portal layout template to work derek simons, simon fraser university, canada portal journal of multidisciplinary international studies, vol. 7, no. 2, july 2010. issn: 1449-2490; http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/ojs/index.php/portal portal is published under the auspices of utsepress, sydney, australia. simons to work portal, vol. 7, no. 2, july 2010. 2 simons to work portal, vol. 7, no. 2, july 2010. 3 simons to work portal, vol. 7, no. 2, july 2010. 4 simons to work portal, vol. 7, no. 2, july 2010. 5 simons to work portal, vol. 7, no. 2, july 2010. 6 simons to work portal, vol. 7, no. 2, july 2010. 7 simons to work portal, vol. 7, no. 2, july 2010. 8 simons to work portal, vol. 7, no. 2, july 2010. 9 simons to work portal, vol. 7, no. 2, july 2010. 10 simons to work portal, vol. 7, no. 2, july 2010. 11 simons to work portal, vol. 7, no. 2, july 2010. 12 simons to work portal, vol. 7, no. 2, july 2010. 13 simons to work portal, vol. 7, no. 2, july 2010. 14 to work derek simons, simon fraser university, canada 26-1-stripped-obay.qxd conference, symposium, and panel reports imperialist wars and liberal peace the association of muslim social scientists of north america (amss) held its fourth annual canadian regional conference in toronto at the ontario institute for studies in education (oise) on 1 november 2008. this event, which was cosponsored by the department of adult education and counseling psychology (oise) and the women and gender studies institute at the university of toronto, was coordinated by jasmin zine (wilfrid laurier) and maliha chishti (oise). the keynote address was presented by ann russo (depaul university). the theme of this year’s conference, “imperialist wars and liberal peace,” brought together a group of scholars to critically engage the nature of the new imperialist wars that are being waged on a smaller scale. from the “war on terror” to the various forms of intra-state warfare, participants sought to address how a viable peace and prosperity can be achieved for a majority of the world’s people, rather than just for an elite minority. during the morning plenary session, “imperialist ‘obsession’ with hate: a critique of the film ‘obsession: radical islam’s war against the west,’” conference chair shahrzad mojab (oise) questioned the means by which social institutions contribute to violence in our society. shirley steinberg (mcgill) recalled receiving the film in her issue of the chronicle of higher learning. for her and other scholars on the panel, the clarion fund’s distribution abroad in the film was a clear example of the rampant islamophobia of the post-9/11 world. referring to this as an “exoticizing and terrorizing” of the islamic and arab peoples, she proposed a letter writing campaign to mobilize against islamophobia. amir hassanpour (toronto) warned against the ideology of hate prominently displayed throughout the film, highlighting the similarities with historic fascism. jasmin zine problemitized the discursive tropes employed by the film’s creators, which served to “close minds, not open them.” to move past this “pedagogy of fear,” she called for a shift toward a pedagogy of hope rooted in anti-imperialist thought. the conference was divided into three major subthemes. in the first of these sessions, “state, civil society, and media: encountering imperialism pdf created with pdffactory trial version www.software-partners.co.uk http://www.software-partners.co.uk http://www.software-partners.co.uk in canada,” panelists examined the role of civil society actors in perpetuating an imbalance of power and representation. mahdi tourage (michigan) focused on inter-religious dialogue and transnational peacemaking between the mennonite central committee and the imam khomeini education and research institute, arguing for a “defetishized” and rehumanized approach to transnational dialogue. in her paper, shaista patel (oise) questioned the place of the racialized muslim in the canadian context. her approach employed a critical understanding of colonially derived myth of whiteness on “stolen” settler lands. the final panelist, patricia molloy (wilfrid laurier) provided a contextual analysis of the “war resisters” movement vis-à-vis a discussion on the dehumanizing effects of military violence. describing peacemaking as a civilizing mission with imperialist connotations, she outlined cases of american military persons who sought asylum in canada after feeling compelled to leave the army. in her concluding statement, she drew attention to the institutional failure of domestic law in protecting those who do not wish to break international law. commencing the afternoon discussion, keynote speaker ann russo (depaul) spoke on the troubling convergences between “western” liberal feminism and the bush administration’s “war on terrorism.” problematizing the approach taken by key groups that advocate for women’s rights, she addressed the synchronicities between “western” liberal feminism and right wing women’s groups that have taken on the imperialist agenda. critiquing the current framework, which normalizes violence, she suggested developing a strategy that would counter the imperialist lens. during the afternoon’s second panel, “critical responses to imperialism and peace,” panelists examined the question of representation as found in the imperialist model. alirezah asgharzadeh (york) argued for a subalternist approach to the study of democracy and peace in muslim-majority and global south contexts. in her discussion of post-conflict rebuilding programs in afghanistan, maliha chishti (toronto) critically examined how the women’s rights agenda can partake in the imperialist rule and cautioned against the possibility of an uncritical acceptance of a “masculine-imperialist peace.” husein khimji (wilfrid laurier) provided a historical account of muslim reactions to “western” imperialism, arguing that the response of the last century was rejectionist and revolutionary in nature. the final panel, “the multitude imperialism: colonialism, occupation, and war,” presented an alternate discourse on the project of international peace and security missions. deborah gordon (wichita) examined the israeli-palestinian conflict through the perspective of palestinian women, identifying the complexities of a peace that is constructed as a non-reciprocal 154 the american journal of islamic social sciences 26:1 pdf created with pdffactory trial version www.software-partners.co.uk http://www.software-partners.co.uk http://www.software-partners.co.uk gift. drawing upon foucault’s notion of truth, she identified the necessity for “western” feminist to reapply the critical lens of anti-colonial thought when examining this issue. tariq amin khan (ryerson univeristy) presented his paper on the perceived threat of “talibanization” in pakistan, arguing that the imperialist response to target militant islam perpetuates violence and does not promote peace in the region. in his multi-layered approach to analyzing the phenomenon, he concluded that the taliban’s social base of support has diminished and thus, this threat is perceived as part of an “orientalist remapping” of prominent muslim-majority countries. asma bala ph.d. candidate, religious studies university of waterloo, ontario, canada conference, symposium, and panel reports 155 pdf created with pdffactory trial version www.software-partners.co.uk http://www.software-partners.co.uk http://www.software-partners.co.uk american journal of islam and society vol 38 no 3-4.indb 176 the muslim resolutions: bosniak responses to world war two atrocities in bosnia and herzegovina s a r a j e v o : c e n t e r f o r i s l a m i n t h e c o n t e m p o r a r y w o r l d , 2 0 2 1 . 2 2 8 p a g e s . h i k m e t k a r č i ć , f e r i d d a u t o v i ć , e r m i n s i n a n o v i ć , e d s . in the 1912 tome unsere zukunft: ein mahnwort an das deutsche volk, friedrich von bernhardi once wrote: “war is the highest expression in life of a truly cultured people” (55). this book would argue for a more nuanced view of reality. in 1941 nazi germany and fascist italy invaded royal yugoslavia and established a puppet regime called the ‘independent state of croatia’ (nezavisna država hrvatska, or ndh). this polity included all of modern bosnia-hercegovina and included nearly one million indigenous muslims. the dictatorship was led by an extremist roman catholic nationalist faction who initiated a campaign of brutal violence against citizens of the serb orthodox church and others, many of whom then turned their anger towards the mostly unarmed muslim civilians. a cycle of religio-communal brutality erupted and several islamic scholars and muslim leaders signed a number of formal public resolutions: these documents resolutely condemned the bloodshed and b o o k r e v i e w s  177 carnage, and called on the authorities to enforce justice and peace, law and order. in retrospect, it was an act of remarkable courage and bravery. eighty years later, several bosnian academics have produced this book to mark the incident, to reproduce the original texts – where extant – and to comment on them. editor hikmet karčić writes: “the aim of this publication is to present this phenomenon to a wider audience, but research on the project started in early 2020, at the height of the covid-19 pandemic, and has proven more complex than initially anticipated, not least because there appear to be multiple versions of at least some of the resolutions” (11). to use a beautiful german term, the schwerpunktbildung of this positive endeavour is to inspire readers to reflect on these matters, to examine them more deeply, and then proceed to purposeful action. the comprehensiveness and reliability of the sources concerning these proclamations leave, unfortunately, much to be desired, and they make the task of independent appraisal and elucidation all the more difficult. unofficial researches to date are riddled with lacunae. some papers are no longer extant, some have deteriorated, or exist in institutions unwilling to share academic resources in a collegial atmosphere. this book endeavours to piece together various perspectives and narratives from multiple sources and informants that relate to the traditional ethnic mosaic of pre-war bosnia-hercegovina. the editors and contributors believe this will reveal much about the values of muslim political leadership during this era. based on substantial fieldwork and a thorough knowledge of sources, they provide an innovative study of the pre-communist history of bosnian muslims and their cultural traditions. the indomitable resolve and sanguine energy of bosnian muslim leadership in 1941 is here examined with academic skill, insight, and detachment. the muslim resolutions elucidates a little-known aspect of the civilization of bosnia, and unravels the paradoxes and transformations of indigenous islamic religious identity in the region. it suggests inventive perspectives on the war period, the formation of socio-cultural (‘national’) identities and the strength of such legacies in eastern europe. this book offers a substantial contribution to the study of islam and muslim society in the modern era. 178  a m e r i c a n j o u r n a l o f i s l a m a n d s o c i e t y 3 8 : 3 4 this is one of the most significant history books of the year, edited by several outstanding scholars. the muslim resolutions is especially concerned with the complex role of muslim leadership in the ndh and how this contributed to ideas regarding muslim identity. multiple lines of inquiry by the editors and contributors ignore ideological preoccupations and political correctness, and explore issues of race, religion and nationality without bigotry or prejudice. there are several interesting asides that reveal all too human concerns and proclivities. for instance, the mostar resolution actually demands the ndh fascist regime halt non-muslims from wearing the fez (180-181). it follows that the kind of civilization which we specifically designate as bosnian reposes not upon a spurious foundation of alleged race, but on an inheritance of achievement and thought and religious aspiration. hence the formal resolutions themselves in 1941 and the events that followed until 1945. this volume is a multi-faceted examination of social encounters between folk groups of differing faiths but common customs and lands. the editors and contributors argue that such encounters and shared apotropaic rituals can solidify into communal time-spaces. xavier bougarel in particular, raises the vexed question of why these events and matters— with their complex collective, class and regional resonances—developed the way they did. he queries what happened when such enigmatic intimacies and enthralling discursive processes were challenged and actively destroyed, when the muslims were ethnically-cleansed from the rural districts of bosnia over 1941-1945, and the entire country was parcelled into congeries of warlords and divergent political factions, each governed by an obscure provincial camarilla, all lacking in humility or mansuetude. considered in all its spectra, this is not a direct discussion of religious syncretism or hegemony, then, but a careful articulation of a complicated societal evolution and the bosanski duh, the bosnian spirit or character. the muslim resolutions is a remarkable and comprehensive survey of a complex topic. the text is accessible and will make an excellent introduction to more in-depth material. the broad scope and quick pace make this a definite work, though novices should be able to follow the swirl of names and events. this is a solid work for college classrooms and scholars on the history of muslim communal leadership, socio-political b o o k r e v i e w s  179 consciousness, and our current world. the attention to personal testimonies in this book will, in simple fashion, help students grasp underlying concepts with which outsiders sometimes struggle. this is a comprehensive presentation of a multifarious issue and the text successfully combines expert accounts of the deep history of bosnia and herzegovina with a highly erudite investigation of where the society is presently. drawing upon significant new research, the book greatly advances our comprehension of muslim responses to the processes of nation-building, religion and war in the 1940s. this tome is an essential addition to the literature for both the general reader and students of islamic civilization alike. abdullah drury phd candidate the university of waikato waikato, new zealand doi: 10.35632/ajis.v38i3-4.3030 persophilia: persian culture on the global scene hamid dabashi cambridge, ma and london: harvard university press, 2015. 285 pages. academic investigation of the mutual influences of the west and the east has been the subject of few studies during the past decades. in this category, hamid dabashi’s work on the mutual effects of the persianate orient and the west is impressive. the book traces evidences of the west’s persophilia throughout world history from biblical and ancient texts to contemporary texts under the influence of the romanticism, transcendentalism, mysticism, fascism, and pan-islamism approaches. it provides thoughtful commentary on the roots of western persophilia, its outcome for the west and the persianaite world, and the overall picture of persophilic knowledge production and transfer. as such, dabashi’s work contributes to the socio-historical hermeneutics of persian and western culture by mapping their inter-related texts. he considers persophilia a sub-category of orientalism, through which he challenges colonial-based orientalism. by relying on jürgen habermas’ theory of bourgeois public space, dabashi criticizes raymond schwab and edward said’s views as introducing a one-directional influence of the west upon the east. his work suggests that there is a cyclic relation of influences between them. to further this point, dabashi expands habermas’ public space theory beyond “bourgeois” and shifts it from a limited national level into a transnational scene that emphasizes the role of persophilia in the circulation and production of knowledge worldwide. the book deems the emergence of persophilia during the eighteenth century and its continuation to the present time as an influential book reviews 119 factor in forming a public space in which contradictory discourses of resistance and support develop in both the west and the persianate world. the author believes that such contradictory discourses, which have resulted in reformulating new western and iranian identities, shape the main theme of his work. the book contains an introduction, twelve chapters, a conclusion, and an appendix. the introduction lays down a good rationalization for the overall goal and the theoretical foundation of the work for establishing that persophilia has been neglected in studies of orientalism and that such neglect has impacted world history. the author’s introduction of habermas’ “public sphere” would have been apropos in the introduction, rather than appearing late in chapter seven. chapter 1 focuses on the europeans’ discovery of ancient persia as an origin of western persophilia and provides evidence supporting the great impact that cyrus (d. 531 bc), through xenophon’s (d. 354 bc) cyropedia, has had on many scholars, specifically on the authors of america’s constitution; an influence that he believed was provided via the formation of transnational spheres through which the discourse on cyrus circulated throughout the world. two other persophilic awareness-instigating texts mentioned by the author are the bible and the cyrus cylinder. in chapter 2, the author discusses montesquieu’s (d. 1755) persian letters as another proof of western persophilia, mapping it to akhondzadeh’s maktūbāt and claiming that the two works influenced eighteenth-century europe and nineteenth-century iran and central asia, respectively, in a way that ultimately led to the rise of iranian nationalism. he differs with said and schwab in that he concludes that persophilia has been more of a liberating force than a colonial dominating effort for both the west and the east. chapter 3 focuses on the introduction of persian as an indo-european language by sir william jones (d. 1794) and its later incorporation into the european public sphere. the emphasis is on the crucial role of jones’ finding on the rise of european persophilia that, in turn, influenced many social and intellectual movements, among them the french and russian revolutions, romanticism, and the persian linguistic nationalism associated with european and iranian self-redefinition. in chapter 4, dabashi distinguishes the persophilic attractions of goethe (d. 1832) to hafez (d. 1389/90) and sa’di (d. 1291 or 1292) and hegel (d. 1831) to persian history from the ones rooted in european colonial interests. he holds that this pure persophilia resulted in the formation of a universal literary humanism that affected european public spheres and the course of history around the world, together with an active nationalization 120 the american journal of islamic social sciences 33:3 of persian literature. in this chapter, his attempt to link german fascism to persian mysticism and its later romanticization is a new approach that, however hard he tries to justify in the next chapters, does not seem to have sufficient support. chapter 5 finds the roots of pan-islamism in the transfer of an amalgam of mystic-romantic western persophilia, american transcendentalism, and fascism in a cycle of cross-references and connections among hafez, goethe, iqbal, wagner, nietzsche, emerson, tagore, thoreau, and martin luther king, jr. throughout europe, south asia, the united states, and iran. he uses these exchanges as a proof against the idea of opposition between east and west. dabashi concludes that the orient began to see itself in a different light through persophilia, a light that was shed by the occident. i find this ironic and believe that this may, in turn, point to a covert west-centeredness at the heart of the book. in chapter 6, the author seeks the persophilic roots of friedrich nietzsche’s (d. 1900) philosophy in the three figures of zarathustra, hafez, and dionysus. the author claims that nietzsche’s philosophy reintroduced iran to european philosophy. in turn, the influence of his philosophy in iran became the underlying framework of resistance against government tyranny and terror. this can be found, for example, in ahmad shamlou’s (d. 2000) poetry. chapter 7 centers around edward fitzgerald’s magnificent 1859 english translation, the rubáiyát of omar khayyám, that, in turn, instigated a new interest throughout the world and also among such iranian literati as sadegh hedayat, who was influenced by khayyam’s and nietzsche’s nihilism and kafka’s fright. dabashi considers the changing fate of persian poetry to be in perfect harmony with the changing economic and moral atmosphere of europe and counts european social and intellectual movements as liberating persian poetry and prose; an interpretation that falsifies his west-decentralizing claim. a belated definition and criticism of habermas’ “public sphere” appears in this chapter, which should have appeared in the introduction. chapter 8 discusses the impact of the europeans’ discovery of ferdowsi’s (d. 1020) shahnameh on the west and on the emergence of iranian epic nationalism. dabashi associates matthew arnold’s (d. 1888) fascination with rustam and sohrab to his commitment to christian renunciation. accordingly, he views montesquieu, goethe, hegel, nietzsche, and arnold as strong figures in persophilia and, as such, as instigating resistance against european imperialism and “the engine of postcolonial history.” in chapter 9, the reader is introduced to the importance of proxy public spheres (i.e., countries adjacent to iran) and para-public transnational spheres book reviews 121 (i.e., underground knowledge production sites). dabashi claims that it was through these mediums that such persian translations as james morier’s hajji baba of ispahan could be published in 1824 and distributed. they, in turn, nurtured revolutionary ideas and movements in iran. dabashi argues that the advantage of western knowledge production sites over their eastern counterparts is that the imperial hegemony of the former facilitated the travel of knowledge throughout the world. ultimately, he criticizes such terms as “westernization/modernization” for, in his view, concealing the existence of transnational public spheres. chapter 10 provides evidence of persophilia in the european visual and performing arts through which persia is portrayed as royal and imperial. dabashi considers the colonial subjects of artwork and literary works as active agents of their own history, as opposed to the passive objects of others’ representations. chapter 11 seeks to introduce the diffusion of the iranian literary heritage throughout europe and north america as a product of the transnational literary spheres created by europeans, iranians, indians, tajiks, afghans, and others. his mention of multiple subjects of knowledge production neither undermines his uneven focus on the priority of western persophilia nor his excessive emphasis on imperialism’s hegemony at the expense of other active agents. chapter 12 provides evidence of persophilia in the works of reynold nicholson (d. 1945), annemarie schimmel (d. 2003), and henry corbin (d. 1978) as well as their fascination with rumi’s mysticism. he considers ali shariati, dariush shaygan, ahmad fardid, abdolkarim soroush, and seyyed hossein nasr as their iranian counterparts. he associates the rise of pan-islamism with persian mysticism combined with german nazism and fascism through a common attraction to mystical notions of authenticity, collectivity, and tradition. he repeatedly criticizes nasr throughout the book as the chief champion of persian mysticism, a philosopher at the service of the pahlavi monarchy and a nurturer of the islamic revolution. however, he includes no evidence from the body of his work. he considers jalal al-e ahmad and shari’ati as merely the path pavers. dabashi sees a structural similarity between the german author ernst jünger/martin heidegger’s and al-e ahmad’s approaches to modernity and considers the search for the authentic “german” in postwar germany as a precise equivalent to the search for “true islam” in iran. he contributes such similarities to global capitalism, which has legitimated the concurrent migration of labor and capital against which a globalized revolutionary condition has emerged due to the dialectical character of the created public spaces worldwide. 122 the american journal of islamic social sciences 33:3 in the last chapter, dabashi redefines persophilia using the new terms of “nomadic ideas travel” and “mode of cultural gift exchange” and considers “western civilization” to be a product of circular influences in which capital, labor, and ideas are flowing. he supports this idea by referring to the japanese philosopher kojin karatani’s (b. 1941) interpretation of the structure of the world’s history by substituting “exchange” for “modes of production” seeking a change in the relation of capital/nation-state. he believes that such redefinitions avoid naturalizing the west’s fictive centrality as the main source of knowledge, a discourse that deprives a great part of the world of its agentivity potential, however effective in facilitating the domination of capital over labor and the bourgeois over the proletariat. dabashi’s book is a successful attempt to map the origin and development of persophilia, tracing its outcomes for both the west and the east and resulting in a comprehensive interpretation of orientalism. his revision of habermas’ theory dismantles the idea of the east-west contrast by portraying the west as a transitory knowledge-production site that has been related to and is influenced by the eastern-most parts of an important part of ancient persian and later muslim civilizations. negar davari associate professor, faculty of humanities, department of linguistics shahid beheshti university, tehran, iran book reviews 123 thought leadership and women’s liberation politics: a book review of left of karl marx by carol boyce davies janae knott university of toronto rotman commerce, arts & science, university of toronto claudia jones’ life and intellectual work have made impactful contributions in several spaces, including marxist-leninist ideology and anti-imperialism discourse. this review analyzes the left of karl marx: the political life of black communist claudia jones written by carol boyce davies. davies offers valuable insight into jones’ anti-imperialist ideas, which are layered as she believed imperialism was the root cause of racism and fascism. furthermore, davies draws upon a wide range of jones’ journalistic pieces to highlight the impact she has had in areas like communist ideology and women’s political liberation. a b s t r a c t keywords: communism, imperialism, internationalism, liberation, marxism, wage equality, feminism b i o janae knott is a 4th year undergraduate student at the university of toronto. she is completing her bachelor’s degree in commerce, while obtaining minors in caribbean studies and economics. her academic interests include political economy and economic development in the caribbean, decolonization theory, and social mobility. © 2021 janae knott caribbean studies students’ union, canada https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cquilt/ this work is licensed under the creative commons attributionsharealike 4.0 international license. to view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ 60 (january 20, 2022 / 09:38:42) 122864-1b_caribbeanquilt_vol7_rev.pdf .60 61 claudia jones' life, intellectual work, and organizing efforts have shaped history when considering its expansion of marxist-leninist ideology and contribution to anti-imperialist discourse. ‘the left of karl marx: the political life of black communist claudia jones’ written by carol boyce davies details her life and career journey, outlining the ways in which jones navigates through neo-colonial systems as an active black feminist and communist. the geographical movements and displacements in her life also contributed to her internationalist ideology. although born in trinidad, she spent much of her adult life in the united states before being deported to england. her unique life and observations motivated her to advocate for disenfranchised people in various capacities, and much of her advocacy was done through journalism and community organizing. in this review, i will discuss jones’ notable additions to marxist theory as it relates to black people, women, and other marginalized groups ultimately arguing that jones was the first to bring an intersectional approach to marxist and socialist theory, before ‘intersectionality’ became widely accepted and well known. furthermore, i will discuss her approach in combating imperialism, which she suggests is the root cause of racism and division in modern society. finally, i will discuss why her contributions are frequently overlooked, which i suspect is due to the us government’s strategic efforts to paint her as a criminal and deviant. one of jones’ most notable contributions is her expansion of marxist theory to show how black people, and in particular black women, are disproportionately affected by capitalist structures and policies. prior to her time, marxist theory simply suggested that class exploitation was due to factors including wage differentiation, which unfairly allow monopolists to make unreasonable profits. since women are a part of the working class, they too are subject to class exploitation, but the exploitation was not seen to be caused by their gender itself. jones proves that the issue is much deeper than this, where multiple structures work together to oppress groups to varying degrees: capitalism, imperialism, and patriarchy. therefore, one-dimensional analysis of the impact of capitalism isn’t sufficient to drive actual change. for example, examining the racial impact of capitalism alone isn’t sufficient to create a more equitable society, because although black men and black women both experience racism, black women are oppressed by black men due to structural conditions of patriarchy. her contribution is important because it changes the benchmark of progress within the marxist-leninist framework. she explains that advancement can really only occur if black women, as the “triply oppressed group,” can access better living conditions because this would entail dismantling all oppressive structures that drive issues like wealth inequality, power struggles, etc. jones’ approach in demonstrating the need for intersectionality was brilliant due to its logical approach. to demonstrate that the issues within the capitalist society are layered, she dissects the issue by the layer of gender, and then combines race and gender together. as a baseline, claudia explains that women face exploitation as workers and within the household. in work settings, women face (january 20, 2022 / 09:38:42) 122864-1b_caribbeanquilt_vol7_rev.pdf .61 62 lower wages and subordination to service positions, and in the household their labor goes unrecognized and uncompensated. importantly, these are related as since household work is not respected or deemed as real work. the value of work that women do outside the household is simply seen as an extension of this and therefore they aren’t paid wages that reflect the output of their labor. jones then used statistics to demonstrate that black women are positioned economically at the lowest rank of society confined to lower paying jobs and given few opportunities to become professionals. disproportionate representation in service work led to striking disparities in wages. when considering comparisons between black women’s wages to men’s average wages and then white women’s wages to the same, it demonstrates the issue as both a racial and gendered problem. the super exploitation of black women was an issue close to jones’ heart likely because of her family’s experience of her mom dying at 37 from strenuous working conditions in a garment industry job. i found the approach she used to prove why the black woman’s problem should be ‘everyone’s problem’ to be an interesting one. she provided the reasoning that since black women are leaders in their households, improving conditions for them means creating better living conditions for all black people, and remarkably, society in general benefits from the value of the labor of black women. i believe jones introduced the public to the basic premise of intersectionality through her intellectual work provided to the communist party of usa, as she introduced them to the concepts and language of ‘triple oppression’. ultimately, this was an important contribution to communist ideology because by proving that capitalism, imperialism and sexism create unique conditions for different groups, the need for specific and targeted group-by-group solutions is highlighted. jones was firmly rooted in anti-imperialist politics as she found imperialism was the primary driver behind structural issues like racism and fascism. once again, jones made interesting contributors to marxist theory with respect to imperialism and conflict. marxist theory states that all modern wars are caused by competition for resources and markets controlled by imperial powers, and these wars are a natural consequence of the free market and social stratification systems we operate in. jones enhanced this theory by writing about war’s disproportionate effects on black and brown communities, stating that these groups truly bear the brunt of this competition for resources. according to author boyce davies, jones wrote a froxpq�lq�µ+doi�wkh�:ruog¶�wkdw�lghqwl¿hv� how health, food, schooling, and day-to-day survival and general well-being are impacted when the government emphasizes war rather than people. particular attention is given to the report’s ¿qglqjv�rq�eodfn��0h[lfdq��dqg�3xhuwr� rican families who often lived in poverty. the column ends by saying ‘‘let woman today hear from its readers on what you are doing in your community: (1) to demand an end to the wage freeze and for immediate wage increases; (2) for immediate price and rent control; (3) for a cut in taxes of low-incomed people.’’(davies, carole boyce. left of karl marx: the political life of black communist claudia (january 20, 2022 / 09:38:42) 122864-1b_caribbeanquilt_vol7_rev.pdf .62 63 jones. (north carolina: duke university press, 2008), 81.). clearly, jones was interested in the effects of imperialism on particular groups, one of which was caribbean countries. she defines the us as a covert imperialist where they view the west indies as a source of advantages, such as food and cheap labor. given these terms, she advocated for a fully independent caribbean federation, which was self-governing and safeguarded the rights of vulnerable people such as minority groups. when met with knowledge that made this seem unlikely, she advocated for the islands having labor organizations and unions to protect common workers from the interests of bourgeoisie rulers. journalism helped jones disseminate her anti-imperialist ideas, where she found that political education was key to building the consciousness of oppressed groups. furthermore, she used writing as a tool to build a joint sense of identity amongst black people of various geographies, drawing connections between anti-colonial struggles around the world as she saw all fights for liberation as related. jones brought this internationalist perspective to all platforms she wrote for. for example, she prompted the west indian gazette to launch ‘solidarity campaigns’ with leaders of liberation movements in african and asian countries. similarly, she was instrumental in helping caribbean readers in the uk to redefine their blackness and separate themselves from ‘britishness’, which was meaningful given they were regularly reminded that they were outsiders, as evidenced by the nottinghill riots occurring in 1958. whilst tackling british racism was one of the central goals of the west indian gazette, jones also provided caribbean uk residents with exposure to black artists and intellectuals from around the world, creating fertile ground for development of an african consciousness and unifying the black world. using the west indian gazette, she featured african american artists, interviewed w.e.b du bois & martin luther king, and facilitated events for british residents that paralleled those of global events. for example, she connected the ‘march in britain’ to the one occurring in washington dc. jones personally understood the challenge of maintaining identity in migration, as the time at which she moved to the united states marked the initial influx of caribbean people settling in the us. like many immigrants, she was immersed in caribbean culture while living in new york, and from observation she saw that public displays of culture were important to diasporic development and solidarity. she observed the caribbean carnival in new york was being resumed post-war as a sister event to carnival in trinidad, and it was seen as a means of bridging cultures. her critique of carnival in new york influenced her organizing of carnival in the uk: jones saw that the event did not foster any relationship to caribbean and african americans celebrating it, and it did not help caribbean migrants adjust to their new environment in any way. given the nottinghill riots, jones made the uk carnival both symbolic of interracial friendship and the power of caribbean culture identity, organizing a caribbean carnival committee to help best display aspects of caribbean culture like steelband music and art/fashion through a carnival queen competition. her effort lives on today as the scale of the carnival grew and the event later became known as the (january 20, 2022 / 09:38:43) 122864-1b_caribbeanquilt_vol7_rev.pdf .63 64 notting hill carnival, an event which attracts millions of uk residents and foreigners annually. her internationalist approach was also evident in her feminist politics, which could easily be observed by looking at her writing for the ‘half the world’ column. jones believed that when women became conscious of their exploitation and once empowered, they were capable of organizing amongst themselves, obtaining power to influence public and political activity that they were previously strategically excluded from. in the column, jones recommended texts from authors around the world who were pursuing socialism, including books on women in china and the soviet union, ‘the woman question’ (which included ideas from marx, engels, lenin, and stalin), and biographies of influential black women, including sojourner truth and harriet tubman. this ideological stance permeated her personal life and relationships too, as she felt connected to other women in leadership with the same liberation ideals for their respective countries. for example, in prison jones used poetry to communicate solidarity with other feminist activists like the puerto rican activist blanca canales torresola, who was fighting for political liberation in puerto rico. in my opinion, one reason why jones may not be credited properly for her contributions to society and intellectual thought is the us government’s criminalization of her image, and consequent damage to her reputation in the international community. since she publically branded herself as a communist, she was deemed oppositional to the american government from the beginning as in the eyes of the state, communism and radicalism were synonymous, and advocates for marxist-leninism were criminals rather than politically engaged citizens. the fbi strongly believed that people of her political orientation had intention to overthrow the american government, and therefore should be policed and silenced. the texts which formed the basis for her deportation are telling, as they highlight that american society is founded upon values of racism, sexism, and capitalism. her article ‘international women’s day and the struggle for peace’ was deemed subversive by the fbi, and her piece ‘women in the struggle for peace and security’ led to her arrest as it prompted american women to advocate for peace and end the korean war, taking up a similar stance to women involved in anti-war and anti-fascism efforts in latin america, the soviet union, asia, and africa. jones was said to be violating the internal security act of 1950, which condemns aliens publishing information that opposes the present government in attempts to overthrow it. this is particularly interesting because jones was involved in several counter-education efforts, educating people on the true values of communism to reduce stigma. however, her public affiliations to the communist party, black liberation movements, and international feminist movements made her the perfect target for the fbi to incarcerate and deport. this criminalization points to the struggle of black activists with public political affiliations and ideological stances that differ from the state’s ideological orientation. (january 20, 2022 / 09:38:43) 122864-1b_caribbeanquilt_vol7_rev.pdf .64 65 davies, carole boyce. left of karl marx: the political life of black communist claudia jones. north carolina: duke university press, 2008. works cited (january 20, 2022 / 09:38:43) 122864-1b_caribbeanquilt_vol7_rev.pdf .65 trowbridge final correspondence address: terry trowbridge, socio-legal studies, york university, on, m3j 1p3; email: trowbridgeterry@gmail.com issn: 1911-4788 volume 16, issue 1, 294-299, 2022 book review american nightmare: facing the challenge of fascism giroux, henri. (2018). city lights publishers. isbn 9780872867796 (paper) us$17.95; 384 pages. terry trowbridge york university, canada henry giroux’s scholarly polemic american nightmare: facing the challenge of fascism is the sequel to his book about the recent history of poverty and populism in the usa, america at war with itself (2018). both were published in 2018, which might make them more companion pieces than sequential, but america at war with itself both sets the socioeconomic stage that describes the moment in nightmare, and explains the purpose of both books, rooted in giroux’s ongoing contributions to critical pedagogy. in war, he writes: america is at war with itself, and pedagogy has an essential role to play in fighting back creatively and non-violently. the challenges we face are immense, and the civil rights, resources, community spaces, and political processes required to struggle are under direct and relentless assault. the very notions of the public and the special are being reconstructed under circumstances… which help consolidate authoritarian modes of governance, a warfare state, and a predatory economy by and for the interests of the wealthiest few. (2018, p. 255) war is the recent history of the usa. in it, giroux traces the history of the elements that mobilized voters in the 2016 presidential election. the usa was divided by geography, gerrymandering, and ecological disaster. in the regions dominated by the republican party, the themes of 2016 seamlessly joined the security state. war examines the consolidation of gop power in the ideologies of voters. for that reason, nightmare seems more like a sequel than a parallel text. it is hastily written in the present tense, disorganized, and making appeals for book review studies in social justice, volume 16, issue 1, 294-299, 2022 295 future research and postsecondary teaching goals. the pedagogy is subtle, though. if a reader is not familiar with the rigours of critical pedagogy and its forms of community engagement, then nightmare seems like a scatterbrained plea for rights mobilization and a surge in activism that protects the social safety net. these are important and consequential choices for political actions that are being considered by the entire critical pedagogy community, which in its north american and european niches is currently facing a stark choice between life in the shrinking underfunded academic institution, or a plunge into movement-based community organizing. nevertheless, nightmare is still a follow-up to war. war describes how america arrived at its present state, and nightmare is about the american mid-trump administration present in which it is written and published. we should look at nightmare as an example of what happens to academic writing in a moment of profound and irreversible social change. giroux writes about an apocalyptic moment, from the point of view of someone undergoing the psychological speed stresses of rapid totalizing social change. america at war with itself stands out in giroux’s corpus as his most unorthodox book. the prose is repetitive, disorganized. his argument switches between descriptions of the current situation, to appeals for future actions, peppered with polemics. giroux’s cogent synthesis of journalism is inflected with adjectives that belie societal stress. his (albeit sound) claims about fascism developing in the alt right contexts of donald trump’s posttruth digital media are distracted by insertions about misery, violent alienation, and other genuine reasons for moral panic. this is a book written by an elder scholar-statesman who has no time to edit and whose publisher is under an unusually morally infused pressure to publish right away. all of which is to say, there are better books about the history of the alt right. it is as though giroux felt unable to write in his usual cogent style of self-reflection and analysis. the reason that american nightmare is necessary for professors and graduate students to read is to understand the rhetoric of academic writing during ongoing apocalyptic crises. one of the components of the current authoritarian movement is to rapidly change direction. leaders contradict themselves in the same answer to a question. they legislate by press release, instead of by legal instrument. personnel are appointed and fired so quickly that their incumbency is measured in a new unit of time, scaramuccis. as a result, we who are in academia are suffering. we must read peer reviewed, trustworthy secondary sources that synthesize primary sources. on the other hand, we have no time to edit, redact, plan surveys of literature, and post preprints for comment. whatever it is that separates academic conferences from open mic polemics, it is not very helpful to us now. when the next semester comes, we will want to know what to have on our syllabi for contemporary north american politics. american nightmare belongs on the syllabus as an expression of academic stress and ethical necessity. american nightmare is premised on the idea that our scholarly terry trowbridge studies in social justice, volume 16, issue 1, 294-299, 2022 296 question is not if america is at war with itself, but what does that war look like and how can its damage be mitigated. academics must ask, if giroux is correct, then is this the voice in which we must do our work? is nightmare an example of the only style that our resistance writing can take: doomscrolling infovore scholarship parked in front of the internet since the day donald trump rode a down-escalator to the presidency? and if so, is scholarship only possible as gestalt logic? does giroux only make sense as a mirror of how the reader feels? is that reliable scholarship during a crisis? is there a reliable scholarly voice during our ongoing crisis? giroux’s style is shaped by trumpism’s totalized present tense, as are our own stressed minds. should scholars internalize the new forms of totalitarianism that exert “paralyzing impact on society” (p. 140); that is, a social and technological pressure to “privatize communication by shifting the site where information is produced… [writing for] the immediate present [instead of referring to] the future, as the time of the political” (p. 141)? chapter one is an insightful description of how george orwell’s writing (emphasis on 1984), and aldous huxley’s brave new world contain lessons for effective resistance to trump’s government and the post-truth media. furthermore, giroux argues that the two novels will probably inspire incompatible approaches to opposition. while they are valid depictions of the reality we are now experiencing, we will have to choose one or the other to shape our mode of resistance. giroux concludes, orwell believed in the power of people to resist the seduction of authoritarian propaganda with spirited forms of broad-based resistance willing to grasp the reins of political emancipation. for huxley, there was only hope to be found in pessimism that had exhausted itself, leaving people to reflect on the implications of a totalitarian power that controls pleasure as well as pain, and the utterly disintegrated social fabric that would be its consequence. (p. 107) giroux himself takes the side of orwell’s optimism, but not at the expense of dismissing huxley’s equally probable prophecy. he encourages anti-fascist scholars not to question, “am i with orwell or with huxley?” but rather to ask: “are the people around me with orwell or with huxley?” (p. 107). so, there is in giroux’s first chapter, an essay that sets up a syllabus in which we read 1984 and brave new world. the challenge for us is to follow-up by analyzing our local communities and deciding which novel most helps our local resistance. chapter two, “authoritarianism and the legacy of fascist collaboration,” deals with the question of whether donald trump’s command over the american government and society ought to be named as “fascist” using a pattern from the past, despite an uneven fit. giroux’s answer is that he believes scholars risk “overplaying” the differences between trump and fascism of the past. the problem is not whether trump is a neo-nazi. the problem is that his administration facilitates neo-nazi legal theory and book review studies in social justice, volume 16, issue 1, 294-299, 2022 297 realizes their fascist, regionalized, antagonizing political agendas. giroux takes a rhetorical position, in that one of the strengths of the alt right’s political rhetoric is to manifest endless differences without distinctions, which delays reasoned opposition. giroux instructs us to pay attention to the similarities because it is the similarities that advance trump’s agenda. giroux knows fascism not by its historically parallel components, but instead by its parallel social impacts (p. 140). giroux proposes an equally capacious room for broad resistance. he proposes that the resistance is about social impacts, by bringing together “various isolated movements to struggle for a democracy appropriate for the twenty-first century, based on participatory democracy and a massive redistribution of wealth and power” (p. 135). ideological agreement is unproductive wherever pragmatism can justify the means to resist. theoretical rigour runs up against the pragmatic challenges of oppositional research. explaining the difficulty that extends beyond activism and into academic discourse that is both rigorous and oppositional, both obligated to tenure and accountable to private research funding, giroux states, “we cannot let anger and resentment distort our organizing and political work. it is time to… repudiate the notion that the interests of corporations and those of citizens are… the same” (p. 135). a statement that is simple on its face but has time-sensitive considerations for methodology and peer review. in chapter three, titled “beyond the politics of incivility” (pp. 137-156), giroux examines rapidly accelerating political and corporate processes that isolated americans from each other in 2018. according to giroux, the 21st century form of american fascism has a “paralyzing effect on society” (p. 140), the paralysis of which is neither hyperbole nor metaphor, but a design feature of neoliberal policies that strategically create social isolation wherever there used to be personal agency to reach out to government support services and interpersonal support (p. 141). giroux, citing koreangerman philosopher byung-chul han, argues donald trump’s election campaign was successful not necessarily because of social media’s enabling of fake news, but because digital media “privatizes communication by shifting the site where information is produced… in the immediate present” (p. 141), therefore politics happen in the now instead of being planned for in the future. digital political life is not premised on our experiences now that inform our future interactions with the state, the media, and people. politics is reduced to instantaneous reactionary responses. giroux cites guy debord’s image of social media as a “perpetual motion machine of fear” (p. 146), as a neoliberal form of governing isolated people, combined with tom englehart’s analysis that “the national security state [has become] a fourth branch of [american] government” (p. 147), which made it available to trump to tweet himself into control with rapid fascist rhetoric. therefore, trump was co-opting a system of policy messaging that already reduced politics to “the realm of the personal and affective” while “cancelling out [discourse about] the underlying condition that might produce anger, or terry trowbridge studies in social justice, volume 16, issue 1, 294-299, 2022 298 misguided resentment, or a passion grounded in the capacity to reason” (pp. 147-148). giroux confronts educators and researchers with the problem that, isolated, americans are streamed into the “politics of unchecked personal resentment” while anti-fascist power is “legitimate politics of indignation rooted in solidarity” (p. 148). solidarity, in 2018, seemed to giroux no longer existent in a practical way that could make use of trained critical thinking, nor generate social justice activism from experience. isolated, “critical reflection no longer challenges [trump’s bigoted] appeal to ‘common sense’ or casts light on the shadows of racism, hatred, and bigotry” (p. 149). giroux points out that at a moment when a federal government is fascist, citizens can use “incivility as righteous anger [to engender] emotional connection” instead of isolation, “a renewed sense of community, compassion and collective resistance” (p. 156). therefore, chapter three offers a theoretical framework with which to study the emergence of the american failed pandemic responses, their synergy with american neo-fascism, as well as empirical questions about the solidarity seen in black lives matter protests, the new abolitionism, and public challenges to police violence, jury trials, and the 2020 electoral map. in writing chapter three as a stand-alone essay giroux was prescient, informed, or lucky in his analysis; whichever way he succeeded in his critical claims, the style of american nightmare indicates he had access to appropriate methodology for researching rapid, chauvinistic social change operating as part of an attempted coup of the usa. but post-pandemic, the most important question of all might be whether we north americans are returning to social life or returning to the most isolated society we have ever known. in chapter four, giroux concludes, “incivility as righteous anger can fuel an emotional connection not to hatred and bigotry, but to a renewed sense of community, compassion and collective resistance” (p. 156). the american public has been intellectually and ideologically primed for trump’s policies by 20 years of arguments for neoliberal government, and decades of popular culture that glorifies the predatory power of individualism over the welfare of the many. the resolution that giroux proposes is that resistance entails interrogating the corporate cruelty critically. academics must develop “a political and moral lens for thinking through the present convergence of power, politics, and everyday life. ...unveiling the way in which a nation demoralizes itself [and] highlights… structures of domination” (pp. 165-166). giroux wants to oppose the “politics of unchecked resentment” with a “legitimate politics of indignation rooted in solidarity” (p. 148). the topic of the fifth, sixth and seventh chapters concentrate on the victorious white supremacist movement and the resurgence of the international neo-nazi movement. in those chapters giroux offers secondary source confirmation of other research rather than original interpretations. in these chapters, as elsewhere, giroux does not explicitly say that empirical book review studies in social justice, volume 16, issue 1, 294-299, 2022 299 research approaches are required, but often he makes moral declarations that would imply empirically guided solutions. trump’s politics of incivility create an atmosphere where “critical reflection no longer challenges a poisonous appeal to ‘common sense’ or casts light on the shadows of racism, hatred, and bigotry” (p. 149). what, then, can generate solidarity when social networks have already been undone by a state of social isolation? what can inform access to justice, when the rule of law is explicitly deemed inconsequential by the government? this focus on empirically guided solutions is thread throughout the book. giroux spatters his pages with occasional ranting lists of empirically verifiable predictions. in the first chapter he predicts that, “a culture of civic illiteracy will likely become more widespread and legitimated, along with a culture of fear that will enable an increasingly harsh law-and-order regime” (p. 103), a project for empirical political science and sociolegal research. in the second chapter, he says “it is against the historical backdrop of collaboration that trump’s association with various dictators should be analyzed” (p. 126), a project that might drive academic priorities. also, in the third chapter, there is a description of the breakdown of society and access to justice, a description that is well within the bounds of critical empirical research: the not-so-subtle signs of the seething culture of resentment are everywhere… young children, especially those whose parents are being targeted by trump’s rhetoric, are being bullied more. state-sanctioned violence is accelerating against native americans, black youth, latinos, and others now deemed inferior… hate crimes are on the rise, seeping into public spaces and institutions once largely protected from such assaults. (p. 151) for how long are the predictions offered in american nightmare going to be relevant? the answer is unclear. some readers will take on giroux’s most tumultuous book as a genre milestone for a catastrophic writing style during a genuine global moral panic. be careful, though, not to overplay the artistic looseness of a brainstorm in a post-truth panic. references giroux, h. (2018). america at war with itself. city lights publishers. 19issue vi ◆ spring 2019 δι αν οι α the horror of the real: filmic form, the century, and fritz lang's m peter gavaris near the end of the century, alain badiou comes to the conclusion that “the art of the century inscribed itself paradigmatically between dance and cinema.”1 he never explains this development explicitly, though it can be reasoned that he arrived at this conclusion through a consideration of the immediacy inherent to the nature of both forms. evidently, dance and cinema share a fixation on dynamic movement, and for badiou, this distinguishes them from everything that came before, especially since the century “violently declares the present of art.”2 in what follows, i will focus specifically on cinema and the cinematic role as the essential art form of badiou’s century. i will begin by considering why film has been taken up by so many contemporary theorists, examining why the medium (seemingly defined by its constitutional conundrums) lends itself so easily to analysis, and conclude with a consideration of fritz lang’s m (1931), a film that embodies many of the central ideas presented in the century. cinema, from its conception at the end of the nineteenth century, differentiated itself first and foremost by the way it was to be consumed. unlike reading a book or looking at a painting, the act of watching a film always involves something of a 1 badiou, alain. the century, trans. alberto toscano. malden: polity, 2008, p. 160. 2 badiou, the century, 135 20 dianoia: the undergraduate philosophy journal of boston college power dynamic in the way that it strips the viewer of autonomy. we cede all control when we enter the dark room, look up at the bright screen, and gaze as images unremittingly flash before us until the credits roll. conversely, we choose the pace at which to read a book; we can deliberate over certain words, re-read pages, and put the book down whenever we want. the same could be said of looking at a painting, since the act still leaves us with our autonomy. we can look away whenever we want, and the canvas is fundamentally static. given this essential difference, cinema aligns itself much more obviously with theatre, performance art, and dance, as badiou points out. these art forms originate from movements in a setting that requires us to relinquish control and from the construction of resemblance to our lives. this act of replication, whether it be naturalistic, expressionistic, or anything in between, is just that. apart from being far more democratic than theater or dance, film differentiates itself from these other forms in that its replication of life has greater potential for resembling life as it is, and duly, bears greater potential for abstraction. rather than watching the action play out in front of us with the naked eye—as is the case with these other forms of performance—cinema necessitates further layers of construction (and artifice) that are communicated by a director’s shot selection, the editing of scenes, among other things. when writing on film, walter benjamin observes: “the camera intervenes with the resources of its lowerings and liftings, its interruptions and isolations, its extensions and accelerations, its enlargements and reductions. the camera introduces us to unconscious optics as does psychoanalysis to unconscious impulses.”3 these “unconscious optics,” as benjamin puts it, come about through the dissonance between cinema’s base artificiality and its potential for capturing life in motion. consider the early lumière films that attempted to do just this. the arrival of a train (1896) is simply what its title implies (see figure 1). yet, it is much more than just that, since, as benjamin put it, “filmed behavior lends itself more readily to analysis because of its incomparably more precise statements of the situation […] it can be isolated more easily.”4 the same cannot be said for any other artistic form, even those that are movement-based, because it is the camera that imbues an image with meaning by subtracting something from it. life is at once imitated, and thusly, removed (indeed, benjamin would likely argue that “the aura” is that which is being removed). even in shooting life as it is (say, a train arriving at a station), the camera adds an unquantifiable number of variables to the equation: the shot angle, the shot length, the exposure, to name a few. these variables create a specific, irreplicable image for the camera frame. it is the frame itself that further complicates things. in many ways, shooting a film is an act of profound exclusion, since a shot is defined not only by what is in the frame, but also by what is excluded. a shot of a train 3 walter benjamin. “the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction.” the norton anthology of theory and criticism, ed. vincent b. leitch. w. w. norton & company, inc., 2001: 1181. 4 benjamin, “the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction,” 1180-1181. 21issue vi ◆ spring 2019 the horror of the real arriving at a station implicitly asks us to consider what is occurring outside of the frame. therefore, the frame is at once finite—and infinite—and this constitutive contradiction lies at the heart of the medium, which makes film the definitive art form of the century, and an object of curiosity for theorists like benjamin and badiou. figure 1 badiou takes up cinema’s infinite finitude in his chapter on “the infinite.” for him, cinema is almost deceitfully deceptive in its promise of showing us life as it is, and the harsh reality that the medium’s replication of life is wholly artificial. after all, what is cinema other than a series of still images flashed quickly before us in such a way as to imply movement? in any case, badiou’s conception of the real, which he correlates to the infinite, can never be replicated in art, including cinema: “the torment of contemporary art in the face of the infinite situates it between a programmatic forcing that announces the return of romantic pathos, on the one hand, and a nihilistic iconoclasm, on the other.”5 cinema is situated nicely at this crossroads, as i’ve explained, because it seems almost to hold these two conflicting ideals (a “romantic pathos” and a “nihilistic iconoclasm”) at once, in that its infinite quality only comes about in its shear finitude. every shot is utterly unique and cannot be replicated perfectly; yet, the shot’s artificial construction allows for said uniqueness. consciously or otherwise, every film carries with it this inherent contradictory, romantic promise of the infinite, which arises from its own formal limitations, as badiou acknowledges: “the infinite is not captured in form; it transits through form […] finite form can be equivalent to an infinite opening.”6 since the film’s form loudly announces its own ineptitude, we are pointed to this infinite opening more frequently than when engaging with other artistic forms. 5 badiou, the century, p. 155. 6 ibid., p. 155. 22 dianoia: the undergraduate philosophy journal of boston college in exploring the dichotomy between art’s “romantic pathos” and “nihilistic iconoclasm,” badiou spends noticeably more time addressing the latter, focusing on how the “art of subtraction” renders the medium inoperative. (this exemplified by his lengthy analysis of malevich's white on white.) admittedly, art can function as a study of surfaces, critiquing its own medium while also incorporating narrative elements and interiority. as discussed, cinema intrinsically seems able to hold these two contradictory elements at once. badiou’s reluctance to take up film as an “art of subtraction” that does not inherently eschew interiority is somewhat disappointing. with that, this essay will henceforth attempt to amend this fact by applying a badiousian reading to m (1931), a film that succinctly embodies much of the theory presented in the century. a far cry from the early cinema of the lumière brothers, fritz lang’s m is one of heightened drama and hyperstylization, featuring exquisite sets, ostentatious camerawork, and dynamic performances. m’s formal qualities belong to the german expressionist movement. founded on the basis that abstraction could better emulate a sense of interiority than strict, naturalistic representation, expressionism draws attention to itself as artificial (and it makes perfect sense that a form predicated on artificiality would take up abstraction in such a way as to carve out a greater opening for the badiousian real to transit through). m’s expressionism seems far from the art of subtraction that badiou discusses in the century, and yet, it arrives at a similar impasse. expressionism and film go hand in hand precisely because cinema is expressionistic in nature, and lang’s film embodies this synthesis, as the apparent, meticulous construction of its images gives way to a newfound interiority. wedged between two world wars, m appears to present itself as a procedural, almost rudimentary, crime thriller about a string of child murders, before revealing itself to be an eerily prophetic critique of a society ready to embrace totalitarianism. the mystery of the story is not so much about the identity of the killer—who we learn early on is hans beckert (peter lorre)—but is rather about the lengths to which the residents of berlin will go to capture him. lang commits to highlighting the interconnectedness of the “society of the century,” showing how seemingly everybody (from the police force, to the crime bosses, and even the beggars) is working to get this man for a smattering of different and self-serving reasons. by the end, the crime bosses, helped by regular residents who form a sort of citizens’ tribunal, capture beckert. they conduct an unfair trial and commit to killing him before the authorities rush in to break up the party. all this comes after beckert gives a rousing monologue as the tortured killer, expressing in between shrieks and screams the compulsivity of his actions in a surprisingly affecting call for sympathy. this climactic sequence of the citizens’ trial and beckert’s pleading marks a key moment in the film where lang pulls the wool from our eyes and turns the table on the residents of berlin (see figures 2 & 3). badiou argues that war and extreme violence in the century come as 23issue vi ◆ spring 2019 the horror of the real a result of passion for the real: a stark idealism that requires violence before peace. in what will follow, i aim to argue that this passion for the real is not manifested in beckert’s compulsive kills, but is rather embodied in the citizens’ desire to “put [him] out of commission.”7 for the film’s residents of berlin, the real can only be actualized by exterminating this evil from within their own society. when outlining his method for approaching the century, badiou explains that he wants to examine “how the century thought its own thought.”8 i wish to do the same by considering lang’s film as an artifact of the century, a work of profound self-diagnosis that will provide further insight into how the century thought of itself. in the century, badiou seemingly co-opts the lacanian real to refer to that which is unsignifyable: “representation is a symptom (to be read or deciphered) of a real that it subjectively localizes in the guise of misrecognition.”9 the real, as conceived of, and explained by, badiou, refers to a plane of perfection that is perpetually out of reach, separated from us by a gap. nonetheless, this passion for the real inspires the destruction, subtraction, and formalization that seem only to manifest in either art or violence. idealism, more than anything else, becomes the driving force behind this passion for the real since the passion itself comes from a belief that the gap between semblance and real can be transcended. badiou explains this idea in relation to nazi thought before concluding that “passion for the real is devoid of morality […] extreme violence is therefore the correlate of extreme enthusiasm.”10 it, therefore, becomes paramount to acknowledge that nazism, or any other form of oppressive regime, bears an ideology. as horrific as it may sound, it is a fundamental optimism—that of attaining the real—that accounts for so much violence in the century that badiou claims is defined by its passion: “bad violence must be followed 7 lang, m. 8 badiou, the century, p. 3. 9 ibid., p. 49. 10 ibid., p. 63. figure 2 figure 3 24 dianoia: the undergraduate philosophy journal of boston college by good violence, which is legitimated by the former […] the good war will put an end to the bad war.”11 in turn, it makes perfect sense to view berlin’s residents’ totalitarian, self-serving desire to kill beckert as a passion for the real. surely, the perversity of the situation manifests itself in the simple fact that the residents of berlin are acting reasonably—at least initially—when it comes to their desire to catch beckert (since he represents a legitimate threat to their society). their crusade, their “just war,” is justifiable up until the point at which society collectively decides that beckert is less than human and undeserving of justice. this almost casual change in mindset has profound consequences, as badiou explains, in that it accounts for much of the violence of the century: “the century's real problem is to be located in the linkage between ‘democracies’ and that which, after the fact, they designate as their other […] what needs to be undone is precisely this discursive procedure of absolution.”12 the film’s title refers to the chalk letter “m” (for murderer) slapped onto beckert’s back at one point in the film (see figure 4). this moment holds significant import in that it represents the moment when beckert is explicitly made to be other; he becomes the target. the citizens, in turn, find no issue in making beckert the ostensive other in accordance with the belief that his elimination will allow for a lasting peace: “the twentieth century's idea of war is that of the decisive war, of the last war.”13 it is this stark optimism—and an inability to see beyond the present moment and situation—that allows for this sort of barbarous, ideological collective consciousness to take shape. 11 ibid., p. 30. 12 ibid., p. 5. 13 ibid., p. 34. figure 4 25issue vi ◆ spring 2019 the horror of the real lang effortlessly makes us aware of this shifting subjectivity through the use of cinematic techniques that informs our internalization of the narrative. notice, for instance, the way most of the action is staged throughout the film. the scenes where beckert is being chased through the streets are shot using high-angle long shots (see figure 5). shots of this kind emphasize the smallness of these characters, making them appear almost like pawns in a game as they chase each other down corridors and dark alleys. the camera shoots them at a distance to represent the metaphorical distance established between these characters and the viewer. by the film’s conclusion, lang closes this distance, through his use of close-ups, in order to evoke our sympathy for this character. if the long shots before were meant to imply distance, then these close-ups, like the famous one of beckert pleading (see figure 6), are meant to elicit empathy and imply interiority. writing on the close-up shot, benjamin concludes: “with the close-up, space expands […] the enlargement of a snapshot does not simply render more precise what in any case was visible, though unclear: it reveals entirely new structural formations on the subject.”14 surely, the power of the film’s ending comes in our acknowledgement of the newly discovered structural formations of beckert’s character. notable, too, is the fact that we can only collapse this emotional distance as lang does in film: live performance cannot replicate the cinematic freedom that comes with using a camera. adding to the novelty of m is the fact that the crime bosses, and not the police, mastermind the plan to capture and to try beckert’s. we come to realize that the heightened police activity—brought about by beckert’s killings—thwarts the city’s criminal activity. in laying down this groundwork, lang sets up a strange sort of hierarchy wherein the police hold power over the criminals and the criminals hold power over beckert. they resort to a dangerous kind of absolution in the end, which 14 benjamin, “the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction,” p. 1181. figure 5 figure 6 26 dianoia: the undergraduate philosophy journal of boston college badiou vehemently warns against when writing on nazi ideology. he disapproves of those who simply consider nazism unthinkably evil, since this inability to acknowledge ideology (or interiority) often results in even more violence and horror. badiou explains: “to maintain that nazism is not a form of thought, or, more generally, that barbarism does not think, is to abet a process of surreptitious absolution.”15 we see this surreptitious absolution in the sheer cruelty of the criminals and other residents of berlin who put beckert on trial, and who laugh and jeer at the killer as he begs for his life. in a strange way, lang’s directorial method asks us to consider this killer’s thought—that is, to assume a basic sort of interiority. badiou writes of wanting to know how the century thinks of itself, and lang’s film almost seems to want to achieve the same thing. m not only thinks about the century, but it also goes further to criticize it in the midst of its happening. the “surreptitious absolution” taken up by the residents of berlin represents how ideology becomes collective, and, evidently, political. in m, passion for the real is addressed and brought to life by groups of smarmy men in smoke-filled rooms: the crime bosses, and also the police chiefs (see figure 7). ideology, under the guise of politics, forms amidst the few before it is promulgated to the masses. the central dichotomy, that between the thinking, ideologically protected residents and the barbarous beckert, is achieved through this absolution and enforced by the simple, undeniable fact that politics thinks itself just. a lone killer cannot have an ideology—or any sort of interiority—whereby a group of likeminded residents must be justified in their thinking since there are so many of them. badiou confirms this very suspicion: “politics, when it exists, grounds its own principle regarding the real, and is thus in need of nothing, save itself.”16 evidently, passion for the real acts both as a justification for a genuinely barbarous ideology, and as a way to self-legitimatize that which wields power. politics is self-serving, and this point is made explicit by the fact that those condemning beckert are, themselves, criminals too! this propensity of politics to “save itself ” calls to mind giorgio agamben’s theory of ‘bare life,’ whereby a sovereign-power must exclude—deem worthless—some other form of life in order to maintain its own hegemony: “[the] living being who, though being human, is excluded–and through this exclusion, included–in humanity, so that human beings can have a human life, which is to say a political life.”17 though, it’s unclear if agamben’s exclusive inclusivity of the sovereign-power/bare-life dichotomy requires bare-life to exist. is beckert ‘bare life’ if he is to be killed? even in death, does he live on as an emblem of the agambenian homo sacer for the politically minded residents of berlin? history mournfully reminds us that many of these same germans would find a new form of ‘sovereign power’ in the decade to follow. either way, in 15 badiou, 4. 16 ibid., p. 6. 17 agamben, giorgio. the use of bodies. edited by werner hamacher. translated by adam kotsko, stanford university press, 2016, p. 23. 27issue vi ◆ spring 2019 the horror of the real attempting to synthesize agambenian and badiousian theory, looking at lang’s film through the lens of both, i extrapolate a few notable points. first, i argue that this passion for the real is a justification—a kind of moral imperative—for agambenian ‘bare life.’ we can also determine that the specifics of ‘bare life’ as described by agamben, life whose biological existence is considered worthless, applies to badiou’s thoughts on politics. do all politics and ideologies subsist on rendering the other as homo sacer? badiou surely overlooked m because its expressionist sensibility flies in the face of the ‘art of subtraction’ that he champions in the century. and while his points on subtraction (the art of auto-interrogation) are made clear in the text, there remains something to be said about more mainstream art that still manages to interrogate these aspects of society. the closest m gets to modernism is in its jagged construction, which comes from its constantly shifting perspective, oscillating from the crime bosses, to the beggars, to beckert, to the police, and back again. take that as you may, but there is something tragic about the fact that lang’s film was widely seen—largely championed—and yet, failed to make the country of its origin aware of its demons. if badiou is correct in postulating that passion for the real manifests in the disjunctive synthesis between art and violence, than m proves, more than anything else, that this violence may overpower its artistic correlate. ◆ figure 7 28 dianoia: the undergraduate philosophy journal of boston college bibliography agamben, giorgio. the use of bodies. edited by werner hamacher. translated by adam kotsko, stanford university press, 2016. badiou, alain. the century. translated by alberto toscano, polity, 2008. benjamin, walter. “the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction.” the norton anthology of theory and criticism, edited by vincent b. leitch, w. w. norton & company, inc., 2001, pp. 1166–1186. lang, fritz, director. m. nero-film a-g, 1931. perspective_politice_2014_decembrie.pdf the resurrection of the radical political movements abstract: in the last decade the radical political movements became a important threat to european democracies in the conditions of decline on popularity of main political ideological parties all across the europe. especially nationalist radical movements seems to became more popular between the citizens after they took from the populist parties the euroskeptical message and the radical message against minorities or immigrants. the extremist message of those parties or radical movements it�s pretty much the same even they are located in different counties or cultures. the radical message of golden dawn in greece � an christian orthodox culture � is similar with the magyar hajnal (hungarian dawns) in hungary � a catholic and protestant culture � or progress party from norway � a more secular culture than religious based. our paper is focused on the origins of those parties in europe and their radical message against immigrants or social/ethnic minorities. we argue that such parties succeed over the long term only when they both 1) build on pre-existing nationalist organizations and networks and 2) face a permissive rather than repressive political environment. those parties develop themsleves on the fertile ground of far right wing populism and assume a very narrow to the fascist discourse of the beginings of the xxth century in order to contest the economical and democratic order. by adding factors such as historical legacies, party organization, and interactions between mainstream parties and far right challengers to the study of radical right parties, we can better understand their divergent trajectories on july 22nd 2011 in norway, one of the most safe and socially just society, andreas breivik killed 77 people of whom 69 were attending a social-democrat youth meeting. the impact was enormous and suddenly the interest in the european extreme right surged. the massacre was not only carefully planned but justified by a long manifesto written by the attacker himself. the hate speech and xenophobia had been for years practiced on obscure internet sites and forums but not it was out in the open. the breivik manifesto is a glossary of the european and american extreme right discourse, exposing the hate and discontent of a white average person projected against the world in which he was born and raised. breivik is the latest visible figure in a current which runs deep in the european history, originating in its modern form in the interwar period and resurrecting across the continent after the end of communism. how was that possible? or more exactly how was that still possible after the second world war in which the third reich and its extreme ideology was defeated? breivik�s manifesto called 2083 � a european declaration of independence (breivik, 2011) is a mixture of common sense ideas, intellectual resentment against a society failing to r ecognize his worth and reactions against the political and intellectual european mainstream. it also contains a guide to urban guerilla warfare whose principles were put in practice during the attack. the first public reaction after the tragedy was that the person was mentally deranged. yet, the forensic psychiatrists evaluating breivik judged that he was mentally sane. the manifesto would have probably go unnoticed if not followed by the attack. and it would have been not so relevant if it was just a singular work. texts and manifestoes, groupings and actions are multiplying of this type were multiplying in the last 20 years. his german counterparts also killed turkish and arab immigrants in the name of white supremacy (breivik, 2011). moreover, beate zschape, member of the national socialist structure, involved in the killing of 10 immigrants, was in direct contact with andreas breivik. these contacts show that the european extreme right has the capacity to formulate a transnational ideological program and to carry out violent attacks motivated by it. for decades the european extreme right is promoting ideas and principles related to the racial white domination of other groups, in conjunction with the american one. but the groups were usually marginal and had no major political relevance. the dominant political model after 1945 was built on the tradition of the enlightment and universality of human rights. it had central values � equality, tolerance and non-discrimination but also a method � rational and public debate as opposed to identity clashes based on differences. after 1989 the only challenge left was to disseminate the model to the former communist states taking the consolidated european democracies as stable and safe. those expectations were expressed by fukuyama (fukuyama, 1994) and all others who revived the study of democratization and consolidation in the new context. yet, the reaction of the extreme right against political correctness after the fall of communism was particularly strong. political correctness became a ��soft totalitarianism��. as example, the christian conservative movements in us and europe, using the momentum of the fall of the ��atheistic� communism, reacted against political correctness as a form of marxism and attempt to dissolve the stability of the bourgeois society. the political correctness was also questioned from the radical left. with the contestation from all sides it became increasingly difficult to preserve political correctness as a viable model. the fall of communism and the apparent economic development associated with globalization triggered a discourse opposed to the political left , traditionally building on enlightment and equality and individual liberty as cardinal values. loosing their adversary � the soviet style communism, western democracies also lost their purpose and identity. soon after the celebratory euphoria phased out the lack of direction was keenly felt, both elites and citizens being unable to find an uniting democratic narrative. the western political left, in its dominant social-democratic form was also in a state of confusion. its main economic narrative was based on absolute economic liberty and the retreat of the state as part of the globalization megatrend. they had replaced the working class with the middle class as preferred historical agent and configured their politics to bring in this class the relative deviants � lower middle and upper middle classes. the social groups who for various reasons were not able to join the middle class � extremely poor, uneducated, marginal skills, disabled, turned into misfits of the new globalized world. reading the works of anthony giddens (giddens, 2001, 2001) and tony blair (blair, 2001) one realizes how social democracy gave up on trade-unionism, equality of chances and strong economic regulation. this turn had also a historical significance � deprived or vulnerable social groups, especially ethnic, were abandoned as constituents of a future progressive society. 24 perspective politice the official mainstream discourse maintained the centrality of equality, human rights and multiculturalism. later on, multiculturalism was officially abandoned by european centre � right key leaders. in 2010 the german chancellor angela merkel affirmed that multiculturalism was a complete failure. david cameron, the british conservative prime minister was equally critical: �under the doctrine of state multiculturalism, we have encouraged different cultures to live separate lives, apart from each other and the mainstream. we have failed to provide a vision of society to which they feel they want to belong. we have even tolerated these segregated communities behaving in ways that run counter to our values� (cameron, 2011). the french president francois sarkozy agreed: multiculturalism failed in europe and france because we took too much care about the identity of the ones who came and not enough care about the identity of the country receiving (sevilla, 2012). abandoned in the retreat of the political left and the governments, the vulnerable social groups, especially ethnic, cultural, gender and economic minorities, became the targets of right wing populisms and nationalisms of all sorts. paradoxically or not, those taking advantage of the retreat of the left were not the conservatives but the right wing populists who promoted a rather ambiguous doctrine � supporting capitalism and globalization but strengthening of the nation state and the judeo-christian traditions against it. this ambiguity ended with the 11th of september attack and the war on terror. the civilization fault lines materialized and the enemy gained a name and a face � the foreigner, and especially islam. right wing ideas became more widespread as the mainstream politics transformed itself, providing opportunities for development. right wing populists are surprisingly well represented in the european politics. the current european parliament structure following the 2014 elections reflects the shifts in opinion, attitude, organization and reach of the right wing. what makes these new movements so appealing? what kind of expectations are these movements produce and meet? a part of the answer is that they successfully create myth-based political narratives. a myth is an idealized pattern of behavior whose realization or re-enactment gives sense to individual life and provides orientation for social action. apart from homo sapiens, homo faber, homo ludens or homo religiosus there is a homo mythologicus. homo mythologicus needs to believe in what he or she does, constantly looking for sense, explanations and utility. myths organize these needs and supply to individuals and communities convincing narratives (cassirer, 2001). as they are projected in the past, myths provide a measure of success by approximation and imitation. they also depict not real history but an imaginary one, describing the past not as it was but as to fit in the narrative. myths can have a mobilizing role thus playing important social and historical roles. but it also can function as delusional devices, hiding real history and isolating the individual from present realities. it can also act as refuge for those who are unhappy with the real world and seek a sort of symbolical safety within it. myths can be tribal or archetypal. the first use a differential and confrontational logic. the later propose a uniting scope which summons individuals around a superior idea and common good. it features a project that resembles the initial exemplary model (the archetype). the archetypal myths are used as engines for reaching common goals. it is a more ��contractual�� type, based on common interests and less emotional. the tribal myths are the preferred choice for populists. they have four constitutive elements: the damned enemy; the chosen people who can and must be saved; providential savior; and the salvation solution � simple, accessible and convincing. the enemy can be anyone identified as the other (girardet, 1997): neighboring societies, competitors, regions, empires, social categories, minorities, professions. it can be america, decembrie 2014 25perspective politice europe, russia, arabs, jews, muslims, immigrants, corrupt, poor, rich, politicians. the list is endless and subject to continuous change. the enemy is equally vicious and guilty. the us is a virtuous collective victim, ready to cede power in order to attain the common goals. access to happiness is conditioned by sacrifice. but inaction can turn some of us in accomplices of the enemy so the situation invites continuous scrutiny over the motivation and fidelity. the savior � in fact the populist leader it is not only the one wishing the defeat or disappearance of the enemy but the one accepting the sacrifice for saving the collective us. the sacrifice is to be happily accepted by the group who avoids taking personal risks. the solutions given by the savior are not evaluated in regards to their capacity to solve the problems but in their success meeting the expectations of the group. thus the failures are never attributable to the leader. as the mythical behavior is based on the confusion between real and possible, the group is satisfied by the indication of a remedy and preferred course of action coming from the leader. the satisfaction of having the dream confirmed is enough.(girardet, 1997) members of the group not even wait for the dream to materialize. the lack of fulfillment doesn�t kill of the dream or its supporter. a dream can be killed by another dream and a myth by another myth. until then the solutions apparently efficient only fail to reach the desired goals. for such failures a democrat leader would be sanctioned by the people. the populist leader is not responsible for the concrete results but for the maintaining the comforting sentiment that they are attainable. in practice he is not responsible at all. the populist and populism can only be defeated by the symbols that they created, when they loose control over them or the myths and symbols that replaced them. as david c. art highlights, radical right movements were born following this particular populist pattern (art, 2001). after the fall of communism radical right movements were deeply marginal. the general populist turn in european politics provided a window of opportunity for the extreme right. golden dawn in greece, jobbik in hungary, and the national democratic party in germany are hybrids of right wing ideology and populism. but whereas many populist parties remain only rhetorical the right wing ones move into action. coming back to norway, the progress party which is nationalistic and xenophobe calls for the limitation of migration and does not incite for the mass murdering of immigrants and socialists. but andreas breivik took the ideological model and acted violently against the enemy. the set of right wing ideas are very similar in the european political space, all of them being founded on what erich fromm called ��escape from freedom�� (fromm, 1998) even though they all claim that the are liberating and the leader sees himself as a liberator. the oppressive element that they fight is not a colonizer as is the case of tiermondisme but a diffuse cultural invader spreading insidiously his influence trough cultural channels many of them new and pervasive. the enemy is the other � completely foreign and impossible to be assimilated (art, 2011), whose actions weakens the ��self� (national/religious/cultural). thus the extreme right is xenophobe even though its form and targets differ from society to society. the french and north european extreme right is islamophobe while the eastern one � czech and hungarian is antirroma. they display an instinctual rejection of alterity in its biological form � skin color, smell, etc. the slovak and hungarian rroma are catholic but this commonality fades before the dominant prejudice against them. in western europe, religion is a key factor in reinforcing the distance. in the bulgarian case �ataka, the right wing party is against the turkish minority and as a consequence developed an islamophobe dimension. the muslim turks in bul26 perspective politice garia are treated as hungarian or czech rroma, whereas the bulgarian rroma, despite their orthodox religion share the position of the muslim turks. these variations show that there are major differences in how the enemy is defined and approached � culturally, religiously and politically. it is a common error to assimilate all these currents with the interwar fascism and nazism. there is a certain fascination with the hierarchy, uniforms, colors and symbols (see the rune on the golden dawn logo). yet, the majority of right wing movements reject this connection, taking on instead the right wing populist discourse and adding a violent militant attitude. michael bruter and sarah harrison (bruter, harrison, 2011) showed that it is difficult to identify a direct link between these movements with nazism, the extreme right being more the violent form of the european right wing populism. the european right wing is build around strong xenophobic attitudes, as islamophobia, anti-immigration or anti-minority. xenophobia is sometimes doubled but a mythology of white man�s superiority � european and/or western, but this is less racial but grounded in culture and economic factors. the interwar has had an impact, the european extreme right importing trough the us (see bauer schmitter, 2001) a strong social darwinism. this social darwinism values certain societies which were able to innovate and develop as opposed to backward societies whose relative development and modernization is attributed to the influence of the first category trough colonization. this is the base for the discontent with the immigrants who in principle recognize the superiority of the receiving society but do not want to change their customs and their cultural model ending in conflict with the majority. to the three streams of xenophobia we might add another one, the rejection of the intra-european immigrants mostly romanians and bulgarians, whose presence is deemed corrosive to the safety and economic status of western europeans. the last type of xenophobia is also a reaction against socially defined categories � economically vulnerable and in need of social assistance (golden dawn referring to them as to ��social parasites��). thus the radical groups in greece and hungary do not attack immigrants only but also their co-nationals viewed as economically or socially useless. the reactions against those at the fringes of society become a key mark in recognizing the extreme right movements. the obsession with superiority can be traced back to the italian fascist vitalism rooting in nietzsche�s philosophy (conway, 2002). their perceived superiority is based on nationalism and arianism (not in racial but cultural terms) in equal measure. geert hofstede asserts that there is a significant influence of the national cultural model on individual behavior. in his work cultures and organizations: software of the mind (hofstede, 1991) the cultural model of the organization (nation) is determining the behavioral, work, and leisure individual patterns including the base structure of values and ethics. this perspective is highlighting national differences in individual values. hofstede was not of course concerned with offering to the extreme right a justification for its ideas but his work was misused including in breivik�s manifesto (breivik, 2011) the extreme right twists hofstede�s model considering that some cultures are superior to others and not simply different. for its supporters the most successful cultural model seems to be the western/christian capitalist one. during modernity and post-modernity it allowed unprecedented technological innovation, economic development and social modernization. this is the reason the extreme right is not following the anti-capitalist interwar doctrine but the populist extremism which supports capitalism. a social darwinist perspective opposing not individuals but collectivities/nations struggle for survival in which foreigners are a weakness. decembrie 2014 27perspective politice the relation between the extreme right and the economic crisis is not entirely clear. the crisis disrupted the social stability of the european societies and the consensual character of their politics. in the crisis, the extreme right presented itself as a way to return to older values and a model to protect the middle classes whose position was threatened by the various strands of the radical left including anarchist. appealing to the cultural tradition, work and capitalism � ideological key constructs in the last 30 years, the extreme right became the guardian dog of the capitalism as described by naomi klein. the extreme right is essentially a reactionary ideology, aiming at preserving the status quo in this case the well-off position of groups reaping the benefits of capitalism. thus, the extreme right must use consensual myths as unity and savior and to generate the fear of conspiracy and foreign invasion (klein, 2008). the extreme right movements gained more influence during and being opposed to the european socialist governments. the later were considered corrupt, unable to solve social problems and too hospitable to immigrants especially ones coming from the outside of the european space. for this reason it was possible to merge the ideological critique and the attack on multiculturalism and political correctness. in parallel the return to ��tradition�� meant the revival of spiritual/religious and national culture values (albrecht, 2013). in the orthodox societies � greece, bulgaria, cyprus and romania � there is a strong tendency to return to the agrarian moral community, fearing god and dully accepting the crisis and twists of history in general. the church is taken as partner in the attacks on political correctness and multiculturalism, as a reaction to modernity and postmodernity. in the catholic and protestant societies the dominant churches are not part of the grand battle against multiculturalism. with or without the support of the church the extreme right is becoming more violent against sexual minorities, feminism and liberty of conscience, all considered and forms of socialism and multiculturalism. the extreme right is trying to become an ideology of the reaction of middle class against the changes produced by the transition from modernity to postmodernity. and here is a paradox of extreme right ideology. by asserting the political and moral stability of the middle class it attacks the very foundations it was built after the second world war: liberty, tolerance and dynamism. 1. jan phillip albrecht, publisher, europe on the far right, right wing extremists and th right wing populists in the european parliament, european parliament, the green/efa group, 2013 2. david c. art, inside the radical right, the development of anti immigrant parties in western europe, (cambridege university press, 2011), pag 46, apg 121 et passim. 3. michael w.bauer, phillipe schmitter, a (modest) proposal for expanding social citizenship in european union, journal of european social policy, 11, 2001, pag 55-65 4. tony blair, o cãlãtorie, ed. publica, bucuresti 2011 5. andrew breivik, 2083, a european declaration of independence. de laudae novae militae, pauperes commilitones christi templique solomonici, london 2011, https://archive.org/details/2083_a_european_declaration_of_independence 6. michael bruter ºi sarah harrison, mapping extreme right ideology (an empirical geography of the european extreme right ideology), palgrave, ny, 2011 7. david cameron, speech on radicalisation and islamic extremism, munich, 5 february 2011. http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/02/terrorism-islam-ideology 8. ernst cassirer, mitul statului, ed. institutului european, iasi 2001, pag 52 9. daniel w. conway, nietzsche s dangerous game, philosophy in the twilight of the idols, cambridge university press, 2002 28 perspective politice 10. erich fromm, frica de libertate, ed. veritas, bucuresti, 1998 11. francis fukuyama, sfârºitul istoriei ºi ultimul om, paideia, bucuresti, 1994 12. anthony giddens, a treia cale, polirom, iasi, 2001 13. anthony giddens, a treia cale ºi criticii ei, polirom, iaºi, 2001 14. raoul girardet, mituri ºi mitologii politice, ed.institutului european, iaºi, 1997, pg 85, pag 142 15. geert hofstede, gert jan hofstedte, michael minkov,cultures and organizations: software of the mind, intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival, 3rd edition, the mcgraw-hill companies, 2010 (1st edition 1991) 16. naomi klein, doctrina ºocului. naºterea capitalismului dezasterelor, vellant, bucuresti, 2008 17. jean sevilla, incorectitudinea istoricã, ed humanitas, bucuresti, 2012, pg 318 decembrie 2014 29perspective politice the american journal of islamic social sciences vol. 6 , no. i , l989 125 toward islamization of the non-visual arts: a brief discussion of some crucial issues rasha al-disuql in his recent article, "religious fascism and art," dr. sa'ad al dtn ibrahim concludes with these words addressed to all scholars in the visual and nonvisual arts field: "those who have the 'islamic alternative or ajtematives' let them be obliged, if they truly be lieve in the existence of refined standards for aesthetic creativity different from those available, (let them) e ndeavor to present these refinements to society. they have endeavored and succeeded in recent years in presenting alternatives in economic institutions, services and investments, which attracted large numbers . . . why do they not do the same in the arts field?"1 frantic endeavors at lslarnizing the non-v isual arts have reached a highpoint at the present time. these endeavors are primarily due to the realization of the grave effect art has on shaping morals and channeling, or sway ing them in certain directions, and to its easy accessibility to, and profound effect on, emotion and intellect. many contemporary islamistsi have found some basis for literary theory but have not arrived at one grounded in the qur'an and the sunnah with a view leading to islamization of the non-visual arts (literature) and the fine arts as a whole. although thi s discussion does not present a theory, it attempts to draw attention to crucial issues which may invite further endeavors for the islamization of these artistic disciplines. the present state of the arts and islamic research contributions the problem oflabeling all kinds of written material "literature," is itself rasha al disuqi is a doctoral candidate in the literature department of the university of california at san luis obispo, california. •that article was published in al-shira ' 324 (june) 1988 pp. 6-7. 2£mad al din khalil, 'adnan 'ali riqa al nal)awi, 'a"'®' allah al qabsi is an example. the work of the late sayyid qutb and the contemporary mul)ammad qucb on the arts have, in different wl1.'js, provided critical analyses of islamic works and encouraged lslamization. 126 the american journal of islamic social sciences voi. t>. no. i. l:to:t indicative of the obliterated sense of refinement needed in the existing nonvisual arts. literature, such as drama, fiction, poetry, and even criticism has been called, among its specialists, "art." but because it has not lived up to refined artistic standards, it has prompted many scholars to center their discussions on the quality and value present in the different existing genres.j at several points in history similar attempts have existed: al asma'i (d. 215 a.h./830 a.d.), mu)jammad a)jmad ':-faba\ba (d. 322 a.h./933 a.o.), al ·amidi (d. 370 a.h./980 a.d.), al farabi (d. 339 a.h./950 a.o.), and al jurjani (d. 392 a.h./1001 a.o.) have concentrated their efforts on quality of style, rhetoric, and means of expression in the work of art. in literary criticism: roots and methodology, sayyid qut~ initiated a return to the qur'an and the hadith as sources, by analyzing emotive values of the work, exploring the nature of islamic art, describing its characteristics and its basic emergence from islamic 'aqidah. similarly, in experiments in practical criticism, al qabsis touches on the prophet's (~aas) viewpoint of poetry and the legitimacy of poetic expression. in analyzing the significance of the work as a human product, it was learned that human expression, related first and foremost to the human being, has not been explored. we must, then, first find the basis for such a theory in the qur'an and the suonah in order to build a literary, artistic theory around it. also needed is consideration for the literary benefit of the work for the whole of mankind as it conforms with the sources of islam, which have been quite accurate about what values should be transmitted and spread in society. psycho-biological makeup of al-insan (the human being) 1. al fi(rah (man's pristine purity) the pristine nature with which allah (swt) has created man is the basic factor in deciding what kind of art is being produced and presented to society. the pristine nature must be preserved in literary expression. the qur'an is emphatic about the fitrah's unchangeability: "it is the pristine nature with which allah has created people, there is no change for his creation" (30:30). l see \a.dan 'ali ric,a al na!jawi, al adab al lslami ln.sa11iyatuh wa ' alami){ltulr (riyadh : dar al n~awi lilnashr, 1987). 4the arabic title is al naqd al aba