The Church of England truly represented according to Dr. Heylins history of the Reformation : in justification of Her Royal Highness the late Dutchess [sic] of Yorks paper.
1686
Approx. 30 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 11 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images.
Text Creation Partnership,
Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :
2003-01 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1).
A33074
Wing C4192
ESTC R23708
07880540
ocm 07880540
40256
This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of
Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal
. The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
Early English books online.
(EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A33074)
Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 40256)
Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 1202:7)
The Church of England truly represented according to Dr. Heylins history of the Reformation : in justification of Her Royal Highness the late Dutchess [sic] of Yorks paper.
York, Anne Hyde, Duchess of, 1637-1671.
18 p.
[s.n.],
London :
1686.
Master microform held by: UnM.
Reproduction of original in the Union Theological Seminary Library, New York.
Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford.
Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors.
EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO.
EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org).
The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source.
Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data.
Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so.
Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as <gap>s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor.
The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines.
Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements).
Keying and markup guidelines are available at the
Text Creation Partnership web site
.
eng
Heylyn, Peter, 1600-1662. -- Ecclesia restaurata.
Church of England -- History.
Reformation -- England.
2002-08 TCP
Assigned for keying and markup
2002-09 SPi Global
Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images
2002-10 John Latta
Sampled and proofread
2002-10 John Latta
Text and markup reviewed and edited
2002-12 pfs
Batch review (QC) and XML conversion
THE
Church
OF
England
TRULY
Represented
,
According
to
Dr.
Heylins
History
of
the
Reformation
,
In
Justification
Of
her
Royal
Highness
the
Late
Dutchess
of
YORKS
Paper
.
Induantur
qui
detrahunt
mihi
,
pudore
:
&
operiantur
sicut
diploide
confusione
sua
,
Psal.
108.
v.
28.
LONDON
,
Printed
for
the
Author
,
and
Sold
by
Matthew
Turner
near
Turn-stile
in
Holbourn
,
1686.
THE
Church
Of
England
TRULY
Represented
,
&c.
THe
Ignis
Fatuus
of
Reformation
struck
by
Collision
out
of
the
lustful
and
violent
desires
of
King
Henry
the
Eighth
,
and
the
opposition
made
to
them
by
the
Pope
:
The
Riches
of
Abbeys
and
Monasteries
,
still
administring
new
matter
unto
it
all
the
reign
of
that
unhappy
Prince
;
grew
to
the
Prodigy
of
a
Comet
in
the
immature
years
of
his
Son
King
Edward
the
Sixth
,
by
many
Acts
of
Spoil
and
Rapine
even
to
a
high
degree
of
Sacriledge
on
Chanteries
,
Bishopricks
,
Hospitals
and
Churches
,
and
wandering
as
in
Exile
all
the
time
of
Queen
Mary
,
about
Zurick
,
Basil
,
Geneva
,
but
chiefly
about
Frankfort
;
is
thus
again
usher'd
into
the
Land
by
that
great
Luminary
of
his
Church
Dr.
Heylin
to
be
refin'd
of
the
filth
it
had
drawn
unto
it
from
the
Lakes
in
the
Alpes
,
and
to
be
new
moulded
and
formed
into
a
Church
by
Queen
Elizabeth
to
make
good
here
Legitimation
.
She
(
says
he
)
knew
full
well
,
that
her
Legitimation
and
the
Popes
Supremacy
could
not
stand
together
,
and
that
she
could
not
possibly
maintain
the
one
without
a
discarding
of
the
other
.
And
what
follows
,
we
more
feelingly
know
than
Dr.
Heylin
,
viz.
That
the
Answer
of
the
Pope
according
to
his
accustomed
vigour
:
That
the
Kingdom
of
England
was
held
in
Fee
of
the
Apostolick
See
;
that
she
could
not
succeed
being
Illegitimate
;
that
he
could
not
contradict
the
Declarations
of
Clement
the
Seventh
,
and
Paul
the
Third
;
That
it
was
a
great
boldness
to
assume
the
Name
,
and
Government
of
it
without
him
,
was
not
only
the
foundation
of
the
Church
of
England
,
but
also
of
all
the
Distractions
and
Miseries
this
poor
Land
has
suffer'd
from
that
day
to
this
.
And
all
this
upon
a
frivolous
account
of
a
pretended
Donation
of
this
Kingdom
to
the
Pope
by
King
Iohn
the
usurper
;
which
had
been
equally
frivolous
,
had
he
been
never
so
lawfull
a
King.
But
!
what
a
Bottom
is
this
to
build
a
Church
upon
?
And
to
forsake
the
Communion
of
a
Church
professed
so
many
hundreds
of
years
,
and
established
by
so
many
Laws
in
the
Nation
;
because
forsooth
the
Queens
Legitimation
,
and
the
Pope's
Supremacy
could
not
stand
together
?
We
read
,
that
the
Gates
of
Hell
shall
never
prevail
against
the
Church
of
Christ
:
But
had
the
Pope
,
and
the
Queen
,
known
how
to
have
adjusted
their
differences
,
this
Ignis
Fatuus
had
been
extinguisht
in
the
Lake
of
Geneva
,
and
the
Church
of
England
had
never
been
seen
,
nor
heard
of
in
the
world
.
And
will
any
man
in
his
wits
repose
his
hopes
of
salvation
in
a
Church
,
that
came
from
so
bare
an
accident
,
so
meer
a
chance
as
this
,
midwived
into
the
world
by
a
Maiden
Queen
to
make
good
her
Legitimation
?
Moreover
,
we
read
,
that
Christ
will
be
with
his
Church
to
the
end
of
the
world
.
But
(
I
pray
)
when
did
he
begin
to
be
with
this
Church
?
was
it
when
the
Queen
had
made
good
her
Legitimation
?
She
has
not
done
it
yet
.
But
,
(
as
Dr.
Heylin
well
observes
)
Bacon
was
not
to
be
told
of
an
old
Law-maxime
;
That
the
Crown
takes
away
all
defects
:
Which
,
it
seems
,
in
the
language
of
the
Law
,
was
a
Tantamount
to
a
Legitimation
;
and
on
this
Tantamount
was
first
erected
the
Crown
,
and
on
that
the
Church
;
as
tho'
the
Law-makers
ever
meant
,
that
that
odd
scrap
of
Law
should
be
extended
to
Legitimate
,
whom
the
Law
had
illigitimated
;
which
,
if
so
,
might
as
well
have
legitimated
the
Rebellion
of
Oliver
Cromwel
,
(
had
he
clapt
the
Crown
on
his
head
,
)
and
made
him
a
lawful
King
,
tho
he
had
been
a
Bastard
into
the
bargain
.
And
now
,
I
think
,
here
is
enough
said
of
the
fundamental
and
final
Cause
of
the
Church
of
England
,
viz.
The
Pope's
accustomed
Rigour
,
and
the
Queens
legitimation
.
I
will
now
proceed
to
consider
the
Embryo
of
this
Church
in
the
rest
of
her
Causes
,
according
to
Dr.
Heylin
,
and
then
I
hope
I
shall
have
truly
Represented
her
according
to
her
best
,
and
most
beloved
Historian
.
I
find
no
greater
Enemies
to
Reformations
,
than
Reformers
;
each
Reformer
,
like
the
Ape
in
the
story
,
thinking
his
own
Brat
the
fairest
,
would
have
no
Reformation
stand
good
but
his
own
;
and
therefore
reviles
and
flouts
at
the
rest
as
whimseys
and
phancys
;
as
indeed
they
are
no
better
,
nor
his
own
neither
.
Who
ever
saw
more
bitter
scolding
,
than
between
the
Lutherans
,
the
Zuinglians
,
and
the
Calvinists
?
the
worst
of
men
cannot
be
represented
greater
Villains
,
than
they
represent
each
other
;
and
,
if
a
man
considers
them
rightly
,
he
will
find
no
other
truth
but
This
in
all
their
Volums
;
and
yet
some
of
them
are
very
voluminous
too
.
In
like
manner
does
the
Presbyterian
revile
and
flout
at
the
Church
of
England
in
his
Cobler
of
Gloucester
;
and
serves
Her
up
to
his
Readers
in
whole
Cart
loads
of
debauched
Ministers
and
prophane
Bishops
:
But
indeed
the
Church
of
England
reviles
and
ridicules
the
Presbyterian
with
much
more
wit
and
far
greater
civility
in
her
Hudibras
:
But
,
with
too
much
Rigour
too
:
For
she
will
not
allow
Sow-Gelders
when
they
wind
their
horns
to
geld
a
Cat
,
to
cry
Reform
:
Nor
an
Oyster-wench
to
shut
up
shop
,
and
trudge
about
to
cry
no
Bishop
;
as
tho'
Sow-Gelders
might
not
as
well
cry
Reform
the
Church
of
England
,
as
a
pack
of
Laymen
in
Parliament
,
cry
,
Reform
the
Church
of
Rome
;
or
as
tho'
an
Oyster-Wench
might
not
as
well
cry
No
Bishop
,
as
Queen
Elizabeth
cry
No
Pope
.
How
can
it
enter
into
the
head
of
an
Episcopal
man
,
that
a
Church
of
so
long
standing
,
as
the
R.
Catholick
Church
had
been
of
continuance
in
England
,
&
backt
by
so
many
Old
Laws
,
could
on
a
suddain
be
lay'd
aside
,
with
all
her
Doctrins
,
and
a
new
one
foisted
into
her
place
with
new
ones
,
without
either
Patriark
of
the
West
,
Primates
of
the
Land
,
or
Bishops
at
all
to
it
.
This
is
the
case
of
the
Church
England
,
and
Dr.
Heylin
makes
it
out
as
clear
,
as
ever
the
sun
shin'd
at
noon
day
.
He
tells
you
,
that
in
the
beginning
of
that
Parliament
,
1.
Eliz.
Which
Parliament
made
,
and
establisht
the
Church
,
that
the
Oath
of
Supremacy
was
tendered
to
the
Bishops
;
upon
the
refusal
whereof
,
they
were
cast
out
of
PARLIAMENT
,
all
but
Bishop
Kitching
who
took
the
Oath
,
but
never
was
PROTESTANT
notwithstanding
.
Then
it
is
evident
,
that
the
old
Bishops
were
not
in
Parliament
at
the
devising
and
making
of
this
Church
.
He
begins
the
2
d.
year
of
Queen
Elizabeth
with
the
consecrating
of
the
new
Bishops
,
Parker
and
the
rest
;
then
they
were
not
in
Parliament
neither
at
the
devising
and
making
of
this
Church
:
for
the
Church
was
made
and
establisht
in
the
first
year
of
Q.
Elizabeth
,
&
the
Church
to
this
day
dates
from
this
first
of
Elizabeth
,
as
Rome
did
formerly
ab
urbe
condita
:
And
therefore
my
Lord
Chancellor
Finch
in
an
eloquent
speech
to
the
Parliament
,
learnedly
declared
unto
them
,
that
she
was
a
Church
now
of
above
a
hundred
years
standing
,
meaning
from
this
first
of
Elizabeth
:
Then
you
see
that
Dr.
Heylin
has
made
it
as
clear
as
the
sun
,
that
there
were
no
Bishops
at
all
at
the
making
of
this
Church
.
Men
of
the
Gospel
,
now
tell
me
,
Are
not
Bishops
of
the
Essence
of
God's
Church
?
no
Episcopal
man
ever
deny'd
it
.
And
men
of
the
Law
,
tell
me
,
Are
not
Bishops
so
of
the
Essence
of
this
Government
,
that
there
can
be
no
Parliament
without
them
?
no
Lawyer
can
deny
it
.
Then
here
is
a
Church
set
up
in
spite
of
God
,
and
in
defiance
to
the
fundamental
Laws
of
the
Land.
And
this
forsooth
is
your
Church
by
Law
establisht
!
Establisht
!
with
a
non
obstante
to
the
very
Essence
of
the
Government
by
Bishops
,
which
God
set
over
his
Church
;
and
to
the
Essence
and
foundation
of
th●
Government
of
this
Realm
:
So
that
,
unless
the
deserting
of
one
Church
for
lust
,
spoil
,
rapin
,
and
sacriledge
be
the
setting
up
,
making
and
establishing
of
another
;
there
has
been
neither
Church
made
,
nor
setled
,
nor
establisht
since
the
defection
from
the
Church
of
Rome
in
England
to
this
present
time
.
Then
is
it
not
severe
,
that
after
all
this
ado
and
noise
of
a
Church
,
Articles
,
Tests
,
Laws
penal
and
sanguinary
to
compel
men
from
their
consciences
,
there
should
not
be
the
least
semblance
or
shadow
of
a
Church
to
invite
them
unto
:
Nor
had
the
Queen
with
her
Lay-Parliament
any
more
Power
or
Authority
by
the
laws
of
God
,
and
his
Church
founded
on
Episcopacy
,
to
make
,
alter
,
or
establish
a
Church
,
than
has
the
Parliament
of
Women
,
and
the
poor
man
that
crys
it
up
and
down
the
Town
,
Power
,
or
Authority
to
make
a
Religion
,
and
establish
it
when
he
had
done
,
by
crying
it
about
the
streets
:
Nor
do
I
see
how
it
is
possible
for
any
Episcopal
man
to
have
confidence
to
pretend
the
contrary
.
With
good
Reason
then
did
the
late
Dutchess
of
York
of
happy
memory
declare
,
that
instead
of
satisfaction
in
the
History
of
the
Reformation
recommended
to
her
for
that
purpose
,
she
found
nothing
,
but
the
description
of
the
horridest
sacriledges
in
the
world
;
and
could
find
no
Reason
why
we
left
the
Church
,
but
for
three
the
most
abominable
ones
,
that
were
ever
heard
of
amongst
Christians
.
First
,
Henry
8
th
renounces
the
Popes
Authority
,
because
he
would
not
give
him
leave
to
part
with
his
wife
,
and
marry
an
other
in
her
life
time
.
Secondly
,
Edward
6
th
was
a
Child
,
and
governed
by
his
Vnkle
,
who
made
his
estate
out
of
Church-Lands
,
and
then
Queen
E.
who
being
no
lawful
Heiress
to
the
Crown
,
could
have
no
way
to
keep
it
,
but
by
renouncing
a
Church
,
that
could
never
suffer
so
unlawful
a
thing
to
be
done
by
one
of
her
Children
.
I
confess
,
I
cannot
think
the
Holy
Ghost
could
be
in
such
Counsels
.
The
Church
being
thus
truly
represented
,
and
shewed
to
be
nothing
;
it
must
necessarily
follow
,
that
her
Bishops
and
Priests
are
likewise
nothing
,
as
to
any
Power
or
Mission
,
they
can
pretend
to
:
And
how
shall
they
Preach
,
unless
they
be
sent
?
For
in
a
Bishop
,
is
required
not
only
Ordination
,
but
also
Spiritual
Jurisdiction
and
Mission
,
and
both
these
are
derived
not
from
Kings
,
or
Queens
,
but
immediately
from
Christ
by
succession
from
the
Apostles
:
Then
the
Church
of
England
being
nothing
,
and
in
Communion
with
no
other
Episcopal
Church
;
by
what
succession
will
her
Bishops
derive
their
Powers
from
the
Apostles
?
Do
they
think
the
Church
of
Rome
sent
them
to
Preach
the
Doctrine
of
the
Thirty
Nine
Articles
?
No
,
it
cannot
be
so
imagin'd
;
and
therefore
the
Presbyterians
derive
their
Mission
extraordinarily
from
God
by
the
Spirit
:
well
knowing
,
that
it
were
impossible
for
them
to
derive
it
Ordinarily
,
by
succession
through
the
Church
of
Rome
from
Christ
and
his
Apostles
.
So
that
't
is
a
clear
Case
that
the
pretended
Bishops
of
England
have
no
Mission
nor
Power
at
all
,
to
do
what
they
do
,
but
from
lay
Authority
.
But
,
indeed
,
as
to
the
Ordination
,
it
is
quite
an
other
thing
:
for
the
Arian
and
Donatist
Bishops
were
true
Bishops
as
to
Ordination
,
tho
by
Apostacy
and
Heresie
they
had
lost
their
Mission
.
And
Dr.
Heylin
pretends
the
like
of
the
Bishops
of
the
Church
of
England
:
and
to
clear
all
doubts
to
the
contrary
,
tells
us
,
that
the
story
of
the
first
four
Bishops
of
his
Church
being
merrily
ordained
at
the
Naggs-head
Tavern
in
Cheapside
,
was
but
the
invention
chiefly
of
one
Neal
,
once
Hebrew
reader
in
Oxford
,
and
Chaplain
to
Bishop
Bonner
,
and
Dr.
Sanders
;
and
thus
like
an
erudite
Protestant
,
learnedly
and
compendiously
confutes
them
both
:
Sanders
he
calls
Slanders
;
and
as
for
the
other
,
it
is
enough
that
he
was
once
Chaplain
to
Bonner
,
and
so
their
business
is
soon
done
.
He
also
tells
us
,
that
George
Abbot
,
Archbishop
of
Canterbury
,
caused
several
Priests
and
Jesuits
,
then
Prisoners
in
the
Clink
to
be
brought
before
him
:
Who
being
brought
to
Lambeth
the
Twelfth
of
May
,
1613.
were
suffered
in
the
presence
of
diverse
Bishops
to
peruse
the
publick
Registers
,
and
thereby
to
satisfy
themselves
in
all
particulars
concerning
the
Confirmation
and
Consecration
of
Archbishop
Parker
.
Dr.
Heylin
is
indeed
a
very
punctual
man
;
you
see
he
sets
down
exactly
the
day
of
the
Month
,
and
the
year
this
happened
,
viz.
The
Twelfth
of
May
,
1613.
But
Bishop
Parker
was
consecrated
in
the
second
year
of
Queen
Elizabeth
,
1559.
Then
where
were
these
Registers
all
this
while
?
Dr.
Sanders
,
Dr.
Harding
,
Dr.
Stapleton
,
even
in
the
time
of
Archbishop
Parker
,
and
to
himself
called
his
Consecration
in
question
,
and
denyed
it
,
without
any
Reply
either
from
himself
or
any
body
else
in
his
behalf
.
Then
where
were
at
that
time
these
same
Registers
?
But
suppose
these
Registers
true
,
and
that
the
Consecration
was
at
Lambeth
,
and
the
Consecration-dinner
only
at
the
Naggs-head
,
did
not
multitudes
of
people
flock
to
see
the
great
solemnity
of
Consecrating
the
first
four
new
Bishops
of
the
Novel
Church
?
and
was
not
the
Dinner
well
attended
on
by
multitudes
both
of
men
and
women
(
for
they
are
also
curious
,
especially
in
Church
affairs
)
and
were
all
these
men
and
women
dead
on
a
suddain
,
that
none
should
be
left
alive
to
witness
against
Neal
and
Sanders
,
that
they
saw
Parker
Consecrated
at
Lambeth
?
Or
could
so
great
a
man
as
Dr.
Sanders
have
the
confidence
to
broach
such
a
Tale
(
as
Dr.
Heylin
calls
it
)
when
multitudes
of
eye-witnesses
were
alive
to
give
him
the
lye
?
Had
those
Registers
been
found
out
in
any
competent
time
,
and
flapt
in
the
faces
of
Neal
and
Sanders
,
and
the
rest
who
reproached
the
Church
with
her
Naggs-head
Consecration
,
they
might
all
have
been
justly
called
Slanderses
;
but
instead
of
finding
such
Registers
,
the
Church
and
State
politickly
combined
to
renew
the
statutes
against
Tellers
of
false
news
,
that
a
poor
Papist
if
he
passed
through
Cheapside
,
durst
not
so
much
as
look
toward
that
side
of
the
street
,
where
the
Naggs-head
stood
,
for
fear
of
being
punisht
as
a
Teller
of
false
news
:
for
the
looks
of
a
Papist
in
those
days
boaded
false
news
;
as
a
Wash-ball
in
his
pocket
of
late
boded
〈◊〉
firing
of
the
City
.
And
indeed
,
to
produce
these
Registers
Fifty
four
years
after
the
time
,
and
not
before
,
when
Neal
and
Sanders
,
the
Vintner
of
the
Naggs-head
,
his
wife
,
drawers
,
and
all
were
dead
;
was
to
as
much
purpose
,
as
if
they
had
left
them
at
Salamanca
in
Dr.
Oates
his
Library
to
be
brought
over
with
the
Forty
Thousand
pilgrims
,
1678.
September
,
the
Lord
knows
when
;
for
Oates
did
not
confine
himself
to
a
day
as
Dr.
Heylin
,
and
Mason
the
forge●●
of
the
Registers
did
.
But
Dr.
Heylin
treats
of
this
matter
here
en
passant
only
,
and
refers
his
Readers
for
their
further
satisfaction
to
the
begining
of
his
eight
and
last
book
,
where
thus
he
tells
his
own
Tale
worth
any
mans
reading
.
Nothing
remaineth
,
but
that
we
settle
the
Episcopal
Government
;
and
then
it
will
be
time
to
conclude
this
History
.
And
for
the
settling
of
this
Government
by
as
good
Authority
,
as
could
be
given
unto
it
by
the
Laws
of
the
Land
,
we
are
beholding
to
the
obstinacy
of
Dr.
Edmund
Bonner
,
late
slaughter-man
of
London
.
By
a
statute
made
in
the
last
Parliament
for
keeping
her
Majesties
Subjects
in
due
obedience
,
a
Power
was
given
unto
the
Bishops
to
tender
,
and
receive
the
Oath
of
Supremacy
to
all
manner
of
persons
dwelling
and
residing
in
their
several
Dioceses
.
Bonner
was
then
prisoner
in
the
Clink
or
Marshalsee
;
which
being
in
the
Borrough
of
Southwark
,
brought
him
within
the
Iurisdiction
of
Horn
Bishop
of
Winchester
,
by
whose
Chancellour
the
Oath
was
tendered
unto
him
:
on
the
refusal
of
which
Oath
,
he
is
indicted
at
the
Kings
Bench
upon
the
Statute
:
to
which
he
appeared
in
some
Term
of
the
year
foregoing
,
&c.
The
second
Principal
Plea
was
this
,
that
Horn
at
the
time
the
Oath
was
tendered
,
was
not
Bishop
of
Winchester
,
and
therefore
not
impowred
by
the
said
Statute
to
make
tender
of
it
by
himself
,
or
by
his
Chancellour
.
And
for
the
proof
of
this
,
that
he
was
no
Bishop
,
it
was
alledged
,
that
the
form
of
Consecration
of
Archbishops
and
Bishops
,
which
had
been
ratify'd
by
Parliament
in
the
time
of
King
Edward
,
had
been
repealed
in
the
first
year
of
Queen
Mary
,
and
so
remained
at
Horn's
pretended
Consecration
.
The
Cause
being
put
off
from
Term
to
Term
,
comes
at
last
to
be
debated
amongst
the
Iudges
at
Serjeants
Inn
,
by
whom
it
was
finally
put
upon
the
Issue
,
and
the
Tryal
of
that
Issue
ordered
to
be
committed
to
a
Iury
of
the
County
of
Surry
:
But
then
withall
,
it
was
advised
,
that
the
decision
of
the
point
,
should
rather
be
referred
to
the
following
Parliament
,
for
fear
that
such
a
weighty
matter
might
miscarry
by
a
Country
Iury
,
of
whose
either
Partiality
,
or
Insufficiency
,
there
had
been
some
proof
made
before
touching
the
Grants
made
by
King
Edwards
Bishops
,
of
which
a
great
many
were
made
void
,
under
pretence
that
the
Grantors
were
not
Actually
Bishops
,
nor
Legally
possessed
of
their
several
Sees
.
According
to
this
sound
advice
,
the
business
comes
under
consideration
in
the
following
Parliament
,
which
begun
on
the
Thirtyeth
of
September
,
where
all
particulars
being
fully
,
and
consideratly
discoursed
upon
,
it
was
first
declared
,
that
their
not
restoring
that
book
to
the
former
Power
in
Terms
significant
,
and
express
,
was
but
casus
omissus
;
And
secondly
,
that
by
the
Statutes
Fifth
and
Sixth
of
Edward
the
Sixth
,
it
had
been
added
to
the
book
of
Common
Prayer
,
and
Administration
of
the
Sacraments
,
as
a
Member
of
it
,
or
at
least
an
Appendant
to
it
;
and
therefore
by
the
first
of
Elizabeth
was
restored
again
,
together
with
the
said
book
of
Common
Prayer
,
intentionally
at
the
least
,
if
not
in
Terminis
.
But
being
that
the
words
of
the
said
Statute
were
not
clear
enough
to
remove
all
doubts
,
they
did
therefore
revive
it
now
,
and
did
accordingly
Enact
,
That
all
persons
that
had
been
,
or
should
be
made
,
ordered
,
or
Consecrated
Arch-Bishops
,
Bishops
,
Priests
,
Ministers
of
God's
Holy
Words
,
and
Sacraments
,
or
Deacons
after
the
form
and
order
prescribed
in
the
said
book
,
be
in
very
deed
,
and
also
by
Authority
hereof
declared
and
enacted
to
be
,
and
shall
be
Arch-Bishops
,
Bishops
,
Priests
,
Ministers
of
God's
holy
Words
and
Sacraments
,
and
Deacons
rightly
made
,
Consecrated
and
ordered
,
any
Statute
,
Law
,
Canon
,
or
any
thing
to
the
contrary
notwithstanding
.
A
bold
Parliament
indeed
,
that
thus
generously
bids
defiance
to
all
Laws
and
Statutes
ever
made
in
the
world
,
to
all
Canons
ever
made
in
God's
Church
,
and
to
every
thing
else
whatsoever
.
To
good
purpose
then
did
Saint
Gregory
the
Great
,
and
Bishop
Lawd
after
him
,
declare
that
they
gave
the
like
credit
to
the
first
four
General
Councils
,
as
to
the
four
Evangelists
;
when
an
English
Parliament
shall
come
and
enact
and
declare
Bishops
in
the
form
they
please
with
a
non
obstante
to
all
the
Powers
of
Heaven
and
Earth
,
or
any
thing
to
the
contrary
notwithstanding
,
i.
e.
of
Hell
too
.
But
being
that
Dr.
Heylin
tells
us
,
that
this
business
,
was
onely
fully
and
considerately
discoursed
upon
in
Parliament
;
it
may
I
hope
yet
bear
a
further
discussion
and
canvassing
.
You
see
,
here
were
many
doubts
whether
these
Bishops
were
rightly
consecrated
or
not
.
First
,
Because
the
Form
of
Consecration
made
in
King
Edwards
days
,
was
declared
void
and
null
in
the
first
year
of
Queen
Mary
;
and
as
yet
has
never
been
allowed
in
the
Church
of
Rome
.
Secondly
,
Because
you
see
,
there
was
a
Casus
omissus
,
and
the
Form
of
King
Edward
was
not
restored
in
Terms
express
and
significant
,
which
is
requisite
in
Law.
Thirdly
,
To
talk
of
a
Statute
once
made
null
and
void
,
intentionally
is
non-sence
:
For
Intention
will
not
make
Law
;
neither
is
it
in
Church
affairs
,
nor
indeed
,
is
it
any
where
else
,
as
it
is
in
England
,
where
there
are
definitive
Interpreters
of
Law
,
and
no
Law
Text
,
and
where
there
is
Gospel
and
no
definitive
Interpreters
of
the
Text.
Fourthly
,
Because
,
the
words
in
the
said
Statute
were
not
clear
enough
to
remove
doubts
:
Then
't
is
clear
that
there
were
doubts
.
Fifthly
,
Because
the
Doubts
were
so
many
,
that
the
whole
Power
of
the
Kingdom
,
Queen
,
Council
,
Church
and
State
,
durst
not
venture
a
tryal
against
a
poor
Prisoner
,
(
notwithstanding
that
the
business
was
order'd
for
a
tryal
by
Serjeants
Inn
)
to
see
it
fairly
decided
,
whether
the
Doubts
could
be
removed
or
not
,
for
fear
such
a
weighty
matter
might
miscarry
by
a
County
Iury
,
as
tho'
it
had
not
been
in
their
Power
to
make
what
Jury
they
pleased
.
Sixthly
,
Bonner
tho'
a
Prisoner
,
enjoyed
his
Revenue
all
this
while
by
dint
of
Law
,
that
is
,
from
the
first
of
Eliz.
to
the
eighth
of
Eliz.
because
Horn
in
all
this
time
could
not
prove
himself
a
Bishop
:
Then
the
Law
did
not
look
upon
them
as
yet
Bishops
.
But
,
all
the
Bishops
were
made
in
this
time
,
and
all
that
pretend
to
be
now
Bishops
are
derived
from
them
;
Then
how
sacrilegious
were
those
Bishops
that
administred
the
Sacraments
and
conferred
Orders
,
whilst
so
many
Doubts
remained
.
Whether
they
were
truly
ordained
,
or
had
any
lawful
Jurisdiction
or
not
.
And
of
this
there
can
be
no
question
,
nor
can
any
man
deny
it
.
But
now
comes
the
Parliament
,
the
Doubts
are
removed
and
Horn
gets
his
Cause
;
But
how
?
were
both
Parties
heard
?
No
;
nor
durst
the
Parliament
hear
what
Bonner
could
say
for
himself
,
nor
what
his
Lawyers
could
say
for
him
neither
,
who
were
Eminent
Men
,
as
Dr.
Heylin
tells
us
,
Wrey
,
Lovelace
and
Ployden
;
nor
is
it
to
be
imagined
that
such
Eminent
Men
would
have
undertaken
so
invidious
a
business
to
Church
and
State
,
unless
they
had
foreseen
,
that
the
Cause
was
sure
enough
in
their
hands
.
It
is
a
received
Maxim
throughout
the
world
,
that
Qui
judicat
causa
inaudita
altera
iniquus
est
Iudex
;
He
that
judges
without
hearing
both
Parties
is
a
wicked
Judge
.
But
this
Parliament
judged
without
hearing
both
parties
:
then
this
was
iniquum
Parliamentum
,
iniquus
Iudex
;
a
wicked
Parliament
,
wicked
Judges
:
then
what
are
the
Bishops
,
who
are
no
otherwise
Bishops
,
than
by
verdict
of
such
Iniquity
?
But
this
is
not
all
.
Either
those
Bishops
of
whose
Consecration
there
were
so
many
Doubts
were
in
this
Parliament
or
not
?
Of
right
they
could
not
be
there
until
the
Doubts
were
removed
:
But
either
they
were
,
or
they
were
not
?
If
they
were
,
can
any
thing
be
more
pleasantly
ridiculous
,
than
to
see
the
very
men
in
question
whether
Bishops
or
not
,
sit
judging
in
Parliament
,
and
voting
themselves
to
be
in
very
deed
,
and
also
by
Authority
hereof
(
that
is
,
of
themselves
)
declared
and
enacted
to
be
,
and
shall
be
Arch-Bishops
,
Bishops
,
&c.
rightly
made
,
consecrated
,
and
ordered
;
any
thing
to
the
contrary
notwithstanding
.
This
is
far
worse
,
than
ask
my
Brother
if
I
am
a
Thief
.
In
fine
,
it
is
so
ridiculous
,
that
for
soberness
sake
,
we
will
suppose
,
that
those
pretended
Bishops
did
not
sit
in
that
Parliament
.
Then
was
the
Parliament
but
a
pack
of
Laymen
;
and
what
have
such
to
do
with
enacting
or
declaring
of
Bishops
?
Bishops
derive
their
ordination
and
the
power
that
follows
it
,
immediately
from
Christ
himself
by
succession
from
the
Apostles
,
(
as
I
said
before
)
and
not
from
King
nor
Queen
;
It
is
a
thing
purely
spiritual
,
and
therefore
cannot
fall
under
the
cognizance
of
any
Temporal
Power
:
So
that
the
pretended
Bishops
were
no
more
Bishops
for
this
Act
of
Parliament
,
than
they
were
before
:
For
such
a
Parliament
neither
had
power
to
enact
them
Bishops
,
nor
to
declare
them
such
?
so
that
all
the
former
Doubts
yet
remain
,
and
reach
our
present
pretended
Bishops
equally
,
and
as
much
,
as
they
did
the
former
.
But
it
is
Sacriledge
for
any
pretended
Bishop
to
offer
to
administer
the
Sacraments
,
and
confer
Orders
,
when
but
one
Doubt
remains
,
whether
he
be
rightly
in
Orders
himself
,
or
have
Authority
to
do
it
;
Then
greater
is
the
Sacriledge
,
when
men
offer
to
administer
the
Sacraments
and
confer
Orders
,
when
so
many
Doubts
remain
whether
they
be
in
Orders
,
or
rightly
authorized
to
do
such
Acts.
And
now
to
conclude
,
how
came
Dr.
Heylin
so
well
acquainted
with
Bishop
Bonner
,
that
he
should
know
which
were
his
chief
Pleas
,
or
what
he
would
chiefly
have
insisted
upon
,
had
the
weighty
matter
been
suffered
to
have
come
to
a
hearing
?
Did
he
think
the
story
of
the
Naggs-head
less
known
to
Bonner
,
than
it
was
to
Neal
and
Saunders
?
or
can
any
man
in
his
wits
believe
that
the
whole
Power
of
the
Realm
,
Queen
,
Church
,
Parliament
,
Council
and
all
,
were
in
earnest
afraid
the
weighty
matter
might
miscarry
by
a
County
Iury
,
either
by
Partiality
or
Insufficiency
?
Was
it
impossible
for
the
Queen
and
Church
to
have
found
in
the
whole
County
of
Surry
,
twelve
men
according
to
their
own
hearts
?
And
could
not
they
have
instructed
them
as
far
as
they
pleased
,
that
there
could
not
be
any
fear
of
Insufficiency
?
And
could
not
they
have
made
them
wholly
their
own
,
that
there
could
be
no
fear
of
Partiality
,
at
leastwise
towards
Bonner
?
And
if
all
other
means
had
failed
,
could
not
they
have
brib'd
and
suborn'd
them
?
A
more
necessary
Policy
then
,
when
the
weighty
matter
was
at
stake
,
than
ever
there
was
occasion
for
the
like
since
.
And
does
Dr.
Heylin
call
the
declining
of
this
Tryal
sound
Advice
;
Certainly
,
when
this
question
was
started
,
Bishops
or
not
Bishops
?
And
that
the
Cause
,
debated
amongst
the
Iudges
at
Serjeants
Inn
,
was
finally
put
upon
the
Issue
,
and
the
Tryal
of
that
Issue
ordered
to
be
committed
to
a
Iury
of
the
County
of
Surry
,
it
was
necessary
the
world
should
be
satisfied
.
But
the
Queen
and
Church
did
foresee
,
either
that
such
things
would
be
brought
upon
the
stage
,
as
would
be
very
dishonourable
to
both
,
or
that
the
pretended
Bishop
Horn
would
be
cast
.
And
then
whither
would
her
Majesty
have
sent
for
Bishops
to
Consecrate
her
new
Elects
?
The
Catholick
Bishops
would
not
do
it
,
and
of
that
she
had
a
Tryal
in
Kitchin
.
The
Lutherans
would
not
do
it
;
for
Dr.
Heylin
tells
us
,
that
they
would
not
receive
English
fugitives
in
Queen
Mary's
time
,
and
that
they
called
such
as
dyed
here
then
,
the
Devils
Martyrs
.
So
that
the
Church
of
England
must
e'en
have
been
an
Episcopal
Church
without
Bishops
.
And
that
had
not
been
more
ridiculous
than
it
was
infamous
,
and
Scandalous
to
have
declined
the
Tryal
.
That
my
Reader
may
the
better
remember
,
what
has
been
said
;
I
thus
in
short
Recapitulate
it
.
Th●
first
beginning
of
Reformation
was
founded
on
lust
,
it
encreased
by
Spoil
,
Rapine
and
Sacriledge
;
it
was
at
last
new
moulded
,
and
formed
into
a
Church
to
Legitimate
the
Queen
,
when
nothing
else
could
do
it
;
it
was
made
and
establisht
a
Church
by
a
Power
,
that
had
no
more
Authority
to
make
,
and
establish
Churches
,
than
has
the
poor
man
with
his
Parliament
of
women
,
which
he
crys
about
the
streets
,
Authority
to
make
and
establish
Religions
.
The
pretended
Bishops
of
this
pretended
Church
are
no
Bishops
at
all
;
or
at
the
best
,
they
can
but
pretend
to
be
Bishops
with
many
doubts
on
their
backs
,
whether
they
are
Bishops
or
not
;
and
consequently
must
lye
under
the
guilt
of
Sacriledge
for
Administring
the
Sacraments
,
and
conferring
Orders
,
those
doubts
still
remaining
unclear'd
,
nor
possible
now
ever
to
be
so
.
For
no
ensuing
Parliament
can
ever
do
it
:
nor
if
it
could
,
were
it
ever
possible
for
them
to
prove
by
what
Lawfully
Authorized
Successor's
of
the
Apostles
,
they
were
sent
to
Preach
the
Doctrine
of
the
Thirty
Nine
Articles
.
Thus
is
the
pretended
Church
of
England
truly
represented
throughout
all
her
causes
,
except
her
Material
ones
;
and
those
I
omitted
,
because
she
has
none
:
being
only
made
up
,
but
of
No's
and
Negatives
,
of
which
hereafter
.
In
the
mean
time
I
defy
any
man
to
shew
me
,
that
I
have
Slandered
her
with
the
least
untruth
in
the
world
.
Had
not
then
the
good
late
Dutchess
of
York
just
Reason
to
confess
,
that
she
could
not
think
the
Holy
Ghost
could
ever
be
in
such
Counsels
?
FINIS
.
Notes, typically marginal, from the original text
Notes for div A33074-e130
Heylin
in
pref
.
pag.
131
pag.
275
pag.
294