







 
   
     
       
         Certain disquisitions and considerations representing to the conscience the unlawfulnesse of the oath, entituled, A solemn League and Covenant for reformation &c. As also the insufficiency of the arguments used in the exhortation for taking the said Covenant. Published by command.
      
       
         This text is an enriched version of the TCP digital transcription A31491 of text R1967 in the  English Short Title Catalog (Wing C1700A). Textual changes  and metadata enrichments aim at making the text more  computationally tractable, easier to read, and suitable for network-based collaborative curation by amateur and professional end users from many walks of life.  The text has been tokenized and linguistically annotated with  MorphAdorner. The annotation includes standard spellings that support the display of a text in a standardized format that preserves archaic forms ('loveth', 'seekest'). Textual changes aim at restoring the text the author or stationer meant to publish.  This text has not been fully proofread 
       Approx. 135 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 28 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images.
       
         EarlyPrint Project
         Evanston,IL, Notre Dame, IN, St. Louis, MO
         2017
         A31491
         Wing C1700A
         ESTC R1967
         99860718
         99860718
         112843
         
           
            This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of
             Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal
            . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
          
        
      
       
         Early English books online.
      
       
         (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A31491)
         Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 112843)
         Images scanned from microfilm: (Thomason Tracts ; 8:E43[5])
      
       
         
           
             Certain disquisitions and considerations representing to the conscience the unlawfulnesse of the oath, entituled, A solemn League and Covenant for reformation &c. As also the insufficiency of the arguments used in the exhortation for taking the said Covenant. Published by command.
             Barwick, John, 1612-1664.
          
           [2], 49, [1] p.
           
             Printed by Leonard Lichfield printer to the University,
             Oxford [i.e. London] :
             1644.
          
           
             By John Barwick, with the assistance of William Lacey, Isaac Barrow, Seth Ward, Edmund Balders, William Quarles, and Peter Gunning.
             The imprint is false; printed in London (Madan).
             Annotation on Thomason copy: "Said to be written by the Universitie of Cambridge"; "Aprill 17th".
             Reproduction of the original in the British Library.
          
        
      
    
     
       
         eng
      
       
         
           Solemn League and Covenant (1643). -- Early works to 1800.
           Covenanters -- Early works to 1800.
           Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1642-1649 -- Early works to 1800.
        
      
    
       A31491  R1967  (Wing C1700A).  civilwar no Certain disquisitions and considerations representing to the conscience the unlawfulnesse of the oath, entituled, A solemn League and Covena Lacey, William 1644    24704 19 135 0 0 0 0 62 D  The  rate of 62 defects per 10,000 words puts this text in the D category of texts with between 35 and 100 defects per 10,000 words. 
        2000-00 TCP
        Assigned for keying and markup
      
        2001-07 Aptara
        Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images
      
        2001-08 TCP Staff (Michigan)
        Sampled and proofread
      
        2001-09 TCP Staff (Michigan)
        Text and markup reviewed and edited
      
        2001-11 pfs
        Batch review (QC) and XML conversion
      
    
  
   
     
       
       
       
         
           CERTAIN
           DISQUISITIONS
           AND
           CONSIDERATIONS
           Representing
           to
           the
           Conscience
           the
           unlawfulnesse
           of
           the
           Oath
           ,
           entituled
           ,
           
             A
             solemn
             League
             and
             Covenant
             for
             Reformation
             &c.
             
          
        
         
           As
           also
           the
           insufficiency
           of
           the
           Arguments
           used
           in
           the
           Exhortation
           for
           taking
           the
           said
           Covenant
           .
        
         
           Published
           by
           command
           .
        
         
           OXFORD
           ,
           Printed
           by
           LEONARD
           LICHFIELD
           Printer
           to
           the
           University
           .
           1644.
           
        
      
    
     
       
       
       
         
           CERTAIN
           DISQUISITIONS
           AND
           CONSIDERATIONS
           Representing
           to
           the
           Conscience
           the
           unlawfulnesse
           of
           the
           Oath
           ,
           entituled
           ,
           A
           solemn
           League
           and
           Covenant
           for
           Reformation
           ,
           &c.
           
        
         
           We
           Noblemen
           ,
           Barons
           ,
           Knights
           ,
           Gentlemen
           ,
           Citizens
           ,
           Burgesses
           ,
           Ministers
           of
           the
           Gospell
           ,
           and
           Commons
           of
           all
           sorts
           in
           the
           Kingdoms
           of
           
             England
             ,
             Scotland
             ,
          
           and
           
             Ireland
             ,
          
           by
           the
           providence
           of
           God
           living
           under
           one
           King
           ,
           and
           being
           of
           one
           reformed
           Religion
           ,
           having
           before
           our
           eyes
           the
           glory
           of
           God
           ,
           and
           the
           advancement
           of
           the
           Kingdom
           of
           our
           Lord
           and
           Saviour
           Iesus
           Christ
           ,
           the
           honour
           and
           happinesse
           of
           the
           Kings
           Majesty
           ,
           and
           His
           Posterity
           ,
           and
           the
           true
           publique
           Liberty
           ,
           Safety
           and
           Peace
           of
           the
           Kingdoms
           ,
           wherein
           every
           ones
           private
           condition
           is
           included
           ,
           and
           calling
           to
           mind
           the
           treacherous
           and
           bloody
           plots
           ,
           conspiracies
           ,
           attempts
           ,
           and
           practices
           of
           the
           enemies
           of
           God
           against
           the
           true
           Religion
           ,
           and
           professours
           thereof
           in
           all
           places
           ,
           especially
           in
           these
           three
           Kingdomes
           ever
           since
           the
           reformation
           of
           Religion
           ,
           and
           how
           much
           their
           rage
           ,
           power
           ,
           and
           presumption
           are
           of
           late
           ,
           and
           at
           this
           time
           increased
           and
           exercised
           ;
           whereof
           the
           deplorable
           estate
           of
           the
           Church
           and
           Kingdome
           of
           
             Ireland
             ,
          
           the
           distressed
           estate
           of
           the
           Church
           and
           Kingdome
           of
           
             England
             ,
          
           and
           the
           dangerous
           estate
           of
           the
           Church
           and
           Kingdome
           of
           
             Scotland
             ,
          
           are
           present
           and
           publique
           testimonies
           ;
           
           We
           have
           now
           at
           last
           ,
           (
           after
           other
           meanes
           of
           Supplication
           ,
           Remonstrance
           ,
           Protestations
           ,
           and
           Sufferings
           )
           for
           the
           preservation
           of
           our selves
           and
           our
           Religion
           from
           utter
           ruine
           and
           destruction
           ,
           according
           to
           the
           commendable
           practice
           of
           these
           Kingdomes
           in
           former
           times
           ,
           and
           the
           example
           of
           Gods
           people
           in
           other
           Nations
           ,
           after
           mature
           deliberation
           ,
           resolved
           and
           determined
           to
           enter
           into
           a
           mutuall
           and
           solemn
           League
           and
           covenant
           ,
           wherein
           we
           all
           subscribe
           ,
           and
           each
           one
           of
           us
           for
           himself
           ,
           with
           our
           hands
           lifted
           up
           to
           the
           most
           high
           God
           ,
           doe
           swear
           :
        
         
           SEeing
           it
           hath
           pleased
           the
           composers
           of
           this
           Covenant
           to
           set
           it
           forth
           with
           an
           Introduction
           ,
           which
           containes
           that
           which
           (
           it
           seems
           )
           prevailed
           with
           them
           ,
           and
           they
           expect
           should
           work
           upon
           the
           three
           Kingdomes
           to
           take
           the
           following
           Covenant
           ;
           it
           will
           be
           behoofefull
           in
           the
           first
           place
           to
           reduce
           the
           conscience
           to
           a
           cleare
           and
           strict
           examination
           upon
           the
           contents
           of
           this
           Introduction
           ;
           and
           then
           if
           it
           shall
           find
           that
           all
           things
           therein
           be
           true
           ,
           and
           withall
           sufficient
           to
           that
           end
           for
           which
           they
           were
           premised
           ,
           (
           
             viz.
          
           to
           inferre
           a
           necessity
           of
           swearing
           to
           all
           things
           contained
           in
           the
           following
           Articles
           )
           the
           conscience
           will
           be
           directed
           to
           follow
           that
           dictate
           :
           But
           if
           it
           fail
           in
           either
           of
           those
           ,
           we
           must
           betake
           our selves
           to
           other
           considerations
           to
           be
           guided
           by
           .
           We
           will
           therefore
           sincerely
           propound
           the
           contents
           of
           the
           Preface
           ,
           as
           neer
           as
           may
           be
           according
           to
           its
           method
           ,
           joyning
           together
           matters
           of
           the
           same
           kind
           :
           And
           then
           we
           shall
           find
           the
           discourse
           of
           the
           Preface
           to
           be
           resolved
           into
           these
           principles
           .
        
         
           
             1.
             
             The
             glory
             of
             God
             ,
             the
             advancement
             of
             the
             Kingdome
             of
             Iesus
             Christ
             ,
             the
             honour
             and
             happinesse
             of
             the
             King
             &c.
             are
             to
             be
             aimed
             at
             and
             endeavoured
             .
          
           
             2.
             
             Especially
             when
             they
             are
             endangered
             .
          
           
             3.
             
             The
             meanes
             therefore
             necessary
             towards
             those
             ends
             are
             to
             be
             used
             ,
             which
             are
             either
             Supplication
             ,
             Remonstrance
             &c.
             or
             making
             warre
             .
          
           
             4.
             
             The
             former
             are
             first
             to
             be
             used
             ,
             but
             if
             they
             faile
             ,
             then
             the
             latter
             .
          
        
         
           These
           are
           the
           universall
           Maximes
           ,
           whereon
           (
           by
           application
           to
           the
           present
           condition
           )
           the
           taking
           of
           the
           Covenant
           is
           enforced
           :
           The
           three
           first
           then
           being
           granted
           ,
           they
           subsume
           ,
           that
           having
           used
           the
           former
           ,
           and
           failing
           of
           successe
           ,
           we
           are
           all
           necessitated
           to
           use
           the
           latter
           ,
           
             viz.
          
           To
           swear
           to
           joyn
           with
           the
           Scots
           in
           Armes
           ,
           which
           is
           
           the
           generall
           ,
           and
           to
           those
           particulars
           after
           mentioned
           in
           the
           Articles
           .
        
         
           That
           such
           joyning
           in
           armes
           is
           the
           generall
           end
           of
           the
           Covenant
           ,
           will
           appeare
           by
           comparing
           the
           sixt
           Article
           of
           the
           Covenant
           for
           mutuall
           assistance
           and
           defence
           of
           one
           another
           ,
           with
           the
           14
           Article
           of
           the
           Instructions
           ,
           wherein
           the
           imposers
           of
           this
           Oath
           appoint
           to
           be
           read
           (
           publiquely
           at
           the
           time
           when
           the
           Covenant
           is
           read
           )
           the
           Declaration
           of
           the
           Kingdomes
           of
           
             England
          
           and
           
             Scotland
          
           joyned
           in
           Armes
           for
           the
           vindication
           ,
           &c.
           
           In
           which
           Declaration
           ,
           the
           taking
           this
           Covenant
           is
           made
           one
           of
           the
           grounds
           both
           of
           their
           confidence
           (
           as
           they
           say
           )
           that
           this
           warre
           wherein
           they
           are
           so
           deeply
           engaged
           is
           of
           God
           ,
           and
           of
           their
           resolution
           (
           which
           they
           professe
           )
           with
           courage
           and
           constancy
           unto
           the
           end
           to
           doe
           their
           part
           .
        
         
           Whosoever
           therefore
           is
           not
           perswaded
           in
           his
           conscience
           ,
           either
           that
           all
           these
           meanes
           mentioned
           ,
           and
           all
           other
           such
           like
           have
           been
           used
           ,
           and
           have
           been
           rejected
           ;
           or
           upon
           supposition
           that
           they
           had
           ,
           yet
           doubts
           of
           the
           consequence
           (
           viz.
           that
           such
           an
           Army
           may
           be
           leavied
           ,
           and
           such
           a
           warre
           managed
           )
           cannot
           without
           deadly
           sinne
           (
           though
           disengaged
           from
           oaths
           for
           any
           of
           the
           following
           particulars
           )
           upon
           the
           former
           principles
           take
           this
           Covenant
           .
           But
           not
           to
           insist
           hereon
           ,
           we
           will
           briefly
           run
           over
           the
           severall
           places
           of
           the
           Preface
           ,
           and
           consider
           the
           naturall
           intimations
           from
           them
           ;
           onely
           supposing
           for
           example
           ,
           the
           end
           of
           this
           Covenant
           to
           be
           the
           assistance
           ,
           or
           at
           least
           ,
           consent
           in
           this
           present
           joyning
           in
           armes
           ,
           applying
           it
           to
           men
           of
           the
           Church
           of
           
             England
             .
          
        
         
           
             I
             ,
          
           A.
           B.
           
             living
             under
             the
             King
             .
          
           ]
           This
           cannot
           reasonably
           be
           a
           motive
           
           to
           warre
           ,
           but
           obedience
           to
           him
           ;
           nor
           a
           motive
           to
           enter
           into
           a
           publique
           League
           ,
           Oath
           and
           Covenant
           not
           prescribed
           by
           Law
           ,
           without
           him
           ,
           much
           lesse
           against
           his
           expresse
           Proclamation
           ;
           forasmuch
           as
           an
           Oath
           for
           confirmation
           (
           either
           assertory
           or
           promissory
           )
           is
           to
           men
           for
           
             an
             end
             of
             all
             strife
             :
          
           And
           a
           publique
           Oath
           propounded
           to
           a
           Nation
           or
           Nations
           ,
           is
           for
           the
           ending
           of
           publique
           strife
           and
           divisions
           :
           and
           of
           any
           publique
           strife
           of
           a
           Nation
           or
           Nations
           ,
           under
           one
           King
           (
           properly
           so
           called
           )
           
             the
             King
             is
             the
             supreame
             Iudge
             in
             all
             causes
             ,
             as
             well
             Ecclesiasticall
             as
             civill
          
           (
           as
           is
           evident
           by
           the
           Law
           of
           God
           ,
           1
           
             Pet.
          
           2.
           
           And
           to
           us
           moreover
           by
           the
           Law
           of
           the
           Land
           ,
           24
           
             H.
          
           8.
           c.
           12.
           by
           the
           doctrine
           of
           the
           Church
           of
           
             England
          
           Art.
           37.
           the
           book
           of
           Homilies
           ,
           and
           establish●d
           Oaths
           of
           Allegiance
           and
           Supremacy
           .
           )
           And
           therefore
           such
           an
           Oath
           and
           Covenant
           may
           not
           be
           entered
           into
           without
           and
           against
           the
           allowance
           of
           the
           King
           ,
           who
           is
           the
           supream
           Judge
           even
           in
           the
           supream
           Judicatory
           it selfe
           .
        
         
         
           
           
             Being
             of
             the
             Reformed
             Religion
          
           ]
           established
           in
           the
           Church
           of
           
             England
             ,
          
           the
           very
           marke
           and
           Character
           of
           which
           ,
           as
           differenced
           from
           Popery
           and
           other
           Sects
           ,
           hath
           been
           chiefly
           ,
           that
           it
           hath
           alwaies
           maintained
           ,
           That
           it
           is
           not
           lawfull
           in
           any
           case
           (
           not
           in
           the
           danger
           of
           their
           Religion
           )
           for
           subjects
           to
           take
           up
           Armes
           against
           their
           lawfull
           Soveraign
           .
        
         
           
           
             Having
             before
             my
             eyes
             the
             glory
             of
             God
             ,
             and
             the
             advancement
             of
             the
             kingdome
             of
             Iesus
             Christ
             .
          
           ]
           Here
           the
           consideration
           of
           the
           mind
           requisite
           towards
           the
           judgement
           of
           conscience
           will
           be
           this
           ;
           whether
           by
           this
           warre
           ,
           considered
           with
           its
           circumstances
           ,
           
             the
             glory
             of
             God
             ,
          
           &c.
           is
           more
           apt
           to
           be
           advanced
           then
           by
           peace
           :
           wherein
           ,
           although
           reason
           might
           easily
           conclude
           ,
           yet
           it
           will
           be
           much
           more
           certainly
           guided
           ,
           if
           we
           shal
           examine
           those
           precepts
           which
           Christ
           and
           his
           Apostles
           have
           laid
           down
           ,
           towards
           the
           accomplishment
           of
           those
           ends
           here
           proposed
           ,
           and
           try
           whether
           they
           doe
           suggest
           or
           intimate
           any
           thing
           towards
           such
           a
           warre
           ;
           If
           they
           doe
           not
           (
           or
           if
           the
           contrary
           )
           the
           conscience
           
             having
             before
             its
             eyes
             the
             glory
             of
             God
             ,
          
           &c.
           will
           not
           be
           induced
           to
           take
           this
           course
           for
           the
           advancement
           of
           it
           .
           For
           the
           rectification
           of
           conscience
           in
           this
           case
           ,
           it
           will
           be
           requisite
           to
           consider
           this
           warre
           to
           which
           we
           are
           enjoyned
           to
           contribute
           ,
           by
           whom
           and
           against
           whom
           it
           is
           undertaken
           :
           Where
           ,
           if
           the
           conscience
           finde
           it
           to
           be
           unlawfull
           in
           the
           undertaking
           ,
           it
           cannot
           lawfully
           consent
           or
           assist
           ,
           
             viz.
          
           If
           it
           be
           no
           waies
           lawfull
           for
           such
           as
           we
           are
           moved
           to
           joyne
           with
           ,
           to
           take
           up
           Armes
           against
           such
           as
           we
           should
           be
           sworne
           to
           oppose
           ;
           If
           it
           might
           possibly
           be
           lawfull
           in
           the
           first
           undertaking
           ,
           it
           could
           no
           otherwise
           be
           but
           as
           it
           should
           be
           a
           necessary
           meanes
           to
           procure
           a
           just
           peace
           ;
           and
           the
           determination
           of
           conscience
           in
           this
           case
           will
           depend
           upon
           the
           consideration
           of
           the
           conjunctures
           of
           things
           at
           the
           undertaking
           ,
           and
           all
           the
           time
           of
           the
           continuance
           of
           this
           warre
           :
           and
           if
           peace
           with
           truth
           might
           have
           been
           ,
           or
           may
           be
           established
           without
           it
           ,
           (
           much
           more
           if
           this
           means
           shall
           be
           found
           opposite
           )
           the
           conscience
           cannot
           without
           sin
           assent
           to
           this
           warre
           :
           Here
           the
           mind
           is
           to
           examine
           the
           severall
           propositions
           ,
           motions
           ,
           overtures
           ,
           &c.
           which
           have
           been
           and
           are
           made
           by
           both
           parties
           ,
           and
           according
           to
           them
           to
           judge
           .
        
         
           
           
             The
             happinesse
             and
             honour
             of
             the
             King
             and
             his
             Posterity
             .
          
           ]
           Here
           we
           are
           to
           consider
           ,
           whether
           ,
           or
           what
           this
           action
           of
           ours
           will
           contribute
           towards
           the
           honour
           and
           happinesse
           of
           the
           King
           and
           his
           posterity
           .
           And
           because
           it
           is
           not
           easie
           to
           discover
           any
           foundation
           of
           such
           
             honour
             and
             happinesse
          
           &c.
           besides
           ,
           that
           the
           managers
           of
           this
           party
           with
           whom
           
           they
           would
           have
           us
           to
           joyne
           ,
           have
           never
           particularly
           declared
           the
           way
           how
           these
           ends
           shall
           be
           or
           are
           advanced
           by
           their
           warre
           (
           although
           it
           is
           one
           of
           their
           most
           common
           expressions
           :
           )
           the
           safest
           way
           (
           at
           least
           the
           most
           naturall
           )
           for
           the
           conscience
           is
           to
           raise
           a
           judgement
           of
           what
           is
           likely
           to
           ensue
           upon
           what
           hath
           preceded
           (
           since
           these
           undertakings
           )
           upon
           the
           same
           Principles
           :
           where
           it
           is
           to
           consider
           ,
           whether
           his
           Honour
           or
           Contumely
           have
           beene
           increased
           by
           and
           since
           these
           warres
           .
           And
           so
           for
           the
           happinesse
           of
           Himselfe
           and
           his
           Posterity
           ,
           consider
           whether
           if
           these
           men
           be
           upon
           the
           same
           designe
           with
           those
           who
           gave
           him
           battell
           at
           
             Edge-Hill
             ,
             Newbery
             &c.
          
           what
           those
           designes
           made
           towards
           the
           happinesse
           of
           him
           ,
           and
           his
           Posterity
           .
        
         
           
             The
             true
             publike
             Liberty
             ,
             Safety
             ,
             and
             Peace
             of
             the
             Kingdome
          
           ]
           If
           
           the
           Scots
           (
           to
           whose
           assistance
           especially
           we
           are
           to
           be
           sworn
           )
           should
           not
           hereby
           be
           able
           to
           conquer
           and
           prevail
           ,
           what
           will
           our
           taking
           of
           the
           Covenant
           advance
           the
           publike
           Liberty
           and
           Peace
           of
           the
           Kingdom
           ,
           according
           to
           the
           conceit
           of
           the
           enjoyners
           of
           the
           Covenant
           ?
           If
           they
           should
           ,
           consider
           how
           that
           can
           conduce
           to
           our
           
             Liberty
             ,
          
           unlesse
           thereby
           be
           meant
           freedom
           from
           our
           ancient
           Laws
           ,
           and
           from
           the
           setled
           happy
           government
           of
           Church
           and
           State
           ,
           whilst
           we
           may
           fear
           to
           be
           put
           under
           uncertain
           new
           ones
           ?
           Secondly
           ,
           
             Safety
             ,
          
           whether
           the
           danger
           of
           ruine
           doe
           not
           outweigh
           or
           equalize
           the
           hopes
           of
           safety
           .
           Thirdly
           ,
           
             Peace
             ,
          
           whether
           this
           be
           the
           onely
           ,
           the
           likeliest
           ,
           or
           indeed
           any
           probable
           meanes
           of
           procuring
           
             Peace
             ?
          
           Seeing
           there
           are
           but
           two
           wayes
           obvious
           by
           which
           this
           course
           should
           procure
           it
           ,
           
             viz.
          
           Victory
           ,
           or
           reducing
           the
           King
           to
           yeeld
           to
           their
           desires
           .
           Here
           the
           judgement
           of
           conscience
           will
           be
           grounded
           upon
           this
           ,
           Whether
           the
           King
           be
           no
           way
           but
           by
           force
           inclinable
           to
           a
           just
           
             Peace
             ?
          
        
         
           
             Wherein
             every
             ones
             private
             ,
             &c.
          
           ]
           This
           is
           subordinate
           to
           the
           former
           
           immediately
           preceding
           .
        
         
           
             Calling
             to
             minde
             the
             practices
             of
             the
             enemies
             of
             God
             against
             the
             true
             
             Religion
             ,
             &c.
          
           ]
           Here
           we
           are
           to
           consider
           and
           reckon
           up
           ,
           who
           and
           of
           what
           sorts
           are
           the
           enemies
           of
           the
           Church
           of
           
             England
             ,
          
           of
           which
           we
           are
           ,
           and
           which
           is
           established
           by
           Law
           ,
           to
           which
           we
           have
           subscribed
           ,
           and
           what
           party
           in
           this
           quarrell
           is
           openly
           professed
           for
           it
           ,
           hath
           equally
           declared
           against
           all
           sorts
           of
           its
           enemies
           ,
           and
           which
           is
           not
           ;
           and
           accordingly
           ,
           &c.
           
        
         
           
             Whereof
             the
             deploreable
             estate
             of
             Ireland
             ,
             &c.
          
           ]
           Consider
           whether
           
           the
           true
           cause
           of
           this
           is
           to
           be
           referred
           (
           both
           in
           the
           rise
           and
           progresse
          
           
           
           
           of
           it
           )
           to
           the
           King
           ,
           or
           the
           malice
           of
           the
           Papists
           stirred
           up
           by
           those
           who
           (
           they
           say
           )
           had
           declared
           an
           intention
           of
           their
           utter
           extirpation
           ?
           and
           secondly
           ,
           where
           afterward
           the
           impediment
           of
           succour
           to
           those
           of
           our
           Religion
           lay
           ?
        
         
           
           
             The
             distressed
             estate
             of
             England
          
           ]
           whether
           that
           profession
           which
           is
           established
           by
           Law
           ,
           be
           distressed
           by
           the
           King
           or
           by
           Sectaries
           ?
        
         
           
           
             The
             dangerous
             estate
             of
             Scotland
          
           ]
           Wherein
           was
           their
           danger
           after
           all
           things
           were
           setled
           with
           them
           and
           who
           brought
           them
           into
           that
           danger
           ?
           that
           party
           which
           we
           should
           swear
           against
           ,
           or
           themselves
           ?
        
         
           
           
             After
             other
             meanes
             of
             Supplication
             ,
             Remonstrance
             ,
             Protestation
             ,
             and
             Suffering
          
           ]
           This
           which
           is
           here
           di●joyned
           from
           the
           rest
           of
           the
           motives
           ,
           and
           cast
           into
           a
           Parenthesis
           ,
           is
           indeed
           made
           the
           onely
           foundation
           of
           this
           way
           of
           proceeding
           ,
           and
           puts
           the
           onely
           case
           wherein
           such
           a
           way
           of
           covenanting
           ,
           &c.
           can
           be
           imagined
           to
           be
           lawfull
           :
           So
           that
           if
           these
           meanes
           have
           not
           beene
           both
           before
           ,
           and
           ever
           since
           the
           undertaking
           of
           this
           designe
           sincerely
           and
           effectually
           endeavoured
           (
           by
           the
           intimation
           of
           this
           introduction
           it selfe
           )
           this
           course
           is
           not
           warrantable
           ;
           and
           there
           are
           other
           principles
           of
           Scripture
           and
           our
           Religion
           which
           are
           to
           be
           examined
           if
           they
           have
           beene
           used
           such
           as
           inferre
           ,
           That
           it
           is
           not
           lawfull
           in
           any
           case
           whatsoever
           to
           resist
           with
           Arms
           the
           lawfull
           power
           by
           God
           set
           over
           us
           .
           Now
           whether
           these
           means
           have
           been
           and
           are
           to
           used
           ,
           it
           will
           best
           appear
           by
           considering
           who
           hath
           sent
           the
           Messages
           for
           Treaty
           towards
           
             Peace
             ,
          
           what
           hath
           been
           declared
           by
           both
           parties
           of
           certainty
           ,
           and
           particularly
           touching
           Religion
           ,
           Law
           ,
           and
           Proviso's
           for
           tender
           Consciences
           ;
           and
           comparing
           together
           the
           severall
           Remonstrances
           ,
           Protestations
           ,
           and
           Sufferings
           .
           Though
           all
           hitherto
           had
           beene
           used
           and
           rejected
           ,
           consider
           if
           the
           overture
           now
           lately
           made
           by
           the
           Kings
           party
           ,
           might
           not
           (
           by
           the
           mercy
           of
           God
           )
           be
           a
           meanes
           to
           produce
           Peace
           &c.
           if
           the
           businesse
           be
           managed
           as
           it
           ought
           .
           And
           according
           to
           the
           results
           of
           these
           the
           conscience
           must
           conclude
           .
        
         
           
           
             For
             the
             preservation
             of
             our selves
             and
             our
             Religion
          
           ]
           The
           Religion
           wherein
           we
           are
           grounded
           and
           to
           which
           the
           Clergy
           hath
           subscribed
           ,
           in
           the
           Religion
           of
           the
           Church
           of
           
             England
          
           comprised
           in
           the
           Liturgy
           ,
           Articles
           ,
           Book
           of
           Ordination
           ,
           and
           Homilies
           of
           our
           Church
           ,
           confirmed
           by
           our
           35.
           
           Article
           :
           consider
           whether
           the
           Covenant
           be
           a
           meanes
           ordered
           in
           reason
           to
           preserve
           these
           from
           ruine
           .
        
         
           
           
             According
             to
             the
             commondable
             practice
             ,
             &c.
          
           ]
           If
           this
           Kingdome
           have
           done
           so
           ,
           that
           cannot
           resolve
           the
           conscience
           :
           But
           consider
           
           whether
           ever
           in
           the
           like
           case
           the
           like
           warre
           was
           commenced
           ;
           if
           any
           one
           had
           been
           propounded
           ,
           the
           conscience
           would
           the
           more
           easily
           have
           determined
           ;
           but
           seeing
           there
           hath
           not
           ,
           it
           must
           run
           over
           the
           Chronicles
           .
           In
           the
           meane
           time
           in
           such
           cases
           as
           are
           found
           ,
           it
           may
           anticipate
           instances
           to
           the
           contrary
           (
           as
           in
           Queen
           
             Maries
          
           dayes
           and
           those
           of
           
             Henry
          
           the
           8.
           when
           there
           was
           more
           just
           reason
           in
           respect
           of
           Religion
           ,
           if
           there
           might
           be
           any
           ,
           then
           now
           is
           alleaged
           )
           and
           other
           Arguments
           ,
           such
           as
           the
           Doctrine
           of
           the
           Church
           of
           
             England
          
           ever
           since
           the
           Reformation
           ,
           and
           the
           like
           ,
           to
           equipoize
           this
           which
           is
           asserted
           
             gratis
             ;
          
           and
           if
           after
           disquisition
           this
           be
           not
           found
           true
           ,
           the
           conclusion
           of
           the
           conscience
           will
           be
           according
           to
           those
           premisses
           .
        
         
           
             According
             to
             the
             example
             of
             Gods
             people
             ,
             &c.
          
           ]
           This
           is
           of
           the
           same
           
           nature
           with
           the
           former
           warrant
           ,
           and
           therefore
           the
           conscience
           upon
           this
           may
           proceed
           as
           upon
           that
           ,
           seeing
           they
           have
           not
           set
           downe
           which
           of
           Gods
           people
           in
           any
           age
           or
           place
           ,
           upon
           the
           like
           causes
           have
           taken
           the
           like
           course
           ;
           till
           this
           be
           represented
           to
           the
           conscience
           ,
           the
           safest
           way
           will
           be
           to
           examine
           what
           our
           Saviour
           himself
           ,
           and
           the
           Apostles
           ,
           and
           primitive
           Christians
           (
           who
           were
           assuredly
           Gods
           people
           )
           did
           hold
           and
           practice
           for
           doctrine
           and
           example
           in
           the
           like
           (
           if
           there
           have
           ever
           been
           )
           or
           a
           worse
           case
           them
           is
           proved
           or
           pretended
           .
           And
           if
           they
           have
           not
           resisted
           (
           or
           held
           it
           lawfull
           )
           their
           Princes
           in
           the
           greatest
           persecutions
           and
           utmost
           danger
           of
           Religion
           ,
           and
           all
           that
           could
           be
           dear
           unto
           them
           ,
           it
           may
           raise
           a
           conclusion
           ,
           (
           till
           some
           stronger
           reasons
           can
           be
           presented
           ,
           or
           the
           errour
           of
           these
           be
           cleared
           and
           taken
           off
           )
           what
           is
           to
           be
           done
           when
           we
           are
           required
           to
           assist
           a
           warlike
           entrance
           of
           Subjects
           (
           with
           all
           the
           other
           circumstances
           which
           attend
           this
           action
           of
           the
           Scots
           )
           made
           onely
           upon
           a
           beleeved
           charity
           of
           helping
           their
           neighbours
           .
        
         
           The
           summe
           of
           all
           is
           ,
           That
           if
           all
           and
           every
           of
           the
           materials
           of
           this
           Preface
           (
           in
           as
           much
           as
           concernes
           the
           Premisses
           )
           were
           true
           ,
           our
           consciences
           cannot
           assent
           to
           the
           consequence
           ,
           that
           it
           is
           lawfull
           for
           us
           as
           Subjects
           of
           the
           Church
           
             England
          
           (
           though
           we
           had
           not
           sworn
           or
           subscribed
           to
           some
           particulars
           ,
           against
           which
           some
           of
           the
           Articles
           are
           contrived
           )
           to
           assist
           the
           Scots
           ,
           or
           consent
           to
           them
           in
           this
           warre
           ,
           which
           assistance
           is
           the
           generall
           end
           of
           this
           Covenant
           .
        
         
           Secondly
           ,
           there
           is
           not
           any
           one
           member
           which
           doth
           conclude
           any
           thing
           to
           our
           consciences
           to
           move
           us
           to
           take
           it
           ,
           neither
           in
           the
           complication
           doe
           they
           conclude
           .
        
         
           Thirdly
           ,
           there
           is
           not
           any
           particular
           member
           of
           it
           which
           doth
           not
           
           either
           directly
           ,
           or
           by
           considerations
           naturally
           suggested
           by
           them
           and
           altogether
           unforced
           ,
           prevaile
           with
           us
           to
           the
           contrary
           .
           So
           that
           till
           every
           one
           of
           these
           obstacles
           and
           scruples
           be
           taken
           off
           ,
           we
           cannot
           without
           violence
           to
           our
           consciences
           take
           this
           Oath
           :
        
         
           That
           we
           shall
           sincerely
           ,
           really
           ,
           and
           constantly
           ,
           through
           the
           grace
           of
           God
           ,
           
           endeavour
           in
           our
           severall
           places
           and
           callings
           ,
           the
           preservation
           of
           the
           Reformed
           Religion
           in
           the
           Church
           of
           
             Scotland
             ,
          
           in
           Doctrine
           ,
           Worship
           ,
           Discipline
           and
           Government
           ,
           against
           our
           common
           Enemies
           ;
           the
           Reformation
           of
           Religion
           in
           the
           Kingdoms
           of
           
             England
          
           and
           
             Ireland
             ,
          
           in
           Doctrine
           ,
           Worship
           ,
           Discipline
           and
           Government
           ;
           according
           to
           the
           Word
           of
           God
           ,
           and
           the
           Example
           of
           the
           best
           Reformed
           Churches
           :
           And
           shall
           endeavour
           to
           bring
           the
           Churches
           of
           God
           in
           the
           three
           Kingdoms
           ,
           to
           the
           neerest
           conjunction
           and
           uniformity
           in
           Religion
           ,
           Confession
           of
           Faith
           ,
           Form
           of
           Church
           Government
           ,
           Directory
           for
           Worship
           and
           Catechizing
           ;
           That
           we
           and
           our
           posterity
           after
           us
           may
           as
           brethren
           live
           in
           Faith
           and
           Love
           ,
           and
           the
           Lord
           may
           delight
           to
           dwell
           in
           the
           midst
           of
           us
           .
        
         
           In
           the
           first
           Article
           are
           we
           to
           be
           sworne
           
             to
             endeavour
             the
             preservation
             of
             the
             Doctrine
             ,
             Worship
             ,
             and
             Discipline
             of
             the
             Church
             of
             Scotland
          
           absolutely
           ,
           or
           with
           this
           added
           as
           a
           restriction
           ,
           
             against
             our
             common
             Enemies
             ?
          
           By
           whom
           doe
           we
           not
           rightly
           conceive
           to
           be
           meant
           the
           common
           Enemies
           to
           the
           Churches
           of
           
             England
             ,
             Scotland
             ,
          
           and
           
             Ireland
             ?
          
           That
           those
           words
           ,
           [
           
             against
             our
             common
             enemies
          
           ]
           are
           to
           be
           taken
           restrictively
           it
           may
           be
           thought
           ,
           because
           they
           otherwise
           should
           have
           been
           vainly
           added
           ;
           and
           that
           by
           
             common
             Enemies
          
           those
           are
           meant
           ,
           the
           necessity
           of
           the
           Grammaticall
           sense
           implies
           ;
           there
           having
           preceded
           no
           other
           division
           ,
           to
           which
           this
           community
           can
           referre
           ,
           besides
           that
           of
           
             England
             ,
             Scotland
          
           and
           
             Ireland
             ,
          
           in
           the
           Preface
           .
           So
           that
           the
           word
           
             Our
          
           must
           referre
           to
           
             We
          
           in
           the
           beginning
           of
           the
           Preface
           ,
           whose
           onely
           distribution
           which
           can
           referre
           to
           
             common
          
           here
           ,
           is
           that
           of
           the
           Kingdoms
           of
           
             England
             ,
             Scotland
          
           and
           
             Ireland
             .
          
           Is
           not
           therefore
           the
           true
           sense
           of
           this
           part
           of
           the
           Article
           this
           ,
           
             viz.
          
           I
           will
           sincerely
           ,
           really
           ,
           constantly
           ,
           through
           the
           grace
           of
           God
           ,
           in
           my
           calling
           against
           those
           who
           are
           enemies
           (
           for
           example
           )
           both
           to
           the
           Articles
           of
           the
           Church
           of
           
             England
             ,
          
           and
           those
           of
           
             Scotland
             ,
          
           both
           to
           our
           Liturgy
           and
           their
           directory
           for
           worship
           ,
           both
           to
           our
           Church-Government
           and
           to
           Presbyteriall
           Government
           ,
           endeavour
           to
           preserve
           their
           Articles
           ,
           manner
           of
           worship
           and
           Presbytery
           ?
           If
           thus
           it
           be
           ,
           these
           things
           are
           to
           be
           considered
           ;
           If
           the
           imposers
           of
           this
           Oath
           are
           assured
           in
           
           their
           Conscience
           ,
           that
           the
           
             Doctrine
             ,
             Worship
             &c.
          
           of
           the
           
             Church
             of
             Scotland
             ,
          
           can
           infallibly
           be
           proved
           out
           of
           the
           Word
           of
           God
           ,
           why
           would
           they
           have
           us
           sweare
           to
           endeavour
           (
           in
           our
           calling
           of
           the
           Ministery
           )
           to
           preserve
           it
           with
           a
           restriction
           against
           some
           men
           onely
           ,
           and
           not
           absolutely
           and
           indefinitely
           ?
           Whether
           is
           this
           so
           free
           from
           the
           scandall
           of
           respect
           of
           Persons
           ,
           as
           an
           oath
           for
           the
           impartiall
           defence
           of
           Truth
           doth
           require
           ?
           If
           they
           doubt
           it
           cannot
           be
           infallibly
           proved
           ,
           how
           can
           our
           Brethren
           of
           
             Scotland
             ,
          
           without
           spirituall
           Tyranny
           ,
           desire
           an
           Oath
           to
           be
           imposed
           upon
           us
           Ministers
           of
           the
           Gospell
           of
           another
           Church
           ,
           
             to
             endeavour
             sincerely
             ,
             really
             &c.
             in
             our
             calling
          
           (
           viz.
           by
           preaching
           ,
           disputing
           ,
           or
           otherwise
           )
           the
           preservation
           of
           it
           thus
           far
           ?
        
         
           Secondly
           ,
           how
           can
           we
           take
           an
           Oath
           to
           endeavour
           the
           preservation
           of
           that
           Doctrine
           which
           we
           neither
           know
           what
           it
           is
           (
           as
           it
           now
           stands
           )
           nor
           are
           told
           in
           any
           Declaration
           or
           Exhortation
           to
           us
           ?
           nor
           were
           bound
           to
           know
           or
           search
           (
           no
           opportunity
           offering
           it self
           ?
           )
           How
           then
           can
           this
           Oath
           be
           by
           us
           taken
           in
           judgement
           ?
           Or
           since
           we
           doubt
           thus
           ,
           though
           in
           generall
           ,
           how
           can
           it
           (
           not
           being
           of
           Faith
           )
           be
           other
           then
           Sinne
           ?
           Whether
           are
           we
           not
           ,
           if
           any
           thing
           shall
           be
           by
           us
           hereafter
           found
           in
           the
           Doctrine
           of
           
             Scotland
          
           contrary
           to
           sound
           Doctrine
           ,
           bound
           to
           endeavour
           by
           the
           second
           Article
           to
           extirpate
           it
           ,
           and
           by
           the
           first
           to
           preserve
           it
           ?
           As
           for
           their
           Discipline
           and
           Government
           ,
           so
           much
           as
           we
           understand
           of
           it
           (
           though
           otherwise
           we
           never
           interposed
           ,
           yet
           being
           now
           called
           to
           give
           our
           consent
           to
           it
           ,
           or
           reason
           to
           the
           contrary
           )
           we
           professe
           it
           to
           be
           such
           as
           that
           we
           dare
           not
           binde
           our selves
           by
           Oath
           to
           endeavour
           its
           preservation
           constantly
           and
           indefinitely
           ,
           for
           all
           time
           to
           come
           ,
           till
           it
           be
           evidenced
           unto
           us
           that
           it
           hath
           been
           in
           any
           time
           before
           untill
           this
           our
           last
           age
           .
           If
           it
           shall
           here
           be
           replyed
           ,
           that
           we
           are
           required
           
             to
             endeavour
             the
             preservation
             of
             their
             Doctrine
             ,
             Worship
             ,
             Discipline
             and
             Government
             ,
          
           onely
           
             against
             our
             common
             enemies
             ,
          
           that
           is
           ,
           of
           us
           of
           the
           Churches
           of
           
             England
             ,
             Scotland
             ,
          
           and
           
             Ireland
             ,
          
           and
           so
           the
           preservation
           of
           it
           onely
           so
           farre
           as
           we
           all
           agree
           ;
           this
           we
           cannot
           conceive
           to
           be
           the
           adequate
           sense
           of
           those
           words
           ,
           especially
           according
           to
           the
           intention
           of
           the
           imposers
           .
           For
           it
           is
           clear
           (
           as
           we
           have
           already
           touched
           )
           that
           our
           common
           Enemies
           are
           not
           onely
           they
           who
           are
           adversaries
           to
           us
           in
           that
           wherein
           we
           all
           three
           doe
           agree
           ,
           but
           those
           also
           who
           in
           such
           things
           wherein
           we
           differ
           amongst
           our selves
           ,
           are
           yet
           by
           opposing
           themselves
           to
           us
           all
           ,
           our
           common
           Enemies
           ;
           against
           whom
           therefore
           by
           this
           Oath
           we
           should
           be
           bound
           to
           preserve
           to
           each
           that
           also
           wherein
           we
           differ
           amongst
           our selves
           .
           Moreover
           ,
           
           that
           that
           Sense
           is
           neither
           the
           onely
           ,
           nor
           the
           chief
           Sense
           intended
           by
           the
           Imposers
           ,
           we
           have
           cause
           to
           think
           :
           because
           if
           so
           restrained
           ,
           our
           Brethren
           of
           
             Scotland
          
           (
           in
           favour
           of
           whom
           we
           conceive
           this
           part
           of
           the
           Article
           to
           have
           been
           proposed
           )
           would
           be
           no
           whit
           secured
           against
           the
           fears
           of
           innovations
           from
           
             England
             ,
          
           if
           we
           were
           onely
           sworn
           to
           preserve
           unto
           them
           those
           things
           wherein
           we
           all
           agree
           at
           the
           entring
           this
           present
           League
           and
           Covenant
           .
        
         
           Thirdly
           ,
           we
           desire
           to
           know
           why
           our
           Brethren
           of
           
             Scotland
          
           should
           desire
           it
           to
           be
           imposed
           upon
           us
           by
           Oath
           to
           maintain
           the
           Articles
           of
           their
           Religion
           ,
           so
           far
           forth
           as
           hath
           been
           said
           ,
           since
           our
           Mother
           the
           Church
           of
           
             England
          
           never
           yet
           hath
           imposed
           upon
           us
           by
           Oath
           to
           preserve
           her
           own
           known
           Articles
           ,
           but
           hath
           testified
           her
           moderation
           to
           all
           ,
           in
           that
           she
           hath
           required
           subscription
           onely
           of
           all
           men
           which
           were
           admitted
           into
           holy
           Orders
           ,
           or
           Ecclesiasticall
           Benefice
           ,
           or
           to
           degrees
           in
           the
           University
           ?
           And
           yet
           this
           was
           lately
           judged
           ,
           since
           the
           sitting
           of
           this
           Parliament
           ,
           to
           be
           too
           harsh
           an
           imposition
           upon
           younger
           Students
           at
           their
           admission
           to
           degrees
           ,
           and
           the
           urging
           of
           it
           suspended
           .
           And
           we
           know
           not
           whether
           ever
           it
           was
           in
           use
           before
           this
           age
           ,
           even
           in
           any
           not
           corrupted
           Church
           ,
           to
           command
           men
           to
           swear
           the
           maintaining
           the
           Articles
           of
           their
           Religion
           ,
           much
           lesse
           their
           Discipline
           and
           Church
           government
           .
        
         
           As
           to
           the
           second
           thing
           in
           this
           first
           Article
           to
           which
           we
           are
           to
           swear
           ,
           How
           can
           any
           who
           are
           perswaded
           that
           there
           is
           nothing
           in
           the
           Doctrine
           of
           the
           Church
           of
           
             England
             ,
          
           which
           is
           not
           consonant
           to
           the
           Word
           of
           God
           ,
           without
           vanity
           swear
           to
           endeavour
           the
           Reformation
           of
           it
           according
           to
           the
           VVord
           of
           God
           ?
           especially
           since
           we
           have
           lately
           protested
           to
           defend
           that
           
             Doctrine
             of
             the
             Church
             of
             England
             ?
          
           And
           how
           can
           any
           who
           reverently
           beleeve
           this
           Church
           to
           be
           in
           respect
           of
           her
           Doctrine
           ,
           Worship
           ,
           Discipline
           ,
           and
           Government
           established
           by
           Law
           ,
           no
           lesse
           perfect
           then
           any
           of
           the
           Reformed
           Churches
           ,
           swear
           to
           endeavour
           its
           reformation
           in
           all
           those
           ,
           according
           to
           the
           example
           of
           the
           best
           reformed
           Churches
           ?
           And
           here
           by
           the
           way
           we
           cannot
           but
           take
           notice
           that
           this
           part
           of
           the
           Article
           is
           so
           framed
           ,
           as
           if
           there
           were
           nothing
           in
           the
           
             Doctrine
             &c.
             of
             the
             Churches
             of
             England
             and
             Ireland
          
           to
           be
           preserved
           ,
           and
           nothing
           in
           theirs
           of
           
             Scotland
          
           to
           be
           reformed
           .
        
         
           Moreover
           ,
           the
           best
           direction
           for
           Conscience
           in
           examining
           what
           is
           here
           meant
           by
           Reformation
           ,
           will
           be
           to
           consider
           those
           instances
           wherein
           in
           the
           following
           Articles
           is
           declared
           the
           Reformation
           ,
           and
           then
           if
           perswaded
           that
           there
           is
           any
           thing
           there
           exprest
           (
           as
           instances
           
           of
           reformation
           )
           which
           is
           not
           according
           to
           (
           much
           more
           if
           against
           )
           the
           Word
           of
           God
           ,
           how
           can
           we
           take
           this
           part
           of
           the
           Oath
           ,
           at
           least
           in
           the
           sense
           of
           the
           Imposers
           ?
        
         
           As
           touching
           the
           third
           thing
           ,
           
             an
             endeavour
             of
             Uniformity
             &c.
          
           the
           considerations
           for
           direction
           of
           conscience
           will
           be
           the
           same
           with
           the
           second
           :
           For
           we
           are
           required
           to
           swear
           
             to
             endeavour
             an
             uniformity
             ,
          
           and
           that
           in
           the
           reformation
           before
           mentioned
           ,
           and
           after
           that
           reformation
           ;
           so
           that
           in
           whatsoever
           sense
           or
           kind
           the
           reformation
           by
           them
           mentioned
           ,
           and
           after
           described
           ,
           is
           not
           to
           be
           undertaken
           ,
           in
           the
           same
           our
           endeavour
           for
           uniformity
           is
           not
           lawfull
           .
        
         
           Lastly
           ,
           in
           the
           taking
           of
           this
           first
           Article
           ,
           we
           should
           (
           as
           we
           conceive
           )
           make
           our selves
           guilty
           either
           of
           rash
           swearing
           ,
           or
           of
           perjury
           ;
           and
           that
           from
           the
           necessary
           consequence
           of
           the
           complication
           of
           these
           two
           clauses
           ,
           wherein
           first
           we
           should
           swear
           to
           preserve
           
             the
             reformed
             Religion
             in
             the
             Church
             of
             Scotland
             ,
             in
             Doctrine
             ,
             Worship
             ,
             Discipline
             ,
             and
             Government
             against
             our
             common
             enemies
             .
          
           And
           secondly
           ,
           
             to
             bring
             the
             Churches
             of
             the
             three
             Kingdoms
             ,
             to
             the
             neerest
             conjunction
             and
             uniformity
          
           in
           those
           particulars
           among
           ourselves
           :
           If
           we
           endeavour
           in
           our
           callings
           (
           but
           by
           prayer
           )
           to
           alter
           any
           thing
           in
           the
           Church
           of
           
             Scotland
             ,
          
           wherein
           our
           enemies
           are
           theirs
           also
           (
           though
           therein
           we
           differ
           amongst
           our selves
           )
           we
           commit
           perjury
           ,
           because
           we
           swear
           to
           preserve
           it
           .
           To
           effect
           therefore
           the
           neerest
           uniformity
           in
           those
           particulars
           in
           the
           three
           Kingdoms
           ,
           we
           are
           sworn
           to
           endeavour
           to
           bring
           the
           other
           two
           Kingdoms
           to
           the
           neerest
           conformity
           to
           the
           Church
           of
           
             Scotland
             .
          
           Now
           how
           can
           we
           swear
           to
           regulate
           by
           a
           rule
           ,
           and
           to
           reform
           by
           a
           form
           ,
           which
           we
           fully
           know
           not
           ,
           (
           and
           much
           lesse
           know
           to
           be
           a
           fit
           rule
           or
           form
           )
           without
           rash
           swearing
           ?
           sure
           we
           are
           ,
           we
           cannot
           swear
           it
           in
           judgement
           ,
           and
           for
           ought
           we
           know
           ,
           not
           in
           righteousnesse
           .
        
         
           That
           we
           shall
           in
           like
           manner
           ,
           without
           respect
           of
           persons
           ,
           
           endeavour
           the
           extirpation
           of
           Popery
           ,
           Prelacy
           ,
           (
           that
           is
           ,
           Church-government
           by
           Archbishops
           ,
           Bishops
           ,
           their
           Chancellours
           and
           Commissaries
           ,
           Deans
           ,
           Deans
           and
           Chapters
           ,
           Arch-deacons
           ,
           and
           all
           other
           Ecclesiasticall
           Officers
           depending
           on
           that
           Hierarchy
           )
           Superstition
           ,
           Heresie
           ,
           Schisme
           ,
           Prophanenesse
           ,
           and
           whatsoever
           shall
           be
           found
           to
           be
           contrary
           to
           sound
           Doctrine
           ,
           and
           the
           power
           of
           Godlinesse
           ;
           lest
           we
           partake
           in
           other
           men
           sins
           ,
           and
           thereby
           be
           in
           danger
           to
           receive
           of
           their
           plagues
           ,
           and
           that
           the
           Lord
           may
           be
           one
           ,
           and
           his
           Name
           one
           in
           the
           three
           Kingdoms
           .
        
         
           How
           can
           we
           swear
           to
           this
           part
           of
           the
           Covenant
           ,
           who
           doe
           believe
           
           that
           to
           endeavour
           the
           extirpation
           of
           Church-government
           by
           Bishops
           is
           an
           act
           utterly
           unlawfull
           for
           all
           severall
           places
           and
           callings
           (
           and
           especially
           ours
           )
           by
           the
           Law
           of
           God
           and
           this
           Land
           ,
           and
           to
           swear
           it
           much
           more
           sinfull
           .
           And
           are
           we
           not
           here
           bidden
           to
           covenant
           and
           swear
           to
           
             endeavour
             the
             extirpation
             of
             Church-government
             by
             Bishops
             ?
          
           To
           us
           either
           the
           words
           are
           ambiguous
           ,
           (
           and
           to
           ambiguities
           we
           may
           not
           swear
           )
           or
           rather
           (
           for
           we
           are
           loath
           to
           charge
           the
           words
           with
           ambiguitie
           )
           the
           Grammatical
           sense
           (
           according
           to
           which
           the
           Oath
           is
           to
           be
           taken
           )
           speaks
           so
           :
           for
           as
           to
           what
           we
           hear
           by
           some
           said
           ,
           that
           onely
           our
           Church-government
           
             in
             aggregato
             ,
          
           by
           all
           those
           Governours
           together
           in
           a
           collective
           sense
           taken
           formally
           ,
           is
           to
           be
           endeavoured
           to
           be
           extirpated
           ,
           and
           not
           each
           there
           mentioned
           :
           first
           ,
           Such
           interpretation
           given
           out
           is
           private
           onely
           ,
           and
           not
           by
           the
           authority
           of
           the
           imposers
           ;
           and
           secondly
           ,
           those
           words
           [
           
             and
             all
             other
             ,
             &c.
          
           ]
           do
           manifest
           that
           all
           the
           formerly
           mentioned
           particulars
           (
           in
           the
           parenthesis
           )
           are
           to
           be
           construed
           distributively
           ,
           so
           farre
           forth
           as
           to
           the
           extirpation
           of
           them
           .
           To
           omit
           that
           the
           word
           
             Prelacy
          
           there
           interpreted
           more
           properly
           agreeth
           to
           
             Arch-bishops
          
           and
           
             Bishops
             ,
          
           then
           to
           the
           rest
           there
           mentioned
           ,
           and
           a
           Prelacy
           they
           would
           be
           without
           them
           ,
           because
           preferred
           before
           Presbyters
           :
           and
           if
           it
           no
           more
           were
           meant
           to
           ejure
           Bishops
           then
           Presbyters
           or
           Deacons
           ,
           since
           as
           well
           Presbyters
           and
           Deacons
           make
           up
           part
           of
           our
           Church-government
           ,
           as
           it
           now
           stands
           
             in
             aggregate
             ,
          
           whether
           might
           this
           Oath
           be
           taken
           ,
           had
           they
           also
           been
           included
           ?
           Lastly
           ,
           is
           not
           their
           practise
           for
           whose
           satisfaction
           this
           Covenant
           should
           be
           taken
           
             a
          
           (
           added
           to
           the
           common
           sense
           of
           mankind
           in
           the
           like
           manner
           of
           speaking
           or
           understanding
           such
           speeches
           )
           evidence
           enough
           to
           us
           that
           we
           cannot
           take
           this
           Oath
           and
           Covenant
           ,
           unlesse
           we
           will
           swear
           to
           endeavour
           the
           extirpation
           of
           Church-government
           by
           Bishops
           .
        
         
           If
           this
           be
           so
           ,
           we
           desire
           to
           know
           ,
           first
           ,
           whether
           it
           be
           lawfull
           for
           subjects
           to
           swear
           such
           a
           Covenant
           as
           directly
           contradicts
           the
           oath
           of
           their
           Soveraigne
           at
           his
           Coronation
           ,
           as
           this
           second
           branch
           of
           the
           Covenant
           doth
           ,
           binding
           us
           to
           endeavour
           the
           extirpation
           of
           the
           government
           of
           our
           Church
           by
           Bishops
           ?
           For
           that
           our
           Soveraign
           hath
           taken
           as
           contradictory
           Oath
           is
           evidently
           manifest
           by
           the
           last
           clause
           of
           the
           oath
           which
           the
           Kings
           of
           
             England
          
           take
           at
           their
           Coronation
           :
           when
           after
           many
           other
           gracious
           promises
           wch
           the
           King
           makes
           to
           his
           people
           ,
           one
           of
           the
           Bishops
           reading
           to
           the
           King
           before
           the
           people
           concerning
           the
           Canonicall
           priviledges
           of
           the
           Church
           ,
           and
           beseeching
           him
           that
           he
           
           would
           be
           the
           Protectour
           and
           Defender
           of
           the
           Bishops
           &
           the
           Churches
           under
           their
           government
           ,
           the
           King
           answereth
           in
           these
           words
           [
           
             With
             a
             willing
             and
             devout
             heart
             I
             promise
             and
             grant
             my
             pardon
             ,
             and
             that
             I
             will
             preserve
             and
             maintain
             to
             you
             and
             the
             Churches
             committed
             to
             your
             charge
             ,
             all
             canonicall
             priviledges
             ,
             and
             due
             Law
             and
             Iustice
             ,
             and
             that
             I
             will
             be
             your
             Pretectour
             and
             Defender
             ,
             to
             my
             power
             ,
             by
             the
             assistance
             of
             God
             ,
             as
             every
             good
             King
             in
             his
             Kingdom
             in
             right
             ought
             to
             protect
             and
             defend
             the
             Bishops
             ,
             and
             Churches
             under
             their
             government
             .
          
           ]
           Then
           the
           King
           ariseth
           ,
           and
           at
           the
           Communion
           Table
           makes
           a
           solemn
           Oath
           in
           the
           presence
           of
           the
           people
           ,
           to
           observe
           the
           premisses
           ,
           and
           laying
           his
           hand
           upon
           the
           book
           saith
           [
           
             The
             things
             which
             I
             have
             before
             promised
             ,
             I
             shall
             perform
             and
             keep
             ,
             so
             help
             me
             God
             ,
             and
             the
             contents
             of
             this
             Book
             .
          
           ]
           How
           can
           this
           Oath
           then
           for
           the
           
             extirpation
             of
             Church-government
             by
             Bishops
          
           be
           consistent
           with
           the
           Oath
           or
           Honour
           of
           our
           Soveraign
           ,
           which
           we
           have
           so
           solemnly
           protested
           to
           defend
           in
           the
           late
           Protestation
           ?
           How
           can
           we
           with
           a
           solemn
           Oath
           enter
           into
           such
           a
           Covenant
           to
           which
           we
           may
           neither
           swear
           without
           our
           Soveraigns
           consent
           ,
           nor
           yet
           can
           lawfully
           desire
           nor
           have
           his
           consent
           ?
           How
           sad
           were
           our
           condition
           ,
           were
           the
           King
           willing
           of
           himselfe
           to
           violate
           this
           Oath
           ?
           But
           what
           should
           we
           have
           to
           answer
           ,
           should
           we
           by
           taking
           such
           a
           Covenant
           ,
           this
           way
           necessitate
           (
           so
           far
           as
           in
           us
           lies
           )
           His
           sacred
           Majesty
           to
           violate
           his
           Oath
           so
           solemnly
           sworn
           at
           his
           Inauguration
           ?
        
         
           Secondly
           ,
           that
           
             to
             endeavour
             the
             extirpation
             of
             Church-government
             by
             Bishops
             ,
          
           is
           a
           sin
           against
           Divine
           Law
           ,
           all
           those
           Arguments
           and
           Authorities
           convince
           ,
           which
           prove
           that
           Bishops
           are
           of
           Apostolicall
           institution
           ,
           and
           unalterable
           ,
           and
           consequently
           Divine
           ;
           which
           we
           shall
           unfold
           in
           these
           Propositions
           :
           First
           ,
           that
           their
           institution
           stands
           grounded
           upon
           our
           Saviours
           own
           Action
           and
           Institution
           of
           the
           Apostles
           .
           Secondly
           ,
           that
           Christ
           and
           his
           holy
           Spirit
           ,
           by
           his
           Apostles
           appointed
           Bishops
           .
           Thirdly
           ,
           that
           Christ
           the
           Sonne
           of
           God
           ,
           and
           the
           Holy
           Ghost
           afterward
           confirmed
           and
           approved
           Bishops
           ,
           and
           their
           Commission
           and
           power
           which
           the
           Apostles
           had
           appointed
           .
        
         
           For
           the
           first
           ,
           we
           say
           their
           institution
           is
           grounded
           upon
           our
           Lords
           own
           instituting
           and
           ordaining
           twelve
           Apostles
           ,
           above
           seventy
           Disciples
           ;
           who
           saith
           to
           these
           his
           Apostles
           ,
           
             As
             my
             Father
             hath
             sent
             me
             ,
             even
             so
             send
             I
             you
             .
          
           
             a
          
           St.
           Joh.
           20.
           21.
           
           As
           in
           other
           ends
           of
           his
           mission
           so
           how
           not
           in
           this
           ,
           which
           we
           know
           they
           did
           according
           to
           his
           pattern
           ?
           As
           he
           was
           sent
           by
           his
           Father
           therefore
           to
           ordain
           one
           order
           of
           
           Teachers
           of
           the
           Gospell
           superiour
           to
           another
           ,
           (
           which
           we
           know
           ,
           because
           he
           did
           so
           ordain
           .
           )
           So
           also
           sent
           he
           his
           Apostles
           to
           ordain
           (
           which
           accordingly
           they
           did
           ,
           and
           whatsoever
           they
           did
           by
           Christs
           example
           therein
           ,
           they
           did
           by
           his
           Commission
           here
           given
           )
           in
           an
           imparity
           ,
           Bishops
           succeeding
           the
           Apostles
           above
           Presbyters
           subordinate
           ,
           as
           the
           seventy
           
             a
          
           .
        
         
           That
           Bishops
           succeeded
           the
           Apostles
           in
           the
           ordinary
           part
           of
           their
           function
           ,
           as
           it
           is
           the
           judgement
           of
           the
           most
           ancient
           godly
           Fathers
           ,
           
             b
          
           that
           Bishops
           ,
           we
           say
           as
           contradistinct
           to
           Presbyters
           were
           the
           successours
           of
           the
           Apostles
           ;
           so
           is
           it
           manifest
           from
           Scripture
           ,
           since
           power
           Episcopall
           ,
           (
           as
           it
           is
           now
           taken
           in
           this
           dispute
           )
           which
           we
           shall
           prove
           to
           have
           been
           given
           by
           the
           Apostles
           to
           Bishops
           ,
           and
           to
           them
           onely
           after
           the
           Apostles
           ,
           was
           undeniably
           in
           the
           Apostles
           ,
           and
           for
           a
           while
           held
           in
           their
           own
           hands
           without
           communicating
           it
           to
           others
           .
           That
           the
           Bishops
           were
           afterwards
           instituted
           by
           the
           Apostles
           themselves
           ,
           which
           so
           many
           ancient
           Authous
           have
           averred
           .
           
             c
          
           And
           namely
           by
           the
           Apostolicall
           Authority
           of
           St.
           
             Paul
             ,
          
           and
           their
           institution
           ,
           part
           of
           holy
           Scripture
           is
           made
           good
           ,
           in
           that
           the
           power
           and
           Office
           of
           a
           Bishop
           (
           as
           the
           word
           is
           now
           taken
           in
           the
           Ecclesiasticall
           notion
           )
           is
           prescribed
           in
           the
           three
           Epistles
           of
           St.
           
             Paul
             ,
          
           to
           those
           two
           famous
           Church-governours
           
             Timothy
          
           and
           
             Titus
             ,
          
           particularly
           the
           Office
           and
           power
           of
           a
           Bishop
           (
           as
           it
           is
           now
           taken
           contradistinctly
           to
           the
           Office
           of
           a
           Presbyter
           )
           in
           these
           Texts
           ,
           1
           
             Tim.
          
           1.
           3.
           1
           
             Tim.
          
           5.
           19
           ,
           20
           ,
           21
           ,
           22.
           2.
           
             Tim.
          
           1.
           6.
           
           
             Tit.
          
           1.
           5
           ,
           11.
           
           
             Tit.
          
           3.
           9.
           10
           
           :
           (
           and
           some
           others
           )
           and
           these
           Texts
           thus
           interpreted
           by
           Antiquity
           
             d
          
           .
           And
           as
           the
           office
           prescribed
           there
           is
           Episcopall
           ,
           so
           these
           two
           appointed
           to
           this
           prescribed
           office
           of
           a
           Bishop
           by
           St.
           
             Paul
          
           himselfe
           ,
           1
           
             Tim.
          
           1.
           3.
           2
           
             Tim.
          
           1.
           6.
           
           
             Tit.
          
           1.
           5.
           
           
             Yea
             by
             the
             holy
             Ghost
             ,
          
           say
           
             Chrysost.
             
             Theophyl
             ,
             Oecumenius
             :
             by
             divine
             Revelation
          
           saith
           
             Theodoret
          
           of
           
             Timothy
             .
          
           And
           that
           these
           two
           were
           Bishops
           according
           to
           the
           Ecclesiasticall
           notion
           of
           the
           word
           now
           used
           ,
           ancient
           Fathers
           
           plentifully
           witnesse
           .
           
             b
          
           Moreover
           this
           superiority
           to
           office
           Episcopall
           to
           have
           been
           fixed
           and
           continued
           to
           the
           day
           of
           death
           is
           evident
           ,
           as
           from
           Church-history
           ,
           so
           also
           from
           1
           
             Tim.
          
           6.
           14.
           where
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           is
           the
           same
           with
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           in
           the
           beginning
           of
           the
           Epistle
           1
           
             Tim.
          
           1.
           18.
           and
           includes
           in
           it
           the
           whole
           charge
           given
           by
           St.
           
             Paul
          
           to
           
             Timothy
          
           in
           this
           Epistle
           .
           
             c
          
           From
           which
           Text
           also
           it
           is
           manifested
           ,
           that
           his
           Office
           prescribed
           was
           not
           personall
           onely
           ,
           but
           to
           descend
           by
           succession
           unto
           the
           comming
           of
           Christ
           
             d
          
        
         
           Thirdly
           ,
           this
           Office
           and
           power
           Episcopall
           ,
           that
           it
           was
           afterward
           approved
           and
           confirmed
           by
           the
           Sonne
           of
           God
           himselfe
           immediately
           ,
           and
           by
           the
           holy
           Ghost
           ,
           will
           be
           proved
           from
           
             Revel.
          
           c.
           1.
           
           &
           .
           2.
           
           &
           3.
           
           Where
           by
           the
           
             seven
             Stars
             ,
             the
             Angels
             of
             the
             seven
             Churches
             ,
          
           according
           to
           all
           reason
           ,
           from
           the
           Text
           it selfe
           ,
           and
           by
           the
           testimony
           of
           Antiquity
           
             e
          
           are
           seven
           Bishops
           of
           those
           seven
           Churches
           understood
           (
           which
           Ecclesiasticall
           story
           mentions
           to
           have
           been
           in
           the
           Church
           long
           before
           this
           time
           )
           as
           so
           many
           Angels
           and
           Apostles
           
             f
          
           of
           the
           Churches
           ;
           such
           as
           was
           
             Polycarp
             ,
          
           the
           
             Angell
             ,
          
           the
           Bishop
           
             of
             the
             Church
             of
             Smyrna
             ,
          
           made
           Bishop
           of
           that
           place
           by
           the
           Apostles
           themselves
           thirteen
           yeers
           before
           this
           book
           of
           the
           Revelation
           of
           St.
           
             John
          
           was
           written
           :
           and
           
             Onesimus
          
           probably
           the
           then
           Bishop
           ,
           
             the
             Angell
             of
             the
             Church
             of
             Ephesus
             .
          
           Their
           Office
           ,
           Power
           ,
           and
           Commission
           are
           there
           intimated
           to
           have
           been
           Episcopall
           ,
           and
           charged
           upon
           them
           by
           Christ
           ,
           in
           that
           five
           of
           the
           Angels
           are
           charged
           as
           blameable
           ,
           and
           accomptable
           for
           the
           faults
           of
           both
           Presbyters
           and
           people
           ;
           and
           therefore
           surely
           were
           trusted
           with
           authority
           over
           Presbyters
           and
           people
           ,
           to
           have
           corrected
           and
           censured
           them
           .
           Particularly
           ,
           Episcopall
           power
           is
           intimated
           there
           ,
           chap.
           2.
           of
           the
           
             Revel.
             vers.
          
           20.
           and
           that
           power
           of
           excommunication
           is
           sufficiently
           grounded
           on
           the
           14
           verse
           ,
           Mr.
           
             Perkins
             in
             locum
             ,
          
           affirmeth
           .
           Their
           mission
           to
           that
           office
           also
           ,
           as
           it
           is
           there
           confirmed
           by
           the
           Sonne
           of
           God
           ,
           and
           by
           the
           holy
           Spirit
           :
           So
           also
           ,
           to
           have
           been
           at
           first
           from
           God
           is
           in
           their
           title
           implied
           :
           For
           Angels
           sent
           forth
           for
           the
           Churches
           sake
           are
           never
           said
           in
           holy
           Scripture
           to
           be
           any's
           Messengers
           but
           Gods
           ;
           and
           if
           his
           Messengers
           or
           Angels
           ,
           then
           sent
           by
           him
           .
           That
           
           their
           superiority
           was
           fixed
           ,
           not
           weekly
           ,
           or
           annuall
           ,
           is
           clear
           ,
           as
           from
           the
           Ecclesiasticall
           History
           of
           
             Polycarp
             ,
          
           and
           
             Onesimus
             ,
          
           so
           also
           from
           the
           Text
           it self
           ,
           c.
           2.
           10.
           
           Where
           the
           
             Angell
             of
             the
             Church
             of
             Smyrna
             ,
          
           as
           Angell
           of
           the
           Church
           ,
           is
           bidden
           
             to
             be
             faithfull
          
           (
           in
           his
           Office
           surely
           )
           
             untill
             death
          
           
             b
          
           .
           Nor
           was
           it
           personall
           onely
           but
           describing
           the
           Office
           of
           the
           Angell
           of
           any
           Church
           (
           in
           like
           laudable
           or
           blame-worthy
           state
           )
           unto
           the
           comming
           of
           Christ
           (
           as
           it
           is
           implied
           v.
           24.
           
           &
           25.
           of
           the
           second
           chapter
           .
           )
           For
           what
           is
           said
           to
           them
           ,
           so
           long
           as
           there
           is
           any
           that
           
             hath
             an
             eare
             to
             hear
             ,
          
           he
           must
           hear
           ,
           c.
           2.
           v.
           3.
           
           Nor
           did
           the
           personall
           blameworthy
           carriage
           of
           the
           
             Angell
             of
             the
             Church
             of
             Sardis
             ,
          
           c.
           3.
           v.
           1
           ,
           &c.
           or
           of
           
             the
             Angell
             of
             the
             Church
             of
             the
             Laodiceans
             ,
          
           v.
           14.
           16.
           hinder
           Christs
           approbation
           of
           their
           Office
           ,
           who
           are
           in
           regard
           of
           their
           Office
           (
           not
           of
           their
           personall
           Excellency
           )
           stiled
           
             the
             Angels
             of
             the
             seven
             Churches
             ,
             and
             the
             Stars
             in
             the
             right
             hand
             of
             the
             Son
             of
             man
             :
          
           both
           which
           stiles
           that
           they
           are
           there
           singularly
           appropriated
           to
           these
           successours
           of
           the
           Apostles
           ,
           ought
           not
           to
           seem
           strange
           ,
           since
           the
           twelve
           Apostles
           are
           confessedly
           meant
           by
           
             the
             crown
             of
             twelve
             Stars
             ,
          
           Apoc.
           12.
           1.
           
           And
           St
           
             Paul
          
           the
           Apostle
           of
           us
           Gentiles
           ,
           speaks
           of
           himself
           
             received
             as
             an
             Angell
             of
             God
             ,
             Galat.
          
           4.
           14.
           
           Summarily
           therefore
           out
           of
           holy
           Scriptures
           thus
           we
           reason
           ,
           Many
           Presbyters
           and
           Preachers
           in
           one
           Church
           ,
           and
           one
           chief
           ,
           having
           eminency
           and
           power
           over
           all
           Presbyters
           and
           people
           therein
           ,
           proveth
           the
           Office
           of
           a
           Bishop
           ;
           but
           so
           holy
           Scripture
           witnesseth
           were
           in
           
             Ephesus
             ,
          
           many
           Presbyters
           ,
           Act.
           20.
           17.
           
           (
           or
           if
           they
           were
           Bishops
           in
           the
           sense
           now
           disputed
           ,
           some
           of
           them
           at
           least
           ,
           as
           
             Irenaeus
          
           thought
           ,
           l.
           3.
           c.
           14.
           we
           need
           go
           no
           further
           in
           the
           argument
           )
           and
           more
           afterwards
           surely
           ,
           and
           yet
           one
           chiefe
           Pastor
           or
           Bishop
           over
           all
           ,
           such
           as
           was
           
             Timothy
          
           in
           his
           time
           ,
           and
           the
           Angel
           of
           that
           Church
           (
           whosoever
           he
           was
           )
           mentioned
           
             Rev.
          
           2.
           1.
           
           So
           also
           in
           the
           
             Church
             of
             Pergamus
             ,
          
           there
           were
           divers
           Teachers
           ,
           true
           and
           false
           ,
           c.
           2.
           v.
           13
           ,
           15.
           one
           Angel
           Governour
           in
           chief
           ,
           v.
           1.
           
           For
           be
           it
           that
           all
           the
           Presbyters
           of
           each
           of
           the
           Churches
           might
           well
           have
           been
           called
           Angels
           
             c
          
           ,
           yet
           that
           one
           among
           them
           (
           in
           each
           Church
           )
           in
           such
           a
           compatible
           community
           of
           name
           is
           so
           called
           by
           way
           of
           eminency
           ,
           proves
           an
           eminency
           in
           the
           one
           so
           called
           :
           which
           must
           either
           be
           of
           personall
           excellency
           above
           all
           the
           rest
           (
           and
           this
           who
           can
           shew
           us
           in
           
             the
             Angel
             of
             the
             Church
             of
             Sardis
             ,
             Laodicea
             ,
          
           or
           
             Thyatira
             ?
          
           )
           or
           else
           (
           and
           rather
           )
           of
           Office
           and
           power
           ,
           so
           as
           
             Iohn
             Baptist
          
           was
           called
           
             an
             Angel
             ,
             Malac
             :
          
           3.
           who
           was
           
             more
             then
             a
             Prophet
             ;
          
           and
           St.
           
             Paul
             received
             as
             an
             Angell
             ,
             Gal.
          
           4.
           14.
           who
           was
           more
           then
           a
           Minister
           ,
           and
           our
           Saviour
           Christ
           is
           called
           
           
             Michael
             ,
          
           Apoc.
           12.
           7.
           
             with
             his
             Angels
          
           fighting
           under
           him
           .
           One
           objection
           more
           we
           shall
           take
           notice
           of
           ,
           
             viz.
          
           the
           pretended
           necessity
           of
           understanding
           by
           each
           of
           the
           
             Angels
          
           there
           a
           collective
           body
           ,
           from
           c.
           2.
           v.
           10.
           
           &
           24.
           
           But
           this
           is
           manifestly
           clear
           to
           be
           no
           necessity
           at
           all
           from
           the
           like
           manner
           of
           speaking
           of
           the
           holy
           Ghost
           2
           
             Chron.
          
           28.
           1.
           
           &
           to
           the
           5.
           
           Compare
           and
           judge
           .
           And
           therefore
           it
           is
           not
           lawfull
           without
           any
           necessary
           reason
           ,
           to
           depart
           from
           the
           literall
           and
           determinate
           individuation
           of
           one
           chief
           spirituall
           Church-governour
           ,
           in
           each
           of
           the
           seven
           Churches
           :
           for
           otherwise
           ,
           as
           
             Tertullian
          
           speaks
           
             lib.
             de
             carne
             Christi
             ,
             cap.
             13.
             
             Omnia
             periclitabuntur
             alitèr
             accipi
             quàm
             sunt
             ,
             &
             amittere
             quod
             sunt
             ,
             dum
             alitèr
             accipiuntur
             .
          
           Yea
           there
           is
           not
           onely
           no
           necessity
           ,
           but
           much
           in
           the
           Text
           which
           doth
           resist
           such
           an
           interpretation
           of
           a
           collective
           body
           :
           for
           it
           should
           be
           either
           an
           Angel
           put
           for
           the
           whole
           particular
           Church
           ;
           and
           this
           cannot
           be
           ,
           seeing
           the
           Angels
           and
           the
           Churches
           are
           accurately
           distinguished
           c.
           
           1.
           v.
           20.
           
           Or
           an
           Angel
           put
           for
           the
           whole
           collection
           of
           the
           Presbyters
           ;
           but
           neither
           may
           this
           be
           admitted
           ,
           inasmuch
           as
           in
           the
           same
           20
           verse
           the
           
             Angels
          
           are
           called
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           seven
           ,
           no
           more
           ;
           and
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           not
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           stars
           ,
           not
           constellations
           ,
           as
           
             Suidas
          
           distinguisheth
           the
           words
           .
           You
           have
           our
           reasons
           from
           these
           Scriptures
           ,
           why
           to
           us
           it
           seems
           that
           to
           swear
           to
           endeavour
           the
           extirpation
           of
           Church-government
           by
           Bishops
           is
           to
           swear
           to
           endeavour
           the
           extirpation
           of
           that
           whose
           Root
           is
           in
           holy
           Scripture
           ;
           and
           to
           swear
           to
           endeavour
           (
           which
           we
           tremble
           to
           think
           of
           )
           to
           wrest
           these
           Stars
           out
           of
           the
           right
           hand
           of
           the
           Sonne
           of
           man
           ,
           who
           is
           also
           the
           Son
           of
           God
           .
           For
           
             in
             his
             right
             hand
             are
             they
             held
             ,
             the
             Angels
             of
             the
             Churches
             ,
             Revel.
          
           1.
           16
           ,
           20.
           
        
         
           As
           Church-government
           by
           Bishops
           hath
           been
           evidenced
           by
           holy
           Scripture
           ,
           so
           was
           it
           also
           the
           judgement
           of
           the
           ancient
           godly
           Fathers
           ,
           that
           it
           was
           
             an
             institution
             Apostolicall
             and
             Divine
             ;
          
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           saith
           
             Theodoret
             ,
          
           l.
           4.
           c.
           18.
           by
           St.
           
             Cyprian
             ,
          
           ep.
           55.
           the
           power
           of
           Episcopacy
           is
           exegetically
           called
           ,
           
             Ecclesiae
             gubernande
             sublimis
             &
             divina
             potestas
             :
             &
             epist.
             27.
             
             Dominus
             noster
             Episcopi
             honorem
             disponens
             in
             Evangelic
             .
          
           And
           anon
           after
           ,
           
             ut
             omnis
             actus
             Ecclesiae
             per
             Episcopos
             gubernetur
             :
             cum
             hoc
             itaque
             divina
             lege
             fundatum
             sit
             ,
             miror
             quosdam
             audaci
             temeritate
             &c.
             &
             epist.
             65.
             
             Episcopos
             &
             Praepositos
             Dominus
             elegit
             :
          
           And
           anon
           after
           ,
           
             Deus
             Episcopos
             facit
             .
             Athanasius
             epist.
             ad
             Dracontium
          
           saith
           ,
           that
           
             he
             who
             contemns
             the
             function
             of
             a
             Bishop
             ,
          
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           and
           that
           the
           Office
           is
           of
           those
           things
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           &c.
           
           
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           :
           
             Ignat.
             epist.
             ad
             Magnes
             .
          
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           
             Idem
             Ignat
             ,
             epist
             ,
             ad
             Ephes.
             Oecumen.
             c.
             9.
             in
             Tim.
             4.
             
          
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           
             Theophylact.
          
           and
           
             Oecumenius
          
           found
           Bishops
           upon
           
             Ephes.
          
           4.11
           .
           and
           on
           
             Hebr.
          
           13.17
           .
           
             Oecumenius
          
           and
           
             Nazianzen
          
           in
           
             Apologet
             .
          
           in
           1
           
             Pet.
             5.
             vide
             Hegesippum
             apud
             Euseb.
             lib.
          
           4.
           
             cap.
          
           22.
           and
           
             Chrysostom
             .
             in
             Tit.
          
           1.
           
             Hom.
          
           2.
           
           Saint
           
             Ambrose
             de
             dignitate
             Sacerdot
             .
             c.
             2.
             
             &
             6.
             
             Isidor
             .
             Pelusiot
             .
             lib.
             2.
             ep.
             125.
             
          
        
         
           Further
           ,
           out
           of
           the
           holy
           Scripture
           we
           might
           alledge
           according
           to
           Saint
           
             Hieroms
          
           interpretation
           ,
           that
           this
           distinction
           between
           the
           Bishops
           and
           his
           Presbyters
           was
           signified
           in
           
             Moses
          
           and
           the
           70.
           
           So
           
             Hierom
          
           in
           
             Tit.
          
           1.
           the
           distinction
           of
           Presbyters
           and
           Deacons
           ,
           to
           be
           that
           which
           was
           under
           the
           Law
           of
           the
           
             high
             Priest
             ,
             Priests
          
           and
           
             Levites
             .
          
           So
           
             S.
             Hieron.
             Ep.
             2.
             ad
             Nepotianum
             &
             Ep.
             ad
             Evagrium
             ;
          
           and
           before
           him
           
             Ignat.
             ad
             Philadelph
             .
             Clement
             .
             ep.
             ad
             .
             Corinth
             .
             Chrysost.
             Hom.
             20.
             ad
             pop.
             Antioch
             .
          
           and
           after
           
             Leo
             ep.
             66
             Isidor
             .
             Hisp.
             de
             officiis
             ,
             Eccles.
             l.
             2.
             c.
             5.
             
             &
             7.
             
          
           That
           the
           eminent
           dignity
           and
           office
           of
           Bishops
           was
           prophecied
           of
           ,
           
             Psal.
             45.
             16.
          
           where
           Bishops
           are
           meant
           ,
           say
           
             S.
             August
             .
             in
             loc.
             Comment.
          
           called
           
             S.
             Hieroms
             in
             locum
             .
          
           S.
           
             Cyril
             .
          
           of
           
             Alex.
             in
             loc.
             Theodoret
             in
             locum
             .
             Ruffinus
             in
             locum
             :
          
           as
           the
           other
           of
           Presbyters
           and
           Deacons
           were
           prophecied
           of
           ,
           
             Isaiah
             66.
             21.
             
          
           And
           further
           ,
           for
           imparity
           of
           Teachers
           in
           the
           new
           Testament
           ,
           that
           answerably
           to
           Prophets
           in
           the
           old
           ,
           and
           sons
           of
           the
           Prophets
           ,
           among
           some
           that
           served
           in
           the
           Gospell
           ,
           some
           were
           as
           Fathers
           ,
           others
           serving
           with
           them
           as
           sont
           .
           So
           also
           that
           we
           read
           of
           
             Builders
             and
             Master-builders
             in
             Gods
             building
             ,
             1
             Cor.
          
           3.
           and
           we
           read
           also
           among
           those
           builders
           of
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           &c.
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           &c.
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           &c.
           
           1
           Cor.
           12.
           28.
           
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           
             Hebr.
             13.
             17.
          
           and
           under
           them
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
           
             Luc.
             22.
             27.
             
          
           But
           for
           the
           confirmation
           by
           Scripture
           of
           the
           office
           of
           a
           Bishop
           ,
           we
           adhere
           especially
           to
           the
           Epistles
           to
           
             Timothy
          
           and
           
             Titus
             ,
          
           and
           those
           seven
           Epistles
           ,
           
             Apoc.
          
           1
           ,
           2
           ,
           and
           3.
           
           And
           if
           it
           be
           acknowledged
           of
           institution
           Apostolicall
           ,
           and
           approved
           by
           God
           but
           temporary
           onely
           ,
           the
           contrary
           will
           be
           made
           manifest
           ,
           as
           from
           the
           proper
           light
           of
           the
           Texts
           alledged
           ,
           and
           from
           the
           forecited
           Text
           ,
           1
           
             Tim.
          
           6.
           14.
           
           So
           also
           from
           this
           Proposition
           which
           we
           avow
           :
           No
           Constitution
           Apostolicall
           received
           by
           the
           universall
           Church
           perpetually
           in
           all
           ages
           ,
           unto
           this
           age
           of
           this
           controversie
           ,
           can
           without
           scandall
           and
           dangerous
           consequence
           be
           called
           Temporary
           ;
           the
           universall
           practice
           of
           the
           Church
           practising
           continually
           and
           perpetually
           
           an
           Apostolicall
           Institution
           ,
           being
           a
           most
           sure
           Commentary
           that
           it
           was
           no
           temporary
           institution
           .
           Forasmuch
           as
           we
           are
           taught
           by
           the
           holy
           Ghost
           in
           divine
           Scripture
           ,
           that
           contention
           in
           what
           the
           Law
           of
           God
           is
           pretended
           not
           to
           be
           expresse
           ,
           may
           be
           warrantably
           taken
           off
           by
           
             the
             custome
             of
             the
             Churches
             of
             God
             ,
             1
             Cor.
          
           11.
           16.
           
           See
           
             Theophylact.
             in
             locum
             .
          
           Custom
           ,
           I
           doe
           not
           say
           any
           ,
           but
           of
           the
           Churches
           of
           God
           ,
           
             i.e.
          
           Primitive
           ,
           also
           Universall
           ,
           Perpetuall
           ,
           interpreting
           the
           controverted
           Law
           of
           God
           ,
           whether
           Naturall
           ,
           as
           vers.
           14.
           or
           Positive
           ,
           by
           no
           lesse
           reason
           .
           Whereunto
           agreeth
           well
           the
           rule
           of
           S.
           
             Augustine
             ,
             contra
             Crescon.
             lib.
             1.
             c.
             32.
             &
             contra
             Donat.
             l.
             4.
             c.
             24.
             
             Quod
             universa
             tenet
             Ecclesia
             &c.
             &
             ep
             .
             86.
             ad
             Casul
             .
             &
             epist.
             ad
             Januarium
             118.
             si
             quidtota
             hodie
             &c.
             
             &
             Vincent
             Lyrin
             .
             adversus
             haereses
             ,
             c.
             2.
             &c.
             3.
             
             Quod
             ubique
             ,
             quod
             semper
             ,
             quod
             ab
             omnibus
             &c.
             
          
           And
           if
           not
           by
           such
           traditive
           interpretation
           from
           
             the
             custom
             of
             the
             Churches
             of
             God
             ,
          
           according
           to
           the
           Apostles
           rule
           ,
           how
           shall
           we
           convince
           contentious
           gainsayers
           ,
           that
           the
           sense
           of
           those
           Texts
           ,
           
             Goe
             and
             teach
             all
             Nations
             ,
             baptizing
             them
             &c.
             
             Matth.
          
           28.
           and
           those
           other
           of
           baptizing
           
             the
             houshold
             of
             Stephanus
             ,
          
           and
           of
           
             the
             keeper
             of
             the
             prison
             ,
             1
             Cor.
             1.
             
             Acts
          
           16.
           or
           any
           other
           Scriptures
           ,
           to
           be
           a
           divine
           warrant
           (
           as
           they
           are
           )
           for
           Baptisme
           of
           Infants
           ?
           Or
           the
           sense
           of
           
             hoc
             facite
             &c.
             
             Luk.
          
           22.
           to
           imply
           a
           divine
           right
           of
           Presbyters
           onely
           to
           consecrate
           the
           Elements
           of
           the
           blessed
           Sacrament
           ?
           or
           the
           sense
           of
           those
           Texts
           ,
           
             Iohn
          
           20.
           1
           ,
           19
           ,
           26.
           
           
             Acts
          
           20.
           7.
           1.
           
             Cor.
          
           16.
           2.
           
             Revel.
          
           1.
           10.
           or
           
             Psalm
          
           118.
           24.
           or
           of
           any
           other
           Scriptures
           to
           be
           a
           divine
           warrant
           for
           the
           translation
           of
           our
           one
           day
           in
           seven
           from
           the
           seventh
           day
           of
           the
           week
           to
           the
           first
           ?
           Or
           on
           the
           other
           side
           ,
           how
           shall
           we
           convince
           those
           of
           the
           Church
           of
           
             Rome
             ,
          
           that
           that
           Apostolicall
           divine
           Precept
           ,
           
             Iames
          
           5.14
           .
           
             as
             to
             the
             anointing
             the
             sick
             with
             oil
          
           was
           a
           temporary
           Precept
           onely
           ,
           but
           negatively
           from
           the
           interpretation
           of
           the
           custom
           of
           the
           
             Churches
             of
             God
             ?
          
           Since
           miraculous
           gifts
           were
           also
           conferred
           by
           the
           laying
           on
           of
           hands
           ,
           which
           yet
           was
           not
           temporary
           ,
           
             Heb.
          
           6
           2.
           
        
         
           Now
           that
           this
           Apostolicall
           institution
           hath
           been
           universally
           practised
           ,
           and
           perpetually
           in
           the
           custom
           of
           the
           Churches
           of
           God
           of
           all
           times
           and
           places
           (
           excepting
           onely
           some
           narrow
           place
           and
           time
           of
           this
           age
           of
           this
           controversie
           )
           and
           that
           in
           Churches
           founded
           by
           different
           planters
           ,
           by
           all
           the
           severall
           Apostles
           and
           others
           sent
           by
           them
           ,
           as
           well
           those
           Churches
           which
           have
           in
           severall
           ages
           rejected
           the
           Antichristian
           Monarchy
           of
           the
           Bishop
           of
           
             Rome
          
           over
           all
           the
           Church
           ,
           as
           others
           ;
           and
           that
           order
           preserved
           by
           God
           from
           extirpation
           ,
           
           thorow
           all
           the
           ten
           persecutions
           ,
           and
           descending
           in
           each
           Church
           or
           City
           by
           particular
           continued
           succession
           :
           as
           for
           example
           ,
           27
           Bishops
           from
           S.
           
             Timothy
          
           to
           the
           time
           of
           the
           Chalcedon
           Councell
           ,
           as
           was
           declared
           there
           ,
           
             act
             .
          
           11.
           that
           in
           all
           times
           ,
           primitive
           and
           following
           ,
           Bishops
           have
           been
           chief
           in
           Ecclesiasticall
           government
           ,
           in
           Councels
           ,
           in
           Martyrdom
           ,
           in
           Piety
           ,
           in
           Learning
           ,
           in
           the
           conversion
           of
           Nations
           ,
           in
           the
           mighty
           confounding
           of
           Heresies
           and
           Heretiques
           ;
           we
           beleeve
           we
           are
           able
           (
           if
           any
           deny
           )
           to
           make
           good
           .
           And
           first
           here
           for
           the
           Primitive
           Churches
           ,
           we
           alledge
           all
           the
           forecited
           Testmonies
           of
           Antiquity
           ,
           proving
           Bishop
           to
           have
           been
           instituted
           by
           the
           Apostles
           themselves
           ,
           
             vide
             supra
             .
          
           Yea
           and
           early
           ,
           within
           the
           Apostles
           times
           there
           having
           been
           not
           onely
           three
           Bishops
           of
           
             Rome
          
           successively
           ,
           
             Linus
             ,
             Cletus
             ,
          
           and
           
             Clemens
             :
          
           and
           within
           Saint
           
             Johns
          
           time
           of
           life
           ,
           four
           Bishops
           of
           
             Alexandria
          
           successively
           ,
           Saint
           
             Mark
             ,
             Anianus
             ,
             Abilius
             ,
          
           and
           
             Cerdo
             ;
          
           three
           Bishops
           of
           
             Antioch
             ,
          
           Saint
           
             Peter
             ,
             Evodius
             ,
          
           and
           
             Ignatius
             ;
          
           two
           of
           
             Jerusalem
             ,
          
           Saint
           
             Iames
          
           and
           
             Simeon
             ;
          
           all
           while
           Saint
           
             John
          
           the
           Apostle
           yet
           lived
           ,
           
             Euseb
             ,
             hist
             eccles.
             lib.
          
           3.
           
             cap.
          
           12.
           
           But
           also
           Saint
           
             Iames
          
           made
           Bishop
           of
           
             Ierusalem
          
           soon
           after
           the
           passion
           of
           our
           Lord
           ,
           saith
           Saint
           
             Hierom.
             de
             Script
             .
             Eccles.
          
           After
           the
           Ascension
           of
           our
           Saviour
           ,
           saith
           
             Euseb.
             lib.
          
           2.
           
             cap.
          
           1.
           before
           Saint
           
             Stevens
          
           Martyrdom
           ,
           for
           Saint
           
             Steven
          
           was
           
             Deacon
          
           to
           
             Iames
          
           Bishop
           of
           
             Ierusalem
             ,
          
           saith
           
             Ignatius
             epist.
             ad
             Trall
             .
          
           and
           the
           ancient
           Author
           of
           the
           
             Epist.
             ad
             Heronem
          
           under
           his
           name
           ;
           and
           that
           
             James
             himself
             was
             martyred
          
           after
           he
           had
           governed
           the
           Church
           of
           
             Ierusalem
          
           30.
           yeers
           ,
           saith
           Saint
           
             Hierom.
             de
             Script
             .
             Eccles.
          
           And
           as
           Saint
           
             Hierom
          
           affirmeth
           ,
           
             Iames
             the
             Apostle
             to
             have
             been
             the
             first
             Bishop
             of
             Ierusalem
             ,
          
           in
           
             Gal.
          
           1.
           
           So
           also
           
             Peter
             to
             have
             been
             the
             first
             Bishop
             of
             Antioch
             ,
          
           in
           
             Gal.
          
           2.
           
           And
           
             Mark
             the
             first
             Bishop
             of
             Alexandria
             ,
          
           in
           
             Prooem.
             in
             Matth.
          
           who
           died
           six
           yeers
           before
           Saint
           
             Peter
          
           or
           S.
           
             Paul
          
           (
           saith
           Saint
           
             Hierom.
          
           though
           therein
           he
           dissent
           from
           
             Irenaeus
             lib.
          
           3.
           )
           35.
           yeeres
           before
           Saint
           
             Iames
          
           the
           Apostle
           ;
           besides
           therefore
           nine
           recorded
           as
           Bishops
           in
           holy
           Scripture
           ,
           
             Timothy
          
           and
           
             Titus
          
           Bishops
           of
           
             Ephesus
          
           and
           
             Crete
             ,
          
           and
           the
           
             seven
             of
             the
             seven
             Churches
             in
             Asia
             ;
          
           besides
           two
           Apostles
           Bishops
           ,
           
             viz.
             Iames
          
           of
           
             Ierusalem
             ,
          
           and
           
             a
          
           
             Peter
             of
             Antioch
             ,
          
           
             b
          
           and
           one
           Evangelist
           ,
           
           
             Mark
          
           of
           
             Alexandria
          
           
             c
          
           :
           there
           are
           also
           nine
           other
           (
           in
           all
           21.
           )
           recorded
           in
           holy
           Scripture
           (
           all
           which
           ,
           except
           two
           of
           the
           seven
           Angels
           ,
           are
           there
           registred
           for
           Saints
           )
           who
           (
           if
           we
           will
           beleeve
           as
           credible
           records
           of
           Christians
           as
           any
           other
           humane
           Records
           whatsoever
           )
           were
           Bishops
           before
           they
           died
           ,
           
             viz.
             Clemens
          
           
             d
          
           and
           
             e
          
           
             Linus
          
           made
           Bishops
           of
           
             Rome
          
           successively
           by
           
             Peter
          
           and
           
             Paul
             .
             Evodius
          
           
             f
          
           Bishop
           of
           
             Antioch
          
           by
           
             Peter
          
           and
           
             Paul
             .
             Dionysius
          
           the
           
             Areopagite
          
           Bishop
           of
           
             Athens
          
           
             g
          
           :
           
             Archippus
          
           
             h
          
           Bishop
           of
           the
           
             Colossians
             :
             Epaphroditus
          
           
             i
          
           Bishop
           of
           the
           
             Philippians
             :
             Epaphras
          
           
             k
          
           Bishop
           of
           the
           
             Colossians
             :
             Gaius
          
           
             l
          
           also
           Bishop
           of
           the
           
             Thessalonians
             :
             Trophimus
          
           
             m
          
           Bishop
           of
           
             Arles
             :
          
           To
           which
           you
           may
           adde
           (
           the
           two
           and
           twentieth
           )
           
             Antipas
          
           Bishop
           of
           
             Pergamus
             ,
          
           if
           we
           will
           beleeve
           
             Paraeus
          
           in
           
             Apoc.
          
           2.
           proving
           it
           out
           of
           
             Arethas
             Caesariensis
             ,
          
           in
           
             Apoc.
          
           1.
           and
           
             Onesimus
          
           Bishop
           of
           
             Ephesus
             ,
          
           
             n
          
           if
           he
           were
           not
           the
           forementioned
           
             Angel
             of
             the
             Church
             of
             Ephesus
             ,
          
           when
           Saint
           
             Iohn
          
           wrote
           his
           Revelation
           .
           To
           omit
           to
           speak
           here
           of
           other
           Bishops
           ,
           who
           were
           Schollars
           and
           Auditors
           of
           the
           Apostles
           ,
           
             Ignatius
          
           of
           Saint
           
             Iohn
          
           
             o
          
           made
           Bishop
           of
           
             Antioch
          
           by
           Saint
           
             Peter
             ;
             Papias
          
           
             p
          
           Saint
           
             Iohns
          
           Schollar
           ,
           Bishop
           of
           
             Hierapolis
             ;
             Publius
          
           and
           
             Q●adratus
          
           
             q
          
           Bishops
           of
           
             Athens
             ,
          
           Disciples
           of
           the
           Apostles
           ;
           
             Simeon
          
           the
           son
           of
           
             Cleoph●●
          
           
             r
          
           Bishop
           of
           
             Ierusalem
          
           (
           after
           
             Iames
          
           )
           and
           the
           Kinsman
           of
           our
           Lord
           .
        
         
           This
           order
           of
           Bishops
           which
           began
           (
           though
           the
           first
           we
           read
           of
           in
           Scripture
           be
           
             Timothy
          
           and
           
             Titus
          
           )
           in
           Saint
           
             Iames
          
           of
           
             Ierusalem
             ,
          
           or
           Saint
           
             Mark
          
           of
           
             Alexandria
             ,
          
           continued
           thorowout
           all
           the
           following
           ages
           of
           the
           Churches
           of
           God
           ,
           in
           which
           Bishops
           have
           been
           the
           most
           reverend
           Martyrs
           ,
           such
           as
           
             Ignatius
             ,
             Polycarp
             .
             Irenaeus
          
           Bishop
           of
           
             Lions
             ,
             Cyprian
          
           of
           
             Carthage
             ,
          
           and
           more
           then
           30.
           of
           the
           first
           Bishops
           of
           
             Rome
          
           successively
           both
           in
           Episcopacy
           and
           Martyrdom
           .
           Of
           Bishops
           also
           especially
           did
           consist
           the
           first
           four
           generall
           Councels
           ,
           received
           by
           all
           the
           reformed
           Churches
           ,
           the
           confounders
           of
           the
           maine
           heresies
           touching
           the
           second
           and
           third
           persons
           in
           the
           blessed
           Trinity
           ;
           and
           by
           an
           Act
           of
           Parliament
           ,
           1.
           
             Eliz.
             cap.
          
           10.
           next
           to
           the
           canonicall
           Scriptures
           ,
           made
           the
           rule
           of
           judging
           Heresies
           :
           who
           also
           in
           Councell
           gave
           judgement
           for
           the
           inviolable
           practice
           of
           the
           Church
           in
           this
           order
           :
           the
           generall
           Councell
           of
           
             Nice
          
           providing
           ,
           
             Ne
             in
             unâ
             civitate
             duo
             sint
             Episcopi
             ,
             Cant.
          
           8.
           
           The
           generall
           Councell
           of
           
             Constantinople
          
           
           adjudging
           to
           Bishops
           the
           power
           of
           Ordination
           ,
           
             Can.
          
           2.
           and
           
             Can.
          
           4.
           in
           the
           case
           of
           Maximus
           .
           The
           generall
           Councell
           of
           
             Ephesus
          
           distinguishing
           betwixt
           the
           Bishop
           and
           the
           rest
           of
           the
           Clergy
           .
           
             Can.
          
           7.
           and
           confirming
           the
           Bishops
           jurisdiction
           ,
           
             Can.
          
           5.
           
           The
           generall
           Councell
           of
           
             Chalcedon
          
           determining
           ,
           
             Can.
          
           29.
           
           
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
             {non-Roman}
          
        
         
           For
           as
           much
           then
           ,
           as
           in
           the
           first
           Article
           we
           are
           required
           to
           swear
           to
           endeavour
           the
           reformation
           of
           Religion
           according
           to
           the
           Word
           of
           God
           ,
           and
           the
           examples
           of
           the
           best
           reformed
           Churches
           ,
           surely
           we
           may
           not
           in
           the
           second
           Article
           swear
           to
           endeavour
           the
           extirpation
           of
           Church-government
           by
           
             Bishops
             ,
          
           and
           so
           to
           forsake
           the
           government
           grounded
           on
           the
           Word
           of
           God
           ,
           and
           to
           forsake
           the
           example
           of
           all
           the
           ages
           of
           the
           Primitive
           Churches
           ,
           then
           which
           we
           conceive
           no
           late
           reformed
           Church
           will
           pretend
           to
           be
           more
           pure
           ,
           and
           to
           whose
           examples
           they
           do
           or
           ought
           to
           endeavour
           to
           reform
           themselves
           .
        
         
           But
           after
           all
           this
           ,
           it
           will
           be
           said
           ,
           that
           this
           government
           by
           Bishops
           is
           ejured
           onely
           ,
           as
           it
           interprets
           
             Prelacy
             ,
          
           which
           word
           if
           it
           have
           been
           translated
           
             Regimen
             Tyranicum
             ,
          
           the
           Translation
           as
           farre
           exceeds
           the
           truth
           of
           Grammar
           ,
           as
           the
           Prelates
           are
           accused
           to
           have
           exceeded
           their
           lawfull
           power
           ;
           forasmuch
           as
           Prelacy
           in
           its
           originall
           ,
           and
           acception
           of
           ancient
           Authors
           (
           
             Praelati
          
           we
           say
           ,
           not
           
             elati
          
           )
           imports
           but
           lawfull
           preeminence
           and
           power
           .
           So
           is
           
             Timothy
          
           called
           by
           
             Gregory
             de
             Cura
             pastor
             :
             p.
          
           2.
           
             c.
          
           11.
           
           
             Praelatus
             Gregi
             ;
          
           and
           the
           word
           Prelate
           is
           often
           honourably
           mentioned
           in
           our
           Lawes
           ,
           9
           
             Ed.
          
           2.
           
           &
           24
           
             Hen.
          
           8.
           and
           is
           no
           more
           then
           the
           Title
           
             Praepositi
          
           mentioned
           also
           with
           honour
           by
           St.
           
             Cyprian
          
           Epist.
           10.
           
           &
           55.
           
           &
           65.
           
           
             Augustin
             .
             de
             civitate
             Dei
             ,
          
           l.
           20.
           c.
           9.
           or
           
             Antistites
             ,
          
           S.
           
             Cypr.
             ep.
          
           69.
           
           &
           
             Sancti
             Antistites
             ,
             S.
             August
             .
             ep.
          
           162.
           and
           divers
           words
           in
           Scripture
           used
           ,
           signifying
           equivalently
           such
           preeminence
           ,
           but
           let
           it
           not
           be
           told
           indeed
           in
           other
           Churches
           ,
           that
           any
           other
           is
           here
           abjured
           then
           
             Regimen
             Tyrannicum
             .
          
        
         
           But
           are
           we
           warranted
           by
           the
           following
           stile
           of
           Hierarchy
           ?
           Doth
           that
           word
           import
           originally
           and
           anciently
           any
           other
           then
           a
           sacred
           government
           ?
           was
           it
           not
           accepted
           and
           approved
           in
           it selfe
           by
           Mr.
           
             Calvin
             .
             lib.
             de
             necessitate
             Eccl.
             reformandae
             ,
             Talem
             si
             nobis
             Hierarchiam
             exhibeant
             in
             quâ
             sic
             emineant
             Episcopi
             ,
             ut
             Christo
             subesse
             non
             recusent
             ,
             &c.
             ut
             ab
             illo
             tanquam
             uno
             Capite
             pendeant
             ,
             &
             ad
             ipsum
             referantur
             ,
             &c.
             tum
             verò
             nullo
             non
             anathemate
             dignos
             fateor
             ,
             qui
             non
             eam
             reverentèr
             summâque
             obedientiâ
             observent
             .
          
        
         
           Moreover
           ,
           how
           can
           we
           in
           the
           same
           Article
           abjure
           Church-government
           
           by
           Bishops
           ,
           with
           Heresie
           ,
           Schisme
           ,
           and
           Prophanenesse
           ,
           (
           as
           there
           it
           follows
           )
           yea
           Prelacy
           even
           before
           Schisme
           and
           Heresie
           ,
           &c.
           when
           as
           Bishops
           have
           been
           in
           all
           ages
           the
           chief
           confounders
           of
           heresie
           and
           heretickes
           ,
           such
           was
           
             Athanasius
          
           Bishop
           of
           
             Alexandria
          
           of
           the
           heresie
           of
           
             Arrius
             .
             Cyril
          
           of
           
             Alexandria
          
           of
           the
           
             Nestorian
          
           heresie
           .
           
             Caelestine
          
           Bishop
           of
           
             Rome
             ,
             Augustine
          
           Bishop
           of
           
             Hippo
             ,
             Prosper
          
           Bishop
           of
           
             Rhegium
             ,
             Fulgentius
          
           Bishop
           of
           
             Ruspi
             ,
          
           of
           the
           
             Palagian
          
           heresie
           :
           and
           many
           more
           in
           all
           ages
           of
           the
           Church
           before
           and
           since
           .
           Nor
           was
           there
           found
           any
           one
           Christian
           ,
           thorowout
           all
           the
           Primitive
           and
           purest
           times
           of
           the
           Church
           ,
           for
           above
           five
           hundred
           yeers
           after
           Christ
           ,
           who
           thought
           it
           fit
           to
           abolish
           Church
           government
           by
           Bishops
           (
           much
           lesse
           to
           ej●re
           it
           )
           save
           onely
           one
           heretick
           ,
           
             Aerius
             ,
          
           so
           censured
           by
           
             Epiphanius
             ,
             Haeres
             .
          
           75.
           and
           by
           Saint
           
             Augustine
             ,
             Haeres
             .
          
           53.
           
             whose
             speech
             savoured
             of
             madnesse
             ,
          
           saith
           
             Epiphanius
             ;
          
           for
           he
           had
           said
           ,
           
             What
             is
             a
             Bishop
             differing
             from
             a
             Presbyter
             ?
          
           
             a
          
           and
           the
           occasion
           of
           it
           Saint
           
             Augustine
          
           lets
           us
           know
           ,
           
             lib.
             de
             Haeres
             .
             c.
             in
             Aerium
             ;
             Aerius
          
           being
           a
           Presbyter
           ,
           is
           said
           to
           have
           been
           vexed
           ,
           because
           he
           could
           not
           get
           to
           be
           ordained
           a
           Bishop
           ,
           and
           thence
           arose
           his
           envy
           :
           
             Epiphanius
          
           witnesseth
           as
           much
           ,
           
             Haeres
             .
          
           75.
           
        
         
           Secondly
           ,
           as
           to
           Schism
           ,
           Saint
           
             Hierom
          
           the
           one
           and
           onely
           Father
           alledged
           ,
           as
           denying
           the
           divine
           Institution
           of
           Bishops
           ,
           yet
           held
           them
           necessary
           to
           represse
           Schism
           ,
           and
           then
           surely
           most
           necessary
           ,
           when
           Schism
           doth
           ,
           as
           in
           these
           our
           dayes
           ,
           most
           abound
           :
           For
           avoiding
           of
           Schism
           ,
           Saint
           
             Hierom
          
           witnesseth
           ,
           Episcopacy
           was
           thought
           necessary
           long
           within
           the
           Apostles
           times
           ,
           even
           as
           early
           as
           it
           was
           said
           by
           some
           ,
           
             I
             am
             of
             Paul
             ,
             I
             am
             of
             Apollo
             &c.
          
           and
           therefore
           saith
           in
           his
           Dialogue
           ,
           
             Adversus
             Luciferian
             .
             Ecclesiae
             salus
             in
             summi
             Sacerdotis
             dignitate
             pendet
             ,
             cui
             si
             non
             exors
             quaedam
             ,
             &
             ab
             omnibus
             eminens
             detur
             potestas
             ,
             tot
             in
             Ecclesiis
             efficientur
             schismata
             ,
             quot
             Sacerdotes
             .
             S.
             Cyprian
          
           also
           
             Epist.
          
           55.
           
           
             Non
             aliunde
             haereses
             obortae
             sunt
             ,
             aut
             nata
             sunt
             schismata
             ,
             quam
             &c.
          
           and
           so
           also
           
             lib.
          
           4.
           
             epist.
          
           9.
           
           
             Unde
             enim
             Schismata
             &
             Haereses
             obortae
             sunt
             &
             oriuntur
             ,
             nisi
             dum
             Episcopus
             qui
             unus
             est
             praesumptione
             contemnitur
             ?
             &c.
          
           Master
           
             Calvin
          
           also
           himself
           upon
           
             Philipp
             .
          
           1.
           1.
           
           
             Fateor
             quidem
             ut
             sunt
             hominum
             ingenia
             &
             mores
             ,
             non
             posse
             ordinem
             stare
             inter
             verbi
             Ministros
             ,
             quin
             reliquis
             praesit
             unus
             .
          
           So
           that
           we
           cannot
           apprehend
           the
           abjuration
           of
           Episcopacy
           to
           be
           a
           meane
           to
           that
           unity
           in
           this
           Article
           mentioned
           ,
           
             That
             the
             Lord
             may
             be
             one
             ,
             and
             his
             Name
             one
             amongst
             us
             ,
          
           but
           rather
           the
           continuation
           thereof
           ,
           according
           to
           the
           counsell
           of
           the
           holy
           Martyr
           S.
           
             Cyprian
             ,
             Unus
             Deus
             ,
             unus
             Dominus
             ,
             unus
             
             Episcopus
             ;
          
           and
           that
           of
           
             Ignatius
             ad
             magnes
             .
          
           
             b
          
           
             Subjecti
             estote
             Episcope
             &
             vobis
             mutuè
             ,
             ut
             Christus
             Patri
             ,
             ut
             inter
             vos
             divina
             quaedam
             sit
             unio
             .
          
        
         
           Next
           ,
           
             Prophanenesse
          
           is
           here
           also
           to
           be
           cast
           out
           with
           Episcopacy
           ;
           yet
           who
           may
           not
           fear
           Gods
           Judgements
           ,
           if
           he
           deny
           the
           detestable
           growth
           of
           prophanenesse
           since
           the
           contempt
           of
           that
           Apostolicall
           institution
           of
           Episcopacy
           ?
           So
           that
           this
           Article
           as
           to
           Bishops
           extirpation
           we
           must
           refuse
           ,
           upon
           that
           close
           upon
           which
           others
           take
           it
           ,
           
             lest
             ,
          
           as
           it
           is
           said
           ,
           
             we
             should
             partake
             in
             others
             sin
             ,
             and
             consequently
             in
             their
             plagues
             .
          
        
         
           Thirdly
           ,
           because
           neither
           can
           we
           swear
           to
           endeavour
           the
           extirpation
           of
           that
           part
           of
           this
           Church-government
           by
           Archbishops
           ,
           an
           Ecclesiasticall
           constitution
           ,
           so
           confessedly
           ancient
           ;
           nor
           that
           part
           of
           this
           Church-government
           by
           Deanes
           and
           Chapters
           ,
           that
           is
           ,
           a
           society
           of
           grave
           Divines
           ,
           of
           Presbyters
           joyned
           to
           the
           Bishop
           in
           his
           see
           of
           residence
           ,
           as
           assistants
           in
           Councell
           and
           Government
           :
           as
           
             James
          
           Bishop
           of
           
             Ierusalem
          
           had
           his
           resident
           Presbyters
           ,
           
             Acts
          
           21.
           18.
           and
           consulted
           with
           them
           ,
           
             vers.
          
           20.
           
           According
           also
           to
           the
           ancient
           generall
           and
           continued
           custom
           of
           the
           Church
           of
           God
           ever
           since
           the
           first
           Christian
           Emperours
           time
           ;
           and
           moreover
           endowed
           with
           means
           given
           to
           them
           by
           the
           last
           Wils
           and
           Testaments
           of
           many
           (
           which
           it
           is
           not
           lawfull
           for
           us
           to
           endeavour
           to
           annull
           ,
           
             Hebr.
          
           9.
           17.
           
           )
           and
           by
           the
           gifts
           of
           many
           other
           Donors
           ,
           who
           had
           true
           propriety
           in
           their
           goods
           ,
           and
           might
           and
           did
           transfer
           the
           undoubted
           property
           to
           those
           to
           be
           enjoyed
           by
           the
           right
           and
           liberty
           of
           the
           Subject
           ;
           especially
           such
           endowments
           having
           been
           consecrated
           and
           devoted
           unto
           God
           for
           pious
           uses
           ,
           and
           which
           may
           not
           therefore
           by
           us
           (
           as
           we
           conceive
           )
           be
           endeavoured
           to
           be
           alienated
           ,
           
             Prov.
          
           20.
           25.
           
           
             Numb.
          
           16.
           38.
           
           And
           as
           to
           the
           exercises
           of
           piety
           ,
           so
           also
           to
           the
           encouragement
           of
           the
           most
           excellent
           part
           of
           learning
           ,
           the
           study
           of
           divinity
           and
           of
           holy
           Scripture
           .
        
         
           We
           shall
           with
           the
           same
           sincerity
           ,
           
           reality
           and
           constancy
           ,
           in
           our
           severall
           Vocations
           ,
           endeavour
           with
           our
           estates
           and
           lives
           ,
           mutually
           to
           preserve
           the
           Rights
           and
           Priviledges
           of
           the
           Parliaments
           ,
           and
           the
           Liberties
           of
           the
           Kingdoms
           ,
           and
           to
           preserve
           and
           defend
           the
           Kings
           Majesties
           Person
           and
           Authority
           ,
           in
           the
           preservation
           and
           defence
           of
           the
           true
           Religion
           ,
           and
           Liberties
           of
           the
           Kingdoms
           ,
           that
           the
           world
           may
           beare
           witnesse
           with
           our
           Consciences
           of
           our
           loyalty
           ,
           and
           that
           we
           have
           no
           thoughts
           or
           intentions
           to
           diminish
           His
           Majesties
           just
           power
           and
           greatnesse
           .
        
         
           Because
           in
           the
           third
           Article
           ,
           whereas
           we
           are
           required
           ,
           and
           that
           
           in
           the
           first
           place
           to
           binde
           our selves
           absolutely
           without
           limitation
           expressed
           ,
           
             To
             preserve
             the
             Rights
             and
             Priviledges
             of
             Parliaments
             ,
             and
             the
             Liberties
             of
             the
             Kingdoms
             ;
          
           and
           were
           likewise
           tied
           simply
           and
           indefinitely
           to
           defend
           the
           Kings
           Person
           ,
           State
           ,
           and
           Honour
           ,
           by
           the
           Oath
           of
           Allegiance
           and
           the
           late
           Protestation
           ;
           here
           when
           we
           are
           bidden
           to
           swear
           to
           defend
           his
           Majesties
           Person
           and
           Authority
           ,
           it
           is
           added
           [
           
             In
             the
             preservation
             and
             defence
             of
             the
             true
             Religion
             ,
             and
             Liberties
             of
             the
             Kingdoms
          
           ]
           therefore
           this
           manner
           of
           swearing
           we
           dare
           not
           admit
           ,
           till
           it
           be
           publikely
           declared
           by
           the
           Imposers
           ,
           that
           the
           meaning
           of
           those
           words
           is
           not
           (
           as
           to
           some
           it
           may
           sound
           )
           that
           I
           binde
           my selfe
           to
           preserve
           and
           defend
           his
           Majesties
           Person
           and
           Authority
           
             so
             farre
             forth
          
           as
           he
           shall
           preserve
           and
           defend
           true
           Religion
           and
           the
           Liberties
           of
           the
           Kingdoms
           :
           Since
           by
           the
           holy
           Scriptures
           of
           the
           old
           and
           new
           Testament
           ,
           by
           the
           Law
           of
           Nature
           and
           Nations
           ,
           by
           the
           Oath
           of
           God
           ,
           and
           by
           true
           Religion
           ,
           we
           are
           bound
           to
           endeavour
           the
           preservation
           and
           defence
           of
           his
           Person
           and
           Authority
           ,
           though
           he
           were
           a
           persecutor
           of
           the
           true
           Religion
           ,
           and
           an
           abridger
           of
           our
           Liberties
           ,
           such
           as
           were
           
             Saul
          
           and
           
             Nero
          
           in
           their
           times
           .
           And
           surely
           a
           larger
           Declaration
           of
           our
           endeavours
           simply
           to
           defend
           his
           Person
           ,
           is
           at
           this
           time
           necessary
           ,
           when
           through
           the
           divisions
           of
           the
           Kingdom
           his
           sacred
           Majestie
           is
           so
           endangered
           ;
           and
           that
           his
           Majesty
           hath
           often
           complained
           of
           affronts
           offered
           to
           his
           person
           ;
           and
           hath
           complained
           also
           ,
           that
           some
           have
           endeavoured
           to
           kill
           his
           Person
           in
           two
           set
           battails
           ;
           and
           that
           there
           is
           nothing
           more
           frequent
           in
           the
           minds
           and
           mouths
           of
           some
           
             Shimei's
             ,
          
           then
           that
           
             the
             King
             is
             popishly
             affected
             .
             A
             Papist
             in
             his
             heart
             ;
          
           and
           therefore
           some
           furious
           Zelot
           may
           not
           onely
           upon
           these
           surmises
           conclude
           himselfe
           exempted
           (
           in
           case
           )
           from
           the
           duty
           of
           preservation
           and
           defence
           of
           his
           Royall
           Person
           ,
           but
           also
           mistake
           it
           as
           a
           debt
           to
           this
           Covenant
           ,
           even
           to
           offer
           violence
           to
           his
           sacred
           Majestie
           .
           May
           not
           therefore
           some
           such
           fuller
           Declaration
           and
           explication
           of
           our
           duty
           (
           when
           we
           will
           by
           Oath
           professe
           it
           )
           seem
           necessary
           to
           the
           end
           here
           proposed
           ,
           
             That
             the
             world
             may
             bear
             witnesse
             with
             our
             Consciences
             of
             our
             loyalty
             ?
          
        
         
           We
           shall
           also
           with
           all
           faithfulnesse
           endeavour
           the
           discovery
           of
           all
           such
           as
           have
           been
           ,
           
           or
           shall
           be
           Incendiaries
           ,
           Malignants
           ,
           or
           evill
           Instruments
           ,
           by
           hindring
           the
           reformation
           of
           Religion
           ,
           dividing
           the
           King
           from
           his
           people
           ,
           or
           one
           of
           the
           Kingdoms
           from
           another
           ,
           or
           making
           any
           Faction
           or
           parties
           amongst
           the
           people
           ,
           contrary
           to
           this
           League
           and
           Covenant
           ,
           that
           they
           may
           
           be
           brought
           to
           publike
           triall
           ,
           and
           receive
           condign
           punishment
           ,
           as
           the
           degree
           of
           their
           offences
           shall
           require
           or
           deserve
           ,
           or
           the
           supream
           Indicatories
           of
           both
           Kingdoms
           respectively
           ,
           or
           others
           having
           power
           from
           them
           for
           that
           effect
           ,
           shall
           judge
           convenient
           .
        
         
           Whether
           are
           not
           all
           those
           to
           be
           accounted
           to
           us
           as
           
             Malignants
             ,
             &c.
             by
             hindring
             reformation
             of
             Religion
          
           (
           and
           consequently
           
             to
             be
             discovered
             that
             they
             may
             receive
             condign
             punishment
          
           )
           whom
           we
           know
           to
           endeavour
           in
           their
           places
           and
           callings
           ,
           the
           continuation
           of
           Church-government
           by
           Bishops
           ,
           and
           the
           preservation
           of
           the
           whole
           frame
           of
           government
           (
           as
           it
           now
           stands
           by
           the
           known
           Laws
           of
           this
           Kingdom
           established
           )
           administred
           according
           to
           the
           right
           intent
           of
           those
           Laws
           against
           all
           alteration
           ,
           till
           it
           be
           by
           act
           of
           Parliament
           (
           enacted
           by
           his
           Majesties
           personall
           consent
           ,
           and
           both
           Houses
           )
           altered
           and
           changed
           ?
        
         
           Secondly
           ,
           we
           demand
           how
           far
           forth
           we
           are
           here
           to
           be
           sworn
           
             to
             endeavour
             the
             discovery
             of
             all
             that
             have
             been
             or
             shall
             be
             Malignants
             &c.
             
          
           Is
           the
           son
           hereby
           ingaged
           to
           betray
           his
           father
           ,
           the
           wife
           her
           husband
           ,
           the
           servant
           his
           master
           ?
           and
           to
           accuse
           them
           
             as
             Malignants
             and
             evill
             Instruments
             by
             hindring
             the
             reformation
             ?
          
           If
           so
           ;
           hath
           the
           Law
           of
           God
           ,
           of
           Nature
           ,
           or
           of
           the
           Land
           ever
           commanded
           it
           ;
           except
           in
           the
           case
           of
           high
           Treason
           ?
           Where
           God
           enjoyned
           to
           the
           Jews
           the
           discovery
           of
           those
           who
           should
           entice
           them
           to
           serve
           other
           gods
           (
           a
           sin
           surely
           as
           detestable
           and
           hainous
           ,
           as
           to
           be
           such
           as
           here
           are
           to
           be
           accounted
           
             Malignants
             &c.
             by
             hindring
             the
             reformation
             of
             Religion
          
           )
           thus
           we
           read
           ,
           
             Deut.
          
           13.
           6.
           
           
             If
             thy
             brother
             the
             son
             of
             thy
             mother
             ,
             or
             thy
             son
             ,
             or
             thy
             daughter
             ,
             or
             the
             wife
             of
             thy
             bosom
             ,
             or
             thy
             friend
             which
             is
             as
             thine
             own
             soul
             ,
             entice
             thee
             ,
             &c.
             thou
             shalt
             not
             conceal
             him
             ,
             but
             thy
             hand
             shall
             be
             first
             upon
             him
             to
             put
             him
             to
             death
             :
          
           where
           it
           may
           be
           observed
           ,
           That
           all
           the
           persons
           there
           by
           God
           so
           particularly
           recounted
           in
           the
           Text
           ,
           not
           to
           be
           concealed
           ,
           they
           are
           onely
           such
           as
           are
           in
           a
           collaterall
           equall
           degree
           ,
           as
           the
           brother
           not
           to
           conceal
           his
           brother
           ,
           the
           friend
           his
           friend
           ;
           or
           of
           some
           inferiority
           ,
           as
           the
           husband
           his
           wife
           ,
           the
           father
           his
           son
           :
           But
           there
           is
           expressed
           no
           such
           injunction
           ,
           That
           the
           son
           was
           to
           reveal
           his
           father
           ,
           or
           the
           wife
           her
           husband
           :
           so
           tender
           was
           the
           God
           of
           nature
           of
           the
           respects
           due
           to
           those
           by
           whom
           he
           hath
           bestowed
           upon
           us
           our
           Being
           ,
           Life
           ,
           and
           Livelihood
           ,
           or
           whom
           he
           hath
           made
           a
           head
           to
           others
           ;
           that
           he
           did
           not
           command
           inferiours
           should
           give
           in
           an
           accusation
           against
           such
           their
           superiours
           ,
           even
           in
           crimes
           which
           the
           Law
           judged
           should
           be
           punished
           with
           death
           .
        
         
         
           Thirdly
           ,
           whereas
           we
           have
           in
           the
           late
           Protestation
           vowed
           
             to
             maintain
             the
             liberty
             of
             the
             Subject
             ,
          
           and
           also
           are
           required
           to
           bind
           our selves
           in
           this
           Covenant
           to
           preserve
           the
           same
           (
           if
           the
           liberties
           of
           the
           Kingdoms
           include
           the
           liberty
           of
           the
           subject
           .
           )
           Yet
           contrary
           hereunto
           (
           as
           we
           conceive
           )
           we
           should
           bind
           our selves
           to
           endeavour
           that
           our
           fellow-subjects
           may
           be
           brought
           
             to
             punishment
             ,
             either
             such
             as
             their
             offence
             shall
             deserve
             ,
             or
             such
          
           as
           not
           onely
           
             the
             supream
             Indicatories
             of
             both
             Kingdoms
             ,
             but
             any
             other
             also
             having
             power
             from
             them
             for
             that
             effect
             ,
             shall
             judge
             convenient
             ;
          
           by
           which
           we
           should
           endeavour
           to
           put
           power
           (
           arbitrary
           surely
           ,
           since
           it
           is
           not
           restrained
           according
           to
           the
           Lawes
           of
           our
           Land
           )
           in
           some
           other
           then
           the
           supream
           judicatory
           ,
           
             viz.
          
           some
           deputed
           from
           them
           ,
           who
           may
           judge
           it
           covenient
           (
           if
           what
           they
           shall
           judge
           convenient
           may
           be
           their
           rule
           )
           as
           well
           sometimes
           to
           exceed
           the
           Letter
           of
           the
           Law
           ,
           made
           by
           the
           supream
           Judicatory
           ,
           as
           otherwhile
           to
           mitigate
           it
           :
           Yea
           who
           may
           proceed
           against
           such
           Malignants
           where
           the
           Laws
           are
           wholy
           silent
           ,
           and
           neither
           have
           given
           name
           to
           their
           fault
           ,
           nor
           prescribed
           any
           punishment
           ?
        
         
           And
           whereas
           the
           happinesse
           of
           a
           blessed
           peace
           between
           these
           Kingdoms
           ,
           denied
           in
           former
           times
           to
           our
           progenitors
           ,
           
           is
           by
           the
           good
           providence
           of
           God
           granted
           unto
           us
           ,
           and
           hath
           been
           lately
           concluded
           ,
           and
           setled
           by
           both
           Parliaments
           ,
           we
           shall
           each
           one
           of
           us
           ,
           according
           to
           our
           place
           and
           interest
           endeavour
           that
           they
           may
           remain
           conjoyned
           in
           a
           firm
           peace
           and
           union
           to
           all
           posterity
           ;
           and
           that
           justice
           may
           be
           done
           upon
           the
           wilfull
           opposers
           thereof
           ,
           in
           manner
           expressed
           in
           the
           precedent
           Articles
           .
        
         
           Concerning
           the
           happy
           
             peace
             between
             these
             Kingdoms
             lately
             concluded
             ,
          
           we
           earnestly
           prayed
           and
           desired
           that
           it
           might
           have
           been
           continued
           ,
           and
           pray
           that
           it
           may
           be
           renewed
           ;
           and
           are
           sorry
           heartily
           ,
           that
           contrary
           to
           the
           Pacification
           made
           by
           His
           Majesty
           and
           both
           Parliaments
           ,
           and
           contrary
           to
           the
           solemn
           Faith
           given
           ,
           there
           is
           at
           this
           time
           a
           miserable
           War
           begun
           again
           between
           an
           Army
           of
           that
           Kingdom
           entring
           ours
           ,
           (
           without
           and
           against
           his
           Majesties
           consent
           and
           Declaration
           )
           and
           the
           Forces
           raised
           by
           His
           Majesty
           ,
           who
           (
           we
           have
           heard
           )
           hath
           much
           deprecated
           their
           entring
           in
           ,
           alledging
           vehemently
           that
           their
           late
           solemn
           Faith
           and
           Pacification
           :
           So
           that
           shall
           it
           not
           be
           in
           us
           also
           
             Protestatis
             contraria
             facto
             ,
          
           to
           bind
           our selves
           in
           this
           Article
           (
           as
           willingly
           we
           would
           )
           to
           endeavour
           the
           continuance
           of
           a
           
             firm
             peace
             and
             union
             ,
          
           and
           in
           the
           next
           to
           assist
           and
           defend
           those
           who
           declare
           ,
           that
           in
           pursuit
           of
           this
           Covenant
           they
           now
           enter
           into
           this
           Kingdom
           
           with
           an
           Army
           ?
           which
           if
           we
           look
           to
           the
           late
           Act
           of
           Pacification
           ,
           and
           may
           for
           our selves
           judge
           and
           discern
           what
           it
           is
           ,
           since
           we
           are
           required
           to
           swear
           thereto
           ,
           appears
           in
           its
           self
           an
           action
           as
           contrary
           thereto
           as
           War
           to
           Peace
           .
           So
           that
           this
           Covenant
           would
           bindus
           to
           endeavour
           that
           which
           it
           makes
           us
           to
           abjure
           .
        
         
           We
           shall
           also
           according
           to
           our
           places
           and
           callings
           in
           this
           common
           cause
           of
           Religion
           ,
           
           Liberty
           ,
           and
           peace
           of
           the
           Kingdoms
           ,
           assist
           and
           defend
           all
           those
           that
           enter
           into
           this
           League
           and
           Covenant
           ,
           in
           the
           maintaining
           and
           pursuing
           thereof
           ,
           and
           shall
           not
           suffer
           our selves
           directly
           or
           indirectly
           by
           whatsoever
           combination
           ,
           perswasion
           ,
           or
           terrour
           to
           be
           divided
           and
           withdrawn
           from
           this
           blessed
           union
           and
           conjunction
           ,
           whether
           to
           make
           defection
           to
           the
           contrary
           part
           ,
           or
           to
           give
           our selves
           to
           a
           detestable
           indifferency
           or
           neutrality
           in
           this
           cause
           ,
           which
           so
           much
           concerneth
           the
           glory
           of
           God
           ,
           the
           good
           of
           the
           Kingdoms
           ,
           and
           the
           honour
           of
           the
           King
           ;
           but
           shall
           all
           the
           daies
           of
           our
           lives
           zealously
           and
           constantly
           continue
           therein
           ,
           against
           all
           opposition
           ,
           and
           promote
           the
           same
           according
           to
           our
           power
           ,
           against
           all
           lets
           and
           impediments
           whatsoever
           ;
           and
           what
           we
           are
           not
           able
           our selves
           to
           suppresse
           or
           overcome
           ,
           we
           shall
           reveal
           and
           make
           known
           ,
           that
           it
           may
           be
           timely
           prevented
           or
           removed
           ;
           All
           which
           we
           shall
           do
           as
           in
           the
           sight
           of
           God
           .
        
         
           Whereas
           we
           are
           in
           the
           sixt
           Article
           required
           to
           Covenant
           
             in
             this
             common
             cause
             of
             Religion
          
           (
           which
           is
           described
           in
           the
           first
           Article
           ,
           
             A
             reformation
             of
             Religion
             in
             England
             and
             Ireland
             )
             that
             we
             wil
             assist
             and
             defend
             all
             those
             that
             enter
             into
             this
             League
             and
             Covenant
             against
             all
             opposition
             ,
          
           and
           that
           in
           the
           close
           it
           is
           implied
           ,
           that
           we
           should
           endeavour
           to
           do
           what
           we
           are
           able
           to
           
             suppresse
          
           and
           
             overcome
          
           whatsoever
           
             opposition
             ;
          
           we
           conceive
           it
           to
           be
           against
           the
           whole
           current
           of
           the
           Gospell
           of
           
             Christ
             ,
          
           the
           practise
           and
           Doctrine
           of
           all
           Primitive
           Christians
           ,
           whom
           the
           world
           hath
           ever
           esteemed
           for
           blessed
           Saints
           and
           Martyrs
           ,
           and
           lastly
           repugnant
           to
           the
           Doctrine
           of
           the
           best
           reformed
           Churches
           ,
           (
           to
           which
           we
           here
           should
           swear
           to
           conform
           our selves
           )
           to
           endeavour
           a
           Reformation
           of
           religion
           by
           force
           of
           Arms
           against
           the
           supream
           Magistrat's
           consent
           .
        
         
           Secondly
           ,
           May
           we
           swear
           never
           to
           
             suffer
             our selves
             to
             be
             withdrawn
             by
             whatsoever
             perswasion
          
           from
           this
           League
           and
           Covenant
           ,
           since
           the
           reasons
           perswading
           us
           to
           it
           are
           in
           no
           wise
           Demonstrative
           ?
           What
           if
           hereafter
           we
           shall
           see
           better
           reasons
           ,
           and
           stronger
           motives
           to
           forsake
           it
           ,
           then
           we
           have
           now
           to
           take
           it
           ,
           or
           shall
           have
           then
           to
           keep
           it
           ?
           will
           not
           then
           our
           consciences
           better
           informed
           force
           us
           to
           break
           our
           Oath
           (
           an
           Argument
           that
           we
           sinn'd
           in
           taking
           it
           )
           or
           our
           Oath
           bind
           us
           contrary
           
           to
           our
           consciences
           so
           informed
           ,
           (
           which
           is
           impossible
           ?
           )
           What
           if
           (
           as
           now
           the
           King
           ,
           so
           )
           future
           Parliaments
           disallow
           this
           Covenant
           ,
           and
           oppose
           it
           ,
           shall
           we
           then
           be
           obliged
           to
           continue
           therein
           ,
           and
           to
           assist
           and
           defend
           all
           those
           that
           so
           
             continue
             against
             all
             opposition
             ,
          
           though
           it
           shall
           be
           contradicted
           by
           the
           same
           Authority
           by
           which
           it
           is
           now
           imposed
           upon
           us
           ?
        
         
           Thirdly
           ,
           Where
           we
           are
           required
           to
           bind
           our selves
           never
           
             to
             make
             defection
             to
             the
             contrary
             part
             ;
          
           whether
           by
           the
           contrary
           part
           is
           not
           to
           be
           understood
           all
           that
           are
           against
           this
           Covenant
           ?
           If
           so
           ,
           will
           not
           these
           words
           following
           ,
           [
           
             Against
             all
             opposition
             ,
             against
             all
             lets
             and
             impediments
             whatsoever
          
           ]
           include
           His
           Majesties
           opposition
           ?
           And
           then
           ,
           as
           we
           have
           said
           ,
           we
           are
           in
           the
           close
           impliedly
           supposed
           ,
           That
           we
           will
           endeavour
           to
           do
           what
           we
           are
           able
           to
           suppresse
           and
           overcome
           any
           part
           whatsoever
           of
           the
           contrary
           part
           opposing
           it self
           ;
           which
           since
           it
           seems
           not
           to
           except
           His
           Sacred
           Majesty
           ,
           how
           will
           this
           be
           consistent
           with
           the
           Oaths
           of
           Allegiance
           and
           Supremacy
           ,
           and
           the
           Laws
           of
           the
           Land
           ,
           5
           
             H.
          
           4.
           25
           
             Edw.
          
           3
           ?
           Secondly
           ,
           how
           with
           the
           Word
           of
           God
           ,
           when
           we
           are
           taught
           by
           St.
           
             Paul
             ,
          
           Rom.
           13.
           
           
             That
             whosoever
             shall
             resist
             the
             higher
             Powers
             ,
             shall
             receive
             to
             himself
             Damnation
             ?
          
           and
           in
           case
           of
           contrary
           conflicts
           of
           these
           higher
           Powers
           among
           themselves
           ,
           from
           the
           reason
           included
           in
           the
           object
           ,
           the
           damnation
           will
           be
           (
           without
           repentance
           )
           to
           those
           that
           resist
           the
           Highest
           :
           and
           among
           the
           higher
           powers
           ,
           (
           if
           St.
           
             Peter
          
           may
           interpret
           St.
           
             Paul
             )
             the
             King
             is
             Supream
             ,
          
           and
           all
           other
           
             Governours
          
           are
           
             sent
             by
             Him
             ,
             1
             Pet.
             2.
             14.
             
          
           
             a
          
           For
           our selves
           therefore
           ,
           if
           His
           Majesty
           should
           use
           the
           Sword
           committed
           to
           him
           unjustly
           ,
           we
           must
           take
           up
           St.
           
           
             Ambrose's
          
           words
           ,
           
             conc.
             1.
             contra
             Auxentium
             ,
             Dolere
             potero
             ,
             flere
             potero
             ,
             potero
             gemere
             ,
             adversus
             arma
             ,
             milites
             ,
             Gothos
             quoque
             Lachrymae
             miae
             Arma
             sunt
             ,
             talia
             sunt
             munimenta
             Sacerdotis
             ,
             aliter
             nec
             deb●o
             ,
             nec
             possumresistere
             .
          
        
         
           Fourthly
           ,
           were
           there
           nothing
           in
           the
           Law
           of
           God
           ,
           or
           of
           this
           Land
           forbidding
           us
           of
           the
           Kingdom
           of
           
             England
          
           to
           enter
           a
           Covenant
           of
           mutuall
           assistance
           and
           defence
           ,
           without
           and
           against
           the
           allowance
           of
           the
           King
           ,
           yet
           it
           would
           be
           unlawfull
           for
           us
           to
           joyn
           in
           this
           Covenant
           ,
           since
           we
           are
           required
           here
           not
           onely
           to
           joyn
           with
           one
           another
           ,
           but
           with
           the
           Scots
           also
           in
           a
           Covenant
           of
           mutuall
           assistance
           and
           defence
           ;
           to
           whom
           ,
           if
           by
           a
           law
           of
           their
           Land
           all
           such
           Covenants
           and
           Leagues
           be
           forbidden
           as
           seditious
           ,
           we
           ,
           if
           we
           knowingly
           covenant
           to
           assist
           and
           defend
           them
           in
           such
           a
           League
           ,
           contract
           to
           our selves
           the
           guilt
           of
           sedition
           .
           Now
           to
           the
           Scots
           (
           in
           the
           second
           part
           of
           that
           Act
           of
           Parliament
           
           holden
           at
           
             Linlithgow
          
           anno
           1585.
           )
           are
           forbidden
           
             all
             leagues
             or
             bonds
             of
             mutuall
             defence
             which
             are
             made
             without
             the
             privity
             and
             consent
             of
             the
             King
             ,
             under
             the
             pain
             to
             be
             holden
             and
             execute
             as
             movers
             of
             sedition
             and
             unquietnesse
             .
          
           This
           we
           read
           objected
           by
           the
           Divines
           of
           
             Aberdeen
             ,
          
           but
           could
           never
           yet
           see
           any
           satisfying
           answer
           made
           thereunto
           .
        
         
           Fiftly
           ,
           Whether
           will
           not
           men
           think
           themselves
           bound
           by
           this
           part
           of
           the
           Covenant
           ,
           all
           the
           daies
           of
           their
           lives
           to
           continue
           so
           farre
           zealously
           united
           against
           the
           contrary
           part
           ,
           as
           to
           reject
           all
           overtures
           of
           Accomodation
           ,
           and
           reconciliation
           ;
           till
           they
           be
           
             suppressed
             or
             overcome
             ,
          
           and
           so
           our
           wounds
           become
           incurcable
           ?
        
         
           Sixtly
           ,
           This
           Covenant
           (
           as
           we
           conceive
           ,
           under
           correction
           )
           cannot
           be
           wisely
           taken
           by
           any
           man
           affected
           to
           this
           cause
           ;
           for
           should
           they
           not
           here
           swear
           never
           to
           yeeld
           themselves
           ,
           though
           debelled
           ,
           and
           unable
           to
           withstand
           the
           common
           Enemy
           ,
           
             viz.
          
           the
           Forces
           raised
           by
           the
           King
           ?
           nor
           ever
           to
           lay
           down
           Arms
           ,
           or
           cease
           active
           resistance
           ?
           But
           if
           it
           should
           please
           God
           to
           give
           the
           foresaid
           contrary
           part
           power
           of
           conquest
           ,
           and
           consequently
           
             Ius
             victorie
             ,
          
           should
           they
           not
           bind
           themselves
           by
           this
           Covenant
           never
           to
           submit
           themselves
           to
           Gods
           Will
           and
           Judgement
           against
           them
           ?
           and
           so
           exclude
           all
           Christian
           patience
           and
           suffering
           in
           afflictions
           ,
           and
           tie
           themselves
           (
           though
           unable
           )
           actively
           to
           resist
           ,
           plot
           ,
           disturb
           and
           overthrow
           all
           such
           who
           shall
           so
           have
           power
           over
           them
           hereafter
           ,
           all
           such
           Governours
           and
           governments
           ,
           which
           it
           may
           please
           God
           (
           as
           they
           must
           confesse
           for
           a
           punishment
           of
           their
           sins
           at
           least
           )
           to
           place
           over
           them
           ,
           which
           thing
           we
           conceive
           to
           be
           against
           the
           Law
           of
           God
           ,
           reason
           and
           Nations
           .
        
         
           
             And
             because
             these
             Kingdoms
             are
             guilty
             of
             many
             sins
             ,
             &c.
          
           ]
        
         
           What
           the
           Conclusion
           
           suggests
           we
           have
           also
           considered
           ,
           and
           professe
           our selves
           ready
           to
           joyn
           with
           our
           brethren
           in
           the
           necessary
           
             humbling
             of
             our selves
          
           under
           the
           mighty
           hand
           of
           God
           ,
           and
           in
           the
           confession
           of
           
             our
             sins
             ,
          
           (
           though
           in
           a
           publique
           set
           form
           &
           prescribed
           ,
           such
           as
           we
           conceive
           this
           former
           part
           of
           the
           Conclusion
           to
           be
           )
           
             our
             purpose
          
           also
           ,
           
             desire
             &
             endeavour
             ,
          
           through
           the
           grace
           of
           God
           ,
           
             to
             amend
             our
             lives
             ;
          
           and
           touching
           those
           words
           here
           mentioned
           [
           
             In
             all
             duties
             we
             owe
             to
             God
             and
             man
          
           ]
           we
           professe
           and
           declare
           ,
           that
           did
           we
           believe
           in
           our
           consciences
           ,
           the
           above-written
           Articles
           of
           the
           Covenant
           not
           to
           be
           repugnant
           to
           our
           duties
           which
           we
           owe
           to
           God
           and
           man
           ,
           (
           in
           the
           particulars
           specified
           relating
           to
           His
           Majesty
           and
           to
           the
           Bishops
           of
           our
           Churches
           ,
           by
           God
           set
           over
           us
           ,
           and
           otherwise
           )
           we
           should
           gladly
           have
           gone
           along
           with
           our
           brethren
           therein
           .
        
         
         
           Secondly
           ,
           since
           this
           Oath
           expresly
           professeth
           ,
           what
           also
           all
           lawfull
           promisory
           oaths
           must
           include
           ,
           that
           it
           is
           to
           be
           made
           
             in
             the
             presence
             of
             Almighty
             God
             ,
             the
             searcher
             of
             all
             hearts
             ,
             with
             a
             true
             intention
             to
             perform
             the
             same
             ,
             as
             we
             shall
             answer
             at
             the
             great
             day
             ;
          
           we
           trust
           our
           just
           refusall
           will
           ,
           or
           ought
           to
           be
           better
           interpreted
           ,
           even
           by
           the
           Imposers
           themselves
           ,
           then
           those
           mens
           detestable
           hypocrisie
           ,
           who
           enter
           this
           League
           ,
           and
           make
           this
           Oath
           ,
           with
           mentall
           reservation
           ;
           others
           
             as
             far
             as
             lawfully
             they
             may
             ,
          
           and
           
             saving
             all
             former
             Oaths
             ;
          
           yet
           others
           ,
           
             as
             far
             as
             it
             is
             agreeable
             to
             Gods
             Word
             ,
          
           or
           
             in
             their
             own
             sense
             ,
          
           or
           
             according
             to
             the
             sense
             of
             the
             Preacher
             ,
          
           scandalizing
           thus
           our
           Christian
           and
           reformed
           Religion
           ,
           with
           Jesuiticall
           mentall
           reservations
           ,
           reserving
           in
           their
           minds
           a
           sense
           contrary
           to
           their
           words
           (
           which
           are
           instituted
           to
           signifie
           our
           minds
           )
           and
           contrary
           to
           the
           mind
           of
           the
           Imposers
           ,
           (
           even
           in
           the
           judgement
           of
           their
           own
           minds
           )
           sufficiently
           signified
           in
           the
           words
           of
           the
           Covenant
           :
           and
           indeed
           ,
           
             mentem
             injuratam
             gerunt
             ;
          
           reserving
           this
           Popery
           in
           thus
           swearing
           ,
           while
           they
           swear
           to
           extirpate
           Popery
           .
           We
           professe
           to
           know
           no
           other
           legitimate
           sensing
           of
           our
           Oaths
           ,
           but
           
             mens
             deferentis
             ,
          
           
             a
          
           (
           and
           that
           declared
           before
           the
           taking
           of
           the
           Oath
           ,
           not
           in
           a
           post-Declaration
           )
           and
           the
           Grammaticall
           common
           sense
           of
           the
           words
           without
           limitation
           other
           then
           what
           is
           expressed
           ;
           according
           to
           the
           rule
           of
           St.
           
             Augustin
             .
             Juramentum
             debet
             esse
             pressum
             ,
             &
             expressum
             :
          
           By
           thy
           words
           thou
           shalt
           be
           justified
           ,
           and
           by
           thy
           words
           thou
           shalt
           be
           condemned
           .
           How
           also
           can
           any
           lawfully
           take
           an
           Oath
           ,
           the
           matter
           whereof
           he
           judgeth
           to
           be
           unlawfull
           ,
           
             so
             far
             as
             lawfally
             he
             may
             ?
          
           Be
           we
           not
           deceived
           ,
           God
           is
           not
           mocked
           ;
           May
           we
           swear
           to
           lie
           ,
           steal
           ,
           or
           commit
           adultery
           so
           far
           as
           lawfully
           we
           may
           ?
           Is
           it
           more
           sinfull
           to
           go
           about
           to
           do
           it
           ,
           so
           far
           as
           lawfully
           we
           may
           ,
           then
           so
           to
           swear
           it
           ?
           He
           that
           so
           swears
           ,
           swears
           with
           judgement
           against
           his
           judgement
           ,
           and
           to
           unrighteousnesse
           without
           truth
           ,
           and
           condemneth
           himself
           in
           that
           which
           he
           alloweth
           .
        
         
           Thirdly
           ,
           to
           swear
           ,
           
             saving
             all
             former
             Oaths
             ,
          
           to
           what
           we
           judge
           to
           be
           opposite
           to
           our
           former
           lawfull
           Oaths
           ,
           is
           to
           delude
           both
           our
           former
           and
           present
           Oath
           ;
           to
           warrant
           ,
           that
           we
           may
           without
           scandall
           abjure
           (
           in
           words
           ,
           not
           in
           heart
           )
           what
           we
           have
           sworn
           before
           to
           keep
           ,
           because
           we
           have
           sworn
           before
           to
           keep
           and
           never
           to
           abjure
           it
           ;
           to
           make
           vain
           (
           as
           far
           as
           in
           us
           lies
           )
           the
           great
           and
           dreadfull
           name
           of
           God
           ,
           the
           wholsome
           end
           and
           use
           of
           Oaths
           ,
           and
           particularly
           to
           destroy
           the
           end
           of
           this
           present
           Covenant
           ,
           if
           the
           takers
           intend
           not
           what
           the
           Oath
           intend●
           ;
           and
           may
           also
           hereafter
           (
           saving
           this
           present
           Oath
           )
           swear
           to
           the
           contrary
           .
           For
           the
           present
           be
           it
           considered
           ,
           that
           whereas
           this
           Oath
           is
           a
           
           League
           for
           unity
           ;
           if
           each
           may
           take
           it
           in
           their
           own
           sense
           ,
           its
           end
           will
           be
           none
           ;
           and
           we
           as
           far
           from
           joynt
           union
           of
           assistance
           as
           before
           .
           For
           ,
           swearing
           to
           assist
           all
           who
           enter
           into
           this
           League
           ,
           if
           we
           think
           our selves
           bound
           to
           assist
           o●ely
           the
           takers
           in
           our
           own
           sense
           ,
           then
           we
           may
           happily
           be
           tied
           to
           assist
           none
           hereby
           ,
           for
           perhaps
           our
           own
           sense
           is
           peculiar
           and
           different
           from
           all
           others
           ,
           and
           probably
           from
           most
           ,
           for
           most
           take
           it
           in
           the
           common
           sense
           of
           the
           words
           .
        
         
           Lastly
           ,
           if
           one
           end
           of
           this
           Covenant
           be
           ,
           that
           (
           if
           it
           succeed
           )
           it
           may
           be
           
             encouragement
             to
             other
             Christian
             Churches
          
           (
           in
           like
           case
           )
           
             to
             joyn
             in
             the
             same
             or
             like
             Association
             and
             Covenant
             ;
          
           we
           judge
           it
           necessary
           to
           admonish
           our selves
           and
           others
           ,
           that
           if
           in
           this
           we
           offend
           ,
           we
           also
           lay
           a
           stumbling-block
           of
           offence
           before
           the
           faces
           of
           so
           many
           Christian
           Churches
           now
           and
           hereafter
           ,
           who
           are
           here
           invited
           to
           follow
           our
           example
           .
           Should
           we
           not
           therefore
           sadly
           consider
           ,
           whose
           example
           in
           this
           action
           we
           follow
           ,
           before
           we
           give
           and
           invite
           others
           to
           follow
           our
           example
           ?
           Ought
           we
           not
           wisely
           to
           fear
           ,
           lest
           by
           this
           we
           expose
           our
           brethren
           of
           the
           reformed
           Churches
           beyond
           the
           Seas
           ,
           to
           the
           jealousie
           of
           their
           severall
           Princes
           under
           whom
           they
           live
           ,
           and
           become
           guilty
           of
           the
           provocation
           of
           all
           those
           evils
           ,
           wherewith
           Princes
           in
           prevention
           of
           what
           is
           here
           suggested
           to
           their
           Subjects
           (
           if
           not
           declared
           against
           by
           them
           )
           may
           aggrieve
           our
           brethren
           of
           the
           reformed
           Religion
           ?
           And
           also
           ,
           have
           we
           not
           cause
           to
           question
           with
           our selves
           ,
           how
           the
           example
           of
           entring
           a
           covenant
           mutually
           to
           assist
           and
           defend
           one
           another
           ,
           when
           there
           is
           declared
           a
           joyning
           in
           Armes
           ,
           without
           and
           against
           the
           consent
           of
           the
           supream
           Magistrate
           ,
           how
           this
           example
           (
           we
           say
           )
           will
           make
           ,
           as
           is
           here
           said
           ,
           to
           
             the
             Peace
             and
             Tranquillity
             of
             Christian
             Kingdoms
             and
             Common-wealths
             ?
          
           Now
           the
           Lord
           of
           Peace
           himself
           give
           unto
           us
           ,
           and
           to
           all
           the
           Churches
           of
           God
           ,
           Peace
           alwaies
           ,
           by
           all
           means
           .
        
         
           Amen
           .
        
      
       
       
         
           An
           Exhortation
           to
           the
           taking
           of
           the
           solemn
           League
           and
           Covenant
           ,
           &c.
           
        
         
           
             IF
             the
             power
             of
             religion
             ,
             or
             solid
             reason
             ,
             if
             loyalty
             to
             the
             King
             ,
             &c.
             
          
        
         
           IF
           it
           had
           not
           been
           intimated
           that
           the
           Authors
           of
           this
           Exhortation
           were
           the
           
             Assembly
             of
             Divines
             ,
          
           (
           as
           they
           are
           stiled
           in
           the
           14
           Article
           of
           the
           Instructions
           )
           and
           expressed
           ,
           that
           the
           end
           of
           it
           was
           the
           satisfying
           of
           such
           scruples
           as
           may
           arise
           (
           and
           that
           by
           the
           same
           Authority
           by
           which
           the
           Covenant
           it selfe
           is
           to
           be
           imposed
           )
           it
           could
           not
           have
           given
           the
           conscience
           of
           any
           man
           either
           so
           much
           licence
           to
           examine
           the
           discourse
           with
           strictnesse
           and
           severity
           ,
           or
           so
           much
           satisfaction
           (
           one
           way
           or
           other
           )
           in
           the
           examination
           ;
           seeing
           there
           is
           scarce
           any
           other
           end
           of
           writing
           which
           necessarily
           obliges
           to
           a
           discovery
           of
           all
           the
           consequences
           and
           the
           principles
           of
           a
           discourse
           ,
           and
           there
           is
           no
           such
           outward
           encouragement
           to
           the
           conscience
           towards
           satisfaction
           ,
           as
           when
           it
           shall
           consider
           that
           it
           is
           examining
           
             an
             Exhortation
             and
             a
             Defence
             ,
          
           the
           Authors
           of
           which
           have
           been
           chosen
           ,
           the
           worke
           appointed
           ,
           and
           after
           the
           performance
           
             twice
             publiquely
             read
             ,
          
           and
           considered
           ,
           and
           lastly
           
             ordered
             to
             be
             published
          
           by
           them
           who
           are
           the
           managers
           of
           the
           Cause
           for
           which
           this
           Exhortation
           and
           Defence
           is
           made
           .
           But
           this
           being
           the
           declared
           end
           ,
           and
           those
           the
           Authors
           ,
           it
           will
           not
           stand
           with
           the
           opinion
           of
           the
           faithfulnesse
           of
           those
           men
           towards
           the
           Cause
           it self
           ,
           to
           imagine
           that
           they
           reserve
           to
           themselves
           clearer
           and
           firmer
           principles
           ,
           upon
           which
           they
           are
           able
           to
           enforce
           the
           taking
           of
           the
           Covenant
           ,
           then
           those
           they
           have
           here
           expressed
           :
           And
           consequently
           ,
           if
           upon
           just
           examination
           it
           shall
           appear
           ,
           that
           all
           the
           truth
           that
           is
           by
           them
           laid
           down
           is
           not
           sufficient
           to
           infer
           their
           Conclusion
           ,
           they
           may
           be
           more
           tender
           of
           those
           who
           are
           of
           different
           perswasion
           from
           themselves
           ,
           though
           they
           shall
           (
           notwithstanding
           their
           endeavours
           )
           persist
           in
           their
           opinion
           ,
           nay
           though
           they
           should
           hereby
           gain
           a
           degree
           of
           adhesion
           to
           it
           .
        
         
           The
           conclusion
           which
           they
           would
           infer
           is
           the
           taking
           of
           the
           Covenant
           ,
           and
           the
           generall
           end
           of
           that
           ,
           as
           expressed
           in
           the
           Covenant
           it selfe
           and
           in
           all
           the
           Declarations
           which
           concern
           the
           same
           ,
           is
           (
           in
           our
           calling
           )
           the
           assistance
           of
           those
           of
           the
           Kingdoms
           of
           
             England
          
           and
           
             Scotland
             
             joyned
             in
             Arms
             ,
             &c.
             against
             the
             Popish
             ,
             Prelaticall
             ,
             and
             Malignant
             party
             :
          
           in
           a
           word
           ,
           to
           assist
           ,
           or
           comply
           with
           those
           English
           and
           Scottish
           Forces
           ,
           against
           the
           Forces
           raised
           by
           the
           Kings
           personall
           command
           .
           This
           being
           the
           case
           wherein
           the
           scruples
           (
           by
           them
           spoken
           of
           )
           are
           supposed
           to
           be
           removed
           ,
           that
           their
           Arguments
           to
           that
           end
           might
           be
           effectuall
           ,
           it
           was
           necessary
           to
           their
           end
           ,
           that
           the
           present
           case
           should
           have
           been
           clearly
           and
           particularly
           laid
           down
           ,
           considering
           that
           the
           discovery
           of
           strong
           and
           not
           doubting
           presumption
           and
           supposall
           of
           that
           part
           which
           is
           defended
           ,
           though
           it
           might
           produce
           a
           degree
           of
           confirmation
           in
           those
           who
           are
           (
           though
           not
           so
           strongly
           )
           of
           the
           same
           opinion
           ,
           yet
           can
           it
           not
           in
           reason
           be
           reputed
           a
           means
           to
           take
           off
           scruple
           from
           a
           rationall
           adversary
           .
           This
           being
           necessary
           in
           it self
           for
           a
           true
           and
           thorough
           resolution
           of
           conscience
           in
           the
           case
           ,
           it
           cannot
           be
           denied
           but
           their
           discourse
           is
           imperfect
           in
           it selfe
           ,
           and
           consequently
           they
           may
           as
           well
           have
           erred
           in
           assuming
           to
           themselves
           all
           that
           is
           holy
           and
           perfect
           ,
           and
           esteeming
           of
           the
           adverse
           party
           as
           of
           people
           
             bewitched
             and
             besotted
             ,
             hoodwink't
             and
             blinded
             ,
             &c.
          
           nay
           ,
           as
           
             the
             dregs
             and
             scum
             of
             the
             people
             ,
          
           and
           in
           affirming
           
             the
             name
             and
             countenance
             of
             His
             sacred
             Majesty
             to
             be
             captivated
             ,
             and
             prostituted
             to
             serve
             all
             the
             lusts
             of
             such
             men
             ;
          
           and
           in
           setting
           in
           opposition
           the
           
             King
             and
             those
             that
             be
             faithfull
             in
             the
             Land
             .
          
        
         
           But
           seeing
           that
           it
           is
           possible
           that
           a
           case
           may
           be
           so
           clear
           and
           plain
           to
           all
           men
           ,
           that
           it
           may
           without
           any
           great
           damage
           be
           omitted
           in
           a
           discourse
           made
           for
           the
           resolution
           of
           the
           conscience
           ;
           it
           will
           concern
           the
           conscience
           however
           impartially
           to
           set
           before
           its
           eyes
           the
           present
           question
           ,
           and
           then
           to
           examine
           the
           discourse
           of
           this
           Exhortation
           ,
           upon
           which
           the
           determination
           of
           conscience
           will
           naturally
           follow
           .
        
         
           To
           propound
           the
           State
           of
           the
           question
           impartially
           (
           though
           not
           according
           to
           the
           utmost
           truth
           of
           the
           case
           )
           it
           will
           be
           enough
           ,
           if
           it
           be
           made
           up
           of
           truths
           confessed
           and
           undeniable
           .
        
         
           
             1.
             
             Scots
             and
             English
             are
             Subjects
             to
             the
             King
             .
          
           
             2.
             
             Of
             the
             same
             Protestant
             Religion
             ,
             the
             professors
             whereof
             do
             not
             differ
             in
             fundamentals
             .
          
           
             3.
             
             Their
             joyning
             in
             Arms
             ,
             (
             as
             is
             alledged
             )
             is
             for
             the
             vindication
             and
             defence
             of
             their
             Religi●n
             ,
             Liberties
             ,
             and
             Laws
             .
          
           
             4.
             
             Against
             the
             Popish
             Prelaticall
             ,
             and
             Malignant
             party
             .
          
           
             5.
             
             By
             these
             are
             meant
             the
             Souldiers
             raised
             by
             the
             King
             .
          
        
         
           
             On
             the
             other
             side
             :
          
           
             1.
             
             The
             King
             is
             our
             lawfull
             Soveraign
             ,
          
           
           
             2.
             
             Of
             the
             same
             Protestant
             Religion
             .
          
           
             3.
             
             He
             hath
             protested
             and
             engaged
             himself
             with
             all
             solemnity
             (
             as
             at
             the
             receiving
             of
             the
             holy
             Eucharist
             ,
             &c.
             )
             to
             preserve
             and
             maintain
             the
             Protestant
             Religion
             ,
             the
             Laws
             and
             Liberties
             of
             the
             Kingdoms
             and
             Parliaments
             .
          
           
             4.
             
             That
             he
             hath
             sent
             many
             Messages
             for
             Treaties
             toward
             Peace
             ,
             both
             before
             and
             during
             the
             time
             of
             these
             wars
             ,
             and
             expressed
             a
             desire
             of
             making
             the
             people
             witnesses
             of
             the
             equity
             of
             his
             proceedings
             .
          
           
             5.
             
             He
             hath
             declared
             his
             will
             against
             both
             the
             Scots
             and
             English
             ,
             who
             take
             up
             Arms
             in
             this
             Cause
             .
          
        
         
           Out
           of
           these
           principles
           (
           whereas
           many
           more
           might
           be
           added
           in
           behalf
           of
           His
           Majestie
           )
           let
           the
           question
           be
           ,
           Whether
           it
           may
           be
           lawfull
           and
           necessary
           for
           subjects
           to
           covenant
           together
           ,
           without
           and
           against
           the
           expresse
           will
           of
           their
           lawfull
           Soveraign
           ,
           to
           joyn
           in
           Arms
           against
           the
           Forces
           raised
           by
           his
           command
           ,
           and
           that
           for
           the
           vindication
           and
           defence
           of
           that
           which
           he
           hath
           by
           all
           possible
           obligations
           engaged
           himself
           to
           maintain
           and
           defend
           ,
           and
           for
           security
           of
           his
           people
           hath
           desired
           that
           differences
           might
           be
           composed
           by
           Treaty
           ,
           and
           that
           the
           world
           might
           judge
           of
           his
           proceedings
           in
           it
           .
        
         
           If
           this
           be
           a
           true
           state
           of
           the
           question
           (
           at
           least
           so
           far
           as
           is
           here
           expressed
           )
           the
           next
           labour
           for
           our
           Consciences
           will
           be
           to
           examine
           whether
           any
           argument
           in
           this
           exhortation
           (
           upon
           supposition
           that
           they
           all
           were
           truths
           in
           themselves
           )
           doe
           infer
           a
           lawfulnesse
           and
           necessity
           to
           covenant
           in
           our
           case
           ,
           all
           things
           considered
           ;
           and
           if
           it
           be
           evident
           that
           they
           are
           not
           sufficient
           ,
           it
           may
           be
           a
           motive
           to
           abate
           the
           confidence
           of
           the
           composers
           of
           it
           (
           whosoever
           they
           were
           in
           particular
           )
           and
           to
           procure
           an
           examination
           of
           their
           own
           principles
           and
           actions
           ,
           wherein
           they
           may
           possibly
           see
           that
           they
           have
           not
           either
           in
           their
           own
           actions
           ,
           or
           in
           their
           judgement
           of
           others
           ,
           proceeded
           so
           exactly
           according
           to
           the
           Law
           of
           conscience
           and
           the
           word
           of
           God
           .
        
         
           Now
           ,
           although
           we
           are
           confident
           that
           there
           is
           not
           in
           this
           exhortation
           any
           one
           argument
           which
           the
           Assembly
           it self
           will
           undertake
           so
           to
           contrive
           ,
           as
           that
           it
           shall
           conclude
           for
           a
           necessity
           or
           a
           lawfulnesse
           of
           taking
           such
           a
           Covenant
           in
           such
           a
           case
           (
           all
           things
           considered
           )
           and
           consequently
           the
           whole
           businesse
           ,
           which
           was
           of
           necessity
           for
           vindication
           of
           our selves
           from
           
             sottishnesse
             &c.
          
           is
           already
           done
           ;
           Yet
           that
           it
           may
           without
           any
           danger
           of
           prejudice
           or
           errour
           appear
           ,
           that
           we
           are
           not
           guilty
           of
           such
           a
           presumption
           as
           we
           have
           excepted
           against
           in
           them
           ,
           we
           will
           ,
           as
           briefly
           as
           may
           be
           ,
           examine
           their
           whole
           discourse
           ,
           and
           evidently
           (
           unlesse
           
           indeed
           we
           be
           
             bewitched
          
           to
           think
           so
           )
           discover
           what
           is
           untrue
           or
           uncertain
           (
           if
           any
           thing
           of
           those
           kinds
           shall
           occur
           )
           and
           what
           is
           insufficient
           in
           their
           Exhortation
           ,
           after
           we
           have
           by
           way
           of
           Apology
           premised
           ,
           that
           we
           will
           not
           all
           answer
           them
           in
           the
           manner
           of
           the
           delivery
           of
           the
           reasons
           .
           We
           have
           (
           as
           we
           hope
           )
           prevailed
           against
           those
           affections
           which
           might
           have
           arisen
           upon
           those
           expressions
           which
           concern
           our selves
           ,
           and
           (
           though
           with
           far
           greater
           difficulty
           )
           against
           that
           indignation
           which
           followed
           upon
           the
           apprehension
           of
           those
           (
           not
           so
           very
           reverent
           )
           expressions
           and
           reflections
           upon
           his
           sacred
           Majestie
           ,
           so
           far
           as
           not
           to
           suffer
           our
           judgements
           or
           consciences
           to
           be
           withdrawn
           from
           a
           just
           and
           meer
           examination
           of
           the
           truth
           :
           having
           seen
           in
           them
           ,
           that
           zeal
           and
           confidence
           (
           however
           they
           are
           excellent
           affections
           in
           those
           who
           are
           sufficiently
           grounded
           in
           an
           unfallible
           truth
           ,
           yet
           they
           )
           do
           in
           no
           measure
           help
           toward
           a
           discovery
           of
           truth
           or
           a
           removall
           of
           scruples
           in
           a
           case
           of
           conscience
           .
        
         
           The
           whole
           discourse
           was
           intended
           by
           the
           Authors
           of
           it
           ,
           to
           consist
           of
           perswasions
           ,
           and
           resolutions
           of
           scruples
           ,
           and
           is
           immediately
           resolved
           into
           an
           introduction
           and
           the
           body
           of
           the
           discourse
           .
        
         
           As
           for
           the
           Introduction
           ,
           it
           contains
           a
           collection
           of
           many
           places
           ,
           from
           whence
           the
           composers
           thereof
           presume
           that
           the
           necessity
           of
           taking
           this
           League
           might
           be
           enforced
           .
           But
           seeing
           it
           carries
           not
           clearly
           in
           it self
           any
           discovery
           of
           the
           consequences
           ,
           it
           could
           not
           in
           reason
           be
           premised
           to
           any
           other
           discourse
           ,
           then
           such
           as
           in
           the
           processe
           should
           clear
           that
           which
           was
           there
           presumed
           ;
           and
           seeing
           the
           following
           discourse
           is
           no
           way
           ordered
           to
           a
           clearing
           of
           those
           inferences
           ,
           so
           that
           the
           design
           of
           him
           who
           made
           the
           introduction
           is
           no
           further
           prosecuted
           ,
           we
           may
           here
           indeed
           observe
           an
           instance
           of
           the
           variance
           which
           is
           said
           to
           be
           in
           the
           Assembly
           ,
           but
           are
           no
           wayes
           helped
           in
           that
           which
           was
           the
           fundamentall
           intention
           of
           the
           whole
           (
           the
           resolution
           of
           our
           scruples
           )
           which
           by
           the
           serious
           consideration
           of
           those
           things
           here
           reckoned
           up
           ,
           we
           professe
           to
           have
           been
           exceedingly
           strengthened
           upon
           us
           ;
           and
           that
           by
           such
           inference
           as
           may
           be
           gathered
           ,
           if
           not
           cleerly
           seen
           ,
           by
           this
           ensuing
           parallel
           .
        
         
           
             If
             the
             power
             of
             Religion
             ,
          
           described
           and
           practised
           by
           our
           Saviour
           Christ
           and
           his
           Apostles
           ,
           and
           expressed
           in
           the
           most
           heroicall
           actions
           of
           the
           primitive
           Christians
           ;
           or
           if
           
             solid
             reason
          
           informed
           by
           the
           Doctrine
           of
           the
           Church
           of
           
             England
             ,
          
           and
           assisted
           by
           the
           light
           of
           the
           examples
           of
           holy
           Saints
           and
           Martyrs
           ,
           and
           by
           a
           perfect
           information
           of
           the
           beginnings
           and
           proceedings
           of
           our
           present
           miseries
           ,
           and
           of
           
           the
           standing
           known
           Laws
           of
           the
           Land
           ;
           
             If
             loyalty
             to
             the
             King
             ,
             and
             piety
             to
             their
             native
             Couatry
             ,
             or
             love
             to
             themselves
             ,
             and
             naturall
             affection
             to
             their
             posterity
             ;
             if
             the
             example
             of
             men
             touched
             with
             a
             deep
             sense
             of
             all
             these
             ,
          
           such
           as
           have
           been
           the
           most
           eminent
           among
           the
           Clergy
           for
           piety
           and
           learning
           ,
           the
           Instruments
           (
           as
           it
           is
           confessed
           )
           used
           by
           Almighty
           God
           for
           the
           preservation
           of
           our
           Religion
           against
           all
           its
           enemies
           ,
           who
           ,
           with
           many
           others
           ,
           the
           most
           worthy
           of
           the
           Laity
           ,
           have
           cheerfully
           and
           constantly
           been
           spoiled
           of
           their
           goods
           ,
           and
           suffered
           a
           long
           and
           tedious
           imprisonment
           ,
           and
           are
           and
           have
           been
           ready
           to
           suffer
           death
           it selfe
           in
           the
           present
           cause
           of
           his
           Sacred
           Majestie
           ;
           or
           if
           
             extraordinary
             successe
             from
             God
             thereupon
             ,
          
           such
           as
           was
           necessary
           to
           raise
           his
           Majesty
           from
           a
           state
           of
           despised
           weaknesse
           to
           a
           power
           able
           to
           resist
           ,
           and
           probably
           able
           to
           debell
           all
           the
           Forces
           which
           his
           enemies
           of
           three
           Kingdoms
           can
           procure
           .
           If
           any
           or
           all
           of
           these
           
             can
             awaken
             a
             Nation
          
           hitherto
           stupified
           and
           blinded
           ,
           and
           thereupon
           
             imbroiled
          
           in
           the
           miseries
           which
           have
           attended
           upon
           this
           war
           ,
           
             to
             see
             and
             imbrace
             the
             soveraign
             and
             onely
             means
             of
             their
             recovery
             ;
          
           there
           can
           be
           no
           doubt
           or
           fear
           ,
           that
           they
           will
           enter
           into
           a
           League
           with
           those
           who
           have
           
             lifted
             up
          
           (
           under
           what
           pretence
           soever
           )
           
             their
             hands
          
           against
           his
           Sacred
           Majestie
           ,
           but
           they
           will
           rather
           repent
           them
           of
           their
           former
           disobedience
           ,
           endeavouring
           to
           reduce
           their
           brethren
           to
           a
           labour
           for
           reconciliation
           and
           pardon
           from
           his
           Majestie
           ,
           at
           least
           to
           an
           acceptation
           of
           those
           proffers
           for
           Treaty
           towards
           accommodation
           ,
           which
           he
           so
           often
           makes
           ;
           and
           in
           case
           they
           shall
           be
           by
           any
           pertinaciously
           refused
           ,
           joyn
           themselves
           with
           his
           Sacred
           Majesty
           in
           his
           just
           defence
           .
        
         
           Having
           thus
           done
           with
           the
           Introduction
           ,
           it
           follows
           that
           we
           examine
           the
           Discourse
           it self
           ,
           which
           proceeds
           in
           this
           method
           :
        
         
           First
           ,
           to
           propound
           the
           motives
           to
           perswade
           men
           to
           take
           the
           Covenant
           .
        
         
           Secondly
           ,
           to
           answer
           the
           objections
           or
           scruples
           which
           might
           hinder
           ,
           &c.
           
        
         
           Here
           ,
           before
           we
           begin
           to
           examine
           the
           strength
           of
           the
           motives
           themselves
           ,
           we
           observe
           the
           different
           apprehensions
           of
           the
           framers
           of
           it
           ;
           for
           ,
           whereas
           he
           who
           framed
           the
           Introduction
           did
           ,
           it
           seems
           ,
           imagine
           that
           the
           taking
           of
           the
           Covenant
           might
           be
           enforced
           from
           the
           positive
           Law
           of
           God
           ,
           and
           the
           Law
           of
           Nature
           ;
           the
           other
           ,
           who
           was
           to
           lay
           down
           the
           Motives
           ,
           was
           so
           farre
           from
           that
           ,
           as
           to
           esteem
           it
           necessary
           towards
           the
           same
           end
           ,
           in
           the
           first
           place
           to
           insinuate
           the
           example
           of
           themselves
           of
           the
           Assembly
           ,
           and
           others
           who
           had
           already
           taken
           it
           .
        
         
         
           The
           strength
           of
           their
           perswasive
           Arguments
           is
           this
           :
        
         
           
             First
             ,
          
           This
           Covenant
           is
           already
           taken
           by
           the
           two
           Houses
           of
           Parliament
           ,
           by
           the
           Assembly
           of
           Divines
           ,
           the
           City
           of
           London
           ,
           and
           the
           Kingdom
           of
           Scotland
           .
        
         
           
             Secondly
             ,
          
           It
           hath
           been
           already
           seconded
           from
           Heaven
           by
           blasting
           the
           Counsels
           ,
           &c.
           
        
         
           
             Thirdly
             ,
          
           It
           carries
           in
           it self
           such
           a
           convincing
           evidence
           of
           Equity
           ,
           Truth
           ,
           and
           Righteousnesse
           ,
           as
           may
           raise
           in
           all
           enflamed
           affections
           to
           take
           it
           ;
           
             which
             is
             proved
             ,
             because
          
        
         
           
             There
             is
             [
             almost
             ]
             nothing
             in
             this
             Covenant
             which
             was
             not
             for
             substance
             either
             expressed
             ,
             or
             manifestly
             included
             in
             the
             Protestation
             of
             May
             5.
             1641.
             
          
        
         
           
             Ergo
             ,
          
           whosoever
           are
           not
           
             wilfully
             ignorant
             ,
          
           or
           
             miserably
             seduced
             ,
          
           must
           infallibly
           take
           this
           Covenant
           .
        
         
           For
           the
           first
           of
           these
           Arguments
           :
        
         
           
           First
           ,
           in
           generall
           ,
           we
           do
           not
           see
           how
           the
           example
           of
           either
           party
           can
           reasonably
           be
           alledged
           to
           direct
           the
           Conscience
           in
           any
           controversie
           .
        
         
           Secondly
           ,
           we
           have
           reason
           to
           believe
           that
           farre
           the
           greater
           number
           ,
           both
           in
           the
           City
           of
           
             London
             ,
          
           and
           the
           Kingdom
           of
           
             Scotland
             ,
          
           could
           not
           take
           this
           Oath
           
             in
             judgement
             ,
          
           as
           being
           not
           able
           to
           discern
           of
           the
           
             righteousnesse
          
           or
           
             iniquity
          
           of
           some
           of
           the
           Articles
           ,
           especially
           that
           which
           concerns
           Episcopacy
           ,
           so
           that
           a
           chief
           strength
           of
           this
           Argument
           from
           Example
           ,
           consists
           in
           the
           example
           of
           themselves
           who
           are
           of
           the
           Assembly
           ,
           and
           made
           this
           Exhortation
           .
           And
           then
           we
           conceive
           ,
           they
           cannot
           justly
           accuse
           us
           either
           of
           immodesty
           or
           presumption
           ,
           if
           we
           shall
           openly
           professe
           that
           they
           have
           not
           in
           this
           first
           Essay
           of
           theirs
           (
           at
           least
           which
           we
           know
           to
           have
           been
           published
           )
           given
           evidences
           of
           so
           great
           Judgement
           ,
           Learning
           ,
           or
           Integrity
           ,
           as
           may
           warrant
           or
           encourage
           us
           in
           matters
           of
           Religion
           and
           cases
           of
           Conscience
           ,
           to
           subscribe
           to
           the
           authority
           of
           their
           example
           .
        
         
           
           To
           the
           second
           Argument
           ,
           which
           is
           ,
           
             That
             it
             hath
             been
             seconded
             from
             Heaven
             ,
             &c.
          
           it
           cannot
           conclude
           to
           the
           Conscience
           ,
           till
           it
           be
           sufficiently
           proved
           ;
           neither
           can
           that
           be
           without
           a
           revelation
           of
           the
           Counsels
           of
           God
           ,
           which
           if
           the
           Composer
           of
           this
           part
           hath
           obtained
           ,
           it
           was
           requisite
           to
           the
           end
           propounded
           that
           he
           should
           have
           made
           it
           appear
           ;
           till
           when
           it
           may
           be
           beleeved
           ,
           that
           those
           instances
           where
           the
           signature
           of
           Gods
           Judgements
           may
           the
           most
           plainly
           have
           been
           discovered
           ,
           have
           fallen
           upon
           those
           who
           have
           had
           the
           greatest
           share
           in
           the
           
           raising
           and
           managing
           of
           those
           Arms
           ,
           for
           the
           maintaining
           of
           which
           this
           Covenant
           is
           ordained
           .
        
         
           So
           then
           the
           whole
           force
           of
           their
           perswasion
           will
           depend
           upon
           the
           third
           Argument
           ,
           and
           the
           proof
           of
           it
           ,
           which
           (
           to
           avoid
           any
           errour
           in
           examining
           )
           shall
           be
           again
           propounded
           :
        
         
           
             There
             is
             (
             almost
             )
             nothing
             in
             this
             Covenant
             ,
             which
             was
             not
             for
             substance
             either
             expressed
             ,
             or
             manifestly
             included
             in
             the
             Protestation
             ,
             May
             5.
             1641.
             
          
        
         
           Therefore
           this
           Covenant
           goeth
           forth
           in
           its
           own
           strength
           ,
           with
           such
           convincing
           evidence
           of
           Equity
           ,
           Truth
           ,
           and
           Righteousnesse
           ,
           as
           may
           raise
           in
           all
           not
           wilfully
           ignorant
           or
           miserably
           seduced
           ,
           inflamed
           affections
           to
           joyn
           in
           the
           Covenant
           .
        
         
           
             Resp.
          
           1.
           
           We
           are
           not
           able
           by
           all
           those
           wayes
           of
           reasoning
           ,
           to
           which
           we
           have
           hitherto
           been
           used
           ,
           to
           discover
           the
           inference
           which
           is
           here
           made
           .
           If
           by
           the
           strength
           of
           their
           
             solid
             reason
          
           it
           may
           possibly
           be
           made
           to
           appear
           ,
           yet
           we
           are
           confident
           the
           dependence
           is
           so
           deep
           and
           secret
           ,
           that
           it
           ought
           not
           (
           to
           the
           end
           for
           which
           this
           discourse
           is
           declared
           to
           be
           intended
           )
           have
           been
           left
           unrevealed
           .
        
         
           2.
           
           Whereas
           the
           Argument
           
             of
             the
             evident
             Equity
             ,
             Truth
             and
             Righteousnesse
          
           of
           this
           is
           taken
           from
           the
           agreement
           of
           it
           with
           that
           Protestation
           ,
           we
           will
           assume
           the
           matter
           of
           that
           Protestation
           to
           have
           been
           (
           in
           the
           judgement
           of
           this
           Assembly
           )
           
             Equall
             ,
             True
             ,
          
           and
           
             Righteous
             ;
          
           from
           whence
           it
           will
           follow
           ,
           that
           if
           this
           should
           ,
           according
           to
           their
           principles
           ,
           either
           immediately
           or
           by
           necessary
           consequence
           contradict
           that
           Protestation
           ,
           therein
           they
           must
           confesse
           it
           to
           be
           
             unequall
             ,
             false
             ,
          
           or
           
             unrighteous
             ;
          
           and
           wherein
           soever
           it
           doth
           positively
           dissent
           from
           it
           ,
           there
           the
           
             Truth
             ,
             Equity
             ,
          
           and
           
             Righteousnesse
          
           of
           it
           must
           be
           confessed
           to
           be
           here
           no
           way
           proved
           ;
           this
           being
           premised
           ,
           let
           us
           compare
           together
           this
           Covenant
           and
           that
           Protestation
           .
        
         
           There
           we
           protested
           that
           we
           would
           
             with
             our
             lives
             ,
             &c.
             defend
             the
             Doctrine
             of
             the
             Church
             of
             England
          
           [
           indefinitely
           ]
           which
           is
           undoubtedly
           contained
           in
           the
           39.
           
           Articles
           ,
           which
           (
           in
           the
           further
           Articles
           of
           impeachment
           ,
           Jan.
           17.
           1643.
           by
           the
           Commons
           assembled
           in
           Parliament
           against
           the
           Archbishop
           of
           
             Canterbury
          
           )
           are
           stiled
           ,
           
             The
             39.
             
             Articles
             of
             the
             Church
             England
             established
             by
             Act
             of
             Parliament
             ;
          
           and
           in
           the
           six
           and
           thirtieth
           of
           those
           Articles
           it
           is
           avouched
           that
           
             the
             Book
             of
             Consecration
             of
             Archbishops
             and
             Bishops
             ,
             and
             ordering
             of
             Priests
             and
             Deacons
             ,
             confirmed
             by
             Authority
             of
             Parliament
             ,
             doth
             contain
             all
             things
             necessary
             to
             such
             Consecration
             and
             Ordering
             ,
             and
             hath
             nothing
             in
             it
             ungodly
             .
          
           
           This
           book
           asserteth
           ,
           that
           
             it
             is
             evident
             to
             all
             men
             ,
             diligently
             reading
             holy
             Scripture
             and
             ancient
             Authors
             ,
             that
             from
             the
             Apostles
             times
             there
             have
             been
             these
             Orders
             of
             Ministers
             in
             the
             Church
             ,
             Bishops
             ,
             Priests
             ,
             and
             `
             Deacons
             ,
             which
             Officers
             were
             evermore
             bad
             in
             reverent
             estimation
             .
          
           Wherefore
           we
           there
           protested
           
             with
             our
             lives
             ,
             &c.
          
           to
           defend
           that
           it
           is
           not
           ungodly
           (
           therefore
           not
           false
           Doctrine
           )
           to
           say
           ,
           That
           diligent
           reading
           of
           the
           Holy
           Scriptures
           will
           help
           to
           make
           it
           evident
           ,
           that
           from
           the
           Apostles
           times
           there
           have
           been
           Bishops
           ,
           which
           could
           not
           be
           ,
           unlesse
           the
           Scriptures
           did
           testifie
           ,
           that
           in
           the
           Apostles
           times
           they
           were
           .
           One
           of
           the
           Prayers
           also
           (
           
             &
             lex
             orandi
             lex
             docendi
          
           )
           thus
           begins
           ;
           
             Almighty
             God
             ,
             giver
             of
             all
             good
             things
             ,
             which
             by
             thy
             Holy
             Spirit
             hast
             appointed
             divers
             orders
             of
             Ministers
             in
             thy
             Church
             ,
             mercifully
             behold
             this
             thy
             servant
             now
             called
             to
             the
             work
             and
             ministery
             of
             a
             Bishop
             ;
          
           and
           the
           elected
           Bishop
           is
           afterward
           required
           to
           professe
           ,
           
             That
             he
             is
             perswaded
             that
             he
             is
             truly
             called
             to
             this
             Ministration
             according
             to
             the
             will
             of
             our
             Lord
             Iesus
             Christ
             .
          
           And
           by
           consequence
           we
           there
           did
           protest
           to
           defend
           that
           also
           ;
           and
           consequently
           (
           upon
           their
           own
           principles
           )
           it
           is
           
             unequall
          
           and
           
             unrighteous
          
           to
           swear
           to
           the
           
             extirpation
          
           of
           them
           .
        
         
           Again
           ,
           in
           that
           Protestation
           there
           was
           nothing
           concerning
           the
           endeavouring
           the
           preservation
           of
           the
           Doctrine
           ,
           Discipline
           ,
           and
           Worship
           of
           the
           Church
           of
           
             Scotland
             ,
          
           the
           Reformation
           of
           the
           Doctrine
           of
           the
           Church
           of
           
             England
             .
          
           Moreover
           ,
           in
           that
           we
           protested
           
             absolutely
          
           the
           defence
           of
           the
           Kings
           Person
           ,
           according
           to
           our
           Allegiance
           ,
           which
           here
           we
           do
           
             not
             absolutely
          
           swear
           to
           ,
           
             to
             maintain
             the
             Laws
             of
             the
             Land
             ,
             the
             Liberty
             of
             the
             Subject
             ,
             and
          
           onely
           to
           
             defend
             one
             another
             so
             far
             as
             lawfully
             we
             may
             ,
          
           which
           here
           are
           omitted
           .
           Many
           other
           differences
           may
           be
           observed
           .
           If
           yet
           they
           shall
           say
           ,
           that
           there
           is
           nothing
           (
           almost
           )
           in
           this
           which
           is
           not
           in
           that
           ,
           or
           nothing
           of
           moment
           (
           which
           must
           be
           the
           meaning
           ,
           if
           their
           Argument
           be
           of
           any
           force
           at
           all
           )
           it
           may
           not
           be
           thought
           unreasonable
           ,
           if
           we
           desire
           (
           with
           leave
           from
           His
           Majestie
           )
           to
           renew
           that
           Protestation
           ,
           that
           we
           may
           be
           thereby
           excused
           from
           this
           League
           and
           Covenant
           .
        
         
           After
           the
           proposall
           of
           their
           perswasive
           Arguments
           ,
           they
           proceed
           to
           the
           taking
           away
           of
           scruples
           ,
           not
           all
           ,
           or
           most
           of
           such
           as
           might
           arise
           to
           the
           contrary
           (
           as
           appears
           by
           that
           which
           we
           have
           humbly
           represented
           against
           the
           Covenant
           it self
           )
           therefore
           such
           as
           they
           have
           chosen
           out
           (
           probably
           )
           because
           they
           conceived
           themselves
           best
           able
           for
           their
           Answer
           .
           The
           scruples
           which
           they
           suppose
           ,
           are
           such
           as
           concern
           either
           the
           King
           or
           the
           Bishops
           .
        
         
         
           They
           begin
           with
           the
           extirpation
           of
           Bishops
           ,
           where
           first
           they
           design
           to
           prove
           ,
           that
           they
           may
           ,
           and
           ought
           to
           be
           extirpated
           ;
           and
           after
           they
           addresse
           themselves
           to
           answer
           one
           speciall
           objection
           .
           We
           will
           therefore
           in
           order
           propound
           and
           examine
           the
           weight
           and
           truth
           which
           is
           in
           their
           Arguments
           .
        
         
           The
           first
           is
           but
           an
           intimation
           ,
           
             Some
             say
             this
             Government
             was
             never
             formally
             established
             by
             the
             Laws
             of
             this
             Land
             at
             all
             .
          
           If
           this
           were
           true
           ,
           which
           some
           say
           ,
           the
           Argument
           were
           not
           of
           so
           great
           force
           toward
           the
           taking
           away
           of
           this
           government
           ,
           as
           it
           would
           be
           of
           power
           to
           confirm
           us
           in
           the
           belief
           we
           have
           of
           the
           venerable
           institution
           of
           this
           Government
           ,
           when
           we
           shall
           consider
           that
           our
           Predecessors
           ,
           who
           have
           been
           the
           Authors
           of
           our
           Laws
           ,
           had
           such
           an
           esteem
           of
           the
           government
           by
           Bishops
           ,
           that
           they
           thought
           it
           altogether
           needlesse
           
             formally
          
           to
           establish
           it
           by
           Law
           .
           Now
           that
           this
           (
           if
           any
           positive
           )
           consideration
           might
           be
           a
           ground
           of
           that
           which
           is
           here
           intimated
           (
           if
           true
           )
           appears
           ,
           in
           that
           if
           it
           were
           true
           that
           it
           were
           not
           
             formally
             established
             ,
          
           yet
           is
           it
           so
           interwoven
           with
           many
           of
           our
           Laws
           ,
           that
           they
           and
           it
           must
           stand
           or
           fall
           together
           .
           So
           that
           here
           again
           we
           may
           desire
           of
           them
           to
           be
           tender
           of
           us
           ,
           who
           have
           protested
           solemnly
           with
           our
           lives
           to
           defend
           the
           Laws
           of
           the
           Land
           .
        
         
           2.
           
           The
           life
           and
           soul
           of
           it
           is
           already
           taken
           away
           by
           an
           Act
           ,
           &c.
           so
           as
           nothing
           of
           jurisdiction
           remains
           ,
           but
           what
           is
           precarious
           in
           them
           ,
           and
           voluntary
           in
           those
           who
           submit
           unto
           them
           .
        
         
           
             1.
             
             We
             cannot
             acknowledge
             that
             any
             essentiall
             part
             of
             Episcopacy
             (
             such
             as
             that
             which
             is
             
               the
               life
               and
               soul
               of
               it
            
             must
             be
             )
             is
             ,
             or
             can
             be
             
               taken
               away
            
             from
             our
             Bishops
             ,
             whether
             it
             be
             of
             
               order
            
             or
             
               jurisdiction
               ;
            
             however
             the
             outward
             coercive
             Power
             communicated
             to
             it
             by
             the
             secular
             arm
             ,
             hath
             been
             in
             the
             times
             of
             the
             famous
             Persecutions
             ,
             and
             may
             be
             again
             divided
             from
             it
             .
          
           
             2.
             
             For
             the
             Act
             of
             this
             present
             Parliament
             here
             mentioned
             ,
             we
             do
             believe
             that
             there
             was
             more
             taken
             away
             in
             it
             ,
             then
             was
             intended
             by
             the
             major
             part
             of
             both
             Houses
             at
             the
             passing
             of
             it
             :
             This
             we
             gather
             out
             of
             those
             words
             of
             his
             Majestie
             in
             his
             Declaration
             ,
             
               Aug.
            
             12.
             
             
               And
               whether
               that
               Act
               was
               penned
               with
               that
               warinesse
               and
               animadversion
               ,
               that
               there
               was
               not
               more
               determined
               by
               it
               ,
               then
               the
               major
               part
               of
               both
               Houses
               intended
               at
               the
               passing
               of
               it
               ,
               let
               themselves
               judge
               .
            
          
           
             3.
             
             However
             that
             were
             ,
             we
             cannot
             conceive
             it
             reasonable
             ,
             that
             their
             
               temporall
               lurisdiction
            
             should
             be
             taken
             away
             (
             as
             was
             suggested
             )
             that
             they
             might
             the
             better
             intend
             their
             
               Spirituall
               ,
            
             and
             then
             an
             argument
             
             made
             to
             take
             away
             the
             
               Spirituall
            
             part
             of
             their
             Government
             also
             ,
             because
             the
             former
             is
             already
             parted
             from
             them
             .
          
        
         
           
           Thirdly
           ,
           
             That
             their
             whole
             Government
             is
             (
             at
             best
             )
             but
             a
             humane
             constitution
             .
          
           ]
           If
           there
           be
           no
           fallacy
           in
           these
           words
           ,
           it
           is
           necessary
           that
           
             whole
          
           be
           taken
           materially
           ,
           as
           it
           includes
           each
           severall
           part
           ,
           and
           not
           formally
           onely
           ;
           and
           then
           we
           answer
           ,
           That
           the
           Government
           so
           far
           as
           to
           the
           superiority
           of
           Bishops
           above
           Presbyters
           is
           (
           at
           least
           )
           of
           
             Apostolicall
             constitution
             ,
          
           as
           is
           proved
           in
           our
           reasons
           against
           the
           second
           Article
           :
           and
           consequently
           (
           as
           to
           that
           which
           is
           here
           spoken
           of
           )
           it
           is
           not
           lawfull
           to
           be
           taken
           away
           .
        
         
           
           
             Fourthly
             ,
          
           It
           is
           such
           as
           is
           found
           and
           adjudged
           by
           both
           Houses
           of
           Parliament
           ,
           not
           onely
           very
           prejudiciall
           to
           the
           civill
           State
           ,
           but
           a
           great
           hindrance
           also
           to
           a
           perfect
           Reformation
           ;
           Yea
           ,
           who
           knoweth
           not
           ?
           &c.
           
        
         
           We
           know
           the
           danger
           (
           and
           if
           indeed
           we
           did
           not
           )
           yet
           the
           honour
           and
           respect
           we
           bear
           to
           the
           very
           name
           of
           Parliaments
           would
           not
           suffer
           us
           to
           question
           the
           judgement
           of
           the
           two
           Houses
           ;
           onely
           in
           this
           case
           which
           so
           neerly
           concerns
           the
           Church
           of
           God
           ,
           we
           crave
           leave
           to
           represent
           ,
           that
           we
           doe
           not
           apprehend
           how
           that
           should
           be
           in
           it self
           
             prejudiciall
             to
             the
             civill
             State
             ,
          
           together
           with
           which
           the
           State
           both
           anciently
           and
           of
           late
           ,
           we
           conceive
           ,
           hath
           flourished
           ,
           and
           enjoyed
           a
           Politicall
           happinesse
           beyond
           most
           of
           the
           Nations
           of
           the
           earth
           .
           Neither
           how
           that
           should
           be
           opposite
           to
           a
           
             perfect
             Reformation
             ,
          
           which
           in
           our
           Consciences
           we
           are
           perswaded
           (
           and
           we
           think
           may
           as
           clearly
           be
           proved
           as
           most
           matters
           in
           Divinity
           )
           was
           instituted
           by
           the
           Apostles
           and
           constantly
           obtained
           in
           the
           purest
           times
           of
           the
           Primitive
           Church
           ,
           to
           which
           we
           conceive
           a
           
             Reformation
          
           ought
           to
           be
           squared
           :
           and
           indeed
           the
           chiefest
           Instruments
           and
           Defendants
           of
           that
           
             Reformation
          
           which
           we
           (
           by
           the
           mercy
           of
           God
           )
           enjoy
           ,
           having
           been
           Bishops
           ,
           some
           of
           which
           were
           Martyrs
           ,
           as
           Bishop
           
             Cranmer
             ,
             Ridley
             ,
             Hooper
             ,
             Latimer
             ,
             Ferrers
             ,
             Jewell
             ,
             Bilson
             ,
             &c.
             
          
           We
           cannot
           see
           to
           what
           
             Reformation
          
           Episcopacy
           can
           be
           
             a
             hindrance
             ,
          
           unlesse
           to
           such
           a
           form
           as
           supposes
           that
           Episcopacy
           must
           be
           extirpated
           .
        
         
           Which
           moved
           the
           well-affected
           thorowout
           this
           Kingdom
           ,
           long
           since
           to
           petition
           this
           Parliament
           (
           as
           hath
           been
           desired
           before
           in
           the
           days
           of
           Queen
           
             Elizabeth
          
           and
           King
           
             James
          
           )
           for
           a
           totall
           abolition
           of
           the
           same
           .
        
         
           In
           this
           which
           is
           intended
           for
           a
           proof
           the
           fourth
           Argument
           ,
           seeing
           it
           is
           presumed
           that
           those
           who
           have
           
             petitioned
             for
             the
             abolition
             of
             Episcopacy
             ,
             are
          
           and
           have
           beene
           
             well
             affected
             ;
          
           For
           a
           judgement
           of
           that
           we
           doe
           onely
           represent
           ,
           that
           the
           same
           in
           the
           dayes
           of
           those
           renowned
           
           Princes
           ,
           by
           those
           famous
           Parliaments
           held
           in
           their
           times
           were
           rejected
           as
           Ignorant
           and
           Seditious
           .
           And
           whereas
           it
           is
           said
           ,
           
             the
             well
             affected
             throughout
             the
             Kingdom
             ,
             &c.
             
          
           It
           doth
           ,
           and
           may
           appear
           ,
           that
           since
           the
           sitting
           of
           this
           present
           Parliament
           (
           and
           that
           after
           discountenance
           given
           to
           that
           party
           )
           more
           then
           four
           and
           fourty
           thousand
           men
           of
           quality
           have
           
             petitioned
          
           for
           the
           continuance
           of
           our
           present
           Church-government
           :
           besides
           the
           City
           of
           
             London
             ,
          
           the
           Counties
           of
           
             Dorcet
             ,
             Kent
             ,
             Surrey
             ,
             Westmorland
             ,
             Cumberland
             ,
             Southampton
             ,
             Lancaster
             ,
             Cornwall
             ,
             Oxfordshire
             ,
             Berkeshire
             ,
             Wiltshire
             ,
          
           the
           six
           shires
           of
           
             North-wales
             ,
          
           and
           besides
           the
           two
           Universities
           :
           all
           the
           which
           have
           petitioned
           for
           the
           same
           .
        
         
           The
           restriction
           (
           or
           what
           else
           )
           is
           here
           laid
           down
           that
           we
           are
           not
           by
           this
           Covenant
           
             bound
             to
             offer
             violence
             to
             their
             persons
             ,
          
           we
           pray
           may
           be
           observed
           by
           those
           who
           have
           taken
           this
           Covenant
           ,
           or
           shall
           hereafter
           enter
           into
           it
           ;
           for
           us
           who
           are
           so
           perswaded
           as
           we
           have
           expressed
           ,
           it
           would
           have
           been
           a
           greater
           satisfaction
           ,
           if
           we
           should
           have
           been
           to
           swear
           to
           bring
           the
           
             persons
          
           of
           any
           who
           have
           offended
           to
           a
           just
           and
           legal
           triall
           ,
           so
           that
           their
           
             Office
          
           might
           have
           been
           continued
           ,
           then
           to
           
             extirpate
             the
             Office
             ,
          
           with
           an
           intimation
           only
           that
           we
           are
           not
           necessitated
           to
           
             offer
             violence
             to
             their
             persons
             .
          
        
         
           That
           which
           follows
           ,
           is
           to
           take
           off
           the
           onely
           scruple
           which
           they
           would
           suppose
           to
           remain
           ,
           the
           oath
           of
           Canonicall
           obedience
           ,
           wherein
           Clergy-men
           have
           sworn
           to
           
             obey
             the
             Bishops
             ,
             in
             licitis
             &
             honestis
             ;
          
           we
           will
           propound
           their
           Arguments
           .
        
         
           
             1.
             
             They
             which
             have
             sworn
             obedience
             to
             the
             Laws
             of
             the
             Land
             ,
             may
             yet
             endeavour
             their
             abolition
             in
             a
             lawfull
             way
             .
             Therefore
             they
             which
             have
             sworn
             to
             obey
             the
             Bishops
             may
             endeavour
             the
             abolition
             of
             Bishops
             .
          
        
         
           We
           do
           not
           see
           this
           consequence
           from
           the
           Law
           to
           the
           Law-giver
           ,
           or
           the
           Authority
           it self
           from
           whence
           the
           Law
           is
           derived
           .
        
         
           It
           follows
           upon
           this
           
             Hypothesis
          
           that
           they
           who
           have
           sworn
           to
           obey
           the
           injunctions
           of
           Bishops
           ,
           may
           
             endeavour
             in
             a
             lawfull
             way
          
           the
           alteration
           or
           abolition
           of
           those
           injunctions
           ;
           but
           to
           infer
           their
           conclusion
           ,
           the
           
             Hypothosis
          
           must
           have
           been
           ,
           that
           notwithstanding
           our
           
             Oath
             made
             to
             obey
             the
             Laws
          
           made
           by
           the
           King
           and
           the
           two
           Houses
           of
           Parliament
           ,
           we
           may
           
             endeavour
             to
             abolish
          
           the
           King
           and
           both
           Houses
           of
           Parliament
           .
        
         
           Their
           second
           Argument
           is
           this
           :
        
         
           
             2.
             
             If
             Ministers
             or
             others
             have
             entred
             into
             any
             Oath
             not
             warranted
             by
             
             Gods
             Word
             and
             the
             Laws
             of
             the
             Land
             ,
             such
             Oaths
             call
             for
             repentance
             ,
             not
             pertinacy
             in
             them
             .
             
               Ergo
               ,
            
             notwithstanding
             the
             Oath
             of
             Canoxicall
             obedience
             ,
             Ministers
             may
             endeavour
             the
             extirpation
             of
             Bishops
             .
          
        
         
           We
           believe
           ,
           that
           to
           have
           cleared
           this
           consequence
           ,
           they
           ought
           to
           have
           proved
           that
           the
           
             Oath
             of
             Canonicall
             obedience
          
           is
           not
           warranted
           by
           the
           
             Word
             of
             God
             ,
          
           or
           the
           
             Laws
             of
             the
             Land
             ,
          
           which
           seeing
           they
           have
           not
           done
           ,
           the
           scruple
           ,
           notwithstanding
           this
           Argument
           ,
           will
           still
           remain
           .
        
         
           Having
           thus
           done
           with
           Episcopacy
           ,
           they
           proceed
           to
           such
           scruples
           of
           conscience
           as
           they
           suppose
           may
           arise
           from
           that
           which
           concerns
           His
           Majesty
           ;
           And
           there
           the
           design
           is
           to
           prove
           ,
           that
           this
           Covenant
           may
           be
           taken
           ,
           notwithstanding
           the
           
             Oaths
             of
             Supremacy
             and
             Allegiance
          
           already
           taken
           ,
           and
           notwithstanding
           the
           
             want
             of
             His
             Majesties
             consent
             .
          
        
         
           
             1.
             
             This
             Oath
             binds
             all
             ,
             and
             more
             strongly
             engageth
             them
             to
             preserve
             and
             defend
             the
             Kings
             Majesties
             Person
             and
             Authority
             in
             the
             preservation
             and
             defence
             of
             the
             true
             Religion
             and
             liberties
             of
             the
             Kingdoms
             ;
             
               therefore
               ,
            
          
           
             It
             doth
             not
             crosse
             the
             Oaths
             of
             Supremacy
             and
             Allegiance
             .
          
        
         
           We
           answer
           ,
           1.
           
           The
           Oaths
           of
           Supremacy
           and
           Allegiance
           were
           ordained
           against
           those
           ,
           who
           would
           not
           have
           denied
           to
           swear
           in
           these
           very
           words
           ,
           
             To
             preserve
             and
             defend
             His
             Majesties
             Person
             and
             Authority
             in
             the
             preservation
             and
             defence
             of
             the
             true
             Religion
             and
             liberties
             of
             the
             Kingdoms
             ;
          
           Therefore
           notwithstanding
           this
           Argument
           ,
           this
           Covenant
           may
           crosse
           the
           Oaths
           of
           Supremacy
           and
           Allegiance
           .
        
         
           2.
           
           That
           this
           Oath
           may
           be
           taken
           
             without
             His
             Majesties
             consent
             ,
          
           they
           would
           prove
           by
           examples
           ,
           either
           Modern
           ,
           or
           out
           of
           Scripture
           ,
           as
        
         
           
             1.
             
             The
             Protestation
             May
             5.
             was
             taken
             without
             His
             Majesties
             consent
             .
          
        
         
           We
           did
           not
           think
           we
           took
           it
           without
           his
           Majesties
           consent
           ,
           and
           one
           reason
           we
           will
           expresse
           in
           their
           words
           of
           the
           same
           Paragraph
           ,
           
             Because
             His
             Majesty
             did
             not
             except
             against
             it
             ,
             or
             give
             any
             stop
             to
             the
             taking
             of
             it
             ,
             albeit
             he
             was
             then
             resident
             in
             person
             at
             Whitehall
             .
          
        
         
           
             2.
             
             Ezra
             and
             Nehemiah
             ,
             
               Ezra
               10.
               
               Nehem.
               9.
               
               Neh.
               1.
            
             being
             vassals
             ,
             and
             one
             of
             them
             meniall
             servant
             to
             Artaxerxes
             ,
             drew
             all
             the
             people
             into
             a
             Covenant
             ,
             without
             the
             speciall
             Commission
             of
             the
             Persian
             Monarchs
             .
          
        
         
           
             The
          
           Covenant
           
             into
             which
          
           Ezra
           
             drew
             the
             people
             is
             expressed
          
           Ezra
           
           10.
           3.
           
             to
             have
             been
             to
          
           put
           away
           all
           the
           strange
           wives
           ,
           and
           such
           as
           were
           born
           of
           them
           ,
           according
           to
           the
           counsell
           of
           the
           Lord
           ,
           and
           of
           those
           that
           tremble
           at
           the
           Commandement
           of
           God
           ,
           and
           
             that
          
           according
           to
           the
           Law
           .
        
         
           
             And
             that
             of
          
           Nehemiah
           ,
           (
           Nehem.
           9.
           
           
             &
          
           10.
           29.
           
           )
           
             is
             expressed
             to
             have
             been
          
           a
           Curse
           and
           an
           Oath
           to
           walk
           in
           Gods
           Law
           ,
           which
           was
           given
           by
           Moses
           the
           servant
           of
           God
           ;
           and
           to
           observe
           and
           do
           all
           the
           Commandements
           of
           the
           Lord
           ,
           and
           his
           Iudgements
           and
           his
           Statutes
           .
        
         
           The
           Commission
           of
           
             Nehemiah
             ,
          
           (
           besides
           what
           is
           mentioned
           
             Nehemiah
          
           2.
           )
           cannot
           be
           denied
           to
           be
           the
           same
           which
           
             Ezra
          
           had
           obtained
           ,
           which
           is
           expressed
           
             Ezra
          
           the
           7.
           
           In
           the
           7
           of
           
             Ezra
             ,
          
           v.
           26.
           we
           find
           this
           as
           a
           part
           of
           his
           Commission
           :
           
             Whosoever
             will
             not
             do
             the
             Law
             of
             thy
             God
             ,
             and
             the
             Law
             of
             the
             King
             ,
             let
             judgement
             be
             executed
             speedily
             upon
             him
             ,
             whether
             it
             be
             unto
             death
             ,
             or
             banishment
             ,
             or
             to
             confiscation
             of
             goods
             ,
             or
             to
             imprisonment
             .
          
           Wherefore
           we
           cannot
           but
           extreamly
           wonder
           that
           these
           Covenants
           here
           mentioned
           ,
           should
           be
           said
           to
           have
           been
           
             entered
             into
             without
             the
             consent
             of
             the
             Persian
             Monarchs
             ;
          
           an
           Assertion
           to
           us
           so
           exceedingly
           inconsiderate
           ,
           that
           our
           apprehension
           of
           the
           failings
           in
           it
           cannot
           in
           a
           few
           words
           be
           expressed
           .
        
         
           As
           for
           that
           of
           
             Hezekiah
             ,
          
           which
           follows
           at
           some
           distance
           ,
           we
           might
           answer
           ,
           that
           it
           is
           not
           ,
           nor
           can
           it
           be
           proved
           out
           of
           the
           Scripture
           ,
           that
           the
           
             keeping
             of
             the
             Passover
          
           was
           not
           consented
           to
           by
           
             Hoshea
             King
             of
             Irael
             .
          
           However
           ,
           if
           the
           revolt
           of
           the
           ten
           Tribes
           were
           indeed
           a
           rebellion
           ,
           as
           it
           is
           believed
           by
           many
           of
           the
           most
           famous
           Divines
           
             a
          
           ,
           then
           why
           might
           not
           
             Hezekiah
          
           justly
           send
           
             Proclamations
          
           to
           them
           ,
           to
           joyn
           with
           him
           in
           a
           Covenant
           ,
           although
           the
           King
           of
           
             Israel
          
           should
           positively
           have
           dissented
           ?
        
         
           But
           not
           to
           insist
           upon
           negative
           Answers
           ,
           or
           any
           thing
           which
           may
           be
           controverted
           ,
           we
           answer
           :
           1.
           
           That
           act
           of
           
             Hezekiah
             ,
          
           was
           a
           bare
           invitation
           .
           2.
           
           That
           to
           which
           he
           invited
           them
           was
           
             not
             a
             League
             or
             Covenant
             ,
          
           but
           (
           that
           which
           the
           Law
           of
           God
           enjoyned
           )
           
             the
             observation
             of
             the
             Passover
             :
          
           which
           was
           some
           yeeres
           after
           the
           Covenant
           mentioned
           .
           2
           
             Chro.
          
           29.
           3
           
           That
           it
           was
           at
           that
           time
           when
           
             Israel
          
           had
           not
           the
           face
           of
           a
           Kingdom
           ,
           their
           King
           being
           in
           captivity
           under
           the
           King
           of
           
             Assyria
             .
          
           Which
           two
           latter
           answers
           are
           joyntly
           proved
           by
           this
           following
           Discourse
           .
           The
           
             Covenant
          
           was
           made
           in
           1mo
           
             Hezekiae
             ,
          
           2
           
             Chron.
          
           29.
           the
           
             Passover
          
           was
           not
           celebrated
           till
           after
           the
           captivity
           ,
           2
           
             Chron.
          
           30.
           6.
           
           There
           was
           no
           captivity
           mentioned
           till
           after
           this
           first
           yeer
           of
           
             Hezekiah
             .
          
           Therefore
           the
           
             Covenant
          
           and
           
             Passover
          
           were
           not
           kept
           in
           the
           same
           yeer
           ;
           and
           therefore
           also
           
             Hoshea
          
           was
           in
           captivity
           ,
           before
           this
           invitation
           of
           
           
             Hezekiah
             .
          
           The
           last
           of
           the
           premisses
           (
           which
           onely
           can
           be
           doubted
           )
           is
           thus
           proved
           ,
           because
           the
           first
           time
           expressed
           (
           which
           we
           read
           in
           Scripture
           )
           of
           
             Salmanasers
          
           comming
           up
           against
           
             Israel
          
           is
           the
           fourth
           yeer
           of
           King
           
             Hezekiah
             ,
             2
             King.
          
           18.
           9.
           
           It
           no
           wise
           followeth
           therefore
           from
           this
           act
           of
           
             Hezekiah
             and
             the
             men
             of
             Israel
             ,
          
           that
           it
           is
           lawfull
           to
           impose
           ,
           or
           enter
           a
           
             Covenant
             ,
             without
             the
             consent
             of
             the
             King
             .
          
        
         
           Now
           ,
           after
           these
           instances
           of
           Scripture
           ,
           they
           betake
           themselves
           to
           modern
           examples
           ,
           from
           whence
           they
           would
           infer
           more
           then
           a
           bare
           lawfulnes
           to
           enter
           a
           
             Covenant
             without
             the
             Kings
             consent
             ,
          
           viz.
           an
           allowance
           of
           Subjects
           joyning
           in
           Arms
           against
           their
           Soveraign
           ,
           which
           they
           would
           warrant
           from
           the
           actions
           of
           Q
           
             Elizabeth
             ,
          
           K.
           
             James
             ,
             and
             our
             gracious
             Soveraign
             .
          
           Here
           we
           must
           indeed
           ingenuously
           professe
           ,
           that
           we
           have
           not
           been
           sufficiently
           exercised
           in
           passages
           of
           State
           ,
           to
           give
           a
           full
           satisfaction
           in
           all
           these
           particulars
           ;
           wherefore
           we
           shall
           not
           of
           our selves
           interpose
           at
           all
           ,
           onely
           briefly
           speak
           to
           their
           instances
           .
        
         
           1.
           
           As
           concerning
           the
           assistance
           of
           ,
           and
           the
           
             confederacy
             with
             the
             united
             Provinces
             ,
          
           we
           shall
           transcribe
           for
           satisfaction
           ,
           a
           part
           of
           a
           Declaration
           of
           Q.
           
             Elizabeth
             ,
          
           who
           first
           entered
           upon
           their
           Assistance
           ;
           the
           Declaration
           is
           entituled
           ,
           
             A
             Declaration
             of
             the
             causes
             moving
             the
             Q.
             of
             England
             to
             give
             ayd
             to
             the
             defence
             of
             the
             people
             afflicted
             and
             oppressed
             in
             the
             low
             Countries
             .
          
           This
           Declaration
           was
           put
           sorth
           ,
           1585.
           and
           in
           the
           8
           ,
           &
           9.
           pages
           it
           hath
           these
           words
           .
        
         
           
             And
             furthermore
             ,
             as
             a
             good
             loving
             Sister
             to
             him
             ,
             and
             a
             naturall
             good
             Neighbour
             to
             his
             Low
             Countries
             and
             people
             ,
             we
             have
             often
             ,
             and
             often
             again
             ,
             most
             friendly
             warned
             him
             ,
             that
             if
             he
             did
             not
             otherwise
             by
             his
             wisdom
             and
             Princely
             clemency
             restrain
             the
             Tyranny
             of
             his
             Governours
             ,
             and
             cruelty
             of
             his
             men
             of
             war
             ,
             we
             feared
             that
             the
             people
             of
             his
             Countrys
             should
             be
             forced
             for
             safety
             of
             their
             lives
             ,
             and
             for
             continuance
             of
             their
             native
             Countrey
             in
             their
             
               former
               state
               of
               their
               liberties
               ,
            
             to
             seek
             the
             protection
             of
             some
             other
             forraign
             Lord
             ,
             or
             rather
             to
             yield
             themselves
             wholy
             to
             the
             Soveraignty
             of
             some
             mighty
             Prince
             ,
             
               as
               by
               the
               ancient
               Laws
               of
               their
               Countreys
               '
               ,
               and
               by
               speciall
               priviledges
               granted
               by
               some
               of
               the
               Lords
               and
               Dukes
               of
               the
               Countries
               to
               the
               people
               ,
            
             they
             do
             pretend
             and
             affirm
             ,
             that
             in
             cases
             of
             
               such
            
             generall
             injustice
             ,
             and
             upon
             
               such
            
             violent
             breaking
             of
             their
             
               priviledges
               ,
            
             they
             are
             free
             from
             their
             former
             Homages
             ,
             and
             at
             liberty
             to
             make
             choice
             of
             any
             other
             Prince
             ,
             to
             be
             their
             Prince
             and
             Head
             .
             The
             proof
             whereof
             by
             examples
             past
             is
             to
             be
             seen
             and
             read
             in
             the
             ancient
             Histories
             of
             divers
             alterations
             of
             the
             Lords
             and
             Ladies
             of
             
             the
             Countries
             of
             
               Brabant
               ,
               Flanders
               ,
               Holland
               and
               Zealand
               ,
            
             and
             other
             Countries
             to
             them
             united
             ,
             by
             the
             States
             and
             People
             of
             the
             Countries
             .
             
               And
               that
               by
               some
               such
               alterations
               ,
               as
               the
               Stories
               do
               testifie
               ,
               the
               Duke
               of
               Burgundy
               came
               to
               his
               Title
               ,
               from
               which
               the
               King
               of
               Spains
               interest
               is
               derived
               .
            
          
        
         
           Upon
           these
           principles
           it
           it
           evident
           that
           then
           the
           Queen
           and
           Kings
           of
           
             England
          
           in
           joyning
           to
           the
           assistance
           of
           or
           
             confederacy
             with
             the
             low
             Countries
             ,
          
           have
           not
           joyned
           with
           Subjects
           in
           Arms
           either
           against
           or
           without
           the
           consent
           of
           their
           true
           undoubted
           Monarch
           .
        
         
           2.
           
           As
           touching
           the
           assistance
           of
           the
           French
           Protestants
           of
           
             Rochell
          
           by
           our
           gracious
           Soveraign
           that
           now
           is
           ,
           we
           shall
           onely
           reply
           (
           not
           insisting
           upon
           the
           Charter
           of
           
             Rochell
          
           granted
           to
           them
           by
           
             Lewis
             the
          
           11.
           )
           that
           we
           are
           fully
           satisfied
           ,
           that
           no
           argument
           can
           be
           drawn
           from
           thence
           ,
           except
           by
           those
           who
           would
           raise
           a
           dispute
           of
           His
           Majesties
           Title
           and
           Interest
           in
           the
           
             Kingdom
             of
             France
             .
          
        
         
           3.
           
           As
           for
           the
           Scots
           ,
           we
           expected
           that
           all
           further
           mention
           of
           their
           former
           actions
           should
           have
           been
           prevented
           by
           the
           
             Act
             of
             Oblivion
             .
          
           Yet
           seeing
           these
           men
           have
           undertaken
           to
           make
           an
           advantage
           against
           His
           sacred
           Majesty
           ,
           even
           out
           of
           His
           acts
           and
           expressions
           of
           Grace
           and
           Clemency
           :
           we
           answer
           ,
           That
           
             forms
             of
             Pacification
          
           and
           reconciliation
           ,
           are
           not
           to
           be
           interpreted
           any
           further
           then
           to
           the
           
             reputation
             of
             the
             party
             to
             whom
             the
             reconciliation
             is
             made
          
           (
           you
           have
           not
           done
           so
           ,
           or
           so
           ,
           i.e.
           you
           shall
           be
           to
           me
           as
           if
           you
           had
           not
           )
           so
           as
           out
           of
           His
           Majesties
           expressions
           in
           the
           late
           pacification
           with
           the
           Scots
           ,
           to
           conclude
           his
           approbation
           of
           the
           course
           then
           taken
           by
           them
           ,
           or
           to
           take
           a
           warrant
           for
           their
           present
           undertaking
           ,
           seems
           to
           be
           alike
           ,
           as
           if
           they
           should
           conclude
           that
           it
           was
           lawfull
           for
           other
           Churches
           to
           use
           St.
           
             Paul
          
           as
           the
           
             Galathians
          
           had
           done
           ,
           
             by
             accounting
             him
             their
             enemy
             ,
          
           because
           (
           by
           his
           own
           confession
           )
           they
           
             had
             done
             him
             no
             injury
             ,
          
           and
           should
           gather
           that
           out
           of
           his
           Act
           of
           pacification
           with
           them
           ,
           
             Gal.
          
           4.
           12.
           
           
             Brethren
             ,
             I
             beseech
             you
             be
             as
             I
             am
             ,
             I
             am
             as
             ye
             are
             ,
             ye
             have
             not
             injured
             me
             at
             all
             .
          
        
         
           The
           sum
           of
           all
           is
           this
           :
           The
           Assembly
           of
           Divines
           in
           their
           exhortation
           ,
           have
           neither
           concluded
           any
           thing
           positive
           for
           a
           lawfulnesse
           ,
           or
           necessity
           of
           taking
           this
           Covenant
           ,
           nor
           taken
           away
           any
           of
           those
           scruples
           which
           they
           propounded
           to
           themselves
           ;
           they
           have
           neither
           proved
           that
           Bishops
           must
           or
           may
           be
           extirpated
           ,
           nor
           taken
           off
           the
           scruple
           from
           the
           Oath
           of
           Canonicall
           obedience
           :
           They
           have
           neither
           cleared
           the
           objection
           from
           the
           Oaths
           of
           Allegiance
           and
           Supremacy
           ,
           
           nor
           proved
           by
           any
           example
           recorded
           in
           Scripture
           ,
           or
           by
           any
           undoubted
           warrantable
           practise
           ,
           that
           it
           is
           lawfull
           in
           any
           case
           whatsoever
           ,
           without
           the
           Kings
           consent
           ,
           to
           enter
           into
           any
           whatsoever
           League
           and
           Covenant
           :
           So
           far
           have
           they
           been
           from
           proving
           that
           it
           is
           necessary
           or
           lawfull
           to
           enter
           into
           this
           League
           ,
           the
           state
           of
           the
           question
           being
           such
           ,
           as
           we
           in
           the
           beginning
           have
           evinced
           it
           to
           be
           .
           So
           that
           should
           we
           enter
           into
           this
           covenant
           ,
           it
           would
           be
           impossible
           to
           conclude
           our
           innocency
           therein
           from
           the
           innocency
           of
           
             Mordecai
          
           and
           the
           
             lewes
          
           here
           mentioned
           out
           of
           
             Esther
          
           9.
           
           Their
           innocency
           was
           clear
           indeed
           ,
           (
           but
           how
           would
           ours
           be
           so
           ?
           )
           in
           that
           they
           resisted
           not
           the
           higher
           power
           ,
           or
           the
           Arms
           commanded
           by
           him
           otherwise
           then
           by
           Fasting
           and
           Prayer
           ,
           untill
           the
           King
           granted
           them
           leave
           
             to
             gather
             themselves
             together
             ,
             and
             to
             stand
             for
             their
             lives
             ,
          
           which
           before
           they
           did
           not
           assume
           ,
           for
           no
           want
           of
           sufficient
           strength
           to
           have
           defended
           themselves
           ,
           (
           as
           is
           usually
           in
           the
           like
           cases
           objected
           )
           which
           is
           evident
           from
           their
           after
           sufficient
           strength
           by
           themselves
           to
           defend
           themselves
           ,
           cap.
           9.
           
        
         
           Thus
           having
           examined
           the
           strength
           of
           their
           Reasons
           and
           Allegations
           ,
           we
           think
           it
           still
           true
           (
           not
           onely
           
             pretended
             ,
          
           as
           the
           Exhortation
           hath
           it
           )
           that
           
             Clergy
             men
             (
             above
             all
             others
             )
             may
             not
             covenant
             to
             extirpate
             Church
             government
             by
             Bishops
             ,
          
           both
           because
           of
           
             their
             Oath
          
           (
           as
           hath
           been
           proved
           )
           and
           simply
           considering
           the
           nature
           of
           the
           thing
           ,
           in
           respect
           of
           the
           Reasons
           already
           by
           us
           alledged
           ;
           and
           because
           Presbyters
           ,
           if
           here
           they
           erre
           ,
           they
           erre
           most
           dangerously
           and
           arrogantly
           ,
           swearing
           (
           in
           effect
           )
           to
           endeavour
           to
           extirpate
           all
           order
           of
           spirituall
           Church
           Governours
           above
           themselves
           ,
           to
           endure
           none
           such
           (
           if
           they
           can
           help
           it
           )
           superiour
           to
           themselves
           .
           The
           danger
           we
           had
           rather
           such
           should
           hear
           from
           St.
           
             Cyprian
             ,
             Epist.
          
           10.
           
           
             Quod
             enim
             non
             periculum
             metuere
             debemus
             ,
             de
             offensa
             Domini
             ,
             quando
             aliqui
             de
             Presbyteris
             ,
             nec
             Evangelii
             ,
             nec
             loci
             sui
             memores
             ,
             sed
             neque
             futurum
             Domini
             Iudicium
             ,
             neque
             nunc
             sibi
             praepositum
             Episcopum
             cogitantes
             ,
             quod
             nunquam
             omnino
             sub
             Antecessoribus
             factum
             est
             ,
             cum
             contumelia
             &
             contemptu
             praepositi
             totum
             sibi
             vendicent
             ?
          
           What
           also
           will
           they
           think
           of
           that
           ancient
           and
           reverend
           Canon
           (
           the
           35.
           among
           those
           50.
           commonly
           called
           
             The
             Canons
             of
             the
             Apostles
             )
             
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
            
             If
             any
             one
             ordained
             Bishop
             be
             not
             received
             ,
             not
             through
             his
             own
             will
             ,
             but
             through
             the
             wickednesse
             of
             the
             people
             ,
             let
             him
             remain
             a
             Bishop
             ,
             but
             let
             the
             Clergy
             of
             that
             City
             be
             bar'd
             Communion
             ,
             because
             they
             have
             not
             been
             better
             
             instructors
             of
             so
             inobedient
             a
             people
             .
          
           By
           which
           also
           it
           appeareth
           ,
           that
           those
           lay
           men
           deceive
           themselves
           ,
           who
           think
           that
           the
           Clergy
           onely
           need
           scruple
           at
           this
           Oath
           ,
           at
           least
           in
           the
           second
           Article
           thereof
           ;
           we
           must
           tell
           them
           of
           
             Ignatius
             his
             rule
             ,
             Epist
             ad
             Magnes
             .
             
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
            
             Nothing
             ought
             to
             be
             done
             without
             the
             Bishop
             ,
             by
             Presbyter
             ,
             Deacon
             ,
             or
             Lay-man
             .
          
           If
           therefore
           (
           according
           to
           the
           Preface
           of
           this
           Covenant
           )
           we
           set
           the
           glory
           of
           God
           before
           our
           eyes
           ,
           the
           same
           
             Ignatius
          
           gives
           us
           this
           other
           excellent
           monition
           ,
           
             Epist.
             ad
             Trallian
             .
          
           
             a
          
           
             It
             becommeth
             each
             of
             you
             ,
             and
             especially
             the
             Presbyters
             ,
             to
             cherish
             the
             Bishop
             ,
             to
             the
             honour
             of
             God
             the
             Father
             ,
             and
             our
             Lord
             Iesus
             Christ
             .
          
        
      
       
       
         
           The
           Printers
           Postscript
           to
           the
           Reader
           .
        
         
           GEntle
           Reader
           ,
           a
           Copy
           of
           the
           foregoing
           Disquisitions
           accidentally
           comming
           to
           the
           hands
           of
           some
           ,
           at
           whose
           command
           I
           am
           ,
           was
           thought
           fit
           to
           be
           published
           ,
           though
           without
           the
           knowledge
           and
           approbation
           of
           the
           Authors
           .
           The
           fitnesse
           of
           the
           subject
           ,
           the
           worth
           of
           the
           work
           ,
           and
           a
           peculiar
           relation
           to
           the
           Authors
           (
           if
           I
           mistake
           them
           not
           )
           may
           be
           a
           sufficient
           motive
           both
           for
           their
           command
           and
           my
           undertaking
           .
           Consider
           it
           seriously
           ,
           and
           if
           thou
           art
           not
           yet
           ingaged
           in
           the
           Covenant
           ,
           this
           will
           confirm
           thee
           in
           thy
           resolution
           against
           it
           ;
           if
           thou
           art
           ,
           this
           by
           the
           assistance
           of
           Gods
           grace
           may
           bring
           thee
           to
           a
           timely
           repentance
           .
           I
           cannot
           but
           admonish
           thee
           this
           one
           thing
           ,
           
             viz.
          
           That
           I
           have
           gone
           exactly
           according
           to
           the
           Copy
           ,
           even
           in
           those
           phrases
           which
           resemble
           the
           
             Genius
          
           of
           the
           place
           where
           it
           was
           composed
           ,
           more
           then
           where
           it
           is
           published
           ;
           onely
           the
           faults
           which
           have
           escaped
           ,
           I
           desire
           may
           be
           imputed
           to
           me
           and
           those
           many
           transcribers
           ,
           through
           whose
           hands
           it
           passed
           before
           it
           could
           come
           to
           mine
           .
        
         
           FINIS
           .
        
      
    
     
       
         Notes, typically marginal, from the original text
         
           Notes for div A31491e-100
           
             Article
             1.
             
          
           
             Article
             2.
             
          
           
             a
             Intelligentia
             verborum
             ex
             causis
             est
             assumenda
             dicendi
             ,
             H●●ar
             .
             l.
             4.
             de
             Tr●●
             .
          
           
             a
             Eandem
             illis
             imponit
             personam
             ,
             ac
             idem
             juris
             assignat
             .
             Calvinus
             in
             locum
             .
             
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
            
             Chrysostomus
             in
             locum
             .
             
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
            
             Ammonius
             in
             locum
             .
          
           
             a
             Theodoret.
             in
             Luc.
             10.
             
          
           
             b
             
               Viz.
            
             Irenaeus
             ib.
             3.
             c.
             3
             Tertul.
             de
             praescrip.
             .
             c
             36
             Cyprian
             ●p
             42
             ,
             &
             61
             ,
             &
             69
             Concil.
             Carthag
             anno
             258
             sub
             Cypriano
             .
             Theodoret
             .
             l.
             4.
             c.
             18.
             
             Ambros.
             de
             dignsacer
             .
             c.
             2.
             
             Augustin
             .
             in
             Ps.
             44.
             
             &
             Epist.
             42.
             &
             de
             verbis
             Domini
             Serm.
             24.
             
             Hieron.
             ep.
             ad
             Marcel
             .
             advers.
             Montanum
             ,
             &
             epist.
             ad
             Evagr.
             
             Greg.
             mag.
             Hom.
             26.
             in
             Evang.
             Theophylactus
             in
             Matth.
             16.
             
             Pacianus
             ep.
             2.
             ad
             Sympro●ian
             .
             
               And
               all
               those
               which
               aver
               the
               Apostles
               to
               have
               been
               Bishops
               ,
               (
               though
               more
               also
               )
            
             vid.
             Cyprian
             .
             ep
             65
             ,
             &
             ep
             68.
             
             Epipha
             .
             contra
             haeres
             .
             l.
             1
             haeres
             .
             27.
             
             Ambros.
             in
             Ephes.
             4.
             &
             serm.
             50.
             
             
               The
               supposed
            
             Ambrose
             
               in
            
             1
             
               Cor.
            
             12
             ,
             28.
             
               and
               so
               much
               some
               of
               them
               thought
               proved
               from
               Acts
            
             1.
             20.
             
          
           
             c
             
               viz.
            
             Iren.
             l.
             3.
             c.
             3.
             &
             l.
             4.
             63.
             
             &
             l.
             5.
             c.
             20.
             
             Ignat.
             ep.
             ad
             Antioch
             .
             Tertul.
             adversus
             Marcion
             .
             l.
             4.
             c.
             5.
             &
             de
             praescr
             .
             c.
             32
             ,
             &
             36.
             
             Clemens
             Alexan.
             l.
             de
             divit
             .
             salvand
             .
             apud
             Euseb.
             l.
             2.
             c.
             17.
             
             Euseb.
             lib.
             Eccl.
             hist.
             5.
             c.
             6.
             &
             l.
             3.
             c.
             11
             ,
             &c.
             23.
             
             Irenaeus
             apud
             Euseb.
             l.
             4.
             c.
             10.
             
             S.
             Hieron.
             de
             script
             .
             Eccl.
             Chrysost.
             hom.
             de
             Ignat.
             tom
             .
             5.
             
             Concil.
             Constant.
             5.
             act
             .
             2.
             
          
           
             d
             1
             
               Tim.
            
             1.
             3.
             Theophyl.
             &
             Oecumen.
             in
             locum
             ,
             1
             
               Tim.
            
             5.
             19.
             
             Epiphanius
             haeres
             .
             75.
             n.
             15
             ,
             &
             Theop.
             in
             locum
             ,
             v.
             20
             ,
             21.
             
             Idem
             in
             locum
             ,
             &
             Hemmin
             .
             in
             locum
             ,
             v.
             22.
             
             
               The
               supposed
            
             Ambrose
             in
             locum
             ,
             
               a
               Tim.
            
             1.
             6.
             
             Hieron.
             Oecumen.
             Bucer
             .
             in
             locum
             
               Tit.
            
             1.
             5.
             
             Oecumen.
             in
             locum
             ,
             v.
             11.
             
             Chrysostomus
             in
             
               Tit.
            
             1.
             
             Hieronimus
             in
             
               Tit.
            
             3.
             9.
             10.
             
             Ambros.
             lib.
             5.
             de
             fid.
             s.
             
             Trinit.
             Bucer
             .
             Calvin
             .
             in
             locum
             .
          
           
             b
             
               For
            
             Timithy
             Epib
             .
             haeres
             .
             75.
             
             Eusebius
             lib.
             3●
             .
             c.
             4.
             
             Hieronimus
             de
             script
             .
             Eccl.
             Chrysost.
             hom.
             2
             ad
             Epist.
             Pilip
             .
             &
             in
             praefat.
             in
             1
             
               Tim.
               the
               supposed
            
             Ambrose
             in
             praefat.
             in
             1
             
               Tim.
            
             Polycrates
             apud
             Phot.
             Biblioth.
             Leont
             in
             concil.
             calce.
             .
             Prim.
             in
             praefat.
             in
             1
             
               Tim.
            
             &
             in
             1
             
               Tim.
            
             c.
             4.
             adde
             Sedul
             .
             in
             1
             
               Tim.
            
             1.
             2.
             
             
               For
            
             Titus
             ,
             see
             Euseb.
             l.
             3.
             c.
             4.
             
             Hieronimus
             de
             script
             .
             Eccl.
             dictus
             Ambr.
             in
             praefat.
             ad
             Ep
             :
             Tit.
             Theodoret
             apud
             Oecumen.
             in
             praefat.
             ad
             ep.
             Tit.
             Theodoret
             apud
             Oecumen.
             in
             praefat.
             ad
             
               Tit.
            
             Theophyl.
             in
             praefat.
             ad
             
               Tit.
            
             Oecumen.
             in
             
               Tit.
            
             1.
             adde
             Sedul
             ,
             prolog.
             in
             epist.
             ad
             
               Tit.
               
            
          
           
             c
             Vid.
             Theodor
             .
             in
             1
             
               Tim.
            
             6.
             14
             
             
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
            
             
               Nempe
               ea
               quae
               scribo
               .
            
          
           
             d
             
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
            
             Oecumen.
             in
             1
             
               Tim.
            
             c.
             5.
             
             
               See
               also
            
             Ambrose
             
               in
               1
               Tim.
               6.
               
            
          
           
             e
             
               Saint
            
             Augustine
             
               ep.
            
             162.
             
               and
               in
               the
               Comment
               on
               the
               Revelations
               under
               his
               name
               ,
               Hom.
               2.
               
               The
               supposed
            
             Ambrose
             
               in
               1
               Cor.
               11.
               16.
               
               &
               in
               Apoc.
               
            
             Oecum
             :
             
               in
               Apoc
               :
            
             2.
             
             Arethas
             
               in
               Apoc.
               1.
               and
               among
               the
               Moderns
               ,
            
             Marlorat
             
               in
               Apoc.
            
             2.
             1.
             
             Bullinger
             
               Concil.
               9.
               in
               Apoc.
            
             Paraeus
             
               in
               Apoc.
            
             1.
             20.
             
             
               Dr
            
             Reynolds
             
               conference
               with
            
             Hart.
             c.
             8.
             
               divis
               .
            
             3.
             Pet.
             Molinaeus
             
               in
               his
               marginall
               Notes
               .
            
          
           
             f
             Theodoret
             
               in
            
             1
             
               Tim.
            
             3
             ,
             1.
             
             Pacianus
             epist.
             2
             :
             ad
             Sympronian
             :
          
           
             b
             
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
            
             1b
             :
             v
             :
             26
             :
          
           
             c
             Iob
             33.
             23.
             
             &
             Malach.
             2.
             7.
             
          
           
             a
             James
             
               Bishop
               of
            
             Jerusalem
             ●
             ,
             Concil.
             gen.
             Constantinop
             .
             Can.
             32.
             
             Clemens
             apud
             Euseb.
             l.
             2.
             c.
             1.
             Euseb.
             l.
             4.
             c.
             21.
             &
             l.
             2.
             c.
             22.
             &
             l.
             7.
             c.
             14
             ,
             15
             ,
             19.
             
             Aug.
             l.
             2.
             contra
             Lit.
             Petil.
             c.
             57.
             contra
             Crescon.
             l.
             2.
             c.
             37.
             
             Epiphanius
             contra
             Ma●ich
             ,
             sect.
             66.
             &
             haeres
             .
             78.
             
             Chrysost.
             
               in
            
             1
             Cor.
             cap.
             15.
             hom.
             38.
             &
             hom.
             33.
             in
             
               Act.
            
             15.
             23.
             
             &
             Hom.
             46.
             in
             Act.
             Hieron.
             in
             Gal.
             1.
             
             &
             Epist.
             ad
             Evagr.
             &
             de
             Script
             .
             Eccles.
             Theophylact.
             &
             Oecum
             .
             in
             Gal.
             2.
             
          
           
             b
             Origen
             .
             hom.
             6.
             in
             Luc.
             
             Euseb.
             l.
             3.
             c.
             22
             ,
             35
             ,
             36.
             &
             in
             Chronico
             .
             in
             
               A.
               D.
            
             38.
             
             S.
             Hieron.
             in
             Gal.
             2.
             &
             l.
             de
             Eccles.
             Script
             .
             Chrysost.
             hom.
             de
             trans
             .
             Ignat.
             Theodor
             .
             dialog
             .
             1.
             Greg.
             l.
             6.
             
             Ep.
             37.
             
          
           
             c
             Euseb.
             l.
             2.
             15.
             24.
             
             Hier.
             prooem
             in
             Mat.
             &
             de
             scr
             .
             Eccles.
             &
             Ep.
             ad
             Evag.
             
             Greg.
             l.
             6.
             
             Ep
             371
             ,
          
           
             d
             Irenaeus
             l.
             3.
             c.
             3.
             
             Optat
             l.
             2.
             cont.
             Parmen.
             Tertul.
             de
             praesadversus
             haeret
             ,
             S.
             Aug.
             
             Ep.
             165.
             
          
           
             e
             Irenaeus
             l.
             3.
             c.
             3.
             Optat.
             l.
             2.
             cont.
             Parmen.
             Aug.
             Ep.
             165.
             
          
           
             f
             
               Euseb.
               l.
            
             3.
             
               c.
            
             22.
             and
             the
             Author
             of
             the
             Epist.
             
               ad
               Antioch
               .
            
             under
             
               Ignatius
            
             his
             name
             .
          
           
             g
             Euseb.
             l.
             4.
             c.
             22.
             &
             l.
             3.
             c.
             4.
             
          
           
             h
             Amb
             in
             Col.
             4.
             
             Calvin
             Instit.
             l.
             4.
             c.
             3.
             sect.
             7.
             
          
           
             i
             Theod.
             in
             1
             Tim.
             3.
             &
             in
             Phil.
             2.
             
             Primasius
             in
             Phil.
             2.
             
             Pacianus
             Ep.
             2.
             ad
             Sympronian
             .
          
           
             k
             Ambros.
             Col.
             4.
             
          
           
             l
             Origen
             l.
             10.
             in
             Ep.
             ad
             Rom.
             c.
             16.
             
          
           
             m
             Epist.
             comprovin
             .
             ad
             Leon
             .
          
           
             n
             Ignat.
             Ep.
             ad
             Ephes.
             
             Euseb.
             lib.
             3.
             c.
             35.
             
          
           
             o
             Eus.
             l.
             3.
             35.
             
             
               S.
            
             Hieron.
             de
             .
             Script
             .
             Eccles.
             Theod.
             dial
             .
             1.
             
             Felix
             3.
             Epist.
             ad
             Zenonem
             .
          
           
             p
             Hieron
             ,
             de
             Script
             .
             Eccles.
             &
             Euseb.
             l.
             3.
             cap.
             35.
             39.
             
          
           
             q
             Hieron.
             ibid.
             Euseb.
             l.
             4.
             c.
             23.
             
          
           
             r
             Hegesippus
             apud
             Euseb.
             l.
             4.
             c.
             22.
             
             &
             Euseb.
             l.
             3.
             c.
             11.
             
          
           
             a
             Et
             infra
             
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
            
          
           
             b
             
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
            
          
           
             Article
             3.
             
          
           
             Article
             4.
             
          
           
             Article
             5.
             
          
           
             Article
             6.
             
          
           
             a
             Vid.
             Angl.
             Confes.
             art
             .
             37
             :
             &
             Scotican
             .
             confess
             art
             .
             24.
             ideo
             confitemur
             &
             profitemur
             ,
             quod
             qui
             supremae
             autoritati
             resistunt
             ,
             usurpantes
             quod
             ad
             illius
             munus
             pertinet
             ,
             illi
             Dei
             ordinationi
             resistunt
             ,
             ideoque
             coram
             illo
             innocentes
             esse
             non
             possunt
             .
          
           
             Concl.
             
          
           
             a
             Quâcunque
             arte
             verborum
             quis
             juret
             ,
             Deus
             tamen
             qui
             conscientiae
             testis
             est
             ,
             ita
             hoc
             accipit
             ,
             sicut
             ille
             cui
             juratur
             intelligit
             ●sidorus
             .
             Perjuri
             sunt
             ,
             qui
             servatis
             verbis
             expectationem
             eorum
             quibus
             juratum●●
             ,
             ●ecepe●u●●t
             ,
             Augustin
             .
             ep.
             224
             ad
             Alipium
             .
          
        
         
           Notes for div A31491e-7050
           
             a
             
               Cyril
               .
               Alexand
               Calvin
               .
               in
            
             Hosea
             8.
             4.
             
               vide
            
             also
             the
             Fuller
             answer
             to
             Dr.
             Ferne
             .
          
           
             a
             
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
               {non-Roman}
            
             &c.
             
          
        
      
      
  

