of all time, and 67 books published by the golden cockerell press, in­ cluding its four-volume edition of the canter­ bury tales illustrated by eric gill and a spe­ cially bound copy of keats’ endymion. there is a copy of thomas browne’s urne buriall illustrated by paul nash, one of the most notable books published by cassell in london in the 1920s, and a copy of the ex­ tremely rare translation of homer’s odyssey by t. e. lawrence (of arabia), privately pub­ lished by bruce rogers and emery walker. there are books from the gregynog press, the eragny press, and the vale press, many in un­ usually fine special bindings. the collection includes many books by fol­ lowers of the tradition of printing as a fine art, including the heritage press, the first editions club, the folio society, the imprint society, and a complete set of the books published by the limited editions club from 1929 to 1972. the collection contains complete runs of the fleur on and colophon, two extremely rare pe­ riodicals in the field of fine book-making. the collection was assembled by mr. gold­ man over a period of 50 years, and its acquisi­ tion provides the university library for the first time with a collection of research strength in book-making as a fine art. • common cause, the nonpartisan citizens’ lobby, has designated the princeton univer­ sity library as the repository for its archives and historical materials, beginning with its rec­ ords for 1970 and 1971, which were recently received in the newly opened seeley g. mudd manuscript library. common cause was founded in 1970 by john w. gardner, former secretary of health, education and welfare, to promote openness, responsiveness, and accountability in govern­ ment, working with members of congress and state legislators with the aid of professional lob­ byists in washington and in the several states. james m. banner, jr., associate professor of history and a member of the national governing board of common cause, noted that the ar­ chives will add significantly to the university library’s collections of the papers of modern american public affairs organizations, which in­ clude the archives of the american civil lib­ erties union as well as other holdings of related interest. banner called common cause “one of the most influential and venturesome organiza­ tions to take shape in the 1970s,” whose records “will greatly enhance scholars’ ability to under­ 5 stand recent american political history. that princeton is to be their home is testimony to the university’s growth as a major repository for materials on modern statecraft and govern­ ment.” the archives of common cause will include correspondence and other documents dating from its beginning in 1970 and relating to its founding; documents relating to its governing boards, staff, and internal affairs; papers con­ nected with studies, reports, and memoranda issued by common cause; and press releases and other papers. following the first install­ ment of noncurrent records, additions to the archives will be made annually, with each new installment containing files dating from five years prior to their acquisition by the library. it is understood that the papers will be general­ ly accessible to researchers as soon as the li­ brary staff has been able to organize them and prepare the necessary cataloging. • the friends of the columbia university libraries celebrated their 25th anniversary november 4. a devoted group of some 500 private book collectors and scholar-benefactors, it constitutes one of the oldest continuously active organiza­ tions of its kind at a major american university. the friends have brought research materials worth more than $2.3 million to columbia since 1951 through purchases and gifts from their personal collections. their chairman is gordon n. ray, president of the john simon guggen­ heim memorial foundation. the original rockwell kent drawings for walt whitman’s leaves of grass were for­ mally presented to the university by the friends as a group. more than 165 members and their families made special contributions toward the purchase of the 127 drawings, in­ cluding herman wouk, francis t. p. plimp­ ton, william s. paley, corliss lamont, melville cane, paul mellon, mr. and mrs. helmut n. friedlaender, and william s. beinecke. a copy of the 1936 edition of leaves of grass, in­ scribed by kent, accompanied the gift. the drawings “express with both strength and deli­ cacy kent’s sympathy for the poet’s celebration of america,” said columbia rare books librarian kenneth a. lohf. the materials will become part of the extensive rockwell kent collection at columbia, which numbers more than 5,000 drawings and sketches. these and other selections from the gift col­ lection are being exhibited through february 24 on the third floor of butler library, 114th street and broadway. • the millionth volume of the texas a&m university libraries, a gift from mrs. m. f. (chan) driscoll of midland, texas, was offi­ cially accepted by clyde h. wells, chairman of the board of regents of the texas a&m uni­ versity system, in a special ceremony on no­ vember 20. considered by collectors to be “number one” among the top rarities in the literature of the range cattle industry, prose and poetry of the live stock industry of the united states ( den­ ver and kansas city: national live stock his­ torical association, 1905) was described by dr. irene b. hoadley, director of libraries, as es­ pecially appropriate for addition to the univer­ sity libraries’ collections during texas a&m university’s centennial year because it records some of the first accounts of the colorful range cattle industry which flourished in texas a century ago. the donor, who owns ranchlands near mid­ land, texas, is a past president of the friends of the texas a&m university library and is presently vice-president and president-elect of the organization. two of mrs. driscoll’s sons are graduates of texas a&m university, and she was instrumental in the organization of the texas a&m university mothers’ club in mid­ land, serving as its first president. the rare prose and poetry of the live stock industry of the united states has been identi­ fied by one book collector, louis p. merrill, as the “king of the book aristocrats” of the range cattle literature. in a recently published bibli­ ography of 120 “best books on the range cattle industry,” william s. reese deems it to be “the most desired and desirable book on the range cattle industry.” prose and poetry of the live stock industry of the united states joins a wealth of other rarities in the university libraries’ jeff dykes range livestock collection, which is one of the most extensive collections on the subject. the nucleus of this research collection, which now contains more than 9,000 items, was put to­ gether by texas a&m university alumnus jeff dykes of college park, maryland. • peter l. oliver, librarian of the andover harvard theological library, has announced the gift to the harvard divinity school of the universalist historical society (uhs) li­ brary. a rare and valuable collection of some 5,000 books, 2,200 bound periodicals, 672 vol­ umes of manuscripts, and 1,600 pamphlets, the uhs library includes official records of the universalist church of america, the unitarian universalist service committee, the universal­ ist publishing house, the universalist youth fellowship, the general sunday school associa­ tion, as well as papers of univeralist ministers and records of many state organizations and local churches. rarer items in the collection include the un­ published letters of john murray, the founder of american universalism; the letters and work­ books of hosea ballou, the denomination’s pre­ 6 eminent nineteenth-century theologian; the minute book of the earliest gathering of univer salists in the united states, the 1790 conven­ tion in philadelphia; and records of the uni versalists’ general conventions from 1793 nlw materials available 1977 national library week (n lw ) posters, banners, and bookmarks are now available from the american library as­ sociation. the materials all carry the message “use your library” and are designed to get all kinds of people into all kinds of libraries. they’re as effective an adver­ tisement for college as for school libraries and for special as for public libraries. designed by john massey (creator of the “great ideas of man” series), the posters can be used to promote your li­ brary’s services, materials, and programs before, during, and long after nlw 1977 (april 17-23) has passed. only the ban­ ners are dated. in a list of possible uses for the ma­ terials that will accompany every order, ala officials suggest specific ways to get the posters displayed outside the library, where they will be seen by nonusers. the october issue of american libraries includes this list, as well as color repro­ ductions of the materials. posters will arrive in a mailing tube, not folded, so they’re perfect for hanging and framing. ala will also provide, up­ on request, a suggested list of retail prices so libraries can sell posters to the public. private companies will again this year be selling nlw materials, but the graph­ ics described above are the only ones of­ fered by the american library associa­ tion. income from sales is reinvested in a year-round library publicity campaign. also available for ordering is a set of four tv slide adaptations of the posters that include 10-second scripts and are perfect for use on local television or li­ brary cable programs. besides the suggestion kit of publicity ideas, each order will also include cam­ era-ready copy of national print ads for use in local or in-house publications and sample news releases. write to the public information office, american library association, for an or­ der form. the form includes prices, sizes, and color reproductions of the materials. through 1869. a large portion of the records and reports of these conventions exist solely in the original ledger books. the uhs library was founded in 1834, and for the next 35 years was in the possession of the rev. thomas j. sawyer. in 1869, sawyer took the library with him to tufts university, where he taught for some time but where his library remained for more than a century. finally, in june 1975, the society voted to turn the library over to the harvard divinity school, whose existing collection the gift enhances ap­ preciably. several years ago, the andover-harvard the­ ological library acquired many of the books and periodicals and nearly all of the manu­ scripts held by the historical library of the unitarian universalist association; and since that time, the association has given its nine­ teenthand much of its early twentieth-century archives to the divinity school. the combina­ tion of this gift and the newly acquired uhs library makes harvard’s the richest available collection of unitarian universalist historical materials. • maestro william steinberg, former musi­ cal director of the pittsburgh symphony or­ chestra, has made a generous gift of books, music scores, and mementos to the university of pittsburgh. although william steinberg is best known as an orchestral conductor, he was in private life an avid reader and book collector. his gift to the university includes about 1,400 volumes of literature, represented by titles in english, german, french, japanese, and chinese. steinberg’s gift of music consists of about 800 titles, including full and study scores, opera scores, chamber works, vocal and piano solos, facsimile reprints, and recordings. he received numerous presentation copies of symphonic works signed by the composers, such as sam­ uel barber, aaron copland, nicholai lopat nikoff, richard strauss, arnold schoenberg, ernst toch, and virgil thompson. while not a music antiquarian, steinberg acquired early editions of beethoven, chopin, haydn, and mozart, as well as an autographed copy of richard wagner’s walküre. also included in the gift are various awards, photographs, mementos, and miscellaneous items, such as bronze medallions, silver presen­ tation bowls, presentation scrolls, publicity photographs, and presentation photographs of notable musicians of his acquaintance. this gift is currently being processed by the university librarians, and, with the generous support of the hillman foundation, a perma­ nent display case will be located in the hill­ man library and will feature highlights from the collection along with a pastel portrait of dr. steinberg. 7 awards • dean thomas j. galvin has announced that mrs. marilyn whitmore, a student in the doctoral program at the graduate school of li­ brary and information sciences, university of pittsburgh, is the first recipient of the school’s harold lancour award for excellence in in­ ternational and comparative librarianship. dean emeritus harold lancour was on hand to pre­ sent the award to mrs. whitmore at the annual dinner of the university of pittsburgh and car­ negie library schools alumni association oc­ tober 29. the cash award of $250 is accompa­ nied by an engrossed certificate. honorable mention, with awards of $50 each, went to mina schwarz-seim and naimuddin qureshi. also at the dinner, dr. gerald orner pre­ sented the previously announced catherine ofiesh orner award to its first recipient, ms. cecile wesley. the award of $500 for excel­ lence in information science was established by the orner and ofiesh families in memory of dr. omer’s late wife, a notable alumna of the school. ms. wesley, a native of the sudan, in­ tends to return there after completing her work for the ph.d. degree. both awards are made on the basis of a paper suitable for publication in a journal of the profession. ms. wesley’s paper was entitled “planning for a national scientific and technical information system.” the title of mrs. whitmore’s paper was “the role of education and national development in latin american librarianship.” • the american revolution in drawings and prints, compiled by donald h. cresswell of the j. murrey atkins library, university of north carolina at charlotte, has won a certifi­ cate of award in the printing industries of america’s graphic arts awards competi­ tion. a publication of the library of congress, the book includes more than 900 illustrations of works created between 1765 and 1790. the publication was prepared as a part of lc’s american revolution bicentennial program. mr. cresswell, a member of the library fac­ ulty at the university, is the acting special collections librarian. he holds degrees from belmont abbey college, the university of cin­ cinnati, and george washington university. he is currently a candidate for the ph.d. degree at george washington university. exhibits the affinity between art and poetry as ex­ pressed in america’s “little” magazines is the focus of a major exhibit at the library of congress. “making it new: poetry and the visual arts in american publications, 1893 1975,” a display of 300 magazines, prints, photographs, and posters, examines the close association between poetry and the visual arts in avant-garde publications. from the beginning, little magazines have been open to writers as well as workers in the visual arts. on exhibit is america’s first little lit­ erary review, the chap-book, founded in 1893 by stone & kimball, which created and popu­ larized the art nouveau style. also shown are library of congress revises schedule of automation of cataloging the library of congress processing department has revised some of its auto­ mation priorities in the light of the funds appropriated by the congress for the current fiscal year that began october 1. the number of additional positions au­ thorized for the marc development office and the marc editorial division will permit the expansion of marc ( machine-readable cataloging) cover­ age to all current cataloging in roman alphabet languages not now being done in machine-readable form, but input of sound recordings and music scores, also planned for fiscal year 1977, will be de­ ferred until fiscal year 1978. by a domi­ no effect, coverage of publications in cyrillic is being rescheduled to 1979 and other nonroman-alphabet materials to 1980. the decision to give a higher priority to other roman-alphabet languages rather than to sound recordings and music scores is based on the much more exten­ sive developmental work that automating the cataloging of these nonbook forms will require. there is insufficient staff in the marc development office to allo­ cate to this task without seriously dis­ rupting other programs with urgent pri­ orities. input of the other roman-alphabet lan­ guages is expected to begin early in 1977, after staff has been recruited and trained for the new positions authorized in marc editorial division. of the ap­ proximately 120 languages being added to the marc data base, albanian, cre­ ation, czech, hungarian, indonesian, latvian, lithuanian, malay, polish, slovak, turkish, and vietnamese will probably encompass about 95 percent of the new material cataloged; the rest will be made up largely of occasional titles in african, amerindian, pacific, and mis­ cellaneous languages. 8 reviews devoted to publishing both art and poetry on their pages, among them the trans­ atlantic review, dial, hound and horn, tiger’s eye, and partisan review. frequently magazines carried works by poets who were artists or by artists who wrote poetry, such as humorist gelett burgess, whose draw­ ings and poems were published in the lark; poet e. e. cummings, whose drawings often ap­ peared in the dial; and painter marsden hart­ ley, who was a prolific poet. some artists and poets collaborated to produce a work of art; an example in the exhibit is 21 etchings and poems, a portfolio of etchings containing poems in the poet’s hand, published by the morris gallery in 1960. organized by period, the exhibit covers the art nouveau movement, the twenties, the ex­ patriates, the thirties, post-world-war-ii years, regionalism, and the contemporaries. there are also sections of drawings and photographs of artists and poets done by artists and photogra­ phers. the little magazine emerged in the 1890s as a reaction to mass-produced books which tech­ nical innovations like offset printing made pos­ sible. after 1910, a combination of events—the rise of new experimental movements in the arts, the increased need for outlets for work directed to small audiences, and the birth of the small press movement— led to a great flour­ ishing of the little magazine as the home of the new, the experimental, and noncommercial, and the controversial that continues today. the 1976 international directory of little maga­ zines and small presses, which runs to more than 300 pages, is a testimony to the populari­ ty of this medium. “making it new . . .” (the title is derived from ezra pound’s admonition to poets to “make it new” ) has been mounted in conjunc­ tion with the washington, d.c., area-wide poetry and visual arts project, “inscapes: words and images.” it will be on display for an indefinite period in the central corridors, ground floor, library of congress building. grants • the library school, university of southern california, has received a grant of $44,900 from the research division, bureau of library services of the u.s. office of educa­ tion, for a continuation of its “independent self-paced professional educational program.” the first year’s grant was $86,000. the purpose of this program is to provide an independent, self-paced, professional education­ al program in library and information science for those persons who because of heavy finan­ cial, personal, or family obligations are unable to attend classes in the traditional, scheduled daily classroom setting of formal on-campus study. • the office of university library manage­ ment studies (oms) of the association of research libraries has received a grant of $110,000 from the andrew w. mellon founda­ tion in support of a project to design and test a procedure for the analysis of collection acqui­ sition, retention, and preservation policies at university research libraries. the objective of the project is to identify and investigate key issues related to collection development, such as characteristics of effective collection development policies and mechanisms for revising such policies in response to needed change; the functions, role, and performance of research libraries in terms of size and quality of collections and reliability and speed of ac­ cess to collections; requirements for libraries’ decision-making processes regarding collection development in a period of economic retrench­ ment; the reconciliation of steady-state or re­ duced budgets to the increasing costs of ac­ quiring needed collections; and ways of ensur­ ing that the limited amount of money that an individual research library has to spend on de­ velopment of collections is used in the most effective way possible. consideration of these issues will focus on local library needs and capabilities and regional and national trends in resource sharing. the collection analysis project will be a three-phase effort lasting approximately one year. the first phase will be devoted to the de­ sign of a collections analysis self-study proce­ dure for individual libraries; the second phase will be a pilot test of the analytical procedures at a limited number of libraries; and the third phase will focus on evaluating the pilot test with subsequent consideration of appropriate next steps. to accomplish the project design, the office of university library management studies will draw upon its experiences in designing and op­ erating the management review and analysis program, the mcgill university libraries per­ formance evaluation project, the academic li­ brary development program, and the systems and procedures exchange center. the project provides a unique opportunity to apply con­ temporary management methods to the investi­ gation of other substantive concerns of research libraries. the principal objective of the association of research libraries is to develop the resources and services of research libraries of north america. the office of university library man­ agement studies was established in 1970 by the arl with financial support from the council on library resources to provide assistance to research libraries in strengthening their man­ agement processes and organizational perform­ 9 ance. the oms operation is currently support­ ed by arl membership dues, a grant from the council on library resources, and sale of ser­ vices and publications. project investigators will be duane e. webster, director of the of­ fice, and jeffrey j. gardner, management re­ search specialist. • northwestern university lirrary has been selected to administer a bibliographical project for the national library of venezuela. the program planned by the national library has two phases. the first one will be the identi­ fication of the complete bibliographical record of venezuelan history in all formats. the sec­ ond phase is the retrieval, on a selective basis, of materials from this bibliographical source. northwestern university library will be re­ sponsible for two principal objectives of phase i. the first is the compilation of a ma­ chine-readable project catalog of the holdings on venezuela and by venezuelans in the major research libraries in the united states. the catalog will cover the fields of humanities, so­ cial sciences, science, technology, and archival materials. the preliminary estimate for the number of monographs is about 200,000, while the number of nonbook titles is unknown. the second important objective of the proj­ ect is the training of three librarians from venezuela each year of the project. this inten­ sive program will emphasize bibliographical techniques essential for effective work at north­ western university library and at their respec­ tive institutions when they return to venezuela. special attention will center on cataloging, search techniques, bibliographical skills, inter­ national standards, and computer technology for library operations. the visiting librarians will also have an opportunity to observe re­ search methods and modern library techniques in other libraries in the united states. the venezuela project, funded for two years at a total cost of $1.4 million, will be located in space adjacent to the newspaper/microtext department. • clene (continuing library educa­ tion network and exchange) has begun polling personnel in the library/media/informa tion professions for ideas that will lead to the development of a model continuing education recognition system. this major project was funded by the u.s. office of education program for library re­ search and demonstration under title ii-b, higher education act, beginning in mid-sep­ tember. the grant expires june 30, 1977. its objective is to develop a model system for recognition of those in the library/media/in formation professions who participate in con­ tinuing education activities. a draft proposal will be circulated in the spring of 1977 for comments. surveys conducted by the national commis­ sion on libraries and information science (nclis), as well as state, regional, and na­ tional studies, revealed keen interest in devel­ oping incentives for post-entry-level education. the model recognition system project is based on the premise that a carefully designed continuing education program will enhance an individual’s competency and a recognition award system will encourage this activity. • the national endowment for the hu­ manities has awarded a $35,508 grant to the university of washington archives and manuscripts division. the two-year grant allowed work to begin in january for the compilation of entries for a comprehensive guide to the holdings of the university’s regional manuscripts collection, as well as personal papers in the university ar­ chives. a guide will be published after the entries have been completed. the university collection is of national as well as regional importance in supplying the re­ search needs of a large research university and documenting the development of a major north­ west population center. “we in the archives and manuscripts division of the university library are naturally proud of the national stature of our collections,” said richard c. berner, university archivist and di­ vision head. “this stature has been achieved despite a less than optimal growth rate due to insufficient storage space, a situation faced much of the time since 1966.” berner pointed out that the neh rarely awards grant funds for this type of project, but “the combination of national importance of the university’s collections and the inability of the library to sustain this basic program” made the grant possible. work on such a compilation had been terminated because of work overload and staffing cutbacks, beginning in 1968. • the research libraries group, inc., has been awarded a $197,200 grant from the carnegie corporation of new york to develop, in cooperation with the library of congress, a computer-based cataloging system. the 18 month pilot project will provide for inception and operation of the first remote on-line access by a library network directly to lc’s machine readable cataloging ( marc) data base. specifically, the grant will fund the estab­ lishment of a telecommunications link between the similar computer systems of the new york public library and the library of congress. the project’s initial phase will be the connect­ ing of the two systems in such a manner that rlg terminals at both the nypl and colum­ 10 bia university appear to the lc system just as lc’s own terminals. later stages in the system’s expansion will see harvard and yale terminals tied in with lc’s data base through the nypl system. to ensure maximum benefits from the new system, rlg members have agreed to adopt a single cataloging standard based on na­ tional norms and on the practices of the library of congress. according to james e. skipper, president of the research libraries group, the endeavor is an important first step towards creation of the comprehensive computer-based bibliographic processing system that represents the rlg’s primary aim. the project also is expected to supply statistics and experience requisite for in­ stitution of a system for remote access by other library networks to library of congress data bases. the rlg concurrently is planning an addi­ tional joint effort, with the library of congress, to introduce the standards and communications technology necessary for sophisticated linkage between library networks and lc. under the direction of john f. knapp, rlg’s vice-presi­ dent for systems, this supplemental program is designed to ease the identification and trans­ mission of bibliographic data and to enable the rlg to contribute thousands of catalog records annually to the national data base for titles not acquired by lc. the link established also would permit automatic transfer of unsuccessful electronic searches of the national data base at lc to other bibliographic data bases around the country. • two grants to radcliffe college for the use of the arthur and elizabeth schlesinger library on the history of women in america have been announced. the national endow­ ment for the humanities has awarded a three year grant of $133,784 to process the papers of american women and their families, and a national historical publications and records commission grant of $12,637 will fund the first phase of a project to process the papers of massachusetts women and organizations. the neh-funded project, entitled “career and family patterns of american women,” will enable the schlesinger library to prepare for research use approximately 30 manuscript col­ lections. according to patricia king, director of the library, who will head the project, the papers to be processed include those of nation­ ally known women, including freda kirchwey, editor of the nation; jeannette rankin, the first woman in congress; and miriam van waters, penologist and head of the framingham re­ formatory for women from 1931 to 1957. oth­ er collections are the records of less-well-known women but have the potential to shed light on many aspects of the history of the family and on the experience of women in both employ­ ment and the home. the neh grant will also fund the microfilming of a few fragile and heavily used manuscript collections. the nhprc-funded project will be under the direction of eva moseley, curator of manu­ scripts at the schlesinger library. during the year for which funding has been awarded, the voluminous records of the north bennet street industrial school will be processed. the north bennet street school, which is still active to­ day, was founded in boston’s north end in 1881 to offer vocational instruction for children and adults. a settlement house was added early in the 20th century, and the school’s records, which date from the 1880s to the 1950s, will illuminate various aspects of immigrant, labor, women’s, educational, urban, and social history. meetings january 28-f ebruary 2: the fifth annual conference of the art libraries society of north america will be held in los angeles at the staffer hilton hotel. included in the pro­ gram are visits to the getty museum, los an­ geles county museum of art, architectural highlights of los angeles, etc. for more infor­ mation, contact: judith a. hoffberg, executive secretary, p.o. box 3692, glendale, ca 91201. february 6-11: “the effective use of oclc,” kent state university. contact: pro­ fessor anne marie allison, university libraries, kent state university, kent, oh 44242. february 16: an “interactive biblio­ graphic reference and retrieval” work­ shop will be held at the university of arizona, graduate library school, 1515 e. first st., tucson, az 85719. march 7-9: dr. william o. baker, president, bell laboratories, will present the miles conrad memorial lecture at the 1977 annual confer­ ence of the national federation of ab­ stracting and indexing services. the con­ ference will be held at stauffers national cen­ ter hotel, crystal city, arlington, virginia. dr. baker’s accomplishments as scientist and research executive have brought him many hon­ ors and awards, including the american chem­ ical society’s priestley and perkin medals, the honor scroll of the american institute of chemists, and the industrial research institute medal. see the december news for more infor­ mation. april 24-27: “clinic on library applica­ tions of data processing—negotiating for computer services,” university of illinois, uc, illini union. contact: edward kalb, uni­ versity of illinois, 116 illini hall, champaign, 11 il 61820. see the december news for more information. april 27-30: the ninth annual meeting of the council on botanical and horticul­ tural libraries will be held at the morton arboretum, lisle, illinois. further information may be obtained from: ian macphail, librari­ an, sterling morton library, the morton ar­ boretum, lisle, il 60532. may 8-20: eleventh annual library ad­ ministrators d evelopment program, uni­ versity of maryland’s donaldson brown center. contact: mrs. effie t. knight, administrative assistant, library administrators development program, college of library and information services, university of maryland, college park, md 20742. see the december news for more information. may 12-14: midwestern academic li­ brarians conference, 22nd annual meeting, st. cloud state university. contact: tony schulzetenberg, st. cloud state university, st. cloud, mn 56301. june 6-10: “women in library manage­ ment.” contact: drs. judith braunagel and john ellison, school of information and library studies, state university of new york at buf­ falo, 201 bell hall, amherst, ny 14260. june 12-17: the university of florida at gainesville will be the site of the twenty second seminar on the acquisition of lat­ in american library materials. the theme of the seminar will be “the multifaceted role of the latin american sub­ ject specialist.” a series of workshops, panels, and roundtables will examine the multiple and diverse activities engaged in by present day subject or area specialists. these activities in­ clude the selection of library materials in all formats, the technical procedures involved in acquiring the material, making it available to the public, and the provision of reference ser­ vice and classroom instruction. the seminars on the acquisition of latin cinema studies librarians there will be an organizational meet­ ing at ala midwinter meeting to form a discussion group for cinema studies li­ brarians. check the board at registration for time and place. for information, con­ tact nancy manley, university of illinois (217 ) 333-3479, or jill caldwell, indi­ ana university (812) 337-3314. american library materials have been spon­ sored since 1956 by the organization of ameri­ can states as an activity of its inter-american program of library and bibliographic develop­ ment and carried on informally by libraries and institutions interested in the procurement of latin american materials. registration for the twenty-second seminar is $20 for members and $30 for nonmembers. librarians and scholars from latin america and the caribbean may register without charge. students from all areas will be admitted free to the conference but must register and pay a fee of $12.50 if they wish sets of the preprinted papers and abstracts distributed at the meeting and the final report and working papers of the conference, published afterward by the salalm secretariat. invitation and registra­ tion forms will be distributed soon. information on the content of the program and working papers may be procured from mrs. mary ma gruder brady, university of saskatchewan li­ brary, saskatoon, saskatchewan, canada s7n owo. news on local arrangements will be sup­ plied by rosa q. mesa, latin american docu­ ments, university of florida libraries, gaines­ ville, fl 32611. for other information refer to the executive secretary, miss lou wetherbee, university of texas at austin, benson latin american collection, sid richardson hall 1-108, austin, tx 78712. june 20-24: the american theological library association will hold its thirty-first annual conference at the vancouver school of theology in vancouver, british columbia, can­ ada. further information may be secured from: dr. john b. trotti, librarian, union theologi­ cal seminary in virginia, 3401 brook rd., rich­ mond, va 23227. miscellany • the research libraries group (r l g ), comprising the libraries of columbia, harvard, and yale universities and the research li­ braries of the new york public library, recent­ ly was chartered as a nonprofit corporation in the state of connecticut. as a corporation, the rlg will continue the work it has undertaken since its start three years ago as an informal consortium— planning and implementing pro­ grams for the improvement of access to its com­ bined collection, for the elimination of unneces­ sary duplication in collection development, and for the establishment of a single computer based bibliographic processing system to serve the needs of present and future group mem­ bers. the research libraries group, inc., will be governed by a board of directors composed of the corporation president and three representa­ tives from each member institution. the presi­ 12 dent and the directors of member libraries to­ gether will constitute the executive committee of the board. officers of the corporation are warren j. haas (columbia), chairman of the board of di­ rectors; james e. skipper (rlg, inc.), presi­ dent; patricia battin (columbia), secretary; and john e. ecklund (yale), treasurer. other members of the board of directors are douglas w. bryant, director of the harvard university library; richard w. couper, presi­ dent of the new york public library; juanita doares, planning officer for the new york pub­ lic library; donald b. engley, associate yale university librarian; james w. henderson, di­ rector of research libraries of the new york public library; louis e. martin, librarian of harvard college; rutherford rogers, yale uni­ versity librarian; joe b. wyatt, director of the office of information technology, harvard university; and james s. young, vice-president for academic planning at columbia university. • the library of congress was host to participants at a three-day meeting on novem­ ber 10-12 to address one of the great uncharted areas of english-language bibliography— the creation of a comprehensive record of printing in the english-speaking world for the years 1701-1800. this mount everest of bibliograph­ ic projects—as the london times styled it— has long been contemplated by bibliographers. as comparable compilations for the years 1475 to 1640 and 1641 to 1700 near completion, scholars in the field have been asserting that the time is ripe to turn attention to the 18th cen­ tury. to consider the feasibility of compiling such a catalog, the british library and the ameri­ can society for eighteenth century studies (asecs) convened a conference in london on june 14-18 of last year. the 40 american and british librarians, bibliographers, scholars, and computer specialists who gathered for this pur­ pose concluded that such a project is indeed feasible. to carry forward their work, they ap­ pointed a smaller group, the organizing com­ mittee, to explore issues which had proved incapable of easy resolution. it is this smaller 13-member group which met at the library of congress, chaired by d. t. richnell, director general of the british library reference division, and paul j. kor shin, executive secretary of asecs. directors of the libraries of harvard, the bodleian li­ brary, oxford, the cambridge university li­ brary, the john rylands library, manchester, and the john carter brown library are among the committee members working to bring this project closer to fruition. william matheson, chief of the rare book and special collections division, is the library of congress representa­ tive on the organizing committee. meeting discussion papers addressed such matters as methodology for entering informa­ tion into the computer, the length of the short title entry, the interrelationships of this project with existing bibliographic projects, and— per­ haps the most vexing question of the london meeting—what should be included. in discuss­ ing the size of the project, the london confer­ ence took 500,000 entries as a base figure. de­ pending on the definition of ephemera (the “ragged edge” of publication in the period as one of the participants in the june conference labelled it), the figure might be increased by hundreds of thousands of entries. the commit­ tee is seeking solutions which serve the pur­ poses of scholarship and are at the same time possible within the financial constraints inevita­ bly imposed on such an undertaking. to identify the materials to be incorporated into this project, the search is expected to ex­ tend into more than 500 libraries throughout the world. the benefits of the resulting record to students of all aspects of english civilization will be incalculable. scholars will have access to information on hitherto unknown materials of interest to their fields and on relevant hold­ ings throughout the world. the resulting record will enable the library of congress and other major research libraries better to fulfill their roles as centers of scholarship. • the cataloging distribution service of the library of congress is 75 years old. known formerly and perhaps better known as the card division, the service is in the business of distributing cataloging information through­ out the library world, a task that once involved primarily the sale of catalog cards and which today also includes the sale of numerous book and microform catalogs and cataloging informa­ tion in the form of marc (machine readable cataloging) tapes. catalog cards are still an important part of the lc’s service to the library community, as witnessed by the fact that more than one billion cards have been sold just in the last 20 years. that figure represents only a por­ tion of the total number printed and dis­ tributed. on october 28, 1901, a four-page announce­ ment signed by then librarian of congress herbert putnam polled the library community for interest in subscribing to the lc card ser­ vice. the response was so satisfactory that a month later “a second circular, giving addition­ al information and correcting misapprehen­ sions” was issued. the response continues. in fiscal year 1976, the cataloging distribution service distributed more than 82 million cata­ log cards and tens of thousands of publications and marc records. automation and diversification signalled the name change from card division to cataloging distribution service. in 1968, the first stage of 13 mechanization of the card distribution service was installed. orders for cards are now received on machine-readable order forms, and marc records are used to print sets of cards auto­ matically for the lc catalogs and for distribu­ tion to the library community. according to deputy librarian of congress william j. welsh, the service is continuing to distribute the bibliographic products of the lc processing department in both conventional book form and in microform. for example, li­ brary of congress subject headings is now being issued in a completely new edition every three months in microfiche and in microfilm produced by the computer-output-microform (com) process. paralleling the other services is the marc distribution service, begun with an experiment nearly 10 years ago in which marc informa­ tion on magnetic tapes was distributed weekly to 16 cooperating libraries. that service has grown to include virtually all lc’s current cata­ loging of roman-alphabet monographs and to include motion pictures, films, filmstrips, maps, and serials. ultimately all the lc cataloging output will be included. a new marc service, announced only last month, will make available lc authority data in machine-readable form. the first files being made available are subject headings and refer­ ences, but the format has been designed so that all kinds of authorities, such as names, subjects, and uniform titles, can reside in the same data base or be manipulated by the same programs. the service is a joint effort of the lc catalog­ ing division, the marc development office, and the cataloging distribution service. while automation of lc’s catalogs has been a topic of discussion at the library of congress and throughout the library world, current cata­ loging distribution service chief david rem­ ington has assured librarians that lc has no plans to discontinue distributing printed cards or publications. “as long as there is sufficient demand to support the distribution of these ser­ vices financially,” he said, “the library will con­ tinue to provide them.” • the h. raymond danforth library at new england college was dedicated octo­ ber 17 in a formal ceremony held at the col­ lege’s new science building. danforth, 71, a native of concord, n.h., served as superintendent of schools in concord, nashua, epping, and foxboro, mass., and as a teacher and principal in the keene and clare­ mont school systems before becoming new england college’s fourth president in 1958. dan huntington fenn, jr., director of the j. f. kennedy library in waltham, mass., was awarded an honorary doctor of laws degree during the ceremony, which was followed by a reception in the danforth library. some 150 faculty, trustees, and friends of new england college were in attendance. h. raymond danforth served as new eng­ land college’s president from 1958 until 1969. the four-year liberal arts college received its accreditation under his administration in 1967. • nominations for the 1977 robert b. downs award for outstanding contributions to intellectual freedom in libraries are now be­ ing accepted by the graduate school of library science, university of illinois at urbana-cham­ paign. the award was established in 1968 to honor downs, now dean emeritus of library adminis­ tration at illinois, on his 25th anniversary with the university. the $500 award will be presented by the uiuc library school alumni during the fall of 1977. herbert goldhor, director of the school, said the award may go to a library board member, a nonprofessional staff member, a professional librarian, a government official, or anyone who has worked to further intellectual freedom and the cause of truth in any type of library. nominations may be placed by librarians or laymen, he said. though preference will be given to u.s. nominees, candidates from other countries will be considered, goldhor said. the faculty of the school will select the winner or may decide that no one qualifies. letters of nomination will be considered un­ til april 15 and should be sent to goldhor at the graduate school of library science, uni­ versity of illinois, urbana, il 61801. • westex is the western continuing ed­ ucation (c e ) information exchange and net­ work coordinated by wilco (western inter­ state library coordinating organization). the purpose of westex is to provide a centralized place in the west where continuing education planners can come when they need assistance to (a) locate current and complete information on continuing education resources ( courses, programs, seminars, etc., and personnel), (b ) evaluate the effectiveness and impact of con­ tinuing education resources, and (c) utilize existing resources or develop new ones. by sharing information on programs and their impact on those who have experienced them, the goal is to reduce redundant or irrele­ vant development and improve the quality of continuing education. by having a continuing staff resource at westex, the goal is to save time for those responsible for continuing edu­ cation programs at the state, local, or regional level in any type of library, media, or informa­ tion center. for more information, contact eleanor a. montague, director, wilco, western interfor extra convenience in using choice ... w ith the first issue o f volume 5 (march 1968), c h o ic e began an additional service long requested by subscribers — c h o ic e r eview s-on-c ards. if you were n o t among the service's charter subscribers, you may w a n t to consider it now. r eviews-on-c ards can make your acquisitions system as versatile as you like. they make it easy to separate and distribute reviews sim ultaneously to other librarians and fa cu lty (no more tearing up maga­ zines or w aiting forever fo r circulating copies to return). they save clerical steps in ordering and checking holdings (ample space for notations on both sides). they are a cataloging aid, and they are easy to locate in your desiderata file. you w ill find dozens o f uses for them. as c h o ic e goes to press, all reviews are reprinted on 3 x 5 cards. each is identified by subject and issue date. collated in the order follow ed in the magazine, they are boxed and mailed to you via fourth class mail, special handling. you should receive them w ithin three weeks after your regular issue o f c h o ice. a year's subscription to review s-on-c ards (available only to c h o ic e magazine subscribers) costs $110.00. w ith current publication o f approxim ately 6,500 reviews per year, the cost o f the card service is only 1.7c per review. acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries 12 / c&rl news “ask at r e fe r e n c e ” fo r b a c k lo g g e d b ook s b y r u b y m iller assistant director fo r technical services trinity university library a n d b a rb a ra j. f ord associate director trinity university library how to avoid user frustration as arrearages grow. cataloging arrearages or backlogs have been dis cussed in the library literature from the 1940s to the present. considering the continuing relevance of the subject, this report on a program at trinity university to make the backlog accessible through the public catalog may be of interest. background in th e m em oranda on library cooperation, published by the library of congress in 1941, h er­ bert a. kellar listed accum ulated arrearages of u n ­ cataloged books and pam phlets as a problem . he noted th at, according to one calculation, 20% of the holdings of research institutions were uncata­ loged.1 a 1951 m eeting of the ala division of c at­ aloging and classification discussed cataloging a r­ re a ra g e s a t u c l a , y ale, th e u n iv e rsity of pennsylvania, brooklyn public, c olum bia, and the l ibrary of congress.2 lucile m. morsch from the library of congress observed: “w e must find some way to live w ithin our means, in other words, to catalog each year all the current acquisitions, or otherwise organize them for service in such a way th a t the m aterials will never be considered a cata­ loging arrearage.”3 at the same program , m aurice 1h erbert a. keller, memoranda on library co­ operation (w ashington, d .c .: l ib rary of c on­ gress, 1941) , 21. 2journal o f cataloging and classification 7 (fall 1951):89-109. 3lucile m. morsch, “cataloging arrearages in t au b er sum m arized the solutions to arrearage problems and discussed “the growing concern of li­ brarians generally w ith the need to adapt, tailor, and modify traditional methods of organizing m a­ terials w hen these methods are too complex to p er­ m it the reasonably prom pt assimilation of m ateri­ als acquired into their collections.”4 in 1968 george piternick sent a questionnaire on cataloging arrearages to a sample of association of research libraries members, and in 1985 grace agnew, christina l andram , and jane richards ad m in istered a n o th er q u estio n n aire. p iternick concluded in his 1968 study th a t “some type of per­ m anent cataloging below ‘lc standard’ for mono­ graphs had little appeal for the great m ajority of li­ braries now operating w ith arrearages.”5 by 1985 agnew, l a n d ra m , an d r ichards found w id e­ spread concerns about arrearages.6 they identified two m ajor strategies for coping w ith them : placing the backlog in a public area while providing minithe l ibrary of congress,” journal o f cataloging and classification 7 (fall 1951): 103. 4maurice f. t auber, “summ ary of solutions to arrearage problem ,” journal o f cataloging and classification 7 (fall 1951): 107. 5george piternick, “university library a rrear­ ages,” library resources & technical services 13 (w inter 1969): 104. 6grace agnew, christina l andram , and jane richards, “m onograph arrearages in research li­ braries,” library resources & technical services 29 (october/december 1985): 352-53. january 1988 / 13 mal cataloging and allowing the items to circulate; or keeping the arrearage in storage and providing full cataloging for materials as time and funding al­ low. over the years various solutions have been devel­ oped by libraries trying to deal with arrearages or backlogs. for smaller libraries, temporary back­ logs often develop while librarians wait for library of congress cataloging or when there are tempo­ rary increases in acquisitions. nelsie rothschild of guilford college wrote in 1977 about a method for processing the backlog by temporarily cataloging all books which arrive before the library of con­ gress card sets.1 in 1984 ellen neville and antonia snee found that monographs do lose their useful­ ness with age and suggested that “to expedite the availability of materials to patrons in the face of backlogs, staff shortages, and economic con­ straints, less than full level cataloging should be given serious consideration.”8 in 1986 d onald share of rice university discussed management of backlogs and how a “reorganization effectively eliminated our cataloging backlog, since there was more time for experienced catalogers to work on member-copy or original cataloging.”9 many libraries today have resigned themselves to some kind of backlog. in seeking to make the m a­ terials in the backlog available to library users, some have looked for methods that do not take a great deal of time. most recently, the use of mini­ mal level cataloging has been discussed as a means to provide access to backlogs. karen horny out­ lines the issues and reactions to this method in a 1986 article.10 the situation at trinity trinity university’s library has been involved in an intensive collection development effort since 1980 when substantial sums of money for retro­ spective purchases were received. prior to the infu­ sion of funds for retrospective purchasing, the li­ brary was staffed to acquire and catalog some 10,000 to 12,000 book and bound periodical vol­ umes per year. with the new emphasis on retro­ spective purchases, the university increased staff­ ing in both acquisitions and cataloging to enable the library to acquire and catalog 40,000 book and 7nelsie p. rothschild, “arrearages: how one library eliminated the problem,” southeastern librarian 7 (winter 1977):235-37. 8ellenp. neville and antonia m. snee, “agingof u ncataloged m onographs,” in a cadem ic l i­ braries: myths and realities, proceedings of the third national conference of the association of college and research libraries (chicago: associa­ tion of college and research libraries, 1984), 275. 9donald share, “management of backlogs, ” l i­ brary journal 111 (september 1, 1986): 161. 10karen l. horny, “minimal-level cataloging: a look at the issues—a symposium,” journal of a c a d e m ic l ib ra ria n sh ip 11 (jan u ary 1986): 332-42. bound periodical volumes per year. the initial em­ phasis was on acquisitions and it was expected that a cataloging backlog would develop. the increase in staffing in cataloging was to come later, and w ith the time necessary for training cataloging staff, the acquisitions rate exceeded the library’s ability to catalog. in anticipation of the backlog, a portion of the stack area in the library was closed off to house materials. the initial solution to handling the backlog was simply to organize the materials in the storage rooms. shelves were designated for materials in various languages, for collections, and for regular purchases. maps were then prepared showing w hat was housed on w h at section of shelving. these maps were periodically updated as materials were moved, cataloged, or withdrawn. however, this arrangement did not permit the finding of an individual title, and as the backlog grew, it became impossible to find a title in it. in an attem pt to pro­ vide some access, the cataloging departm ent and the acquisitions departm ent developed a system of numbering the titles, marking that number on the “on-order” slip, and refiling it in the title section of the on-order file in acquisitions. in the storage rooms the books were arranged in numerical order with a flag in each book to indicate its number. this permitted at least one point of access to the ti­ tle. as the acquisitions rate continued, the system of numbering and refiling titles in the on-order file in acquisitions became more time-consuming. as a way to improve access to the backlog, the assistant director for technical services and the di­ rector determined that the campus computer could be utilized to provide access to these titles by simply adding the bibliographic records for the titles in the backlog to the locally produced com (computer o utput on microform) catalog. trinity university library has long had a machine-readable database of all its cataloged titles. the library actually main­ tains three separate bibliographic databases at the campus computer center. one database contains all the cataloged titles within the library; a second database contains all the united states government documents cataloged since 1976; and the third database, an oclc processing database, contains all the titles searched and found on oclc, but not yet cataloged. the bibliographic records for the ti­ tles in the backlog remain in the oclc processing database until they are cataloged. beeause these ti­ tles were not cataloged they had never been in­ cluded in the com catalog. after discussion with the catalogers and reference librarians, it was de­ cided that even though these titles were not fully cataloged, the oclc records would provide more access than the slips in the on-order file and would require less staff time. the following procedures have been developed to implement this expanded access to backlogged m aterials in storage rooms. the books, once searched on oclc, are placed on the shelves in the backlog, first by language and then by oclc tape when you call mls, the whole team answers! jay askuvich scott schmidt carl d orr general sales midwest southeast manager lawrence nagel forrest link kim anderson lorraine best west northeast m ountain plains canada midwest library service 11443 st. charles rock road bridgeton, mo 63044, usa call toll-free 1-800-325-8833 missouri librarians call toll-free 1-800-392-5024 canadian librarians call toll-free 1-800-527-1659 january 1988 / 15 number. w ithin the tape num ber, the books are placed in accession n u m b e r o rd er. w hen th e oclc tape is received, the uncataloged titles are added to the oclc processing database. w hen the com catalog is now produced, records from the o c lc processing d atab ase, the cataloged database and the u.s. documents database are merged, sorted and used to produce the com cata­ log. once a title has been cataloged, the biblio­ graphic record is automatically removed from the processing database and added to the cataloged database. the changes in the com puter center were minimal to add this database to the com cat­ alog. “ask at reference” the com catalog in the trinity university li­ brary is form atted w ith brief entries in either a single-line entry or a two-line entry. for example, in the author catalog authors’ names are followed by an alphabetical list of their works. full biblio­ graphic information is not available in most of the catalogs, although microfiche copies of the catalog w ith full bibliographic records are available if needed. since the accession number is the local com puter control num ber for the titles, it was not thought desirable to print this number in the cata­ log since the processing file would be merged into the regular catalog at the time of com catalog pro­ duction. after some discussion, it was decided to use the phrase “ask at reference” in lieu of a call num ber or accession num ber for these uncataloged en tries. t hus, access is p ro v id ed for lo c atin g known items th a t are in the cataloging backlog. “ask at reference” items are not given subject ac­ cess, only author and title, in the public catalog. but, how does a patron physically locate a title when she or he finds an “ask at reference” call num ­ ber in the catalog? ideally, the patron goes to the reference d epartm ent and asks the librarian for help in finding a title th a t says “ask at reference.” the reference librarian then fills out a form. the patron supplies the author and title of the book, is told th a t it will be available at the circulation desk w ithin 48 hours, and is asked to check back at the circulation desk for the title. the form is then sent to the oclc supervisor, who actually retrieves the title from the backlog and sends the book w ith a printed copy of the oclc record to either a copy cataloger or the cat aloger who does rush cataloging. the oclc su­ pervisor notes the am ount of time spent in looking for a title, and the cataloger or copy cataloger notes the call num ber on the form and sends the book through processing to circulation w ith a copy of the “ask at reference” form. the average search time is 23 minutes for cataloging staff to find and retrieve the title in the backlog. trinity has been utilizing this system for fifteen months and there have been 103 requests for titles from a backlog th at started at an estimated 25,000 titles and is estimated currently at 8,000 titles. the titles are requested by both faculty and students, w ith a slight majority requested by students. most of the titles are in english, with a range of im print dates. these statistics do not support the 1984 study by ellen neville and antonio snee th a t materials lose their usefulness w ith age.11 at times patrons finding “ask at reference” in the call num ber field in the catalog assumed th a t the title was a very im portant one th a t was literally be­ ing held at the reference desk and w ere disap­ pointed when told otherwise. to respond to this misperception, other phrases were considered for the catalog, but a short data field limited choices. some patrons were unwilling to w ait 48 hours to obtain a title and were assisted by reference librari­ ans in finding other materials to meet their needs. we also do not know how many patrons did not go to the reference desk to ask for help when finding “ask at reference” in the call num ber field and left the library w ithout locating the item they were seeking. overall, patrons seemed quite pleased th at uncataloged materials could be made avail­ able relatively quickly for their use. conclusion in summary, “ask at reference” provides access to a large portion of the cataloging backlog. how­ ever, the materials received after oclc searching and updating of titles to the processing file are not available, nor are the titles th at are not found on oclc and need original cataloging. there has been discussion about the use of minimal level cata­ loging for materials requiring original cataloging as well as discussion about placing the backlogged books in an open stack area to be available for browsing. the materials th at are generally not ac­ cessible through oclc tend to be non-english language items and esoteric english-language m a­ te ria ls . w e are now re v ie w in g th e d a ta an d considering making these uncataloged materials available for browsing in a public area. this simple approach to providing access to a backlog could be used by any library that has its ac­ quisitions or c a talo g in g backlog in m achine readable form. it has not been very time-consuming for the cataloging department and has not added substantially to the rush cataloging load. it supplies patrons w ith titles identified by author or title searches of the public catalog which have been de­ layed in cataloging. the procedures help patrons take advantage of the library’s acquisition invest­ ment and at the same time give the library enough control to keep track of the materials temporarily backlogged. the reference staff has not found the procedures intrusive, but rather a good way to initi­ ate discussion with patrons about research interests and problems. we offer this evidence to the growing literatu re w hich describes the utility of making backlogs available to library patrons. ■ ■ 11neville and snee, 273-75. acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries 108 / c &rl news the classified ads ( bibliographic quality control organize l ca i rd b cat r al a og r an i d a othe n r manual records for data entry in a retrospective con­ version project. establish work flow and suggest policy for the conversion project. insure that national and local standards are followed by vendors. solve problems arising from project. maintain documentation on the project and the resulting bibliographic data base. ongoing responsibility for maintaining machine-readable bibliographic records ac­ cording to established standards. perform original and copy cataloging o f various kinds o f library material and some authority work. must be willing to work flexible hours, e.g. nights and weekends, if necessary. • demonstrated professional level experi­ ence with aacr2 and marc formats and lcsh required. • experience with retrospective conversion projects and with bibliographic utilities such as rlin, oclc, wln, etc. strongly preferred. • knowledge o f national cataloging stand­ ards essential. • ability to communicate effectively both verbally and in writing. • knowledge o f one or more major foreign scientific languages helpful. • m .l .s. degree from an a .l.a . accredited library school or the equivalent combin­ ation o f education and experience. • u .s . citizenship required. monthly salary range for fully qualified can­ didates is from $1960 to $3140. the los alamos national laboratory is one o f the largest multidisciplinary, multipro­ gram national laboratories in the united states and is internationally recognized as one o f the most prestigious scientific institu­ tions in the world. its libraries have extensive collections in the physical, engineering and biomedical sciences and offer a wide range of services to the laboratory community. the laboratory offers an excellent benefits plan to include 24 days o f vacation per year. send resume in confidence to: elmer salazar d iv -8 4 -l personnel administration division los alamos national laboratory los alamos, nm 87545 l u niversity of c ali a forn a o s i l a m o s los alamos national laboratory los alamos, new mexico 87545 an affirm ative action/equal opportunity em ployer deadlines: orders for regular classified advertisements must reach the acrl office on or before the second of the month preced­ ing publication of the issue (e.g. september 2 for the october issue). late job listings will be accepted on a space-available basis after the second of the month. rates: classified advertisements are $4.00 per line for acrl members, $5.00 for others. late job notices are $10.00 per line for members, $12.00 for others. organizations submitting ads will be charged according to their membership status. telephone: all telephone orders should be confirmed by a writ­ ten order mailed to acrl headquarters as soon as possible. orders should be accompanied by a typewritten copy of the ad to be used in proofreading. an additional $10 will be charged for ads taken over the phone (except late job notices or display ads). guidelines: for ads which list an application deadline, that date must be no sooner than the last day of the month in which the notice appears (e.g., october 31 for the october issue). all job announce­ ments should include a salary figure. job announcements will be edited to exclude discriminatory references. applicants should be aware that the terms faculty rank and status vary in meaning among institutions. jobline: call (312) 944-6795 for late-breaking job ads for aca­ demic and research library positions. a pre-recorded summary of positions listed with the service is revised weekly; each friday a new tape includes all ads received by 1:00 p.m. the previous day. each listing submitted will be carried on the recording for two weeks. the charge for each two-week listing is $30 for acrl members and $35 for non-members. fast job listing service: a special newsletter for those actively seeking positions. this service lists job postings received at acrl headquarters four weeks before they appear in c&rl news, as well as ads which, because of narrow deadlines, will not appear in c&rl news. the cost of a six-month subscription is $10 for acrl mem­ bers and $15 for non-members. contact: classified advertising dep't, acrl, american library association, 50 e. huron st., chicago, il 60611; (312) 944-6780. positions open assistant reference librarian (search reopened) duties will include general reference service, bibliographic instruction, on­ line bibliographic searching, and materials selection. required: mls from ala-accredited graduate school and ability to interact effec­ tively with all library users. ability and interest in online searching and some experience in academic library reference service and instruc­ tion desirable. some night and weekend hours necessary. twelve­ month appointment, rank of lecturer (non-tenure track). usual fringe benefits including 23 days annual leave. beginning salary range: $ 14,400—$14,700. apply with current resume including names of at least three references, to: eugene w. huguelet, director of library s ervices, r andall l ib ra ry , u n ive rsity of n orth c a ro lin a at wilmington, 601 south college road, wilmington, nc 28403-3297. for further information related to the position, call director of library services, (919) 791-4330, ext. 2271. applications will be accepted through march 15, 1984. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. bibliographic instruction librarian. the university of evansville is seeking a librarian to coordinate and participate in an active bibliographic instruction program. responsibilities include planning and developing the instruction program, presenting class­ room and workshop lectures, conducting and coordinating online searches, and providing reference service (nights and weekends in­ cluded). good communication skills, the ability to work effectively with faculty and colleagues, and teaching and administrative talent are essential. a background in science and experience in online searching is highly desirable. the position requires the mls from an ala-accredited library school and an energetic commitment to ser­ vice. the university of evansville is an independent, coeducational, methodist-affiliated institution located in a metropolitan area of south­ western indiana. enrollment numbers 5,000 fulland part-time stu­ dents. the library’s collections total over 300,000 items. faculty rank will be based upon qualifications. salary is $14,000-$16,000. the application deadline is march 31, 1984, with the position available june 1 ‚ 1984. send application, resume, and three current letters of february 1984 / 109 reference, to: grady morein, university librarian, p.o. box 329, uni­ versity of evansville, evansville, in 47702; (812) 479-2376. the uni­ versity of evansville is an equal opportunity, affirmative action em­ ployer. catalog librarian for middle eastern and south asian languages. the university of arizona library is seeking an experienced professional catalog librarian to be responsible for the original cataloging of m onographs and serials in near eastern and south asian languages (primarily arabic, hindi, urdu, and per­ sian). the majority of the south asian language materials are cata­ loged on oclc. the near eastern language materials are cataloged manually using both printed cards and original cataloging. other cataloging responsibilities include supervising the copy cataloging by student assistants for these languages; serving on a catalog infor­ mation desk; active participation in establishing policies and proce­ dures for the catalog department; participation in planning for an online catalog. requirements include: ala-accredited library de­ gree; working experience with aacr2, lc classification and lcsh; experience with oclc or a similar utility, ability to transliterate using lc romanization tables. primary language skills should be arabic, hindi and urdu. ability to catalog materials in persian and pushto is also desired. professional librarians at the university of arizona li­ brary are academ ic professionals with voting faculty status, have 12 month appointments, earn 22 vacation days a year, 12 days of sick leave, and have a standard package of holidays and other fringe benefits. the salary range is $16,500-$22,000, depending on quali­ fications. send letter of application, resume, and names of three ref­ erences by 30 march 1984 to: w. david laird, university librarian, university of arizona library, tucson, az 85721. the university of arizona is an eeo/aa employer. catalog librarian. search extended. responsible for original cataloging of m onographic materials, including specialized and non-book materials. descriptive and subject cataloging and library of congress classification, using most current aacr rules. format­ ting and marc tagging copy for input into the washington library network. required: ala-accredited mls. desirable: experience in working lc classification and subject headings, marc tagging, aacr2, western and cyrillic languages, nonprint and specialized materials, and experience with library networking and bibliographic utilities (preferably wln). position currently vacant. rank: librarian 2, faculty status. salary: beginning professional salary is $17,200. tiaa/cref, broad insurance program , 22 days annual leave and 12 days sick leave per year. send letter of application, resume and three original letters of reference to: allene f. schnaitter, director of li­ braries, washington state university, pullman, wa 99164-5610. deadline for receipt of applications is march 30, 1984. washington state university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. catalog er. position available at cleveland state university for experienced librarian. responsibilities: original cataloging and clas­ sifying of m onographs, primarily in science and technology; assign­ ing of classification and numbers and subject headings; tagging cat­ aloging data for input to oclc; verifying and preparing authority records and some catalog maintenance; some possible supervisory responsibilities. minimum qualifications: ala-accredited mls; three years of professional cataloging experience in an academ ic or re­ search library; experience with aacr2, lc classification, l c or nlm subject headings, original cataloging, marc tagging, and the o clc or other catalo gin g systems. preferred: two fore ign lan­ guages of bibliographic importance, academ ic background or cata­ loging experience in science and technology. salary: $17,500 + , dependent upon qualifications. submit resumes and names and ad­ dresses of three references by march 7,1984 , to: billie joy reinhart, chairperson of search committee, university libraries, cleveland state university, 1983 e. 24th street, cleveland, oh 44115. equal opportunity employer, m/f/h. co llection developm ent librarian. university of arkan sas at little rock. responsible for selection of all formats of materials to support curricula; coordination of selector activity; coordination of planning and analysis of collection developm ent and collection man­ agement policies and procedures. participates in budget allocation; collection evaluation; use and user studies; policies and decisions regarding storage, weed, conservation, and serials management. some night and weekend work should be expected. prefer strong academ ic background in history; archival experience; serials m an­ agement; dem onstrated skill at oral and written communications; and ability to work effectively with all levels of library employees, do­ n ors, p a tro n s , a n d fa c u lty m e m b e rs . r e q u ire m e n ts in c lu d e consultant resource development coordinator colorado state library colorado state library seeks an enthusiastic, motivated and bright librarian for the position of consultant resource development coordinator. facilitates cooperative collection development among resource li­ braries in colorado. provides consultation and/or coordination in collection development methodology and applications, conservation of resources, disaster preparedness, and intellectual freedom for colo­ rado’s seven regional multi-type systems and the library community at large. works in a team approach to general library development. acts as general liaison to special and post-secondary libraries. minimum qualifications: willingness and ability to acquire in the position knowledge and experience in all areas of job responsibility; ala-accredited mls or equivalent; media master’s degree; three years profes­ sional library experience after the required educational training; demonstrated skills in leadership, interper­ sonal relations, oral and written communication; willingness to travel. preferred qualifications: knowledge of or experience in one or more of the following: collection development, preservation/conservation, disas­ er preparedness, library development, intellectual freedom, and post-secondary and/or special libraries. send letter of application and three letters of reference, all of which specifically address the applicant’s bility to meet the minimum and preferred qualifications, as well as the resume, to: personnel office, olorado department of education, 303 w. colfax ave., denver, co 80204; (303) 534-8871. con act same address for full description of position. starting salary range $17,864-$25,213, dependent upon ducation and experience. eoe. applications must be received by 4:30 p.m. on march 5 ,1 9 8 4 . t a c t e 110 / c&rl news ala/m ls and three years of post-mls reference or collection devel­ opm ent experience with upper-level academ ic materials and ser­ vices. minimum salary $20,000. the position is open now. position is faculty-rank, tenure-track, 12-month, full-time with good fringe bene­ fits including up to 6% -m atched tiaa/cref. send resume and names of three references (with their current titles, addresses, and phone numbers) who have observed human relationships and pro­ fessional abilities, to: library search committee, c/o kathy essary, chair of recruitment committee, university of arkansas at little rock, 33rd and university ave., little rock, ar 72204. an eeo/aa employer. c o o r d in a to r of in fo r m a tio n services. depauw uni­ versity, an undergraduate liberal arts college, is seeking an innova­ tive librarian to expand reference and outreach information services (search extended). manages reference departm ent and coordinates the information specialist program where librarians work with aca­ dem ic departm ents on selection and user instruction. required: an ala/m ls, substantial professional experience ( + 5 years) in public/ information services; proven reference and supervisory capability, strong interpersonal skills, com petence in planning information ser­ vices, and online search experience. salary: $22,000. position avail­ able june 1,1984 , and offers faculty rank and status. a p ply to: jana bradley, director of libraries, box 137, depauw university, green castle, in 46135. deadline: march 1, 1984. an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. d o cu m ents libr arian . position available september 1,1984. responsible for m anaging governm ent docum ents unit within the technical services division. responsibilities include acquisition, processing, cataloging of documents, including non-u.s., and u.s., and w ashington state depository documents. supervise staff of two. required: ala-accredited mls and substantial experience in the cataloging and processing of serials and documents. desirable: ex­ perience in processing u.s. depository docum ents and microforms; experience in using the library of congress classes and subject headings, marc tags, and a bibliographic utility, preferably wln, and in supervising a library unit. rank and salary com m ensurate with q u a lific a tio n s and e x p e rie n c e . (m in im u m p ro fe ssio n a l salary: $17,000). tiaa/cref, broad insurance program , 22 days annual leave and 12 days sick leave per year. send letter of application, re­ sume, and three original letters of reference, to: allene f. schnaitter, director of libraries, w ashington state university, pullman, wa 99164-5610. deadline for receipt of applications is march 30, 1984. w ashington state university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. e d u c a tio n a l resources librarians (2). ball state uni versity. senior position responsible for supervising acquisition, cata­ loging, and physical processing of non-print materials, and for policy making and staff training. both positions responsible for descriptive and subject cataloging of all non-print formats using aacr2 rules and oclc/marc formats and library of congress subject head­ ings and practice; cataloging revision of technical cataloging assis­ tants; planning, development, and evaluation within the educational resources technical services area. requirements: senior position requires two years’ cataloging experience at least one of which is in cataloging of varied a/v formats, and a minimum of one year’s su­ pervisory experience with full-time regular staff. second position re­ quires one year’s experience in either a/v or m onographic catalog­ ing. both p o sitio n s re q u ire the mls from an a l a -a c c re d ite d program or its equivalent in instructional materials, media, technol­ ogy, etc. desire evidence of strong com m itm ents to and potential for scholarly and professional achievement. academ ic year salary and appointm ent with possibility of additional summer appointment. g ood fringe benefits. possible faculty rank and status with tenure track appointm ent with second m aster’s degree. negotiable salary: $16,000 minimum for senior position; $14,000 minimum for second position. applications should state which position is sought and must be postm arked no later than february 29, 1984. send resume and list of references to: nyal williams, chairperson, departm ent of li­ brary service, ball state university, muncie, in 47306. ball state uni­ versity practices equal opportunity in education and em ployment. engineering sciences librarian. faculty position in the harold b. lee library at brigham young university. primary respon­ sibility for reference service in the physical and life sciences and col­ lection developm ent in engineering. also responsible for library use instruction, online database searching and some supervision of cleri­ cal and student em ployees. qualifications include an undergraduate degree or equivalent in engineering, mls from an ala-accredited school and a working know ledge of reference sources in the physi­ cal and life sciences. twelve-month appointm ent with twenty-two days vacation and additional professional developm ent time. salary from $16,500 dep ending on qualifications. candidate must be will­ ing to maintain in the highest standards of honor, integrity, and m o­ rality as taught by the church of jesus christ of latter-day saints and abstain from alcoholic beverages, tobacco, tea and coffee. send re­ sume and names of three references to: randy olsen, assistant uni­ versity librarian, 3080 hbll, brigham young university, provo, ut 84602. deadline for applications is february 29, 1984. g o vern m ent d o c u m ents/r eferenc e librarian. re sponsible for selective depository of state and federal documents, instruction, and general library reference including some evenings and weekends. ala approved mls, training and professional expe­ rience in documents, general reference, bibliographic instruction and effective interpersonal com m unication skills are required. expe­ rience with automated systems and additional academ ic prepara­ tion are desirable. tenure track, 12 month appointm ent. salary mini m u m s: in s tru c to r, $ 1 7 ,7 8 7 ; a s s is ta n t p ro fe s s o r, $ 2 2 ,4 8 5 ; dependent on qualifications. available july 1,1984. a p ply by march 15, 1984, to: darrel m. meinke, dean of instructional resources, m oorhead state university, moorhead, mn 56560. an equal o p p o r­ tunity employer. head of tec h n ic a l services. university of arkansas at little rock. administers overall operations of collection development, cat­ aloging, and physical processing. responsible for coordination of bibliographic files throughout the library. some night and weekend editor/publisher choice editor and publisher for the choice magazine and related products. has overall responsibility for editorial, production, financial, marketing, advertis­ ing, prom otion, and d istrib ution activities for choice, reviews-on-cards, and other publications and services produced by choice. manages a staff of 20 and a budget of $1 million. choice is a book and non-print reviewing journal targeted at college and university libraries, and is lo­ cated in m iddletown, connecticut. the editor /publisher is responsible to the executive director of acrl, a division of the american library associ­ ation, located in chicago. position qualifications: demonstrated com pe­ tence in management and administration; knowl­ edge of higher education in north america -d e vel­ opments and trends in academic program s-and the role of the academic library in the college and university; knowledge of publishing, particularly journal publishing-editorial aspects, production, marketing, advertising, distribution, and copyright; knowledge of academic librarianship and collection management issues and challenges; a high level of energy and stamina; knowledge of data processing and computers, and how this technology can be used in publishing; ability to meet deadlines and a budget. evidence of qualifications may consist in part of a degree in librarianship or business administration, degrees in other disciplines, and relevant experi­ ence. position available late july, 1984. salary range: $30,400-$45,600; 22 days vacation; tiaa-cref. send resume and the names and addresses of three references by march 1 5 ,1 9 84 , to: executive director—choice search acrl/ala 50 e. huron st. chicago, il 60611 an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. february 1984 / 111 work should be expected. qualifications include understanding of autom ated library systems; thorough know ledge of cataloging poli­ cies and procedures; dem onstrated ability to plan and im plem ent im proved program s; dem onstrated abilities in m anagement; ability and willingness to com m unicate effectively and work well with all lev­ els of em ployees; stable em ploym ent background. an innovative li­ brarian with analytical skills is highly desirable. requirements in­ clude ala/m ls and five years of relevant post-mls experience. minimum salary $25,000. the position is open now. position is faculty-rank, tenure-track, 12-month, full-time with good fringe bene­ fits including up to 6% -m atched tiaa/cref. send resume and names of three references (with their current titles, addresses, and phone numbers) who have observed human relationships and pro­ fessional abilities, to: library search committee, c/o kathy essary, chair of recruitment committee, university of arkansas at little rock, 33rd and university ave., little rock, ar 72204. an eeo/aa employer. head, reference d e pa r tm en t. hagerty library at drexel university. position is available immediately. the requirements for this position are a m aster’s in library science and several years of professional e xp e rie n ce in reference w ork in c lu d in g database searching, with at least two years of adm inistrative/supervisory re­ sponsibilities. the reference departm ent consists of six other profes­ sional librarians, eight clerical assistants, two library assistants, plus part-time staff. the responsibilities of the job include supervision and leadership of professional staff—four subject specialists in the fields of humanities and social sciences, home econom ics, business ad­ ministration, library and information science, plus two general refer­ ence librarians; selection of reference materials; and supervisory general reference desk duties, interlibrary loan and other pertinent routines. the departm ent head is a m em ber of the library adm inis­ trative council and reports directly to the d ire cto r’s office. the start­ ing salary is $21,000/year with academ ic status, retirement and ill­ ness benefits. a h ig h e r salary m ay be available d e p e n d e n t on northern illinois university three positions assistant director for public services. northern illinois university is seeking a qualified individual to fill the position of assistant director for public services. mls from an accredited library school, a second master’s or doctorate, and a minimum of five years of successful professional experience of increasing responsibility in an academic or research library required. applicants must have a record of publication and professional involvement supporting a senior level appointment in a tenure track. experience in super­ vising more than one public services area and with public relations and with computer applications in public service preferred. applicants must demonstrate administrative ability, strong leadership qualities, and communication skills. responsibilities include: administration of general reference service, computer refer­ ence service, circulation, reserve, interlibrary loan, bibliographic instruction and government publications for a university library of more than one million volumes, serving 25,000 students and 1,200 faculty; direc­ tion of staff of 11.5 librarians and 21 support staff; consultation with administrative staff to engage in long range planning and to establish and carry out policies and procedures for all public services. $32,000 mini­ mum for a twelve month contract; illinois retirement system; 24 vacation days. send resume, placement file, official transcripts, and thee current letters of recommendation by april 1, 1984, to: theodore f. welch, director, northern illinois university libraries, dekalb, il 60115. assistant director for technical services. northern illinois university is seeking a qualified individual to fill the position of assistant director for technical services. mls from an accredited library school, a second master’s or doctorate, and a minimum of five years of successful professional experience of in­ creasing responsibility in an academic or research library required. applicants must have a record of publi­ cation and professional involvement supporting a senior level appointment in a tenure track. experience in supervising more than one technical services area preferred. experience with computer applications in technical services and collection development experience required. applicants must demonstrate admin­ istrative ability, strong leadership qualities, interpersonal and communication skills. responsibilities in­ clude: administration of acquisitions, cataloging and serials for a university library of over one million vol­ umes, serving 25,000 students and 1,200 faculty; direction of staff of 11 librarians and 45 support staff; consultation with administrative staff to establish and carry out policies and procedures for all technical services. $32,000 minimum for twelve month contract; illinois retirement system, 24 vacation days. send resume, placement file, official transcripts, and three current letters of recommendation by march 15, 1984, to: theodore f. welch, director, northern illinois university libraries, dekalb, il 60115. systems development librarian. northern illinois university is seeking a qualified individual to fill the position of systems development librarian. mls from an accredited library school and a second master’s or completion of 30 hours beyond the mls required. experience in an academic or research library in comprehensive systems planning and analysis, and automated systems development required; familiarity with national trends and strengths and weaknesses of specific applications of computer hardware and soft­ ware in the academic environment. responsibilities include: coordinating the planning and implementa­ tion of automation projects throughout the library; studying existing manual systems and assessing the viability of current automation activities in acquisitions, cataloging, circulation and interlibrary loan, to lead to the implementation of an automated integrated library system. $25,000 minimum for a twelve month contract; illinois retirement system; one month vacation; faculty status and rank. send resume, placement file, official transcripts, and three letters of recommendation by march 15,1 9 84 , to: john tyson, assis­ tant to the director, northern illinois university libraries, dekalb, il 60115. 112 / c&rl news qualifications. interested persons should address their correspon­ dence to: lucille r. jones, head of administrative services, drexel university library, philadelphia, pa 19104. deadline for applica­ tions: february 28, 1984. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. monograph original catalog er. university of georgia entry level position. (salary minimum $14,800). search reopened. duties: responsible to the head of the m onograph original catalog­ ing section of the cataloging department for perform ing original cat­ aloging of m onographic materials in all subjects and languages in­ cluding the sciences. the cataloging department, com prised of 30 staff m embers, catalogs over 47,000 books, serials, m icroform s and nonprint materials yearly. qualifications: mls from ala-accredited library school; strong interest in academ ic librarianship; knowledge of aacr, aacr2 and lc classification and subject headings; ability to work with broad range of subjects and languages; good oral and written com m unication skills; ability to establish and maintain effec­ tive working relationships; knowledge of oclc cataloging prefer­ red; know ledge of other automated systems applicable to libraries desired; background in sciences desired. application procedure: send letter of application by march 16, 1984, including resume and names of three references, to: bonnie jackson clemens, assistant director for administrative services, university of georgia libraries, athens, ga 30602. this position will be filled only if suitable appli­ cants are found. an equal opportunity, affirmative action institution. reference departm ent head. university of georgia, main library. (salary: minimum $25,000). duties: responsible to the assis­ tant director for public services for adm inistering the main library reference department (social sciences and humanities) and coordi­ nating its activities with other departments. the department provides reference, instructional, and referral services on an individual basis; conducts formal library instruction through general tours and spe­ cialized presentations; prepares bibliographies and guides; per­ forms com puterized database searches; and develops a strong, via­ ble reference collection (currently approxim ately 20,000 volumes). the head supervises the assistant head, coordinator of biblio­ graphic instruction, coordinator of online services, 8 reference li­ brarians, 3 support staff, and student assistants. qualifications: mas­ te r’s degree from ala-accredited library school; minimum three years of relevant reference experience in a large academ ic or re­ search library; extensive working know ledge of reference and blio graphic sources in social sciences and humanities; demonstrated supervisory ability; bibliographic instruction experience; knowledge of com puterized database searching; effective oral and written com ­ m unication skills; ability to work effectively with colleagues, students, and faculty. application procedure: send letter of application by march 16, 1984, including resume and names of three references, to: bonnie jackson clemens, assistant director for administrative services, university of georgia libraries, athens, ga 30602. this position will be filled only if suitable applicants are found. an equal opportunity, affirmative action institution. refer en ce/instruc tio n librarian. provides reference service, online searching, instruction, and assists in collection devel­ opment. mls from ala-accredited library school. second m aster’s degree desired (progress toward a second master's required for ten­ ure). academ ic background or library experience in social sciences (especially business), sciences, health sciences or engineering preferred. minimum of three years experience in academ ic library reference services including bibliographic searching and instruc­ tion. collection development experience desired. ability to com m u­ nicate effectively in oral and written presentations and planning and supervisory skills essential. tenure-track position. candidate will be expected to meet library and university criteria in research, publica­ tion, service for promotion and tenure. rank and salary dependent upon qualifications. minimum $17,000. ten month contract, tiaa cref, excellent fringes. deadline (postmark) for letter of application, resume and names of three references: march 15, 1984. starting date: august 15, 1984. submit to: suzanne o. frankie, dean of the library, oakland university library, rochester, ml 48063. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. r e f e r e n c e l ib r a r ia n /c o m m u n ic a t io n & l e is u r e stu d ies subject spec ia list. (search extended). responsi­ bilities include reference service; com puter literature searching; ori­ entation and instruction; collection development; faculty liaison. qualifications: ala/mls; dem onstrated com m unication skills, de­ gree (preferably graduate) in a behavioral science relevant to com ­ munication, journalism/telecomm unication, or leisure studies. pref­ e re n c e will also be g ive n to c a n d id a te s with tra in in g a n d /o r experience in reference, com puter literature searching, library in­ struction or collection development. salary: from $16,300, depen­ dent on qualifications. send statement of qualifications, current re­ sume, and names, addresses and telephone num bers of four recent references to: constance corey, hayden library, arizona state uni­ versity, tempe, az 85287, by march 15,1984 (postmark accepted). minorities are encouraged to apply. asu is a com mitted equal op ­ portunity, affirmative action employer. refer en ce l ib r a r ia n /in f o r m a t io n s p e c ia l is t . de pauw university, an undergraduate liberal arts college, is seeking an innovative librarian to expand reference and outreach information services (search extended). responsibilities include reference, on­ line searching, collection development, and user instruction. re­ quired: an ala/mls, reference experience in an academ ic library, online searching and com m unication skills. a second master's de ­ gree or a subject speciality is highly desirable. salary: $16,000. posi­ tion is available june 1,1984, and offers faculty rank and status. a p ­ ply to: jana bradley, d irector of libraries, box 137, depauw university, greencastle, in 46135. deadline: march 1, 1984. an af­ firmative action, equal opportunity employer. sc ie n c e refer en ce l ib r a r ia n /s u b j e c t s p e c ia l is t for m a th em a tic s , ph ysic s, and a s tr o n o m y. (search extended). responsibilities include reference service; online litera­ ture searching; orientation and instruction; collection development; faculty liaison. qualifications: ala/m ls or foreign equivalent; strong background in science (academic training and/or experience); dem ­ onstrated com m unication skills. preferred: undergraduate or gradu­ ate degree in mathematics or physics; experience in reference and collection development; training in and/or experience with lock­ heed, brs, sdc. salary: from $16,300, dependent on qualifications. send statement of qualifications, current resume, and names, ad ­ dresses and telephone numbers of four recent references to: con­ stance corey, hayden library, arizona state university, tempe, az 85287, by march 15, 1984 (postmark accepted). minorities are en­ couraged to apply. asu is a com mitted equal opportunity, affirma­ tive action employer. serials/r eference librarian. university of nevada, reno seeks energetic, innovative librarian for split assignment: half-time head of serials departm ent and half-time m em ber of professional staff of reference department. serials responsibilities include super­ vision of three library assistants, serials collection development, planning and some public service. reference responsibilities in­ clude assisting library users, instructional activities and selection of reference materials. graduate library degree from ala-accredited school and appropriate experience with serials and/or reference, preferably in an academ ic or research library. strong com m unica­ tion skills and supervisory skills. faculty status requires that librarians meet faculty standards for appointm ent, prom otion and tenure. sal­ ary $17,135 to $25,101, dep ending on qualifications and experi­ ence. tw elve-m onth appointm ent. tiaa/cref, 24 days annual leave. open july 1, 1984. mountains, desert, lakes, five hours from san francisco by car. send resume and names and addresses of three references by march 15,1984, to: ruth h. donovan, associate director of libraries, university of nevada, reno library, reno, nv 89557. an aa/eo employer. techn ic al services librarian. participates with the head of technical services in developing goals and procedures for acqui­ sition and cataloging operations; performs original cataloging of print and non-print materials; oversees reclassification and retro­ spective conversion projects; supervises catalog maintenance, in­ cluding authority work. qualifications: an ala-accredited mls; 2 -4 years of te c h n ic a l se rvice s e x p e rie n c e ; k n o w le d g e of oclc, aacr2, lc classification and subject headings; ability to work with foreign language materials. salary: $18,000 minimum. send resume and names of 3 references by march 9, to: phyllis cutler, college librarian, williams college library, williamstown, ma 01267. an eo,aa employer. late job listings associate university librarian for systems. this position is responsible to the university librarian for the planning, development and installation of an integrated library system serving all libraries within the tufts university library system. these include wessell library (arts and sciences), the ginn library of the fletcher school of law and diplomacy and the health sciences library. with the advice and assistance of the principal librarians, library and faculty advisory committees, the appointee will continue planning for installation of the system, vendor relations, and the development of systematic plans for staged introduction of the various sub-systems in multiple locations. at an appropriate time service will be extended to various non-library locations. because the university operates on two major campuses and, plans to extend service to a large number of teaching hospitals in the future, the use of electronic communication systems will play a large role in this development. tufts university is a member of the boston library consortium and system developments will be designed to enhance cooperation with its member libraries. applicants should possess an mls or its equivalent in library or information science, experience in system management and a sound knowledge of library requirements in automation. experience in system development is required as is managerial experience, showing increasing responsibility over five years. appointment will be made at a rank and salary commensurate with qualifications and experience. salary $35,000-$45,000. tufts librarians are expected to participate in professional associations and to be interested in research and development. advancement in rank is dependent on the demonstration of outstanding professional ability. send application, resume and the names and addresses of three referees to: murray s. martin, university librarian, wessell library, tufts university, medford, ma 02155, before february 29, 1984. tufts university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. catalog librarian with responsibility for coordinating related technical services functions. requires mls with experience in cataloging books and av using lc classification and aacr2; a knowledge of automated cataloging procedures; evidence of organizational ability; demonstrated supervisory ability; and excellent interpersonal skills. deadline march 15, 1984. salary $19,000 entry level. contact: betty funderburke, central piedmont community college, p.o. box 35009, charlotte, nc 28235; (704) 373-6631. cataloger: responsible for original cataloging and tagging of book, score, and non-book materials in assigned areas including music. requirements: ala-accredited mls; minimum one year cataloging experience; reading knowledge of one foreign language; working knowledge of aacrl/2, lc classification, and lcsh; oclc experience; music background or experience in music cataloging; ability to work well with others. salary minimum $18,000. assistant professor rank. 12-month tenure-track appointment. position begins july 1, 1984. application deadline: march 1, 1984. send resume and names of three references to: gail j. junion, coordinator, cataloging department, jerome library, bowling green state university, bowling green, oh 43403. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. director of the library. position available for director of library at a private college which offers a four-year professional degree program to approximately 1,800 students. qualifications required: mls from an ala-accredited institution; five years of library experience with evidence of administrative responsibility; knowledge of current developments in library automation and resource sharing; strong leadership and management skills, with ability to establish and maintain effective public and professional relationships. additional degree in another academic field is highly desirable. responsibilities: directing long and short term planning, fiscal management of budget; supervision of five professional librarians and twelve support staff. the director reports to the vice president for academic affairs. salary: commensurate with qualifications, experience and academic rank (assistant or associate professor) the range being $26,700-$31,500. application procedure: send nomination or resume along with three professional references by march 30, 1984, to: iftikhar h. bhatti, chairman of search committee, palmer college of chiropractic, 1000 brady street, davenport, ia 52803. (319) 324-1611, ext. 282 or 251. palmer college is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. health sciences network librarian. responsible to the associate university librarian for systems for the development of aspects of that system relating to the special needs of the health sciences, particularly enhancements of the serials access sub-system and the health sciences library network. in association with the director of the health sciences library, this librarian will be responsible for the installation and maintenance of the integrated library system in the health sciences library and, through the local area network, for services to the health sciences campus. the position will coordinate the introduction of access to other information systems and be responsible for the maintenance of the document center with the object of facilitating the transmission of electronic information. the position requires a degree in library or information science, familiarity with the information needs of the health sciences, experience in the operation of library computer systems and general familiarity with library procedures and requirements. demonstrated ability to work with faculty members and administration is required. formal education in some area of medical communication or a general scientific background will be an added recommendation. librarians at tufts are expected to participate in professional associations and to be interested in research and development. appointment will be made at a rank and salary appropriate to qualifications and experience. salary $30,000. advancement in rank is dependent on the demonstration of outstanding professional ability. send application, resume and the names and addresses of three referees to: murray s. martin, university librarian, wessell library, tufts university, meford, ma 02155, before february 29, 1984. tufts university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. nesbitt and evening colleges librarian in the hagerty library of drexel university. the requirements for this position are master’s degree in library science, at least 2 years’ professional experience in reference work including database searching, and an acceptable subject background or interest. the nesbitt and evening colleges librarian works closely with the faculty and students of the colleges. reference work, bibliographic assistance, and book selection in the field of art, architecture, education, design, psychology, and human behavior and development form the principal responsibilities of the position. the starting salary is $15,000 per year with academic status, retirement and illness benefits. a higher salary may be available depending on qualifications. deadline for applications is march 15. interested persons should address their correspondence to: lucille r. jones, head of administrative services, drexel university library, philadelphia, pa 19104. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. g e rm a n h is t o r y r e c o n s t r u c t e d . . . files of the national-socialist party chancellery edited by the institut für zeitgeschichte the partei-kanzlei, until 1941 the alternate headquarters of the führer, was not only hitler’s relay station for the admin­ istration of the party, its influence extended to national and other social institutions. the files of the partei-kanzlei have been reconstructed from copies of correspondence, min­ utes, memoranda, and other documents scattered through german and foreign archives and lost until now. the micro­ fiche edition of the complete collection—some 300,000 pages—makes accessible an invaluable tool for historical research. 89 fic h e a n d three volumes available. 720 silver halide fíche, 4 register volumes and 2 index v o lu m es.............................................................. $3550 situation reports ( 1 9 2 0 —1 9 2 9 ) and dispatches ( 1 9 2 9 —1 9 3 3 ) a specially reconstructed section of the most essential files of weekly reports and topical dispatches from the govern­ ment agency incorporated into the gestapo in the spring of 1933. these documents analyzed collective attempts to overthrow the weimar constitution by groups on the right and the left—in particular the kpd or german communist party and its allied organizations. an important tool, organized by topic and political organization, for research on the political situation during the turbulent period of hitler’s rise to national power. 400 silver halide fiche (24x) and printed g u id e ........... $ 7 50 for more information about these and other saur publications, please contact walter jaffe. k.g. saur inc. 175 fifth avenue n.y..n.y. 10010 212 982-1302 just published...the 1984 guide to over 9,000 active publishers... publishers directory ...a guide to new and established commercial and nonprofit, private and alternative, corporate and association, government and institution publishing programs and their distributors. 5th edition. edited by linda s. hubbard. (formerly book publishers directory but now expanded to include selected publishers of classroom materials, reports, databases, software, maps, calendars, cards, prints, etc.) 1,630 pages in 2 vols. $225.00/set. inter-edition supplement, $ 135.00. the new pd provides complete profiles on some 9,300 u.s. and canadian publishers: name, address, phone number, year founded, principal officers and managers, number of titles per year, representative titles, description, discount schedules, returns policies, and much more. new edition covers 122 distributors and wholesalers...and identifies defunct publishers. index of publishers, imprints, and distributors includes publishers in literary market place (note that pd does not duplicate coverage in imp). also includes subject index using 275 terms and geographic index. available on standing order at 5% discount. all gale books are sent on 60-day approval. deduct 5% if you send check with order. customers outside the u.s. and canada add 10%. gale r esearch co. book tower • detroit, mi 48226 to order by phone: 800-521-0707 tollfree. in canada, m ichigan, alaska, and hawaii: 3 1 3 9612242. u m i article clearinghouse h ere we are, in the midst of the age of inform ation, and everybody wants some. econom ically. quickly. w ith ­ out a hassle. and here we are, at university microfilms international, introducing an answer that makes sense for you. we call it u m i article clearinghouse. y o u ’ll be able to access our cat­ alog of over 7 ,5 0 0 periodical titles and order copies of articles electronically. v ia the o c l c i l l subsystem and i t t d ialcom and others to com e. you can order electronically through c l a s s o ntym e and over a l a n e t as well. y o u ’ll also have the assurance that we hold the listed titles and that yo u ’re getting articles from a licensed agent. t h e y ’ll be shipped to you within 48 hours. and it w on’t cost you an arm and a leg. ($ 4 -$ 6 per arti­ cle for deposit accounts; $8 for credit card accounts.) o u r ja n u a ry 1984 c atalog is available now. call 1-800-732-0616 (in m ichigan, alaska and h aw aii, call collect 3 1 3 /761-4700) for your free copy. u n iv e rsity m icro film s in te rn a tio n a l a x e r o x c o m p a n y 3 0 0 n orth z eeb r o a d a n n a rb o r, m ic h ig a n 48106 acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries c&rl news ■ n ovem ber 2003 / 689 c l a s s i f i e d a d s career opportunities from across the country d e a d lin e s : o rders fo r regular classified advertisem ents m ust reach th e a c r l o ffice on o r before th e second of the m onth preceding publication of the issue (e.g., septem ber 2 fo r the o ctober issue). should th is d ate fa ll on a w eekend or holiday, ads w ill be accepted on the next business day. late jo b listings will be accepted on a sp ace-available basis a fte r the secon d of th e m onth. r a te s : c lassified advertisem ents are $10.85 p e r line fo r institutio n s th a t are a c r l m em bers, $12.95 fo r others. late jo b notices are $24.95 per line fo r institutio n s th a t are a c r l m em bers, $30.45 fo r others. o rgan iza tio ns s u bm it­ ting ads w ill be charged according to th e ir m em bership status. display ad rates range from $500to $925based upon size. p lease call fo r sizes and rates. o r see our w eb site: h ttp ://w w w .a la .o rg /a c rl/. g u id e lin e s : for ads th a t list an application deadline, we sugg e st th a t date be no so on e r than the 20th day o f the m onth in w hich th e n otice a ppears (e.g., o ctob e r 20 fo r the o ctob e r issue). all jo b a nn o uncem ents should include a salary range per policy o f th e a m erican l ibrary a ssociation (ala). job a nn ouncem ents w ill be edited to exclude dispositions open c a t a l o g l ib r a r ia n . (half-time) the m e n n o n ite historical li b r a r y seeks a 0.5 fte catalog librarian. primary duties will be classifying and cataloging materials (50% original) in a research collec t o n of anabaptist-mennonite materials owned by goshen college, afour year liberal arts institution operated by the mennonite church. goshen c ollege is 30 miles southeast of south bend, indiana. ala-accredited master’s strongly preferred; at leasttwo years’ experience cataloging in a n online environment; knowledge of oclc, marc, aacr2, ddc, and lcsh. familiarity with foreign languages and interest in anabaptist/ mennonite history a plus. to apply: full job description and application instructions found at: http://www.goshen.edu/employment/#open. per s o n s from underrepresented groups are encouraged to apply. goshen college, an affirmative action employer, is committed to christian beliefs and values as interpreted by the mennonite church. interviews will begin^ november 15,2003, and continue until filled. projected beginning date: ja n u a ry5,2004. c o l l e c t io n d e v e l o p m e n t l ib r a r ia n . p rim a ry .re­ sp o n s ib ility fo r ensuringthatthe library provides a strong collection that supports the teaching and research mission of the institution. coordinates the selection of materials in all formats; allocates the library’s material budget to the other academic units; works with academic departmental jiaisons to promote appropriate and substantive growth of the library’s collections in all disciplines taught in the indiana university south bend ( u sb) curriculum; selects general monographic and serial materials not covered by departments; and directs collection assessment, evaluation^ a n d deselection activities. the person in this position will also participate in reference deskservices, including some evening and weekend hours. participation in a highly active instruction program may be possible. shares in university governance through memberships on committees, r e p o rts to th e d ire c to r of l ib ra ry s e rv ic e s . r e q u ire d : ala-accredited mls; minimum of five years’ experience at an aca dem ic library with collection developm ent responsibilities; ener­ getic, m otivated, and creative professional with a strong service jw en ta tio n ; strong fiscal management skills; fam iliarity with vendor contracts and licenses. must possess strong oral and written com -»wnication skills and be able to meet the responsibilities of. a tenure-track appointment. preferred: academ ic reference experi .ftöce and knowledge of acquisitions process and preservation tech­ niques. twelve-month appointment beginning august 2004 will be at ‚tfcie associate librarian rank. salary: $45,000-$50,000. review of applications will begin january 10,2004, and will continue until filled. jaend letter of application, résumé, and three letters of reference to: linda fisher, chair, search and screen committee, franklin d. s etíurz library, in d ia n a u n iv e rs ity s o u th b e n d , p.o. box 7111, south bend, in 46634. fax: (574) 237-4472; e-mail: hfisher@iusb.edu. i usb is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. visit our web site: http://www.iusb.edu/~libg/. crim in a to ry references. app lica nts should be aware th a t th e te rm s fa cu lty rank and status va ry in m eaning am ong institutio n s. in te r n e t: c&rl news classifie d ads are a ccessible on the w eb at h ttp ://w w w .a la .o rg/acrl/jo b s. a ds w ill be placed approxim ately four weeks before th e printed edition of c&rl news is published. c o n ta c t: elise parker, c lassified a d ve rtisin g m anager, c&rl news c lassified a d vertising d epartm ent, acrl, a m erican library a ssociation, 50 e. huron st., chicago. il 60611 -2795: (312) 280-2513; fax: (312) 2 80-7663 or (312) 280-2520; e-m ail: c & rlne w sad s@ a la .org . p o lic y : ala policy requires that organizations recruiting through ala publications o r placement services com ply with ala anti-discrim ination policies. policy 54.3 states that “ala is committed to equality of opportunity fo ra il library employees or applicantsforem ploym ent, regardless o f race, color, creed, sex, age, physical or mental handicap, individual life-style, or national origin.” by advertising through ala sen/ices, the organization agrees to com ply with this policy. salary guide listed below are the latest minimum starting salary figures recom­ mended by state library associationsforprofessional library posts inthese states. the recommendationsareadvisory only,and alahasnotadopted recommendations for minimum salaries. job seekers and employers should considerthese recommended minimums when evaluating profes­ sional vacancies. foradditional information on librarian salaries, contact ala office for library personnel resources. connecticut $39,148 delaware $22,500** illinois $37,408* indiana varies* iowa $23,911 louisiana $26,000 maine varies* massachusetts $31,362* new jersey $38,146 north carolina $27,641** ohio $25,198** pennsylvania $30,249* rhode island $29,800 south carolina varies* south dakota $22,000 texas $33,000 vermont $26,464 west virginia $22,000 * › wisconsin $32,700 *ratherthan establish one statewide salary minimum, some state associations have adopted a formula based on variables such as comparable salaries for public school teachers in each commu­ nity, or the grade level of a professional librarian post. in these cases, you may wish to contact the state association for minimum salary information. **these recommendations apply only to public librarians. c o o r d in a t o r , in f o r m a t io n l it e r a c y p r o g r a m / r t s e a r c h a n d in s t r u c t io n l ib r a r ia n . (s earch extended) un iv ers ity of s outhe rn m aine (usm) libraries seek a .dynamic and experienced librarian to lead the development of its growing information literacy program. current library expansion atthe portland θβfnpus includes the new centerfor information literacy, a state-of-the art teaching facility. she or he will organize, coordinate, promote, manage, evāhiate, and be the lead instructor in the program with emphasis on http://www.ala.org/acrl/ http://www.goshen.edu/employment/%23open mailto:hfisher@iusb.edu http://www.iusb.edu/~libg/ http://www.ala.org/acrl/jobs mailto:rlnewsads@ala.org 6 9 0 / c&rl news ■ n ovem ber 2003 introductory undergraduate instruction, as well as serve on the general reference services team. usm has gained national recognition for the breadth and quality of its academic programs. portland is an appealing and a w ard-winning community in a beautiful area on the coast of maine. full job description and qualifications are at: www.usm.maine.edu/hrs/jobs/ «professional.htm. d e p a r t m e n t h e a d f o r p e r io d ic a l s a n d n o n p r in t c o l l e c t io n s . the university libraries at the university of memphis is seeking an experienced and dynamic leaderto fill the position of department head for periodicals and nonprint collec­ tions. librarians have faculty status and rank; this is a 12-month, tenure t r a ck position. salary is dependent upon qualifications with a minimum of $38,000 plus department head salary supplement. review of applications b egins 0ctober30,2003, and may continue until the position is filled. see the complete vacancy announcement at: http://exlibris.memphis.edu/an r o d nce/jobs/per_hd.html. the university of memphis is an affirma­ tive action, equal opportunity employer. d ir ec to r o f s p e c ia l p r o je c ts . develop and direct the s pecial projects department; achieve budget and programmatic goals serving as a member of senior management; identify and develop special p r o jects to serve member libraries. immediate assignment is to a direct a projectto select, acquire, catalog, and process a replacement collection f o r the university of houston law library. requirements: mls from an ala-accredited library school; minimum eight years of professional e x perience, at least five years in management; experience in multiple types of libraries; successful management of multiple projects; experi e n ce developing and deploying balanced revenue and expense budgets. location: would consider dallas or houston, texas. to learn more a b o u t us, please visit: www.amigos.org. to apply: send a letter of application, résumé, and three references (one of which was/is in a supervisory capacity over you): a m ig o s l ib rary services, attn: human resources, 14400 midway road, dallas, tx 75244. or y o u may send your information via e-mail: klote@ amigos.org; fax: (972)991-6061. d ir e c t o r , w il l ia m j e f f e r s o n c l i n t o n l ib r a r y , l i ttle rock, arkansas. the national archives and records administration (nara) invites nominations and applications for the position of director o f t he william jefferson clinton presidential library, located in little rock, arkansas. leading candidates will have extensive experience d ir e cting a historical, archival, cultural, philanthropic, educational, or governmental institution. also required is success in building public-private o r o ther coalitions and partnerships to advance the programs and mis­ sions of a public or private institution. candidates should also have a strong purchase college, state university of new york (suny) is seeking an energetic librarian to provide general reference service, with a specialization in the natural or social sciences. will have collection development responsibility for the sciences and serves as a liaison to the school of natural and social sciences. participates in an active information literacy program, teaching both introductory and specialized sessions. serves at the reference desk-some evening and weekend hours. required qualifications: ala accred ited mls; strong academic background in at least one of the sciences or social sciences, preferably psychology, biology, chemistry, or environmental science; excellent written and oral communication skills. p r efe r r ed : $39,000-42,000, commensurate with qualifications and experience. faculty rank: senior assistant librarian; 12 month tenure track. excellent benefits. send letter of application, resume, and names of three references to : mr. menelik r. alleyne, esq., affirmative action officer, purchase college, 735 anderson hill road, purchase, ny 10577. closing date for applications is until filled. review of applications begins immediately an affirmative action/ equal opportunity employer. i n terest and understanding of events and issues of the last 50 years, skill in creatively broadening and serving their constituencies, and outstanding communications skills. the library director is responsible for planning, directing, and administering all programs and activities of the library, i n cluding archival, museum, and educational programs. the director of william jefferson clinton library works closely with president c lipton, the william j. clinton presidential library foundation, and the university of arkansas to develop public programs and services that e n h a n c e the growth and reputation of the library as a center of public scholarship and service. this is an excepted service senior level (sl) appointment within the federal government with a salary range of $111,997-$142,500. detailed information about nara and presiden t ia l libraries is available at www.archives.gov. this announcement will remain in effect until the position is filled. applicants should send a re sumé and address how theirq ualifications and experience match the criteria for success in this position. applicants must be u.s citizens. applications should be sent to the following address: richard claypoole, assistant archivist for presidential libraries, national a r c hives and records administration, 8601 adelphi road, college park, md 2 0 7 4 0 -6 0 0 1 ; p ho ne: (3 0 1 ) 8 3 7 -3 2 5 0 ; e -m a il: r i c h ard.claypoole@ nara.gov; orfax: (301)837-3199. j d is t a n c e le a r n in g c o o r d in a to r . provide leadership, direction, planning, and assessment for library support of distance educa­ tion. reference desk service and specialized reference, collection devel o p ment and liaison sen/ices for assigned academic areas. participate in the evening and weekend reference rotation. qualifications: ala-accred i t e d mls or equivalent; minimum of two years’ current experience in academic library reference; experience in web page development, cur r ent instructional technologies, and instructional m aterials design. experience in teaching and in providing library services to distant le a rners preferred. salary minimum: $43,354, negotiable based upon qualifications. send letter of application, résumé, and the names, a ddresses, and telephone numbers of at least three references to: susan e. cirillo, director of library services, southern c o n ­ n ecticut state university, 501 crescent street, new haven, ct 06515-1355. southern connecticut state university is an affirma tive action, equal opportunity employer and encourages women and minorities to apply. http://www.usm.maine.edu/hrs/jobs/ http://exlibris.memphis.edu/anhttp://www.amigos.org mailto:klote@amigos.org http://www.archives.gov c&rl news ■ n ovem ber 2003 / 691 two positions available college of new jersey the college of new jersey is a highly selective, comprehensive residential institution recognized as one of the outstanding public colleges in the country. located between new york city and philadelphia in suburban ewing township, the college enrolls approximately 6,000 undergraduates and 900 graduate students. we are currently seeking candidates to fill two full-time, 12-month, tenure-track positions at the roscoe l. west library. requirements for both positions: ala-accredited master’s degree; excellent interpersonal, oral, and written communication skills. initiative, flexibility, and a strong service orientation are essential. research/scholarly activity, service on institutional committees, and active participation in the profession are expected for tenure. rank is commensurate with qualifications and experience. salary ranges: librarian iii, $41,329-61,998; librarian ii, $45,566-68,340; with full benefits package including tiaa-cref. head of cataloging (librarian ii) provide leadership in cataloging and authority control, developing policies and procedures for cataloging materials in all formats. coordinate the work of a team of professional catalogers; train and supervise paraprofessional catalogers. create original and revise copy cataloging. limited participation in general reference service. qualifications: required: at least three years’ professional-level, recent cataloging experience; extensive knowledge of cataloging standards including aacr2r, lcsh and lc classification, marc21 ‚ oclc; knowledge of metadata standards; ability to implement new cataloging standards and procedures; strong computing skills; excellent problem-solving skills. preferred: management experience; experience cataloging electronic resources; experience with authority control services; familiarity with ddc; knowledge of voyager; knowledge of general reference and facility with electronic and traditional information resources; strong reading knowledge of spanish or other western european language. record of scholarly or professional activity. additional graduate degree is highly desirable. contact: maureen gorman, chair, head of cataloging search committee (mgorman@tcnj.edu). for a more detailed position description, see http://www.tcnj.edu/~eesinfo/employment/library.shtml. social sciences librarian (librarian ii or iii) coordinate collection development and provide in-depth reference for psychology, political science, criminology and justice studies, communication studies, sociology and anthropology. w ork closely with faculty in the school of culture and society to assess the needs of the academic programs; provide subject-specific user education. participate in general reference service, including some weekends and evenings, and in general information literacy program. qualifications: required: educational background and/or experience in a relevant social science; knowledge of general reference and facility with electronic and traditional information resources. preferred: significant experience using resources in the social sciences; experience in statistical methods. basic knowledge of web page design. additional graduate degree in an appropriate discipline is highly desirable. contact: marc meola, chair, social sciences librarian search committee (meolam @tcnj.edu). for a more detailed position description, see http://www.tcnj.edu/~eesinfo/employment/library.shtml. a review of applications will begin november 17, 2003, and will continue until the positions are filled. to apply, please send coverletter, résumé, and names and contact information (including e-mails) for at least four professional references to the attention of the contact person listed for each position to: roscoe l. west library the college of new jersey p.o. box 7718 ewing, nj 08628-0718 applications may be sent by e-mail. to enrich education through diversity, the college o f n ew jersey is an affirm ative action, equal opportunity employer. mailto:mgorman@tcnj.edu http://www.tcnj.edu/~eesinfo/employment/library.shtml http://www.tcnj.edu/~eesinfo/employment/library.shtml 6 9 2 / c&rl n e w s ■ n o v e m b e r 2 0 0 3 university librarian the university of north carolina greensboro the university of north carolina at greensboro (uncg) invites applications and nominations for the position of university librarian. the university librarian reports to the provost and is a full member of the deans council. we are seeking an individual who can provide both visionary leadership and superior management for the library and who will advance its central role in the educational and research missions of the university. uncg’s jackson library has a staff of 31 tenure-track professional librarians and 56 supportstaff and a budget of $7 million. the library’s collections total m orethan2.8 million books, federal and state documents, microforms, and other formats. resources include access to a large and growing number of databases and other online resources including more than 17,000 full-text electronic journals. library facilities include an on-campus storage facility and a separate music division that reports to the university librarian. (for more information, visit the library’s web site at http:// library.uncg.edu.) the library is a dynamic leader in information technology, and the university librarian is expected to maintain this leadership role. candidates must hold an mls from an ala-accredited program, with an additional advanced degree preferred, and have at least five years of increasingly responsible administrative experience in academic or research libraries. experience with budgets and personnel management is expected, and an affinity and enthusiasm fo r fund raising are highly desirable. candidates should have excellent communication skills and must be able to work collegially with library personnel, all members of the university community, and the community at large. they should also have a strong record of scholarship in the form of publications, presentations, and active participation in professional organizations. the librarian serves as the institution's representative on the unc university library advisory council and the association of southeastern research libraries and plays an active role in advancement and public relations. the position has faculty status and is eligible for participation in the tiaa-cref retirement program. it is expected that candidates will qualify for tenure as a professional librarian. salary is competitive and commensurate with experience and qualifications. uncg, one of 16 campuses in the university of north carolina system, is a doctoral research-intensive university with more than 650 faculty and approximately 15,000 students, including 3,000 graduate students, in the college of arts and sciences and six professional schools (business and economics, education, health and human performance, human environmental sciences, music, and nursing). greensboro is a city of about 220,000 with five institutions of higher education in the piedmont triad region of north carolina, a location providing easy access to the research triangle and to recreational opportunities at the coast and the mountains. the local metropolitan area (which includes the cities of high point and winston-salem) has a population of almost 1 million and offers an excellent quality of life. (for more information on the city and the region, visit http://www.gotriad.com.) review of applications will begin on january 10, 2004, and will continue until the position is filled. the appointment is expected to begin july 1 ‚ 2004. applicants should submit their vita with a letter explaining their interest in the position, a description of their view of the responsibilities of the university librarian, and contact information for four references to: timothy d. johnston university librarian search committee office of the provost unc greensboro greensboro, nc 27402 inquiries and applications will be treated confidentially on request. affirm ative action, equal opportunity employer. g o v e r n m e n t in f o r m a t io n lib r a r ia n . the college o f wooster is seeking a government information librarian to be responsible for managing and developing the libraries’ federal deposi t e r y government publication collection and program; participating with other librarians in reference and instructional services; working with academic departments on library instruction and collection development; working effectively with faculty, students, and colleagues in promoting library resources; and representing the college on the government docu­ ments subcommittee of the five colleges of ohio and godort of ohio. f o r details, goto http://www2.kenyon.edu/ohio5/admin.htmandclickon “libraries.” head, information services. levy economics institute of b a r d college, annandale-on-hudson, new york, seeks an entrepreneur­ ial manager to direct the day-to-day operations of a gem of a research c o llection related to economic development, political economy, and mon­ etary policy. duties include: information and research services; digital recoource management; and collection development. qualifications: mls from ala-accredited institution; second master’s in economics, sociol­ ogy, or other field related to public policy research is highly desirable; two plus years’ experience providing collection development and information s e r ces in a foundation, corporate, or other special library related to economics and public policy research; and/or experience in business, http://www.gotriad.com http://www2.kenyon.edu/ohio5/admin.htmandclickon c&rl news ■ n o ve m b e r 2003 / 693 visual resources and media cataloging librarian university of pennsylvania the university of pennsylvania library, patricia and bernard goldstein information processing center, seeks a dynamic, creative, and forward-thinking professional to assume responsibility for managing the ongoing cataloging of visual resources and diverse media. this position is responsible to the head, original cataloging department, one of a number of units that make up the information processing center. the library is a member of the program for cooperative cataloging and contributes to the naco, bibco, and saco programs. the successful candidate must have an understanding of current issues affecting visual resources cataloging in a rapidly changing information and technical environment and of trends in providing access to digital information, as well as experience in cataloging media of all kinds. to be effective, the candidate must also possess strong collegial and interpersonal skills, be able to work effectively with staff at all levels of the organization, and flourish in a high-intensity work environment. as the university of pennsylvania library rapidly develops the digital library, there is a growing reliance on the descriptive and organizational skills of staff in the information processing center. the visual resources and media cataloging librarian will have an opportunity to play a major role in developing innovative methods to describe digital information, in building crosswalks between marc and other metadata, and in working with staff outside the unit on metadata projects. responsibilities: supervises the cataloging of video and other media resources fo r the university library. performs original and complex copy cataloging of visual materials representing all levels of difficulty, all subjects, languages, and formats according to national standards and contributes to the program for cooperative cataloging. assists with the library’s management of a rapidly growing visual resources collection. w orks closely with high-level paraprofessionals and assists same in problem solving. catalogs electronic/digital materials with marc records and creates non-marc metadata records for national and local digital projects. collaborates with the library’s digital team to devise metadata standards fo r the library’s digital presence. investigates, experiments with, and implements new approaches for creating and manipulating bibliographic data, including extended and creative uses of metadata. acts as resource for digital library projects for establishing and applying metadata standards. other cataloging responsibilities as assigned. qualifications: an accredited mls degree or the equivalent in theory and practice with a minimum of three years’ related experience; working knowledge of video and other media resources cataloging procedures and principles including aacr2, lcsh, lc classification, marc21, and national standards; current awareness of national trends and developments in cataloging, metadata standards, and information retrieval; knowledge of metadata schema in order to be flexible and innovative in approaching cataloging problems; excellent analytic and problem-solving skills; excellent communica­ tion, interpersonal, organizational, and time-management skills with strong service orientation; demon­ strated ability to work independently and as part of a team in adynam ic environment; reading knowledge of at least one european language and facility in working with other languages; ongoing commitment to professional development and growth. salary and benefits: highly competitive and comm ensurate with experience. minimum starting salary range $40,000 plus. the university of pennsylvania offers tuition remission (including generous spousal and dependent children benefits), an excellent pension program with a university match, m ortgage/housing assistance, childcare program, excellent area schools, and many other fringe benefits. application procedure: candidates are asked to submit a letter of application, a complete résumé, and the names, addresses, and phone numbers of three references who can address the suitability of the candidate for the responsibilities above. nominations and applications should be sent to: robert eash library human resources officer university of pennsylvania library 3420 walnut street philadelphia, pa 19104 e-mail to: reash@pobox.upenn.edu the u niversity o f pennsylvania is an affirm ative action, equ a l opportunity employer. mailto:reash@pobox.upenn.edu 694 / c&rl news ■ n o ve m b e r 2003 two positions available university of pittsburgh japanese cataloger, east asian library the east asian library seeks an energetic and innovative japanese cataloger. reporting to the head of the east asian library, this position is responsible for the cataloging and classification of all materials in all form ats in the japanese collection and performs all original and copy cataloging using aacr22002 revision, lc classification, lcsh, lcri, marc21 ‚ oclc cjksoftware, and other online facilities. the incumbent also performs authority work on japanese headings for both local and national databases and actively participates in the training and supervision of support staff (including students) involved in the cataloging of japanese language materials. full position announce­ ment is available at: http://www.library.pitt.edu/uls/em ployment/. qualifications: required: mls from an ala-accredited library school (or recognized equivalent); fluency in spoken and written japanese; knowledge of aacr2 2002 revision, lcri, lc classification, lcsh, and marc21 formats; familiarity with oclc cjk software and online library systems; excellent organizational and communication skills in english and the ability to work effectively in a team-based environment. preferred: experience in working with japanese language materials; experience in an academic library; knowledge of classical japanese; additional advanced degree in appropriate japan related subject area; experience with cjk system and voyager cataloging module; working knowledge of korean. salary: $30,000 minimum. digital projects librarian, digital research library provides computer systems design, management, and technical support for the digital research library. under the supervision of the coordinator of the digital research library, this position is responsible for the developm ent of automated aspects of production workflow, mounting and maintaining digital collections and department websites, and assessing the feasibility of new projects with regard to available technologies, existing vendor services, staffing requirements, etc. incumbent will coordinate work with the uls information systems department an d th e unix systems administrator, and be expected to keep up to date with developments in digital library efforts. full position announcem ent is available at: http://www.library.pitt.edu/uls/em ployment/. qualifications: required: mls from an ala-accredited institution (or an equivalent degree), and two years' experience with computer hardware, software, and operating systems in a complex networked environment. working knowledge of the unix environment, ability to encode in xhtml, sgml, and xml, and programming experience in perl for w eb-based deployment of information and processing text/data. ability to import data and query sql relational databases. knowledge of digital library issues, scanning software and techniques, image form ats and processing, and knowledge of web server technology. ability to pay attention to detail, to work with a wide variety of people as part of a team, and to learn new skills quickly. experience in a production-oriented environment. preferred: supervisory or m anagement experience. experience indexing large full-text databases, programming in java and php, and im plementing css or xslt style sheets. familiarity with the text encoding initiative (tei), encoded archival description (ead), and the open archives initiative protocol for metadata harvesting (oai-pmh). knowledge of digital library extension service (dlxs) middleware for mounting text, image, finding aids, and bibliographic collections. salary: $35,000 minimum. librarians at the university of pittsburgh are m embers of the faculty and are expected to contribute significantly to the profession as well as to perform their specific responsibilities. successful reviews at the third and sixth year of employment lead to the granting of expectation of continuing employment. librarians have a comprehensive benefits package including medical; tiaa-cref, vanguard; and tuition assistance. to apply: submit letter of application (indicating position of interest) and résumé with the names, addresses, and phone numbers of three references to: william gentz personnel librarian 271 hillman library university of pittsburgh pittsburgh, pa 15260 review of applications will begin october 15, 2003, and continue until position is filled. http://www.library.pitt.edu/uls/employment/ http://www.library.pitt.edu/uls/employment/ c&rl news ■ n ovem ber 2003 / 695 university librarian the city university of new york the office of academic affairs of the city university of new york is seeking a university librarian. as a senior member of the staff of the office of academic affairs, the university librarian provides leadership and practical support for collaborative work among the university’s 19 campus libraries forming a single integrated system, and takes a lead role in integrating the libraries with the teaching, learning, and research activities throughout the university. the library system has a combined budget of over $35 million, including $9 million in e-resource licenses and collections of over 5 million volumes. for further information about cuny, please visit our web site at www.cunv.edu. the university librarian will have responsibilities that include: • working with the council of chief librarians and other senior university academic administrators, to establish and implement policies for the university’s libraries; • managing the university’s integrated online library system (ex libris-aleph 500) and related information systems; • negotiating university-wide licenses for nearly $1 million in electronic journals and full text e-resources; • coordinating shared licenses among groups of campus libraries for additional full-text and reference packages totaling nearly $3 million; • negotiating university-wide book, serial and binding contracts; • collecting and maintaining statistics on the university’s libraries; • preparing and justifying budgets; • seeking grants and participating in other fundraising activities; • collaborating with cuny computer and information services leadership; and • representing cuny in metropolitan, statewide and national academic library initiatives. qualifications: the successful candidate will have a strong record of managing library programs, excellent communication skills, the ability to work collaboratively, a demonstrated understanding of library technology, and of the issues facing academic libraries. experience with coordinated programs and fundraising is highly desirable. an mls, subject masters or doctorate and a minimum of 10 years of experience in academic libraries required. review of applications will continue until the position is filled. salary: commensurate with education and experience send cover letter and résumé to: ms. dolly martinez, executive director of executive search and evaluation the city university of new york, 535 east 80th street, new york, ny 10021 l ________________________ the city university o f new york is an eo/aa/lrca employer.________________________ j l aw; or social science department of academic or large public library. experience with digital content management and familiarity with scholar­ ship and publication activity in economics required. full-time, 12-month position. typical college benefit package. salary commensurate with experience. send cover letter and résumé to: bard college, office of human r esources, levy lib ra ry search, p.o. box 5000, annandale-on-hudson, ny 12504. for a more detailed description, visit the bard human resources web site a t http://inside.bard.edu/hr/; orvisit t h e levy institute web site at: www.levy.org. affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. l it e r a t u r e c a t a l o g e r . brigham young university (byu), provo utah, an equal opportunity employer, sponsored by the church of jesus christ of latter-day saints, requires observance of church stan darels. preference is given to applicants who are church members. the literature cataloger performs original cataloging following national and leeel standards for the creation of bibliographic and authority records. to apply, review the complete job listing (position #001425) located at http:// www.byu.edu/hr/employment/faculty.html and submit résumé, names of three references, and byu employment application form (available from a bove url) to: erva rieske, library human resource coordinator, 2225 hbll, brigham young university, provo ut 84602. o u t r e a c h a n d in s t r u c t io n lib r a r ia n . liberty uni v e rsity seeks candidates for a 12-month faculty position at the assistant librarian level. the outreach and instruction librarian organizes, coordi n a tes, and assesses the integrated learning resource center’s informa­ tion literacy instruction program; provides orientations, tours, instruction, and training workshops; and develops instructional materials in print and digital formats. qualifications: required: mls or equivalent degree from an ala-accraredited institution; instructional aptitude; strong oral and writ­ ten communication skills; ability to collaborate with librarians and teaching faculty; commitment to christian higher education and en­ dorsem ent of liberty university’s doctrinal statem ent. desirable: e xp erience in teaching information literacy and providing reference service in an academic library; training or experience in public re la tio n s and marketing; mous certification. send letter of applica­ tion and résumé to: gregory a. smith, dean of library services, lib e rty university, 1971 university boulevard, lynchburg, va 24502. liberty university welcomes applications from women and m e mbers of ethnic m inorities. for more inform ation, visit: http:// library.liberty.edu; or e-mail: gsm ith@ liberty.edu. p u b l ic s e r v i c e s l i b r a r ia n / i n t e r l ib r a r y l o a n d i s t a n t l e a r n e r s e r v i c e s c o o r d i n a t o r . foley center library at gonzaga university in spokane, washington, offers a perm anent full-time, tenure-track library faculty position, public sen/ices librarian/interlibrary loan and distant learner services coordinator, responsibilities: plans, coordinates, and evaluates the library’s interli­ brary loan, document delivery, and distant learner service programs; and shares in the faculty’s responsibility for departmental organization and governance. qualifications: ala-accredited mls; five years’ library ex­ perience with at least three years’ experience coordinating interlibrary loan, distant learner services, or related library activities; familiarity with current practices and issues related to interlibrary loan and distant learner services; commitment to improving public services for student and facµlty. salary commensurate with qualifications and experience. posi­ tion is a 12-month permanent tenure-track faculty appointment with liberal faculty benefits, including tuition waiver and relocation assistance. posi­ tion reports to the chair of the public services department. the foley center library is a modem facility with wireless access, 300,000 vol­ umes, a wide variety of databases, and extensive interlibrary loan ser vice s. gonzaga is a four-year comprehensive university dedicated to a catholic and humanistic education of its 5,700 students. spokane is a city o f 2 0 ‚ooo residents and boasts ample restaurants, shopping, a temperate climate, and low cost of living. position is available june 1 ‚ 2004. screen­ ing of applications will begin in january 2004 and continue until position is filled. to apply: send letter of application, vita, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three current references to: faculty search committee, ill/distant learner sen/ices coordinator, c/o dean of li brary services, gonzaga university library, spokane, wa 99258 0001. gonzaga is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer com‚ mitted to diversity, http://www.foley.gonzaga.edu. s y s te m librarian. california institute of the arts, valencia, california. responsibilities: implementation, maintenance, upgrade, and support of the integrated library system hardware and software (voy­ ager); establishing and maintaining access to online subscription databases and electronic journals; manages and oversees use of cataloging and interlibrary loan functions on oclc. qualifications: mls; knowledge of unix, microsoft access, oclc, marc formats. tem porary appointm ent available im mediately through june 30, 2004. full job description available at: http://calarts.edu/about/em p loym ent/academ ic/system slibrarian.html. send letter of applica­ tion, résumé, and names, addresses (including e-mail), and phone http://www.cunv.edu http://inside.bard.edu/hr/ http://www.levy.org mailto:gsmith@liberty.edu http://www.foley.gonzaga.edu http://calarts.edu/about/em696 / c&rl news ■ n ovem ber 2003 education indiana university k o k o m o director of library services the indiana university kokomo library is seeking an innovative and dynamic leader to move its library into an exciting age o f organizational and technological development. the kokomo campus o ffe rs more than 30 academic programs and through the purdue university school of technology the campus also offers degree and certificate programs in a number o f technical fields. the iu kokomo library is part o f the indiana university library system, one o f the leading academic research library system s in north america, providing strong collections, quality service and instructional programs, and leadership in the application o f information technologies. the kokomo library provides printed and electronics m aterials fo r approximately 3 0 0 0 students and 90 faculty members, and is open to the public. the library collection totals 6 5 6 ,5 6 3 volumes including microforms and other media. the beautifully landscaped campus is within an hour drive o f indianapolis and three hours o f cincinnati and chicago. the prim ary responsibility o f the director is to provide leadership in all areas o f library adm inistration and operation including policy and strategic planning, fiscal management, personnel su pervision and the development o f collaborative relationships by establishing strong relationships with the faculty and creating partnerships fo r teaching and learning. the director will lead in the development and implem entation o f a reinvigorated and expanding library program and evaluate the layout o f the library and make changes as needed to make the facility more inviting and user friendly. qualifications: applicants fo r th is position m u st have a mls from an ala accredited program, substantial academic library experience with significant dem onstrated experience in adm inistration and management. previous experience in the supervision and mentoring o f librarians is required along with proven leadership in fiscal management and program development. the successful applicant will have an understanding o f current technological applications and trends in libraries, good knowledge o f curriculum development, project management, knowledge o f diversity issues, excellent written and oral communication skills and the ability to m eet the requirements o f a tenure-track appointment. salary and benefits: salary will be offered in high 7 0 's ; rank will depend upon qualifications and experience. this is a tenure-track academic .appointment th a t includes eligibility fo r sabbatical leaves. benefits include medical, dental and group life insurance; tiaa/cref retirem ent/annuity; tuition assistance, and liberal vacation and sick leave. to apply: submit a letter of application, professional vita, and the names, addresses, and phone numbers of three references by november 3, 2003 to: dr. niranjan pati, chair of the director of library services search committee and dean, school of business, indiana university kokomo 2300 south washington street, p.o. box 9003 kokomo, in 46904-9003 for additional information regarding this position and indiana university kokomo, visit our web site at www.iuk.edu review of applications will begin november 3, 2003 and continue until the position is filled. indiana university kokomo is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. women and minorities are encouraged to apply. persons with disabilities that need modifications o r adjustments to participate in this application process should contact the office o f affirmative action a t (765) 455-9529. verification o f a‹disability under americans with disabilities act (ada) may be required. numbers of three references to: susan lowenberg, acting dean, division of library and information resources, california insti t u te of the arts, 24700 mcbean parkway, santa clarita, ca 91355; e-mail: susan @calarts.edu. university librarian. longwood university invites nomina tions and applications forthe position of university librarian to begin as early as january 1 ‚ 2004. this position reports to the provost and vice p r e sident for academic affairs. for this full-time, 12-month position, the university seeks a dynamic and creative individual to provide strategic leadership. the university librarian should possess a vision for the modern university library that combines the traditional roles of the aca d e mic library with the increasing importance of electronic information technologies. he or she plans, organizes, coordinates, and directs a b a la nced program of library services for the students, faculty, staff, and administration of longwood university. responsibilities: implement uni­ versity mission and vision through long-range strategic planning; plan and manage all aspects of library operations, including program development, pe rsonnel, budget, and assessment; lead and manage 6 professional librarians and 18 staff members; plan and implement library policies with lib r ary faculty and staff; plan strategies to improve and/or expand library services using available resources; foster successful professional interac tio n with faculty and administrators, including the information and instruc­ tional technology services department. minimum qualifications: mls degree from an ala-accredited program (earned doctorate preferred); five years of academic library experience in an administrative capacity; record of scholarly and professional contribution at the state, regional, or national level; demonstrated knowledge and understanding of current issues in academic librarianship and higher education; proven ability to work collaboratively with library staff, faculty, students, and administrators; strong interpersonal skills working within a diverse community; demonstrated success in developing and implementing technological innovation in the library; demonstrated proficiency in verbal and written communication. review of applications will begin october 1 7 , 2003, and will continue until the position is filled. forfull consid­ eration, please subm it a cover letter, résumé, transcripts, and the n a m es, with e-mail and telephone contacts, for three professional references to: search committee/university librarian, longwood u n iversity office of human resources, 201 high street, farmville, v a 23909. e-mail: humres@longwood.edu. phone: (434) 395-2015. f ax: (434) 395-2666. affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. minorities are encouraged to apply. http://www.iuk.edu mailto:humres@longwood.edu c&rl news ■ n o v e m b e r 2003 / 697 assistant librarian business/patents reference librarian louisiana state university louisiana state university (lsu) seeks an energetic and innovative individual for the position of assistant librarian (business/patents reference librarian/tenure-track). responsibilities: fulfills a combination of responsibilities, including serving at the libraries' main reference desk; participates as a member of the outreach committee; provides collection development services; serves as a faculty liaison for the college of business administration and agricultural economics; administers the patents depository collection; serves as the libraries' representative to the u.s. patent and trademark office. for a detailed description of the position, go to: http://www . lib.lsu.edu/lib/jobs/index.htm l. required qualifications: mls from an ala-accredited library school; 12 hours undergraduate coursework in the areas of business and/or economics or one year related work experience; knowledge of traditional and electronic reference resources; strong com puter skills, including the ability to create w eb pages; ability to work both independently and collegially in a demanding and rapidly changing environment; excellent interpersonal, communication, and organizational skills; evidence of ability to meet promotion and tenure requirements. add itio nal qualifications desired: graduate degree or graduate coursework in business and/or economics; familiarity with current bibliographic and reference sources in business; experience in collection development, reference work, and/or bibliographic instruction in an academ ic library; record of ability to develop and implement effective, innovative public service, instruction, or outreach projects, services, or programs. salary and benefits: $34,000 per fiscal year minimum, dependent upon qualifications and experience; 12-month, tenure-track appointment; excellent benefits. to apply: review of applications will begin novem ber 17, 2003, and will continue until candidate is selected. candidates should submit a letter of application, résumé (including e-mail address), and names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three references to: dawn zaske coordinator, personnel services 295 middleton library louisiana state university ref: #019471 baton rouge, la 70803 phone: (225) 578-2217; fax: (225) 578-6825 e-mail: dzaske@lsu.edu ls u is an equ a l opportunity, equ a l access employer. late j o b l istin g s instructional services ubrarian.luther college, decorah, iowa. tenure-eligible position as instructional services librarian/assistant professor beginning late august 2004. required: master’s degree from an ala-accredited program. implements information literacy program, familiar with information literacy standards for higher education, strong interest in teaching/learning, effective oral/written communication. preferred: teaching or professional esperience in an academic or comparable setting. responsibilities: leads faculty librarians toward vision for implementation and promotion of information literacy initiatives, teaches information literacy classes, coordinates and evaluates library instructional activities, meets all obligations for tenure and promotion. application review begins immediately and continues u n til the position is filled. send letter of application, c.v., and names, addresses, and e-mail addresses of three references, and official graduate school transcripts to: ja n e kemp, chair, search committee, preus library, luther college, decorah, ia 521 0 1 phone: (319) 387-1195; e-mail: kempjane@luther.edu. an equal opportunity employer. ; http://www mailto:dzaske@lsu.edu mailto:kempjane@luther.edu acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries shall cause his reproduction to be of a quality satisfactory to the institution from which he has borrowed the originals, and, if published on microfilm, shall meet the minimum standards for microfilming es­ tablished by the library of congress. if the reproduction is published in book form, the publisher must use permanent paper (as defined by the barrow labora­ tories, richmond, virginia). d. the original. (1 ) the publisher will not permit original manuscripts or other ar­ chival materials to suffer physical damage while in his care. should damage occur, all repairs are to be made by qualified conservators in accordance with guide­ lines established by the owning institu­ tion and at the expense of the publisher. (2 ) if the archival or manuscript materi­ als are damaged beyond repair, the pub­ lisher must reimburse the owning institu­ tion at the value set by an independent appraiser who is jointly selected and therefore satisfactory to both the publish­ er and the owning institution. e. reproduction. the owning institution shall specify when the reproductions are to be made and the conditions under which they will be made. f. royalties. the owning institution shall receive from the publisher (1 ) an agreed royalty which has been established in ad­ vance by legal contract and (2 ) a suffi­ cient number of copies of the publisher’s reproduction for the institution’s internal use. g. restrictions. the publisher must respect any restrictions placed upon reproduc­ tions or copies of original manuscripts or archival materials furnished to him. 4. a. both the owning institution and the pub­ lisher must inform purchasers of repro­ ductions that permission to make exten­ sive direct quotations or to print any re­ production in full must be obtained from the owning institution. every reproduc­ tion must bear a clear statement to this effect. b. manuscripts must not be published with­ out due regard for common law rights, literary rights, property rights, and libel laws. ■ ■ acrl membership january 31, 1973 ............................... 12,472 january 31, 1974 ............................... 13,722 january 31, 1975 ............................... 13,660 clr board elected page ackerman, librarian of the uni­ versity of california at los angeles, ruth davis, director of the national bureau of standards’ center of computer sci­ ence and technology, w arren j. haas, librarian and vice-president of columbia university, and maximilian w. kempner, member of the new york law firm of webster sheffield fleischmann hitch­ cock & brookfield, have been elected to the board of directors of the council on library resources, inc. ( c l r ). classified a dvertising notice respondents to advertisers offering faculty "ra n k " and "status" are advised tha t these terms are ambiguous and should inquire as to benefits involved. a ll advertisements submitted by institutions offering positions must include a salary range. the range should provide the ap plicant with an indication of the salary the institution is w illin g to provide for the position offered.. a ll advertisements for the. positions wanted and the positions open classifications w ill be e d ­ ited to exclude dire ct o r indirect references to race, creed, color, age, and sex as conditions of employment. classified advertising orders and copy, and cancellations, should be addressed to the a dvertising department, 50 east huron street, chicago 60611, and should reach that office before the second of the month preceding p u b li­ cation of issue desired. copy received after that time may be held fo r the next issue. telephone orders for classified advertising, while not encouraged because of the increased risk of copy error, w ill be accepted. calls should be directed to leona swiech at (312) 944-6780. a confirming order should be mailed to the a dvertising department as soon as pos­ sible following the call, along with typewritten copy to be used in proofreading the ad. rate fo r classified advertising is $1.30 per printed line. positions wanted mls plus ma and postgraduate b.ed. five years' teach­ ing plus i*/2 years' college public services, 2'/2 special administration, 5 university technical services. regular or special assignment. full resume available; can relocate. w rite box number 847. positions open a cq u isitio n s head of acquisitions. ala-accredited mls, proven administrative a b ility , substantial experience in acqui­ sitions work, interest in developing automated acqui­ sitions program. faculty status, not professional title ; e lig ib le for tenure. mandatory state retirement plan; tiaa optional. sick leave benefits; 20 days annual 97 vacation. salary: $16,000-$18,000. available: july i, 1975. inquire: mr. robert gibbs, chairman, acquisitions librarian search committee, ralph brown draughon library, auburn university, auburn, alabama 36830. an equal opportunity employer. administration deputy director for resource development. re­ sponsible for acquiring and organizing library materials with specific emphasis on agriculture and related sub­ jects. formulates, develops and implements programs and plans in area of responsibility consonant with the overall programs and policies of the national a g ri­ cultural library and the department of agriculture. participates in the development and activation of nal approved national and international cooperative indexing and cataloging programs. must have experience, and knowledge of various automated input and output cataloging and information retrieval systems such as oclc, medline, lockheed's dialog retrieval service. must have several years of demonstrated administrative and line experience in managing a staff responsible for acquisitions, cataloging and indexing. must have an mls or equivalent college education, training a n d /o r ex­ perience providing a knowledge of theories, etc. of pro­ fessional librarianship and literature resources. gs-i4i0-i5, minimum salary $29,818. send c ivil service standard form 171 to: mrs. darlene fowler, usda, ars, personnel div., federal building, room 568, hyattsville, md 20782. director of libraries for the university of missouri st. louis, a public urban university (enrollment 12,000) offering undergraduate and graduate programs. responsi­ ble fo r overseeing all aspects of operation of 350,000 volume library with 35 full-tim e employees. mls and substantial library and administrative experience re­ quired. subject master's or doctorate preferred. knowl­ edge of library administration, evidence of professional activity, a b ility to work well with people required. salary and benefits: $25,000—$30,000, 4 weeks vacation, and other fringe benefits. starting date sept. i, 1975. quali­ fying candidates should send resume and supporting documents to dean blanche touhill, associate dean of faculties, university of missouri-st. louis, 8001 natural bridge road, st. louis, mo 63121. an equal op portunity/ affirmative action employer. university librarian. urban institution with 6 schools and approximately 19,000 students, offering undergraduate and graduate degree programs invites applications for university librarian. candidates should hold graduate degree in librarianship from ala-accredi†ed library school and doctorate in academic field or at least a 2nd master's in an academic field. a t least 5 yrs. progressively responsible administrative experience in an academic or research library of substantial size and experience in financial budgeting and long-range planning are important qualifications. experience in both technical and public service areas of library work, including fam iliarity with automated systems, is also advantageous. salary: $29,000 $32,000. a pply: dr. eli a. zubay, vice president for academic affairs, georgia state univ., university plaza, atlanta, ga 30303. an equal opportunity/affirm ative action employer. librarian. a vacancy as assistant university librarian, collections, u. of c. santa barbara, w ill exist upon re­ tirement of martha h. peterson, june 30, 1975. know­ ledgeable and creative leadership in maintenance of collections, with additions of about 70,000 volumes per year, is being sought. experience in collections develop­ ment in academic institutions, administrative capacity, demonstrated a b ility to work well with staff, book trade representatives, faculty and general patrons; broad and thorough understanding of publishing, the book trade, libraries and their materials; and university scholarship are necessary attributes. minimum educational require­ ment is graduation from an accredited postgraduate school of librarianship. additional education may have contributed to desired breadth and depth of scholar­ ship. the successful candidate for this position probably w ill have had a decade of appropriate professional experience. salary range, prior to pending range adjust­ ments is $i8,000-$30,400. librarians at santa barbara have been organizing themselves collegially, and a task force report on the relationship of collegiality to this position is under discussion. w rite to donald c. david­ son, university librarian, university of california, santa barbara, ca 93106. an equal opportunity/affirm ative action employer. assistant to library director. assist director in personnel management, budget preparation and control, perform administrative and cost studies. qualifications include mls with experience a n d /o r training in library management and library automation desirable. salary: $10,000-$14,000 depending on qualifications and experience. send resume to : david a. kronick, ph.d., library director, university of texas health science center, san antonio, tx 78284. executive director for pittsburgh regional library center, a consortium of 35 academic, public and special libraries. responsible for planning and administering all center programs for cooperative development including participation in ohio college library center. q u a lifi­ cations are mls from accredited library school, 4 years' experience in library administration, knowledge of machine data bases, experience in proposal writing and fund raising, a b ility to deal with people. position open now. minimum salary $15,000 and negotiable. 12 month appointment, good fringe benefits. send resume to: mrs. glenora e. rossell, chairman, search committee, 271 hillman library, u. of pittsburgh, pittsburgh, pa 15260. an equal opportunity employer. librarian. department head responsible for adminis­ tration of j. henry meyer memorial library for services to undergraduate student population, including book selection and public service. requires evidence of knowl­ edge of and concern for undergraduate studies; ex­ perience in one or more public service departments; knowledge of book selection principles and practices 98 with regard to undergraduate collections; evidence of administrative a b ility in providing effective relations with and service to faculty and students. mls or equiva­ lent training plus 8 years' professional experience; work of relevant nature outside field of librarianship may be used in partial fulfillm e nt of this requirement. salary $ 15,000—$20,000. send resume to: lawrence leonard, search officer, room 106-a, stanford university li­ braries, stanford, ca 94305. an equal o p p o rtu n ity / affirm ative action employer. cataloging assistant cataloger. university of wisconsin, w hite water, to begin sept. 2, 1975, preference w ill be given to experience in print and non-print materials. familiarity with lc and aacr and knowledge of french and german. a nticipate participation in oclc sept. 75. some reclassification. require ala-accredited mls. faculty rank and status. 9 month contract, university retirement system. group insurance, sick leave, social security. minimum salary $10,000. submit resume and placement credentials by may 15, 1975 to virginia love­ ring, chairperson of search and screen committee, uni­ versity of wisconsin whitewater, learning resources center, whitewater, w l 53190. an equal o p portunity/ affirm ative action employer. women and members of minority groups encouraged to reply. cataloger. a vailable immediately. new community college seeks cataloger with cataloging experience at the community college level. responsible fo r cataloging book and nonbook resources for a multicampus insti­ tution. proficiency in ddc and lc subject headings re­ quired. mls desirable. salary: $9,500-$10,500. reply with resume to: pat campbell, personnel dept., metropolitan technical community college, 13202 " i " street, omaha, ne 63187. head cataloger. minimum 5 yrs experience in technical services in acad. libs. responsible fo r cat. 26,000 vols. yearly and conversion of 300,000 vols. from ddc to lc. staff of 17. req: mls and subj m a or equiv. sal. $14,664—. position open 7/1/75. contact f. a. schneider, san francisco state unîv., 1630 holloway, s.f., ca 94132. an affirm ative action employer. cataloging department head. adm inistration of department in close cooperation with heads of a cqui­ sitions and serials. full time staff of ii and 10 fte student assistants processing about 30,000 volumes per year. challenging problems and new developments con­ trib ute to a fluid and interesting situation. excellent working conditions in modern building. salary for 9 month-year (mid-august to mid-may) $14,500 or more depending on qualifications. full faculty privileges, rank dependent on academic qualifications. excellent fringe benefits, tiaa-cref, and professional travel op por­ tunities. requirements: mls accredited library school; 5 years progressive experience in academic library; and administrative ab ility. send resume to: elizabeth myers, chairman, committee on faculty selection, central michigan university library, mt. pleasant, ml 48859. an equal op portunity/a ffirm a tive action employer. head monograph cataloging division. supervise units responsible for descriptive cataloging of mono­ graphs in english and western european languages, and pre-order and pre-cataloging searching. several years professional experience in descriptive cataloging in large academic library, knowledge of several european lan­ guages and supervisory a b ility required. salary $15,800— $19,000. w rite: mrs. lynn marko, assistant fo r personnel and staff development, u. of michigan library, ann a rbor, ml 48104. n on-discrimina†ory/affirmative action employer. cataloger. university health sciences library. col­ lection classified nlm since i960, divided catalog using mesh. adequate clerical support. require mls bio­ logical sciences background and 2 years professional ex­ perience. fam iliarity with oclc and other computer applications desirable. salary: $10,000 up depending on qualifications. 12-mo. contract; faculty rank and good fringe. send resume to : priscilla m. mayden, director, eccles medical sciences library, univ. of utah, salt lake city, ut 84112. an equal opportunity employer. cataloger. requires ala-accredited mls, including cataloging-classification courses; background or interest in music, architecture, and fine arts. experience and working knowledge french and german desirable. faculty status, not professional title ; e lig ib le for tenure. state retirement plan mandatory; tiaa optional; sick leave; 20 days vacation. salary: approx. $11,000. position avail­ able july i, 1975. inquire to: miss minnie w all, c hair­ man, cataloger search committee, ralph brown draughon library, auburn university, auburn, alabama 36830. an equal opportunity employer. cataloger. professional cataloger to handle original cataloging of monographs in the sciences. w ork assign­ ment consists of pure and applied sciences, with em­ phasis on geology and electrical engineering. other related activities may be assigned such as revising of filin g and involvement with our reclassification program. knowledge of non-book cataloging also desirable. person fillin g this position w ill be accorded faculty status with 12-mon†h contract. preference given to candidates with master's in science field as well as required mls from ala-accredited library school with course in advanced cataloging. working knowledge of at least two foreign languages desirable; german, french, spanish preferred. professional librarians earn 24 working days vacation, plus 12 days sick leave, standard package of legal holidays and other fringe benefits, such as optional tiaa retirement. salary: $9,300 minimum, dependent on experience and a b ility to assume administrative re­ sponsibilities of senior cataloger. deadline a p ril 15, 1975. send resume to : james n. myers, assistant librarian for technical services. univ. of arizona library, tucson, az 85721. an equal opportunity employer. cataloger. o riginal cataloging. editing of cataloging prepared by others. supervision and training of support staff. desired qualifications: mls. knowledge of foreign 99 languages. additional desirable qualifications: back­ ground in social sciences; ab ility to supervise. experience desirable but not essential. salary: $9,000+ depending on qualifications. faculty status and responsibilities; 22 working days annual vacation; group insurance; tiaa cref retirement. date of vacancy: july i, 1975 or before. apply with resume to: personnel officer, purdue univ. libraries, west lafayette, in 47907. deadline a p ril 20, 1975. an equal opportunity/affirm ative action employer. cataloger. o riginal cataloging. editing of cataloging prepared by others. supervision and training of support staff. desired qualifications: bachelor's degree majoring in sciences or engineering, mls. additional desirable qualifications: knowledge of russian and ability to supervise. experience desirable but not essential. salary $9,000 or more depending on qualifications. faculty status and responsibilities; 22 working days annual va­ cation. group insurance; tiaa-cref retirement. date of vacancy: july i, 1975. apply with resume to: personnel officer, purdue univ. libraries, west lafayette, in 47907. deadline a p ril 20, 1975. an equal opportunity/affirm ative action employer. multiple head of acquisitions-bibliography: responsible for directing the selection and ordering of material for library's monographic collection; supervise a staff of eight; three years related experience required; additional graduate work beyond mls and knowledge of library data processing techniques are desirable; minimum $890 per month. assistant reference librarian: provide general reference service for students and faculty; as­ sist with library orientation program and interlibrary loan activity; minimum $860 per month. assistant periodical librarian: provide public service in­ struction in use of periodicals for students and faculty; aid with supervision of student assistants; minimum $860 per month. a ll positions require mls from ala-ac credited school; positions carry faculty rank and status. request application from: assistant director of libraries; western illinois university, macomb, il 61455. an equal opportunity/affirm ative action employer. gain the experience other libraries require. two more junior professional positions with specific assignment to public or technical services upon employment. seeking language capabilities, agriculture, a n d /o r engi­ neering. library is oclc operational through amigos. temporary positions for at least two years, possibly longer, without tenure accrual. a ll other perquisites identical to those for academic. $9,240 for 12-mo. year beginning july i, 1975. provide full resume in initial contact and request career information folders be forwarded to james dyke, director of library, box 3475, new mexico state univ., las cruces, nm 88003. a ppoint­ ments w ill not be made if positions not approved by state legislature. an equal opportunity/affirm ative ac­ tion employer. acquisition librarian and serials/govt. docu­ ments librarian. two positions: small city of 12,000. high quality liberal arts college library of 190,000 volumes and 1,200 periodical titles. requires mls accredited library school. no experience necessary, but w ill be given consideration. faculty status with 9 month contracts. sum­ mer work available. usual fringe benefits o f an academic institution. minimum salary $8,800 for academic . year. position open fall 1975. contact miss marian bishop, stockwell memorial library, albion college, albion, ml 49224. public services assistant director for public services. shares responsibility for libraries-wide planning and policy and program development with other university libraries administrative officers. develops and implements public service policies and programs and coordinates system wide public services activities. represents university libraries on all public service matters. reviews and monitors public services budget. the university at buffalo is the largest in the suny system. the libraries serve student body of over 25,000 and faculty of 1,600; support­ ing 55 ph.d. programs and a broad range of professional schools, including health sciences and law. q ualifi­ cations: required—mls and 3 to 5 years' public service experience in large academic setting. desirable—ad­ ditional graduate degree, research interests, and p u b li­ cations. rank: librarian or associate librarian. salary: $20,000 range commensurate with qualifications. send resume to: dr. arthur cole, libraries personnel officer, state university of new york at buffalo, 308 lockwood memorial library, 3435 main street, buffalo, ny 14214. an equal opportunity/affirm ative action employer. reference reference librarian. general reference. mls re­ quired. experience or subject background in other discipline (e.g., business administration or a behavioral science) highly desirable. 12-mon†h contract, with initial appointment at instructor or assistant professor. salary $ 10,400—$ 12,800 range. closing date for app. may i, 1975. send resume to: donald h. burrier, personnel o fficer/b udget officer, university libraries, kent state univ., kent, oh 44244. an equal opportunity employer. education reference librarian. instructor responsi­ ble for the directing and development of a budding curriculum materials center. share general library reference duties. mls and 2nd master's in education. proven administrative ab ility and academic library ex­ perience. salary: $13,500. excellent fringe benefits. send resume to: gladys w. jarrett, acting chief librarian, york college, cuny, 150-14 jamaica ave., jamaica, ny 11432. an equal opportunity/affirm ative action employer. assistant reference librarian. mini mum of mls from ala-accredited library school. some special or advanced preparation in outside subject area(s) pre­ ferred. under direction of library services reference librarian, performs professional library duties in pro­ viding reference information services to students, faculty and staff. applies professional library techniques and procedures in the performance of his/her reference duties. salary w ill be based upon the institutional support personnel salary schedule. starting range be­ tween $10,727-$11,226. position w ill be filled by july i, 1975. send vitae to: pima county community college district, p.o. box 48, 2202 w . anklam rd., tucson, az 85709. an equal opportunity employer. head reference services; key position in university health science library for qualified biomedical librarian with minimum five years experience, including reference, supervision and medline. responsibilities: administration of active department with one professional, one assistant, adequate clerical support. salary: $12,500 up for 12 month contract, faculty rank, good fringe. send resume: priscilla m. mayden, director, eccles medical sciences library, univ. of utah, salt lake city, ut 84112. an equal opportunity employer. reference/government publications librarian. responsible for government publications reference and research service, as well as some general reference work. w ill direct and supervise technical processing of u.s. and un documents, including reclassification of us publications to sudocs. mls from accredited school, at least 3 years experience with government materials. faculty status. salary: from $10,000 depending on quali­ fications. unique region, delightful climate. send resume with 3 references to ms. dorothy webb trester, chair­ man search committee, general library, univ. of new mexico, albuquerque, nm 87131. an equal opportunity/ affirmative action employer. serials head serials librarian: perform function of acqui­ sition and cataloging of all serials in university library system, including check-in and processing of current 100 periodicals. approx. 30,000 titles currently received. serials budget for 74/75 fiscal year approx. $600,000, ex­ cluding binding. person selected will be responsible for supervision of 3 professional librarians, 9 career staff members as well as student assistants. must have mls from ala-accredited library school, absolute minimum 2 years experience in technical services (preferably serials) at large academic library. supervisory experi­ ence or potential essential. minimum salary: $13,000. professional librarians earn 24 days vacation each year + 12 days sick leave, standard package of academic holi­ days and fringe benefits. deadline a pril 15, 1975. position available september i, 1975. send resume to: james n. myers, assistant librarian for technical ser­ vices, univ. of arizona library, tucson, az 85721. an equal opportunity employer. head of serials cataloging. this section is re­ sponsible for classifying and processing all serial ma­ terials in both english and foreign languages for lock wood library and related units. all official records for serials cataloging are created, and official statistics of holdings are maintained by this list. qualifications: candi­ dates should have mls ala-accredited school. serials cataloging experience is required. a t least three to five years experience in a large research library is desirable. demonstrated knowledge of aacr and lc cataloging is necessary. salary range: $14,000-$16,000. inquiries may be sent to: dr. arthur cole, libraries personnel officer, suny, buffalo, 308 lockwood memorial library, buffalo, new york 14214. an equal opportunity/affirm ative action employer. serials cataloger. under direction of the head of catalog department, the serials cataloger is responsible for serials catalog section which creates and maintains automated serials catalog. desired qualifications: a graduate degree in librarianship. plus ab ility to super­ vise. previous experience with serials, data processing, foreign language skills and background in science or engineering advantageous. salary: $9,000+ depending on qualifications. faculty status and responsibilities, 22 working days annual vacation, group insurance, tiaa cref retirement. apply with resume to: personnel o ffi­ cer, purdue univ. libraries, west lafayette, in 47907. deadline a pril 20, 1975. an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. subject specialists librarian rare book collections. duties involve collection development, preservation and services. pro­ fessional experience in rare book collection essential. history of science background desirable. salary. $15,481+. send apps to room 1471, arts & industries bldg., smith­ sonian institution, washington, dc 20560. an equal op­ portunity employer. rare book cataloger. duties include identification and full cataloging of rare books. professional experience in rare book work and cataloging essential. working knowledge of latin and one or more modern languages desirable. salary: $15,481. send apps to room 1471, arts and industries bldg., smithsonian institution, washington, dc 20560. an equal opportunity employer. assistant professor. teach in three areas: i. history of books, printing and libraries; 2. bibliography; and 3. nonprint media and services. ph.d. or candidacy, plus library experience, also teaching preferred. salary: $13,000 minimum. begin september 16, 1975. send resume to: e. w. mcdiarmid, search committee, library school, 419 walter library, university of minnesota, minneapolis, mn 55455. an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. science librarian. first responsibility to integrate 6 separate department collections into new science center library scheduled for completion about june i, 1975. requirements: professional master's degree; educational background in any of sciences, at least at undergraduate level; experience in academic science library sufficient to have given acquaintance with wide variety of materials; organizational and administrative ability. salary: $12,000. usual benefits include tiaa, blue cross/blue shield. posi­ tion open july i, 1975. apply: miss helen m. brown, li­ brarian, wellesley college, wellesley, ma 02181. assistant krannert librarian (management, eco­ nomics and agricultural economics). duties include book selection, collection development, catalog maintenance, etc., as well as reference service and bibliographic as­ sistance to users. qualifications: graduate degree in li­ brarianship; strong interest in subjects covered by the library management an d/or economics highly desirable. faculty status and responsibilities. 12-month appoint­ ment. salary up to $13,000 depending on qualifications. send resume of qualifications and experience to person­ nel officer, purdue univ. libraries, west lafayette, in 47907. deadline a p ril 15, 1975. an equal opportunity/ affirmative action employer. technical services assistant director for technical services. re­ sponsible for administration of technical services including acquisitions, serials control, and cataloging. qualifica­ tions include mls plus experience in technical service, personnel administration, fiscal management and library automation. salary: $12,000—$18,000 depending on qu alifi­ cations and experience. send resume to: david a. kronick, ph.d., library director, university of texas health sci­ ence center, san antonio, tx 78284. technical services librarian. small liberal arts college; responsible for acquisitions, cataloging and serials. salary $9,000 per annum. experience in technical services. send resume to: librarian, barat college li­ brary, lake forest, il 60045. an equal op portunity/affir­ mative action employer. 101 now, only $345 gives you access to twenty billion dollars worth of u. s. government scientific and technical research. government reports annual index, 1974 edition five indexes and six hard-cover volumes cover the 60,000 new technical reports produced from government sponsored re­ search. the national technical information services annual index includes a subject index (2 volumes); corporate author index; personal author index; accession/report number index; contract number index. this first annual index to be published in hardcover provides a merged and corrected index to all gov­ ernment reports in the ntis collection published during the year. march, 1975 $345.00 government reports announcements and index clear, concise abstracts of government reports, published bi­ weekly, in a specially designed paper cover format for librarians and information specialists.they’re arranged in 22 subject fields, further divided into 178 subgroups. entries list authors, subjects, contract numbers and accession/report numbers; also types of reproduction and prices. cross-referenced, with each citation listed eleven times. annual subscription, $125.00 ■ 1974 announcements still available $70.00 ■ 1975 announcements and indexes available only as a set $125.00 introducing the first multidisciplinary guide to review articles index to scientific reviews n ow you can easily retrieve review a rti­ retrieve more recent articles through citation cles on any subject in science. the in d ex relationships. to s c ie n tific reviews ( i s r '“) w ill index h ig h ly c u r r e n tth e m each year— over 1 6 ,0 0 0 review s the isr indexes the review literature on a selected from m ore than 2 ,7 0 0 o f the calendar year basis. a soft-bound semi-annual m o s t im p o r t a n t jo u r n a ls p u b lis h e d issue (covering january to june) will be avail­throughout the world. able each september, and a hard-bound an ­ b r o a d c o v e r a g e nual cumulation will appear the following april. over 100 disciplines in every area of science are so you can find new articles while they re still covered: new. agricultural, biological a n d in e x p e n s iv e and environmental sciences a year’s subscription to the isr costs only engineering and technology $250. you get a lot of information—and easy medical and life sciences access to it—for your money. physical and chemical sciences social and behavioral sciences w h a t’s i n i t f o r y o u ? the isr could be the most welcome addition to so you won’t have to go through separate ref­ erences to locate review articles for subjects in your library you’ll make all year. there just isn’t any other reference tool that indexes so many any of these areas. with one index—the isr —you can cross disciplinary boundaries and review articles so effectively. once you have it, retrieve these key articles no matter where they you’ll use it over and over again to find those were published in the literature. the isr will one or two key articles you need to start you off even cover the literature published in quarterly on a really thorough search. and what better and annual “review” publications (eg., annual way to find those summary-type articles for review o f biochemistry). students, researchers, and educators in need of quick reviews of subjects unfamiliar to them? e ffe c tiv e ly in d e x e d the index to scientific reviews is organized to f o r m o r e in f o r m a t io n a b o u t give you easy yet precise access to the review t h e i s r . . . articles you need. you can search by authors, the first is r annual c u m u latio n (cover­ title words, word phrases, and organizations. in ing the 1 9 7 4 lite ra tu re ) w ill be o ut soon, addition the isr includes a citation index that so get th e fu ll story on the in d e x to s c ie n ­ permits you to start a search with previously tific reviews now. just fill in th e coupon, published material relevant to a subject and and m a il it today. now in print! bonwell charles c bonwell charles c, dept of hist, national southeast mo st coll, cape girardeau mo 63701 bo nw ich w illiam t, dept of mktg, st faculty louis univ, st louis mo 63103 b o n w it marianne, dept of german, univ of cal, berkeley cal 94720 directory b o n w itt kenneth l, dept of libr sei, miami-dade jrc oll, 11380 nw 27th ave, miami fla 33167 bony jean v, dept of hist of art, univ of cal, berkeley cal 94720 bonyhard janet f, dept of phil, mary wash coll, fredericksburg va 22401 bonyun david a, dept of computer an alp 7’ habetica 5 l list, with addresses, o f about 435,000 sei, acadia univ, wolfville, n s canada members of teaching faculties at junior colleges, d0640 colleges, and universities in the united states and at bonzelaar helen, dept of art, calvin selected canadian institutions. fifth edition. two volumes. coll, e belt line m37, grand rapids mich 49506 2,327 pages. l.c. no. 76-114404. isbn 0-8103-0652-2. bonzelet joseph t, dept of law $85.00/set. enforcement, coll of the mainland, 8001 palmer hwy, tex city tex 77590 the national faculty directory is the standard reference for bonzyk edmund, dept of phys ed, identifying and locating members of teaching faculties at thornton comm coll, south holland iii 60473 u.s. and selected canadian institutions of higher educa­ boo m ary richard, dept of english, tion. nfd-1975 is a thoroughly updated work: over coll of st scholastica, duluth minn 110,000 changes have been made in existing listings and 5581 1 about 35,000 names have been added. each entry gives boo m atilde l, dept of modern lang, univ of miss, univ miss 38677 name, department, institution, and complete mailing boo sung lai, dept of soc work, address. catholic univ of america, wash d c 20017 boo w illiam o j, dept of chem, univ of review ers' c o m m e n t s miss, univ miss 38677 on previous e d it io n s . . . booden theodore, dept of microbiol, choice: "clearly, this compilation is one of the most chicago med sch, 2020 w ogden ave, important reference works now available to the higher chicago iii 60612 boodey c webster, dept of poli sei, education academic community . . . an essential acquisition fashion inst of tech, 227 w 27th st, for all academic libraries.” new york ny 10001 boodley james’w , dept of hort, american reference books annual: "the cornell univ, ithaca n y 14850 currency of information in the present edition is con­ boodnick allan, dept of fine arts comm, cerritos coll, 11110 e alondra, siderably better than are most mailing lists distributed by norwalk cal 90650 some publishers and special mailing houses." boody charles george, dept of mus, austin coll, sherman tex 75090 higher education book review : "the national booe luetta navada, dept of nursing, univ of n c, wilmington n c 28401 faculty directory is a thorough and comprehensive boohar richard k, dept of zool, univ volume and an invaluable source material for personnel in of nebr, lincoln nebr 68508 the academic community and otherwise. a 'must' reference booher delbert, dept of reproductive aid in any administrative-academic office." biol, case western reserve univ, cleveland ohio 44106 "this should prove to be a widely booher edith rapp, dept of ed, science books: elizabethtown coll, elizabethtown pa used reference in colleges, universities, public libraries, 17022 educational and professional organizations, etc. . . . booher edwin r, dept of english, highly recommended." lincoln land comm coll, springfield iii 62703 dept of religious order now to receive nfd-1975 on free 30-day approval. booher harold h, lit, episcopal theol sem, box 2247, receive future editions as published by placing a time austin tex 78767 saving standing order. ___ booher james m, dept of health & phys ed, s d st univ, brookings s d 57006 booher jerry g, dept of computer gale research co. technol, scottsdale comm coll, box y, book tower • detroit, michigan 48226 scottsdale ariz 85252 acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries 370 / c &rl news course w ill draw upon the expertise and re ­ sources of the northeast document conserva­ tion center in andover. a hands-on session and trips to n ed c c are included. contact: director of admissions, g sl is, simmons college, 300 the fenw ay, boston, ma 02115; (617) 7 3 8 ­ 2264. 1 4 1 8 — d ocum entation: “in form atio n , c om ­ munications and technology transfer” is the theme for the 43d congress of the federation in­ tern ation ale de docum entation (f id ), m on­ treal, september 14-1 8 , 1986. topics covered will include copyright issues in electronic pub­ lishing, developments in communications, and the political and social issues surrounding tech­ nology transfer between governments, nations, and institutions. contact: denis rousseau, l o ­ cal organizing committee, c .p. 1144, succur­ sale place desjardins, montreal, quebec, c an­ ada h5b 1b3; (514) 282-3884. 1 9 -2 0 — new technology: “connections: improv­ ing library services through uses of technol­ ogy,” bismarck hotel, chicago, sponsored by the illinois, indiana, and wisconsin chapters of a c r l. c ontact: d onna goehner, university library, western illinois university, macomb, il 61455. 20— ohio chapter: “developing library person­ nel for the 1980s…and beyond,” annual meeting of the academic library association of ohio, sinclair plaza hotel, columbus. charles dy­ gert, ohio state university, will speak on “c re­ ating environments for the expression of hu­ man excellence.” contact: paula n. w arnken, xavier university libraries, 3800 victory park­ way, cincinnati, oh 45207; (513) 745-3881. october 1 1 -1 2 — california: second binational conference on libraries of the californias, calexico, c ali­ fornia, and mexicali, mexico. sponsored by the california state library with the cooperation of san diego state university-imperial valley, un­ iversidad autonoma de b a ja c alifornia, and centro de ensenanza tecnica y superior. o bjec­ tives: to increase the understanding of library and in fo rm a tio n services for the s p a n ish ­ speaking population of the u.s.-m exico border the classified ads deadlines: orders for regular classified advertisements must reach the acrl office on or before the second of the month preced­ ing publication of the issue (e.g. september 2 for the october issue). late job listings will be accepted on a space-available basis after the second of the month. region, and to promote multitype library coop­ eration. contact: reynaldo ayala, director, in ­ stitu te for b ord er studies, san d iego state university-imperial valley campus, 720 heber, calexico, ca 92231; (619) 357-3721, 265-4201. 2 5 3 0 — health sciences: annual c onference, north atlantic health sciences libraries, shera­ ton islander inn, newport, rhode island. key­ note speaker ira magaziner will address the eco­ nomic outlook in the health care field. contact: chris chapman, women and infants hospital of rhode island, health sciences information center, 50 maude st., providence, ri 02908; (401) 274-1100, x l570. november 1 2 — manuscripts: “editing and editors: a retro­ spect,” the 21st annual conference on editorial problems, will be held at the university of t o­ ronto. speakers include bruce m. metzger, “his­ tory of the editing of the greek new t esta­ m e n t” ; l eo n a rd b o y le , “ t h e e d itin g of m edieval t e x ts” ; and d onald h. r eim an , “notes on the history of editing texts of the 18th and 19th centuries.” registration is limited to 100 delegates. contact: richard landon, con­ ference on editorial problems, victoria univer­ sity, 73 queen’s park crescent, university of t o­ ronto, ontario, canada m5s 1k7. 2 2 -2 6 — africana: fall meeting of the archives libraries committee of the african studies as­ sociation, join tly held with the middle e ast studies association, hyatt regency, new o r­ leans. t h e cooperative a fricana m icroform project (camp) will also meet. contact: joseph j. lauer, university research library, ucla, los angeles, ca 90024. ■ ■ erratum the address of the u.s. office of datascape information, publishers of l an ds earch, an in­ dex to the periodical literature of landscape ar­ chitecture, was given incorrectly in the april 1985 issue. the correct address should have read: datascape information, p .o . box 396, cranford, nj 07016. rates: classified advertisements are $5.00 per line for acrl members, $6.25 for others. late job notices are $12.00 per line for members, $14.00 for others. organizations submitting ads will be charged according to their membership status. telephone: all telephone orders should be confirmed by a writ­ ten order mailed to acrl headquarters as soon as possible. orders should be accom panied by a typewritten copy of the ad to be used in proofreading. an additional $10 will be charged for ads taken over the phone (except late job notices or display ads). guidelines: for ads which list an application deadline, that date must be no sooner than the 20th day of the month in which the notice appears (e.g., october 20 for the october issue). all job announce­ ments should include a salary figure. job announcements will be edited to exclude discriminatory references. applicants should be aware that the terms faculty rank and status vary in meaning among institutions. jobline: call (312) 944-6795 for late-breaking job ads for aca­ dem ic and research library positions. a pre-recorded summary of positions listed with the service is revised weekly; each friday a new tape includes all ads received by 1:00 p.m. the previous day. each july /august 1985 / 371 listing submitted will be carried on the recording for two weeks. the charge for each two-week listing is $30 for acrl members and $35 for non-members. fast job listing service: a special newsletter for those actively seeking positions. this service lists job postings received at acrl headquarters four weeks before they appear in c&rl news, as well as ads which, because of narrow deadlines, will not appear in c&rl news. the cost of a six-month subscription is $10 for acrl mem­ bers and $15 for non-members. contact: classified advertising d e p ’t, acrl, american library association, 50 e. huron st., chicago, il 60611; (312) 944-6780. positions open arabic language catalo ger, harvard college li­ brary. origi nal descriptive and subject cataloging of arabic mon­ ographs and serials as well as overseeing lc copy cataloging. qual­ ifications: mls; academ ic study of arabic language, literature, and civilization with background in islamic culture; good reading knowl­ edge of arabic, familiarity with aacr2 and lc classification and sub­ ject headings. available now. librarian i or ii, depending on qualifi­ cations. l ib ra ria n i: $ 1 8 ,1 6 5 m in im um , l ib raria n ii: $ 21 ,63 0 minimum. good benefits package. resumes to: karen n. mcfarlan, university personnel librarian, widener library, harvard university, cambridge, ma 02138. an equal opportunity, affirmative action em­ ployer. a s s is ta n t director for co llection development. overall coordination, direction, and supervision of collection devel­ opm ent divisions of circulation, acquisitions, interlibrary services, resource development, and processing. allocation and monitoring of materials budget of $2.6 million. substantive participation in over­ all administration of the library, including budgeting, planning, and policy formation. significant participation in planning and implemen­ tation of automation activities. represents the library’s collection de­ velopment and technical services concerns and interests through participation in various forums. direct responsibility for encourage­ ment of professional developm ent for collection development per­ sonnel, including 20.5 fte librarians and 91.5 support staff. qualifi­ c a tio n s : a l a mls. ten ye a rs of in c re a s in g ly re s p o n s ib le professional (post–mls) experience in libraries, including dem on­ strated managerial and supervisory competence and actual work experience in at least two areas of collection development. knowl­ edge of and com m itm ent to cooperative collection development, in­ novative technical services, library automation, and use of national bibliographic utilities. record of productive scholarship. open: sep­ tember 1,1985. closing date: july 20. salary: minimum $40,000 (for 12 months); negotiable. benefits: competitive benefits package. no state income tax. faculty rank. for complete description of duties, qualifications, and benefits, and to apply, contact: susan lytle, head, personnel operations, evans library, texas a&m university, college station, tx 77843; (409) 845-8111. preliminary interviewing at ala. aa/eeo employer. a s s is ta n t engineering librarian. search reopened re quirements: mls (ala-accredited). minimum of 2 years of profes­ sional experience, preferably in an engineering or science/techno logy library. desired qualifications: experience or interest in automated library procedures; some com puter experience or edu­ cation desirable. interest in publications and public relations. data­ base searching experience helpful. some supervision experience needed. ability to formulate, administer, and implement user educa­ tion and public relations programs utilizing various media. experi­ ence in bibliographic instruction to large classes. shares in m anage­ ment and operational responsibilities. participates in planning and implementation of new services, procedures, and policies. shares responsibility for database searching, reference, performs liaison work with faculty, trains and supervises support staff, and shares in collection development and bibliographic instructional responsibili­ ties. faculty status and responsibilities. rank commensurate with education and experience. promotion and tenure require meeting standards of excellence in librarianship, publishing, research, and service. 12-month appointm ent with annual vacation of 22 days. group life, major medical, and disability insurance are in effect as are tiaa/cref and social security. salary: $18,000 and up de­ pending upon qualifications. application deadline: august 30,1985. send resume and list of references to: thomas l. haworth, person­ nel officer, libraries, stewart center, purdue university, west lafay­ ette, in 47907. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. a s s is ta n t personnel librarian. yale university library responsible for administering the personnel program for librarians which includes recruitment, staff development, training, counseling, and other special projects. assist with select aspects of the person­ nel functions for other staff. total staff consists of 180 librarians, 357 support staff and 450 student assistant employees. requires: ala accredited mls degree or equivalent. knowledge of and dem on­ strated interest in academic or research librarianship. ability to work effectively with a diversified staff at all levels and with others in the university community. knowledge of the principles of personnel management. salary and rank: dependent on experience and quali­ fications, from a minimum of $23,100. fringe benefits include con­ trib u to ry com prehensive g ro up practice health insurance, five weeks vacation. please send resume listing the names of three refer­ ences by july 15,1985, to: maureen sullivan, head, library person­ nel, box 1603a yale station, new haven, ct 06520. an aa/eeo employer. all interested persons are encouraged to apply. as s is ta n t reference librarian. assistant reference li­ brarian for service oriented university library on thriving campus with 400 faculty members and 8,000 students. library has installed, with other university of maryland campuses, an online catalog and circu­ lation system using geac equipment. primary duties include refer­ ence work, bibliographic instruction, and special projects. some e v e n in g a nd w e e k e n d h o u rs re q u ire d . q u a lific a tio n s : a la accredited mls and demonstrated ability to work well with a variety of persons. familiarity with library autom ation, online database searching, and experience in academ ic library and/or reference de­ partment helpful. salary: $18,700. twelve-month appointm ent with 22 vacation days amd 15 holidays. other attractive benefits. avail­ able: september 16, 1985. applications received by july 26, 1985, will be given preference. send resume and names and addresses of three professional references to: b.r. wilkinson, director, albin o. kuhn library and gallery, university of maryland baltimore county, catonsville, md 21228. umbc is an affirmative action, equal o ppor­ tunity employer. catalog librarian for ibero-american monographs and seri­ als in all classifications and for all monographs and serials for the a r­ izona and arizona historical foundation collections at arizona state university. responsibilities include cataloging, classifying, and pro­ viding subject analysis and marc tagging; serving as liaison with the ibero-american subject specialist and the head of the arizona collections; participating in the governance of the catalog service. the service is comprised of 9 librarians, 29 classified staff and 8 fte student assistants. the alis iii automated system is operational for circulation; the public access catalog for nearly 500,000 full marc records will be brought up later this year; and an active retrospective conversion program is ongoing. the collection now numbers 2 mil­ lion volumes. salary: dependent on qualifications ($17,000 mini­ mum). required: ala-accredited mls; post-mls original catalog­ ing experience in a research library (preferably a large academic library); working knowledge of aacr2, lcsh, lc classification, marc tagging; experience with oclc or similar utility and its prac­ tice; reading proficiency in spanish; good interpersonal and com ­ munication skills. preferred: academ ic background in spanish or ibero-american studies; reading knowledge of portuguese; experi­ ence in cataloging ibero-american materials. recruitment will re­ main open until the position is filled. to ensure consideration, appli­ cations should be received by august 15, 1985, when review will begin. please send letter of application whrch addresses each of the qualifications listed above, a current resume, and the names, ad­ dresses and telephone num bers of four recent references to: con­ stance corey, assistant university librarian, hayden library, a r­ izona state university, tempe, az 85287. asu is a committed equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. minorities are encouraged to apply. catalo ging librarian. reports to head, cataloging depart­ ment. responsible for original cataloging of m onographic materials in all formats and in all subjects and languages according to aacr2, lc, and oclc standards; performs authority work; upgrades and enhances bibliographic information in geac marc database. the cataloging department, comprised of 5 professional librarians and 9 support staff, catalogs over 22,000 titles a year including books, mi­ croforms, and non-print materials. required qualifications: ala372 / c&rl news accredited mls; knowledge of aacr2, lc classification and subject headings and familiarity with a bibliographic utility, preferably oclc; good communication skills; working knowledge of one or more mod­ ern european languages. previous cataloging experience in an aca­ dem ic library and knowledge of russian language preferred. tenure-track position. 24 days annual leave. tuition remission. group health insurance. tiaa/cref or state retirement plan with non-refundable contributions paid by the university. no state income tax. rank and salary dependent upon education and experience. in­ structor: $16,500-$18,500; assistant professor: $18,500-520,500. send letter of application, current resume, and the names, ad­ dresses, and telephone numbers of 3 recent references by july 31, 1985, to: jill keally, personnel librarian, the university of tennes­ see library, knoxville, tn 37996-1000. utk is an eeo, affirmative action, title ix, section 504 employer. cataloger for southeast asian materials. tempo rary (1 year grant-funded) position starting september 1,1985. origi­ nal cataloging of southeast asian monographs and serials in english and foreign languages and oclc–shared cataloging. require­ ments: mls or foreign equivalent; 2 years cataloging experience; fa­ miliarity with aacr2, lc classification and subject headings, marc formats; working knowledge of indonesian language preferred. sal­ ary: $18,000. application deadline july 31,1985. send application, resume, and three references to: lian the–mulliner, search commit­ tee chair, ohio university library, athens, oh 45701-2978. equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. cataloger of rare books (3 positions). perform original and oclc copy cataloging of books and pamphlets published be­ fore 1769. catalog using aacr2, lcsh, and lc classification for oclc and lumin, the university of missouri’s online system. these are one-year project positions, with the possibility of extension. re­ quired: ala/mls, knowledge of at least one european language. desired: cataloging experience, reading knowledge of latin and/or greek, experience with oclc or other utility. project begins october 1, 1985. salary: $16,500; excellent benefits. send letter of applica­ tion, resume, and names of three references to: pat burbridge, per­ sonnel c oordinator, 104 ellis library, university of missouri columbia, columbia, mo 65201–5149. to ensure consideration, applications should be received by august 15,1985. the university of missouri-columbia is an equal opportunity, affirmative action in­ stitution. cataloger. performs original cataloging of early-printed books and cataloging with copy using rlin; catalog maintenance includ­ ing authority work. knowledge of aacr2, lcsh, and marc format essential; ability to catalog foreign language materials. previous cat­ aloging experience required. twelve-month appointment, proposed effective date october 1985. salary range $18,260-$23,000 de­ pending on qualifications, plus usual fringe benefits. send resume and names of three references by august 30,1985, to: lilly lievsay, head of cataloging, folger shakespeare library, 201 e. capitol st., s.e., washington, dc 20003. an aa/eeo employer. cataloger with ala-accredited msls. three years professional cataloging experience. knowledge of oclc, aacr-2 skills— requires excellent client and staff relationships. this is a one-year contract, position available immediately. salary $23,958 for 12 months, excellent fringe benefits. send resume to: department head, library services, community college of philadelphia, 1700 spring garden st., philadelphia, pa 19130. affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. circulation and reference librarian. qualifications: an mls from an ala-accredited school is required. one year circu­ lation experience is essential as well as one year reference experi­ ence. the candidate must possess the ability to communicate and a s s is t a n t /a s s o c ia t e u n iv e r s it y l ib r a r ia n fo r p u b l ic s e r v ic e s university of southern california the incumbent is responsible for administering the public services division and reports to the deputy university librarian. the public services division includes ten branch libraries and four departments which have a combined staff of 31 professional librarians, 50 library assistants and other support staff, as well as 250 part-time stu­ dent assistants. the aul for public services, as a member of the library’s administration, is also involved in mediumand long-range planning, resource allocation and personnel selection and assignment. applicants are expected to have a graduate degree from an ala-accredited program; substantial library experience, preferably in a large research library; demonstrated managerial ability in a complex organiza­ tion; understanding of automation issues in research libraries; knowledge of personnel matters; ability to work effectively and harmoniously with colleagues at all levels of campus administration; commitment to excellence in providing library services to the university community. a second master’s degree in a related discipline is desirable. the usc library is a major research library in the process of expanding its staff and collections. it now holds 2.3 million volumes. the library is currently in a major fund raising program for improvement of collec­ tions, staffing, physical facilities and innovative automation programs. benefits include tiaa retirement plan, 22 days paid vacation per year in a twelve month contract, dental plan and tuition remission. rank and salary: negotiable depending upon background and experience. minimum starting salary: $35,000. please send letter of application and resume including three names of references by july 15,1985, to: anna covington personnel officer doheny memorial library university of southern california university park los angeles, ca 90089-0182 july /august 1985 / 373 work effectively with staff, faculty, students, and administrators as well as with the community-at-large. training in online database searching is desirable and experience and interest in bibliographic instruction is a plus. demonstrated supervisory experience is neces­ sary for success in the position. responsibilities: the responsibilities include coordinating the schedule, policies and procedures of the circulation department which includes interlibrary loan. the circula­ tion and reference librarian also assists in providing reference ser­ vices to the college com m unity. he/she coordinates the b ib lio ­ graphic instruction programs for all freshmen and shares in teaching the classes. the person also schedules, trains and supervises 15 stu­ dent workers and a permanent circulation staff of 2 full-time em ploy­ ees. terms and benefits: full-time, 12-month position, 22 days vaca­ tion. christian brothers insurance. tiaa-cref. faculty status, on tenure track. please send resume and three references to: chief li­ brarian, rosary college library, 7900 w. division street, river for­ est, il 60305. the position is available august 1,1985. salary in m id­ teens. circulation librarian/departm ent head (12 month, tenure-track). open july 1. plan, organize, and direct circulation, re­ serve, and bookstack services in a land-grant university library. su­ pervise two technicians plus student assistants. spend up to one-fifth time at the main information desk including some weekends and evenings on a rotating basis. qualifications: requirements include ala-accredited mls, demonstrated communications skills, and a minimum of two years professional academic library experience, or fulltime nonprofessional experience in a circulation department, or experience in a similar position including work with a varied public and involving supervision. desirable qualifications include second master’s, supervisory experience in a library, and demonstrated knowledge of automated circulation systems. salary dependenent on rank: instructor (minimum $18,000) or assistant professor mini­ mum $20,000). application deadline: august 31, 1985, or until suit­ able applicant is hired. send resume, and have academic creden­ tials and three recent letters of recommendation sent directly to: philip brown, chair, circulation librarian search committee, south dakota state university library, box 2115, brookings, sd 57007. an aa/eeo employer. curator of archives and m anuscripts. pitts theology library, emory university. the curator is responsible for accession­ ing and arranging manuscript collections and archival records; pre­ paring finding aids for archive and manuscript holdings; taking ap­ propriate measures towards preserving the materials; preparing occasional exhibits; assisting researchers in the use of the materials personally and through correspondence; and representing the li­ brary on university library committees concerning preservation and related matters. qualifications: mls from an ala-accredited institu­ tion; formal training in archives administration; and an ability to exer­ cise initiative and work independently under minimal supervision are required. an advanced degree in a humanistic discipline and famil­ iarity with computer applications to manuscript/archival processing are preferred but not required. salary: from $15,500 to $17,000 plus benefits depending on qualifications and length of experience. emory university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action em­ ployer. send letter of application and resume with names of three ref­ erences to: channing r. jeschke, librarian, pitts theology library, emory university, atlanta, ga 30322. all application materials must be received by august 20, 1985. appointm ent will be effective as soon as feasible. documents librarian/cataloger. responsibilities will be equally divided between two roles, and will include coordination of the overall operation of the gpo depository collection. as a member of the reference department, the documents librarian will partici­ pate in the general reference service with rotating evening and weekend schedule. as a member of the technical services departa s s is t a n t /a s s o c ia t e u n iv e r s it y l ib r a r ia n f o r t e c h n ic a l s e r v ic e s university of southern california the incumbent in this position is responsible for overall management of activities related to the biblio­ graphic control of library materials and access to these materials. this aul has line responsibility for the catalog, acquisitions, gifts and exchange, and bindery departments. he/she coordinates bibliographic control and access activities which occur in other units within the library system. the aul for technical services represents the library on the research library group’s bib-tech committee. qualifications: mls degree from an ala-accredited school; five years successful administrative experi­ ence in technical services at the department head level or above, preferably at a large academic research library; strong analytic, communication and interpersonal skills. candidates with a second subject masters and demonstrated ability to provide leadership in a climate of change will be given preference. familiarity with automation of technical services is desirable. the usc library is a major research library in the process of expansion of staff and collections with a collection of 2.3 million volumes and is currently in a major fund raising program for improvement of collec­ tions, physical facilities, staff, and innovative automation programs. the library is a member of the associa­ tion of research libraries and research libraries group. the library has an automated circulation system and is in the process of implementing automated acquisitions and an online catalog. benefits include tiaa retirement plan, 22 days paid vacation per year in a twelve-month contract, dental plan and tuition remission. rank and salary: negotiable depending upon background and experience. minimum starting salary: $35,000. please send letter of application and resume including three names of references by july 1 5,1985, to: anna covington personnel officer doheny memorial library university of southern california university park los angeles, ca 90089-0182 374 / c&rl news ment, the cataloger will perform original and copy cataloging in all subjects and languages. qualifications: mls and professional expe­ rience with federal documents and cataloging. knowledge of foreign languages desirable. salary: $18,000 + , commensurate with back­ ground and experience. to apply: send resume and names of three references, by august 15,1985, to: phyllis cutler, college librarian, williams college, williamstown, ma 01267. an eo/aa employer. head, serials services and records unit of the serials division, associate librarian. manages and coordinates the activi­ ties of the serials services and records section which consists of 9 fte regular staff and 5 fte student assistants. responsible for over­ seeing the maintenance of the library’s central serials record and the rlin summary holdings statements. oversees check-in of seri­ als received at the graduate library (approx. 15,000 titles), and the operation of serials information desk. manages the graduate library current periodical and newspaper collection, consisting of 5,500 ti­ tles. directs the preparation of graduate library serials and incom­ plete separates for binding. solicits serial sample issues and selects general interest periodicals and newspapers for inclusion in the graduate library collection. responsible for long-range and short range planning for the section and for evaluation of section staff. re­ quired: accredited mls; previous experience working with serials in an academic library setting; demonstrated interpersonal and com­ munication skills; supervisory and management skills, including budgeting, planning, and evaluation of programs and services; practical knowledge of an automated libraiy system used for serials c a t a l o g l ib r a r ia n williams/watson theatre collection project dartmouth college library is seeking qualified applicants for the position of catalog librarian, wil­ liams/watson theatre collection project. the posi­ tion is a temporary 12-month position beginning december 30, 1985. the project, funded by an hea title ll–c strengthening research library re­ sources program grant, will improve bibliographic access to the library’s collections in theater and the performing arts and preserve fragile and deteriorat­ ing materials in these collections. the catalog li­ brarian reports to the project coordinator and is re­ sponsible for original cataloging of print and non-print materials from the theater and performing arts collections in all formats and participates in the training, supervision, and evaluation of support staff. qualifications: mls from an ala-accredited li­ brary school; knowledge of one or more foreign lan­ guages, competency in drama or music, familiarity with aacr2, lc classification and lcsh; experi­ ence with rlin or another automated system; one or more year’s cataloging experience in an aca­ demic or research library is highly desirable. salary and rank commensurate with experience and quali­ fications with a minimum salary of $17,500. please send resume before july 31st to: john r. james director of collection development and bibliographic control 115 baker library dartmouth college hanover, nh 03755. dartmouth college is an aa, eeo, m/f employer activity, e.g., rlin, oclc, datalinx. desirable: experience in pub­ lic services in an academic library; experience in the implementation or use of an automated serials check-in system. salary range: $18,000 to $32,400 dependent on previous relevant experience. applications received by august 31,1985, will be given first consid­ eration. apply to: library personnel office, 404 hatcher graduate library, university of michigan, ann arbor, ml 48109. the university of michigan is a non-discriminatory, affirmative action employer. humanities reference librarian. d h hill library at n c state university is seeking experienced reference librarian with strong humanities background. position involves 30% duty time at reference desk; compiling bibliographies and other publications in humanities subject areas; serving as liaison with humanities depart­ ments; performing online literature searches; participating in tours of library and specific subject-oriented presentations; serving on uni­ versity and library committees. night and weekend duty required. qualifications required: mls degree, knowledge and experience in database searching, 3 years experience in college or university ref­ erence position, strong service orientation and communication skills, undergraduate degree in humanities, preferably english major or minor. second masters degree in humanities, knowledge of one or more foreign languages, and knowledge and experience with major bibliographic utility desired. salary: $21,000 minimum. academic status with standard fringe benefits. application deadline: aug. 16, 1985. position available sept. 1, 1985. send application, resume, and names of 3 references to: w. r. pollard, chm., search commit­ tee, d. h. hill library, ncsu box 7111, raleigh, nc 27695-7111. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. h u m a n it ie s l ib r a r ia n university of california berkeley manage and develop the main library’s collec­ tions in the humanities and social sciences. work closely with faculty and graduate students. select current and retrospective materials in english and american literature, linguistics, comparative litera­ ture, journalism, rhetoric, dramatic arts, religion and philosophy. initiate special services to assist stu­ dents. requires graduate degree from accredited li­ brary school and graduate work in a humanities dis­ cipline with strong background in english or ameri­ can literature. advanced degree desirable. broad interests and understanding of current develop­ ments in literary scholarship and research libraries, and knowledge about applications of modern tech­ nologies to support reference, instruction and re­ search activities highly desirable. full job description mailed on request. salary in the $25,692-536,996 per annum range depending on qualifications. position available 1 october 1985, or as soon thereafter as possible. send re­ sume, including the names and addresses of three professional references, by 16 august 1985, to: william e. wenz library personnel officer room 447 general library university of california berkeley, ca 94720 the university of california is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. july/august 1985 / 375 info rm atio n services librarian, library of science and medicine. available: immediately. under the direction of the library of science and medicine director, provides general and in-depth in­ form ation services in reference and governm ent docum ents to rutgers students, faculty and staff; conducts computerized literature searches in science subjects, with emphasis on biomedical data­ bases; provides library orientation and instruction to lower-level sci­ ence classes as well as coordinates the library’s bibliographic in­ struction efforts. evening and weekend work required. mls required from ala-accredited library school. advanced subject degree(s) in biological sciences, scholarly record. minimum of three years perti­ nent experience in academ ic science library preferred. $25,189 min­ imum dependent upon experience and qualifications. faculty sta­ tus, calendar year appointment, tiaa/cref, life/health insurance, 22 days vacation, tuition remission, prescription drug/dental/ey eglass reimbursement plan. submit resume and three sources for current references by july 15, 1985, to: alfrieda phillips (app 96), personnel assistant, alexander library, rutgers university, new brunswick, nj 08903. an equal opportunity, affirmative action em­ ployer. l ib r a r ia n t e c h n ic a l s e r v ic e s . a s s is ta n t c a ta lo g e r (60°/o)/oclc terminal o perators’ unit supervisor (4o°/o). performs original cataloging in varied subjects including business; also some editing of oclc copy. qualifications: mls, oclc cataloging experi­ ence with aacr2, dewey 19, lc classification and lc subject head­ ings, and supervisory experience required; working knowledge of one european language required, two desirable; m icrocomputer ex­ perience desirable. salary: $ 1 6 ,00 0 + . position open october 1; closing date august i, 1985. submit resume and names of 3 refer­ ences to: gwen owens, chairperson, appointments and promo­ tions committee, marquette university libraries, 1415 w. wisconsin avenue, milwaukee, w l 53233. marquette university is an indepen­ dent jesuit institution of higher learning, and is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. library director. the university of colorado at colorado springs invites applications and nominations for position of director of library. uccs is one of four campuses of university of colorado and is a growing state supported commuter campus with enrollment of 5500 students (headcount). the director is responsible for adm in­ istration of library and media center, reports to vice chancellor for a cadem ic affairs, and is member of deans council. the library has annual budget approaching $1,000,000, collection of 350,000 vol­ umes, and staff of eight professionals and eight support staff plus stu­ d e n t e m p lo y e e s . the lib ra ry u tiliz e s o c lc , brs, d ia lo g , medline, and electronic mail for interlibrary loan. qualifications: master's degree in library science from ala-accredited program. five years of progressively more responsible administrative experi­ ence in academ ic library. candidate must have demonstrated lead­ ership ability, good communication skills, skills in planning and orga­ nization, and commitment to serving users, as well as ability with budgeting, personnel management, and library automation. desir­ able: second m aster’s or ph.d. and experience with media services. candidate must have qualifications for appointm ent to tenure track position. salary competitive, tiaa-cref and comprehensive bene­ fits program. position available october 1. send letter of application detailing what you can bring to position, resume, and names and telephone numbers of three references by august 9 ,1985, to: chris­ tina martinez, acting director, library, university of colorado at col­ orado springs, p.0. box 7150, colorado springs, co 80933-7150. popular american music archivist, music library, uni­ versity of california, los angeles. the archive of popular american music houses more than 500,000 individual song sheets, thousands of recordings, popular song folios and commercial band arrange­ ments. this collection relates to other collections in the music li­ brary, the theater arts library, the ucla film archive, and the ucla library’s special collections department. under the general supervision of the music librarian, the popular american music ar­ chivist supervises processing of all materials; manages reference services; supervises 2.0 fte; and participates in the development of automated processes for processing and cataloging. the archivist will direct the acquisition program and administer the budget of the archive. the archivist may be involved in development of grant ap­ plications. candidates should have knowledge of and expertise in handling archival and m anuscript materials in music, including knowledge of music reference materials and research methods in music. strong commitment to public service within constraints re­ quired to protect the collection. prefer background of research in music in an academ ic environment and familiarity and experience w ith c o m p u te r-b a s e d a rc h iv a l p ra c tic e s . s alary ra n g e is $25,692-$43,464. anyone wishing to be considered for this position should write to: rita a. scherrei, director, administrative systems and personnel services, university research library, ucla, 405 hilgard avenue, los angeles, ca 90024. the application letter should include a complete statement of qualifications, a full resume of education and relevant experience, and the names of at least three persons who are knowledgeable about the applicant’s qualifi­ cations for the position. candidates replying by july 31,1985, will be given first consideration. ucla is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. librarians at ucla are represented by an exclu­ sive bargaining agent, the american federation of teachers (aft). reference/bibliographer librarian. university of min nesota bio-medical library. the university of minnesota bio-medical l ib ra ry is s e e k in g a p p lic a n ts fo r an e n try level r e feren ce b ib liographer position. m ajor responsibilities include: 1. b iblio­ graphic database searching: analyzes requests and formulates searches for online computer retrieval using brs, nlm, and other systems. 2. general reference: participates in all reference and inl ib r a r y d ir e c t o r golden gate university responsible for the management of the univer­ sity’s general library, including policy-making, staffing, budgeting, collection development, and supervision of its audio-visual and computerized li­ brary services. located on the university’s main campus in san francisco’s financial district, the general library has a volume-count of approxi­ mately 150,000, utilizes a number of computer sys­ tems, and is operated by a full-time staff of fourteen including five professional librarians. the library supports the u n ive rsity’s on-cam pus and off campus educational programs and services in the subject areas of business, public administration, humanities and social and behavioral sciences. the director reports to the president of the university. mls or equivalent degree from ala-accredited school required; prefer candidate with graduate degree in relevant subject field; substantial knowl­ edge of computerized information systems; mini­ mum of five years experience at a managerial level in an academic or public library (preferably in its business division) or in a corporate library; and demonstrated ability to work well with students, fac­ ulty, library staff, administrative personnel, and cor­ porate and public agency managers and execu­ tives. salary: $38,000-$46,000, depending on qualifi­ cations and experience. send a letter of application and current resume to: gayla lorthridge director, personnel services golden gate university 536 mission street san francisco, ca 94105 the deadline for receiving applications is july 2 2 ,1 9 8 5 aa/eoe 376 / c&r l news formation services provided by the reference department, including reference desk services and bibliographic instruction. other respon­ sibilities will include collection development and faculty liaison in a specified subject area. applicants must possess (1) a masters de­ gree from an ala-accredited library school; (2) course work and/or experience in database searching on brs, nlm, or the dialog sys­ tem; and (3) substantial course work in the health or life sciences or professional experience in a health sciences library. other desirable qualifications include mla certification; good communication skills; and experience with microcomputers. this is a 12-month academic/ professional position atthe assistant libarian rank. applicants will be expected to meet criteria for continuous appointment. starting salary from $20,000. benefits include 22 vacation days; medical, dental and life insurance; and retirement plans. the university of minnesota bio-medical library serves the schools of medicine, dentistry, nurs­ ing, public health, pharmacy, mortuary science, certain biological sciences, and the university hospitals. the library has over 350,000 bound volumes and 4,005 active journal subscriptions. the refer­ ence staff consists of six reference librarians and a secretary. refer­ ence staff report to the head of public services. send letters of appli­ ca tion , resum e and nam es and a dd re sse s of at least three references to: barbara doyle, personnel officer, university li­ braries, 499 wilson library, 309 19th avenue south, minneapolis, mn 55455. application must be received by august 1, 1985. the p h y s ic a l s c ie n c e s r e f e r e n c e l ib r a r ia n dartmouth college dartmouth college library is reopening the search for a reference librarian for the kresge phys­ ical sciences library, one of eight libraries in the dartmouth college library system. the individual we are seeking will be capable of working as part of a team providing information services in a techno­ logically sophisticated library environment utilizing the dartmouth online catalog, rlin, oclc, online database vendors such as darc/questel, brs, and dialog; as well as microcomputers. respon­ sibilities include the provision of reference services including bibliographic instruction and online searching, consultation with faculty to determine in­ structional and research interests, and collection development of the reference collection. qualifica­ tions: ala/mls; educational background, gradu­ ate degree preferred, in one of the physical sci­ ences, chemistry preferred, and a minimum of 2 years of post mls experience in an academic or special library are required. experience in online database searching and library applications of mi­ crocomputers is highly desirable. salary and rank commensurate with experience and qualifications with a minimum of $17,500 for a librarian i and a minimum of $20,000 for a librarian ii. dartmouth college is an aa/eeo/m/f employer and minority candidates are encouraged to apply. please send resume to: phyllis e. jaynes director of user services 115 baker library dartmouth college hanover, nh 03755 before july 31, 1985. university of minnesota is an equal opportunity employer and specif­ ically invites and encourages applications from women and minori­ ties. reference/collection development librarian, bio­ logical sciences and psychology. the incumbent will have primary responsibility for collection management and refer­ ence services in the fields of biological sciences and psychology and will be based primarily in the biology and psychology libraries. the biology library, opened in 1981, contains approximately 41,000 volumes in the field of biological sciences with emphasis on molecu­ lar and cellular biology, neurobiology, and biochemistry. the library receives approximately 300 serial subscriptions and has a 1984/85 collection budget of approximately $118,000. the psychology li­ brary serves readers from a wide variety of disciplines, including health sciences, education and the social services. it contains 28,000 volumes on animal physiology, cognition, learning, memory, perception, psycholinguistics and vision, and receives approxi­ mately 300 serial subscriptions. the collection budget for psychol­ ogy is approximately $50,000. in the biology and psychology li­ braries, the incumbent is responsible for the provision of reference services such as library orientation programs, instruction in library utilization, design of publications, and online database services, as well as for training student and support staff in basic reference ser­ vice. collection management responsibilities include formulating, justifying and monitoring budgets, selecting and deselecting mate­ rial, and identifying changes in the research and instructional pro­ grams as they relate to the libraries’ collections. the incumbent will participate in making and evaluating collection development policies and planning reference service for the entire science division. in ad­ dition to an accredited mls or the demonstrated equivalent in train­ ing and experience in bibliographic theory, organization, and prac­ tice, requirements are: previous relevant reference and database experience and training, the ability to communicate and work effec­ tively with faculty and students, a knowledge of scientific communi­ cation, and an innovative approach to collection development and the promotion of computer-based operations and services. prefer­ ence will be given to applicants with a subject background in biology and psychology, experience in collection development, or previous experience in science or technical libraries. excellent benefits, in­ cluding free tuition and assistance with university housing. salary ranges (w hich will in cre ase 7 /1 /8 5) are: l ib ra ria n i: $19,000-$24,700; librarian ii: $21,000-$27,300. submit resume, listing 3 references and salary requirements to: box 35, butler li­ brary, columbia university libraries, 535 west 114th street, new york, ny 10027. deadline for applications is august 31, 1985. an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. reference librarian/bibliographer. search reopened. duties include 20 hpw general desk duty; book selection; supervi­ sion of the microforms dept.; computer searching in the humanities and social sciences. required: mls from ala-accredited school, strong liberal arts background, positive service orientation, ability to learn dialog search system. desirable: academic reference expe­ rience, master's degree in foreign language or art, dialog training, and supervisory experience. minimum salary: $16,000 for 12 months. 12 days annual vacation, liberal holidays. state pays 5.85% of employee’s 7.05% social security, excellent insurance and retire­ ment benefits. available immediately. letter of application and re­ sume to: margaret joseph, assistant director for public services, university of texas at san antonio library, san antonio, texas 78285. interviews at july ala conference placement ctr. utsa is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. reference librarian/education subject special­ ist. university of oregon library, reference department. assistant professor or higher, depending upon qualifications. responsibilities: provides general reference service in the humanities and social sci­ ences and specialized reference service to students and faculty in the college of education. teaches individuals and groups the use of the catalogs and reference sources. performs online searching of bibliographic databases. gives tours and lectures to classes. has subject responsibility for collection development for education and related fields. serves on library and university committees. qualifi­ cations: mls and degree in education required. three years profes­ sional experience preferred. demonstrated commitment to public service and strong oral and written communication skills essential. salary: $18,000 plus benefits for 12-months contract. to apply, send letter of application, resume and names of 4 references by august 31,1985, to: thomas a. stave, personnel librarian, university of orjuly/august 1985 / 377 egon library, eugene, or 97403. the uo is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. reference librar ia n. engineering library. duties and re­ sponsibilities: under the supervision of the senior reference librar­ ian, perform s general reference service for patrons of the engineer­ ing library. specific duties are: provide reference service at the desk, including use of online services; handle patron microfiche and interlibrary loan requests; assist with collection developm ent for the reference collection; handle interlibrary loan requests sent to the en­ gineering library, including verification of reference and material processing; prepare library handouts for patrons; prepare monthly acquisitions list; perform online searches for patrons; assist with pro­ viding orientation and instruction to patrons; assist the engineering librarian with technical service projects as assigned. qualifications: mls degree from an accredited library school; academ ic back­ ground in physical sciences, engineering or com puter science pre­ ferred. closing date: applications requested by july 15,1985. avail­ able date: august 1, 1985. salary: $17,000 plus, depending on qualifications and experience. send cover letter, resume and a list of three references to: carolyn a. pyhtila, personnel director, 235 olin library, cornell university, ithaca, ny 14853-5301. cornell univer­ sity is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. reference lib r a r ia n . requirements: mls (ala-accredited). minimum of 2 years of professional academ ic reference experience in the social sciences. desired qualifications: reference experience including com puter-based information services. a dvanced degree in the social sciences; reading know ledge of one western european language. demonstrated ability to work effectively with research oriented faculty, library staff and other members of the academ ic com m unity in an intellectually challenging environment. responsi­ bilities: provides reference service and database searching to under­ graduates, graduate students, and faculty members, with emphasis on the social sciences. liaison w ork with faculty; participation in col­ lection developm ent. faculty status and responsibilities. rank com ­ mensurate with education and experience. promotion and tenure re­ quire meeting standards of excellence in librarianship, publishing, research, and service. 12-month appointm ent with annual vacation of 22 days. g roup life, major medical, and disability insurance are in effect as are tiaa/cref and social security. salary: $18,000 and up depending upon qualifications. application deadline: august 30, 1985. send resume and list of references to: thomas l. haworth, personnel officer, libraries, stewart center, purdue university, west lafayette, in 47907. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. research in s t it u t e lib r a r ia n . the desert research insti­ tute (dri) and the university of nevada, reno (unr) library seek a librarian to plan and provide library and information services for the institute. dri h eadquarters is in reno, with additional locations in southern nevada. the major areas of interest are atmospheric, bio­ logical, social sciences, energy and environmental engineering, and water resources. ala -accredited mls or equivalent educational preparation and experience are required. formal education in sci­ ence or engineering, or experience in a science or engineering li­ brary is desirable. a ppropriate professional experience in reference, collection developm ent, cataloging, and com puter skills is desirable. demonstrated supervisory and m anagem ent skills also required. minimum salary $24,000; higher salary is negotiable, dependent on qualifications and experience. the position is located in reno. open septem ber 1, 1985. send resume and names, addresses, and phone num bers of 3 references on or before o ctober 1, to: twyla harrison, desert research institute, p.o. box 60220, reno, nv 89506; (702) 673-7317. the search will continue until a suitable can­ didate is found. an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. r e tr o spec tive co nversio n c o o r d in a to r , case west ern reserve university. (search reopened.) this librarian position, funded by special grant, is responsible for planning, coordinating, im plem enting and supervising the retrospective conversion project in university libraries, law, social sciences and health sciences li­ braries in preparation for a geac online catalog. the conversion ef­ fort will include records for m onographs and serials as well as other materials. responsible for hiring, training and supervising project staff, maintaining quality control standards, and coordinating the conversion effort with related library activities. qualifications include accredited mls, experience in cataloging and retrospective conver­ sion using a major bibliographic utility and supervisory experience. desired: experience with serials as well as m onographs. rank and salary: librarian iii: $22,000 m inim um for 2 years with likelihood of one-year extension. send resume and names of 3 current references to: l.h. gerson, human resources department, case western re­ serve university, 10900 euclid ave., cleveland, oh 44106 by a u­ gust 15, 1985. an equal opportunity, affirmative action em ployer. science lib rar ia n. responsible for the evaluation, planning, developm ent, and delivery of information services to the science de­ partments of w ittenberg university. duties include teaching of li­ brary use and research m ethodologies, reference and research con­ sultation, online searches, co lle ction developm ent, and faculty liaison. work with the librarians and the science faculty to develop and maintain com prehensive collection developm ent, bi, css, and sdi program s for the science departm ents. delivers general and specialized information services from thom as library as a full-time m em ber of the lib ra ry’s information service team. qualifications: ala -accredited mls; degree in one of the sciences. faculty posi­ tion, 12-month appointm ent. faculty rank and salary com m ensurate with qualifications. tiaa-cref. send letter of a p p lica tio n, tra n ­ scripts, vita, and names and addresses of three references to: imre meszaros, director of the library, w ittenberg university, p.0. box 720, springfield, oh 45501. deadline for applications is august 19, 1985. an eeo, affirmative action employer. science reference librar ia n. a new position. as a m em ­ ber of the reference departm ent has special responsibility for devel­ oping traditional and online reference services to the science dep a rt­ ments, as well as p articipa tin g in general reference services, bibliographic instruction and collection developm ent. will assist in the planning of a new com bined science library building incorporat­ ing the latest technologies. m aster’s degree in library science (ala accredited). formal training or extensive experience in a science re­ lated field essential. knowledge of com puters and autom ated library system s desirable. m ount h olyoke c ollege is part of the five college-oclc/ls2000 project for developing an integrated, multi­ library, automated system. hiring range $ 18 ,5 0 0 -$ 2 3 ,500 d ep e n d ­ ing on experience and qualifications. position available immediately. applications, resumes and names of three references by a ugust 30, 1985, to: anne c. edmonds, college librarian, m ount holyoke col­ lege, south hadley, ma 01075. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. science reference lib rar ia n. provides reference service in a centralized reference departm ent; perform s online literature searches; coordinates program s with faculty in academ ic depart­ ments; provides bibliographic instruction and collection develop­ ment primarily in the physical sciences. required: ala-accredited mls; formal training and/or experience with online literature search­ ing; academ ic training or relevant experience in the physical sci­ ences or mathematics; dem onstrated verbal and written com m uni­ cation skills. salary: minimum $17,040; negotiable, depending on qualifications and experience. twelve month tenure-track appoint­ ment; faculty rank. tiaa/cref. vacation of 22 working days. kan­ sas state university, with an enrollm ent of over 18,000, is located in the scenic flint hills of northeastern kansas. ksu libraries contains almost 1,000,000 cataloged volumes and has a materials budget in excess of $1,700,000. deadline for application: septem ber 10, 1985. send letter of application, resume, names, addresses and phone num bers of three current references to: ann scott, assistant director for adm inistrative services, kansas state university li­ braries, manhattan, ks 66506. position available o ctober 18, 1985. kansas state university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. science reference lib r a r ia n . search reopened bucknell university is recruiting for a science reference librarian to partici­ pate in a broad program of general reference service including desk coverage (with regular evening and weekend hours), bibliographic instruction, database searching, and collection developm ent. ability to work in a dynam ic changing environment, strong organizational skills, and excellent written and oral com m unication ability neces­ sary; a la -accredited mls; dem onstrated familiarity with a scien ce/engineering field or experience in providing science/engineering reference service. salary com m ensurate with qualifications and ex­ perience. position open: august 1, 1985. send resume, with names and telephone num bers of three references to: ann de klerk, univer­ sity librarian, bucknell university, lewisburg, pa 17837, before july 31, 1985. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. serials ca ta lo g er (2 p o s it io n s ), available january 1, 378 / c&rl news 1986, for 12 months, with possibility of continuation for an additional two years. catalog serial titles in the wilcox collection of c ontem po­ rary political movements, a large and unique collection of u.s. ex­ tremist political literature, com prised of approxim ately 4,000 serial ti­ tles, 5,000 books and pam phlets, 50,000 pieces of epherem a, audiotapes, and manuscripts. the wilcox collection represents the views and ideological positions of approxim ately 7,000 left and right wing organizations in the u.s., including the john birch society, the american nazi party, the christian anti-communist crusade, the so­ cialist workers party, the communist party usa, and the socialist labor party. during the grant project, the project team of 2.75 cata­ lo g e d , 1 research assistant, and 3 graduate students will catalog 1,800 serial titles in accordance with aacr2, assign lc subject headings, and input records into the oclc database. the funding for this project has been provided by the departm ent of education title ll–c program. requires ala-accredited mls; recent training or experience with aacr2; ability to work successfully within a time limited project. prefer experience in serials cataloging; familiarity with oclc or similar bibliographic utility; experience with lc subject headings; research library experience relevant to duties described above; background in the literature of american political move­ ments. salary $18,000/year. excellent benefits. to apply, submit let­ ter of application, resume, transcripts, and names of three refer­ e nces to: s an d ra k. g illila n d , u n ive rsity of k ansas l ib rarie s, lawrence, ks 66045-2800. applications must be postmarked no later than august 30, 1985. minorities are encouraged to apply. an aa/eeo employer. system s librarian (a n a ly st/p r o g r a m m er ), systems office, associate librarian. under the general direction of the head of the systems office, this position is expected to serve a leadership role in the planning, implementation, operation and maintenance of com puter systems within the university library. specific duties in­ clude: designing and conducting analytic studies in support of man­ ual and automated systems; software development; planning and implementation of data com m unication in support of an ils; devel­ oping functional specifications; conducting needs assessments; de­ veloping user documentation; developing and delivering training for july/august 1985 / 379 automated systems; providing advice and guidance on the use of automated tools; developing software in a variety of languages in­ cluding, but not limited to: pl/1, sas, and condor; supervising other analysts, and other duties as assigned. required: accredited mls; demonstrated proficiency in designing, implementing, and op­ erating automated systems, in organizational systems analysis, and in workflow analysis; demonstrated success in software develop­ ment; excellent communication and interpersonal skills; knowledge of marc record structure. desirable: knowledge of and experience in data communications; familiarity with rlin; knowledge of pl/1, condor, statistical packages; familiarity with hierarchical and rela­ tional database management systems. salary range: $18,000 to $32,400, dependent on previous relevant experience. applications received by august 31,1985, will be given first consideration. apply to: library personnel office, 404 hatcher graduate library, univer­ sity of michigan, ann arbor, ml 48109. the university of michigan is a non-discriminatory, affirmative action employer. technical reports librarian. selects and acquires techni­ cal report literature with emphasis on oceanography, transportation, and water. provides comprehensive reference assistance and as­ sists with computerized reference services and bibliographic instruc­ tion for technical reports and government documents collections. supervises and trains one half-time cataloger and two support staff. reports to head, documents division. qualifications: ala/mls. minimum of one year professional (post-mls) experience, prefera­ bly in acquisitions, serials, or cataloging. familiarity with government documents and technical reports highly desirable. prefer familiarity with oclc. open: september 1,1985. closing date: july 20. salary: minimum $17,000 (for 10.5 months); negotiable. benefits: competi­ tive benefits package. no state income tax. faculty rank. complete description of duties, qualifications, and benefits available. to apply, submit resume and names and telephone numbers of three profes­ sional references to: susan lytle, head, personnel operations, evans library, texas a&m university, college station, tx 77843; (409) 845-8111. preliminary interviewing at ala. aa/eeo employer. university librarian overseas. american university of beirut, lebanon, requires administrative head for the university li­ brary system consisting of 425,400 volumes, 3,721 current periodi­ cals, currently a professional staff of 11 and a student body of 5,000. a la-accredited mls required; additional masters or doctorate strongly preferred; minimum 7 years of professional experience in academic research library including minimum 5 years in progres­ sively responsible administrative positions; a working knowledge of library technology and a well-demonstrated leadership and adminis­ trative ability, an awareness of current trends in higher education, a proven ability to work effectively with a research oriented faculty. a background knowledge of the middle east is deemed essential. po­ sition available immediately. salary range: $25,000-$30,000. can­ didates should send c.v. to: vice president of the university, ameri­ can university of beirut, beirut, lebanon. aub is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. user education librarian. a full-time faculty position report­ ing to the assistant director for public services. incumbent will be responsible for planning, designing, implementing, and coordinat­ ing a library user education program for a tertiary care academic medical center. responsibilities include, but are not limited to, curric­ ulum design, publicity and marketing of programs, preparations of handouts, user needs assessments, orientation tours, program anal­ ysis, identification and recruitment of instructors and teaching. re­ quired: mls from an ala-accredited library program; recent experi­ ence searching online databases peculiar to the health sciences and excellent oral and written communications skills. a minimum of two years recent experience in a health sciences library user education program is preferred; also, experience in curriculum design, staff de­ velopment and program coordination with emphasis on library skills development. position available: august 1, 1985. a pplications should be received by september 15, 1985. minimum salary: $22,000. send letter of application, resume, and the names and ad­ dresses of four references to: nancy j. smith, assistant director for public services, the claude moore health sciences library, box 234, university of virginia medical center, charlottesville, va 22908. eeo/aa. late job listings academic librarian. beginning level, 12-month tenure-track faculty position. duties include evening library supervision, collection development, bibliographic instruction, dialog computer usage. qualifications: ala-accredited master’s, knowledge of library operations, supervisory experience. additional desirable qualifications: second master’s and/or previous library experience. beginning salary from $17,000, depending on experience and qualifications. send letter of application, resume including all library-related positions held, graduate and undergraduate transcripts, names, addresses and telephone numbers of all immediate library supervisors and three additional references by july 31,1985 to: gaynelle r. pratt, personnel officer, keene state college, keene, nh 03431. aa/eeo acquisitions/serials librarian. mls or equivalent from ala-accredited library school. 1 year post masters degree experience in serials and/or monographs acquisition. responsible for acquisition of all serials, monographs, and government documents for an academic law library approaching 250,000 volumes. supervises fund accounting for all book expenditures. library is currently requesting proposals for automation of all library record keeping. reports to technical services librarian. supervises 2.5 fte. occasional evening/weekend reference responsibilities. minimum salary: $17,500. application deadline: open until position filled. contact: robert j. nissenbaum, law library director, cleveland state university, 1983 e. 24th street, cleveland, oh 44115. equal opportunity employer, m/f/h. associate director, pacific southwest regional medical library service, biomedical library. under the general direction of the biomedical librarian, serves as operating head with broad management responsibilities for the rmlp 380 / c&rl news for arizona, california, hawaii, and nevada. responsible for planning, coordinating, and supervising rml programs: resource sharing and coordination; information services including nlm online training classes and ce for regional searchers; public relations and publicity. also coordinates regional document delivery network and cooperative regional projects such as union list development. responsible for preparing rml contracts, budgets, statistical and narrative reports, and evaluations of rml services. maintains liaison with nlm, resource library directors, mla chapters, and health sciences librarians and health professionals throughout region. participates in long range planning for biomedical library’s total program with the director and heads of public and technical services. qualifications: mls from an accredited program. evidence of strong management skills including: competence in planning, setting objectives and priorities; oral and written communication; mobilizing people for group action and organizing for effective action. regional, extension, or outreach experience in a health sciences library desirable. salary range: $25,692-$43,464 based on qualifications and years of experience. excellent fringe benefits. personal interview required. prefer application by august 1, 1985 with complete statement of qualifications, resume, and names of three references to: rita a. scherrei, director of administrative systems and personnel services, university research library, ucla, 405 hilgard avenue, los angeles, ca, 90024. for more information call (213) 825-1201. ucla is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. librarians are represented by an exclusive bargaining agent, the american federation of teachers. catalog librarian, central technical services. available: immediately. provides original cataloging of monographic materials in english and foreign languages, including classical languages for humanities, social sciences or science/technology via rlin. revises cataloging done by other catalogers, provides technical assistance to library and student assistants. mls required from ala-accredited library school. a minimum of three years cataloging experience in an academic library. working knowledge of german, latin and/or greek is required. supervisory experience necessary. $24,192 minimum, dependent upon experience and qualifications. faculty status, calendar year appointment, tiaa/cref, life/health insurance, 22 days vacation, tuition remission, prescription drug/dental/eyeglass reimbursement plan. submit resume and three sources for current references by july 31, 1985, to: alfrieda phillips (app 97), personnel assistant, alexander library, rutgers university, new brunswick, nj 08903. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. catalog librarian for original cataloging and classification, with emphasis on music and audio-visuals. must have experience with aacrii, marc coding and music cataloging. at present, this is a non–tenured position. must have mls from ala-accredited library school and skill in at least one foreign language. salary, minimum $17,718 annum. send letter of application and resume to: joan tracy, assistant librarian for technical services, eastern washington university, cheney, wa 99004, by july 31, 1985. an equal opportunity employer. cataloger, biomedical library. under the general supervision of the head of the catalog-bindery division, catalogs and classifies monographs, theses, audiovisuals and other nonbook materials in the health and life sciences fields in english and various foreign languages. assists with teaching and training of library assistants who do copycatalog. may be responsible for planning and supervising special projects. qualifications include familiarity with aacr2, and the marc format. familiarity with nlm classification, medical subject headings, oclc cataloging system; reading knowledge of one or more july/august 1985 / 381 modern european languages; and strong academic background or cataloging experience in health or life sciences is desirable. salary $21,024-$36,996. prefer application by august 1, 1985 with complete statement of qualifications, resume, and names of three references to: rita a. scherrei, director of administrative systems and personnel services, university research library, ucla, 405 hilgard avenue, los angeles, ca, 90024. for more information call (213) 825-1201. ucla is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. librarians are represented by an exclusive bargaining agent, the american federation of teachers. cataloger, health sciences. responsible for original cataloging of materials in all formats (monographs, serials, av, and machine-readable data files). duties include complex bibliographic searching, bibliographic description, subject analysis using mesh, assignment of lc classification and authority work. assists in assigning, training, and revising work of library assistants. also responsible for coordinating recon activities and participation in planning automated systems and data-bases. technical services operations are automated: cataloging and acquisitions through rlin and serials control through faxon’s linx system. an online public access catalog and automated circulation system are now being implemented. services are changing as integrated academic information management system (iaims) planning and development take place, offering challenging opportunities and experience with the implementation of new information techniques. in addition to an ala-accredited mls, requirements are knowledge of cataloging principles and techniques including aacr2, lc classification, mesh, automated cataloging systems utilizing marc formats (preferably rlin); aptitude for analytical work; ability to work effectively with professional and support staff; working knowledge of one or more western european languages and of bibliographic and other reference tools. preference will be given to candidates with background in the life sciences or with previous relevant experience. excellent benefits, including tuition exemption and assistance with university housing. salary ranges: librarian i: $ 19,500-$25,350; librarian ii: $21,500-$29,025. submit resume, listing salary requirements and 3 references, to: box 35, butler library, columbia university libraries, 535 west 114th street, new york, ny 10027. deadline for applications is october 15, 1985. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. dynamic head librarian required to respond to and create new board initiatives for a venerable st. louis subscription library contemplating extensive changes in scope and mission; 200,000 plus volumes, 35,000 rare books, archives, western american and other special collections. position requires library degree and at least five years of library administrative experience. experience should include work in collection development, technical services (including familiarity with oclc and rlin), some knowledge of online systems, budget and finances. advanced degree in american history desirable. oral and written communication skills, some development experience, proposal writing and public relations sense important. available september 1, 1985. salary commensurate with experience. send resume and three references to: search committee, st. louis mercantile library association, p.0. box 633, st. louis, mo 63188. head librarian, rio grande campus, austin community college. acc learning resource services seeks a superior librarian and library manager to supervise the rio grande campus learning resource center and coordinate reference/bibliographic instruction college-wide. will supervise 6.5 fte (2.5 professionals), a book collection of 30,000+, an lrc of 8,000 square feet, and a bibliographic instruction program serving over 4,000 students per year. will serve on lrs management team with other unit heads. requirements: mls 382 / c&rl news from ala-accredited school; 5 years progressively responsible library experience including supervision; excellent communication and human skills; evidence of commitment to profession through advanced study, publication, or association involvement. second master’s preferred. university or college librarians who have affinity for the community college mission are encouraged to apply. acc enrolls over 19,000 credit students and is growing. major automation and building program expected during next 4 years. in addition, austin is one of the most livable and exciting cities in the united states. salary: minimum $26,866, depending on placement on faculty scale, plus administrative stipend (12 month). excellent benefits. closing date: august 2, 1985. send letter of application, resume, and names of three references to: personnel office, austin community college, p.0. box 2285, austin, tx 78768. aa/eoe. head, serials cataloging section. (search extended.) university of minnesota libraries— twin cities, central technical services department, serials management division. the university of minnesota libraries— twin cities seeks applicants for the position of head of serials cataloging section, which is a unit within the serials management division of the central technical service department. the section includes 3 professional, 2 paraprofessional, and 1 clerical positions. responsibilities: under the direction of the head of the serials management division, manages, organizes, and coordinates serials cataloging unit. supervises, trains, and evaluates staff, monitors workflow; develops operations procedures; and acts as a liaison between the serials management division and other library units concerning serials cataloging. performs original cataloging and classification of serials; revises serials cataloging by staff as needed; and resolves bibliographic problems. qualifications: requirements include ala-accredited mls, demonstrated managerial ability and communication skills, at least 3 years of professional experience that include substantive serials cataloging, thorough knowledge of aacr2, lc classification, and lc subject headings, and experience in online cataloging systems as well as supervisory experience. desirable qualifications include experience in a large academic research library, reading knowledge of one or more european languages, and automated serials cataloging/management. appointment: the appointment is in the academic professional series at the assistant librarian rank. beginning annual salary is at a minimum of $24,000, depending on qualifications. position available immediately. application deadline (postmark) september 15, 1985. applicants should send a letter of application with detailed resume and names of three references to: barbara doyle, personnel and staff development officer, university libraries, 499 wilson library, 309 19th avenue south, minneapolis, mn 55455. the university of minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. information services coordinator, pacific southwest regional medical library services, biomedical library. under the general direction of the associate director provides online training and information services in region 7. one of two instructors for nlm’s initial online training classes in the western region. teaches nlm’s “basics of searching medline" course to health professionals in the western region. coordinates online demonstrations and writes articles about the medlars system or online searching. responsible for editing the psrmls newsletter, publishing the psrmls directory, and updating manuals, fact sheets, and brochures. coordinates psrmls exhibits at health professional meetings. qualifications: mls from an accredited program. evidence of strong teaching skills and extensive experience in searching nlm’s medlars system. public relations, writing, and publications experience desirable. salary range: $21,024-$36,996 based on qualifications and years of experience. excellent fringe benefits. personal interview required. july/august 1985 / 383 prefer application by july 15, 1985, with complete statement of qualifications, resume, and names of three references to: rita a. scherrei, director of administrative systems and personnel services, university research library, ucla, 405 hilgard avenue, los angeles, ca, 90024. for more information call (213) 825-1201. ucla is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. librarians are represented by an exclusive bargaining agent, the american federation of teachers. library director. dropsie college. starting date: september, 1985. salary: negotiable. responsibilities: overall responsibility for maintaining a 100,000-plus volume library. supervision of a library staff of seven. collection development in dialogue with the faculty. budget management, acquisitions control. overall supervision of catalog conversion from freidus to library of congress, plus periodic reporting to funding sources on projects’ progress. qualifications: mls from an ala–accredited school, strong knowledge of judaica. hebrew is a must. previous administrative experience preferred. send letter of application and supporting materials (resume, salary requirements) to: david goldenberg, president, dropsie college, 250 highland ave., merion, pa 19066. music cataloger (search reopened). southern illinois university at carbondale, morris library. required qualifications: ala-accredited mls; graduate degree in music; foreign language capability in french, german, italian; supervisory potential; knowledge of aacr2. preferred qualifications: graduate music degree in music history, literature and/or theory; familiarity with oclc; music cataloging experience. faculty rank, full-time, 12-month tenure track appointment. university retirement system of illinois, state paid life, medical and surgical insurance, 25 vacation days and 11 holidays per contract year. salary of $17,600 and up based upon education and experience. position available august 1, 1985. application deadline: july 25, 1985, or until filled. send application and names of 3 references to: susan s. poteet, chairperson, music cataloger search committee, cataloging department, morris library, southern illinois university at carbondale, carbondale, il 62901; (618) 453-4339. the university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. public service librarian. wayne state university libraries seek a public service librarian to coordinate database searching in the science and engineering library. this responsibility entails promotion of the activity to the academic community, scheduling and training of librarians in conducting searches, and maintaining the necessary records for system operation. other duties include reference service (weekends on a rotational basis), library instruction, collection development and faculty liaison. a tenure-track position based on the standards of evaluation and quality of performance in (a) professional assignments, (b) creative and scholarly work and (c) contributions to the profession. candidates are urged to review available documentation. qualifications: ala-accredited mls with a minimum of 2 years experience in a scientific/technical library, preferably an academic library. science background is desirable but not required. the candidate must have experience in searching one or more of the standard databases: brs, dialog, or cas online. effective communications and interpersonal skills required. evidence of scholarly, creative or professional contributions desired. position reports to the head of the science and engineering library. liberal fringe benefits, tenure-track academic rank, dental and health plan options. tiaa/cref, tuition breaks to family members. minimum salary of $19,000; rank competitive and negotiable, based on experience and qualifications. send applications and/or nominations to: james f. williams ii, associate director of libraries, 134 purdy library, wayne state university, detroit, mi 48202; 384 / c&rl news telephone (313) 577-4021. position open immediately and will remain open until filled. applications received by july 15, 1985, will be given first consideration. wayne state university is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. reference librarian/social science subject specialist. university of oregon library, reference department. assistant professor or higher, depending upon qualifications. responsibilities: provides general reference service in the humanities and social sciences and specialized reference service to students and faculty in the social sciences. teaches individuals and groups the use of the catalogs and reference sources. performs online searching of bibliographic databases. gives tours and lectures to classes. has subject responsibility for collection development in the social sciences. serves on library and university committees. qualifications: an mls and a degree in the social sciences required. demonstrated commitment to public service and strong oral and written communication skills essential. position available: september 1, 1985. salary: $18,000 minimum. to apply, send letter of application, resume, and names of 4 references by august 31, 1985, to: thomas a. stave, personnel librarian, university of oregon library, eugene, or 97403. the uo is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. social sciences librarian, university of california, irvine. appointment at assistant or associate librarian rank within salary range $21,024-$30,156. benefits in uc equal to approximately 40% of salary. appointment at associate rank will require appropriate degree in one of the social sciences, substantial previous experience in collection development, and well developed reference skills. responsibilities: reports to head of collection development for bibliographic functions related to development and management of library collections, with special responsibility for materials in the social sciences. reports to head of reference for reference functions that include general and subject/specialized reference service ranging from factual information to indepth research. participates in bibliographic instruction, online database searching, and general assignments in the reference department. qualifications: required: mls degree; degree in one of the social sciences or commensurate experience. demonstrated commitment to public service and to the profession, excellent oral and written communications skills. high level of motivation and accomplishment. ability to work effectively, both independently and cooperatively with others. desirable: graduate degree in one of the social sciences. experience in collection development, bibliographic instruction, and online database searching. to apply: send letter, resume and names and addresses of three references to: michael j. maclnnes, aul for personnel services, university of california, irvine, library, p.0. box 19557, irvine, ca 92713. deadline: 30 september, but applications will be accepted until position is filled. applicants should indicate whether they will be available for a preliminary interview at the summer ala conference. uci is an affirmative action employer. special collections librarian, librarian ii. search extended. university of southern california, university library. the usc library, a major research library in process of expansion of staff and collections, has a collection of 2.3 million volumes and is currently in a major fund raising program for improvement of collections, physical facilities and innovative automation programs. the library is a member of the association of research libraries, and the research libraries group. the library has an automated circulation system and is in the process of implementing automated acquisitions and an online catalog. position located in special collections department. duties include implementing acquisitions and solicitation policies of books and manuscripts for american literature and special collections; maintains acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries 354 / october 1983 the classified ads deadlines: orders for regular classified advertisements must reach the acrl office on or before the second of the month preced­ ing publication of the issue (e.g. september 2 for the october issue). late job listings will be accepted on a space-available basis after the second of the month. rates: classified advertisements are $4.00 per line for acrl members, $5.00 for others. late job notices are $10.00 per line for members, $12.00 for others. organizations submitting ads will be charged according to their membership status. telephone: all telephone orders should be confirmed by a writ­ ten order mailed to acrl headquarters as soon as possible. orders should be accompanied by a typewritten copy of the ad to be used in proofreading. an additional $10 will be charged for ads taken over the phone (except late job notices or display ads). guidelines: for ads which list an application deadline, that date must be no sooner than the last day of the month in which the notice appears (e.g., october 31 for the october issue). all job announce­ ments should include a salary figure. job announcements will be edited to exclude discriminatory references. applicants should be aware that the terms faculty rank and status vary in meaning among institutions. jobline: call (312) 944-6795 for late-breaking job ads for aca­ demic and research library positions. a pre-recorded summary of positions listed with the service is revised weekly; each friday a new tape includes all ads received by 1:00 p.m. the previous day. each listing submitted will be carried on the recording for two weeks. the charge for each two-week listing is $30 for acrl members and $35 for non-members. fast job listing service: a special newsletter for those actively seeking positions. this service lists job postings received at acrl headquarters four weeks before they appear in c&rl news, as well as ads which, because of narrow deadlines, will not appear in c&rl news. the cost of a six-month subscription is $10 for acrl mem­ bers and $15 for non-members. contact: classified advertising dep't, acrl, american library association, 50 e. huron st., chicago, il 60611; (312) 944-6780. for sale college and research libraries, 1940– 1982 226 is­ sues. also c&rl news, 1970-1982. make offer to: david k. max­ field, 2217 manchester rd., ann arbor, m i 48104. elsevier antiquarian department. periodicals and rare books on lifeand earth sciences. over 1 million volumes on stock. catalogues available on demand. please write to: lippijn straat 4, 1055 kj amsterdam, the netherlands. positions open architecture librarian. arl library, responsible for organi­ zation and administration of collections and services in the architec­ ture library. school of architecture within the college of engineering has faculty of 15 and 380 students in a 5-year bachelor’s program. supervises one library assistant and several student assistants. graduate degree from ala-accredited program required with at least a bachelor’s degree in architecture, art, or related field. at least one year professional experience in an architecture-related library. supervisory experience desirable. minimum salary $18,000. send resume to: peggy weissert, library personnel officer, university li­ braries, university of notre dame, notre dame, in 46556. arts/humanities bibliographer and reference li­ brarian (search re-opened). provides vital collection develop­ ment liaison with departments in the arts and humanities. position demands bibliographic skills, ability to communicate effectively with faculty and students, and includes line responsibility for service at the centralized reference desk on a limited schedule, including some nights, weekends, and holidays. qualifications: mls degree from an ala-accredited program. second graduate degree in an appropri­ ate academic subject area strongly preferred. minimum one year ex­ perience in reference services area of a medium to large academic library; collection development experience strongly preferred. knowledge of one or more modern european languages desirable. salary: $19,000, negotiable, depending upon qualifications and ex­ perience. letter of application, resume, and the names of three refer­ ences must be received at the university of southwestern louisiana by october 31,1983, or until position is filled, and should be directed to: d. l. saporito, director of libraries, university libraries, 302 e. st. mary blvd., lafayette, la 70504. u.s.l. is an equal employment opportunity, affirmative action employer. october 1983 / 355 a s s is t a n t g ener al/n u r sin g lib r ar ia n . entry level posi tion requiring masters from an ala-accredited library school with coursew ork in m edical librarianship. duties involve working in small college environm ent plus cross-town duties in developing on-site li­ brary and av services for nursing school students and faculty at re­ gional hospital. public service and cataloging skills essential. know l­ e dge of oclc and dialog (i.e., medline) required. av background useful. non-voting faculty status and rank. 12-month contract. salary com m ensurate with qualifications, $14,00 0 -$ 16 ,0 00 . reports to li­ brary director. position will remain open until filled. send letter of ap­ plication, resume, credentials file with at least three current letters of reference, to: aldo panerio, vice-president for academ ic affairs, hu­ ron college, huron, sd 57350. aa/eoe. a s s is t a n t librarian for public services to supervise and coordinate all public service units, develop budgets and related services, assist in collection developm ent, serve on reference desk and foster faculty liaison. must have mls from ala-accredited li­ brary school; at least five years of pertinent experience in an aca­ dem ic library with increasing levels of responsibility, including expe­ rience with com puter-assisted reference service; tw o years of college level training in a foreign language; and evidence of good com m unication skills, both written and verbal. second masters de­ gree or ph.d desirable; some college level training in one or more sciences, or business adm inistration also desirable. salary will be based on training and experience, but minimum of $27 ,258/annual. send letter of application, resume and three letters of reference, to: charles h. baumann, university librarian, eastern washington uni­ versity, cheney, wa 99004, by n ovem ber 1 . 1983. ewu is an affirm­ ative action, equal opportunity em ployer and subject to all provisions of executive order 11246. a s s is t a n t reference lib ra r ia n -in te r n (9 month, non tenure track appointm ent, renewable up to 4 years). available janu­ ary 1 ‚ 1984. performs general reference service and shares respon­ s ib ility fo r b ib lio g ra p h ic in s tru c tio n a nd o n lin e b ib lio g ra p h ic searching. assists in ill verification and reference collection devel­ opment. ala/m ls required (earned by dec. 31 . 1983). preference given to recent library school graduates with training and/or experi­ ence in online searching and/or an academ ic background in the nat­ ural sciences. minimum salary $12,500, with standard benefits. a p ­ plication deadline is n ovem ber 10,1983, or until suitable applicant is hired. send resume, academ ic credentials, and three current letters of recom m endation, to: clark hallman, reference librarian, south dakota state university library, box 2115, brookings, sd 57007. an aa/eeo employer. a ss o c ia te dean for public services. policy and pro gram m anagem ent in five m ajor service com ponents of the adelphi university libraries; reference and research support, circulation, fine and perform ing arts, social work, and science. nine professional and 22 supporting staff m em bers are in these units. additional areas of reference specialization include business and banking, educa­ tion, nursing, and governm ent docum ents. the associate dean is responsible for program developm ent, m arketing, and service deliv­ ery, service evaluation, and collection developm ent in reference, and for service coordination and oversight in circulation, course re­ serves, and interlibrary loan. this is a non-faculty, non-tenure track position. salary: $25,000 minimum. a d e lp h i’s collections num ber 500.000 volumes in addition to substantial holdings in m icroform s and non-print media. the online catalog is in service, with retrospec­ tive conversion scheduled for com pletion next june. circulation, re­ serve processing, non-print materials booking, and acquisitions are all com puterized and in production. qualifications: mls from an ala-accredited library school; seven years of increasingly responsi­ ble reference experience in a mid-size or large academ ic library, in­ cluding experience with program s of bibliographic instruction, data­ base searching, public information, and publication; appropriate m anagerial experience and dem onstrated skill in motivating, devel­ oping, and working harm oniously with library faculty and staff. send letter of application and resume, to: jerom e yavarkovsky, dean of libraries, adelphi university, g arden city, ny 11530. an equal o p ­ portunity, affirmative action employer. a s s o c ia t e d ir e c to r of lib r a r ie s for te c h n ic a l pr o cessing . administrative responsibility for all technical ser­ vices in a major texas academ ic library of over one million volumes, including the coordination of the acquisition and processing of over 85.000 new materials annually. participation as m em ber of library adm inistrative council in overall library planning, budgeting, grant solicitation, and policy form ulation and implem entation. planning for incorporation of latest technology into acquisition, bibliographic con­ trol, and processing of library materials. presently oclc member. supervision of acquisitions, cataloging, and processing, with fifteen librarians and 25 + support staff. requires ala m aster’s degree and a m inimum of five years experience in a large academ ic library with successful record of increasing adm inistrative responsibility. additional degree preferred. demonstrated ability to com m unicate effectively with various levels of university staff, and a know ledge of autom ated systems. minimum salary: $30,000 (12 mo.) excellent benefits, with tiaa/cref option. application deadline: n ovem ber 15, 1983. available immediately; starting date negotiable. send let­ ter, resume, names of 3-5 references to: virginia andrews, chair search committee, texas tech university, library, lubbock, tx 79409-0002. texas tech university is a m ulti-disciplinary university with 23,000 students in lubbock, a com m unity of 180,000. eoe/aa. c a ta lo g libr ar ia n . performs original cataloging and classifi­ cation of print and non-print materials. also responsible for some cat­ alog m aintenance and for assisting paraprofessionals with difficult copy cataloging. may advise and evaluate a paraprofessional who is in charge of a m ajor clerical function within the departm ent. mls from an ala-accredited library school. an additional graduate de­ gree is desired and is required for tenure. must be familiar with aacr2, lc classification and subject headings, and oclc. cata­ loging experience and knowledge of western european languages a nd c o m p u te r a p p lic a tio n s is d e s ira b le . a p p o in tm e n t range, $ 17 ,00 0 -$ 20 ,0 00 for 12 months, depending on qualifications. ten­ ure eligible. tiaa/cref, blue cross/blue shield. starting data asap after january 1 ‚ 1984. finalists will be invited for expense paid inter­ view. wichita state university is an urban institution with an enroll­ m ent of 17,000. librarians at wichita state enjoy faculty rank, privi­ leges, and responsibilities. send letter of application and resume by novem ber 15, to: a.t. birrell, head, c ataloging department, li­ brary, box 68, wichita state university, wichita, ks 67208. wichita state university is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. c a ta lo g librarian. the university of arizona library is seek­ ing a professional librarian responsible for the original cataloging of m onographs and serials in chinese, japanese and other far east­ ern languages. other responsibilities include the original oclc cata­ loging of western language materials on far eastern languages and cultures; serving on a catalog information desk; active participation in establishing policies and procedures for the catalog department; participation in planning for an online catalog; training and supervis­ ing student assistants with chinese and japanese language skills who do copy cataloging. the university of arizona is a large aca­ dem ic library with a materials budget of more than $3 million. re­ quirem ents: a l a -a ccre d ite d degree; w orking expe rie nce with aacr2, lc classification and lcsh; experience with oclc or a similar utility; undergraduate degree in chinese or japanese and working know ledge in the other language. professional librarians at the university of arizona are voting m em bers of the faculty, earn 22 days paid vacation each year, 12 days of sick leave, and have a stan­ dard package of holidays and other benefits. the salary range is $ 16 ,50 0 -$ 22 ,0 00 . deadline for application is n ovem ber 30, 1983. send letter of application, resume, and the names of three refer­ ences to: w. david laird, university librarian, university of arizona library, tucson, az 85721. the university is an eeo/aa employer. c a ta lo g e r s. search extended. two positions for experienced catalogers under head of the catalog department. 1) cataloger/re trospective conversion coordinator. coordinates and supervises current oclc retrospective conversion activities, including reclassi­ fication and online authority conversion. original cataloging of m on­ ographs in english and other western european languages. re­ quires minimum of three years’ post-mls cataloging experience, including application and use of oclc cataloging system. supervi­ sory ability in an environm ent requiring an effective com bination of productivity and quality control. minimum $19,000. 2) cataloger. original cataloging of m onographs using oclc and lc. assists with authority control and catalog maintenance. requires minimum of two years’ post-mls cataloging experience using an automated cat­ aloging system. science background preferred. minimum $15,000. both positions require know ledge of aacr, aacr2, lcsh and lc classification, accredited mls, working know ledge of one foreign language, and a willingness to w ork evenings and weekends. fac­ ulty status, blue cross/blue shield, south carolina state retirement. send resume with statement of salary history, and addresses and telephone num bers of three professional references to elizabeth lange, assistant director for technical services, thomas c ooper li­ brary, university of south carolina, columbia, sc 29208, by o cto­ ber 31 ‚ 1983. an aa/eeo employer. c o o r d in a to r , in fo r m a tio n services. d epauw university is seeking an experienced and innovative public services librarian to w ork with faculty and students to expand reference and information services in its main and branch libraries. responsibilities include m anagem ent of the reference departm ent (3 fte’s, 2 professional) and the continued developm ent of reference/inform ation services, online searching, interlibrary loan, bibliographic instruction, and col­ lection developm ent. the position will also coordinate the library’s departm ental liaison/information specialist program , in which each professional on the library staff works with several academ ic depart­ ments to assist with collection developm ent and provide library sup­ port for individual classes. required: an ala-accredited mls; sub­ stantial professional experience (5 + years) in public/inform ation services; proven reference and supervisory capability; leadership ability with strong interpersonal and com m unication skills; dem on­ strated com petence in assessing needs and designing and im ple­ m enting services; and online searching experience. desirable quali­ fic a tio n s in c lu d e a s c ie n c e a c a d e m ic b a c k g ro u n d or stro n g experience with scientific information sources and collection devel­ opm ent experience. the position is available january 2, 1984, and 356 / october 1983 offers faculty rank and status, $22,000, and excellent fringe benefits. send a letter of application, a resume, and the names of three to five references to: jana bradley, director of libraries, p.o. box 137, de pauw university, greencastle, in 46135. deadline for applications: n ovem ber 1, 1983. an affirmative action, equal opportunity em ­ ployer. d irector of lib r ar ies, cleveland state university. position available for director of libraries at state-supported, urban university of seven colleges, which offers undergraduate and graduate degree p ro g ra m s to a p p ro xim a te ly 20,0 00 students. q u alificatio ns re­ quired: mls degree from an ala-accredited program ; 10 years of library experience, with evidence of increasing administrative re­ sponsibility; know ledge of current developm ents in library capabili­ ties, including automation and resource sharing; strong leadership and m anagem ent skills, with ability to establish and maintain effec­ tive public and professional relationships. desirable: doctorate in li­ brary science or advanced degree in another academ ic field; ad­ m inistrative e xpe rie nce in m edium or large a ca d e m ic library. r e sp o n sib ilitie s: d ire c tin g a te a c h in g a nd re se a rch lib ra ry of 500,000 volumes, with 23 professional librarians and over 35 sup­ port staff. salary: com m ensurate with qualifications and experience. a minimum salary of $45,000 is anticipated. renewable annual con­ tract, starting july 1, 1984. application procedure: send nom ina­ tions or resumes along with names, addresses and telephone num ­ bers of three (3) persons familiar with cand id ate ’s qualifications to: g eorgia e. lesh-laurie, chairperson of library director search committee, cleveland state university, 1983 e. 24th street, cleve­ land, oh 44115. telephone: (216) 687-3595. equal o pportunity employer, m/f/h. d ir ec to r of lib rar y, stetson university, deland, florida. mls and five years of successful library service required. preference given to persons with doctorates and experience in administration. c om pensation com petitive with similar institutions and is dependent on qualifications and experience. starting date august 1, 1984. send letters of application and resumes by n ovem ber 1, 1983, to provost denton r. coker, c am pus box 8358, stetson university, deland, fl 32720. g o v e r n m e n t d o c u m e n t s l ib r a r ia n . the g overnm e nt d ocum ents librarian is responsible for adm inistering the g overn­ m ent d ocum ents collection and the maps and m icroform s c ollec­ tion. in addition to supervising support staff, this position is responsi­ ble fo r c o lle c tio n d e v e lo p m e n t, fa c u lty liaison , b ib lio g ra p h ic instruction, and general reference service. minimum qualification: mls from an ala-accredited school and a b achelor’s degree of subject emphasis in the sciences or social sciences. a working know ledge and experience of 3 5 years in a large academ ic or p ub ­ lic library docum ents departm ent. some experience in dealing with autom ated library systems. know ledge of one m odern european language or latin. g ood rapport with the public, and good com m un­ ication skills. desirable qualification: a second masters degree in a related field. m ore than 5 years experience w orking with federal d ocum ents and texas state documents. a reading know ledge of spanish, and som e e xpe rie nce with the oclc system. salary: $ 2 2 ,5 0 0 -$ 2 5 ,9 4 4 depending upon qualifications and experience. available: february 1 ‚ 1984. a pplicants should send a resume, offi­ cial transcripts of all degrees, and the names and addresses of three references before novem ber 18, 1983, to: dean covington, chair, g overnm ent docum ents librarian search committee, north texas state u nive rsity libraries, box 5188, n. t. station, denton, tx 76203. equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. head, seria ls c a ta lo g ing c o o r d in a to r , university of m innesota libraries-twin cities, central technical services d epart­ ment, catalog division. this m iddle m anagem ent position is one of 17 professional positions in the catalog division and reports to the division head. responsibilities: manages, organizes and co ordi­ nates serials c ataloging unit. supervises, trains, and evaluates staff; m onitors workflow; develops operations procedures; and acts as a liaison between the catalog division and other library units co nce rn ­ ing serials cataloging. original cataloging and classification of serials and analytics; revising serials cataloging w ork by staff; and resolving com plex bibliographic problems. qualifications: requirem ents in­ clude ala-accredited mls, dem onstrated m anagerial ability and com m unication skills, at least 3 years professional experience that includes substantive serials cataloging, thorough know ledge of aacr2, ddc and/or lc classification, and lc subject headings, and experience in online cataloging systems as well as supervisory experience. desirable qualifications include experience in a large academ ic research library, reading know ledge of european lan­ guages, and autom ated serials cataloging/m anagem ent. a p po int­ ment: the position is in the academ ic professional series at the assis­ tant librarian rank. a ppointm ent salary is based on experience at a minimum of $24,000. application deadline (postmark) is novem ber 4, 1983. applicants should send a letter of application with detailed resume and names of three references to: robert l. wright, person­ nel and staff developm ent officer, university libraries, 499 wilson library, 309 19th avenue south, minneapolis, mn 55455. the uni­ versity of m innesota is an equal opportunity educator and em ployer and specifically invites and encourages applications from wom en and minorities. head libr a r ia n . salary from $27,500 for fiscal year. masters plus w ork on doctorate. 3 years library experience plus 3 years su­ pervisory/adm inistrative experience required. send vita and 3 refer­ ences by nov. 4, to: sherrill watts, south g eorgia college, douglas, ga 31533. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. head of c a ta lo g in g , health sciences library, c olum bia uni­ versity. the health sciences library serves the schools of m edicine, dentistry, nursing, and public health; the presbyterian hospital; and other affiliated health care and research p ro g ra m s in the colum bia-presbyterian m edical center. the library has a staff of over 40, a collection a pproaching 400,000 volumes, approxim ately 3,100 current journal subscriptions, a large m edia center, a separate special collections section, and annual acquisitions expenditures of approxim ately $500,000. technical services operations are auto­ mated: acquisitions and cataloging through rlin, and serials con­ trol th ro u g h philso m . this position, re p o rtin g to the assistant health sciences librarian for access and technical services, m an­ ages all cataloging activities in the health sciences library. respon­ sibilities include planning and implem entation of cataloging and other bibliographic control policies and procedures; supervision of one professional and 3 support staff; coordination of bibliographic control policies with the university libraries; participation in planning overall health sciences library services and operations. duties in­ clude perform ing some original cataloging and resolving difficult cat­ aloging problems. the cataloging unit processes co py cataloging and provides original cataloging for books (including rare books), serials and audiovisuals. in addition to an accredited mls, require­ ments are: m inimum of 4 years of cataloging experience in an aca­ dem ic or research library; thorough com m and of current cataloging principles and practices; experience with an online technical service system; evidence of initiative, problem -solving ability and good oral and written com m unication skills. preference will be given to ca nd i­ dates with experience in cataloging bio-m edical materials, know l­ edge of lc classification and mesh, and a w orking know ledge of at least 2 m odern foreign languages. salary ranges are: librarian ii: $ 2 1 ,5 00 -$ 2 7,9 50 ; librarian iii: $ 2 4 ,5 0 0 -$ 35 ,5 25 . excellent fringe benefits include free tuition and assistance with university housing. subm it resume, listing 3 references and salary requirem ents, to: box 35, butler library, c olum bia university, 535 west 114th street, new york, ny 10027. deadline for applications is n ovem ber 18, 1983. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. head of reference. to be filled between january 1 and july 1 ‚ 1984. responsible for m anaging and providing leadership for a ref­ erence departm ent consisting of 9 professionals plus support staff. areas of responsibilities inclu de reference services, co m p u te r searching, library instruction, faculty liaison, interlibrary loan and governm ent docum ents. qualifications: mls from ala-accredited li­ brary school. an additional graduate degree is desired and required for tenure. must have four years of reference experience, be service oriented and com m itted to m anaging, developing, and prom oting services. ability to w ork and com m unicate effectively with students, fa cu lty and librarians. salary and benefits: a p p o in tm e n t range, $22 ,0 0 0 -$ 2 7 ,0 0 0 , depending on qualifications. tenure-track ap­ pointment. tiaa-cref, blue cross-blue shield. send letter of appli­ cation and resume by n ovem ber 15,1983, to: jam es c. eller, asso­ ciate dean for library services, w ichita state university, box 68, wichita, ks 67208. finalists will be invited for an expense paid inter­ view. wichita state is an affirmative action, equal opportunity em ­ ployer. refer e n c e/b u s in ess l ib r a r ia n . the auraria library, lo­ cated in dow ntow n denver and serving the university of c olorado at denver, m etropolitan state c ollege and the denver auraria c om m u­ nity college, seeks a reference/business librarian to coordinate an active and progressive library business program . the position will su pp ort the cam pus business curriculum through collection devel­ opm ent, specialized reference work, com puter assisted research and specialized library instruction. general reference work, teaching in a library instruction program , participation in staff developm ent ac­ tivities and com m ittee assignm ents will be expected. some evening and weekend w ork required. qualifications: ala-accredited mas­ ters degree is required. a cadem ic b ackground or experience in the business field is strongly preferred. reference, online bibliographic searching, familiarity with governm ent docum ents, teaching experi­ ence and strong com m unication skills are desired. salary: $14,500 m inimum, negotiable depending on background and experience. faculty status, 12-month contract, tuition benefits, 22 vacation days and tiaa/cref. deadline for receipt of all application materials is o ctober 21, 1983. send letter of application, vita, and names and telephone num bers of three references, to: david alexander, search com m ittee chair, auraria library, lawrence at 11 th st., denver, co 80204. aa/eeo employer. refer e n c e/c o lle c tio n d ev elo pm en t lib r a r ia n , en gineering library. the incum bent will have prim ary responsibility for collection m anagem ent and reference services in the engineering library, which has a collection of 174,000 volumes; 950,000 techni­ cal reports; and 1300 current serials. the engineering library sup­ october 1983 / 357 ports the research and instructional program s of the 8 departm ents of the school of engineering and applied sciences; applied physics a nd n ucle ar e n gineering; c hem ical e ngineering and a p p lie d chemistry; civil engineering and engineering mechanics; c om ­ puter science; electrical engineering; industrial engineering and o p eratio n s research; m echanical e n gin ee rin g; and the h enry krum b school of mines. the library also serves related departm ents in the college and the g raduate school of arts and sciences. the incum bent works with the science and engineering division’s 3 other reference and collection developm ent librarians to provide ref­ erence and instructional services and to m anage and develop the collections in the physical sciences, natural sciences and engineer­ ing. the division’s collections total 500,000 volumes, with 5,000 pe­ riodical subscriptions received annually. in the engineering library, the incum bent is responsible for the provision of reference services such as library orientation program s, instruction in library utilization, design of publications, and online data base services, as well as for training student and support staff in basic reference service. c ollec­ tion m anagem ent responsibilities include form ulating, justifying and m onitoring budgets, selecting and deselecting material, and identi­ fying changes in the research and instructional program s as they re­ late to the libraries’ collections. the incum bent will participate in m aking and evaluating collection developm ent policies and plan­ ning reference service for the entire science division, and will be su­ pervised directly by the head, reference and collection d evelop­ ment, science and engineering division. in addition to an accredited mls, requirem ents are; previous relevant reference and data base experience and training, the ability to com m unicate and w ork effec­ tively with faculty and students, a know ledge of scientific com m uni­ cation, and an innovative approach to collection developm ent and the prom otion of com puter-based operations and services. prefer­ ence will be given to applicants with a subject b ackground in engi­ neering or com puter science, experience in collection developm ent, or previous experience in engineering or technical libraries. salary ra n g e s a re ; l ib ra ria n i: $ 1 8 ,0 0 0 $ 2 3 ,4 0 0 ; l ib ra ria n ii; $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 -$ 26 ,0 00 . excellent benefits include free tuition and assist­ ance with university housing. subm it resume, including 3 references and salary requirements, to: box 35, butler library, c olum bia uni­ versity, 535 west 1 14th street, new york, ny 10027. deadline for applications is n ovem ber 11, 1983. an equal opportunity, affirm a­ tive action employer. r efer e n c e l ib r a r ia n /in f o r m a t io n s p e c ia l is t . de pauw university is seeking an innovative public services librarian to participate in the developm ent of expanded information services. responsibilities will include providing both traditional and outreach reference and information services, online searching, and user in­ struction. the position also serves as an information specialist to sev­ eral academ ic departm ents, assisting with collection developm ent and providing library support for individual classes. required: an a la-accredited mls, reference experience in an academ ic library, experience with online searching, and strong interpersonal and com m unication skills. a second masters degree or a strong subject speciality is highly desirable. the position is available january 2, 1984, and offers faculty rank and status, $16,000, and excellent fringe benefits. send a letter of application, a resume, and the names o fth re e to fiv e references to: jana bradley, director of libraries, p.o. box 137, depauw university, greencastle, in 46135. deadline for applications: n ovem ber 1 ‚ 1983. an affirmative action, equal o p p o r­ tunity employer. reference lib r ar ia n , science and te c h n o lo g y . pro vides com prehensive reference assistance in the reference depart­ ment, with emphasis on the sciences and engineering; assists with bibliographic instruction and com puterized literature searching for students and faculty, prepares bibliographies and guides to the liter­ ature. serves as one of six reference division resource librarians in the sciences. is responsible for reference collection developm ent in areas of subject expertise. assists in providing service in the auto­ m ated information retrieval service; interviews patrons and deter­ mines search strategy; operates terminal in order to provide desired in fo rm a tio n to th e p a tro n . q u a lific a tio n s : g ra d u a te o f a l a accredited library school; academ ic b ackground in the physical sci­ ences or engineering; ability to w ork effectively with faculty, staff, and students; should possess flexibility, initiative, and organizational abil­ ities; need effective com m unication skills and a good public service attitude. two years of post-mls professional experience preferred, however entry-level applicants will be considered. open: o ctober 1 ‚ 1983. salary: $15,000 minimum for 10.5 months, negotiable. bene­ fits include up to $70/m onth paid on health, life and disability insur­ ance package; 88% of social security paid for first $16,500 of salary; choice of retirement plans including tiaa-cref, tax deferred annu­ ity program available; no state or local incom e taxes; faculty rank; 14 state holidays. to apply contact susan s. lytle, head, personnel o p­ erations, university library, texas a&m university, college station, tx 77843. an aa/eeo employer. reference lib r a r ia n , tem porary appointm ent (to o ctober 31 ‚ 1984). provides various reference services, bibliographic instruction and some supervisory functions for the duration of a major research grant. the incum bent will organize the technical manuals for use of su pp ort and student staff in the departm ent, and co nd uct a review of physical space utilization within the reference and periodicals rooms. d epartm ent consists of eight professionals and two support staff. mls from an accredited library school required, including some coursew ork involving either automation of library procedures or managem ent. interest in innovative public service delivery. g ood com m unication skills and ability to w ork effectively with colleagues and library users. experience in bibliographic instruction strongly preferred. library or other automation experience useful. starting salary: $16,000 + ‚ depending on qualifications. send letter of a ppli­ cation and resume, including list of references, and have library school credentials, in clu d in g transcripts, fo rw a rd e d to: lance query, personnel librarian, northwestern university library, evan­ ston, il 60201. applications received by o ctober 21 ‚ 1983, will be considered. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. ser ia ls c a ta lo g e r (annual, non-tenure track appointm ent, re­ newable up to 3 years). available january 1 ‚ 1984. responsible for cataloging of serials/periodicals in all subject areas; limited w ork with m onographs and retrospective conversion project. possible assign­ m ent up to 10 hours per m onth at main information desk. ala/m ls required. w orking know ledge of dewey and lc classifications and aacr2 desired. preference given to candidates with two or more years serials cataloging experience using oclc. minimum salary $ 1 5 ,2 0 0 .12-month appointm ent with standard benefits. application deadline is n ovem ber 10, 1983, or until suitable applicant is hired. send resume, academ ic credentials, and three current letters of rec­ om m endation, to: iqbal junaid, catalog librarian, south dakota state u niversity library, box 2115, b rookings, sd 57007. an aa/eeo employer. spec ia l c o llec tio n s tec h n ic a l services c o o r d in a ­ to r . university of georgia libraries. (salary m inimum $18,000). the special collections division com prises rare books and m anu­ scripts, g eorgia collection, richard b. řussell memorial library, and records m anagem ent/university archives. the division ser­ vices the libraries’ collections of prim ary research materials includ­ ing general rare books, confederate imprints, georgiana, historical and literary manuscripts, twentieth century political collections, and university archives. duties: supervise the rare books cataloger and one support staff m em ber; coordinate the w ork of other staff m em ­ bers in processing materials and m aintaining catalogs and finding aids for the rare books and m anuscripts and g eorgia collections; participate in providing reference service for the collections, includ­ in g s o m e w e e k e n d a n d e v e n in g d u ty . q u a lific a tio n s : a l a accredited mls; advanced subject degree preferred; experience with processing, cataloging, and indexing rare books, ephem era, manuscripts, and archives; experience with various policies and pro­ cedures of special collections librarianship, preferably in a large re­ search library; know ledge of automated cataloging and indexing techniques; know ledge of basic research and reference techniques; effective com m unication skills; ability to establish and maintain effec­ tive w orking relationships with co-workers and patrons; knowledge of basic conservation techniques. application procedure: send letter of application by n ovem ber 15,1 98 3 , including resume and names of three references, to: bonnie clemens, assistant director for a d ­ ministrative services, university of g eorgia libraries, athens, ga 30602. this position will be filled only if suitable applicants are found. an equal opportunity, affirmative action institution. t e c h n ic a l s e r v ic e s c o o r d in a t o r . the u n ive rsity of w isconsin-la crosse is seeking applications from experienced li­ brarians for the position of technical services coordinator, to begin january 9 ,1 9 8 4 . primary responsibilities include planning and coor­ dinating existing and new automation activities (acquisitions, circula­ tion, and online catalog); supervision and coordination of acquisi­ tions; coordination of cataloging, serials and m icroform services; planning and implem entation of new services and assisting on an oc­ casional basis at public services desk. the professional librarians are organized as a departm ent of the faculty. applicants must be pre­ pared to participate in collegial governance affairs of the library de­ partm ent. ala-accredited libary degree and a minimum of five years experience in an academ ic library required. knowledge, skills, and experience in library acquisitions and cataloging as well as applica­ tions of com puter technology and supervision necessary. additional graduate w ork desirable. salary from $25,000 depending on qualifi­ cations and experience, for academ ic year tenure track faculty posi­ tion. deadline for submission of applications, n ovem ber 11 ‚ 1983. send resume, names of three professional references and cred en ­ tials to: edwin hill, d epartm ent chairperson, m urphy library, uni­ versity of wisconsin-la crosse, la crosse, wl 54601. uw-la crosse is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. 358 / october 1983 late job listings biomedical collection development librarian, dartmouth college library. dartmouth college library is seeking qualified candidates for the newly created position of collection development librarian for the dana biomedical library which serves the dartmouth college medical school, the dartmouth hitchcock medical center, and the dartmouth college department of biomedical sciences. under the direction of the biomedical librarian, is responsible for collection development and maintenance of the collections in the life sciences and the medical sciences, and coordinates technical services activities in dana biomedical library with the centralized technical services of the dartmouth college library system. supervises the work of the serials assistant, participates in the provision of reference service. qualifications: ala/mls, 2 years experience in a health sciences library, academic background in the biological sciences, familiarity with the medical sciences literature, knowledge of computer-based systems (oclc, rlin, nlm). salary and rank commensurate with background and experience, $15,500 minimum. send resume and names of 3 references by november 30, 1983, to: phyllis e. jaynes, director of user services, 115 baker st., dartmouth college library, hanover, nh 03755. dartmouth college is an aa/eeo/m/f employer. bibliographer, humanities. yale university library. responsible for the development and management of the library's collections in german languages and literature, including netherlands and scandinavian, classical languages and literature, and other humanities disciplines. requires graduate degree in german languages and literature; additional graduate work or degree desirable in other assigned subject areas. mls degree or equivalent work and educational experience. fluency in german and a working knowlege of latin required. greek and hebrew desirable. broad knowledge of the humanities. salary from $20,000. send resume listing three references by november 15, to: diane turner, yale university library, box 1603 a, yale station, new haven, ct 06520. an aa/eeo employer. art, archaeology, and music librarian. position available: february 1, 1984. requirements: requires minimum of an ala-accredited masters degree in library science. undergraduate major or minor degree in art history, archaeology, or musicology required. a second masters is preferred. also required are three years' reference experience in an academic library or in a reference position working with art or music library materials and working knowledge of french, german, or italian. experience in collection development, computer searching and library instruction preferred. must have ability to supervise other staff. excellent communication skills and strong service orientation are essential. duties and responsibilities: responsible for administration of the art, archaeology and music library, a subject divisional library located within the main library. supervises the services of the recorded sound collection and library services for the disabled. staff includes three support staff and student assistants. aam library materials include valuable art books, musical scores, recordings and audio equipment. plans, implements, and evaluates services of the aam library in coordination with departmental programs. responsible for collection development in art, art history, archaeology, anthropology and music. provides reference services to library users, participates in the library instruction program, conducts data base searching in the disciplines of selection responsibility, and serves as library representative to these departments. benefits: excellent benefits package including health, dental, life and disability insurance; tax-deferred annuity program available; educational assistance program. library information: the university of missouri-columbia library, an arl library, serves a student body of 24,000 and a faculty of 2,600 with a collection of october 1983 / 359 over two million volumes and over 2.4 million microforms. an online catalog, to serve the four campuses of the university, is being developed. general information: founded in 1839 as the first state university west of the mississippi, the university of missouri now has four campuses. the columbia campus has 19 schools and colleges, and is located midway between kansas city and st. louis. application deadline: december 1, 1983. minimum salary: $16,000+ depending on qualifications. send letter of application, names of three references and resume to pat burbridge, personnel coordinator, 104 ellis library, university of missouri-columbia, columbia, mo 65201. an equal employment institution. catalog librarian. required: mls from ala-accredited school and experience with oclc, aacr2 and lc classification. responsible for all processing and cataloging of print and non-print materials in a department which includes 3 full time clerical staff plus student staff. one evening a week and occasional weekend duty. salary $14,500-$15,500‚ commensurate with training and experience. faculty status, 12 month contract, liberal benefits. available immediately. send letter of application, resume, transcripts, and three recent letters of reference postmarked by november 15, 1983, to: elmer e. rodgers, head librarian, missouri southern state college library, newman & duquesne roads, joplin, mo 64801. aa-eoe. biomedical librarian. ucla invites applications for head of the biomedical library. this library serves the schools of medicine, dentistry, public health, nursing, and related institutes, the life sciences division and the university hospital and clinics. it is headquarters for the pacific southwest regional medical library service. the collection includes 400,000 volumes and 6,900 serial titles. the head will administer the library and psmrls, including a full time staff of 50. qualifications include demonstrated competence in administering a complex organization; capability of working with academic, library and government groups and individuals; understanding of concepts and trends in health services; knowledge of biomedical library services. an mls from an accredited school is desirable. this position reports to ucla's university librarian and has the rank of associate university librarian. salary $39,700 to $59,600. send letter of application, resume and names of at least three references by december 31, 1983, to: rita a. scherrei, director, administrative systems and personnel services, university research library, ucla, los angeles, ca 90024. ucla is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer and encourages all qualified persons to apply. ucla libraries are represented by an exclusive bargaining agent, the american federation of teachers. this position is exempt from the bargaining unit. executive director_of pais. responsible for the management of all pais activities: planning; policy recommendations; communications with board, staff and members: personnel, financial and product management; purchasing; marketing and membership services. qualifications: mls degree in library or information science; management experience with emphasis on personnel and marketing management; experience in periodicals publishing; communication skills; experience with computerized publishing techniques for indexes; experience with online information retrieval systems. public affairs information service (pais) is a nonprofit educational corporation, publishing the pais bulletin and pais foreign language index, which are also available for online searching through various vendors. salary commensurate with experience. excellent fringe benefits. resume to: wilhelm bartenbach, executive director, public affairs information service, 11 west 40 street, new york, ny 10018. deadline: october 25, 1983. equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. 360 / october 1983 public services librarian. responsible for direction of reference, search services and loan services sections (16 fte). coordinates active library user education program. qualifications: mls and five years of successful experience in one or more areas of academic library public service including two years of supervision. experience with a variety of computer bibliographic search systems essential. salary up to $27,600 to start, depending on experience. send resume and three references, to: sherrilynne fuller, associate director, norris medical library, usc health sciences campus, 2025 zonal avenue, los angeles, ca 90033. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. women and minorities are specifically encouraged to apply. assistant head, original cataloging (search extended). applicant responsible for training and supervision of non-professional staff, for original cataloging of book and non-book materials according to aacr2, library of congress classification and subject headings, and oclc systems requirements, and for maintenance of public catalogs. qualifications: ala-accredited mls. second masters degree desirable, preferably in sciences. cataloging experience in an academic library and sound reading knowledge of one or more european languages are strongly preferred. non-tenure tack appointment with faculty rank, status and benefits. approximate starting salary $18,000. letter of application, resume, and 3 letters of recommendation will be accepted through november 15, 1983, or until position is filled, and should be directed to: donald l. saporito, director of libraries, university libraries, university of southwestern louisiana, 302 e. st. mary blvd., lafayette, la 70504. usl is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. catalog librarian for special formats, central technical services. available: november 1, 1983. provide original cataloging of cartographic materials, films, sound and video recordings, other non-print materials and possibly machine readable data files. revise copy and preliminary cataloging and provide technical assistance to paraprofessionals and nonparaprofessionals. handle complex cataloging problems and coordinate cataloging activities with other sections in central technical services. mls required. minimum three years in an academic/research library, two of which were in original cataloging. supervisory experience preferred. knowledge of marc formats. aacrl/2, oclc/rlin required. knowledge of german/french preferred. $18,144 minimum based upon 1982/83 academic salary schedule. appointment dependent upon qualifications. faculty status, calendar year appointment, tiaa/cref, life/health insurance, 22 days vacation. submit resumes and three sources for current references by november 1, 1983, to: shirley w. bolles (app. 71), alexander library, rutgers university, new brunswick, nj 08903. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. manuscript curator for active university manuscript collection. duties include arrangement and description of collections, preparation of finding aids, and day-by-day supervision of research room and student workers. minimum qualifications: ma in american history; professional archival training and/or substantial experience in manuscript work; ability to deal effectively with the public. preferred: demonstrated competence in north carolina and/or southern history and government; publication or editorial experience; master's degree from ala-accredited library school. available immediately. salary: $16,000 minimum, 12-month appointment; faculty rank and fringe benefits. send letter of application with resume, and names of three references, to: elizabeth smith, faculty personnel committee, joyner library, east carolina university, greenville, nc 27834. applications must be postmarked on or before november 26, 1983. east carolina university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. october 1983 / 361 agriculture librarian. a permanent position available immediately. the agriculture librarian is responsible for the administration of the agriculture library and for the direction of its staff. the librarian utilizes a materials budget of approximately $60,000 to develop research quality collections in the fields of agricultural economics, agricultural engineering, animal science, plant pathology, forestry, horticulture, dairy science, and agronomy, and assures that reference, cataloging and online services are provided to meet the library needs of the faculty, students, and allied personnel in the areas served. the librarian continues a strong working relationship with the faculty and administration of the college of agriculture and engages in instructional and promotional activities for the library. required: a masters degree in library science from an accredited ala library school or its equivalent. a minimum of 5 years of successful professional experience of increasing responsibility in an academic, research or special library, including experience in public services and significant supervisory and administrtive experience. must be familiar with the literature and with the needs of researchers in agricultural and/or biological sciences. also must be familiar with automated information systems and services. applicant must have a record of publication and professional involvement consistent with appointment with tenure. preferred: experience with collection development, reference, cataloging, and bibliographic instruction. experience in an agricultural and/or biological sciences library. librarians have faculty rank. rank for this position is associate professor or professor depending upon qualifications. librarians must meet general university requirements for promotion and tenure (research, publication and university/ community/ professional service). salary $25,000 upward, depending on qualifications and scholarly credentials. send complete resume with names and addresses of five references, to: allen g. dries, library personnel manager, university of illinois library at urbana-champaign, 127 library, 1408 west gregory drive, urbana, il 61801. phone (217) 333-8169. for maximum consideration, applications and nominations should be received no later than november 1 ‚ 1983. the university of illinois is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. media specialist. supervises and promotes audio-visual services on the rio grande campus (austin) and evening/extension campuses. maintains liaison with audio-visual services and television studio on other campuses. advises on budget and program needs. supervises three media technicians. scripts and produces in-house media programming. stron service orientation required. qualifications: masters in educational technology and/or masters in library science (ala-accredited) with emphasis on audiovisual services. two years experience in related position in education with experience as teacher, av librarian, or instructional developer in college environment preferred. details on request. salary range: $18,424-$23,009 (professional classification). excellent enefits. apply with letter, resume, and names of three references by november 11, 1983, to: personnel services, austin community college, p.o. box 2285, austin, tx 78768. an aa/ee0 employer. head of acquisitions. senior assistant librarian rank, tenure-track, minimum starting salary of $18,000 for 12 months, excellent benefits. acquisitions staff of 5.5 fte handles an annual budget of more than $500,000, using an automated system. required: mls from ala-accredited school; minimum of 3 years post-mls experience in college or university library, including one year in managerial capacity; knowledge of bibliographic/book trade resources; familiarity with automated systems. given the minimum requirements (above), weight will be given to professional experience in technical service, particularly in acquisitions, to direct experience with automated systems, to working knowledge of foreign languages, and to graduate study beyond the mls. 362 / october 1983 to be considered, application, resume, and 3 recent letters of reference must be received by october 17. full job description will be sent upon request. send all correspondence to: office of faculty and staff relations, 4th floor, administration building, suny college at brockport, brockport, ny 14420. suny is an eeo, aa employer. acquisitions librarian. responsible for administration of monographs, serials, and av acquisitions department for state-supported university of 7,000 students with materials budget exceeding $400,000. supervise clerical and student assistants. qualifications: ala-accredited mls; 1-2 years experience in acquisitions in an academic library preferred; knowledge of the book rule, approval plans, and automated library systems; ability to work effectively with diverse faculty and library staff; supervisory skills; broad intellectual background and sound judgment; second master's degree desirable. salary commensurate with education and experience; $15,500-$17,500. faculty status, 3-year contract. send letter of application, resume, and names of 3 references, to: director's office, olson library, northern michigan university, marquette, mi 49855. deadline: december 1. begin as soon as possible. an aa/e0 employer. archives and special collections librarian. to set up an archive collection. some reference desk duty also required. qualifications: mls, ala-accredited library school, minimum of 2 years catalog or archive experience. salary: open. deadline: november 15, 1983. contact: library director, fayetteville state university, fayetteville, nc 28301. catalogers (2). must be familiar with 0clc, aacr2, dewey and lc. to catalog and process monographic and av materials. qualifications: mls, ala-accredited library school. minimum of 2 years catalog experience required. one foreign language helpful. salary: open. deadline: november 15. contact: library director, fayetteville state university, fayetteville, nc 28301. the oberlin conference on theft on september 19-20, 1983, at oberlin college, ohio, 38 librarians, curators, booksellers, attorneys, and law enforcement agents participated in a unique conference that, in an ideal world, should never have taken place— the oberlin conference on theft. funded largely by a grant from the h.w. wilson company, the conference was modeled on last year's conference on deaccessioning held at brown university. william a. moffett, the oberlin college librarian who two years ago apprehended the most active book thief in american history (james richard shinn)‚ and elisabeth woodburn, president of the antiquarian booksellers association of america (abaa)‚ were co-chairs of the conference. because of the increasing number of rare and unique items that are stolen from academic and special collections and bought unknowingly by antiquarian bookdealers‚ conference participants shared stories, ideas, concerns, and suggestions for raising the consciousness of librarians and other professionals in university administration, law enforcement agencies, law firms, and the book trade. all too often the attitude has been that "it won't happen here, and if it does there is not much anyone can do about it.” october 1983 / 363 but it soon became clear that there are many steps that a library can take to secure its collections, minimize the likelihood of a major theft, and increase the chances of successfully recovering stolen items. the majority of library thefts are perpetrated by students or faculty who do not wish to be inconvenienced by checking out or photocopying a book or journal article in the core collection. several conference participants pointed out ways of deterring this kind of theft: setting up an electronic detection system that is subtly obvious without being too obtrusive (like 3m's tattle-tape); using security guards or surveillance systems that give a thief the impression of being watched; locking windows; alarming the perimeters; and blocking access to the stacks from odd entry points like the roof or underground steam tunnels. determined thieves like shinn are a minority. however, they may well be clever enough to sidestep any security precautions a library has taken. what should a library do when it has discovered a theft? oberlin confer­ ence participants unanimously agreed that a major theft should be reported immediately to a) campus police, b) local antiquarian booksellers, c) bookline alert: missing books and manuscripts (bambam)‚ a national database to alert the national book trade to stolen items, and d) the abaa. reporting a theft is a deterrent to future thefts and is a critical factor in the recovery of the stolen items. on the other hand, placing an embargo on all information about a theft does nothing to solve the crime, facilitates the sale of the stolen items, and can be very embarrassing for an institution if word leaks out from unofficial sources. depending on the magnitude of the crime and other jurisdictional matters‚ other local and federal law enforcement agencies may be called in. now that the fbi has been educated about the significance of rare books and manuscripts thanks to their involvement in the shinn case, local bureaus may be willing to spend considerable time in recovering an institution's property. many of the conference speakers stressed the importance of educating local police officials, university administrators, and relevant legal counsel on the value of culturally precious and unique materials before a theft occurs. they will then take action more readily should a crisis develop. another critical area of discussion at the oberlin conference centered around the marks of ownership placed on rare materials. in order to recover stolen materials, proof of ownership must be demonstrated. if marks of owner­ ship have been expertly removed, a librarian must be able to show the probabil­ ity of their once having existed on the items in question. accurate cataloging and acquisition records must also be presented that can uniquely identify par­ ticular items and show that indeed they are the library's property. guidelines for the security and marking of special materials may be found in the march 1982 c&rl news‚ pp. 90-93. the conference ended with discussion on the establishment of a national security office that would act as a clearinghouse of information about stolen library/archival property, keep a national registry of library markings to make it easier to identify the location of owner institutions, publicize the modes of operation used by professional book thieves, and advise institutions on security information and legislation. the proceedings of the oberlin conference on theft will be published next year in a format that is yet to be determined. c&rl news will announce its availability at that time. all gale r eferen ce books a re sent on 6 0 -d a y approval encyclopedia of associations m a rtin c o n n o rs. a b o u t 750pp. 4 cumulative indexes. gale, 1983-84. isbn ... a guide to national and international 0-8103-1696-x. sub., $150.00. (so) (part o r g a n iz a tio n s , in c lu d in g : t ra d e‚ 1 in print)business, and commercial; agricultural and commodity; legal, governmental, c o n s u lt t h is new d ire c to ry fo r public administration, and military; detailed descriptions and complete scientific, engineering and technical; con tact inform ation on today's high educational; cultural; social welfare; technology communications systems health and medical; public affairs; and services. covering the entire f r a te r n a l, f o r e ig n i n t e r e s t , n a ­ t i o n a l i t y , a n d e th n ic ; r e lig io u s; g a m u t o f m odern te le c o m m u n i­ veteran, heriditary‚ and patriotic; c a tio n s , the th ree-p art work will hobby and aυocational; athletic and d e s c rib e 8 00 o r g a n iz a tio n s and sports; labor unions, associations, provide 500 glossary terms. a n d f e d e r a t i o n s ; c h a m b e r s o f commerce; a n d greek l e tte r a nd encyclopedia of medical related organizations. 18th ed. edited organizations and agenciesby denise akey. the 1984 edition of the no. 1 guide to sources for current facts, ... a subject guide to medical societies, figures, and opinions. gale, 1983. professional and voluntary associ­ a t i o n s , f o u n d a t i o n s , r e s e a r c h vol. 1, n a ti o n a l organizations o f institutes, federal and state agencies, the u.s. the basic volume provides medical and allied health schools, over 17,750 full descriptions of active information centers, data base ser­ groups. 1,936pp. in 2 parts. is b n 0v ic e s , a n d r e l a t e d h e a l t h care 8103-1687-0. $170.00/set. (so) o r g a n iz a tio n s . 1st ed. e d ite d by anthony t. kruzas. 768pp. name index. vol. 2, geographic a n d executive subject cross index. gale, 1983. isbn index. both indexes give addresses 0-8103-0347-7. $125.00. (so) and phone numbers. 1,064pp. is b n fu rnishes current inform ation on 0-8103-1688-9. $150.00. (so) some 10,000 m ajor public and private v o l. 3, n e w a s s o c i a t i o n s a n d agencies in medicine and related projects. inter-ed. supp. is b n 0-8103fields th a t are concerned with in ­ 0130-x. sub., $165.00. (so) f o r m a t i o n , f u n d in g , r e s e a r c h , education, planning, advocacy, and service. the descriptive entries are telecommunications systems arranged in 78 chapters covering and services directory specific areas of modern health care ...an international descriptive guide and medicine. to n e w a n d e s t a b l i s h e d t e l e ­ communications organizations, s y s ­ tems, and services, covering voice and (so) t hese titles are av ailable at d a ta c o m m u n i c a t i o n s ‚ t e le c o n ­ g ale’s 5% stand ing order discount. ferencing, electronic mail, local area deduct 5% i f you send check with networks, satellite services, videotex and teletext, interactive cable tele­ order. customers outside the u .s. v i s i o n , t r a n s a c t i o n a l s e r v i c e s , and c anad a add 10%. telegram, telex, facsimile, and others, i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d c o n s u l t a n t s ‚ a s s o c ia tio n s, research i n s titu te s , publishers and information services, gale research co. book tower • detroit, mi 48226 and regulatory bodies, with a detailed g l o s s a r y o f t e r m s , a c r o n y m s ‚ standards, and issues in the field. 1st to order by phone: 1 -8 0 0 -5 2 1 -0 7 0 7 ed. published in 3 softbound parts. tollfree. in c anada, michigan, alaska, edited by joh n schmittroth, jr., and and hawaii: 1-313-961-2242. new books from gale an overview of the current state of linked and open data in cataloging irfan ullah, shah khusro, asim ullah, and muhammad naeem information technology and libraries | december 2018 47 irfan ullah (cs.irfan@uop.edu.pk) is doctoral candidate, shah khusro (khusro@uop.edu.pk) is professor, asim ullah (asimullah@uop.edu.pk) is doctoral student, and muhammad naeem (mnaeem@uop.edu.pk) is assistant professor, at the department of computer science, university of peshawar. abstract linked open data (lod) is a core semantic web technology that makes knowledge and information spaces of different knowledge domains manageable, reusable, shareable, exchangeable, and interoperable. the lod approach achieves this through the provision of services for describing, indexing, organizing, and retrieving knowledge artifacts and making them available for quick consumption and publication. this is also aligned with the role and objective of traditional library cataloging. owing to this link, major libraries of the world are transferring their bibliographic metadata to the lod landscape. some developments in this direction include the replacement of anglo-american cataloging rules 2nd edition by the resource description and access (rda) and the trend towards the wider adoption of bibframe 2.0. an interesting and related development in this respect are the discussions among knowledge resources managers and library community on the possibility of enriching bibliographic metadata with socially curated or user-generated content. the popularity of linked open data and its benefit to librarians and knowledge management professionals warrant a comprehensive survey of the subject. although several reviews and survey articles on the application of linked data principles to cataloging have appeared in literature, a generic yet holistic review of the current state of linked and open data in cataloging is missing. to fill the gap, the authors have collected recent literature (2014–18) on the current state of linked open data in cataloging to identify research trends, challenges, and opportunities in this area and, in addition, to understand the potential of socially curated metadata in cataloging mainly in the realm of the web of data. to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this review article is the first of its kind that holistically treats the subject of cataloging in the linked and open data environment. some of the findings of the review are: linked and open data is becoming the mainstream trend in library cataloging especially in the major libraries and research projects of the world; with the emergence of linked open vocabularies (lov), the bibliographic metadata is becoming more meaningful and reusable; and, finally, enriching bibliographic metadata with user-generated content is gaining momentum. conclusions drawn from the study include the need for a focus on the quality of catalogued knowledge and the reduction of the barriers to the publication and consumption of such knowledge, and the attention on the part of library community to the learning from the successful adoption of lod in other application domains and contributing collaboratively to the global scale activity of cataloging. introduction with the emergence of the semantic web and linked open data (lod), libraries have been able to make their bibliographic data publishable and consumable on the web, resulting in an increased understanding and utility both for humans and machines.1 additionally, the use of linked data principles of lod has allowed connecting related data on the web.2 traditional catalogs as mailto:cs.irfan@uop.edu.pk mailto:khusro@uop.edu.pk mailto:asimullah@uop.edu.pk mailto:mnaeem@uop.edu.pk current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 48 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 collections of metadata about library content have served the same purpose for a long time.3 it is, therefore, natural to establish a link between the two technologies and exploit the capabilities of lod to enhance the power of cataloging services. in this regard, significant milestones have been achieved, which includes the use of linked and open data principles for publishing and linking library catalogs, bibframe, and europeana data model (edm).4 however, the potential of linked and open data for building more efficient libraries and the challenges involved in that direction are mostly unknown due to the lack of a holistic view of the relationship between cataloging and the lod initiative and the advances made in both areas. likewise, the possibility of enriching the bibliographic metadata with user-generated content such as ratings, tags, and reviews to facilitate the search for known-items as well as exploratory search has not received much attention. 5 some studies of preliminary extent have, however, appeared in literature an overview of which is presented in the following paragraphs. several survey and review articles have contributed to different aspects of cataloging in the lod environment. hallo et al. investigated how linked data is used in digital libraries, how the major libraries of the world implemented it, and how they benefit from it by focusing on the selected ontologies and vocabularies. 6 they identified several specific challenges to applying linked data to digital libraries. more specifically, they reviewed the linked data applications in digital libraries by analyzing research publications regarding the major national libraries (obtaining five-stars by following linked data principles) and published from 2012 to 2016.7 tallerås examined statistically the quality of linked bibliographic data published by the major libraries including spain, france, the united kingdom, and germany. 8 yoose and perkins presented a brief survey of lod uses under different projects in different domains including libraries, archives, and museums.9 by exploring the current advances in the semantic web, robert identified the potential roles of libraries in publishing and consuming bibliographic data and institutional research output as linked and open data on the web.10 gardašević presented a detailed overview of semantic web and linked open data from the perspective of library data management and their applicability within the library domain to provide a more open and integrated catalog for improved search, resource discovery, and access.11 thomas, pierre-yves, and bernard presented a review of linked open vocabularies (lov), in which they analyzed the health of lov from the requirements perspective of its stakeholders, its current progress, its uses in lod applications, and proposed best practices and guidelines regarding the promotion of lov ecosystem.12 they uncovered the social and technical aspects of this ecosystem and identified the requirements for the long-term preservation of lov data. vandenbussche et al. highlighted the features, components, significance, and applications of lov and identified the ways in which lov supports ontology & vocabulary engineering in the publication, reuse and data quality of lod.13 tosaka and park performed a detailed literature review of rda (2005–11) and identified its fundamental differences from aacr2, its relationship with the metadata standards, and its impact on metadata encoding standards, users, practitioners, and the training required.14 sprochi presented the current progress in rda, frbr (functional requirements for bibliographic records), and bibframe to predict the future of library metadata, the skills and knowledge required to handle it, and the directions in which the library community is heading. 15 gonzales identified the limitations of marc21 and the benefits of and challenges in adopting the bibframe information technology and libraries | december 2018 49 framework.16 taniguchi assessed bibframe 2.0 for the exchange and sharing of metadata created in different ways for different bibliographic resources.17 he discussed bibframe 1.0 from rda point of view.18 he examined bibframe 2.0 from the perspective of rda to uncover issues in its mapping to bibframe including rda expressions in bibframe, mapping rda elements to bibframe properties, and converting marc21 metadata records to bibframe metadata. 19 fayyaz, ullah, and khusro reported on the current state of lod and identified several prominent issues, challenges, and research opportunities. 20 ullah, khusro, and ullah reviewed and evaluated different approaches for bibliographic classification of digital collections.21 by looking at the above survey and review articles, one may observe that these articles target a specific aspect of cataloging from the perspective of lod. the holistic analysis and a complete picture of the current state of cataloging in transiting to lod ecosystem are missing. this paper adds to the body of knowledge by filling this gap in the literature. more specifically, it attempts to answer the following research questions (rqs): rq01: how linked open data (lod) and vocabularies (lov) are transforming the digital landscape of library catalogs? rq02: what are the prominent/major issues, challenges, and research opportunities in publishing and consuming bibliographic metadata as linked and open data? rq03: what is the possible impact of extending bibliographic metadata with the usergenerated content and making it visible on the lod cloud? the first section of this paper answers rq01 by discussing the potential role of lod and lov in making library catalogs visible and reusable on the web. the second section answers rq02 by identifying some of the prominent issues, challenges, and research opportunities in publishing, linking, and consuming library catalogs as linked data. it also identifies specific issues in rda and bibframe from lod perspective and highlights the quality of lod-based cataloging. the third section answers rq03 by reviewing the state-of-the-art literature on the socially curated metadata and its role in cataloging. the last section concludes the paper followed by references cited in this article. the role of linked open data and vocabularies in cataloging the catalogers, librarians, and information science professionals have always been busy defining the set of rules, guidelines, and standards to record the metadata about knowledge artifacts accurately, precisely, and efficiently. the aacr2 are among the widely used rules and guidelines for cataloging. however, it has several issues with the nature of authorship, the relationships between bibliographic metadata, the categorization of format-specific resources, and the description of new data types.22 in an attempt to produce its revised version, aacr3, the cataloging community noticed that a new framework should be developed with the name of rda.23 based on frbr conceptual models, rda is a “flexible and extendible bibliographic framework” that supports data sharing and interoperability and is compatible with marc21 and aacr2.24 according to the rda toolkit, rda describes digital and non-digital resources by taking advantage of the flexibilities and efficiencies of modern information storage and retrieval technologies while at the same time is backward-compatible with legacy technologies used in conventional resource discovery and access applications.25 it is aligned with the ifla’s current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 50 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 (international federation of library associations and institutions) conceptual models of authority and bibliographic metadata (frbr, frad [functional requirements for authority data], frsad [functional requirements for subject authority data]).26 rda accommodates all types of content and media in digital environments with improved bibliographic control in the realm of linked and open data; however, its responsiveness to user requirements needs further research.27 the discussion of the cataloging rules and guidelines stays incomplete without the metadata encoding standards and formats that give practical shape to these rules in the form of library catalogs. the most common encoding formats include dublin core (dc) and marc21. dublin core (http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/vocabs/dce) is a [general-purpose metadata encoding scheme and] vocabulary of fifteen properties with “broad, generic, and usable terms” for resource description in natural language. it is advantageous as it presents relatively low barriers to repository construction; however, it lacks in standards to index subjects consistently as well as to offer a uniform semantic basis necessary for an enhanced search experience.28 the lack of uniform semantic basis is due to the individual interpretations and exploitations of dc metadata by the libraries, which in turn originated from its different and independent implementations at the element level.29 marc21 is the most common machine process-able metadata encoding format for bibliographic metadata. it can be mapped to several formats including dc, marc/xml (http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/), mods (http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods), mads (http://www.loc.gov/standards/mads), and other metadata standards.30 however, marc21 has several limitations such as only library software and librarians understand it, it is semantically inexpressive and isolated from the web structure, and it lacks in expressive semantic connections to relate different data elements in a single catalog record.31 besides its limitations, marc metadata encoding format is vital for resource discovery especially within the library environment, and therefore, ways must be found to make visible the library collections outside the libraries and available through the major web search engines.32 one such effort is from the library of congress (http://catalog.loc.gov/) that introduced a new bibliographic metadata framework, bibframe 2.0, which will eventually replace marc21 and allow semantic web and linked open data to interlink bibliographic metadata from different libraries. other metadata encoding schema and frameworks include schema.org, edm, and the international community for documentation (cidoc)’s conceptual reference model (cidoc-crm).33 today, the bibliographic metadata records are available on the web in several forms including marc21, online public access catalogs (opacs), and bibliographic descriptions from online catalogs (e.g., library of congress), online cooperative catalogs (e.g., oclc’s worldcat [https://www.oclc.org/en/worldcat.html program]), social collaborative cataloging applications (e.g., librarything [https://www.librarything.com]), digital libraries (e.g., ieee xplore digital library [https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xplore/home.jsp]), acm digital library(https://dl.acm.org), book search engines such as google books, and commercial databases including e.g., amazon.com. most of these cataloging web applications use either marc or other legacy standards as metadata encoding and representation schemes. however, the majority of these applications are either considering or transiting to the emerging cataloging rules, frameworks, and encoding schemes so that the bibliographic descriptions of their holdings could be made visible and reusable as linked and open data on the web for the broader interests of libraries, publishers, and end-users. http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/vocabs/dce http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/ http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods http://www.loc.gov/standards/mads http://catalog.loc.gov/ https://www.oclc.org/en/worldcat.html https://www.librarything.com/ https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xplore/home.jsp https://dl.acm.org/ information technology and libraries | december 2018 51 the presence of high-quality reusable vocabularies makes the consumption of linked data more meaningful, which is made possible by linked open vocabularies (lov) that bring value-added extensions to the web of data.34 the following two subsections attempt to answer the rq01 by highlighting how lod and lov are transforming the current digital landscape of cataloging. linked and open data the semantic web and linked open data have enabled libraries to publish and make visible their bibliographic data on the web, which increases the understanding and consumption of this metadata both for humans and machines.35 lod connects and relates bibliographic metadata on the web using linked data principles.36 publishing, linking, and consuming bibliographic metadata as linked and open data brings several benefits. these include improvements in data visibility, linkage with different online services, interoperability through universal lod platform, and the credibility due to user annotations.37 other benefits include: the semantic modeling of entities related to bibliographic resources; ease in transforming topics into skos; ease in the usage of linked library data in other services; better data visualization according to user requirements; linking and querying linked data from multiple sources; and improved usability of library linked data in other domains and knowledge areas.38 different users including scientists, students, citizens and other stakeholders of library data can benefit from adopting lod in libraries.39 linked data has the potential to make bibliographic metadata visible, reusable, shareable, and exchangeable on the web with greater semantic interoperability among the consuming applications. several major projects including bibframe, lodlam (linked open data in libraries archives and museums [http://lodlam.net]), and ld4l (linked data for libraries [https://www.ld4l.org]) are in progress, which advocates for this potential.40 similarly, library linked data (lld) is lod-based bibliographic datasets, available in mods and marc21 and could be used in making search systems more sophisticated and may also be used in lov datasets to integrate applications requiring library and subjects domain datasets.41 bianchini and guerrini report on the current changes in the library and cataloging domains from ranganathan’s point of view of trinity (library, books, staff), which states that changes in one element of this trinity undoubtedly affect the others.42 they found several factors including readers, collections, and services influence this trinity and emphasize for a change: • readers moved to the web from libraries and wanted to save their time but want many capabilities including searching and navigating the full-text of resources by following links. they want resources connected to similar and related resources. they want concepts interlinked to perform an exploratory search, find serendipitous results to fulfill their information needs. • collections encompass several changes from their production to dissemination, from search and navigation to the representation and presentation of content. the ways the users access them and catalogers describe them are changing. their management is moving beyond the boundaries of their corresponding libraries to the open and broader landscape of open access context and exposure to lod environment. • services are moving from bibliographic data silos to the semantic web. this affects moving the bibliographic model to a more connected and linked data model and environment of semantic web. the data is moving from bibliographic database management systems to large lod graph, where millions of marc records are reused and converted to new http://lodlam.net/ https://www.ld4l.org/ current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 52 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 encoding formats that are backward compatible with marc21, rda, and others and provide opportunities to be exploited fully by the linked and open data environment. thinking along this direction, new cataloging rules and guidelines, such as rda, are making us a part of the growing global activity of cataloging. therefore, catalogers should take keen interest in and avail themselves of the opportunities that lie in linked and open data for cataloging. otherwise, they (as a service) might be forgotten or removed from the trinity, i.e., from collections and readers.43 several major libraries have been actively working to make their bibliographic metadata visible and re-usable on the web. the library of congress through its linked data service (http://id.loc.gov) enables humans and machines to access its authority data programmatically. 44 it exposes and interconnects data on the web through dereferenceable uniform resource identifiers (uris).45 its scope includes providing access to the commonly found loc standards and vocabularies (controlled vocabularies and data values) for the list of authorities and controlled vocabularies that loc currently supports.46 according to the loc, the linked data service brings several benefits to the users including: accessing data at no cost; providing granular access to individual data values; downloading controlled vocabularies and their data values in numerous formats; enabling linking to loc data values within the user metadata using linked data principles; providing a simple restful api, clear license and usage policy for each vocabulary; accessing data across loc divisions through a unified endpoint; and visualizing relationships between concepts and values.47 however, to fully exploit the potentials of lod, loc is mainly focusing on its bibframe initiative.48 bibframe is not only a replacement for the current marc21 metadata encoding format it is a new way of thinking how the available large amount of bibliographic metadata could be shared, reused, and made available as linked and open data. 49 the bibframe 2.0 (https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe2-model.html) model organizes information into work (the details of the about the work information), instance (work on specific subject quantity in numbers), item (format: print or electronic), and nature (copy/original work). bibframe 2.0 elaborates the roles of the persons in the specific work as agents, and the subject of the work as subjects and events.50 according to taniguchi, bibframe 2.0 takes the bibliographic metadata standards to the linked and open data with model and vocabulary that makes the cataloging more useful both inside and outside the library community.51 to achieve this goal, it needs to fulfill two primary requirements. these include (1) accepting and representing metadata created with rda by replacing the marc21, and therefore, working as creating, exchanging, and sharing rda metadata; (2) accepting and accommodating descriptive metadata for bibliographic resources created by libraries, cultural heritage communities, and users for the wide exchange and sharing. bibframe 2.0 should comply with the linked data principles including the use of rdf and uris. in addition to the library of congress, oclc through its linked data research has also been actively involved in research on transforming and publishing its bibliographic metadata as linked data.52 under this program, oclc aims to provide a technical platform for the management and publication of its rdf datasets at a commercial scale. it models the key bibliographic entities including work and person and populates them with legacy and marc-based metadata. it extends http://id.loc.gov/ https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe2-model.html information technology and libraries | december 2018 53 models to efficiently describe the contents of digital collections, art objects, and institutional repositories, which are not very well-described in marc. it improves the bibliographic description of works and their translations. it manages the transition from marc and other legacy encoding formats to linked data and develops prototypes for native consumption of linked data to improve resource description and discovery. finally, it organizes teaching and training events.53 since 2012, oclc has been publishing bibliographic data as linked data with three major lod datasets including oclc persons, worldcat works, and worldcat.org.54 inspired from google research, currently, they have been working on knowledge vault pipeline process to harvest, extract, normalize, weigh, and synthesize knowledge from bibliographic records, authority files, and the web to generate linked data triples to improve the exploration and discovery experience of end-users.55 worldcat.org publishes it bibliographic metadata as linked data by extracting a rich set of entities including persons, works, places, events, concepts, and organizations to make possible several web services and functionalities for resource discovery and access.56 it uses schema.org (http://schema.org) as the base ontology, which can be extended with different ontologies and vocabularies to model worldcat bibliographic data to be published and consumed as linked data.57 tennant presents a simple example of how this works. suppose we want to represent the fact “william shakespeare is the author of hamlet” as linked data.58 to do this, the important entities should be extracted along with their semantics (relationships) and represented in a format that is both machine-processable and human-readable. using schema.org, virtual international authority file (viaf.org), and worldcat.org, the sentence can be represented as a linked data triple, as shown in figure 1 based on tennant.59 the digital bibliography & library project (dblp) is an online computer science bibliography that provides bibliographic information about major publications in computer science with the goal of providing free access to high-quality bibliographic metadata and links to the electronic version of these publications.60 as of october 2018, it has indexed more than 4.3 million publications from more than 2.1 million authors and has indexed more than 40,000 journal volumes, 38,000 conference/workshop proceedings, and more than 80,000 monographs.61 its dataset is available on lod that allows for faceted search and faceted navigation to the matching publications. it uses growbag graphs to create topic facets and uses dblp++ datasets (an enhanced version of dblp) and additional data extracted from the related webpages on the web.62 a mysql database stores the dblp++ dataset that is accessible through several ways including (1) getting the database dump; (2) using its web services; (3) using d2r server to access it in rdf; and (4) getting the rdf dump available in n3 serialization.63 the above discussions on loc, oclc, and dblp make it clear that lod can potentially transform the cataloging landscape of libraries by making bibliographic metadata visible and reusable on the web. however, this potential can only be exploited to its fullest if relevant vocabularies are provided to make the linked data more meaningful. lov fulfills this demand for relevant and standard vocabularies, discussed in the next subsection. current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 54 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 figure 1. an example of publishing a sample fact as linked data (based on tennant64). linked open vocabularies linked open vocabularies (lov) are a “high-quality catalog of reusable vocabularies to describe linked and open data.”65 they assist publishers in choosing the appropriate vocabulary to efficiently describe the semantics (classes, properties, and data types) of the data to be published as linked and open data.66 lov interconnect vocabularies, version control, the property type of values to be matched with a query to increase the score of the terms, and offers a range of data access methods including apis, sparql endpoint, and data dump. the aim is to make the reuse of well-documented vocabularies possible in the lod environment.67 the lov portal brings valueadded extensions to the web of data, which is evident from its adoption in several state-of-the-art applications.68 the presence of vocabulary makes the corresponding linked data meaningful, if the original vocabulary vanishes from the web, linked data applications that rely on it no longer function because they cannot validate against the authoritative source. lov systems prevent vocabularies from becoming unavailable by providing redundant or back-up locations for these vocabularies.69 the lov catalog meets almost all types of search criteria including search using metadata, ontology, apis, rdf dump, and sparql endpoint enabling it to provide a range of services regarding the reuse of rdf vocabularies.70 linked data should be accompanied by its meaning to achieve its benefits, which is possible using vocabularies especially rdf vocabularies that are also published as linked data and linked with each other forming an lov ecosystem.71 such an ecosystem defines the health and usability of linked data by making its meaningful interpretation possible.72 for an ontology or vocabulary to be included into the lov catalog, it must be of an appropriate size with low-level and normalized information technology and libraries | december 2018 55 constraints and represented in rdfs or web ontology language (owl); it must allow creating instances and support documentation by permitting comments, labels, definitions, and descriptions to support end users.73 the ontology must have additional characteristics such as those described in semantic web languages like owl, published on the web with no limitations on its reuse, and support for content negotiation using searchable content and namespace uris .74 the lov catalog offers four core functionalities that make it more attractive for libraries. the aggregate accesses vocabularies through dump file or (a sparql) endpoint. the search finds classes/properties in a vocabulary or ontology. the stat displays descriptive statistics of lov vocabularies. finally, suggest enables the registry of new vocabularies.75 radio and hanrath uncovered the concerns regarding transitioning to lov including how preexisting terms could be mapped while considering the potential semantic loss.76 they describe this transition in the light of a case study at the university of kansas institutional repository, which adopted oclc’s fast vocabulary and analyzed the outcomes and impact of exposing their data as linked data. to them, a vocabulary that is universal in scope and detail can become “bloated” and may result in an aggregated list of uncontrolled terms. however, such a diverse system may be capable of accurately describing the contents of an institutional repository. in this regard, adopting linked data vocabulary may serve to increase the overall quality of data by ensuring consistency with greater exposure of the resources when published as lod. however, such a transition to a linked data vocabulary is not that simple and gets complicated when the process involves reconciling the legacy metadata especially when dealing with the issues of under or misrepresentation.77 publishers, commercial entities, and data providers such as universities are taking keen interest and consortial participation, and therefore the library community must contribute to, benefit from, and consider this inevitable opportunity seriously.78 considering, the core role of libraries in connecting people to the information, they should come forward to make available their descriptive metadata collections as linked and open data for the benefit of the scholarly community on the web. it is time to move from strings (descriptive bibliographic records) to things (data items) that are connected in a more meaningful manner for the consumption of both machines and humans.79 besides the numerous benefits of the lov, there are some well-documented [and well-supported] vocabularies that are “not published or no longer available.”80 while focusing on the mappings between schema.org and lov, nogales et al. argue that the lov portal is limited as “some of the vocabularies are not available here.”81 in other words, the lov portal is growing, but currently, it is at the infant stage, where much work is needed to bring all or at least the missing welldocumented and well-supported vocabularies. this way the true benefits of lov could be exploited to the fullest when such vocabularies are linked and made available for the consumption and reuse of the broader audience and applications of the web of data. challenges, issues, and research opportunities to answer the rq02, this section attempts to identify some of the prominent/key challenges and issues regarding publishing and consuming bibliographic metadata as linked and open data. the sheer scale and diversity of cataloging frameworks, metadata encoding schemes, and standards make it difficult to approach cataloging effectively and efficiently. the quality of the cataloging data is another dimension that needs proper attention. current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 56 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 the multiplicity of cataloging rules and standards the importance and critical role of standards in cataloging are clear to everyone. with standards, it becomes possible to identify authors uniquely; link users to the intended and the required resources; assess the value and usage of the services a library or information system provides; operate efficiently different transactions regarding bibliographic metadata, link content, preserve metadata, and generate reports; and enable the transfer of notifications, data, and events across machines.82 the success of these standards is because of the community-based efforts and their utility for a person/organization and ease of adoption. 83 however, we are living in a “jungle of standards” with massive scale and complexity.84 we are facing a flood of standards, schemas, protocols, and formats to deal with bibliographic metadata. 85 it is necessary to come up with some uniform and widely accepted standard, schema, protocol, and format, which will make possible the uniformity between bibliographic records and make way for records de-duplication on the web. also, because of the exponential growth of the digital landscape of document collections and the emerging yet widely adopted linked data environment, it becomes necessary for librarians to be part of this global scale activity of making their bibliographic data available as linked and open data.86 therefore, all these standards need reenvisioning and reconsideration when libraries transit from the current implementations to a more complex lod-based environment.87 rda is easy to use, user-centric, and retrieval-supportive with a precise vocabulary.88 however, it has lengthier descriptions with a lot of technical terms, is time-consuming, needs re-training, and suffers from the generation gap.89 rda is transitioning from aacr2 to produce metadata for knowledge artifacts, and it will be adaptive to the emerging data structures of linked data.90 although librarians could potentially play a vital role in making rda successful, it is challenging to bring them on the same page with publishers and vendors.91 while studying bibframe 2.0 from rda point of view, taniguchi observed that: • bibframe has no class correspondence with rda, especially making a distinction between work and expression is challenging. • some rda elements have no corresponding properties in bibframe, and therefore, cannot be expressed in bibframe. in other cases, bibframe properties cannot be converted back to rda elements due to the many-to-one and many-to-many mappings between them. • the availability of multiple marc21-to-bibframe tools results in the variety of bibframe metadata, which makes its matching and merging in the later stages challenging.92 to understand whether bibframe 2.0 is suitable as a metadata schema, taniguchi examined it closely for domain constraint of properties and developed four additional methods for implementing such constraints, i.e., defining properties in bibframe.93 in these methods, method 1 is the strictest one for defining such properties, method 2 from bibframe, and the remaining gradually loosen. method 1 defines the domain of individual properties as work or instance only, which is according to the method in rda. method 2 defines properties using multiclass structure (work-instance-item) for descriptive metadata. method 3 introduces a new class bibres to accommodate work and instance properties. method 4 uses two classes bibres and work for representing a bibliographic resource. method 5 leaves the domain of any property unspecified and uses rdf:type to represent whether a resource belongs to the work or instance. he observed that: information technology and libraries | december 2018 57 • the multi-class structure used in bibframe (method 2) questions the consistency between this structure and the domain definition of the properties. • if the quality of the metadata is concerned especially matching among converted metadata from different source metadata, then method 1 works better than method 2. • if metadata conversion from different sources is required, then method 4 or 5 should be applied.94 taniguchi concludes that bibframe’s domain constraint policy is unsuitable for descriptive metadata schema to exchange and share bibliographic resources, and therefore, should be reconsidered.95 according to sprochi, bibliographic metadata is passing through a significant transformation. 96 frbr, rda, and bibframe are among the three major and currently running programs that will affect the recording, storage, retrieval, reuse and sharing of bibliographic metadata. ifla focuses on reconciling frbr, frad, and frsad models into one model namely frbr-library reference model (rfbr-lrm [https://www.ifla.org/node/10280]), published in may 2016.97 sprochi further adds that it is generally expected that by adopting this new model, rda will be changed and revised significantly. bibframe will also get substantial modifications to become compatible with frbr-lrm and the resulting rda rules.98 these initiatives, on the one hand, makes possible their visibility on the web, but on the other hand, introduces several changes and challenges for the library and information science community.99 to cope with the challenges of making bibliographic data visible, available, reusable, and shareable on the web, sprochi argues that: 100 • the library and information science community must think of the bibliographic records in terms of data that is both human-readable and machine-understandable, which can be processed across different applications and databases with no format restrictions. also, this data must support interoperability among vendors, publishers, users, and libraries and therefore, should be thought of beyond the notion that “only library create quality metadata (as quoted in coyle (2007)” and cited by sprochi101). • a shared understanding of semantic web, lod, data formats, and other related technologies is necessary for the library and information science community for more meaningful and fruitful conversations with software developers, information & library science (ils) designers, and it & linked data professionals. at least some basic knowledge about these technologies will enable the library community to take active participation in publishing, storing, visualizing, linking, and consuming bibliographic metadata as linked and open data. • the library community must show a strong commitment to more ils vendors to “postmarc” standards such as bibframe or any other standard that is supportive of the lod environment. this way we will be in a better position to exploit linked data and semantic web to their fullest. the library community must be ready to adopt lod in cataloging. transitioning from marc to linked data needs collaborative efforts and requires addressing several challenges. these challenges include: https://www.ifla.org/node/10280 current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 58 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 • committing to a single standard by getting all units in the library, so that the big data problem resulting from using multiple metadata standards by different institutions could be mitigated; • bringing individual experts, libraries, university, and governments to work together and organize conferences, seminars, and workshops to bring linked data into the mainstream ; • translating the bibframe vocabulary into other languages; • involving different users and experts in the area; and • obtaining funding from the public sector and other agencies to continue the journey towards linked data.102 in the current scenario of metadata practices, the interoperability for the exchange of metadata varies across different formats.103 the semantic web and lod support different library models such as frbroo, edm, and bibframe. these conceptual models and frameworks suffer from the interoperability issue, which makes data integration difficult. currently, several options are available for encoding bibliographic data to rdf (and to lod), which further complicates the interoperability and introduces inconsistency.104 existing descriptive cataloging methodologies and the bibliographic ontology descriptions in cataloging and metadata standards set the stage for redesigning and developing better ways of improved information retrieval and interoperability.105 besides the massive heaps of information on the web, the library community (especially digital libraries) has devised standards for metadata and bibliographic description to meet the interoperability requirements for this part of the data on the web.106 semantic web technologies could be exploited to make information presentation, storage, and retrieval more user-friendly for digital libraries.107 to achieve such interoperability among resources, castro proposed an architecture for semantic bibliographic description.108 gardašević emphasizes on employing information system engineers and developers to understand resource description, discovery, and access process in libraries and then extend these practices by applying linked data principles.109 this way bibliographic metadata will be more visible, reusable and shareable on the web. godby, wang, and mixter stress collaborative efforts to establish a single and universal platform for cataloging rules, encoding schema, and model to a higher level of maturity, which requires initiatives such as rda, bibframe, ld4l, and biblow (https://bibflow.library.ucdavis.edu/about).110 the massive volume of metadata (available in marc and other legacy formats) makes data migration to bibframe challenging.111 although bibframe challenges the conventional ground of cataloging, which aims to record tangible knowledge containers, it is still in the infant stage at both theoretical and practical levels.112 for bibframe to be more efficient, enhanced, and enriched, it needs the attention of librarians and information science experts who will use it to encode their bibliographic metadata.113 gonzales suggests that librarians must be willing to share metadata and upgrade metadata encoding standards to bibframe; they should train, learn, and upgrade their systems to efficiently use bibframe encoding scheme and research new ways of bringing interoperability between bibframe and other legacy metadata standards; and they should ensure the data security of patrons and mitigate the legal and copyright issues in making visible their resources as linked and open data.114 also, lov must be exploited from the cataloging perspective by finding out ways to create a single, flexible, adaptable, and representative vocabulary. such a vocabulary will bring the cataloging data from different https://bibflow.library.ucdavis.edu/about information technology and libraries | december 2018 59 libraries of the world and make it accessible and consumable as a single library linked data to get free from the jungle of metadata vocabularies [and standards]. publishing and consuming linked bibliographic metadata according to the findings of one survey, there are several primary motives for publishing an institution’s [meta]data as linked data. these include (in the order from most frequent/ essential to a lesser one):115 • making data visible on the web; • experimenting and finding the potentials of publishing datasets as linked data; • exposing local datasets to understand the nature of linked data; • exploring the benefits of linked data for search engine optimization (seo); • consuming and reusing linked data in future projects; • increasing the data reusability and interoperability; • testing schema.org and bibframe; • meeting the requirements of the project; and • making available the “stable, integrated, and normalized data about research activities of an institution.”116 they also identified several reasons from the participants regarding the consumption of such data. these include (in the order from most frequent/essential to a lesser one):117 • improving the user experience; • extending local data with other datasets; • effectively managing the internal metadata; • improving the accuracy and scope of search results; • trying to improve seo for local resources; • understanding the effect of data aggregation from multiple datasets; and • experimenting and finding the potentials of consuming linked datasets. publishing and consuming bibliographic data on the lod cloud brings numerous applications. kalou et al. developed a semantic mashup by combining semantic web technologies, restful services, and content management services (cms) to generate personalized book recommendations and publish them as linked data.118 it allows for the expressive reasoning and efficient management of ontologies and has potential applications in the library, cataloging services, and ranking book records and reviews. this application exemplifies how we can use the commercially [and socially] curated metadata with bibliographic descriptions from improved user experience in digital libraries using linked data principles. however, publishing and consuming bibliographic metadata as linked and open data is not that simple and need addressing several prominent challenges and issues, which are identified in the following subsections along with some opportunities for further research. publishing linked bibliographic metadata the university of illinois library worked on publishing marc21 records of 30,000 digitized books as linked library data by adding links, transforming them to lod-friendly semantics (mods) and deploying them as rdf with the objective to be used by a wider community.119 to them, using semantic web technologies, a book can be linked to related resources and multiple possible current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 60 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 contexts, which is an opportunity for libraries to build innovative user-centered services for the dissemination and uses of bibliographic metadata.120 in this regard, the challenge is to utilize the existing book-related bibliographic maximally and descriptive metadata in a manner that parallels with the services (both inside the library and outside) as well as exploit to the fullest the full-text search and semantic web technologies, standards, and lod services.121 while publishing the national bibliographic information as free open linked data, ifla identifies several issues including:122 • dealing with the negative financial impact on the revenue generated from traditional metadata services; • the inability to offer consistent services due to the complexity of copyright and licensing frameworks; • the confusion in understanding the difference between “open” and “free” terms; • remodeling library data as library linked data; • the limited persistence and sustainability of linked data resources; • the steep learning curve in understanding and applying linked data practices to library data; • making choices between sites to link to; and • creating persistent uris for library data objects. from the analysis of the relevant literature, hallo identified several issues in publishing bibliographic metadata as linked and open data. these include difficulties in cataloging and migrating data to new conceptual models; the multiplicity of vocabularies for the same metadata; the lack of agreements to share data; the lack of experts and tools for transforming data; the lack of applications and indicators for its consumption; mapping issues; providing useful links of datasets; defining and controlling data ownership; and ensuring dataset quality.123 libraries should adopt to linked data five-stars model by adopting emerging non-proprietary formats to publish its data; link to external resources and services; participate actively in enriching; and improving the quality of metadata to improve knowledge management and discovery. 124 the cataloging has a bright future with more dataset providers by involving citizens and end -users in metadata enrichment and annotation; making ranking and recommendation as part of library cataloging services; and the increased participation of the library community to the body of semantic web and linked data.125 publishing linked data poses several issues. these include data cleanup issues es pecially when dealing with legacy data; technical issues such as data ownership; the software maturity to keep linked data up-to-date; managing its colossal volume; and providing it support for data entry, annotation, and modeling; developing representative and widely applicable lovs; and handling the steep learning curve to understand and apply linked data principles. 126 bull and quimby stress understanding how the library community is transiting their cataloging methods, systems, standards, and integrations to the lod for making them visible on the web and how they keep backward compatibility with legacy bibliographic metadata.127 it is necessary for the lod data model to maintain the underlying semantics of the existing models, schemas, and standards, yet innovate and renew old traditions, where the quality of the conversion solely depends on the ability of this new model to cope with heterogeneity conflicts, information technology and libraries | december 2018 61 maintain granularity and semantic attributes and consequently prevent loss of data and semantics.128 the new model should be semantically expressive enough to support meaningful and precise linking to other datasets. by thinking alternatively, these challenges are the significant research opportunities that will enable us to be part of linked and open data community in a more profound manner. consuming linked bibliographic metadata consuming linked data resources can be a daunting task and may involve resolving/mitigating several challenges. these challenges include:129 • dealing with the bulky or non-available rdf dumps, no authority control within rdf dumps, and data format variations; • identifying terms’ specificity levels during concept matching; • the limited reusability of library linked data due to lack of contextual data; • harmonizing classes and objects at the institution level; • excessive handcrafting due to few off-the-shelf visualization tools; • manual mapping of vocabularies; • matching, aligning, and disambiguating library and linked data; • the limited representation of several essential resources as linked data due to nonavailability of uris; • the lack of sufficient representative semantics for bibliographic data; • the time-consuming nature of linked data to understand its structure for reuse; • the ambiguity of terms across languages; and • the non-stability of endpoints and outdated datasets. syndication is required to make library data visible on the web. also, it is necessary to understand how current applications including web search engines perceive and treat visibility, to what extent schema.org matters, and what is the nature of the linked data cloud.130 an influential work may be translated into several languages, which results in multiple metadata records. some of these are complete, and others are with missing details. godby and smith‐ yoshimura suggest aggregating these multiple metadata records into a single record, which can be complete, link the work to its different translations and translators, and is publishable (and consumable) as linked data.131 however, such an aggregation demands a great deal of human effort to make these records visible and consumable as linked data. this also includes describing all types of objects that libraries currently collect and manage, translating research findings to best practices; and establishing policies to use uris in marc and other types of records. 132 to achieve the long-term goal of making metadata consumable as linked data; the libraries, as well as individual researchers, should align their research with work that of the major players such as oclc, loc, and ifla and follow their best practices.133 the issues in lov needs immediate attention to make lod more useful. these issues, according to include the following:134 • lov publishes only a subset of rdf vocabularies with no inclusion for value vocabularies such as skos thesaurus; • it provides no or almost negligible support for vocabulary authors; current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 62 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 • it relies on third parties to get the information about vocabulary usage in published datasets; • it has insufficient support for multilingualism or many languages; • it should support multi-term vocabulary search, which is required from the ontology designers to understand and employ the complex relationships among concepts; • it should support vocabulary matching, vocabulary checking, and multilingualism to allow users to search and browse vocabularies using their native language. it also improves the quality of the vocabulary by translation, which allows the community to evaluate and collaborate; and • efforts are required to improve and make possible the long-term preservation of vocabularies. lod emerged to change the design and development of metadata, which has implications for controlled vocabularies, especially, the person/agent vocabularies that are fundamental to data linkage but suffer from the issues of metadata maintenance and verification. 135 therefore, practical data management and the metadata-to-triples transition should be studied in detail to make the wider adaptation of lod possible.136 to come out of the lab environment and make lod practically useful, the controlled vocabularies must be cleaned, and its cost should be reduced.137 however, achieving this is challenging and needs to answer how knowledge artifacts could be uniquely identified and labeled across digital collections and what should be the standard practices to use them.138 linked data is still new to libraries.139 the technological complexities, the feeling of risks in adopting new technology and limitations due to the system, politics, and economy are some of the barriers in its usage in libraries.140 however, libraries can potentially overcome these barriers by learning from the use of linked data in other domains including, e.g., google’s knowledge graph and facebook’s open graph.141 the graph interfaces could be developed to link author, publisher, and book-related information, which in turn can be linked to the other open and freely available datasets.142 it is time that the library and information science professionals come out of the old, document-centric approach to bibliographic metadata and adapt their thinking as more datacentric for a more meaningful consumption of bibliographic metadata by both users and machines.143 quality of linked bibliographic metadata the use of a cataloging data defines its quality.144 the quality is essential for the discovery, usage, provenance, currency, authentication, and administration of metadata. 145 cataloging data or bibliographic metadata is considered fit for use based on its accuracy, completeness, logical consistency, provenance, coherence, timeliness, conformance and accessibility. 146 data is commonly assessed by its quality to be used in specific application scenarios and use cases, however, sometimes, low-quality data can still be useful for a specific application as far as its quality meets the requirements of that application.147 the reasons include several factors including availability, accuracy, believability, completeness, conciseness, consistency, objectivity, relevance, understandability, timeliness, and verifiability that determine the quality of data. 148 the quality of linked data can be of two types, one is the inherent quality of linked data, and the other relates to its infrastructure aspects. the former can be further divided into aspects including domain, metadata, rdf model, links among data items, and vocabulary. the infrastructural information technology and libraries | december 2018 63 aspects include the server that hosts the linked data, linked data fragments, and file servers.149 this typology introduces issues of their own, the issues related to the inherent quality including “linking, vocabulary usage and the provision of administrative metadata.”150 the infrastructural aspect introduces issues related to naming conventions, which include avoiding blank nodes and using http uris, linking through owl:sameas links, describing by reusing the existing terms and dereferencing.151 the quality cataloging definitions are mainly based on the experience and practices of the cataloging community.152 its quality falls into at least four basic categories: (1) the technical details of the bibliographic records, (2) the cataloging standards, (3) the cataloging process, and (4) the impact of cataloging on the user.153 the cataloging community focuses mainly on the quality of bibliographic metadata. however, it is not sufficient enough to consider the accuracy, completeness, and standardization of bibliographic metadata, and therefore, it is necessary that they should also consider the information needs of the users.154 van kleeck et al. investigated issues in the quality management of metadata of electronic resources to assess in supporting user tasks of finding, selecting, and accessing library holdings as well as identifying the potential for increasing efficiencies in acquisition and cataloging workflow.155 they evaluated the quality of existing bibliographic records mostly provided by their vendors and compared them with those of oclc and found that the latter has better support users in resource discovery and access. 156 from the management perspective, the complexity and volume of bibliographic metadata and the method of ingesting it to the catalog emphasize the selection of highest quality records.157 from the perspective of digital repositories, the absence of well-defined theoretical and operational definitions of metadata quality, interoperability, and consistency are some of the issues for the quality of metadata.158 the national information standards organization (niso) identifies several issues in creating metadata. 159 these include the inadequate knowledge about cataloging in both manual and automatic environments leading to inaccurate data entry, inconsistency of subject vocabularies, and limitations of resource discovery, and the development of standardized approaches to structure metadata.160 the poor quality of linked data can make its usefulness much difficult.161 datasets are created at the data level resulting in a significant variance in perspectives and underlying data models.162 this also leads to errors in triplication, syntax, and data; misleading owl:sameas links, and the low availability of sparql endpoints.163 library catalogs, because of their low quality, most often fail to communicate clear and correct information correctly to the users.164 the reasons for such low quality include user’s inability to produce catalogs that are free from faults and duplicates as well as low standards and policies that drive these cataloging practices. 165 although the rich collections of bibliographic metadata are available, these are rich in terms of the heaps of cataloging data and not in terms of quality with almost no bibliographic control. 166 these errors in and the low quality of bibliographic metadata are the result of misunderstanding the aims and functions of bibliographic metadata and adopting the “unwise” cataloging standards and policies.167 still there exist some high-quality cataloging efforts with well-maintained cataloging records, where the only quality warrant is to correctly understand the subject matter of the artifact and effectively communicate between librarians and experts in the corresponding domain knowledge. 168 the demand for such high quality and well-managed catalogs has increased on the web. although current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 64 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 people are more accustomed to web search engines, the quality catalogs will attract not only libraries but the general web users as well (when published and consumed as linked data).169 the community must work together on metadata with publishers and vendors to approach cataloging from the user perspective and refine the skillset as well as produce quality metadata.170 as library and information science professionals, we should not only be the users of the standards , instead, we must actively participate and contribute to its development and improvement so that we may effectively and efficiently connect our data with the rest of the world.171 such collaboration is required from not only the librarians and vendors but also from the users in developing an efficient cataloging environment and for a more usable bibliographic metadata, this is discussed in the next section. linking the socially curated metadata this section addresses rq03 by reviewing the state-of-the-art literature from multiple but related domains including library sciences, information sciences, information retrieval, and semantic web. the section below discusses the importance and possible impact of making socially curated metadata as part of the bibliographic or professionally curated metadata. the next section highlights why social collaborative cataloging approaches should be adopted by librarians to work with other stakeholders in making their bibliographic data available and visible as linked and open data and what is the possible impact of fusing the user-generated content with professional metadata and making it available as linked and open data. the socially curated metadata matters in cataloging conventional libraries have clear and well-established classification and cataloging schemes but these are as challenging to learn, understand, and apply as they are slow and painful to consume.172 using computers to retrieve bibliographic records resulted in the massive usage of copy cataloging.173 however, adopting this practice is challenging, because these records are inconsistent; incomplete; less visible, granular, and discoverable; unable to integrate metadata and content to the corresponding records; difficult to preserve with new and usable format for the consumption by users and machines; and not supportive towards integrating the user-generated content into the cataloging records.174 the university of illinois library, through its vufind service, offers extra features to enhance the search and exploration experience of end users by providing a book’s cover image, table of contents, abstracts, reviews, comments, and user tags.175 users can contribute content such as tags, reviews, comments, and recommend books to friends. h owever, it is necessary to research whether this user-generated content should be integrated to or preserved along the bibliographic records.176 in their book, alemu and stevens mentioned several advantages of making user-generated content as part of the library catalogs.177 these include (i) enhancing the functionality of professionallycurated metadata by making information objects findable and discoverable; (ii) removing the limitations posed by sufficiency and necessity principles of the professionally-curated metadata; (iii) bringing users closer to the library by “pro-actively engaging” them in ratings, tagging, and reviewing, etc., provided that users are also involved in managing and controlling metadata entries; and (iv) the resulting “wisdom of the crowd” would benefit all the stakeholders from this massively growing socially-curated metadata. however, this combination can only be utilized optimally if we can semantically and contextually link it to the internal and external resources; the resulting metadata is openly accessed, shared, and reused; users are supported in easily adding information technology and libraries | december 2018 65 the metadata and made part of the quality control by enabling them to report spamming activities to the metadata experts.178 librarything for libraries (ltfl) makes a library catalog more informative and interactive by enhancing opac, providing access to professional and social metadata, and enabling them to search, browse, and discover library holdings in a more engaging way (https://www.librarything.com/forlibraries). it is one of the practical examples of enriching library catalogs with user-generated content. this trend of merging social and professional metadata innovates library cataloging by dissolving the borders between “social sphere” and library resources.179 the social media has expanded library into social spaces by exploiting tags and tag clouds as navigational tools and enriching the bibliographic descriptions by integrating the user-generated content.180 it bridges the communication gaps between the library and its users, where users take active participation in resource description, discovery, and access. 181 the potential role of the socially curated metadata in resource description, discovery, and access is also evident from the long long-tail social book search research under the initiative for xml retrieval (inex) where both professionally curated bibliographic and user-generated social metadata are exploited for retrieval and recommendation to support both known-item as well as exploratory search.182 by experimenting with amazon/librarything datasets of 2.8 million book records, containing both professional and social metadata, the results conclude that enriching the professional metadata with social metadata especially tags significantly improves search and recommendation.183 koolen also noticed that the social metadata especially tags and reviews significantly improve the search performance as professionally curated metadata is “often too limited” to describe books resourcefully.184 users add socially curated metadata with the intention of making resource re-findable during a future visit, i.e., they add metadata such as tags to facilitate themselves and allow other similar users in resource discovery and access, and therefore, form a community around the resource.185 clements found user tags (social tagging) beneficial for librarians while browsing and exploring the library catalogs.186 to some librarians, tags are complementary to controlled vocabulary; however, training issues and lack of awareness of social tagging functionality in cataloging interfaces prevent their perceived benefit.187 the socially curated metadata as linked data metadata is socially constructed.188 it is shaping and shaped by the context in which it is developed and applied, and demands community-driven approaches, where data should be looked at from a holistic point of view rather than considering them as discrete (individual) semantic units.189 the library is adopting the collaborative social aspect of cataloging that will take place between authors, repository managers, libraries, e-collection consortiums, publishers, and vendors.190 librarians should improve their cataloging skills in line with the advances in technology to expose and make visible their bibliographic metadata as linked and open data.191 currently, linked library data is generated and used by library professionals. socially constructed metadata will act as a value-added in retrieving knowledge artifacts with precision.192 the addition of socially constructed and community-driven metadata in current metadata structures, controlled vocabularies, and classification systems provide the holistic view of these structures as they add the community-generated sense to the professionally-curated metadata structures.193 an https://www.librarything.com/forlibraries current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 66 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 example of the possibilities of making user-generated content as part of cataloging and linked open data is the semantic book mashup (see “consuming linked bibliographic metadata” above) which demonstrates how the commercially [and socially] curated metadata could be retriev ed and linked with bibliographic descriptions.194 while enumerating the possible applications of this mashup, they argue that book reviews from different websites could be aggregated using linked data principles by extending the review class of bibframe 2.0.195 from the analysis of twenty-one in-depth interviews with lis professionals, alemu discovered four metadata principles, namely metadata enrichment, linkage, openness, and filtering.196 this analysis revealed that the absence of socially curated metadata is sub-optimal for the potential of lod in libraries.197 their analysis advocates for a mixed-metadata approach, in which social metadata (tags, ratings, and reviews) augments the bibliographic metadata by involving users proactively and by offering a social collaborative cataloging platform. the metadata principles should be reconceptualized, and linked data should be exploited to address the existing library metadata challenges. therefore, the current efforts in linked data should fully consider social metadata.198 library catalogs should be enriched by mixing the professional and social metadata as well as semantically and contextually interlinked to internal and external information resources to be optimally used in different application scenarios.199 to fully exploit this linkage, the duplication of metadata should be reduced. it must be made openly accessible so that its sharing, reuse, mixing, and matching could be made possible. the enriched metadata must be filtered per user requirements using an interface that is flexible, personalized, contextual, and reconfigurable.200 their analysis suggests a “paradigm shift” in metadata’s future, i.e., from simple to enriched; from disconnected, invisible and locked to well-structured, machine-understandable, interconnected, visible, and more visualized metadata; and from single opac interface to reconfigurable and adaptive metadata interfaces.201 by involving users in the metadata curation process, the mixed approach will bring diversity in metadata and make resources discoverable, usable, and user-centric with the wider and well-supported platform of linked and open data.202 in conclusion, the fusion of socially curated metadata with the standards-based professional metadata is essential from the perspective of the user-centric paradigm of cataloging, which has the potential to aid resource discovery and access and open new opportunities for information scientists working in linked and open data as well as catalogers who are transiting to the web of data to make their metadata visible, reusable, and linkable to other resources on the web. from the analysis and scholarly discussions of alemu, stevens, farnel, and others as well as from the initial experiments of kalou et al.203 it becomes apparent that the application of linked data principles for library catalogs is future-proof and promising towards more user-friendly search and exploration experience with efficient resource description, discovery, access, and recommendations. conclusions in this paper, we presented a brief yet holistic review of the current state of linked and open data in cataloging. the paper identified the potentials of lod and lov in making the bibliographic descriptions publishable, linkable, and consumable on the web. several prominent challenges, issues, and future research avenues were identified and discussed. the potential role of sociallycurated metadata for enriching library catalogs and the collaborative social aspect of cataloging were highlighted. some of the notable points include the following: information technology and libraries | december 2018 67 • publishing, linking, and consuming bibliographic metadata on the web using linked data principles brings several benefits for libraries.204 the library community should improve their skills regarding this paradigm shift and adopt the best practices from other domains.205 • standards have a key role in cataloging, however, we are living in a “jungle of metadata standards” with varying complexity and scale, which makes it difficult to select, apply and work with.206 to be part of global scale activity of making bibliographic data available on the web as linked and open data, these standards should be considered and reenvisioned.207 • the quality of bibliographic metadata depends on several factors including accuracy, completeness, logical consistency, provenance, coherence, timeliness, conformance and accessibility.208 however, achieving these characteristics is challenging because of several reasons including cataloging errors; limited bibliographic control; misunderstanding the role of metadata; and “unwise” cataloging standards and policies.209 to ensure high-quality and make data visible and reusable as linked data, the library community should contribute to developing and refining these standards and policies. 210 • metadata is socially constructed and demands community-driven approaches and the social collaborative aspect of cataloging by involving authors, repository managers, librarians, digital collection consortiums, publishers, vendors, and users.211 this is an emerging trend, which is gradually dissolving the borders between the “social sphere” and library resources and bridging the communication gap between libraries and their users, where end users contribute to the bibliographic descriptions resulting in a diversity of metadata and making it user-centric and usable.212 • adopting a “mixed-metadata approach” by considering bibliographic metadata and the user-generated content complementary and essential for each other suggests a “paradigm shift” in the metadata’s future from simple to enriched; from human-readable data silos to machine understandable, well-structured, and reusable; from invisible and restricted to visible and open; and from single opac to reconfigurable interfaces on the web.213 several researchers including the ones cited in this article agree that the professionally curated bibliographic metadata supports mostly the known-item search and has little value to open and exploratory search and browsing. they believe that not only the collaborative social efforts of the cataloging community are essential but also the socially curated metadata, which can be used to enrich bibliographic metadata and support exploration and serendipity. this is not only evident from the wider usage of librarything and its ltfl but also from the long-tail inex social book search research where both professionally curated bibliographic and user-generated social metadata are exploited for retrieval and recommendation to support both known-item as well as exploratory search.214 therefore, this aspect should be considered for further research to make cataloging more useful for all the stakeholders including libraries, users, authors, publishers, and for the general consumption as linked data on the web. the current trend of social collaborative cataloging efforts is essential to fully exploit the potential of linked open data. however, if we look closely, we find four groups including librarians, linked data experts, information retrieval (ir) and interactive ir researchers; and users, all going on their separate ways with minimal collaboration and communication. more specifically, they are not benefiting from each other to a greater extent, which could result in better possibilities of current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 68 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 resource description, discovery, and access. for example, the library community should consider the findings of inex sbs track, which have demonstrated that professional and social metadata, are essential for each other to facilitate end users in resource discovery and access and support not only known-item search but also exploration and serendipity. the current practices of librarything, ltfl, and social web in general advocate for user-centric cataloging, where users are not only the consumers of bibliographic descriptions but also the contributors to metadata enrichment. linked open data experts have achieved significant milestones in other domains including, e.g., e-government, they should understand the cataloging and resource discovery & access practices in libraries to make the bibliographic metadata not only visible as linked data on the web but also shareable, re-usable, and beneficial to the end-users. the social collaborative cataloging approach by involving the four mentioned groups actively is significant to make bibliographic descriptions more useful not only for the library community and users but also for their consumption on the web as linked and open data. together we can, and we must. references 1 maría hallo et al., “current state of linked data in digital libraries,” journal of information science 42, no. 2 (2016):117–27, https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515594729. 2 tim berners-lee, “design issues: linked data,” w3c, 2006, updated june18, 2009, accessed november 09, 2018, https://www.w3.org/designissues/linkeddata.html; hallo, “current state,” 117. 3 yuji tosaka and jung-ran park, “rda: resource description & access—a survey of the current state of the art,” journal of the american society for information science and technology 64, no. 4 (2013): 651–62, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22825. 4 hallo, “current state,” 118; angela kroeger, “the road to bibframe: the evolution of the idea of bibliographic transition into a post-marc future,” cataloging & classification quarterly 51, no. (2013): 873–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2013.823584; martin doerr et al., “the europeana data model (edm).” paper presented at the world library and information congress: 76th ifla general conference and assembly, gothenburg, sweden, august 10–15, 2010. 5 getaneh alemu and brett stevens, an emergent theory of digital library metadata—enrich then filter,1st edition (waltham, ma: chandos publishing, elsevier ltd. 2015). 6 hallo, “current state,” 118 . 7 berners-lee, “design issues.” 8 kim tallerås, “quality of linked bibliographic data: the models, vocabularies, and links of data sets published by four national libraries,” journal of library metadata 17, no. 2 (2017):126– 55, https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2017.1355166. 9 becky yoose and jody perkins, “the linked open data landscape in libraries and beyond,” journal of library metadata 13, no. 2–3 (2013): 197–211, https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2013.826075. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515594729 https://www.w3.org/designissues/linkeddata.html https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22825 https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2013.823584 https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2017.1355166 https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2013.826075 information technology and libraries | december 2018 69 10 robert fox, “from strings to things,” digital library perspectives 32, no. 1 (2016): 2–6, https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-10-2015-0020. 11 stanislava gardašević, “semantic web and linked (open) data possibilities and prospects for libraries,” infotheca—journal of informatics & librarianship 14, no. 1 (2013): 26–36, http://infoteka.bg.ac.rs/pdf/eng/2013-1/infotheca_xiv_1_2014_26-36.pdf. 12 thomas baker, pierre-yves vandenbussche, and bernard vatant, “requirements for vocabulary preservation and governance,” library hi tech 31, no. 4 (2013): 657-68, https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-03-2013-0027. 13 pierre-yves vandenbussche et al., “linked open vocabularies (lov): a gateway to reusable semantic vocabularies on the web,” semantic web 8, no. 3 (2017): 437–45, https://doi.org/10.3233/sw-160213. 14 tosaka, “rda,” 651, 652. 15 amanda sprochi, “where are we headed? resource description and access, bibliographic framework, and the functional requirements for bibliographic records library reference model,” international information & library review 48, no. 2 (2016): 129–36, https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1176455. 16 brighid m.gonzales, “linking libraries to the web: linked data and the future of the bibliographic record,” information technology and libraries 33, no. 4 (2014): 10, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v33i4.5631. 17 shoichi taniguchi, “is bibframe 2.0 a suitable schema for exchanging and sharing diverse descriptive metadata about bibliographic resources?,” cataloging & classification quarterly 56, no. 1 (2018): 40–61, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1382643. 18 shoichi taniguchi, “bibframe and its issues: from the viewpoint of rda metadata,” journal of information processing and management 58, no. 1 (2015): 20–27, https://doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.58.20. 19 shoichi taniguchi, “examining bibframe 2.0 from the viewpoint of rda metadata schema,” cataloging & classification quarterly 55, no. 6 (2017): 387–412, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1322161. 20 nosheen fayyaz, irfan ullah, and shah khusro, “on the current state of linked open data: issues, challenges, and future directions,” international journal on semantic web and information systems (ijswis) 14, no. 4 (2018): 110–28, https://doi.org/10.4018/ijswis.2018100106. 21 asim ullah, shah khusro, and irfan ullah, “bibliographic classification in the digital age: current trends & future directions,” information technology and libraries 36, no. 3 (2017): 48–77, https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v36i3.8930. 22 tosaka, “rda,” 659. https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-10-2015-0020 http://infoteka.bg.ac.rs/pdf/eng/2013-1/infotheca_xiv_1_2014_26-36.pdf https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-03-2013-0027 https://doi.org/10.3233/sw-160213 https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1176455 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v33i4.5631 https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1382643 https://doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.58.20 https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1322161 https://doi.org/10.4018/ijswis.2018100106 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v36i3.8930 current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 70 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 23 tosaka, “rda,” 651, 652, 659. 24 tosaka, “rda,” 653, 660. 25 the first author used the trial version of rda toolkit to report these facts about rda (https://access.rdatoolkit.org). rda toolkit is co-published by american library association (http://www.ala.org), canadian federation of library associations (http://cflafcab.ca/en/home-page), and facet publishing (http://www.facetpublishing.co.uk). 26 ifla, “ifla conceptual models,” the international federation of library associations and institutions (ifla), 2017, updated april 06, 2009, accessed november 12, 2018, https://www.ifla.org/node/2016. 27 tosaka, “rda,” 651, 652, 655. 28 michael john khoo et al., “augmenting dublin core digital library metadata with dewey decimal classification,” journal of documentation 71, no. 5 (2015): 976–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-07-2014-0103; ulli waltinger et al., “hierarchical classification of oai metadata using the ddc taxonomy,” in advanced language technologies for digital libraries, edited by raffaella bernardi, frederique segond and ilya zaihrayeu. lecture notes in computer science (lncs), 29–40: springer, berlin, heidelberg, 2011; aaron krowne and martin halbert, “an initial evaluation of automated organization for digital library browsing,” paper presented at the proceedings of the 5th acm/ieee-cs joint conference on digital libraries, denver, co, usa, june 7–11, 2005 2005; waltinger, “ddc taxonomy,” 30. 29 khoo, “dublin core,” 977, 984 . 30 loc, “marc standards: marc21 formats,” library of congress (loc), 2013, updated march 14, 2013, accessed january 2, 2014, http://www.loc.gov/marc/marcdocz.html. 31 philip e schreur, “linked data for production and the program for cooperative cataloging,” pcc policy committee meeting, 2017, accessed may 18, 2018, https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/facil-session-2017/pcc_and_ld4p.pdf. 32 sarah bull and amanda quimby, “a renaissance in library metadata? the importance of community collaboration in a digital world,” insights 29, no. 2 (2016): 146–53, http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.302. 33 philip e. schreur, “linked data for production,” pcc policy committee meeting, 2015, accessed november 09, 2018, https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/pcc-ld4p.docx. 34 vandenbussche, “linked open vocabularies,” 437, 438, 450. 35 hallo, “current state,” 120. 36 hallo, “current state,” 118. 37 hallo, “current state,” 120, 124. https://access.rdatoolkit.org/ http://www.ala.org/ http://cfla-fcab.ca/en/home-page http://cfla-fcab.ca/en/home-page http://www.facetpublishing.co.uk/ https://www.ifla.org/node/2016 https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-07-2014-0103 http://www.loc.gov/marc/marcdocz.html https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/facil-session-2017/pcc_and_ld4p.pdf http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.302 https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/pcc-ld4p.docx information technology and libraries | december 2018 71 38 hallo, “current state,” 120, 124. 39 hallo, “current state,” 124. 40 bull, “community collaboration,” 147. 41 sam gyun oh, myongho yi, and wonghong jang, “deploying linked open vocabulary (lov) to enhance library linked data,” journal of information science theory and practice 2, no. 2 (2015): 6–15, http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/jistap.2015.3.2.1. 42 carlo bianchini and mauro guerrini, “a turning point for catalogs: ranganathan’s possible point of view,” cataloging & classification quarterly 53, no. 3-4 (2015): 341–51, http://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.968273. 43 bianchini, “turning point,” 350. 44 loc, “library of congress linked data service,” the library of congress, accessed march 24, 2018, http://id.loc.gov/about/. 45 loc, “linked data service.” 46 loc, “linked data service.” 47 loc, “linked data service.” 48 loc, “linked data service.” 49 margaret e dull, “moving metadata forward with bibframe: an interview with rebecca guenther,” serials review 42, no. 1 (2016): 65–69, https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2016.1141032. 50 loc, “overview of the bibframe 2.0 model,” library of congress, april 21, 2016, accessed november 09, 2018, https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe2-model.html. 51 taniguchi, “bibframe 2.0,” 388; taniguchi, “suitable schema,” 40. 52 oclc. 2016, “oclc linked data research,” online computer library center (oclc), https://www.oclc.org/research/themes/data-science/linkeddata.html. 53 oclc, “linked data research.” 54 jeff mister, “turning bibliographic metadata into actionable knowledge,” next blog—oclc, february 29, 2016, http://www.oclc.org/blog/main/turning-bibliographic-metadata-intoactionable-knowledge/. 55 mister, “turning bibliographic metadata.” 56 george campbell, karen coombs, and hank sway, “oclc linked data,” oclc developer network, march 26, 2018, https://www.oclc.org/developer/develop/linked-data.en.html. 57 campbell, “oclc linked data.” http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/jistap.2015.3.2.1 http://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.968273 http://id.loc.gov/about/ https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2016.1141032 https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe2-model.html https://www.oclc.org/research/themes/data-science/linkeddata.html http://www.oclc.org/blog/main/turning-bibliographic-metadata-into-actionable-knowledge/ http://www.oclc.org/blog/main/turning-bibliographic-metadata-into-actionable-knowledge/ https://www.oclc.org/developer/develop/linked-data.en.html current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 72 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 58 roy tennant, “getting started with linked data,” next blog—oclc, february 8, 2016, http://www.oclc.org/blog/main/getting-started-with-linked-data-3/. 59 tennant, “linked data.” 60 dblp, “dblp computer science bibliography: frequently asked questions,” digital bibliography & library project (dblp), updated november 07, 2018, accessed 08 november 2018. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/faq/. 61 dblp, “frequently asked questions.” 62 jörg diederich, wolf-tilo balke, and uwe thaden, “demonstrating the semantic growbag: automatically creating topic facets for faceteddblp,” paper presented at the proceedings of the 7th acm/ieee-cs joint conference on digital libraries, vancouver, canada, june 17–22, 2007. 63 jörg diederich, wolf-tilo balke, and uwe thaden, “about faceteddblp,” 2018, accessed november 09, 2018, http://dblp.l3s.de/dblp++.php. 64 tennant, “linked data.” 65 in this section, lov catalog or portal refers to the lov platform available at http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/, whereas the abbreviation lov, when used alone (without the term catalog/portal), refers to linked open vocabularies in general; vandenbussche, “linked open vocabularies,” 437. 66 vandenbussche, “linked open vocabularies,” 443, 450. 67 vandenbussche, “linked open vocabularies,” 437. 68 vandenbussche, “linked open vocabularies,” 437, 438, 450. 69 vandenbussche, “linked open vocabularies,” 438. 70 vandenbussche, “linked open vocabularies,” 437, 438, 443–46. 71 baker thomas, pierre-yves vandenbussche, and bernard vatant, “requirements for vocabulary preservation and governance,” library hi tech 31, no. 4 (2013): 657–68, https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-03-2013-0027. 72 thomas, “vocabulary preservation,” 658. 73 oh, “deploying,” 9. 74 oh, “deploying,” 9. 75 oh, “deploying,” 9, 10. http://www.oclc.org/blog/main/getting-started-with-linked-data-3/ http://dblp.uni-trier.de/faq/ http://dblp.l3s.de/dblp++.php http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/ https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-03-2013-0027 information technology and libraries | december 2018 73 76 erik radio and scott hanrath, “measuring the impact and effectiveness of transitioning to a linked data vocabulary,” journal of library metadata 16, no. 2 (2016): 80–94, https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2016.1215734. 77 radio, transitioning,” 81. 78 robert, “strings to things,” 2. 79 robert, “strings to things,” 2, 4, 6. 80 vandenbussche, “linked open vocabularies,” 438. 81 as of april 23, 2018, the schema.org vocabulary is now available at http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/; alberto nogales et al., “linking from schema.org microdata to the web of linked data: an empirical assessment,” computer standards & interfaces 45 (2016): 90-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2015.12.003. 82 bull, “community collaboration,” 146. 83 bull, “community collaboration,” 146. 84 bull, “community collaboration,” 147. 85 bull, “community collaboration,” 147. 86 bull, “community collaboration,” 147, 148. 87 schreur, 2015. linked data for production. 88 yhna therese p. santos, “resource description and access in the eyes of the filipino librarian: perceived advantages and disadvantages,” journal of library metadata 18, no. 1 (2017): 45–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2017.1401869. 89 santos, “filipino librarian,” 51–55. 90 philomena w. mwaniki, “envisioning the future role of librarians: skills, services and information resources,” library management 39, no. 1, 2 (2018): 2–11, https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-01-2017-0001. 91 mwaniki, “envisioning the future,” 7, 8. 92 taniguchi, “bibframe 2.0,” 410, 411 . 93 taniguchi, “suitable schema,” 52–58 . 94 taniguchi, “suitable schema,” 59, 60. 95 taniguchi, “suitable schema,” 60. 96 sprochi, “where are we headed?,” 129, 134. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2016.1215734 http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2015.12.003 https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2017.1401869 https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-01-2017-0001 current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 74 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 97 sprochi, “where are we headed?,” 129. 98 sprochi, “where are we headed?,” 134. 99 sprochi, “where are we headed?,” 134. 100 sprochi, “where are we headed?,” 134, 135. 101 sprochi, “where are we headed?,” 134. 102 caitlin tillman, joseph hafner, and sharon farnel, “forming the canadian linked data initiative,” paper presented at the the 37th international association of scientific and technological university libraries 2016 (iatul 2016) conference, dalhousie university libraries in halifax, nova scotia, june 5–9, 2016. 103 carol jean godby, shenghui wang, and jeffrey k mixter, library linked data in the cloud: oclc's experiments with new models of resource description. vol. 5, synthesis lectures on the semantic web: theory and technology, san rafael, california (usa),morgan & claypool publishers, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2200/s00620ed1v01y201412wbe012. 104 sofia zapounidou, michalis sfakakis, and christos papatheodorou, “highlights of library data models in the era of linked open data,” paper presented at the the 7th metadata and semantics research conference, mtsr 2013, thessaloniki, greece, november 19 –22, 2013; timothy w. cole et al., “library marc records into linked open data: challenges and opportunities,” journal of library metadata 13, no. 2–3 (2013): 163–96, https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2013.826074; kim tallerås, “from many records to one graph: heterogeneity conflicts in the linked data restructuring cycle, information research 18, no. 3 (2013) paper c18, accessed november 10, 2018. 105 fabiano ferreira de castro, “functional requirements for bibliographic description in digital environments,” transinformação 28, no. 2 (2016): 223–31. https://doi.org/10.1590/231808892016000200008. 106 castro, “functional requirements,” 223, 224. 107 castro, “functional requirements,” 224, 230. 108 castro, “functional requirements,” 223, 228–30. 109 gardašević, “possibilities and prospects,” 35. 110 godby, oclc's experiments, 112. 111 gonzales, “the future,” 17. 112 karim tharani, “linked data in libraries: a case study of harvesting and sharing bibliographic metadata with bibframe,” information technology and libraries 34, no. 1 (2015): 5–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i1.5664. 113 tharani, “harvesting and sharing,” 16. https://doi.org/10.2200/s00620ed1v01y201412wbe012 https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2013.826074 https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892016000200008 https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892016000200008 https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i1.5664 information technology and libraries | december 2018 75 114 gonzales, “the future,” 16. 115 karen smith-yoshimura, “analysis of international linked data survey for implementers,” dlib magazine, 2016, july/august 2016. 116 smith-yoshimura, “analysis.” 117 smith-yoshimura, “analysis.” 118 aikaterini k. kalou, dimitrios a. koutsomitropoulos, and georgia d. solomou, “combining the best of both worlds: a semantic web book mashup as a linked data service over cms infrastructure,” journal of library metadata 16, no. 3–4 (2016): 228–49, https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2016.1258897. 119 cole, “marc,” 163, 165, 175. 120 cole, “marc,” 163, 164, 191. 121 cole, “marc,” 164, 191. 122 ifla, “linked open data: challenges arising,” the international federation of library associations and institutions (ifla), 2014, accessed march 03, 2018, https://www.ifla.org/book/export/html/8548. 123 hallo, “current state,” 124. 124 hallo, “current state,” 126. 125 hallo, “current state,” 124. 126 karen smith-yoshimura, “linked data survey results 4–why and what institutions are publishing (updated),” hanging together the oclc research blog, september 3, 2014, accessed november 12, 2018, https://hangingtogether.org/?p=4167. 127 bull, “community collaboration,” 148. 128 tallerås, “one graph.” 129 karen smith-yoshimura, “linked data survey results 3–why and what institutions are consuming (updated),” hanging together the oclc research blog, september 1, 2014, accessed november 12, 2018, http://hangingtogether.org/?p=4155. 130 godby, oclc’s experiments, 116. 131 carol jean godby and karen smith‐yoshimura, “from records to things: managing the transition from legacy library metadata to linked data,” bulletin of the association for information science and technology 43, no. 2 (2017): 18–23, https://doi.org/10.1002/bul2.2017.1720430209. 132 godby, “from records to things,” 23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2016.1258897 https://www.ifla.org/book/export/html/8548 https://hangingtogether.org/?p=4167 http://hangingtogether.org/?p=4155 https://doi.org/10.1002/bul2.2017.1720430209 current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 76 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 133 godby, “from records to things,” 22. 134 vandenbussche, “linked open vocabularies,” 449, 450. 135 silvia b. southwick, cory k lampert, and richard southwick, “preparing controlled vocabularies for linked data: benefits and challenges,” journal of library metadata 15, no. 3–4 (2015): 177–190, https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2015.1099983. 136 southwick, “controlled vocabularies,” 177. 137 southwick, “controlled vocabularies,” 189, 190. 138 southwick, “controlled vocabularies,” 183. 139 robin hastings, “feature: linked data in libraries: status and future direction,” computers in libraries (magzine article), 2015, http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/nov15/hastings-linked-data-in-libraries.shtml. 140 hastings, “status and future.” 141 hastings, “status and future.” 142 hastings, “status and future.” 143 hastings, “status and future.” 144 tallerås, “national libraries,” 129 (by quoting from van hooland 2009; wang and strong 1996). 145 jung-ran park, “metadata quality in digital repositories: a survey of the current state of the art,” cataloging & classification quarterly 47, no. 3–4 (2009): 213–28, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370902737240. 146 tallerås, “national libraries,” 129 (by quoting from bruce & hillmann, 2004). 147 park, “metadata quality,” 213, 224; tallerås, “national libraries,” 129, 150. 148 park, “metadata quality,” 213, 215, 218–21, 224, 225; tallerås, “national libraries,” 141. 149 tallerås, “national libraries,” 129. 150 tallerås, “national libraries,” 129. 151 tallerås, “national libraries,” 129. 152 karen snow, “defining, assessing, and rethinking quality cataloging,” cataloging & classification quarterly 55, no. 7–8 (2017): 438–55, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1350774. 153 snow, “quality cataloging,” 445. 154 snow, “quality cataloging,” 451, 452. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2015.1099983 http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/nov15/hastings--linked-data-in-libraries.shtml http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/nov15/hastings--linked-data-in-libraries.shtml https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370902737240 https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1350774 information technology and libraries | december 2018 77 155 david van kleeck et al., “managing bibliographic data quality for electronic resources,” cataloging & classification quarterly 55, no. 7-8 (2017): 560–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1350777. 156 van kleeck, “data quality,” 560, 575, 576. 157 van kleeck, “data quality,” 575. 158 park, “metadata quality,” 214, 216–18, 225. 159 niso, a framework of guidance for building good digital collections, ed. niso framework advisory group, 3rd ed (baltimore, md: national information standards organization, 2007), https://www.niso.org/sites/default/files/2017-08/framework3.pdf. 160 park, “metadata quality,” 214, 215; niso. guidance; jane barton, sarah currier, and jessie mn hey, “building quality assurance into metadata creation: an analysis based on the learning objects and e-prints communities of practice,” paper presented at the proceedings of the international conference on dublin core and metadata applications: supporting communities of discourse and practice—metadata research & applications, seattle, washington, september 28–october 2, 2003. 161 pascal hitzler and krzysztof janowicz, “linked data, big data, and the 4th paradigm,” semantic web 4, no. 3 (2013): 233–35, https://doi.org/10.3233/sw-130117. 162 hitzler, “4th paradigm,” 234. 163 hitzler, “4th paradigm,” 234. 164 alberto petrucciani, “quality of library catalogs and value of (good) catalogs,” cataloging & classification quarterly 53, no. 3–4 (2015): 303–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.1003669. 165 petrucciani, “quality,” 303, 305. 166 petrucciani, “quality,” 303, 309, 311. 167 petrucciani, “quality,” 303, 309. 168 petrucciani, “quality,” 309, 310. 169 petrucciani, “quality,” 310. 170 bull, “community collaboration,” 147. 171 bull, “community collaboration,” 148. 172 han, myung-ja, “new discovery services and library bibliographic control,” library trends 61, no. 1 (2012):162–72, https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2012.0025. 173 han, “bibliographic control,” 162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1350777 https://www.niso.org/sites/default/files/2017-08/framework3.pdf https://doi.org/10.3233/sw-130117 https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.1003669 https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2012.0025 current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 78 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 174 han, “bibliographic control,” 169–71. 175 han, “bibliographic control,” 163. 176 han, “bibliographic control,” 167–70. 177 alemu, emergent theory, 29–33, 43–65. 178 alemu, emergent theory, 29–65. 179 lorri mon, social media and library services, synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services, ed. gary marchionini, 40, san rafael, california (usa), morgan & claypool publishers, 2015), https://doi.org/10.2200/s00634ed1v01y201503icr040. 180 mon, social media, 50. 181 mon, social media, 24. 182 marijn koolen et al., “overview of the clef 2016 social book search lab,” paper presented at the 7th international conference of the cross-language evaluation forum for european languages, évora, portugal, september 5–8, 2016; koolen et al., “overview of the clef 2015 social book search lab,” paper presented at the 6th international conference of the crosslanguage evaluation forum for european languages, toulouse, france, september 8–11, 2015; patrice bellot et al., “overview of inex 2014,” paper presented at the international conference of the cross-language evaluation forum for european languages, sheffield, uk, september 15–18, 2014; bellot et al., “overview of inex 2013,” paper presented at the international conference of the cross-language evaluation forum for european languages, valencia, spain, september 23–26, 2013. 183 bo-wen zhang, xu-cheng yin, and fang zhou, “a generic pseudo relevance feedback framework with heterogeneous social information,” information sciences 367–68 (2016): 909–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.07.004; xu-cheng yin et al., “isart: a generic framework for searching books with social information,” plos one 11, no. 2 (2016): e0148479, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148479; faten hamad and bashar alshboul, “exploiting social media and tagging for social book search: simple query methods for retrieval optimization,” in social media shaping e-publishing and academia, edited by nashrawan tahaet al., 107–17 (cham: springer international publishing, 2017). 184 marijn koolen, “user reviews in the search index? that’ll never work!” paper presented at the 36th european conference on ir research (ecir 2014), amsterdam, the netherlands, april 13–16, 2014. 185 alemu, emergent theory, 29–33, 43–65. 186 lucy clements and chern li liew, “talking about tags: an exploratory study of librarians’ perception and use of social tagging in a public library,” the electronic library 34, no. 2 (2016): 289–301, https://doi.org/10.1108/el-12-2014-0216. 187 clements, “talking about tags,” 291, 297-99. https://doi.org/10.2200/s00634ed1v01y201503icr040 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.07.004 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148479 https://doi.org/10.1108/el-12-2014-0216 information technology and libraries | december 2018 79 188 sharon farnel, “understanding community appropriate metadata through bernstein’s theory of language codes,” journal of library metadata 17, no. 1 (2017): 5–18, https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2017.1285141. 189 farnel, “bernstein’s theory,” 5, 6. 190 mwaniki, “envisioning the future,” 8. 191 mwaniki, “envisioning the future,” 8, 9. 192 getaneh alemu et al., “toward an emerging principle of linking socially-constructed metadata,” journal of library metadata 14, no. 2 (2014): 103–29, https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2014.914775. 193 farnel, “bernstein’s theory,” 15–16. 194 kalou, “book mashup.” 195 kalou, “book mashup,” 242, 243. 196 alemu, “socially-constructed metadata,” 103, 107. 197 alemu, “socially-constructed metadata,” 103. 198 alemu, “socially-constructed metadata,” 103, 104, 120, 121. 199 getaneh alemu, “a theory of metadata enriching and filtering: challenges and opportunities to implementation,” qualitative and quantitative methods in libraries 5, no. 2 (2017): 311–34, http://www.qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/343 200 alemu, “metadata enriching and filtering,” 311. 201 alemu, “socially-constructed metadata,” 125. 202 alemu, “metadata enriching and filtering,” 319, 320. 203 alemu, “metadata enriching and filtering”; alemu, emergent theory; alemu, “sociallyconstructed metadata”; farnel, “bernstein's theory”; kalou, “book mashup.” 204 hallo, “current state,” 120. 205 alemu, “socially-constructed metadata,” 125; hastings, “status and future.” 206 bull, “community collaboration,” 147. 207 bull, “community collaboration,” 152; bull, “community collaboration,” 152; schreur, 2015. linked data for production. 208 tallerås, “national libraries,” 129. 209 petrucciani, “quality,” 303, 309. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2017.1285141 https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2014.914775 http://www.qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/343 current state of linked and open data in cataloging | ullah, khusro, ullah, and naeem 80 https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v37i4.10432 210 bull, “community collaboration,” 147, 152. 211 farnel, “bernstein's theory,” 5, 6, 12, 13, 15, 16; mwaniki, “envisioning the future,” 8. 212 mon, social media, 3; alemu, “metadata enriching and filtering,” 320. 213 alemu, “socially-constructed metadata,” 125. 214 koolen, “clef 2016”; koolen, “clef 2015”; bellot, “inex 2014”; bellot, “inex 2013.” abstract introduction the role of linked open data and vocabularies in cataloging linked and open data linked open vocabularies challenges, issues, and research opportunities the multiplicity of cataloging rules and standards publishing and consuming linked bibliographic metadata publishing linked bibliographic metadata consuming linked bibliographic metadata quality of linked bibliographic metadata linking the socially curated metadata the socially curated metadata matters in cataloging the socially curated metadata as linked data conclusions references college and research libraries the technical services division in libraries: a symposium t he rapid development of technical services (or processes) divisions in american libraries has been of interest to many administrators. the following six papers and summary, prepared for the program of june r8, 1948, of the division of cataloging and classification, at atlantic city, n.j., were abridged and edited for use in college and research libraries. mr. cohen is senior cataloger, rutgers university; mr. custer, assistant librarian in charge of processing, detroit public library ; miss brown, head of processing, brookline public library, mass.; mr. kilpatrick, associate director of libraries, state university of iowa; miss kenny, chief of technical services division, brooklyn college library; miss winter, assistant librarian, u.s. bureau of the budget library; and dr. logdson, assistant director of libraries (technical services), columbia university libraries.~the editor. by joseph lorence cohen a general consideration of the technical services division in libraries two provocative articles which have appeared in recent library literature are "midwest reaches for the stars," by ralph ellsworth and norman kilpatrick1 and " the catalog department in the library organization," by raynard c. swank. 2 both of these papers discuss current and possible library organizational techniques. they have a point in common which is the basis for the topic under review, namely, cooperation and centralization in the area of librarianship commonly called the technical processes or services. ellsworth and kilpatrick propose an interlibrary cooper"ative program whereby acquisitions and cataloging would be centralized in a regional l'ibrary 1unit. swank is concerned with centralization of acquisitional work and other processing activities in a single library. the trend toward the unification of order work and cataloging is a recent one. so widely has it grown in its short history of about ten years that our thinking in regard to the division or dep a rtment of technical 1 co llege and research libraries 9 :136·44, a p ril 1948. 2 library. q1tarterly 18 : 24-3 2, j a nuary i 948 . services now . probably overshadows many other topics in librarianship. the technical services may be considered · as all of those processes . which incorporate ,into a library collection any items selected for it. books and films , broadsides and serials, recordings and maps , after being acquired, must be cataloged, classified, stored, bound , shelved in order to be of use to the library's public. in view of the increase in the size and scope of library collections, these procedures have been judged of such a nature as to make it more efficient for libraries to consider them within a centralized unit. reference may be made here to swank's analysis of the relationship between the acquisition and cataloging departments of libraries. he notes the following four points: first, the catalog and acquisition departments bear a historical relationship to each othe-r in that they existed fir st .... second, the acquisitional and cataloging processes bear a sequential relationship to each other. they comprise the first and second steps in a sequence of processes of which the end result is a book in the reader's hand ...• 46 college and research libraries third, ... the catalog and acquisition departments are alike in that neither meets the public to any extent .... finally, there are similarities in the kind of work done in the catalog and acquisition departments. we call them "technical" departments, meaning ... that their modal or typical operations are more formal, detailed, and susceptible to codification than those of the service departments, or that a larger amount of subprofessional or mechanical processes is carried on. this paper will not attempt, for the most part, to evaluate the unified "technical services division," but rather to report statistical data obtained by a questionnaire last spring from a group of libraries. twenty-six libraries have thus far completed the rather extensive questionnaire. the information provided by them serves as the basis for the discussion which follows. consideration is given to: (i) the incidence and size of libraries having technical services divisions, ( 2) the reasons for establishing them, (3) aspects of their organization and personnel, and (4) some of the observed effects of reorganization upon readers' services.3 incidence from the responses to the original letter it was discove,red that there are forty-seven libraries which have had a technical services division established. these libraries are located in twenty-three states, washington, d.c., and in hawaii, with a concentration in the northeast and in the midwest. of these forty-seven libraries, eighteen are public libraries, four governmental libraries, six colup of fifteen college and eleven university libraries. the twenty-six libraries whose ,questionnaires have been analyzed are made up of fifteen colleges and eleven university libraries (these sixteen will hereafter be considered together) and nine public and one state library (these ten libraries will also be considered together). the book stock of these twenty-six libraries varies from 3200 volumes to more than 2,ooo,ooo. the public libraries range hom 39,000 to the 2,ooo,ooo volumes, with ·seven of these ten libraries well over the . 200,000 mark. the college and university s ibid., p. 25. .january~ 1949 libraries have collections ranging from 3200 to 1,65o,ooo, with eleven of these sixteen libraries over the 200,000 volume mark. the question has arisen as to whether book stock size has any effect upon the establishment of a technical services division. the above statistics reveal that it has little effect. circulation figures also do not seem to have any direct relation. ·the annual circulation figures of the libraries vary from 3500 to almost io,ooo,ooo. the technical services divisions are recent developments. of the twenty-six libraries under survey, only three had their divisions established before 1941, and two of these were public libraries. the others are indeed new, most of them having been established in 1945 or 1946, and five as late as 1947-48. the names of these divisions are similar. the word "technical" appears in half of them, generally followed by "services" or "processes" department or division. the next most used term is "preparations division." one librarian disapproved of the term "process." he doubted that a preparations division is confined to technical operations and questioned "the adequacy of the term 'processing' for order work or highgrade cataloging work." reasons at this point, it may be well to inspect the reasons given for combining the various functional units into a union of the preparational act1v1t1es. four possible reasons were suggested in the questionnaire for the formation of the processing division: i:. to decrease the span of control of the head librarian 2. to increase the flow of processed material 3· to decrease the cost of processing 4· to develop cooperation among the various autonomous departments. since two libraries had a technical services division in their original organization, only twenty-four answers are available upon which to base an analysis. of the twenty-four libraries concerned, then, eighteen, or 75 per cent, considered that two of the aforementioned reasons were of equal importance and could be regarded as basic. these were reducing the span of control of the librarian and increasing the flow of material processed. after these two reasons, the third-to de47 crease the cost of processing-was thought to be a motive by about half of the libraries reporting. it may be seen that reduction of cost was not the chief reason for the development of processing divisions. only ten libraries reported that lack of cooperation was a factor that was considered as a basis for the administrative change. other reasons given for the change were: to remove personnel difficulties; to provide more mobility in personnel; to decrease the number of routines. size and organization of divisions consideration may now be given to the size of the centralized divisions. swank doubted the practicability of such a division in a medium-sized library when its total acquisitions and cataloging staff numbered anywhere from fifteen to thirty full-time people. of the twenty-six libraries under examination, five college and university libraries and two public libraries-seven in all -fall within this grouping. of the other libraries, twelve are smaller (their processing staffs averaging six), and seven are larger (their processing staffs averaging sixtythree). the largest division of these libraries has ninety-two members. it is perhaps worth noting the relative proportion of men to women who head these divisions. of the twenty-six administrators who head technical services, fifteen are women and eleven are men. in public libraries, seven women and three men head processing divisions; however, the men head the three largest units. in the college and university libraries, the control is evenly divided; eight men and eight women. the four largest divisions among these libraries have men at their helms. the educational background of all heads of processing divisions indicates adequate preparation. each of the twenty-six persons has at least the undergraduate degree, or its equivalent; . twenty-one have a graduate degree in library service, or its equivalent; and two have doctor's degrees. beyond formal educational background, nearly all the processing heads possess experience in administrative pos1t10ns. a majority at some time in their varied pasts have headed cataloging departments, a lesser number have headed acquisitions de_partments, and an unexpected number, more than 20 per cent, have had experience in teaching. so far as formal training and work experience are concerned, then, the administrators seem well prepared for the responsibilities delegated to them. the question has arisen as to what the qualifications may be of the heads of the functional departments within the processing division if a costly administrator is appointed in the hierarchy to supervise them. the questionnaire attempted to elicit information on this problem by inquiring about the training experience of the department heads. with sixteen responses on this topic it was discovered that the head cataloger, for example, is usually as well-trained as the average processing head, although possessing a more limited job experience. swank is especially doubtful of the advisability of having a head of technical processes in the mediumsized library because, as he puts it, "one must either employ mediocre department heads if a division chief is also wanted, or else do without the division chief and put everything one has into the best possible department heads .... as a general rule," he concludes, ".it may be wise to spend one's money on the department heads, lest one end with a top-heavy administration for a weak-kneed organization." 4 the seven libraries mentioned beforehand as being of the medium-sized group have heads of catalog1 ing departments with training almost identical to that of the heads of the processing divisions. although we have noted a number of details about the technical services divisions or their chiefs, none of the processes developed by these administrators has as yet been con'sidered. it will be impossible to indicate all of such processes. however, a few of the most important warrant atten. tion. in more than 87 per cent of the college and university libraries and in so per cent of the public libraries, the removal of clerical operations from the professional staff has been the step most frequently taken in changing the work of the processing. unit. perhaps we may assume from this fact that here is a legitimate reason for criticizing the cost of processing. after the separation of clerical from professional operations, the next eight most fre• ibid ., p. 26. 48 college and research libraries quently noted procedures introduced or developed by processing heads are in order of occurrence: simplified cataloging, revision of subject headings, the acquirement of new types of materials (such as films or records), the use of the multiple process slip, reclassification, simplification of billing records and procedures, blanket ordering with particular presses, and finally, the centralization of special types of materials in the main processing unit. the total .number of different technical procedures which were developed by the division administrators is nearly forty. results it was previously pointed out that technical services divisions are relatively recent, so it is difficult to test exactly what the economic results of such a new organizational unit may be. it was hoped through the questionnaire to discover whether costs of processing had been reduced, as has been generally assumed. several specific questions were asked about the numbers of items handled and personnel costs previous to the establishment of the processing division, in order to compare such figures with recent ones. however, it appears that many such statistics either were never kept, were confidential, or were ·too difficult to assemble. since a cost analysis is not possible at this time, the effects of the processing unit on readers' services will be examined. through the preliminary correspondence it was learned that of the fortyseven libraries which had technical services divisions, twelve had a unified readers' services division set up as a coordinate unit. of the twenty-six libraries with which we are concerned, ten have such divisions. however, regardless of the existence or nonexistence of a formally organized unit, nineteen of. these libraries report that readers' services in those institutions have improved because of the establishment of the technical servtces division. no negative answers were received on this point, but most of the remaining libraries indicated that it was too difficult to measure so important a change when the processing unit has been in operation for only two or three years. the improvements . most often noted are the following: ( i ) there has been a simplification in the procedures of locating in-process material; (2) there has been an increase in the amount of material processed; and ( 3) there has been simplification in the cataloging which the reference staff and readers find helpful. it may be of interest to note that two libraries, one public and one university, had had processing divisions but discontinued them. one reports its reason: the library is probably too small to attract a librarian for the job. finally, several ideas contributed by processing administrators who have organized and directed a centralized unit may be noted. one head was not convinced that preparations divisions are administratively desirable in every size and type of library; he stressed such potential disadvantages as the lack of contact between the librarian and his professional staff, or the overemphasis on the technicalities of processing rather than on the reference and service aspects of librarianship. another administrator, however, viewing the processing problem in optimistic perspective, affirmed that having a single administrator for all processing functions was advantageous from the point of view of management, efficiency, organization, and service; but he conceded that the special aims and goals of each library should determine its pattern of organization. although evidence is incomplete, there are sufficient data t6 warrant continued experimentation with this type of organization. by benjamin a. custer the large public library this analysis of the development and achievements of the technical services program in the large public library can best be january~ 1949 presented by describing the processing work in the library which i know best, the detroit public library. 49 division oj work under the librarian and the associate librarian of this institution the work is divided into five broad areas-exclusive of the maintenance of buildings and grounds-each under the supervision of an assistant librarian or the eq~ivalent, who plans, organizes, directs, and coordinates the activities of his own service, and makes policy recommendations to the librarian. briefly, the organization of the work in the five areas is as follows: the business management of the institution, under the business manager, is composed of five units which manage the financial activities of the library, purchase all supplies and equipment, maintain receiving and inventory controls, provide shipping and trucking service, operate the print shop, compile statistical data, and supervise the financial, stock inventory and statistical records activities in all departments and branches. the personnel service, under the assistant librarian for personnel, directs and coordinates the personnel activities of the library, establishing requirements for professional and clerical personnel, developing classification and pay plans, recruiting, recommending appointments, promotions, transfers, and separations, and providing employee counseling and other adjustment services. the processing service , under the assistant librarian for processing, selects in part, acquires, classifies, catalogs, and maintains the physical condition of the library's books and other printed and related materials. this s~rvice will be described in more detail later. the reference services, under the assistant librarian for reference services, are composed of thirteen subject or general service departments , divisions, and units, and a checking and switchboard service. among the reference services are the selection and preservation of the book copections required for information study, and research; the organization and maintenance of information, clipping, and pamphlet files; the preparation of bibliographies and indexes; and the provision to readers of information, and aid in the use of the library's resources. the home reading services, under the assistant librarian for home reading services, are composed of the children's department, the youth service, twenty-three branch libraries, the extension division, the home i reading department and the children's room of the main library, the schools department, the audio-visual division, and the registration, loan, and central typing bureaus. among the home reading services are the selection and organization of collections of printed and audio-visual materials for popular use; the giving of guidance to readers; the planning of activities to stimulate groups and individuals to use materials; the supplementing of programs of other educational organizations; the registration of borrowers; and the loan of books and other materials. of all the activities and services thus carried on by the library, those with which we are especially concerned here are the ones called "processing," that is, the activities concerned with acquiring, recording, and preparing for use the books, serials, periodicals, maps, pamphlets, films, and recordings which may be called collectively "library materials," as distinct from supplies and equipment. these duties are performed for the most part by three departments, book selection, catalog, and bindery. however , in some part processing activities are carried on by departments and branches throughout the system, and the assistant librarian for processing has advisory, though not supervisory, control of all these. the book selection department, known until about three years ago as the order department, has the responsibility for selecting, or assisting the public service agencies to select, library materials , and for acquiring them. the catalog department receives and certifies all purchased materials except serial publications and documents, classifies and catalogs the collections, with some fifty-eight dictionary catalogs in the system , makes and maintains inventory controls for library materials, maintains the union catalog of southeastern michigan, and makes books ready for the shelves. the bindery inspects and prepares books for binding, binds, mends, and cleans them , gilds call numbers, and performs related miscellaneous jobs. it is the responsibility of the assistant librarian-let us call him hereafter the director of processing-to supervise and coordinate these activities, to simplify routines and expedite the flow of work, to reconcile the so college and research libraries inconsistencies and irregularities o£ the dewey classification with the needs of a departmentalized library, to establish standards of cataloging for reference and popular services, and to recommend policy on these matters to the librarian. he also serves, with the other assistant librarians and the associate librarian, as a member of the librarian's administrative coqncil~ or "cabinet," in the establishment of general institution procedures and organization. in a large library there are many opportunities for the development of coordinated effort. wi'thin the purview of the direct9r of processing the following, among others, might be cited: coordination between the catalog, and book selection departments, between the catalog department and the bindery, between each of the processing departments and the various public service agencies. let us consider an example or so from each of these. of paramount importance perhaps is the development of coordinated effort between the book selection and catalog departments. no library could run smoothly without some degree of cooperation here, and one of the more interesting steps taken in this direction at the detroit public library was initiated before the directorship of processing was established and the present incumbent assumed the position. this was the transfer from the book selection to the catalog department of the responsibility for receiving and certifying book orders. as i have described in some detail elsewhere, 1 this change was made in the interest of sound accounting practice, but ,resulte.d in a situation where not only did ~the inater.ial flow in and through the process mo~e smoothly, but also the checking in of materials, · the approval of invoices, and the marking of agency symbols in volumes could be combined in large part with cataloging procedure and the marking of call numbers or other cataloging symbols. missing volumes, incorrectly filled orders, overdue invoices, and other such snags are returned to the book selection department for follow-up correspondence, but these represent only a small percentage of the orders placed and filled. this one step has enabled us to cut greatly the elapsed time between the receipt of branch books in the shipping 1 library lo1trnal, 73:32, january i, 1948. january~ 1949 room from the dealer and their appearance on branch shelves. time has been cut, in fact, from two or three weeks to less than one week for nonfiction, and to one or two days for fiction. combined with a prepublication approval service negotiated not long since by the book selection department, it has had the result of placing the most popular titles in branches on publication date or very shortly thereafter. a most important field for coordination of the work of the two departments is that of records of materials in process. plans have been developed for the establishment of a single process catalog, similar to that in use in a number of libraries, where will be recorded in one file all titles on order, or received and in process, up to the time when they are recorded in the library's catalogs. these plans have not yet been put into effect because of difficulties in connection with getting the necessary forms. when they are, it will be possible to guard easily against undesirable duplication of titles, to lay hands almost instantly on any title in process, and to carry on a continuous system of follow-up on all processing activiti~.-s, so that at no step may materials be pigeonholed or sidetracked. the maintenance of this catalog will be a joint effort of the two departments, whose records will be thus infegrated into one harmonious whole. at present, searching of titles before ordering is the responsibility of the service departments. it is anticipated that when the process catalog is established, if not sooner, searching will be made a responsibility of the book selection department, the service departments making certain only that titles ordered by them are not in their own catalogs. when this change is made, book selection will be expected to ascertain and note the bibliographical information available in the catalog and needed by the catalog department for handling the titles after they are received. coordination between the catalog department and the bindery is illustrated by the development of schedules for sending newly cataloged unbound books to the bindery, and of cooperative routines for the gilding of call numbers on new books. relations between units some of the most inte~esting moves m co51 ordination concern the relations between one or another of the processing departments and the various branches and service agencies. here, of course, the director of processing works in close cooperation with one or more of the other assistant librarians. as i have already hinted, book selection, while primarily the concern of the service agencies, is also carried on by the book selection department. it was in recognition of this fact that the order department was a few years ago given its present name. in the selection of books for the library's collections, this department serves primarily as an assisting and coordinating agency to the service departments. the service departments select their own books, but the book selection department assists by bringing catalogs, lists, and reviews to their attention. it also supplements the departmental selection work by watching out for those peripheral fields of knowledge which fall between or beyond the scope of the existing collections, and it has a desiderata fund for the purchase of such titles, as well as for general or expensive titles of broad scope or interest. secondarily, the department has the responsibility of viewing and judging collections as a whole, implementing the librarian's plans for future development, and advising in the formulation of collection policies. in the · selection of books for purchase for popular use in the branches and in the home reading department of the main library, the department coordinates the work of and assists the popular service librarians by arranging for the receipt of new titles on approval, by having staff members review these as needed, by assisting a committee of popular service librarians to exa)lline and vote upon specific titles not of unquestioned worth or unquestioned worthlessness, by preparing mimeographed annotated lists of titles approved for buying, by presenting the titles weekly at book meetings for branch librarians, and in general by keeping the popular service agencies advised on available materials. coo•rdination with readers services among the ways in which the work of the catalog department has been or can be coordinated with that of the service agencies are the following: special branch cataloging, as distinguished from the kind of cataloging required for the complex needs of the research library, calls not for a bibliographical but for a use approach, and use annotations on catalog cards can best be supplied by popular service librarians. in a departmentalized library such as detroit's, catalog guides are needed to lead the reader from a given department' to related materials in the other departments. we visualize ~eferences such as the following . which might be filed in the fine arts department catalog: "architecture. for works on the practical and technical aspects of building see the catalog of the technology department. the public catalog is the complete guide to material in all parts of the library." these references can be worked out only with the active assistance of the departments concerned. many of .you are familiar with the general order of the librarian of congress on gradation of cataloging for various categories of material. the detroit public library plans a similar system, but the _catalog department expects to require guidance from the departments in assigning individual titles or collections to their proper categories. as for coordination between the bindery and the service agencies: until recently all agencies sent materials for binding whenever and in as large quantities as they wished, with the result that the bindery shop was flooded, floor to ceiling, with a backlog of many thousands of volumes. by the simple expedient of assigning weekly binding quotas to each of the agencies, based on circulation, book fund, replacement problem, and the like in each agency, the backlog has been eliminated, and the binding time has been cut from an average of several months to 2-3 weeks. objectives among other objectives already attained or to be worked out are the following: a change over to the use of visible index equipment for the recording of serial information, and possibly in time the establishment of a serial unit for the acq~isition, cataloging, and servicing of serials. the possible elimination of separate departmental shelf lists. the assumption by the catalog department of the regular inventory of the main library. 52 college and research libraries the assumption by the catalog department of all the special cataloging activities previously performed in service departments, e.g. phonograph records, and books and other materials of the burton historical collection. consideration of the form of the public catalog. should the catalog be broken horizontally? should older subject headings be left unchanged, as terminologies change, with see also references to them? or · should older subject cards be eliminated altogether as more and more bibliographies are published? should the edwards catalogs and l. c. cumulative catalog be used as a primary catalog, supplemented by cards? cooperation with neighboring libraries in acquisition, cataloging, and photoduplication service. segregation of clerical duties from the assignments of professional staff members. for example, the following assignments in the catalog department have been transferred from professional hands or close professional supervision to clerical hands exclusively: discard records; searching, ordering and following up orders for l. c. cards; marking of agency name on books; routine receiving and certification of orders, exclusive of discrepancies and errors; filing; copy reading on all cards; all added copy and added volume work. it remains now to be shown how the coordination and changes in procedure outlined above, so far as they are accomplished facts and not plans for future action-as many of them still are at this time-have brought about increased production. in the past two years, new title cataloging has increase.d nearly 13 per cent per cataloger. in addition to this, with a fractional decrease in catalogers, and a i 7 per cent increase in clerical staff, the catalog depart~ent has nearly finished the making of catalogs for three new subject departments soon to be established, involving the duplication of over 350,000 cards; made a catalog for the new extension division, which had a $20,000 establishment fund to spend for books; transferred a large geology collection from nondepartmental status to the technology department; transferred the library economy materials from non-departmental status to a special collection with its own catalog. it has coped with a large increase in temporary cataloging, brought about by increased effort to release popular books promptly, combined with delay in filling l. c. card orders and discontinuance of the depository catalog. and, it now makes two sets of cards for from 75 to 8o per cent of the new titles cataloged, as compared with two sets · for from 40 to 50 per cent before cards were made for the new departmental catalogs. with no increase in staff, the book selection department's coverage of new titles published has increased by perhaps 40 per cent, and of dealers' catalogs by several hundred per cent. it has not bought more books, because funds for that purpose have not increased, but its selection problem is the greater for that very reason. the production of the bindery, with no increase in staff, has increased about 10 per cent. there is no logical point at which to end this discussion. although many things have been accomplished, much more remains to be done. and much of what has been done is so recent that beneficial results have hardly had time to appear. the only conclusion which can be drawn at the moment is that, on the basis of the partial results now known, the administration of the library is convinced that the technical services division is not a luxury, but a highly important part of modern library organization. by margaret c. brown the ~mall public library in much of our thinking and writing about the administrative consolidation of all socalled "technical ·services" we have tended usually to consider the possibilities of this type of organization for the large library. january, 1949 certainly the libraries adopting such an organization have been, with few exceptions, large public or university libraries. in studying the technical division, as it has been developed in the small library, we have fewer 53 examples upon which to draw. i have been asked to describe the organizational plan of one such small library. of those libraries which have organized all processing procedures under the direction of one staff member, the public library of brookline is undoubtedly one of the smallest. brookline's total book collection is about 200,000 volumes. this collection is distributed among the following units: the main library, three branches, three elementary schools and one high school. the library is organized along functional lines and has a staff of about thirty-five, with six members of this staff responsible directly to the librarian. these are: head of circulation department, head of reference department, head of technical services, high school librarian, head in charge of services to the schools, and head of children's department. like many a new england library with a long and venerable history-the public library of brookline is almost one hundred years old-the growth of the library's collection has been very gradual. consequently its organizational plan is as much the result of compromises with tradition as it is of clearly defined specifications. the division of technical services is no exception to this rule. over the years the duties connected with the operations we call today "technical" were assumed by various members of the staff who discharged these responsibilities in the time remaining from a schedule designed primarily to accommodate the service departments. all other duties took precedence over the behind-the-scene operations. as the library grew, however, the need for specialization became evident, and eventually there developed the departmental organization which we have today. from general staff responsibility for processing procedures there emerged four departments to carry on this work: (i) adult cataloging, responsible for the cataloging of materials for all adult services in the system, including the high school; ( 2) children and school cataloging; ( 3) ordering; ( 4) marking and binding. however, centralization remained incomplete. many of the activities which rightly belonged in one of the processing departments continued to be performed by the members of other departments. the lines of authority and responsibility were not clearly defined, and, if defined, certainly not clearly understood. the relationship between the line and staff officers was frequently a nebulous one. the need for a greater degree of centralization of all processing procedures was one consideration prompting the creation, in february of 1947, of a division of technical services. the head of this division was made responsible for all processes concerned with ordering, cataloging, mending, marking, and binding of books. the heads of the departments named above were made responsible to the head of technical services. besides the impetus toward greater centralization which it was hoped the reorganization would give, it was also felt that more conscientious planning of the work of these departments in their interrelationships would result in a more coordinated effort, greater efficiency of operation and, consequently, improved service to the public. one further consideration prompted this administrative consolidation. prior to the setting up of the division of technical services, the librarian necessarily assumed much of the responsibility for the over-all planning and directing of the processing departments. the new organization enabled the librarian to deal with one officer instead of four, and to delegate responsibility for planning and directing operations in the division to the head of technical services. at the present time, the division of te hoical services at brookline has a staff of seven professionals, five clericals, and two student assistants. as in many small public libraries, the members of the processing departments are scheduled a few hours of every week at the service desks. the time so allotted ranges from an average of five hours in the case of one cataloger, to as much as fifteen or sixteen in the case of another. for this reason, the ratio of professional to clerical, when expressed in terms of hours rather than individuals, is approximately one to one, since all clerical workers give full time to the work of the division. in the calendar year 1947, catalog records for approximately ro,ooo volumes were furnished the various libraries in the brookline system. these 10,000 volumes were represented by approximately 4500 individual sets 54 college and research libraries of catalog cards. in this same year, 3470 fact. the expenditure of effort is not convolumes were withdrawn from the collection, fined to the members of the staff directly and the number of books and pamphlets involved. the success of the reorganizaordered, exclusive of government documents, tional plan at brookline depends, to a contotaled 8472. a figure which is perhaps even siderable extent, on the cooperation and more significant than those just quoted, when understanding of every member of the staff. considering the work load of the cataloging it is the habits and thinking of the staff that departments, is the number of individual require reorganizatidh as much as any procatalogs maintained and edited by these comcedural details. it is our habits and thinkbined departments. at present writing, ten ing, of course, that are the more difficult to catalogs are the responsibility of these departreorganize. ments, and the figure promises to grow. in in brookline the very creation of the posiaddition to the dictionary catalogs, four tion of head of technical services, in itself, shelflists, duplicates of those shelflists at the has helped, i think, to clarify the lines of main library, are provided for some collecauthority and responsibility. the responsitions remote from the main library. bility for all processing procedures was placed the production figures quoted above, for in the hands of one individual; the control the first year under the new organization, over these procedures had also to pass into represent a slight increase over the previous the hands of that same individual. as was years for which comparable statistics were mentioned earlier, many details of processing available. this increase in production was were performed by various members of the effected despite various adverse circumstaff under the direction of no single indistances, the most important of which was a vidual. during the year in which the new turnover in staff that affected nine of the organization has been in existence it has been twelve positions in the division. however, possible to transfer some of these operations these production figures seem to me to be an to the appropriate department. but for lack unsafe basis for any very meaningful conof staff more would have been transferred. elusions about the benefits of the new type i think this move toward centralized operaof organizational plan over the old. there tion and control was made easier with the is not qecessarily any relationship between consolidation of all procedures under one the increased production and the reorganizaadministrator. such centralization, when tion described. an equation with too many finally completed, will undoubtedly result in variables is incapable of solution and variamore efficient operation, and until such cenbles we had. there are many factors retralization is completed no very accurate sponsible for the statistical picture. one estimates can be made of work loads, staff factor, wholly unrelated to the reorganizaneeds, or budget requirements. tion, undoubtedly affected the cataloging starthe centralization of all processing protistics for 1947. in that year purchases cedures in the hands of one person also makes were heavier than any year since 1941. it it possible for the librarian to supervise this is quite likely that, of the myriad of tasks branch of the library's operation through one that fall to · the staff of a catalog department, assistant instead of four or more. in a greater number of those performed in 1947 speaking of the type of administrative conwere capable of statistical presentation in an solidation we are discussing here, the spanannual report. of-control argument has perhaps been indeed, if we are lacking a neat statistical over-emphasized. what is usually meant by before-and-after view, what evidence can we this argument is that the librarian's span of present that this new organization at brookcontrol, through the creation of a service and line is superior, in any way, to the old? the a technical division, is reduced to two. hiorganization at brookline is in what could secting an organization into service and be described as an experimental stage of its technical divisions may be advantageous in development. it is inevitable that any recertain instances, but reducing the span of organization, while it can take place overcontrol to as low a figure as two usually night on paper, requires a much longer time can only be done at the cost of removing the and a great deal of effort before it exists in librarian yet one step further from his staff. january~ 1949 55 where possible, the librarian would seem to benefit from the counsel and reporting of five or six members of his staff who are directly in touch with the work they supervise, rather than from two staff members who themselves may be just another part of the hierarchy. the problem in brookline was not how to reduce the librarian's span of control to two, but how to reduce it tve number and a shelf number within the alcove followed after collation and the recording of source information in the volume during the receipt process. each alcove had a "shelf-catalogue." as fiske put it, "when the book is duly entered on this shelf-catalogue, and has its cornerpiece [i.e., label inside the front cover] marked, it is at last ready to be 'catalogued.' "132 robinson, librarian of the university of rochester, reported that his principle of classification for college libraries was that "the division of books should correspond on the whole to that division of the instruction which is best suited to the aims and purposes of the institution.''133 certainly, this was a user-orientated plan, encouraging the teacher to examine his class of books, ~ • \ , j., i • columbia university libraries m elvil dewey . watch its growth, and "add its full force to the means of instruction in his department," while helping the student to "enter upon the use of it with very .little difficulty." to the librarian ·"perplexed with books which belong in no class in particular," robinson's advice was "to ignore the title, examine the book in detail, and put it into that department in which it is likely to be most extensively used."134 in his discussion of the arrangement of books within the library (general and reference works together, followed by the various classes), robinson makes it clear that each subject class is assigned a specific area of shelving and that volumes are shelved and found through the assignment of class mark and !shelf number. dewey's a classification and subject index, heard of before the 1876 conference, described there by dewey on demand, 135 and explained in the 1876 report, obviously filled a need. in the 1876 report, dewey wrote with what seemed to be pleased surprise: "though the system was devised for cataloguing and indexing purposes, it was found on from cutter to computer i 437 trial to be very valuable for numbering and arranging books and pamphlets on the shelves."136 the dewey i amherst scheme was indeed a giant step forward, and the dewey decimal classification went on to sweep the country, first being used for the classified catalog and later primarily as a shelf arrangement for the dictionary catalog.137 in spite of many other interests and activities, dewey continued to control the development of the decimal classification until the end of his life, the thirteenth edition being published as a memorial edition in 1932, the year after his death. thereafter, the lake placid club education foundation continued to keep it up to date and to promote its use. since 1930 an office at lc has added ddc numbers to some of the lc cards, and later the ddc editorial office was moved to lc. today more libraries in the country use . the decimal classification than any other scheme, as well as libraries in many countries around the world. although classification was the aspect of cataloging which cutter omitted from his rules, he was to make two las~­ ing contributions to it. cutter had been working on the problem of classifica. tion since 1873 without finding a solu. tion which he wanted. he was attracted to the amherst decimal plan ·but found that it did not give the close classifica· tion which he was seeking.138 eventually, his efforts led to his expansive classification, a scheme in a series of schedules of increasing (i.e., expanded) fullness. the first was elementary and intended for small collections; the seventh, not yet completed when he died in 1903, was designed to be adequate for a library of ten million volumes.139 just as he had provided for short-title, medium-title, and full-title dictionary catalogs to suit the needs of different libraries, 140 so he offered classification schedules of varying degrees of fullness to fill different needs. a survey made re438 1 college & research libraries • september 1976 cently showed that nine libraries in this country and three in canada were continuing to classify the majority of their new acquisitions in the cutter classification scheme.141 in connection with his expansive classification, cutter devised a system of arranging individual books alphabetically by author within classes, these so-called book numbers consisting of the initial of the author's surname followed by decimal numbers. cutter developed tables of numbers using two figures to arrange the authors alphabetically on the shelves; kate sanborn later developed the cutter-sanborn three-figure table.l 42 cutter's lasting contributions appear in the two principal classifications of today. his cutter numbers regularly form the second element of call numbers derived from the decimal classification; both his expansive classification and his book numbers had a strong influence on the lc classification. the development of the library of congress classification, appropriately for a national library and one which was to provide cataloging copy for many libraries throughout the country, was a team effort. not only did several staff members work on it, but as plans emerged, they were taken to leading librarians of the country for opinions. the final decision on the general plan was made late in 1900. development was begun immediately and is still not complete.l43 the story of its genesis is an interesting one and can be found in lamontagne's american library classification. during the development of the two classification systems which came to dominate the american scene, librarians were still making independent judgments about classification and developing individual systems. in spite of the first appearance nationally of the decimal classification in 1876, george little reported to the world's library congress in 1893 general agreement among college librarians that books should be arranged by subject but a wide difference of opinion as to the system of classification to be adopted.144 horace kephart, librarian of the st. louis mercantile library, reported to the same congress (with an admirable bibliography on classification) the results of a survey he had made on the subject, which confirmed little's generalizations. kephart had sent a "circular of inquiry" to every u.s. library of 25,000 volumes or more, a mailing of 183 circulars. of the 127 usable replies returned, it was shown that half of the libraries were using classification systems of their own and one-third were using dewey in whole or in part. mr. cutter's system (so he said!) was rapidly growing ' in favor. 145 mcmullen reports that when j. c. m. hanson left lc and joined the university of chicago libraries in 1910, he found half of the books not classified and the rest classified according to about fifteen different systems, the dominant system being dewey' s.146 during the ala 1911 pasadena conference, a symposium on classification gave equal time to the expansive classification (in a paper written by william parker cutter, a nephew of c. a. cutter), the decimal classification, and the library of congress classification. 147 in 1927, works reported that "classification presents a difficulty that is almost if not actually insuperable." his recommendation was that each library staff study the needs of the library users and adjust the classification as far as possible to meet such needs, and he pointed out that classification needs a high quality of personnel!148 in a 1975 survey of dewey decimal classification use in the u.s. and canada, comaromi, michael, and bloom found that about two-thirds of the sampling of college and university libraries counted were using the lc classifica' ,. tion, but there was a striking difference between college and university use. of the college libraries, forty-four employed lc and thirty-eight used dewey. of the university libraries, thirty-six used lc and one used dewey. 149 consider~ng only libraries holding 500,000 or more volumes, 107 reported the use of lc and only fourteen of dewey.150 seeking to assay the "trend to lc" in college and university libraries, robert mowery studied 1,160 accredited fouryear colleges and universities and found that more than half were using the lc system. however, counts made in 1968 and 1971 showed that the move to lc had lost momentum.151 given the past history of classification and the present lack of consensus among academic libraries, it is not surprising that today' s textbooks maintain a careful neutrality between the two prevailing systems .152 catalog format how did today's traditional dictionary ( as opposed to classed) card ( as opposed to book) catalog become the dominant format in american libraries? card catalogs were used in libraries for some time before they were opened to the public in 1857, when lloyd p. smith introduced such a tool in the philadelphia library company. four years later ezra abbot, assisted by cutter, provided one for harvard, which became a model for other libraries.153 according to ranz, the ,final quarter of the nineteenth century witnessed the decline of the printed book catalog in american libraries. his excellent the printed book catalogue in american libraries: 1723-1900, covering the years of the printed book catalog's predominance, sets the stage for 1876.154 an example of the attitude of that time is offered by robinson, who initiated the university of rochester's first card catalog, a manuscript dictionary catalog, in 1870 at a cost of $329 in labor and rnafrom cutter to computer i 439 terials for holdings of 9,560 volumes. he did so over many objections: "it presents to the eye only one title at a time; time and patience are lost in turning over the cards; it cannot be carried about, but must be used at the library, and only one person can consult a given part of it at a time."15s in spite of objections, robinson could report in 1876 that: in some of the largest libraries of the country the card system has been ex· elusively adopted. several of them have no intention of printing any more catalogues in book form. in others, cards are adopted for current accessions, with the expectation of printing supplements from them, from time to time. i think the tendency of the smaller libraries is to adopt the former plan, keeping a manuscript card catalogue of books as they are added, without a thought of printing.156 classed catalogs were never highly favored in the u.s. early prevailing opinion of classed catalogs is summarized in an 1880 discussion of c allege libraries as aids of instruction. justin winsor states: "for the skilled and habitual user, classed catalogues, especially those in which related subjects stand in close propinquity, may be more satisfactory; but such users are always rare."157 robinson agrees, "classed catalogues are good for experienced readers, but for the student with little or no experience we believe every obstacle should be removed."158 the single decision which locked in the dictionary card catalog as the predominant standard was the decision by the library of congress to sell its printed cards. the lc printed unit cards were designed for the dictionary rather than the classed catalog, and their availability was too great an advantage to be ignored. these and other decisions which resulted in the predominance of the dictionary card catalog were based on li440 i college & research libraries • september 1976 brarians' opinions for the most part, opinions growing out of experience and theorizing. formal efforts to ascertain the users' points of view and to base . conclusions on facts rather than general impressions came long after the basic decisions had been made. krikelas' survey of catalog use studies in 1972 lists fifty-four studies, the earliest made in 1931. krikelas finds an increasing effectiveness of the later studies over the earlier ones but still notes difficulties in producing useful studies. he suggests that maybe the general finding that between 70 and 80 percent of all catalog searches are successful to the extent that the user is able to identify some relevant document should be interpreted to mean that librarians have been able to develop a rather sophisticated tool. 159 cooperative and centralized cataloging the twin dreams of cooperative and centralized cataloging very much concerned. the librarians who met in 1876. included in the first ala constitution was a provision for the establishment of a co-operation committee.160 an editorial appearing in the same issue of the american library journal which printed the constitution offered the opinion: "of the standing com~~ittees, that on co-operation will probably prove the most important organ of the association, as most of the practical work will fall to its share or to that of its sub-committees. the poole's index, size, and co-operative cataloging matters, now in special hands, are only a portion of the work to· be done."161 several months later, in the august 31 issue, dewey wrote: co-operation has become among librarians a household word during the past year .... while we have so much with which to be satisfied, there has been less progress in what s«;lemed the main question-co-operative cataloguing. here the greatest need was felt, and to this most of the profession look for the greatest benefit. the september meeting [the new york conference of 1877] will probably remove the first difficulties, by agreeing upon a code of rules by which the titles in any system shall be made. this decided, we are ready for the question, who shall prepare the titles of new books as published? the library of congress or its copyright department? the publishers themselves? a cataloguing bureau, established and maintained by the libraries of the country? an individual or firm, as a commercial venture? there are arguments for and against each one of them.162 progress was not as fast as the impetuous dewey predicted. there were to be many steps between the dream and today's marc tapes. of basic importance was the standardization of descriptive cataloging and subject analysis, if the centralized product was to be of maximum use. once there were common cataloging practices and a central producer, distribution was the next problem, solved by lc' s card distribution service and by the printing of its catalogs and, later, the national union catalog. much of the history of these efforts can be found in the early volumes of the library journal, and it has been summarized by dawson and given in more detail in two master's theses by vivian d. palmer and velva j. osborn.163-65 the product that has evolved over the past hundred years, namely, lc catalog copy, has laid more stress on centralized cataloging. however, it has included cooperative cataloging in varying degrees through the use of cataloging done by selected libraries, especially those receiving books under the cooperative acquisitions program and later those participating in the farmington plan for the acquisition of foreign titles.166 the whole effort received a tremendous boost with the inclusion of title iic in the higher education act of 1965. lc responded handsomely to this mandate to t' ,, ~ i acquire and catalog all currently published titles of scholarly value, as john cronin's report to the new york ala conference in 1966 promised167 and as lc has since expanded the resulting national program for acquisitions and cataloging and its shared cataloging program. another dream of the early ala years was that of providing cataloging copy with each new book published in this country. the editors of the 1876 report noted a suggestion from winsor that publishers might send with each book a card providing a bibliographical description which would be suitable to be inserted in the library catalog.1ss during the past thirty years, the library of congress has taken a number of steps to make cataloging copy for domestic books more easily available, as follows: 1. in 1947, lc and the publishers' weekly arranged to include lc card numbers with the listings of new books in the "weekly record" section. 2. in 1951, publishers began to cooperate in a program to print lc card numbers in their books. 3. in 1953, the lc "all-the-books" program was begun, a program to secure early copies of new books for early cataloging.169 4. in 1958, lc undertook the cataloging-in-source experiment. while it failed, much to the disappointment of librarians, it provided information useful for a later try_170 5. in 1961, lc began through its cards-with-books-program to encourage publishers and book wholesalers to supply printed cards with the books they sold. 171 6. in 1971, lc started the successful and continuing cataloging in publication program. in the first volume of the american library journal, dewey asked: "is it practicable for the library of congress -from cutter to computer i 441 to catalogue for the whole country?" a hundred years later, the answer is still not, "yes!" but is has become "maybe!" serials historically, serials have been rather on the edge of things in technical services. the librarians who gathered in philadelphia talked a great deal about indexing periodicals, suggesting cooperative measures for updating poole's 1853 index .to periodical literature, but they did not discuss the cataloging of periodicals as offering different problems from monographs. there was healthy respect for periodical literature, as they called the whole range of serials, and spofford, who wrote in the 1876 report on "periodical literature and society publications," dwelt on the importance of collecting and preserving complete files of such titles.172 cutter's rules covered periodicals. he used the term without defining it in the first edition of his rules; by 1904, in the last edition, he defined both periodical and serial. the latter, he wrote, was "a publtcation issued in successive parts, usually at regular intervals, and continued indefinitely,"173 not so very different from the definition provided in the anglo-american cataloging rules of 1967. cutter's entry rule for periodicals scarcely changed throughout his four editions. rule number 54 in the first edition is "periodicals are to be treated as anonymous and entered under the first word."174 the fourth edition adds to this the phrase "not an article or serial number."175 he listed four characteristics of a periodical and by means of them decreed that society memoirs, proceedings, and transactions were not periodicals. thus, they could be entered under the name of . the society, since they were the work of the society acting through its members. this issue of corporate entry versus title entry continues as a problem for serials catalogers and has been the subject of discussion with442 i college & research libraries • september 1976 out full agreement in the current project to revise the 1967 anglo-american cataloging rules. the works study of college and university library problems in 1927 noted eight definitions of the term periodical used by academic libraries. the meaningful differences were in the categories of publications included under the various definitions and the resulting differences in treatment among libraries.176 drury ( 1930), with his businesslike approach to library ordering, gave firm definitions of serials as the overall term for publications issued indefinitely in successive parts, periodicals as publications issued at regular intervals of less than a year, and continuations as all other serials. these differentiations provide a generally firm basis on which to set up the ·appropriate records for ordering and receiving titles, but are too simplistic for the requirements of cataloging.177 reading through the literature of the last hundred years makes it clear that, in addition to the problems of cataloging, serials offer much the same problems to the technical services which they always have-missing issues; the need to make n,ew issues available as quickly as possible, frequent changes in title, format, and content; the increasing number of serials available for acquisition; increasing costs, and how to fit this function into the traditional acquisition/ cataloging format. within the past quarter century, the serials identity within the technical services has become stronger with size. andrew osborn's serial publications, published by ala in 1955, gave serials librarians their first general text and an excellent one. they had already achieved their own periodical, serial slants, beginning in 1950, submerging its identity in library resources & technical services in 1957, when the ala reorganization created the resources and technical services division. there has been a separate serials unit within ala since the formation of the round table on periodicals in 1926. in 1974, because of the interest of serials librarians, rtsd set up the organization study committee to explore the possibility of organizing the division according to form rather than function. the committee recommended a continuation of the present sectional organization, which combines form and function. binding binding was a concern of the librarians gathered in philadelphia and was discussed on the conference floor. winsor's advice was sought on the advisability of maintaining a bindery in the library, and opinions were expressed about the cause of binding deterioration-was it gas lights, heat, or impure air?178 the co-operation committee, with cutter as its first chairperson, reported the willingness of some publishers to furnish bindings specifically for libraries, and the committee listed the specifications it had drawn up for such a program. 179 during the 1877 conference, binding and preservation were again discussed, including treatment for water damage following a fire, the replacing of leaves by heliotyping, and the restoration of rare books. later in the proceedings, president jus tin winsor mentioned a new material for binding books, which he had noticed in an english newspaper. he had obtained some sheets from mr. nicholson of the london library and had tried them with good results. the new material? buckram! mr. dewey rose to state that "it was the impression of the committee that buckram was to be the coming binding, but that a little more experience was needed before recommending it; that for the present goat instead of this buckram would have to be recommended for binding."180 well, it wasn't his discovery. during the english conference in ~· k . 1877, a number of papers were given on binding and labeling books, including one by the same edward nicholson, "on buckram as a . binding-material."isi nicholson strongly recommended the use of buckram, finding it durable and not too expensive, and predicted that it would largely diminish binding costs. binding, as a separate topic, was treated by librarian of congress spofford in the 1876 report. 182 he provided six pages of well-informed, practical advice on all aspects of the subject, emphasizing the librarian's duty to go carefully and frequently through the collection to select those volumes requiring repairs or rebinding and to arrange for all books returned to receive the same scrutiny. in spofford's opinion, "next to the selection and utilization of books, there is no subject more important in the administration of a public library than the binding and preservation of the volumes."183 both spofford and winsor, as well as poole, 184 emphasized the importance of good workmanship and materials in binding, and the reason for maintaining a bindery in the library was the poor binding which might be expected under commercial contract. another common opinion of the time was the better binding value to be obtained by ordering books abroad to be bound before they were supplied. the citations of literature on the care and preservation of books .in cannons' bibliography of library economy, covering 1876 through 1920, give an idea of the details discussed. in addition · to the topics above, there are such subjects as: how to open a bo9k, methods of inducing care of books, book dusting, methods of keeping books clean, and directions for mending. the world's library congress volume included a tenpage paper on the "elements of library binding" by d. v. r. johnston, the new york state reference librarian.i85 he cautioned against the false economy of cheap binding, recommended bindfrom cutter to computer i 443 ing abroad for cost and durability, warned that only larger libraries could save money by maintaining their own binderies, and, surprisingly, gave a rather negative report on buckram. ala set up a bookbinding committee in 1905, which answered the members' questions, maintained relations with publishers, worked for library binding of books commonly bought by libraries, and reported annually to the membership through the ala bulletin and conference pro'ceedings. the ala survey report in the mid-1920s included a chapter on "binding and repair," reporting library practice relating to what were evidently of current interest, namely, treatment of new books, dusting, inspection after circulation, washing and shellacking volumes, marking, care of leather bindings, duplication of missing pages ( the usual method was to type them), collation before binding, costs, binding contracts, staffing of library binderies, sewing methods, strengthening devices, and hanaling of music. buckram was definitely in as the best-wearing and best-bargain material for binding. works ( 1929) mentioned binding only as a problem of minor importance and singled out complaints of faculty relating to the inaccessibility of periodicals during the binding process.i86 the placing of service above cost was definitely in! when the college and university postwar planning committee of ala and acrl dealt with the "poor quality of many books," it referred to the low esteem in which the writing itself was held, particularly in the academic field. however, one paragraph was given to the problem of the future, namely, the need for preservation and duplication of fragile materials. 18'7 the early concern about shoddy commercial binding was resolved by a series of binding standards developed jointly by the library binding institute, a trade association organized in 1935, and its 444 i college & research libraries • september 1976 predecessors with the american library association. even before that time, the binders were working with librarians to provide specifications for acceptable library bindings. the results are today's binding standards, which are periodically revised. 188 in the 1960s the ala library technology project reported the results of its program on the development of performance standards for library binding.189 the project developed standards based on performance rather than the materials and methods on which the institute's standards are based. the difficulty of monitoring the newer standards has kept them from becoming a force. under the protection of standards, librarians have transferred their major concern from the quality of binding to the preservation ·of library materials. programs to meet this concern are not yet history. the computer and so we come from cutter to the computer, from cutter's clear statement of what cataloging should be as a basis for uniformity of practice to the computer as ' a tool for implementing cooperative and centralized cataloging with all that implies for library service. the academic library director has stepped out of the workroom into the office; the technical services have been accepted as a major division of the library's organization; acquisition records have been simplified and designed to furnish the first step in cataloging; descriptive cataloging has been codified, and classification has been reduced to two generally accepted systems; the catalog itself is a dictionary catalog, usually in card form, except for some pioneering computerproduced book catalogs; the library of congress is providing leadership for centralized and cooperative cataloging; serial users have accepted indexing for control of periodical literature, thus easing demands on the catalogers, which the latter could not hope to meet; and commercial binding has been standardized so that libraries can get what they pay for and can concentrate on the problems of preservation. in the late 1930s fremont rider plotted the growth rate of american research libraries and found that their collections doubled every sixteen years. taking yale university library as an example, he calculated that by the year 2040, yale would have an alarming total of 200 million volumes with a card catalog occupying nearly three-quarters of a million catalog drawers spread out over not less than eight acres of floor space.190 but the computer is not easily alarmed, and by 2040, it will be able to handle such magnitude with ease. it may even store many of the texts in order to reduce the 6,000 miles of shelving which rider calculated as needed.191 the potential of the computer for recording catalog records, making them readily available to many libraries, and providing a record of libraries' resources is assumed but not yet fully realized. baumol and marcus in 1973 saw computers moving toward greater use in academic libraries as a practical development of the future: to date, the majority of successful data processing applications in libraries have involved mechanization of nonprofessional tasks such as circulation control and typing of bibliographic aids. at the same time, there are trends in process which may in the next two decades change the range of innovation that is economically feasible. these are: ( 1) the .achievement of a standard format for bibliographic records in machine-readable form and the associated production at the library of congress and elsewhere of a sizable data base of such records; ( 2) a continuing sharp decrease in the cost of certain components of electronic data processing systems; ( 3) continuing increases in the capacity and reliability of electric communications channels with concomitant decreases in the unit costs of the channels; and ( 4) the creation of evolving modular, computer-based library systems, which take advantage of the three other changes just mentioned.l92 based on d. r. swanson's predictions, hanson and daily describe the most advanced form of the catalog of the future as a computerized catalog with eleven performance goals: user dialogues (programmed interrogation), aids to browsing, user-indexed library, access to in-depth information, wheat and chaff identification, national "network" of libraries, national network of bibliographic tools, instant information, remote interrogation and delivery, active dissemination, and quality control over library services (improved feedback) ,193 the library of congress leadership in developing machine-readable cataloging (marc) with its potential for providing instant availability of standardized cataloging coupled with the .location of specific copies of texts makes networking possible. and networking is today's dream and tomorrow's reality. during the 1876 conference, barnwell spoke urgently on "a universal catalogue: its necessity and practicability." such a catalog "to include the literary stores of every existing or possible library" could be used in place of the single library's catalog. "a marginal mark could be made opposite the titles of such books as the library contained, and thus the deficiencies would also be ascertainable at a glance."194 is barnwell describing the computerized system called oclc (which stands for ohio college library center, a name long since outgrown by this bibliographic data exchange system)? isn't oclc, in its present form, an incipient universal (mainentry, on-line) catalog for those library members which enter their full holdings in its immense data bank? and, of course, when it adds serials control, orfrom cutter to computer i 445 der records, and whatever other ideas fred kilgour pulls from his far-ranging imagination, it will be much, much more. 195 there is · still a long, fascinating trail to travel. full exploitation of com~ puters has been handicapped by our thinking in traditional terms. networking tends to be thought of as an extension of present services rather than rethought as a new concept with new potential. the fact that the new machines impose new conditions . on their users is another reason why the traditional conceptions must be rethought. it has been said that as the specialists took over the technical services, the user was lost to view. the chief librarian in 1876, checking over an incoming shipment of books to assign them to subject alcoves, might be interrupted to answer a query from a student. thus, the user was securely embedded in the librarian's decisions without conscious effort and without the need to communicate with other staff to discover the users' concerns. harassed by hoods of materials and pressures to reduce processing costs and arrearages simultaneously, the technical services staff may indeed lose track of the ultimate customer, an oversight which must receive more attention in the future. the large academic libraries, which provide much of the cataloging leadership, tend to ignore multimedia. in 1976, we stand in relation to nonprint materials in much the same relationship as librarians of 1876 did to the book, although the latter at least had a deep respect for the educational importance of the book. these materials should be fully accepted as resources and given appropriate controls. uniformity of practice should be the lesson which cataloging teaches to the other library functions. "'uniformity of practice" is one way of describing standardization, the foundation on which networking can be built. iiideed, 446 i college & research libraries • september 1976 standardization may be more important than logic in drawing up the rules to which, as barnwell said on the opening day of the 1876 conference, we are to adhere "with the most slavish servility."196 a hundred years after librarians organized for cooperative action, the technical services still have not agreed upon terminology to provide a means of gathering comparable statistics for sound comparison. the role of the library heads is crucial to the technical services. as libraries became larger and the heads could no longer be so intimately involved in acquisition and cataloging operations, their concern did not become less. as ala became involved in much larger issues-research, management, personnel, social issues, library school accreditation, and simply the difficulties of communication among an enlarged membership-the attention of the leaders was necessarily distracted from the technical services, which were left to the specialists. the difficulties in providing the technical services remained, but the chief librarian's interest turned from the details to the costs. turning from the greatly enlarged ala, the chiefs found a way to continue their important dialogues within the restricted membership of the association of research libraries. there, backed by the authority to provide supportive activity within their own libraries, they continued their cooperative exploration of common concerns, and they were able to do so on a much grander scale than was possible for their predecessors. according to mcgowan, the principal interests of arl after its formation in 1932 were to develop and increase by cooperative effort the resources and usefulness of the research collections in american libraries. 197 these, of course, are basically the technical service concerns of acquisitions and cataloging. the programs and projects for which arl has been responsible in these areas culminated in the addition to the higher education act of 1965 of the provision which developed as the national program for acquisitions and cataloging. it could be argued that this activity without the early intimate knowledge of the technical service operations has resulted in some miscalculations. for example, the cooperative cataloging aspect of the farmington plan simply broke down as the cataloging demands of the participating libraries overrode the directors' commitment to providing early cataloging for receipts. but, on balance, the value of the arl aid to technical services has been of decisive importance to whatever progress has been made, and will doubtless continue to be so. in reviewing 1876, one senses an excited gathering of librarians' concerns and an exciting move toward cooperation in dealing with them. the need for cooperation today is at once grimmer than in 1876 and easier because of new technological support. in 1976, one feels a similar shimmer of excitement on the edge of new areas of cooperation and, again, librarians approaching them willing to face the hazards to each library's autonomy which the changes will bring. references 1. john fiske, "a librarian's work," atlantic monthly 38:480 (oct. 1876). 2. george b. utley, the librarians' conference of 1853 ( chicago: american library assn., 1951), p.65. 3. lloyd p. smith, ''proceedings," american library jourruil1:141 (nov. 30, 1876). 4. college and university postwar planning committee of the american library association and the association of college and reference libraries, college and university libraries and librarians hip ( plan)i ning for libraries, no.6 [chicago: american library assn., 1946] ), p.40. 5. [melvil dewey] a classification and subject index for cataloguing and arranging the books and pamphlets of a library (amherst, mass.: 1876). 6. charles a. cutter, "rules for a printed dictionary catalogue," in department of the interior, bureau of education, public libraries in the united states of america: their history, condition, and management (special report, part ii [washington, d.c.: govt. print. off., 1876]). hereafter cited as 1876 report. 7. paul s. dunkin, cataloging u.s.a. (chicago: american library assn., 1969), p.l. 8. fiske, "a librarian's work," p.480. 9. george t. little, "school and college libraries," in melvil dewey, ed., papers prepared for the world's library congress read at the columbian exposition (washington, d.c.: govt. print. off., 1896), "reprint of chapter ix of part ii of the report of the commissioner of education for 1892-93," p.930. hereafter cited as world's library congress in notes and in the text. 10. american library association, a survey of libraries in the united states, v.4 (chicago: american library assn., 192627), p.19698. 11. william m. randall and francis l. d. goodrich, principles of college library administration ( chicago: american library assn. and the univ. of chicago pr., 1936), p.94-99. 12. donald coney, "the administration of technical processes," in carleton b. joeckel, ed., current issues in library administration: papers presented before the library institute at the university of chicago, august 1-12, 1938 (chicago: univ. of chicago pr., 1939 ), p.163-80. 13. ibid., p.176. 14. raynard c. swank, "the catalog department in the library organization," library quarterly 18:24-32 (jan. 1948). 15. "the technical services division in libraries: a symposium," college & research libraries 10:46-68 (jan. 1949). 16. joseph l. cohen, "a general consideration of the technical services division in libraries," in "the technical services division in libraries," p.47. 17. margaret c. brown, "the small public library," in "the technical services division in libraries," p.55. 18. richard h. logsdon, "summary," in "the technical services division in libraries," p.67. from cutter to computer i 447 19. arthur m. mcanally, "organization of college and university libraries," library trends 1:25 (july 1952). 20. maurice f. tauber and associates, technical services in libraries: acquisitions, cataloging, clas~ification, binding, photographic reproduction, and circulation operat·ions (new york: columbia univ. pr., 1954). 21. esther j. piercy, "introducing lrts," library resources & technical services 1:3-4 (winter 1957). 22. john m. dawson, "a brief history of the technical services in libraries," library resources & technical services 6:197-204 (summer 1962); james e. skipper, "the present state and future development of technical services," library resources & technical services 6:205-9 (summer 1962). 23. raynard c. swank, "subject catalogs, classifications, or bibliographies? a review of critical discussions, 1876-1942," library quarterly 14:31632 (oct. 1944). 24. ibid., p.316. 25. swank, "the catalog department," p.2432. 26. e. walfred erickson, college and university library surveys, 19381952 ( acrl monographs, no.25 [chicago: american library assn., 1961]), p.3. 27. ralph e. shaw, "introduction," in shaw, ed., "scientific management in . libraries," library trends 2:359 (jan. 1954). 28. bella e. shachtman, ed., "technical services: .policy, organization, and coordination," journal of cataloging and classification 11:59-114 ( april1955). 29. richard m. dougherty, robert w. wadsworth, 'and d. h. axford, policies and programs designed to improve cooperation and coordination among technical service operating units (occasional papers, no.86 [urbana: univ. of illinois graduate school of library science, 1967] ). 30. booz, allen & hamilton, inc., organization and staring of the libraries of columbia university (westport, conn.: redgrave information resources corp., 1973), p.xvi. 31. ibid., p.55-57. 32. columbia university libraries, the administrative organization of the libraries of columbia university: a detailed description (new york: columbia univ. libraries, 1973). 33. dawson, "a brief history of the technical services," p.127. 448 i college & research libraries • september 1976 34. william m. randall, "the technical processes and library service," in randall, ed., the acquisition and cataloging of books; papers presented before the library institute at the ·university of chicago, july 29 to august 9, 1940 (chicago: univ. of chicago pr., 1940 ), p.6. 35. world's library congress, p.809-26, 91633. 36. c. w. andrews, "the acquisition of books," public libraries 8:195-202 (may 1903). 37. "methods of book buying," library journal31:14-17 (jan. 1906). 38. isabel e. lord, "some notes on the principles and practice of bookbuying for libraries," library journal 32:3-64 (jan. 1907). 39. gardner m. jones, "accession department," world's library congress, p.814. 40. lord, "some notes," p.64. 41. francis k. w. drury, order work for libraries ( chicago: american library assn., 1930), p.69. 42. randall and goodrich, principles of college library administration, p.131. 43. guy r. lyle, the administrat-ion of the college library (4th ed.; new york: wilson, 1974), p.194. 44. kenneth g. peterson, the university of california library at berkeley, 19001945 (university of california publications in librarianships, no. 8 [berkeley: univ. of california pr., 1970] ), p.20. 45. cutter, "rules," p.82. 46. "methods of book buying," p.17. 47. lord, "some notes," p.9. 48. george a. works, college and university library problems: a study of a selected group of institutions prepared for the association of american universities (chicago: american library assn., 1927), p.104. 49. college and university postwar planning committee, college and university libraries, p.39-40. 50. william f. poole, "the organization and management of public libraries," in 1876 report, p.482. 51. lord, "some notes," p.60. 52. drury, order work, p.74-78. 53. randall and goodrich, principles of college library administration, p.93. 54. louis r. wilson and maurice f. tauber, the university library: its organization, administration, and functions (chicago: univ. of chicago pr., 1945), p.145. 55. nelson w. mccombs, "correlated order forms," library journal 58:285-89 (april 1, 1933). 56. cutter, "rules," p.82. 57. jones, "accession department," p.817. 58. drury, order work, p.67-71. 59. randall and goodrich, principles of college library administration, p. 92, 60. ibid., p.131. 61. gertrude wulfekoetter, acquisition work: processes involved in building library collections (seattle: univ. of washington pr., 1961), p.45-51. 62. stephen ford, the acquisition of library materials ( chicago: american library assn., 1973 ), p.23. 63. ibid., p.38-39. 64. poole, "the organization and management," p.483. 65. jones, "accession department," p.816. 66. ibid., p.816-17. 67. lord, "some notes," p.61. 68. drury, order work, p.49. 69. wulfekoetter, acquisition work, p.64-65. 70. ford, the acquisition of library materials, p.104-5. 71. american library association, co-operation committee, ''sixth report," library journal2:221 (nov.-dec. 1877). 72. "methods of book buying," p.16. 73. lord, "some notes," p.58. 74. drury, order work, p.12-13. 75. ibid., p.23-33. 76. wulfekoetter, acquisition work, p.52-69. 77. poole, "the organization and management," p.482. 78. william f. poole, "proceedings," american library journal 1:134 (nov. 30, 1876). 79. lord, "some notes," p.3-8. 80. poole, "the organization and management," p.481. 81. "legislation respecting duties on books imported for public use," 1876 report, p.290-91. 82. poole, ''the organization and management," p.489. 83. fiske, "a librarian's work," p.481.. 84. ibid. 85. "proceedings," american library journal 1:133-34 (nov. 30, 1876). 86. justin winsor, "shelf lists vs. accession catalogues," library journal 3:247-48 (sept. 1878). 87. american library association, committee on library administration, "report [on accessioning]" in "papers and proceedings," ala bulletin 2:223-25 (sept. 1908). 88. american library association, a survey, v.4, p.57-65. 89. "lj's survey of accession and inventory practices;~ library journal 84:104~52 (april!, 1959). 90. "college libraries," 1876 report, p.62. 91. jones, "accession department," p.816. 92. ibid., p.819. 93. andrews, "the acquisition of books," . p.l97-98. 94. ibid., p.201. 95. j. i. wyer, the college and university library (manual of library economy, iv [3d ed. rev.; chicago: american library assn., 1928]), p.28-29. 96. drury, order work, p.l28-40. 97. melvil dewey, "proceedings," american library joumall:l31 (nov. 30, 1876). 98. adolf hepner, . "a proposition for an american libraries' clearinghouse," in "cleveland conference proceedings," library journal 21 :c67 (sept. 1896). 99. jones, "accession department," p.81819. 100. helen w. welch, "publications exchange," library trends 3:425 (april 1955). . 101. theodore gill, . "the smithsonian system of exchanges," 1876 report, p.285-90. 102. erickson, college and university library . surveys, pal. 103. edward g. holley, raking the historic goals; the a.l.a. scrapbook of 1876 (beta phi mu chapbook no.b [beta phi mu, 1967] ), p.l2-13. 104. james g. barnwell, "a universal catalogue-its necessity and practicability," american library journal 1:57-58 (nov. 30, 1876). 105. "proceedings," american library journal 1:112 (nov. 30, 1876). 106. otis h. robinson, "college library administration," 1876 report, p.509. 107. charles a. cutter, "library catalogues," 1876 report, p.526-622. 108. "catalogues and cataloguing," 1876 report, p.623-62. 109. dunkin, cataloging u.s.a., p.99. 110. l. e. jones, ''the government library report," american library journal 1:9 (sept. 30, 1876). ill. dunkin, cataloging u.s.a., p.viii. 112. eugene r. hanson and jay e. daily, "catalogs and cataloging," in encyclopedia of library and information science, v.4 (new york: dekker, 1968), p.242305. 113. cutter, "rules," p.10. 114. ibid., p.5. 115. hanson and daily, "catalogs and cataloging," p.245. 116. william c. lane, "cataloging," world's library congress, p.835-49. from cutter to computer i -44.9 117. dunkin, cataloging u.s.a., p.9-10. 118. andrew d. osborn, "the crisis in cataloging," library quarterly 11:393-411 (oct. 1941). 119. wyllis e. wright, "the anglo-american cataloging rules: a historical perspective," library resources & technical services 20:36-47 (winter 1976). 120. jim ranz, the printed book catalogue in american libraries: 1723-1900 (acrl monographs no.26 [chicago, american library assn., 1964]), p.70. 121. little, "school and college libraries," p.928. 122. charles a. cutter, "proceedings," library journal2:259 ( nov.dec. 1877 ). 123. hermann a. hagen, "the librarian's work," nation 24:40-41 (jan. 18, 1877). 124. charles a. cutter, "the cataloguer's work," nation 24:86-88 (feb. 8, 1877). 125. ibid., p.87. 126. for more details see kenneth j. brough, scholars workshop: evolving conceptions of library service (illinois contributions to librarianship, no.5 [urbana: univ. of illinois pr. 1953] ), p.105-9. 127. dunkin, cataloging u.s.a., p.20. 128. cutter, "rules," p.10 . 129. dunkin, cataloging u.s.a., p.20. 130. lyle, the administration of the college library, p.5~9. 131. isadore g. mudge, ''present day economies in cataloging as seen by the reference librarian of a large university library," in american library association, catalog section, catalogers' and classifiers' yearbook 4:22 ( 1934). 132. fiske, "a librarian's work," p.481-82. 133. robinson, "college library administration," p.509. 134. ibid. 135. "proceedings," american library journal 1:141-42 (nov. 30, 1876). 136. melvil dewey, "catalogues and cataloguing," part i, 1876 report, p.623. 137. hanson and daily, "catalogs and cataloging," p.268. 138. leo e. lamontagne, american library classification with special reference to the library of congress (hamden, conn.: shoe string, 1961), p.208. 139. dunkin, cataloging u.s.a., p.100. 140. cutter, "rules," p.9. 141. robert l. mowery, "the cutter classification: still at work," library resources & technical services 20:154-56 (spring 1976). 142. dunkin, cataloging u.s.a., p.101. 143. lamontagne, american library classification, p.232-33. 450 i college & research libraries • september 1976 144. little, "school and college libraries," p.923. 145. horace kephart, "classification," world's library congress, p.861-62, 890. 146. haynes mcmullen, "administration of the university of chicago libraries, 1910-28," library quarterly 23:29 (jan. 1953). 147. "symposium on classification," ala bulletin 5:224-39 (july 1911). 148. works, college and university library problems, p.103-4. 149. john p. comaromi, mary e. michael, and janet bloom, a surve.y of the use of the dewey decimal classification in the united states and canada (albany, n.y.: forest press, lake placid foundation, 1975), p.13. 150. ibid., p.16. 151. robert l. mowery, "the 'trend to lc' in college and university libraries," library resources & technical services 19: 389 (fall 1975). 152. lyle, the administration of the college library, p.57-58; rutherford d. rogers and david c. weber, university library administration {new york: wilson, 1971 ), p.171. 153. abstract of ruth m. heiss, ''the card catalog in libraries of the united states before 1876" (master's thesis, univ. of illinois, 1938), in american library association, catalog section, catalogers' and classifoers' yearbook 8:125-26 ( 1939). 154. ranz, the printed book catalogue, p.76. 155. catherine d. hayes, "the history of the university of rochester libraries-120 years," the university of rochester library buuetin 25:70 {spring 1970). 156. robinson, "college library administration," p.512. 157. justin winsor and otis h. robinson, college libraries as aids to instruction (u.s. bureau of education circulars of information, no.1-1880 [washington, d.c.: govt. print. off., 1880]), p.14. 158. ibid., p.17. 159. james krikelas, ''catalog use studies and their implications," in melvin j. voigt, ed., advances in librarians hip 3: 195-200 (1972). 160. american library association, "constitution," american library journal 1:254 (march 31, 1877). 161. american library journal 1:251 (march 31, 1877). 162. melvil dewey, "the coming catalogue," american library journal 1:423 (aug. 31, 1877). 163. john m. dawson, "a history of central. ized cataloging," library resources & technical services 11:28-32 (winter 1967). 164. vivian d. palmer, "a brief history of cataloging codes in the united states, 1852-1949" (master's paper, univ. of chicago, 1963). 165. velva j. osborn, "a history of cooperative cataloging in the united states" (master's paper, univ. of chicago, 1944). 166. john m. dawson, "the library of congress: its role in cooperative and centralized cataloging," library trends 16: 88 {july 1967). 167. john w. cronin, "remarks on lc plans for implementation of new centralized acquisitions and cataloging program u nder title iic, higher education act" library resources & tchnical services 11: 35-45 (winter 1967 ) . 168. 1876 report, p.513-14, fn.l. 169. dawson, "the library of congress," p.90-91. 170. library of congress, processing department, the cataloging-in-source experiment: a report to the librarian of congress {washington, d.c.: library of congress, 1960). 171. hanson and daily, "catalogs and cataloging,"p.287. 172. a. r. spofford, "periodical literature and society publications," 1876 report, p.681. 173. charles a. cutter, rules for a dictionary catalog (4th ed.; washington, d.c.: govt. print. off., 1904), p.22. 17 4. cutter, "rules," p.33. 175. cutter, rules, 4th ed., p.59. 176. works, college and university library problems, p.118-19. 177. drury, order work, p.98. 178. "proceedings," american library journal 1:124-25 (nov. 30, 1876). 179. american library association, co-operation committee, "fifth report," american library journal1:432 (aug. 31, 1877). 180. ''proceedings," library journal 2:34 (sept. 1877). 181. edward b. nicholson, "on buckram as a binding-material," library journal 2: 207-9 {nov.-dec. 1877). 182. a. r. spofford, "binding and preservation of books," 1876 report, p.673-78. 183. ibid., p.673. 184. poole, "the organizational and management" p.481. 185. d. v. r. johnston, ''elements of library binding," world's · library congress, p.907-16. 186. works, college and university library problems, p.99. i( 187. college and university postwar planning committee, college and university libraries, p.30-32. 188. dudley a. weiss, .. binding institute, library," in encyclopedia of library and information science v.2 (new york: dekker, 1968), p.510-12. 189. american library association, library technolggy project, development of performance standards for library binding, phase i-ii (chicago: american library assn., 1961, 1966). 190. fremont rider, the scholar and the future of the research library: a problem and its solution (new york: hadham pr., 1944), p.12. 191. ibid. 192. william j. baumol and matityahu mar. cus, economics of academic libraries from cutter to computer i 451 (washington, d.c.: american council on education, 1973), p.41-42. 193. hanson and daily, "catalogs and cataloging," p.292. 194. barnwell, .. a universal catalogue," p.5455. 195. oclc needs no explanation for the many library users of this fastest growing of the computer systems. for those just back from a decade on a desert island, art plotnick has drawn together a primer on oclc, with a side glance at ballots, its west coast counterpart, in american libraries 7:258-75 (may 1976). 196. ibid., p.58. 197. abstract of frank m. mcgowan, ''the ~sociation of research libraries, 19321962," in dissertation abstracts international 34:348-a (july 1973). helen w. tuttle is assistant university librarian far technical services, princeton university, princeton, new jersey. _i acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries 400 / c &rl news t h e theme is “a national information policy: eco n o m ic im plications for in form ation p ro­ viders.” for registration information, contact n fais, 112 south 16th street, 12th floor, phila­ delphia, pa 19102; (215) 563-2406. april 16– 18— videotex: videotex ’84, sponsored by l o n ­ don online in c ., will be held at the hyatt re­ gency, chicago. the conference will focus on marketing, information products and services, and technology. contact: videotex ’84, london o nline i n c ., suite 3 3 1 4 , 1133 avenue of the americas, new york, ny 10036; (212) 3 9 8 –1177. 2 3 –2 6 —catholic libraries: 63d annual conven­ tion, catholic library association, boston park plaza hotel. the convention theme is “freedom our heritage, peace our challenge.” contact: john t . corrigan, c l a headquarters, 461 west lancaster avenue, haverford, pa 19041; (215) 649-5251. ■ ■ statement of ownership and management c o lleg e & r esearch l ib raries n ews is published 11 times a year (monthly, combining july/august), by the american library association, 50 e. huron st., chicago, illinois 60611. american library associa­ tion, owner; george m. eberhart, editor. second class postage paid at chicago, illinois. printed in u.s.a. as a nonprofit organization authorized to mail at special rates (section 4 11.3, dmm), the purposes, function, and nonprofit status of this organization, and the exempt status for federal income tax purposes, have not c h a n g ed d urin g the p re c e d in g tw elve months. extent and nature of circulation (“ a verage” figures denote the num ber of copies p r in te d each issue d urin g the p rec ed in g tw elve months; “actual” figures denote number of copies of single issue published nearest to filing date— the sep­ tember 1983 issue.) total number of copies printed: average, 12,250; actual, 11,535. sales through deal­ ers and carriers, street vendors, and counter sales: not applicable. mail subscriptions: average, 8 ,696 ; ac­ tual, 8,810. total paid circulation: average, 8,696; actual, 8,810. free distribution by mail, carrier, or other means, samples, complimentary, and other free copies: average, 1,172; actual, 1,169. total distribu­ tion: average, 9,868; actual, 9,979. copies not dis­ tributed: office use, left over, unaccounted, spoiled after printing: average, 2,382; actual, 1,556. returns from news agents: not applicable. total (sum of pre­ vious entries): average, 12,250; actual, 11,535. statement of ownership, management, and circula­ tion (ps form 3526, june 1980) for 1983 filed with the united states postal service, postmaster in chicago, illinois, september 30, 1983. dasthisdlfsecisae deadlines: orders for regular classified advertisements must reach the acrl office on or before the second of the month preced­ ing publication of the issue (e.g. september 2 for the october issue). late job listings will be accepted on a space-available basis after the second of the month. rates: classified advertisements are $4.00 per line for acrl members, $5.00 for others. late job notices are $10.00 per line for members, $12.00 for others. organizations submitting ads will be charged according to their membership status. t eleph one: all telephone orders should be confirmed by a writ­ ten order mailed to acrl headquarters as soon as possible. orders should be accompanied by a typewritten copy of the ad to be used in proofreading. an additional $10 will be charged for ads taken over the phone (except late job notices or display ads). g uidelines: for ads which list an application deadline, that date must be no sooner than the last day of the month in which the notice appears (e.g., october 31 for the october issue). all job announce­ ments should include a salary figure. job announcements will be edited to exclude discriminatory references. applicants should be aware that the terms faculty rank and status vary in meaning among institutions. jo bline: call (312) 944-6795 for late-breaking job ads for aca­ demic and research library positions. a pre-recorded summary of positions listed with the service is revised weekly; each friday a new tape includes all ads received by 1:00 p.m. the previous day. each listing submitted will be carried on the recording for two weeks. the charge for each two-week listing is $30 for acrl members and $35 for non-members. fast job listing service: a special newsletter for those actively seeking positions. this service lists job postings received at acrl headquarters four weeks before they appear in c&rl news, as well as ads which, because of narrow deadlines, will not appear in c&rl news. the cost of a six-month subscription is $10 for acrl mem­ bers and $15 for non-members. contact: classified advertising dep't, acrl, american library association, 50 e. huron st., chicago, il 60611; (312) 944-6780. for sale elsevier a n tiq u a r ia n d epa r tm en t. periodicals and rare books on lifeand earth sciences. over 1 million volumes on stock. catalogues available on demand. please write to: lippijn straat 4, 1055 kj amsterdam, the netherlands. positions open b io m e d ic a l c o l l e c t io n d e v e l o p m e n t l ib r a r ia n , dartmouth college library. dartmouth college library is seeking qualified candidates for the newly created position of collection de­ velopment librarian for the dana biomedical library which serves the dartmouth college medical school, the dartmouth hitchcock medical center, and the dartmouth college department of biomedi­ cal sciences. under the direction of the biomedical librarian, is re­ sponsible for collection development and maintenance of the collec­ tions in the life sciences and the medical sciences, and coordinates technical services activities in dana biomedical library with the cen­ tralized technical services of the dartmouth college library system. supervises the work of the serials assistant, participates in the provi­ sion of reference service. qualifications: ala/mls, 2 years experi­ ence in a health sciences library, academic background in the bio­ logical sciences, familiarity with the medical sciences literature, knowledge of computer-based systems (oclc, rlin, nlm). salary and rank commensurate with background and experience, $15,500 minimum. send resume and names of 3 references by november 30, 1983, to: phyllis e. jaynes, director of user services, 115 baker st., dartmouth college library, hanover, nh 03755. dartmouth col­ lege is an aa/eeo /m /f employer. b r itish-am erica n stu d ies biblio grapher. responsible for selection of materials to support instruction and research in en­ glish language and literature, other literature in english, american n ovem ber 1983 / 401 and british history and culture. selection of current and retrospective monographs and serials. acquiring and evaluating gift collections. able to cultivate strong work relations with academic departments. work closely with other bibliographers, librarians, and the acquisi­ tions and cataloging departments. work with potential donors re­ quired. responsible for evaluation of collections in addition to budg­ etary management. mls required from accredited library school. minimum six years relevant experience in british-american studies. advanced subject degree(s), scholarly record, competency in for­ eign languages and pertinent collection development experience. knowledge of publishing industry, antiquarian book trade and effec­ tive communication skills required. $26,940 minimum based on 1982/83 academic salary schedule. salary commensurate with qual­ ifications. faculty status, calendar year appointment, tiaa/cref, life/health insurance, 22 days vacation. submit resumes and three current reference sources by november 30, 1983, to shirley w. bolles(app. 72), alexander library, rutgers university, new bruns­ wick, nj 08903. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. business librarian. two positions. applications are invited from qualified persons. primary responsibility is to provide reference services including desk service, instruction, online data base search­ ing, and preparation of reference guides. additional duties involve computerized circulation activities and interaction with three library support staff and student aides. other duties as assigned. work with the head of the business library to develop activities, policies, and procedures. some evening and possibly some weekend assign­ ments. the business library serves the college of business with an enrollment of 5,000 undergraduate and graduate students. re­ quired: ala-accredited mls degree. college course work in busi­ ness and/or business library experience. a good knowledge of busi­ ness literature. some acquaintance with online database searching. available january 1, 1984. instructor rank. salary range begins at $14,500 for twelve months. two year term appointment. may be re­ newed. full faculty status. annual vacation of 20 days, all designated university holidays, 10 days professional development leave. send letter of application, resume, academic credentials and placement file by december 1 ‚. 1983, to: carl h. sachtleben, director of li­ braries, western michigan university, dwight b. waldo library, ka­ lamazoo, ml 49008. eeo, aa employer. catalog librarians (2) at the brown university library. one catalog librarian responsible for original cataloging of music mono­ graphs, scores, sound recordings, and romance language litera­ ture. one temporary catalog librarian responsible for original cata­ loging of monographs in the subject areas of art history, classics and bibliography; this position is a temporary, 12 month appointment with the possibility of becoming permanent. requirements for both positions: mls degree from an ala-accredited library school; two years relevant professional experience; knowledge of aacr2, lc rule interpretations and the marc format; familiarity with oclc or rlin. the music catalog librarian should have a background in music and a reading knowledge of german and italian; a knowledge of additional romance languages is desirable. the temporary cata­ log librarian should have an academic background or work experi­ ence in art, history or bibliography, with a reading knowledge of ger­ man, one romance language, and latin or greek. appointment range: $17,853-$23,016, based upon experience. interested can­ didates should send letter of application, resume and names of three references by november 20, 1983, to: gloria hagberg, brown uni­ versity library, providence, rl 02912. an equal opportunity, affirma­ tive action employer. catalog librarian. duties include original cataloging and ed­ iting oclc copy in all marc formats. mls from ala-accredited school required. two to three years experience preferred, especially with working knowledge of lc classification, aacr2 and oclc. knowledge of at least one european language highly desirable. twelve-month appointment, proposed effective date: april 1984. faculty rank and salary commensurate with qualifications; $16,500 minimum; tiaa/cref and university mandated benefits. send re­ sume and names of three references by december 16,1983, to ray­ mond a. frankie, director, j. murrey atkins library, the university of north carolina at charlotte, uncc, charlotte, nc 28223. the uni­ versity of north carolina at charlotte is an equal opportunity, affirma­ tive action employer. women and minorities are encouraged to ap­ ply. cataloger, original cataloging department. facili­ tates the processing of m onographic materials by assigning lc clas­ sification numbers and subject headings, establishing aacr2 form of name for corporate and difficult personal names, and interpreting aacr2 and lc practice for clerical and beginning professional staff. participates in meetings of original catalogers and in development of processing divisional policies, procedures, and plans. qualifica­ tions: ala/mls; minimum 2 years cataloging experience, which should include original cataloging, plus monographic cataloging ex­ perience with aacr2, lc and lcsh in an academic environment; experience with oclc or equivalent and name authority files highly desirable. salary negotiable, minimum $16,500. available immedi­ ately. texas a&m university has an enrollment of 36,000 and is lo­ cated in the bryan-college station community of 90,000 residents, 100 miles from houston and austin. library holdings consist of 1.4 million volumes, 15,347 subscriptions, and 2.2 million microforms. the library staff includes 54 librarians and 141 classified employ­ ees. librarians hold faculty status and are expected to meet promo­ tion and tenure requirem ents of the university. benefits: up to $70/month paid on health, life, and disability insurance package; 88% of social security paid for first $16,500 of salary; choice of re­ tirement plans including tiaa-cref, tax deferred annuity program available; no state or local income taxes; 10.5-month appointment, faculty rank; 14 state holidays. to apply, contact: susan s. lytle, head, personnel operations, university library, texas a&m univer­ sity, college station, tx 77843. an aa/eeo employer. cataloger. (search reopened). performs original cataloging and cataloging with copy using oclc; catalog maintenance, includ­ ing authority work; some reference duties. participates with the head of catalog section, in formulation of cataloging policies and proce­ dures. knowledge of oclc, aacr2, lc classification and subject headings essential; ability to catalog foreign language materials. qualifications: mls. salary: $16,000, tiaa/cref and usual fringe benefits. interviewing at midwinter ala january 7-10. send resume and names of three references by january 11,1984, to: willis e. bri degam, librarian, amherst college, amherst, ma 01002. eoe, aa, m/f/h. director western washington university wilson library western washington university is a comprehen­ sive university with over 9,000 students and 425 faculty. the library contains 475,000 volumes, 600.000 units of microform and subscribes to over 4.000 periodicals. there are 13 faculty, 45 staff, and a materials budget of over $800,000. the li­ brary is an rlin member and has access to all ma­ jor data bases. there is a branch music library and an educational media service. the director of the wilson library reports to the provost and is a member of the deans council. po­ sition is available july 1, 1984, following the retire­ ment of the present director. salary is dependent on qualifications and experience; minimum $30,000. criteria for selection shall include: an appropriate graduate degree; record of scholarly accomplish­ ment and professional service; successful progres­ sive administrative experience in comparable or larger university libraries; a record of constructive interaction with university and wider communities; experience with automated systems, collection de­ velopment, personnel, budget and space manage­ ment; a strong commitment to library support for teaching, scholarship and service to all members of the academic community; service at several univer­ sity libraries and teaching experience desired. letters of application (or nomination), including a professional resume and the names and addresses of three references, should be sent by january 12, 1984, to: dean daniel larner chair, library director search committee fairhaven college western washington university bellingham, wa 98225 western washington university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. 402 / c &rl news director of libraries. the university of wisconsin-madison. the director of libraries is the chief executive and manager of the general library system (gls) of the university of wisconsin madison. the director is responsible for management of centralized services for gls libraries and for direction of the central staff and in­ dividual library directors. the director is the principal representative and advisor for the chancellor and vice chancellor on university li­ brary coordination and policy development, is a member of the chancellor’s administrative council, chairs the campus-wide admin­ istrative library planning body, and serves as the primary campus link with other libraries throughout the university of wisconsin sys­ tem and the state. the director of libraries must have demonstrated management skills and leadership ability. management experience within a system of libraries, plus competence in and understanding of library functions, is desired. a master of library science or earned doctorate is preferred. appointment to the faculty or academic staff is dependent upon qualifications. salary: $45,000 + . the university of wisconsin-madison is an affirmative action, equal opportunity em­ ployer. send nominations or applications, accompanied by resume, to: robert lampman, chair, director of libraries search and screen committee, office of the secretary of the faculty, the university of wisconsin-madison, 134 bascom hall, 500 lincoln drive, madison, wl 53706. director of minitex (search extended). the director of mini tex (minnesota interlibrary telecommunications exchange) repre­ sents minitex in appropriate state, regional, and national forums, and is expected to provide effective and innovative leadership, on behalf of m in itex and its participants, in furthering interlibrary coop­ eration at the state, regional, and national levels. applicants for this position must have demonstrated skills in management, planning, communication, and interpersonal relations. they must have a so­ phisticated knowledge of interlibrary cooperation and networking, including developments that are currently taking place in this area. they must be able to work effectively with library administrators, li­ brarians, and others in a complex cooperative environment. at least three years of significant management responsibility in a library— preferably a large academic library—or a library network is required, as is the mls. the director of m in itex is responsible for managing a regional interlibrary cooperative program, which has as its mission to facilitate resource sharing among libraries in minnesota and north and south dakota in order to strengthen the library services pro­ vided to the user and to contribute to the effectiveness of library ser­ vices in individual libraries. minitex is a program of the minnesota higher education coordinating board (mhecb), which provides its basic funding. additional funding is provided by the minnesota of­ fice of public libraries and interlibrary cooperation and by north da­ kota and south dakota, under contract with mhecb. at the present time, more than 150 academic, state agency, and public libraries in minnesota, north dakota, and south dakota participate in the vari­ ous minitex activities. mhecb contracts with the university of min­ nesota for management of minitex. minitex currently has five ma­ jor programmatic activities: document delivery, backup reference service, periodical exchange, coordination of and training for oclc participation, and maintenance of a regional union list of serials (muls). the director of minitex has responsibility for management of these programs, each of which is headed by a coordinator who reports to the minitex director. the minitex director, in turn, re­ ports to the director of the university of minnesota libraries, under the agreement between the university and mhecb. minitex is lo­ cated in wilson library on the university of minnesota campus. it has an annual operating budget of approximately $850,000 and a staff of approximately 32 fte, including four professionals. with regard to policy and program priorities, the director of minitex is responsible to the director of program planning and coordination at mhecb. a minitex advisory committee, comprised of representatives of the various types of libraries who participate in the program and the agencies with whom mhecb contracts for minitex services, ad­ vises the minitex director and the mhecb director of program planning and coordination regarding minitex policy and program directions. the mhecb is ultimately responsible for minitex policy. the director of minitex holds an academic-administrative appoint­ ment in the university of minnesota libraries. salary is negotiable, with a base of $40,000. a full range of benefits is provided. deadline for a postmark of applications is december 15, 1983. applicants should send a resume, a sample of their writing, and the names and addresses of three references with their relationship to the applicant, to the university libraries personnel officer. applications should be sentto: robert l. wright, personnel officer, university libraries, 499 wilson library, 309 south 19th avenue, minneapolis, mn 55455. the university of minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer and specifically invites and encourages applications from women and minorities. director of research library. colonial williamsburg foundation. responsibilities: 1) administer the research library and special collections (manuscripts, rare books, other research materi­ als) of the historical museum; develop collections; establish stan­ dards and promote programs for conservation, automated biblio­ graphic access, and reader services; manage fiscal resources, including outside funding; supervise and coordinate staff (profes­ sional, paraprofessional, and clerical) and volunteers; head foundation-wide library services committee; and maintain donor re­ lations. 2) publicize the research collections through books, articles, and lectures. 3) plan for and design expanding library network, in­ cluding consolidating library services, automated systems, and per­ sonnel and space growth. 4) be accountable for the security of the collections. salary: mid-twenties. qualifications. required: ala accredited fifth-year degree in library science; minimum of four years administrative experience of increasing responsibility in an aca­ demic or special collections environment; advanced degree in colo­ nial history or the humanities; demonstrated ability to speak and write effectively. desired: demonstrated fund-raising ability, including successful grants; experience in library/archival conservation pro­ grams; research interest in an area of colonial williamsburg’s collec­ tions. send letter of inquiry and resume to: barbara wielicki, director of employment, colonial williamsburg foundation, p.o. box c, wil­ liamsburg, va 23187. application deadline: 31 december 1983. the colonial williamsburg foundation is an equal opportunity, af­ firmative action employer. head, cataloging department. administers cataloging department which is responsible for monographic and non-print original and copy cataloging, authority control, catalog mainte­ nance, and retrospective conversion. supervises 14 staff members, including 4 professional librarians. plays a major role in continuing implementation of geac online library system. reports to the asso­ ciate director for technical services. required: ala-accredited mls; minimum of 5 years experience in cataloging in a large aca­ demic library; excellent communication skills; experience with lc classification and subject headings, aacr2 and authority control; experience with cataloging using a bibliographic utility, preferably oclc; demonstrated successful supervisory experience; demon­ strated ability to plan and implement new programs; ability to work with materials in foreign languages. 12-month appointment, 24 days annual leave, tuition remission, usual benefits. minimum salary $25,000. assistant or associate professor, d.o.q. send letter of appli­ cation, resume, and names of 3 references by december 5,1983, to: jill keally, personnel librarian, the university of tennessee library, knoxville, tn 37996-1000. utk is an eeo, affirmative action, title ix, section 504 employer. head librarian/bibliographer. direct the program of ser vice and collection development of swain library of chemistry and chemical engineering. duties include managing the library and its research collections, providing graduate and research reference service, and serving as member of collection development council and other committees as necessary. mls from an ala-accredited school or equivalent in training/experience required, along with 5 -6 years in building research level collections, demonstrated ability in coordinating resources/services, excellent interpersonal/written skills, and experience in supervision/administration and automated data and reference services. reading ability in a non-english west­ ern european language, preferably german, is required. send cover letter and resume with 3 references by november 30,1983, to carolyn henderson, library personnel officer, stanford university libraries, stanford, ca 94305. cite #245a on all correspondence. we are an equal opportunity employer through affirmative action. head of public services (librarian iii). land grant university library serving over 9,000 students; member of tri-college univer­ sity (north dakota state university, moorhead state university, con­ cordia college); participant in minnesota state university system’s online library catalog. responsible for the administration of all public service operations. coordinates public services’ activities with other library divisions and with the tri-college libraries. reports to the li­ brary director and participates in general policy formation and ad­ ministration of library. requirements include: no less than 5 years progressively responsible professional experience in an academic library including automation and supervisory responsibility; compre­ hensive knowledge of and experience in public services; strong leadership and management skills; ability to work effectively with uni­ versity community; degree from accredited mls program or equiva­ lent. salary range: $20,580-$24,937. tiaa/cref. blue cross-blue shield. submit letter of application, resume, and 3 current references to: personnel office, north dakota state university, fargo, nd 58105. application deadline: december 15,1983. ndsu is an equal opportunity institution. head of public services. responsible for administration of all areas of public service in a 380,000-volume library serving 7,000 stu­ dents. coordinates and supervises professional and support staff in interlibrary loan, circulation, reference, data base search, media center, documents, and maps. provides reference service. re­ sponsible for one of the public service functions. qualifications: ala accredited mls, 3 -5 years professional academic experience in public service, administrative and supervisory skills, familiarity with automated library systems is desirable. faculty status, tenure-track position. salary from $22,000 depending on qualifications. send let­ ter of application, resume, and three letters of recommendation, to the director's office, olson library, northern michigan university, marquette, m l49855. deadline: december 15. an a a /e o employer. head, science libraries. librarian iv, mit libraries. under the assistant director for public services, administers the mit sci­ ence library and its branches, lindgren (earth and planetary sein ovem ber 1983 / 403 ences) and schering-plough (health sciences), and the chemistry reading room. supervises a staff of eight librarians and eight sup­ port staff. participates in and oversees the provision of reference ser­ vices and bibliographic instruction, and the developm ent of collec­ tions in astronomy, biology, chemistry and chemical engineering, earth and planetary sciences, materials sciences, mathematics, medical sciences, meteorology, neuroscience, nuclear engineering, nutrition, oceanography, and physics. serves as a m em ber of the divisional librarians group which coordinates the public services of the mit libraries and as a m em ber of library council. qualifications: mls from an accredited library school required. minimum of seven years increasingly responsible professional experience in an aca­ dem ic library required. demonstrated effective managem ent skills required. experience in reference services and collection m anage­ ment in a science or engineering research library as well as dem on­ strated knowledge of the applications of technology are essential. graduate or undergraduate degree in science highly desirable. sal­ ary: $25,500 + , depending on experience. interested individuals should send resumes including the names of three references by de­ cem ber 15, 1983, to: search committee for science librarian, the libraries, room 14s-216, massachusetts institute of technology, c am bridge, ma 02139. mit is an equal opportunity em ployer with an affirmative action plan and welcomes applications from qualified women and minority candidates. in s tr u c tio n a l services librarian. this individual reports to the public services librarian and is responsible for planning, de­ veloping and im plem enting all library instructional programs; online bibliographic data-base searching; and assisting with reference in­ quiries. requires accredited mls; additional masters degree de­ sired. must be able to participate in a dynam ic library m anagement team, supervise staff, work cooperatively with faculty, students, staff and general public. this is a permanent nine month, tenure-track fac­ ulty appointment. minimum monthly salary of $2,638. uaj is one of three university cam pus centers in the university of alaska system. it is a small but growing institution located in the splendor of southeast alaska. please send com plete credential file, including letters of ref­ erence, by decem ber 15,1983, to: fran barnes, administrative sec­ retary, library & media services, university of alaska, juneau, 11120 g lacier h ighw ay, juneau, ak 99801. the u niversity of alaska is an eo/aa em ployer and educational institution. library directo r, california state college, bakersfield. re­ sponsible for all library operations. directs professional staff of seven and support staff of thirteen. qualifications: ala/m ls and an addi­ tional advanced degree required. successful library managerial ex­ perience required, with both public and technical services experi­ e nce d e sira b le . e xp e rie n ce with lib ra ry a u to m a tio n re q u ire d . college library experience desirable. the successful candidate will possess the ability to com m unicate and work effectively with the ad­ ministration, faculty, staff, students and com m unity and the ability to promote and present the library position to the cam pus com m unity and within the state university system. active participation in the li­ brary profession required. salary: $39,756 to $48,072. position available on or about april 1 ‚ 1984. send letters of application, re­ sume and the names of three professional references to chair, search and nominating committee, office of the vice president, cal­ ifornia state college, bakersfield, 9001 stockdale hwy., bakersfield, ca 93311. applications must be received by december 30, 1983. csb is an affirmative action, equal opportunity, title ix, m/f/h/d em­ ployer. m a n a g e m e n t reference l ib r a r ia n . specializes in full range of information and reference services for students and faculty of northwestern university’s kellogg graduate school of m anage­ ment, and participates in general social sciences and humanities ref­ erence programs. assists in planning and developm ent of the m an­ agem ent services departmental programs, and participates in other activities of the department, which is staffed by the department head, two m anagem ent reference librarians and an administrative assistant. mls from accredited library school required. academ ic background in econom ics or other business-related discipline and advanced degree preferred. business reference or general refer­ ence experience, and training in com puterized literature searching desirable. starting salary range: $ 1 6 ,0 0 0 -$ 1 8 ,0 0 0 , d e pe n d in g upon qualifications. send letter of application and resume and have library school credentials, including transcripts, forwarded to: lance query, personnel librarian, northwestern university library, evan­ ston, il 60201. applications received by novem ber 30,1 9 83 , will be considered. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. head librarian and chair skidmore college skidmore college invites applications and nominations for the position of head librarian and chair of the library department. this individual is responsible as head librarian for administering the total oper­ ation of the lucy scribner library, including budget preparation, personnel administration, policy de­ velopment, collection building, public relations, resource sharing, and networking; and as chair of the library department is responsible for the evaluation and developm ent of its professional staff. librari­ ans at skidmore have full faculty rank and status. skidmore college is a private, coeducational, undergraduate liberal arts college located in saratoga springs, n.y. its enrollment is approxim ately 2,100 full-time students. the lucy scribner library contains over 300,000 volumes and employs 8 professionals and 12.5 fte support staff. the library is a m ember of the capital district library council, serving as the area’s major resource library for art and art history; participates in oclc; provides com puterized information retrieval services; and is a designated depository for u.s. governm ent documents. the successful candidate will meet the following minimum requirements; 1) ala-accredited mls; a second graduate degree (preferably a doctorate) highly desirable. 2) 8 years of professional experi­ ence with a minimum of 5 years in a progressively responsible administrative capacity in an academic library. 3) demonstrated experience in both public and technical services areas of the library. 4) strong com m unication skills and demonstrated ability to work effectively and supportively with faculty, staff, students, administration, alumni, and donors. 5) ability to guide and oversee new developm ents in in­ formation technology. 6) evidence of professional and scholarly achievement. the a p p o in tm e n t will be at one of the senior professorial ranks with salary in the range of $35,000-$42,000, depending on qualifications and experience. fringe benefits are competitive. posi­ tion available on or before july 1 ‚ 1984. applications should include current resume including names, telephone numbers, and addresses of all references. applicants should arrange to have 3 references, directed specifically to the candidate’s qualifications for this position, mailed by the referees to the dean of faculty. applications should include a statement stressing the candidate’s perception of the role of the library in undergraduate education. screening of applicants will begin on december 1. initial interviews will be conducted at the ala midwinter meeting, january 1984. appointm ent expected to be made by march 1, 1984. applications and references should be sent to; dean of faculty, skidmore college, saratoga springs, ny 12866. skidmore college is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. 404 / c& rl news o r ig in a l c a t a l o g e r , spec ia l c o ll e c t io n s m a t e ­ rial. catalogs and classifies m onographs and arranges for cata­ loging of serials located in the special collections division. assigns lc subject headings and classification numbers; verifies coopera­ tive cataloging from oclc; tags and revises oclc input. solves cat­ aloging problems, monitors workflow, and consults with special col­ lectio n s and p rocessing divisio n heads on related activities. provides input on hiring of special collections staff who process ma­ terials. participates in meetings of original catalogers and in devel­ opm ent of processing divisional policies, procedures and plans. qualifications: ala/mls; minimum of 2 years of mls professional cataloging experience, including familiarity with aacr2, oclc, and lc classification and subject headings; supervisory experience pre­ ferred. salary negotiable, minimum $16,500. available immediately. texas a&m university has an enrollment of 36,000 and is located in the bryan-college station com m unity of 90,000 residents, 100 miles from houston and austin. library holdings consist of 1.4 million vol­ umes, 15,347 subscriptions, and 2.2 million microforms. the library staff includes 54 librarians and 141 classified employees. librarians hold faculty status and are expected to meet promotion and tenure requirements of the university. benefits: up to $70/month paid on health, life and disability insurance package; 88% of social security paid for first $16,500 of salary; choice of retirement plans including tiaa-cref, tax deferred annuity program available; no state or local income taxes; 10.5-month appointment, faculty rank; 14 state holi­ days. to apply, contact: susan s. lytle, head, personnel opera­ tions, university library, texas a&m university, college station, tx 77843. an aa/eeo employer. preservation intern. this is a one-year position funded by a grant from the mellon foundation to support research-library preser­ vation programs nationally. four other institutions have also re­ ceived preservation intern grants from the mellon foundation: li­ brary of congress, new york public library, stanford university libraries, and yale university libraries. the intern will report to the preservation department and, after orientation in the preservation department, will be assigned to one or more departmental libraries, which will be chosen in consultation with the library services group. every effort will be made to assign the intern to subject areas of indi­ vidual interest. the primary responsibilities will involve surveying the condition of specific collections, monitoring environmental condi­ tions, assessing current preservation procedures and determining needs in order to design a practical preservation program, and pre­ paring a proposal for the funding of any identified special needs. the intern will have the opportunity to participate in planning sessions, policy discussions, and other library-wide preservation activities. in addition to an accredited mls, requirements are knowledge of pres­ ervation practices and demonstrated expertise in executing conser­ vation procedures and techniques, as demonstrated through pre­ vious relevant experience and/or successful completion of a formal program in the conservation of research library materials. a working knowledge of one romance and one germanic language is desir­ able. submit resume, listing 3 references and salary requirements, to: box 35, butler library, columbia university libraries, 535 west 114th street, new york, ny 10027. annual salary: $18,500. this is a 12-month position, available on or about january 1 ‚ 1984. deadline for applications is november 30, 1983. an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. reference librarian. applications are invited for the position of assistant librarian in reference at the james p. adams library. twelve month faculty tenure line appointment. requires a masters degree in library science and at least two years of full-time library ex­ perience in reference services with online searching and a biblio­ graphic instruction program. appointm ent at rank of instructor or as­ sistant professor depending on qualifications. applications must be received by 4:30 p.m. on december 16,1983. send letter of applica­ tion with resume and three current letters of reference to office of personnel services, rhode island college, 600 mount pleasant ave­ nue, providence, rl 02908. attention: director of the library. an af­ firmative action, equal opportunity employer. r e fe r e n c e l ib r a r ia n , c o m m u n ic a t io n & l e is u r e studies subject specialist. responsibilities include refer­ ence service; com puter literature searching; orientation and instruc­ tio n ; c o lle c tio n d e v e lo p m e n t; fa c u lty lia is o n . q u a lific a tio n s : ala/mls; demonstrated comm unication skills, degree (preferably graduate) in a behaviorial science relevant to c om m unication, journalism/telecommunication, or leisure studies. preference will also be given to candidates with training and/or experience in refer­ ence, com puter literature searching, library instruction or collection development. salary: from $16,300, dependent on qualifications. statement of qualifications, current resume, and names, addresses and telephone numbers of four recent references should be sent by novem ber 3 0,1983, to: constance corey, hayden library, arizona state university, tempe az 85287. asu is a committed equal oppor­ tunity, affirmative action employer. r e fe r e n c e l ib r a r ia n , s o c ia l s c ie n c e s . search ex tended. provides comprehensive reference service with emphasis on the social sciences, for a centralized reference collection. pre­ pares bibliographies and guides to the literature for use in staff train­ ing, classroom instruction, and bibliographic instruction. serves as reference division liaison with departm ents in college of education and develops and m aintains c urriculum c ollection. prepares com puter-produced index to the curriculum collection and partici­ pates in provision of automated information retrieval services. quali­ fications: ala/mls; degree in education or minimum 2 years of teaching experience at elementary or secondary school level. sec­ ond masters degree in education-related field or 2 years of pre-mls library experience preferred. must possess effective communication skills, positive public service attitude, and ability to work effectively with others. salary: $15,000. available immediately. texas a&m uni­ versity has an enrollment of 36,000 and is located in the bryan college station com m unity of 90,000 residents, 100 miles from houston and austin. library holdings consist of 1.4 million volumes, 15,347 subscriptions, and 2.2 million microforms. the library staff includes 54 librarians and 141 classified employees. librarians hold faculty status and are expected to meet promotion and tenure re­ quirements of the university. benefits: up to $70/month paid on health, life and disability insurance package; 88% of social security paid for first $16,500 of salary; choice of retirement plans including tiaa-cref, tax deferred annuity program available; no state or local income taxes; 10.5-month appointment, faculty rank; 14 state holi­ days. to apply, contact: susan s. lytle, head, personnel opera­ tions, university library, texas a&m university, college station, tx 77843. an aa/eeo employer. science cataloger. the position reports to the original cata­ loging unit supervisor in the cataloging department. it is responsi­ ble for original cataloging of m onographs in english and either ger­ man or french with emphasis on science materials. cataloging is performed using the oclc system, library of congress classifica­ tion and subject headings, and the aacr2 descriptive cataloging code. requirements: mls degree from an ala-accredited library school or its historical antecedent; reading knowledge of either ger­ man or french; tw o years library cataloging experience using oclc, lc classification and subject headings and aacr2 catalog­ ing code; fifteen semester hours of course credit in a natural or physi­ cal science. preferences: additional academ ic course work or a bachelors degree in a natural or physical science; additional catalog­ ing experience; additional foreign language; science cataloging ex­ perience. this is a 12-month appointm ent with faculty rank and pre­ requisites including tiaa/cref and liberal annual and sick leave benefits. salary range: $18,000-$22,000. a pply by december 1, 1983, to: paul sheldon, chairman, science cataloger search c om ­ mittee, university libraries, university of colorado, boulder, co 80309. telephone: (303) 492-7463. include resume with names of three references, their current titles, addresses and telephone num ­ bers. the university of colorado is an affirmative action, equal op ­ portunity and section 504 employer. science engineering reference librarian (2 positions) the university of arizona is seeking 2 professional librarians to pro­ vide reference, online searching, and bibliographic instruction ser­ vices in its science engineering library. additional responsibilities include collection development, faculty liaison work, and the possi­ bility of coordinating one or more service activities within the science engineering library. a separate branch of the university library, the science engineering library occupies a 5-story building in the cen­ ter of cam pus and houses a collection of 350,000 volumes and over one million microforms, covering all fields of the pure and applied sciences, except clinical medicine. required: ala-accredited de­ gree; either an academ ic background in the sciences, or public ser­ vice experience in an academ ic science library or special library; good com m unication and interpersonal skills. preferred online searching and bibliographic instruction experience. desired: w ork­ ing knowledge of spanish, german, or russian. positions available february 1 ‚ 1984. minimum salary is $16,500; higher salary is nego­ tiable depending on qualifications and experience. librarians at the university of arizona have 12-month appointments, are voting mem ­ bers of the faculty, have 22 days vacation and 12 days sick leave. usual fringe benefits available. application deadline: novem ber 30, 1983. send resume, including list of three references, to: w. david laird, university librarian, university of arizona library, tucson, az 85721. an equal opportunity, affirmative action, title ix, section 504 employer. science reference librarian, subject specialist for mathe matics, physics and astronomy. responsibilities include reference service; online literature searching; orientation and instruction; col­ lection development; faculty liaison. qualifications: ala/m ls or for­ eign equivalent; strong background in science (academ ic training and/or experience); demonstrated communication skills. preferred: undergraduate or graduate degree in mathematics or physics; ex­ perience in reference and collection development; training in and/or experience with lockheed, brs, sdc. salary: from $16,300, de­ pendent on qualifications. statement of qualification, current re­ sume, and names, addresses and telephone numbers of three re­ c e n t re fe re n c e s s h o u ld be se n t by n o v e m b e r 30, 1983, to constance corey, hayden library, arizona state university, tempe, az 85287. asu is a committed equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. serials librarian. responsible for m anagement of collection n ovem ber 1983 / 405 of over 1,300 serial titles. some reference and instruction responsi­ bilities. seeking “ generalist” who is enthusiastic about working with students and faculty at an undergraduate liberal arts college. qualifi­ cations: ala-accredited mls, 2 -3 years relevant experience. pref­ erence given to science or business background. minimum salary: $17,000. send resume with 3 references by d ecem ber 15, to: catherine w. chmura, library director, siena college, loudonville, ny 12211. s o c ia l s c ie n c e /s c ie n c e c a t a l o g l ib r a r ia n (r e­ opened). the university of arizona is seeking a professional librarian responsible for the original cataloging of monographs in selected subject areas including geography, geology, statistics, economics, and technology. ua is a large academ ic research library. require­ ments: an ala-accredited degree; working knowledge of aacr2; experience with lc classification; experience with oclc or a similar utility; at least one foreign language. advanced degree in a science or social science field is desirable. salary range is $16 ,5 0 0 -$ 2 1 ,000. professional librarians have faculty status but 12-month appoint­ ments, earn 22 days of vacation a year, and have a standard pack­ age of holidays and other benefits. send letter of application, resume and the names of three referees by december 1 , 1983, to: w. david laird, university librarian, university of arizona library, tucson, az 85721. the university is an eeo/aa employer. systems development officer. california institute of tech­ nology is an independent, privately-supported institution which is considered one of the w orld’s major research centers. we are pres­ ently embarking upon a major effort to introduce technology into the managem ent of our library and information retrieval operations and are seeking a systems development officer to direct this project. re­ sponsibilities will include developing plans and specifications for our. com prehensive library automation program, evaluating and recom ­ mending hardware and software, directing the implementation of specific com puter applications, and undertaking or supervising spe­ cial studies or research related to library automation and information retrieval. the qualified applicant must possess a masters degree in library or information science or an appropriate advanced degree. must demonstrate knowledge, experience and achievement in li­ brary systems developm ent and possess skills in planning, written and oral com munications and interpersonal relations. at least 3 -5 years experience in an academ ic or research library is required. we offer a salary commensurate with experience, with a minimum of $40,000. for consideration, please send a letter of application with resume and at least three references, to: glenn l. brudvig, director of information resources, millikan library, california institute of technology, pasadena, ca 91125, we are an equal opportunity, af­ firmative action employer. late job listings serials conversion, project librarian. librarian i. (temporary position) responsible for technical processing required for creation of machine readable records for serial titles held in msu libraries. involves problem solving, some recataloging, and creation of local data records. will train and supervise clerical and student staff. required: mls degree; working knowledge of one or more european languages; broad academic background. preferred: serial cataloging experience; knowledge of oclc system. expectation that project will be funded for two years. salary: $16,000-$21,000 depending on experience. resume plus 3 references by november 30, 1983, to: carolyn j. mcmillen, assistant director for technical services, michigan state university libraries, east lansing, mi 48824-1048. msu is an affirmative action, equal opportunity institution. director of libraries. loyola university invites nominations and resumes for the position of director of libraries. loyola has 4 campuses and a diverse educational program in 10 colleges and schools, including both day and evening divisions; student enrollment of 16,000 and faculty of 1398. each campus has a library. the total collection is 820,000 volumes. responsibilities include budget preparation, administration and collection development. reports to the senior vice president and dean of faculties. in addition to appropriate educational background, candidates should have administrative experience in academic libraries, evidence of continuing professional development, and good interpersonal skills. detailed job description and qualification requirements available upon request. salary: $40,000-$50,000. contact: francis doyle, loyola university law school, 1 e. pearson st., chicago, il 60611 by december 15th. loyola university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer and invites and encourages application from women and minorities. data processing librarian. will participate in the development of an automated library information system and maintain the efficient operation of all ongoing automation projects. desirable qualifications are: working experience in assembler language, pli and cobol; knowledge of interactive applications and text processing applications. must have mls from an ala-accredited library school or graduate degree in a computer science, mathematics, linguistics, philosophy or other information science related discipline. minimum salary: $17,064. send letter of application, resume, and names of 3 references, to: virginia f. toliver, director of library planning, budget and personnel, washington university libraries, st. louis, mo 63130, by december 15, 1983. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. 406 / c &r l ne •4»tµ ws v . university archivist. responsible for the archival records and services of the state university of new york at albany. acquires, arranges, describes, preserves, and provides access to the records and papers pertaining to the institutional history and the university community. promotes use of the collections through programs of instruction and research. coordinates the sunya records management program: advises campus administrators concerning the creation, maintenance and disposition of records and papers and meeting the requirement of laws and regulations in the maintenance and disposition of official records. reports to the head of the special collections department. participates in all work of the department and provides reference services as needed. library faculty at sunya are expected to fulfill faculty obligations in the areas of contributions to the advancement of the profession and university services as well as specific library assignments. qualifications: mls from an ala-accredited library school. one to two years archival experience. candidate with ph.d in subject area may receive preference and if qualified be asked to teach. ability to communicate effectively with faculty, staff, students, and alumni. salary and rank commensurate with education and experience: salary from $18,000, depending on qualifications. send letter of application, current resume, and names of three references, to: kevin mccarthy, library personnel officer, state university of new york at albany, 1400 washington avenue, albany, ny 12222. inquiries should be received by november 30, 1983. state university of new york at albany is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. applications from women, minorities, and handicapped are especially welcome. assistant librarian, cataloging. responsible for all cataloging and processing and for card catalog supervision. shares reference work, nights and weekend duties. requires mls from ala-accredited school and at least two years experience, preferably in a college library. must be familiar with oclc, aacr2, and lc classification. starting salary, $12,361-$15,500 plus liberal benefits. available january, 1984. send application, resume and names of at least three references by november 30, to: mary l. bucher, chairperson, library search committee, southworth library, suny agricultural & technical college, canton, ny 13617. aa/eoe. director of libraries. hope college invites nominations and applications for the position of director of libraries. hope college is a liberal arts college affiliated with the reformed church in america and is located in holland, michigan, 130 miles from chicago. the libraries contain about 200,000 volumes; are staffed by 15 persons, 4 professionals; and have an annual budget in excess of $600,000. the libraries are committed to interlibrary cooperation and are active in oclc, mlc, and regional networking. a major building program is in the early stages of planning. the director is responsible for overall planning, policy making, and coordinating of all library activities including budgeting, personnel, and collection development. salary: $30,000 + . requirements: mls from an ala-accredited institution and an advanced degree (ph.d preferred) in another discipline; demonstrated skill in creative development and management of resources and in application of current library technology. it is desirable to have experience with reference service and bibliographic instruction. the ability to work effectively with students, faculty, and staff is essential. consideration of applicants will begin on december 5, 1983. submit letter of application and interest, curriculum vitae, and three letters of reference, to: provost david marker, hope college, holland, mi 49423; (616) 392-5111, ext. 2010. an equal opportunity employer. h arvard u n iversity d istew!nrib u tab le union catalog 1 9 8 3 and co n tin u atio n com prehensive bibliographic records from the entire harvard university library system —over 50 individual libraries—recu m u lated every six months. • author title catalog over 1.5 million entries including full cataloging entries, short entries for books on ord er and cross references. • subject catalog 3/4 million entries, based on library of congress subject headings. • medical subject file t w o editions per year; published february and august. 626 diazo negative com fiche, 4 8 x … $480 p er edition* * 5 % discount on sta n d in g orders. b ritis h b io g rap h ic al a rch ive 1 7 t h 1 9 t h c enturies compiled and edited by paul sieveking o ver 300 biographical references w o rk s spanning 3 centuries have been used to com pile this m icrofiche archive w h ich will co ntain 4 5 0 ,0 0 0 e n tr ie s p e r t a i n i n g to 2 4 0 ,0 0 0 in d iv id u a ls —s ta te s m e n , s c ie n tis ts , soldiers, clerics, criminals, lawyers, artists, poets, musicians, actors and nu m ero u s o th e r m en and w o m e n o f local, national, and in ternational im p o rta n c e —cum ulated into a single alphabetical sequence. publication 1984-1985 in installm ents. 24x. diazo negative fiche . . . $ 5 9 8 0 * silver negative fiche . . . $ 6 5 8 0 * • p aym ent on receipt o f fi r s t installment. prices are tentative. for other p a y m e n t p la n s ‚ please inquire. f or m o re in fo r m a tio n a b o u t these a n d o th er n ew s a u r titles, p le a se c o n ta c t the n ew a m e r ic a n office. a ll m ic r o fo r m titles p u b lis h e d b y k. g. s a u r verlag, m u n ic h ca n n o w be o rd ered d ire c tly f r o m n ew york. k.g. s au r inc. 1 7 5 f ifth avenue n.y., n.y. 1 0 0 1 0 no more searching through dozens of sources! encyclopedia of medical organizations and agencies gives current data on more than: 2,500 national and international associations 1,250 state associations • 1,500 federal and state agencies 2,000 medical and allied health schools 225 foundations • 1,400 research centers • 200 data bases first edition. edited by anthony t. kruzas. 7 8 0 pages. 10,00g entries. subject cross index. name index. published by gale, 1983. $ 1 2 5 .0 0 . available at gale’s 5°/o standing order discount. this new all-in-one source book eliminates much tedious research by providing, in one volume, c u rre n t information on 1 0 ,0 0 0 medical organizations and agencies. entries are arranged in 7 8 clearly defined chapters, each dealing with one major area of the vast universe of health and medicine. topics covered include aging, alternative medicine, biomedical engineering, child abuse, chiropractic, dentistry, dermatology, epidemiology, health s ta tis tic s , law and medicine, nursing, optometry, pathology, public health, radiology, sexuality, sports medicine, surgery, transplantation, and much more. each entry gives, when appropriate: name, address, telephone number, c o n ta ct person … description of purposes and goals … research, information, and educational activities … services offered and publications issued … areas of special interest. all gale books are sent on 60-day approval. deduct 5°/o if you send check with order. c ustom ers outside the u.s. and canada add 10°/o. gale research co. book tower • detroit, m l 48226 to order by phone: 800-521-0707 tollfree. in canada, michigan, alaska, and hawaii: 3 1 3 9 6 1 2 2 4 2 . acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries 215 classified advertising deadlines: orders for regular classified advertisements must reach the acrl office on or before the second of the month pre­ ceding publication of the issue. late job listings will be accepted on a space-available basis after the ninth of the month (by telephone only). contact: riley tate, administrative secretary, acrl, american library association, 50 e. huron st., chicago, il 60611; (312) 944-6780. rates: classified advertisements are $2.25 per line for acrl members, $2.80 for others. late job notices are $7.00 per line for members, $8.50 per line for others. organizations submitting ads will be charged according to their membership status. telephone: all telephone orders should be comfirmed by a writ­ ten order mailed to acrl headquarters as soon as possible. orders should be accompanied by a typewritten copy of the ad to be used in proofreading. guidelines: advertisers placing job announcem ents m ust list closing dates for application no sooner than the last day of the month in which the notice appears. all job announcements must in clu de a salary range. job announcem ents w ill be edited to exclude discrim inatory references. applicants should be aware that the terms faculty rank and status vary in meaning among institu­ tions. available soft-core pornography collection. eastern new mexico university has a small collection of soft-core pornography available for trade or purchase. the collection consists of approximately 900 paperbacks and 4 0 magazine issues, published between 1948 and 1970. fabian novels, nightstand books, and midnight readers are included. a list is available upon request. if interested, write to special collections, golden library, eastern new-mexico university, portales, new mexico 88130. for sale marv broadbent, box 6, beltsville, md 20705. government publications. standing, subscription, single, or search orders. no. prepayment. no foreign surcharge. (301) 937-8846 china-japan. major private quality collection— reasonable. all topics. write m. frazin, box 110, farmington, ct 06032. inquiries invited. contemporary china. serials fbis p.r. o f china and asia and p acific 1 9 6 8 -7 9 . reasonable. write m. frazin, box 110, far­ mington, ct 06032. inquiries invited. foreign microforms. any foreign microform from anywhere in the world at the foreign list price. free searching. monographs and serials. imds, 1995 broadway, ny, ny 10023, (212) 873-2100. search service. ex-librarians locate titles or subject, plus 1 50 ,0 0 0 indexed stock. pab 2 91 7 a tla n tic, a tla n tic city, nj 08401. phone 609/344-1943. positions open assistant acquisitions librarian. temporary position for period of september 1980 through june 1981. ala-accredited mls. closing: august 15, 1980. salary $ 1 1 ,0 0 0-$1 2,0 00 (fiscal year). send résumé, undergraduate and graduate transcripts, and three letters of reference to: don craig, university librarian, middle tennessee state university, murfreesboro, tn 37132. mtsu is an equ al o p p o rtu n ity /a ffirm a tiv e a c tio n e m p lo ye r. women and minorities are encouraged to identify themselves for the university’s affirmative action statistical reports. assistant director for health science. the university of minnesota, duluth, library & learning resources service is seeking an assistant director to head the health science reference and collection development division. performs and oversees reference services, medline and other data base searches, collection de­ velopment through exchanges and grant-seeking, interlibrary loan and consortium activities and representation. ala-accredited de­ gree with courses in medical librarianship plus three years of pro­ fessional experience. twelve-month academic staff appointment. salary $ 18 ,0 0 0 plus adm inistrative augmentation. résumé and three references by 1 august, 1980, to library director, university o f m innesota, d u lu th , m innesota 5 5 8 1 2 . equal o pp o rtu n ity / affirmative action employer. assistant to the director of libraries for person­ nel. administers the personnel program of the libraries in ac­ cordance with the university policies for a staff of 246 plus 400 student assistants. assists in the development and interpretation of library policies and procedures. recruits applicants for librarian po­ sitions; supervises staff of the personnel office in the hiring of sup­ port staff and student assistants; maintains required personnel rec­ ords and files; coordinates staff developm ent and training pro­ grams. qualifications: ala-accredited mls degree; ability to plan and adm inister personnel services in a large library system; knowl­ edge of the principles of personnel administration; empathetic to the diverse needs of staff in a large academic library and able to work cooperatively w ith officials at all levels in the university. minim um salary: $21,000 per year. submit résumé and names of three references by july 31, 1980 to maureen s. schechter, per­ sonnel librarian, university of maryland libraries, college park, maryland 20742. associate director for technical services. the univer­ sity of michigan. under the general direction of the director, uni­ versity library, is responsible for the administration, planning, and policy direction of technical services of the university library with its major functional units of acquisitions, cataloging, serials, auto­ mated bibliographic catalog control and maintenance, and area programs. the university of michigan is a member of the research libraries group and is in the process of implementing rlin biblio­ graphic system. significant participation in overall library planning and policymaking also expected. salary: $ 4 0 ,0 0 0 + . qualifications: mls; progressively responsible experience in library management w ith emphasis on te ch n ical services operations w ith in a large academic library; demonstrated leadership ability with strong em­ phasis on interpersonal skills; demonstrated ability in both oral and written communication; background in automated systems as they pertain to technical services is important. write: lynn marko, assis­ tant for personnel and staff development, the university of michi­ gan library, 8 18 hatcher library, ann arbor, ml 48109. the uni­ versity of michigan is a nondiscriminatory, affirmative action em­ ployer. associate director, health sciences library. the health sciences library at east carolina university is seeking a dynamic individual to serve as associate director. the health sci­ ences library serves a rapidly expanding school of medicine as well as a school of allied health and a school of nursing. the as­ sociate director has primary responsibility for supervising the dayassistant librarian — serials cataloger u niversity of florida catalogs serials originally or with copy in all sub­ jects and languages. upgrade serial records in oclc data base with conser authorization. requires ala-accredited mls; cataloging experience with oclc in a research library desirable; reading knowl­ edge of one modern european language. salary: $ 10 ,5 0 0 -$ 1 7 ,0 0 0 with florida state retirement, social security, blue cross/blue shield group plan, 22 days vacation, faculty status. please send com­ plete resumes with names of three references and salary requirements by august 1, 1980 to: mr. robert l. willits assistant director, personnel relations second floor hub university of florida gainesville, florida 32611 the university o f florida com plies with section 5 0 3 o f the r ehabilitation a ct o f 1 9 7 3 and section 4 0 2 o f the vietnam era veterans readjustment a ct o f 1 97 4. equal employment opportunity/affirmative action employer 216 to-day operation of the library, assisting the director in budget for­ mulation and control, participating in the development and mainte­ nance of the library's long-range plan, and directing the selection, training, and evaluation of support staff. qualifications: master’s de­ gree in library science from an ala-accredited program and an earned doctorate; at least two years of experience in health sci­ ences librarianship and at least two years of administrative experi­ ence; a record of scholarly/intellectual/creative activities; and the ability to work harmoniously and to communicate effectively with others. salary range: $26,000-$30,000. position available septem­ ber 1, 1980. application, résumé, references (2), and transcripts must be received by july 30, 1980. contact: jo ann bell, ph.d., director, health sciences library, east carolina university, green­ ville, nc 27834. east carolina university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. av/reference librarian. responsible to coordinator of li­ brary av services for providing reference services in all media, print and nonprint. master’s degree from ala-accredited school. formal courses in nonprint equipment or experience with equip­ ment is necessary. salary: minim um of $12,000. position available on or before september 1. excellent fringe benefits. send résumé, three references, and salary requirements to sister franz lang, o.p., barry college library, miami, florida 33161. an equal oppor­ tunity, affirmative action employer. cataloger. central technical services catalog division, univer­ sity of minnesota, minneapolis. this cataloging position is one of 17 professional positions in the catalog division. this is a staff position and reports through the head of the monographic coordinate to the head of the catalog division. responsibilities include descrip­ tive and subject cataloging of monographs; original and lc catalog­ ing of a substantial amount of chinese titles, some japanese titles, and english and western european languages as appropriate to language qualifications; editing of data base records; revising lc copy cataloging; and, general divisional duties such as advising on local cataloging policy, catalog maintenance, and some supervision of paraprofessional and clerical staff. qualifications include an ac­ credited mls degree or its equivalent in training and experience; cataloging experience using lc classification and subject headings and aacr, preferably in an academic or research library; ability to read and write chinese with ease; working knowledge of japanese desirable; good communication skills in english; and, fam iliarity with data base form ats and ddc desirable. the position is a professional/academic one with all perquisites of academic staff personnel. minim um starting salary for the position is $18,192 for twelve months. the position is available immediately. closing date for receipt of application is august 15, 1980. the university of minnesota is committed to a policy that all employees shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, creed, color, sex, national origin, or handicap. send all applications with detailed résumé and names of three references to clarence carter, personnel officer, 499 wilson library, university of minnesota, minneapolis, mn 55455. cataloger. to perform original cataloging of monographs, se­ rials, and nonprint materials with major responsibility for oclc cataloging, catalog maintenance, and the supervision of 5.5 fte clerical assistants. qualifications: m.l.s.; familiarity with french or spanish desirable. two years’ oclc cataloging as a professional li­ b ra ria n ; su p e rviso ry and o rg a n iz a tio n a l c a p a b ilitie s . salary: $ 1 3 ,50 0-$ 15,500, tiaa/cref and usual fringe benefits; 12-month trustee appointment. closing date: august 1, 1980. send résumé and names of three references to willis e. bridegam, librarian, amherst college library, amherst, ma 01002. aa/eoe, m/f/h. cataloger/reference librarian. responsible to head of technical services for cataloging of print and nonprint materials. assist with general reference services. master’s degree from ala accredited school. knowledge of lc classification, aacr 2, and oclc necessary. salary: minim um of $11,500. position available on or before september 1. excellent fringe benefits. send résumé, three references, and salary requirements to sister franz lang, o.p., barry college library, miami, florida 33161. an equal oppor­ tunity, affirmative action employer. college librarian. mls required plus 5 years' experience at supervisory level. salary $14,000/year. send résumé to academic dean, sherman college of straight chiropractic, spartanburg, sc 29304 by july 30, 1980. equal opportunity/affirmative action em­ ployer. director of library. senior-level college and graduate school for international training. responsible for management of small but rapidly growing specialized library, and for all technical services. staff includes experienced public services/reference librarian and work-study student assistants. qualifications should include ala accredited mls and experience demonstrating successful supervi­ sory responsibility, ability to develop budgets and maintain financial control, and ability to work with staff and with students from many countries. desirable: familiarity with one or more foreign languages and with international education; commitm ent to experiential edu­ 217 cation; g rant-w riting experience. r ecruitm ent range $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 to $18,000. position available september 1. aa/eeo employer. send résumé and references to personnel director, school for interna­ tional training, brattleboro, vermont 05301, by july 31. director of library technical services. under the gen­ eral direction of the dean of library services, responsible for the overall administration, planning, and coordination of technical ser­ vices, which consists of the acquisitions and catalog departments and the operations unit, has 10 professional and 23 full-tim e sup­ port staff members, and a materials budget of nearly $600,000. ala-accredited mls required. six years progressively responsible professional experience in medium-to-large academic or research library required, with 3 years as head of acquisitions or cataloging desirable, as well as experience in p u b lic services. thorough knowledge of cataloging and acquisitions procedures, demonstrated leadership ability w ith strong em phasis on interpersonal skills, demonstrated ability in both oral and written communication re­ quired. experience with oclc and automated library systems de­ sirable. m inim um salary $23,000. generous fringe benefits. an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. send letter of appli­ cation with résumé and names and telephone numbers of 3 refer­ ences to sally gale, chairperson, search committee, cunningham memorial library, indiana state university, terre haute, in 47809. application must be postmarked on or before july 28, 1980, to in­ sure consideration. head college librarian. julia rogers library of goucher col­ lege. library has 212 ,00 0 volumes, currently receives over 8 00 pe­ riodicals, and is a u.s. government depository. thirteen fte staff members, 4.5 professionals, including head librarian, over 30 stu­ d ent assistants. librarian directs all activities and ensures the smooth functioning of the library. responsibilities include managing the library resources, including audiovisual services; developing budgets and maintaining financial control; selecting, supervising, and evaluating library personnel; supervising the selection of ap­ propriate library materials; maintaining liaison with faculty, students, and administrative staff. applicants should be sympathetic to the programs and goals of a liberal arts college for women. qualifica­ tions: msl/mla degree from ala-accredited school; experience in both technical and public service aspects of college libraries with demonstrated successful administrative experience and responsibil­ ity; knowledge of national trends in planning, automation, networks and resource sharing. the librarian reports to the academic dean of the college, holds faculty status, is a member of the faculty and college assembly. tiaa-cref, health insurance. salary competitive and negotiable. minim um $22,000. appointment to begin february 1, 1981. apply by september 10 to dean james billet, goucher college, towson, maryland 21204. an equal opportunity, affirma­ tive action employer. head of bibliographic services division. has overall re­ sponsibility for bibliographic searching, oclc operations and origi­ nal cataloging, serials cataloging, catalog maintenance, and plan­ ning for additional catalog automation. the division is comprised of 3 professionals, 5 full-tim e support staff, and student assistants. further duties in clu de participation in budget preparation and cam pus and university-system library planning. requirements: mls; minim um 5 years' professional experience in an academic or research library, including significant cataloging and administrative experience: knowledge of oclc and/or other automated cataloging systems, lc classification, and aacr 2. second subject master’s and facility in one or more foreign languages desirable. minim um salary: $17,500. twelve-month contract with 24 days' vacation and usual fringe benefits. position available september 1, 1980. submit résumé and names of 3 references by july 31, 1980 to: virginia workman, university of missouri-st. louis libraries, 8001 natural bridge road, st. louis, mo 63121. an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. head, preservation. responsible for continued development and coordination of the libraries' preservation program with bibliog­ raphers and department librarians. initiate, plan, advise on, and help im plement policies, standards, systems and procedures relat­ ing to the preservation of library materials; administer binding, ma­ terials processing, reprography and preservation records units. professional and supervisory staff of 5; supporting staff o f 17. ala-accredited mls required. other requirements are adm inistra­ tive ability and ability to develop, organize and im plem ent pro­ grams, standards and services, as demonstrated through previous relevant experience; familiarity with technical processing in a large academic or research library, including preservation and reprog­ raphy work. librarian ii: $ 18 ,500-$22,200; librarian iii: $ 2 0 ,5 0 0 $27,700. submit résumé listing 3 references and salary require­ ments by july 31 to: box 35, butler library, columbia university, 5 3 5 west 1 14 th stree t, new york, ny 1 0 0 2 7 . an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. librarian. sydney university (australia). applications are invited for the position of librarian of the university of sydney, following the appointm ent of the university librarian (m r. h. bryan) as director-general of the national library of australia. the university librarian is responsible for the administration of the central (fisher) russian and slavic cataloger university of florida catalog monographs in cyrillic and eastern euro­ pean languages originally or with copy. some catalog­ ing in english and other languages in either the hu­ manities or social sciences. requires ala-accredited mls; minimum of three years experience (for appoint­ ment at assistant level) to five years (for appointment at associate level) in a research library; experience with oclc and lc classification; reading knowledge of rus­ sian and preferably one other eastern european slavic language. position available september 1, 1980. sal­ ary: at the assistant level to $ 1 7,0 00 or associate level to $ 2 0 ,5 0 0 depending upon experience with excellent fringe benefits, including florida state retirement, social security, blue cross/blue shield group plan, 22 days vacation, faculty status. send complete re­ sume with names of five references and salary require­ ments by august 29, 1980 to: mr. robert l. willits assistant director, personnel relations second floor hub university of florida gainesville, florida 32611 the university o f florida com plies w ith section 5 0 3 o f the rehabilitation a ct o f 1 9 7 3 and section 4 0 2 o f the vietnam era veterans readjustment a ct o f 1 97 4. equal employment opportunity/ affirmative action employer 218 library and the 16 branch libraries. further particulars may be ob­ tained from the registrar, university of sydney, n.s.w. 2006, to whom applications in writing, including the names of three refer­ ences, should be forwarded no later than 31 july, 1980. librarian, applied life studies. a permanent position, open october 1, 1980. responsible, under the direction of the di­ rector of public services, for the administration and operation of the applied life studies library. this individual works closely with the students and faculty of the college of applied life studies and department of dance in collection development and the develop­ ment and provision of reference, research, and instructional ser­ vices. selects, trains, and supervises student and clerical staff. the library houses approximately 18,500 books, 200 periodical titles, 300 other serials, vertical files, microforms, and other library mate­ rials in its reading collections in the fields of health, physical educa­ tion, safety, recreation, rehabilitation, sports medicine, and dance. research collections in these areas are located in the central bookstacks. the applied life studies library is one of 3 5 de­ partmental libraries within the public services department of the university of illinois library. master’s degree in library science or its equivalent required. minim um of three years' successful profes­ sional public service experience in an academic, research, or spe­ cial library required, with preference given to background or ex­ perience in recreation, dance, physical education, or heatlh. ser­ vice orientation, understanding of research library activities and procedures and demonstrated administrative ability required. evi­ dence of research orientation and the ability to engage in scholarly activity required. librarians have faculty rank. minim um assistant professor rank with salary ranging from $15,000-upward depend­ ing on qualifications and scholarly credentials. librarians must meet general university requirements for promotion and tenure (re­ search, publication, and university/community/professional service) in addition to perform ing specific library assignment. send com­ plete résumé with names and addresses of 5 references to thomas m. gaughan, acting personnel librarian, university of illinois li­ brary at urbana-champaign, 415 library, urbana, il 61801. phone (2 17) 333-8 16 9 . for m axim um consideration, applications and nominations should be received no later than august 15, 1980. the university of illinois is an affirmative action/fiqual opportunity employer. librarian/instructor: education subject specialist. duties: responsible for coordination and participation in on-going bibliographic instruction program with the college of education; work with faculty in providing s.d.i., current awareness, and auto­ mated information retrieval services in education data bases; as­ sumes responsibility in collection development via standard selec­ tion procedures and in evaluation and monitoring the approval plan profile in education; information/reference desk responsibilities, including some evenings and weekends. qualifications: ph.d. in education and mls from ala-accredited school preferred. subject m.a. and mls will be considered. academic library experience and teaching skills important. faculty status; 12-month contract; salary $16,000 range. position available july 1, 1980. before july 30th send résumé and names of references to kathleen voigt, search committee secretary, carlson library, the university of toledo, 2801 w. bancroft street, toledo, ohio 43606. the university of to­ ledo is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. reference lib r a r ia n /c o m pu ter assisted b ib l io ­ graphic services coordinator. i. d. weeks library, univer­ sity of south dakota, 12-month, faculty rank, tenure-track position. position available september 1, 1980. duties include: general ref­ erence service including some evening and weekend work, coordi­ nation of on-line bibliographic search services and interlibrary loan. participation in bibliographic instruction and orientation program. ala-accredited mls m inim um qualification, 2nd master’s p re­ ferred. 1 -2 years’ experience in reference and computer-assisted bibliographic searching required with knowledge and experience in oclc interlibrary loan subsystem desirable. experience in biblio­ graphic instruction helpful. salary $15,000 minim um. send appli­ cation, résumé, and 3 current references to bob carmack, dean, library services, i. d. weeks library, university of south dakota, vermillion, sd 57069. closing date august 15, 1980. an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. reference services coordinator. coordinates the de velopment and im plementation of reference services policies and procedures tor the public services division, including the main li­ brary and six branch libraries. administers the reference units in the main library including reference, government/documents, interlibrary loan— outgoing, and periodicals/microforms. super­ vises a staff o f 2 6 fte, in clu din g 14 librarians. qualifications: ala-accredited mls degree, five years of appropriate and pro­ gressively responsible experience in an academic library, at least two of which have been in a supervisory position. experience in academ ic library reference services essential. m inim um salary: $24,000 per year. submit résumé and names of three references by july 31, 1980, to maureen s. schechter, personnel librarian, university of maryland libraries, college park, maryland 20742. serials librarian. university of cincinnati. responsible to the head, acquisitions department, for the acquisition of all serial ma­ terial for the central library and 8 college and departmental librar­ ies. includes searching, invoice approval, check-in, claims, and re­ placements. serials budget approximately $450,000 and increas­ ing, including standing orders. plans and implements a program for quality control of serial records involving revising records for consis­ tency, clarity, and resolving problems. supervises up to 7 full-tim e staff and a department of 17 staff members and a varying number of student assistants. ala-accredited mls or equivalent. minim um of three years’ professional experience with emphasis on serials. supervisory expe rie n ce re q u ire d . reading know ledge of one modern european language, preferably german or french. knowl­ edge of oclc and/or automated techniques desirable. minim um salary $14,200. send résumé and names and addresses of three professional references to: chairperson, serials librarian search committee, room 640 central library, university of cincinnati, cincinnati, oh 45221, no later than september 1, 1980. we are an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. sociology/anthropology/geography librarian. north­ ern illinois university is seeking a qua lifie d sociology/anthro pology/geography librarian. mls from an accredited library school and two years' professional experience required. second master’s degree or substantial graduate work expected, preferably in sociol­ ogy or anthropology. completion of 30 hours beyond the mls re­ quired for tenure. experience in collection development, biblio­ graphic instruction, reference service preferred. duties include: ref­ erence service, bibliographic instruction, and collection develop­ ment in sociology/anthropology/geography/library science section of a subject divisional library and supervision of a large branch map library. m im inum salary: $16 ,08 0 for a twelve-month contract. benefits include illinois retirement system benefits, one month va­ cation, and academic status. apply by october 1, 1980. send ré­ sumé, transcripts, placement file and 3 current letters of recom­ mendation to george nenonen, personnel director, university li­ braries, northern illinois university, dekalb, il 60115. northern il­ linois university is an equal opportunity/affirmative action em­ ployer. staff development librarian. primary responsibility for planning, implementing, and, when appropriate, conducting train­ ing and staff development programs for all categories of staff. pro­ grams will be directed at both organizational and staff needs with initial emphasis on both supervisory and library skills training. initial priorities to be addressed include interviewing techniques, effective communications, perform ance appraisal, labor relations, time man­ agement, and the troublesome patron. incumbent will assist the assistant university librarian for personnel in various aspects of the libraries’ personnel program, including recruitment of profes­ sional staff and development and maintenance of publications and manuals. in addition to an mls from an accredited library school, requirements are a minim um of 3 years’ relevant experience in a large academic or research library, a knowledge of management theory and practice, and effective writing and speaking skills. ex­ perience with audiovisual and other teaching techniques desirable. previous relevant supervisory experience may substitute for formal training experience; however, preference will be given to those with relevant background in staff development. evidence of imagination and leadership will be sought in all cases. salary range: librarian ii: $18,500-$22,200; librarian iii: $20,50d-$27,700. please submit résumé listing 3 references and salary requirements to: box 35, butler library, columbia university, 535 west 114th street, new york, ny 10027. deadline for applications september 30, 1980. an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. late job listings head, circulation services. responsible for managing the circulation unit in the main library. supervises staff of 18. qualifications: ala accred­ ited mls, minimum three years' professional experience, one of which must have been in circulation services; demonstrated supervisory ability, and effective communications skills. minimum salary $17,000. send resume and names of three references by july 31 to maureen s. schechter, personnel li­ brarian, university of maryland libraries, college park, md 20742. librarian—cataloger. directs cataloging and related activities, including reclassification, catalog maintenance, and the planning for implementation of aacr 2. supervises work of three support staff plus ceta participants. mls from ala—accredited library school required. background should include lc cataloging, supervisory and oclc experience. two years' professional li­ brary experience with lc cataloging, and competency in at least one foreign language desirable. salary $11,000 $13,000. faculty status, 12-month appointment, tiaa/cref, and usual benefits. send resume and names of three references by july 31, 1980 to paul w. crumlish, librarian, warren hunting smith library, hobart and william smith colleges, geneva, ny 14456. government publications librarian. participates in collection development, processing, reference, outreach, and administrative activities of the gov­ ernment publications department. has primary responsibility for selection and processing of state and local documents. assists in processing u.s. documents. staff consists of three librarians, two support staff and stu­ dent assistants. collection includes federal, state and local, and inter­ national documents. mls from accredited library school and two years' aca­ demic library experience, including general reference or government publi­ cations, required. academic background and advanced degree in the social sciences preferred. must demonstrate evidence of initiative, strong inter­ est in government publications, and ability to work effectively with col­ leagues, students, and faculty. must have ability to communicate well in writing and orally. salary $13,500 $14,500, depending on qualifications. available immediately. applications received by july 31, 1980 will be con­ sidered. send letter of application and resume, and have library school credentials, including transcripts, forwarded to virginia freyre, personnel office, northwestern university library, evanston, il 60201. an equal op portunity/affirmative action employer. director, public services. responsible for the administration, planning, development, and evaluation of public services. formulates goals; prepares narrative and statistical reports; participates in overall library planning and policy making. coordinates public services activities with other li­ brary departments, external libraries, and the research libraries group. oversees staff of 19 full-time professional librarians, 55 support staff members, and 130 part-time employees. qualifications: accredited mls with second master's degree required for promotion beyond the rank of library associate (eqv. to instructor). substantial experience in the library field with at least 3 years at administrative level. proven and progressive rec­ ord of successful experience in library management with emphasis on public services operation within a large academic or research library; demonstrated leadership ability with strong interpersonal and communication skills; fa­ miliarity with library computer applications, particularly as they pertain to public services; ability to organize and supervise the work of a large staff of professionals with faculty status and support personnel. minimum salary $25,000. tenure-track appointment, tiaa/cref retirement plan, group iifc insurance, five weeks' annual vacation, and full tuition remission. apply by july 31 to carlton c. rochell, dean of libraries, new york univer­ sity, 70 washington square south, new york, ny 10012, an equal opportun­ ity/affirmative action employer. reference librarians. open 1 august, 1980. participates in broad program of reference service including desk coverage, bibliographic instruction, data base searching, and collection development. duties as supervisor of interlibrary loan. graduate library degree from ala accredited school plus second master's or doctorate. three years' experience in academic library service. $14,000 $16,000. second position as above except is responsible for federal documents instead of interlibrary loan. graduate library de­ gree from ala accredited school. second master's desirable. $12,500 $13,000. send resume before 31 july to george m. jenks, university librar­ ian, bucknell university, lewisburg, pa 17837. head copy catalog librarian. requirements: mls from an accredited library school; reading knowledge of one foreign language (germanic or romance) re­ quired and a working knowledge of a slavic language desirable; thorough knowledge of anglo-american cataloging codes, lc classification system, and lc subject headings; three to five years' experience, including at least two years in academic libraries in the methods and techniques of monographic cataloging with some relevant administrative/supervisory experience; exper­ ience with automated cataloging systems. head serials/microforms librarian. requirements: mls from an accredited library school; management or business courses or equivalent; reading knowledge of one foreign language (germanic or romance) required and a working knowledge of a slavic language desirable; three to five years' professional experience, two years of which should be in an academic library in cataloging and/or technical services, with some administrative/supervisory responsiblity; experience with automated biblio­ graphical control systems; familiarity with micropublishing and microform technology. hiring range for both positions: $19,400 $24,300. benefits include twelve-month contract, one-month vacation, tiaa-cref. interested candidates should send letter of application, resume, and names of three references by august 1, 1980 to gloria e. hagberg, assistant to the univer­ sity librarian, brown university library, providence, rhode island 02912. an equal opportunity and affirmative action employer. assistant director, public services. manages and coordinates the activities of circulation, reference, inter-library lending, audio-visual, government documents, and fine arts branch. qualifications include mls from ala ac­ credited library school and at least five years of progressively higher levels of administrative responsibility including experience in public ser­ vices in a medium or large academic library especially in reference and cir­ culation. duties include working with library staff, students, and faculty toward providing, promoting, and improving library services. minimum salary $20,000 (12 months). tiaa/cref, and many other fringe benefits. position opens july 1, 1980. send application and resume to: royal v. pope, direc­ tor of libraries, university of arkansas, fayetteville, arkansas 72701. an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer; welcomes applications from all qualified individuals. reference/cataloging librarian. chapman college. available september 1, 1980. a nine month faculty position with probable two month summer con­ tract. appointment will be made at the instructor or assistant professor rank, depending on experience. salary $12,600 $14,400 for nine months. responsibilities: teaching classes in library research, reference services, cataloging, and liaison with faculty colleagues in assigned subject areas including collection development and bibliographic services. qualifica­ tions: mls degree and a minimum of two years' academic library experience, cataloging, reference, and/or teaching experience required. send letter of application, resume, and the names and addresses of three references by august 8, 1980 to janice h. shawl, chapman college library, 333 n. glassell st., orange, ca 92666. head, fine arts library. administers fine arts library of 65,000+ volumes. responsible for supervision of staff (1 support staff and student assis­ tants) ; reference service; bibliographic instruction; collection develop­ ment; responding to research queries. active participation in developments in the field, including participation in such groups as the art libraries society of north america. faculty are expected to meet university promotion and tenure requirements for research, service, and publication. available october 1980. $19,920 $22,080. required: mls from ala accredited pro­ gram. five or more years of relevant professional experience in a research library for the fine arts; demonstrated knowledge of the literature of the arts; reading knowledge of german and at least one other western european language (preferably french and/or italian). desirable: advanced degree in art history. apply by august 15, 1980 to personnel librarian, ohio state university libraries, 1858 neil avenue mall, columbus, oh 43210. in­ clude resume with names and addresses of at least 3 references. an aa/eeo employer. qualified women, minority and handicapped persons, as well as others, are encouraged to apply. chief, general reference department. stanford university libraries. over­ sees general reference function for graduate faculties and students in hu­ manities and social sciences. responsible for current periodicals, micro­ texts and newspapers, interlibrary services, information desk, and central map collection. mls or equivalent. 6-8 years' applicable reference exper­ ience, demonstrated supervisory and administrative competence, ability to work well with others and communicate clearly in oral and written forms, ability to establish and implement service programs required. large re­ search library experience including development of bibliographic instruc­ tion, library publication programs, and extensive interaction with faculty will weigh heavily in favor of applicant. salary $26,000 $29,000. apply by july 30, 1980 to caroline henderson, library personnel officer, stanford university libraries, stanford, ca 94305. eoe. assistant reference librarian. engineering library, stanford university li­ braries. provides specialized reference service, bibliographic instruction and computerized literature searching in the field of engineering. mls or equivalent, bs in science or engineering, or equivalent in experience. ex­ perience in reference, collection development, data base searching desir­ able. salary $15,600 $21,000. apply by july 30, 1980 to caroline hender­ son, library personnel officer, stanford university libraries, stanford, ca 94305. eoe. chief librarian, acquisition department (reposting). stanford university libraries. direct acquisitions function for a major library with $2 million acquisitions budget, managing a highly automated system with responsibility for order division, gifts and exchange, binding and finishing. mls or equivalent, substantial acquisitions knowledge, demonstrated management and leadership abilities required. two foreign languages desirable. salary $22,800 $27,600. apply by august 15, 1980 to james myers, stanford uni­ versity libraries, stanford, ca 94305. eoe. assistant library personnel officer. stanford university libraries. as­ sists in administration of a major research library's personnel program. works in the areas of employment, compensation, employee relations, and staff development. mls or equivalent strongly preferred; demonstrated skill in supervision, training, and personnel management required; must be easily approachable, enthusiastic, tolerant, and able to operate under stress, skill in written and oral communications, memory for and understanding of procedural detail required. salary $17,600 $21,000. apply by august 8, 1980 to caroline henderson, library personnel officer, stanford university libraries, stanford, ca 94305. eoe. manuscripts librarian. stanford university libraries. oversees operation of manuscripts division, including development, processing, and maintenance of manucsripts collections. provides access to users. mls with specializa­ tion in special collections work or master's degree in archives/manuscripts management or equivalent required. degree in u.s. or european history or literature with some work in both areas, background in paleography highly desirable. music or classics training useful. reading competency in one or more of the following languages desirable: latin, greek, french, german, or italian. library experience desirable. salary $15,000 $21,000. apply by august 31, 1980 to caroline henderson, library personnel officer, stan­ ford university libraries, stanford, ca 94305. eoe. catalog librarian. rutgers university libraries, new brunswick. mls plus five years' minimum academic/research library original cataloging experi­ ence essential. one or two foreign languages, $18,826 minimum, faculty status. submit resumes no later than august 1, 1980 to bonita craft grant, (app. #30), personnel librarian, alexander library, rutgers university li­ braries, new brunswick, nj 08903. please cite app. #30 on all correspon­ dence. cataloger. responsible for planning and implementing retrospective con­ version on oclc including recataloging to conform to aacr 2. required: ala accredited mls and several years' experience cataloging with oclc and lc. salary range $14,592 $23,460 dependent on qualifications and experi­ ence. appointment limited to two years. apply by september 1, 1980 to david k. oyler, university librarian, humboldt state university, arcata, ca 95521 (707) 826-3441. serials cataloging. two positions. university of california, santa bar­ bara. responsible for original cataloging and analytics in all classes and languages in the roman alphabet. requirements: (1) ala accredited mls or equivalency; (2) thorough knowledge of aacr, lc classification and lc subject headings; (3) interest in and aptitude for serials cataloging evi­ denced by recent experience or recent advanced course study in cataloging. experience with oclc highly desirable. salary: $14,940 $20,100, depen­ dent upon experience and qualifications. applications must be received by july 31, 1980. send letter of application, names of references, and resume to margaret deacon, aul, ucsb, santa barbara, ca 93106. eo/aa employer. reference librarian. (assistant or senior assistant, depending on qualifi­ cations.) requires master's degree from an ala accredited library school, ability to communicate well and work well with others. relevant experience in an academic library and computer-based reference experience desired; sci­ ence background useful. incumbent provides general and subject reference service, gives library instruction lectures, performs computer-based refer­ ence searches, assists in collection development. salary $14,592 $23,460, initial appointment up to mid range of rank appropriate to qualifications. expect 9-10% salary adjustment july 1, 1980. this is a tenure track posi­ tion, open september 1, 1980. california state university, long beach is a large, comprehensive university, with a student body of 31,000, offering 78 baccalaureate and 50 master's degrees. the library is housed in a modern, six story building, with collection of over 1,600,000 bibliographic items, including 800,000 volumes. the staff of 151.8 fte librarians and support personnel is devoted to providing the highest quality services. the library has one of the most active library instruction programs in the nation, reaching over 9,000 students in direct instruction, with over 500 seminars or lectures per year. send nominations or letter of application with res­ ume, a statement of professional philosophy with emphasis on reference ser­ vice, and other supporting evidence of professional work and scholarship to: office of the director of the library, the university library, california state university, long beach, long beach, california 90840; (213) 498-4047. application deadline: august 1, 1980. an equal opportunity/affirmative action/title ix employer. library director. michigan technological university, houghton, michigan. applications and nominations for this position are now being solicited. michigan technological university is a state supported university with cur­ rent enrollment of about 7,700 students. the university's traditionally strong education and research programs in engineering and the sciences are complemented by academic programs in forestry, business administration, hu­ manities, and social sciences. a strong commitment has been made toward continuing expansion of research and graduate studies while maintaining a high quality of undergraduate education. the library director reports to the vice president of academic affairs and is responsible for administering a full time staff of 30, including 10 librarians, a collection of over 455,000 volumes, overall library services, budget, and long range planning. applicants must have an ala-accredited mls degree, college or university library experience, and a record of administrative achievement. salary minimum of $35,000 dependent on experience and qualifications. applications including names of three references should be made by september 15 to chair, library director search committee, office of the vice president of academic affairs, michigan technological university, houghton, mi 49931. michigan technological university is an equal opportunity educational institution, equal opportunity employer. associate librarian. on-line searching. mls plus two years' experience with dialog or orbit using chemical or biological data bases. salary 14-21 k. please send resume detailing on-line experience to personnel positon #1558, frederick cancer research center, litton bionetics incorporated, p.0. box b, frederick, md 21701. eoe, m/f. jobline established— (312) 955-6795: beginning september 1, 1980, a tele­ phone jobline provided by acrl will relay to academic librarians up-to-the minute information on job openings. simply call (312) 944-6795 for a pre­ recorded summary of positions listed with the service. the tape will be revised weekly; listings received by 1:00 p.m. on thursdays will be includ­ ed on the tape starting the next day. the right priorities: dr. henry r. winkler, university of cincinnati pres­ ident, who recently ended a much-publicized search by appointing mike mcgee as his school's athletic director: "i'm tempted to call a press conference and announce our new librarian, who is more important to the university." (reprinted with permission from sports illustrated, june 9, 1980.) charles osburn, currently assistant librarian for collection management at north­ western university, will become vice provost for university libraries at the university of cincinnati on september 1. b asic g ale r e feren ce b o o ks for managers, marketers, and administrators n e w editions a n d n e w titles statistics sources, 6th ed. . . . a subject guide to data on industrial, business, social, educational, financial, and other topics for the united states and internationally. edited by paul wasserman. 1,098pp. 1980. $85.00. just published, this new edition is 20% larger than its predecessor and has been completely revised and updated. it presents over 26,000 citations on 12,000 subjects of importance to librarians, businesspeople, government officials, students — anyone needing a guide to sources of factual quantitative information. directory encyclopedia of business of directories, 1st ed. information sources, 4th ed. . . . a reference guide covering business and . . . a detailed listing of primary subjects of industrial directories, professional and scientific interest to managerial personnel, with a record rosters, and others lists and guides of all kinds. of sourcebooks, periodicals, organizations, thoroughly describes and completely indexes over directories, handbooks, bibliographies, and other 5,100 directories. edited by james m. ethridge. sources of information on each topic. provides subject and title indexes. 722pp. 1980. $56.00. nearly 20,000 entries on 1,280 specific topics. supplemented by directory information service, edited by paul wasserman, charlotte georgi, and inter-edition subscription, $52.00. james woy. 782pp. 1980. $72.00. business organizations and agencies directory, 1st ed. standing order service . . . a guide to trade, business, and commercial all of these books are available on standing organizations, government agencies, stock order. note: standing orders for gale exchanges, labor unions, chambers of commerce, reference books are now billed at a diplomatic representation, trade and convention 5% discount. centers, trade fairs, publishers, data banks and computerized services, educational institutions, write for the catalog o f gale books tor managers, m arketers, a nd adm inistrators. business libraries and information centers, and research centers. a ll gale books are sent on 30-day approval. edited by anthony t. kruzas and robert c. thomas. keyword and geographical custom ers outside th e u.s. a nd canada a d d 10% indexes for many of the 26 sections. 894pp. to p ric e s shown. 1980. $72.00. gale research company b ook tower d e tro it, m ichigan 48226 acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries 308 classified advertising deadlines: orders for regular classified advertisements must reach the acrl office on or before the second of the month pre­ ceding publication of the issue (e.g., september 2 for the october issue). late job listings will be accepted on a space-available basis after the second of the month. rates: classified advertisements are $4.00 per line for acrl members, $5.00 for others. late job notices are $10.00 per line for members, $12.00 per line for others. organizations submitting ads will be charged according to their membership status. telephone: all telephone orders should be confirmed by a writ­ ten order mailed to acrl headquarters as soon as possible. orders should be accompanied by a typewritten copy of the ad to be used in proofreading. guidelines: for ads which list an application deadline, that date must be no sooner than the last day of the month in which the notice appears (e.g., october 31 for the october issue). all job an­ nouncements must include a salary figure. job announcements will be edited to exclude discriminatory references. applicants should be aware that the terms faculty rank and status vary in meaning among institutions. job lin e: call (312) 944-6795 for late-breaking jo b ads for academic and research library positions. a prerecorded summary of positions listed with the service is revised weekly; each friday a new tape includes ail ads received by 1:00 p.m. the previous day. each listing submitted will be carried on the recording for two weeks. the charge for each two-week listing is $30 for acrl members and $35 for non-members. fast job listing service: a special newsletter for those actively seeking positions. the service lists job postings received at acrl headquarters four weeks before they appear in c&rl news, as well as ads which, because of narrow application deadlines, will not ap­ pear in c&rl news. the cost of a six-month subscription is $10 for acrl members and $15 for non-members. contact: classified advertising dep’t, acrl, american library association, 50 e. huron st., chicago, il 60611; (312) 944-6780. for sale annals ny acad sci, used, $1.00 and up. send for price list or inquire about specific issues. d. windsor, p.o. box 604, norwich, ny 13815. business for sale. over 18,000 collections of original book reviews from 1929-1970. reviews on file, box 298, walton, ny 13856. foreign microform s. any foreign microform from anywhere in the world at the foreign list price. free searching. monographs and serials. imds, 1995 broadway, ny, ny 10023, (212) 873-2100. marv broadbent, box 6, beltsville, md 20705. government publications. standing, subscription, single, or search orders. no prepayment. no foreign surcharge. (301) 937-8846. information wanted th e colonial w illiam sburg foundation research center is continuing its search for pre-1800 williamsburg imprints. our goal is a checklist of all extant williamsburg imprints. please send us a record of the williamsburg holdings in your institution if you have not already done so. photocopies of catalog copy are pre­ ferred. send all information to susan strome¡, assistant librarian, research center, colonial williamsburg foundation, p.o. box c, williamsburg, va 23185; (804) 229-1000, ext. 2275. positions open academic services librarian. the james branch cabell li­ brary of virginia commonwealth university is seeking an academic services librarian to supervise all aspects of patron services. re­ sponsibilities include: supervision of a staff of 42 including 10 li­ brarians; development of library public service policies; liaison with faculty, students, academic campus groups, cooperative associa­ tions, and the health services librarian of the university. reports to the director of the university libraries. required: demonstrated ability to interact with the academic community; experience in pro­ gram planning and development, policy making, and coordination in the provision of public services; ala-accredited mls degree, minimum of 10 years' experience. salary is competitive, minimum $14,000, usual fringe benefits, academic rank. send resume with name and addresses of three references, no later than september 30, 1981, to: j. craig mclean, administrative services librarian, virginia commonwealth university, 901 park avenue, richmond, va 23284. virginia commonwealth university is an eeo affirmative action employer. assistant acquisitions librarian (serials). golda meir library, the university of wisconsin-milwaukee, has a capital budget exceeding $1 million annually and adds over 100,000 bib­ liographic items per year to its collections. duties emphasize work with serials and continuations and include review and evaluation of existing subscriptions and standing orders, involvement in coopera­ tive activities, bibliographic searching, collection and analysis of data, some review of incoming requests and materials, work with gifts, preparation of reports, surveys, and correspondence, some supervision of support staff, etc. qualifications: strong, broad-based educational background, including ala-accredited mls, ability to work with data in foreign languages. highly desirable: experience with serials work in research library setting; additional graduate training; experience and/or training in other areas of library work re­ lated to job assignment; and fluency in at least one modern west­ ern european language (german preferred). salary: this is an academic specialist position with a base salary of $14,776. starting salary depending upon experience and qualifications. generous va­ cation and fringe benefits. application: send request for application to search committee, university of wisconsin-milwaukee, the golda meir library, p.o. box 604, milwaukee, wl 53201. applica­ tion deadline is october 15, 1981. the university of wisconsin milwaukee is an equal-opportunity/affi rmative-action employer. assistant/associate u n iversity librarian for public services. shields library, university of california, davis. reports directly to the university librarian, exercising prime responsibility for the management, supervision, planning, and development of the biological & agricultural sciences department, government docum ents departm ent, (in c lu d in g m aps and m icrofo rm s), humanities/social sciences reference department (including inter library loan), loan department (including reserves), and two branch libraries— the physical sciences library and the agricultural economics library. in association with other members of the li­ brary administration, helps to develop policies for the management and advancement of the uc davis library system. will also be re­ sponsible for some public relations activities, editorial duties, in­ cluding the publication of the library's chapbook series, and repre­ sentation of the davis library in state and regional library activities. a graduate degree in librarianship from an ala-accredited institu­ tion or its equivalent and demonstrated successful experience at the administrative or managerial level in a large academic or re­ search library are required for appointment. experience with auto­ mated public service operations and library educational service programs highly desirable. salary range for assistant u.l. is $29,400-$46.600/year; for associate u.l. $31,100-$48,100/year. appointment salary to $36,000, dependent upon qualifications and experience. applicants should send resumes and names of 4 re­ ferees to: bernard kreissman, university librarian, 108 shields li­ brary, university of california, davis, ca 95616. all applications must be received no later than 16 october 1981. assistan t college l ib r a r ia n . responsible for circulation services and student personnel; ill; cataloging of av software. ala-accredited mls required. experience preferred but not re­ quired. 12-month appointment; faculty rank and status; tiaa cref, bc/bs. 20 days' vacation; salary; $12,000; available im­ mediately. send resume, library school transcripts, and three letters of reference to: judith abner, eastwood library, limestone college, 1115 college dr., gaffney, sc 29340. assistant department head, serials/serials acquisi­ tion libra rian. assists the department head in planning and procedures for a department which receives 13,500 current peri­ odicals and serials, domestic and foreign, with a staff of 31. has major responsibility for serials acquisitions including supervision of the serials order section (5.2 staff members). requirements: mls, at least two years' experience in serials acquisitions or processing in an academic library, demonstrated supervisory ability, and a reading knowledge of at least one foreign language. salary: $18,190-$23,379, dependent upon experience and qualifications. applications must be received by october 15, 1981. send letter of application, names of three references, and a resume to margaret deacon, assistant university librarian, the library, university of california at santa barbara, santa barbara, ca 93106. an equal opportunity/affirmative-action employer. assistant director and head of public services. in­ diana university at south bend. november 1, 1981. responsible for the supervision of all public service functions, including refer­ ence, circulation, library instruction, database searching, and inter library loan; assumes administrative responsibilities in the absence 309 of the director. mls degree from an ala-accredited library school; three years of academic reference experience; demonstrated fam il­ iarity with programs of library instruction and online searching; demonstrated interest in professional development; knowledge of one or more foreign languages; ability to relate effectively to stu­ dents, faculty, staff, and a varied public; ability to meet require­ ments and responsibilities of a tenure-track appointm ent are re­ quired. advanced degree, supervisory experience; knowledge of interlibrary loan procedures; and technological advances in circula­ tion are desirable. 22 days' vacation, bc/bs and life insurance, tiaa/cref. salary $18 ,50 0 -$ 2 0 ,5 0 0 , dependent on experience and qualifications. closing date: september 30, 1981. apply to: james l. mullins, director, indiana university at south bend li­ brary, 1700 mishawaka avenue, p.o. box 7111, south bend, in 46634. indiana university is an affirmative-action/equal-opportunity employer. a s s is ta n t director for pu b lic ser vices. massachusetts institute of technology libraries. responsible, under the director and associate director, for directing and supervising the operations and adm inistration of the divisional, branch, and reading room units of the library system, and all other internal and external pub­ lic service activities. as a member of the library’s steering commit­ tee, responsible for overall administration of library system, policy determination and implementation, salary review, and promotion process. qualifications: mls from accredited library school. at least 8 years of increasingly responsible professional experience in an academic/research library, including at least 3 years in an adminis­ trative capacity in public services. extensive experience with appli­ cation of technology in research libraries, including automated cir­ culation systems and online database searching. knowledge of and/or experience in collection development in academic/research libraries required. background in science and technology desirable. m inim um salary: $31,000. subm it resume, in cluding names of three current references, by september 30, 1981, to search com­ mittee for assistant director, the libraries, room 14s-216, mit, cambridge, ma 02139. an equ al-opportunity/affirm ative-action employer. a s s is ta n t head, m o n o g r a ph ic cataloging. supervision of 12 fte paraprofessional staff who handle all descriptive and adap­ tive cataloging; responsibility for file management unit (filing, re­ cataloging, problems, general quality control): responsibility for general management of retrospective conversion project. qualifica­ tions: ala accredited mls, 3 years' experience cataloging, familiar­ ity with processes and problems of machine-readable cataloging, demonstrated ability to supervise paraprofessional staff, one foreign language; second language and second master's desirable. bene­ fits: 10-24 working days’ annual leave, depending on qualifications; group insurance and hospitalization; 10 working days' sick leave; state retirement plan. salary: $ 1 6 ,0 0 0 -$ 19,000 depending on qual­ ifications. available october 1, 1981. contact: walter high, head, monographic cataloging, d. h. hill library, north carolina state university, p.o. box 5007, raleigh, nc 27650. a s s is t a n t h e a d of a c q u is t io n s /s e r ia l s d e p a r t m e n t . university of arkansas. responsible for assisting in the administra­ tion and supervision of a combined department of 19 fte, with major emphasis on quality control of serials and binding operations. ala-accredited mls and two or more years' professional experi­ ence in serials cataloging and/or serials acquisitions required. su­ pervisory experience and knowledge of computer based record sys­ tems highly desirable. salary $16,500. 12-month contract. tiaa/ cref and many other fringe benefits. tenure track position. send application and resume to: royal v. pope, director of libraries, u n iv e rs ity of a rkansa s, f aye tte ville , ar 7 2 7 0 1 . an eq u a l opportunity/affi rmative-action employer; welcomes applications from all qualified individuals. as s is ta n t h ead of cataloging. responsibilities include orig­ inal cataloging of monographs and serials, catalog maintenance, training and supervision of support staff, oclc shared cataloging and shelflist conversion, assisting in policy and procedure formula­ tion and documentation in a departm ent of 5 professional staff and 11 paraprofessionals. requirements: ala-accredited mls, three years' cataloging experience in academic library, working knowl­ edge of aacr2 and lc cataloging practices, oclc tagging. lan­ guage helpful. salary $16 ,500 . tenure track faculty position, tiaa/cref and other fringes. position open immediately. send let­ ter of application and resume to royal v. pope, director of librar­ ies, university of arkansas, fayetteville, ar 72701. an equal opportunity/affirmative-action employer. a s s is t a n t l ib r a r ia n : m e d ia cataloger. catalogs mostly nonprint materials in various formats using oclc system. mls from an ala-accredited program, two years’ experience, and familiarity with oclc and aacr2 required. reading knowledge of foreign lan­ guages helpful. undergraduate concentration in communications technology or music desirable. tenure-track, twelve month position. salary $ 1 2 ,0 0 0 -$ 15,000, depending on experience. new york state fringe benefits; tiaa/cref option available. position available january 2, 1982. application deadline october 1. send resume and names of three references to john p. saulitis, director of li­ brary services, reed library, state university college, fredonia, ny 14063. an affirmative-action/equal-opportunity employer. a s s is ta n t refer en c e l ib r a r ia n . private four year women's college of 1250 students. share responsibilities for all phases of reference work including library instruction, collection development. some supervisory responsibilities in the summer. position requires mls from an ala-accredited institution and a com m itm ent to women’s education. professional reference experience in academic libraries preferred. twelve month tenurable position with full faculty rights and responsibilities. salary $12,000. begin january 1982. applications due september 30, 1981, and must include a cur­ rent vita, transcripts, and at least three letters of reference. for complete position description write to: joanna todd, chair, search committee, hugh stephens library, stephens college, columbia, mo 65215. an equal-opportunity/affirm ative-action employer. a s s is t a n t s c ien c e r e fe r e n c e l ib r a r ia n . provides ser­ vices at general reference desk and information desk in morris li­ brary, the main library of the university of delaware. assists in col­ lection development with faculty liaison responsibility for technology areas, including mathematics, statistics, com puter science, and engineering; provides bibliographic instruction and searches online database in these subject areas. participates in general operation and administration of the reference department through discus­ sion at staff meetings and individual assignments. some night and weekend work required. qualifications: ala-accredited mls; ability to communicate effectively, orally and in writing; ability to work ef­ fectively with diverse groups of individuals in an academic envi­ ronment; com m itm ent to provision of high-quality reference ser­ vices. preferred: undergraduate degree or coursework in sciences or engineering; graduate course in science reference; experience in reference in a large academic library. position available december 1, 1981, or january 1, 1982. salary dependent on qualifications and experience, m inimum $13,327. tiaa, blue cross/blue shield, liberal benefits. send letter of application and resume by october 16, 1981, to taras ortynsky, chair, search committee for assistant librarian— reference department, university of delaware library, newark, de 19711. the u n iversity of delaware is an equal opportunity employer who encourages applications from qualified minority groups and women. a s s is t a n t s er ia ls l ib r a r ia n . assists head of serials de­ partm ent by participating in serials acquisitions, serials biblio­ graphic control, and providing public access to serial and m i­ cromedia collections. assists in organizing, planning, implementing, and coordinating serial activities as appropriate, with emphasis on acquisitions of over 14,000 titles. reviews serials functions and makes recommendations for revision and implementation as ap­ propriate. participates in collection development in an area of re­ sponsibility. serials departm ent newly remodeled september 1, 1981. qualifications: ala-accredited mls; ability to communicate effectively, orally and in writing; ability to deal with diverse groups of individuals in an academic environment; familiarity with oclc, aacr2, lc, and at least one modern foreign language. broad over­ view of serial relationships between acquisitions, cataloging, and serials bibliographic control is desirable. preferred: experience in technical services in a large academic library. position available december 1, 1981, or january 1, 1982. salary dependent on ex­ perience and qualifications; minimum $13,327. tiaa, blue cross/ blue shield, liberal benefits. send letter of application and resume by october 16, 1981, to jack levine, chair, search committee for assistant librarian— serials department, university of delaware li­ brary, newark, de 19711. the university of delaware is an equal opportunity employer who encourages applications from qualified minority groups and women. catalog lib r a r ia n (s e r ia l s ). michigan technological univer­ sity library is on the oclc system and uses the serials subsystem. the collection is predominantly in the sciences and engineering. qualifications: mls from ala-accredited library school, experience in oclc and cataloging of serials. salary: $14,300 minimum. fac­ ulty rank. application deadline: september 30, 1981. send resume and three letters of reference to lee j. lebb¡n, director, university library, michigan technological university, houghton, ml 49931. michigan technological university is an equal-opportunity educa­ tional institution, equal-opportunity employer. cataloger. american and latin american history and romance languages, university of arizona library. responsible for original cataloging and monographs in western hemisphere history and romance languages other than french. subject assignments also include art and books about music. ala-accredited library degree, advanced cataloging course or experience with lc classification, and extensive knowledge of spanish is required. knowledge of ita­ lian and portuguese and academic preparation in latin american history or romance languages preferred. oclc or sim ilar experi­ ence desired. salary $ 1 4 ,400 -$2 0,0 00 depending upon qualifica­ tions. faculty status, 12-month appointm ent, 22 days' vacation, fringe benefits. send resume including names of 3 referees by oc­ tober 15, 1981, to w. david laird, university librarian, university of a rizo na l ibra ry, t ucso n, az 8 5 7 2 1 . an e q u a l opportunity/affirmative-action title ix sec. 504 employer. 310 cataloger. golda me¡r library, the university of wisconsin milwaukee. one of five professional catalogers in a department which processed 45,(xx) titles in 1980. responsible for original and oclc member library edit-cataloging of monographs, including lo­ cal, state, and federal government documents and law materials, using aacr 2, lc classification schedules, and subject headings. aacr 2 revision in the public card catalogs is also a professional responsibility. qualifications: a la-accredited mls required. working knowledge of two foreign languages desirable (modern european or russian preferred). oclc and aacr 2 experience highly desirable. salary: this is an academic specialist position with a base salary of $14,776. starting salary depending upon experience and qualifica­ tions. generous vacation and fringe benefits. application: send re­ quest for app lica tion to search comm ittee, university of wisconsin-milwaukee, golda meir library, p.o. box 604, m il­ waukee, wl 53201. application deadline is october 15, 1981. the u n iversity of w isconsin-m ilw aukee is an equal opportunity/affirmative-action employer. director of information services. experienced reference librarian and administrator with knowledge of bibliographic instruc­ tion needed to oversee on daily basis the functioning of reference, periodicals, and government publications divisions. associate pro­ fessor rank. ala-accredited mls, plus second master's or docto­ rate degree required. salary $23,663. liberal fringe benefits. send resume and names of references by october 1, 1981, to david 0. lane, 695 park avenue, new york, ny 10021. hunter college is an equal-opportunity/affirmative-action employer. director of libraries. the california institute of technology invites applications and nominations for the position of director of libraries. the position is available january 1, 1982. the collective libraries contain approximately 350,000 volumes, serving 740 fac­ ulty, 830 undergraduates, and 900 graduate students. the director supervises personnel, works with the faculty library committee, administers library policies, and develops plans for automation, space and equipment needs. the director also encourages and participates in cooperative relationships with other academic librar­ ies. the library is a member of oclc, class,'center for research libraries, and calinet. the use of on-line data bases is encour­ aged. the california institute of technology is an independent, pri­ vately supported institution, and is considered one of the world’s major research centers. the position is a challenging one because the librarians are vital to the basic thrust of the institute’s scientific and technical research activities, as well as its strong programs in humanities and social sciences. candidates for director of libraries should present evidence of: adm in istrative experience in an academic library and appropriate managerial skills, including per­ sonnel management and the ability to work with the faculty; experi­ ence with cooperative academic library activities, as well as knowl­ edge of current developments in library technology, is expected. professional training is highly desirable, but persons with an equiva­ lent level of library experience or demonstrated scholarly ability will also be given consideration. because of the institute’s heavy in­ volvement with computers and computer networks, special em­ phasis will be placed on knowledge of, and interest in, com ­ puterized cataloging and information systems. minimum salary is $38,(xx), depending on qualifications and experience. a letter of application, a professional resume, and names of three current ref­ erences should be sent to: john d. roberts, vice president and provost, california institute of technology, pasadena, ca 91125. caltech is an equal opportunity employer, m/f/h. governm ent docum ents librarian. responsible for short and long-range planning for, and administration of, a documents collection of 200,000 volumes, including selecting, acquiring, pro­ cessing, and providing user access to this collection. library is a partial depository. supervisor of 3 fte support staff. some general reference and bibliographic instruction and some evening service are required. applicants must have mls, experience in documents work. second master's degree preferred. appointment at instructor ($16,434+) or assistant professor ($17,985+) depending on qual­ ifications. twelve month contract, 30 working days' vacation, excel­ lent health and retirement programs. position open september 1, 1981. send resumes to brooklyn college library, personnel office, brooklyn, ny 11210. an equal-opportunity/affirmative-action em­ ployer. head, b ib l io g r a p h ic control. required: ala-accredited mls. at least 5 years of increasingly responsible professional ad­ ministrative and supervisory experience in a catalog or other tech­ nical services function, preferably in a research library setting. de­ sired: second master's degree and foreign language ability, prefera­ bly spanish and/or portuguese. duties: manage department of 9 full-tim e faculty and 28 fte support staff. responsible for the management of all monographic cataloging operations including supervision of assistant department head, oclc coordinator, and team leaders in general, fine arts, and ibero-american cataloging; catalog records; preparation and file maintenance. is expected to make major contribution to implementation of online circulation and inventory control system. participates in and contributes to library-wide planning. coordinates with other areas of the library. salary range: $23,000-$27,000 for 12 months. faculty status. li­ brarians must meet general university requirements for promotion and tenure (librarianship, scholarship/research, professional and university service) in addition to specific library assignments. avail­ able january 1982. send letter of application, resume, and names of three references by november 1, 1981, to margo rathbun, per­ sonnel administrator, university of new mexico general library, al­ buquerque, nm 87131. an affirmative-action/equal-opportunity employer. head, interlibrary services department. reports to the associate director for public services. responsible for management and operation of interlibrary loan for the main library and 3 branch libraries; acts as library's liaison with other in-state libraries; repre­ sents the utk library in state, regional, and national planning for networking and resource sharing activities; plans, directs, coordi­ nates, and evaluates the work of 4.5 fte staff. the department handles 24,000 requests per year. qualifications: master's degree from ala-accredited library school or equivalent required. 2 years of successful academic library experience required. a working knowledge of oclc and other major bibliographic tools required. some previous supervisory experience, a knowledge of interlibrary loan practices, and extensive experience with oclc/ill subsystem preferred. tenure-track position, instructor or assistant professor (d.o.q.), salary $16,000-$ 18,000. 12 month appointment, tiaa/ cref or state retirement plan, health insurance, usual holidays, 24 days’ annual and 12 days' sick leave, tuition remission. applicants should submit letter of application, resume, and placement folder or three letters of reference by october 15, 1981, to jill keally, personnel librarian, the university of tn library, knoxville, tn 37916. utk is an eeo, affirmative-action, title ix, section 504 employer. head of technical services. the st. louis public library, a research oriented public library with an annual budget of over $5 million and 1.5 million volumes is recruiting for a manager of the technical services division. duties include planning, organization, and coordination of technical services. supervises 25 professional, technical, and clerical support staff. oclc, dewey classification with an annual acquisition budget of $550,000. responsibility for online statewide union list of serials and future additional automa­ tion anticipated. ala-accredited mls and at least six years of pro­ fessional experience including supervisory or administrative experi­ ence in technical services. must have some knowledge of auto­ mated library systems. starting salary $21,286 or more depending on experience. send resume of qualifications immediately to mar­ ion e. flowers, personnel officer, st. louis public library, 1301 olive street, st. louis, mo 63103. 311 head, reference d e partm ent. the university of connecticut health center library anticipates filling the position of head, refer­ ence department. responsibilities include: reference department staff training, particularly training in online computerized literature searching; administration of online data base services and con­ tracts; supervision of 4.5 professional and clerical fte; general in­ formation desk coverage; development of library orientation and educational programs; participation in, and management of, clinical librarian service; maintenance and analysis of departmental statis­ tics; assistance in collection development. qualifications: mls from an ala-accred¡ted library school; 3 5 years' medical library refer­ ence experience, including online searching on brs and nlm sys­ tems; demonstrated experience in library instruction. undergradu­ ate background in science or biology, familiarity with health science audiovisuals desirable. administrative and supervisory experience preferred. salary range: $20,000-$26,000. application letter and resume should be sent to ralph d. arcari, director, health center library, university of connecticut, farmington, ct 06032. an affirmative-action/equal-opportunity employer. head, scien ce and technology room. required: graduate library degree; seven years' relevant experience (a substantial part in sciences and/or technology) or compensating achievement; suc­ cessful management experience; experience in and commitment to library instruction; experience in computerized reference service; commitment to service; written and oral communication skills; abil­ ity to lead, to motivate and direct professional people, to relate posi­ tively to users and colleagues in a multi-ethnic environment, and to develop and maintain liaison with teaching departments and fac­ ulty; continuing professional growth and acceptance of responsibil­ ity; must be creative, innovative, self-motivated; must have made professional, scholarly, or creative contributions. desired: bachelor and/or graduate degrees in sciences and/or technology. duties: manages science and technology room, supervises 4 fte librar­ ians and support staff, serves at reference desk and selects mate­ rials in appropriate subject areas; is responsible for quality of refer­ ence service, leads in development of working relationships be­ tween staff and teaching faculty, and coordinates library instruction and computerized reference service. appointment as associate li­ brarian, $25 ,44 0 -$ 3 0 ,6 7 2 , salary dependent on qualifications. tenure on 5th year reappointment, 24 days' vacation, 12 days' sick leave per year, option of 10-mo. appointment beginning each fiscal year. apply with resume by 15 october 1981, to: morris polan, university librarian, california state university, los angeles, 5151 state u n iv e rs ity drive, los angeles, ca 9 0 0 3 2 . equal opportunity/affirmative act¡on/hand¡capped/t¡tle ix employer. head, tec h n ic a l services. rollins college, winter park, f l, a private, liberal arts institution, invites applications for a librarian to direct and coordinate its technical services operations. duties in­ clude supervision of acquisitions, cataloging, serials, and process­ ing functions, with a staff of 2 professionals, 5.5 nonprofessionals, plus student assistants. responsibilities include collection de­ velopment. a working knowledge of oclc cataloging and familiarity with aacr2 and its implications are required. education require­ ments include an ala-accredited mls degree and a subject mas­ ter’s. at least five years’ academic library supervisory experience is essential, preferably at a liberal arts college. salary competitive, base $17,500, plus rank and experience. this is a 12 month fac­ ulty appointm ent. send resume prior to october 15, 1981, to esther s. chase, chair, search committee, mills memorial library, r o llins college, w inter park, fl 3 2 7 8 9 . an equ al opportunity/affirmative-action college. ju d a ic a l ib r a r ia n . responsibilities include reference and cataloging of a collection entirely devoted to jewish studies. must deal with original and copy cataloging. ala-accredited mls plus a reading knowledge of hebrew and yiddish required, other lan­ guages desirable. salary $12,000. to apply, please send a resume and three references by september 30 to: richard w. marcus, di­ rector, asher library, spertus college of judaica, 618 s. michigan avenue, chicago, il 60605. l ib r a r ia n . head of library instructional services in an academic library, located in a college town of 50,000 near tuttle creek re­ servoir. position open august 18, 1981. twelve month contract with one month vacation, faculty rank and status, and tiaa. under the supervision of the associate dean for public services, the ap­ pointee will be responsible for teaching a 'credit course of library instruction, developing self-paced instructional materials, acting as liaison to academic departments, and coordinating class presen­ tations. required are a master's degree in library science and five years of successful academic library experience including refer­ ence/instruction experience. the ability to work well and creatively with faculty, students, and staff is essential. audiovisual back­ ground is preferred; courses in teaching methods would be desir­ able. salary $17,040-$21,660 dependent upon qualifications and experience. applications, together with resume, transcripts, and placement file (if placement file is not current, submit three letters of reference) m ust be subm itted by septem ber 30, 1981, to: meredith litchfield, assistant director, kansas state university li­ braries, m anhatta n, ks 6 6 5 0 6 . ksu is an equ al opportunity/affirmative-action employer. 312 l ib r a r ia n , reference services d e p a r tm e n t. librarian to provide reference service as part of a team of professionals and paraprofessionals in the perry-castañeda library (pcd, the main library of the university library system, with emphasis on the social sciences, hum anities, business, and education. in addition to scheduled hours at the reference and information desks, other re­ sponsibilities will include user education, selection of materials for the reference collection, preparation of bibliographies, searching computer-based information sources, reference correspondence, and other related duties as assigned. night and weekend work will be required. qualifications: mls from ala-accredited program, good written and verbal communication skills, and a degree or li­ brary experience in the social sciences required. at least one year post-mls experience in reference work, experience or training in online searching, and knowledge of at least one foreign language preferred. candidates should have a strong service orientation and an interest in user education. salary: m inimum of $15,000. the state pays 88% of employee’s social security payments on the first $16,500 of salary. retirement plans include tiaa/cref. to ensure consideration, applications should be received by september 30, 1981. send letter of application and resume, including names of three professional references and a statement of current salary and salary requirements, to robert s. treppa, pcl 3.200, the general libraries, the university of texas at austin, austin, tx 78712. the university of texas at austin is an equal-opportunity/affirmative action employer. l ib r a r ia n , s p e c ia l c o l l e c t io n s , u n iversity of arizona. works under the direction of the head special collections librarian in providing reference service, assisting with the acquisition of local and state documents, processing book and manuscript materials, preparing exhibits and other projects as assigned. ala-accredited library degree and successful library public service experience re­ quired. knowledge of modern cataloging procedures preferred. background in southwest americana or latin americana with an em phasis on m exico or book arts or rare books, as well as reading/speaking knowledge of spanish desired. position available january 2, 1982. application deadline october 15, 1981. salary range $ 1 4 ,4 0 0 -$ 2 0 ,0 0 0 dependent upon experience. faculty status, 12-month appointment, 22 days’ annual vacation, fringe benefits. send resume, including names of three referees, to w. david laird, university librarian, university of arizona, tucson, az 85721. an equal-opportunity/affirmative-action title ix, sec. 504 employer. l ib r a r ia n s . immediate professional career opportunities are available with the broward county libraries division, serving a rapidly developing urban community of 1.1 million. an attractive employee benefit package is included. librarian iii: $ 1 9 ,0 7 0 $25,020 per year. requires mls from an accredited college and four (4) years’ professional experience in a supervisory capacity. vacancy specialties include: special collections development, law, genealogy, and business/science/technology. librarian iv: $21 ,050 $27,617 per year. requires mls from an accredited college and five (5) years' professional experience in a supervisory capacity. vacancy specialties include: collection development, government documents, and bus¡ness/sc¡ence/technology. applications and additional information by phone or mail may be obtained from the personnel division, broward county, governor’s club building, 2nd floor, 236 s.e. first avenue, ft. lauderdale, fl 33301; (305) 765-5555. equal opportunity employer (m/f). m a n a g em en t services l ib r a r ia n . position available october 15, 1981. assists dean in all phases of library operations with em­ phasis on fiscal analysis and control, personnel transactions and services, physical planning and building maintenance, general op­ erational functions. ala-accredited master's degree with academic background and/or experience in areas noted essential. graduate work in relevant aspects of business administration strongly de­ sired. m inimum salary $15,000. to receive full consideration, ap­ plicants should send resume, transcripts of academic work, names and addresses of three references by october 1, 1981, to cynthia b. duncan, dean of library services, old dominion university, nor­ folk, va 23508. an affirmative-action/equal-opportunity employer. m onographic cataloger. entry level position. involves exten­ sive name authority work using aacr2 and assignment of access points (choice of entries, call numbers, and subject headings). re­ views descriptive cataloging of paraprofessional staff. qualifications: ala-accredited mls, some experience with aacr2, lc classifica­ tion, and lc subject headings. working knowledge of at least one foreign language (preferably german), and an undergraduate de­ gree in a scientific field is desirable. benefits: 10 working days' an­ nual leave; 10 working days' sick leave, group insurance and hos­ pitalization; state retirement plan. salary: $12,500 to $14,000 de­ pending on qualifications. available: october 1, 1981. contact: wal­ ter high, head, monographic cataloging, d. h. hill library, north carolina state university, p.o. box 5007, raleigh, nc 27650. network directo r. applications are invited for the new posi­ tion of executive director of capcon, a regional library network providing oclc-related services in the district of columbia, mary­ land, and northern virginia. the position will be available november 1 1981. responsibilities include operational planning, the de­ velopment of marketing strategies and membership promotion, fi­ nancial planning and budgeting, design and implementation of ser­ vice programs, and customer services. the executive director will be responsible to an executive board. capcon was form ed in 1976 by the consortium of universities of the washington met­ ropolitan area and is currently being reorganized as a membership organization with support services provided by the consortium. capcon is seeking an executive director with proven skills and ex­ perience in communication, marketing, and public relations. can­ didates must have a thorough knowledge of library operations or li­ brary networking with preference given to those with managerial experience and familiarity with the oclc system. m inimum salary is $28,000, depending on experience. tiaa-cref, partially paid, contributed group health and life insurance programs, 20 days’ an­ nual leave. send inquiries and resumes by october 1 to capcon, 1776 massachusetts avenue n.w., suite 412, attn: fred m. peter­ son, chair, search committee, washington, dc 20036. letters of recommendation are to be mailed to the same address. the con­ sortium of universities is an affirmat¡ve-action/equal-opportunity employer. r efer en c e lib r a r ia n . golda meir library, the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. duties include general reference service and responsibility for reference business/economics area. participates in the library bibliographic instruction program and also assists with data base services interviews. must be service oriented individual with ability to relate well to a wide variety of people. qualifications: ala-accredited mls required. must also have social science back­ ground with emphasis in business and economics. work experi­ ence in reference in an academic library and a thorough knowl­ edge of social science reference sources and/or comparable sub­ ject related course work preferred. knowledge of computer tech­ niques or experience with automated search systems desirable. salary: this is an academic specialist position with a base salary of $14,776. starting salary depending upon experience and qualifica­ tions. generous vacation and fringe benefits. application: send re­ que st for a p p lic a tio n to search c o m m ittee, u n ive rsity of wisconsin-milwaukee, the golda meir library, p.o. box 604, mil­ waukee, wl 53201. application deadline is october 15, 1981. the u n ive rsity of w is co n sin -m ilw a u ke e is an e q u a l-o p p o r tunity/affirmative-action employer. r e fe r e n c e l ib r a r ia n /b ib l io g r a p h e r in history, central university library reference department. assistant or associate li­ bra ria n , u n ive rsity of c a lifornia , san diego. salary range-. $ 17,412-$22 ,284 or $21,288 -$3 0,6 48. available september 1, 1981. participates in the department's programs of reference, col­ lection development, liaison, instruction and information services; serves at the reference desk, including some evening and weekend hours; provides specialized reference assistance in history; provides computer-assisted reference service; participates in instructional services; is responsible for collection developm ent and faculty liaison in the subject area of history; ucsd librarians expected to participate in such activities as library-wide planning; also expected to be active professionally. qualifications: mls degree from an ala-accredited library school. appropriate training and/or experi­ ence in collection development and reference service in a large re­ search library. familiarity with the literature of history essential; ad­ vanced degree in history preferred. an appointee at associate level would be expected to bring to the position well developed reference and c o lle c tio n deve lo p m e n t s k ills , and su b s ta n tia l previous academic library experience. applicants at this level should also possess leadership skills as evidenced by previous experience; a demonstrated ability to work effectively with research-oriented fac­ ulty, library staff, and other members of the academic community; and evidence of participation in professional activities. ucsd is an equ al-opportunity /a ffirm ative-action em ployer. a p plications ac­ cepted until october 15, 1981. submit a letter of application, en­ closing resume and a list of references, to: martha l. bovee, asso­ ciate university librarian, university of california, san diego, li­ brary, c-075-g3, la jolla, ca 92093. r eference lib r a r ia n for e n g in e e r in g a n d s cien ce. in a state-supported college offering bachelor’s degrees in the liberal arts, engineering, and sciences. duties include providing general reference service with emphasis on science and engineering, teach­ ing a one-hour credit bibliography course, conducting orientation programs and online literature searches, and helping in collection development. background and interest in engineering and/or sci­ ence essential, governm ent docu m en ts experience desirable. minimum requirements: mls from ala-accredited library school, several years' relevant work experience, ability to interact with the academic community, high energy level, versatility, and ability to supervise. salary to $21,000, depending on qualifications. 12 month contract, 30 days’ vacation, excellent fringe benefits through vmi foundation, possibility of housing assistance. instructor rank; possibility of assistant professorship for second master’s degree and extensive work experience. position available from june 1982. application deadline: nov. 30, 1981. send resume and placement folder to j. e. gaines, head librarian, virginia military institute, lexington, va 24450. aa/eeo employer. 313 scien ce l ib r a r ia n . louisiana tech university. responsible for collection development, bibliographic instruction, database search­ ing, and general and subject reference service. work flexible schedule of night and weekend rotation. required: ala-accred¡ted mls; academic training in sciences; database searching skills; gen­ eral and subject reference experience. preferred: appropriate sub­ ject area master’s; 3 -5 years’ experience in traditional academic reference service; 3 5 years’ experience in computer-assisted ref­ erence services; good interpersonal skills and demonstrable creativ­ ity and innovation. faculty rank, tenure track, 12-month contract. comprehensive benefits, excellent retirement. rank and salary sub­ ject to qualifications and experience. m inimum $16,500. send re­ sume, supporting credentials, and names, addresses, and tele­ phone numbers of three references to barbara lipscomb, chair, search committee, prescott memorial library, louisiana tech uni­ versity, ruston, la 71272. deadline november 1, 1981. louisiana tech university is an affirmative-action/equal-opportunity employer. s c ien c e l ib r a r ia n . master’s degree from accredited library school and ms in science required; ph.d. desirable. duties include refe ren ce, co lle c tio n d e ve lopm ent, c o m p u te rize d lite ra tu re searches, liaison with academic department. 12 month faculty posi­ tion. rank and salary depend on experience and education, but not less than $20,000. position available august 15, 1981. apply to: joe w. kraus, director, illinois state university library, normal, il 61761. an equal-opportunity/affirmative-action employer. s e r ia l s ca t a lo g er . golda m eir library, the u n iversity of wisconsin-milwaukee. one of two serials catalogers in a depart­ ment of five professional catalogers. the library receives approxi­ mately 11,000 serial titles per year and maintains a serials holdings list of 20,000 entries. responsible for original, oclc member li­ brary and lc edit-cataloging of serials. also responsible for creating entries for the local automated serials holdings list and for creating local data records in oclc. some monographic cataloging is also involved. aacr 2 revision in the public card catalogs is also a pro­ fessional responsibility. qualifications: ala-accredited mls and three years of professional experience in cataloging and/or serials is required. two years of serials cataloging experience is preferred. experience with oclc or another automated cataloging system, aacr 2, and lc classification schedules and subject headings also required. working knowledge of two foreign languages highly desir­ able. salary: this is an academic specialist position with a base sal­ ary of $14,776. starting salary depending upon experience and qualifications. generous vacation and fringe benefits. application: send request for application to search committee, university of wisconsin-milwaukee, the golda meir library, p.o. box 604, mil­ waukee, wl 53201. application deadline is october 15, 1981. the u n ive rsity of w isco n sin -m ilw a u ke e is an e q u a l-o p p o r tunity/affirmative-act¡on employer. ser ia ls cataloging sec tion head. university of california, santa barbara. supervises serials section of cataloging department. duties include original cataloging and classification of serials and analytics, revision of contributed cataloging work by library assis­ tants, and resolution of complex bibliographical problems. re­ quirements: mls, at least two years' professional experience in se­ rials cataloging, experience with aacr1 and aacr2, lc classifica­ tion and lc subject headings, and online cataloging systems. su­ pervisory experience desired. facility with european languages de­ sired. salary: $17,376-$30,642, dependent upon experience and qualifications. applications must be received by september 30, 1981. send letter of application, names of references, and resume to margaret deacon, assistant university librarian, university of california at santa barbara, santa barbara, ca 93106. an equal opportunity/affirmative-action employer. social sciences librarian. provides general reference ser­ vices and specialized services by use of electronic data bases; has specific responsibility in the area of political science, which in­ cludes collection development, acting as liaison with the depart­ ment and preparing guides and bibliographies; participates in gen­ eral library instruction programs. requirements: mls from ala accred¡ted library school; ma in political science or other social sci­ ence; working knowledge of a foreign language desirable; training in computerized bibliographic searching; course work in statistics and experience in using computerized data sources highly desirable; knowledge of online catalog use desirable. the university provides a generous staff benefit program. minimum salary $13,644. please submit a detailed resume by september 30, 1981, to vicky witte, head of social sciences services, olin library, washington univer­ sity, st. louis, mo 63130. an equal-opportunity/affirmative-action employer. th r ee p ositio n s available (los angeles area). 1) head of circulation: rank of library assistant iii or sr. assistant librarian. library assistant iii— salary $ 1 6 ,6 2 0 -$ 1 9 ,9 6 8 ; equivalent of 2 years of college and 4 years of progressively responsible experience in subprofessional library work. sr. assistant librarian— salary $18,612-$25,740; mls and 3 years of professional experience, preferably in an academic setting. 2) reference librarian: salary $16,008-$22,080; mls required; some general academic refer­ ence experience desired. 3) archivist: salary $20,616-$24,828; mls with archival specialization or equivalent degree in archival administration. submit a letter of application, complete resume, and the names of 3 references to phillip wesley, dean, educational resources, california state university dominguez hills, carson, ca 90747. applications must be either received or legibly postmarked by september 30, 1981. an equal-opportunity/affirmative-action employer. late job listings business reference librarian (search reopened). position available immediately at arizona state university, home of one of the world's largest business schools (235 faculty, 10,000 students). the successful candidate will report to the head of the business library but will operate out of the university library, which houses the major portion of the business collection. responsibilities will include general reference in the humanities and social sciences; specialized reference and research assistance in business subjects; instruction and orientation; computerized literature searching; and collection development in the fields of accounting, finance and quantitative systems. qualifications: ala-mls; academic training in business or strong working knowledge of business resources; ability to communicate effectively with students, faculty, and the general public. preference may be given to applicants with an appropriate advanced degree; reference experience; and training or experience in computer searching and bibliographic instruction. salary: dependent on qualifications ($15,000 range). send letter of application citing specific qualifications, including relevant courses taken, a current resume, and the names and addresses of three recent references to constance corey, assistant university librarian for management services, arizona state university, tempe, az 85287 by september 30, 1981. (postmark accepted.) asu is a committed equal opportunity affirmative action employer. 314 head, science reference service. position available at arizona state university january 1, 1982, when a large, new science and engineering library will be occupied. reporting to the head of the science library, the successful candidate will be responsible for program planning, management, and supervision of five library faculty and four support staff, plus student assistants. science reference librarians are actively engaged in reference and research assistance, online literature searching, instruction and orientation, collection development, and faculty liaison. disciplines supported include engineering, technology, and construction; computer sciences, mathematics, physics and astronomy, chemistry, geology, botany and microbiology, zoology, agriculture, health sciences, nursing, geography, and home economics. the library, which has just been designated a u.s. patent depository, will also house a well known solary energy collection. qualifications: ala-mls; professional academic or research library reference experience; successful supervisory and administrative experience; subject expertise in science or technology. preference will be given to applicants with a minimum of five years’ professional experience; experience in or knowledge of automated information retrieval; and an academic degree in science or technology. salary: dependent on qualifications ($20,000 minimum). send letter of application to constance corey, assistant university librarian for management services, arizona state university, tempe, az 85287 by september 30, 1981. (postmark accepted.) applicants should address all of the qualifications stated above and enclose a list of relevant courses taken, a current resume, and the names and addresses of three recent references. asu is a committed equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. instruction librarian. new position available immediately at arizona state university, one of the largest urban universities in the country. the successful candidate will conduct needs assessments, evaluate programs, and coordinate the development of new and continuing library and orientation into a comprehensive, integrated program. additional responsibilities include administering the instruction budget; acting as a resource person for the selection of modes and techniques of instruction; serving ten hours per week at the general reference desk; and developing the library instruction collection. qualifications: ala-mls; substantial experience in library instruction and orientation; reference experience. preference will be given to applicants with academic library instruction experience; demonstrated managerial, communication, and interpersonal skills; ability to assess, develop, implement and evaluate instruction programs; knowledge of theories and techniques of instruction. salary: dependent on qualifications ($18,000 minimum). send letter of application, resume, and list of three current references to constance corey, assistant university librarian for management services, arizona state university, tempe, az 85287, by october 15, 1981. (postmark accepted.) applicants must include documentation or evidence of specific qualifications and a short statement of their philosophy of library instruction. asu is a committed equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. reference librarian (search reopened). position available immediately. arizona state university is seeking a reference librarian to assume responsibility for general reference in social sciences and humanities; collection development in religion and philosophy; in-depth reference and instruction in subject areas; faculty liaison; and participation in the library’s general instruction and orientation program. qualifications: ala-mls; academic training in the humanities; reading knowledge of german. preference may be given to applicants with appropriate background in philosophy and/or religious studies, reference experience, and training or 315 experience in orientation and instruction. salary: dependent on qualifications ($15,500 range). send letter of application, a current resume, and the names and addresses of three recent references to constance corey, assistant university librarian for managment services, arizona state university, tempe, az 85287 by september 15, 1981. (postmark accepted.) application must include documentation or evidence of specific qualifications, including relevant coursework, background and areas of strength in relevant subjects and german language. asu is a committed equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. serials librarian for a major art museum library. responsibilities: acquisition, maintenance, cataloging (aacr 2 and rlin) for 1,400 current titles; general reference work. qualifications: ala/mls; ba in art history; demonstrated facility in two foreign languages; 2 years' experience in museum or university art library; serials experience preferred. salary from $12,000, based on qualifications and experience. apply with resume, salary history, names of three references to: j. p. brown, librarian, the cleveland museum of art, 11150 est boulevard, cleveland, oh 44106. assistant personnel librarian. to coordinate all recruitment for professional vacancies, including placing ads, scheduling interviews, and insuring compliance with affirmative action program. other duties: coordinating orientation and staff development programs, and assisting in developing and maintaining publications and manuals. in addition to an accredited mls, requirements are excellent writing and speaking skills, initiative, imagination, excellent human relations skills, and the ability to work under pressure. preference will be given to applicants with some relevant personnel and/or supervisory experience. the position provides an excellent opportunity for someone interested in gaining a background and experience in library personnel administration. salary ranges: librarian i, $15,200-$l8,250; librarian ii, $17,200-$20,650. submit resume by september 30, listing three references and salary requirements, to: box 35, butler library, columbia university, 535 w. 114th street, new york, ny 10027. an eo/aa employer. catalogers (two temporary, one-year positions). responsible for original and some selected copy cataloging of monographs in art history and architecture, including supplmentary and difficult searching, bibliographic description, subject headings and assignment of call numbers, and authority work. in addition to an accredited mls, requirements are a working knowledge of aacr2 rules and the lc classification, a reading knowledge of one romance and one germanic language, and an aptitude for analytical and detail work, as demonstrated through previous relevant experience and/or superior performance in a formal course in cataloging. preference will be given to applicants with a strong background in art and architectural history and current trends in contemporary art and city planning. salary ranges: librarian i, $15,200-$l8,250; librarian ii, $17,200-$20,650. submit resume by september 30, listing three references and salary requirements, to: box 35, butler library, columbia university, 535 w. 114th street, new york, ny 10027. an eo/aa employer. r e v ie w e r s p r a is e ea r e f e r e n c e and s u b s c r ip tio n books r e v ie w s : "indispensable. … as a result of the work's current and extensive coverage and the con­ tinuing high demand for the type of data found in the encyclopedia o f as­ sociations, it remains one of the most useful and essential titles in any li­ brary’ s reference collection.” (book­ list, april 1, 1979) am erican r eference books an­ nual 1981: “ this is the only com­ prehensive source of detailed informa­ tion concerning american national, nonprofit membership organizations. … this well-known reference set is heavily used in almost all libraries.” 1982 edition just published! encyclopedia f associations 16th edition o over 90% of the entries in the 16th edition have been revised to reflect new addresses, phone numbers, executive names, or other important items of information. for over 25 years ea has been the standard reference book for locating those as­ sociations that information seekers turn to for highly qualified sources. the new, 1982 edition tells you exactly whom to write, phone, or visit for information too fresh to appear in books and periodicals. vol. 1 • national o rganizations of the u .s . describes 15,400 organizations in 17 subject categories. en­ tries give official name of group, popular name or acronym, address, phone number, chief executive, number of members, committees, publications, convention schedule, and more. w ith massive 4 7 ,0 0 0 -lin e keyw ord/alphabetical index. 1,600pp. isbn 0-8103-0144-x. $135.00. v ol. 2 • g eographic and executive indexes listings in both indexes give organization name, chief execu­ tive, address, phone number, and the entry number of the more detailed organization entry in volume 1. 900pp. isbn 0-8103-0145-8. $120.00. vol. 3 • n e w associations and projects an inter-edition, cumulatively indexed supplement that re­ ports on new groups concerned with the latest problems and ideas. isbn 0-8103-0130-x. subscription, $135.00. ea is available on standing order. (5% discount fo r standing orders.) all gale books are sent on 90-day approval. customers outside the u.s. and canada add 10%. acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries 508 / cirrl news the classified ads deadlines: orders for regular classified advertisements must reach the acrl office on or before the second of the month preced­ ing publication of the issue (e.g. september 2 for the october issue). late job listings will be accepted on a space-available basis after the second of the month. rates: classified advertisements are $5.00 per line for acrl members, $6.25 for others. late job notices are $12.00 per line for members, $14.00 for others. organizations submitting ads will be charged according to their membership status. telephone: all telephone orders should be confirmed by a writ­ ten order mailed to acrl headquarters as soon as possible. orders should be accompanied by a typewritten copy of the ad to be used in proofreading. an additional $10 will be charged for ads taken over the phone (except late job notices or display ads). guidelines: for ads which list an application deadline, that date must be no sooner than the 20th day of the month in which the notice appears (e.g., october 20 for the october issue). all job announce­ ments should include a salary figure. job announcements will be edited to exclude discriminatory references. applicants should be aware that the terms faculty rank and status vary in meaning among institutions. jobline: call (312) 944-6795 for late-breaking job ads for aca­ demic and research library positions. a pre-recorded summary of positions listed with the service is revised weekly; each friday a new tape includes all ads received by 1:00 p.m. the previous day. each listing submitted wifi be carried on the recording for two weeks. the charge for each two-week listing is $30 for acrl members and $35 for non-members. fast job listing service: a special newsletter for those actively seeking positions. this service lists job postings received at acrl headquarters four weeks before they appear in cr&l news, as well as ads which, because of narrow deadlines, will not appear in cr&l news. the cost of a six-month subscription is $10 for acrl mem­ bers and $15 for non-members. contact: classified advertising d e p ’t, acrl, american library association, 50 e. huron st., chicago, \l 60611; (312) 944-6780. positions open art and architecture librarian. manages the art and a r­ chitecture library which provides library services to users in the school of architecture, school of fine arts, and the department of art and archaeology; performs bibliographic duties and is responsi­ ble for collection development in related subject areas; works in gen eratreference services; performs online searches in humanities databases. qualifications: mls from an ala-accredited library school; degree in art or architecture; reading knowledge of german, italian or french; academic library experience, preferably in public services; knowledge of online searching, preferably in brs or dia­ log; supervisory experience with the ability to make independent judgements and to organize work. send letter of application, re­ sume, and three letters of reference to: virginia f. toliver, director of library personnel and administrative services, washington univer­ sity libraries, st. louis, mo 63130 by october 31,1984. washington university is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. assistant catalog librarian. search reopened faculty, tenure-track position. catalogs serials, music, and av; supervises subject and series authority work. cataloging experience, knowl­ edge of aacr2, lc classification, lcsh, marc format essential. required: mls from an ala-accredited program, three years’ expe­ rience. appointment at assistant librarian or above (equivalent to as­ sistant professor). minimum salary: $20,000 depending on educa­ tion and experience. university of south alabama libraries are a member of soliniet/oclc and operate notis, an integrated li barary system, with an online catalog. benefits include: 20 days’ va­ cation, university-subsidized insurance, state retirement, tiaa/ cref option. submit resume and names of three references by oc­ tober 31, 1984, to: patricia g. ramage, chair, university library search committee, library administration, the university of south alabama, mobile, al 36688. an eeo/aa employer, assistant cataloger, department of bibliographic control, tennessee tech university libraries. responsible for member input and original cataloging, assist with catalog maintenance and aacr2 changes, assist with online catalog maintenance, and retrospective conversion. duties will include cataloging of monographs and some media materials. requirements: ala/mls, knowledge of lc classifi­ cation and lc subject headings. ability to use all oclc formats and knowledge of aacr2 required. experience in cataloging print and non-print materials desirable. evidence of involvement in profes­ sional association activities desirable. salary and benefits: $15,000 minimum; tiaa/cref; health and life insurance; 24 days annual leave; faculty status, tenure-track. letter of application, resume, and names, addresses and telephone numbers of four references to: su­ san lafever, coordinator of bibliographic control, university li­ brary, tennessee tech university, box 5066, cookeville, tn 38505. applications must be postmarked by october 30, 1984. appoint­ ment may begin as early as january 1,1985. aa/eoe. applications from minorities especially welcome. assistant director for collection development. under the general direction of the director of libraries, responsible for development, implementation, coordination and evaluation of the library’s general collection; recommending allocation of and moni­ toring the current materials budget of $2.37 million; supervising cd staff of three bibliographers and four fte support staff; maintaining close liaison with university administration and faculty regarding aca­ demic planning and research needs; negotiating the acquisition of special purchases and gifts as required; serving as library resource for trends in new technologies, bibliographic utilities and networks as they apply to collection development access and management; par­ ticipating in general administration of the library. required: ala accredited mls degree with responsible and appropriate experi­ ence; evidence of understanding the scholarly communication process, faculty and student needs and state-of-the-art collection de­ velopment in an arl library environment; evidence of analytic skills necessary to evaluate the collection and to access control needs through fiscal and budgeting operations; evidence of managerial skills, strong interpersonal skills, and effectiveness in communica­ tion, both orally and in writing. preferred: experience with consor­ tium or network impact on collection development; record of active professional involvement; competency in foreign languages. salary negotiable dependent upon qualifications, experience, and rank ($25,000 minimum). review of applications will begin october 31, 1984. apply to: sharon a. hogan, director, middleton library, loui­ siana state university, baton rouge, la 70803. lsu is an equal em­ ployment university. assistant director for special collections. (new position.) under the general direction of the library director, the as­ sistant director for special collections will have administrative re­ sponsibility for the hill memorial library and its collections. these collections encompass primary research materials including rare books, louisiana, and natural history materials, historical and literary manuscripts, photographs, works of art, memorabilia, and the pa­ pers of russell b. long. the assistant director will assume a leader­ ship role in planning, implementing, coordinating and evaluating special collections, services, and programs. he/she will be responsi­ ble for the administration of a staff of 6 librarians and 7 fte support staff; for formulating special collection development policy, and gift and acquisition programs in support of university research needs; and for promoting use of special collections by the scholarly commu­ nity. the assistant director will play a key role in library fund-raising activities by working with the friends of the library and with other organizations and individuals and will participate in general adminis­ tration of the library. r equired: mls degree from an ala accredited library school; responsible and appropriate experience; evidence of managerial skills, strong interpersonal skills and effec­ tiveness in communication; knowledge of the policies governing scholarly use of special collections, the principles of preservation, the rare books market, and the processing, cataloging, and indexing of rare books, ephemeral materials, manuscripts and archives. pre­ ferred: experience with special collections in an academic research environment; interest in applying computer technology to manage­ ment of special collections; working knowledge of foreign lan­ guages, especially french and spanish; and a record of active pro­ fession al in volvem ent. salary: neg o tia b le d e p e n d in g upon october 1984 / 509 qualifications, experience and rank ($25,000 minimum). review of applications will begin october 31, 1984, apply to: sharon a. ho­ gan, director, middleton library, louisiana state university, baton rouge, la 70803. lsu is an equal employment university. assistant head of original cataloging. responsible for training and supervision of non-professional staff, for original cat­ aloging of books and non-book materials according to aacr 2, lc classification and subject headings, and oclc systems require­ ments, and for maintenance of public catalogs. qualifications: ala accredited mls. second master’s degree desirable. cataloging ex­ perience in an academic library and sound reading knowledge of one or more european languages are strongly preferred. appoint­ ment rank and salary commensurate with qualifications and experi­ ence. minimum starting salary: $18,500. position available immedi­ ately. lette r of a p p lic a tio n , resum e, and thre e letters of recommendation will be accepted through october 20,1984, or until position is filled, and should be directed to: donald l. saporito, di­ rector of libraries, university of southwestern louisiana, 302 e. st. mary blvd, lafayette, la 70503. usl is an equal opportunity, affirm­ ative action employer. assistant librarian for public services, the ambrose swasey library of c olgate rochester divinity school/bexley hall/crozer theological seminary and st. bernard’s institute, roch­ ester, new york. responsibilities include the maintenance of a dy­ namic reference program, the management of the reference collec­ tion and index table, the design of present and future library catalogs, the development and execution of a program of biblio­ graphic instruction, and the supervision of the circulation staff as well as some student assistants. requirements: m.div. or equivalent from ats-accredited seminary; mls from a la-accredited library school, at least three years of experience in reference services in an aca­ demic library. position available december 1, 1984. salary range: $17,000-$19,000; benefits. send letter of application, resume, and the names/addressesof four references to: norman j. kansfield, di­ rector of library services, colgate rochester divinity school/bexley hall/crozer theological seminary and st. bernard’s institute, 1100 south goodman street, rochester, ny 14620. an equal opportu­ nity, affirmative action employer. assistant university librarian for systems and planning. the university of arizona library seeks applicants to fill a new position in systems and planning. the person filling this va­ cancy will have responsibility for continuing development of an inte­ grated online system, as well as responsibility for more general plan­ ning activity, including chairing the library’s planning council, participating as a member of the administrative group and direc­ ti ng/coordinati ng existing automated services. the aul for systems and planning reports to the university librarian. this new division of the library will have, initially, a small staff but is expected to grow quickly with a possible significant increase in size next fiscal year. applicants must have an mls from an ala-accredited library school as well as five years professional experience in large, academic li­ braries. ability to communicate clearly in both written and oral forms is essential. preference will be given to persons with degrees and/or experience in computer/information science, planning, systems, and related disciplines, as well as to persons with successful supervi­ sory experience or experience in technical services. salary range: $35,000-$45,000 annually and the position is open immediately. application deadline is november 15,1984. librarians at the univer­ sity of arizona have academic professional status with privileges equivalent to the teaching faculty, twelve-month appointments (eligi­ ble for continuing status), 22 days annual vacation, 10 university holi­ days, and several health-care and retirement plans. to apply send a resume, including the names of three references, to: w. david laird, university librarian, a349 main library, university of arizona, tuc­ son, az 85721. the university of arizona is an eeo/aa employer. assistant librarian for technical services, the am brose swasey library of colgate rochester divinity school/bexley hall/crozer theological seminary and st. bernard’s institute, roch­ ester, new york. responsibilities include original cataloging, staff su­ pervision of acquisitions, cataloging serials and binding, some su­ pervision of student assistants. requirem ents: mls from an ala-accredited library school; knowledge of modern european lan­ guages (sufficient for cataloging purposes); knowledge of lc classi­ fication and subject headings, aacr 2, marc formats, and oclc terminal; background in theology or religion desirable; program­ matic skills expected. salary range: $17,000-$19,000; good fringe benefits. send letter of application, resume, and the names/ad dresses of four references to: norman j. kansfield, director of li­ brary services, colgate rochester divinity school/bexley hall/cro­ zer theological seminary and st. bernard’s institute, 1100 south goodman street, rochester, ny 14620. an equal opportunity, af­ firmative action employer. a s s o c ia t e d ir e c t o r o f u n iv e r s it y l ib r a r ie s case western reserve university university libraries, an arl member, is composed of sears and freiberger libraries and is the targest unit in the case western reserve university library system, housing the collections in the humanities and arts, social and behavioral sciences, engineering, science, management, and music. the collection con tains over 1,500,000 items (bound volumes, government documents, and microforms) and includes over 7,000 current serial subscriptions. the staff includes 33 professionals and 44 non-professionals. the responsibilities of this newly-created position will include: coordination of the activities of the public services (including collection development), technical services, and administrative units; participation in the development and preparation of grant proposals; development of an effective research sharing pro gram, both within and without the university; working with the director on the development of long-range budget, space and automation plans for the university libraries. qualifications for this position include a graduate degree in library science from an accredited ala ii brary school; active involvement in and commitment to research, publishing, and professional activities; in depth knowledge of academic library organization and functions, including library automation; and sub stantive administrative experience preferably in a comparable academic research institution. minimum salary: $35,000. send letter of application, resume, and names of three professional references to: mary devocht berges, department of human resources, case western reserve university, 10900 euclid ave nue, cleveland oh 44106, by november 1 ,1 984 case western reserve university is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer. 510 / c&rl news assistant special collections librarian. university of nevada, las vegas. (search reopened.) special collections con­ tains materials pertaining to southern nevada, the gaming industry, culinary arts, and the unlv archives. responsibilities: acquire, ar­ range, describe and provide access to nevada manuscript collec­ tions and archival records of unlv; develop the nevada collection; participate in the reference desk and exhibit schedule of the depart­ ment; and perform other duties as assigned. qualifications: ala accredited degree and formal archive and/or manuscript training re­ quired; effective com munication skills, ability to establish and maintain harmonious working relationships with co-workers, donors and patrons, and to organize, analyze and plan efficiently essential; experience in processing archives, personal papers, or u.s. political or historic manuscripts preferred; advanced subject degree in u.s. history or political science desired. minimum salary: $17,000. fac­ ulty status, 12-month appointment, 24 days vacation, fringe benefits. send letter of application, resume, names, addresses, and phone numbers of three references by october 31, 1984, to: mary dale deacon, director of libraries, university of nevada, las vegas, 4505 maryland parkway, las vegas, nv 89154. the university of nevada, las vegas is an equal opportunity, affirmative action, title ix, 504, 402 employer. business/engineering library, assistant depart­ ment head. developing and implementing innovative information services for the faculty and students of the amos tuck school of business and the thayer school of engineering at dartmouth col­ lege will be the challenge of the person selected to fill this position. the individual we are seeking will be capable of working as part of a team providing information services in a technologically sophisti­ cated library environment utilizing the dartmouth online catalog; rlin; oclc; online database vendors such as brs, dialog, i.p. sharp, dow jones, and nexis; as well as microcomputers. under the general direction of the business/engineering librarian, the as­ sistant business/engineering librarian’s responsibilities include su­ pervision of the interlibrary loan assistant, participation in collection development, consultation with faculty to determine instructional and research needs and the provision of reference services includ­ ing bibliographic instruction and online searching. feldberg library has a staff of three professionals and five staff and is one of eight li­ braries in the dartmouth college library system. qualifications: ala/mls, educational background in one of the fields of business, engineering, or economics, a minimum of three years of post mls experience in an academic or special library and online database searching experience in bibliographic and numeric files are rea s s o c ia t e u n iv e r s it y l ib r a r ia n fo r p u b l ic s e r v ic e s arizona state university the arizona state university libraries are seeking candidates for the newly created position of associate university librarian for public services. the successful candidate will report to university librarian donald e. riggs, be responsible for the leadership and management of all public service units, and participate in overall library planning and policy formulation. required qualifications include an ala-accredited mls degree; successful administrative experience at the department head level or above in public services in a university library; a minimum of seven years’ progressively responsible experience in an academic/research library; demonstrated leadership qualities; strong analytic, communication and interpersonal skills; experience in creating and implementing new public service programs; knowledge of the latest issues and trends in academic librarianship; knowledge of bibliographic instruction and online systems; evidence of university service, research and/or participa­ tion in professional associations. preferred experience: fiscal, personnel and other administrative responsi­ bility in two or more public service areas; supervision of a large staff; involvement in both undergraduate and graduate programs in an arl library. arizona state university and its libraries: asu’s mission is to continue development as a major research university and to become competitive with the best public universities in the nation. toward that end, the libraries have experienced dynamic growth during the past five years, adding 55 new positions and increasing the materials budget from $1.7 million to the current $3.1 million. a new science and engi­ neering library was occupied in 1983, and the other libraries are being remodeled. the libraries are creat­ ing a total online integrated system using tandem hardware and data phase software. collections total 1.8 million volumes and 1.6 million microform units. of the 243 fte staff, 127 are employed in public services. membership is held in arl, crl, amigos, and oclc. the total budget is $7 million. asu, with 40,000 students, is the nation’s 6th largest university and is looted near phoenix, the nation’s 9th largest city. salary: $40,000 minimum, depending on qualifications. tiaa-cref or state retirement plan; annual paid leave of 22 days’ vacation; 12 days’ sick leave and 10 holidays; tuition remission for employee and family at all three arizona universities. librarians serve on university governance committees and are eligible for continuing employment status and sabbatical leave. applicants must include documentation or evidence of specific qualifications and short statements (no more than 2 pages each) concerning (a) their philosophy of public service and (b) what new public service programs they have implemented and are interested in implementing. send letter of application, resume, supporting documents, and a list of four recent references to: constance corey, assistant university librarian, hayden library, arizona state university, tempe, az 85287. a copy of the complete posi­ tion description is available upon request. recruitment will remain open until the position is filled. to ensure consideration, applications should be received by october 2 9 ,198 4, when review will begin. asu is a committed equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. minorities are encouraged to apply. october 1984 / 511 quìred. experience with library applications of microcomputers is highly desirable. salary and rank commensurate with experience and qualifications with a minimum salary of $18,500 for a librarian ii or $22,500 for a librarian iii. please send resume before october 31,1984, to: phyllis e. jaynes, director of user services, 115 baker library, dartmouth college, hanover, nh 03755. dartmouth col­ lege is an aa/eeo/m/f employer. catalog librarian. search continued. responsible for the general operations and specific activities of cataloging department and for development of cataloging policies and procedures which support service goals of the library. required: ala-accredited mls, familiarity with aacr2, oclc, lc classification and subject headings. five years’ experience in cataloging; european lan guage(s) facility desirable. deadline for applications is october 31, 1984. screening begins immediately. salary: $22,000 minimum. send application and three letters of reference to: w. robert woerner, library director, ithaca college, danby road, ithaca, new york 14850. aa/eoe. catalog librarian. responsible under head of original cata­ loging for the cataloging of monographs and serials in all formats in history, political science, economics and business. mls from an ala-accredited program. working knowledge of at least one foreign language; cyrillic and/or japanese also desirable. knowledge of lc classification schedules, subject headings, aacr2 and marc for­ mats. experience with retrospective conversion of bibliographic rec­ ords is desirable, as is experience in the cataloging department of a research library; knowledge of oclc procedures and formats is de­ sirable. salary: $15,500 minimum or higher depending on qualifica­ tions. apply by december 1, 1984. send resumes to: peggy weis sert, library personnel officer, 221 memorial library, university of notre dame, notre dame, in 46556. catalog librarian. point loma nazarenecollege. primary re­ sponsibilities include original and oclc cataloging and the supervi­ sion of two paraprofessionals. includes reference desk duty (with some evening and weekend hours), participation in collection devel­ opment and bibliographic instruction. oualifications: ala/mls, ex­ perience with aacr2 and dewey. knowledge of oclc, or a compa­ rable online system. christian commitment and membership in an evangelical church. salary: $15,000-$25,000. tiaa/cref. send application, resume, and three current references by november 1 to: james d. newburg, director of learning services, point loma nazarene college, 3900 lomaland drive, san diego, ca, 92106. catalog librarian. librarian i (instructor), target level. re­ sponsibilities: interpretation and implementation of aacr2, lcsh, ddc, marc formats, and lc cataloging practice; assistance in de­ termination of cataloging and catalog maintenance policy and pro­ cedures; oclc cataloging operations including regular and retro­ spective conversion activities; syndetic structure of the catalog; original cataloging of printed materials; training personnel; some ref­ erence duties. oualifications: master’s degree from ala-accredited program required. preference will be given to applicants with a sec­ ond master’s degree in a subject area. experience relevant to the position and competence in a modern romance language desir­ able. salary: dependent on education and experience. minimum of $16,500 for nine-month appointment at rank of librarian i with mls and second master’s degree. summer conditional upon library needs. application deadline: november 10,1984, send letter of ap­ plication, resume, transcripts, and three current letters of reference to: james zink, director, kent library, southeast missouri state uni­ versity, cape girardeau, mo 63701. an equal opportunity, m-f, af­ firmative action employer. catalog librarian for middle eastern and south asian languages. (search reopened). the university of ar­ izona library is seeking an experienced professional catalog librar­ ian to be responsible for the original cataloging of monographs and serials in middle eastern and south asian languages. the majority of the south asian language materials are cataloged on oclc. the near eastern language materials are cataloged manually using both printed cards and original cataloging. other cataloging responsibilic h ie f , h u m a n it ie s a n d h is t o r y d iv is io n columbia university libraries (search reopened) this position has primary responsibility for the public services activities and operations of one of three major divisions, including columbia univesity’s major collection of over 1.5 million volumes in the humani­ ties and history and pre-1974 social sciences. the division includes butler library, which houses the in­ structional and sls libraries, and the music, paterno, and school of library service libraries. the incum­ bent will report directly to the director of the library services group and is expected to ensure the effective continuation of current service activities while continuing the development of innovative services and pro­ grams, including: exploration with faculty of new approaches to information services; expanding access to computer-based data systems; and developing the application of video, audio-visual, and computer based bibliographic instruction. the incumbent is also responsible for coordinating, with the staff of the resources group, collection development objectives to ensure an effective program of collection building, organization, and preservation. requirements for the position: accredited mls or equivalent relevant experience required, graduate subject degree desirable. demonstrated evidence of imagination, leadership, and managerial skills are essential and will be sought in all cases. knowledge and understanding of the process of scholarly com­ munication and of the complexities of a major research library are also essential. candidates with five years administrative experience in pertinent areas of library operations will be sought, with special attention given to responsibility for public service activities. salary ranges: librarian ii: $29,500-$38,350; librarian iii: $32,500-$47,125. applications or nominations should be submitted in writing to: box 35, butler library, columbia uni­ versity libraries, 535 west 114th street, new york, new york 10027. deadline for applications is october 2 6 ,198 4 an eaual odoortunitv. affirmative action emolover. 512 / c&r l news ties include supervising the copy cataloging by student assistants; serving on a catalog information desk; active participation in estab­ lishing policies and procedures for the catalog department. the middle eastern catalog librarian reports to the head of the catalog department and serves as a department liaison to the oriental stud­ ies collection. the university of arizona is a member of oclc through the amigos network. automated methods of cataloging non-roman materials are being explored. requirements include: ala-accredited library degree; working experience in a research li­ brary with aacr2, lc classification, and lcsh; experience with oclc or a similar utility; ability to transliterate using lc romanization tables. primary language skill should be arabic. ability to catalog materials in hindi, urdu, persian and pushto is also desired. profes­ sional librarians at the university of arizona are academic profes­ sionals and voting members of the faculty have, 12-month appoint­ ments, earn 22 vacation days a year, and 12 days of sick leave. the beginning professional salary is $16,500; a higher salary can be ne­ gotiated depending on qualifications and experience. send letter of application, resume and names of three references by november 30, 1984, to: w. david laird, university librarian, university of ar­ izona library, tucson, az 85721. the university of arizona is an eeo/aa employer. circulation librarian. responsible for supervising general circulation, reserves, and interlibrary loans. directs staff of 4 full-time and 2 part-time non-professionals, and 35 student assistants. sched­ ule may include some evening and weekend hours. requires an ala-accredited mls, and appropriate supervisory experience. col­ lection management experience and familiarity with automated li­ brary systems desirable. salary: $16,500 plus depending on experi­ ence. send letter of application, resume, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of 3 references by november 15, 1984, to: mary j. cronin, director of libraries, loyola university of chicago, 6525 n. sheridan road, chicago, il 60626. loyola university of chicago is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. collection development librarian. university of arkan­ sas at little rock. responsible for selection of all formats of materials to support curricula; coordination of selector activity; coordination of planning and analysis of collection development and collection man­ agement policies and procedures. participates in budget allocation; collection evaluation; use and user studies; policies and decisions c o o r d in a t o r o f p u b l ic s e r v ic e s tennesseeteeh university position available january 1, 1984. require­ ments: ala/mls with preference given to candi­ date with second masters; minimum of 5 years ex­ perience in various aspects of public service; prior supervisory experience preferred. one of four ma­ jor division heads responsible for a faculty of four and support staff of five. major responsibilities for services interpretation and public relations. letter of application, resume, and telephone numbers of four references to: edward d. garten director of libraries tennessee tech university box 5066 cookeville, tn 38505 applications must be postmarked b y ocluŭüí 38 ̂ 1984j minimum of $23,592; excellent benefit package; tiaa/cref or state retirement. tennessee tech is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. regarding storage, weeding, conservation, and serials manage­ ment. some night and weekend work should be expected. prefer strong academic background in history; archival experience; serials management; demonstrated skill at oral and written communica­ tions; and ability to work effectively with all levels of library employ­ ees, donors, patrons, and faculty members. requirements include ala/mls and three years of post-mls reference or collection devel­ opment experience with upper-level academic materials and ser­ vices. minimum salary: $20,000. the position is open now. position is faculty-rank, tenure-track, 12-month, full-time with good fringe benefits including up to 6%-matched tiaa/cref. send resume and names of three references (with their current titles, addresses, and phone numbers) who have observed human relationships and pro­ fessional abilities to: library search committee, c/o kathy essary, chair of recruitment committee, university of arkansas at little rock, 33rd and university ave.s little rock, ar 72204. an eeo/aa employer. collection management librarian (search reopened). faculty position in an urban university with academic and medical campuses. requires ala-accredited mls and minimum three years experience, preferably in collection development, with degree or background in the social sciences. responsible for coordination and development of collections to support curricula in broad areas of the social sciences in the schools of social work, education, community and public affairs and the college of the humanities and sciences. librarian has major responsibility for making and maintaining faculty contacts. must be able to work well with faculty, donors, students, and colleagues. salary commensurate with qualifications and expe­ rience but will not be less than $18,000. faculty rank and usual fringe benefits. send resume and names of three references by october 15 to: janet dalberto, chair, search committee, university library ser­ vices, virginia commonwealth university, 901 park ave, richmond, va 23284-0001. vcu is an equal opportunity, affirmative action em­ ployer. conservation officer. responsibilities: responsible for the leadership and management of the conservation program for the en­ tire library system (excluding the medical, dental, and law li­ braries). plans, manages, and evaluates program components, which include: commercial binding operations, in-house mending and tem porary binding, disaster preparedness, staff and user awareness, book-condition surveys, brittle book management (re­ placement, reproduction, etc.). plans for the best use of the library’s integrated system (notis) for m anaging conservation matters. helps monitor library’s environmental conditions. coordinates the use of the cuneo restoration laboratory with the curator of special collections. oversees preservation microfilming. manages the com­ mercial binding budget ($131,000 in fy 1985). qualifications: dem­ onstrated management skills. training in preservation administration and hands-on conservation techniques; formal training preferred. accredited mls preferred. ability to communicate effectively orally and in w ritin g . a va ila b le : f eb ru a ry 1, 1985. salary range: $20,000-$25,000. to apply, send letter of application and resume, including names of three references, to: lance query, director of li­ brary research, analysis, and personnel, northwestern university library, evanston, il 60201. applications received by november 30,1984, will be considered. an eeo-aa employer. documents librarian. the government documents depart­ ment of the stanford university libraries is seeking a librarian for the position of acquisition and bibliographic control division head. re­ sponsible for developing, implementing and monitoring a govern­ ment documents technical service program. as state and local docu­ ments bibliographer, selects appropriate documents and performs other collection development tasks. we require an mls; proven abil­ ity to analyze, evaluate, and improve workflow processes; technical service experience related to government documents; effective su­ pervisory experience; ability to provide document reference service; ability to communicate effectively, both orally and in writing; and the ability to interact with a variety of people. beginning salary range $28,000-$37,200 annually. send application/resume before no­ vember 15, 1984, to: carolyn j. henderson, library personnel offi­ cer, green library, stanford, ca 94305. cite number 256 on all cor­ respondence. we are an equal opportunity em ployer through affirmative action. documents librarian. required qualifications: mls (ala accredited, or equivalent); a degree in education, psychology, a sci­ ence or a social science; familiarity with documents classification october 1984 / 513 and processing routines; in-depth knowledge of u.s. federal docu­ ments and of state documents; general knowledge of international documents; demonstrated ability to organize simple but effective op­ erational systems; demonstrable experience in planning and imple­ menting successful programs; reference experience in an academic setting. preferred qualifications: training and/or experience in data­ base searching; microcomputer applications to library systems. as­ signment: plans, develops, and supervises support staff in a newly established documents department and collection in a subject divided library; future emphases will focus on streamlining process­ ing operations and upon simplifying access procedures; performs subject specific reference duties in appropriate reference area, in­ cluding some evenings and weekends; performs database search­ ing and collection development as appropriate. appointment: assis­ tant or senior assistant librarian (tenure-track), twelve-month, $1502-$2406/month, depending upon qualifications. generous benefits package. send letter of application, resume and list of three references, postmarked by october 29, 1984, to: charles martell, california state university library, sacramento, 2000 jed smith drive, sacramento, ca 95819. an equal opportunity employer. extended campus services librarian. (new position.) responsible for overall administration and provision of services of the schaffner library which serves the university college (a degree­ granting unit of the university providing adult continuing education) and other extension programs on northwestern’s chicago campus. development of innovative public service programs including biblio­ graphic instruction, online searching, and microcomputer-based services for continuing education students on the chicago and evanston campuses is a significant component of this new position. qualifications: ala-accredited mls degree; at least two years rele­ vant experience in academic library reference service, including bib­ liographic instruction and online searching; familiarity with a broad range of library computer applications and general administrative is­ sues in academic libraries. good communication skills, both oral and in writing, essential. experience with library services for non tra d itio n a l stu d e n t pro g ra m s is h ig h ly d e sira b le . salary: $20,000-$22,000. send letter of application and resume, including the names of three references, to: lance query, director of library research, analysis, and personnel, northwestern university li­ brary, evanston, il 60201. an eeo/aa employer. applications re­ ceived by november 15, 1984, will be considered. government documents/microforms librarian. un der the general supervision of the head of reference. responsible for the selection, organization and user services of the government documents collection, and supervision of current newspapers and microforms. may be required to work at the reference desk, includ­ ing some night and weekend work. qualifications: mls from an ala-accredited school or equivalent; at least three years profes­ sional experience as governm ent documents librarian; dem on­ strated ability to effectively supervise and communicate. rank: li­ brarian ii. minimum salary: $17,200. liberal benefits including tuition exemption and 22 days vacation. twelve-month academic appointd e p u t y u n iv e r s it y l ib r a r ia n a n d a s s o c ia t e d e a n university of southern california the university of southern california invites applications and nominations for the position of deputy uni­ versity librarian and associate dean. usc is a private, urban university with approximately 25,000 national and international students in undergraduate, graduate and professional disciplines. the university librar­ ian and dean is the chief administrative officer for a library system consisting of doheny main library and 11 branches, with five independent libraries, and reports to the provost. the aggregate holdings total in excess of 2.2 million volumes and 1.4 million microforms, and there is a staff of 50 librarians, and approxi­ mately 300 support personnel. responsibilities: serve as the deputy administrator responsible for day-to-day operations, reporting di­ rectly to the university librarian; provide bold and imaginative leadership in enhancing a major research university library system, utilizing traditional as well as new and innovative technologies; participate in plan­ ning and evaluating policies and procedures which support the university’s academic objectives and pro­ grams; implement further appropriate information technologies; maintain close communication between the various library departments, branches, and their respective heads; supervise all library personnel; co­ ordinate the activities and supervise the library administrative personnel; assist in planning and directing the library budget; administer the library personnel process, and other duties as assigned by the university librarian. qualifications: an appropriate advanced degree, preferably a doctorate in an extablished discipline, or an accredited mls, plus a second graduate degree; extensive experience relevant to the design, develop­ ment, and operation of a substantial academic/research library; demonstrated understanding of the re­ sponsibilities of a library system that meets the needs of those engaged in teaching, research, and scholarly activities in a university; knowledge of current trends and applications of library information technologies; proven leadership and motivational abilities; superior communication skills; demonstrated success as an advocate within a university or related community, within a library community; evidence of continuous growth through scholarly publication and active participation in the individual discipline and/or profession. salary range: $55,000-$64,500. send letters of nomination or application (with resume and three professional letters of reference) to: chair, deputy university librarian search committee, office of the provost, adm 102, university of southern california, los angeles, ca 90089-4019, attention: janet k. chaudhuri, assistant provost. review of applications begins on november 1, 1984. date of appointment effective july 1, 1985. usc is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. 514 / c&rl news ment. position available immediately. closing date for applications: october 15, 1984. please forward resume, and names, addresses, and phone numbers of three references to: kate maniscalco, admin­ istrative assistant, tulane university library, new orleans, la 70118. an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. head, architecture and allied arts library. univer­ sity of oregon. assistant professor, or higher. responsible for devel­ oping and administering policies for a&aa library, coordinating and providing reference services, online information retrieval, course related bibliographic instruction, and collection development. su­ pervise staff of 5 and student employees. mls required, plus degree in one of the following: architecture, interior architecture, landscape architecture, urban & regional planning, art history, art education, fine and applied arts. administrative and supervisory ability, analyti­ cal skills, strong oral and written communication skills, and demon­ strated leadership qualities essential. prefer progressively responsi­ ble experience in a research library and a reading knowledge of a foreign language. salary: $27,000 minimum for 12-month appoint­ ment, plus fringe benefits. submit letter of application, resume and names of four references by november 9, 1984, to: thomas a. stave, personnel librarian, university of oregon library, eugene, or 97403-1299. an aa/eo employer. head, architecture and environmental design li­ brary at arizona state university (search extended). the library is located within the college of the same name and is staffed by one professional (the head), one paraprofessional, and student assis­ tants, the librarian reports to the associate university librarian for public services and is responsible for management of the branch, collection development, reference and research assistance, biblio­ graphic instruction, and liaison with the college and the main library. asu, the nation’s sixth largest public university, is celebrating its centennial year with the theme, “ excellence for a new century.” re­ quired qualifications: ala-accredited mls; at least two years’ public service experience in an academic or research library; demons p e c ia l c o l l e c t io n s d ir e c t o r the university of toledo carlson library the university of toledo seeks applications for special collections director in the ward m. cana day center for research and use of rare books and special collections. duties: general adminis­ tration, collection development, manuscripts proc­ essing, reference, preservation, and public rela­ tions. qualifications: mls from an ala-accredited school and/or three to five years’ experience in an academic special collections department. second graduate degree (preferably ph.d) in humanities and working knowledge of american/english litera­ ture also required. proven administrative abilities, strong oral and written communication skills, and public relations talents very important. faculty sta­ tus in the university libraries; 12-month contract. salary: up to $27,000 depending on qualifications. available now. before november 1, 1984, send resume and names of three references to: leslie w. s h erid an , c hair, s earch c o m m itte e, carlson library, the university of toledo, 2801 w. bancroft street, toledo, oh 43606. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. strated managerial, communication and interpersonal skills; subject expertise in one or more of the fields of architecture, art history, inte­ rior design, landscape architecture, urban design, and city planning. preferred: administrative experience in a branch, unit or depart­ ment, preferably in an academic library. salary: dependent on quali­ fications and experience ($21,000 minimum). send letter of applica­ tion which addresses each of the qualifications listed above, a current resume, and the names, addresses and telephone numbers of four recent references to: constance corey, assistant university librarian, hayden library, arizona state university, tempe, az 85287, by october 29, 1984 (postmark accepted). copies of the complete announcement of vacancy may be requested from the same person. asu is a committed equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. minorities are encouraged to apply. head, au to m a ted info rm atio n retrieval service (airs), reference division. search extended duties: re sponsible for general operation of airs, including supervision of as­ sistant head of airs and one secretary. c onducts literature searches in broad range of subject areas. develops and supervises the library’s programs of computerized reference services, includ­ ing planning, faculty and staff training, user instruction, public rela­ tions, scheduling, and evaluation. supervises, through the assistant head of airs, the management and fiscal aspects of the service. co­ ordinates work and evaluates searching performance of five to eight reference librarians and staff who are assigned part-time to airs program. works at reference desk approximately five hours per w eek. a ssists with b ib lio g ra p h ic in s tru ctio n . q ualifica tio n s: ala/mls. minimum of three years professional (post-mls) experi­ ence in public services in an academic library. minimum of three years experience utilizing online bibliographic databases, including comprehensive knowledge of dialog and brs and substantial knowledge of other systems such as sdc, nlm, recon, rlin, westlaw, lexis/nexis, infoline, and nih/epa. previous su­ pervisory experience required; advanced subject degree desirable. salary: minimum $19,000; negotiable. closing date for applications: november 1,1984, or until suitable applicant is found. for additional information and to apply, contact: susan s. lytle, head, personnel operations, university library, texas a&m university, college sta­ tion, tx 77843. telephone (409) 845-8111. an aa/eeo employer. head government documents librarian. university of nevada, las vegas. (search reopened.) duties: coordinating the reference service, collection development, acquisitions and biblio­ graphic control for federal, state, local and international documents; supervising two classified staff and several student assistants; devel­ oping goals and objectives for the government documents collec­ tion; producing bibliographic guides; performing library orienta tion/instruction and online searching; and preparing and monitoring a budget for the unit. serves as member of the library administrative council. requirements: ala-accredited mls; demonstrated super­ visory, planning and communication skills; knowledge of federal and international organization documents; and the ability to relate harmo­ niously with users and staff. full-time professional experience in a federal depository documents collection essential. understanding of online searching and an advanced degree are desirable. minimum salary: $21,000. tenure-track, faculty status, 12-month appoint­ ment, 24 days vacation, fringe benefits. send letter of application, resume, and names, addresses, and phone numbers of three refer­ ences by november 15,1984, to: mary dale deacon, director of li­ braries, university of nevada, las vegas, 4505 maryland parkway, las vegas, nv 89154. the university of nevada, las vegas is an equal opportunity, affirmative action, title ix, 504, 402 employer. head, monograph cataloging. university of cincinnati li­ braries. (search reopened: salary upgraded.) responsible for orga­ nizing and supervising the work of the monograph cataloging and classification unit of the central processing catalog department, for formulating policies and coordinating monograph cataloging done by members of other units, and for some original cataloging. reports to the head of the catalog department. supervises librarians, sup­ port staff and students assigned to the monograph cataloging unit and coordinates procedures for monograph cataloging done by staff in other units (includes all marc formats except serials). may act as head of the department when latter is absent. plans are un­ derway to automate the cataloging and circulation functions of the libraries. bus software for the online catalog will be loaded in late fall, 1984. qualifications: master’s degree in library science from an ala-accredited program. minimum of three years cataloging expe­ rience using anglo-american cataloging rules, library of congress october 1984 / 515 classification schedules and subject headings; including two years experience working with the oclc system. demonstrated supervi­ sory and leadership ability. demonstrated ability to communicate clearly, both orally and in writing. demonstrated ability to work with other library staff at the support and unit/department head level. reading knowledge of one or more foreign languages. experience or demonstrable interest in assisting the public in the use of biblio­ graphic records. minimum salary: $18,000; rank and salary com­ mensurate with qualifications and experience. send resume with cover letter and names of three references, postmarked by october 31, 1984, to: sharon tuffendsam, libraries personnel officer, uni­ versity of cincinnati, cincinnati, oh 45221-0033. the university of cincinnati is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. head, rare books and special collections depart­ ment. administers, develops, and promotes the special collec­ tions, which feature the cordell collection of dictionaries (nearly 10,000 volumes representing the entire history of western lexicogra­ phy) and the eugene v. debs collection (manuscripts, pamphlets, and books). required: ala-accredited mls and an advanced de­ gree in the humanities or the social sciences, demonstrated leader­ ship ability with strong emphasis on interpersonal skills, creativity, demonstrated writing and speaking ability, and three years’ experi­ ence in libraries or related areas. desirable: ph.d; two years’ experi­ ence in rare books or a related field; proficiency in two languages, preferably one classical and one modern; and knowledge of analyti­ cal and descriptive bibliography and lexicography. salary: minimum $22,500, negotiable depending on qualifications and experience. twelve-month appointment, faculty status, attractive fringe benefits. send letter of application, resume, and names, addresses, and tele­ phone numbers of three current references to: ron g. martin, chair­ person, library search committee, indiana state university, terre haute, in 47809. applications must be postmarked on or before oc­ tober 29, 1984, to ensure consideration. an equal opportunity, af­ firmative action employer. head science-engineering librarian. the university of arizona is seeking a professional librarian to administer its science engineering library. responsibilities include supervision of 6.5 pro­ fessional librarians and 7 career staff members; administration of ref­ erence service, online searching, bibliographic instruction, and collection development; and supervision of the catalog maintenance office and the current periodicals and microforms room in the science-engineering library. the science-engineering library is a separate branch within the library system and houses 350,000 vol­ umes and over 1 million microforms covering all fields of the pure and applied sciences except clinical medicine. a land-grant univer­ sity with an enrollment of 31,000, the university of arizona is nation­ ally recognized for its scientific research and education programs and offers 51 doctoral programs in the sciences and engineering. applicants for this position must have an ala-accredited degree; demonstrated supervisory, plannning, and communication skills, and at least three years’ progressively responsible experience in an academic or special library public service area. candidates with substantial supervisory experience will be given preference. sci­ ence library experience, an academic background in the sciences, and knowledge of computers and library online systems are desir­ able. the position is available beginning march 1, 1985. minimum salary is $28,000; higher salary is negotiable depending on qualifica­ tions and experience. librarians at the university of arizona have ac­ ademic professional status, are voting members of the faculty, and may take up to 15 days’ professional leave per year. they have 22 days’ paid vacation, 12 days’ sick leave, and 10 holidays. a stan­ dard package of fringe benefits is available. by november 15, a let­ ter of application, resume, and names of three references should be sent to: w. david laird, university librarian, university of arizona library, tucson, az 85721. the university of arizona is an eeo/aa employer. head of technical services. university of arkansas at little rock. administers overall operations of collection development, cat­ aloging, and physical processing. responsible for coordination of bibliographic files throughout the library. some night and weekend work should be expected. qualifications include understanding of automated library systems; thorough knowledge of cataloging poli­ cies and procedures; demonstrated ability to plan and implement improved programs; demonstrated abilities in management; ability and willingness to communicate effectively and work well with all lev­ els of employees; stable employment background. an innovative li­ brarian with analytical skills is highly desirable. requirements in­ clude ala/mls and five years of relevant post-mls experience. minimum salary: $25,000. the position is open now. position is faculty-rank, tenure-track, 12-month, full-time with good fringe bene­ fits including up to 6°/o-matched tiaa/cref. send resume and names of three references (with their current titles, addresses, and phone numbers) who have observed human relationships and pro­ fessional abilities to: library search committee, c/o kathy essary, chair of recruitment committee, university of arkansas at little rock, 33rd and university ave., little rock, ar 72204. an eeo/aa employer. head of technical services. (librarian iii.) land-grant insti­ tution serving over 9,000 students and member of tri-cohege uni­ versity (north dakota state university, moorhead state university, concordia college) and minnesota state university system’s online catalog. position is responsible for the administration of all technical services operations (five professionals and 14 support staff), reports to the director and assists in library-wide planning and policy forma­ tion. qualifications include at least five years of progressively respon­ sible technical service experience in an academic library, mls de­ gree from an ala-accredited program, and successful experience in supervision and with automated library systems. needs to relate with sensitivity to staff at all levels and be responsive to needs and concerns of other library units. desirable qualifications include work in more than one technical services area and experience with oclc, aacr2, lc classification, and online catalogs. salary and benefits: $22,500 + doe; tiaa/cref; blue cross/blue shield. application deadline: november 15. submit letter of application, current re­ sume, and names and addresses of three references to: personnel office, north dakota state university, fargo, nd 58105. ndsu is an equal opportunity institution. head of textiles library at north carolina state university, school of textiles. duties include collection development, reference services, current awareness services, online search service, library instruction and library planning. supervise one professional assis­ tant and two clerical positions. the library collection includes 20,000 volumes, 860 serial titles and 422 media items in fields of textiles, chemistry and polymer science. qualifications: applicants must have an mls degree, experience in dialog searching, strong communication skills and demonstrated ability to organize and su­ pervise the work of a progressive department. a second master’s degree in the sciences is preferred. benefits: twenty-four working days vacation, twelve days sick leave, state retirement, group insur­ ance and hospitalization programs. position carries faculty status (non tenure-track). salary: $25,000 depending upon qualifications. apply before november 14, 1984, to: william c. lowe, chairman, search committee, d. h. hill library, north carolina state univer­ sity, box 7111, raleigh, nc 27695. include resume and names and addresses of three references. north carolina state university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. instructional services librarian. point loma nazarene college. reference desk duty (some evening and weekend hours), database searching, and serving as liaison for bibliographic instruc­ tion and collection development with several academic depart­ ments. qualifications: ala/mls, some academic library experience. christian commitment and membership in an evangelical church. faculty rank, tiaa/cref. salary: $15,000-$25,000. send applica­ tion, resume, and three current references by november 1 to: james d. newburg, director of learning services, point loma nazerene college, 3900 lomaland drive, san diego, ca 92106. liaison officer. responsible for the activities to affect the intro­ duction, promotion, delivery and ongoing support of oclc prod­ ucts and services to the network and library community. this in­ volves work with the networks to assess library needs, information dissemination, and implementation of marketing and promotional plans. the position requires an mls degree and a minimum of 2 years in library automation and library/marketing capacities and a demonstrated knowledge of oclc products and services. good written and verbal communication skills are essential. position may require extensive travel. starting minimum salary: $21,475 or higher depending on experience and qualifications. submit a resume com­ plete with education, experience and salary history/expectations to: employment representative, oclc, inc., 6565 frantz rd., dublin, oh 43017. oclc is an equal opportunity employer. librarian in college history and archives collec­ tion, a department of the college library. second professional po­ 516 / c&rl news sition in the department. master’s degree in library science or re­ la ted d is c ip lin e s . e xp e rie n ce desira b le . h irin g range: $17,000-$21,000. position available december 1, 1984. applica­ tions, resumes, and names of three references by november 1, 1984, to: anne c. edmonds, college librarian, mount holyoke col­ lege library, south hadley, ma 01075. an equal opportunity, affirm­ ative action employer. library instruction librarian. required qualifications: mls (ala-accredited or equivalent); a degree in education, in psy­ chology, in a science or a social science; experience in library in­ struction and experience or training in database searching; demon­ strable planning and organizational skills; excellent interpersonal and communication skills (both written and oral). preferred qualifica­ tions: reference experience in an academic setting; familiarity with computer programming. assignment: coordinates present library in­ struction program while developing or expanding new components; plans and develops advanced approaches to library instruction that might include end-user database searching, computer-assisted learning and video productions. performs subject specific reference duties in appropriate reference area, including some evenings and weekends; performs database searching and collection develop­ ment as appropriate. appointment: assistant or senior assistant li­ brarian (tenure-track), twelve-month, $1502-$2406/month, depend­ ing upon qualifications. generous benefits package. send letter of application, resume and list of three references, postmarked by oc­ tober 29, 1984, to: charles martell, california state university li­ brary, sacramento, 2000 jed smith drive, sacramento, ca 95819. an equal opportunity employer. marketing representative i. position requires an ala accredited mls degree or an equivalent academic/experience com­ bination; an in-depth understanding of a variety of library environ­ ments; tw o to three years post-mls expe rience with library automation; and the ability to effectively communicate, both verbally and in writing, with a broad spectrum of individuals. previous experi­ ence in a sales related activity associated with computerized sys­ tems (preferably library systems) is a definite plus. incumbent repre­ sents the c o rp o ra tio n w ith respect to pro m o tio n , sales and after-the-sale contacts in relation to product offerings in the local li­ brary systems class to defined customer group(s). salary minimum for this position is $21,475 or higher depending on experience and qualifications. please submit resume complete with salary expecta tions/history to: employment representative, oclc, inc., 6565 frantz rd., dublin, oh 43017. oclc is an equal opportunity em­ ployer. online services librarian. university of nevada, las ve­ gas. duties: planning, developing, publicizing and evaluating online database services; coordinating use of an ibm pc; planning and evaluating searcher training; cooperating with the systems librarian in developing automation plans; preparing statistical reports for on­ line database services; demonstrating online database searching; serving as a resource person for other searchers; and participating in general reference desk duty and collection development. re­ quirements: ala-accredited mls; two years of academic library ex­ perience; demonstrated planning, analytical, interviewing, and com­ m unications skills; p roficie ncy in online database searching, knowledge of searching principles, database structures, and refer­ ence sources; and the ability to develop innovative services and re­ late harmoniously with users and staff. advanced degree desirable. minimum salary: $19,000. tenure-track, faculty status, 12-month ap­ pointment, 24 days vacation, fringe benefits. send letter of applica­ tion, resume, and names, addresses, and phone numbers of three references by october 31, 1984, to: mary dale deacon, director of libraries, university of nevada, las vegas, 4505 maryland park­ way, las vegas, nv 89154. the university of nevada, las vegas is an equal opportunity, affirmative action, title ix, 504, 402 employer. operations manager for online automated library system, shared by 18 public, academic, and system libraries serving 24 cen­ tral illinois counties. (search extended.) self-starter with exceptional people skills to administer automation program under rsa executive committee. 3 -5 years experience with online automation applica­ tions required. bachelor’s mandatory, master’s preferred in ls or equivalent desired. must own automobile. extensive travel essential. home office in peoria metropolitan area. salary: $25,000-$35,000 plus benefits. deadline: october 31, 1984. send resume and three references to: travis e. tyer, president, resource sharing alliance of west central illinois, 515 york, quincy, il 62301, telephone (217) 223-2560. an eo/aa employer. reference librarian. primary responsibilities include general reference desk work, bibliographic instruction to both graduate and und erg radu ate students, some selection responsibilities and evening/weekend reference duty. some online searching is involved as well as production of bibliographies for general use. academic e xp e rie n c e is desira b le . r equirem ents: mls from an ala accredited library school; good written and oral communication skills; willingness to deal with the public and to cooperate with fellow employees; must be service-oriented. full-time, 12-month position; rank and tenure eligibility; salary minimum $15,000. tiaa/cref. send resume and names of three references to: kathy essary, chair, library search committee, university of arkansas at little rock, 33rd and university, little rock, ar 72204. an eeo/aa employer. reference librarian. cluster undergraduate library, univer­ sity of california, san diego. assistant librarian: $20,316-$ 2 5 ,992, or associate librarian: $24,828-$35,748. (this salary to be in­ creased by 3.8% effective january 1, 1985.) available january 1, 1985. as a branch of the library system of the university of califor­ nia, san diego, the cluster undergraduate library provides basic library services for students in the four colleges on campus. the un­ dergraduate library presently possesses an up-to-date, highly se­ lective collection of 90,000 volumes and 500 serial titles in all fields. works in close association with the other librarians in the unit; pro­ vides reference service at reference desk 18-19 hours per week (in­ cluding some evening and weekend hours); performs short com­ puter searches for refe re n ce s u p p o rt; p re p a re s su b je ct bibliographies, orientation leaflets and guides to use of the library re­ sources; makes classroom presentations; coordinates the library in­ struction program; conducts library tours and orientations; serves as a lecturer in contemporary issues 50, a 2-unit course on information and academic libraries (once a year); and recommends library mate­ rials for acquisition in various humanities disciplines (literature, art). ucsd librarians participate in librarywide planning activities and in­ structional services programs and are expected to be active profes­ sionally. qualifications: mls from an ala-accredited library school. academic major in one of the major humanities fields such as litera­ ture or fine arts is highly desired. teaching ability is essential, as is dedicated interest in a dynamic program of information access and exchange at the undergraduate level. an appointee at the associate level would be expected to bring to the position substantial relevant experience in an academic library. applications accepted until no­ vember 16,1984. submit a letter of application, enclosing a resume and a list of references to: jacqueline coolman, personnel librarian, university of california, san diego, library, c-075-h1, la jolla, ca 92093. ucsd is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. re fer en ce l ib r a r ia n , p h y s ic a l s c ie n c e s /e n g i neering. (entry level.) search extended. duties: provides com­ prehensive reference assistance, with emphasis on the physical sci­ ences and engineering, from a centralized reference collection. prepares bibliographies and guides to the literature for use in staff training and in classroom instruction. assists with bibliographic in structon and computerized reference services. serves as one of seven reference division resource persons in the sciences. respon­ sible for reference collection development in assigned areas. qualifi­ cations: ala/mls. academic background in the physical sciences or engineering required. second master’s degree in science-related field or two years of pre-professional library experience preferred. experience with online systems of bibliographic data retrieval desir­ able. salary: $16,000; $16,500 with second master’s degree. clos­ ing date for applications: november 1, 1984, or until suitable appli­ cant is found. for additional information and to apply, contact: susan s. lytle, head, personnel operations, university library, texas a&m university, college station, tx 77843. telephone (409) 845 8111. an eeo/aa employer. resource development librarian, social sciences. search extended. duties: responsible for collection development activities in the social science disciplines, including selection of mate­ rials, evaluation of collections, and intensive collection building in specific area (selected annually) of the total collection. responsible for monitoring of funds associated with collection development activ­ ities. works closely with approval plan personnel in refining approval plan profiles. works closely with teaching faculty in social science departments and colleges in collection building. participates in the formulation of resource development division policies and proce­ dures. responsible for gift and exchange operations. trains and su­ october 1984 / 517 pervises support staff. qualifications: ala/mls. minimum of two years professional (post-mls) experience. academic background in the social sciences required. knowledge of at least one foreign lan­ guage. familiarity with oclc and major bibliographic tools. super­ visory and organizational abilities. salary: minimum $18,000; nego­ tiable. benefits: up to $85/month paid on health, life, and disability insurance package; 87.3% of social security paid for first $16,500 of salary; choice of retirem ent plans in cluding tiaa/cref; tax deferred annuity program available; no state or local income taxes; 10.5 month appointment; faculty rank; 14 state holidays. closing date for applications: november 1,1984, or until suitable applicant is found. for additional information and to apply, contact: susan s. ly­ tle, head, personnel operations, university library, texas a&m uni­ versity, college station, tx 77843. telephone (409) 845-8111. an aa/eeo employer. senior serials cataloger. reports to head of cataloging department and is responsible for cataloging and classifying new serial titles and title changes; recataloging and/or classifying serial titles; training and directing one fte serials cataloger and training and supervising student assistants and support staff as required; as­ sisting in the development and implementation of serial cataloging policies/procedures and assisting head of department in maintain­ ing a department manual; serving as liaison for serial cataloging ac­ tivities with other units/departments within the library; directing ret­ rospective conversion of serials. ala-accredited mls, two years professional serials cataloging experience, experience with oclc, thorough knowledge of lc subject headings and classification, aacr 2 and 1, marc formats and cataloging conventions are re­ quired. experience with retrospective conversion of serials, knowl­ edge of one foreign language, and academic library experience are preferred. salary dep endent upon qualifications. m inimum: $17,760. faculty rank, twelve-month tenure-track position; tiaa/ cref, vacation of 22 working days. ksu, with an enrollment of 19,000 students, is located in the scenic flint hills of northeastern kansas. ksu libraries contains almost 1,000,000 cataloged vol­ umes and has a materials budget in excess of $1,500,000. deadline for application: november 15, 1984. send letter of application, re­ sume, and names and addresses of three relevant references to: ann scott, assistant director for administrative services, kansas state university libraries, manhattan, ks 66506; position available january 1, 1985. kansas state university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. serials, assistant department head. dartmouth col lege library is seeking qualified applicants for the newly created po­ sition of assistant head for the serials department, one of four biblio­ graphic control departments responsible for the technical services functions for the library system of eight libraries. the serials depart­ ment coordinates and maintains the acquisitions, bibliographic con­ trol and binding operations for the entire centrally received serials collection of 19,000 titles. under the general direction of the serials librarian, the assistant serials librarian is directly responsible for su­ pervising the bibliographic control activities of the department and coordinating bibliographic control activities for serials performed in other technical service areas with the bibliographic control opera­ tions of the serials department. provides administrative assistance to the department head and contributes to the planning and man­ agement of the department and bibliographic control. qualifications: required are an ala/mls; a minimum of three years post mls ex­ perience in an academic or research library, some of which must have been in serials cataloging or serials acquisitions; experience with rlin or another automated system; and familiarity with aacr2 and the lc interpretations as applied to serials. salary and rank com­ mensurate with experience and qualifications with a minimum salary of $18,500 for a librarian ii. send resume by october 31 to: phyllis e. jaynes, director of user services, 115 baker library, dartmouth college, hanover, nh 03755. dartmouth college is an aa/eeo/m/f o m n lr u / o r social sciences bibliographer. university center at binghamton libraries seeks a bibliographer/lnformation specialist to work as one of two social science subject specialists in the univer­ sity library, a research library with holdings of over 1,000,000 vol­ umes. the library uses rlin, geac, and oclc for bibliographic in­ formation and services. responsibilities include book selection in the core disciplines of sociology, economics and political science; fac­ ulty liaison; and reference/consultation services in the social sci­ ences, with the opportunity to help define the role of the library in the information age. the library has network affiliation with the re­ search libraries group and new york state 3r’s. qualifications: ala/mls; advanced degree in a social science; knowledge of two western european languages (german desirable); two-three years experience in information services in a research library, familiarity with online databases. minimum salary: $19,000 with liberal fringe benefits. appointment level and salary commensurate with experi­ ence. submit letter of application, resume, and three references by october 22, 1984, to: recruitment committee, library administra­ tive offices, glenn g. bartle library, university center at bingham­ ton, binghamton, ny 13901. eo/aae. support and training specialists. oclc, online com puter library center, inc., has immediate openings for support and training specialists within our marketing and user services division. the two position openings will provide support and training for oclc automated serials control and acquisitions components of the online system. responsibilities include developing instructional programs and materials to support networks’ training efforts, and presenting training workshops to promote effective use of the sys­ tem. the acquisitions position will also function as coordinator for o clc’s new dx (direct transmission) capability. the positions re­ quire an mls degree; three years of library experience; demon­ strated expertise in one of the oclc online subsystems (preferably serials control including union listing, or acquisitions); and demon­ strated verbal and written skills. minimum starting salary for both po­ sitions is $19,151 annually. oclc offers an excellent benefits pack­ age. interested parties should submit their resume complete with education, experience, and salary history/expectations to: employ­ ment representative, oclc, 6565 frantz rd., dublin, oh 43017. oclc is an equal opportunity employer. technical services librarian (search reopened) enthusi­ astic, creative candidate with ala-accredited mls sought to pro­ vide cataloging and acquisitions services in an lrc. experience or training in oclc highly desirable. interest in computer applications in the lrc essential. position will include some public services activi­ ties and involvement in college-wide activities. salary: $15,000; ex­ cellent benefits. send resume and vitae including details of com­ puter experience to: ellen i. watson, lrc director, arkansas college, p.o. box 2317, batesville, ar 72503. search closes no­ vember 7, 1984. arkansas college is an equal opportunity em­ ployer. qualified minorities are encouraged to apply. university librarian overseas. american university of beirut, lebanon, requires administrative head for the university li­ brary system consisting of 425,400 volumes, 3,721 current periodi­ cals, currently a professional staff of 11 and a student body of 5,000. ala-accredited mls required; additional masters or doctorate strongly preferred; minimum 7 years of professional experience in an academic research library including minimum 5 years in progres­ sively responsible administrative positions; a working knowledge of library technology and a well-demonstrated leadership and adminis­ trative ability, an awareness of current trends in higher education, a proven ability to work effectively with a research oriented faculty. a background knowledge of the middle east is deemed essential. po­ sition available immediately. salary range: $25,000-$30,000. can­ didates should send c.v. to: vice president of the university, ameri­ can university of beirut, beirut, lebanon. aub is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. assistant librarians. the papua new guinea university of technology, matheson library. applications are invited for two posts of assistant librarian in the matheson library's cataloging section. serving a student body of 1,100 and approximately 150 academic staff, the library holds 60,000 volumes and is adding 10,000 volumes a year. it serves as the major technological information center for papua new guinea and the south pacific. duties of the 518 / c &r l news posts include: original cataloging, revision of records procured from the australian marc records service, and the retrospective conversion of catalog records. limited evening and weekend duty in public services will also be required. applicants must hold either a degree in librarianship or a degree in another subject and an internationally recognized professional qualification in librarianship. the posts require familiarity with ddc19, aacr2, isbd and library of congress subject headings. preference will be given to applicants with experience in automated cataloging systems. salary: assistant librarian i: k12,920 per annum; assistant librarian ii: k14,385 per annum. (k1 = us $1.0806.) level of appointment will depend upon qualifications and experience. initial contract period is for three years. benefits include a gratuity of 24% taxed at 2%, appointment and repatriation fares, recreation leave fares for staff member and family after 18 months of service, settling-in and settling-out allowances, six weeks paid leave per year, education fares and assistance towards school fees, free housing, salary protection plan and medical benefits schemes are available. further information is available from the university librarian, mr. s.a. patchett, at the address below. detailed applications (two copies) with curriculum vitae, together with the names and addresses of three referees should be received by october 15, 1984, by the regristrar, png university of technology, private mail bag, lae, papua new guinea. assistant public services librarian. permanent tenure-track faculty appointment available january 1. duties include general reference service, library instruction, online database searching, selection of reference materials, and support of other public service functions as needed. schedule will include some evening and occasional weekend hours. requires ala-accredited mls, minimum 2 yrs. previous professional experience; ability to interact with students and faculty in a variety of subject areas essential. salary $17,000 minimum plus liberal faculty benefits including relocation assistance. send resume and three recent references to: robert l. burr, director, crosby library, gonzaga university, spokane, wa 99258. head, automated systems department. (position redefined). new department, reporting to associate director for technical services and automation. responsible for: managing department staff (1 prof, and 1 para-prof.); coordination of the library’s bibliographic and administrative systems, including dataphase alis ii system (data general mv8000 minicomputer), and 11 ibm pcs for administrative systems; developing comprehensive plans for systems operations;developingspecifications and coordinating recommendations for new hardware and software; developing functional specifications and overseeing programming or software purchase; developing systems security plan; overseeing routine departmental operations; working with automation vendors; conducting studies of proposed and existing systems; coordinating acceptance testing; assisting other departments in implementing systems and developing policies, procedures, and user documentation; assisting library department in training of automated systems; coordinating telecommunications (networking) requirements related to automation operation. qualifications: the following are preferred: experience in implementing automated systems within a library (including bibliographic maintenance, acquisitions, serials control, online catalogs or circulation); knowledge of current library and general hardware and software; ability to deal effectively with operational changes affecting systems, and library staff; analytical skills and the ability to provide creative and comprehensive solutions to problems; library and automation experience, as well as knowledge of the marc formats, oclc, and bibliographic control techniques; organizational flexibility; good oral and written communication skills; ability to work well within a large organization; ability to design and implement research studies; proven supervisory and october 1984 / 519 managerial skills; a record of professional development; knowledge of programming principles and the ability to revise programs (preferably miis/mumps); knowledge of or experience with analysis methods; sensitivity to the concerns of a research library. ala-accredited mls or ms in computer/information science required. environment: university library services, serving the 20,000 students of both the academic and medical campuses, employs the dataphase alis ii system for circulation and acquisition; plans are underway to use alis for the online catalogs, an authority and serials control. the database now contains over 375,000 bibliographic records. microcomputers are used for word processing, statistics, budgeting, database searching, etc. the materials expenditures for 1984/1985 is $1.94 million. salary: $25,000 minimum, depending on qualifications. applications: submit resume and the names and phone numbers of three current references by november 15 to: arnold hirshon, associate director for technical services and automation, cabell library, virginia commonwealth university, 901 park avenue, richmond, va 23284. virginia commonwealth is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. automated systems department librarian. reports to the head of this department. responsibilities: assist in the coordination of the library’s bibliographic and administrative systems, including dataphase, alis ii system (data general mv8000 minicomputer), and eleven ibm pcs for administrative system; write specifications for new hardware and software; write programs; evaluate software requests; perform acceptance testing; assist in implementation and in training of automated systems; assist in maintenance of computer hardware; write and maintain documentation; coordinate maintenance with service vendors. qualifications: the following are preferred: experience with automated systems in libraries (including bibliographic maintenance, acquisitions, serials control, online catalogs or circulation); knowledge of current library and general hardware and software; analytical skills; knowledge of the marc format, oclc, and bibliographic control techniques; good oral and written communication skills; record of professional development; knowledge of programming principles, and the ability to write programs in at least one high-level language (preferably miis/mumps); sensitivity to the concerns of a research library; ability to work well independently; ala-accredited mls or ms in computer/information science required. $19,000 minimum salary, depending on qualifications. see above advertisement for application details. deadline: november 15. bibliographic instruction librarian (readvertisement). major responsibility is to direct and expand the library instruction program. this includes the formal instruction, self-instruction, and faculty outreach programs. other responsibilities are to serve in a support capacity to the primary online search librarian, share in reference desk schedule (daily, evening, weekend), and collection development. requirements: ala-accredited mls, science or engineering degree or significant course work or experience, and good interpersonal and communication skills. position available immediately. initial screening of applications will begin november 1, 1984. minimum salary for this classification is $15,300; however, qualified candidates displaying previous related work experience or special qualifications may negotiate a salary within the first quartile of the salary range. please send letter of application, resume, and names of three references to: mr. lee j. lebbin, library, michigan technological university, houghton, mi 49931. applications accepted until position is filled. michigan technological university is an equal opportunity educational institution, equal opportunity employer. bibliographer for literatures of western europe and latin america. (readvertisement.) the university of california, santa cruz, is seeking a 520 / c&rl news service-oriented bibliographer to develop its collections in french, german, italian, spanish, and latin american literature, and history and social science of latin america. serves in the collection planning section and participates in formulating collection policies and procedures. provides general and specialized reference service. qualifications: mls or equivalent; fluency in french or spanish with a strong working facility in the other language and with working facility in german and italian desired; graduate level knowledge of a major european literature, french strongly preferred; a thorough understanding of scholars’ research needs and of the organization and accessibility of the relevant literature; broad interest in the humanities and social sciences, and interest in working with both undergraduate and graduate students. assistant librarian ($20,316-$25,992) or associate librarian ($24,828-$35,749). application deadline: november 15, 1984. send resume and names of three references to: katherine beiers, assistant university libarian, personnel, university of california, santa cruz, ca 95064. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. director of library automation. dartmouth college library is seeking qualified candidates for the position of director of library automation. responsibilities include planning, analysis, design and implementation of computer support systems for library operations; pursuing and developing experimental systems, such as the online catalog, serials receipt control, and circulation; coordinating library automation programs with national and regional efforts, such as rlg/rlin and nelinet; preparing grant applications and pursuing other sources of funding for computer support of library operations; and hiring, training and supervising library automation staff of 3 programmers. the successful candidate will have a proven effective management style and the ability to communicate equally well with the library personnel and the personnelin the campus computer center. qualifications: master’s degree in computer science, information science, or library science, with at least 5 years of progressively responsible experience with library automation systems and computer programming are required. prior experience in the design and implementation of library automation programs and with other library departments highly desirable. experience with unix highly desirable. salary and rank commensurate with experience and qualifications, with a minimum salary of $27,000. dartmouth college is an aa/eeo/m/f employer. please send resume to: phyllis e. jaynes, director of user services, 115 baker library, dartmouth college, hanover, nh 03755, before november 15, 1984. head catalog librarian. seek energetic growth-oriented professional for permanent tenure-track faculty appointment available december 1. responsible for overall management of wln-based cataloging unit processing approx. 10,000 titles/year; perform original cataloging with emphasis upon business, technology, and social sciences; supervise 1 professional and 3 support staff. requires ala-accredited mls, knowledge of a romance language, minimum 2 years previous experience in a professional position involving original cataloging, use of a bibliographic utility, and supervision. salary $17,000 minimum plus liberal faculty benefits including relocation assistance. send resume and three recent references to: robert l. burr, director, crosby library, gonzaga university, spokane, wa 99258. head of cataloging (search reopened.) reports to the director of library. supervises 1 professional, 1 paraprofessional, 3 technicians, and 5 student assistants. coordinates all cataloging activities using oclc, lc classification and aacr2 rules. may be asked to teach an undergraduate cataloging course. minimum requirements: mls from an ala-accredited institution; 4 years cataloging experience with two years in a supervisory october 1984 / 521 position in an academic setting. automated cataloging experience preferable. minimum salary: $23,000. arkansas state university is located in jonesboro, near ozark recreational areas and memphis, tennessee. tiaa/cref, 20 day‘s vacation on a 12-month contract, and group insurance. send letter of application, resume, and names of three references to: bill hansard, library director, p.0. box 2040, state university, ar 72467. applications accepted until a candidate is found. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. head of reader services. responsible for a progressive program of courserelated bibliographic instruction, online searching, and reference services and collection. also responsible for circulation and interlibrary loan. participates in collection development. ala-accredited mls, 3-5 years supervisory, reference, bi and online searching experience. demonstrated strong leadership, management and communication skills, with an active public services orientation. minimum salary: $20,000. apply by november 9 to: paula warnken, director of libraries, xavier university, 3800 victory parkway, cincinnati, oh 45207. xavier is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. head, technical services. lead, guide and direct technical services with heavy emphasis on cataloging, including copy/revision/original in oclc environment. required: ala/mls; 5 yrs. cataloging, with 3 under aacr2 in oclc (or equivalent); successful supervision of cat/tech services operation; thorough knowledge of aacr2, lcsh, marc, national cataloging standards. desired: science cataloging, science undergraduate, library automation; hiring salary: $28,000-$32,000. resume, application letter, statement (500 wds) on cat/tech services philosophy to: marsha r. kipperman, personnel, bldg. 185, brookhaven national laboratory, upton, li, ny 11973. position will remain open until filled; preference given to applications received by october 15. music curriculum librarian. responsible for the juvenile, curriculum, score, record, and av collections of a university library serving 6500 students. could involve some service responsibility or document or database searching. opportunity to teach section or required course in use of library resources. supervision of one clerical position in addition to student assistants. nights and weekend work expected. accredited mls required. bs in education with music background desirable. experience helpful but not required. annual salary $14,400+, depending upon qualifications and experience. excellent fringe benefits. open immediately. application, including resume, undergraduate and graduate transcripts, and two letters of recommendation should be sent by november 1, 1984, to: george n. hartje, director of libraries, pickier memorial library, northeast missouri state university, kirksville, mo 63501. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. personnel librarian, case western reserve university libraries. university libraries, an arl member, is composed of sears and freiberger libraries and is the largest unit in the case western reserve university library system, housing the collections in humanities and arts, social and behavioral sciences, engineering, science, management, and music. the collection contains over 1,500,000 items (bound volumes, government documents, and microforms) and includes over 7,000 current serial subscriptions. the staff includes 33 professionals and 44 non-professionals. the personnel librarian, a newly-created position, will, in accordance with established university and library policies, be responsible for planning, organizing, and coordinating activities related to the recruitment, employment, and staff development and training of all library personnel. responsibilities will include: recommending and assisting in the development, implementation, and review of library personnel policies and procedures; developing, coordinating, and evaluating library’s staff training and development programs; recruiting and reviewing applicants for librarian and staff positions; directing student employment activities; serving as the library’s principal liaison with the university’s human resource department, affirmative action office, and student employment office. required qualifications are an accredited mls and previous library experience in personnel at an administrative level. post-graduate work in personnel administration desired. salary from $18,000 depending on qualifications and experience. deadline for applications is november 1, 1984. send application, resume, and names of three references to: mary devocht-berges, department of human resources, case western reserve university, 10900 euclid ave, cleveland, oh 44106. case western reserve university is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. reference librarian. reports to the head, public services. is responsible for general reference work, bibliographic instruction, reference and general collection development and online database searching. supervision of circulation, interlibrary loan, and/or stack maintenance may be assigned in addition. qualifications: ala-accredited master’s degree and the ability to perform dialog searches are required. post-mls reference and bibliographic instruction experience in an academic library are preferred. circulation work experience is highly desirable. salary range: $18,000-$22,000. letter of application, resume, and names, addresses and telephone numbers of three current professional references should be sent by october 31, 1984, to: henry r. stewart, director, william allen white library, emporia state university, emporia, ks 66801. aa/eoe. reference librarian with specialization in chemical sciences. serves a student body of 16,000 and provides individual research guidance to graduate students, faculty, and research staff; teaches courses and selects materials in the chemical literature; prepares profiles and performs online searching. requires mls and degree in a chemical field. for appointment at assistant librarian level, salary range is $20,316-$25,992. send resume by october 15, 1984, to: margaret deacon, associate university librarian, personnel, university of california, santa barbara, ca 93106. ucsb is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. reference librarians. the library of the schools of theology in dubuque has two openings: one on the university of dubuque campus, the other on the wartburg theological seminary campus. mls from an ala-accredited institution required. theological training desirable. previous reference experience desirable. responsibilities include supervision of circulation, bibliographical instruction, online searching. salary: $15,000-$16,000. apply with resume and 3 references by november 1, 1984, to: duncan brockway, director of libraries std-ud, 333 wartburg place, dubuque ia 52001. serials librarian. reports to the head, technical services. is responsible for management of serials area with 2000 subscriptions. functions include: selection and acquisition record-keeping, supervision and maintenance of the serials collections in all formats; general collection development; information desk services including nights and weekends; and online database searching (dialog). qualifications: ala-accredited master’s degree is required. post-mls serials work experience in an academic library is preferred. some knowledge of microcomputers and/or serials automation is desirable. salary range: $18,000-$22,000. letter of application, resume, and names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three current professional references should be sent by october 31, 1984, to: henry r. stewart, director, william allen white library, emporia state university, emporia, ks 66801. aa/eoe. a n unprecedented resourcefro m the **w orld’s largest lib ra ry ” — t h e m a in c a ta lo g o f t h e l ib r a r y o f c o n g r e ss 1 8 9 8 —1 9 8 0 on microfiche • com plete d ictionary catalog w ith author, title, subject, series and related entries in a single alphabetical sequence. • 25,000,000 entries covering 7 vi m illion item s—books, pam phlets, periodicals and o th er serials cataloged by the library o f congress. • com plete bibliographic descriptions rep ro d u ced in their entirety. • subject access unavailable in the n a tio n a l u nion catalog. p u b lica tio n in in sta llm en ts 1984— 1987. silver halide and diazo editions available; reduction ratio 48:1. both 105mm roll fiche and standard 105mm x 148mm form at in p reparation. roll f i c h e ............. $ 14,900 * standard fiche . . $ 15,900* * prices f o r silver halide edition, p a ym ent in fu ll on receipt o ffirst shipment. for diazo edition a n d other p a ym ent options, please inquire. a detailed brochure is now in preparation; please con­ tact walter jaffe at 212 982-1302 for more information. k .g . s a u r i n c . 1 7 5 f if t h a v en u e n .y ., n .y .1 0 0 1 0 revised and enlarged 1985-86 edition encyclopedia of information systems and servicessixth edition • edited by john schmittroth, jr. now in two volumes: i n t e r n a t i o n a l . a pproxim ately 600 pages. 1,150 entries. 27 indexes. $165.00. pub. oct. 1984. inis, derwent, agris, inpadoc, telesystemes, and nearly 1,200 other international and national organizations, systems, and services located in some 70 countries (excluding the u.s.). u n i t e d s t a t e s . a p p ro x im ately 1,200 pages. 2,350 entries. 27 indexes. $190.00. pub. dec. 1984. inform ation systems, services, and organizations of inte rn atio n al, national, state, or regional scope located in the u.s. two-volume set, $325.00. t h is m assive tool is more th a n ever the world's leading guide to electronic inform ation system s and services. its highly detailed entries list and describe nearly 25,000 systems, services, products, and programs. included are over 400 online services and 3,600 databases, more th an in any other source. among the organizations covered... • publishers . . . associations . . . governm ent a g en c ie s... private firm s ... and others th a t produce databases. t he range includes bibliographic . . . non-bibliographic... o n lin e ... offline... commercial . . . g o v e rn m e n t. . . and private databases. • o nline com puter service organizations th a t can give access to databases in countless fields. • c o n s u lta n ts ... m arket research f irm s ... associa­ tio n s . . . and pu b licatio n s th a t can help you m ake profitable use of electronic inform ation. • videotex/teletext sy ste m s... telecom m unications netw orks . . . library system s .. . demographic and m arketing data firm s ... docum ent delivery sources . . . software products . . . the whole vast range of products and services th a t m ake up the dynam ic world of inform ation technology. detailed entries... entries cover: organization and system name, address, and p h o n e ... date esta b lish e d ... name and title of a dm inistrator . . . staff size . . . related organizations . . . detailed description . . . subject coverage . . . in p u t sources . . . holdings and storage m edia . . . publications . . . m icroform products and services . . . com puter-based products and services . . . o th er services (abstracting, consulting, data collection, sdi, research, etc.) . . . electronic mail netw ork address . . . and more. 27 indexes speed research... easy access is provided by indexes to organization names, subjects, types of services, etc. t he m aster index covers all 25,000 organizations, systems, services, databases, software products, and more. supplement also available... n ew inform ation system s and services is a soft bound, inter-edition supplem ent, $250.00. 5% d iscount for standing orders. all gale books are sent on 60-day approval. 5% discount for sending check w ith order. c ustom ers outside the u.s. and canada add 10%. g t a o or l der e by ph r one: e 80 s 0e 521 a -07 r 07 c . in h ca n co ada, m . book tower • d etroit, mi 48226 ichigan, alaska, and hawaii: 313-961-2242. acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries july /august 1986 / 471 and the way in which the discipline of history is organized. co-sponsored by the american his­ torical association and syracuse university. 18—automation: “designing specifications for an automated library system and preparing a re­ quest for proposals,” a workshop sponsored by the university of iowa school of library and in­ formation science, will be held at the ironmen inn, coralville, iowa. the instructor will be jo­ seph r. matthews. fee: $45. contact: ethel bloesch, slis, university of iowa, 3087 l i­ brary, iowa city, ia 52242; (319) 353-3644. 19–22— federal information: “government infor­ mation: an endangered resource of the elec­ tronic age,” an interactive state-of-the-art in­ stitu te th at com bines lectures by expert practitioners, group discussions, and study ses­ sions, will be held at the sheraton grand hotel, washington, d .c . the institute is sponsored by the special l ib ra ry a ssociation. keynote speaker will be steve bell, the anchor for abc’s world news this morning. fees: $350 for sla members; $400 for non-members. contact: sandy morton, special libraries association, 1700 18th st., n .w . , washington, dc 20009; (202) 234-4700. the classified ads deadlines: orders for regular classified advertisements must reach the acrl office on or before the second of the month preced­ ing publication of the issue (e.g. september 2 for the october issue). late job listings will be accepted on a space-available basis after the second of the month. rates: classified advertisements are $5.00 per line for acrl members, $6.25 for others. late job notices are $12.00 per line for members, $14.00 for others. organizations submitting ads will be charged according to their membership status. telephone: all telephone orders should be confirmed by a writ­ ten order mailed to acrl headquarters as soon as possible. orders should be accompanied by a typewritten copy of the ad to be used in proofreading. an additional $10 will be charged for ads taken over the phone (except late job notices or display ads). guidelines: for ads which list an application deadline, that date must be no sooner than the 20th day of the month in which the notice appears (e.g., october 20 for the october issue). all job announce­ ments should include a salary figure. job announcements will be edited to exclude discriminatory references. applicants should be aware that the terms faculty rank and status vary in meaning among institutions. jobline: call (312) 944-6795 for late-breaking job ads for aca­ demic and research library positions. a pre-recorded summary of positions listed with the service is revised weekly; each friday a new tape includes all ads received by 1:00 p.m. the previous day. each listing submitted will be carried on the recording for two weeks. the charge for each two-week listing is $30 for acrl members and $35 for non-members. fast job listing service: a special newsletter for those actively seeking positions. this service lists job postings received at acrl headquarters four weeks before they appear in c&rl news, as well as ads which, because of narrow deadlines, will not appear in c&rl news. the cost of a six-month subscription is $10 for acrl mem­ bers and $15 for non-members. contact: classified advertising d ep’t, acrl, american library association, 50 e. huron st., chicago, il 60611; (312) 944-6780. wanted used 60 or 72 drawer card catalog. call or write frank baudonnet, shields library, university of california-davis, davis, ca 95616; (916) 752-2110. wanted from libraries. american and foreign newspapers, bound, 1700-1975; u.s. pamphlets, 1700-1945; scholarly book collections in liberal arts (particularly 20th century american litera­ ture), popular scholarly periodicals and magazines. the caren ar­ chive. p.o. box 303, nanuet, ny 10954; (914) 624-3693. positions open archivist (2 positions), university of southern mississippi. the ccain library and archives maintains the primary research collec­ ions of the university and has been selected as a host institution for he nhprc archival fellowship program. 1) city archivist/assistant rchivist will be responsible for the city of hattiesburg archives and ecords management program (approx. 50% of time) as well as as­ isting with the university archives. qualifications: accredited mls or equivalent) with archival training, 1–3 years experience with mi­ rographics records management and institutional archives. experi­ nce with local government records desirable. 2) assistant archivist ill assist with both the university archives and historical manu­ cripts program. position is presently a one year appointment with ossibility for renewal. qualifications: accredited mls (or equivalent) ith archival training, 1–3 years experience in administering histori­ al manuscripts collections and institutional archives. knowledge of outhern history desirable. salaries dependent on qualifications. ac­ demic appointments. submit resume and names of 3 references to: erry s. latour, mccain library and archives, university of southern ississippi, southern station box 5148, hattiesburg, ms 39406; 601) 266-4348. review of applications will begin july 15,1986, and ontinue until positions are filled. u.s.m. is an equal opportunity, af­ irmative action employer. ssistant music special services librarian, univer ity of illinois library at urbana-champaign. a permanent position vailable august 21,1986. under general direction of music special ervices librarian, primarily responsible for original cataloging of usic scores, microforms, and sound recordings for the music li­ rary; paticipation in providing reference services; collection devel­ pment responsibilities, including liaison with academic depart­ ents. required qualifications: mls from ala-accredited school. a in music with evidence of formal coursework in music history. ex­ erience in modern cataloging practices, including knowledge of acr2, marc tagging, lc classification, and lc subject headings. eading knowledge of german. evidence of ability to meet general niversity requirements for promotion and tenure. other preferred nd desired qualifications: complete job description mailed upon re­ uest. librarians have faculty rank. salary $19,000 upward for apclassified display rates to rise the following rates for display classified ads will be in effect with the september 1986 issue: one-quarter page, $220; three-eighths page, $260; one-half page, $300; and greater than one-half page, $345. rates for the regular classifieds, the late job listings, the fast job listing service, and the jobline will remain the same. m t t a r s ( c e w s p w c s a t m ( c f a s a s m b o m b p a r u a q 472 / c & rl news pointment as assistant professor, and $24,000 upward for appoint­ ment as associate professor, depending on qualifications and scholarly credentials. send letter of application and complete re­ sume with names, addresses, and telephone numbers of 5 refer­ ences to: allen g. dries, library personnel manager, university of illinois library, 127 library, 1408 w. gregory dr., urbana, il 61801; (217) 333-8169. applications and nominations deadline is august 15, 1986. aa/eeo employer. assistant reference librarian, general reference ser vices, north texas state university libraries, denton, texas. posi­ tion description: the assistant reference librarian provides refer­ ence services to students, faculty, and other patrons of the collection in the university libraries under the direct supervision of the head of general reference services. this position will also supervise the mi­ croforms/periodicals unit with 5 library assistants; serve at the refer­ ence and microforms/periodicals desks; provide bibliographic in­ struction and perform online searching. minimum qualifications: this position requires an mls from an ala-accredited library school and 2 to 3 years experience in the reference component of an aca­ demic library or a large public library. a combination of supervisory experience, reference desk experience, good communication and interpersonal skills, teaching experience and enthusiasm for library instruction is being sought. some experience with microforms or se­ rials would be desirable. a vailable august 1, 1986. salary: $17,592–$18,168. applicants should send a resume, copies of all transcripts, and the names and addresses of 3 references before au­ gust 31, 1986, to: margaret e. galloway, associate director of li­ braries, north texas state university, p.o. box 5188, n.t. station, denton, tx 76203. north texas state university is an equal opportu­ nity, affirmative action employer. assistant reference librarian, north texas state univer sity libraries. denton, texas. position description: the assistant ref­ erence librarian provides reference services to students, faculty, and other patrons of the collection in the university libraries under the direct supervision of the head of general reference services. this position involves a variety of bibliographic and consultative du­ ties including library instruction and database searching. minimum qualifications: an entry-level position with little or no experience ex­ pected; mls from an ala-accredited library school; and an under­ graduate subject specialty in the humanities, the social sciences, business or education. desirable qualifications: experience at a pub­ lic service desk, knowledge of database searching techniques, and teaching experience. available: septem ber 1, 1986. salary: $16,536. applicants should send a resume, copies of all transcripts, and the names and addresses of 3 references before august 15, 1986, to: margaret e. galloway, associate director of libraries, north texas state university, p.o. box 5188, n.t. station, denton, tx 76203. north texas state university is an equal opportunity, af­ firmative action employer. authorities/online catalog maintenance librar­ ian. kent state university library is a member of arl, uses oclc, and is implementing notis. the successful candidate will be re­ sponsible for the intellectual content of the name, series, uniform title and subject authority files and for maintaining authority control in the online catalog. recommends authority procedures and helps estab­ lish authority policy. serves as an authority resource person for cata­ logers and other technical services staff. oversees online catalog maintenance activities including correction of errors in bibliographic and holdings records, elimination of duplicate records and process­ ing of routine adds, withdrawals and transfers. supervises a staff of three paraprofessionals. qualifications: required: mls from an ala-accredited library school. desirable: 2 years experience, in­ cluding authority work, in the cataloging department of an academic library. experience with the library of congress online authority file, library of congress subject headings, and marc formats. familiar­ ity with a bibliographic utility and a local automated system. knowl­ edge of one or more foreign languages. supervisory experience. this is a tenure track position. the successful candidate must dem­ onstrate the ability to meet faculty reappointment, tenure, and pro­ motion criteria. minimum salary $19,566 with initial salary and aca­ d e m ic rank c o m m en su ra te with e d u c a tio n and e xp erie n ce. deadline for applications is september 1,1986. send letter of appli­ cation, resume, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three references to: harry kamens, budget & personnel officer, kent state university library, kent, oh 44242. kent state university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. bibliographic instruction coordinator (search ex tended). under the direction of the head of reference, plans, coordi­ nates, and evaluates the library’s bibliographic instruction program. in addition, works with eight reference librarians in providing general reference service and freshman library orientation. other responsi­ bilities include reference consultation service, online searching, bib­ liographic instruction, and collection development in the subject ar­ eas of history, language, and political science. qualifications: ala/mls, two years successful public service experience required. demonstrated ability to plan, develop, coordinate, and evaluate bib­ liographic instruction program; excellent oral and written communi­ cation skills; and ability to work effectively with the public and cochief, serials department stanford university libraries the chief, serials department is responsible for the m anagement of acquisitions and cataloging pro­ cesses for serial publications, for coordinating these with other technical processing functions and with the collection development program, and is expected to play an important role in general library planning as a senior library officer. we are seeking candidates who have significant expertise and experience in serials processes; a breadth of experience and understanding of processes in a research library environment; strong m anage­ ment skills; leadership abilities and a flexibility of approach towards changing departmental responsibilities and assignments; the ability to contribute effectively to the overall m anagement of technical services. mls or the equivalent in training and/or experience, effective communication skills, and awareness of autom a­ tion trends. appointm ent will be at the librarian ($31,300–$46,300) or senior librarian ($36,500-353,300) rank de­ pending upon experience and qualifications. apply before august 8, 1986. cite #282crl on all corre­ spondence. send com plete cover letter and resume, with the names of three references to: carolyn j. henderson library personnel o fficer stanford university libraries stanford, ca 94305 eoe/aa july /august 1986 / 473 workers highly desirable. experience in online searching and microcomputer application and experience in media design and production desirable. master’s in relevant subject field preferable. faculty status, tenure-track appointment, and good benefits. salary range: $19,000–$25,000. the robert muldrow cooper library is an important research support facility with a collection of 13,500 serial titles and 1,260,000 volumes. the staff includes 23 librarians and 60 support staff. candidates applying by august 18 will receive first consideration. send letters of application with resume and names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three references to: chair, bibliographic instruction coordinator search committee, robert muldrow cooper library, clemson university, clemson, sc 29634 3001. an eeo/aa employer. bibliographic instruction librarian. the university of evansville is seeking a librarian to coordinate and participate in an active bibliographic instruction program. responsibilities include planning and developing the instruction program, presenting class­ room and workshop lectures, providing reference service (nights and weekends included), and conducting and coordinating online searches. good communication skills, the ability to work effectively with faculty and colleagues, and teaching and administrative talent are essential. a bąckground in science and experience in online searching is h i g h l y desirable. the position requires the mls from an ala-accredited library school and an energetic commitment to ser­ vice. the university of eva n s v ille is an independent, coeducational, methodist-affiliated institution located in a metropolitan area of south­ western indiana. enrollment num be r 3,500 fuiland parttime stu­ dents. the university has recently com ple t e d a new addition to the library, totally converted its database, and is in the final stages of in­ stalling the notis automation system. (the online catalog, acquisi­ tions and cataloging are operational.) the library’s collections total over 300,000 items. faculty rank will be based upon qualifications. minimum salary is $17,500, with a 12 month contract. the applica­ tion deadline is august 1, 1986, with the position available septem­ ber 1, 1986. send application, resume, and three current letters of reference to: g rady morein, university librarian, university of evansville, 1800 lincoln avenue, evansville, in 47722; (812) 479 2376. the university of evansville is an equal opportunity, affirma­ tive action employer. cataloger, japanese language materials, c.v. starr east asian library, columbia university. this position reports di­ rectly to the flead of technical services, east asian library, and has primary responsibility for the cataloging of japanese-language serial and m onographic materials through the rlin cjk system, including both original and copy cataloging. other responsibilities include the training and revising the work of bibliographic assistants and provid­ ing assistance in reference and other units. in addition to an accred­ ited mls, requirements are fluency in spoken and written japanese, english communication skills; relevant bibliographic experience; and familiarity with the rlin system, aacr2, lc classification and subject headings. knowledge of the japanese culture, scholarship, and book trade, skills in chinese and/or korean languages, and pre­ vious relevant professional experience are desirable. applications should be submitted to the library personnel office, box 35, butler library, columbia university libraries, 535 w. 114th st., new york, ny 10027. applicants should list three references and salary re­ quirements. deadline for applications is august 1, 1986. salary ranges for 1986/7 are: librarian i: $22,000–$28,600; librarian ii: $24,000–$32,400. an equal opportunity, affirmative action em­ ployer. cataloging librarian. assistant professor (tenure-leading). processing department, starting november 1. the successful candi­ date will be responsible for cataloging print and non-print mono­ graphic materials in the humanities and social sciences and assist with music materials, editing non-library of congress copy from the oclc database, making series decisions and doing name authority work for assigned subject and language areas, acting as a resource person for cataloging assistants in assigned subject areas and for­ eign languages, and special assignments as necessary. required: mls from an ala-accredited library school, familiarity with oclc or similar cataloging utility, knowledge of lc classification, lc subject headings, and aacr2 course work at the undergraduate or gradu­ ate level in music history and/or music theory, and a good working knowledge of one western european language. preferred: profes­ sional and/or preprofessional cataloging experience and a second foreign language. $17,500 minimum for a twelve-month contract. salary may be higher depending upon the qualifications of the suc­ cessful applicant. apply with full resume plus names and current ad­ resses/telephone numbers of three references by august 15 to: ent hendrickson, dean of libraries, 106 love library, university of ebraska-lincoln, lincoln, ne 68588-0410. affirm ative action, qual opportunity employer. ataloging librarian. entry level position responsible for riginal and complex variant cataloging of monographs and non­ ook materials in all subject areas. will assist in training new staff, evising original cataloging, and complex authority work. ucr uses clc, aacr2 and lc interpretations, lc subject headings, and lc lassification in cataloging, and contributes to melvyl, the univer­ ity of california’s online union catalog. requires: graduate library egree or equivalent. working knowledge of at least one foreign lan­ uage preferred, in this order of preference: spanish, french, rus­ ian, german. cataloging training or experience and familiarity with arc formats highly desirable. appointment salary: $22,872. send tter of application, resume, and list of 3 professional references to: ohn w. tanno, acting university librarian, university of california, iverside, p.o. box 5900, riverside, ca 92517. application dead­ ne: august 15, 1986. the university of california is an equal em­ loyment opportunity, affirmative action employer. hemistry librarian. has primary responsibility for the overall peration of the chemistry library, including collection develop­ ent; works in general reference services and performs biblio­ raphic duties in chemistry and related areas. required: mls from n ala-accredited library school; degree in chemistry, chemical en­ ineering or sciences, or equivalent experience in chemistry. prefer­ ed: reading knowledge of a foreign language; knowledge of online earching in brs or dialog; experience in science librarianship or eference in an academic library; supervisory experience with the bility to make independent judgm ents and to organize work. salary ange: $21,864–$27,312. applications, resumes, and letters of ref­ rence should be sent to: virginia f. toliver, director of library per­ onnel and adm inistrative services, w ashington university li­ raries, st. louis, mo 63130 by ju ly 31, 1986. w ashington niversity is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. urator of books and printed materials. the essex nstitute, a regional historical agency with research library, museum, istoric houses, and publications functions, seeks a librarian special­ ing in american history (primarily new england materials). super­ ise other staff in day-to-day operations; responsible for acquisitions, ataloging and preservation of book collections; promotion of col­ ge and library use through public programs, exhibition, and publi­ ation. plan for online cataloging. qualifications: mls, courseworkin merican history required; good communication skills; some super­ isory experience. salary range: $18,000–$20,000. starting date ctober 1, 1986. send resume and names of 3 current references : anne farnam, president, essex institute, 132 essex st., salem, a 01970. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. urriculum materials librarian. university of georgia ibraries. entry level position. recent graduates may have the op­ ortunity to participate in a special staff developm ent program nded by the council on library resources. duties: responsible for e development and management of services and collections of the urriculum materials center located in the college of education; rovides reference and instructional services; selects and evaluates urriculum materials, including children’s and young adults’ litera­ re; serves as a liaison to the college of education faculty; partici­ ates in the cataloging process for curriculum materials at the main ibrary; supervises one support staff. reports to the education bibli­ grapher, social sciences department. the department is com ­ osed-of four librarians, three computer information specialists, ree support staff, and student assistants. qualifications: ala ccredited mls; ability to establish and maintain effective coopera­ ve relationships with colleagues, faculty, and library users; interest bibliographic instruction; effective oral and written communication kills; undergraduate degree in education or equivalent educational ackground preferred; teaching experience in the grades k– 12 ange desired; interest in cataloging and bibliographic control and rganization of library materials desired; strong interest in academic brarianship desired. salary minimum: $17,200. application proce­ ures: send letter of application by august 15, 1986, including re­ ume and names of three references to: john sutherland, adminis­ ative office, main library, university of georgia libraries, athens, a 30602. this position will be filled only if suitable applicants are und. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. d k n e c o b r o c s d g s m le j r li p c o m g a g r s r a r e s b u c i h iz v c le c a v o to m c l p fu th c p c tu p l o p th a ti in s b r o li d s tr g fo 474 / c & rl news east asian librarian. the university of chicago library seeks a librarian with advanced training in east asian studies to manage its east asian collections. directly supervises librarian bibliographers for chinese, japanese and korean, the head of cataloging, and the public services coordinator. responsibilities include: developing and maintaining collections of over 400,000 volumes in chinese, japanese, korean, manchu, mongol and tibetan, and western lan­ guages from and about east asia; providing bibliographic asistance to users; administering technical processing and public services op­ erations. candidate should have: accredited library school degree and at least a master’s degree in east asian studies; at least 5 years of experience in a research library; thorough acquaintance with the bibliography and research methodology of east asian studies; expe­ rience with applications of automation and networking for east asian libraries. good to fluent knowledge of modern and classical chinese or japanese and working knowledge of french and german re­ quired. familiarity with other asian languages desirable. salary range beginning at $25,000, depending on experience and qualifi­ cations. send letter of application, resume, and names, addresses and telephone numbers of of 3 references to: search committee for east asian librarian, c/o andrew waters, personnel officer, univer­ sity of chicago library, 1100 e. 57th st., chicago, il 60637. receipt of applications before september 1,1986, will assure consideration. we anticipate filling the position before january 1987. the university of chicago is an equal opportunity employer. engineering librarian. available: september 1, 1986. de­ scription: faculty position in the collection development division. responsible for selecting, reviewing and developing engineering science collections. works closely with engineering faculty to meet their library needs. also provides specialized reference and re­ search services in all areas of engineering. includes assisting with the bibliographic instruction program and serving on library commit­ tees. qualifications: an mls degree from an ala-accredited library school and an undergraduate degree in engineering are required and a graduate degree in a physical science area is highly desirable. good written and oral communication skills are required as well as skills in reference service. must be willing to maintain the highest standards of honor, integrity, and morality as taught by the church of jesus christ of latter-day saints, including abstinence from alco­ holic beverages, tobacco, tea and coffee. salary & benefits: faculty status, generous insurance and retirement benefits. salary range is $20,000 and up depending on qualifications. this is a twelve month appointment with twenty-two days annual leave and additional pro­ fessional development time available. deadline for application: au­ gust 1,1986. to apply: send resume and names of three references to patti jo findley, personnel officer, 3080 hbll, brigham young university, provo, ut 84602. evening reference librarian. indiana university of penn­ sylvania seeks a public service oriented librarian to work with users in general reference in an evening reference capacity. this is a new position to the reference unit which will start in september, 1986. librarians with an academic and/or work background in a natural science, economics, business, sociology, or psychology are particu­ larly encouraged to apply. iup is the fifth largest four-year university in pennsylvania and the largest in the state system of higher educa­ tion with an enrollment of nearly 13,000 students on its main campus and two branches. the university, employing over 1,300 employ­ ees, including a faculty of approximately 700, consists of six colleges and two schools and offers more than 100 majors within 40 depart­ ments. just 50 miles northeast of pittsburgh, iup is located in the foothills of the allegheny mountains in indiana, pa, a community of 35,000 residents. the university libraries participate in oclc and dialog, subscribe to 4,500 periodical titles, and contain 560,000 volumes, 180,000 government publications, and 1.6 million items of microforms. the libraries are a depository for pennsylvania state publications and are a select depository for u.s. government publi­ cations. media holdings and services are extensive. the position re­ quires an ala-accredited mls, training or experience in online bib­ liographic searching, and strong communication/teaching skills. applicants with a subject background on the graduate level in the areas of natural sciences, economics, business, sociology, or psy­ chology will be preferred. the person appointed will be expected to assist with bibliographic instruction, serve as a liaison to subject-area departments/colleges, and participate in collection development. work consists primarily of evening and mıd-to-late afternoon hours, weekends on a rotating basis, and other duties as assigned. ap­ pointment for this nine-month, tenure-track position will be either in­ structor or assistant professor. the salary will be within the $17,198 to $23,048 range. additional summer hours are expected to be avail­ able. librarians have full faculty status and rank. send letter of appli­ cation, resume, and names/addresses/telephone number of three references by july 21,1986, to chairperson, evening reference li­ brarian search committee, university libraries, iup, indiana, pa 15705-1096. iup is an affirmative action, equal opportunity em­ ployer. head, circulation department. responsible for supervi­ sion of all aspects of circulation of the general collection (1.1 million vols.); determining departmental policies; hiring, training, and evalu­ ating circulation staff (10 full-time, 11 part-time, and 72 student assis­ tants); general supervision of stacks management unit, student pay­ roll, reserve room, and current periodical display. responsible for building security and exit control. will participate in selection and im­ plementation of automated library system, and in planning for build­ ing expansion. strong organizational, interpersonal, and communi­ cations skills essential. ala-accredited mls required, supervisory and library experience preferred, automated systems experience desirable. salary and rank dependent on qualifications and experi­ ence, $18,000 minimum. 12-month, tenure-track, tiaa/cref, 22 days annual leave, many other fringe benefits. position available june 1, 1986. applications accepted until a suitable candidate is found. as the major academic research institution in the state, the university of arkansas, fayetteville, a land-grant university, offers a full range of undergraduate, graduate, and professional degrees. located in scenic northwest arkansas, fayetteville is a university town of 40,000 in a picturesque setting in the foothills of the ozarks, an unspoiled region with clean air, a temperate climate, and a variety of cultural and recreational opportunities. letter of application and curriculum vitae, with the names of three references should be sub­ mitted to: john a. harrison, director, university libraries, university of arkansas, fayetteville, ar 72701. the university of arkansas is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. head, louisiana and lower mississippi valley his­ torical collections, lsu libraries. anticipated vacancy october 1,1986. reports to the assistant director for special collec­ tions, participates in the general administration of lsu’s special col­ lections program, and is specifically responsible for administering all aspects of the louisiana and lower mississippi valley historical col­ lections. required: mls from an ala-accredited program; a mini­ mum of three years experience in the management of special collec­ tions, including book, manuscript and photograph collections; familiarity with the applications of automated technologies to special collections operations; familiarity with donor relations and rare book trade; demonstrated managerial ability; strong interpersonal skills and effectiveness in both oral and written communication. desired: additional advanced degree in history or related discipline record of active professional involvement; familiarity with the history of louisi­ ana and the south. salary competitive, commensurate with qualifica­ tions and experience, $25,000 minimum. review of applications will begin august 1,1986. letter of application, resume, and names, ad­ dresses and phone numbers of at least three references to: sharon a. hogan, director of libraries, middleton library, louisiana state university, baton rouge, la 70803-3300. lsu is an equal opportu­ nity employer. head of cataloging department, associate librarian 12 month, tenure-track position. minimum salary $35,004, plus any au­ thorized salary increase for 1986/87. reports to the library director. administers the cataloging department, supervises 2 professional catalogers and 8 support staff. establishes cataloging policies and procedures; responsible for creation, management, maintenance, quality and consistency of the library’s bibliographic and machine readable files. maintains communication with other library depart­ ments and personnel. requires ala-accredited mls degree and 7 years progressive cataloging experience in an academic library. knowledge of and progressive experience in automated biblio­ graphic utilities (oclc preferred), lc classification, lcsh, aacr2, marc formats for monographs, serials, etc., is essential. demon­ strated ability in written and oral communication skills required. must have knowledge of and demonstrated ability in automated library functions. additional knowledge and experience with clsi, innov acq, and online public access catalogs preferred. administrative experience as head of a cataloging department or unit preferred. a master's degree in a subject field is required for tenure or promotion. letter of application, current resume, and 3 letters of reference should be sent to: charles r. beymer, interim library director, rob­ ert e. kennedy library, california polytechnic state university, san july /august 1986 / 475 luis obispo, ca 93407. deadline for applications is august 31, 1986. position available november 1, 1986. california polytechnic state university is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. hebraica catalog librarian. catalog monographs and se­ rials in hebrew and yiddish using aacr2 and lc classification/sub­ ject headings and participate in hebraica retrospective conversion on rlin database. mls, background in jewish studies and fluency in h ebrew essential. 2 year position funded by grant. salary $18,000 + , depending on experience. applications due by septem­ ber 1, 1986. please send resume and 3 letters of reference to mr. r. gilroy, brandeis university library, waltham, ma 02254. an equal opportunity employer. institute of jazz studies librarian, rutgers university available: october 1, 1986. reporting to director of dana library through the director of the institute of jazz studies, is responsible for collection development and technical discographic services of the institute’s library and archives—including acquisitions, organization, preservation, and cataloging of materials. the institute contains the largest and most comprehensive archive of jazz and jazz-related ma­ terials in the world. it provides services and resources to rutgers fac­ ulty and students, to jazz scholars and musicians from the united states and abroad, and to the general public. specific responsibili­ ties will include: maintaining and revising specifications for comput­ erized cataloging of sound recordings; overseeing production of jazz register and indexes; developing and maintaining effective working relationships with other archives of recorded music and with professional organizations concerned with music librarianship and cataloging of recorded music; and submitting grant proposals and directing grant-funded projects. shared responsibility for providing reference and other public services. research, publication, involve­ ment in professional organizations, and participation in committee work at rutgers are encouraged and expected. mls from ala accredited library school required. knowledge of music (with a spe­ cial emphasis on jazz and popular forms) and significant experience in computerized cataloging of sound recordings is required. experi­ ence in developing and administering grants and in preservation of both print and non-print materials is highly desirable. $25,907 and up, dependent upon experience and qualifications. faculty status, calendar year appointment, tiaa/cref, life/health insurance, 22 days vacation, tuition remission, prescription drug/dental/eyeglass reimbursement plan. submit resume and three sources for current references by august 1, 1986 to: barbara e. sanders-harris, (app 113), personnel officer, alexander library, rutgers university, new brunswick, nj 08903. an equal opportunity, affirmative action em­ ployer. librarian, lewis walpole library, a unit of the yale university li­ braries. responsible for the organization, interpretation, conserva­ tion, and security of the collections of rare books, manuscripts, paint­ ings, drawings, prints and furniture; and for the maintenance of chief librarian queensland institute of technology brisbane, australia applications are invited for the position of chief librarian of the institute, the queensland institute of technology has 9,500 students in the schools of business studies, engineer­ ing, health science, applied science, com puting studies and law. the cam pus is located in the central business district of the city of brisbane. the institute library presently comprises a collection of 150,000 monographs, 6,000 serial titles and an extensive collection of non-book materials. these closely reflect the teaching and research activities of the seven schools of the institute. the collection is generally integrated and centralized, except for a separate library serving the school of law. the library comprises a staff of 59 full-time equivalents and for 1986 has a total budget of $2.6 million. preliminary planning is underway for its extension into additional space in the same building in 1988 and beyond. the library has a high profile in the application and developm ent of library technology, being full partici­ pant in the australian bibliographic network, and running the date phase alis ii system and online cata­ log. an advanced online reference service is a major feature of its present range of services. the successful applicant will provide leadership in all areas of library management, including long-range strategic planning, all personnel and staff developm ent matters, all aspects of financial support for institute academ ic planning, and the provision of library support for institute academ ic planning and research activi­ ties. applicants should be conversant with the latest developments in library technology. the position is graded at head of school iii at an annual salary of $aus 53,130. assistance will be pro­ vided to meet the costs of relocation. applicants should possess appropriate academ ic and professional qualifications and experience at a senior level in a large library. further details of the position and the library are available on application from the personnel manager, queensland institute of technology. applications quoting three referees should reach: the personnel m anager q ueensland institute of technology g .p.o . box 2434 brisbane 4001 q ueensland, australia by august 29, 1986. an equal opportunity employer houses and grounds of the lewis walpole library. supervises staff of four. the library, located in farmington, connecticut, is an excep­ tional collection of eighteenth century materials. qualifications: mls from ala-accredited school. knowledge of eighteenth century liter­ ature, history, and the arts. experience with rare books and manu­ scripts. reading ability in french and/or german desirable. ability to work effectively with library users and staff. excellent communication skills. salary from $22,300, dependent upon qualifications and ex­ perience. to be assured consideration, submit resume and names of 3 references by august 1,1986, to linda green, assistant person­ nel librarian, box 1603a yale station, new haven, ct 06520. yale is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. map and assistant science librarian. southern illinois university at carbondale, morris library. serves as map librarian in charge of 210,000 maps and aerial photos (about two-third time) and assistant science librarian (about one-third time). required qualifi­ cations: ala-accredited mls; bachelor’s degree in geography or a science, or experience with maps and bachelor’s degree involving coursework in the hard sciences. preferred qualifications: reading capability in german or french (preferred) or other foreign lan­ guage, additional graduate degree in geography or science. faculty rank, full-time, tenure-track position at the assistant or associate pro­ fessor rank. liberal fringe benefits. salary of $19,000 and up based upon education and experience. position available september 1, 1986. recruitment will remain open until the position is filled. review of applications began june 15, 1986; however, applications re­ ceived after that date are encouraged. send applications and names and address of three references to george black, chairperson, map librarian-assistant science librarian search committee, science division, morris library, southern illinois university at carbondale, il 62901; (618) 453-2700. the university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. principal catalog librarian. the university of arizona li­ brary is seeking a principal catalog librarian to serve as the catalog­ university of the west indies st. augustine, trinidad applications are invited for four (4) posts of li­ brarian ill/assistant librarian in the university li­ braries to be assigned to the faculty of medical sci­ ences library in the following areas: (i) reference & loans; (ii) cataloger; (iii) acquisitions; (iv) audio visual all applicants should have: (1) a good first degree, preferably in the biological/biom edical sci­ ences (for positions (i) and (ii) this is essential) and (2) a professional qualification in library/inform a­ tion science. relevant experience in academ ic or research-oriented libraries is essential; experience in medical sciences libraries would be an advan­ tage. w orking knowledge of one or more foreign languages is highly desirable. annual salary ranges: librarian iii (lecturer level): tt$54,708–$77,604; assistant librarian (as­ sistant lecturer level): tt$45,480–$52,008. hous­ ing, pension, passages. send detailed applications, naming three refer­ ences, to the registrar from whom further details are available. r egistrar the university of the w est indies st. a ugustine trinidad, w .l. ing department’s authority on aacr2 interpretation and assist in solving difficult bibliographic problems. the principal catalog li­ brarian supervises the member copy cataloging section, which consists of 7 library assistants, and also assists in coordinating the training and writing the policy and procedure manuals for the mem­ ber copy cataloging and lc copy cataloging sections. the princi­ pal catalog librarian chairs the library’s cataloging policy board, an interdepartmental committee to establish cataloging policy. the principal cataloger also catalogs materials in a defined subject area, and is actively involved in planning for an online catalog. require­ ments include an ala-accredited degree; minimum of four years ex­ perience as a catalog librarian in a research library; demonstrated knowledge of aacr2, lc classification, lcsh, and marc tagging; excellent oral and written communication skills; ability to work effec­ tively in a flexible environment. working knowledge of one foreign language, and demonstrated managerial experience preferred. sal­ ary: $21,500 or higher, depending on qualifications. librarians at the university of arizona have academic professional status, are voting members of the faculty, have 12-month appointments with 22 days of vacation, 12 days of sick leave, and 10 holidays. applications re­ ceived by august 15, 1986, will receive first consideration. send let­ ter of application, resume, and the names of 3 references to: w. david laird, university librarian, university of arizona library, tus­ con, az 85721. position available immediately. the university of ar­ izona is an eeo/aa employer. reference librarian for humanities, university of ala bama at birmingham. the sterne library at the university of ala­ bama at birmingham is accepting applications for a reference li­ brarian for humanities. the position provides specialized reference assistance to library users in the humanities, supports the general reference services and works closely with the faculty in the area of collection development. the reference-bibliographer is responsible to the head of reference. duties include collection development for the school of humanities. management of a library materials budget for the subject area of responsibility. close and effective interaction with the teaching faculties with an active and progressive interest in furthering the objectives of the library and the university is a primary responsibility. an equally important responsibility of the position is providing effective service to the library user. an active concern for the student’s academic progress is reflected through a service oriented approach to the user combined with up-to-date knowledge of the subject fields. information must be effectively organized and communicated when formal instruction in the use of the library is pre­ sented. requirements: an mls from an ala-accredited library school and previous library experience is required; a degree in a hu­ manities subject area is highly preferred. appointment: the position is available june 1, 1986. it is a 12-month academic appointment at the rank of assistant librarian or senior assistant librarian depend­ ing on qualifications. minimum starting salary $18 ,0 0 0 -$ 1 9,600, de­ pending on rank. excellent benefits package. deadline for applica­ tions and nominations is july 20,1986. address inquiries to: gordon dunkin, mervyn h. sterne library, university of alabama at birming­ ham, university station, birmingham, al 35294. an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. science/engineering librarians (two positions) provides general as well as in-depth science/engineering reference services, including online literature searching; selects materials, teaches li­ brary usage and serves as liaison with science/engineering depart­ m ents). required: mls from an ala-accredited library school; de­ gree in science or engineering, preferably with specialization in the physical sciences or in the field of biology. preferred: reading knowl­ edge of a foreign language; knowledge of online searching in brs or dialog; experience in science librarianship or reference depart­ ment of an academic library. salary range, $18,336–$22,908. appli­ cations, resumes and three letters of reference should be sent to per­ sonnel office, box 1184, washington university, st. louis, mo 63130, by july 31, 1986. washington university is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. july /august 1986 / 477 late job listings alcohol studies bibliographer, rutgers university. available: october 1, 1986. under direction of the head librarian at the center of alcohol studies is primarily responsible for identification and acquisition of research documents for the library’s general and special collections. will also share responsibility for subject classification of uncataloged materials, general reference service, online searching. mls from ala-accredited library school required. advanced subject degree(s) or work experience in the bio-medical sciences is preferred. the center of alcohol studies library is one of the science branch libraries of the rutgers university library system. located on busch campus, the center maintains one of the world’s largest alcohol research libraries with materials covering biomedical and psychosocial aspects of alcohol use. minimum $21,262 or $25,907, dependent upon experience and qualifications. faculty status, calendar year appointment, tiaa/cref, life/health insurance, 22 days vacation, tuition remission, prescription drug/dental/eyeglass reimbursement plans. submit resume and three sources for current references by september 15, 1986, to: barbara e. sanders-harris, (app 115), personnel officer, alexander library, rutgers university, new brunswick, nj 08903. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. arts/humanities bibliographer-reference librarian. provides vital collection development liaison with the departments in the arts, humanities, and behavioral sciences. position demands bibliographic skills, ability to communicate effectively with faculty and students, and includes line responsibility for service at the centralized reference desk on a limited schedule, including some nights, weekends, and holidays. qualifications: mls degree from an ala-accredited program. second graduate degree in an appropriate academic subject area strongly preferred. experience in collection development and reference services in a medium to large academic library is required. knowledge of one or more modern european languages desirable. appointment level commensurate with qualifications and experience. minimum starting salary $20,000. letter of application, resume, and the names of 3 references will be accepted at the university of southwestern louisiana through july 31, 1986, or until position is filled, and should be directed to: donald l. saporito, director of libraries, university libraries, 302 e. st. mary blvd., lafayette, la 70503ğ usl is an equal employment opportunity, affirmative action employer. assistant director for collection and bibliographic services. duties: overall coordination, direction, and supervision of the collection and bibliographic services divisions of acquisitions, resource development, processing, and circulation (including interlibrary services). allocation and monitoring of a materials budget of $2.5 million, participates in the overall administration of the library, including budgeting, planning, and policy formulation. facilitates faculty liaison activities in relevant areas. participation in planning and implementation of automation activities, including a replacement of the oclc acquisitions subsystem and an integrated online catalog and circulation system. represents the library’s collection development and technical services concerns and interests through participation in local, state, regional, and national discussions. responsible for the encouragement and support of professional development and growth for collection and bibliographic services personnel, including 19.5 fte librarians and 91.5 support staff. works with collection interpretation divisions on matters pertaining to collection and bibliographic services activities and other cooperative ventures. position reports to the director, sterling c. evans library. qualifications: ala-mls. doctoral degree preferred. 10 years of increasingly responsible and varied professional 478 / c & r l news (post-mls) experience in libraries, including demonstrated managerial and supervisory competence, and actual work experience in at least 2 of the following areas: acquisitions, collection development, processing, interlibrary services, or circulation. knowledge of and commitment to cooperative collection development, innovative technical services, library automation, and use of national bibliographic utilities. experience with a major automated library system; prefer experience with oclc. record of productive scholarship, including demonstrated interest and skill in the development, direction, and encouragement of research. significant experience and stature in professional library and special interest organizations. ability to present concepts clearly, both orally and in writing. experience working in strong participative administrative environment. ability to work on long-range goals as well as immediate objectives of the library. demonstrated ability to work effectively with faculty and staff. knowledge of budget development techniques and understanding of financial analysis and reporting desirable. salary: negotiable based on qualifications; minimum $43,000 for 12 months. benefits: competitive benefits package; no state income tax; faculty rank. open: september 1. closing date: to ensure full consideration, applications should be received by august 15, 1986. submit letter of application, complete resume, and names and phone numbers of 3 professional references to: susan steele, head, personnel operations, evans library, texas a&m university, college station, tx 77843; (409) 845-8111. aa/eeo employer. assistant serials librarian. the dartmouth college library is seeking qualified applicants for the position of assistant serials librarian. the assistant serials librarian reports to the serials librarian and is responsible for supervising the bibliographic control activities of the department in a technically sophisticated environment utilizing the dartmouth online catalog, rlin, and oclc. the assistant serials librarian assists in the planning, development, and implementation of serials control policies and procedures; coordinates bibliographic control activities for serials throughout technical services areas; provides administrative assistance to the department head; contributes to the planning and management of the department and bibliographic control; participates in the selection, training, supervision, and evaluation of staff; contributes to the implementation and continuing development of computer technology for the department. qualifications: mls from an ala-accredited library school; minimum of 3 years experience in an academic or research library, some of which must have been in serials cataloging or acquisitions; familiarity with aacr2; experience with rlin or another automated system; user-oriented philosophy; effective communication and interpersonal skills. previous experience with an automated serials control system is highly desirable. salary and rank commensurate with experience and qualifications. minimum salary for a librarian i, $18,500; for a librarian ii, $21,000* please send resume before july 31, 1986, to: phyllis e. jaynes, director of user services, 115 baker library, hanover, nh 03755. dartmouth college is an aa/eeo/m/f employer. collection development/reference librarian, management library, university of california, los angeles. duties: works under the general direction of the head of the management library. collection development duties include: select items to add to the library’s holdings and oversee a newly-established approval plan; monitoring a book budget of $166,000 and approx. $17,000 in special funds; serve as liaison between graduate school of management faculty and the library regarding collection development; monitor and analyze the collection; participate in library-wide collection development activities and projects. reference duties include providing reference assistance to library users by working a minimum of two hours per day at the reference desk; july/august 1986 / 479 providing special consultation service to mba students; executing literature searches on computer databases; participating in a wide array of user education programs and compiling and editing gsm library guides. qualifications: demonstrated experience in business collection development and knowledge of current practices and issues, preferably in an academic library setting; demonstrated working knowledge of business reference sources and experience in providing reference services in an active library; experience in searching business computer databases; excellent interpersonal and communication skills (oral and written). salary range is $22,872-$40,248. anyone wishing to be considered for this position should write to: rita a. scherrei, director, administrative systems and personnel services, university research library, ucla, 405 hilgard avenue, los angeles, ca 90024. the application letter should include a complete statement of qualifications, a full resume of education and relevant experience, and the names of at least three persons who are knowledgeable about the applicants qualifications for the position. candidates applying by august 15, 1986, will be given first consideration. ucla is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. librarians at ucla are represented by an exclusive bargaining agent, the american federation of teachers. engineering/science librarian. participates with other reference librarians in general desk service, library instruction, online searching, and collection development. responsibilities include general reference, liaison with the college of engineering, which includes computer science, and the departments of mathematics, physics, and geography/earth science. reports to the head of the reference unit. the library is heavily automated and has an online catalog. qualifications: ala-accredited masters degree. undergraduate or advanced degree in engineering, computer science, mathematics, or physics is preferred. at least two years of science or technology reference experience in an academic library is preferred. the preferred candidate will have experience with online searching and library instruction. benefits: twelve­ month appointment, tenure track position, rank commensurate with experience. state mandated benefits. salary: $20,000 minimum. send resume and names of three references by august 15, 1986, to: raymond a. frankie, director, j. murrey atkins library, uncc, charlotte, nc 28223. the university of north carolina at charlotte is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. women and minorities are encouraged to apply. head, engineering and mathematical sciences library (ems), university of california, los angeles. the ems library contains 190,000 volumes and currently receives 3,500 serials titles. it is staffed by 3.75 fte librarians, 8.0 fte library assistants, and 6 .5 fte student assistants. duties: under the general direction of the head, physical sciences and technology libraries (pstl), responsible for collection development/management; public services, technical services, including online acquisitions and serials control systems; space planning; library operations. prepares budget requests, monitors expenditures, writes reports. promotes good relations with library users. serves at the reference desk. member of the pstl management team. participates in general activities of the ucla libraries. may be invited to teach in the ucla graduate school of library and information science. qualifications: demonstrated potential to manage and develop collections and services of a large, complex academic science/engineering library. excellent communication skills. strong interpersonal skills. self-motivated, with strong potential for leadership in planning and implementing innovative user services, user instruction and collection development. managerial/supervisory experience in an academic library. experience in a science or engineering library including experience with conventional reference and online database searching. commitment to a 480 / c & rl news sound technical processing basis for public services. commitment to professional growth and staff development. experience with online systems. mls or equivalent. academic background in physical sciences or engineering preferred, but not required. salary range: $32,808-$47,292. anyone wishing to be considered for this position should write to: rita a. scherrei, director, administrative systems and personnel services, university research library, ucla, 405 hilgard avenue, los angeles, ca 90024. the application letter should include a complete statement of qualifications, a full resume of education and relevant experience, and the names of at least three persons who are knowledgeable about the applicant’s qualifications for the position. candidates applying by october 1, 1986, will be given first consideration. ucla is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. librarians at ucla are represented by an exclusive bargaining agent, the american federation of teachers. head of public services. ohio wesleyan university is seeking a dynamic and innovative librarian to fill the newly created position of head of public services. this librarian will be responsible for the management, development, and supervision of staff and services of the folowing units: circulation, reference, instruction, online searching, microcomputer services, inter-library loan, government publications, and three branch libraries. this position supervises 8 staff workers (3 librarians) and works with staff from other library departments who devote time to other public service. the head of public services will actively participate in two major ongoing projects: implementation of an integrated library system (ls/2000), and implementation of the activist "teaching library” philosophy into all aspects of library services. additional duties include participation in the library management team; staffing the reference desk, including nights and weekends; and service as a liaison to faculty departments for the purpose of collection development, instruction, and online searching. ohio wesleyan university offers the collegial atmosphere of the liberal arts college committed to academic excellence, a library collection including over 400,000 volumes with a strong rare book collection and the second oldest federal depository in the country, an integrated library system, and a commitment to an activist approach to library service. the new head of public services will be offered the opportunity to make a major impact on services, to advance our planning and evaluation process, and to participate in the radical restructuring of the library. qualifications: master’s degree in library science from an ala-acredited program; minimum of 3 years experience in providing public services; demonstrated planning, supervisory, communication, and staff development skills; and a strong user-oriented philosophy. experience in teaching, microcomputer applications, and/or automated library systems desirable; a background in science or social science preferred but not essential. 12 month librarian/faculty appointment, salary range $21,000-$23,000. send letter of application, resume, and a statement of personal public service and management philosophy (no more than two pages, please), to: kathleen weibel, director of libraries, ohio wesleyan university, delaware, oh 43105. applications will be accepted until july 18. position will be filled by mid-august. an equal opportunity employer. public services librarians (two). ohio wesleyan university is seeking two innovative librarians who will be responsible for the coordination and development of of some combination of the following services: displays, online searching, inter-library loan, instruction, branches, microcomputer laboratory, special colections/rare books. in addition to managing these public services functions, under the guidance of the head of public services, each librarian will staff the reference desk an average of 15 hours per week, including nights and weekends, and will serve as liaison to faculty july/august 1986 / 481 departments for the purpose of collection development, instruction, and online searching, ohio wesleyan university offers the collegial atmosphere of the liberal arts college committed to academic excellence, a library collection including over 400,000 volumes with a strong rare book collection and the second oldest federal depository in the country, an integrated library system, and a commitment to an activist approach to library service. opportunities abound to make major impact on services and to participate in the radical restructuring of the library. qualifications: master’s degree in library science from an ala-acredited program; strong user-oriented philosophy; interest in gaining managerial experience; ability to plan and develop services; and strong communication skills. teaching, bibliographic instruction experience, working knowledge of microcomputer applications and/or library automated systems desirable; a background in science or social science preferred but not essential. 12 month librarian/faculty appointment, usual benefits, salary range $17,500-$18,500, depending on qualifications. send letter of application, resume, and 3 letters of reference to: kathleen weibel, director of libraries, ohio wesleyan university, delaware, oh 43105. applications will be accepted until july 18. positions will be filled by mid-august. an equal opportunity employer. reference librarian. two positions. available: september 1, 1986. under the direction of the head of public services, provides general and specialized reference services. responsibilities include online database searching, bibliographic instruction, collection development. research, publication, involvement in professional organizations, participation in committee work at rutgers encouraged and expected. must be able to work one evening and weekends on rotating basis. other responsibilities as assigned. mls from ala-accredited library school required. online database searching and bibliographic instruction highly desirable. the john cotton dana library, located on the newark campus of rutgers university, supports the academic and research programs of the college of arts and sciences, the university (evening) college, the graduate school (of arts and sciences), the graduate school of management, the school of criminal justice, the college of nursing, and a number of institutes and research centers. minimum $21,262 or $25,907 dependent upon experience and qualifications. faculty status, calendar year appointment, tiaa/cref, life/health insurance, 22 days vacation, tuition remission, prescription drug/dental/eyeglass reimbursement plans. 1) reference librarian (business) (app 114). mba and undergraduate degree in one social science desirable. responsibilities primarily in the areas of business, accounting, economics. serves as a liaison to assigned academic programs and departments, including those of the graduate school of management. business reference experience in an academic, research or special library preferred. 2) reference librarian (science) (app 116). science degree (preferably in one of the physical sciences) is expected. reference experience in an academic, research, or special library preferred. responsibilities primarily in the physical sciences. serves as a liaison to assigned academic programs and departments. submit resume and three sources for current references by september 1, 1986, to: barbara e. sanders-harris, (app 114) or (app 116), personnel officer, alexander library, rutgers university, new brunswick, nj 08903. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. social science librarian. the university of missouri-columbia is seeking a librarian responsible for providing reference, instruction, online searching, interlibrary loan services, and collection development for the social science library, a department within the university’s main library. shares in the administration of the social science library and in supervision of support staff and student assistants. provides online searching of social science 482 / c& rl news databases and bibliographic instruction and training in the use of the library. develops collections in selected disciplines and engages in faculty liaison activities. requirements include a masters degree from an ala-accredited program; strong social science background and/or equivalent experience; second masters in a social science discipline preferred. two years of professional library experience in an academic or research library preferred; competence in online database searching required. ability to communicate well orally and in writing; strong public service orientation; ability to work in a team environment as well as independently. minimum salary: $16,500 for 12 months with usual fringe benefits. available: september 1, 1986. send letter of application, names of three references and resume to: pat burbridge, personnel coordinator, 104 ellis library, university of missouri-columbia, columbia, mo 65201. to ensure consideration, applications should be received by august 1, 1986. the university of missouri-columbia is an equal opportunity and affirmative action institution. cataloger, martha ellison library, warren wilson college. responsible for original and copy cataloging of all materials, oclc/dewey; planning for automation; maintenance of catalog and databases; supervision of recon project; reference work one evening weekly and every fifth weekend; supervise and train students. full-time. required: ala degree; academic experience. working knowledge of oclc cataloging and name authority subsystems. extensive knowledge of recon; aacr2; good training, reference, and interpersonal skills. salary range $13,000-$l5,000, with housing if desired. application closing date is august 15, 1986. contact: jean hutton, director, martha ellison library, warren wilson college, 701 warren wilson rd., swannanoa, nc 28778-2099; (704) 298-3325, ext. 245 or 321. affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. head, technical services, c.v. starr east asian library, columbia university. this position, reporting directly to the east asian librarian, has administrative responsibility for technical services units including acquisitions, cataloging, catalog maintenance, and current periodicals for materials in chinese, japanese, and korean languages. other responsibilities include coordination of east asian technical services with central technical service units, research libraries group members, and other outside organizations. in addition to an accredited mls and fluency in spoken and written english, requirements are fluency in chinese or japanese, excellent managerial, communication, and interpersonal skills, experience with applications of standard cataloging codes and practices (e.g. aacr2, lcsh, lc classification), with the rlin/cjk system, and with supervisory responsibilities. a graduate degree in east asian studies and knowledge of other east asian languages preferred. applications should be submitted to the library personnel office, box 35, butler library, columbia university libraries, 535 w. 114th st., new york, ny 10027. applicants should list three references and salary requirements. salary ranges: librarian ii: $27,500-$37,125; librarian iii: $30,500-$44,225. deadline for applications is august 15, 1986. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. reference/documents and maps librarian. responsible for administering federal and state documents depository collections and map collection and for providing reference service from the library’s general reference desk. qualifications: ala-accredited mls; ability to work effectively with faculty, students, and colleagues; teaching ability; effective oral and written communication skills; knowledge of u.s. government documents and their organization desirable; supervisory capability; second master’s degree in a subject area desirable. faculty status, tenure-track. salary: $20,000 minimum and fringe benefits. submit letter of application, resume, three july/august 1986 / 483 letters of reference, and copies of credentials and transcripts to: director’s office, olson library, northern michigan university, marquette, mi 49855-5376. screening of applications to begin: september 15, 1986. nmu is an aa/eo employer. reference librarian. energetic generalist for reference, bibliographic instruction and interlibrary loan. must have ala-accredited mls and at least two years of academic library experience, including database searching and oclc. good management and interpersonal skills are essential. salary range: $17,000-$20,000 for twelve months. appointment begins september 1, 1986. applications will be accepted until july 20, 1986, or until position is filled. send resume and list of three references to: joanne cooper, director, hammermill library, mercyhurst college, erie, pa 16456. aa/eoe. head, reference department. the university of akron, bierce library, is seeking a head of reference to coordinate and supervise activities of all reference department personnel. position available october 1, 1986, or as soon thereafter as possible. responsibilities: plan, implement, and evaluate general reference services and instructional programs; monitor reference and government documents collections; serve as link between the reference department and other units. qualifications: master’s degree in library science from an ala-accredited school; at least 3 years professional experience in public services in an academic library; evidence of managerial ability; strong interpersonal skills; and ability to communicate well, both orally and on paper required. salary: $20,200-$24,000, depending on qualifications and experience; excellent fringe benefits. application deadline: september 15, 1986. send letter of application, resume, and 3 letters of reference to: lee faulhaber, reference search committee, bierce library, box cr, the university of akron, akron, oh 44325. the university of akron is an equal education and employment institution. interlibrary loan coordinator. coordinates inter-library loan operations for the main library and three branches. may represent the library in state, regional, and national planning for networking and resource sharing. as a member of the reference department, participates in a variety of activities including desk service and database searching. plans, directs, trains and evaluates the work of 4.5 fte staff. reports to the head, reference/documents. library faculty must meet university requirements for promotion and tenure. qualifications: ala-accredited mls; two years* academic library experience, particularly with inter-library loan practices and the oclc/lll subsystem preferred. tenure-track position. 24 days annual leave. tuition remission. group health insurance. tiaa/cref or state retirement plan with non-refundable contribution paid by the university. no state income tax. rank and salary dependent upon education and experience. instructor, $19,000 minimum; assistant professor, $23,000 minimum. send letter of application, current resume, and names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three recent references by september 15, 1986, to: jill keally, personnel librarian, the university of tennessee library, knoxville, tn 37996-1000. utk is an eeo, affirmative action, title ix, section 504, employer. 484 / c& rl news (washington hotline, continued) telecommunication rates for library connections to nationwide biblio­ graphic databases have continued to increase every few months, causing planning, paperwork, and cost problems. although the federal communications commission allowed new at&t private line tariffs to take effect over a year ago, it is conducting a continuing investigation of the tariffs. senate communications subcommittee member larry pressler (r-sd) delivered may 2 a letter with a total of 29 senate signatures to fcc chairman mark fowler on the problems continuing cost increases cause for libraries. on may 28 chairman fowler sent a lengthy response, which is being analyzed by sen. pressler’s office. acrl publications in librarianship — your special perspective on the profession. series titles cu rre n tly available: 3 9 . libraries for teaching, libraries for research: essays for a century, richard d. johnson, ed. "...a m ust for all library school students interested in academ ic librarianship.’’ arba 78 $15.00cl. 259p. 0247-2 (use o rd e r c o d e 3196-0) 1977 4 0 . book selling and book buying: aspects o f the nineteenth-century british and north american book trade, richard g. landon, ed. "... these essays, five of them on bookselling and tw o ... on book collecting, fit together admirably.” b o o k c ollector's m a rk et $15.00cl. 118p. 3224-x 1979 4 1 . w omen view librarianship: nine perspectives, kathryn renfro lundy, ed. it is satisfying to read their considered resp onses to questions ranging from ideas about adm inistration and personal career ch oices to developing library school curricula and advice to beginning professionals.’’ c o lleg e & r e s e a r c h l ib r a r ie s $8.00pbk. 99p. 3251-7 1980 42 . the spirit of inquiry: the graduate library school at chicago, 1921-51, by jo h n v. richardson, jr. "...a significant book in library ed ucation and an exam ple o f painstaking historical research.’’ arba 84 $35.00cl. 238p. 3273-8 1982 4 3 . the landscape of literatures: use of subject collections in a university library, by paul metz. “metz p ro v id es...a n im portant use s tu d y ...by attem pting to identify the su bject literature o f interest to faculty and students in various academ ic d iscip lin es.’ rq $30.00pbk. 143p. 3286-x 1983 4 4 . the carnegie corporation and the development of american college libraries, 1928-41, by neil a. radford. provides a useful historical perspective on collection analysis and external funding by studying the im pact of carnegie grants for collection development. $29.95pbk. 257p. 3295-9 1984 o rd er from am erican library association publishing services 50 east huron st. c hicago, il 60611 (isbn prefix 0-8389) acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries j u n e 1983 / 209 m ary rhoads, h ealth sciences c en ter l ib ra ry 3 4 0 4 , university of a rizona, 1501 n. c am p bell avenue, t ucson, az 85 7 2 4 . 2 6 2 8 — n orth c a ro lin a : “stand up for l ib ra rie s ,” b ien nial conference of th e n orth c arolin a l i ­ b rary association, b enton c onvention c en ter and h yatt h otel, w inston -salem . c o n ta ct: l e la n d m . p a rk , l ib r a ry o f d avidson c o lleg e, d a v id s o n , n c 2 8 0 3 6 ; (7 0 4 ) 8 9 2 2 0 0 0 , e x t. 3 3 1 . ■ ■ the classified ads d e a d lin e s: orders for regular classified advertisements must reach the acrl office on o r before the second o f the month p reced­ ing publication o f the issue (e.g. s eptem ber 2 fo r the o ctob er issue). late job listings will be accepted on a space-available basis after the second o f the month. h ates: classified advertisements are $4.00 per line for acrl members, $5 00 for others. late jo b notices are $ 10.00 p er line for members, $12 00 for others. organizations subm itting ads will be charged accordin g to their m em bership status. t e le p h o n e : all telephone o rd ers should be confirm ed by a w rit­ ten o rder mailed to acrl headquarters as soon as possible. orders should be a ccom panied by a typewritten co p y of the ad to be used in proofreading. an additional $10 will be charged fo r ads taken over the phone (except late jo b notices o r d isplay ads). g u id e lin e s : for ads w hich list an application deadline, that date m ust be no sooner than the last day of the month in which the notice appears (e.g., o ctober 31 fo r the o ctober issue). all jo b a nnounce­ ments should include a salary figure. j o b announcem ents will be edited to e xclude discrim inatory references. applicants should be aware that the term s faculty rank and status vary in m eaning am ong institutions. jo bl in e : call (312) 944 6795 for late-breaking jo b ads for aca­ dem ic and research library positions. a pre-recorded summary of positions listed with the service is revised weekly; each friday a new tape includes all ads received by 1:00 p.m. the previous day. each listing subm itted will be earned on the recording fo r two weeks. the charge fo r each two-week listing is $30 for acrl m em bers and $35 for non-members. fast jo b l is tin g s e rv ic e : a special newsletter for those actively seeking positions. this service lists jo b postings received at acrl headquarters four weeks before they appear in c&rl news, as well as ads which, because of n arrow deadlines, will not a pp ea r in c&rl news. the cost o f a six-month subscription is $10 fo r acrl m em ­ bers and $15 for non-members. c o n ta c t: classified advertising d ep't, acrl, am erican library association, 50 e huron st., chicago, il 606 11, (312) 944-6780 _______ for sale elsevier a n tiq u ar ia n d epar tm en t. periodicals and rare books on l ite and earth s cie n c e s . over 1 million volum es on stock. catalogues available on dem and. please write to: lippijnstraat 4. 1055 kj amsterdam, the netherlands. position desired al a -accredited mls. o r e year professional experience in re­ ference/collection development k nowledge o f co m p ute r and for­ eign languages. desires sim ilar position. will relocate. o m ar khalidi 2462 dalton, wichita, ks 67210 po s itions open a ss is t an t c atalo g er . ala-m ls some cataloging e xperi­ nce required knowledge o f lc classification and oclc (or other e network). c oursew ork in business and econom ics helpful. w e are in the process o f planning for an integrated online system. o ne year appointm ent $15,000 + dep en d in g upon qualifications and e xperi­ ence. send resume and three letters of reference to: virgil f. mass man, executive director, james je ro m e hill reference library, st. paul, mn 55102 eoe. a ss is t an t engin eering l ib r a r ia n . a perm anent position available july 1,1 9 83 . u nder direction of the e ngineering librarian, d u tie s in c lu d e re fe re n ce a n d in fo rm a tio n se rvice s; d ata ba se searching c f brs, lockheed, and oclc; b ibliographic instruction, collection developm ent; liaison with faculty; original cataloging of m onographs; staff supervision; and special projects utilizing the en­ gineering l ib ra ry’s m icrocom puter system required: master's d e ­ gree in library science from an a la-accredited library school, o r its equivalent; evidence o f research orientation and ability to meet uni­ versity requirem ents for p rom otion and tenure; com m itm ent to serv­ ing the research needs o f clientele. preferred: subject b ackground or library experience in engineering o r related science. desirable: experience o r p roficiency in reference service, cataloging, biblio­ g raphic instruction, collection developm ent, and online database searching. librarians have faculty rank. assistant professor rank for applicant with desired experience and qualifications, including evi­ dence of a bility to m eel general university requirem ents for p rom o­ tion and tenure (research, publication, university/comm unity/profes­ sional service) in addition to p erform ing specific library assignment. salary $14,500 upward, d epending on qualifications and scholarly credentials. send com plete resume with names and addresses of five references to: allen g. dries, libraries personnel manager, uni­ versity o f illinois at urbana-champaign, 127 library, 1408 w. gre­ gory drive, urbana, il 61801 ; phone (217) 333-8169. for m axim um consideration, applications and nom inations should be received no later than ju ly 31, 1983. the u niversity o f illinois is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. as s is t a n t head, chemistry lib r a r ia n . affiliate, assis tant, o r associate librarian provides reference service, including online interactive searching and library instruction; assists in collec­ tion developm ent; directly supervises the library operations, in clu d ­ ing supervision a nd training of one full-time su pp ort staff, and o ver­ sees all technical services operations. master's degree from an a la-accredited library school; m inim um o f one year post-mls li­ brary experience preferred; supervisory experience; experience with computer-assisted reference services; dem onstrated ability to relate effectively to faculty, students, and staff. effectiveness in plan­ ning a nd organizing w o rk flow. some a cadem ic b ackg ro un d in sci­ e nce a nd /or experience in a science-oriented library. ability to co m ­ municate effectively both orally a nd in writing. reading know ledge of german is desirable ability to meet the responsibilities and require­ ments o f a tenure-track appointm ent salary dependent on qualifica­ tions and experience. salary minim um. affiliate. $14,500; assistant, $15,800; associate, $18,500. send letters o f application to. anne r im m e r, p e rs o n n e l o ffic e r, in d ia n a u n iv e rs ity l ib ra rie s , bloomington, in 47405; (812) 335-3403. c losing date for app lica ­ tions no earlier than june 15, 1983. indiana university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. a s s is t a n t lib r a r ia n . southern arkansas university has a va­ ca ncy for an assistant librarian effective im mediately. applicants should hold the mls degree and have three to four years experience as a reference librarian in a four-year college o r university library a more complete jo b description is available. salary is com m ensurate with training and experience. southern arkansas university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action em ployer. applications will be received until position is filled. interested persons should send letter o f interest and resume to: l a logan, president for acad e m ic a f­ fairs, southern a rkan sas university, box 1402, m agnolia, ar 71753. a ss is tan t professor. search reopened. the university o f illi­ nois graduate s chool o f library and information science is seeking candidates for a full-time tenure-track position fo r teaching two o r m ore of the follow ing areas: information science, cataloging, m edi­ cal reference, special libraries, and /or science reference full-time teaching load equals two courses p er semester plus sharing in stu­ dent advising and faculty committee work. earned d octorate in li­ brary and information science preferred, and library (o r information center) and leaching experience desirable. the university o f illinois offers excellent research resources, including six million plus volum e library, com puter facilities, m anuscript typing, etc. minim um salary $20,000. summer session and extension leaching with additional pay is possible but not required. position open a ugust 21. january 210 / c &rl news 1984 starting date possible. send letter of application, resume, and names of three persons from whom references can be secured, to: charles h. davis, dean, graduate school of library and information science, university of illinois, 410 david kinley hall, 1407 w. gre­ gory dr., urbana, il 61801; (217)333-3280. applications will be ac­ cepted until june 27, o r until a suitable candidate has been found. the university of illinois is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. assistant undergraduate librarian (media coordi­ nator). a permanent position available august 1 ‚ 1983. under di­ rection of the assistant director for undergraduate libraries and in­ structional services, administers the library audio/media center, a playback—not production—facility housed in the undergraduate li­ brary. assignment includes supervision of 2 fte staff and a student wage budget of $13,500. participates in and coordinates all original media cataloging; participates in provision of general reference ser­ vices and bibliographic instruction; assists with ugl book and jour­ nal selection in assigned areas of responsibility; and in areas of sub­ ject responsibility expected to establish faculty liaison and develop reference aids. other duties as assigned, regular night and weekend work expected. required: master’s degree in library science from an ala-accredited library school, or its equivalent; at least one year pro­ fessional experience working in a media center or with non-print ma­ terials; demonstrated ability to relate effectively with faculty, students and staff; and evidence of ability to meet university requirements for tenure and promotion. preferred: experience in providing reference and/or bibliographic instruction in an academic environment. de­ sired: experience with non-print cataloging, particularly in the area of motion pictures and television. librarians have faculty rank. appoint­ ment at the assistant professor level. salary $16,000 upward de­ pending on qualifications and experience. librarians must meet general university requirements for promotion and tenure (research, publications, and university/community/professional service) in ad­ dition to performing specific library assignment. send complete re­ sume with names and addresses of five references to: allen g . dries, library personnel manager, university of illinois library at urbana champaign, 127 library, 1408 w. gregory drive, urbana, il 61801; phone (217) 333-8169. for maximum consideration, applications and nominations should be received no later than july 29,1983. the university of illinois is an affirmative action, equal opportunity em­ ployer. behavioral sciences librarian and science librar­ ian. two 9-month, tenure-track, faculty positions at chapman col­ lege, a private liberal arts college in southern cailfornia. responsibil­ ities: teaching required library research courses, general reference, and liaison with faculty and students in subject areas including col­ lection development, online bibliographic searching, and catalog­ ing. required: mls from ala-accredited school and 2 years aca­ demic library experience. prefer second master’s and teaching experience. one position requires strong cataloging background. appointment at the assistant or associate professor level. salary range: $ 16,400-$31,100 for 9 months. separate summer contracts usually available. send letter of application, resume, and three letters of reference by june 30,1983, to: janice h. shawl, library director, chapman college library, 333 n. glassell st., orange, ca 92666. interviews may be held at ala conference. equal opportunity, af­ firmative action employer. b io lo g y /n a tu r a l resources and h u m a n itie s l i­ brarians effective august 15, 1983, at the assistant librarian, senior assistant librarian or associate librarian level as appropriate depending on qualifications and experience (current salary range $17,028-$30,672). one of the positions may be combined with the position of head, information services. closing date july 1, 1983. equal opportunity employer. for more detailed information write: university librarian, humboldt state university, areata, ca 95521. cataloger, entry level new position with responsibility for origi­ nal cataloging of monographs and editing of oclc copy, using the lc classification schedules and subject headings. master's degree from ala-accredited library school. minimum $14,500. academic status. send letter of application wtih resume and names of three ref­ erences by june 3 0,1 98 3, to: walter m. high, head, monographic cataloging department, d.h. hill library, north carolina state uni­ versity, po box 5007, raleigh, nc 27650. an equal opportunity, af­ firmative action employer. cataloger, new position. experienced cataloger with demon strated potential to manage people. detailed knowledge of marc formats and the theory underlying the d evelo p m en t a n d use of m a c h in e-read ab le cataloging necessary. responsibility for original cataloging of monographs and editing of oclc copy, using the lc classification schedules and subject headings. knowledge of multi media cataloging will be especially useful. master’s degree from ala-accredited library school. minimum $17,500. academic status. send letter of application with resume and names of three references by june 3 0,1983, to: walter m. high, head, monographic catalog­ ing department, d.h. hill library, north carolina state university, po box 5007, raleigh, nc 27650. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. cataloger, northwestern university. performs original and complex cataloging of monographs, including descriptive and sub­ ject cataloging and classification and authority work, using aacr2, lcsh, ddc 19, and the marc bibliographic and authority formats. works cataloged may be on any subject, and in a variety of lan­ guages. cataloging and authority work are perform ed on northwest­ ern's notis (northwestern online total integrated system) library automation system, for inclusion in the union online catalog and for­ warding to the rlin database. some authority work may be submit­ ted to the library of congress for inclusion in the name authority co­ o p e ra tiv e p ro gram (n aco ). q ua lific a tio n s : mls fro m an ala-accredited library school, working knowledge of one or more foreign languages, preferably including german or a romance lan­ guage. experience in library technical services, using an automated system d es ira b le . p osition a va ila b le : o pe n. salary: $15,000-$16,000 depending upon experience. send application and resume, including names of references to: lance query, per­ sonnel librarian, northwestern university library, evanston, il 60201. applications received by july 15, 1983, will be considered. northwestern university library is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. cataloger. responsible for original cataloging of latin ameri­ can materials. required: mls from ala-accredited school; reading knowledge of spanish; ability to work with french, german, and por­ tuguese; working knowledge of lc classification and subject head­ ings, aacr2, and oclc; at least one year of cataloging experience. salary: $16,000. two-year term appointment available september 1 ‚ 1983. application deadline july 1 ‚ 1983. send letter of application, resume, and names of three references to: associate curator for the pre-columbian collection, dumbarton oaks, 1703 32nd st., nw, washington, dc 20007. cataloging librarian. responsible for cataloging of all li­ brary materials except music. formulates cataloging policies and procedures; trains and supervises cataloging staff. collection devel­ opment and some reference duties included. responsible for the creation and maintenance of all authority files. master’s degree from ala-accredited library school and at least 3 years experience as a cataloger using an automated system. second master’s degree in a subject field preferred. salary: $18,800 + depending upon qualifica­ tions and experience. faculty status and liberal fringe benefits in­ cluding tiaa/cref. send resume and names of 3 references by june 30,1983, to: deanne molinari, affirmative action officer, suny college at purchase, purchase, ny 10577. curator of rare books and special collections, university of wisconsin-madison. 12-months academic staff ap­ p o in tm e n t. a d m in is te r a d e p a rtm e n t w ith 2 .5 fte a nd 20 hours/week of student assistance, and holdings of 80,000 volumes including materials of national reputation in history of science, little magazines, french pamphlets, russian underground materials, and english and american literature. curator will be encouraged to seek gifts of special collections and outside funding for purchase of rare books. responsibilities: plan and implement department's public and technical services; collection development in history of books and printing, little magazines, and rare books reference materials; assist faculty, students, and visitors in use of collections; act as liaison between department and university teaching units; mount exhibits; work with friends of the library; supervise the shift of valuable mate­ rials from the general stacks to the rare book vaults; provide lectures and tours for university classes and outside groups; act as liaison to estc/na project; represent department, as requested, on university a nd c o m m u n ity c o m m itte e s. m inim um q u a lific a tio n s : ala accredited mls or equivalent demonstrated subject mastery in li­ brarianship; graduate degree in humanities or social sciences; 5 years experience in rare books and/or special collections, preferably in a research library; administrative experience; foreign language expertise. salary: $26,000 minimum. appointment effective septem­ ber 1 ‚ 1 983, or as soon thereafter as possible. application deadline: june 30, 1983. letter of application, current vita, and names, ad­ dresses, and telephone numbers of three references to: sandra j. pfahler, assistant director for budget and personnel, 360 memorial library, 728 state street, madison, wl 53706. eeo/aa employer. dean of learning resources center, pueblo commu­ nity college. pueblo community college is accepting applications for the position of dean of the learning resources center. appli­ cants must possess an ala-accredited mls (doctorate of library sci­ ence desirable). minimum experience: candidate shall have been employed full-time for one year as a director of a learning resources center at an institution of higher education, in addition, two years ex­ perience as chairperson of a library d ep artm en t is required. t h e col­ lege is seeking an individual with a b a ckg ro u n d in both public and technical services who will provide leadership in working with library staff, faculty and administrators; who is knowledgeable about the ap­ plication òf computer technology to library processes and who can design and im plem ent projects to increase existing library re ­ sources. minimum salary is $30,000 for 12 months. the dean of the learning resources center will be responsible to the vice president for instructional services. send application and vita before july 1 ‚ 1983, to: edward broadhead, chairman, dean of learning reju n e 1983 / 211 sources center search & screen committee, pueblo community college, 900 w. orman avenue, pueblo, co 81004. pueblo com­ munity college is an affirmative action and equal opportunity em­ ployer. general reference librarian. position requires an ala accredited degree; second subject master’s degree or doctorate de­ sirable; and five years’ academ ic library reference experience with appropriate supervisory experience. position carries faculty rank. responsibilities include administration, planning and supervision of general reference professional staff, services, and collection, in a dd i­ tion to coordinating collection developm ent activities. rank and sal­ a ry d e p e n d e n t u p o n q u a lific a tio n s a n d e x p e rie n c e : $ 16,000-$19,000. send letter of application, resume, transcripts, and three letters of recommendation to: office of a cadem ic affairs, librarian position, wetherby administration building, western ken­ tucky university, bowling green, ky 42101. applications will be ac­ cepted until position is filled. an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. head, g en er al reference, robert w. w o o druff library. emory university, atlanta. responsibilities: manage reference de­ partment, including supervision of six reference librarians and three support staff. areas of service include bibliographic instruction, inter lib ra ry loan, m icroform re a din g room, and online b ib lio g ra p h ic searching. coordinates reference collection developm ent and par­ ticipates in developm ent of the general collections. minim um qualifi­ cations: ala-accredited degree; depth of subject knowledge and fa­ m iliarity with research techniques, p referably in an area of the humanities or the social sciences; 3-5 years of reference experience with a dem onstrated com petency in supervisory and managerial skills, preferably in a large a cadem ic o r research library; or equiva­ lent combination of education and experience. reading knowledge of at least one modern european language. demonstrated strong com munication and public relations skills required. salary and rank dependent upon qualifications and experience (m inimum rank and salary librarian ii, $20,000). send letter, resume, and names of three references, by july 15,1983, to: nancy a. books, director of public services, robert w. w oodruff library, emory university, atlanta, ga 30322. an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. head of serials cataloging. catalog serials originally for input into oclc-conser o r upgrade shared records with conser authorization. represent uf at conser operational meetings at oclc. coordinate along with the department chairman, other de­ partments, and satellite libraries serials developm ent on the library's new in-house automated system developed from northwestern uni­ versity software. train beginning professionals in serials cataloging. mls from ala-accredited school required. reading knowledge of at least one modern european language preferred. salary range for assistant librarian: $ 1 3 ,0 3 0 -$ 2 1 ,700; associate librarian: (5 years of professional experience) $15,660-$26,100. florida state retire­ ment, faculty status, blue cross/blue shield g roup plan, 22 days va­ cation. send letter of application with complete resume with names o f five references and salary requirements by july 1 ‚ 1983, to: james h. renz, associate director for technical services, 216 library west, university of florida, gainesville, fl 32611. eeo/aae. head of special collections. oversees the operations and actively pursues the continued developm ent and expansion of the libraries' special collections. participates in public relations, fund raising, special events, and grant proposals related to the collec­ tions. requires ala-accredited mls o r minim um of 5 years experi­ ence in book trade, archives or special collections administration. graduate degree in american literature or history strongly preferred. salary m id-20’s d epending on qualifications. excellent benefits in­ clu ding choice of retirement programs. the university of houston c entral c a m p us l ibraries has 1.4 million volum es, a m aterials b udget of $1.9 million, and a staff o f 54 professionals and 170 sup­ port staff. applications accepted thru ju ly 1 ‚ 1983. send letter of ap­ plication, names o f 3 references, and resume to: dana rooks, uni­ versity of houston libraries, 4800 calhoun, houston, tx 77004. equal opportunity employer. head, optom etr y library. assistant or associate librarian (one-half fte position). responsible for administering the library. also responsible for the provision of reference services and library instruction; the establishment of library policies and procedures of the university libraries; the selection, training, and supervision of li­ brary staff; the m aintenance of bibliographic control of the collection in coop eratio n with technical services; a nd the p reparation of b udget requests. serves as the fund m anager in the selection of m a­ terials to support the curriculum and research activities of the school of optometry and the department of psychological optics. master's degree from an ala-accredited library school; minim um of 2 years post-mls library experience; dem onstrated ability to supervise; abil­ ity to relate effectively to faculty, students, and staff; some academ ic background in science or experience in science-oriented library is preferable. a bility to com m unicate effectively both orally and in writ­ ing. a bility to meet the responsibilities and requirements of a tenure track appointment. salary dependent on qualifications and experi­ ence. salary floors will be observed: assistant, $15,800; associate, $18,500. send letters of application to: anne rimmer, personnel of­ ficer, indiana university libraries, bloomington, in 47405; (812) columbia university libraries head of serials acquisitions u nder the general direction of the chief of the s upport division, this position has responsibility for adm in­ istering a centralized serials function for the colum bia library system. the position has direct responsibility for 16 full-time staff m embers; coordinating routines and w o rkflo w ; planning and im plem enting change in an evolving technological environm ent; establishing priorities; resolving problem s relating to the ordering, receipt, and paym ent of serial materials; and d eveloping a thorough knowledge of publishing and sources of supply. in addition to an accredited mls, qualifications are administrative ability as dem onstrated by successful relevant supervisory experience; a substantial know ledge of serials; the ability to w ork with staff in other library units and outside vendors; effective writing and speaking skills; evidence of professional creativity and initiative; familiarity with computer-assisted technical processing in a large research library; and the ability to w ork with a broad range of languages, with preferential consideration being given to applicants with a w orking knowledge of french or german. preferential consideration will also be given to applicants with relevant acquisitions and/or bibliographic experience. s ubm it resume, including salary requirements and three references, to: box 35, b utler library c olum bia university 535 w . 114th s treet new york, ny 10027 s alary ranges for 1982-83: librarian ii, $22,500-$29,250; librarian iii, $25,500-$36,975. applications: july 3 1 ,1 9 8 3 . deadline for an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. 212 / c &r l news 335-3403. closing date for applications: no earlier than june 15, 1983. indiana university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. instructio n and orientation librarian, assistant or associate rank. responsibilities: planning, developing, and coordi­ nating instruction and orientation for the main library and the branch libraries on the bloomington campus; providing leadership, general direction, and assistance to other librarians who participate in in­ structional activities; and collecting, creating, and maintaining files of instructional materials. also responsible for publications and other handouts used in the instruction program. evaluates the effective­ ness of classes, programs, and teachers and keeps library faculty, staff, and the university community informed of developments in the libraries’ user education program. serves as a member of the public services committee’s publications subcommittee and is invited to meetings of the public services committee. will work 10 hours each week in the provision of reference services in the undergraduate li­ brary including some night and weekend hours. qualifications: mls from an ala-accredited library school; minimum of 2 years of post mls public service library experience with experience in library in­ struction. demonstrated ability to plan and coordinate library pro­ grams. ability to work well independently and with others. familiarity with trends and techniques of library instruction. verbal and written communication skills. supervisory and reference experience prefer­ red. ability to meet the responsibilities and requirements of a tenure track appointment. salary dependent on qualifications and experi­ ence. salary floors are observed. assistant, $15,800; associate, $18,500. send letters of application to: anne rimmer, personnel of­ ficer, indiana university libraries, bloomington, in 47405; (812) 335-3403. closing date for applications: no earlier than june 15, 1983. indiana university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. internatio nal documents librarian. the position re porting to the head of documents combines reference and technical responsibilities for u.s., un and other international documents, and is specifically charged with planning and supervising collection de­ velopment and technical work for several international colllections. participates in library instruction, faculty outreach and online refer­ ence searching. supervises one part-time assistant. required: mls from an ala-accredited library school; interest in government publi­ cations; strong public service orientation. preferred: experience with government publications, familiarity with online searching tech­ niques; subject master’s in a social science field; proficiency in a western european language; familiarity with cataloging rules. entry level position. rank of affiliate librarian. salary, $14,000. paid health insurance and retirement. 25 days vacation. additional benefits. send resume and either names of three references or a placement address to: winn margetts, library personnel, university of utah li­ braries, salt lake city, ut 84112. interviewing at ala in los an­ geles. deadline june 30,1983. equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. librarian, architecture & fine arts library and music library. the university of florida libraries is looking for a librarian to administer the operations of the architecture & fine arts library and the music library. applicants should have an mls from an accredited library school, at least six years pertinent professional experience, and demonstrated ability to supervise and to work effec­ tively with faculty, staff, and students. the appointment is for twelve months with faculty status and tenure track. there are twenty-two working days vacation per year, eight paid holidays, and state retire­ ment plan at no cost to the employee. appointment will be at the as­ s o c ia te u n iv e rs ity l ib ra ria n ra n k w ith a sa lary b e tw e e n $15,660-$25,100. applications should be made by july 31, 1983, to: r. max willocks, 215 library west, university of florida libraries, gainesville, fl 32611. the university of florida libraries comply with section 503 of the rehabilitation act of 1973, and is an equal opportunity affirmative action employer. original materials cataloger. trinity university of san antonio, texas, invites applications for the position of original mate­ rials cataloger, a faculty appointment in a rapidly-growing and dy­ namic university library. trinity is strongly committed to excellence in support of the liberal arts tradition at the bachelor’s and master’ s de­ gree levels. primary responsibilities include cataloging: all english language m onographic materials requiring original cataloger; some foreign language monographs; and all trinity theses and research projects. may have some responsibility for the daily operations of university of wisconsin associate director for collection development the university of wisconsin general library system is accepting applications for the position of associ­ ate d irectorfor collection development. benefits include 22 vacation days, sick leave, group health and life insurance and a state retirement plan. salary minimum: $40,000. the associate director for collection development of the university of wisconsin-madison libraries has prim ary responsibility for collection developm ent policies and procedures for the general library system and for the allocation of its acquisitions budget (currently about 2.5 million dollars). in coordinating collec­ tion policies, priorities, and procedures, the associate director for collection development considers the advice of the selectors (who include the subject bibliographers and the branch librarians), the library coordinating council, the university library committee, faculty, and administrators. the associate direc­ tor for collection development maintains close contact with cam pus-wide academic planning activities in order to relate library collection developm ent policy to the wider planning process on the madison campus. on matters of collection developm ent and administration, the subject bibliographers and the curator of rare books report to the associate director for collection development; the branch librarians report to him or her on matters of collection developm ent alone. in addition, the associate director for collection development is responsible in the area of collection developm ent for preparing grant proposals and initiat­ ing other fund-raising activites. the associate director for collection d evelopment reports to the director of libraries and works closely with the director in the overall administration of the general library. in certain circumstances he or she serves as acting director in the absence of the director. the director of libraries may delegate to the associate director for collection development the function of liaison with the university of wisconsin system and other state libraries and regional networks in the area of collection development. the candidate must have an mls from an ala-accredited library school and a strong academic back­ ground, and must show evidence of substantial scholarly achievement, broad bibliographical knowledge, and five years of relevant experience in a major research library. applications including resume, and the names, addresses and telephone numbers of three references should be directed to: sandra pfahler, assistant director to r budget and personnel, 360 memorial library, 728 state street, madison, wl 53706. applications must be postmarked by june 30, 1983. eeo/aa employer. june 1983 / 213 oclc including supervision and training of oclc operators. re­ quired qualifications include: the mls from an ala-accredited li­ brary school; knowledge of aacr2; knowledge of library of con­ gress cla ssifica tion system and su bje ct headings; reading knowledge of at least one foreign language; knowledge of the oclc system; and initiative, creativity, and strong communications skills. highly desirable is cataloging experience in an academic library. an additional graduate degree is also desirable. instructor or assistant professor rank with tenure-track. salary minimum of $16,500, higher depending on experience or other qualifications. twelve month ap­ pointment, tiaa/cref and liberal ringe benefits. send letter of appli­ cation, detailed resume and names of three references by july 7, 1983, to: chair, search committee, original materials cataloger, trinity university library, 715 stadium drive, san antonio, tx 78284. affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. program manager. the research libraries group (rlg) lo­ cated on the stanford campus is a consortium owned by twenty-five of the nation’s major universities and other research institutions. rlg is committed to the development of innovative applications of com­ puter technology to the capture, storage, retrieval and delivery of in­ formation to support research and scholarship in the u.s. rlg is cur­ rently recruiting two program managers to support the daily operation of the shared resources, collection development and preservation programs of the corporation. responsibilities will in­ clude: analysis of collection development verification studies; man­ agement of conspectus data collection and products; analysis of in­ terlibrary loan statistical data; management of rlg’s reference liaison program; management of activities associated with the pres­ ervation projects; and grants administration staff support. qualifica­ tions: mls degree or equivalent; three years experience as a refer­ ence librarian, bibliographer, curator, or cataloger in a major research library; strong organizational, editorial, verbal, writing and interpersonal skills. reading knowledge of one or more foreign lanu gages, statistical skills, supervisory experience, and familiarity with rlin desirable. salary: $1,854-$2,312/month. to apply, submit a resume with the names of 3 references, to the following address. for further information contact: art wilson, stanford university, old pa­ vilion (personnel), stanford, ca 94305; (415) 497-3117. equal op­ portunity employer through affirmative action. public services librarian to develop and coordinate an on­ line information retrieval system. must have library degree from an ala-accredited library school. must be able to communicate and work effectively with all segments of the academic community. expe­ rience in database searching highly desirable. will participate in gen­ eral reference services, including library instruction. twelve month appointment with faculty rank. salary range $17,000-$22,500 de­ pendent upon experience and qualifications. mcneese state uni­ versity has a library budget of $1.059 million and over 260,000 vol­ umes. 13 professional librarians serve a faculty of 305 and student population of 7,500. interviews can be arranged at ala in los an­ geles. send letter of application, names of 3 references, and current resume before july 1 ‚ 1983, to: richard h. reid, director of library services, frazar memorial library, mcneese state university, lake charles, la 70609. an equal opportunity employer. reference librarian, education library. affiliate or as­ sistant librarian. responsible for the provision of reference services, including computer-assisted reference services and library instruc­ tion and orientation; coordinating the activities of the reference assis­ tant and the preparation of bibliographies and other documents. some night and weekend hours are required. mls from an ala accredited library school; background in education and/or informa­ tion science; minimum of one year post-mls public services experi­ ence preferred. experience with computer-assisted reference ser­ vices; basic kn ow ledge of edu catio n reference materials; demonstrated ability to relate effectively to students, faculty and staff; ability to communicate effectively both orally and in writing. an edu­ cation degree and/or relevant experience and supervisory experi­ ence are preferred. ability to meet the responsibilities and require­ ments o f a tenure-track appointm e n t. salary d e p e n d e n t on qualifications and experience. salary floors are observed: affiliate, $14,500; and assistant, $15,800. send letters of application to: anne rim mer, personnel o fficer, indiana u niversity libraries, bloomington, in 47405; (812) 335-3403. closing date for applica­ tions: no earlier than june 15, 1983. indiana university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. reference librarian. two positions available as subject spe­ cialist in business assigned to the graduate business administration library. principal duties: reference assistance, database searching, orientation, and participation in classroom instruction. qualifications: accredited mls, degree in business or related subject area prefer­ red. two years experience in an academic or special business li­ brary. benefits: faculty status (subject master's degree required for promotion beyond the rank of library associate, instructor equiva­ lent); tiaa/cref; five weeks annual vacation. salary: minimum $20,000. apply: send resume and letter of application, including the names, addresses and telephone numbers of three references by june 30, 1983, to: new york university, elmer holmes bobst li­ brary, 70 washington square south, new york, ny 10012, attn: connie colter. nyu is an affirmative action institution. reference librarian, undergraduate library. re­ sponsible for providing reference services, teaching in library in­ struction program, and participating in collection development. ala-accredited mls, or equivalent, required; reference experience preferred; library instruction and database searching experience de­ sirable; ability to relate well with undergraduate students; effective communication skills. tenure-track position. 12-month appointment, 24 days annual leave, tuition remission, usual benefits. salary ranges, d ep en d en t upon qualifications: instructor, $14,000-$16,000; assistant professor, $16,000-$18,000. send let­ ter of application, resume, and 3 letters of reference or placement folder by july 15 to: jill keally, personnel librarian, the university of tennessee library, knoxville, tn 37996-1000. u tk is a n eeo, afffir' mative action, title ix, section 504 employer. reference librarian/visual arts specialist. general reference, online searching and bibliographic instruction in library of college with special programs in the performing and visual arts. col­ lection development in visual arts and art history; responsibility for slide collection and picture file. master’s degree from ala accredited library school and knowledge of french, german or ital­ ian required; preference given to candidates with second master's in art history. salary: $15,500 + depending upon qualifications and ex­ perience. faculty status and liberal fringe benefits including tiaa /cref. send resume and names of 3 references by june 30,1983, to: deanne molinari, affirmative action officer, suny college at pur­ chase, purchase, ny 10577. science reference librarian/bibliographer. re sponsible for the library’s collection development in assigned sci­ ence disciplines, including approval plans, firm orders, gifts and seri­ als. provides service at the reference desk, including some weekend and evening hours. participates in an active program of li­ brary instruction and computerized database searching in the disci­ plines of selection responsibility. requires a master's degree from an ala-accredited library school and an undergraduate degree in a science discipline or professional library experience in science refer­ ence. salary $15,500-$19,500 depending on qualifications. excel­ lent benefits including choice of retirement programs. the university of houston-central campus libraries has 1.4 million volumes, a ma­ terials budget of $1.9 million, and a staff of 54 professionals and 170 support staff. applications accepted thru july 1 ‚ 1983. send letter of application, names of 3 references, and resume to: dana rooks, university of houston libraries, 4800 calhoun, houston, tx 77004. equal opportunity.emptoyerr ........ / " — ‚ science reference librarian. search extendary participates with other librari ans in general reference duties, online searching, bibliographic śtruction, and collection development. liaison responsibilities with science departments, college of engineering, and college of nurs­ ing. ala-accredited master’s. highly desirable: two years reference ; and bibliographic instruction experience in an academic library; ex­ perience in online searching, particularly in the sciences; undergrad­ uate and/or advanced degree in science. twelve-month appoint­ ment; proposed effective date: september 1983; faculty rank and salary commensurate with qualifications, $16,500 minimum; tiaa /cref and university mandated benefits. send resume and names of three references by july 15,1983, to: raymond a. frankie, direc­ t o r , j. murrey atkins library, the university of north carolina at charlotte is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. women and minorities are encouraged to apply. serials cata loger, trinity university of san antonio, texas, invites applications for the position of serials cataloger, a faculty ap­ pointment in a rapidly-growing and dynamic university library. trinity is strongly committed to excellence in support of the liberal arts tradi­ tion at the bachelor's and master’s degree levels. primary responsi­ bilities include cataloging of all serials titles; cataloging monographs in one foreign language, either french, russian, or german; and cat­ aloging all non-book materials. may have some responsibility for the daily operation of oclc including supervision and training of oclc operators. required qualifications include: the mls from an ala accredited library school; knowledge of aacr2, particularly as re­ lated to serials; knowledge of library of congress classification sys­ tems and subject headings; reading knowledge of at least one of the foreign languages specified above; familiarity with oclc or other in house automated systems; and initiative, creativity, and strong com­ munications skills. highly desirable is experience in serials acquisi­ tions or serials cataloging in an academic library. an additional graduate degree is also desirable. instructor or assistant professor rank with tenure-track. salary minimum of $16,500, higher depend­ ing on experience or other qualifications. twelve month appoint­ ment, tiaa/cref and liberal fringe benefits. send letter of applica­ tion, detailed resume and names of three references by july 7,1983, to: chair, search committee, serials cataloger, trinity university li­ brary, 715 stadium drive, san antonio, tx 78284. affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. serials cataloging section head, university of califor­ nia, santa barbara. supervises serials section of cataloging depart­ ment. duties include original cataloging and classification of serials and analytics, revision of contributed cataloging work by library as­ sistants, and resolution of complex bibliographical problems. re214 / c& rl news quirements: mls, at least two years professional experience in seri­ als c a ta lo g in g , e x p e rie n c e w ith aac r1 a n d a a c r 2, lc classification and lc subject headings, online cataloging systems, and supervisory experience. facility with european languages and w ith a u to m a te d se ria ls c a ta lo g in g d e s ire d . s a la ry ra n ge : $17,412 -$ 3 0 ,648 dependent upon experience and qualifications. applications must be received by july 1 5,1983. send letter of appli­ cation, names of references, and resume to: margaret deacon, as­ sistant university librarian, ucsb library, university of california, santa barbara, ca 93106. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. staff services librarian, university of georgia (salary mini­ mum $17,000). duties: responsible for administering classified staff personnel program, establishing orientation and staff development programs, developing and maintaining a comprehensive personnel manual, and assisting with personnel functions related to librarians. reports to the assistant director for administrative services. the li­ braries staff consists of 150 classified personnel, 65 librarians, and 200 student assistants. qualifications: ala-accredited mls; knowl­ edge of and demonstrated interest in academ ic/research librarian­ ship; ability to work effectively with all levels o f library staff and with other university personnel; interest in and ability to present effective orientation and staff developm ent programs; ability to handle per­ sonnel matters with sensitivity and confidentiality; commitment to af­ firmative action guidelines; excellent communication skills; effective organizational skills; knowledge of principles of personnel manage­ ment preferred. application procedure: send letter of application by july 8, 1983, including resume and names of three references to: bonnie jackson clemens, assistant director for administrative ser­ vices, university of g eorgia libraries, athens, g a 30602. this posi­ tion will be filled only if suitable applicants are found. an equal o ppor­ tunity, affirmative action institution. user education librarian. 75% position (30 hrs/week); there is some possibility that the position may becom e full-time. as­ sists in planning, implementing and evaluating user education pro­ grams for undergraduate and graduate students; includes class­ room instruction. contributes to the developm ent of instructional materials, and provides some reference service. requires flexible scheduling to meet changing program needs. reports to the direc­ tor of library user education. faculty are expected to meet univer­ sity requirements for tenure and promotion, including research, pub­ lication, and service. required: mls from a la-accredited program; demonstrated interest in bibliographic instruction; ability to com m u­ nicate clearly and effectively, orally and in writing. desirable: experi­ ence in library user education, with instructional use of audio-visual materials and with online bibliographic systems; broad subject back­ ground. salary: $ 12,000-$14,400 for 75%. a pp ly by 8 july to: sharon a. sullivan, personnel librarian, ohio state university li­ braries, 1858 neil avenue, columbus, oh 43210. submit detailed resume with names and addresses of at least 3 references. an eeo/affirmative action employer. qualified women, m inority and handicapped persons as well as others are encouraged to apply. assistant director for technical services. position available: immediately. requirements: requires minimum of an ala-accredited master's degree in library science and five years of progressively more responsible professional experience in the technical services of a large academic library. a second master's preferred. demonstrated successful supervisory experience and thorough knowledge of automated systems. demonstrated ability to communicate effectively with various levels of university staff and to manage a large acquisitions budget. duties and responsibilities: participation in overall library planning, budget preparation and the formulation of library policies; development and implementation of plans and policies for technical services in consulation with divisional staff; coordination of automated processes in the division; preparation of annual and special reports on problems and progress in technical services; representation of the department on the library council; assumption of any special responsibilities and duties that are assigned by the library administration; directly supervising eight department and unit heads; coordination of divisional staff training and development. benefits: excellent benefits package including health, dental, life and disability insurance; tax-deferred annuity program available; educational assistance program. library information: the university of missouri-columbia library, an arl library, serves a student body of 24,500 and a faculty of 2,600 with a collection of over two million volumes and over 2.4 million microforms. an online catalog, to serve the four campuses of the university, is being developed. general information: founded in 1839 as the first state university west of mississippi, the university of missouri now has four campuses. the columbia campus has 19 schools and colleges, and is located midway between kansas city and st. louis. application deadline: july 15, 1983. minimum salary: $33,500. send letter of application, names of three references and resume to: pat burbridge, personnel coordinator, 104 ellis library, university of missouri-columbia, columbia, mo 65201. an equal opportunity employer. business librarian. primarily a public service position. works closely with head to determine activities, policies, and procedures. shares reference and other responsibilities, such as coordination of library instruction, database searching, computerized circulation activities, preparation of reference guides, hiring and scheduling of student staff. a staff of three library assistants plus students complement the three professional positions. required: ala—mls; degree in business; library public service experience with emphasis on reference; some knowledge or experience with online database searching. instructor rank, faculty status. $14,500 for 12 months, two-year ju n e 1983 / 215 appointment ending june 30, 1985. may be renewed. twenty days annual leave plus ten paid holidays. excellent fringes. send letter of application, resume, academic credentials, and placement file to: carl sachtleben, director of libraries, western michigan university, kalamazoo, mi 49008. an eeo, aa employer. catalog maintenance librarian, automated processing department. supervises operation of the section. responsible for maintenance of the online catalog (lcs) and the card catalog. selects, trains, supervises, and revises the work of 12 support staff and 10-15 student assistants. oversees the interface of oclc data with the online catalog and the maintenance of headings and holdings files. recatalogs and upgrades catalog information and resolves problems. is responsible for the operation of the department one or two evenings a week. reports to the head of the department. required: master’s degree from ala-accredited program; at least two years post-mls experience in original cataloging using aacr2 and lc classsification and subject headings; substantial experience with oclc or other bibliographic utilities; supervisory experience; ability to communicate effectively orally and in writing; ability to adapt to frequently changing environment. highly desirable: reading knowledge of one or more western european languages and familiarity with automated library systems. faculty are expected to meet university requirements for promotion and tenure including research, publication, and service. $17,040-$19‚560. apply by 8 july to: sharon a. sullivan, personnel librarian, ohio state university libraries, 1858 neil ave. mall, columbus, oh 43210. submit resume with names, addresses, and telephone numbers of at least three references. an aa/ee0 employer. qualified women, minority, and handicapped persons, as well as others, are encouraged to apply. collection management department head. associate librarian, $25,440-$30,672 for 12 months (ten month option with proportionate salary reduction available). required: ala-accredited degree; 7-8 years professional library experience; minimum three years as a collection management librarian in academic library. send inquiry and resume including names and addresses of three references who have observed candidate’s professional performance and human relationships, to: walter h. roeder, chair, search committee, c/o library office, 15-102 california state polytechnic university, 3801 w. temple ave., pomona, ca 91768. closing date: july 15. ee0/aa employer. coordinating cataloger, automated processing department (search extended). supervises operation of the section responsible for editing and input of cataloging data through oclc to create records in the local online catalog. trains, schedules, supervises, and revises the work of 10 support staff and 10-15 student assistants. upgrades, enhances, and solves problems related to cataloging copy through application of aacr2 and lc classification and subject headings; serves as liaison with catalog department for resolution of cataloging problems. compiles statistics and reports, and maintains procedure manuals. responsible for operation of the department one or two evenings per week. reports to the head of the department. required: master's degree from ala-accredited program, two or more years post-mls cataloging experience using aacr2, lc classification and subject headings; substantial experience with oclc or other bibliographic utilities; supervisory experience; ability to communicate effectively orally and in writing; ability to adapt to frequently changing environment. desirable: reading knowledge of one or more western european languages. faculty are expected to meet university requirements for promotion and tenure, including research, publication and service. salary: $17,040-$19‚560. apply by 8 july to: sharon a. sullivan, personnel librarian, ohio state university libraries, 1858 neil avenue mall, columbus, oh 43210. include resume and names and addresses of at least three 216 / c &rl news references. an aa/eeo employer. qualified women, minority, and handicapped persons, as well as others, are encouraged to apply. head of cataloging department. significant professional opportunity for innovative librarian in university library with full online public cataloging. responsible for unit of three professional and ten support staff. position includes responsibility for coordination of bibliographic files throughout the library. minimum qualifications; an ala-mls and at least seven years of relevant professional experience, including 1) demonstrated supervisory and management skills; 2) recent in-depth cataloging and automation related activities; 3) experience with oclc or other bibliographic utilities or networks. desirable qualifications include background in authority control, non-print media, online catalog development. salary range is $25,440-$30,672; 24 days annual vacation and liberal benefits. position is associate librarian rank, tenure-track, 12-month. send by july 17, 1983, names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three current professional references, and resume with complete record of education, experience, and salary, to: frederick ryan, assistant library director for systems and technical services, meriam library, california state university, chico, ca 95929. csu chico is located 90 miles north of sacramento in an attractive northern california setting, and is an affirmative action employer. head of circulation and interlibrary loan services. position available: september 1, 1983. requirements: ala-accredited master's degree in library science. minimum of five years professional library experience, at least two of which should be in a large academic library. at least two years experience in circulation activities; experience with automated circulation systems highly desirable. supervisory experience, communication skills and strong service orientation essential. duties and responsibilities: responsible for the administration of circulation services, which includes circulation, reserve collection sevices, interlibrary loans, shelving, billing, security, and the library annex. supervision of 13 full-time staff members, and approximately 80 student assistants. supervision of all automated activities and equipment maintenance in the department. plans for future circulation needs with library administration, appropriate library staff and university computer center. benefits: excellent benefits package including health, dental, life and disability insurance; tax-deferred annuity program available; education assistance program. library information: the university of missouri-columbia library, an arl library, serves a student body of 24,500 and a faculty of 2,600 with a collection of over two million volumes and over 2.4 million microforms. an online catalog, to serve the four campuses of the university is being developed. general information: founded in 1839 as the first state university west of mississippi, the university of missouri now has four campuses. the columbia campus has 19 schools and colleges, and is located midway between kansas city and st. louis. application deadline: july 15, 1983. minimum salary: $19,500. send letter of application, names of three references and resume to: pat burbridge, personnel coordinator, 104 ellis library, university of missouri-columbia, columbia, mo 65201. an equal opportunity employer. head, learning resources center, mansfield campus. administers library and learning resources programs and services, including planning, budgeting, staffing and directing the activities of the learning resources center which serves the 3,000 students and 175 faculty of the osu-mansfield campus and the north central technical college. manages technical and public services. reports to the associate dean of the mansfield campus and, for coordination purposes, to the vice president for academic affairs of north central technical college and to the head of undergraduate libraries in columbus. june 1983 / 217 required: mls from ala‚-accredited program; substantial post-mls professional experience, preferably in public services; experience in the development and creation of a/v materials and with a/v equipment; user-education or teaching experience; supervisory experience; ability to communicate effectively orally and in writing; and to interpret and promote the learning resources center to the campus community. highly desirable: administrative and technical services and experience, as well as familiarity with the needs of students in a technical program. faculty are expected to meet university requirements for promotion and tenure including research, publication, and service. $22,080-$27,720. apply by 8 july to: sharon a. sullivan, personnel librarian, ohio state university libraries, 1858 neil ave. mall, columbus, oh 43210. submit resume with names, addresses, and telephone numbers of at least three references. an aa/eeo employer. qualified women, minority, and handicapped persons, as well as others, are encouraged to apply. head of reference/information services and collection development. administers a department of 16 professionals and 31 support staff responsible for reference service, collection development, user education, computer searching, interlibrary loans, government documents, copy service, and four branch libraries (architecture, music, optometry, and pharmacy). under the general direction of the assistant director for public services and collection development, this position is responsible for planning, coordinating, and managing the operations of the department, training and evaluating staff, and for the direct supervision of the assistant head of reference, the coordinators of the department's service programs, and the branch librarians. current projects include a collection analysis project, implementation of a library skills workbook into the english core curriculum, and planning for the impact on reference and branch libraries of an online catalog, circulation, and acquisition system. requires ala-accredited mls, substantial professional experience (3+ years) in a major academic or research librry, proven supervisory capability, substantial experience in reference services, leadership ability with strong interpersonal skills, excellent oral and written communication skills. desirable qualifications include: experience in other areas of responsibility of reference department, with collection development experience highly desirably. salary from upper $20s, depending on qualifications and experience. excellent benefits, including choice of retirement programs, 88% of social security paid for first $16,500 of salary. the university of houston-university park libraries have a 1.4 million volume collection, a 1983/84 acquisitions budget of over $2 million, and a staff of 54 professionals and 170 support staff. the library is a member of arl. to ensure consideration applications must be received by july 10, 1983. preliminary interviews available at ala. send letter of application, names of three references, and resume to: dana rooks, university houston libraries, 4800 calhoun, houston, tx 77004. equal opportunity employer. head of technical services. responsible for all technical services operations; interacts with centralized serials, acquisitions, and cataloging units in bloomington; includes some public services responsibilities, including reference. mls from ala-accredited library school, reading knowledge of at least one modern european language; ability to supervise staff and deal with complicated procedures; 2-3 years experience required; knowledge of aacr2; must be able to meet the responsibilities of a tenure-track appointment. assistant librarian rank, minimum salary $16,000. 22 days vacation, blue cross-blue shield, dental, life, tiaa/cref. closing date july 7, 1983. send letter of application and resume, including names of three references, to: james mullins, director, indiana university at south bend, p0 box 7111, south bend, in 46634. indiana university is an eeo/aa employer. 218 / c &rl news humanities or social sciences/reference librarian, the bniversity of texas at san antonio library. duties include general reference, collection development in area of expertise, online searching, library instruction and some supervisory responsibility. ala-accredited mls degree and second master's in one of the humanities or social sciences, training in online database searching required. experience in any of the areas of responsibility highly desirable. salary: $15,000 minimum for 12 months with usual fringe benefits. send letter of application, resume, and names of three references to: margaret a. joseph, assistant director for public services, the university of texas at san antonio library, san antonio, tx 78285. utsa is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. librarian. maine maritime academy is seeking a librarian with skills in both reader services and technical services with a strong interest in computer applications. qualifications: mls, familiarity with aacr2 and with automation. academic library experience with working knowledge of oclc, lc classification, and online bibliographical searching preferred. interest in maritime field desirable. salary: $18,200. twelve-month appointment. available: august 15, 1983. send letter of application, resume, and three references by june 30, 1983, to: marjorie harrison, librarian, maine maritime academy, box c-l, castine, me 04420. librarian, reference division, maryland historical society. mls, genealogical research experience, general knowledge of maryland history. administers collection of books, specialized files. supervises reference and cataloging activity. plans for improvement of organization and accessibility of collections, including automated acquisitions and cataloging routines. minimum: $12,800. generous benefits. available july 1. resumes to: william b. keller, maryland historical society, 201 w. monument st., baltimore, md 21201. music cataloger. the university of arizona is seeking a professional librarian responsible for original cataloging of music scores, recordings, and monographs. serves as the liaison to the staff of the music collection. requirements: an ala-accredited degree; experience in cataloging both scores and recordings according to aacr2; strong background or degree in music; experience with lc classification and lcsh; facility with french and german languages preferred; experience with oclc or a similar utility desired. salary range $16‚500-$21,000. professional librarians at ua have faculty status but twelve-month continuing appointments, earn 22 days of vacation, and have a standard package of holidays and other benefits. send letter of application, resume, and names of three referees by july 15 to: w. david laird, university librarian, university of arizona library, tucson, az 85721. the university is an ee0/aa employer. reference librarian, st. mary’s college of maryland. the college is a publicly-supported liberal arts college with no religious affiliation, located on the water in the country 70 miles southeast of washington, dc. duties: reference desk work, bibliographic instruction, online searching (experience in brs or dialog preferred). we are seeking someone with a strong commitment to public services in general and bibliographic instruction in particular. schedule includes nights and weekends. qualifications: mls from ala-accredited library school. prefer* given candidates with some previous professional experience. salary starting range: $14,666-$15,520, depending on background and experience. tiaa/cref or maryland state retirement, 22 days annual leave, blue cross-blue shield. applications accepted through july 1, position available august 1983. send resume and ask three references to write letters of reference to: john g. williamson, director of the library, st. june 1983 / 219 mary’s college of maryland, st. mary's city, md 20686. st. mary's college is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. reference librarian, university of california, irvine. entry level position at assistant librarian rank. responsibilities: general and subject/specialized reference service ranging from factual information to in depth research. reference collection development (selection, weeding, and management) in literature and other humanities. liaison with faculty and students in subject areas. active participation in orientation and bibliographic instruction program at the undergraduate and graduate levels. participation in and contribution to general work of the department. some night and weekend work required. qualifications: required— mls, strong commitment to public service with an emphasis on bibliographic instruction and clear commitment to the profession, strong verbal and written communication skills, ability to work effectively, independently, and cooperatively with others; desirable— ma in english or american literature, professional experience in public service, training or experience in bibliographic instruction, knowledge of both traditional and machine-assisted reference services in an academic library. assistant librarian salary range, $17,412-$22,284 per year, depending upon qualifications and experience. benefits in uc equal to approximately 40% of salary. applicants need to send letters, resumes, and the names of three references to: michael j. maclnnes, library personnel office, university of california-irvine, po box 19557, irvine, ca 92713; (714) 833-7115. deadline for applications: july 1, 1983. applicants should indicate whether they will be available for a preliminary interview at the june ala conference. uci is an affirmative action employer. women and minorities especially encouraged to apply for this position. serials cataloger. responsible for cataloging and classification of serials in all subject areas. required: mls from ala-accredited school or equivalent; working knowledge of aacr2, lc classification and lc subject headings. reading knowledge of spanish and familiarity with oclc preferred. appointment at librarian i level. minimum salary $16,000. liberal benefits. twelve months academic appointment. closing date for applications july 15, 1983. please forward resume and three letters of recommendation to: kate maniscalco, administrative assistant, tulane university libraries, new orleans, la 70118. an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. science/social science cataloger. the university of arizona is seeking a professional librarian responsible for the original cataloging of monographs in selected subject areas, including geography, geology, statistics, economics, and technology. ua is a large, academic research library. requirements: an ala-accredited degree; working knowledge of aacr2; experience with lc classification; experience with oclc or a similar utility; at least one foreign language. advanced degree in a science or social science field is desirable. salary range $16,500-$21,000. professional librarians at ua have faculty status but twelve month continuing appointments, earn 22 days of vacation, and have a standard package of holidays and other benefits. send letter of application, resume, and names of three referees by july 15 to: w. david laird, university librarian, university of arizona library, tucson, az 85721. the university is an eeo/aa employer. checklist of selected gale reference books c o n te m p o r a r y a u th o rs v olum e 107 brings the total coverage to over 7 2,000 writers and media personalities. cumulative indexes in even numbered new v o lu m e s . $ 7 6 . 0 0 / v o l. ( s o ) ca n e w r e v is io n s er ie s . vols. 1-8 in print. $76.00/ vol. (s o ) c o n te m p o r a r y l ite r a ry c r iti c is m t h is continuing series provides excerpts from current criticism of m ajo r authors now living or deceased since 19 6 0 .1 5 0 -2 0 0 a u th o rs p e r vol. v o ls . 1 -2 4 in p rin t. $76.00/vol. (s o ) t w e n tie th -c e n tu r y l ite r a ry c r iti c is m each volume furnishes long excerpts from r e p r e s e n ta tiv e c r itic is m on th e g re a t novelists, poets, and playwrights o f 1900 1960. author portraits, starting with vol. 4. about 600pp. per vol. vols. 1-9 in print. $76.00/vol. (s o ) n in e te e n th -c e n tu ry l ite r a tu re c r iti c is m m eets the need for a co nvenient source of w ide-ranging critical com m ent on authors o f 1 8 0 0 1 9 0 0 . e a ch v o lu m e p r e s e n ts definitive overviews o f about 30 authors. about 600p p . per vol. vols. 1-3 in print. $ 7 4 .00/vol. (s o ) d i c tio n a r y o f l ite r a r y b io g ra p h y a m ulti-volum e series designed to fill a long-standing gap in literary biographical scholarship. each volume focuses on a sp ecific literary m ovem ent o r period, so the en tire series will ultimately encom pass all who have contributed to the greatness o f literatu re in a m erica, england, and elsewhere. vols. 1-17 in print. (s o ) ( w r ite f o r d e t a ils ) c o n te m p o r a r y issu es c r iti c is m g athers excerpts from many critics on a wide range o f contem porary issues, all fully indexed by writer, critic, and subject. about 6 0 w riters p er vol. about 6 0 0 pp. per vol. vol. 1 in print. $66.00/vol. (s o ) b io g ra p h y a lm a n a c 2nd ed. a guide to biographies o f over 2 3 ,0 0 0 new sw orthy p e rso n s, p ast and present. e n trie s include data for quick identifications. vol. 1. 1,352 pp. 1983. $ 4 8 .0 0 . (s o ) vol. 2, chronological index by y e a r, chronological index by d ate, g eograp hic index. 1,272 pp. 1983. $48.00. (s o ) $ 8 4 .00/set. s u p p le m e n t will cover 2 ,5 0 0 persons. softbound. 200pp. 1984. $35.00. (s o ) s o m e th in g a b o u t th e a u th o r heavily illustrated child-oriented reference tool. each volume contains articles on 150 2 0 0 juven ile and young adult authors and illustrators. about 250pp. per vol. vols. 1-30 in print. $ 5 2 .00/vol. (s o ) c h ild r e n ’s l ite r a tu re r e v ie w provides excerpts from current criticism on past and present authors of children’s books. about 50 authors per vol. illus­ trations, sta rtin g w ith vol. 4. vols. 1-4 in print. $58.00/vol. (s o ) m a g ill’s l ite r a ry a n n u al each annual two-volum e set furnishes critical evaluations and summ aries o f the previous year's 20 0 m ost significant books. about 900p p . per set. annuals for 1978 1982 in print. published by salem press. a vailable in n o rth a m erica from gale. $ 5 0 .00/set. (s o ) (so ) t h ese titles are available at g ale’s 5 % s ta n d in g o rd e r discount. a ll gale books are se n t on 90-day ap p roval. d educt 5 % if you send check w ith order. c u sto m ers o u tsid e th e u.s. a n d canada add 10% to p rices show n. gale research co. b o o k t o w e r • d e t r o it, m i 4 8 2 2 6 t o o r d e r b y p h o n e : 1-800-5 2 1-0707 to llfre e . in c anada, m ich ig an , a laska, a n d h aw aii 1-313-961-2242 college & researc libraries news a s s o c ia tio n o f c o lle g e & r e s e a rc h l ib ra rie s j u n e 1 9 8 3 v o l. 4 4 , n o . 6 h photos by f. peter weil, newbery library c areful handling o f rare research m aterials is a m ajor concern. n ote the cradle, b ooksnake, an d use o f pencil. special collections desk duty: preventing damage anthony j. a m odeo carbondale, illinois the desk attendant in a special collections, rare book, or archives reading room is in a unique position regarding the conservation of the collections. both surveillance for the prevention of theft and monitor­ ing the physical treatment of materials are obviously important responsibilities. an additional contribu­ tion which deserves attention is the desk attendant’s attitude toward the collections and their handling, which is picked up by both patrons and staff. the following suggestions have been drawn up as a sample of the kinds of concerns that should be addressed in the training of special collections desk attendants. (continued on p. 180) acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries 146 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 c l a s s i f i e d a d s career oppoiiunities from across the country deadlines: orders for regular classified advertisem ents must reach the acrl office on or before the second of the month preceding publication of the issue (e.g., septem ber 2 for the o ctober issue). should this date fall on a weekend or holiday, ads will be accepted on the next business day. late job listings will be accepted on a space-available basis after the second of the month. rates: c lassified advertisem ents are $9.50 per line for institutions that are acrl members, $11.50 for others. late job notices are $22.00 per line fo r institutions that are acrl members, $26.75 for others. o rganizations subm it­ ting ads will be charged according to their m em bership status. display ad rates range from $435 to $820 based upon size. please call for sizes and rates. or see our website: http://w w w .ala.org/acrl/advert2.htm l. guidelines: for ads that list an application deadline, we suggest that date be no sooner than the 20th day of the month in which the notice appears (e.g., o ctober 20 for the o ctober issue). all job announcem ents should include a salary range per policy of the am erican library association (ala). job announcem ents will be edited to exclude discrim inatory references. applicants should be aware that the term s faculty rank and status vary in meaning am ong institutions. internet: c&rl news classified ads are accessible on the w orld w ide w eb at http://w w w .ala.org/acrl/c& rlnew 2.htm l. ads will be placed approxim ately 2 -3 weeks before the printed edition of c&rl news is published. contact: c hristopher becker, c lassified advertising m an­ ager, c&rl news c lassified advertising departm ent, acrl, am erican library association, 50 e. huron st., chicago, il 60611-2795; (31 2)2 80 -2 5 13 ; fax: (312) 280 7663 or (312) 280-2520; e-mail: c & rlnew sads@ ala.org. policy: ala policy requires that organizations recruiting through ala publications or placement services comply with ala anti-discrimination policies. policy 54.3 states that “ala is committed to equality of opportunity for all library employ­ ees or applicants for employment, regardless of race, color, creed, sex, age, physical or mental handicap, individual life­ style, or national origin.” by advertising through ala ser­ vices, the organization agrees to comply with this policy. positions open access services division head. isu's milner library seeks an innovative, service-oriented leadertom anagecirculation services, print and electronic reserve, interlibrary loan, document delivery, storage, and building security with a staff of 12 career fte employees. this library faculty member will evaluate workflow, procedures, and policies of access service units; maintain and apply current knowledge of copyright and intellectual property issues; work general reference desk for occasional weekend hours; participate in library and university governance; pursue scholarship and service tofulfill tenure requirements. qualifications: ala accredited master's, 2nd advanced degree, 2 years’ experience in auto­ mated circulation systems, 3years’ supervision, excellent communication skills. salary: $37,600 at assistant professor, plus $2,400 administrative stipend. standard benefits. starts: july 1,2000. to apply: by february 1, 2000, submit letter of application, resume, and names of three references to: access services search committee, attn: cheryl elzy, dean of univer­ sity libraries, milner library, illinois state university, cam pus box 8900, normal, il 61790-8900. for more on milner library, contact our website at www.m lb.ilstu.edu. illinois state is an affirmative action/equal opportunity university encouraging diversity. assistant librarians. the university library seeks professionals to join its team-based, innovative, flexible, user-oriented organization. the library is com mitted to continuous learning, increasing client self-suffi ciency, fostering diversity in thecam pus environment, and furthering its own cultural transmission, educational, and preservation roles. the fine arts and humanities tearn announces a search forfour assistant librar­ ians the in following areas: music (job #15519), interdisciplinary (job #15520), english & american literature (job #15521), and media arts (job #15522). these positions require a m aster’s degree in library/ information science (mls) from an ala-accredited institution. activities include selection of information resources, library education and course related instruction, in-depth reference and consultation services, liaison . with faculty, assessment and evaluation of information and service needs of customers, general reference services, training and supervision and library-wide responsibilities. in addition, the digital library initiatives group is recruiting for an assistant librarian. this position requires an mls from an ala-accredited institution, a m aster’s degree in m anage­ ment information systems, or another relevant field of study. only appli­ cants with an mls degree may be granted continuing eligibility status. a selected candidate without an mls will receiveayear-to-yearappointment. the successful candidate will provide leadership in the selection, budget­ ing, and implementation of majordigitization initiatives; establish evalua­ tive criteria from which priorities may be determined, policies developed, and performance measures specified; and establish the technical archi­ tecture supporting the library’s transition to digital services. for complete duties, responsibilities and qualifications, see the human resources website at http://www.hr.arizona.edu. the hiring rangeforall five positions is $35,460-$44,157 doe. to apply, send a cover letterciting position title salary guide listed below are the latest minimum starting figures recommended by state library associations and the north carolina state library for professional library posts in these states. these recommendations are intended for governmental agencies that employ librarians. the recommendations are advisory only, and ala has not adopted recommendations for minimum salaries. for information on librarian salaries, job seekers and employers should consider these recom­ mended minimums, as well as other salary surveys (such as the survey in the october 15, 1989, issue of library journal, the ala survey of librarian salaries, the annual arl salary survey, orthe annual cupa administrative compensation survey) when evaluating professional vacancies. for more information, contact the ala office for library personnel resources. connecticut $31,273 delaware $22,500+ lllinois $27,400# indiana varies* iowa $24,533 louisiana $22,000 maine varies* massachusetts $27,554* new jersey $33,188 new york varies* north carolina $27,641 + ohio $25,198+ pennsylvania $26,400 rhode island $29,800 south carolina varies* south dakota $22,000 texas $28,000 vermont $26,464 west virginia $22,000 wisconsin $32,240 *r a th e rth a n establish one statew ide salary m inim um , som e state associations have adopted a form ula based on such varia bles as com parable salaries for public school teachers in each com m unity o rth e grade level of a professional librarian post. in these cases, you may wish to contact the state association for m inim um salary inform ation. +salary m inim um s for public librarians only. #option for local formula. http://www.ala.org/acrl/advert2.html http://www.ala.org/acrl/c&rlnew2.html mailto:rlnewsads@ala.org http://www.mlb.ilstu.edu http://www.hr.arizona.edu c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 147 assistant/associate librarian arizona state university west life sciences/nursing librarian. we seek an individual who can plan, deliver, and assess research support and instruction for diverse students, faculty, and staff. responsibilities include developing innovative approaches to research assistance, collection development, and delivery of services in an organization committed to electronic resources and access. this position provides assistance for complex research inquiries, collaborates with faculty in the design of instructional/learning opportunities, and promotes the integration of infor­ mation competencies into the curriculum. the position carries subject assignments in life sciences and nursing. asu west library is a team-based organization. librarians individually and collaboratively develop programs, services, and web-based resources and select electronic and other mate­ rials. this is a continuing-appointment (tenure) eligible position; scholarship and participa­ tion in service activities are expected. asu west library is in the initial phases of implementing new models of service built on desktop delivery, customizable user interfaces, and information literacy. the library m akes ex te n siv e use o f e le c tro n ic sy ste m s and re s o u rc e s and sp en d s m ore than $ l m annually for collections and access. visit our web site for additional information: http://www.west.asu.edu/asuw/cam pus/lib/libinfo.htm l g eneral inform ation about asu west: asu west, a com ponent o f a rizona state university’s multi-campus plan vision, offers junior, senior, and graduate level research based courses in the arts and sciences, business, education, human services, nursing, and wom en’s studies. the campus is committed to advancing educational, economic, cultural, and social development of the community. located in the northwest phoenix metropolitan area, asu west serves 5,000 students with an expected growth to 10,000 students at its beautiful new campus. please visit our web page at: http://www.west.asu.edu required qualifications: an ala-accredited mls. experience with: a networked com ­ puting environment; database searching; web search engines; web page development; de­ velopment and/or delivery of technology-based instruction; reference service; a variety of computer applications and information formats. demonstrated skill in communication, critical thinking, and/or problem solving. relevant experience or formal education in the life sci­ ences or nursing. preferred qualifications: post-mls professional experience. experience in: development of electronic delivery of services; selection of electronic resources; project/program devel­ opment, management, or assessment. evidence of working knowledge in a variety of web page authoring tools; spanish language ability. experience in or demonstrated commitment to a team-oriented environment. understanding of academic institutions and higher educa­ tion issues. rank and salary: assistant/associate librarian, salary commensurate with experience and rank; $32,000 minimum for assistant librarian. deadline for applications: applications must be received by february 15, or by the 1st or 15th day of each month thereafter until the position is filled. to apply: submit letter of application addressing background and experience relevant to the qualifications; current resume; and names, addresses, telephone numbers and e-mail addresses of four professional references to: deg farrelly, chair, life sciences/nursing librarian search committee, asu west library, p.o. box 37100, phoenix, arizona 85069-7100. asu west is an eo/aa employer. http://www.west.asu.edu/asuw/campus/lib/libinfo.html http://www.west.asu.edu 148 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 and job #, a current resume, and the names, addresses, and phone numbers of 3 professional references to: martina johansen, the univer­ sity of arizona library, 1510 e. university, room c327, p.o. box210055, tucson, az 85721-0055. you may also send e-mail inquiries to: ghendric @ bird.library.arizona.edu or johansen @ bird.library.arizona.edu. review of application materials begins february21,2000, and will continue until the positions are filled. complete job descriptions will be sent upon receipt of letter of interest. the university of arizona is an eeo/aa employerm/w/da/. catalog librarian. school of the art institute of chicago, john m. flaxman library. full-time, professional position with supervisory duties. see http://www.artic.edu/aic/employment/salaried.htmlforfulldescription. responsibilities: cataloging, classification and processing of all library materials. copy and original cataloging in oclc & illinet online. supervises one part-time professional staff member, plus student workers. reports to head of technical services. required: ala mls. minimum of 3 years cataloging experience in professional, supervisory position. lc classification, lc subject headings, aacr2+, marc, oclc or other major bibliographic utility; windows fluency. demonstrated planning, in­ terpersonal and communication skills. strong commitment to service. preferred: degree(s) in arts or humanities. experience: illinet online; dra; non-english-language materials. basic preservation knowledge. familiarity with academic environment. compensation: starting salary $30,000 to $33,500. generous benefits. applications must be received by february 29,2000. reference job code mc787. resume and cover letter to: shannon mcginnis, human resources, the art institute of chi­ cago, 111 south michigan avenue, chicago, il60603; aic.jobs@artic.edu; fax: (312)857-0141. eoe. cataloger. the university of arkansas libraries seek a full-time catalogerto perform original cataloging for monographs, curriculum materials, and selected av materials. the person in this position will supervise one fte assistant, assist with the management of copy catalog ing for books, and perform other professional duties as assigned. the cataloger reports to the head of the cataloging department. required qualifications: ala-accredited mls; knowledge of aacr2, oclc, marc, lcsh, and lc classification, excellent oral and written communication skills. preferred qualifications: a minimum of two years of cataloging experience in an online environment; familiarity with innovative interfaces systems; supervisory experience; and bibliographic knowledge of one or more western-european languages. minimum beginning salary forap pointment at the tenure-track faculty rank of assistant librarian/assistant professor: $28,000; twelve-month appointment. benefits: tiaa/cref or fidelity; 22 days annual leave; tuition reduction; and other benefits. the university of arkansas, fayetteville, is the primary land-grant institution and research university in the state and offers a comprehensive range of undergraduate, graduate, and professional degrees. fayetteville (popula­ tion over 56,000) is situated in the ozarks in one of the most rapidly growing areas of the country, offering numerous cultural and recreational opportu­ nities associated with natural beauty and a university community. review of applications will begin february 25, 2000. send letter of application, instruction librarian university of northern colorado the university of northern colorado seeks appli­ cants for the position of instruction librarian & assistant professor of library science, position number 21.921. required: master's degree from an ala-accredited library school; experience in a college, university, or research library appro­ priate to the position. this is a term track position. the position reports to the head of instructional services. responsible for developing and deliv­ ering library orientations, course-specific in­ struction sessions, and teaching information literacy credit course. develops print and elec­ tronic instructional and promotional resources including web pages and tutorials. must have strong interpersonal skills and the ability to iden­ tify and respond to instructional needs. salary commensurate with experience and qualifica­ tions. starting date is july 1, 2000 (negotiable). the position is contingent on funding from the colorado state legislature, approval by the board of trustees, and subject to the policies and regulations of the university of northern colo­ rado. all application materials will be accepted until march 1. send letter of application highlight­ ing candidate’s suitability, resume and the names, addresses, telephone numbers of three refer­ ences to: george r. jaramillo instruction librarian search committee c/o administration office james a. michener library university of northern colorado greeley, co 80639 unc is an a a eo employer and committed to fostering diversity in its student body, faculty and staff. aaeo office, carter 2011. librarian (c a ta lo g e r ) vacancy a nnouncem ent #990341 gs-1410-09 (9304) $ 3 5 ,3 1 0 $ 4 5 ,9 0 0 gs-1410-11 (9305) $ 4 2 ,7 2 4 $55,541 gs-1410-12 (9306) $ 5 1 ,2 0 4 $ 6 6 ,6 6 4 *salary reflects locality pay for calendar year 2000. the library of congress is seeking a librarian to perform descriptive and subject cataloging of monographs and serials in an online mode in the medical disciplines and biotechnology. the incumbent will search bibliographic databases to determine rela­ tionship of items to existing bibliographic records; analyze material to determine proper access points, classifications and content designation; and perform research to establish and recommend new subject headings and new classification numbers. the ideal candidate must have demonstrat­ ed reading knowledge of the german lan­ guage ana experience in cataloging rules, procedures and practices. knowledge of automated systems and excellent com m uni­ cation and writing skills are required. applicants must obtain a copy of vacancy announcem ent # 9 9 0 3 4 1 in order to apply fo r this position. the vacancy announce­ ment lists knowledge, skills, and abilities (ksas) that must be addressed. for a copy of this vacancy announcement and an application form, please call the library of conqress employment o ffice at (202) 707 4 3 1 5 or (202) 7 0 7 -5 6 2 7 . o ne can also obtain copies from our web site at lcw eb.loc.aov/nr/em ploym ent or by visit ing the library of congress employment room l m -1 0 7 , 101 independence avenue, se, washington, dc m on. fri. 8 :3 0 a.m. 4 :3 0 p.m. applications must be received no later than march 3, 2 0 0 0 . http://www.artic.edu/aic/employment/salaried.htmlforfulldescription mailto:aic.jobs@artic.edu c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 149 resume, and names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three current references to juana r. young, acting directorof libraries, university of arkansas, fayetteville, ar 72701 -1201. the university of arkansas is an equal-opportunity, affirmative-action employer. applicants must have proof of legal authority to work in the united states. coordinator of bibliographic services & systems. as­ sistant/associate professor, university library. required: graduate de­ gree in librarianship from an ala-accredited institution; minimum of five years of progressively responsible professional experience in academic library technical services, including some experience at the supervisory level; knowledge of and experience with library automated systems and services; excellent verbal, written and interpersonal skills; knowledge of standards, issues and trends in acquisitions, technical services, digital library initiatives, metadata, electronic publishing and copyright. pre­ ferred: proven managerial and leadership experience; knowledge of inno­ vative interfaces; experience with resource sharing consortia. this is a tenure-track, 12-month calendar year position. review of applications will begin on march 1, 2000, and continue until position is filled. submit a resume and cover letterto: william o’malley, search committee chair (log# 141034crl), university of rhode island, p.o. box g, kingston, rl 02881. the university of rhode island is an aa/eoe and is committed to increasing the diversity of its faculty, staff and students. persons from under-represented groups are encouraged to apply. coordinator of library instruction. washington state university, pullman, washington. available immediately. wsu libraries seek candidates who are leaders, enthusiastic aboutteaching, and work successfully in a team environment. our expanding and innovative instruc­ tion program supports the university’s writing-across-the-curriculum ob­ jectives, collaborates with multiple university departments and programs, provides internet classes, and offers a credit course in research and information literacy. program emphasis includes developing models for teaching and learning information access skills as part of the university’s “virtual campus” initiative, which seeks to infuse new technologies and teaching methods into the campus-wide curriculum. specific responsi­ bilities: provides direction, planning and coordination to deliver a creative and effective library instruction program. in cooperation with instruction librarians, library faculty, and teaching faculty, this individual will develop, design, and implement instructional programs, methods, and materials incorporating a variety of technologies. teaches information literacy to lower and upper division undergraduates, graduate students, and other clientele. serves as a resource for library colleagues participating in dean of library services the american college of greece the american college of greece invites appli­ cations for the position of dean of library services, effective august 1, 2000. the american college of greece is the oldest and largest independent, american-sponsored educational institution in europe. today it en­ rolls approximately 8000 students in three divisions: pierce college, a six-year high school; the junior college, awarding associate de­ grees; and deree college, a four-year under­ graduate college offering instructional pro­ grams across a wide spectrum of arts and sciences and business administration, ac­ credited by the neasc. the american college of greece is nonsectarian and nonprofit. the dean of library services is based at the deree college learning center, a handsome and modern facility housing a collection of over 50,000 volumes and well equipped with infor­ mation technology, and also oversees the smaller collections of the other two divisions at their respective locations. the dean is respon­ sible for the supervision, operations, policies, and procedures of the library system. the dean should have appropriate profes­ sional training and extensive experience in library management, including conversance with contemporary technologies. international experience will be an advantage but is not required. particular challenges of the position will be to oversee a major increase in the collection and an expansion of the electronic services. applications including a resume, cover letter and references should be sent to: dr. william mcgrew vp for strategic planning the american college of greece 6 gravias street, aghia paraskevi athens 15342, greece library director cardinal stritch university c ardinal stritch u niversity, a c atholic, franciscan, coeducational institution, the sec­ ond largest private institution in wisconsin, whose main campus is located in a suburb of milwaukee, seeks an individual to assume the position of library director. the successful candidate will be an energetic, creative librar­ ian who will provide strong, forward-looking leadership and effective management for a service-oriented library. requirements: mls from an ala-accredited library school; minimum of five years experi­ ence and significant leadership in an academic library; excellent written and oral communica­ tion skills; good understanding of the needs of a scholarly community; well informed about library automation, information technology applications and instructional services, having an informed vision of “the library of the future.” desired additional qualifications: a second master’s degree in a liberal arts field; teaching experience at the college level; and evidence of continued professional development. salary and benefits are competitive and com­ mensurate with qualifications and experience. nominations and applications, including re­ sume and the names/addresses of three ref­ erences should be submitted to: dr. marna boyle chair, library search committee cardinal stritch university 6801 north yates road milwaukee, wl 53217 equal opportunity employer 150 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 library instruction. produces instructional materials in print and web-based formats. conducts needs assessment and evaluation of instructional ser­ vices. proactively promotes the library instruction program through market­ ing, public relations, and outreach. provides reference service. supervises library instruction librarian. reports to the assistant director for public and research services. qualifications: required: ala-accredited de­ gree; demonstrated commitment to library public services and instruction; demonstrated relevant teaching experience; excellent interpersonal and communication skills; ability to work effectively in a collegial environment. preferred: experience developing, coordinating, promoting, and assess­ ing instructional programs; familiarity with current theory, practices, and issues related to library instruction; administrative and supervisory experi­ ence; experience in the application of new technologies to instruction. salary: from $40,000, commensurate with qualifications and experience. rank: librarian 2; faculty status. otherbenefits:tiaa/cref, broad insur­ ance program, 22 days vacation and 12 days sick leave peryear. application review begins: march 10,2000. send letter of application, resume, and names of three references with complete mailing addresses, telephone numbers, and e-mail addresses to: bonny l. boyan, washington state university libraries, p.o. box 645610, pullman, wa99164-5610. wsu libraries’ home page is: http://www.wsulibs.wsu.edu. wsu is an eeo employer. protected group members are encouraged to apply. director of the library. indiana university southeast invites applications and nominationsforthe position of director of the library. iu southeast is a regional campus of the indiana university system, located across the ohio riverfrom louisville, kentucky, with astudent body of about 6,000. responsibilities of director include overall administration of iu southeast library, budgeting and financial management, personnel man­ agement, strategic planning, and advocacy of the library. director reports to vice chancellor of academic affairs, isam em berofthe iu southeast academic council, and holds library faculty status. director also works cooperatively with dean of indiana university libraries and is a memberof council of head librarians of indiana university. requirements: mls from an american library association-accredited program; at leastthree years of progressively responsible administrative experience in an academic library setting; strong orientation to technology and significant experience with library technology; strong oral and written communication skills; a collegial leadership style; and qualifications for appointment to faculty tenure-track position. candidates should also have a creative and coherent vision of the role of the library in the swiftly changing academic environ­ ment; a breadth of practical library experience encompassing both public and technical services; and demonstrated participation in campus life and community activities. salary competitive, dependent on qualifications and experience. to apply, send letter of interest, curriculum vitae and three current letters of reference to: library director search committee, c/o human resources, indiana university southeast, 4201 grant line road, box99-32, new albany, in47150. review of applications begins march 15,2000, and will continue until position is filled. iu southeast is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer. education services specialist/librarian. duke university medical center library is seeking an enthusiastic and innovative individual forthe position of education services specialist/librarian. responsibilities include planning, coordinating, and developing educational programs; developing instructional materials and working collaboratively with faculty in developing educational resources. specialized duties will reflect needs of library and the skills and experience of the selected candidate and may focus on one of these areas: instructional/educational technology applica­ tions; informatics and information management training; or evidence based medicine. minimum starting salary $35,300. afull job description, including qualifications and how to apply, is available at http:// www.mc.duke.edu/mclibrary. review of applications will begin february 15. applicants should send their resume and the names of three references to: eric albright, duke university medical center library, box 3702, durham, nc 27710. eoe/aa. electronic resources access specialist. the university of iowa libraries is seeking a professional catalogerto provide leadership and expertise fo rdefining and supplying appropriate access to the librar­ ies’ electronic collections. the incumbent will supervise electronic re­ sources cataloging and database maintenance, and create original marc cataloging records and non-arc metadata records for electronic re­ sources. s/he will participate in the development of strategies for the control of digital collections, coordinate current cataloging practices with developing national standards and shifting local needs, and supervise the social sciences librarian university of richmond the social sciences reference librarian is one of six librarians who provide reference, outreach, and instruction services in boatwright memorial library (main library). the university of richmond has an innovative program in outreach and instruction and we intend to hire a dynamic librarian who will contribute in this important area. as part of this team, the librarian’s schedule requires at least one evening a week as well as participation in a weekend rotation. the social sciences librarian conducts library instruction sessions, serves as liaison to one or more academic departments, prepares web pages and other bibliographic resources, participates actively in collection develop­ ment, provides staff training, and performs other duties as assigned. reports to the head of outreach and instruction services. required qualifications: ala-accredited mls; working knowledge of reference sources, both print and electronic; good oral and written communication skills; good interpersonal skills; ability to work successfully in a team environment; and a strong commitment to public service. preferred qualifications: 1 -2 years of general reference experience; a bachelor’s or master’s degree (or appropriate experience) in the social sciences (psychology, sociology, etc.); teaching experience; experience using technology in an educational or library setting; experience with microsoft office, electronic databases, and web page development. salary and benefits: commensurate with experience. benefits include tiaa/cref, paid medical insurance, 20 days vacation and 14 paid holidays. contact: applications received by march 15, 2000, will receive first consideration. applicants should submit a letter of application, resume, and the names, addresses, telephone numbers and email addresses of at least three current professional references to: human resource services political science bldg. university of richmond richmond, va 23173 http://www.wsulibs.wsu.edu http://www.mc.duke.edu/mclibrary c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 151 head of reference and instruction carleton college laurence mckinley gould library the laurence mckinley gould library is a vibrant center of the intellectual and cultural life of the campus, and serves a significant educational role in a college community committed to excellence in learning and teaching. we seek an experienced, talented and energetic head of reference and instruction to join us in developing an imaginative, student-centered liberal arts college library program. beginning in the fall of 2000, we are planning a major expansion of reference and instructional services. a major feature will be an experimental program of information literacy that is completely integrated into the curriculum of the college. this newly created position represents a unique opportunity to provide creative leadership, working in collaboration with an exceptional group of librarians, faculty and students, in building a dynamic set of sophisticated information resources and services. as a member of the library’s management team, you will participate in library-wide policymaking, planning, and administration. carleton’s library has an outstanding undergraduate collection and a talented staff of 26. information about the library can be found at http://www.library.carleton.edu. carleton college is a highly selective, residential, non-sectarian liberal arts college offering degrees in 33 fields of study and seven interdisciplinary programs to 1,850 men and women. carleton is consistently ranked among the nation’s top liberal arts institutions. it is located in the historic town of northfield, minnesota, 45 miles south of minneapolis and st. paul. responsibilities: the head of reference and instruction provides leadership in planning, implementing and evaluating information services. works closely with faculty and college administration in defining and achieving the college’s goals for information services and information literacy. supervises 4 or more reference librarians, participates in teaching both students and faculty. oversees reference collection development and participates in strengthening and extending a liaison program which, in partnership with colleagues in academic computing, provides a high level of computing and information support to faculty campus-wide. qualifications: experience in developing, evaluating and managing effective programs of reference and instruction. excellent teaching skills and broad familiarity with reference resources and trends and issues in academic information services. minimum of 5 years of academic library management experience. sophisticated supervisory skills, including supervision of librarians; good listener; sensitive and supportive approach to personnel management. ability to view issues from a library-wide perspective, foster teamwork and esprit de corps, and stimulate cross­ functional collaboration. strong interpersonal skills and ability to formulate ideas clearly in both written and spoken form. ala-accredited mls. strong background in using and in implementing access to a wide range of electronic resources, and a solid grounding in the world of books and scholarship. demonstrated ability to work effectively with faculty and students in interpreting and advancing the work of the library in support of learning and teaching. strong experience and skills in evaluating and implementing information technology applications, and in collaborating with academic computing operations in a campus setting. advanced degree in an academic discipline preferred; college library experience desirable. salary and fringe benefits highly competitive. for further information on salary and fringe benefits, contact bonnie jean mork, director of human resources, (507) 646-4175. to apply, please submit a letter of application and resume, along with the names, addresses, email, and phone numbers of three references. review of applications will begin february 29, 2000, and continue until the position is filled. materials should be sent to: samuel demas head of reference and instruction search committee laurence mckinley gould library carleton college northfield, mn 55057 carleton college is an equal opportunity employer committed to excellence through diversity. http://www.library.carleton.edu 152 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 establishment and revision of procedures for providing intellectual access to electronic resources, including cd-roms, digital images, numeric files, electronic journals, text files, and online databases. in addition, this position will provide leadership fo r the formulation of policies related to access to electronic resources and the role of the opac in providing coherent access to in-house and external electronic resources including locally developed scholarly digital resources. the incumbent will address issues related to topics such as metadata standards, persistent identifiers for networked resources, record format and record contents (marc, sgml, dublin core, multiple versions) for digital resources, the relation­ ship of new access mechanisms to traditional catalogs, and linkages among various access systems. successful completion of these tasks will require the ability to work both independently and as a team member on a variety of issues in a dynamic environment. qualifications: required: mls from an ala-accredited library school; knowledge of or recent cataloging experience in an automated environment; knowledge of aacr2r, lc subject headings and classification, and usmarc formats; an interest in or experience with providing access to electronic resources; strong communication and organizational skills; aptitude for complex, analytical work with attention to detail; demonstrated problem-solving skills; flexibility; ability to prioritize work to ensure that departmental and library goals are realized; ability to work effectively in a production-oriented environment; and a demonstrated commitment to professional growth and development. preferred: recent electronic resources and/or serials cataloging experi­ ence in an academic or research library within the last five years; working knowledge of sgml, html and tei standards; experience with oclc and/or rlin; reading knowledge of two western european foreign lan­ guages. salary and appointment: appointment rank and salary will be based on relevant experience and educational background. appointment will be made at the librarian i or ii level. salary will be commensurate with experience and educational background, and will be competitive with peer institutions. the salary range for this position is $30,000 to $36,000. the university offers an attractive package of benefits including 24 days of paid vacation per year, tiaa/cref retirement, and a flexible selection of medical, life, dental, and vision insurance, childcare credit, and additional benefits. application procedures: applications must be received by febru­ ary 25, 2000. minorities and women are particularly encouraged to apply. qualified individuals should submit a letter of application, resume, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three references to: janice simmons-welburn, director, human resources and processing ser­ vices, university of iowa libraries, iowa city, ia 52242-1420; (319) 335 5871. the university of iowa is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. women and minorities are encouraged to apply, http:// www.lib.uiowa.edu/index.html. evening reference/assistant cataloging librarian.the university of scranton, harry & jeanette weinberg memorial library. tenure-track position. the university of scranton seeks an evening refer­ ence librarian/assistant cataloger. dual responsibilities include providing a full range of evening reference services, including user education, and cataloging activities. qualifications: ala-accredited mls and library experience. knowledge of basic reference sources and database search­ ing techniques. familiarity with oclc, aacr2, lc classification. strong supervisory, communication, and interpersonal skills. second subject area master's preferred. twelve-month faculty appointment, tenure track. hours: monday-thursday, 2 -1 0 p.m., friday, 8:30-4:30. reports to technical and public services assistant directors. the university of scranton, located in northeastern pennsylvania nearthe pocono mountains, is a highly selec­ tive catholic and jesuit institution of 4,800 students. the university is committed to liberal arts education and offers strong professional and pre­ professional programs. review of applications will begin march 15,2000. the search will remain open until the position is filled. applications: interested candidates should submit a letterof application, list of 3 refer­ ences, and current vita to: charles e. kratz, library director, harry & jeanette weinberg memorial library, the university of scranton, scranton, pa 18510-4634. the university of scranton is an aa/eeo employer/educator. head of cataloging. washington state university, pullman, wash­ ington. available immediately. lead cataloging beyond tradition. put your knowledge to good use in a leadership position emphasizing database creation, high productivity, effective access to library collections, collabo­ ration, and creative problem solving. under the direction of the assistant director for technical services, this position serves as head of catalog­ ing and principal cataloger. responsibilities include management of the bibliographic control department, liaison with public services, staff train­ ing, monitoring of workflow, assuring quality access to library materials, and insuring a productive environment that values quality and quantity. the bibliographic control department is responsible for cataloging, marking, and some ils database maintenance functions, and employs 3 catalog librarians and 13 classified staff. tenure-track position at arl member library. required: ala-accredited degree. five years of original catalog­ ing experience in a large library setting; knowledge of authority control; knowledge of traditional cataloging tools (aacr2, lcsh, etc.); experirutgers university libraries women’s studies librarian: selects women’s and gender studies materials; provides instruction, training, reference; liaison to the women’s studies program. develops/maintains www pages. reading knowledge of european and/or other languages and relevant experience in the humanities and social sciences. (app # 1 3 7 ) world history/jewish studies librarian: selector for western and eastern europe, asia, m iddle east and jewish studies. provides instruction, training, reference; liaison to history and jewish studies faculties. develops/maintains www pages. knowledge of one european language, preferably french or german; knowl­ edge of hebrew desirable. (app# 138) anglo-american history/political science librarian: selector for american, british history and political science. provides instruction, training, reference; liaison to history, p olitical science faculty. develops/ maintains www pages. (app# 139) instruction and information services librarian: develops/implements undergraduate library instruction and inform ation literacy programs; provides reference and training for library faculty and staff. develops/ maintains www pages. experience with teaching/training, instructional technology and electronic resources required; advanced degree in education, instructional technology or instructional design preferable; experience with business information services and undergraduate services highly desirable. (app# 140) an p o s itio n s are based in the new b ru n s w ic k l ib ra rie s . we re q u ire an a l a /m l s , th re e ye ars relevant professional experience for a tenure track appointment with minim um salary of $41,751 dependent upon experience and qualifications; knowledge and experience with electronic resources and technology; a scholarly record and service in professional associations. see the complete position profiles on our website at http://www.libraries.rutgers.edu/ under "news and events". candidates applying by february 21, 2000 w ill receive first consideration. submit resume, cover letter, and names of three references to; sandra troy (app # ) , libraries personnel officer, rutgers university libraries, 169 college ave., new brunswick, nj 08901; fax: 732-932-7637; e-mail: stroy@ rci.rutgers.edu. rutgers, the state university of new jersey, is committed to affirmative action and equal opportunity. http://www.lib.uiowa.edu/index.html http://www.libraries.rutgers.edu/ mailto:stroy@rci.rutgers.edu c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 153 ence with oclc; experience with a local integrated library system; knowl­ edge of cataloging trends and national initiatives; knowledge of technical services automation; and excellent communication skills. preferred: su­ pervisory and management experience; experience with innovative inter­ faces inc. system. salary: from $45,000 commensurate with qualifications and experience. rank: librarian 2; faculty status. other benefits: tiaa/ cref, broad insurance program, 22 days vacation and 12 days sick leave per year. application review begins: march 10, 2000. send letter of application, resume, and names of three references with complete mailing addresses, telephone numbers, and e-mail addresses to: bonny l. boyan, washington state university libraries, p.o. box 645610, pullman, wa 99164-5610. wsu libraries’ home page is: http://www.wsulibs.wsu.edu. wsu is an eeo employer. protected group members are encouraged to apply. head of hper (health, p hysical education, and recreation) library. indiana university libraries, bloomington. under general direction of coordinator for the science libraries, responsible for leader­ ship and overall management of the campus library, including planning, supervising, and evaluating library’s sen/ices, operations, and collections; manages budget, provides extensive bibliographic instruction and delivery of information services to respective departments; consults regularly with hper’s library committee and serves on appropriate hper and iub libraries committees. qualifications: mls degree with academic back­ ground or prior work experience in relevant areas or combination of equivalent education and experience. preference to be given to candidates with training or experience in one of the subject areas served by hper library as well as to those with prior management and instruction experi­ ence. demonstrated ability to work creatively and pragmatically in chang­ ing environment; solid experience in planning and evaluating library ser­ vices and collections; excellent oral and written communication and inter­ personal skills. ability to meet responsibilities and requirements of tenure track appointment. salary and benefits: salary and rank negotiable and competitive, dependent upon qualifications and experience. this is a tenure-track academic appointment that includes eligibility fo rsabbatical leaves. benefits include medical, dental, and group life insurance; tiaa/ cref retirement/annuity; and liberal vacation and sick leave. to apply: send letter of application, professional vita, and names, addresses, and phone numbers of four references to: yolanda cooper-birdine, acting libraries human resources officer, indiana university libraries, main web development librarian georgia state university georgia state university (gsu), a dynamic urban university in downtown atlanta, is seeking a web development librarian to create a library website that is the “portal of choice” for the faculty and students of gsu. this position will have overall responsibility for the design, development, and maintenance of the library’s public and internal websites; provide leadership in defining and creating innovative web-based services; engage in staff training in the development of new internet resources; serve within the systems department office team. responsibilities: develops, manages, and coordinates library website content and format, working closely with web authors, public service departments, and special collections/archives. trains and assists library faculty and staff in use of web development software and provides training and documentation in creating and maintaining internet resources. develops and maintains internal library databases. provides technical expertise and assists with the integration of web-based resources into library instruction, online tutorials, collection development, and reference services. investigates emerging technologies, tests new software, and experiments with new strategies for optimizing the development and use of internet resources, including oclc’s corc project. pursues digitizing initiatives. develops guidelines, standards, and procedures for web development. assesses software and strategies for meeting the library’s strategic goals. requirements: ala-accredited master’s degree in library science, electrical engineering or information science or equivalent. experience in an academic institution. strong technical skills, including knowledge of and experience in web design. effective oral and written communication skills. preferred: additional degree and/or experience in computer science. experience as trainer or consultant. experience using web programming languages and scripting. available: immediately. salary and rank: $43,000-$50,000 for twelve months commensurate with qualifications and experience. appointment at faculty rank, on a contract renewal basis. to apply: send letter addressing above. include resume and names, addresses, and phone numbers of three references to: carmen newton human resources officer georgia state university pullen library 100 decatur street se atlanta, ga 30303-3202 materials received by march 15, 2000, will receive priority consideration. for more information, please visit our website at wwwlib.gsu.edu. georgia state university is an equal opportunity educational institution/ affirmative action employer strongly committed to cultural diversity. http://www.wsulibs.wsu.edu 154 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 library c-201, bloomington, in 47405. phone: (812) 855-8196; fax: (812) 855-2576; e-mail: ycooperb @ indiana.edu. review of applications begins march 7,2000, continues until the position is filled. for further information concerning indiana university: http://www.indiana.edu/iub. indiana uni­ versity is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer. information systems librarian. responsibilities: unlv li­ braries is seeking a service-oriented librarian, at the assistant professor rank, for the position of information systems librarian. the successful candidate will help coordinate the unlv libraries’ website and the evalu­ ation, development, and implementation of the libraries’ future electronic information resources and digital initiatives. the successful candidate will assist in tracking current and future information technologies, initiatives, and services; provide staff assistance and/ortraining with common desktop applications, and assume other responsibilities as assigned. the suc­ cessful candidate may work regular hours at one or more public services desks. this position will report to the head of the library systems unit. qualifications required: mlsorequivalentfrom an ala-accredited pro­ gram or international equivalent; excellent oral, written, and interpersonal communication skills; knowledge of electronic information resources; knowledge of microcomputer applications in libraries; demonstrated apti­ tude for learning new technology; evidence of creative application of information technologies to meet user needs; familiarity with html. qualifications preferred: proven documentation skills; experience with multimedia applications and technologies; experience with database cre­ ation, publishing, and management in a shared or web-based environment; experience with web authoring and scripting languages/standards such as sgml, dhtml, vrml, xml, css, cgi, perl, and/or javascript; experience with website development and maintenance applications, in­ cluding imaging software; experience with internet communications tools and applications; reference services experience. salary range: this is a tenure-track position. salary is commensurate with qualifications and experience. the university has an excellent fringe benefits package. the setting: unlv is nevada’s largest comprehensive, doctoral-degree granting institution with 22,500 students and more than 700full-time faculty. the unlv libraries are comprised of the main james r. dickinson library, the curriculum materials library, the architecture studies library, and a soon-to-be constructed music library. construction on a new main library, the lied library, began in early 1998. this 300,000-square-foot, $51 million facility will include an information commons and afully wired four-class­ room collaborative learning center. for additional information, see the unlv website at http://www.unlv.edu. application deadline & details: send letter of application, resume, and the names, addresses, telephone num­ bers and e-mail addresses of three professional references to: megan fitch, chair, information systems librarian search committee; james r. dickinson library, u niversity of nevada, las vegas; 4505 maryland parkway, box457001, las vegas, nv89154-7001. review of applications head, acquisitions department rutgers university libraries rutgers university libraries invites nominations and applications for the position of head, acquisitions d epartm ent. the su cce ssfu l candidate w ill be responsible for central acquisitions of all library materials and end processing for materials cata loged centrally; rutgers libraries materials budget is approxim ately 7 m illio n dollars. the head of acquisitions w ill direct the department of 10 fte staff in the use of new technologies and in electron ic processing of materials; oversee the acquisitions module for the libraries’ integrated system, sirsi; and lead the department in fulfilling its role in the rutgers digital library initiative, particularly in the acquisition of electronic resources. the head of acquisitions is one of the three department heads in central technical and automated services reporting to the associate university librarian for information systems and technology. a l a /m l s re q u ire d , th re e years re le v a n t professional experience for a tenure track appoint ment with minim um salary of $41,751 dependent upon experience and q u a lific a tio n s ; record of accomplishment in acquisitions management and e x p e rie n c e u s in g an a u to m a te d a c q u is itio n s system preferably sirsi. s ch o la rly record and se rvice in p ro fe s s io n a l a s s o c ia tio n s . see the c o m p le te p o s itio n p ro file on our w e b s ite at http://www.libraries.rutgers.edu/ under "news and events” . candidates applying by february 21, 2000 w ill receive first consideration. submit resume, cover letter, and names of three references to: sandra troy (app # 1 3 5 ), libraries personnel officer, rutgers u n iv e rs ity l ib ra rie s , 169 c o lle g e a ve., new b ru n s w ic k , nj 0 8 9 0 1 ; fax 7 3 2 9 3 2 7 6 3 7 ; e-mail stroy@rci.rutgers.edu. rutgers, the state u niversity of new jersey, is committed to affirmative action & equal opportunity. special collections and preservation librarian oberlin college coordinates special collections and preserva­ tion programs in an outstanding college library. required: sound liberal arts education, aca­ demic library experience; knowledge of rare books and special collections, preservation and conservation techniques, and preserva­ tion program administration; demonstrated su­ pervisory ability; excellent communication and interpersonal skills; strong service orientation; planning and organization skills; commitmentto professional development. oberlin college combines a leading under­ graduate college of arts and sciences with a music school of national prominence. the college has a long history of leadership in educating women and minorities and actively seeks a racially, ethnically, and culturally di­ verse staff and student body. the library contains over 1.2 million volumes; is a fully automated, active member of ohiolink; and provides access to a wide array of electronic resources. competitive salary, excellentfringe benefits. a full position description and information about oberlin and the oberlin college library is available at: http://www.oberlin.edu/library/ search.html to ensure consideration, send letter of appli­ cation, resume, and names of three refer­ ences by february 15, 2000, to: special collections/preservation search committee oberlin college library mudd center oberlin, oh 44074 aa/eoe http://www.indiana.edu/iub http://www.unlv.edu http://www.libraries.rutgers.edu/ mailto:stroy@rci.rutgers.edu http://www.oberlin.edu/library/ c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 155 will begin february 25,2000, and will continue until the position is filled. specific questions may be addressed to megan fitch, search committee chair, atmfitch@nevada.edu, or call (702) 895-3286. unlvisan equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. persons are selected on the basis of ability without regard to race, color, sex, age, national origin, sexual orientation, religion, disability or veteran status. lending services librarian. tenure-track, 12-month, faculty po­ sition. responsibilities primarily include supervision of circulation, re­ serves and interlibrary loan, with some secondary duties in reference desk rotation. required: ala-accredited mls or equivalent, 3 -5 years library experience and supervisory experience. salary range from $35,000 depend­ ing on qualifications and experience. excellent fringe benefits. available immediately. indiana state university, located in west central indiana, invites applicants to visit our home page at http://odin.indstate.edu and, under “about us,” click on “jobs” to get full position description and application information. review of applications begins immediately and continues until position is filled. aa/eoe. librarian/archivist. albion college is searching for a full-time librarian/archivist. the archivist is responsible to the director of libraries forthe full administration of the albion college archives collection. this includes selection, preservation, and management of historical material including photographic images, inactive administrative files, materials relating to the history of albion college, its faculty, staff, administration and students. the archivist will serve as a librarian on the staff and as an advisor on preservation issues. in addition the archivist is also the methodist archivist. the methodist archivist is responsible to the commission for archives and history of the west michigan conference for the care of their material. afull job description can be found at http://www.albion.edu/fac/ libr/archivis.htm. qualifications: master’s degree in librarianship (with an archives focus), archives, public history, or related field, and experience information literacy librarian/coordinator information literacy program http://www.plattsburgh.edu plattsburgh state university of new york library & information service the division of library & information services at plattsburgh state university invites applications for a newly created information literacy librarian position. this position is responsible for the continuing development of plattsburgh's outstanding information instruction program that began in 1979. the core feature of the current program is a required one-credit component of general education. the integration of information literacy across the curriculum is presently a key initiative in the college's strategic plan. this position will play a leadership role in program planning and implementation. the successful candidate will bring experience, energy, and vision to the collaborative work of infusing information literacy concepts and skills throughout the college curriculum. the information literacy librarian joins a team of librarians currently engaged in an active and diverse information literacy program that is already experimenting with new integrated information literacy approaches. this is an exciting opportunity to develop and shape a new program in conjunction with other campus initiatives, including a review of general education, a growing emphasis on instructional technology, and an expanding distance learning program. this position also participates in the core responsibilities of librarians: instruction, reference desk service, collection development and programmatic group work. successful candidates will have an interest in integrating information technologies and a willingness to participate with new distance learning programs. required qualifications: a master's degree from an ala-accredited institution or foreign equivalent. academic library experience that includes a minimum of four years of active participation in an information literacy/library instruction program; demonstrated ability to assume a leadership role in information literacy; demonstrated knowledge of current information literacy theory and practice; demonstrated success as an instructor of information literacy; commitment to group decision making; thorough familiarity with academic environments; successful experience in working with classroom faculty; outstanding interpersonal, communication, and organizational skills. preferred qualifications: experience with planning and implementing an information literacy program; experience with group work; scholarly contributions to the literature of information literacy; active involvement in professional information literacy activities. salary & benefits: $40,000 minimum, academic rank commensurate with experience; tenure track position. applications will be reviewed beginning immediately and will continue until position is filled. please submit cover letter, resume and names and addresses of three references to: chair, search committee (pj# 2360-crln) c/o human resources plattsburgh state university of new york 101 broad street plattsburgh, ny 12901-2681 fax: (518) 564-5060 applications from women and minority candidates are especially welcomed. plattsburgh state university of new york is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. mailto:atmfitch@nevada.edu http://odin.indstate.edu http://www.albion.edu/fac/ http://www.plattsburgh.edu 156 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 consulting librarians three positions cornell college the russell d. cole library is redesigning its program to create a team of librarians who will collaborate with faculty toward an integrated information literacy program to prepare students for an information society. we seek librarians with a passion for teaching and service, enthusiasm for interaction with faculty, initiative and creativity, and skills in reference and collection development with an increasing emphasis on electronic resources. these librarians are members of the professional leadership team in a collegial environment, hold faculty rank, and may have opportunities for teaching in areas of expertise. some reference work is required of all librarians, including one evening per week and occasional weekends. consulting librarian for the social sciences (full-time, 12-month appointment) collaborates with faculty in the social sciences to design and deliver instruction integrated into course expecta­ tions; develop and manage the collection; and provide reference and bibliographic service. additional responsibilities include oversight management of government documents, general reference service, and oversight of interlibrary loan services. preferred qualifications: ala-accredited master’s degree. outstanding interpersonal, commu­ nication, teaching, and problem-solving skills. understanding of emerging electronic and print information resources relevant to the social sciences. strong skills in accessing information via online systems. strong skills in teaching. evidence of initiative, creativity, service ethic, ability to prioritize based on organizational goals. academic background in the social sciences required. consulting librarian for the arts and humanities (full-time, 12-month appointment) collaborates with faculty in the arts and humanities to design and deliver instruction integrated into course expectations; develop and manage the collection; and provide reference and bibliographic service. additional responsibilities include management of college archives and general references. since the cole library serves the local community as its public library, this librarian will oversee coordination of programming for the public. preferred qualifications: ala-accredited master’s degree. outstanding interpersonal, commu­ nication, teaching, and problem-solving skills. understanding of emerging electronic and print information resources relevant to the arts anc, humanities. strong skills in accessing information via online systems. strong skills in teaching. evidence of initiative, creativity, service ethic, ability to prioritize based on organizational goals. academic background in the arts and/or humanities required. consulting librarian for the sciences (half-time, 9-month appointment) collaborates with faculty in the sciences to design and deliver instruction integrated into course expectations; develop and manage the collection; and provide reference and bibliographic service. preferred qualifications: ala-accredited master’s degree. outstanding interpersonal, commu­ nication, teaching, and problem-solving skills. understanding of emerging electronic and print information resources relevant to the sciences. strong skills in accessing information via online systems. strong skills in teaching. evidence of initiative, creativity, service ethic, ability to prioritize based on organizational goals. academic background in the sciences required. send letter of application, resume, three letters of recommendation, copies of credentials and transcripts to: annopatz assistant to the vice president for academic affairs cornell college 600 first street west mt. vernon, ia 52314-1098 consideration of applications begins march 1, 2000. cornell college is an eo/aa employer and encourages applications from women and minority candidates. c&rl news ■ february 2000 /1 5 7 in managing historical collections in an archives, library museum or historical agency. preferable qualifications include strong background in archival research methodology with demonstrated skills in oral and written communication, and library reference experience desirable. interested candidates should send a letter of application, resume, and three current letters of reference to dr. john p. kondelik, director of libraries, albion college, kc 4692, albion, ml 49224. eoe. applicant screening will begin february 15,2000. projected start date: july 1,2000. monographs original cataloger. (search reopened) divi­ sion/department: collection services/cataloging. purpose and scope: the monographs original cataloging section of the cataloging depart­ ment is comprised of the head and 2.5 fte librarians plus student assistants. the monographs original cataloger is responsible to the head of the monbgraphs original cataloging section for performing original cataloging of monographic materials in all languages and sub­ jects. materials handled may include electronic resources and other media. materials are processed for the main and science libraries, some laboratory collections, and off-campus research facility libraries. mono­ graphs original catalogers sen/e as resource persons for monographic cataloging within the department and in otherareas of the libraries. the university of georgia libraries participates in gil, a state-wide intercon­ nected implementation of the endeavor voyager system. the libraries is a member of conser and participates in naco, saco, and oclc’s enhance program. the cataloging department has 11 professional and 10 support staff positions and catalogs over40,000 books, serials, micro­ forms, and nonprint materials yearly. for a full description of duties, visit www.libs.uga.edu/humres/monocat.html. qualifications: ala-accredited mls; knowledge of aacr2 and lc classification and subject headings; ability to work with a broad range of subjects; competency in one or more modern european languages (german or russian preferred); familiarity with automated cataloging systems; ability to function as a contributing university of califor nia, irvine associate university librarians the university of california, irvine libraries are recruiting for three associate university librarian (aul) positions to complete the senior administrative team. the university librarian, gerald j. munoff, is seeking innovative, creative, flexible, and knowledgeable executives to join an enthusiastic staff in building a research library of excellence for a young and rapidly-growing university ranked nationally in the top universities. the campus of 19,285 students and 1,010 faculty is planning to grow by 50% in the next ten years. the auls have an unusual opportunity to actively participate in shaping the quality and character of the campus and the excellence of the libraries. all three positions are responsible library-wide for collaborative leadership, management, and decision-m aking. each position also has an individual area of responsibility, currently defined as a u l fo r collections and access services, a u l fo r research and instructional services, and a u l for technical services. changes in assignments may be made based on qualifications and interests of appointees and in response to an analysis of organization in which the auls will play a leading role. positions require a graduate degree in library science from an ala-accredited institution and substantial related experience. the salary will be commensurate with qualifications and experience within a range of $70,000 $105,000. one of nine university of california campuses, the university of california, irvine, is nestled in 1,489 acres of coastal foothills, five miles from the pacific ocean, between san diego and los angeles. the full position descriptions, instructions on how to apply, and information about the libraries and the university are available at http://www.lib.uci.edu/about/libvac.html, or request a copy by e-mail to kaufman@ uci.edu or by confidential fax to (949) 824-1288. applications received by february 15, 2000 will receive first consideration, but applications will continue to be accepted until the position is filled. the university of california, irvine is an equal opportunity employer committed to excellence through diversity. http://www.libs.uga.edu/humres/monocat.html http://www.lib.uci.edu/about/libvac.html mailto:kaufman@uci.edu team member in a production-oriented environment; effective oral and written communication skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships; cataloging experience in an academic or research library preferred. benefits: standard benefits package includes life, health and disability insurance and mandatory participation in the state or optional retirement system, and 21 days annual leave, plus 12 paid holidays. salary minimum: $29,500, commensurate with experience. for further information on the campus and the community, visit the university of georgia’s website (http://www.uga.edu/). application procedure: send letter of application addressing all qualifications with a resume and the names, addresses and phone numbers of three references by february 25,2000, to: florence e. king, assistant university librarian for human resources, university of georgia libraries, athens, ga 30602-1641; (706) 542-2716. an equal opportunity/affirmative action institution. music librarian/chief administrator. sibley music library of the eastman school of music, university of rochester. responsible for ensuring excellence in all aspects of the library’s programs and services, including personnel management, budgeting, technical services, collec­ tion development, client services, and technology development. works with officeof public relations and development to cultivate potential donors and devise strategy for library development. works with eastman coordinator of technology to guide direction of technology development within the library; also collaborates with other university of rochester library direc­ tors to create policy guiding the university-wide automated library system. reports to the dean of academic affairs at the eastman school of music. institution: the sibley music library, founded in 1904, serves primarily students and faculty of the eastman school of music and the university of rochester as a reference and research collection implementing various curricula leading to undergraduate and graduate degrees in performance, composition, music education, musicology, theory, and jazz and contempo­ rary media. the library contains a distinguished collection of some 360,000 cataloged volumes, including a renowned collection of rare printed books and manuscripts, 60,000 sound recordings, and subscribes to over 650 journals. it employs a professional staff of 8 fte, a support staff of 8 fte, and about 90 graduate and undergraduate students. for more details, see the library’s web page at http://sibley.esm.rochester.edu. qualifica­ tions: mls or equivalent from an ala-accredited program, plus graduate study in music history, theory, music education, performance, ora related field. five years minimum administrative experience in a music research library including staff supervision, strategic planning, fund development, and budget management. past experience in collection development, reference librarians: two positions university of missouri-rolla the university of missouri-rolla is seeking qualified applicants to: (1) provide comprehensive reference services for print and electronic resources in a centralized library which has a strong science and engineering focus; (2] participate in an active library instruction program; and (3) serve as liaisor to selected departments for acquisitions and specialized information ser­ vices. some evening and weekend hours are required. required: ala-mls. demonstrated strong commitment to delivering quality public service. experience with library computer applications, including html, the internet, and other information technologies experience in a computer-intensive setting and ability to work in a demanding, rapidly changing environment. reference experience in an academic library, including the ability to conduct effective reference interviews. desired: experience in meeting user information needs, especially in scientific and engineering disciplines. experience in library and electronic resources instruction. degree in sciences o r engineering. knowledge of emerging information technology trends. um-rolla is one of the four university of missouri campuses and the state’s premier technologica campus. the university offers engineering and science degrees through the doctoral level anc undergraduate degrees in the liberal arts. um-rolla has earned a national reputation for quality education. eight professionals and seventeen support staff serve 4,500 high-ability students and 35c faculty. the collection includes over 375,000 volumes and 1,400 periodical subscriptions, with ar increasing emphasis on electronic resources. innovative interfaces ils. the library website is w w w .u m r.e d u /~ lib ra ry . salary/benefits: $28,000 minimum for 12 months. 28 vacation days per year, vested retirement after five years, and partial tuition assistance. dental and medical insurance and other benefits are alsc available. to apply: send letter of application, resume including names, addresses, telephone numbers, anc e-mail addresses of three professional references. please include how your interests anc experience can contribute to the responsibilities of this position. human resource services attention: #r-51056/#r-52927 um-rolla 1870 miner circle rolla, mo 65409-1050 completed applications received by march 15, 2000, will be given first consideration. review wil continue until positions are filled. um-rolla is an aa/eeo employer. members of minority groups and persons with disabilities are encouraged to apply. 158 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 http://www.uga.edu/ http://sibley.esm.rochester.edu http://www.umr.edu/~library c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 159 cataloging, client services, or music information technologies. dynamic leadership skills and ability to work with diverse constituency of studio and academic faculty, students, and the larger community of the university of rochester. strong written and oral communication skills. active participa­ tion and leadership in professional organizations in music or librarianship. desired: graduate degree in music history, theory, music education, performance, or a related field. salary and benefits: competitive salary commensurate with qualifications and experience. benefits include a generous retirement plan, awide variety of university hmo plans, university life insurance plans, tuition benefits, and generous vacation allowances. application deadline: review of applications to begin january 20,2000. appointment to begin july 1,2000. application: to apply, send letter of application, curriculum vitae, and names, addresses, and phone numbers of three references to professor patrick macey, chair, librarian search committee, c/o sibley music library, eastman school of music, 26 gibbs st., rochester, ny 14604. reference librarian/assistant professor. rollins col­ lege invites applications for an enthusiastic and service-oriented librarian to join its reference team. primary responsibilities include: providing assistance during scheduled hours at the reference desk; participating in library instruction, electronic database search training, and reference collection development; preparing bibliographies, user guides and exhib­ its. basic qualifications include an ala-accredited mls; a working knowl­ edge of print and electronic reference resources; enthusiasm forteaching; commitment to professional growth and scholarly activity; excellent com­ munication and interpersonal skills; and ability to work independently and as a part of a team. one or more years of recent post-mls reference experience in an academic library are preferred. rank and salary: this is an entry-level faculty position with tenure-track status or a 24-month visiting appointment depending on qualifications. a second master’s degree is required fortenure-track appointment. research, publication, and service to the library, the college, and the profession are required to satisfy m a n n l ib r a r y , c o r n e ll u n iv e r s it y 2 p o s it io n s cornell university's albert r. mann library invites applications for the following two positions: metadata librarian responsible for organizing access to the growing number o f networked information resources and cataloging materials in a variety of formats. evaluate and analyze models for organizing networked information and help devise and implement solutions. provide recommendations on the types of metadata required tor effective access to electronic publications, track developments on metadata standards, and facilitate access to resources through original cataloging for a variety o f formats. actively participate in the library's research and development efforts and in local and national discussions relating to providing access for internet resources. required qualifications: demonstrated interest in the issues and standards related to metadata, cataloging, and information retrieval. desired qualifications: previous cataloging experience, working knowledge of one or more foreign languages. instruction coordinator administer the library’s instruction program, determine specific information management workshops to be taught, work with faculty to develop effective instruction sessions, and coordinate assignment of instructors from the professionals in the library. provide quality reference, one-on-one consulting, and instruction in information management. develop expertise in existing and emerging technologies for information delivery as well as lead and/or participate in other innovative research projects. the individual is one of a team of 8 librarians reporting to the head of public services. required qualifications: demonstrated interest in instruction, with strong public speaking and presentation skills. qualifications for both positions: required: ala accredited mls or equivalent graduate degree. strong communication, analytical, and interpersonal skills, including the ability to work within a team setting. solid facility with personal computers, information retrieval software, and information technologies. interest in innovation and commitment to professional development. desired: some work experience in an academic setting; subject knowledge in agriculture, life sciences, social sciences, or business/economics. salary commensurate with qualifications and experience. environment: albert r. mann library provides innovative information services for the 21st century and has achieved national renown for its digital library (http://www.mannlib.comell.edu). the albert r. mann library's collection of agricultural, life sciences and related social sciences materials serves the college of agricultural and life sciences, the college o f human ecology, and the division of nutritional sciences at cornell. mann library holds almost one million items in its collection o f print, microform, and digital materials. mann library's principal user population numbers almost 10,000 and includes undergraduates, graduate stuaents, faculty, researchers, and staff. mann library is the second largest of 19 libraries that together constitute the cornell university library. applications: requested by march 15, 2000, but accepted until the positions are filled. send cover letter, resume, and the names, phone numbers, and addresses of three references to: susan markowitz, director, library human resources, 201 olin library, cornell university, ithaca, ny 14853-5301. informal, preliminary applications will be accepted electronically (sem2@c c ornell.edu) with signed copy to follow. u n o i v r e n r s e i l t l y cornell university is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer strongly comm itted to diversity. we value qualified candidates who can bring to our community a variety o f backgrounds and experiences. h t t p : //w w w .c o r n e ll.e d u http://www.mannlib.comell.edu mailto:sem2@cornell.edu http://www.cornell.edu 160 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 k r e s g e engineriansassistant/associate libraering(2) u .c .b erkeley electronic outreach librarian responsible for developing and coordinating the instructional outreach program of the engineering library, and for collection development and faculty liaison in support of one engineering department. other responsibilities include refer­ ence desk coverage, instruction and web page development. assistant head/reference librarian responsible for coordination of reference services, collection development and faculty liaison in support of two engineering departments, and management oversight of circulation services and personnel. both positions require an accredited graduate degree in librarianship/lnformation studies, and/or an equivalent combination of education and relevant experience. for addi­ tional information please consult: tt p : / / www.lib.berkeley.edu/ lhrd/librec.html, or call library human resources dept., 510/642-3778. salary range: $32,940 $44,196 per year based upon qualifications. send cover letter, resume and names and addresses of three professional references to janice h. dost, 447 doe library university of california, berkeley, ca 94720-6000. deadline for receipt of applications: march 1, 2000. eoe/aae. criteria forcontinuing appointment, promotion, and tenure. salary: $30,000 $36,000 annually depending on qualifications; 12-month contract; standard benefits package available. starting date: june 1,2000. rollins college is an independent, private liberal arts institution with a total enrollment of 2,600 located in winter park, florida. the olin library houses a collection of 280,000 volumes, 1,500 periodicals, 68,000 government documents, nu­ merous electronic databases, and two state-of-the-art information tech­ nology laboratories, (www.rollins.edu/olin/index/htm). toapply,submita letterof application, acurrent vita and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three professional references to: wenxian zhang, chair of search committee, olin library, rollins college, winter park, fl 32789 4499. review of applications will begin immediately and continue until the position is filled. rollins college is an equal opportunity employer. reference librarian/political science bibliographer. (search extended.) university of rochester river campus libraries seeks a reference librarian with a strong commitment to user services and enthusiasm forteaching to develop innovative library services for a premier political science department. an excellent opportunity to join a humanities/ social sciences reference team (8 librarians, 2 paraprofessionals) to deliver services that support instruction, research, and writing for faculty and students. the successful candidate will be a member of a group facilitating the integration of statistical and geographical data services into library programs. applicants are required to have a mls degree from an ala-accredited program, undergraduate degree in political science or related social science, public service experience in academic library, outstanding written and oral communication skills. for additional informa­ tion, visit the university of rochester libraries’ web page: www.lib.rochester.edu/main/jobpolsc.htm. send a letter of application, re­ sume, three references’ names and addresses to: political science bibli­ ographer search committee, dean’s office, rush rhees library, uni­ versity of rochester, rc box27055, rochester, ny 14627-0055. phone: http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/ http://www.rollins.edu/olin/index/htm http://www.lib.rochester.edu/main/jobpolsc.htm c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 161 two positions—searches extended head, electronic resources program head, library automation department nimitz library u.s. naval academy the nimitz library, united states naval academy, is extending the timetable of its searches for the following two positions. 1. head, electronic resources program. as leader in the development and maintenance of the library’s electronic information resources, the incumbent will, with input from the nine other librarians in the reference department, and working closely with the head of reference and head of library automation: plan, design, and coordinate access to electronic resources; develop procedures and tools for effective use of such resources; teach applications to faculty, students, reference librarians, and other library staff; recom­ mend hardware, software, budget, training, and staffing requirements to support use of electronic resources. as a reference-bibliographer, the incumbent will provide general reference service (including some evening and weekend hours), and also carry out collection development responsibili­ ties, specialized reference assistance, and instruction in conjunction with one or more academic departments. 2. head, library automation department. as leader in the development and maintenance of the library’s systems for electronic information access and delivery, the incumbent will, with input from other library units, be responsible for the: planning, coordination, and execution of the library’s automation budget; procurement, implementation, and maintenance of the library’s computer systems’ hardware and software; staff training associated with such systems; maintenance and operation of the library’s innovative interfaces online system; supervision of the other 2.5 fte in the library automation department. we are seeking individuals who will accept the challenge of working in an extraordinary environment that includes engaged faculty, high-performing and highly motivated students, and impressive information technology resources, including a web-based catalog and a library intranet. for both positions, the gs-12 salary range is $51,204-$66,654. the naval academy is the navy’s undergraduate college, with 4,000 students, more than 500 civilian and military faculty, and 19 major fields of study in three academic divisions (eight in engineering, seven in math & science, and four in humanities/social sciences). it produced three rhodes scholars in the 1990s. the nimitz library has a staff of 41 fte (including 18 professional librarians) and some 520,000 volumes of books and periodicals, plus govern­ ment documents, microforms, extensive holdings in special collections & archives, and numerous subscriptions to web-based electronic resources and cd-roms. located in annapolis, the capital of maryland and “the sailing capital of america,” the naval academy is 30 miles from both washington, d.c. and baltimore, in the beautiful chesapeake bay area. for additional information about these positions, including desired qualifications and new application procedures, consult the library’s home page (http://www.usna.edu/library). applications must be received or postmarked no later than february 25, 2000, in order to be considered. individuals who have already applied for either position will remain under consideration and do not need to reapply. send application materials to: dr. richard hume werking director, nimitz library u.s. naval academy annapolis, md 21402 the naval academy is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. http://www.usna.edu/library 162 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 william paterson u n i v e r s i t y the william paterson u n iversity o f n ew jersey is a comprehensive public in stitution o f higher learning that is com m itted to prom oting stu den t success, academic excellence, and c o m m u n ity outreach w ith o p p o rtu n itie s f o r lifelong learning. b oasting a h ig h ly distinguished and diverse facu lty, nationally renowned academic programs, and state-of the-art information and communications technology, the u n iversity maintains a low student-faculty ratio (12:1) and small class size (21:3) fo r its 29 undergraduate and 17 graduate degree programs. the u n iversity is situated on a beautiful suburban campus in wayne, n ew jersey, tw en ty miles w est o f n ew york city. a ssista n t d irector the sarah byrd askew library of william paterson university seeks a creative, experienced and goal oriented librarian to be part of the management and planning team in a dynamic, state-of-the-art library. the assistant director for resource management reports to the director of library services and is responsible for the overall management and supervision of a fully automated technical services unit, which includes acquisitions, cataloging, processing of library materials, serials and document delivery the primary function of this position is to provide leadership in planning, implementing and evaluating departmental operations and services and setting goals, developing initiatives and establishing priorities in these areas. oversees staff development; prepares and manages unit budget and statistical reports as necessary. primary liaison with oclc and palinet. participates in collection development activities and user education programs. ala-accredited mls and five years professional library experience in progressively responsible positions; second master’s degree or abd status or an additional five years experience or the equivalent combination of education and experience required. demonstrated proficiency in technical services area including substantial knowledge of cataloging and authority control; three years administrative experience, including supervisory experience with library professional and support staff; preferably in an academic library. thorough knowledge of online integrated library systems (preferably dra), bibliographic utilities and networks and experience with budget management. outstanding analytic and problem solving skills for initiating plans and carrying out projects. evidence of strong communication and organizational skills, and the ability to work with all personnel in a collaborative team environment. salary range: $51,705-$77,563 with a comprehensive benefits package. this is a 12-month, tenure track appointment; second master's degree or abd required for tenure. for more information about the library: http;//www.wpunj.edu a pplications zvill be accepted until position is filled. please forw ard letter o f application, resume and a list of three references to: n o rm a l evy, d ir e c to r o f l ib ra r y s ervices, d r a w e r crl, w illia m p a te r s o n u n iv e r s ity , sarah b y rd a s k e w l ib ra ry, 300 p o m p to n r o a d , w a yn e, nj 07470. william paterson university w a y n e , n e w j e r s e y a n e q u a l o p p o r tu n ity i n s titu tio n c o m m itte d to d iv e r s i t y (716)275-4461. fax: (716)244-1358. e-mail: kkitrinos@rcl.lib.rochester.edu. university of rochester is an equal opportunity employer. review of applications will begin no laterthan february 20,2000, and will continue until the position is filled. social science reference librarian. (position no. 250150) florida atlantic university. reports to head, reference department. participates in all aspects of busy reference department, including evening/ weekend rotation, library instruction, database searching, and committee work. required: ala-accredited mls, effective oral and written communi­ cation skills, flexibility and initiative, and positive public service attitude. preferred: reference experience in an academic library; education/training in social sciences; demonstrated experience with electronic and print sources; demonstrated experience in library instruction o r otherteaching. salary: $31,000 plus benefits. the position offers faculty rank of assistant university librarian. the anticipated starting date is july 1,2000. for more information about the fau libraries, seeour web page: http://wv\(w.fau.edu/ library. send letter of application, resume, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three references to: chair, reference librarian search committee, s.e. wimberly library, florida atlantic university, 777 glades road, boca raton, fl 33431. application must be postmarked no later than march 30, 2000. florida atlantic university is an equal opportunity/access/affirmative action institution. social sciences librarian. western kentucky university seeks applications forthe position of social sciences librarian in the department of library public services of university libraries. this is a tenure-track faculty position. western kentucky university is a state-assisted compre­ hensive university offering a broad array of master’s degree programs and two cooperative doctoral programs, located in bowling green, a growing city one hour north of nashville. university libraries has migrated to the endeavor voyager library management system, participates in the ken­ tucky virtual library program and has designed extensive web-based services (www.wku.edu/library). required: ala-accredited mls, a sub­ http://www.wpunj mailto:kkitrinos@rcl.lib.rochester.edu http://wv/(w.fau.edu/ http://www.wku.edu/library c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 163 ject master's/doctorate in the social sciences, familiarity with electronic reference tools, including internet resources. preferred qualifications include successful public sen/ices and collection experience; reading knowledge of french, german o r spanish; and excellentoral and written communication skills. research and publication are required for promo­ tion and tenure. duties: selection and management of collections in broadcasting/journalism, communications, psychology and sociology; serving as the liaison with faculty for assigned departments; providing research instruction covering print and electronic resources; providing reference assistance; oversight of the periodicals reading room; and maintaining awareness of new technology. anticipated starting date: may 1,2000. salary: $26,472-$31,100. candidates should submit a letter of application and resume along with the names, addresses and telephone numbers of three professional references to the department of human resources, wetherby administration building, room 42, western ken­ tucky university, 1 big red way, bowling green, ky 42101 -3576. to ensure full consideration, please submit application materials by march 1, 2000. internet url: http://www.wku.edu/dept/support/hr/. online appli­ cation available. women and minorities are encouraged to apply. western kentucky university is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer. technical services coordinator. one full-time, tenure-track faculty position (9-month appointment with summerwork optional) in louis l. manderino library, california university of pennsylvania, atthe rank of instructor or assistant professor. salary range: $31,748 to $51,714. employment date: august 2000. see library homepage at: http:// www.library.cup.edu. compensation: salary is commensurate with educa­ tion and experience. the pennsylvania state system of higher education salary scale applies and includes excellent fringe benefits. essential work functions: work under the direction of the dean of library services. primary responsibilities of this position are tooversee the workflow in acquisitions and cataloging departments, which entails the expedient purchasing and processing of all library materials-monographs, serials, audiovisual ma­ terials, etc. in addition, the individual is responsible forthe structure and accuracy of the library’s bibliographic database (the library uses the endeavor voyager modules for cataloging, acquisitions, and serials). specific duties are as follows: coordinate and provide leadership in the area of collection development; participate in the planning, implementation, and documentation of goals, policies, workflow, and procedures for acquisi­ tions and cataloging departments; oversee fund accounting; keep abreast of the continual oclc and endeavor software changes and enhancements; manage the library’s book approval plan with responsibility for its relevance to the university’s curricula; coordinate the work of two librarians and five support staff. work at the reference desk, as assigned, including evening and weekend rotations. participate in departmental/university/system-wide committee assignments and additional duties as specified by the collective bargaining agreement. participate in professional organizations. work on specific projects as assigned. position requirements: ala-accredited mls (or equivalent); second master’s degree or doctorate preferred; strong microcomputer skills; previous academic library experience; ability to workcooperatively in rapidly changing environment; demonstrated ability to communicate effectively, both orally and in writing. in addition to the aforementioned qualifications, the candidate minimally must be able to communicate well and/or perform well in an interview. deadlineforsubmit ting application: february 29,2000. applications: applicants must submit a letter of application that addresses the candidate’s professional goals and unique qualificationsforthis position, acurrent resume, photocopies of official transcripts showing degree(s) earned, and the names, ad­ dresses, and telephone numbers of at least three references who can provide current assessments of the candidate’s performance potential in his/her discipline. complete application materials should be sent to: professor marsha l. nolf, chair, library search committee, louis l. manderino library, california university of pennsylvania, 250 univer­ sity avenue, california, pa 15419-1394; 724-938-4048; e-mail: nolf @ cup.edu. california university of pennsylvania is an affirmative ac­ tion/equal opportunity employer. women, minorities and individuals with disabilities are encouraged to apply. technical services library manager. re-advertised. (job code 423-exempt) western new mexico university. responsibilities: underthe direction of the university librarian, supervises the operations of technical services unit of miller library, including acquisitions, cata­ loging, and preservation; coordinates with public services and outreach services managers in the daily operations of the library, including sched­ uling and hiring staff and student workers, preparing reports, and manag­ ing the library budget; coordinates with wnmu’s computer support team to insure optimal efficiency in the use of technology in miller library. western new mexico university is a comprehensive regional university serving the multicultural population of western new mexico. located in the mountain community of silver city on the edge of the gila national forest, wnmu offers intellectual and cultural advantages of a university in a beautiful southwest setting. for more information about wnmu and miller library, visitourwebsiteat http://www.wnmu.edu. minimum qualifications: a master’s degree in library science from an ala-accredited institution with three years full-time experience in an academic (or comparable) library, including one yearof supervisory experience; working knowledge of national standards for cataloging (aacr2) and of oclc; working knowl­ edge of print and non-print reference tools including federal and state government documents; experience with automated library and lan sys­ tems. preferred qualifications: experience with a system migration. dem­ onstrated experience working with culturally diverse groups; proficiency in spanish. salary: $30,000 plus doq. to apply: submit a letter of intent, resume, unofficial transcripts, and list of five references to: western new mexico university, human resources department, p.o. box 680, silver city, nm 88062. deadline date: review of applications begins monday, february 28,2000 and continues until filled. all qualified applicants will receive consideration without regard to race, color, religion, gender, age, handicap, or national origin. wnmu is an affirmative action/equal employ­ ment opportunity employer. technical services/reference librarian. the maharishi university of management library in fairfield, iowa has an immediate position for technical services librarian with a minimum of two years experience in oclc, aacr2, lc cataloging on a local system, plus serials management. regular reference shifts, including one evening per week required. our dynamic academic/research environment requires strong service orientation. interest in high quality of life and personal growth is desirable. mls and a minimum of four months regular practice of the transcendental meditation™ program required. benefits include: on-campus housing and vegetarian meats; stipend; insurance; rich, di­ verse, safe campus community; progressive educational environment. maharishi university of management is an affirmative action/eoe, offering undergraduate and graduate programs, and accredited by the ncacs. please contact: craig shaw, director, maharishi university of man­ agement library, fairfield, ia 52557; voice: (515) 472-1148, fax: (515) 472-1173; cshaw@mum.edu, http://www.mum.edu/library. late job listings coordinator collection management. search reopened for libraiy faculty positions. ham pton university, william r. and norma b. harvey library. coordinator collection m anagem ent is a new position of leadership th a t will oversee collection development from assessm ent and selection to acquisitions and organization. this librarian will be respon­ sible for developing strategies to increase the effectiveness of m aterials selection, apply technologies and d ata to assess all university collections, m anage budget expenditures, develop policies/procedures and oversee workflow in the technical services units. coordinator will work closely w ith library adm inistrators. position qualifications: experience w ith an established model of collection assessm ent, knowledge oft rends, ability to establish and articulate policy and objectives, and evaluate outcomes is required. experience in acquisitions, fam iliarity w ith technical services, and relevant supervisory experience preferred. minimum three years experience preferred. all positions: full-time, twelve-month faculty ran k appointment. salary commensurate w ith qualifications. excellent benefit package, including tiaa-cref. ala accredited mls and excellent communications skills are required. send letter of application, resume, names/e-mail addresses of three professional references to: loretta o’brien-parham , director ofu niversity libraries, harvey library, h am pton u niversity, hampton, va 23668. http://www.wku.edu/dept/support/hr/ http://www.library.cup.edu http://www.wnmu.edu mailto:cshaw@mum.edu http://www.mum.edu/library 164 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 director of instructional resources. moorhead state university, moorhead, minnesota. position begins ju ly 1, 2000. salary range $72,565-$97,267, depending on qualifica­ tions and experience. position responsibilities include adm inistering the library and providing leadership and m anagem ent to the university's library, audiovisual, instructional tv and instructional technology services. the director reports directly to the vice president for academic affairs and has supervisory responsibility for approximately th irty employees. the library has a budget of approximately $2 million a year, and is p a rt ofb oth local (tri-college) and regional (pals and minitex) consortia. moorhead s tate university is one of seven four-year institutions in the m innesota state colleges and university system. the u niversity has over 7,000 students enrolled in 70 degree programs, 16 graduate programs, and 19 areas of licensure preparation. required qualifications include the following: ala-approved m aster’s degree in library/information science and a subject m aster’s degree or specialist degree or ph.d.; a minimum of three to five years successful academic library administration/supervision; experience as a reference librarian; experience in developing and adm inistering av/tv, including instructional television and distance education; ability to provide leadership in instructional technology; leadership experience with emerging technologies in an academic setting; record of successful personnel adm inistration and budget preparation and management; effective skills in interpersonal relations, oral and w ritten communication, and analytical and decision-making processes; a commitment to collaborative decision-making and staff development; ability to represent the university and the university’s instructional resources to external constituencies. also desirable: ability to secure external funding; experience in long-range planning; experience w ith collective bargaining; teaching experience. to apply: send a letter of interest, resume, a completed standard application form (accessed a t the website listed below), copies of graduate transcripts and nam es of five references (including current addresses and daytime telephone numbers) to: dr. virginia klenk, chairperson, search committee, m oorhead state u niversity, 1104 seventh avenue south, moorhead, mn 56563; telephone: (218)236-2764; fax: (218) 287-5037; e-mail: schafier@ mhdl.moorhead.msus.edu; vacancy website: http://www.moorhead.msus.edu/vacancy; instructional resources director website: http://www.moorhead.msus.edu/acadserv/director.htm. review of completed files will begin on februaiy 15, 2000 and will continue until position is filled. successful candidate m ust be legally authorized to work in the u nited states on the day employment begins. moorhead state university is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer and educator. head, yrl bibliographers group. the bibliographers group within the ucla library's charles e. young research library seeks an innovative librarian who will have broad adm inistrative responsibility for the operations of the department. responsible for managing and providing leadership in the development and management of collections in the hum anities and social sciences. the head has responsibility for collection development in one or more areas of history and possibly other subjects within the hum anities and social sciences. m anagement and administrative responsibilities include: overseeing all personnel m atters for a staff of 11.5 fte; monitoring and reconciling the operations budget; allocating and managing a m aterials budget of approximately 2.1 million dollars; directing strategic planning and carrying out of unit goals; and representing the interests and views of the departm ent on administrative advisory committees. qualifications: administrative or supervisory experience in collection development in a research libraiy or demonstrated ability to adm inister a departm ent of professional and support staff devoted to collection development and management. graduate level study, or equivalent experience, in the hum anities or social sciences. collection development experience in one or more areas of history. experience in selection and management of electronic resources and knowledge of current trends in information technology as they apply to collection management and development. thorough understanding of research needs and organization of scholarly literature. reading knowledge of at least one foreign language. ability to work well in a changing environment. excellent english communication and interpersonal skills and ability to work with staff, students, and faculty of culturally diverse backgrounds. commitment to professional development and service. research level knowledge of anglo-american history preferred. background will normally include a profes­ sional degree from an accredited library and information science graduate program. salary range: $40,248-$68,112 plus monthly administrative stipend: $350. anyone wishing to be considered for the position should write to: karen murray, administrative specialist, charles e. young research library, ucla, 11334 yrl, box 951575, los angeles, ca 90095-1575. candidates applying by february 28,2000, will be given first consideration. for full description of duties and qualifications and application procedures, see website: www.library.ucla.edu/admin/staffserv/openposn.htm. mailto:schafier@mhdl.moorhead.msus.edu http://www.moorhead.msus.edu/vacancy http://www.moorhead.msus.edu/acadserv/director.htm http://www.library.ucla.edu/admin/staffserv/openposn.htm structure bookmarks 146 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 career oppoiiunities from across the country deadlines: orders for regular classified advertisements must reach the acrl office on or before the second of the month preceding publication of the issue (e.g., september 2 for the october issue). should this date fall on a weekend or holiday, ads will be accepted on the next business day. late job listings will be accepted on a space-available basis after the second of the month.rates: classified advertisements are $9.50 per line for institutions that are acrl members, $11.50 for others. late job notices discriminatory references. applicants should be aware that the terms faculty rank and status vary in meaning among institutions.internet: c&rl news classified ads are accessible on the world wide web at http://www.ala.org/acrl/c&rlnew2.html. ads will be placed approximately 2-3 weeks before the printed edition of c&rl news is published.contact: christopher becker, classified advertising man­ager, c&rl news classified advertising department, acrl, american library association, 50 e. huron st., chicago, il 60 positions openaccess services division head. isu's milner library seeks an innovative, service-oriented leadertomanagecirculation services, print and electronic reserve, interlibrary loan, document delivery, storage, and building security with a staff of 12 career fte employees. this library faculty member will evaluate workflow, procedures, and policies of access service units; maintain and apply current knowledge of copyright and intellectual property issues; work general reference desk for occasional wee salary guidelisted below are the latest minimum starting figures recommended by state library associations and the north carolina state library for professional library posts in these states. these recommendations are intended for governmental agencies that employ librarians. the recommendations are advisory only, and ala has not adopted recommendations for minimum salaries. for information on librarian salaries, job seekers and employers should consider these recom­mended minimums, as well as other salary c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 147 assistant/associate librarianarizona state university westlife sciences/nursing librarian. we seek an individual who can plan, deliver, and assess research support and instruction for diverse students, faculty, and staff. responsibilities include developing innovative approaches to research assistance, collection development, and delivery of services in an organization committed to electronic resources and access. this position provides assistance for complex research inquiries, collaborates with faculty in 148 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 and job #, a current resume, and the names, addresses, and phone numbers of 3 professional references to: martina johansen, the univer­sity of arizona library, 1510 e. university, room c327, p.o. box210055, tucson, az 85721-0055. you may also send e-mail inquiries to: ghendric @ bird.library.arizona.edu or johansen @ bird.library.arizona.edu. review of application materials begins february21,2000, and will continue until the positions are filled. complete job descriptions will be sent upon receipt of letter to: shannon mcginnis, human resources, the art institute of chi­cago, 111 south michigan avenue, chicago, il60603; aic.jobs@artic.edu; fax: (312)857-0141. eoe.cataloger. the university of arkansas libraries seek a full-time catalogerto perform original cataloging for monographs, curriculum materials, and selected av materials. the person in this position will supervise one fte assistant, assist with the management of copy cataloging for books, and perform other professional duties as assigned. the catalog instruction librarianuniversity of northern coloradothe university of northern colorado seeks appli­cants for the position of instruction librarian & assistant professor of library science, position number 21.921. required: master's degree from an ala-accredited library school; experience in a college, university, or research library appro­priate to the position. this is a term track position. the position reports to the head of instructional services. responsible for developing and deliv­ering library orie (cataloger)vacancy announcement #990341 gs-1410-09 (9304) $35,310 $45,900 gs-1410-11 (9305) $42,724 $55,541 gs-1410-12 (9306) $51,204 $66,664*salary reflects locality pay for calendar year 2000.the library of congress is seeking a librarian to perform descriptive and subject cataloging of monographs and serials in an online mode in the medical disciplines and biotechnology. the incumbent will search bibliographic databases to determine rela­tionship of items to existing bibliographic records; analyze c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 149 resume, and names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three current references to juana r. young, acting directorof libraries, university of arkansas, fayetteville, ar 72701 -1201. the university of arkansas is an equal-opportunity, affirmative-action employer. applicants must have proof of legal authority to work in the united states.coordinator of bibliographic services & systems. as­sistant/associate professor, university library. required: graduate de­gree in librarianship from an ala-accredited instit vative interfaces; experience with resource sharing consortia. this is a tenure-track, 12-month calendar year position. review of applications will begin on march 1, 2000, and continue until position is filled. submit a resume and cover letterto: william o’malley, search committee chair (log# 141034crl), university of rhode island, p.o. box g, kingston, rl 02881. the university of rhode island is an aa/eoe and is committed to increasing the diversity of its faculty, staff and students. persons from under-re dean of library servicesthe american college of greecethe american college of greece invites appli­cations for the position of dean of library services, effective august 1, 2000.the american college of greece is the oldest and largest independent, american-sponsored educational institution in europe. today it en­rolls approximately 8000 students in three divisions: pierce college, a six-year high school; the junior college, awarding associate de­grees; and deree college, a four-year under­graduate college o library directorcardinal stritch universitycardinal stritch university, a catholic, franciscan, coeducational institution, the sec­ond largest private institution in wisconsin, whose main campus is located in a suburb of milwaukee, seeks an individual to assume the position of library director. the successful candidate will be an energetic, creative librar­ian who will provide strong, forward-looking leadership and effective management for a service-oriented library.requirements: mls from an ala-accredited 150 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 library instruction. produces instructional materials in print and web-based formats. conducts needs assessment and evaluation of instructional ser­vices. proactively promotes the library instruction program through market­ing, public relations, and outreach. provides reference service. supervises library instruction librarian. reports to the assistant director for public and research services. qualifications: required: ala-accredited de­gree; demonstrated commitment to library public services and instructi collegial leadership style; and qualifications for appointment to faculty tenure-track position. candidates should also have a creative and coherent vision of the role of the library in the swiftly changing academic environ­ment; a breadth of practical library experience encompassing both public and technical services; and demonstrated participation in campus life and community activities. salary competitive, dependent on qualifications and experience. to apply, send letter of interest, curriculum vitae and social sciences librarianuniversity of richmondthe social sciences reference librarian is one of six librarians who provide reference, outreach, and instruction services in boatwright memorial library (main library). the university of richmond has an innovative program in outreach and instruction and we intend to hire a dynamic librarian who will contribute in this important area. as part of this team, the librarian’s schedule requires at least one evening a week as well as participation in a weekend rotati c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 151 head of reference and instructioncarleton college laurence mckinley gould librarythe laurence mckinley gould library is a vibrant center of the intellectual and cultural life of the campus, and serves a significant educational role in a college community committed to excellence in learning and teaching. we seek an experienced, talented and energetic head of reference and instruction to join us in developing an imaginative, student-centered liberal arts college library program. beginning in the fall of 2000, 152 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 establishment and revision of procedures for providing intellectual access to electronic resources, including cd-roms, digital images, numeric files, electronic journals, text files, and online databases. in addition, this position will provide leadership for the formulation of policies related to access to electronic resources and the role of the opac in providing coherent access to in-house and external electronic resources including locally developed scholarly digital resources. the incumbent will addres employer. women and minorities are encouraged to apply, http:// www.lib.uiowa.edu/index.html.evening reference/assistant cataloging librarian.theuniversity of scranton, harry & jeanette weinberg memorial library. tenure-track position. the university of scranton seeks an evening refer­ence librarian/assistant cataloger. dual responsibilities include providing a full range of evening reference services, including user education, and cataloging activities. qualifications: ala-accredited mls and library experi rutgers university librarieswomen’s studies librarian: selects women’s and gender studies materials; provides instruction, training, reference; liaison to the women’s studies program. develops/maintains www pages. reading knowledge of european and/or other languages and relevant experience in the humanities and social sciences. (app #137)world history/jewish studies librarian: selector for western and eastern europe, asia, middle east and jewish studies. provides instruction, training, reference; liaison t c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 153 ence with oclc; experience with a local integrated library system; knowl­edge of cataloging trends and national initiatives; knowledge of technical services automation; and excellent communication skills. preferred: su­pervisory and management experience; experience with innovative inter­faces inc. system. salary: from $45,000 commensurate with qualifications and experience. rank: librarian 2; faculty status. other benefits: tiaa/ cref, broad insurance program, 22 days vacation and 12 days sick leave per ye manages budget, provides extensive bibliographic instruction and delivery of information services to respective departments; consults regularly with hper’s library committee and serves on appropriate hper and iub libraries committees. qualifications: mls degree with academic back­ground or prior work experience in relevant areas or combination of equivalent education and experience. preference to be given to candidates with training or experience in one of the subject areas served by hper library as well as web development librariangeorgia state universitygeorgia state university (gsu), a dynamic urban university in downtown atlanta, is seeking a web development librarian to create a library website that is the “portal of choice” for the faculty and students of gsu. this position will have overall responsibility for the design, development, and maintenance of the library’s public and internal websites; provide leadership in defining and creating innovative web-based services; engage in staff training in the de 154 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 library c-201, bloomington, in 47405. phone: (812) 855-8196; fax: (812) 855-2576; e-mail: ycooperb @ indiana.edu. review of applications begins march 7,2000, continues until the position is filled. for further information concerning indiana university: http://www.indiana.edu/iub. indiana uni­versity is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer.information systems librarian. responsibilities: unlv li­braries is seeking a service-oriented librarian, at the assistant professor rank, for the position of as sgml, dhtml, vrml, xml, css, cgi, perl, and/or javascript;experience with website development and maintenance applications, in­cluding imaging software; experience with internet communications tools and applications; reference services experience. salary range: this is a tenure-track position. salary is commensurate with qualifications and experience. the university has an excellent fringe benefits package. the setting: unlv is nevada’s largest comprehensive, doctoral-degreegranting institution with 22 departmentrutgers university librariesrutgers university libraries invites nominations and applications for the position of head, acquisitions department. the successful candidate will be responsible for central acquisitions of all library materials and end processing for materials cataloged centrally; rutgers libraries materials budget is approximately 7 million dollars. the head of acquisitions will direct the department of 10 fte staff in the use of new technologies and in electronic processing of ma special collections and preservation librarianoberlin collegecoordinates special collections and preserva­tion programs in an outstanding college library.required: sound liberal arts education, aca­demic library experience; knowledge of rare books and special collections, preservation and conservation techniques, and preserva­tion program administration; demonstrated su­pervisory ability; excellent communication and interpersonal skills; strong service orientation; planning and organization skills; commitme c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 155 will begin february 25,2000, and will continue until the position is filled. specific questions may be addressed to megan fitch, search committee chair, atmfitch@nevada.edu, or call (702) 895-3286. unlvisan equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. persons are selected on the basis of ability without regard to race, color, sex, age, national origin, sexual orientation, religion, disability or veteran status.lending services librarian. tenure-track, 12-month, faculty po­sition. responsibilities primaril continues until position is filled. aa/eoe.librarian/archivist. albion college is searching for a full-time librarian/archivist. the archivist is responsible to the director of libraries forthe full administration of the albion college archives collection. this includes selection, preservation, and management of historical material including photographic images, inactive administrative files, materials relating to the history of albion college, its faculty, staff, administration and students. the archivist information literacy librarian/coordinator information literacy programhttp://www.plattsburgh.edu plattsburgh state university of new york library & information servicethe division of library & information services at plattsburgh state university invites applications for a newly created information literacy librarian position. this position is responsible for the continuing development of plattsburgh's outstanding information instruction program that began in 1979. the core feature of the current program is 156 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 consulting librariansthree positions cornell collegethe russell d. cole library is redesigning its program to create a team of librarians who will collaborate with faculty toward an integrated information literacy program to prepare students for an information society. we seek librarians with a passion for teaching and service, enthusiasm for interaction with faculty, initiative and creativity, and skills in reference and collection development with an increasing emphasis on electronic resources. these libr c&rl news ■ february 2000 /157 in managing historical collections in an archives, library museum or historical agency. preferable qualifications include strong background in archival research methodology with demonstrated skills in oral and written communication, and library reference experience desirable. interested candidates should send a letter of application, resume, and three current letters of reference to dr. john p. kondelik, director of libraries, albion college, kc 4692, albion, ml 49224. eoe. applicant screening will begin fe jects. materials handled may include electronic resources and other media. materials are processed for the main and science libraries, some laboratory collections, and off-campus research facility libraries. mono­graphs original catalogers sen/e as resource persons for monographic cataloging within the department and in otherareas of the libraries. the university of georgia libraries participates in gil, a state-wide intercon­nected implementation of the endeavor voyager system. the libraries is a member of university of california, irvineassociate university librarians the university of california, irvine libraries are recruiting for three associate university librarian (aul) positions to complete the senior administrative team. the university librarian, gerald j. munoff, is seeking innovative, creative, flexible, and knowledgeable executives to join an enthusiastic staff in building a research library of excellence for a young and rapidly-growing university ranked nationally in the top universities. the campus of 19,285 students and 1,010 faculty is planning to grow by 5 team member in a production-oriented environment; effective oral and written communication skills; ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships; cataloging experience in an academic or research library preferred. benefits: standard benefits package includes life, health and disability insurance and mandatory participation in the state or optional retirement system, and 21 days annual leave, plus 12 paid holidays. salary minimum: $29,500, commensurate with experience. for further informa devise strategy for library development. works with eastman coordinator of technology to guide direction of technology development within the library; also collaborates with other university of rochester library direc­tors to create policy guiding the university-wide automated library system. reports to the dean of academic affairs at the eastman school of music. institution: the sibley music library, founded in 1904, serves primarily students and faculty of the eastman school of music and the university of reference librarians: two positionsuniversity of missouri-rollathe university of missouri-rolla is seeking qualified applicants to: (1) provide comprehensive reference services for print and electronic resources in a centralized library which has a strong science and engineering focus; (2] participate in an active library instruction program; and (3) serve as liaisor to selected departments for acquisitions and specialized information ser­vices. some evening and weekend hours are required. required: ala-mls. demonstrated strong commitment to delivering quality public service. experience with library computer applications, including html, the internet, and other information technologies experience in a computer-intensive setting and ability to work in a demanding, rapidly changing environment. reference experience in an academic library, including the ability to conduct effective reference interviews.desired: experience in meeting user information needs, especially in scientific and engineerin 158 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 159 cataloging, client services, or music information technologies. dynamic leadership skills and ability to work with diverse constituency of studio and academic faculty, students, and the larger community of the university of rochester. strong written and oral communication skills. active participa­tion and leadership in professional organizations in music or librarianship. desired: graduate degree in music history, theory, music education, performance, or a related field. salary and benefits: competitive sal reference librarian/assistant professor. rollins col­lege invites applications for an enthusiastic and service-oriented librarian to join its reference team. primary responsibilities include: providing assistance during scheduled hours at the reference desk; participating in library instruction, electronic database search training, and reference collection development; preparing bibliographies, user guides and exhib­its. basic qualifications include an ala-accredited mls; a working knowl­edge of print and e mann library, cornell university 2 positionscornell university's albert r. mann library invites applications for the following two positions:metadata librarianresponsible for organizing access to the growing number of networked information resources and cataloging materials in a variety of formats. evaluate and analyze models for organizing networked information and help devise and implement solutions. provide recommendations on the types of metadata required tor effective access to electronic publication 160 / c&rl news ■ february 2000kresge engineriansassistant/associate libraering(2)u.c.berkeley electronic outreach librarianresponsible for developing and coordinating the instructional outreach program of the engineering library, and for collection development and faculty liaison in support of one engineering department. other responsibilities include refer­ence desk coverage, instruction and web page development.assistant head/reference librarianresponsible for coordination of reference services, collection development and faculty liaison in support of two engineering departments, and management ov criteria forcontinuing appointment, promotion, and tenure. salary: $30,000$36,000 annually depending on qualifications; 12-month contract; standard benefits package available. starting date: june 1,2000. rollins college is an independent, private liberal arts institution with a total enrollment of 2,600 located in winter park, florida. the olin library houses a collection of280,000 volumes, 1,500 periodicals, 68,000 government documents, nu­merous electronic databases, and two state-of-the-art information a reference librarian with a strong commitment to user services and enthusiasm forteaching to develop innovative library services for a premier political science department. an excellent opportunity to join a humanities/ social sciences reference team (8 librarians, 2 paraprofessionals) to deliver services that support instruction, research, and writing for faculty and students. the successful candidate will be a member of a group facilitating the integration of statistical and geographical data services in c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 161 two positions—searches extended head, electronic resources program head, library automation departmentnimitz library u.s. naval academythe nimitz library, united states naval academy, is extending the timetable of its searches for the following two positions.1. head, electronic resources program. as leader in the development and maintenance of the library’s electronic information resources, the incumbent will, with input from the nine other librarians in the reference department, and working closely with th 162 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 william patersonuniversitythe william paterson university of new jersey is a comprehensive public institution of higher learning that is committed to promoting student success, academic excellence, and community outreach with opportunities for lifelong learning. boasting a highly distinguished and diverse faculty, nationally renowned academic programs, and state-ofthe-art information and communications technology, the university maintains a low student-faculty ratio (12:1) and small class size (21:3) for (716)275-4461. fax: (716)244-1358. e-mail: kkitrinos@rcl.lib.rochester.edu. university of rochester is an equal opportunity employer. review of applications will begin no laterthan february 20,2000, and will continue until the position is filled.social science reference librarian. (position no. 250150) florida atlantic university. reports to head, reference department. participates in all aspects of busy reference department, including evening/ weekend rotation, library instruction, database searching, and library. send letter of application, resume, and the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three references to: chair, reference librarian search committee, s.e. wimberly library, florida atlantic university, 777 glades road, boca raton, fl 33431. application must be postmarked no later than march 30, 2000. florida atlantic university is an equal opportunity/access/affirmative action institution.social sciences librarian. western kentucky university seeks applications forthe position of social sciences c&rl news ■ february 2000 / 163 ject master's/doctorate in the social sciences, familiarity with electronic reference tools, including internet resources. preferred qualifications include successful public sen/ices and collection experience; reading knowledge of french, german or spanish; and excellentoral and written communication skills. research and publication are required for promo­tion and tenure. duties: selection and management of collections in broadcasting/journalism, communications, psychology and sociology; serving as the liai dresses, and telephone numbers of at least three references who can provide current assessments of the candidate’s performance potential in his/her discipline. complete application materials should be sent to: professor marsha l. nolf, chair, library search committee, louis l. manderino library, california university of pennsylvania, 250 univer­sity avenue, california, pa 15419-1394; 724-938-4048; e-mail: nolf @ cup.edu. california university of pennsylvania is an affirmative ac­tion/equal opportunity emplo late job listingscoordinator collection management. search reopened for libraiy faculty positions. hampton university, william r. and norma b. harvey library. coordinator collection management is a new position of leadership that will oversee collection development from assessment and selection to acquisitions and organization. this librarian will be respon­sible for developing strategies to increase the effectiveness of materials selection, apply technologies and data to assess all university collections, 164 / c&rl news ■ february 2000 director of instructional resources. moorhead state university, moorhead, minnesota. position begins july 1, 2000. salary range $72,565-$97,267, depending on qualifica­tions and experience. position responsibilities include administering the library and providing leadership and management to the university's library, audiovisual, instructional tv and instructional technology services. the director reports directly to the vice president for academic affairs and has supervisory responsibility for approximatel acrl news issue (b) of college & research libraries 172 / c&rlnews the classified ads deadlines: orders for regular classified advertisements must reach the acrl office on or before the second of the month preced­ ing publication of the issue (e.g. september 2 for the october issue). late job listings will be accepted on a space-available basis after the second of the month. rates: classified advertisements are $5.25 per line for acrl members, $6.60 for others. late job notices are $12.60 per line for members, $14.70 for others. organizations submitting ads will be charged according to their membership status. telephone: all telephone orders should be confirmed by a writ­ ten order mailed to acrl headquarters as soon as possible. orders should be accompanied by a typewritten copy of the ad to be used in proofreading. an additional $15 will be charged for ads taken over the phone (except late job notices or display ads). guidelines: for ads which list an application deadline, that date must be no sooner than the 20th day of the month in which the notice appears (e.g., october 20 for the october issue). all job announce­ ments should include a salary figure. job announcements will be edited to exclude discriminatory references. applicants should be aware that the terms faculty rank and status vary in meaning among institutions. jobline: call (312) 944-6795 for late-breaking job ads for aca­ demic and research library positions. a pre-recorded summary of positions listed with the service is revised weekly; each friday a new tape includes all ads received by 1:00 p.m. the previous day. each listing submitted will be carried on the recording for two weeks. the charge for each two-week listing is $30 for acrl members and $35 for non-members. fast job listing service: a special newsletter for those actively seeking positions. this service lists job postings received at acrl headquarters four weeks before they appear in c&rl news, as well as ads which, because of narrow deadlines, will not appear in c&rl news. the cost of a six-month subscription is $10 for acrl mem­ bers and $15 for non-members. contact: classified advertising dep’t, acrl, american library association, 50 e. huron st., chicago, il 60611; (312) 944-6780. materials wanted space problems? we will buy your surplus serials, technical, scientific and historic materials. send list for best offer to: colfax books, p.o. box 380542, denver, co 80238. positions open access services librarian, temple university libraries. responsibilities: under the direction of the head, access services department, oversees the activities and services of the main univer­ sity library's current periodicals, microforms, and reserve collec­ tions. serves as primary contact to faculty and academic depart­ ments for services offered in support of instructional and research activities. provides access and reference service for journal and mi­ croforms literature. coordinates staff activities, including selection, training and evaluation. fulfills liaison role to other related service ar­ eas in the central library system. assists department head with im­ provement of current services, and planning/implementation of new services or programs. assumes general departmental responsibili­ ties in the department head s absence. participates in developing and implementing library-wide procedures, policies and goals salary guide listed below are the minimum starting sal­ ary figures recommended by 16 state library associations for professional library posts in these states. job seekers and employers should consider these recommended mini mums, as well as other salary surveys (such as the survey in the october 15,1988, issue of library journal, the ala survey of librar­ ian salaries, the annual arl salary survey, or the annual cupa administrative com­ pensation survey) when evaluating profes­ sional vacancies. for more information, con­ tact the ala office for library personnel services. connecticut $22,200 indiana varies* iowa $18,792 kansas $17,500* louisiana $20,000 maine var s* massachusetts $ ie 22,000 new hampshire $17,500 new jersey $22,000 new york varies* north carolina $20,832 ohio $20,024 pennsylvania $20,000 rhode island $21,000 vermont $19,000 west virginia $20,000 wisconsin $23,700 * rather than establish one statewide salary min­ imum, some state associations have adopted a for­ mula based on such variables as comparable sala­ ries for public school teachers in each community or the grade level of a professional librarian post in these cases, you may wish to contact the state as­ sociation for minimum salary information. through service on task forces and committees. qualifications: mls degree from an ala-accredited program. experience in library ac­ cess services or related areas, with one-to-years at the professional level preferred. effective communication skills, both oral and written. organizational skills, and demonstrated ability to supervise and di­ rect the work of staff, including program conceptualization, planning and implementation. experience with online library systems, includ­ ing circulation/reserve modules, and office automation technology highly desirable. salary: minimum $20,000 (for 10-month contract), higher depending on qualifications and experience. liberal fringe benefits include health, dental, and life insurance; tuition remission; tiaa-cref. send letter addressing all qualifications stated above, resume, and names of 3 references to: laila el-zein, chair, search committee, d o administrative services department, paley library 017-00, temple university, philadelphia, pa 19122. review of ap­ plications to begin on march 1,1989, and will continue until position is filled. an aa/eo employer. archives administrator. challenging opportunity to plan, supervise and direct the services, programs and staff of the library/ manuscript department. require graduate degree from accredited institution in library science or archival sciences or afro-american february 1989 / 173 history or american history or studies; formal archival training; expe­ rience in use of manuscript materials in exhibits. salary range: $22,500-$24,500. call 1-800-blk-hist or write to: national afro american museum, p.o. box 578, wilberforce, oh 45384. eoe. assistant director of libraries, collection development and management, libraries of the claremont colleges. provides leadership in defining, building, evaluating and preserving the col­ lections of the libraries in support of the programs of the five under­ graduate colleges and the claremont graduate school for instruc­ tion and research. works closely with senior library staff, faculty members, subject bibliographers and others. collection size, 1.6 mil­ lion volumes, staff of 65. materials budget of $1.3 million. qualifica­ tions: broad range of scholarly interests, experienced administrator in collection development and management, effective communica­ tor, knowledge of book trade and trends in collection management. master’s degree from accredited library school or equivalent essen­ tial. additional graduate study desirable. salary: $40,000-$48,000. apply by april 30,1989 to: eleanor montague, vice president for ad­ ministration, the claremont university center, claremont, ca 91711. include complete statement of qualifications, full resume, statement of two pages or less concerning philosophy of collection management and names and addresses of three references who are knowledgeable about applicant’s qualifications for the position. po­ sition available july 1,1989. equal opportunity employer. assistant engineering librarian, search reopened. re quirements; mls (ala-accredited) plus a minimum of 2 years pro­ fessional experience, preferably in a library supporting technical dis­ ciplines. desired qualifications: experience or interest in automated library procedures; computer experience or education; and techno­ logical literacy. database searching experience helpful. some su­ pervision experience needed. ability to formulate, administer, and implement user education and public relations programs utilizing various media. experience in bibliographic instruction. responsibili­ ties: shares in management and operational responsibilities. partici­ pates in planning and implementation of new services, procedures, and development of policies. shares responsibility for training and supervision of support staff; liaison with faculty; reference; database searching; and collection development. also responsible for super­ vision of aviation technology library. makes presentations to uni­ versity classes and other groups on library services, resources, and facilities. members of the library faculty must meet purdue univer­ sity requirements (excellence in librarianship; research and publish­ ing; and service) for promotion and tenure. status and benefits: fac­ ulty status and responsibilities. rank commensurate with education and experience. twelve month appointment with annual vacation of 22 working days. flexible benefit programs are in effect as are tiaa cref retirement and social security coverage. salary: $22,000 and up depending on qualifications. deadline: march 15, 1989 or until position is filled. send resume and list of references to: thomas l. haworth, personnel officer, libraries, stewart center, purdue uni­ versity, west lafayette, in 47907. an equal opportunity, affirma­ tive action employer. assistant head, acquisitions department assists in managing department and supervising staff; will evaluate vendor performance and assist in upgrading automated acquisitions sys­ tem; may be responsible for collection development in specific ar­ eas. qualifications: master of library science from accredited school; knowledge of foreign language required, french or italian preferred; good organizational and communication skills; experi­ ence with oclc and notis desired. salary: minimum $21,000. starting date, as soon as possible after march 1,1989. send resume to: peggy weissert, library personnel officer, theodore m. hes burgh library, university of notre dame, notre dame, in, 46556 by march 1 for insured consideration. an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. assistant librarian, associate librarian, or li­ brarian, head, cataloging department. under general direction of associate dean for technical services, primarily respon­ sible for leadership, administration, management of work activities and personnel of cataloging department: direct implementation of online catalog as it effects workflow of department; other duties in­ clude assisting in library-wide implementation of notis and serving as member of technical services administrators and administrative council. qualifications: required: mls from ala-accredited library school; demonstrated ability in organizational, managerial, supervi­ sory skills; three years successful library experience in a professional appointment; previous cataloging experience using oclc or other bibliographic utility in a complex, multi-lingual collection; excellent verbal and written communication skills; ability to relate effectively with other library and university faculty and staff; ability to meet re­ sponsibilities and requirements of tenure-track appointment. prefer­ red: experience with notis or other integrated online system; expe­ rience with microcomputers and their application in cataloging. salary dependent on qualifications and experience; salary floors are observed: assistant librarian: $21,500; associate librarian: $27,000; librarian: $33,000. conditions and benefits: librarians hold tenure-track appointments within a system of ranks analogous to and modeled on those of the teaching faculty. they participate in a system of faculty governance which includes the bloomington li­ brary faculty council and the university library faculty council. within the university they are eligible for election to campus and uni­ versity faculty councils and serve on university committees and task forces. they are eligible for sabbatical and other research leaves. benefits include blue cross/blue shield, major medical insurance, tiaa/cref retirement/annuity plan, group life insurance and liberal vacation and sick leave. to apply: a letter of application stating quali­ fications and background relevant to this specific position accompa­ nied by a resume and the names and addresses of four references should be sent to: the search and screen committee in care of: marilyn shaver, personnel officer, indiana university libraries, main library c-2, bloomington, in 47405. telephone: (812) 855­ 3403. available date: may 1,1989. closing date for applications: no earlier than march 15,1989. eeo/aae. assistant reference librarian. assist in providing gen­ eral reference services in the social sciences and humanities. partici­ pates in bibliographic instruction, online searching and collection nonprint media ̂ services librarian tenure track faculty appointment to start september 1. responsible for plan n in g , d evelo p m en t, and day-to-day operations of nonprint media services, including collec­ tion developm ent; upgrading of h a rd w a re ; and s u p e rv is io n of microforms, curriculum materials c e n te r, s e rv ic e s to th e h a n d i­ capped, equipm ent delivery, and microcomputer lab. the fully auto­ mated university libraries house over 575,000 volumes, 550 micro­ forms, 35,000 nonprint items, and maintain 5,500 current serials sub­ s c riptio n s. mls req u ired ; o ther a d v a n c e d e g re e p re fe rre d . experience highly desirable. salary $ 2 4,000 and up. send le tte r of application, resum e, and names and addresses of three references by march 1, 1989 to: eugene t. neely, dean, university libraries, adelphi university box704 ariolfm univeisity is on io/aa fmployot m/f 174 / cirrl news development. minimum requirements are: mls degree from an ala-accredited school; one year’s professional experience (prefer­ ably in an academic library); bibliographic instruction experience; a working knowledge of one modern european language. salary $21,500 minimum, dependent upon experience and qualifications. excel lent fringe benefits. open march 1989. send resume by febru­ ary 28 to: james delaneey, georgetown university library, p.o. box 37445, washington, dc 20013. g.u. is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. assistant systems librarian, position available july 1, 1989, contingent on funding requested from the legislature. under the direction of the systems librarian. responsible for coordinating, monitoring and evaluating library microcomputer applications; coor­ dinates and assists in training of library staff in the use of microcom­ puter software and hardware; participates in automated systems de­ velopment for the libraries; assists systems librarian in budget preparation, grant writing, and analysis related to online systems. tenure track position. a progressive record of professional/scholarly achievement is expected of all librarians. required: ala-accredited mls or its equivalent; demonstrated knowledge of microcomputers and their applications in a library environment; familiarity with online circulation system, public access catalog, and/or other component of an automated library system. preferred: experience in several li­ brary units in an academic or research library; familiarity with micro­ soft word, lotus 1-2-3, dbase iii + , and other microcomputer soft­ ware; experience in production o f batch products from an automated library system; knowledge of cd-rom, expert systems, and/or desktop publishing applications in a library environment. rank: librarian 2 or above, dependent on previous relevant experi­ ence; faculty status. salary: $19,500 or above, commensurate with experience and qualifications. tiaa/cref, broad insurance pro­ grams, 22 days vacation, 12 days sick leave per year. send letter of application, resume and names of three references to: maureen pas tine, director of libraries, washington state university libraries, pullman, wa 99164-5610. applications must be postmarked not later than march 31, 1989. wsu is an eo/aa educator and em­ ployer. protected group members are encouraged to apply. associate librarian/cataloger. small liberal arts college library in lake setting invites applications for position involving variety of professional experiences, including supervision of cataloging processes, oversight of serials and documents, reference, and par­ ticipation in library management. must have demonstrated ability in cataloging, oclc, aacr2, lcc; five years experience including catalog automation preferred. level of appointment dependent upon qualifications and experience, minimum salary $21,000, fac­ ulty status. application deadline, march 15, position open july 1. send letter of application to: elizabeth holmes, college librarian, st. andrews presbyterian college, detamble library, laurinburg, nc 28352. sapc is an aa/eeo employer. director of services columbia university libraries columbia university is seeking an exceptional librarian to provide creative leadership in planning and implementing innovative services as the university libraries enter a challenging period of change. the libraries are in the process of installing the notis integrated system; are undergoing comprehensive space and programmatic planning; and are planning for innovative methods to deliver instructional and information services to the academic community, both locally and nationally. in addition, the libraries and computer center are jointly planning for the application of computer technologies to enhance and reshape information services at columbia. reporting to the vice president for information services and university librarian, the director of services has primary responsibility for the development and provision of services to members of the academic com­ munity in the humanities, social sciences, and science and engineering, as well as for system-wide coordi­ nation of service activities in the distinctive collections. responsibilities encompass policy development; effective utilization of staff and budgetary resources; and the effective coordination of relevant system-wide activities with senior colleagues. in addition to the three division chiefs reporting to this position, the staff of the services group includes 33 professionals, 90 supporting staff, and an fte of 50 student employees. the collections involved contain 2 million volumes. qualifications: a minimum of five years of substantial experience in a large academic and/or research library, including responsibility for a major public services area. an mls from an accredited library school required; a graduate subject degree is desirable. demonstrated evidence of leadership, managerial, and creative abilities essential. excellent benefits include tuition exemption for self and family and assistance with university housing. salary from a minimum of $55,000. submit resume with letter of interest and names of three references to: services search committee box 35 butler library columbia university 535 west 114th street new york, ny 10027 the deadline for applications is march 1, 1989. an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. february 1989 / 175 bibliographic instruction librarian and serials management librarian. the michigan technological univer­ sity library is conducting a national search to fill two (2) professional positions (bibliographic instruction librarian and serials manage­ ment librarian). these positions were authorized in august of 1988 and came about through early retirements. if you are dynamic, chal­ lenged by growth and change, want to work with excellently quali­ fied students, motivated to provide services to conscientious faculty, and want to be part of a collegial professional team, you might be the librarians we seek. minimum salary $19,000. screening of applica­ tions will begin on march 1,1989 and continue until successful appli­ cants are identified, starting date july 1,1989. send letter of applica­ tion, resume, and list of three references to: search committee, j. robert van pelt library, michigan technological university, houghton, ml 49931. michigan technological university is an equal opportunity educational institution, equal opportunity employer. business reference librarian, university of north texas, denton, texas. position description: the business reference li­ brarian provides reference service to the students, faculty, and other patrons of the collection in the university libraries primarily in the fields of management, accounting, marketing, finance, insurance, business law, and business computer information systems under the direct supervision of the head of general reference services. this position will have primary responsibility for providing collection development in enhancing the collection, bibliographic instruction and database searching in the assigned areas of business. minimum qualifications: a position requiring at least five years of professional experience in business reference in an academic or research library; mls from an ala-accredited library school; and an undergraduate subject specialty in business or economics. preference will be given to individuals with advanced degrees in business or economics. knowledge of database searching techniques. desirable qualifica­ tions: knowledge of collection development techniques and re­ sources in the field of business. familiarity of basic computer appli­ cations in libraries and teaching experience is desirable. the university: the university of north texas has over 24,000 students and one of the largest colleges of business administration in the united states. the college of business administration has over 5,600 undergraduates, 150 doctoral candidates, 730 masters candi­ dates, and 110 faculty members. available: 1 january 1989. salary: $35,000 + . benefits: competitive benefits package. no state in­ come tax. applicants should send a resume, copies of all transcripts and the names and addresses of three references before march 17, 1989, to: margaret e. galloway, associate director of libraries, uni­ versity of north texas libraries, box 5188 n.t. station, denton, tx 76203-5188. university of north texas is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. catalog librarian. requirements: mls (ala-accredited) plus reading knowledge of one or more modern foreign languages. preferred qualifications: cataloging exeprience including working knowledge of authority practices, aacr cataloging rules, lc rule in­ terpretations and marc formats; broad educational background, with emphasis on the humanities and/or social sciences; reading knowledge of german, russian, japanese or chinese in combina­ tion with a romance language; familiarity with dewey decimal classi­ fication; experience with oclc or other bibliographic utility; experi­ ence with an online catalog. responsibilities: performs original and complex copy cataloging and classification of monographs in all physical formats in assigned subject areas, mainly the humanities and social sciences; establishes aacr2 form of names, assigns lc subject headings and solves authority problems; participates in the development of cataloging policies and procedures. status and benefits: exempt professional appointment with annual vacation of 22 working days. flexible benefit programs, group life, medical and disability insurance programs are in effect as are tiaa/cref and so­ cial security. salary: $20,000 and up depending on qualifications. deadline: march 9,1989 or until position is filled. send resume and 3 references to: thomas l. haworth, personnel officer, purdue uni­ versity libraries, stewart center-room 265, west lafayette, in 47907. an eeo/aa employer. catalog/reference librarian, rhode island school of de sign. responsibilities: catalog and classify library materials in rlin (3/4 time); assist with reference service in an art school library (1/4 time). qualifications: ala-accredited mls; undergraduate degree in art history or studio art preferred; reading knowledge of at least one modern european language; three years of library experience, pref— ini— d ir e c t o r o f library services (search extended) c heyn ey university is searching for a director to take strong leadership in­ itiatives in further developing the library’s resources and services to enhance the u niversity’s mission o f academic excellence. reporting directly to the v ic e president o f a cadem ic affairs, selected candidate will direct all operations o f the library, supervising b o th faculty professionals and technical staff. m inim um requirements are an a l a accredited m aster’s degree; three years o f administrative experience and five years o f academic library experience with a doctorate preferred. duties include: maintaining and developing library co l­ lections; administering and planning budget; furthering application o f automated inform ation technologies; writing policies and procedures and p ro­ viding services to faculty and students. salary range is $38,789 to $48,486, plus an excellent benefits package. c heyn ey, the oldest historically black college in the u nited states, was established in 1837. t h e university is on e o f the fourteen in the pennsylvania state system o f higher education. its 275 acre campus is located 18 miles west o f the philadelphia a irport and 15 miles north o f w ilm ington, de. qualified candidates should submit a letter o f application, com plete with vita and the names and telephone numbers o f three references, postm arked by m arch 3 0 , 1 9 8 9 to: h um an resources, library d irector search, c h e y n e y u n iv e r s i t y , c heyney, p a 1 9 3 1 9 . a n affirmative a ction /e qu a l opportunity employer. ( f lll 1 c univ h ersi e ty o y f pe n nns e ylva y nia 176 / c&rl news erably in technical services; knowledge of online cataloging (run or oclc) and automated systems. available july 1, 1989. salary; $22,500 minimum, excellent benefits. send application, resume and three references by april 1, 1989 to: carol s. terry, director of li­ brary services, rhode island school of design, 2 college street, providence, rl 02903. eoe cataloger. bowling green state university, a comprehensive university in n.w. ohio, seeks a cataloger (due to retirement). re­ sponsibilities include original cataloging and copy cataloging of books, serials, avs, and other formats, primarily for the bgsu li­ braries' curriculum resource center and the main stacks collection. required: ala-accredited mls; knowledge of aacr2, library of congress and dewey classification, lc and sear’s subject head­ ings, desired: some cataloging experience including application of the dewey classification system for curriculum materials; biblio­ graphic knowledge of one or more western european languages. salary: minimum of $21,000 with excellent fringe benefits. rank of assistant professor. this is a twelve-month, tenure-track position. librarian suny plattsburgh suny plattsburgh’s feinberg library is seeking an innovative and dynamic person to assume leadership role in the newly created area of acces services. reporting to the director of libraries, the head of access services will be responsible for planning, management and supervision of circula tion, media services, reserve, interlibrary loan and space and facilities. will also serve as a liaison to the microcomputer laboratory staff. plattsburgh is located on the shore of lake champlain, one hour from montreal, lake placid and burlington, vermont. qualifications: effective communication, problem-solving and interpersonal skills, and commitment to creating a responsive and innova tive public services environment. ala-accredited master's degree and at least three years of experi ence in public service in an academic library is re quired. supervisory experience in one or more of the areas of responsibility is highly desirable. we encourage applications from candidates who can serve as role models for women and minority students. minimum salary: $30,000, twelve-month ap pointment with faculty rank, excellent fringe benefit package. applications received by march 15, 1989, will receive first consideration. send letter of application, current resume and three current letters of reference to: chair, search committee office of personnel/affirmative action suny plattsburgh box 1583-100 plattsburgh, ny 12901 suny is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. a s ­ a ­ ­ ­ ­ bgsu librarians enjoy full faculty status and privileges, which in­ clude an expectation of research and publication, as well as the op­ portunity to participate in library and university governance. review of applications will begin on april 1,1989, and will continue until the position is filled. position available june 1,1989. send letter of appli­ cation, resume, and names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three references to: kathryn thiede, personnel officer, dean’s of­ fice, jerome library, bowling green state university, bowling green, oh 43403. bgsu is an aa/eoc employer. minorities and women are encouraged to apply and to identify themselves for af­ firmative action purposes. cataloger for serials. the university of arizona library is seeking a librarian to perform original subject and descriptive cata­ loging for serials, including arizona state documents, in a number of language and subject areas using aacr2, library of congress sub­ ject headings, and lc classification as well as some local classifica­ tion schemes. additional duties include problem resolution, re­ cataloging and reclassification as necessary, and may include the supervision of support staff in copy cataloging. the position reports to the senior serials catalog librarian. requirements include an ala accredited mls, good communication and interpersonal skills. pre­ ferred qualifications include a working knowledge of a foreign lan­ guage, experience with serials cataloging, aacr2, the marc serials format, oclc or a similar utility, and some supervisory experi­ ence. the beginning professional salary is $20,000; a higher salary can be negotiated depending upon qualifications and experience. librarians at the university of arizona have academic professional status, are eligible for continuing status, are voting members of the faculty, and may take up to 24 days professional leave per year. they have 22 days paid vacation, 12 days sick leave, and 10 holi­ days. a standard package of fringe benefits is available. a letter of application, resume, and names of 3 references should be sent to: w. david laird, university librarian, university of arizona library, p.o. boxc, tucson, az 85721. applications must be postmarked by march 17,1989. the university of arizona is an equal opportunity employer with an affirmative action plan. women and minorities are urged to apply. in compliance with the immigration reform and con­ trol act of 1986, all persons hired after november 6, 1986, will be required to show proof of their identity and right to work in the united states. cataloger, original, s.e. asian materials, cornell university li­ brary. immediate opening in the cataloging department of central tech services. duties include original cataloging of monographic materials (including authority work) on s.e. asia and on east asia in english and other appropriate languages (e.g., indonesian, dutch, german, or french); serving as expert in designated languages and areas of subject expertise; and assisting in the training of colleagues, quality control procedures, and formulation of cataloging policy. re­ quirements: mls or equivalent; good reading knowledge of appro­ priate languages; demonstrated ability to deal with complex prob­ lems; good interpersonal skills and professional commitment. desirable: cataloging experience and knowledge of additional lan­ guages. minimum salary, $20,000. applications due march 1,1989 but accepted until position filled. send cover letter, resume, and 3 letters of reference to: ann dyckman, director of personnel, cornell university library, 201 olin library, ithaca, n.y. 14853-5301. cor­ nell university is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. cataloger, with faculty rank and tenure track. responsible for original and complex copy cataloging on oclc according to aacr2; descriptive and subject cataloging using lc classification and subject headings; and appropriate authority work. will aiso be involved in implementing the installation of an online integrated li­ brary system. ala-accredited mls for appointment in the rank of as­ sistant professor. one-two years recent cataloging experience in an academic library required. salary $19,500-$22,500 plus benefits. the university of mississippi is a comprehensive state supported university with an enrollment of 9,000 students. ole miss is located in oxford, a pleasant community in north mississippi. the cataloging department is located in the john davis williams library. deadline: march 15,1989. contact: barbara adams, chair, catalog librarian search committee, j. d. williams library, university of missis­ sippi, university, ms 38677. aa/eeo employer. director of collection management, bowling green state university. the university libraries of bowling green state uni­ versity seeks an experienced, energetic collection development li­ february 1989 / 177 brarian to serve in a newly created administrative position reporting directly to the dean of libraries and learning resources. this is a twelve-month, tenure-track appointment. responsibilities: the per­ son in this position directs the work of acquisitions, serials, govern­ ment documents processing, two bibliographers, nine support staff, and approximately 20 subject librarians, whose selection responsi­ bilities average 10°/o-30°/o of their time: is responsible for defining, building, and maintaining an effective collection development pro­ gram in support of the university’s research and instructional activi­ ties; responsibilities include approval plans, gift program, and liaison program with university faculty/academic departments regarding collection development; responsible for determining the placement of material within the various collections; recommends allocations and monitors the materials budget. the person also serves as a sen­ ior member of the libraries and learning resources management team, serves on library faculty committees, and participates in fac­ ulty governance. qualifications: ala-accredited mls required, ph.d. desirable; plus at least five years of successful collection devel­ opment experience in a research library. evidence of previous rec­ ord of experience in management, interaction with donors, and pro­ motion of the collection. evidence of ability to lead, direct, coordinate, and motivate professional associates within a collegial framework. excellent writing, speaking, and interpersonal skills re­ quired. reading knowledge of at least one foreign language. a rec­ ord of research, publication, and professional activities sufficient for appointment at the assistant or associate professor level is required. salary: negotiable with $40,000 minimum, dependent upon qualifi­ cations and experience. excellent fringe benefits. applications: the search committee will begin reviewing applications on april 1,1989, and will continue to do so until the position is filled. send letter of ap­ plication, resume, and the names, addresses, and telephone num­ bers of three references (including current supervisor) to: kathryn thiede, personnel officer, libraries and learning resources, jerome library, bowling green state university, bowling green, oh 43403. bgsu is an aa/eoc employer. minorities and women are encouraged to apply and to identify themselves for affirmative action purposes. director of library services. responsible for the supervi­ sion of professional and support staff of the university library in pro­ viding services to students, faculty and public. reports to the vice president for academic affairs and serves as a member of the coun­ cil of deans. ala-accredited master’s degree in library science, six years of high level administrative experience in academic libraries and experience in implementing automated programs required. doctorate and evidence of scholarly achievement and/or profes­ sional leadership preferred. salary in low $60s. position available july 1,1989. send letter of application and resume with names, ad­ dresses and telephone numbers of three references to: stan ble jwas, chair, search committee, c/o office of the vice president for academic affairs, central connecticut state university, new britain, ct 06050-4010 by march 1, 1989. ccsu is an aa/eo em­ ployer. women, minorities, handicapped, and veterans are encour­ aged to apply. government publications librarian: permanent full time tenure-track position. duties: reference, online searching, bib­ liographic instruction. oversees automated systems within the de­ partment, including carlyle online catalog records for government publications and conversion of government publication serials records from a manual check-in system to the innovacq system. may have responsibility for one of the non-federal categories of government publications, such as international or local. shares evening and/or weekend schedule. required: master’s degree from an ala-accredited program; reference experience in an academic or research library; familiarity with government publications; strong commitment to public service. desirable: familiarity with current li­ brary computer applications, including those relevant to govern­ ment publications; experience with aacr2 and marc tagging; su­ pervisory and training experience; second master’s degree; spanish language. incumbent must comply with the policies of the faculty handbook including research, publication, and service to the profession and community. salary dependent upon qualifica­ tions, $20,000 minimum. submit resume (including names and ad­ dresses of three references) by march 15,1989, to: rita critchfield, librarian applications and nominations are invited for the position of college librarian with a preferred starting date of september 1, 1989. the college librarian reports to the provost and dean of the college. marietta college is a liberal arts institution located in southeastern ohio. the dawes memorial library maintains a vital collection of approximately 287,ocx) volumes includ­ ing rare books, periodicals, manuscripts, and nonbook library materials. the college librarian is responsible for all long-range library planning including building renova­ tions, the implementation of an integrated library automation system and the overall management of a library. the college librarian provides strong leadership in estab­ lishing priorities and goalsfor the library and in developing grant requests and fund rais­ ing strategies. candidates must have an mlsfrom an ala-accredited institution and an additional sub­ ject master’s or ph.d. this position carries faculty status and rank. knowledge and ex­ perience in the implementation of new information technologies and at least 5 years’ ad­ ministrative experience in a liberal arts college or university library are essential. salary range of $35,000to $43,000, depending upon qualifications. to receive full consideration, applications with resume and the names of 3 references should be sentto: professor laura e. kinner chair, search committee for college librarian chartered in 1835 marietta, oh 45750 review of applications will begin march 1, 1989. marietta col lege is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer. i t 178 / c r u o u b u n i v e r s i t i e s u k e lu llb . eoo-325-ob8b uniled scales 800-351)515 canada 314*432-1100 missouri a the approval plan with no surprises. old-fashioned approval plans are they are spending. designed for the book budgets of the our approval plans feature pre­ 1960s. too often they surprise you publication title notification, person­ with unpredictable performance, ally selected (not computer-selected) high returns, and unforeseen cost books, a carefully defined list of pub­ fluctuations. lishers, and m anagem ent reports in contrast, we put librarians that really help you control future firmly back in control of the books approval activity. they are receiving and the money call or write us fo r more information academic book center 5600 ne hassalo street p ortland, or 97213 1-800-547-7704 503-287-6657 scholarly book center 451 greenwich street new york, ny 10013 1-800-223-4442 212-226-0707 surprise! new reference tools for libraries from omnigraphics, inc. p en obscot b u ild in g _____________ d etroit, mi 48226______________ (313) 961-1340 a timely new video series... 6. columbus’s other voyages. the great explorers lands and cultures he encountered. his fall from power, final years, and a summary right in tim e for the 500th anniversary in of his lasting contributions. in prep. 1992, o m n ig rap h ics p re se n ts six video program s, 25 m inutes each, featuring on­ new quarterly journal... site filming and interviews with the w orld’s le a d in g c o lu m b u s a u th o ritie s in italy, jobs today: spain, the caribbean, and the u.s. $85 per current developments concerning em ploy­tape, vhs or beta. standing order for all ment, particularly o f the young the elderly, six, $450 (save $60). , w o m en a n d th e d isabled. t h is new 1. columbus: the man and the myth. quarterly journal focuses on groups which are often the last hired and first fired. issue t h e o rig in s, th e p e rs o n a litie s and th e n o .l, subtitled youth, has five sections: power, with the facts separated from the fic­ p ro b le m s...t ra in in g ...o p p o rtu n itie s...in ­ tions. in prep. novative ideas...entry-level jobs...advice (p re p a rin g for interview s, using library 2. preparations for the 1492 voyage. resources, etc.). future issues will focus on the ships, the crews, the m eans of naviga­ the elderly, women, and the disabled. edited tion, the first landings in the new w orld. in by annie m. brewer. quarterly (march, prep. june, september, december) 1989. issn 1040-9300. annual subscription $48. single 3. search for la navidad. issue $15. free sample on request. long a mystery, the location of colum bus’s ill-fated first settlem ent is actively inves­ new book—just published tigated by scientists, technicians and ex­ perts in docum entary research. now ready. phonames directory this is the first ever practical "how-to" guide 4. the new world columbus found. to help business firms and institutions coin historians, linguists, and m odern explorers p r o m o tio n a l p h o n e n u m b e rs such as recreate the pre-c olum bian indians of the b u t c h e r , f l o r i s t , l a w y e r s , c aribbean, th eir cultures, conflicts, lan­ libra ry , d o c t o r s —or the winning guages, and the colonies columbus estab­ com bination that enables a m tr a c k to lished in their midst. in prep. a d v e rtise n a tio n w id e: call 1-800-u sa r a il . 672 p a g e s . i n s tr u c tio n s . o v e r 5. god and gold. 330,000 n um bers with corresponding l et­ the business of discovery and the relentless te r c om binations and alphabetically ar­ missionary zeal of columbus and those who r a n g e d l e t t e r c o m b i n a t i o n s w i t h followed him. in prep. corresponding n um bers. $350. in print. all bo ok s and videos available on 60-day approval o rder by m ail, p h o n e or fax (313-961-1383) structure bookmarks march 1989 / 237 brary community; discuss the implication of the national commission on libraries and informa­tion science’s posture as related to federal li­braries; and identify resources, publications, and specialized services provided by federal li­braries. participants will be addressed by 25 di­rectors of federal information programs and sev­eral membership association representatives. contact: the school of library and information science, the catholic university of america, washington, dc 20064; (202) 635-5085. ■ ■ deadlines: orders for regular classified advertisements must reach the acrl office on or before the second of the month preced­ing publication of the issue (e.g. september 2 for the october issue). late job listings will be accepted on a space-available basis after the second of the month.rates: classified advertisements are $5.25 per line for acrl members, $6.60 for others. late job notices are $12.60 per line for members, $14.70 for others. organizations submitting ads will be charged according to their m annual ala peace awardala’s social responsibilities round table, its peace information exchange task force, and social issues resources series, inc., have established an annual peace award. the award will be given to a library, which in the course of its educational and social mission, or to a librar­ian, who in the course of professional activities, has contributed significantly to the advance­ment of knowledge related to issues of interna­tional peace and security.the contribution may be in the form of, b erence, government publications, online database searching, interli­brary loan, educational resource center, media production, circula­tion, maps, periodicals, and bibliographic instruction. positions in the technical services include acquisitions, cataloging, and library research. successful candidates must show evidence of demonstra­ble working experience in one of the areas listed. a full assistantship averages 20 hours of work and pays $160 per week for 34 weeks of the academic year. additionally, gradu 238 / cirrl news management using microcomputers. library faculty expected to meet service and research requirements for promotion and tenure. minimum salary $28,000.12-month tenure-track appointment. ben­efits include 20 days annual leave, state or tiaa/cref retirement options, paid life insurance, bc/bs. send letter of application with complete resume and names, addresses, phone numbers of 3 pro­fessional references to: dennis e. robison, university librarian, car­rier library, james madison university, harrisonburg, va 2 knowledge of japanese or chinese (chinese preferred). demon­strated ability to communicate effectively, both orally and in writing, and ability to work effectively with faculty, students and staff are also required. appointment will be made at librarian i or ii level, depend­ing upon qualifications; appointment at the rank of librarian ii re­quires at least three years of successful professional experience in an academic or research library or substantial equivalent experi­ence. other desired qualifications march 1989 / 239 tion skills, and be able to work with diverse groups in an ever chang­ing automated environment. salary and rank commensurate with qualifications. applications must be received no later than march 17, 1989. apply in writing, including a resume and three letters of refer­ence, to: secretary, search committee, 271 hillman library, uni­versity of pittsburgh, pittsburgh, pa 15260. the university of pitts­burgh is an affirmative-action, equal-opportunity employer. minorities are actively sought.cataloger. the he chief of catalog departmentthe stanford university libraries seek an experienced, energetic and flexible manager, comfortable with and effective in a dynamic technical services environment to head the catalog department. as the libraries move to implement an integrated on­line processing system, the chief of the catalog department will play a key role in shaping and coordinating the process of transition.we invite applications from individu­als who can demonstrate: significant experience in providing biblio 240 / cirrl news nati is an affirmative action, equal employment opportunity em­ployer.college archivist/special collections librarian.dickinson college, carlisle, pennsylvania. seeks a creative, ener­getic archivist/librarian to assume responsibility for its archives and special collections department housing historic and contemporary records from all divisions of the college plus rare books, photo­graphs, and over 400 manuscript collections. this position involves continuing collection development and preservation, work w and bibliographic instruction; acts as liaison with school of fine arts, specifically the departments of art history, studio art, dance, drama and music. as a bibliographer, shares responsibility for de­velopment and management of all library collections, especially to support the school of fine arts. requires ala-accredited mls de­gree, degree in fine arts or commensurate experience, commit­ment to public service, excellent communication skills, basic com­puter literacy. desired: post-baccalaureate degree march 1989 / 241 government documents/technical services li­brarian. responsible for developing and maintaining a collection of federal, state, and local documents. the position involves both technical and public services duties including library instruction, fac­ulty liaison, general reference desk work, and cataloging. qualifica­tions: an ala-accredited mls, good interpersonal skills are re­quired. strong interest and background in government documents; the ability to catalog using sudocs, lc classification and subject he experience, effective oral and written communications. preferred: knowledge of and experience with development of an online catalog and online authority control. salary: $22,000 minimum for a 12month appointment. librarians at ksu have academic rank and are eligible for tenure, sabbatical leave, and research support. vacation of 22 working days. choice of retirement and medical plans. kansas state university is a land-grant institution with an enrollment of over 19,000 students and a materials budget of o lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllbinghamtonassistant director for technical services state un,vers,ty of new york associate ubrarian or librarian rankthe state university of new york at binghamton is one of the four comprehensive doctoral-granting uni­versity centers of the 64 campus system.the suny-binghamton library system is composed of the glenn g. bartle library, serving the humani­ties and social sciences a 242 / c&rl news nance department (6 support staff plus 2 fte student assistants) has responsibility for withdrawals, shelflisting and central shelflist mainte­nance, error analysis and correction, bibliographic headings mainte­nance, and maintenance of physical catalogs. with the transition to a notis-based catalog, it is anticipated that the department will as­sume additional responsibilities for the quality and control of on-line authority files, as well as for such post-cataloging activities as trans­fers and reclassifi liaison (including collection development), coordination with other administrators of related information services; strategic planning; ref­erence desk service. required: ala-accredited mls degree; five years’ experience at the professional level in academic or research libraries; three years’ experience in the provision of reference ser­vices; successful experience as a supervisor of librarians; excellent interpersonal and communication skills; skill in the use of new tech­nologies in the provision of refe march 1989 / 243 sciences or humanities. salary: $38,000 minimum (negotiable, de­pendent on qualifications and experience). to apply: send letter of application and resume which together address all of the qualifica­tions listed above, and the names, addresses and telephone num­bers of four recent references to: constance corey, associate dean of university libraries, hayden library, arizona state university, tempe, az 85287-1006, (phone 602-965-3417). recruitment will re­main open until the position is filled, but review o nal cataloging department under the direction of the head, process­ing division. department is responsible for all description cataloging, lc classification, and lc subject headings as needed for oclc member-input records. participates in weekly planning meetings. department consists of 4 entry-level professional librarians, 2 experi­enced catalogers, and 4.5 classified staff. qualifications: ala-mls. minimum 4 years progressively responsible professional (post-mls) cataloging experience, preferably in an o head, catalog department librarianuniversity of california-berkeleyserving the library at berkeley plus 19 of the 23 library branches on campus, the catalog department is responsible for all original cataloging of monographs, media, and machine-readable datafiles in all lan­guages except chinese, japanese and korean. in addition, the department coordinates cataloging and authority control policy throughout the library, including the bibliographic services department, the seri­als cataloging division, four b 244 / cirrl news curator of judaica and hebralca collectionsthe stanford university libraries seek applications from qualified professionals with strong backgrounds in jewish studies to become the first reinhard family curator of judaica and hebraica collections at stanford. principal responsibilities of the curator are to develop and manage the libraries’ growing collections in support of stanford’s recently created jewish studies program. the curator is also expected to develop programs of specialized reference and instru ence is responsible for general reference service; interlibrary lend­ing; bibliographic instruction; computerized information service (database searching and cd-roms); and, selection and manage­ment of the reference collection. the head of reference reports to the associate dean for administration and serves on the library’s administrative council. qualifications required: mls from an alaaccredited institution; substantial reference and/or other public ser­vice experience in an academic library, including computer-based information service, user education and document delivery; management of the work of the department, directing the activities of 5 science reference librarians, participating in space and facilities planning; developing long-range planning for the science and engineering library. reporting to the director of the institute of technology libraries, the reference head serves as a member of the management team, which involves discussion of major program and administrative policy issues. qualifica head, information acquisition departmentcase western reserve universityunder the general direction of the assistant director for technical services, is responsible for planning and supervising the acquisition of monographs and serials in all formats for university libraries. there are two units, the information accounting unit and the information resources unit. the head manages the department, supervising its personnel and activities; establishes new policies as required; coordinates the quality standards march 1989 / 245 246 / c&rl news two positionscolumbia university libraries social science divisionthe columbia university libraries are seeking two talented professionals to join the staff of the social science division. the division consists of the business, lehman, journalism and social work libraries, and the documents service center. these department libraries work together in coordinating, planning and evaluating traditional information/instructional services, access services, collection management, and the introduction of new non-tr march 1989 / 247 identify application with ul 177. the university of minnesota is an equal opportunity employer and invites and encourages applica­tions from women and minorities. note: the immigration reform and control act of 1986 requires all new employees to submit verification of identity and authorization to work in the united states at time of hire.head, sciences and engineering library, university of california, santa barbara. plans, organizes and manages public ser­vice activities within department; supervises and salary $23,000). send letter of application, completed resume, and names and addresses of three references to: robert m. brooks, li­brary director, guggenheim memorial library, monmouth col­lege, cedar avenue, west long branch, nj 07764. an equal op­portunity employer.librarian. we need a “compleat librarian" to do some combi­nation of reference, instruction, collection development, database searching, etc.; business or science experience is a plus. we have been successful in developing positions from our p 248 / cirrl news writing skills with aptitude for bibliographic detail; excellent commun­ication and interpersonal skills; ability to work independently and well with other staff members and the general public; commitment to public service necessary. a broad general understanding of history and politics and an expertise for recognizing significant historical items are needed. supervisory skills required. duties: organization and arrangement of manuscript collections; preparation of descrip­tive inventories, collection catal tinue to do so until the position is filled. application procedure: send application and resume, including names, addresses and telephone numbers of at least three (preferably work) references to frances n. coleman, chair search committee, p.o. box 5408, mississippi state university, mississippi state, ms 39762. mississippi state university is an equal opportunity, affirmative action institution.media librarian. presbyterian college, clinton, south carolina, afour-year liberal arts college with 1,100 studen university librariansearch extended california state university, los angelesapplications and nominations are invited for the position of university librarian with a starting date of july 1, 1989. the university librarian reports to the provost and vice president for academic affairs. candi­dates must have a terminal degree and qualify for tenure in the library. significant administrative experi­ence, demonstrated scholarly activity, and demonstrated commitment to affirmative action also are re­quired. annua march 1989 / 249 microcomputer specialist/reference librarian.the university of nevada-reno library seeks an energetic librarian with a strong interest and aptitude in microcomputers to provide guidance, training, and support of microcomputer applications in the public service areas of the library. the position functions as a member of the reference department and participates in its varied activities, such as online searching and instruction. ala-accredited mls; knowledge of and keen interest in microcomputer applications tion development. responsible for coordinating the collection devel­opment process and special projects on a day-to-day basis; planning and overseeing implementation of collection development policies and procedures; training new collection development staff; establishing work assignments in consultation with the head of ref­erence; evaluating performance of collection development activities of 20 reference librarian/bibliographers; facilitating a smooth work­ing relationship with other units in the librari 250 / cirrl news references to: eugene wiemers, jr., head, social sciences and hu­manities library, main library, michigan state university, east lansing, m148824-1048. applications received by march 15,1989, will receive priority consideration. position will remain open until filled. msu is an affirmative action, equal opportunity institution.reference librarians. two reference positions, assistant li­brarian rank. the suny-binghamton libraries seek two librarians to participate in reference services, including desk duty, librarian and assists in all aspects of coordinating and integrating serials with acquisitions and cataloging. supervises the processing supervisor, two and one-half acquisitions department support staff as pertains to their serials duties, and part-time students. does origi­nal and copy cataloging of periodical titles using oclc. coordinates the review of gift and duplicate exchange lists for periodicals. super­vises the updating of the library’s holdings in a cooperative oclc union list of serials. superv wisconsin-green bay, 2420 nicolet dr., green bay, wl 54311, by april 15, to be considered in the first screening. position will remain posted until filled. uwgb is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer. racial or ethnic minorities, women and disabled persons are encouraged to apply and may identify themselves as such if they wish. late job listingsassociate university librarian, boise state university. responsibilities: coordinate administrative functions under direction of university librarian; supervise public service department heads; participate in collection development and other professional duties; assist in planning, policy development, and budgeting. qualifications: mls; demonstrated ability to plan, manage, and supervise; seven years of professional library experience in academic or research libraries; direct provision of p march 1989 / 251 252 / cirrl news with university housing. deadline for applications is march 31, 1989. send resume, listing names, addresses and phone numbers of three references, to: kathleen m. wiltshire, director of personnel, box 35 butler library, columbia university, 535 west 114th street, new york, ny 10027. an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer.infosouth information manager. university of georgia libraries. infosouth, a southern forestry information service, is funded by u.s. forest service grants and self-generated inc archival arrangement and description (including the us marc amc format) required. apply to: dwayne cox, university archivist, university archives, r.b.d. library, auburn university, auburn, al 36849-5607, (205) 826-4465. technology cataloger (new position): responsible for the cataloging (both original and revision) of monographs in the technology area (lc classifications s, t, u, and v), and the supervision of a support staff position. humanities cataloger: responsible for the cataloging (both original and march 1989 / 253 36849-5606. auburn university is an equal opportunity employer. minorities and women are encouraged to apply.systems and automation librarian. the university of arizona library is seeking applicants to fill this position reporting to the university librarian for continuing development of an integrated online system, and general support responsibility for existing automation, including oclc, a geac circulation system, an innovacq serials and acquisitions system, and an innopac online catalog in the science/e 254 / cirrl news march 1989 / 255 **************************************************************************** (washington hotline, cont’d)measure should impose no significant costs on the federal government, and should reduce fuuture preservation costs. sen. pell appended to his statement the resolution of support by ala (cd #37, 1988-89, adopted january 11) as well as a letter of support from the association of research libraries.action needed. additional cosponsors are needed to move the legislation through the process this year. espec see us at booth 601 in cincinnatisystems without standards miss the marcmost library automation vendorswould like you to believe that they now support the marc standard. dherence to marc, and to all libraryunfortunately, some of them .